Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Jack gannon government sucks. The suit of happing US radio
is dux Liberty and freedom will make you smile. A
Suda happing us on your radio to al justice cheeseburger,
sa librise.
Speaker 2 (00:23):
A popular Halloween costume. What what's going on? Somebody's walking
out of my studio. BILLYOD get out of here, billyad
A popular Halloween costume this Halloween is the Menendez Brothers.
Do not wear it around the house. Kids, That will
kill your parents. Hi, I'm Kenny Webster. Thanks for turning
on the radio. You know who's here this afternoon. Brandon
Waltons is actually in Houston. Now, if you're not a
(00:46):
regular listener of this show, you're probably thinking out, who
cares Brandon Waltons, Who's that. He's one of the journalists,
one of the reporters, one of the editors responsible for
Texas scorecard dot Com. He will be here at the
bottom of the hour. He will be in the studio.
We are going to have a deep analysis of this
week's news. We're going to take a good hard look
at what's going on with the election. Early voting has
already started. There's a lot of stuff happening in Texas.
(01:08):
Ken Paxton is going after people that are trying to
rig the election. We'll give you all the deats to
stick around for that. But before we get to anything,
one more quick announcement here. We are hosting a comedy
show and I want you to go to it. It's
coming up on November tenth, that's a Sunday. Tickets are
available right now wheelchairsfo Warriors dot org. You can also
(01:28):
get them with the Walton and Johnson's smartphone app. Just
load the app. It's right there, really easy to use.
It's at Bad Astronaut Brewing Company. It's a tax deductible donation.
When you buy a ticket, we're going to hook you
up with well, you're not buying a ticket, you're just
making a donation and then we'll give you free tickets
to a comedy show. So that'll be a lot of fun.
And it's an early show too. It's gonna be a
five pm on a Sunday. Some of you are off
(01:50):
work on Monday because it's Veterans Day, But just in
case you're not, we'll get you home in time for.
Speaker 3 (01:55):
Bed, so don't worry about that. All right.
Speaker 2 (01:57):
I want to start the show off this afternoon with
something I noted, because that's really the point of the
whole talk radio experience. It's a guy explaining to you
what he notices and then giving you his take on
things I noticed. There are things that the left is
mad about and things that they're not mad about, things
you think they'd be really mad about, and then oddly,
things you'd assume they wouldn't be mad about at all,
(02:17):
and yet for some reason, when it comes to these
specific things, they're furious.
Speaker 3 (02:21):
Jenny, what are you talking about? Okay?
Speaker 2 (02:23):
I was hoping you would ask. I'll give you an
example right now. Early this morning, the FBI confirmed they
launched a probe into the Pentagon and who leaked top
secret official Israeli strike plans against Iran over the weekend.
Over the weekend, information surfaced online detailing how Israel was
(02:44):
planning on attacking Iran, and that kind of throws a
wrench into their whole attack plan, doesn't it. If everyone
knows you're going to walk up to some bully on
the playground and punch him, then he can anticipate it
happening and he could prepare for it. That's not good, right,
So the FBI is now investigating this. Either some one
hacked into the FBI and stole documents pertaining to how
(03:04):
Israel is going to attack Iran, or somebody that works
at the Pentagon leaked to this stuff online. Either way,
it's pretty bad. Whether you're for the Israeli war or
against the Israeli war. I mean, I assume nobody's for
the war, But whether you support Israel or not, I
gotta think you don't want this information to be out there.
This is dangerous and it makes the world a less
(03:26):
safe place. The White House was asked about the leak
during a press briefing yesterday, and Kareem Jean Pierre gave
a few details.
Speaker 4 (03:36):
The White House is monitoring the progress of the investigative
effort to figure out how this happened, not whether this happened,
but just for the sake of clarity, can you confirm
that the documents in question are authentic and do in
fact in being US classified.
Speaker 1 (03:53):
Look, I appreciate the question.
Speaker 5 (03:54):
We're, like I said, we're certainly aware of the reports.
We are very concerned. I'm not going to get into specifics.
I'm not going to get into details. That's something for
dj I see and Dood to get into it, and
certainly they can hopefully answer any questions that you may
have on this particular matter. But as the reports are
out there and what they're what we are hearing, certainly
(04:16):
we are very concerned by them. They're being looked into.
It's being investigated by the appropriate authorities, obviously the US.
Speaker 2 (04:24):
I want a positive right there. IM gonna positive right there.
Kareem is very concerned. Yeah, we should all be really concerned.
Speaker 3 (04:30):
Guys.
Speaker 2 (04:31):
There's a war happening in what almost every continent. It'd
be easier to tell you where there's not a war
happening at this point. There's no war in Australia or Antarctica.
I think that's about it. Don't tell me there's no
war happening in North or South America. There clearly is
a war happening at our border, and it's pretty bad,
and there are casualties every day. There are casualties in
(04:51):
your own neighborhood from that. But that's okay, fine. You
could say I'm being hyperbolic. There's a war happening in Europe, Africa,
all over Asia, all over.
Speaker 3 (04:59):
The Mid East.
Speaker 2 (05:00):
Did you know that China and indiaa war with each
other and their friends. I mean, we're to start with this.
So so liberals are not mad about this. They're not
upset at the Pentagon for leaking information that is clearly
not only going to cost money but lives.
