Do Texas lawsuits do more harm than good?

This podcast edition of Kenny Webster's Pursuit of Happiness features attorney Will Moye.
( @KennethRWebster )

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Jigana government sucks. Suit of having us radio is d us.
Liberty and freedom will make you smile. A suit of
habing and us on your radio toil, just as cheeseburgers
a liberty prize at the food.

Speaker 2 (00:26):
There we go.

Speaker 3 (00:27):
That's right, that's what I'm talking about. That's how you
know this is a radio show hosted by a Catholic.
We dropped the bangers around here. We dropped this music
slaps homie. The Pope was laid to rest over the
week arrested peace to the Pope. They put him down
over the weekend. But it still wasn't as disappointing as
the news about Dion Sanders Soon that's another story altogether.

(00:50):
The funeral of Pope Francis was live streamed on YouTube.
Not to nitpick, but shouldn't we say it was dead streamed?
I mean, he's not a line anymore anyway. Crowd of
over two hundred thousand attended the Pope's funeral. The world
loved Francis. He was a real paple pleaser.

Speaker 2 (01:07):
Thank you.

Speaker 3 (01:07):
One hundred and seventy heads of state attended the funeral
of Pope Francis. Vladimir Zelensky was there he wore his
nicest quarter zip fleece. Oh thanks, you're dressing up for us.
Did you guys see Zelensky at this thing over the weekend?
You can't even dress nicely for the Pope's funeral.

Speaker 2 (01:24):
Look.

Speaker 3 (01:24):
I don't care. I don't, but come on, come on,
dressed like an adult. I guess I do care a little.
You know what else bothers me about that? You remember
that famous meeting in the Oval office. It was a
month or two ago where Zolensky was wearing children's clothing and.

Speaker 2 (01:41):
A member of the press asked him why he dresses
like that.

Speaker 3 (01:44):
And then the way that they repeated the news, they
made it sound like it was Trump. Why does Trump
get so mad about Zolensky's clothes?

Speaker 2 (01:50):
He didn't. He said he didn't care.

Speaker 3 (01:53):
He said he didn't have an issue with it. It
was he wasn't mad about it at all. Is there
a SoundBite of Trump getting mad about Zolensky's clothes? I
don't think there is. Anyway. It's Monday, it's not gonna
be the Pope all afternoon. In fact, we have a
guest today, Will Moy twenty five years. He has worked
as a defense attorney, and he is here today to
point out there is problems in Austin, Texas today involving

(02:17):
the lobbyists for the insurance company, a group called Texans
for Lawsuit Reform TLR.

Speaker 2 (02:24):
Dick Weekly. Maybe you've heard of them. People are really
mad at this guy right now.

Speaker 3 (02:27):
I'll explain why we're gonna do Texas politics in the
second half of the show. So why don't we fill
the first half of the show with this far right
conspiracy theories that can't know I'm just kidding, actually a
little bit.

Speaker 2 (02:39):
Actually, that is a little bit what I wanted to
talk about.

Speaker 3 (02:41):
Virginia Jeffrey committed suicide wink wink over the weekend. For
those that don't know who she is, she's probably the
most famous Jeffrey Epstein accuser. Six years ago she took
to social media to say she was not suicidal. If
anything happens to her, be very and then this weekend
she committed suicide. A month ago, she got hit by

(03:04):
a bus. There's a report today at townhall dot com
and they detail how, almost six years after the suspicious
suicide of Jeffrey Epstein, his most famous accusers died. Virginia
as a miner was forced into sexual acts with both
Epstein and Prince Andrew, Duke of York. Reportedly died of
suicide over the weekend. At the age of sixteen. She

(03:27):
was recruited to work for Epstein by Gallaine Maxwell. Perhaps
you've heard of her. Convicted in December twenty twenty one
on five counts of assisting Epstein in the sexual abuse
of underage girls. She is in prison for twenty years.
I am told that life for her in prison has
been pretty comfortable. She runs that prison like a boss.

(03:49):
We've been told reports from prison suggest that I don't know.
I'm not there, but I do know. The shocking news
of Jeoffrey's death comes just weeks after she posted bruised
pictures of herself online, claiming she was hit by a
school bus. School bus was going one hundred and ten
kilometers per hour and that she only had four days

(04:09):
to live kidney failure, she claimed. Evidently, Virginia, who lived
on a farm in western Australia, survived the automobile accident,
only to die by suicide.

Speaker 2 (04:18):
Days later.

Speaker 3 (04:20):
Her family released a statement praising Virginia for being a
fierce warrior in the fight against sexual abuse and sex trafficking.

Speaker 2 (04:27):
She was the light that lifted so many survivors.

Speaker 3 (04:31):
In the end, they say the toll of abuse was
so heavy it became unbearable for her to handle its weight.
According to her family, she lost her life to suicide
after being a lifelong victim of sexual abuse and sex trafficking. Now,
even though her family and local authorities claim she died
of suicide, a lot of people don't buy it. Senator

(04:53):
Mike Lee, for example, the Republican of Utah posted online
that Virginia brought which Jeoffrey didn't commit suicide. He doesn't
believe it. Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Green expressing skepticism, commenting online
that the truth needs to come out. No matter who
is responsible, is it the truth that Jeoffrey committed suicide.

