October 25, 2024 • 41 mins
This podcast edition of Kenny Webster's Pursuit of Happiness features journalists Brandon Darby and Michael Quinn Sullivan. ( @KennethRWebster )
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Gi Ganic Government sucks. Sue of Happiness Radio is deluxe.
Liberty and Freedom will make you smile for Suit of
Happiness Us on your radio toil just as cheeseburgs lib
fries at the food.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
Off, Biden Nomics takes another one. Guys, TGI Fridays looks
like they're declaring bankruptcy. By this time next year, they'll
be known as TGI Spirit Halloween. Hi, I'm Kenny Webster.
It's Friday. I got a full house for you here
(00:36):
this afternoon. Michael quinn Sullivan stopping by from Texas Scorecard.
Brandon Darby is stopping by from Breitbart Texas. We're gonna
give you your weekend review. We're going down to the border.
We're gonna take a look at election polling data. We're
gonna figure out what the heck's gonna happen here in
the next couple of weeks. We'll get to all that
real soon, but before we do, can we talk about
where we've been over the past couple of weeks. Remember
(00:56):
that hurricane. You remember how that hurricane what was Halena
barreled through the Carolinas and did a bunch of damage. Well,
as it turns out it was liberal fear mongering that
did a fair share of damage as well. Reason dot
Com today reporting on a very bone chilling report North Carolinians, Carolinians,
people at North Carolina reeling from the aftermath of Hurricane Helen.
(01:20):
Suddenly here FEMA's in town. Federal Emergency Management Agency suddenly
ordered emergency workers to stand down and evacuate. What why, Well,
they said, you got to get out of Rutherford County.
There are reports of trucks of armed militias going out
and hunting FEMA.
Speaker 3 (01:40):
Who's saying this?
Speaker 2 (01:42):
The Washington Post, the most accurate newspaper in America. Here's
the problem. Turns out, it wasn't true. There's no militia
traveling around North Carolina or South Carolina, or Tennessee, or
Georgia or Florida for that matter, hunting down FEMA workers.
It just wasn't true. On October fourteenth, the Rutherford County
(02:04):
Sheriff's Office arrested one guy, one single guy, for making
a threat to a FEMA employee. Law enforcement concluded that
he had acted alone. There was no truckloads of militias.
Didn't matter. The Washington Post, the BBC, they heard right
wing extremists were out hunting for government workers that are
(02:28):
just trying to help people affected by the hurricane, and
it was too good to be true. Well, it turns out,
you know, as far as liberal news narratives go, it
was too good to be true because it wasn't true.
As it turns out, there's a gentleman there was. William
Jacob Parsons told the BBC he was not a member
(02:49):
of any militia. You didn't threaten any federal officials. He
was there to distribute supplies to hurricane victims. Feels like
every time America suffers a natural disaster, there's anxiety about
social collapse, mass violence. You could go to Twitter and
you could type hashtag hurricane loot crew and you'll see
(03:09):
videos of people looting. You'd think, oh, they're in Florida
looting right now. Turns out, more often than not, that
footage you find on social media, it's years old. The
media often runs with the most fantastical version of whatever
people are saying. Journalists here, reports of violence. They're all
over it. They love telling you about violence after Hurricane Katrina,
(03:33):
violence after Hurricane Harvey. More often than not, it's not
as bad as they make it sound if it's happening
at all. Now, these rumors themselves actually can do some
serious damage. Louisiana National Guard Major Ed Bush in two
thousand and five said FEMA would have been quicker if
they hadn't heard all the myths about shootings and rapes
and deaths and killings and bodies everywhere. Last week, relief
(03:58):
effort in Rother County was paused because of these threats
of a militia that weren't true. There was no militia
going around hurting people from FEMA. So, as it turns out,
stuff's become pretty common. Journalists reached out to the federal
government through a Freedom of Information Act request and obtained
(04:19):
an original email thread about the threat. Forest Service fighting
official Gordy Sachs wrote an email to other officials on
October twelfth saying Title ten troops had come across x
two trucks of our militia saying they were out hunting FEMA. So,
as it turns out, both federal troops and National Guards
(04:41):
under federal commander referred to as being Title ten orders,
the Forest Service scrambled to figure out what was happening.
Aren't you aware? Are we engaged, He asked in the email,
this is what I've heard. By that afternoon, federal officials
had already figured out it was just a story, But
unfortunately it took the media a little long to get
that update. Once again, a minor inconvenience, a rumor, some
(05:06):
misinformation vastly exaggerated by our liberal media, turned out to
be a much worse problem than what it was thanks
a lot media. As a gentleman representative, Chuck Edwards, Republican
in North Carolina, actually reached out, said two counties in
North Carolina were reporting different militias attacking and threatening FEMA.
(05:30):
Oh so a Republican got in on this too. On
the ground, the picture looked quite different. People mostly stepped
up to help each other, volunteer aid organizations out helping
each other out. Rather than terrifying plagues of misinformation affecting
the local people there who couldn't get access to the internet,
you just found local people helping each other out.
Speaker 3 (05:52):
Sadly, our national news.
Speaker 2 (05:54):
Media didn't take the same amount of time to actually
go look at what was happening there. Kind of reminds
you of well, so many news stories this year. You
really got to wonder with all the low information voters
out there, how many people go out and vote based
on misinformation they got weeks ago that's already been debunked.
(06:14):
How many people think Kyle Rittenhouse murdered a black person?
How many people think Jesse Smalley was a victim of
a hate crime? How many people think the Covington Catholic
school kids were harassing a Native American activist? And people
will vote using the smithsinformation. It almost makes you wonder
if people should be forced to take a quiz before
(06:35):
they go into a polling location.
Speaker 3 (06:37):
Well, the boy can dream? Can't he love America? The government?
Speaker 2 (06:43):
Listenlive, listen now to proceed a Happiness Radio. It's kind
of Websterginia producer Kenny. Isn't it fascinating how the judicial
system in America? Well, base changed the verdict of a
case if it will make fans of a popular podcast happy.
(07:06):
This has happened a few times recently. Right, I'll give
you an example. You remember that gentleman in I believe
it was South Carolina murdered his whole family. What was
his name, Murdaw? Was that the guy's name? The Murdow family.
Guy went to prison and there was a documentary about
it on Netflix. It was very popular. Most people only
(07:29):
care about that case because they saw a documentary on Netflix. Now,
granted he was probably guilty, probably was. There was another
documentary I believe it was called Making the Murderer. It
was about this guy in Wisconsin, the focus of a
Netflix documentary, who may or may not have committed murder,
and somebody made a documentary basically saying they thought he
(07:49):
was innocent. Woe and behold, there was this movement to
get him out of prison. There are more examples I
could give you, but I think the obvious one this
week would be the Menendez Brothers. I was a little
kid when this happened. It happened in the late eighties.
One of the first news stories I can remember dominating
TV headlines was the Menendez Brothers. Two wealthy young men,
the children of a wealthy man, murdered their parents. It
(08:13):
was claimed at the time that they were sexually molested
by dad and that that's what drove them to murder, right,
and that was never allowed to be mentioned during the trial.
You know, is just because you're a victim of abuse
doesn't mean you get to go murder someone. You're supposed
to go to law enforcement, and you know, there's an
order of things. We have a system in place already,
(08:34):
doesn't matter. Netflix makes a documentary about the Menendez brothers.
It says, these guys have basically been in prison now
for thirty thirty five years for murdering the guy that
molested them, and really making the whole new story even
more bizarre.
Speaker 3 (08:47):
Do you remember Minudo? Menudo was a pop group.
Speaker 2 (08:49):
It was a boy band, but they were Spanish, kind
of like new Kids on the Block, but with a
Hispanic twist. One of the kids in Menudo's all grown
up now he claims he was also molested by the
Menendez Now there's a new story here in Texas that
also kind of fits this example. I don't know if
there's a documentary about it, but there's probably a podcast.
Speaker 3 (09:09):
Robert Roberson.
Speaker 2 (09:11):
Is accused of what well people call it, the baby
shaking case. He's supposed to be executed, He was supposed
to go to death throw, but then in the eleventh hour,
a bunch of legislator, a bunch of Democrat lawmakers in
the state of Texas subpoena him. They say, you know what,
we need to talk to him. We need to bring
him before the capital to make a statement, so you
can't kill him yet.
Speaker 3 (09:31):
Ken Paxton doesn't like it. A lot of people don't
like it.
Speaker 2 (09:34):
There shouldn't be loopholes to get you out of being
executed if you're guilty. Michael Quinn Sullivan is here right
now from Texas scorecard dot com. Michael, if the general
public is angry enough about a case, even if the
person's obviously guilty, is that a good reason to let
that person off for the crimes they committed.
Speaker 4 (09:51):
No, I mean, look at me. We have rule of law,
not the whims of men. That's how our how our
system is supposed to be built. And that just because
someone yells the loudest doesn't.
Speaker 5 (10:04):
Mean they're right.
Speaker 4 (10:05):
And I think that when you're whether you look at
this Roberson case, whether you look at the Menindez case
from this week, or even go back a few years.
Speaker 5 (10:14):
There was this.
Speaker 4 (10:15):
Fellow who met a widow here in Texas's name was
a Bernie Titty, and it ended up being a movie
made about him by Richard link Letter.
Speaker 3 (10:25):
And oh he's.
