August 8, 2023 • 39 mins
Jonas and Brady react to the ACC exploring the waters with Cal and Stanford. The Lions make a contingency plan at QB. Jonas discovers dried up toothpaste and another edition of “Would You Rather?”
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hey, thanks for listening to the Two Pros and a
Cup of Joe podcast with LaVar Arrington, Jonas Knox, and
myself Brady Quinn. Make sure you catch us live weekdays
six to nine am Eastern or three am to six
am Pacific on Fox Sports Radio. You can find your
local station for the Two Pros and a Cup of
Joe show over at Foxsports Radio dot com, or stream
(00:20):
us live every day on the iHeartRadio app by searching
FSR give this part.
Speaker 2 (00:28):
You're listening to Fox Sports Radio.
Speaker 3 (00:34):
Two Pros and a Cup of Joe Fox Sports Radio,
Brady Quinn, Jonas NOx with you here. You can listen
to this show on the iHeartRadio app. You can find
us on hundreds of affiliates all across the country. Wherever
you are making us a part of your Tuesday morning,
we appreciate you doing so. We are going to take
you all the way up until nine am Eastern time
six o'clock Pacific, and we do it all live from
(00:56):
the tire raq dot com studios tire rack dot com.
We'll help you get there an unmatched selection, fast free shipping.
Free Road has a protection and over ten thousand recommended
installers tirerac dot com the way tire buying should be.
I just noticed I've got like a trail of toothpaste
all over my sweater. That's fun.
Speaker 1 (01:17):
Would just how do you think that happened?
Speaker 3 (01:21):
Well, I mean clearly brushing my teeth?
Speaker 1 (01:25):
Yeah? Is that a humble brag?
Speaker 3 (01:27):
No? I well not really, because here's the problem. I
haven't washed this sweater in you know, at least a
couple of wares, and I for sure this did not
happen today, So it feels like this could be have
sitting in my point.
Speaker 1 (01:47):
Are we sure it's toothpaste?
Speaker 3 (01:50):
Let me see? Oh yeah, yeah for sure. Oh yeah
you had to look yeah yeah, just to see like
like how like how high up? And just sort of
yeah for sure? Yeah, yeah that I can't confirm that
that is?
Speaker 2 (02:07):
That is?
Speaker 1 (02:07):
I mean, could I have Lee or Chris or someone
else kind of chiming on this?
Speaker 3 (02:12):
Does it look like killing it today? That's toothpaste?
Speaker 2 (02:16):
Man?
Speaker 1 (02:17):
Come on, Lee? Is that toothpaste?
Speaker 3 (02:18):
No? I'm good, you know, I'll take Jonas's word for it.
Oh come on, Alex or Sandy come only dared to
go into the studio with him yet? I just uh yeah,
So it's a little bit of a just a toothpaste problem.
Because here's here's what I learned from my dentist that
I was We were lied to for I decade.
Speaker 1 (02:38):
Are you really gonna get on this kick? Right?
Speaker 3 (02:39):
Okay, I'm telling you it's Jesus. So this is what
I learned from my dentist.
Speaker 1 (02:43):
We've worked together way too long, and I already know
this is coming.
Speaker 3 (02:46):
And it makes sense. When we growing up, we're taught
you brush your teeth, you use your mouth wash, you
go on with your day. My dentist told me that
is not true. You use mouth wash first, then you
brush your teeth, and that way the toothpaste stays on
your teeth and adds as protectant throughout the course of
(03:08):
your day, longer than if you just rinse it all
off with some mouthwash. How about that? Actually, that does
make sense.
Speaker 1 (03:15):
Now, that makes sense. What he was going to say,
and what he usually says, is how you don't really
need toothpaste. You've taken that stance before the past, And
I'm like, all right, here we go.
Speaker 3 (03:24):
I've never taken that stance. What are you talking about? Okay, listen,
I've got to screw in my mouth all right, because
it replaces that it's just weird. Yeah, it's just weird.
It was metallic, a lot of sort of a metallic
taste at first, but then you just get used to it.
So is what it is? Man mouth like a hardware store.
Speaker 1 (03:44):
Yeah, you know me, are you exploring any possible additions?
Speaker 3 (03:48):
You know, that's a great point. I mean, what do
you think I am the ACC looking at Callan Stanford
because that's the latest to the famil Camel, as Brady
Quinn calls him.
Speaker 1 (04:03):
That's right, baby, fill up those humps.
Speaker 3 (04:05):
Pete Thamil of ESPN says that ACC leaders are set
to have exploratory discussions about the possible additions of cal
and Stanford. So we've got four teams left in the
PAC twelve. It's almost like the Royal Rumble for the
wwe you got four guys left. Who's going to be
(04:26):
standing when everybody gets thrown over the top rope, Except
in this case, everybody was jumping over the top rope
intentionally because they wanted nothing to do with the PAC
twelve Royal Rumble. And so now Callen Stanford are having
exploratory discussions quote unquote, and you've still got Washington State
and Oregon State just kind of sitting around, going all right,
what's the plan? What we got here? So that's the
(04:47):
latest on conference realignment in college football, which has completely
overtaken any of the coaches pulls that have come out
with Georgia rank number one overall. That's completely over take
in any of the discussions about Alabama's quarterback decision going
into the season. Everything is conference realignment which will not
(05:07):
take place until next year, right, kind of wild man?