(05:16):
In twenty nineteen, she posted to Twitter and said, I
am making it known that in no way, shape or form,
am I suicidal. I've made this known to my therapist.
If something happens to me, for the sake of my family,
do not let this go away. Help me protect them too.
Many evil people want to see me quieted. Virginia's haunting
promise makes her suicide look very suspicious. Not only did

(05:41):
she vow to never commit suicide, she fought back against
her abusers for years. She had the courage to go
public against the people that did this to her. She
also had the bravery to file a lawsuit against both
Epstein and Prince Andrew. In twenty twenty two, due to
both his scandalous association with Appstein and Jeoffrey's bombshell accusations,

(06:03):
Prince Andrew lost his military and royal titles. Eventually, he
settled the lawsuit with Virginia, supposedly for twelve million dollars.
So we're supposed to believe Virginia survived all this abuse,
along with the lawsuits and the shame and a horrific
automobile accident, only to kill herself. Matt Gates is another

(06:23):
one of the people that doesn't buy the story. Considering
Virginia's sudden death and the need for many sexual abuse
victims to receive justice, I think the Department of Justice
needs to start investigating this. Not only should they investigate it,
can we finally release the Epstein files, the client list
We've been told for years it exists. Back in February,

(06:47):
Pam Bondi got all these right wing social media influencers
at the White House to have a meeting where they
released Phase one of the Epstein files and it didn't
include any new information. It was a bad look at
the time. It was like, well, you're releasing documents we
already knew about. You can't have a press conference to
tell us things we already know. When the backlash came,

(07:11):
they said it was because an FBI field office in
New York was withholding thousands of documents. Okay, so have
FBI Director Cash Pattel raid the office and get the documents.
Why can't we see this stuff? It doesn't make any sense, guys.
The DOJ promised unprecedented transparency to we the people, full

(07:33):
transparency and justice. Unfortunately, two months after the underwhelming initial
release of the first Phase one, no additional files have
been distributed. The promise to the American people is one
that must be fulfilled, not only in the name of
transparency and disclosure, but in memory of Virginia Geoffrey, a

(07:53):
woman who was repeatedly abused by a monster. Sadly, this
monster was affiliated with powerful interest who have continually worked
from the sidelines to prevent the truth from being released.
It's a disgusting time to think that this woman died,
possibly in vain.

Speaker 2 (08:11):
We deserve justice.

Speaker 4 (08:13):
Coming up more, Kenney Webster's Pursuit of Happiness A safe
space for those who love liberty and try not to
take themselves too.

Speaker 2 (08:21):
Seriously, even if your name is Karen. All right.

Speaker 3 (08:29):
So, George Santos has been sentenced to over seven years
for fraud and identity theft, and even CNN thought this
was a little overboard. Seven years was a pretty tough punishment.
His main defense strategy was, I hope Trump pardons me.

Speaker 2 (08:46):
I don't know if that's going to happen.

Speaker 3 (08:48):
Baltimore, Maryland, was named America's dirtiest city, which doesn't really
surprise me. Baltimore is a reputation for being a great
place to catch crabs, I'm told. And California pass Japan
to be the fourth largest economy in the world over
the week end, and that's very exciting news for people
on the West Coast. I guess you could say California

(09:08):
is on fire. Okay, sorry, that's probably a probably a
poor choice of words, isn't it. Over the weekend, the
White House Correspondence Dinner took place, and don't you just
it's it's never been more irrelevant. The White House Correspondence
Association not that important anymore. Donald Trump and Caroline Lovett

(09:28):
have actually said, we don't need an old media here.
We're gonna change that. We're gonna bring podcasters and bloggers
in here. And so the White House Correspondence Association dinner
didn't really have any Republicans attending. The President wasn't there,
and it's just really not that important anymore. They don't matter.
And over the weekend, look a few sound bites went

(09:50):
viral from what took place there. They had Eugene Daniels spoke,
Zeke Miller. You know all the big heavy hitters. You
know those guys. No, you never heard any of them.
It's funny too that they're kind of owning the fact
that they suck.

Speaker 5 (10:08):
One serious note to my bones. I believe that reporting
and the White House Corresponse Association is as necessary as ever.
President Biden's decline and it's cover up by the people
around him is a reminder that every White House, regardless

(10:28):
of party, is capable of deception.

Speaker 2 (10:32):
Guys, Oh my god, that is so funny. You're telling me.

Speaker 3 (10:39):
Zeke Miller from the Associated Press stood in front of
a live audience, said and said, look, you know they
really tried to cover up this thing with Joe Biden's
mental decline. Yeah, who did that, alex or Zeke, excuse
me you you did that?

Speaker 2 (10:52):
From the White House to.

Speaker 3 (10:54):
The town of white House, Texas, to real place, Peoria,
to the Persian Gulf.

Speaker 6 (10:59):
We had AP remained committed as ever to accurate, independent,
nonpartisan journalism.

Speaker 3 (11:04):
I remember when the Associated Press was the gold standard
for straight news. Now they constantly echo only one side
talking points. The AP has become a liberal, leftist news outlet.
They're not accurate, they don't care about accuracy. They push propaganda.
Eugene Daniels is the president of the White House Correspondence Dinner.

(11:26):
He's also an MSNBC liberal talk show host. Got a
long applause. We're talking about how important it is to
be accurate.

Speaker 7 (11:32):
We journalists are a lot of things. We are competitive
and pushy, we are impatient, and sometimes we think we
know everything. But we're also human. We miss our families
and significant life moments in service to this job. Hello
deeply about accuracy and take seriously the heavy responsibility of
being stewards of the public's trust. What we are not

(11:56):
is the opposition. What we are not is the enemy
of the people, and what we are not is false.

Speaker 2 (12:02):
You are the opposition. You are the enemy of the people.

Speaker 3 (12:06):
You influenced elections, you lie, people in the media have
become the enemy.

Speaker 2 (12:12):
There's a reason why.

Speaker 3 (12:13):
But don't underestimate how funny that first sound by was
Alex Thompson of Axios, pretending like they didn't know. Oh
the whole time, we had no idea that Joe Biden
was in mental decline.