Speaker 3 (05:15):
But here's something they are mad about.
Speaker 2 (05:16):
Townhall dot com today reporting how over the weekend, maybe
you heard Donald Trump went to a McDonald's in Pennsylvania. Honestly,
it was an ace campaign stop. The photo opportunity was
a home run, and it broke the minds of liberals everywhere.
The ownage was so complete that all they could do
was cope and seethe as Trump made fries and served
(05:37):
them up to people. The liberal media come out and
said it was staged, It was all staged. Well, yeah,
obviously it was stage. Do you guys, did you think
Trump was really going to work at McDonald's. Did you
think you know they tried to assassinate him three times recently?
Did you think you could just walk up and buy
fries from him and that he works there? Now, it's
so silly, isn't it. It's just ridiculous. Listen to Tim Walls,
(06:01):
big mad, just furious about this. The chubby guy who
lactates from his male nipples has never been more angry
about a cheeseburger in his life.
Speaker 3 (06:10):
She actually worked in a McDonald's.
Speaker 6 (06:12):
She didn't go and pander and disrespect McDonald's workers by
standing there in your red time take.
Speaker 2 (06:17):
Them all right, So he says it was staged. I
didn't mean to cut him off before he finished his
dumb point there. Why isn't Kamala the one talking about this.
She's the one who says she worked there, right, Why
doesn't she have anything to say? Yesterday, they spent the
whole day, I mean, the liberal media, democrats, you name it, academia,
all of them complaining that Trump's appearance at a McDonald's
(06:40):
was staged, it wasn't real. And then they and then
they held a stage town hall.
Speaker 3 (06:47):
No I'm not kidding.
Speaker 2 (06:48):
They had Maria Shriver in Liz Cheney host to town
hall last night with Kamala Harris. We're basically in so
many words, Kamala said she would be willing to be
more pro war if Liz would agree to be more
pro abortion. But right before the whole thing started, somebody
in the audience asked Maria Shriver, the person hosting the event,
(07:08):
if people in the audience could ask questions, and Maria said, no, no,
we've pre selected all the questions.
Speaker 3 (07:14):
Yeah, this whole thing's staged. You're not.
Speaker 4 (07:17):
Unfortunately, we have some pre determined questions, and I hopefully
I'll be able to ask some of the questions that
might be in your head.
Speaker 7 (07:24):
I hope.
Speaker 3 (07:24):
No, don't worry. Yeah, we'll get to those.
Speaker 2 (07:26):
As long as the questions you want to ask are
why is Kamalas so great? And why is Donald Trump
so awful? Then yeah, don't worry, we'll get to the
question you would ask.
Speaker 3 (07:38):
Stop it, government, get out of my life. You're listening
to the Pursuit of Happiness.
Speaker 2 (07:44):
Radio Protesters want Kellogg to remove artificial colors from fruit loops.
So wouldn't that just make them cheerios? Just do cheerios.
Calm down, everybody. Meanwhile, the LAPD that'd be your police
department in Los Angeles. He patrolling the city with robot dogs.
I hope they don't get eaten by robot haitians. That
(08:05):
would be terrible. Hey, greetings, kids, welcome back from break.
If you don't know, we got a comedy show happening
November tenth. Tickets are available right now. You could get some.
Go to wheelchairsfo Warriors dot Org. Click the events section,
just scroll down a little there and you'll find the
spot to buy the tickets. You can also get them
with the Walton and Johnson smartphone app. It's fun, It's
(08:26):
easy to do. Everybody could do it, even men who lactate.
Speaker 4 (08:30):
Hi.
Speaker 8 (08:30):
I'm Chris Vance. I'm a former Republican lawmaker and the
former chairman of the Washington State Republican Party. I never
voted for any Democrat for any office my entire life
live until twenty sixteen, when the Party of Reagan and
Lincoln and Eisenhower was taken over by Donald Trump and MAGA.
Speaker 3 (08:50):
So today I'm.
Speaker 8 (08:52):
Proud to have cast my vote for Kamala Harris.
Speaker 3 (08:55):
Kamala Harris, sir.
Speaker 2 (08:58):
You know how I know you're lying because you have
a Ukraine flag as your Twitter profile photo.
Speaker 3 (09:04):
These guys are hilarious and they're all over the place.
Speaker 2 (09:07):
I mean, there are all these people that are clearly Democrats.
They've been Democrats, but the narrative now is that, oh,
I'm a Republican. I'm just voting for Kamala because I
don't like Trump. Liberals have a problem right now. They
have two competing narratives working at the same time. They
want you to a believe that they're going to win
the election, and that when they do win the election,
(09:31):
the Republicans are going to try to overturn the election fraudulently.
That's the first thing they want you to believe, and
then the next thing they want you to believe b
is that apparently there's a good possibility Trump's going to
win the election in cheat Well, can't be both of
those things. Michigan Secretary of State Joscelyn Benson is responding
(09:54):
with an explainer to Elon Musk. Elon Musk had a
simple yes or no question about voter registration in the
world Wolverine State, and the two have been arguing with
each other on social media ever since. Elon highlighted over
the weekend how Michigan still has one hundred thousand more
registered voters than eligible citizens. Isn't that interesting? How is
it that there are one hundred thousand more people registered
(10:16):
to vote in the state of Michigan than are legally
allowed to vote? That seems awfully weird, So Benson refuted
that as dangerous instant information. She said there aren't more
voters than citizens. In Michigan, there are seven point two
million active registered voters and seven point nine citizens of
voting age, she said, and then Musk responded. He said,
(10:38):
Joscelyn Michelle Benson, shame on you for lying to the public.