Speaker 4 (10:25):
Innocent, he didn't kill the woman. Oh no, kind of
com meumber rule cause celeb and so they ordered him released,
ordered a new trial. He had originally been given fifty
years crime. After the new trial, he was given ninety
nine years because they found that, oh there's even more
stuff to convict him on related to this murder. So
(10:46):
you know, all these you know, it's very easy for
politicians and celebrities to get really hyped up on something
and create a loud noise. But a loud noise doesn't
make things right, doesn't. You know, you can't create innocence
out of guilt, and I think that's where we have
to really careful being sucked into these kind of you know,
(11:07):
celebrity causes. When the legislature met and had this you know,
one sided show trial kind of retrying of this of
this fellow Robert Roberson for murdering his daughter, you know,
they only brought in They brought in doctor Phil, a
guy who's not licensed to practice medicine. They brought in
John Grisham, a novelist whose last good novel was like,
(11:28):
you know, when you were in junior high. They bring
these kind of celebrities who are going to be talking about, oh,
he's innocent, he's innocent. You know, none of them did that, apparently,
look at the.
Speaker 3 (11:37):
Facts of the case.
Speaker 4 (11:37):
Ken Paxton put out the details, the medical examiner's reports,
stuff from the trial, all these kind of evidence. I mean,
you know, I've you know, back in the old days
as a crime reporter up through you know, middle life,
wat you of being involved in every things. I've seen
some really nasty stuff. I'll tell you this. This is
(11:58):
kind of near the top of nasty thing being done
to children. This guy took brack to his cellmate that
when he was mad at his girlfriend, he would take
it out on the little girl sexually. And she was
two years old when he killed her, and just for
purposes of everyone having a nice Friday, and all the
all the details of him pretty yeah, pretty awful stuff.
Speaker 5 (12:21):
You know.
Speaker 4 (12:21):
And and I think that this is weird, and none
of which was brought up before the Texas House, that
it's a bunch of death built. The advocates Democrats and
Republicans who are there, they don't want to say they're
against the death puilding, particularly the Republican side, because that's
not a popular stance. Instead, they're just trying to play this, uh,
this game of creating a sense of moral outrage rather
(12:43):
than a sense of a clear eyed, focus on the facts,
and they're creating a constitutional crisis out of it in
the same way the men Indez case. You know, it's
you know, I'm sorry that you're getting a lot of
phone calls, but releasing someone from jail should not be
dependent on how many you know, angry phone calls that
you get based on podcast listeners.
Speaker 3 (13:02):
Yeah, follow the law, boy, I think so too.
Speaker 2 (13:04):
I heard that yesterday the prosecutor that was dropping the
charges or he's he's going to let him out of jail,
he's going to ask a judge to reconsider the case
has made the point that one of the only reasons
that they want the Menendez brothers out of prison is
because they can't handle all the phone calls and emails
that they're getting from people.
Speaker 3 (13:20):
That watched a Netflix documentary.
Speaker 2 (13:22):
Now, getting back to the Robert Robertson thing, because I
agree with you on the point you just made. I
heard somebody compare the Robert Robertson case to the case
of Heyeseus Mora Flores. They said, all right, well wait
a second here, No, I'm sorry, not the Robert Robertson,
the Menendez case. They said, hey Zeus mora Flores. It
was this case twelve years ago in Texas where a
(13:42):
father stumbles across an illegal immigrant out in a barn
behind his house in Shiner, Texas. Do you remember this
case raping and molesting his daughter as a five year
old girl. The dad beats the illegal immigrant to death,
and no jury in Texas would have convicted this dad
for what he did. I heard somebody compare these two cases,
and it confused me because I thought, well, wait a second, here,
(14:06):
the dad in that very specific case caught the guy
red handed when he was you know, is in the
heat of the moment there he beat the guy to death. Okay,
you could say maybe he went too far with it,
But when the Menendez brothers murdered their father, it wasn't
while the abuse was happening, right, it was like after
the fact.
Speaker 3 (14:24):
I just feel like that's a where it's a gray area.
I get it.
Speaker 2 (14:27):
And even still, then the argument becomes, wasn't thirty five
years enough to murder the person that sexually assaulted you?
And I gotta be honest with you, Michael, I don't
know the answer to that question, but I feel like
the rule of laws should still apply here.
Speaker 4 (14:41):
Yeah, and look at. This is why it is so
important for us too, you know, the games that a
lot of folks are wanting to play about the judiciary
and about you know, kind of the about legal process,
you know. And I'm kind of hyperfixated on the ropes
and rovers and cases because those are the facts in
my head. But you know, you've had more than a
(15:02):
hundred appellate level and supreme level judges, that state and
federal Supreme Court at the federal level, UH, the UH
Court of Criminal Appeals which is our highest court for
for so for criminal matters in Texas, and all these
state and federal pellet judges in addition to a jury
of twelve in a real time that judge all having
(15:27):
you know, looked carefully at these facts, not you know,
not in the not in the not in the height
of emotion, but in the in the clear, clear eyed, dispassionate,
you know, looking at the law, looking at the facts.
Speaker 5 (15:40):
And I think that that's.
Speaker 4 (15:41):
Where we you know, we we live in this culture, Kenney,
where everyone is being told to live by our emotions
and whatever you feel. If if you feel like a pony,
then we are just supposed to give.
Speaker 3 (15:54):
You hey, if you yeah.
Speaker 4 (15:57):
If we if you feel like maserati, we need to
be pumping, you know, pumping high grade unleaded into your mouth.
Speaker 3 (16:05):
You know what I mean.
Speaker 4 (16:05):
We we just have to treat you know, you're all
your feelings are valid. And maybe that's fine when it
comes to whether or not you eat hay or not
in your spare time, But but it's not right when
you're talking about about the criminal justice system. We can't
go on our feelings. Just because doctor feel feels like
you know, a killer has become a nice guy, doesn't matter.
(16:28):
We we we we do law, We do punishment based
on facts.
Speaker 5 (16:33):
And and and and and.
Speaker 4 (16:34):
As we allow our politicians, as we allow our judicial
system to get pulled, gets sucked into you know, you
know how loudly can people who feel bad about something
speak that that's what determines the course. At that point
you no longer have justice, you know, at some point
you know where we're we're we're running into this place
(16:55):
where you know, if when a person commits a crime,
the first call is not to being when they're arrested,
to a lawyer, but to a publicist and to a lobbyist.
And that's just not the way our system should work, Kenney.
Our system should not work that way.
Speaker 2 (17:09):
Boy, I think so too. I'm trying to find it now.
I stumbled across this video earlier. I'm actually kind of
glad I can't find it. Of this woman who is
a cat litter box in her house. She identifies as
a cat, and so she wants people that visit her
to use the cat litter box in her home. She's
got all these weird rules about it, and it's been
(17:30):
all over social media this week. I don't know why
I'm I guess it's kind of good that I can't
find it right now, because I really don't need to
look at this again. But strangely, Michael, I will tell
you this, But the weird thing about her and you, Oh,
here's the video. You and this woman get the same
number of votes, Michael. As disturbing as that is, but
that's the great thing about democracy.
Speaker 3 (17:48):
I require all my guests to use the bathroom in
a litter box.
Speaker 5 (17:51):
Hi.
Speaker 3 (17:51):
My name is Ivy Bloom and this is my indoor
potty area.
Speaker 4 (17:54):
I used to let my friends use the bathroom in
my garden, but I've since learned how unsanitary that is.
Speaker 3 (18:00):
Before entering the potty area.
Speaker 2 (18:01):
I require guests to put on these foot covers, and
first time was all required to read the rules.
Speaker 3 (18:06):
It is kind of weird to me, Michael.
Speaker 2 (18:08):
I can't tell if this is parody or satire or realistic,
because there are actually people that are like this.
Speaker 4 (18:16):
Listening that video has me both horrified and intrigued. I
think that the rest of my afternoon is going to
be consumed by looking forward looking for this. Don't This
is the most horrifying things, the most hilariously horrifying thing
I think I have heard today.
Speaker 6 (18:30):
And but yeah, I mean, this is crazy. It's crazy,
it's crazy, it's crazy. We used to take people, if
this person's serious, we used to take people like this,
and we used to pat them on the head, give
them bowls of jello and put them into a padded room.
And that is the appropriate place for them, not being
celebrated on TikTok.
Speaker 2 (18:46):
Well, speaking of catletter boxes, Colin Alrid, I don't know
if he uses one or not.
Speaker 3 (18:50):
I just felt like that was a good segue.
Speaker 2 (18:52):
Colin Alrid has been praised and endorsed by the news
editor of the San Francisco Gayt. He published an article
Kent Germans his name published an article here saying, you
know it's great about Colin Alred. He wants to be
Senator of Texas. He's running against Ted Cruz. And in
the article here they explain how the best thing for
Texas would be to elect Colin Alrid. Colin Alrid really
(19:15):
is California's Texas politician, isn't he.
Speaker 4 (19:19):
I'll tell you what, There is no better endorsement for
Ted Cruz than the San Francisco Gate endorsing Colin all Red.
If you if you want Texas to look like San Francisco,
if you think what we need are people defecating on
the sidewalks, If what you think we need are criminals
(19:41):
being allowed to h you know, to rob stores without
any consequence, then I guess Colin Alridd probably is your guy.
But for the rest of us, the San Francisco make
mix San Francisco Gate is making a very compelling argument
for Ted Cruse.
Speaker 2 (19:55):
Every Paul says that their neck and neck, and Colin
Alred is spending all this money on advertising, apparently ten
times the amount of advertising Ted Cruse is spending, which
tells me one of two things. One that Ted Cruse
doesn't have any resources I find that hard to believe.