Speaker 2 (12:24):
You were the ones pushing it.

Speaker 5 (12:26):
But being truth tellers also means telling the truth about ourselves.
We myself included, missed a lot of this story.

Speaker 2 (12:36):
Guys, these weren't errors.

Speaker 3 (12:37):
You deliberately covered up Joe Biden's cognitive decline and guess
what it hurt America ignorant night, How did we know?
How did Republican conservative talk show hosts in Texas know
there was something wrong with Joe Biden in twenty nineteen,
but you guys were around him all the time and
you didn't know. Brightbart dot com today reporting on what

(12:59):
is really just a grift the regime media. They think
they can gaslight the American people into buying into the
blatant lie they had no role in covering up Joe
Biden's painfully obvious cognitive decline. This is the same media
that actually participated in the shameless cover up. Saturday night

(13:21):
was Christmas for people that have been calling them out
for years. On Saturday, the irredeemable corporate media used the
White House Correspondence Dinner to laughably try to gaslight us
with an all new, bright and shiny lie, like we
didn't know this guy's brain was broken. The legacy media's

(13:43):
first gaslighting tactic was to protect Biden, tell us that
our eyes and ears were lying. No, no, no, no no.
These lying degenerates assured us Joe is sharp as attack,
the best Biden ever for five years, despite numerous examples
of him falling up a flight of stairs, speeches about

(14:03):
black kids and blonde leg care, meandering comments short stairs
on Air Force One, countless public incidents of mumbling and
bumbling and crumbling and tumbling and stumbling and fumbling over
and over and over and over again. And if you
dared question his mental capacity, you were mocked. You like
comparing that.

Speaker 2 (14:25):
Guy's mental state. I've said it.

Speaker 6 (14:27):
For years now, He's cogent but I andersold him when
I said he was cogent.

Speaker 2 (14:33):
He's far beyond cogent.

Speaker 6 (14:35):
In fact, I think he's better than he's ever been intellectually, analytically,
because he's been around for fifty years.

Speaker 2 (14:46):
And you know, I don't know if people know this
or not. Biden used to be a hothead.

Speaker 3 (14:51):
That is MSNBC's Joe Scarborough telling you that he's never
been sharper, never been the smartest Joe Biden, the best
Jobe Biden, Joe Biden of all is very clear. Hey,
I'm pause this one. I want to set this one up.
The funniest thing to me is is Jake Tapper on CNN,
who spent five years covering it up and then he

(15:13):
wrote a book about how he was the hero who
exposed Joe Biden's cognitive decline.

Speaker 8 (15:17):
Jake is very clearly a cognitive decline. That's what I'm
referring to. It makes me uncomfortable.

Speaker 2 (15:25):
I think it was so amazing.

Speaker 8 (15:27):
It's so amazing to me that try and figure out an.

Speaker 2 (15:29):
Answer cognitive decline.

Speaker 8 (15:31):
You need to tell me that what I was suggesting
was I think that you.

Speaker 9 (15:34):
Were mocking his stutter. Yeah, I think you were mocking
his stutter. And I think you have absolutely no standing
to diagnose somebody's cognitive decline. I would think that somebody
in the plump family would be more sensitive.

Speaker 3 (15:46):
That's Laura Trump a Jake Tapper. That is Jake Tapper
mocking Laura Trump for suggesting there was something wrong with
Joe's brain. Let us never forget the Orwellian term cheap fakes.
Remember cheap fakes. There's a video of Joe Biden wandering
around at a meeting with different diplomatic leaders and world leaders.

Speaker 2 (16:07):
Where were they Italy?

Speaker 3 (16:08):
I don't even remember all the And then what happened
the following Monday, Kareem Jean Pierre got on TV and said, oh,
those are just cheap fakes.

Speaker 2 (16:15):
What are cheap don't you mean deep fakes?

Speaker 3 (16:17):
Deep fakes are videos that have been manipulated with AI
to make someone look bad.

Speaker 2 (16:21):
They said, no, no, no, these are cheap.

Speaker 10 (16:23):
Fakes, said Biden has spent days locked in intense preparation,
surrounded by his closest advisors at Camp David, and our
sources are telling us tonight that full mock debates are
underway at.

Speaker 8 (16:33):
The podium under the lights.

Speaker 10 (16:35):
He's even watching tape to know exactly what he's going
to see when he steps up to that lecture. His
team shot a video during a walk through the scene
in studio, and, as I reported while covering him at
the White House, when Biden prepares, he does so incredibly intensively.

Speaker 8 (16:50):
So just how.

Speaker 11 (16:50):
Worried where Biden aids before the former president's disastrous debate
last summer. According to Ron klain Is, chief of staff,
his concerns could not be overstated.

Speaker 2 (17:00):
Guys.

Speaker 3 (17:00):
That was the first sound bite was CNN June twenty
twenty four. That second sound bite is April twenty twenty five, and.

Speaker 11 (17:06):
His first meeting with Biden for debate prep. Quote claim
was startled. He'd never seen Biden so exhausted and so
out of it.

Speaker 3 (17:14):
Guys, Fast forward to Saturday's annual self regarding Wancathon. The
lying liar still lying to us, Only it's a new lie.
We didn't know Joe was a vegetable. We were too gullible,
too trusting. The White House fooled us. No, we knew,
We all knew, everyone knew, I knew, you knew. You guys,

(17:35):
Now that the regime media can no longer bottleneck the
truth through its monopolistic hold on communication that allowed for
the memory holding of its endless sin. This is how
the new media world works. There will be no redemption.
There will be no moving on, no accepting of apologies,
no forgiveness without the acknowledgment of sin. Without confession, there

(17:58):
is no obsolution, which means we will be throwing the
sharpest attack hoax in your smug faces at every opportunity
we can until the sun dies. So you guys can
have your Saturday Night Live skits about how Donald Trump's
an idiot, But remember you're the buffoons who tried to
trick us all into thinking Joe Biden was sharp as attack,
and that was how we got here. I think I

(18:20):
speak for every normal American in the world when I
say fu and the silver spoon you wrote in on.