Speaker 3 (10:42):
Blatantly lying to the public.
Speaker 2 (10:44):
You only plan to remove the ineligible voters after this election.
That necessarily means there are far more people registered to
vote than there are eligible voters. And then that prompted
a response from the Secretary of State. She said, in Michigan,
we tell the truth that follow the law. I suggest
you do the same.
Speaker 3 (11:03):
Guys.
Speaker 2 (11:04):
Elon Musk hasn't broken the law. He's just wanting to
make sure Michigan doesn't cheat in this election, you know.
Mia Cathel today is reporting on what could only really
be described as a fan fiction article at politico dot com.
In the lead up to the twenty twenty four presidential election,
Politico just published a lengthy piece, an article fantasizing into
(11:28):
vivid detail about Trump overturning the race results and installing
himself in the White House. The article is titled The
Threat Remains, and it imagines a quote very real scenario
where the GOP nominee loses in November but seizes power anyway,
How does he do that? If he didn't do that
(11:49):
when he was actually president, how's he going to do
it when he's a private citizen.
Speaker 3 (11:56):
They say, here's how it could happen. They say, here's
how it could happen.
Speaker 7 (11:58):
Guys.
Speaker 2 (12:00):
Politico talked to a bunch of experts, and we provided
dates corresponding with the predicted timeline of events. And really
what can only be described as an or welling in
imagery to accompany each promination. It starts with Trump sowing distrust.
That's what they say, something that Deep Dive says he's
already doing, stoking deep, unfounded doubts about the integrity of
(12:21):
the election. Which is funny because that's also what the
Democrats are doing. Simply by publishing this article, They're doing
the thing that they're accusing him of doing. The article
says he will deepen this distrust in the election by
making unsupported or hyperbolic claims of widespread voter fraud and
mounting long shot lawsuits challenging enough ballots to flip the
(12:44):
outcome in key states. Now here's the thing Democrats have
already filed lawsuits in all the swing states for the
possibility that the election's too close to call or something
suspicious happens. And they talk about in the article how
Republicans are doing that, but they don't actually mention how
Democrats are doing that. Politico is predicting that Trump is
(13:09):
going to ramp up pressure during the state certification and
try to overturn the election. They said it could happen
by November eleventh or the seventeenth. He'll convince his allies
and the Republican led swing state legislatures to appoint alternate
electors to send to Congress. No, okay, but no, that's
(13:30):
not going to happen. But sure if you want to
fantasize about it. This is like a liberal wet dream,
they say. By December seventeenth, once the results are delivered
to Congress, presidential electors meet in an atmosphere of threats,
that's what they say, and there will be the prospect
of disruption and even violence at its peak.
Speaker 3 (13:48):
Huh.
Speaker 2 (13:51):
They want you to believe that could happen, which it won't,
but they also want you to believe it already did happen,
and it didn't. The article says, anyone involved in certifying
Trump's defeat should he lose as a potential target, the
extremists or even just a rapid wack of doodles, firmly
believe it's being stolen. Yet again, I'm sorry. You're the
(14:14):
ones writing an article about someone stealing the election, and
you're trying to convince us he's going to steal the election.
That's what your article is about. You're the ones that
are selling distrust in the election, not Trump. The article
goes on that he will persuade a GOP led Congress
to endorse his electionns and spur those for Harris when
(14:36):
congressional members convene to certify the outcome. Look, I think
that would be funny and it wouldn't bother me, But
it's not going to happen. And then by January six, Yes,
January six, four years since the date they say we've
entered the endgame. This phase would mark the culmination of
Trump's ceaseless campaign to cast out on any election defeat
(14:57):
and lay the groundwork for an alternative reality. Four years
after January sixth, they say Trump will make his final
move to seize power at a joint session of Congress.
What are they basing this off of nothing. The whole
article is just made up. It's all just a hypothetical
about what could happen. Those theorizing about Trump's takeover are
(15:20):
actually the senior legal affair reporters and national investigative correspondence
and cybersecurity reporters for Politico, all co authors of this
think piece. The article concludes, ultimately, a handful of key
pieces would have to fall into place to prevent the
certification of a Kamala victory. It would require a good
(15:42):
election night for Republicans and significant complicity among Trump allies
at virtually every level of government. Wait, so you guys
are worried that Trump's going to weaponize the legal system.
That sounds familiar, right, The realm of lawlessness, that's what
they're called it. If the Trump camp declares their preferred
(16:03):
candidate the winner, then you're talking about a real coup.
That's what they say at politico dot com. Politico neglected
to give Harris equal scrutiny, never pointed out how her
campaign is already out filing lawsuits to prepare for the
possibility of challenging the election. Guys, if Trump wins, don't
(16:24):
you think Democrats will challenge the election. Yes, of course
they will. They will riot, they will light things on fire,
they will destroy statues, because that's what they always do.
