Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Jack gannon government sucks. The suit of happiness. Radio is dus.
Liberty and freedom will make you smile of a suit
of happing and us on your radio toil justice. Cheeseburg
is a living arise at food.
Speaker 2 (00:27):
Really exciting news from Illinois. You remember a while back Illinois,
Illinois is so poorly managed.
Speaker 3 (00:34):
How poorly managed is it?
Speaker 4 (00:36):
Thank you very much?
Speaker 2 (00:37):
And visible voice in the back of the room, Illinois
is so poorly managed. A while back they were giving
out ioeu notes to lottery ticket winners. That's an actual
thing that happened. Well, a little bit's changed in Illinois
since then. Apparently Illinois is a million dollars richer. Well,
one Illinois woman, that is to say, is a million
dollars richer. She found a lottery ticket she forgot about
(01:00):
inner purse. Could you imagine you're rifling through your purse
and you find an old lottery ticket and you're like,
I wonder, I wonder, and you check, Wow, a million bucks.
It's pretty wild, right, And now Coamala Harris is checking
her purse to see if she has twenty million votes
in there somewhere. By the way, you're not supposed to
talk about this I'm live streaming right now, besides being
(01:21):
on the radio, on YouTube and Twitter and Facebook, book
face and all the different places. Will YouTube take down
this video if I say this out loud. We've counted
all the votes. Now, guys, we counted all the votes.
You can't make this argument anymore that we're not done
counting the votes anymore. Where did fifteen million voters go?
Speaker 4 (01:41):
They just didn't.
Speaker 2 (01:41):
You're telling me four years ago, fifteen million people, we're
more excited about jeriatric aging, frail. Joe Biden, who did
what five campaign rallies, never left his basement, didn't do
any interviews the week of the twenty twenty Democrat National Convention.
(02:01):
He did one interview with a woman who openly admits
that she went out and drugged men and robbed them. Yeah,
Cardi b That's what I'm talking about. You're telling me
that guy got fifteen million more votes than Where do
they go? We're not are we even allowed to? You know,
I know it's a it's a misinformation or whatever. YouTube
will label this video and tell you I ought not.
Speaker 4 (02:23):
To discuss that, But I'm not wrong.
Speaker 2 (02:25):
We at some point that's got to get addressed, right anyway,
That's not what I'm going to talk about today on
the show. But I know you know, you know that
I know that you know that, I know that they
know they know that we know that they know that
we know that they.
Speaker 4 (02:38):
Did something, and we're not supposed to talk about it.
So I'll leave it at that because I don't want
this video to get taken down.
Speaker 2 (02:44):
Although amazingly on the radio on KPRC nine to fifty
and of course ninety four five three HD, because we're
on FM as well, we are allowed to discuss this.
Speaker 4 (02:53):
Isn't it crazy?
Speaker 2 (02:54):
Every year they predict talk radio is going to die,
this will be the end of radio, and crardly enough,
our industry grows bigger every year, and every year the
cable news is slowly dying.
Speaker 4 (03:07):
The networks are actually dying.
Speaker 2 (03:09):
The very people of the predicted that we were gonna die,
they're the ones that are dying. Anyway, Again, that's not
what I'm here today to talk about. What is going
on on the show today, Well, Brandon Walton's is going
to be here from Texas scorecard dot Com and lots
of cool stuff happening in the state of Texas involving
Attorney General Ken Paxton and lots of horrible things happening
with Cornyn. Why does Cornyn get to talk John Cornyn?
(03:32):
John gun control Cornyn, the senator from the Republican Party
in Texas who gave us a gun control bill, worked
with Joe Biden to make it harder, more difficult to
purchase a gun, actually wants to be Senate Majority leader
right now. And maybe I'm being a little hyperbolic when
I say this, but I'm not being a lot hyperbolic
when I say that if John Cornyn becomes the Senate
(03:52):
Majority leader, basically, it takes a lot of our wins
from last week. Flush there those go up circle the
drain kids. Don't let that happen. Please, for the law
of God. I'm with Elon on this one. It's Rick
Scott or Buss. That other guy, John Thune, he sucks too,
doesn't Isn't John not Cornyn?
Speaker 4 (04:09):
But Thun? The other guy? Isn't his daughter a never
Trump liberal?
Speaker 2 (04:15):
So why do we need you? What do we need
John Thorn? Thun and form by the way, Cornyn and Thoon?
What do we need both of those guys for?
Speaker 5 (04:21):
You?
Speaker 2 (04:21):
Wonder if they split the vote enough? It's two neo
con rhinos. Do they split the vote enough the secret vote?
That doesn't this piss you off? Republicans are gonna get together.
They're gonna have a secret vote. The senators are like
they put on robes and whether they sacrifice a goat,
they go down into the chambers of the temple where
they're What the hell kind of Masonic bs is that?
Speaker 4 (04:43):
Why do they still get to have secret votes? What
do we need? No again, that is a recipe.
Speaker 2 (04:50):
For cronyism, secret votes to determine who the next Senate
majority leader is. I can you could tell him a
little salty today, just a little But anyway, I'm fine,
you're fine.
Speaker 4 (05:00):
We're all here.
Speaker 2 (05:00):
It's good to be here today. But Brandon Waltons will
be here to stick around for that. He's here at
the bottom of the hour. But I guess we'll start
off with this big announcements today got incoming early reports.
You know it's there's really nothing's really a secret in Washington, DC.
Even that Pentagon leaker guy is about to get sentenced
to prison, so everybody knows who Trump's cabinet picks are
(05:22):
about to become. And apparently I gotta tell you I
think this is great. Borders Are. I don't know if
I love the title, but I'm glad that Tom Holman
is one of the first picks for my man, Donald Trump.
You guys remember who he is. I'm sure most people know.
He was in charge of ICE. Now he's going to
be borders Are whatever that means, in charge of the
(05:44):
border patrolly an Ice. I don't know that's just what
they're calling him, but at any rate, here he is,
back at twenty nineteen making an interesting point. If liberal
Democrats don't like these immigration laws, well, when we got
to ask, why did you create him? Is that we're
just not The computer's just not going to work today.
As Oh, I'm sorry, I'm on the wrong channel here.
(06:04):
Sorry about that. I am board opping and I am
hosting my own radio show now, so let me get
a mull again on that.
Speaker 4 (06:10):
Here's Tom Home.
Speaker 6 (06:10):
People in Congress that call for the polishment of ICE
because they don't like what ICE does.
Speaker 3 (06:14):
Ice is merely enforcing laws. You an act. If you
don't like it, change the law. You're the legislator.
