Why do RINOs love to gamble with our money?

This podcast edition of Kenny Webster's Pursuit of Happiness features journalist Michael Quinn Sullivan and comedian Tim Mathis.  ( @KennethRWebster )

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Giganic government sucks. Suit of Happiness radio is DeLux. Liberty
and freedom will make you smile for Suit of Happiness
on your radio. Toil just as cheeseburgers liberate rise at food.

Speaker 2 (00:20):
Ben Franklin, the founding father. Ben Franklin, reportedly enjoyed opium
in cannabis. So I guess sometimes old Ben really was
high as a kite. Hi, thanks for turning on your radio.
I'm Kenny Webster. Great being here with you this afternoon.
Who's on the show today, Michael Quinn Sullivan. We're gonna
go down to the border, figure out what's going on
with Trump. Strange things at Texas A and M today,

(00:43):
and a news story involving a cop from Houston who
went into the home of some innocent people and he
murdered them. And weirdly enough, there's not a lot of
outrage over this news story. Oh yeah, you probably know
this story. We'll get to it. Stick around for that. Oh,
Tim Mathis is stopping by the stand up comedian. He's
going to be here at the end of the show
with all the latest from Hollywood and a lot more.

(01:05):
So stick around for that. In the meantime, a little
polling data for you today courtesy of our friends at
Breitbart dot Com and Rasmusen. This is the third week
in a row that Trump has held a two point
national lead over Kamala. Rasmussen surveyed eighteen hundred likely voters
September nineteenth and to the twenty fifth and found forty

(01:26):
eight percent support Trump forty six percent Kamala. These findings
are nearly unchanged since the previous week, when Harris was
still down by two points. The internal show, and this
is a large sample size, that Trump leads Harris with
Hispanics forty nine to forty two. The former president also

(01:47):
over performing with black voters. Now, granted that's only twenty
eight to sixty six, but Republicans have not seen that
kind of popularity among black voters in decades. That should
be closer to fifteen and eighty five. But it's Trump here.
He's actually very popular with black folks. Compared to normal
Republican candidates, Trump enjoys a single point advantage over voters

(02:08):
age eighteen to thirty nine, forty six to forty five.
Fascinating that Donald Trump is more popular with young voters
than Kamale is among forty to sixty four year old
Trump leads seniors age sixty five and over actually split
between the two candidates forty nine to forty nine. Isn't
that fascinating? Young people seem to prefer Trump by a

(02:31):
little more, but older voters they don't know. The reason
the overall margin is not wider in favor of Trump
is the gender gap. Trump leads by men seven points
in the poll, forty four to fifty one. Men overall
generally tend to have more topics subjects, hot button issues

(02:54):
that they're concerned about than female voters do, especially young
female voters. Young female voters seem to care about one
or two things abortions and like marijuana legalization.

Speaker 3 (03:07):
They don't care about anything else.

Speaker 2 (03:10):
The other polling gap is much wider, but Harris only
leads with women three points, forty nine to forty six. Again,
we've seen a much wider gender gap with women in
favor of Harris and other polls.

Speaker 3 (03:21):
So what is the cause of this?

Speaker 2 (03:24):
In the real Clear Politics average poll of polls, that's
the national poll, that's the poll everybody thinks is the
biggest best poll, Harris actually leads by two points. The
three most recent polls, which include this rass Music poll
either show the race tide, Harris up by one or
Trump by two. On the same date in twenty sixteen,
Hillary Clinton led Trump nationally by two point three points,

(03:45):
and guess what. Trump won that election. There was a
landslide victory of the electoral college. He did great. Hillary
got crushed. On this same date. In twenty twenty, Joe
Biden led Trump by seven points. We are told Trump
narrowly lost that election. Either way, Kamal is underperforming compared

(04:05):
to Hillary and old Joe. The question that remains is
whether or not the pollsters are again under counting Trump voters.
But even if they aren't, the electoral race is closer
today than we've ever seen it. It looks like the
whole race will come down to Pennsylvania, and right now
Pennsylvania is tied, tied tide. Of the last seven Pennsylvania polls,

(04:28):
five or tied. I've never seen anything like that. Trump's
a good closer. He proved that in twenty sixteen. He
proved it in twenty twenty. Kamal is an idiot by comparison.
She proves that every time she opens her mouth, but
she has billions and billions of dollars in corporate media
propaganda backing hers. So Trump certainly has the odds stacked

(04:49):
against him.