Speaker 2 (18:27):
If I were you, I'd stay put Kenny.

Speaker 4 (18:30):
You'll be right back with more of what you came
for for jokes.

Speaker 2 (18:38):
Wait a second, folks. Fascinating news.

Speaker 3 (18:41):
The number of people with dementia is expected to triple
by twenty fifty according to a new report, which is
great news for everyone who wants to forget what happened
during the pandemic. That's what I assume Hi everyone, I'm
Kenny Webster. Thanks so much for getting connected with us
this afternoon. If you're watching us right now on social media,
you're at home whatever you're doing. For those of you

(19:02):
driving around the city, my guest in studio right now
is Will Moya. Am I saying your name correctly, sir,
MOI hang on, I can't here. Let's put a microphone
in front of you. Why don't you get that? Hang
on a second here, you got to lift that up.
That's a flaccid microphone. Will moy what is what is.

Speaker 2 (19:18):
The e for?

Speaker 10 (19:20):
Uh?

Speaker 2 (19:20):
Well, in some circles it's moye.

Speaker 12 (19:23):
But I grew up in Bridge At City, Texas, where
there's no Moye's.

Speaker 2 (19:27):
It were just plain old moise, just moy, Will moy.
I appreciate that.

Speaker 3 (19:31):
In Texas we have a funny way of taking things
that are clearly pronounced one way. San Jacinto that's right,
that's right. Sure, it's not san Ja Sento. No, that's
San Jacinto right there. It's got a J in it.

Speaker 2 (19:43):
Lane.

Speaker 12 (19:43):
Half the Houstonians to say San Felipe or San Philippe.

Speaker 2 (19:47):
We always, you know, there's always a debate on that.

Speaker 3 (19:49):
I know it's it's yeah, it's obvious, it's probably felipe,
but we say anyway, then it is what it is.

Speaker 2 (19:54):
I am like a lot of people.

Speaker 3 (19:56):
I'm a guy that feels like when people use the
government to go out and abuse problems, it's exploitative, right.
And years ago, we had news stories around the country
about a famous incident with coffee being spilled in a
woman's lap and an exorbitant amount of money being paid
to this person, and.

Speaker 2 (20:14):
There's a lot of debate.

Speaker 3 (20:15):
People still argue over this case to this day over
whether or not that was the right thing to do.
And I am told that from mutual friends of mine,
you will moy are an attorney that handles this sort
of thing that you deal in the world of people
trying to get a lot of money for something that
was seemingly mundane.

Speaker 12 (20:33):
I deal with people that are entitled to all the
money they're entitled to get from a local jury. I'm
actually have a unique background in that I was a
defense lawyer on the civil defense side for twenty five
years and as of March last year, March twenty twenty four,
made the decision to frankly stop helping corporate American insurance
companies to start helping Texans instead.

Speaker 3 (20:53):
Okay, so the incident I'm talking about. I have friends
that are very passionate about this case. It's a famous
case involved having a woman sitting in a drive through
spilling coffee in her lap. And I have friends that'll
tell you that woman never should have gotten that much money,
and friends that have told me that the case is
often misconstrued, that we don't actually understand what happened.

Speaker 2 (21:13):
Well, what's the truth. Did that woman deserve that much money?
It is absolutely misconstrued.

Speaker 12 (21:17):
So there were internal temperature metrics, internal requirements and procedures
that McDonald's had and was required to follow, both internally
for their company and also in the industry. What they
did is they handed this poor lady who's in her seventies.
I believe, a hot coffee that was in an extreme tempt,
not from a lawyer's point of view, not from an
argument point of view, but from McDonald's point of view,

(21:38):
that it reached a level that could scald the skin
upon contact immediately. Okay, they handed her through the drive
through window a coffee that was dangerous because they brewed
it to the point that it was scalding hot temperature
and violation of their internal recommendations, their internal rules and regulations,
and it spilled on her and damaged her Lady Parts
in a way that was frankly, you know, supportive of

(21:59):
a There was an offer to settle the case. There
was a low ball offer made and went to a
jury and the jury fixed it.

Speaker 3 (22:05):
Okay, it's very important on this radio show that we
protect and defend Lady Parts.

Speaker 2 (22:09):
That's a big that is a principal position that we
have here.

Speaker 3 (22:12):
But I would ask this question because I you know,
I play white Devil's advocate as often as like, I
don't have a choice. Really, would she have gotten that
much money if it wasn't McDonald's, if it was Brad's,
if it was Will's coffee shop?

Speaker 2 (22:22):
Would there have been that much money? And there might
not have been.

Speaker 12 (22:25):
The reality is because they were McDonald's, they could actually
assess the risk much differently. And I believe it was
an eight hundred dollars demand or twenty thousand dollars demand
and an eight hundred dollars offer. So Corporate America could
have fixed their problem by doing the right thing to
this lady that they injured.

Speaker 3 (22:38):
So they went, they would they could have paid a
lot less if they didn't try to resist.

Speaker 2 (22:41):
In less eight hundred bucks.

Speaker 12 (22:43):
Yeah, that was the offer that was essentially to pay
her medical bills. The demand was closer to twenty thousand dollars,
and refusing that twenty thousand dollars offer, she was left
with know the choice but to go try the cases
she ended up winning.