Speaker 6 (06:19):
But don't vilify the men and women of ICE in
the bor patrol. Nancy Post said yesterday president not above
the law. But she thinks illegal aliens who have a
final order issued by federal judges above the law, because
when a president announced the national operation to seek those
out who had due process and been order removed, she
thought that was a terrible thing to do. She went
on national TV and talked about how they evade ice officers, how.
Speaker 3 (06:41):
To not open the doors.
Speaker 6 (06:43):
So apparently they're above the law because when a federal
judge issues a final order after a due process.
Speaker 3 (06:50):
It means nothing.
Speaker 4 (06:51):
Huh, he's right, I mean, he's right about that.
Speaker 6 (06:56):
You got Costio Cortes who caught our places concentration camps. Yeah,
you got Congressman Yvett Clark stood in front of an
ice building New York City and call us like gestopel.
You got Congressman Escobar, whose name Plague is over there,
but she's not here. She had a press the other
day two weeks ago she compared ice stations to monsters
under children's beds.
Speaker 4 (07:16):
Hmm, you get his point here. I don't want to
waste all my time on Tom Holman, but he's right.
Speaker 2 (07:23):
He's absolutely correct about all of this. I think he
makes some perfectly worded points there. Very excited about that.
We don't have time to play this whole clip. But
remember the speaking of occasionally cortex. Here's AOC. You guys,
remember this classic moment where AOC was trying to dunk
on Tom and boy did he give her the once
around after Holman.
Speaker 7 (07:40):
Your name is on this is this correct?
Speaker 3 (07:43):
Yes?
Speaker 7 (07:43):
I signed that memo, So you are the author of
the family separation polomy.
Speaker 3 (07:47):
I'm not the author of this memo.
Speaker 7 (07:48):
You're not the author, but you signed the memo.
Speaker 3 (07:51):
Yes, a zero tolerance memo.
Speaker 7 (07:54):
So you provided the official recommendation to Secretary Nielsen on
family the United States to pursue family separation.
Speaker 8 (08:02):
I gave Secretary Nielsen numerous recommendations on how to secure
the border and save lives.
Speaker 7 (08:07):
But it says here that you gave her numerous options.
But the recommendation with option three family separation.
Speaker 8 (08:13):
What I'm saying this is not the only paper where
we given the Secretary numerous options to secure the border
and saved lives.
Speaker 7 (08:21):
And so the recommendation of the many that you recommended,
you recommended family separation.
Speaker 3 (08:26):
I recommend to zero tolerance.
Speaker 7 (08:28):
Which includes family separation.
Speaker 8 (08:31):
The same as this wherever US citizen parent gets arrested
when there with a.
Speaker 7 (08:34):
Child right, Zero tolerance was interpreted as the policy that
separated children from there.
Speaker 8 (08:43):
If I get arrested for GUI and I have young
child in a car, I won't be separated. When I
also police officer in New York and I arrested a
father for domestic violence, I separate that mister with all
due respect.
Speaker 7 (08:55):
Legal assils are not charged with any crime.
Speaker 3 (08:58):
Wait for it when you're in the country.
Speaker 8 (09:00):
I llegalis violation eight United States Code thirteen twenty five.
Speaker 7 (09:04):
Sea King asylum is legal.
Speaker 3 (09:06):
Do you want seek a sim to go through the
port of entry? Do it the legal way. The Attorney
General the United States have made that clear.
Speaker 2 (09:12):
Okay, now, okay, okay, Well I guess I'm wrong then whoopsie,
do he's right? You know what's interesting about this, Tom
Homan is such a great example of why Trump won.
Right they say, all these blue collar working class people white, black, brown,
whatever color, Asian and Native Americans are supposed to be.
You're not supposed to say that out loud for some reason.
(09:34):
Do you think they look at AOC and Tom Homan
as blue collar workers? Is working class? Who do you
think they relate with more who do you think they
were the person that went to an expensive private university,
grew up on a country club, or and pretends to
be Jenny from the Block or Tom Holman.
Speaker 4 (09:51):
I think the answer is probably pretty obvious.
Speaker 9 (09:55):
Kenny Webster's pursuit of happiness, where we certainly realize we're
a heart attack away from President Kamala.
Speaker 4 (10:01):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (10:07):
A painting a painting made by a humanoid robot, auctioned
off for one million dollars.
Speaker 4 (10:13):
The artist's name is C three Picasso. That is.
Speaker 2 (10:16):
I am not proud of that joke. I'm actually very
ashamed to have made that joke. But I guess there's
robot music playing in the background, so it's appropriate.
Speaker 4 (10:23):
That was a terrible joke, wasn't it.
Speaker 2 (10:25):
Speaking of bad jokes, a vet surgically removed a tumor
from a family's pet goldfish. In other words, a vet
returned a different pet goldfish to the family. How would
they know it's a goldfish. You don't need to save
goldfish's lives, and bless your hard kid, it's your goldfish
is dead.
Speaker 4 (10:41):
I'm sorry about that. It doesn't matter.
Speaker 2 (10:43):
Anyway, if you're just turning on your radio or you're
just getting connected to this video those of you watching
us on social media. We've been talking about some of
Donald Trump's picks here. He picked Tom Homan to be
the Borders are and I don't even know if that's
just I'm still not sure if that's the nickname or
if that's going to be the real title of this job.
But I do know he's the right guy for it,
whatever the job is called. I don't know what my
(11:04):
job title is. But who else would you want to
have sitting in this chair now? Tom Holman is telling
Sanctuary City mayors, we are coming for you, beautiful. I mean,
it is absolutely perfect timing for that. Now, as you know,
ICE the Border Patrol, that's not its own department in
the government, that's part of the Department of Homeland Security.
Who is going to pick the Department of Homeland Security, Well,
(11:24):
apparently it is National hottie and dog murderer Christin nom
Christine home Is. You will say what you will about
Christy Noma. What was that dog's name? What was the
dog's name that she killed? It was like Cricket or
something like that. If that's if she's going to have
that can do killer attitude as she approaches our national security.
I guess that's okay, right. She is beautiful. Christy home
(11:47):
does prove a point I've made many times about beautiful
women deep down inside who deep down inside. A lot
of them are very deep down inside. A lot of
them have a killer instinct. That's probably the best way
to politely explain it to you. Speaking of AOC, most
of us agree AOC is she's not an ugly woman.
There's a reason she's famous. It's not because she's smart.
(12:07):
You might say it's because of her huge naturals. You
probably wouldn't be wrong about that. AOC is all over
this thing with Tom Holman. She hates that he got
put in charge of the Whatever the borders are is
exactly hearing.