Speaker 1 (05:12):
Can we be real about this? Clearly cal and Stanford
are trying to explore leaving the Pac twelve going elsewhere,
and maybe the ACC is entertaining those discussions, as I've
said in the past, unless they're willing to take a
significant discount, which it's hard to do that with at
(05:34):
least the ACC, only because the rights aren't that big,
you know. I think the two things that we pointed
out yesterday the fact that if you are not on
linear television, you're not going to be seen nationally, and
that's it plays a big role in impact into the
perception of your you know, your sports programs, your university,
(05:57):
and I think even for the athletes, for a lot
of the athletes and their family and everyone else. I mean, yeah,
it's great to be able to sign up for a
streaming platform and watch their games, but there's also an
element of like mommy and daddy, you know, sir, that's
my baby, that's my baby boy. You know, like that's
still part of it, and you don't have that right
(06:18):
now in the PAC twelve with what was on the table.
And so even though they've tried to go to a
model that they felt like could be a competitive economically
with a streaming platform in Apple, there's that element of
linear TV that still has the prestige of if you're
a Stanford player, like so many other the greats, whether
it's Andrew Luck or Christian McCaffrey, Toby Gear are guys
(06:40):
who were up for the Heisman. I mean you could
make the case that, you know, two of those three
maybe should have won it, and instead, you know, you're
looking at with a streaming platform, maybe they're not getting
any attention at all, maybe they're not even a finalist,
and it's almost an afterthought because no one's able to
see those highlights. So there's a ton of concerns that
(07:04):
I think consideration for why cal Stanford other pactual schools
have looked elsewhere. I mean, basically what they were presented
wasn't competitive economically. We went through the numbers yesterday, right yah.
To get one point seven million subscribers, you would be
doing something the MLS as a league has not been
able to do as a league, and that includes, you know,
(07:27):
incentives such as signing up for season tickets. Right where,
or at least from late July when those numbers came
out and they surpassed a million subscribers for the MLS
I believe season pass or whatever it's called. When Messi
signed up or when he you know, came to Inner Miami.
It's almost a I mean, you know, a thirty percent
(07:47):
of what they had had at that point was from incentives. So,
you know, we don't know exact all the details. We
only know what's been reported, but it's it seems pretty
clear with the way schools react acted to what George
Kleevekoff had presented from Apple that none of the schools
are interested in a streaming only platform at this time.
(08:09):
That could change in the future, maybe it changes that
the next media writes deal and most of these around
like twenty thirty where you can you know they could
start some of those negotiations, but at this point it
just doesn't make any sense. And so, yeah, of course
Callan Stanford are gonna be searching other options. But you know,
when you look at the dire position they're in right now,
(08:30):
because everyone keeps talking about how like, oh, does anyone
have the student athletes well being in mind? Yeah, a
lot of the coaches and administrators are obviously cognizant of
the impact traveling from Berkeley, California, or Palo Alto all
the way across the country to Atlantic Coast. Clearly they
are understanding of the impact they would play on those
(08:52):
other teams. But what else do you want them to do?
Do you want them to just go be absorbed in
the Mountain West, Because clearly the PAC twelve isn't going
to be considered an autonomous five, that it's not going
to be considered a power five anymore. So with the
transfer portal, you're either are going to have a mass
exodus of student athletes leaving if you're going to join
a smaller conference because that's not what they want, or
(09:14):
you've got to try to go find a better opportunity
elsewhere so you can support your athletics program. Even if
it's all the way across the country in which we
put it out again yesterday, the PAC twelve travel is
already difficult as it is. I mean, outside of Stanford
playing Cow, which is in close proximity, you're taking flights.
A lot of people on the East Coast don't really
understand how spread out the PAC twelve schools are from
(09:36):
one another, with the exception of schools that are in
the same state and close to one another. What it's Oregon,
Oregon State, Stanford Cow in that case, USCUCLA, But it's
not like a southern California school's busting up to northern California.
They're flying no different than you know, Arizona, Zona State.
It's same thing. They're obviously busting one another. Outside of that,
they're flying. So there's a bit of a misconception as
(09:56):
to the burden that's placed on some of these student athletes.
They're flying the majority of the case as it is now,
the trip's just got a little bit longer. But in
this case, I just don't know how it makes sense
for the ACCDD Stanford and col I understand how it
makes sense for Stanford and Cow at this point. And
that's where like when we keep talking about realignment expansion,
unless Callen Stanford are willing to take a steep discount,
(10:18):
which I think the ACC is getting over thirty some
million a year. Maybe Lee can check on what exactly
that number looks like. And another odd thing about k
Stanford looking at the ACC is you've got FSUC and
they want out, Like they're openly saying they want to
leave the ACC. Yet you're now, this is the conference
you select or you choose to explore joining. So maybe
(10:40):
Jim Phillips, the ACC, you know, conference commissioner, knows something
we don't, and he's saying, if we're gonna lose FSU,
and if we're gonna lose someone else, we might as
well then kind of backload with a couple of the
programs that at least help, you know, fill out that void.
Speaker 3 (10:56):
Washington State's president, Kirk Schultz wrote a letter to Cougar
Nation on Monday, and he talked about just how Washington
and Oregon joining the Big ten quote sealed the fate
of the PAC twelve. He talked about being shocked. He
also just asked for support for the Washington State program,
which I'm sure Nick Rollovitch could have used a few
(11:17):
years ago. But the point is I feel bad for
just the players and the fan base for these schools
because they're probably thinking to themselves, all right, we're finally
done with COVID, finally done with having a deal with
all that stuff. That was kind of a crazy time
for everybody. At least now we can just focus on
football and get ready for the season. Oh, by the way,
(11:38):
there's four teams, Like just like nobody knows. Everything is
so fluid, it's moving around.