Or two that behind closed doors, I don't really think
Ted Cruz is that nervous.
Speaker 3 (20:16):
What do you think, Ted Cruz?
Speaker 4 (20:20):
Every politician should run scared, because if they're not running scared,
they're losing. But just because you're running scared doesn't mean
you run stupid. And Ted Cruz seems to be running
a much more disciplined campaign than Colin all Red. Colin
Allred knows that he is running to be the California
Senator from Texas, and it takes a whole lot of
(20:42):
money to overcome that. You know, just look at what
happened in the debate where you know, he had a
commercial in which he claimed to want to protect women's sports,
but yet in the debate he kind of waffled back
to no, no, he's kind of okay with boys being
allowed in girl showers and playing on competing against girls
on teams. So you know, he's kind in many ways
(21:04):
debating against himself, and so his advertising campaign has to
be spent in a way to confuse Texans about who
the real call and already is. Fortunately, you know, bad
news for the broadcast TV industry, good news for kind
of the future of our republic. Most people don't want
to broadcast TV and so they're not seeing those ads,
(21:26):
and so therefore people are going to be voting based
on facts rather than calling all reds distortions.
Speaker 2 (21:30):
My brother, Michael quinn Sullivan is the website. Well, Texas
scorecard dot Com is the website. He's the guy that
runs it. If you're not on their email list, you
are wasting data. Go to Texas scorecard dot com today,
subscribe to the email. Get yourself some valuable information instead
of the garbage that they're spoon feeding you at the
Houston Chronicle. You could actually be more informed as a
(21:52):
Texas citizen and voter.
Speaker 3 (21:53):
Why not alone? This is Liam Neeson And when I'm
not repeatedly starring in the same movie as a love
father Hill bent on Revenge, I like this show. In
Pursuit of Happiness Radio a rat.
Speaker 2 (22:07):
A rat was found scurrying around inside of a Spirit airplane. Gross, right,
I know that's disgusting. What kind of rat would want
to be on a Spirit airplane?
Speaker 3 (22:17):
Yuck. Hi, I'm Kenny Webster. I got to get to
the airport in a little bit.
Speaker 2 (22:20):
I'm on my way to Colorado as soon as they
get off the air today, but don't worry. I'll be
back by Monday morning. Got to so much happening right
now here in America. News just broke. The Washington Post
for the first time since the nineteen eighties will not
endorse a candidate in the White House race. Kamala sucks
so bad even the Washington Post, an elitist liberal news rag,
(22:43):
will not endorse her. Kind of kind of amazing if you.
Speaker 3 (22:46):
Think about it. Why does she suck so bad?
Speaker 2 (22:50):
Well, probably because in the eleventh hour every single October
surprise they keep publishing to try to bash Trump is
actually making them look better. The Atlantic came out with
this article this week that says Trump is a rapist
and a racistem Like you guys have been telling us
that for ten years. Town Hall just published a report
(23:12):
on the aftermath of that article.
Speaker 3 (23:14):
How did that affect people?
Speaker 2 (23:16):
Did the Atlantic really just go there regarding black and
Latino voters supporting Trump? They've actually sunk to a new
low today. Liberals are very funny people. When things don't
go their way, they have a menu of talking points.
You're sexist, you're racist, you're uneducated. It's all bad for
democracy and institutional health, which is kind of rich coming
(23:38):
from a party that's weaponized the intelligence community and the
Department of Justice to go after the left's political enemies.
But that's besides the point. They really missed the mark here.
They were reviewing polling data on black and Latino voters
supporting Trump, and somebody at The Atlantic kind of said
the quiet part out loud.
Speaker 7 (23:57):
Sharpest divide in our politics today is education. It's whether
you have a college degree or not that is the
likeliest determined of whether you're going to vote Republican or Democratic.
And that's why we're seeing larger numbers and I met
some of them in Western Pennsylvania of Latinos and Black
voters who are moving towards Trumph.
Speaker 2 (24:18):
I get what you're saying. So Blacks and Latinos are dumb.
It sounds like you're saying they're dumb because when they
used to vote for Democrats. You didn't make the point that,
you know, these uneducated people vote for Democrats. You never
made that point. Shouldn't these people at MSNBC in the Atlantic.
That's a clip from MSNBC, by the way, but it's
one of the authors of the Atlantic.
Speaker 3 (24:40):
Shouldn't they be asking.
Speaker 2 (24:41):
Themselves what caused black and Latino voters to drift away
from the DNC after all these years. Maybe it could
be people like this guy, who think you have no
value or contribute nothing to society if you're not a
philosopher king like him. The irony is liberal voters aren't
even that they They have college education, sure, but they're
(25:01):
too obtuse to relate to normal people. They take the
most hyper left position on public policies, most common sense stances,
and then they wonder why it's not popular. If you
don't vote for us, you're a moron. It's quite the
salesman's pitch, isn't it, Fellas, Working class voters are tired
of being lectured. They're tired of being denigrated and dismissed
(25:23):
and mocked by snobby, rbit based elites kind of like
this guy. It's not that the Republicans have done a
better job of courting them. These people are voting for
Republicans simply because they've been pushed away from the Democrats.
That's all this is about. Look at the polling data today,
bright bart dot com reporting I'm the latest national elite.
Donald Trump's surging in a new poll. A lot of
(25:44):
new polls, but this one in particular is interesting. The
New York Times, in the Siena poll just released today,
says Donald Trump is two points ahead of Kamala.
Speaker 3 (25:55):
Oh that's a shame.
Speaker 2 (25:57):
A little over two weeks ago, the same pollsters showed
that he was losing by three points. Now he's ahead
by two. It's pretty big swing.
Speaker 3 (26:05):
Kids.
Speaker 2 (26:07):
That particular result is when the third party candidates are
included in the survey. By the way, when you take
Trump out of the survey, excuse me, when you take
the third party candidates out of the survey, it's actually tied.
So in the previous head to head pole, Trump was
again down three points, forty six to forty nine. So
again we have the three point swing in Trump's direction.
(26:28):
This is the final national poll of twenty twenty four
by the New York Times, and they think Trump's gonna win.
Equally important is what happened in the Real Clear Politics
average poll today. That's the poll of polls. They say
as of right now, that all important pole is tied
forty eight point five to forty eight point five.
Speaker 5 (26:47):
Wow.
Speaker 2 (26:48):
Now in the swing states, things are a little different.
A national poll didn't really mean anything. Odds are Trump's
going to get the red states, Kamala is going to
get the blue states. But when you look at those
swing states, boy, it looks like Trump's ahead in all
of them. Also of note in the New York Times
poll is that Trump ties Harris on favorability. Looks like
(27:10):
Kamala's closing argument, orange man Hitler not really helping her.
Trump's winning the national vote. That should send Democrats right
over the edge. It will be a beautiful thing to
witness these idiots burn down their own neighborhoods. You know
what I was wondering. If Kamala is the vice president,
isn't she tasked with certifying the election? That should be
(27:31):
fun to watch. How will she do that in a
rational manner? Considering what she's recently said. She's recently told
us Donald Trump is hitler, He's a sexual fiend, he's
a dev he's a misogynist, He's going to destroy democracy.
And she's expected to certify the election, which means either
one of two things are going to happen if Trump,
(27:53):
If and when Trump wins one, she's going to certify
the election and say nothing, which means she was lying.
Speaker 3 (27:58):
This whole time.
Speaker 2 (27:59):
She never really believed anything she said about Trump being
a threat to democracy. Or two, they'll go full insurrection
on us. It'll be January sixth, two point zero. Wouldn't
that be interesting? I find it hard to believe, But
you never know. The race is closer than close, and
the polling accuracy or lack thereof, could result in all
(28:20):
sorts of outcomes. But there are a few things we
know for sure. The Harris campaign is acting like a
losing campaign. They are dark and desperate. The Trump campaign
is acting like a winning campaign. They're behaving like happy warriors.
All the damaging leaks, second guessing the campaign strategy are
coming from the Harris campaign. The early vote looks good
five and six days in, when many expected things to
(28:41):
level off by now. And Trump has never ever really
polled well. He always seems to do better than the
polling data suggests, and right now they say he's winning.
Speaker 5 (28:49):
Now.
Speaker 7 (28:50):
I'm not a fan of the government doing anything.
Speaker 3 (28:53):
This is the pursuit of happiness. Radio on kprc Am
nine fifty.
Speaker 2 (29:02):
Breaking News. Did you guys hear about this? Joe Biden?
President Biden just announced he is on his way out
west as we speak. He's going to go deliver a
message to apologize for the policies that forced Native American
children into boarding schools, which began one hundred and fifty
years ago. Joe's expected to say he was young and
(29:25):
stupid and he never should have done it.
Speaker 3 (29:27):
Salds like from Texas Justice to me Lockert and now
live from the Border. It's bright Bart's Brandon Darby with
the cartel chronicles only on KPRC radio. It's true, he.
Speaker 2 (29:42):
Is the Darby who would be Brandon and he is
something of Are you an expert on indigenous people, Brandon
or did you just use to date one?
Speaker 5 (29:53):
I know a little bit about indigenous peoples. Depends on
what we're talking about.
Speaker 2 (29:57):
I know I wasn't gonna ask you this. But while
we're on the topic, why why now? Why is Joe
going out west right now to apologize to Indigenous people?
Speaker 3 (30:05):
Is is that.
Speaker 2 (30:06):
Suddenly they realize that's a bloater, a voter's block they
don't have secured for November?