Speaker 4 (04:50):
This is Binny Scentus, and you are listening to the
Pursuit of Happiness radio. Now give me all of your money,
because that's the only thing that's fair.

Speaker 5 (04:59):
All right.

Speaker 2 (05:00):
Got a lot of news stories I want to talk
to my next guest about, and not a lot of
time to do it. So let's try to cram four
hours of radio into a ten minute radio segment.

Speaker 3 (05:08):
Who's ready, let's try. You're from Houston.

Speaker 2 (05:11):
If you're listening to me talk, you probably at least
follow Texas politics. I know not everybody listening is from Houston.
Some of you listen online around the country, around the region,
and that's great. But you may remember me talking about this.
Back in twenty nineteen, there was a guy named Gerald Goins,
black cop. Houston Police Department narcotics officer organizes a raid,

(05:31):
a swat team raid on a two middle aged white
people's homes, Dennis Tuttle and Regina Nicholas.

Speaker 3 (05:38):
They die.

Speaker 2 (05:39):
Dennis Tuttle, Regina and the dog are all killed in
a shootout with the police. In a state where we
believe you have a right to protect your home with guns. Right,
Cops come in running in guns a blazing, everybody in
the home dies. Turns out they were not doing the
thing they were accused of, black tar heroin dealers. They

(06:00):
didn't find any black tar heroin. They didn't find any
They didn't find any scales, baggies, none of that. As far,
both of these two people had almost a squeaky clean
legal record. I think she got into trouble for some
bad checks once, nothing to do with what they were
accusing her of. Meanwhile, some time passes. This was twenty nineteen,
early twenty nineteen. The next year, the pandemic happens, George

(06:23):
Floyd happens, race riots all over America, and suddenly people
realize George Floyd, Saint George Floyd, excuse me, was once
arrested by this black cop, Gerald Goins, who may have
murdered these two people, Dennis and Regina Nicholas.

Speaker 3 (06:39):
They erase.

Speaker 2 (06:43):
George Floyd's criminal record of the things he was accused
of doing and convicted of by Gerald Goins are like,
well he's a bad cop. Well, hang on a minute.
The whole reason everybody thinks Gerald Goins is a bad cop.
Is because he supposedly murdered Dennis Tuttles and Regina Nicholas
still hadn't been convicted of that. The George Floyd trial
comes and ends, and that they move on. Derek Chauvin

(07:05):
goes to prison. The following year, nothing happens in the
Dennis Regiina case. Gerald Goins still a free man. The
next year, nothing happens, The next year, nothing happens. Finally,
this week, Gerald Goins convicted and imprisoned for the murders
of Dennis and Regina. And I ask you this, guys,
does anything matter? Does black lives matter? Really care about

(07:26):
what they're saying? There were no protests for this, There
was no outrage. Michael quinn Sullivan. I didn't mean to
go it gets along in the tooth there, but I
just wanted to explain this news story to everybody. Here
is one actual example of a bad cop. In a
field of news stories where where good cops, or at
least average cops are treated like bad cops. Here's an

(07:47):
actual bad cop. Nobody cares, Michael, what the heck is
going on?

Speaker 5 (07:53):
Yeah?

Speaker 6 (07:53):
I mean it kind of points to the problem Kennedy
and if you're kind of alluding to that justice politicized
justice is not actually justice. It's you know, there's this
very selective sense of outrage. It's almost like, you know,
we we kind of expect all cops to be bad,
and so therefore we only care when it's someone of

(08:17):
a particular aggrieved uh socio economic uh you know criterion
that people can use, you know, I mean, it's a
all the cries of police brutality, when you think about it,
are only expressed when there is a a political agenda

(08:37):
to be advanced. And you know, I guess killing a
you know, kind of your basic anonymous white couple doesn't count.

Speaker 5 (08:48):
And and I would argue that's a one. It's very
sad because it denis justice.

Speaker 6 (08:53):
But quite frankly, you know, where where the you know,
where the police reform crowd, let's try to you know,
be generous for a moment where you know, if if
they were, if they were something other than Marxist uh
DEI theory touting left us, they would recognize that gosh,

(09:14):
you know, you know, maybe joyd the George Floyd thing
really was baden, but but this one also, you may
maybe we should present both and we'd build a better
coalition if we if our goal is to reform the
way we do criminal justice, which tells you, Kidning, they
don't actually care about reform and criminal justice. They don't

(09:34):
care about fixing uh systemic problems and police forces. What
they're really interested in is pushing some other agenda, and
the police brutality cases are merely props in that in
that effort.