Speaker 1 (11:45):
It's just for this year. It's the future though, I know,
but I just got time. It's not like, oh, this
is going to change for this upcoming year where we're going.
Speaker 3 (11:52):
I just I think there's a portion of people and
I'm kind of falling in line with this to where
I just want whatever it's going to be. I just
wanted to be locked in and set to go. If
we're just going to have conferences, all right, So this
is going to be continued every year.
Speaker 1 (12:06):
We're starting to settle into a model now where you're
essentially going to have four at least, you know, autonomous
conferences or the power for if you will. Yeah, and
we're getting to a point where the age old model
that used to be, and we probably talked about this
on our Sunday Night show, was sixty teams, you know,
sixty teams that are probably worthy of of a the
(12:26):
money and revenue they're generating based on their football and
basketball programs and competitively speaking, like those sixty teams are
the teams that we feel like could ultimately win a
national championship. But those are probably the teams that are
starting to kind of form into this whether you want
to call it Power four or whatever you will, with
the way the realignment's occurring, and maybe it evolves from
(12:50):
four to two as the SEC and Big ten just
look to absorb everyone. But again I keep harkening back
to you, this is all being motivated and pushed by
the TV networks behind it, at least right now in
linear TV, for the platform that it provides, the money
that it provides to help these programs continue to be
(13:10):
able to build and make money and compete with one another. Now,
what's going to change in college sports that could potentially
change the entirety of you know, the economics and how
this works is is if student athletes are considered to
be employees of this of the school or if this
(13:31):
goes to a professional model in some way, whereas I
said you know yesterday, if this turns into football and
men's women's basketball, then becoming essentially a minor league. Now
again we can go into that down that rabble and
talk about whether or not there's reasons for like whether
or not that even works like right now, I would
always say, well, look, you already have a minor league
(13:52):
in basketball, right you have the G League, you have
you know, professional leagues overseas. If players out of high
school don't want to play in college, they don't have to.
They can go elsewhere and then eventually enter into the
NFL or an NBA draft in that case, So there
are avenues there. For football players, it's different because you're
limited and you have to be three years room from
high school. And so in essence, the college football programs
(14:16):
are a minor league program. They are what's preparing that
next wave of employment in the NFL every single year.
And so that you know, makes a little more sense
in regards to how football is viewed and buy and large,
the football program drives the most revenue, and on top
of that, it's you know, even some men's basketball programs
aren't necessarily even profitable, so it's all going to be
(14:39):
driven and pushed by football, even though it impacts all
their sports. However, there could be a world we live
in where football is looked at as an employee or
professional as opposed to a student athlete. And then how
does that work within the rest of these schools, you know,
are there are they still having the same amount of
scholarships for you know, men's in women's student athletes. There's
(15:01):
so many questions that still need to be answered. So
to go back to the initial point, this isn't going
to be solved by the time this season starts and
then the realignment calms down. There's still gonna be subtle
movement here and there until we really kind of iron
out what we view student athletes in football and men's
women's basketball are and how it relates to the schools
(15:22):
that they're at. And that's still going to be decided,
probably in court when it's all said and done.
Speaker 3 (15:28):
I wonder what Beino Coke would say about all this,
probably be just disgusted with all this movement conference realignment.
Just once the good old days, you know, just bring
back the BCS let's just get back to simpler times.
That's that's when college football was at its best.
Speaker 1 (15:44):
And now that wouldn't mind bringing back the BCS to
determine the twelve team playoff, that's for sure.
Speaker 3 (15:49):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (15:49):
I mean that model of at least you know, factoring
in the ranking. And I know there's people who weren't
a fan of it, but if you think about it,
there was a human component, there was the computer component
of it. You knew how far back your team was
based on the actual I guess BCS rankings because it
showed you like a number. You know. Now we have
(16:09):
to have someone come out from the College Football Playoff
Committee and basically tell us like, hey, we think this
team's really good. We think this team should be here.
And you're saying, okay, you're really just setting this up
to let the schedule play itself out.
Speaker 3 (16:23):
You want to how far we've come. Nick Saban his
argument for last year's Alabama's team is that according to
the Gamblers, Alabama would have been favored against this many
teams that were in the College Football Playoff, like that's
where we're at now, where it used to be BCS,
or you would have a split share of the national title,
like I think Colorado and Miami had, or Miami and
(16:45):
Washington had back in the day. Now you got a
Nick Saban for the second time in Alabama history being
left out of the college football Playoff and saying, well,
we would have been favored over three of these teams anyway,
so that's why we should have been in. Like, that's
how far we've come in college football. Good news for
the Gamblers, bad news for the Pac twelve, but good
news for us because we had college football lesson a
(17:05):
month away. So everybody get fired up. It is Two
Pros and a Cup of Joe here on Fox Sports Radio.
Coming up next, though, we have a team in the
NFL that is looking after their well being, all right.
They want to make sure they've got everything covered, everything
buttoned up, just in case they've got a problem at quarterback.
We'll tell you who that is.
Speaker 1 (17:25):
That's next.