Speaker 3 (30:11):
Like why why now?
Speaker 5 (30:13):
Well, it's very simple. So so when it comes to
when it comes to Kamala Harris, like, let's just just
be honest here, right, Like just be straightforward, straightforward. He
does so many things kind of like the transgender tax
funded transgender reassignment for prisoners. Right, so you have a
bunch of people, say murderers, and we're supposed to fund
(30:40):
them to get transitioned. Right Like, if I had life
in prison, I might even get transitioned if it then
I get to go to a women's.
Speaker 3 (30:47):
Prison, right yeah, different yeah right, yeah.
Speaker 5 (30:52):
So so she is so far left and she has
a very far left base. Now, what this administration is
trying to do is they're trying to do things that
appeal to the far left base that don't seem like
things that might upset everyone, like transgender surgeries or you know,
(31:16):
cutting off Israel or a number of the things that
the extreme left really wants to do. So they're trying
to make little overtures ahead of an election to the
far left base. I think that's why they would take
such action at this exact time.
Speaker 2 (31:35):
Yeah, it is interesting the time, I mean the timing.
There's so much news happening right before the election. They're
trying to cram as many October surprises under our nose
as we can, and they don't have anything new to
say about Trump, so One of the things that they're
telling you now is you know he was hitler.
Speaker 3 (31:51):
He helped Jeffrey Epstein rape people.
Speaker 2 (31:53):
And we just suddenly realized this two weeks before the election.
Oh and by the way, the woman accusing him just
happens to work for a Barack Obama political organization. But whatever,
what Republicans are doing it too. The House Judicial Panel,
a House panel just released this report. The House Judiciary
Committee released a sixteen page report yesterday evening revealing seven
(32:16):
hundred thousand migrants whatever you want to call them illegals,
have had their immigration cases dismissed, terminated, or administratively closed.
Apparently just recently, as we are grappling with an overwhelming
surge at the southern border end, they're calling this Biden
Harris's quiet amnesty.
Speaker 3 (32:35):
My question for you.
Speaker 2 (32:36):
Is, are you surprised by this? Are you surprised by
the timing of this, or did you already know about this?
Speaker 5 (32:44):
No. I listened to Tamala Harris and other Democrats where
they were competing for the nomination. Now, this time she
didn't compete for the nomination. Right, it was kind of
a back deal, a backdoor way that they got her
to be the candidate. But prior to that, when she
was competing against Joe Biden, she was very open about
(33:07):
what she wanted, and she said, we want to decriminalized
border entries, regardless of where they show up. We want
to provide free health care to everyone who shows up
at our border. She openly talked about this, and so
it is not surprising at all that Democrats are I
think that that is one of the ways that they
(33:27):
see a long term Let's put it this way. If everyone,
if the vast majority of the people who showed up
at our border were wearing red hats that said make
America great again, Democrats would not be allowing so many
millions of them to come into our country. Let's just
be honest about that. So I think that overall that
(33:49):
Democratic Party leadership, though they sell it to the average
Democrat by talking about humanitarian issues, they realized that if
they can continue to import millions upon millions of people
who will vote blue, that eventually the states that are
read will not be read any longer. And they know that,
(34:10):
and I think that's ultimately what the what the goal is,
let's talk about. I'm not surprised at all.
Speaker 2 (34:16):
Yeah, I mean I'm not surprised either, but it is interesting.
It's right before the election we get it a report
that it's even higher than what we thought it was, Like,
all right, well, yeah, of course it is. In the meantime,
you guys have two reports today that seemed to be
connected about the Mexican military clashing with cartel gunmen. In
one story, it appears to be about the golf cartel,
(34:36):
but apparently the Siniloa is getting in on this as well,
Is that right?
Speaker 5 (34:42):
Yeah? So, so remember each cartel have different factions. Some
factions of the golf cartel work with loseetta cdo. Some
factions are at war with them, right, So overall you
could say, like, hey, the the golf cartel is at
war with the set this. That's true that there's still
(35:02):
factions that work together as well, but who aren't at wark? Right?
So guys, I just I just want to remind everyone
that the United Nations see Mexico as a fragile state, right,
that is, that is one step above that's one step
(35:22):
above a sailed state. Okay, Mexico has more than half
of its thirty two states under the control of transnational
paramilitary criminal organizations. When Mexico. When the government in Mexico,
the central government wants to arrest someone, they cannot in
over half of their country. They cannot just go and
(35:44):
arrest them. They have to send in their marines, right
with military gear and equipment. They have to engage in
military bills, right, and in actual battles with rocket launchers,
and and you know they have they have their their
military's aircraft shot out of the sky. I mean, this
is more than half of Mexico. A lot of listeners go,
(36:08):
that's ridiculous. I went to Combo and it was fine, Okay, guys. Again,
over half of the Mexican states in Mexico are under
the control of transnational paramilitary groups, right, criminal organizations who
have armies and have heavy weaponry. And I think that
people forget that the central government in Mexico does not
(36:32):
have control over most of Mexico. And I think that
people forget that, and people should remember that.
Speaker 3 (36:40):
So is it getting better or worse?
Speaker 2 (36:42):
I mean, I guess we've been told over and over
again that they're trying to slow down the numbers at
the border right before the election, but it really doesn't
sound like it.
Speaker 5 (36:52):
I think they are trying to slow down the numbers.
But I think that there are so such overwhelming numbers
that it's overwhelming that fragile stakes a built to slow
it down. I can only imagine what it would be
if the Mexican government wasn't trying.
Speaker 2 (37:06):
And we always hear about caravans right before the election.
Now we're hearing about caravans again. They claim caravans are
racing here to try to make it before the election,
But that doesn't make any sense because even if that
was true, Trump still doesn't get sworn in until January.
So are those exaggerated news reports or are caravans actually
racing here in case Kamala loses.
Speaker 5 (37:27):
I think caravans are actually racing here in case Kamala loses.
Speaker 2 (37:31):
Yeah, okay, So, but why don't they get that he
doesn't get sworn in until next year?
Speaker 5 (37:37):
Probably not?
Speaker 3 (37:38):
Well, okay, all right.
Speaker 2 (37:41):
Ted Cruz is just did an interview with your news
outlet and basically talked about Colin Alrid's radical open border record.
I spoke about this earlier in the show I'm curious.
I noticed Ted Cruz is not spending as much money
on advertising this go around as his opponent. They say
Colin alreadys spent ten times as much on political ads
(38:02):
as Ted Cruz. Is that because Ted Cruise doesn't have
enough resources or do you think he just isn't as nervous.
He's seen the internal polling, he knows he's not.
Speaker 3 (38:10):
Going to lose.
Speaker 5 (38:12):
I think it's that he's not as nervous. I don't
think for one second that donors would would allow would
just sit idly by and not allow and allow a
blue senator to the in Texas. I think that it's
just he's not nervous. He's looking at internal polling and
(38:35):
he thinks he's okay, all right.
Speaker 2 (38:37):
Do you think that Usher is endorsing Kamala because there's
a video of him in the p did he tape
collection that he doesn't want being used against him?
Speaker 5 (38:47):
I doubt that. I doubt that. I think he's endorsing
Kamala because he's a liberal.
Speaker 2 (38:54):
But he said a month ago on the View he
wouldn't endorse her, and then p did, He got arrested,
he scrubbed his social media, and now he's out campaigning
for that does seem a little timely, you.
Speaker 5 (39:05):
Know, I think with a lot of these guys, like
if we're talking about try to say it nicely. I'm
not going to sessify anyone. But but with a lot
of these guys, I think that they have mental health issues.
And I think that when they say one thing one
month and they change completely, change to what they are
(39:26):
the next month. You know, we've seen this with others
who get born again and start doing gospel music and
then sixty days later they're praising Hitler and pography, letting
photos of letting yeah, and doing basic pornography, and you're like,
what's going on here? Like why are they doing this?
What kind of strategy is? It's not a strategy. They
(39:47):
have mental health issues. You know, they're crazy. Yeah, So
I don't Yeah, if I try to attribute, you know,
logical reasoning as to why did it start to make
me you wonder why? Right? But when I realized that
some things just aren't logical, some things don't have reason,
and sometimes it's just that people have mental health issues,
(40:10):
you know that that's kind of a I think, I say,
for bet when it comes to some of these guys.
I don't know about Usher's mental health, but it would
indicate to me that he probably has some mental health
issues if he's saying he's not going to endorse someone
in a month later he is, especially because of who
he's endorsing, makes me a question of mental health as well.
Speaker 2 (40:30):
All right, who you going to ask for Halloween this year?
Brandon Darby, Senior editor Breitbart.
Speaker 5 (40:35):
I'm actually going as you. I'm gonna dress up like you.
Speaker 3 (40:39):
Nice.
Speaker 5 (40:41):
Yeah, I'm gonna I'm gonna dress up.
Speaker 2 (40:42):
Like you as a handsome radio personality. I will go
as a handsome digital news editor of a popular right
wing news website. And Brandon Darby and I will just
probably just dress the way we always do. I'm Kenny Webster.
I always love talking to my buddy Brandon. At the
end of the week, I love you all as well.
I will be in Colorado this week, and if anybody's
at the Red Rock Amphitheater, come say hi.
Speaker 3 (41:02):
I'll let you buy me a beer.
Speaker 2 (41:04):
To the rest of you, drive safe and we'll be
back bright and early Monday morning for more of what
you bought a radio for.