Speaker 2 (09:48):
Oh, it's so you perfectly explained it, Michael. You're so
right about that. Michael, Quinn Sullivan and I both people
that watch closely what's happening at our border and the
and it's just hilarious to me that Kamalas suddenly pretends
to care about this today.

Speaker 3 (10:02):
She's down in Douglas, Arizona.

Speaker 2 (10:04):
There's a lot of parallels between the border and the
gerald Goyns thing. I mean, liberals don't really care until
it benefits them. They certainly didn't care about securing the
border until they thought it might lose them of the election.
Now Kamala is in Douglas, Arizona, Michael, where apparently there's
already a border wall.

Speaker 3 (10:20):
Look, why did she go there? George W.

Speaker 2 (10:23):
Bush built a border wall in that particular part of
the country. There's not much illegal immigration happening there because
they already have a border barrier.

Speaker 6 (10:32):
Yeah, you know, anything that Kamala is doing as it
relates to the border, I think every human being, every
normal person, recognizes that this is you know, it is
nothing but political theater.

Speaker 5 (10:46):
She could not be bothered to go to the places.

Speaker 6 (10:50):
In the border where there are and have been very recently,
real problems. Instead, she goes to places where previous administrations
saw the problem. You know, I mean, it's it's very transparent.
She's there trying to say, look, there's no problem on
the border because I'm here in Douglas, Arizona, and she

(11:12):
hopes that you know, most of us are too stupid,
too lazy, we've slept whatever to realize that, well, maybe
there are no problems and along that such a border,
because you know, the Bush administration did something about it,
because there were problems there years ago. Uh, you know,
she's she's trying to take credit for something she doesn't

(11:35):
take that she had nothing to do with, which I
guess is part and parcel of politics.

Speaker 2 (11:39):
Boy, you explained it perfectly. I also found it very
interesting today what's going on in the news at Texas
A and M. Once again, Texas scorecard dot Com the
only people reporting on this.

Speaker 3 (11:49):
Texas A and M had.

Speaker 2 (11:50):
An LGBTQ Studies minor and a social justice certificate. And
apparently these things are going away, and not for the
reason that you would think. Uh, I assume that lawmakers
stepped in and said we got to get rid of
this stuff. But actually I'm told that these are going
away because nobody was taking these majors.

Speaker 6 (12:11):
Yeah, I mean, just ats off to Brian Harrison's state
rep from from Middle Othian, a good solid conservative. He's
been kind of, you know, beating the drama about these
kind of programs in general at Texas A and M interviewing
and other universities. But you're right, Texas A and M
is getting rid of these miners because students aren't registering.

(12:33):
And and quite honestly, that is probably the bigger part.

Speaker 5 (12:38):
Of the story is that, you know.

Speaker 6 (12:42):
It makes us have to question, you know, the existence
of all of these study programs where students aren't registering,
but they have them there not because there's a demand
for them in the marketplace.

Speaker 5 (12:53):
Look, last time I checked, no.

Speaker 6 (12:55):
One, no one in the real world is hiring someone
with a l G B t Q studies bachelor's degree
with a minor and queer theater of the Caribbeans. No
one needs to hire that person that that that that
job is not not even a requirement to be a
barista at Starbucks, although you would know that, you know,

(13:17):
no one needs that major, right and and as it
turns out, no one, no student is actually signing up
for those majors, which tells you that the universities.

Speaker 5 (13:26):
Are creating these these majors and these.

Speaker 6 (13:29):
Minors as kind of a virtue signal, uh to other
lefties of oh, look how cool we are, Look how
look how in touch we are with our radical left
wing Marxist professors. That's why they create these programs is
to give these professors a program to be in charge of,

(13:49):
not because it's serving anyone's needs. And you know, I've
been a I'm a graduate of Texas A and M.
I'm a fight in taxes, Aggie, I'll bleed maroon. But
I've been a fierce critic of Texas A and M
for going down this path now the past fifteen years.
So I'm very glad to see them at least having
the intellectual and academic honesty to say, Hey, apparently our

(14:11):
students don't want these majors, so we're getting rid of them.
That's a very positive thing.

Speaker 2 (14:16):
Very well put. I You know, Michael, you and I
don't disagree on much. There's probably a couple of little things.
I don't necessarily care if people gamble, but I can't
help but notice that all of the Republicans so called
Republicans in the state that are advocating for legalizing gambling
are easily the worst people in this dade. Failing would
be one. For example, Carl Rove. Carl Rove's wife is

(14:40):
part of a pro gambling Texas A and M packboard.
Why is Carl Rove's wife involved in anything? And what
does it have to do with A and M? And
why is she suddenly a lobbyist for gambling?