Speaker 2 (17:26):
Be sure to catch live editions of Two Pros and
a Cup of Joe with Brady Quinn, LeVar Errington and
Jonas Knox weekdays at six am Eastern three am Pacific
on Fox Sports Radio and the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 3 (17:40):
Two Pros and a Cup of Joe, Fox Sports Radio
Brady Quinn, Jonas Knox with you here. Coming up later
on this hour, we're gonna have another edition of would
you rather hard hitting question sports and non sports from
the great lead to lap here, So we're gonna have
to answer those for you again. Coming up a little
over twenty minutes from now. How about But you know
(18:01):
we were talking about Jared Goff. You had some sort
of a claim that you wondered if Jared Goff's dad's
first name was Jack. I don't even know what you
were getting out there. I'm not quite sure what you
were trying to say there, but I found it to
be a bit strange. But here's what's not strange. Teddy
Bridgewater finding a new home because he is back, and
(18:21):
it looks like the deal is going to be finalized
and Teddy Bridgewater is going to be a Detroit Lion.
That according to Jeremy Fowler of ESPN, who reported it
on Monday night. So Teddy Bridgewater is going to be back. Obviously,
he's got a previous relationship with Dan Campbell, who was
an assistant coach in New Orleans when Teddy Bridgewater was
(18:41):
there with the Saints. So Teddy Bridgewater is going to
be the backup quarterback there for the Detroit Lions. Hendon
Hooker obviously drafted at A Tennessee but dealing with the
knee injury, and so they got Teddy b in there
just in case anything happens for son of Jack Jared Goff.
Speaker 1 (19:00):
Quinn, Yeah, I think it sends the message that clearly
Hendon Hooker is not going to be physically and probably
mentally where they need him to be at for where
they feel like they are at, you know, a betting
favorite obviously to win the NFC North. And on top
of that, I think they've built this roster point where
they don't want an injury to Jared Goff to stop
(19:20):
them from being able to make the playoffs and potentially
make a run in the NFC, which, again, outside of
a handful or not even a handful, outside of a
two or three teams, I think you'd say it's pretty
wide open. And I think the Lions like the shot
that they've got of getting in there and then making
a run in a one game you know, playoff scenario.
So I love the signing from the standpoint that you know,
(19:42):
Teddy bees the ultimate pro. He's played a lot of games.
He's played some good football, and I think he could
fit well in Ben Johnson's system, their offensive coordinator. He's
Ben's one of the bright butting stars in this league.
I think after this year, if things go the way
we expect them to, he's gonna be a name you're
gonna hear interviewing for head coaching jobs and what they're
Jared or Teddy Bee behind center. He'll put them in
(20:03):
a position to succeed. So this is just one of
those signings that I think gives you a sense of
I think one with the Lions are thinking, but also
too you know, for a veteran guy like Teddy Be,
and you might be saying, well, he might not have
had any other opportunities. We don't know that he might have,
and this might have been the team that he selected,
which would also lead you to say, you know, even
(20:23):
if he didn't at this point, you know, he could
have waited until they got deeper in the season to
see if a team maybe had an injury to a
player or a quarterback and they needed to bring him
in either to play or for some depth. But he
took this opportunity, So it lends you to to you know,
see a little bit of what players who are free
agents also think about Detroit and the difference of maybe
how that compared in the past.
Speaker 3 (20:43):
Do you think that maybe they reached out to Carson
Wentz also, but he couldn't stomach the fact that he
would have to be number two behind Jared Goff again
like he was in the draft. You think that was
part of why maybe Carson Wentz might have turned down
the opportunity.
Speaker 1 (20:54):
I think they wanted to avoid the awkwardness altogether.
Speaker 3 (20:57):
Is that a real thing? By the way, would would
that be? Some think they would actually contemplate this could
get awkward for him if he's got to be the
number two to Jared Goff again like he was in
twenty sixteen in the draft.
Speaker 1 (21:08):
I'm not sure they care about where they were taking
the draft, but they definitely care about when you sign
a quarterback, how that quarterback fits into the quarterback room.
There's been plenty of guys who have stayed on as
a long time backup, and reason being is because they
were never threatening to their starter and people might hear
them go wait what, but that's the truth.
Speaker 3 (21:29):
Oh yeah, I buy it.
Speaker 1 (21:30):
They want that working environment to be copeacetic. They want
the backup and even the third string guy them all
to be working to help prepare the first string quarterback,
to make sure that room is operating in a manner
that there's no distractions. They're all working together and supporting
the starter. And that's the hard part about when you've
got a quarterback competition going into the season, and especially
(21:52):
if it's close or depending on the scenario between the
two guys, it could be tough to be able to
keep both at least more than one year. And so
guys that you've seen that have hung on the league
forever and haven't played many games, one of the reasons
is they've they've been a good backup quarterback to the starter.
They've been a good guy in the meeting rooms and
(22:13):
maybe probably a future coach one day. But that's usually
the rationale for it is they're not ruffling any feathers.
They're not trying to push to get in the field
anytime soon. Now, if they do get on the field,
they've got to do well enough to be able to
make people think, Okay, this guy is capable if we
need them. But they don't want to get on the
field either, trust me, like that. The team doesn't want
them to get on the field. They don't want to
get on the field, and those guys a lot of
(22:35):
times be able to play and last forever in the league.
Speaker 3 (22:37):
Well look, Blaine Gabbert, Blaine Gabert was a top ten
pick in twenty eleven, and the guy's still in the
league because it's like, well he backed up Tom Brady. Yeah,
it makes some sense, so back up Patrick Mahomes. Like,
no issues, no problem. Him and Brady got close when
he was in Tampa Bay.
Speaker 1 (22:53):
Like it.
Speaker 3 (22:53):
Apparently he's got a great reputation. Good dude, no issues whatsoever.
That guy can just keep collecting checks and making money
for what the next five six years.