Speaker 3 (16:35):
Till the government and started listening to the Proceeds of
Happiness Radio with Kenna Webster Gitio aka producer Kenny Creating.
Speaker 2 (16:47):
Is everybody watching us on social media? Hello to those
of you listening to us on the radio. I'm Kenny Webster.
It's KPRC nine to fifty. It's Nny Webster's Pursuit of Happiness,
a spin off of the Walton Johnson Show, sort of
the like the rope to the Walton Johnson Shows.
Speaker 3 (17:01):
Threes Company.
Speaker 2 (17:02):
If you will, if you are listening to us on
the radio and you'd like to join a conversation on
social media, you can.
Speaker 3 (17:08):
I have a guest in my studio right now.
Speaker 2 (17:10):
He is one of the senior editors of Texas scorecard
dot com, a journalist, a conservative activist and author, a
social media personality. Brandon Waltons of Texas scorecard dot Com. Brandon,
I ask you this, Yeah, what does a slutty nurse
go as for Halloween?
Speaker 3 (17:27):
What do they go as?
Speaker 7 (17:30):
I don't know, I guess just a college student is
that one.
Speaker 3 (17:35):
I don't know. It's confusing to me. Have you picked out?
Have you picked out your costume yet? Brandon?
Speaker 6 (17:40):
No?
Speaker 7 (17:40):
No, you know I haven't. Although I feel like a
lot of people probably are going to be dressed as
the Trump and the McDonald's ape, and in fact, that's
going to be a popular one in these next couple
of weeks.
Speaker 3 (17:50):
It's a really good one.
Speaker 2 (17:51):
Another one, I understand a lot of people are going
as the Menendez brothers for Halloween.
Speaker 3 (17:55):
I think that's in poor taste. Do you think they're innocent?
Speaker 7 (17:59):
Uh, I don't know.
Speaker 2 (18:00):
I think I think they clearly committed murder. The question
is this where where did that happen at? Were they
in New Jersey or Florida or California? Shows how a
little way, Yeah one of those, not Texas, someplace with
guidos and yeah, not Texas exactly. The thing that gets
me about the Menendez brothers is, you know they murdered
their parts. There's no doubt about that. The question is
(18:21):
should you be allowed to murder if you were a
victim of some sort of a nefarious sexual assault that's
what they're suggesting.
Speaker 3 (18:28):
With this case.
Speaker 2 (18:29):
And then if if in fact you were a victim
of something, how long should the punishment? Like, you still
can't murder. But the argument they're trying to make is
thirty years seems a little strict to murder the person
that molested you as a kid. Brandon Waltons tell us.
Speaker 7 (18:43):
Everything you know, I don't know. You get a little
out of my wheelhouse here. Thirty years. Look, I don't
know man, okay.
Speaker 2 (18:49):
Well, all right, Well, equally as controversial, Robert Roberson, I
believe is his name. We just had a case here
in the state of Texas. For those who do not know,
the sky is on Oh he's not on trial, he's
on death right. They want to send him away. They
want to execute the guy. He was supposed to get
executed for shaking a baby, and the kid's dead.
Speaker 3 (19:10):
There's no doubt about that. The question is.
Speaker 2 (19:14):
Was it junk science that they used to prove that
he was guilty? And even if the data that they
used to prove he was guilty was flawed, it's still
pretty obvious the guy's guilty.
Speaker 3 (19:26):
Nobody questions that.
Speaker 2 (19:27):
So in an effort to stop him from getting executed,
why don't you explain it to us? Democrats in the
state of Texas did something very unusual, something they've never
done before.
Speaker 3 (19:36):
Yeah.
Speaker 7 (19:36):
And by the way, not just shaking a baby. I
mean the nurse who originally called the police when he
brought his two year old child to the hospital. I
mean the injuries on her body, on her head, her organs,
et cetera. Were absolutely I mean it's hard to read
when you go look through those cases. There's no wonder
why a jury found him guilty, convicted him to death.
(19:57):
This was, by the way, over twenty years ago, right,
How how you know how long this stuff lasts? Well,
he was scheduled to be executed on Thursday. I mean,
you know every Appeals Court Board department pearls unanimously. Governor
said no, you're you're guilty. We're going to carry out
this sentence. You've got the Criminal Jurisprudence Committee in the
(20:17):
Texas House. Now, this is a committee that's led by
a Democrat, Joe Moody from El Paso, who is a
certainly an anti death penalty, you know, blm et cetera liberal. Right,
They essentially, along with some of the Republicans on the
committee like Jeff Leach from up and Allen, put together
this this last minute effort on Thursday night to say, Okay,
(20:40):
we're gonna we're gonna subpoena Robert Roberson essentially saying he
needs to come speak to our committee, and so you can't,
you can't carry out the execution because we need to
be able to talk to him in a few days.
Uh that you know, it was kind of played out
in the courts a little bit on Thursday. The Texas
Supreme Court issued the stay for now. Now. They held
(21:03):
a committee hearing yesterday where they had invited him to
testify the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The Attorney General
is saying absolutely not. We're not going to bring a
death penal, a death row inmate to the Texas Capital.
It's a massive security risk. And they're saying so they're saying,
we could come in, we can video chat.
Speaker 2 (21:23):
Well, and who would even believe this guy's testimony anyway, I.