Speaker 3 (22:53):
There was another one of these cases recently. Let me
put this up on the screen here so people could
see what we're looking at. We had one of these
cases recently with Starbucks. A man was awarded fifty million
dollars after Starbucks hot tea caused permanent disfigurement to his
penis growing and inner thighs.

Speaker 12 (23:10):
Well, it sounds like a man parts. Those are man parts.
They are man parts.

Speaker 2 (23:14):
We can say penis. It's fine.

Speaker 12 (23:15):
This is with lady parts. Someone to ride the man
parts lady parts there.

Speaker 3 (23:20):
That's very classy of you. What are we why so
much money? If you looked at this case, I mean.

Speaker 2 (23:25):
Again, it's a case that could have settled.

Speaker 12 (23:26):
It's a case that mistakes from may and it's a
case that accountability wasn't made. It's a case that someone
had to go to trial on because Corporate America decided
to roll the dice and they lost.

Speaker 3 (23:35):
As a libertarian or a liberty Republican, I've always had
mixed feelings about this, because on one hand, I hate
to see somebody's business have to pay an insane amount
of money that someone else's business wouldn't have had to
pay if not for how successful they were. But similarly,
these corporations have the money to pay a team of
lawyers to go to war with some guy whose testicles

(23:55):
got burned by hot coffee, and he doesn't have the
kind of ammunition, the legal fire.

Speaker 2 (24:00):
The power that they have is that fair he doesn't.

Speaker 12 (24:02):
And that's the reality of what we do on the
plane of side is that too often it's not a
mom and pop scenario. Too often it is a corporate
decision with a corporate boardroom, a corporate directors and investors
and shareholders that make a decision to take a risk,
to try to lowball someone's injury by not being accountable,
by not emitting responsibility, and making a decision to say
we will push the little guy around.

Speaker 2 (24:22):
We have an outcome we desire.

Speaker 12 (24:24):
The difference is they got to eventually face twelve jurors
who can see through that more often than not, and
that's why cases get tried, and that's why these outcomes occur.

Speaker 2 (24:31):
All right.

Speaker 3 (24:31):
The latest one, if I'm not mistaken, involved chicken nuggets.
A girl was awarded eight hundred thousand dollars after taking
McDonald's to court over chicken nuggets. I think it was
the same thing she was burned by. Unreasonably hot chicken
nuggets happened in twenty nineteen. It was a little girl
with a happy meal. I hate when food is cold,
but I guess there's a point where it shouldn't be

(24:52):
like a hot coal in your mouth.

Speaker 2 (24:53):
Apparently, but potentially I don't know.

Speaker 12 (24:55):
That is the case I'm unfamiliar with and would be
unable to comment on.

Speaker 3 (24:59):
Well, that's okay, Yeah, if you don't know, you don't know.
The point is, these things happen from time to time,
and it's kind of put the corporation involved in a
sticky situation here because somebody that's getting paid minimum wage
is the person responsible for this, and yet at the
same time, it's the company that's making the profits, So
shouldn't they really be the ones to pay.

Speaker 2 (25:17):
No, that's right, and you know, no, there's no sin
in profits.

Speaker 12 (25:20):
But the problem with these examples, and I'm glad you
brought them up because they were appropriate to be presented
in this form where they can be addressed to show
they're often different than what society thinks.

Speaker 2 (25:29):
There Ultimately, you.

Speaker 12 (25:30):
Know are right is that you know, this is what
immediately falls into the situation and people's heads of oh, well,
we got to stop, you know, litigation abuse. We have
to embrace tort reform as a concept. We got to
make things change because it's unfair to Joe American business
owner to face the you know, face the music in
front of a Jerry and Harris County, Texas, or Dallas, Texas,

(25:52):
or Bear County, Texas, or Travis County, Texas or anywhere
else in Texas where there could be an outcome that
is deemed to be unfair. But the reality is, until
you know the facts right, outcomes the outcome. Because twelve
twelve persons heard the facts, allow them to be presented
by a judge who we all elected, and the outcome
was the outcome.

Speaker 2 (26:08):
All right.

Speaker 3 (26:09):
So the latest news on this in the world of
suing people, suing big corporations and that sort of thing
involves a bill being passed around Texas right now SB thirty,
which seeks to cap damages survivors and loved ones have
of catastrophic incidents. And apparently this is a bill that
is being pushed and supported by a controversial group called
Texans for Lawsuit Reform, who I am told the biggest

(26:31):
financial supporter of is a guy named Dick Weekly. And
we can all just pause for a minute and laugh
at the fact that his name is Dick Weekly. Go ahead,
I'm gonna let the audience take that. And his name
is Dick Weekly. Guys, I don't get to decide if
that's funny. It's objectively funny. And Dick Weekly is actually
the guy that was responsible for funding the impeachment campaign
against Paxton, they claim, one of the biggest supporters of

(26:52):
Dave Falen, one of the biggest rhinos in the Texas
Republican Party.

Speaker 2 (26:57):
This is always hard for.

Speaker 3 (26:58):
Me to wrap my mind around this, but Governor Abbott
is famously got hit by a tree while he was
out jogging, and then years later he was a big
supporter of tort reform lawsuit reform, and so some people
feel like that makes him a hypocrite.

Speaker 2 (27:11):
Do you have any thoughts on that.

Speaker 12 (27:12):
I do, and actually I think that he's done, I
think an appropriate job and a very purposeful job of
letting this be Dan Patrick's show on this tort reform push.
I think that he has purposely remained silent on that
because I think he does recognize that his physical condition
is built on the fact that someone else was negligent
and he took that person to court and won a
handsome amount of money. That's certainly not life changing, because

(27:34):
if he'd go back in time, he'd rather have his
functional legs and he will be having the recovery he
made in a settlement. But I think he's been rather
purposeful in avoiding the conversational to reform, at least this
legislative session.