Speaker 7 (41:15):
You are listening to the Pursuit of Happiness Radio. Tell
the government to kiss your ass when you listen to
this show.
Gi Ganic Government sucks. Sue of Happiness Radio is deluxe.
Liberty and Freedom will make you smile for Suit of
Happiness Us on your radio toil just as cheeseburgs lib
fries at the food.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
Off, Biden Nomics takes another one. Guys, TGI Fridays looks
like they're declaring bankruptcy. By this time next year, they'll
be known as TGI Spirit Halloween. Hi, I'm Kenny Webster.
It's Friday. I got a full house for you here
(00:36):
this afternoon. Michael quinn Sullivan stopping by from Texas Scorecard.
Brandon Darby is stopping by from Breitbart Texas. We're gonna
give you your weekend review. We're going down to the border.
We're gonna take a look at election polling data. We're
gonna figure out what the heck's gonna happen here in
the next couple of weeks. We'll get to all that
real soon, but before we do, can we talk about
where we've been over the past couple of weeks. Remember
(00:56):
that hurricane. You remember how that hurricane what was Halena
barreled through the Carolinas and did a bunch of damage. Well,
as it turns out it was liberal fear mongering that
did a fair share of damage as well. Reason dot
Com today reporting on a very bone chilling report North Carolinians, Carolinians,
people at North Carolina reeling from the aftermath of Hurricane Helen.
(01:20):
Suddenly here FEMA's in town. Federal Emergency Management Agency suddenly
ordered emergency workers to stand down and evacuate. What why, Well,
they said, you got to get out of Rutherford County.
There are reports of trucks of armed militias going out
and hunting FEMA.
Speaker 3 (01:40):
Who's saying this?
Speaker 2 (01:42):
The Washington Post, the most accurate newspaper in America. Here's
the problem. Turns out, it wasn't true. There's no militia
traveling around North Carolina or South Carolina, or Tennessee, or
Georgia or Florida for that matter, hunting down FEMA workers.
It just wasn't true. On October fourteenth, the Rutherford County
(02:04):
Sheriff's Office arrested one guy, one single guy, for making
a threat to a FEMA employee. Law enforcement concluded that
he had acted alone. There was no truckloads of militias.
Didn't matter. The Washington Post, the BBC, they heard right
wing extremists were out hunting for government workers that are
(02:28):
just trying to help people affected by the hurricane, and
it was too good to be true. Well, it turns out,
you know, as far as liberal news narratives go, it
was too good to be true because it wasn't true.
As it turns out, there's a gentleman there was. William
Jacob Parsons told the BBC he was not a member
(02:49):
of any militia. You didn't threaten any federal officials. He
was there to distribute supplies to hurricane victims. Feels like
every time America suffers a natural disaster, there's anxiety about
social collapse, mass violence. You could go to Twitter and
you could type hashtag hurricane loot crew and you'll see
(03:09):
videos of people looting. You'd think, oh, they're in Florida
looting right now. Turns out, more often than not, that
footage you find on social media, it's years old. The
media often runs with the most fantastical version of whatever
people are saying. Journalists here, reports of violence. They're all
over it. They love telling you about violence after Hurricane Katrina,
(03:33):
violence after Hurricane Harvey. More often than not, it's not
as bad as they make it sound if it's happening
at all. Now, these rumors themselves actually can do some
serious damage. Louisiana National Guard Major Ed Bush in two
thousand and five said FEMA would have been quicker if
they hadn't heard all the myths about shootings and rapes
and deaths and killings and bodies everywhere. Last week, relief
(03:58):
effort in Rother County was paused because of these threats
of a militia that weren't true. There was no militia
going around hurting people from FEMA. So, as it turns out,
stuff's become pretty common. Journalists reached out to the federal
government through a Freedom of Information Act request and obtained
(04:19):
an original email thread about the threat. Forest Service fighting
official Gordy Sachs wrote an email to other officials on
October twelfth saying Title ten troops had come across x
two trucks of our militia saying they were out hunting FEMA. So,
as it turns out, both federal troops and National Guards
(04:41):
under federal commander referred to as being Title ten orders,
the Forest Service scrambled to figure out what was happening.
Aren't you aware? Are we engaged, He asked in the email,
this is what I've heard. By that afternoon, federal officials
had already figured out it was just a story, But
unfortunately it took the media a little long to get
that update. Once again, a minor inconvenience, a rumor, some
(05:06):
misinformation vastly exaggerated by our liberal media, turned out to
be a much worse problem than what it was thanks
a lot media. As a gentleman representative, Chuck Edwards, Republican
in North Carolina, actually reached out, said two counties in
North Carolina were reporting different militias attacking and threatening FEMA.
(05:30):
Oh so a Republican got in on this too. On
the ground, the picture looked quite different. People mostly stepped
up to help each other, volunteer aid organizations out helping
each other out. Rather than terrifying plagues of misinformation affecting
the local people there who couldn't get access to the internet,
you just found local people helping each other out.
Speaker 3 (05:52):
Sadly, our national news.
Speaker 2 (05:54):
Media didn't take the same amount of time to actually
go look at what was happening there. Kind of reminds
you of well, so many news stories this year. You
really got to wonder with all the low information voters
out there, how many people go out and vote based
on misinformation they got weeks ago that's already been debunked.
(06:14):
How many people think Kyle Rittenhouse murdered a black person?
How many people think Jesse Smalley was a victim of
a hate crime? How many people think the Covington Catholic
school kids were harassing a Native American activist? And people
will vote using the smithsinformation. It almost makes you wonder
if people should be forced to take a quiz before
(06:35):
they go into a polling location.
Speaker 3 (06:37):
Well, the boy can dream? Can't he love America? The government?
Speaker 2 (06:43):
Listenlive, listen now to proceed a Happiness Radio. It's kind
of Websterginia producer Kenny. Isn't it fascinating how the judicial
system in America? Well, base changed the verdict of a
case if it will make fans of a popular podcast happy.
(07:06):
This has happened a few times recently. Right, I'll give
you an example. You remember that gentleman in I believe
it was South Carolina murdered his whole family. What was
his name, Murdaw? Was that the guy's name? The Murdow family.
Guy went to prison and there was a documentary about
it on Netflix. It was very popular. Most people only
(07:29):
care about that case because they saw a documentary on Netflix. Now,
granted he was probably guilty, probably was. There was another
documentary I believe it was called Making the Murderer. It
was about this guy in Wisconsin, the focus of a
Netflix documentary, who may or may not have committed murder,
and somebody made a documentary basically saying they thought he
(07:49):
was innocent. Woe and behold, there was this movement to
get him out of prison. There are more examples I
could give you, but I think the obvious one this
week would be the Menendez Brothers. I was a little
kid when this happened. It happened in the late eighties.
One of the first news stories I can remember dominating
TV headlines was the Menendez Brothers. Two wealthy young men,
the children of a wealthy man, murdered their parents. It
(08:13):
was claimed at the time that they were sexually molested
by dad and that that's what drove them to murder, right,
and that was never allowed to be mentioned during the trial.
You know, is just because you're a victim of abuse
doesn't mean you get to go murder someone. You're supposed
to go to law enforcement, and you know, there's an
order of things. We have a system in place already,
(08:34):
doesn't matter. Netflix makes a documentary about the Menendez brothers.
It says, these guys have basically been in prison now
for thirty thirty five years for murdering the guy that
molested them, and really making the whole new story even
more bizarre.
Speaker 3 (08:47):
Do you remember Minudo? Menudo was a pop group.
Speaker 2 (08:49):
It was a boy band, but they were Spanish, kind
of like new Kids on the Block, but with a
Hispanic twist. One of the kids in Menudo's all grown
up now he claims he was also molested by the
Menendez Now there's a new story here in Texas that
also kind of fits this example. I don't know if
there's a documentary about it, but there's probably a podcast.
Speaker 3 (09:09):
Robert Roberson.
Speaker 2 (09:11):
Is accused of what well people call it, the baby
shaking case. He's supposed to be executed, He was supposed
to go to death throw, but then in the eleventh hour,
a bunch of legislator, a bunch of Democrat lawmakers in
the state of Texas subpoena him. They say, you know what,
we need to talk to him. We need to bring
him before the capital to make a statement, so you
can't kill him yet.
Speaker 3 (09:31):
Ken Paxton doesn't like it. A lot of people don't
like it.
Speaker 2 (09:34):
There shouldn't be loopholes to get you out of being
executed if you're guilty. Michael Quinn Sullivan is here right
now from Texas scorecard dot com. Michael, if the general
public is angry enough about a case, even if the
person's obviously guilty, is that a good reason to let
that person off for the crimes they committed.
Speaker 4 (09:51):
No, I mean, look at me. We have rule of law,
not the whims of men. That's how our how our
system is supposed to be built. And that just because
someone yells the loudest doesn't.
Speaker 5 (10:04):
Mean they're right.
Speaker 4 (10:05):
And I think that when you're whether you look at
this Roberson case, whether you look at the Menindez case
from this week, or even go back a few years.
Speaker 5 (10:14):
There was this.
Speaker 4 (10:15):
Fellow who met a widow here in Texas's name was
a Bernie Titty, and it ended up being a movie
made about him by Richard link Letter.
Speaker 3 (10:25):
And oh he's.