Speaker 7 (21:26):
Mean, he has nothing to lose, Kadie, Like, there's no
reason for him not to lie. If he lies, he
was supposed to be put to death last week, right,
So he's on borrow time as it is. So they say, well,
you can you can video do some video testimony, right, Well, what.
Speaker 3 (21:40):
Good is that going to do. It's not like he's
going to tell the truth.
Speaker 7 (21:43):
Well, well, exactly right. But even then they said, well,
he can't do video testimony because he's they say he's autistic,
they wouldn't be able to do it, which is a
first argument that I've I've ever heard.
Speaker 3 (21:55):
Me too, I'm too autistic to pay my taxes. I can't.
Speaker 2 (21:58):
I'm so autistic, confused by the irs. I shouldn't have
to be I shouldn't be required to do that.
Speaker 7 (22:04):
Brandon, Yeah, exactly. And so it's it's frustrating because you know,
even if you'd step back away from this case, people
obviously you know, I think they're you know, arguments certainly
on both sides for the death penalty, against the death penalty.
Putting that aside, you've got now this constitutional crisis, essentially
the separation of powers. You know, it's funny the legislature
(22:24):
always well get mad, right, we talk about activist judges
who try to make law from the bench, and here
you have essentially activist legislators that are trying to retry
this trial from the Texas Capital, which is complete meltdown.
Even Governor Greg Abbott has weighed in and said the
committee's overstepping their bounds. That he's the only one with
(22:47):
the power ultimately to issue stays of executions, and he
didn't in this in this case.
Speaker 2 (22:53):
By and by the way, do I need to point
out the obvious who gave these Democrats the authority.
Speaker 3 (22:57):
To do this?
Speaker 7 (22:57):
Yeah? Well that would be the current House Speaker, Dave
Feeling a date Feeling strikes again. Yeah, and by the way.
Speaker 2 (23:05):
This news story, whatever people's thoughts are on the death
penalty or whatever you think of this guy, this is
one more example of how broken our media is. I'm
gonna put something up on the screen here. I want
everybody to look at this. Here's a headline about this story,
Texas junk science law getting another look over Robert Robertson's
case junk science according to who, Well according to this
(23:26):
guy that wrote the article here, Nadia Lathan. Okay, fine,
that's her opinion. But this is the ap They're not
supposed to be putting their opinions, well even a headline,
yet that's exactly what they do. Have you seen this yet.
This has been getting a lot of attention today on
social media. This is how CBS News started their their
(23:46):
evening broadcast yesterday. Hang on a second, I want to
got to stop the music here if I'm gonna play this,
there's some there's music coming from somewhere on my computer,
and I don't know where it's coming from. There.
Speaker 3 (23:55):
It is okay, stop that, I'm gonna play some.
Speaker 2 (23:58):
Audio for you and video for those of you watching
us on social media. This is how CBS News started
their evening broadcast yesterday. Count the number of times they
compliment Kamala and insult Trump.
Speaker 6 (24:10):
Go.
Speaker 9 (24:11):
A selection day is just over two weeks away, and
the fight for every single last undecided vote in battleground
states is intensifying. Vice President Kamala Harris's targeting disaffected Republican
voters by hitting the trail with Liz Cheney in the
crucial blue wall states of Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. Cheney
was a powerful Republican congresswoman, and today she called Harris
(24:32):
a responsible adult. As for former President Donald Trump, he
was back in North Carolina again pushing false claims about
FEMA and immigrants. That's after he spent the weekends slinging
a crude insult at Harris, engaging in lewd locker room
talk about the late golfing legend Arnold Palmer and staging
a campaign stunt at a Pennsylvania McDonald's let's.
Speaker 3 (24:54):
Pause it right there. Let's just pause that right there. Now.
I counted. They love Liz Cheney, powerful Republican.
Speaker 2 (25:02):
She's a powerful couldn't even get re elected, lost by
thirty points in her own.
Speaker 7 (25:06):
Stage, very powerful and by the way, having her on
stage that wasn't a campaign stunt though, that was a
serious conversation where she had Kamala Harris on right.
Speaker 3 (25:14):
Isn't that amazing?
Speaker 7 (25:15):
When Trump is campaigning, that's a stuff.
Speaker 2 (25:17):
In the last segment before you got here, I played
some audio earlier of Maria Shriver, who moderated the town hall,
telling people in the audience, we will not be taking
any questions from you. I'm sorry, you're just here for
looking at You're not you guys are determined.
Speaker 7 (25:32):
I think crazy.
Speaker 3 (25:33):
I think what is not staged in the Kamala Harris camp.
Speaker 7 (25:37):
It's it's it's all so fake. I mean, I think
that's why you've seen President Trump say that repeatedly, and
his campaign's been driving that home. But it doesn't take
him saying that. I mean, I think people see her campaign,
whether it's you know, when she goes out and you know,
holds a rally where she speaks for five minutes and
then has you know, Lizo come out and essentially run
the whole thing, or if it's you know, when she
(25:59):
she did didn't come to the you know that the
Catholic charity roast dinner thing from you know last week,
where they normally go and they make jokes. She didn't
go to that. She's like a side character in her
own campaign in a weird way. I mean, she's not
even the main character there.