Speaker 3 (27:45):
I can appreciate that. So, what is SB thirty and
why should people care?

Speaker 12 (27:49):
SB thirty is one of Dan Patrick's initiatives. I think
He's got forty to fifty initiatives in this term that
he wants to see push through to make Texas a
better place. I think that there's many on his top
forty list that will in fact do that. I think
this is not one of those. This is an anti
lawyer bill. This is an anti billboard lawyer bill. This
is not a pro Texan bill. This isn't a pro

(28:10):
victim bill. This is a bill that's motivated to frankly,
seek retribution against what people don't like seeing is success
of certain planeff lawyers in this state do quite well
because they've had good outcomes in masquerades. Is a pro
business bill when in fact, when you look at the
core of it, it is not pro business and it is
very not pro conservative, which is again the uniqueness of

(28:31):
what we do is we pick teams we think this
is a conservative position.

Speaker 2 (28:34):
This is a little position.

Speaker 12 (28:35):
You know, plaintiffs lawyers is a lower position, you know,
Middle America, business owners, you know, ordinary Texans a conservative notion.
But if you sat and you read the details of
the bill, it's the opposite of that. The bill is
written is anti conservative.

Speaker 3 (28:50):
I've always a mixed feelings about Dan Patrick because, unlike
what happens in the Texas House, he gets things done.
But at the same time, I mean some would argue,
you know, his policy positions are a little too authoritarian
for the modern day grassroots activists.

Speaker 2 (29:05):
The Republican Party that put him.

Speaker 3 (29:06):
His position and at the same time, he gets stuffed
done in the Senate that would never get accomplished in
the House. He'll pass bills that would never see the
light of the day in the House. Would is SB
thirty go anywhere? With Dustin Burrows in charge of the
Texas House right now?

Speaker 12 (29:19):
Yeah, And that's where the showdown is going to be.
So it is past the Senate. Came out of Senate Committee,
actually testified in the Senate Committee. There's a House committee
hearing under its equivalent eight four eight six, which is
going to be taken up by the Judiciary Committee in
a couple of weeks and will eventually hit the House floor.
I think there's going to be a fair fight on
the House floor because I think there's certain House members
that realize this is an anti lawyer bill and not

(29:41):
a protextan bill.

Speaker 3 (29:42):
All right, So it looks like it's always interesting to
see who voted yes on this stuff. Paul Bettencourt was
a yes on this one. Donna Campbell was a yes.
May's Middleton was a yes. Joan Hoffman was a yes.
This's got a lot of Republican support in the Senate,
but in the House, what do you think happens.

Speaker 2 (29:59):
So I think it's a Biggert show down there.

Speaker 12 (30:00):
I think that there's some House members that will look
at their constituents. I think they're going to answer the
phone that their constituents are calling and saying, from a
conservative standpoint, what happened to personal accountability? What happened to
personal responsibility? What happened to free markets? What happened to liberty?
What happened to all those things that we have embraced,
particularly in the last several state wide election cycles. None
of this stands for this. This entire kind of reading

(30:24):
of this bill is a as you mentioned, i'll steal your words,
authoritative view of let's press upon the people of this state,
outcomes that we predetermined for the good of Frankly TLR
and a few other industries lobbying.

Speaker 3 (30:37):
I did sound smart when I said that. That's a
fantastic word to you. Thank you very much, Thank you.
Will moy is here. I'm Kenny Webster. If you're watching
a streaming live on social media, we'll be back in seconds.
If you're listening on KPRC radio, we'll be back in minutes.
Don't go anywhere.

Speaker 2 (30:51):
Hey, it's me the Donald You're listening to the Pursuit
of Happiness radio voice of the Radio Games.

Speaker 3 (31:00):
All right, this is exciting, very exciting news out of
I was surprised to hear this. A Russian general was
killed by a car bomb in Moscow, which in Russia
is known as dying peacefully of natural causes. I'm told
that's how they define that.

Speaker 2 (31:16):
There.

Speaker 3 (31:17):
Hi, welcome back, everybody. My guest right now is Will Moy.
Will Moy is a lawyer. There are good lawyers and
there are bad lawyers. Well, I'm told that you're a
good one. What makes a lawyer bad and what makes
a lawyer good? Well, there are good ones and there
are bad ones. And I'm flattered that someone has at
least told you. Hopefully it wasn't just my wife who's
in the room, and Amanda, my media consulted in the room.
And it's a greater understanding of Will being a good

(31:38):
lawyer than just these two fine ladies sitting here right now.

Speaker 12 (31:41):
I don't know, being honest goes a long ways. You know,
I've made a long My wife, who's sitting here is
also a lawyer. I've joked off and that I don't
like lawyers, but I like her but you know, there's
lawyers that do good, there's lawyers that don't do good,
and there's good lawyers and bad lawyers.

Speaker 3 (31:54):
As results, we would agree. I think one thing we
all agree on, a crime is bad. And lately, oddly enough,
a lot of politicians have been targets of crime. One
of those people is Christino, the Department of Homeland Security secretary,
formerly known as hot Governor. She really was and apparently
the person that robbed her, that stole her Gucci bag.
For those that it was originally reported as a white

(32:17):
man that a white man stole, it turns out it
was a Chilean illegal immigrant stole her three thousand dollars person.
I was just depressed that it wasn't former Joe Biden
nuclear waste guru Sam Brinton, That's who I thought would
has stolen it.

Speaker 2 (32:29):
But turns how that wasn't the case. It was this guy.

Speaker 3 (32:31):
And she's not the only one that was robbed recently.
Adam Schiff is in the news today. Adam Scheff is
apparently the target of a lot of controversy surrounding whether
or not his preemptive parton actually worked or at any legitimacy.
But before we explain that to you. I want to
play this SoundBite for everybody in the room. Here's Adam Scheff.