Speaker 4 (10:25):
Innocent, he didn't kill the woman. Oh no, kind of
com meumber rule cause celeb and so they ordered him released,
ordered a new trial. He had originally been given fifty
years crime. After the new trial, he was given ninety
nine years because they found that, oh there's even more
stuff to convict him on related to this murder. So
(10:46):
you know, all these you know, it's very easy for
politicians and celebrities to get really hyped up on something
and create a loud noise. But a loud noise doesn't
make things right, doesn't. You know, you can't create innocence
out of guilt, and I think that's where we have
to really careful being sucked into these kind of you know,
(11:07):
celebrity causes. When the legislature met and had this you know,
one sided show trial kind of retrying of this of
this fellow Robert Roberson for murdering his daughter, you know,
they only brought in They brought in doctor Phil, a
guy who's not licensed to practice medicine. They brought in
John Grisham, a novelist whose last good novel was like,
(11:28):
you know, when you were in junior high. They bring
these kind of celebrities who are going to be talking about, oh,
he's innocent, he's innocent. You know, none of them did that, apparently,
look at the.
Speaker 3 (11:37):
Facts of the case.
Speaker 4 (11:37):
Ken Paxton put out the details, the medical examiner's reports,
stuff from the trial, all these kind of evidence. I mean,
you know, I've you know, back in the old days
as a crime reporter up through you know, middle life,
wat you of being involved in every things. I've seen
some really nasty stuff. I'll tell you this. This is
(11:58):
kind of near the top of nasty thing being done
to children. This guy took brack to his cellmate that
when he was mad at his girlfriend, he would take
it out on the little girl sexually. And she was
two years old when he killed her, and just for
purposes of everyone having a nice Friday, and all the
all the details of him pretty yeah, pretty awful stuff.
Speaker 5 (12:21):
You know.
Speaker 4 (12:21):
And and I think that this is weird, and none
of which was brought up before the Texas House, that
it's a bunch of death built. The advocates Democrats and
Republicans who are there, they don't want to say they're
against the death puilding, particularly the Republican side, because that's
not a popular stance. Instead, they're just trying to play this, uh,
this game of creating a sense of moral outrage rather
(12:43):
than a sense of a clear eyed, focus on the facts,
and they're creating a constitutional crisis out of it in
the same way the men Indez case. You know, it's
you know, I'm sorry that you're getting a lot of
phone calls, but releasing someone from jail should not be
dependent on how many you know, angry phone calls that
you get based on podcast listeners.
Speaker 3 (13:02):
Yeah, follow the law, boy, I think so too.
Speaker 2 (13:04):
I heard that yesterday the prosecutor that was dropping the
charges or he's he's going to let him out of jail,
he's going to ask a judge to reconsider the case
has made the point that one of the only reasons
that they want the Menendez brothers out of prison is
because they can't handle all the phone calls and emails
that they're getting from people.
Speaker 3 (13:20):
That watched a Netflix documentary.
Speaker 2 (13:22):
Now, getting back to the Robert Robertson thing, because I
agree with you on the point you just made. I
heard somebody compare the Robert Robertson case to the case
of Heyeseus Mora Flores. They said, all right, well wait
a second here, No, I'm sorry, not the Robert Robertson,
the Menendez case. They said, hey Zeus mora Flores. It
was this case twelve years ago in Texas where a
(13:42):
father stumbles across an illegal immigrant out in a barn
behind his house in Shiner, Texas. Do you remember this
case raping and molesting his daughter as a five year
old girl. The dad beats the illegal immigrant to death,
and no jury in Texas would have convicted this dad
for what he did. I heard somebody compare these two cases,
and it confused me because I thought, well, wait a second, here,
(14:06):
the dad in that very specific case caught the guy
red handed when he was you know, is in the
heat of the moment there he beat the guy to death. Okay,
you could say maybe he went too far with it,
But when the Menendez brothers murdered their father, it wasn't
while the abuse was happening, right, it was like after
the fact.
Speaker 3 (14:24):
I just feel like that's a where it's a gray area.
I get it.
Speaker 2 (14:27):
And even still, then the argument becomes, wasn't thirty five
years enough to murder the person that sexually assaulted you?
And I gotta be honest with you, Michael, I don't
know the answer to that question, but I feel like
the rule of laws should still apply here.
Speaker 4 (14:41):
Yeah, and look at. This is why it is so
important for us too, you know, the games that a
lot of folks are wanting to play about the judiciary
and about you know, kind of the about legal process,
you know. And I'm kind of hyperfixated on the ropes
and rovers and cases because those are the facts in
my head. But you know, you've had more than a
(15:02):
hundred appellate level and supreme level judges, that state and
federal Supreme Court at the federal level, UH, the UH
Court of Criminal Appeals which is our highest court for
for so for criminal matters in Texas, and all these
state and federal pellet judges in addition to a jury
of twelve in a real time that judge all having
(15:27):
you know, looked carefully at these facts, not you know,
not in the not in the not in the height
of emotion, but in the in the clear, clear eyed, dispassionate,
you know, looking at the law, looking at the facts.
Speaker 5 (15:40):
And I think that that's.
Speaker 4 (15:41):
Where we you know, we we live in this culture, Kenney,
where everyone is being told to live by our emotions
and whatever you feel. If if you feel like a pony,
then we are just supposed to give.
Speaker 3 (15:54):
You hey, if you yeah.
Speaker 4 (15:57):
If we if you feel like maserati, we need to
be pumping, you know, pumping high grade unleaded into your mouth.
Speaker 3 (16:05):
You know what I mean.
Speaker 4 (16:05):
We we just have to treat you know, you're all
your feelings are valid. And maybe that's fine when it
comes to whether or not you eat hay or not
in your spare time, But but it's not right when
you're talking about about the criminal justice system. We can't
go on our feelings. Just because doctor feel feels like
you know, a killer has become a nice guy, doesn't matter.
(16:28):
We we we we do law, We do punishment based
on facts.
Speaker 5 (16:33):
And and and and and.
Speaker 4 (16:34):
As we allow our politicians, as we allow our judicial
system to get pulled, gets sucked into you know, you
know how loudly can people who feel bad about something
speak that that's what determines the course. At that point
you no longer have justice, you know, at some point
you know where we're we're we're running into this place
(16:55):
where you know, if when a person commits a crime,
the first call is not to being when they're arrested,
to a lawyer, but to a publicist and to a lobbyist.
And that's just not the way our system should work, Kenney.
Our system should not work that way.
Speaker 2 (17:09):
Boy, I think so too. I'm trying to find it now.
I stumbled across this video earlier. I'm actually kind of
glad I can't find it. Of this woman who is
a cat litter box in her house. She identifies as
a cat, and so she wants people that visit her
to use the cat litter box in her home. She's
got all these weird rules about it, and it's been
(17:30):
all over social media this week. I don't know why
I'm I guess it's kind of good that I can't
find it right now, because I really don't need to
look at this again. But strangely, Michael, I will tell
you this, But the weird thing about her and you, Oh,
here's the video. You and this woman get the same
number of votes, Michael. As disturbing as that is, but
that's the great thing about democracy.
Speaker 3 (17:48):
I require all my guests to use the bathroom in
a litter box.
Speaker 5 (17:51):
Hi.
Speaker 3 (17:51):
My name is Ivy Bloom and this is my indoor
potty area.
Speaker 4 (17:54):
I used to let my friends use the bathroom in
my garden, but I've since learned how unsanitary that is.
Speaker 3 (18:00):
Before entering the potty area.
Speaker 2 (18:01):
I require guests to put on these foot covers, and
first time was all required to read the rules.
Speaker 3 (18:06):
It is kind of weird to me, Michael.
Speaker 2 (18:08):
I can't tell if this is parody or satire or realistic,
because there are actually people that are like this.
Speaker 4 (18:16):
Listening that video has me both horrified and intrigued. I
think that the rest of my afternoon is going to
be consumed by looking forward looking for this. Don't This
is the most horrifying things, the most hilariously horrifying thing
I think I have heard today.
Speaker 6 (18:30):
And but yeah, I mean, this is crazy. It's crazy,
it's crazy, it's crazy. We used to take people, if
this person's serious, we used to take people like this,
and we used to pat them on the head, give
them bowls of jello and put them into a padded room.
And that is the appropriate place for them, not being
celebrated on TikTok.
Speaker 2 (18:46):
Well, speaking of catletter boxes, Colin Alrid, I don't know
if he uses one or not.
Speaker 3 (18:50):
I just felt like that was a good segue.
Speaker 2 (18:52):
Colin Alrid has been praised and endorsed by the news
editor of the San Francisco Gayt. He published an article
Kent Germans his name published an article here saying, you
know it's great about Colin Alred. He wants to be
Senator of Texas. He's running against Ted Cruz. And in
the article here they explain how the best thing for
Texas would be to elect Colin Alrid. Colin Alrid really
(19:15):
is California's Texas politician, isn't he.
Speaker 4 (19:19):
I'll tell you what, There is no better endorsement for
Ted Cruz than the San Francisco Gate endorsing Colin all Red.
If you if you want Texas to look like San Francisco,
if you think what we need are people defecating on
the sidewalks, If what you think we need are criminals
(19:41):
being allowed to h you know, to rob stores without
any consequence, then I guess Colin Alridd probably is your guy.
But for the rest of us, the San Francisco make
mix San Francisco Gate is making a very compelling argument
for Ted Cruse.
Speaker 2 (19:55):
Every Paul says that their neck and neck, and Colin
Alred is spending all this money on advertising, apparently ten
times the amount of advertising Ted Cruse is spending, which
tells me one of two things. One that Ted Cruse
doesn't have any resources I find that hard to believe.
Or two that behind closed doors, I don't really think
Ted Cruz is that nervous.