Speaker 6 (14:54):
Yeah, so you know important, I'm kin. Carl Road's wife, Karen,
is a lobbyist. She represent UH taxpayer UH derivative cities
working against taxpayers around the state. She takes taxpayers money
and lobbies against taxpayer interest. So she's one of those
kind of kinds of lobbyists. She's also a lobbyist for

(15:17):
the Sands Casino corporation based in Nevada. Remember what Sands want.
The legislation being pushed is the is legislation that would
give Sands a monopoly, exclusive government enforced monopoly. You know,
Michael and Kenny couldn't go open a casino under what

(15:37):
Sands wants. Only Sands could operate a casino in Texas,
you know. So it's this gross anti liberty, gross anti capitalism,
uh kind of push that you've got, got Karen Rove
advocating for. I would argue that's the opposite. Texas A
and M is supposed to be this bastion of conservative

(16:00):
the conservatism and free market economics, and instead you've got
someone on their pack board who is pushing for very
not conservative, not capitalistic things, pushing for cronyism. But but
kinniy Also, I was unaware, as an aggie, I was
unaware that Texas A and M had a political action committee.

(16:21):
And quite honestly, all the nice things I said a
minute ago go up and smoke, because it offends me
to the to the deepest core of my DNA that
a public university has a political action committee. What are
you the political action for the political action committee to
raise money? To then give it to candidates. So Texas

(16:41):
A and M is letting its name and brand be
used for a political action committee that goes and gets
money to politicians who then constitutionally are supposed to be
overseeing that institution. This is probably set aside. Karen Rode
for a second, set aside her ties to taxing entities
and are tied to crony groups from out of state. No,

(17:03):
what should offend us is that Texas A and M
and probably the other universities are spending money politically to
influence an impact elections.

Speaker 5 (17:13):
That is wrong on every possible level.

Speaker 3 (17:16):
Kenny Boy, you explained that perfectly.

Speaker 2 (17:18):
Because when I hear that they want to legalize gambling,
my first thought is, yeah, put a riverboat in Galveston.

Speaker 3 (17:23):
Who cares?

Speaker 2 (17:24):
But then when you look at who's pushing it and
how they're pushing it, you really don't have to peel
back the layers of the onion very much to realize
this is bad.

Speaker 3 (17:32):
It's not good for Texas.

Speaker 2 (17:33):
If we're going to do this, it certainly shouldn't be
these people doing it, and not in this capacity, and
probably not right now. But hey, one more quick question
for you before you go Michael, I really love to
get your take on this. About a week ago, State
Representative Steve Toath revealed to us on this radio show
that it was actuallyresent state Representative David Cook that a

(17:53):
lot of the Republicans are rallying around to replace Dade
Falin as Texas Speaker of the House. I'm curious thoughts
on David Cook. Can we trust this guy?

Speaker 6 (18:04):
Uh?

Speaker 3 (18:04):
Probably better than day than Dade Falin Right.

Speaker 6 (18:09):
Well, so you know David Cook, He's been in the
legislature for two terms. He twice voted for Dade Feeling,
He contributed to Dade Feelin's campaign, and he was one
of the guys who voted with the Democrats to impeach
Ken Paxton. You know that that's what we know of
his public record. What he is privately telling other Republican

(18:31):
lawmakers is, oh, no, trust him. He will reform the
Texas House.

Speaker 5 (18:36):
And maybe he will.

Speaker 6 (18:36):
You know, I can't see into the future, and I
can't see into the hearts of politicians, those that even
have a heart, can't you know, I can't can't send
to their hearts. But I think that I am I am,
I am post trust when it comes to Republican members
of the Texas Legislature. My, my reservoir of trust has

(18:57):
been completely emptied out. I have no more trust for them.
So I think that, and I think I'm not alone
in that, and I think the primary results show that
most Texans no longer have much trust in Republican legislators.

Speaker 5 (19:12):
So, you know, mister.

Speaker 6 (19:14):
Toath, who I'm a big fan of, and all these
Republican lawmakers them telling us to trust them, that this
guy is going to be good, Well, we want even
more trust to give. They're just going to have to
really hope he does well because the last election showed
that Texas Republicans are more than happy to go out
and fire a whole lot of the allies and enablers

(19:35):
of bad speakers. And David Cook is going to have
to deliver. There's no more trust us. Next time we'll
get it done. Trust us in the future, we'll do
something now. I think we're I think we're needing things now.
And these legislators, if they're going to back David Cook,
they better be sure that he is going to deliver
for them.