Speaker 7 (12:18):
A lot from undocumented people, and importantly families of undocumented
people who do vote. Y.
Speaker 4 (12:28):
Wait wait wait wait wait wait wait abayupup did she
just say she know it? Undocumented? Is her? That's liberal
talk for illegal immigrants.
Speaker 2 (12:37):
Wait, they're voting. AOC is admitting that they're voting. Well, no,
the brothers here legally, but the sisters not. So the
brother can vote, the sister can't vote. It's like, hang
on a second, here, is a house full of criminals,
and one of them somehow got voting rights.
Speaker 4 (12:50):
I think what that actually.
Speaker 2 (12:51):
Proves is that there is a legal loophole that's being
exploited so that some of these people being imported into
our country from third world crap holes. And by the way,
it's often not Mexico, despite the fact that they keep
saying Mexico, these people are voting. AOC just admitted it
to us, didn't she. This is not her only video
today that's getting attention. A lot of people have noticed,
(13:12):
Oh that's the wrong video. Hang on, I got Megan
the Stallion. I'm jumping ahead here, AOC, there's another video.
I guess I forgot to put it on the screen
here in my studio. She wants to know who the
Trump supporters that follow her on social media, and I'm
sure there's a few. What podcasts are you listening to?
What blogs do you like? That's what she wants. She
wants you to tell her she doing an online poll.
(13:33):
We are you a little suspicious of that? Like if
a communist comes to you and asks you to make
a list of your favorite conservative thought leaders and podcasts
and that sort of thing. This is exactly like at
twenty sixteen when Trump supporters starting getting phone calls from
polsters and they were suspicious of the person calling them,
so they intentionally gave them the wrong information.
Speaker 4 (13:54):
Please lie to AOC.
Speaker 2 (13:56):
Tell her your favorite pro Trump podcast is the call
her Dad. Podcasts don't give her the correct information. For
the love of God. Another I'm not gonna spend a
lot of time on this today because it's all speculation.
But who will Ron DeSantis pick to replace Marco Rubio?
If Marco Rubio becomes Secretary of State? I don't have
a problem with him being secretary of State. He's not
my favorite Republican, I don't I'm certainly not on the
(14:19):
same side of the party that he's on. But he know,
he's kind of a milk toast guy, and for diplomacy,
he's very hawkish on Israel, but the entire Trump administration
is going to be If you don't like that, you
know you should have voted for a different candidate in
the primaries.
Speaker 4 (14:33):
I don't know what to tell you.
Speaker 2 (14:34):
But for the most part, I think that Rubio probably
would be good at diplomacy, and he hates Cuba, so
anyone that hates communism I'm okay if they work at
the State Department for now, you know what, I will
choose to change my mind about that later depending on
how he does. Because you know, our current guy, any
Anthony Blincoln is at AA. Say his name, it's not Anthony,
it's Antony. Did you know he has millions of dollars like,
(14:58):
like beyond just a million dollars, apparently he has seven
or eight It's a seven or eight figure sum of
money invested in the military industrial complex.
Speaker 4 (15:06):
And it's his job to have.
Speaker 2 (15:09):
Conversations with foreign leaders in order to prevent war, which
means if the current guy in charge of diplomacy for
the United States fails at his job.
Speaker 4 (15:20):
He makes millions of dollars. That's insane, that's crazy.
Speaker 2 (15:25):
Name another person on earth who could fail at their
job and become filthy rich because of it.
Speaker 4 (15:30):
Well, I can immediately think.
Speaker 2 (15:32):
Of one person. Let me jump ahead here a little bit. Ah,
here we go. Here's what I wanted to put up
on the screen. Here, this is well, this is the
video I wanted to talk about. This woman right here
for those of you watching me on social media, this
is Megan thee Stallion.
Speaker 4 (15:45):
Can we play a little bit of this.
Speaker 2 (15:49):
Hey, do you guys remember seeing this video? It's a
woman with a yeast infection who washes her panties in
a gas station bathroom with a bunch of strippers. Weirdly,
Middle America did not relate with this. With a bunch
of tramps and strippers and prostitutes dancing around on stage
at a Kamala Harris rally wearing mini skirts, towerking around,
(16:14):
they did not.
Speaker 4 (16:14):
This did not work for Kamala. But what did it
cost her?
Speaker 2 (16:19):
To those of you that already know the answer, don't
answer in the comment section. If you're watching me streaming
on social media? What did this cost Kamala Harris? I
will tell you right now. What would you think she
would pay for this? A few thousand dollars? What would
you pay to have Megan the Stallion, the rapper who
the woman who wrote wet ass p word I'll just
say wet ass pussy, that's the name of the song.
What would you pay Megan the Stallion to perform at
(16:40):
your political rally?
Speaker 4 (16:44):
Five million dollars?
Speaker 2 (16:46):
They gave this woman five million dollars, which is starting
to answer a question we've been asking here for the
last couple of days.
Speaker 4 (16:54):
Who.
Speaker 2 (16:54):
I don't know that has there ever been a presidential
campaign that had a million dollars? Sorry, got that wrong.
Said it's not million with an M, it's a billion
with a B. Kamala Harris had a billion dollars. She
flushed down, I mean she lost. So from over a
billion dollars in funds to twenty million dollars in debt.
Speaker 4 (17:15):
Twenty million dollars in debt? Where did the money go? Look?
Speaker 2 (17:19):
It would be very easy for me as a man
right now to make a joke about how women can't
handle money or finances. And no mail candidate would have
pissed away a billion dollars guys, one hundred and sixty
seven days.
Speaker 4 (17:32):
She wasn't even the candidate for that long, one hundred
and sixty seven days. That's that's a few months.
Speaker 2 (17:38):
A billion dollar, A billion dollars got to here, a
billion dollars. You spent a billion dollars in a few
months and you lost. You hear that tiny little violin?
Hang on, I got to make the violin smaller. It's
really small. Well where did the money go? Well, five
million of it went to this chick. Apparently they know
(17:59):
owe money. Okay, So the big rumor is that they
gave money to Oprah, which is actually not a rumor. Here,
let me get that on the screen for everybody. A
member of the paparazzi approached Oprah yesterday in the hills
of California somewhere. Apparently she drives herself around. There's so
much about this video. I don't understand. She drives herself
(18:20):
around California so she can work out.
Speaker 4 (18:23):
She doesn't go to a gym, she doesn't. I'm very
suspicious of this whole thing. But hey, for good morning,
how are you darling walking down the street? Good? How
do you think the election went? Doesn't look good? It
looks sweaty and old.