Speaker 2 (26:16):
And that's a great point because Brandon, she's not running
for president. She's running for not Trump. That's what it is.
She's not the candidate. Things are so bad in America
right now with our media that conservatives are actually praising
guys like Bill Maher and John Stewart not because they
agree with them, just because they're actually consistent in their principles.
Speaker 3 (26:37):
Let me throw something up on the screen here.
Speaker 2 (26:39):
Yesterday, Tim Walls is being interviewed by John Stewart, and
John Stewart said a thing every conservative, liberal, every every libertarian,
everybody with half a brain cell that can remember what
America was like about ten years ago, seemed to think
when Kamalas started going out and campaigning with the Cheney's.
Speaker 7 (26:59):
The Cheney thing, do we really have to do that?
Speaker 3 (27:05):
Look it goes broad in that.
Speaker 7 (27:07):
Look Bernie Sanders, Dick Cheney, Taylor Swift. No no, no, no, no, no, no,
having the Cheney's on board.
Speaker 2 (27:14):
No you can't Dick Cheney or Taylor Swift.
Speaker 7 (27:17):
No, Dick big plan, big country to Taylor Swift to get.
Speaker 3 (27:23):
Us to in vain. No, yeah, no, don't. Don't you
think though that?
Speaker 2 (27:28):
And I do this, I believe this all right, stop
him right there, because you don't need to hear it.
Is this funny or what it was? Darth Hitler right well, and.
Speaker 7 (27:36):
They hated him right, and when John Stuart, I mean
it's almost like bringing someone out of a time machine
or something, because that was the Democrat position in two
thousand and four, two thousand and eight, two thousand. They
hated Dick Cheney, right. And now you know now he's
I guess a Democratic hero and certainly his daughter, right,
Liz Cheney, they fawn over by the way he's looking
(27:59):
at some of the video. If you saw some of
the video of Liz Cheney and Kamala Harris. What a
bundle of joy she looks like, right, She just absolutely
and the most sullen sulky look seemingly the whole time.
This is the campaign of joy, is what they said.
Speaker 2 (28:16):
That's exactly a joy and vibes, And yet they're disgusted
at the thought of Donald Trump dancing on stage while
healthcare workers help somebody having a medical emergency in the
audience at a Trump rally. I can't help but notice
Trump spent the weekend at a football game.
Speaker 3 (28:31):
He went to a barber shop, he went to McDonald's.
Speaker 2 (28:34):
Kamala, who's trying to prove that she's not too much
of an elitist for the supporters of her populist opponent,
spent the weekend with celebrities, with Lizzo. Does this kind
of remind you at twenty sixteen, when Hillary spent more
time with the cast of Hamilton than the entire state
of Wisconsin.
Speaker 7 (28:53):
It feels that way, right, It certainly feels a lot
like twenty sixteen. I think those comparisons are app I
think Hillary Clinton was winning a better campaign then though
that Kamala Harris is running now.
Speaker 3 (29:02):
Yeah, I think I think she was a.
Speaker 7 (29:05):
Better candidate, and I don't think she was a very
you know, I don't think she was a very good candidate.
So that tells you what I think the state of
the race is at this moment.
Speaker 3 (29:12):
By the way, this video is mislabeled.
Speaker 2 (29:13):
If you're watching us on social media, that guy am
I should have I should have labeled the video before.
Christian Collins is a great guy. He was here the
other day, so this video is labeled wrong. But if
you're following, if you're watching us on social media, Brandon
Waltons is my guest right now for this half hour
of the show, follow him on social media quick break,
we'll be right back.
Speaker 8 (29:33):
It's never too early to learn that the government is
a greedy piglet that suckles on a taxpayer's teat until
they have sore, chapped nipples.
Speaker 3 (29:42):
The Pursuit of Happiness Radio on AM nine fifty KPRC.
Speaker 2 (29:50):
All right, one percent of Americans say they will fry
their turkey this Thanksgiving, And then I got to imagine
the kind of person that does that probably doesn't shut
up about it till Memorial Day.
Speaker 7 (30:01):
Brandon, It's like it's like the green Egg clan as well, right.
Speaker 3 (30:07):
Have you ever had deep Fried?
Speaker 7 (30:08):
Have you had the I have? Actually, yeah, it's I
think it can be good. It's very dangerous. I feel
like every season you see where like people burn their
whole house down because you know, they've put too much
oil in or something, and what is it they're doing wrong?
I think it's putting too much oil in? Is that it?
Or the turkey's too cold or some combination of the both.
Have you seen the videos like just like it's inferno
(30:32):
in seconds? So yeah, I think you know the oven
works well as well. You know, yeah, it really does.
Speaker 3 (30:40):
Yeah, I never had it. I never had an issue
with the oven myself.
Speaker 7 (30:43):
Yeah, and I actually liked her. I think a lot
of people, a lot of people say like, Turkey's not
really good. I'm actually a pro turkey. I'm a turkey fan.
Speaker 2 (30:50):
I'm into turkey as well. Jesse Kelly, our afternoon host
on kPr, so a good friend of the show. He's
been on many times since people only eat turkey on
Thanksgiving and to that, I always say, haven't you had
been to you know, a Texas barbecue place They almost.
Speaker 7 (31:02):
At turkey there, turkey sandwich. I mean, you know, yeah,
all your love absolutely, it's a liver worst that we hate.