Speaker 13 (32:50):
So we're gonna have to change how we do business
in California. We're going to have to address people's legitimate
concerns about crime. I was in South San Francisco two
years ago, after I had experienced in the city at
all too many people had, when my luggage was stolen
out of my car. They tell you, don't ever leave
your luggage in the car. I never do until the

(33:13):
one time I did, and of course it got stolen.
And what was most memorable the experience for me is
I went to this target in South San Francisco ten
o'clock at night, and I'm getting the toiletries I'm going
to need for my next two days in the city.

Speaker 2 (33:30):
I get to the camp by yourself, not an assistant.
I think I went there.

Speaker 13 (33:36):
Well, yes, I had somebody drop me off of the store.

Speaker 3 (33:41):
I don't mean to make that an issue.

Speaker 2 (33:43):
I see I waited somewhere. I should not have waited this.

Speaker 13 (33:52):
First of all, I had to get the clerk, which
is hard to find, to unlock the shampoo or the whatever.
So that's one thing, and then I get.

Speaker 2 (34:01):
To the cashier.

Speaker 13 (34:02):
The cashier asked me if I want one of those
Target bags with a little bulls eye on it, and
I said yes, that Target bag is going to be
my luggage for the next two days. And she asked
me what happened and I told her and she basically said,
in not so many words, yeah, Democrats are assholes.

Speaker 2 (34:18):
Wow, how about that?

Speaker 3 (34:19):
This is a real time with Bill Maher Democrats are
not polling well right now. The White House Correspondence Association
Dinner was on TV over the weekend. Most people didn't
even notice that Adam Schiff a victim of crime. Christy
Nooa'm a victim of crime. If politicians aren't safe, who
is safe will?

Speaker 12 (34:37):
It is interesting watching mister Schiff, though they've all changed
their tunes as of late. It's almost like they got
caught staying out too late drinking and then they apologize
to their wives when they get home.

Speaker 2 (34:46):
It'll never happen.

Speaker 12 (34:46):
Again, because all of them now and it'll never happen again.
In this self reflection, last night of the Correspondence Dinner
is even more hilarious in that they just got bamboozled
by you know, Joe Biden's entourage and team that they
had no idea that he was not much of a
functioning intellectual human for many, many months, if not years.
But hey, they've all learned their lesson now in the

(35:07):
spirit of good journalists.

Speaker 3 (35:08):
Well, I'm a right wing morning show shock jock in Texas.
We knew in twenty nineteen there was something wrong with
Joe stumbling upstairs telling weird stories while he sits at
a pool with a bunch of black kids, to blonde
leg hair, and like falling up a flight of stairs.
So many weird examples. How is it that we knew?
I'm not in contact with him. I don't spend time

(35:30):
alone with this guy if I knew about it and
you knew about it. The best part of it is
Jake Tapper spending four years shaming people for suggesting there's
something wrong with Joe Biden and then writing a flip
and book about how he's the hero of uncovering Joe
Biden's mental decline scandal, the lack.

Speaker 12 (35:48):
Of any ability to self reflect and thank the following one.
I chastised anyone that came on about cheap fakes and
deep fakes and created a new word called cheap fakes.

Speaker 2 (35:57):
But I thought it was deep fakes prior to that
it was.

Speaker 12 (35:59):
But it's cheap fakes because you're taking a cheap shot
at our sitting president who's wandering off in Normandy. He
had to get corralled back to the picture and then
to turn on and say, you know what, I'm gon
write a book on all this because we all got
bamboozled and hood winked. So yeah, the lack of any
self reflection of it's just but hey, the politicians they
do with they that's what they do right now, This
is obviously well like lawyers are always honest and forth right,

(36:20):
for they always are.

Speaker 2 (36:22):
They're the boys, that's right. Amazing.

Speaker 12 (36:24):
My friend Tony Buzby told me that he says, there
no jokes about lawyers that exists, none whatsoever. No, there's
a reason why, because they're such great guys. I am
a big fan of the.

Speaker 3 (36:35):
Stories we're hearing about the preemptive part, and I find
it very funny that these guys needed preemptive pardons. I
don't understand, who, if you didn't commit a crime, what
do you need a preemptive pardon for? But you're a lawyer.
Riddle me this, They say that he was using an
auto pen signature. He Joe Biden to give a preemptive
part in, people like Liz Cheney, anybody on the January
sixth committee, Well, one of those people was Adam Schiff.

(36:57):
Adam Schiff got a preemptive pardon. And now they're suggesting they,
I mean, Donald Trump, the President of the United States,
is suggesting that the auto pen signature was created on
a document at a time and date when Joe was
clearly somewhere else doing something else. If that's true, If
that's true, presuming it is true, does the preemptive parton

(37:17):
have any legal validity?

Speaker 12 (37:18):
I think there will be some constitutional lawyers on the
right that will make sure that they have good arguments
that it doesn't. And if I was the receiver of
a premptive pardon, I would make damn sure I had
someone with a hand and a pen and signing the
document and not autopen and not autopen by sitting on
a beach in Delaware, why I was being done.

Speaker 2 (37:34):
It's pretty wild.

Speaker 12 (37:35):
Right in credit, I would not have the confidence of
my pardon as much of a pardon if it wasn't
signed by the President of the United States, and then
he kin needed a preemptive pardon, I would make the
extra effort to make sure was actually signed.

Speaker 2 (37:46):
But imagine that. Okay.