Speaker 2 (18:35):
Oh is it true that they paid you a million
dollars for the endorsement for Kamala?
Speaker 4 (18:38):
That is true?
Speaker 7 (18:39):
True?
Speaker 1 (18:40):
Not true?
Speaker 4 (18:40):
That's true, not true. What do you think about all
the celebrities with their mass exodus?
Speaker 2 (18:45):
All right, let's pause right here. The mass exodus is
the celebrities claiming to leave America.
Speaker 4 (18:48):
They're not leaving America. Did they leave last time? No,
they're not leaving. Okay. Oprah says she didn't get any
million dollars. She didn't get a million dollars.
Speaker 2 (18:56):
Technically, you could argue that's true because she didn't get it.
Harp Op Productions got it two different payments of a
half a million dollars.
Speaker 4 (19:03):
You know what this probably is? Okay, Alberta don't.
Speaker 2 (19:06):
Need a half a million dollars to you and I,
there'd be a lot of money, right. I have a
pretty good job here. I probably get paid more than
I should. She gets paid way more than she should,
So she didn't really need a half a million dollars.
Why'd they give her a half a million dollars twice?
You know a million do five hundred thousand dollars? Two
installments of it? Probably travel expenses, So better question would
(19:26):
be why does it cost so much money for Oprah
to travel around? How much fuel goes into this climate
change activist private jet for her to fly domestically?
Speaker 4 (19:38):
Are you kidding? No, that's true?
Speaker 2 (19:40):
Actually yeah, climate change activists don't believe any of the
snot that they're showing at it, then none of it.
Speaker 4 (19:45):
Right.
Speaker 2 (19:45):
There's a report out today claiming the British government had
one hundred and three different weather stations that don't exist
that they were cherry picking data from.
Speaker 4 (19:55):
They had fake weather stations.
Speaker 2 (19:57):
Around the country, around the world giving them weather related
data they were using to form their argument that your
Ford f one point fifty is causing hurricanes. And it
turned out the weather stations weren't even real They lied
about it, So you know, I got them getting off
the topic here. But Oprah Obrah did get paid an
awful lot of money to be a climate change activist
and she failed at it.
Speaker 4 (20:18):
Or did she? She got the money.
Speaker 9 (20:20):
They see whenever you lose sight of the enemy, look
behind you. Yeah, that's a bad paranoia right there. Probably
brought on by a bong ripper too, Kenney Webster's pursuit
of happiness.
Speaker 4 (20:32):
This is interesting.
Speaker 3 (20:34):
Cuba.
Speaker 2 (20:35):
Cuba got hit by a giant earthquake in the wake
of multiple hurricanes. Apparently the island descended into darkness and
chaos and lawlessness. No word on any of the effects
from the earthquakes of the hurricanes yet we do not know. Meanwhile,
we got problems of our own here in the United States.
I don't know if you've heard yet, but election night
coverage looking back wasn't great for the liberals this year.
(20:58):
Apparently the ratings for legacy media abysmal. Earlier today, I
heard a media analyst tell me he thinks that Comcast,
the company that owns MSNBC, will ultimately sell it. It's
not profitable for them. Legacy media is dying. I think
we all know that people aren't really getting their news
from them anymore. Look, I work in broadcasting, you know that.
(21:22):
Interestingly enough, talk radio seems to be one of the
exceptions to this rule. The future of news does not
belong to the cable news networks, does not belong to NBCCBS, ABC,
probably not even Fox News. There's a reason why on
election night, Fox didn't want you to know that Trump
was winning until it was really obvious, because if you knew,
(21:44):
you'd turn the TV off and go to bed. They
want you to stay awake till one in the morning.
They want you to sit on the edge of your
seat so you could see commercials for Ford trucks and
tampons and whatever else. There's a rare moment right now,
you're listening to the radio and someone's telling you, actually,
sometimes news coverage on for profit broadcast companies not the best.
(22:04):
Of course, I'm not a journalist. I give commentary for
a reason. You know, usually you got a lot of
you get your news from Twitter and then you come
here to hear what we think about it.
Speaker 4 (22:13):
Thank you for that.
Speaker 2 (22:14):
By the way, Obviously we have great news at the
top and bottom of the hour, and I don't mean
to attack Fox.
Speaker 4 (22:18):
We partner with them.
Speaker 2 (22:19):
They their coverage is a lot better than MSNBC or
CNN or any of those other guys. Person on hold
right now, My buddy Brandon Walton's we were just talking
off air. He's a journalist at Texas scorecard dot com,
technically a nonprofit journalism news outlet.
Speaker 4 (22:34):
They do amazing work.
Speaker 2 (22:36):
He was just telling me off the air he was
watching MSNBC's on their coverage of election Night is on
YouTube right now, and it's the full night, isn't it, Brandon?
Speaker 4 (22:46):
Like a week out? It's a week later.
Speaker 5 (22:48):
Yeah, someone uploaded I saw It's got like they cut
out all the commercials. I think it's the whole night.
Speaker 2 (22:55):
If you fast forward to the point of the night
where it looked like it was obvious that Trump was
a win. They don't really show you the pundits at
the program director, the director whoever's running the newsroom there.
They're mostly just showing you a guy standing in front
of a map telling you things that would have already
been obvious, like oh, look, Kamala one Chicago.
Speaker 4 (23:15):
Who saw that coming?
Speaker 3 (23:16):
Right?
Speaker 2 (23:17):
Do you see what I'm talking about here? Is it
on your screen right now? Or were you just watching it?
Speaker 5 (23:21):
Yeah? No, I totally totally do because you know, as
you're watching this literally, I mean last week, you know,
I'm keeping an eye on a few different table stations
and just seeing what they have to say. But all
of the major calls, everything was on Twitter on X
way before any of the networks, and not just because
people were jumping the gun or being irresponsible, but because
(23:43):
literally it was very obvious and that's what the facts
were playing out.
Speaker 2 (23:47):
Yeah, and of course you know Fox News fine there,
it's still a business election night.
Speaker 4 (23:53):
We weren't doing.
Speaker 2 (23:53):
That over here on KTRH or kprc R sister station
here in Houston. We were just reporting it because you know,
we don't really have an agenda. But oddly enough, talk radio,
which they've predicted our demise so many times, we still exist.
Our industry seems to grow every year as their shrink.
Same thing with news bloggers. We were all told, oh,
(24:13):
the era of blogging is over. But Texas scorecard. You
guys are as big as ever, aren't you.