Speaker 1 (23:01):
And it helps too if you get in with certain
coaching circles, because if you get in a few different systems,
you know, then those coaches can really vouch for you.
But but to your point, I mean, Blayne Gabbertt hasn't
started a game since twenty eighteen. He back back in Tennessee.
He's been that long since he was back. Even asked
to play spot duty, you know. I mean he got
drafted Jacksonville, what twelve years ago, and that was where
(23:25):
he got his opportunity to start and play, and it
was a tough situation I think for any quarterback to
enter into. And then since then he's been able to
kind of, you know, slowly find his way of you know,
building himself out and into being a very capable and
quality backup. And that's a great career if you can
find the opportunity to get that. It's a it's a
great position to be in. So he's he's obviously talented
(23:47):
enough too. I mean, I think that obviously plays a role.
But now he's found himself in a position where he
can back up a guy like Patch Mahomes and play
another I don't know, four years backing up a guy
like that, hoping, you know, again that he doesn't have
to play too much, at least in his mind. That's
probably what the organization is thinking. When you've got Patch
Mahlomes as your starter.
Speaker 3 (24:07):
Now, I know what you're probably thinking to yourself, like, man,
is he at least gonna throw a game show at me?
Is he at least gonna give me a game show?
Speaker 1 (24:14):
If you bet?
Speaker 3 (24:14):
You're asked, Brady Quinn, We've got ourselves a game show
for you. A little improp to game show here to
test the knowledge of the great Brady Quinn. We're calling
it the Teddy six. Can you, without cheating, name these
six teams that Teddy Bridgewater has been a part of
(24:35):
the Lions. Would mark team number six? Can you Brady
Quinn named the previous five?
Speaker 1 (24:41):
Yes? All right? He was drafted to Minnesota in the
first round. That is the first one. Yeah, I know
he recently played with the Miami Dolphins.
Speaker 3 (24:52):
That is correct. That is too.
Speaker 1 (24:54):
I do remember his stint with the New Orleans Saints
because he played so well. It helped him get that
contract and opportunity in Carolina.
Speaker 3 (25:02):
That is correct. So there are two. There was one remaining. Uh,
this would be the most difficult one because I actually
forgot about this as well too.
Speaker 1 (25:13):
Let me think, let me think, Oh, I think I
know this one Denver that is correct, which, by the way,
he didn't. I mean that was during the Vic Fangio
era and he uh, he actually did decent. Like he
did decent that I don't know why.
Speaker 3 (25:33):
Seven and seven they were.
Speaker 1 (25:34):
Well well even statistically speaking, like what's it like? He
played bad? I remember I'd like once I was like,
oh yeah, he was a Denver and I remember, because
I think he wore a visor at one point out there.
I'm not sure why that is the image I have
of Teddy Bridgewort in Denver as him wearing a Broncos
elbow advisor, But I remember he played well and I
thought to myself, like, all right, like maybe they'd bring
(25:55):
him back and didn't happen, end up signing I think
with Miami the next year.
Speaker 3 (25:59):
He's not like he's never played bad, like people like
if you just look at him, like look the Carolina
experiment they gave him. Remember the quote unquote three year
deal he got, which was just a bunch of crap.
It was a one year deal and it was like, Okay,
clearly the writing was on the wall, they're going to
go in a different direction. But if you go through
the course of his career, he never played bad. When
(26:21):
he was in Minnesota, he had the injury and he
was never quite the same there afterwards. But when he
went to New Orleans, he was phenomenal. He was undefeated
when he started games for Drew Brees when Breeze got injured, like,
he's always played pretty good football. And to the personality standpoint,
there's never an issue like there's never a problem with
you know, I mean he spoke out a little bit
about how Carolina practiced and Matt Ruhle and just sort
(26:44):
of how everything was kind of, you know, a little
bit off and kind of up in the air when
they would go through some of the pregame festivities and
get ready, like all the preparation. But other than that,
there's never been an issue. Like, always been a stand
up guy, and he's getting another opportunity and just keep
collecting those checks. Man be a backup quarterback. That's the move.
Is he gonna make Chase Daniel money? He's probably made
(27:06):
more than Chase Daniel at this point, I would think,
thank Chase Teddy B.
Speaker 1 (27:10):
Yeah, I don't know. I mean I would I would
assume he has only because with the first round pick
that helps. But Chase Daniels went a long time, so
you know, maybe it's kind of tough to come Lee.
Speaker 3 (27:23):
Can we can we double check who's made more money,
Chase Daniel or Teddy Bridgewater?
Speaker 1 (27:28):
He is Teddy B. Okay, Yeah, I think it's probably
a safe bet.
Speaker 3 (27:33):
Yeah, all right, so we will have an update for
you on that on what the the W two's look
like for Chase Daniel and Teddy Bridgewater. It is two
pros and a cup of Joe here on FSR. By
the way, let's tell you about ty Iraq. And congratulations
to Anthony K. Because be sure to enter the Summer
of Tyraq Sweepstakes just like Anthony K from Huntingburg, Indiana did.
(27:55):
And congratulations to Anthony. He was our first winner to
receive a set of four brand new tires. Now it's
your turn to win. Our next winner will be selected
this Sunday and then our third winner will be picked
on August twenty seventh, So Anthony from Indiana and two
more winners will have the opportunity to win a set
(28:17):
of four tires plus installation, taxes and fees. Check this
out valued it up to fifteen hundred dollars thanks to
tire Rack. Enter daily to continue getting new entries into
the contest every day at Foxsports Radio dot com. Again
to enter and get rules, visit Foxsports Radio dot com
(28:37):
sponsored by tire rack dot com. The way tire buying
should be so lead to laft. We have a confirmation
on who made more money, Chase Daniel or Teddybridgewater.