Speaker 5 (19:55):
History says that he's not a reformer, but.

Speaker 6 (19:59):
Maybe he's not a turn of art and we'll we will,
we will know that in you know, a couple of
hundred days.

Speaker 2 (20:04):
Oh, I don't know, Michael, you're so skeptical. I'm sure
this time, Dennis Bonden, I mean David Cook will be different.

Speaker 5 (20:14):
Yeah, yeah, what I going. I've seen this movie before
and I know how it ends. But you know, but
maybe maybe this time the empire does brush the rebellion. No,
this is maybe this time.

Speaker 2 (20:27):
This is different. This is different, Michael. This is Fast
and Furious thirteen. In this one, Vin Diesel steals a
Lamborghini and then Tyris gets a poor shot.

Speaker 3 (20:36):
It's great.

Speaker 2 (20:37):
It's a totally different movie, Michael, Michael Quinn Sullivan.

Speaker 3 (20:40):
We went a little long on this.

Speaker 2 (20:41):
Always awesome work Texas scorecard dot Com. If you're not
getting your news from them or US, you're probably getting
it from someone that's lying to you. Go to their website,
subscribe to their email, and follow my buddy Michael on
social media.

Speaker 7 (20:51):
I'm not a fan of the government doing anything.

Speaker 3 (20:55):
This is the Pursuit of Happiness Radio on KPRCI.

Speaker 2 (21:04):
What a Putin and Zelenski both have in common, all right?
I know their first name is both start with Vive
Vladimir and Voldemir, respectively, But they do actually have one
thing in common. Besides all that, besides being Eastern Europeans
and probably eating really bland food with no spice in it,
they have one thing in common. They both want war. Okay,

(21:25):
they have two or three things in common. Another thing
they have in common is they both want Kamala to
win the election. Breitbart dot Com Today has the report, Gosh,
I wonder why why did they both?

Speaker 3 (21:35):
Why do they all like Kamala?

Speaker 5 (21:37):
Well?

Speaker 2 (21:38):
Earlier this month, and only seeming to be half kidding,
Russian President Vladimir Putin endorsed Kamala Harris. Putin said, quote,
I told you our favorite, if you could call it,
That was the current president, mister Biden. He was removed
from the race, but he recommended all his supporters to
support miss Harris. So we will do this. We will

(22:00):
support her. Putin went on. He said, she laughed so
expressively and infectiously that it means that everything is fine
with her.

Speaker 3 (22:12):
He seemed to be joking when he said that, But.

Speaker 2 (22:14):
Then he said that he would prefer Donald Trump not
win the election because he introduced such a number of
restrictions and sanctions against Russia that no president's ever introduced before.
And that's true. When Trump was president, he put enough embargo,
trade embargoes and sanctions against Russia that you remember, they
had a thing called the Nord String Pipeline. They were
unable to complete its construction until the Biden administration took over,

(22:38):
got rid of the sanctions. Russia finished constructing the pipeline,
money started falling from the sky for them, and then
they had enough funds to invade Ukraine, you know. On Sunday,
and by the way, at a taxpayer expense, the Biden
Harris Whitehouse flew Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky to the swing

(22:59):
state of pas Slvania to basically campaign for Kamala and
trash Trump.

Speaker 3 (23:05):
Trump is with Zelensky right now today. We'll play some
of that for you coming up.

Speaker 2 (23:10):
But at the time Zelensky said quote, with this war,
oftentimes I'll.

Speaker 4 (23:14):
Do it in Zelensky's voice. With this war, oftentimes, the
deepot you look at it is the less you understand.
I've seen many leaders who were convinced they knew how
to end it tomorrow, and as they waded deep it
into it, they realized it is not so simple. He
just talking about Trump, He said, Trump and Vance are
too radical. Zelensky then continued to attack the Trump Vance ticket.

(23:36):
He said, quote his message seems to be that Ukraine
must make sacrifice. This brings us back to question of
the cost to shoulders it. The idea that the world
should end this war at Ukraine's expense is unacceptable. I'm sorry,
what end the war at Ukraine's expense?

Speaker 3 (23:52):
Bro?

Speaker 2 (23:53):
We're funding your entire war. You can't do this without us.
It's not your expense at all.

Speaker 5 (23:58):
It's us.

Speaker 3 (23:59):
We're the ones that are paying to have this war happen.