Speaker 5 (24:21):
Absolutely, And it's because people are frustrated right with the
legacy media ignoring these things. I mean literally, I'll give
you an example. How much did we hear about how
close the Ted Cruz was race even on election night? Yeah,
you know, they even took their sweet time trying to
call that to keep people kind of roped into taking
Colin all Right had a chance. And you know, we
(24:42):
looked immediately at the counties and saw even in Harris
County and Tarrant County urban counties where Cruise is way
out performing where he was in twenty eighteen. And it
was obvious after like thirty minutes, like, okay, Ted Cruise
is going to win.
Speaker 2 (24:56):
Yeah, it was pretty clear that he was right. And
not by a little bit either. It was about nine
points I think, I mean practically double digit digits. He
had a million more voters than Colin Alred did, and
Colin alreddy outspent him by ten times. But anyway, we
got new problems in the Senate now. In fact, there
is word that John Cornyn, they want John Cornyn to
(25:18):
be the Senate majority leader. If we put that Rhino
snake gun control liberal neo con Shill in front of
the in charge of the Senate right now, wouldn't that
basically flush away everything that we did last week right
down the toilet.
Speaker 5 (25:35):
Well, a lot of people are saying that. I mean,
you've got actually the county gops in Dallas and Tarantt
County passing resolutions or signing statement saying please know John
Cornan as Senate majority leader. Right now, you've got three candidates,
So you've got John Thune, John Cornyn, and of course
Rick Scott. Rick Scott seems to be who most of
the conservative voices are saying they'd like to see in
(25:57):
the position, but you won't know. And you know, this
is the frustrating part, and this is you know, one
of the things that are so broken about Washington is
that they're going to have this vote tomorrow and it's
going to be a secret ballot, so you know, nobody,
nobody's going to be able to be held accountable. I mean,
we kind of had guesses as to who is with
(26:18):
what candidates. Some people have endorsed, most haven't, And you know,
I think that it's a real shame. I don't know
how the vote's going to turn out tomorrow. But I
think this kind of behavior is very much at odds
with what people voted for last Tuesday.
Speaker 2 (26:35):
Why is this Look, you covered Texas legislature. You know
more about it than probably anyone I know, Brandon, You
and Michael quinn Sullivan. What good is this secret ballot
doing for average people like me? What do I get
out of that?
Speaker 3 (26:49):
Nothing? Right?
Speaker 5 (26:49):
What all it does is protect those incumbents in the
Senate from any sort of any sort of accountability from
the people who put them in off us?
Speaker 4 (27:00):
Right, Yeah, amen to that.
Speaker 2 (27:02):
Okay, So mcclannon County, where's that they're they're urging US
senators to.
Speaker 5 (27:07):
Reject the Texas that's a wacout.
Speaker 4 (27:09):
Okay? So where is Cornyan from? Dallas?
Speaker 7 (27:12):
Right?
Speaker 5 (27:14):
Cornyan is from San Antonio? Actually I want to see
from San Antonio? Originally, I mean he's from DC now.
Speaker 4 (27:20):
But yeah, no, you're right about that.
Speaker 2 (27:24):
I thought he lived I didn't think he lived in Houston,
but his Wikipedia page said he was born here. It's
funny he actually had a tenure at the Texas Supreme Court.
Speaker 4 (27:32):
You forget how long this guy's.
Speaker 2 (27:34):
Been around for Cornyn has been a he has been
a thorn in our ass for decades now and one
of the worst people in the Senate, certainly one of
the worst Republicans, no doubt about that. His enemies are
Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, Rand Paul Not Chuck Schumer. And
isn't that exactly why we don't want this guy in
charge of the Senate?
Speaker 3 (27:56):
Exactly?
Speaker 5 (27:56):
I think those are the kind of things. Andy was
attorney general by the way here in Texas and has
been a very outspoken critic of Ken Paxton. Right, it's word.
Speaker 4 (28:06):
Have you heard? Have you heard that he wants Mike
Lee to be the attorney general? This is a rumor.
Speaker 2 (28:11):
Who knows if it's true, because he doesn't want it
going to Ken Paxton.
Speaker 5 (28:17):
I've heard that he certainly doesn't want to going to
Ken Paxton. I mean, I think he's made that clear.
You know, I don't know. We'll see, We'll see what happens.
I mean, there's gonna be multiple rounds of voting. Somebody
has to get a majority. I don't think anybody's there yet,
and so we'll see what happens after this vote. I
think it's probably, you know, unfortunately, between him and Johnson
(28:38):
at this moment, I.
Speaker 2 (28:39):
Would love to see Ken Paxton is ag of the country,
mays Middleton, to be ag of the state of Texas.
He'd be a good he'd be a good you know,
he's not Ken Paxton, but I think he'd be a
great attorney general. I'd love to see not John Cornyn
is head of the Senate. Obviously, most people are pushing
for Rick Scott. The question is now Marco Rubio over
there in Florida, if he's gonna Secretary of State, who
(29:02):
does DeSantis assign that? Byron Donald's Ana, Pauline a Luna,
Matt Gates, as you often hear in politics, they have
a deep bench over there in Florida. But who takes
the Senate seat if Marco Rubio is going to DC.
Speaker 5 (29:17):
I don't know. I mean, we will see if that
gets confirmed the Secretary of State announcement. But if it does, yeah,
I think he's got a lot of people he could pick.
I know, they've got an attorney general there that has
done some great things in Florida, some great congressman like
Byron Donald. Heck, even I saw somebody tweet, you know
(29:37):
whol Coogan lives in Florida, So I got him.
Speaker 2 (29:41):
Brandon, I jokingly said that on the Morning show today,
and then we got a lot of email from people saying, actually,
why would Hulk be a bad senator?
Speaker 4 (29:49):
And I thought, why why would he be a bad senator?
Speaker 2 (29:52):
He's very charismatic, he seems to be an intelligent person politically.
I think he's aligned with the president. Why not, as
crazy as that would be, can't that be fun?
Speaker 1 (30:02):
There you go?
Speaker 5 (30:02):
Hey, let's uh, yeah, why not? So we'll see you
if it does come to fruition. I don't know that
it's been confirmed yet. I mean, the New York Times
had it out last night that Trump is gonna pick
pick Rubial, But I don't think he's actually confirmed it yet,
So we'll see. We'll see.
Speaker 4 (30:17):
Hey, let's go a.
Speaker 2 (30:17):
Little along on this segment. If you don't mind, Attorney
General Ken Paxton is suing a Dallas doctor for the
children cross sex hormones.
Speaker 4 (30:25):
Really disgusting stuff. Good for Paxton.