Speaker 4 (28:46):
Yeah, Teddy by about a little over twenty million Teddy's made.
So's close at least as Teddy's made about sixty two
Chase forty one.
Speaker 3 (28:54):
Yeah, I mean it's close. I mean kind of the same.
You know, if you think about it, you know minus
like nineteen million. That's fine. So you're writing in, Brady Quinn,
you are a Teddy Bridgewater Teddy six Pack game show winner,
first time in sports radio TV. Yeah, love Teddy Bee.
So welcome to August, everybody, Two Pros and a Cup
of Joe here on Fox Sports Radio. So coming up,
we are going to have another edition of would You
(29:16):
Rather Hear? From the tirak dot Com studios. We are
going to be asked hard hitting questions in the world
of sports and beyond, and it's yours here, a Tuesday
tradition on FSR.
Speaker 2 (29:26):
Be sure to catch live editions of Two Pros and
a Cup of Joe with Brady Quinn, LeVar Errington, and
Jonas Knox weekdays at six am Eastern three am Pacific.
Speaker 5 (29:41):
Listen to comeback stories. I'm Darren Waller. You may know
me best as a tied end for the New York Giants.
You may also know me for my story of overcoming addiction, alcoholism.
You may have heard a few of my tracks as
an artist or a producer, and you may have seen
the work that I've done through my foundation. And you
may know my friend and co host Donnie Starkins as well.
(30:03):
He said, mindfulness teacher, a yoga instructor, a life coach,
a man fully invested in seeing people reach their fullest potential.
And we've come to form this platform of Comeback Stories
to really highlight not only our own adversity, but adversity
in the lives of well known guests with amazing stories.
(30:25):
Catch us every week on Comeback Stories on the iHeartRadio app,
Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 3 (30:37):
Two pros and a cup of Joe. Fox Sports Radio,
Brady Quinn, Jonas Knox with you here. Coming up top
the next hour. We have a decision that was made
in the NFL and it's the right one and a
little surprising it hasn't been done more often. We will
get into that for you again a little over. We'll
call it twelve minutes from now here on FSR. Before
(30:58):
we get to another edition of Would You Rather, I
want to let you know we are brought to you
by Progressive Insurance. Progressive makes bundling easy and affordable. Get
a multi policy discount by combining your motorcycle, RB, boat,
ATV and more all your protection in one place. Bundle
and save at Progressive dot com. Let's make history and now, would.
Speaker 1 (31:19):
Would you rather your.
Speaker 2 (31:21):
Random topics, sports or otherwise?
Speaker 3 (31:24):
All right? Lead to lap? What we got guys?
Speaker 4 (31:26):
The Mega millions is up to one point five to
five billion dollars Woo woo. And if you were to
win the Mega millions, what would you would you rather
take the lump sum which would come out to about
seven hundred and fifty seven million lump sum pre tax,
or the thirty annual lomp some see.
Speaker 3 (31:43):
I saw Mark Cuban, who says, go the other way.
Speaker 1 (31:47):
There's no debate.
Speaker 3 (31:48):
Mark Cuban's a pretty smart business guy, said, goeah.
Speaker 1 (31:51):
Most people will talk about time value money. You'd rather
take it all up front. The other thing is you
have the factor in is you want to take out
the annuities, right, You're gonna take them the payments. That's fine.
If you die in three years from now, that three
years would not be as much fun having what ninety
million paid out over this three years versutus seven hundred million.
You get right now.
Speaker 3 (32:12):
I'm just trying. I still look at it. Doesn't mean
we've talked about this. I just we've talked about this before.
I don't understand how there's financial issues all over this country,
but we got one point five billion to throw around
if somebody picks the right five or six numbers.
Speaker 1 (32:27):
I just I'd love to study is how much it's
gone up over time, Like I don't remember. I mean,
maybe it's just it's it's more prevalent, more people are playing.
But I don't remember the lottery being as big like
five years ago.
Speaker 3 (32:41):
Yeah, no way.
Speaker 1 (32:42):
We've now hit over a billion for the Mega Millions
and for the power Ball at least now two times
three times.
Speaker 3 (32:49):
Yeah, in the last three four weeks.
Speaker 1 (32:51):
It's crazy.
Speaker 3 (32:52):
I don't get it, man, I really don't understand. I
don't know how that happens. Have you ever known anybody
that's won a pretty good amount in the lot I've
known a couple of people that have won six figures
in the lottery. No one like that.
Speaker 1 (33:04):
I don't know that many people that play the lottery.
Speaker 3 (33:06):
But here's the thing, though, the people that won it,
they won like I think it was like two hundred
and twenty thousand they won the I think they got
like four out of five numbers or five out of
six whatever it was. The number of times that they
played the lotto. They were a multiple time a week
investor into the lotto. I just wonder, after taxes and
(33:27):
what they put into it, how much they've actually walked
away with. It almost feels like it kind of wasn't
worth it because it wasn't like they really had anything
to show for it at the end of that.
Speaker 1 (33:35):
My advice would be, you play when you get a
pot that's this big, you know, in part because you
could say you got a shot at winning one point
five billion.
Speaker 3 (33:43):
It's pretty arrogant, though, if you think about.
Speaker 1 (33:45):
It, well, to only play this one.
Speaker 3 (33:47):
It's only worth your time if it's one point five billion.
If it's two hundred million, I'm not interested. Once you
get to the billion.