Speaker 2 (24:02):
We're the ones that provided Russia and Ukraine with the
funds that they needed to have a war. So both
Putin and Zelensky appear to favor Kamala, and both have
explained why isn't that kind of like earning the endorsement
of both Hitler and Winston Churchill. What are we to
make of this? That's a very easy question to answer.

(24:22):
Both Putin and Zelensky have one thing in common. They
both want more war, yep, another god forsaken, forever war.
If they have nothing else in common, that is a
value both leaders share. Both of them want war to
grind on and on as thousands die and American ships
billions and billions of dollars to make that grinding possible.

(24:45):
Of course, the American deep state wants this forever war
as well. The military industrial complex wants it. The liberal
CNN legacy, national news media, even Fox News seems to
enjoy the war. It's good for ratings. War makes everyone rich,
everyone but you, and we have to fund it. We
get nothing in return. Donald Trump and Jadvance do not

(25:06):
want war. Trump has said that if he wins the
upcoming presidential election, he will put a stop to the
futile war between Ukraine and Russia. Putin doesn't want that,
Zelensky doesn't want that. The deep state doesn't want it.
Kamala doesn't want it. So those people are all on
the same side. Putin and Zelensky are not dumb. Hell,

(25:28):
if I wanted more war, I would definitely endorse Kamala,
the woman who will become the standard bearer for the
political party that represents the obsessed Ukraine War lunatics in
the media, in the deep State, in academia, in Hollywood,
they love war, they love death.

Speaker 3 (25:43):
They never want it to end. Remember that when you
vote this November. That's a look.

Speaker 5 (25:49):
You'll just set a pie hole and keep working.

Speaker 3 (25:51):
Back to the pursuit of happiness, Radio is a happiness
Dio sard Liberty.

Speaker 2 (26:01):
After accidentally impregnating a woman who's not his wife. Dave
Grahl just announced that this weekend his band The Foo
Fighters will be pulling out of a weekend music festival.
I'm sure we're all thinking the same thing right now.
I didn't realize David Grahl knew how to pull out.

Speaker 6 (26:21):
Is this a spoiled, pampered, narcissistic Hollywood brat or what?

Speaker 1 (26:25):
Or what?

Speaker 2 (26:27):
Yes, it's a it's a fun time in Hollywood where
casting couch directors are snorting cocaine and sexually molesting teenagers.
Plenty of examples of that today, But there's also a
lot of examples of affluent liberal celebrities not really appreciating
what they've got. Sha'all remember the movie, Well, I guess

(26:47):
it was a TV show. Acolyte. Acolyte is the Star
Wars Disney Plus show that starred Amandla Stenberg. A Manla
Stenberg made a really terrible music video about how Star
Wars fans are racist. This is the music playing in
the background right now. She actually rapped about how she

(27:07):
was on week. It's really it's just terrible music. We're
not going to play it on the air. She apparently
does not like Star Wars fans, even though she was
the star of a Star Wars TV show, cause it bombed.
It did very bad, and that Star Wars TV show,
by the way, costs two hundred and fifty million dollars
a quarter of a billion dollars to bomb. Nobody wanted

(27:28):
to watch it here right now. Local stand up comedian
Tim mathis a notable Star Wars enthusiast. Tim Amandla Stenberg
says her favorite movie was Revenge of the Sith.

Speaker 7 (27:39):
Go ahead, I mean, Revenge of the Sith is not
the worst one. She could have said something like Rise
of Skywalker or whatever. Class I don't know. I don't
know any of the sequels names except for Force Awakens,
so she could have said something worse than Revenge of
the Sith, but still not the best pick. But what

(27:59):
do you want from a Disney kid that's been handed
a career and has in turn turned into a horrible person.

Speaker 2 (28:07):
She's in the news this week for showing her breasts
at some award ceremony. I don't know who cares. But
she also says America is a terrible place. It's racist.
Disney fans are racist. But she's a product of Disney films, right,
she wouldn't be famous if it wasn't for Disney.

Speaker 7 (28:22):
Yeah, I mean, well, she was a Disney kid early
in her career and then went on to do I
think her Big Bowl. That kind of broke her out
with the hung dames. I don't remember which Hunger Games,
there's so many of them. Yeah, but yeah, her and
others have been saying stuff like that, I don't know
how to pronounce her name, but Chapel Roane or whatever.

Speaker 3 (28:44):
Yeah, she's something like that. She's a pop singer.