Speaker 3 (20:16):
What do you think, Ted Cruz?
Speaker 4 (20:20):
Every politician should run scared, because if they're not running scared,
they're losing. But just because you're running scared doesn't mean
you run stupid. And Ted Cruz seems to be running
a much more disciplined campaign than Colin all Red. Colin
Allred knows that he is running to be the California
Senator from Texas, and it takes a whole lot of
(20:42):
money to overcome that. You know, just look at what
happened in the debate where you know, he had a
commercial in which he claimed to want to protect women's sports,
but yet in the debate he kind of waffled back
to no, no, he's kind of okay with boys being
allowed in girl showers and playing on competing against girls
on teams. So you know, he's kind in many ways
(21:04):
debating against himself, and so his advertising campaign has to
be spent in a way to confuse Texans about who
the real call and already is. Fortunately, you know, bad
news for the broadcast TV industry, good news for kind
of the future of our republic. Most people don't want
to broadcast TV and so they're not seeing those ads,
(21:26):
and so therefore people are going to be voting based
on facts rather than calling all reds distortions.
Speaker 2 (21:30):
My brother, Michael quinn Sullivan is the website. Well, Texas
scorecard dot Com is the website. He's the guy that
runs it. If you're not on their email list, you
are wasting data. Go to Texas scorecard dot com today,
subscribe to the email. Get yourself some valuable information instead
of the garbage that they're spoon feeding you at the
Houston Chronicle. You could actually be more informed as a
(21:52):
Texas citizen and voter.
Speaker 3 (21:53):
Why not alone? This is Liam Neeson And when I'm
not repeatedly starring in the same movie as a love
father Hill bent on Revenge, I like this show. In
Pursuit of Happiness Radio a rat.
Speaker 2 (22:07):
A rat was found scurrying around inside of a Spirit airplane. Gross, right,
I know that's disgusting. What kind of rat would want
to be on a Spirit airplane?
Speaker 3 (22:17):
Yuck. Hi, I'm Kenny Webster. I got to get to
the airport in a little bit.
Speaker 2 (22:20):
I'm on my way to Colorado as soon as they
get off the air today, but don't worry. I'll be
back by Monday morning. Got to so much happening right
now here in America. News just broke. The Washington Post
for the first time since the nineteen eighties will not
endorse a candidate in the White House race. Kamala sucks
so bad even the Washington Post, an elitist liberal news rag,
(22:43):
will not endorse her. Kind of kind of amazing if you.
Speaker 3 (22:46):
Think about it. Why does she suck so bad?
Speaker 2 (22:50):
Well, probably because in the eleventh hour every single October
surprise they keep publishing to try to bash Trump is
actually making them look better. The Atlantic came out with
this article this week that says Trump is a rapist
and a racistem Like you guys have been telling us
that for ten years. Town Hall just published a report
(23:12):
on the aftermath of that article.
Speaker 3 (23:14):
How did that affect people?
Speaker 2 (23:16):
Did the Atlantic really just go there regarding black and
Latino voters supporting Trump? They've actually sunk to a new
low today. Liberals are very funny people. When things don't
go their way, they have a menu of talking points.
You're sexist, you're racist, you're uneducated. It's all bad for
democracy and institutional health, which is kind of rich coming
(23:38):
from a party that's weaponized the intelligence community and the
Department of Justice to go after the left's political enemies.
But that's besides the point. They really missed the mark here.
They were reviewing polling data on black and Latino voters
supporting Trump, and somebody at The Atlantic kind of said
the quiet part out loud.
Speaker 7 (23:57):
Sharpest divide in our politics today is education. It's whether
you have a college degree or not that is the
likeliest determined of whether you're going to vote Republican or Democratic.
And that's why we're seeing larger numbers and I met
some of them in Western Pennsylvania of Latinos and Black
voters who are moving towards Trumph.
Speaker 2 (24:18):
I get what you're saying. So Blacks and Latinos are dumb.
It sounds like you're saying they're dumb because when they
used to vote for Democrats. You didn't make the point that,
you know, these uneducated people vote for Democrats. You never
made that point. Shouldn't these people at MSNBC in the Atlantic.
That's a clip from MSNBC, by the way, but it's
one of the authors of the Atlantic.
Speaker 3 (24:40):
Shouldn't they be asking.
Speaker 2 (24:41):
Themselves what caused black and Latino voters to drift away
from the DNC after all these years. Maybe it could
be people like this guy, who think you have no
value or contribute nothing to society if you're not a
philosopher king like him. The irony is liberal voters aren't
even that they They have college education, sure, but they're
(25:01):
too obtuse to relate to normal people. They take the
most hyper left position on public policies, most common sense stances,
and then they wonder why it's not popular. If you
don't vote for us, you're a moron. It's quite the
salesman's pitch, isn't it, Fellas, Working class voters are tired
of being lectured. They're tired of being denigrated and dismissed
(25:23):
and mocked by snobby, rbit based elites kind of like
this guy. It's not that the Republicans have done a
better job of courting them. These people are voting for
Republicans simply because they've been pushed away from the Democrats.
That's all this is about. Look at the polling data today,
bright bart dot com reporting I'm the latest national elite.
Donald Trump's surging in a new poll. A lot of
(25:44):
new polls, but this one in particular is interesting. The
New York Times, in the Siena poll just released today,
says Donald Trump is two points ahead of Kamala.
Speaker 3 (25:55):
Oh that's a shame.
Speaker 2 (25:57):
A little over two weeks ago, the same pollsters showed
that he was losing by three points. Now he's ahead
by two. It's pretty big swing.
Speaker 3 (26:05):
Kids.
Speaker 2 (26:07):
That particular result is when the third party candidates are
included in the survey. By the way, when you take
Trump out of the survey, excuse me, when you take
the third party candidates out of the survey, it's actually tied.
So in the previous head to head pole, Trump was
again down three points, forty six to forty nine. So
again we have the three point swing in Trump's direction.
(26:28):
This is the final national poll of twenty twenty four
by the New York Times, and they think Trump's gonna win.
Equally important is what happened in the Real Clear Politics
average poll today. That's the poll of polls. They say
as of right now, that all important pole is tied
forty eight point five to forty eight point five.
Speaker 5 (26:47):
Wow.
Speaker 2 (26:48):
Now in the swing states, things are a little different.
A national poll didn't really mean anything. Odds are Trump's
going to get the red states, Kamala is going to
get the blue states. But when you look at those
swing states, boy, it looks like Trump's ahead in all
of them. Also of note in the New York Times
poll is that Trump ties Harris on favorability. Looks like
(27:10):
Kamala's closing argument, orange man Hitler not really helping her.
Trump's winning the national vote. That should send Democrats right
over the edge. It will be a beautiful thing to
witness these idiots burn down their own neighborhoods. You know
what I was wondering. If Kamala is the vice president,
isn't she tasked with certifying the election? That should be
(27:31):
fun to watch. How will she do that in a
rational manner? Considering what she's recently said. She's recently told
us Donald Trump is hitler, He's a sexual fiend, he's
a dev he's a misogynist, He's going to destroy democracy.
And she's expected to certify the election, which means either
one of two things are going to happen if Trump,
(27:53):
If and when Trump wins one, she's going to certify
the election and say nothing, which means she was lying.
Speaker 3 (27:58):
This whole time.
Speaker 2 (27:59):
She never really believed anything she said about Trump being
a threat to democracy. Or two, they'll go full insurrection
on us. It'll be January sixth, two point zero. Wouldn't
that be interesting? I find it hard to believe, But
you never know. The race is closer than close, and
the polling accuracy or lack thereof, could result in all
(28:20):
sorts of outcomes. But there are a few things we
know for sure. The Harris campaign is acting like a
losing campaign. They are dark and desperate. The Trump campaign
is acting like a winning campaign. They're behaving like happy warriors.
All the damaging leaks, second guessing the campaign strategy are
coming from the Harris campaign. The early vote looks good
five and six days in, when many expected things to
(28:41):
level off by now. And Trump has never ever really
polled well. He always seems to do better than the
polling data suggests, and right now they say he's winning.
Speaker 5 (28:49):
Now.
Speaker 7 (28:50):
I'm not a fan of the government doing anything.
Speaker 3 (28:53):
This is the pursuit of happiness. Radio on kprc Am
nine fifty.
Speaker 2 (29:02):
Breaking News. Did you guys hear about this? Joe Biden?
President Biden just announced he is on his way out
west as we speak. He's going to go deliver a
message to apologize for the policies that forced Native American
children into boarding schools, which began one hundred and fifty
years ago. Joe's expected to say he was young and
(29:25):
stupid and he never should have done it.
Speaker 3 (29:27):
Salds like from Texas Justice to me Lockert and now
live from the Border. It's bright Bart's Brandon Darby with
the cartel chronicles only on KPRC radio. It's true, he.
Speaker 2 (29:42):
Is the Darby who would be Brandon and he is
something of Are you an expert on indigenous people, Brandon
or did you just use to date one?
Speaker 5 (29:53):
I know a little bit about indigenous peoples. Depends on
what we're talking about.
Speaker 2 (29:57):
I know I wasn't gonna ask you this. But while
we're on the topic, why why now? Why is Joe
going out west right now to apologize to Indigenous people?
Speaker 3 (30:05):
Is is that.
Speaker 2 (30:06):
Suddenly they realize that's a bloater, a voter's block they
don't have secured for November?
Speaker 3 (30:11):
Like why why now?