Speaker 3 (37:48):
So part of the reason why they suggested they needed
this PREEMPTI parton is because they had congressional hearings about
January six in which they manipulated video, among other things rights.
They showed this video of you know, Josh running through
the building as if he was scared of the rioters.
And then you actually saw the full video on Fox
News that the State Capitol US police were telling them

(38:11):
to run through the building. It wasn't like he was scared.
He was instructed to do that, and everybody else was
doing it too. That's one little anecdotal example of them
manipulating video. I know it's not a courtroom, it's a
congressional hearing, but doesn't it still sound like they manipulated
evidence and what was treated like a legal trial.

Speaker 12 (38:28):
I think that if you look at the independent media,
they have evaluated what was presented and it seems to
be a rather one seted scenario offered in the j
six hearings. And granted, as a lawyer, that's your case,
you're going to make it one sided. But if you're
going to convince the American people what's fair and what's right,
you should put both sides out.

Speaker 3 (38:44):
Something that never sat well with me is how different
the rules are for lawmakers on the floor of the
Senate or the floor of the House, then for average
people like you and I. A famous example of this
was Harry Reid, the late senator from Nevada, lying on
the floor of the Senate about how Mitt Romney didn't
pay taxes back in twenty twelve, and of course it
wasn't true. Years later he was asked about this by

(39:05):
a journalist and he said to the journalist, well, Barack
Obama won the election, right, so my lie wasn't It was.
I accomplished what I set out to do. But you
didn't get any trouble for that, because there are laws
that protect lawmakers when they lie on the floor of
the of Congress. That wouldn't If you and I lied
during a congressional hearing, we would go to prison, probably

(39:25):
for a long time. I know it's not fair, obviously,
but what is an average person supposed to make of that?

Speaker 2 (39:30):
Well, we make out of it. We're under oath. It
matters to us.

Speaker 12 (39:33):
They're not under oath, we know that they can say
whatever they're going to say, and we could all at
some point just embrace the level of distrust that anything
anybody says down there needs to be evaluated with your
own evidentiary review.

Speaker 2 (39:43):
Right.

Speaker 12 (39:43):
I had to swear under oath when I gave presentation
of the Senate. I will swear under oath again when
I get presentation of the House, State Senate, State House
for this tour form issue. But yes, I am subject
to the rules of perjury when I signed my name
to that document.

Speaker 3 (39:56):
So you have to go to the Texas House and
talk about SB thirty. That's the next thing for you. Right,
And where is You're obviously an attorney? How long you've
been doing this for I've been attorney for twenty five years?
Twenty five years?

Speaker 2 (40:08):
And when Didge, where did you study at? I?

Speaker 12 (40:11):
Like most kids from Bridge City, Texas, I went to
undergraduate school at Marquette University in Lukuckey and went to
law school in Newark, New Jersey at Seaton Hall University.

Speaker 2 (40:19):
For here's schools from Bridge City, Texas. You seem like
a smart guy.

Speaker 3 (40:22):
You seem well articulate, you seem like you understand what
you're talking about here. But I do have a piece
of evidence to the contrary that I have to submit
to our audience right now to put everything into perspective here,
would you be willing to hold up that bottle that's
sitting on the left of you in front of the
camera so our listeners and viewers could see what you're
drinking right now, will.

Speaker 12 (40:39):
Well, if they're voting on whether or not it's going
to be bourbon or rye or vodka, it's none of those.

Speaker 2 (40:43):
It is diet mountain dew.

Speaker 3 (40:45):
But there you go, Well, who drinks diet mountain dew.
You're the guy that's been buying it this whole time.

Speaker 12 (40:50):
We go through cases. I am a savage. I'll drink
room temperature diet mountain dew. If you can imagine that.

Speaker 3 (40:58):
When I see dial mount Dew on the shelf, the
seven to eleven, the circle K, the BUCkies, I always.

Speaker 2 (41:03):
Wonder who is buying diet mountain dew. It's you. You
want a sad story.

Speaker 12 (41:07):
BUCkies doesn't sell it anymore because they have an exclusive
with a different distributor, so there's no diet mountain do
of Buffies. So while everyone in the state stops at BUCkies.
I keep driving.

Speaker 2 (41:16):
How do you even know that?

Speaker 12 (41:17):
Yes, well said you all get in. You ask where
the diet Mountain Dew is. You're giving some bad news
once you realize they no longer stock it. My guest
right now, will moy Well?

Speaker 3 (41:25):
If people want to look you up online, learn more
about the work you're doing, learn more about SB thirty.

Speaker 2 (41:29):
Where can they go do that? Two things?

Speaker 12 (41:30):
Wanting to go to my website moifirm dot com. But
more important, they need to go to their representative's website
and ring the bell and have them express their concerns
about the outcome of this measure.

Speaker 3 (41:39):
There are two hundred and seventeen people watching us live
streaming right now. Tens of thousands of people listen to
this radio show every week and download the podcast. And
you are sound like a smart guy. You get the subject.
You are obviously on the right side of this argument.
What happens when there's a class action lawsuit about all
the people that get bladder cancer because of diet mountain dew?

Speaker 2 (41:58):
What do we do it well?

Speaker 12 (42:00):
In the class So I hope everybody gets handsome in
the ward. I won't be the lawyer because I'll get
conflicted because I'll be part of the class.

Speaker 2 (42:06):
You can't. He's too uh, he's too biased on this one. Folks.

Speaker 3 (42:09):
I'm Kenny Webster. Thank you so much for watching. To
those of you watching us on social media, hit retweet,
hit share, tell your buddies, hit like, and subscribe. Have
a great day, y'all. Will be back bright and early
tomorrow morning for more of what you bought a radio for.

Speaker 4 (42:22):
Dude, you are listening to the Pursuit of Hapiness Radio.
Tell the government to kiss your ass when you listen
to this show.