Speaker 2 (33:54):
You know.
Speaker 1 (33:54):
The point is this is the payouts so great, you
know you want to have at least a shot at
doing I'm not saying that two hundred million is not
enough to be paid out, but to the point that
you just made if you play it too often, considering
the odds, they're they're never going to be in your
favor of you winning it, So why not just then
play for the biggest payout?
Speaker 3 (34:12):
Would you tell anybody if you won?
Speaker 1 (34:15):
No, Although there are certain states where I don't believe
you can set it up in a LLC to protect
your identity, I actually think in certain states and leads
I could be able to look into this. I'm pretty
sure in certain states you're gonna have you have to
actually identify yourselfing.
Speaker 3 (34:31):
You know that's a little bit insulting because I try
and text Brady during the breaks and he doesn't get
back to me in time, So it's like, what do
you say?
Speaker 1 (34:37):
This is passive aggressive?
Speaker 3 (34:40):
Are you talking about?
Speaker 1 (34:42):
Yeah, it's not my fault. You try to live in
the nineteen eighties and we try to like follow up
on topics and there's no plow through with the rundown.
Speaker 3 (34:50):
I missed, I listen. I missed the text, and I
also misread the last one you sent me, so it
said tough and not touch and so I kind of,
you know, I wasn't reading it correctly, So that's why.
Speaker 1 (35:04):
I didn't know what you're trying to say? Lee? What
else forgot?
Speaker 3 (35:06):
Ye a?
Speaker 1 (35:06):
Lee?
Speaker 3 (35:07):
What else we have?
Speaker 4 (35:07):
Guys, would you rather soil yourself once a day in
private or once a year in public?
Speaker 1 (35:13):
Hold on the world?
Speaker 3 (35:17):
If you almost trump enough? Did you almost like Kevin
Brown and get suspended Brady Quinn for saying something out
of line?
Speaker 1 (35:25):
I mean, the problem is if you did it once
a day that I just that'd become so bad.
Speaker 3 (35:33):
How does this even this is your brain child, How
does this even happen?
Speaker 1 (35:38):
How public is it? That's what I want to know.
Speaker 4 (35:40):
As public as it can get for you, Brady.
Speaker 1 (35:43):
So I'm sitting on set for bid Dude, and I
frapped myself.
Speaker 3 (35:47):
Boulder, Colorado, Week two sea home opener for the Colorado
Bubble Colorado.
Speaker 1 (35:54):
And I'm sitting on set and he's like, what is
that smell? Sorry?
Speaker 3 (35:58):
Brady?
Speaker 1 (35:58):
Sorry? Once a year.
Speaker 3 (36:00):
Brady Quinn's wearing an Armani suit light light in color,
a light gray if you will. And he stands up.
But it looks like you spilled uh some dunk and
all over the front of your pants.
Speaker 1 (36:13):
God, so, but think about the how annoying would be
to do it every single day, even in private.
Speaker 3 (36:20):
I think I'll I would rather go public once, I'll
go public once. Yeah, I'll do it one time.
Speaker 1 (36:27):
I mean maybe if you do it public, it becomes
a thing, you know, you fundraise to go to some
I don't know, some good cause.
Speaker 3 (36:35):
One or two? Lee two? Okay, yeah, no, never mind
that got his nickname stink Stink did it in games?
Speaker 1 (36:44):
Uh number one not number two?
Speaker 3 (36:47):
Yeah, that completely changes things. Yeah, I'll do it in private. Yeah,
I'll do it in private. I'm not gonna do it
not doing it to be private. I'm not sure every
single day though, I mean, listen, that's not that far
of from what the normal routine is, depending on what
what the diet.
Speaker 4 (37:06):
Guys, Lots of celebrities have, you know, liquor own liquor?
Would you rather sip wild turkey with Matthew McConaughey, Kentucky Bourbon?
With Terry Bradshaw? He has Bradshaw Kentucky bourbon. You obviously
got Proper twelve with Connor McGregor, The Rock has a tequila.
Who would you want to sip with on their own liquor?
Speaker 3 (37:29):
Terry Bradshaw? Yeah, it'd be fun, better stories.
Speaker 1 (37:33):
Yeah, he'd be a lot of fun. I don't know.
Connor McGregor would be a lot of fun too.
Speaker 3 (37:37):
Yeah, the problem is you're not quite sure if you're
only having whiskey or if there's some other stuff going on,
maybe a spelling contest. Oh, there's some rumors out there.
Speaker 1 (37:47):
That's not the scenario that Lee played out this more
than it needs to be. I think the hard part
is I would probably after a few drinks, like noting,
be able to understand them. True, you get you get
a few drinks in there, you're like, I have no idea.
What is you? And Sam?
Speaker 3 (38:00):
I've heard that about I've never been to Ireland because
you won't take me for some reason. But I've heard that,
like the accidents are really thick. You would never want
to hang out with me in Ireland.
Speaker 1 (38:11):
Umm, you don't really hang out with people.
Speaker 3 (38:14):
You imagine you and I just like randomly going to
like I don't know, like a Djtsto concert or some
crap like that in Ireland, just maybe going you have to.
Speaker 1 (38:21):
Call it DJ Tiesto or most people just call him Tiesta.
Speaker 3 (38:24):
I call him Djtso, Okay, what else you came from? Lee?
Speaker 4 (38:27):
What do we got million dollars up front? Or ten
million dollars for a thirty yard field goal?
Speaker 1 (38:33):
Oh? Million dollars up front.