Speaker 2 (28:48):
And they're mad at her because she said she's going
to vote for Kamala, but she won't officially endorse Kamala.
And she's twenty, right, like the media is. I've noticed
this that, like Democrat operatives on social media had been
bullying her to endorse Kamala. Why does it matter? What's
someone who just got famous five minutes ago thinks about
the presidential election?

Speaker 7 (29:08):
And not only that, I don't know how you react
to people trying to pressure either do something, but I
react negatively to it. I mean, if somebody tells me
to do something and then like two hundred people tell
me the same thing and they're trying to bully me
into a position, I'll at least try to figure out
why they're so adamant about that. It's this group think,

(29:33):
this high mind. I would just completely dismiss it at
that point. But my beef with people like her and
maclamore and a mandl Stenbergh who seem to not like
the United States. That's fine if you don't like the
United States, but you need to specifically have the guts
to come out and tell us which part of it

(29:54):
are you talking about? You know, the thing that nobody
wants to talk about is the problem is the warm
and the ciad FBI just asked Mayor Adam when he
came out and said something negative about the immigration policy,
which all of those agencies support and the State Department supports.
He got rated two weeks later and now he's in dieting.

Speaker 4 (30:14):
Though.

Speaker 7 (30:15):
These celebrities just don't have the guts come out and
say what the problem is, the problem is that the
United States engages then illegal wars all over the place,
wars for profit, yes, and yeah, and we bomb kids
almost every week. So that's the problem.

Speaker 3 (30:30):
I mean, I agree with that.

Speaker 2 (30:31):
And I'm a right wing conservative, patriotic, red, white and
Blue America loving voter, and I and I agree with
the point you just made. The problem with America is
that we've become the world police and we put our
own interests last. But none of them will say that
out loud. You just mentioned rapper Maclamore. Maclamore is famous
for being a white guy who had a hit song

(30:52):
about buying clothes at a thrift shop. I mean, is
it's not you know, it's he's kind of ugly and untalented.
In any other country on Earth, I assume he would
have starved to death by now at this point of
his career. But here he's rich and famous and he
says f America. He said f America recently on stage
at a concert in Seattle, and then he got dropped
as a headliner from an upcoming Las Vegas music festival

(31:14):
as part of the blowback from that. Similarly, Green Day
is in trouble, Like who cares about Green Day? Radio
stations are now banning green Day after the lead singer
said he hated Las Vegas. It's the worst crap hole
in America. That's not the word he used. So now
Las Vegas rock stations won't play green Day's music anymore.

Speaker 3 (31:31):
But I couldn't help.

Speaker 2 (31:33):
But notice he made an entire album about how bad
the George W. Bush Dick Cheney administration was, and now
him and Dick Cheney are both endorsing Kamala Harris. He's
on the same side as the people he was previously against.

Speaker 3 (31:47):
How did we get here?

Speaker 5 (31:48):
Tim Ah? Yeah?

Speaker 7 (31:50):
What a world? What a world? It's it's so where
if you told anybody in two thousand and six that
Green Day was going to be boot licking Dick Cheney
at some point, they would think you were crazy. Yes,
but I will get I will give Billy Joe credit.
When he starts licking the boot, he goes all the
way to the heel. He can really get that all
the way in. So he's definitely earned his stripes as

(32:13):
a as a celebrity at this point. But it's ridiculous,
and this is this is the problem. They they're really
just partisan hacks. Whatever the Democratic Party tells them to do,
they do because that's who's in charge of the media
and in turn their their public image. I mean, they
can drag him through the mud if they want to.

(32:34):
Bro It's Uh, it's a real problem with our celebrities
that they just don't have the They don't have the
guts to come out and say what the real problem is.
Billy Billy, Joel and well Maclamore specifically is mad about
the gods of war, and yes he said something about it,
but he didn't come out and say that with this
ath America statement that he said, he should have said,

(32:54):
this is my problem with it. We're doing too much
overseas that's leading to too much casualties and too much death.

Speaker 3 (33:02):
I think we're just asking too much of celebrities.

Speaker 2 (33:04):
You can make a song, you can act in a movie,
you can look cool, you can dress pretty, But to
actually form complete sentences and make an interesting point, none
of them are really capable of doing. None of these
people were describing Ken Wax intellectual on the issues that
they claim to care so much about. All that being said,
I can't help but notice what a short attention span

(33:26):
they have.

Speaker 3 (33:26):
The View ABC's The View co host.