Speaker 2 (30:28):
Meanwhile, you guys have a report today about his one
hundredth lawsuit against the Biden Harris excuse me, Harris Biden administration.
Speaker 4 (30:35):
Tell me about that if you don't mind.
Speaker 5 (30:37):
Yeah, you know, break out the balloons, the cake. I
wonder if they had any of that. Dude, Oh hang on,
I got this hold on Tony jail.
Speaker 2 (30:45):
I have a kazoo for this exact purpose. I forget
it's there sometimes.
Speaker 5 (30:49):
Perfect Well, I think they broke out the kazoo at
Packsa's office because this looks the one hundredth lost that
they filed against the administration. This one, this one actually
is about maybe not like a banner lawsuit, that's actually
dealing with some SCC regulations that actually you have to
deal with limiting the charge on prisoner phone calls, so
(31:10):
essentially passing those those costs on to taxpayers. So not
exactly one of the banner issues, but it does mark
the hundred lawsuit. This is a state, you know, Texas,
Ken Paxton, that has sued the administration on a whole
host of issues, be it from the border, be it
from protecting girls, sports, et cetera. His sued administration a lot.
(31:31):
So you know, now they've they've passed the hundreds. They're
going to be in office for you know, I guess
a couple more months, so we'll see, uh, we'll see
how many more they're able to rack up on there
before Biden finally leaves.
Speaker 4 (31:43):
All Right, hang on a second.
Speaker 2 (31:44):
Paxton is suing the Biden administration because he doesn't think
taxpayers should have to pay for prisoner's phone calls. That's
kind of awesome, Britain. I don't want to pay for that.
Why should I have to pay for that? I didn't
break the law on that making the phone call ridiculous?
Speaker 3 (31:59):
All right?
Speaker 5 (32:00):
I agree? I agree.
Speaker 2 (32:01):
Dan Patrick says the top school the top issue right
now is school choice. I had a school choice advocate
on the show last week, Brandon. I get an email
from somebody telling me, Hi, I represent a group of people.
They are homeschool parents against school choice. Isn't that the
craziest thing? That didn't make any sense to me? That
would be like, this is a group of people. It's
(32:24):
disabled people against wheelchairs. Like why on earth would that
group even exist?
Speaker 5 (32:31):
Yeah, you know, it's interesting to see definitely have this
minority inside of the Republican Party that says, well, we
don't want to see any sort of school choice bill
because we're worried that it might affect homeschooling. The argument
that I've heard to counter that is that they can
pass any legislation they want to right now to regulate
homeschooling with or without a school choice bill. And so
(32:54):
what the school choice bill actually does and what advocates
have certainly said it does. It doesn't asside currently homeschooled children.
They you know, are not going to be affected by this.
Who has helped are those who are trapped in failing
public schools and actually giving choice to those people.
Speaker 4 (33:11):
Well, hang on, I'm confused about this.
Speaker 2 (33:13):
Why would homeschool I would think school choice would benefit
homeschooled kids.
Speaker 4 (33:17):
Why would they be against it?
Speaker 5 (33:19):
Well, it said, you know, if there's any money attached
to this, then there might be strings attached to it.
They don't want additional regulation on you know, curriculum, et
cetera when it comes to their homeschooling. But none of
the actual proposals that have been tossed around would actually
do that.
Speaker 4 (33:36):
We don't.
Speaker 2 (33:36):
So there's someone out there that's actually saying we wouldn't
want the government to be less involved in hall we
spend our money because they might be more involved in
the education of homeschool It doesn't make any sense, Brandon.
It sounds like it sounds like a bunch of commy
gobbledegook to me.
Speaker 5 (33:53):
Well, I think you know, a lot of these people
are are certainly, certainly well intentioned. I just I point
to the fact that right now, if you're talking see
about streams being attached with money, and you know they're
being additional restrictions on homescorers. I mean, those could all
be filed right now. They could put in to place
more restrictions right now without a school choice component. So
I think it's I think it's apples and oranges, all right.
Speaker 4 (34:15):
One more quick one.
Speaker 2 (34:16):
Tom Homan was the acting director of US Immigration and
Customers Informative Serforcement ICE under the Trump administration. Over the
last four years, he's basically been a cable news pundit
explaining why the border is a mess. Now he's going
to be borders are and I don't mean go back
to ICE. I mean he's going to be borders are.
Borders are is going to be a job now. I'm
okay with that, But do we have to call it
(34:37):
borders are? I thought the whole point of calling Kamala
that was to make fun of her for being a communist.
Speaker 5 (34:46):
Yeah, well that's what that's what they called her though, right,
I mean, don't forget, don't let the memory hold that
they absolutely called her borders are and now we're going
to have a borders are who Actually, well, actually we'll
go to the border. I think that's probably a great start.
Speaker 3 (35:01):
Now.
Speaker 5 (35:01):
I love some of the stuff I've heard Tom Holman
saying in some of these interviews in recent days talking
about I love the ones. Do you see the clip
where he's asked if they're going to separate families? He says, well,
now we can deport them together. So yeah, I think
this is a great mindset. This is a great sign
that the Trump Trump campaign, which is now the Trump administration,
(35:23):
is going to be actually really serious. I think about
these promises and these commitments they've made to deportation and
closing the border.
Speaker 3 (35:31):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (35:32):
I love hearing it too, man. I really everything seems
to be going very well. We're in a tiny little
corner of time here where things seem to be going
very well. Let's god, let's hope John Cornyn doesn't f
everything up. That voice you just heard that was my
buddy Brandon Waltons. You should follow him on Twitter and
while you're at to go to Texas scorecard dot com
sign up for.
Speaker 4 (35:50):
Their email list. You'll love it.
Speaker 9 (35:53):
The only thing that hurts more than paying taxes, not
paying taxes, Kenny Webster's pursuit of happiness.
Speaker 2 (36:00):
All right, this is incredible to me. A billionaire's offering
women free IVF treatments if they use his DNA, you
know his you know what I mean, you know DNA.
You know what I'm saying right, trying not to be
too profane because I'm still on terrestrial radio right now.
(36:21):
He's gonna give guys, that's a lot of money. He's
offering women free IVF treatments. He's gonna pay for the
whole thing if they'll use his sperm. And here's the
most shocking part of the story. The billionaire is not
Elon Musk. And by the way, I love Elon Musk.
The joke is just that he has a lot of kids.
It's all the joke is. So if you're offended by that,
calm down, Karen, Jeez, Louise. Does everything trigger you? Yeah,
(36:42):
I guess it probably does if you just turn it
on your radio. We've been talking about all the money
that Kamala pissed away and this elect we don't know
where the money went, mostly celebrities.