Nobody wants a liver worst. All right, So Donald Trump
today hanging out with Latino voters apparently, and uh, according
to CNN, this is a group of people that Kamala
is underperforming with.
Speaker 3 (31:23):
What a shocking revelation.
Speaker 10 (31:24):
That is kind of the jitters that are on the
Democratic side is because that there's this feeling and these
polls are showing that Kamala Harris Vice President Harris is
underperforming with Latino voters. And I think, you know, kind
of what we've already talked.
Speaker 6 (31:40):
About is Latino voters are not monolithic, right, and there
are plenty of Latino voters who are concerned about the border,
may want a stronger border, may look at you know,
the rhetoric that that Trump has.
Speaker 2 (31:55):
I'm gonna positive right here, Hold on a second here,
They're not monolithic, she's saying. And that you know, I
get that people at CNN get paid to use big
words we don't normally use in conversation, but we all know.
Speaker 3 (32:05):
What she said.
Speaker 2 (32:06):
Knowing what she said, I have to ask the question, Brandon,
what group of voters is monoliths?
Speaker 7 (32:11):
There's a monolithic group of voters. I mean, you can
say that about anything. That's kind of some cheap commentary there.
It is funny though to see, I mean, whether it's
these numbers she's talking about. But actually I've seen a
few clips out of CNN, especially where it almost seems
like just now in the last couple of weeks, they're
starting to realize the reality of the situation. I feel
(32:31):
like early on in the Kamala race a few months ago,
you know, they were kind of pumping out these fake
polls and you know that way over sample Democrats. And
now they're realizing that whoa Trump is, you know, ahead
in a lot of groups, that Kamala is losing ground
in just about every group. I can't think of a
I mean, we're saying, I can't think of a demographic
group that Kamala Harris is ahead of Biden where Biden
(32:55):
was right. So she's lost ground in all these different groups.
Trump is gaining ground, and it really is starting to
show because they're they're putting the sirens up on CNN, MSNBC,
the rest of those networks. They're saying, this looks like
it could be trouble.
Speaker 3 (33:11):
Yeah, And she has everything going for her.
Speaker 2 (33:13):
She's got Hollywood she's got academia, she's got the college
professors lecturing the student she's got Obviously, everybody on the media,
even half of Fox News, seems to kind of seems
to kind of low key want Kamala to win. But
I think what CNN misses out on when they tell
you how surprised they are that Hispanic voters like Trump,
they're kind of it's it's it's more of that low
(33:35):
key liberal racism, because that's their way of saying, well,
the only people crossing over the border are Hispanics. And
I'm a regular reader of this website, Brandon Walton's Texas
scorecard dot com of illegal aliens from Africa, in the
Middle East encountered at the Texas border. You know where
else they're coming from, chick Chi Chi, China. Guess where
else They're coming from? Eastern Europe and South Asia. And oh,
(33:59):
by the way, Trump's wife's from Eastern Europe and Jade
Vance's wife's from South Asia. So this really has nothing
to do with race and everything to do with following
the law, right, oh.
Speaker 7 (34:09):
Exactly, And as if, you know, as if to suggest
that Hispanic voters they only care about like Hispanic voters
a assuming that they want open borders most of them
do not, and then secondly, assuming that they don't care
about any other issue like the economy. Yeah, like you know,
(34:30):
any of the other major issues that have that have
been out in play in this campaign. It's but you're right, right,
it's that it's that Democrat racism of you know, just
expecting that. Well, we've got our certain groups on lock here.
Why why is she losing ground here? They should be voting.
You know, she said they're not a monolith, and that
she wants you could tell she wants them to vote
that way.
Speaker 3 (34:49):
She wants them to be a model.
Speaker 7 (34:50):
She wants it that way. She's lamenting that.
Speaker 2 (34:52):
It's not one of the problems with Nothing is ever
as great or as awful as anyone in politics will
tell you it is. Whatever it is they're talking about.
Nothing is ever as awesome or as terrible as either
sides would tell you. But the left certainly loves some
identity politics because it works. But there are limitations to
it because if you dive too deep into identity politics,
(35:13):
it becomes insulting to.
Speaker 3 (35:14):
The people in the identity group.
Speaker 2 (35:16):
If you're a Hispanic person, imagine showing up at a
Joe Biden rally and having them hand you a taco
and a sombrero and saying, oh, a miamigo, welcome to
the Democrat.
Speaker 3 (35:26):
Here. We've got what you want, free tortillas. That's what
you want, right.
Speaker 7 (35:30):
Joe Biden got in trouble for that a couple of
years ago, if I recall.
Speaker 2 (35:33):
Yeah, Ce Padres, she said, yeah, the future, and then
she went to San Antonio and she said, the people
here are as diverse as the breakfast tacos we.
Speaker 3 (35:42):
Enjoy in San Antonio.
Speaker 7 (35:43):
And even they were like, uh no, that's not cool.
Speaker 3 (35:46):
No, they really didn't see that.