Speaker 2 (33:29):
Joy Bear was interviewing Wanda Sykes recently both comedians Joy Behar.
It's hard to believe she's a comedian. I don't think
most people knew that before she was on this TV show.
Wanda Sykes, on the other hand, she was on Curby
Your Enthusiasm. She's had some funny moments, and the two
of them expressed concern that if Donald Trump wins, he's
going to go around the country arresting comedians. Where did

(33:50):
this talking point come from? Do they not remember that
Trump was already president? Did he arrest you Tim? You're
a comedian, Yeah, And I'm not.

Speaker 7 (33:58):
A Trump supporter, so I guess I should be worried
about it. But it's ridiculous how illogical these folks are.
That the guy was in office for four years, no
entertainers were summarily punished. The Biden administration is famously going
after a guy that made means about the presidential election

(34:19):
in twenty sixteen. I think it's actually the New York
jurisdiction where they're going after this guy. So if anybody
is going to put comedians in jail, most likely it
would be a leftist administration. So, I mean, all you
have to do is look at who is pro censorship,
and right now, much more than the Republican Party, the

(34:42):
Democratic Party is very much pro censorship. So I don't
understand where they're coming from. It's just Trump arrangement syndrome.
They will blame this man for anything, and the fear
is all they have. At this point, it's said.

Speaker 3 (34:55):
Yeah, that's pretty much it.

Speaker 2 (34:56):
I mean, you have AOC calling for the criminalization of
media outlets that report misinformation or disinformation. Now, I don't
know how many people know the difference between those two words.
One of them means you said something on that wasn't
true on accident. The other one means you said something
that wasn't true on purpose. Now that describes most liberal

(35:16):
news outlets. But imagine the first thing there. Imagine arresting
people for saying something that they thought was true but
it turns out it wasn't. That's crazy locking people up
for that. And this is the same woman that thinks
we should let rapists and murderers out of jail. I
don't know where to start with that. But hey, Tim,
you mentioned a minute ago you're not a Trump supporter,
and that's fine, you don't have to be. But I

(35:38):
remember you saying on the show recently. I think I'm
remembering this correctly. That you wanted to vote for RFK
and now he's endorsed Trump. Does that change how you feel?

Speaker 7 (35:48):
Well, I'm in California, so I'm kind of in a
spot where it doesn't really matter.

Speaker 3 (35:53):
It doesn't really matter.

Speaker 7 (35:55):
I am most likely going to be voting for RFK regardless,
just because I line up the best with his policies.
Trump's going to lose California no matter probably, you know,
if I voted a million times, so.

Speaker 3 (36:10):
And you can vote a million times in California.

Speaker 7 (36:13):
As far as as far as who between the two
that I hope wins, I definitely hope Trump wins over Kamala.
She's just another embodiment of the establishment, would just be
a puppet, just like Joe Biden. I mean, people need
to remember of the last sixteen years, We've had twelve
years of democratic presidents. So if you're mad about where

(36:35):
things are, which most people are, especially on the foreign
policy point. I'm a veteran and I'm vehemently anti war,
so what we've been doing for the last twenty to
thirty years is absolutely abhorrent to me. So I can't
have another continuation of what's going on. So if I
had to vote between the two, I would vote for Trump,

(36:57):
but I'm going to be supporting RFK most likely. And unfortunately,
California will definitely go blue again, even though people here
hate California. I talk to people who say, man, California
is really terrible. The politics out here are terrible, but
they vote lose no matter who, so it drives me crazy.
I am going to be voting for Steve Garvey over
Adam shiff for Senator. Who knows, maybe you'll win.

Speaker 2 (37:17):
That is such a good point, though, if you're unhappy
with America, if you think things are going crappy right
now in the United States, it was Democrat, Democrat, Republican
Democrat for the last four terms of president. I mean,
Tim Rais is a great point there. If these people
hate America so much, maybe what they actually hate are
Democrats and the leadership and the results of their leadership.

(37:38):
I'm Kenny Webster. I appreciate you all for listening. Follow
my buddy Tim Mathis at Tim Mathis Comedy. You'll find
him on Twitter and Instagram. And while you're at it,
why not follow me on social media too. My tweets
are extra spicy, and my other social media posts will
probably also give you indigestion. Don't forget we have a
lot of new merchandise available in the Walton Johnson smartphone app.
Download that right now you can listen about the morning

(38:00):
show and the Afternoon Show. To the rest of you,
I say, have an awesome afternoon, Drive safe. We'll be
back on Monday morning, bright and early for more of
what you bought a radio for. You are listening to
the Pursuit of Happiness Radio.

Speaker 4 (38:20):
Tell the government to kiss your ass when you listen
to this show.