Speaker 5 (30:13):
Well, it's very simple. So so when it comes to
when it comes to Kamala Harris, like, let's just just
be honest here, right, Like just be straightforward, straightforward. He
does so many things kind of like the transgender tax
funded transgender reassignment for prisoners. Right, so you have a
bunch of people, say murderers, and we're supposed to fund
(30:40):
them to get transitioned. Right Like, if I had life
in prison, I might even get transitioned if it then
I get to go to a women's.
Speaker 3 (30:47):
Prison, right yeah, different yeah right, yeah.
Speaker 5 (30:52):
So so she is so far left and she has
a very far left base. Now, what this administration is
trying to do is they're trying to do things that
appeal to the far left base that don't seem like
things that might upset everyone, like transgender surgeries or you know,
(31:16):
cutting off Israel or a number of the things that
the extreme left really wants to do. So they're trying
to make little overtures ahead of an election to the
far left base. I think that's why they would take
such action at this exact time.
Speaker 2 (31:35):
Yeah, it is interesting the time, I mean the timing.
There's so much news happening right before the election. They're
trying to cram as many October surprises under our nose
as we can, and they don't have anything new to
say about Trump, so One of the things that they're
telling you now is you know he was hitler.
Speaker 3 (31:51):
He helped Jeffrey Epstein rape people.
Speaker 2 (31:53):
And we just suddenly realized this two weeks before the election.
Oh and by the way, the woman accusing him just
happens to work for a Barack Obama political organization. But whatever,
what Republicans are doing it too. The House Judicial Panel,
a House panel just released this report. The House Judiciary
Committee released a sixteen page report yesterday evening revealing seven
(32:16):
hundred thousand migrants whatever you want to call them illegals,
have had their immigration cases dismissed, terminated, or administratively closed.
Apparently just recently, as we are grappling with an overwhelming
surge at the southern border end, they're calling this Biden
Harris's quiet amnesty.
Speaker 3 (32:35):
My question for you.
Speaker 2 (32:36):
Is, are you surprised by this? Are you surprised by
the timing of this, or did you already know about this?
Speaker 5 (32:44):
No. I listened to Tamala Harris and other Democrats where
they were competing for the nomination. Now, this time she
didn't compete for the nomination. Right, it was kind of
a back deal, a backdoor way that they got her
to be the candidate. But prior to that, when she
was competing against Joe Biden, she was very open about
(33:07):
what she wanted, and she said, we want to decriminalized
border entries, regardless of where they show up. We want
to provide free health care to everyone who shows up
at our border. She openly talked about this, and so
it is not surprising at all that Democrats are I
think that that is one of the ways that they
(33:27):
see a long term Let's put it this way. If everyone,
if the vast majority of the people who showed up
at our border were wearing red hats that said make
America great again, Democrats would not be allowing so many
millions of them to come into our country. Let's just
be honest about that. So I think that overall that
(33:49):
Democratic Party leadership, though they sell it to the average
Democrat by talking about humanitarian issues, they realized that if
they can continue to import millions upon millions of people
who will vote blue, that eventually the states that are
read will not be read any longer. And they know that,
(34:10):
and I think that's ultimately what the what the goal is,
let's talk about. I'm not surprised at all.
Speaker 2 (34:16):
Yeah, I mean I'm not surprised either, but it is interesting.
It's right before the election we get it a report
that it's even higher than what we thought it was, Like,
all right, well, yeah, of course it is. In the meantime,
you guys have two reports today that seemed to be
connected about the Mexican military clashing with cartel gunmen. In
one story, it appears to be about the golf cartel,
(34:36):
but apparently the Siniloa is getting in on this as well,
Is that right?
Speaker 5 (34:42):
Yeah? So, so remember each cartel have different factions. Some
factions of the golf cartel work with loseetta cdo. Some
factions are at war with them, right, So overall you
could say, like, hey, the the golf cartel is at
war with the set this. That's true that there's still
(35:02):
factions that work together as well, but who aren't at wark? Right?
So guys, I just I just want to remind everyone
that the United Nations see Mexico as a fragile state, right,
that is, that is one step above that's one step
(35:22):
above a sailed state. Okay, Mexico has more than half
of its thirty two states under the control of transnational
paramilitary criminal organizations. When Mexico. When the government in Mexico,
the central government wants to arrest someone, they cannot in
over half of their country. They cannot just go and
(35:44):
arrest them. They have to send in their marines, right
with military gear and equipment. They have to engage in
military bills, right, and in actual battles with rocket launchers,
and and you know they have they have their their
military's aircraft shot out of the sky. I mean, this
is more than half of Mexico. A lot of listeners go,
(36:08):
that's ridiculous. I went to Combo and it was fine, Okay, guys. Again,
over half of the Mexican states in Mexico are under
the control of transnational paramilitary groups, right, criminal organizations who
have armies and have heavy weaponry. And I think that
people forget that the central government in Mexico does not
(36:32):
have control over most of Mexico. And I think that
people forget that, and people should remember that.
Speaker 3 (36:40):
So is it getting better or worse?
Speaker 2 (36:42):
I mean, I guess we've been told over and over
again that they're trying to slow down the numbers at
the border right before the election, but it really doesn't
sound like it.
Speaker 5 (36:52):
I think they are trying to slow down the numbers.
But I think that there are so such overwhelming numbers
that it's overwhelming that fragile stakes a built to slow
it down. I can only imagine what it would be
if the Mexican government wasn't trying.
Speaker 2 (37:06):
And we always hear about caravans right before the election.
Now we're hearing about caravans again. They claim caravans are
racing here to try to make it before the election,
But that doesn't make any sense because even if that
was true, Trump still doesn't get sworn in until January.
So are those exaggerated news reports or are caravans actually
racing here in case Kamala loses.
Speaker 5 (37:27):
I think caravans are actually racing here in case Kamala loses.
Speaker 2 (37:31):
Yeah, okay, So, but why don't they get that he
doesn't get sworn in until next year?
Speaker 5 (37:37):
Probably not?
Speaker 3 (37:38):
Well, okay, all right.
Speaker 2 (37:41):
Ted Cruz is just did an interview with your news
outlet and basically talked about Colin Alrid's radical open border record.
I spoke about this earlier in the show I'm curious.
I noticed Ted Cruz is not spending as much money
on advertising this go around as his opponent. They say
Colin alreadys spent ten times as much on political ads
(38:02):
as Ted Cruz. Is that because Ted Cruise doesn't have
enough resources or do you think he just isn't as nervous.
He's seen the internal polling, he knows he's not.
Speaker 3 (38:10):
Going to lose.
Speaker 5 (38:12):
I think it's that he's not as nervous. I don't
think for one second that donors would would allow would
just sit idly by and not allow and allow a
blue senator to the in Texas. I think that it's
just he's not nervous. He's looking at internal polling and
(38:35):
he thinks he's okay, all right.
Speaker 2 (38:37):
Do you think that Usher is endorsing Kamala because there's
a video of him in the p did he tape
collection that he doesn't want being used against him?
Speaker 5 (38:47):
I doubt that. I doubt that. I think he's endorsing
Kamala because he's a liberal.
Speaker 2 (38:54):
But he said a month ago on the View he
wouldn't endorse her, and then p did, He got arrested,
he scrubbed his social media, and now he's out campaigning
for that does seem a little timely, you.
Speaker 5 (39:05):
Know, I think with a lot of these guys, like
if we're talking about try to say it nicely. I'm
not going to sessify anyone. But but with a lot
of these guys, I think that they have mental health issues.
And I think that when they say one thing one
month and they change completely, change to what they are
(39:26):
the next month. You know, we've seen this with others
who get born again and start doing gospel music and
then sixty days later they're praising Hitler and pography, letting
photos of letting yeah, and doing basic pornography, and you're like,
what's going on here? Like why are they doing this?
What kind of strategy is? It's not a strategy. They
(39:47):
have mental health issues. You know, they're crazy. Yeah, So
I don't Yeah, if I try to attribute, you know,
logical reasoning as to why did it start to make
me you wonder why? Right? But when I realized that
some things just aren't logical, some things don't have reason,
and sometimes it's just that people have mental health issues,
(40:10):
you know that that's kind of a I think, I say,
for bet when it comes to some of these guys.
I don't know about Usher's mental health, but it would
indicate to me that he probably has some mental health
issues if he's saying he's not going to endorse someone
in a month later he is, especially because of who
he's endorsing, makes me a question of mental health as well.
Speaker 2 (40:30):
All right, who you going to ask for Halloween this year?
Brandon Darby, Senior editor Breitbart.
Speaker 5 (40:35):
I'm actually going as you. I'm gonna dress up like you.
Speaker 3 (40:39):
Nice.
Speaker 5 (40:41):
Yeah, I'm gonna I'm gonna dress up.
Speaker 2 (40:42):
Like you as a handsome radio personality. I will go
as a handsome digital news editor of a popular right
wing news website. And Brandon Darby and I will just
probably just dress the way we always do. I'm Kenny Webster.
I always love talking to my buddy Brandon. At the
end of the week, I love you all as well.
I will be in Colorado this week, and if anybody's
at the Red Rock Amphitheater, come say hi.
Speaker 3 (41:02):
I'll let you buy me a beer.
Speaker 2 (41:04):
To the rest of you, drive safe and we'll be
back bright and early Monday morning for more of what
you bought a radio for.
Speaker 7 (41:15):
You are listening to the Pursuit of Happiness Radio. Tell
the government to kiss your ass when you listen to
this show.
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.