Speaker 7 (35:48):
They didn't like that at all. And it's not unlike
I mean, right, you had of course, former President Barack
Obama and his what I thought was pretty insulting pep
talk or whatever you want to call it to black
men's specifically. This was from what a week or two
ago we were saying, well, I think a lot of
essentially saying I think a lot of y'all have a
problem electing a woman, as if that was the only
(36:10):
issue right at play here, right that it's oh, it's
just voters have a problem electing a woman president. No,
there are a lot of issues with the Kamala Harris campaign.
Not everything is about identity the way the left sees.
Speaker 2 (36:22):
It, they would love that. And you know who else
didn't want to elect a woman, the Democrats. She didn't
get any primary.
Speaker 7 (36:28):
She got like a percent or whatever. Yeah, it was
like nothing. They didn't want her.
Speaker 2 (36:31):
She got zero delegates, Brandon, this is zero, Dell, And
that's not the Republican's fault.
Speaker 3 (36:36):
That's the Democrat's fault, all right.
Speaker 2 (36:38):
I remember several years ago when Trump was president, speaking
of immigration and violence and stuff, there was this guy,
Jamal Kashogi, and he was a Washington Post journalist that
was basically kidnapped and murdered by the Saudi Arabian government,
or so we've been led to believe. I don't know
if anyone ever saw it happen, but I think we know.
You know Ockham's razor, right, that's probably what happened. Sure
(36:58):
Time magazine ran a story person of the Year, Dead Journalists.
Dead journalist is going to be the person of the year.
Whoa person of the year. That's pretty serious. So you
flip to the magazine thinking, Hey, they're finally going to
talk about what's going on down at our border because
journalists get murdered in Mexico all the time. Here's a
story today from a friend, a mutual friend of both
(37:20):
of ours, I think Brandon Darby and Alfonso Ortiz. A
group of gunmen fired at least a dozen shots at
the offices of one of the main newspapers in the
Mexican state of Cineloa. The attack comes as Cineloa is
ground zero for a turf wour with cartels. Now, this
sort of thing happens there a lot, a little bit
of time passes. We now find out they have kidnapped
an employee of the newspaper one day after the shooting.
Speaker 3 (37:44):
Probably just, oh, I'm sure, just a coincidence. That's weird.
Speaker 2 (37:48):
Nothing about this in the Washington Post. I thought they
loved talking about dead journalists.
Speaker 7 (37:51):
Now and these stories happened all the time. I mean,
it really is scary, you know, we talk about it.
It's funny because this will be happening, you know, just
not too far away from us, right in Mexico. And
yet the journalists here love to complain. They'll complain that, oh,
there's a hostile environment for the press whenever you know, Trump,
(38:12):
you know, has a has a you know, essentially is
mean to them at a press conference or tweet something
about the fake news. They say, oh, my gosh, journalism's
under attack. We're under attack. They're literally under attack in
Mexico in these other countries.
Speaker 3 (38:26):
Isn't that crazy?
Speaker 2 (38:27):
Yeah, journalists in America wants you to believe that because
Trump was rude to Chris Cuomo at a press conference
once that oh this is Oh, it's not safe to
be a journalist in America. Nothing has happened to any
of these people. Meanwhile, right over here, understanding Mexico, the
corruption of the cartels goes all the way up to
the tippy top, as AOC would say, of their federal government.
(38:50):
And yet down here, up here in America, nobody seems
to care. Hey, we're about to run out of time.
I want to thank my buddy Brandon Waltons from Texas Scorecard.
You work right outside of all at the Texas Scorecard.
Yes office, an awesome facility, by the way. You guys
do great work there. Love the podcast, love the website,
love all the news the videos you guys are doing.
Speaker 3 (39:10):
You were just in Beaumont. What were you doing in Beaumont?
Speaker 7 (39:12):
Oh, Beaumont speaking to a group of a group of
patriots down there at the True Texas Project. Being over
there one of my favorite things to do. I mean,
I do you know. We focused a lot on what
happens in Austin and the Capitol, but I always say
I love it when I get the chance to leave
Austin and go to Texas for a little while. So
it's always nice getting out.
Speaker 3 (39:31):
To those of you who are watching us on social media.
Speaker 2 (39:34):
We're about to wrap it up here, but we'll do
a little bonus right now on social media. We'll talk
with you guys a little more. If you're watching us,
don't go anywhere. To the rest of you that listen
on the radio, subscribe to the podcast. The Walton Johnson
smartphone app is free. You can get it any Apple
app Store, Google play Store. You know what else is
a cool idea?
Speaker 3 (39:52):
Join us.
Speaker 2 (39:53):
November tenth, We're hosting a stand up comedy show with
a whole bunch of funny, right wing, red pill based comedians.
Payton's going to be there, Eric Knowles, Yours Truly, Billy
ed Hatfield, the Walton and Johnson crew. That's gonna be
a lot of fun. Tickets available Wheelchairs for Warriors dot org.
Speaker 1 (40:08):
It's free.
Speaker 3 (40:08):
It's the show is free.
Speaker 2 (40:10):
It's our gift to you for making a tax deductible
donation of twenty five dollars or more to Wheelchairs for
Warriors dot org. You can also get a link to
that on the Walton Johnson smartphone app. I love you all,
have an awesome afternoon. We'll be back Brian early tomorrow
morning for more of what you bought a radio for.
Speaker 7 (40:33):
You are listening to the Pursuit of hay Miss Radio.
Tell the government to kiss your ass when you listen
to this show.