Speaker 4 (36:51):
It would appear Oprah people like that.
Speaker 2 (36:54):
And now there's this great exodus, not from America like
they said there was gonna be, but from Amala herself.
There's a report today at townhall dot com where they
talk about how Mark Cuban is scrubbing his political posts
on X on Twitter, where a lot of you are
watching me right now. Apparently I never noticed this stuff.
I always find it because I don't care if Matt
(37:15):
Drudge deletes a tweet, I don't notice that. But I
guess if you go look at Mark Cuban's tweets, he's
deleted all this stuff about Kamala, which isn't quite as
salacious as Usher and Pink and all those pop stars
deleting all their p ditty content, of which there was
a lot on their social media accounts.
Speaker 4 (37:32):
But at any rate, I think.
Speaker 2 (37:34):
At this point you get it right if you're just
turning on your radio or watching me on social media.
But talking about the election, I've been talking about the
Trump administration. Can we stop for a minute and talk
about a story I thought was going to have a
much bigger effect on the election but didn't. It's actually
not a technically, I mean, it's everything's political nowadays, football,
soft drinks, everything's political, but technically it was not a
(37:54):
political story story at Daniel Penny. I don't want you
to confuse Daniel Penny with Daniel Perry, although their stories
are very very similar. Do you guys remember who Daniel
Perry was. Daniel Perry was a guy that was sitting
in traffic during the summer Love the critical race theory
George Floyd Riots of the summer of twenty twenty. He
was sitting in his car in downtown Austin when he
(38:17):
was surrounded by an angry mob of Black Lives Matter activists,
all of them Karl Marx loving far left communists, not
realizing the irony of loving Karl Marx. Actually he hated
black people and Jews, but in his own words that's
besides the point. But or che Guevera also hated black people.
Daniel Penny sitting there in his car, Perry, Sorry, even
(38:37):
I confuse these guys. Sometimes sitting in his car surrounded
by an angry mob, someone points a gun at him,
He shoots the guy.
Speaker 4 (38:45):
It's Austin, Texas.
Speaker 2 (38:46):
The district attorney there is obviously a George Soros funded
Marxist himself, and so they wanted to send Daniel Perry
to prison for the crime of murder, even though he
was defending himself.
Speaker 4 (38:57):
Obviously, it's an angry mob. That's in a red state,
you guys.
Speaker 2 (39:02):
Fortunately, in a red state, we still have a decent governor.
Not my favorite governor. No, my favorite governor is Jeff Landry,
Sarah Huckabee Sanders, and of course my boy Big d.
But Governor Rabbit's in the top ten somewhere. I'll never
forget what he did during the pandemic when he arrested
people for trying to earn a living. But I can
forgive and forget. I mean I could forgive. I can't forget.
(39:23):
I do know this though, he gave Daniel Perry a
pardon for the crime of self defense. Thank you, Governor Abbit,
Thank god that you did that. But right now in
New York City, a different guy is on trial. That
guy is Daniel Penny. Daniel Penny's a marine. He was
on a subway train when a crazy homeless guy with
a long legal history of all kinds of lashing out
(39:46):
crazy antics in the streets in New York City threatening
people violence. This and that I don't have his rap
sheet in front of me was quite lengthy I think
a lot of you have seen it before. He freaks
out on the train, threatens to hurt some people. He
gets chuck ooked, Daniel Penny puts him in a headlock,
the guy dies. For those of you who have not
followed this case, we've learned some really interesting stuff about
(40:08):
the case this week. For example, did you know that
in the original police report the police officers on the
scene said in the police report they described Daniel Penny
as a good samaritan. It's the reason he didn't originally
get arrested. Remember, they waited to arrest this guy.
Speaker 4 (40:23):
It didn't get arrested right away.
Speaker 2 (40:25):
It turns out the police, the witnesses, most of the
people there, thought Daniel Penny was a good guy. The
reason they charged him with murder was because people that
weren't there, who weren't part of the story, weren't part
of the case. They wanted charges pressed. Look at America,
somebody died. It's a polarizing situation. So there's going to
be a trial, which is very unfortunate for Daniel Penny.
(40:48):
And I'm sure you guys already see how I feel
about this one. I don't think the guy personally did
anything wrong, And I'm willing to be objective on this.
If new information presents itself that says, actually, there's this
detail of the case you don't know about, where he
goes around New York City trying to find black guys
to kill, or something that would change my opinion.
Speaker 4 (41:05):
I hope it would change yours.
Speaker 2 (41:08):
Due process, the right innocent until proven guilty, that sort
of thing, or at least not guilty until proven guilty
in America. And we don't know that yet. We don't
have that yet. We know the cops on the scene
thought he was a good samaritan. We know the guy
he choked out was threatening to hurt people. We know
the guy he choked out at a long history of
violence and other things like that. Still it doesn't matter.
There's no shortage of hit pieces on this guy today.
(41:30):
Let me put one up on the screen for you.
This is the Florida Courier. It's an article from the
New York Daily News. But it's not even a news
outlet in the state of Technically, what I'm about to
show you here on the screen not even a New
York news outlet Florida.
Speaker 3 (41:42):
Right.
Speaker 2 (41:42):
More people that weren't part of the story. Let me
get these ads off the screen so you don't have
to look at them. Read this headline here, Daniel Penny
showed no humanity before choking Jordan Neely to death on
a subway, written by some guy who wasn't there when
it happened. The guy that wrote the article doesn't know
if he showed no There's no idea. There's nothing new
presented in that article that would change your mind about
(42:04):
it if you didn't already have an opinion about the case. Okay,
so you think he murdered somebody, that's your opinion.
Speaker 4 (42:11):
That's fine.
Speaker 2 (42:12):
As it turns out, Daniel Penny thought he was protecting
and this is a very important d you word, a
diverse subway car. He thought he was protecting women, children, blacks, browns, whites,
whatever the other colors are. That may or may not
be allowed to say. He thought he was doing some
good and that appears to be. He didn't think he
did anything wrong at the time. He thought he was
(42:32):
protecting people. That's the story. We now have a big
bombshell in this case. And by the way, that thing
I just told you a second ago in the police
report about cops thinking he was a good Samaritan. As
far as I know, that information has not been shared
with the jury yet. Don't you think they would like
to know that? Well, it's New York City. Remember Alvin
Bragg's still the da over there, boo, Alvin Bragg, the
(42:54):
guy who tried to get Donald Trump imprisoned and taken
off ballots and so many other things. So not exactly,
not exactly the best prosecutor in the country, or even
in the top ten, or even in the top one thousand.
Speaker 4 (43:05):
But I digress. Clearly a little bit biased here.
Speaker 2 (43:08):
There's a big bombshell that we just learned about in
the case the homeless man that he choked out who died,
the guy he's one being charged with killing, he still
had a pulse after Daniel Penny took him out of
the choke hold. We did not know that until just
recently police detected a pulse. I'm the homeless man Jordan Neely,
after he was put in a choke hold, after the
(43:29):
whole thing ended, after Daniel Penny let him go, Which
kind of reminds you a little bit about the George
Floyd case. Right, conservatives and liberals both get the George
Floyd case completely wrong. Liberals think Derek Chauvin went to
prison for putting his knee on George Floyd's neck. It's
not why he went to prison. It's not true. No
(43:50):
liberals think that's what he went to prison for. Conservatives
have some a little more understanding of the case. I'm
speaking in broad generalities here. Conservatives know that George Floyd
want hyperventilating, he was on feedenyl, he was on meth
and a lot of them seemed to understand that he
was apparently having an episode that was induced by drugs
at the time of his death. As far as I know,
that's true. But so while it is true that he
(44:12):
was overdosing on drugs for some reason, Derek Chauvin still
went to prison. To most of you guys listening to
me right now, do you know why Derek Chauvin went
to prison. This is it, right, and this is a
key point of that case. A lot of people get wrong.
Derek Chauvin went to prison because his own defense witness,
a witness for the defense, sat on the stand as
a witness and told the jury and everybody in the
(44:34):
courtroom that Derek Chauvin neglected he stopped a first aid
responder from administering a first responder from administering aid to
George Floyd. George Floyd was lying on the ground, he
was dying. There was a medical person there that wanted
to administer aid to George Floyd, and Derek Chauvin would
not allow that to happen. The knee on the neck
(44:54):
of George Floyd had nothing to do with why Derek
Chauvin went to prison. The fact that Derek Chauvin s
stopped a first aid worker from administering care to George Floyd,
which which his own which which his own lawyer and
witness actually allowed the jury to learn, is the reason
Derek Chauvin went to prison. If you don't think Derek
Chauvin should be in prison right now, you're entitled to
(45:15):
that position, but you should also believe he should have
had a better.
Speaker 4 (45:18):
Lawyer and not to put that witness on the stand.
Speaker 2 (45:20):
Never ask a witness a question as a lawyer that
you don't know the answer to during a criminal case
like that.
Speaker 4 (45:25):
But anyway, we're getting off the topic here.
Speaker 2 (45:27):
Daniel Penny took his hands off that Jordan Neely's throat
or not his hands yet, H'm it wasn't even a
choke hold, as far as I could tell, it was
a neckclock. A necklock a choke hold is a type
of netclock. But we're getting into technicalities here. That's not
why he died, right, Why did he die? I don't
exactly know, but I know he still had a pulse
(45:48):
after Daniel Penny let him go, and then he died
after that, which means there's probably more information we need
to learn about this case. Witnesses on the scene here's
another big reveal, actually praised his actions. Witnesses on the
scene praised his actions. But the prosecutors don't want the
jury to know that. They want to think this whole
thing was racial. The latest information is this police bodycam
(46:12):
footage is now showing witnesses we're defending Daniel Penny on
the scene for protecting Jordan Neely, for protecting them from
Jordan Neely, which is the whole reason why the word
good Samaritan actually showed up in the.
Speaker 4 (46:26):
Police report.
Speaker 2 (46:26):
I've got a video of this right here, of all
this going down to those you're watching on the screen here.
So it's a little mumbled, a little it's kind of
hard to hear what they're saying here. But to those
of you watching me on social media right now, you're
watching a woman and a police officer talking to each
other about what just happened. So's a black woman telling
(46:50):
a cop that Daniel Penny was protecting her. Now, this
is a pretty big deal because how could it be
racist if he was trying to protect a black woman.
I'll tell you, I want to go back. I got
to wrap it up here in just a second because
this show is almost over. But I want to go
back to a point I started with when I began
the show. You know what, or at least the segment
you know what fascinates me the most about the Daniel
(47:11):
Penny case. Aren't you kind of surprised this didn't have
a bigger effect on the presidential election. Kamala never really
weighed in on this. Donald Trump never did either. Maybe
he did. I don't know if that SoundBite er video exists,
I'm not aware of it. I will tell you it
wasn't a big national conversation. It was a big national
(47:32):
conversation months ago. It's about to be a big national
conversation in the coming days and weeks. But weirdly enough, guys,
I gotta tell you a couple months ago, when I
knew this case was coming up and this trial was
going to start before the presidential election, I kind of
thought this was going to affect the results of the
presidential election. It didn't at any rate. Hopefully Daniel Penny
(47:52):
is found not guilty. He did nothing wrong other than
trying to protect people. And the real lesson to learn
from this, guys, Danuel Penny, Daniel Perry, what did they
both have in common? Well, one was in a red state,
the other was in a blue state. But they were
both in deep blue municipal governments. The politics of New
York City in Austin, Texas. While the food and the
climate might be real different, the politics really aren't that different,
(48:14):
are they.
Speaker 4 (48:15):
If you're a good guy.
Speaker 2 (48:16):
If you're one of those people that's bothered by seeing
criminals on the street victimizing women and children and innocent people,
the elderly disabled people, if that bothers you when you
see it, remember when you are in a blue, deep
blue communion, a deep blue municipality, as much as you
might not like seeing it, don't do anything, dude, unless
(48:38):
you want to risk go into prison. Listen, most of
the people watching me on social media are gun rights advocates,
a lot of military veterans, a lot of police officers,
a lot of people in law enforcement out there. But
I've also got a lot of friends and people in
this little social circle that we're in right now that
are lawyers, legal experts, legal scholars, and they will tell you you're.
Speaker 4 (48:59):
Not gonna win that case.
Speaker 2 (49:01):
If Daniel Penny is found guilty, do you think Kathy Holkle,
the communist Democrat governor of the state of New York,
is gonna step in and give him a pardon like
Governor Abbot did in that similar case in Austin, Texas,
that Daniel Perry.
Speaker 4 (49:16):
It's absolutely not gonna happen. I'm Kenny Webster. I love
you all. Thank you for watching and listening.
Speaker 9 (49:25):
You are listening to the.
Speaker 4 (49:28):
Pursuit of Happy this radio.
Speaker 5 (49:31):
Tell the government to kiss your ass when you listen
Speaker 4 (49:36):
To this show.