Speaker 3 (38:35):
I'll take ten million, Lee.
Speaker 1 (38:37):
No, no, no, you have to make the thirty yard field goal?
Yeah yeah, no I don't know that you could.
Speaker 3 (38:41):
No problem. Now is there?
Speaker 1 (38:43):
Uh wait, that's just for the ten yard line? Right?
Oh no, it's Jesus. That's a well how are we
doing this? I got actual thirty yards, so we're encompassing
the end zone as part of that too. So from
the thirty yard line be really a forty yard er.
Speaker 4 (38:55):
I'm gonna call it just straight thirty yards in the
twenty Oh yeah.
Speaker 3 (38:58):
Okay, all right, now, is there is there.
Speaker 1 (39:04):
For the ten million?
Speaker 3 (39:05):
If there are no defenders, all take my chances.
Speaker 2 (39:07):
Fox Sports Radio has the best sports talk lineup in
the nation. Catch all of our shows at foxsports Radio
dot com and within the iHeartRadio app. Search FSR to
listen live.
Hey, thanks for listening to the Two Pros and a
Cup of Joe podcast with LaVar Arrington, Jonas Knox, and
myself Brady Quinn. Make sure you catch us live weekdays
six to nine am Eastern or three am to six
am Pacific on Fox Sports Radio. You can find your
local station for the Two Pros and a Cup of
Joe show over at Foxsports Radio dot com, or stream
(00:20):
us live every day on the iHeartRadio app by searching
FSR give this part.
Speaker 2 (00:28):
You're listening to Fox Sports Radio.
Speaker 3 (00:34):
Two Pros and a Cup of Joe Fox Sports Radio,
Brady Quinn, Jonas NOx with you here. You can listen
to this show on the iHeartRadio app. You can find
us on hundreds of affiliates all across the country. Wherever
you are making us a part of your Tuesday morning,
we appreciate you doing so. We are going to take
you all the way up until nine am Eastern time
six o'clock Pacific, and we do it all live from
(00:56):
the tire raq dot com studios tire rack dot com.
We'll help you get there an unmatched selection, fast free shipping.
Free Road has a protection and over ten thousand recommended
installers tirerac dot com the way tire buying should be.
I just noticed I've got like a trail of toothpaste
all over my sweater. That's fun.
Speaker 1 (01:17):
Would just how do you think that happened?
Speaker 3 (01:21):
Well, I mean clearly brushing my teeth?
Speaker 1 (01:25):
Yeah? Is that a humble brag?
Speaker 3 (01:27):
No? I well not really, because here's the problem. I
haven't washed this sweater in you know, at least a
couple of wares, and I for sure this did not
happen today, So it feels like this could be have
sitting in my point.
Speaker 1 (01:47):
Are we sure it's toothpaste?
Speaker 3 (01:50):
Let me see? Oh yeah, yeah for sure. Oh yeah
you had to look yeah yeah, just to see like
like how like how high up? And just sort of
yeah for sure? Yeah, yeah that I can't confirm that
that is?
Speaker 2 (02:07):
That is?
Speaker 1 (02:07):
I mean, could I have Lee or Chris or someone
else kind of chiming on this?
Speaker 3 (02:12):
Does it look like killing it today? That's toothpaste?
Speaker 2 (02:16):
Man?
Speaker 1 (02:17):
Come on, Lee? Is that toothpaste?
Speaker 3 (02:18):
No? I'm good, you know, I'll take Jonas's word for it.
Oh come on, Alex or Sandy come only dared to
go into the studio with him yet? I just uh yeah,
So it's a little bit of a just a toothpaste problem.
Because here's here's what I learned from my dentist that
I was We were lied to for I decade.
Speaker 1 (02:38):
Are you really gonna get on this kick? Right?
Speaker 3 (02:39):
Okay, I'm telling you it's Jesus. So this is what
I learned from my dentist.
Speaker 1 (02:43):
We've worked together way too long, and I already know
this is coming.
Speaker 3 (02:46):
And it makes sense. When we growing up, we're taught
you brush your teeth, you use your mouth wash, you
go on with your day. My dentist told me that
is not true. You use mouth wash first, then you
brush your teeth, and that way the toothpaste stays on
your teeth and adds as protectant throughout the course of
(03:08):
your day, longer than if you just rinse it all
off with some mouthwash. How about that? Actually, that does
make sense.
Speaker 1 (03:15):
Now, that makes sense. What he was going to say,
and what he usually says, is how you don't really
need toothpaste. You've taken that stance before the past, And
I'm like, all right, here we go.
Speaker 3 (03:24):
I've never taken that stance. What are you talking about? Okay, listen,
I've got to screw in my mouth all right, because
it replaces that it's just weird. Yeah, it's just weird.
It was metallic, a lot of sort of a metallic
taste at first, but then you just get used to it.
So is what it is? Man mouth like a hardware store.
Speaker 1 (03:44):
Yeah, you know me, are you exploring any possible additions?
Speaker 3 (03:48):
You know, that's a great point. I mean, what do
you think I am the ACC looking at Callan Stanford
because that's the latest to the famil Camel, as Brady
Quinn calls him.
Speaker 1 (04:03):
That's right, baby, fill up those humps.
Speaker 3 (04:05):
Pete Thamil of ESPN says that ACC leaders are set
to have exploratory discussions about the possible additions of cal
and Stanford. So we've got four teams left in the
PAC twelve. It's almost like the Royal Rumble for the
wwe you got four guys left. Who's going to be
(04:26):
standing when everybody gets thrown over the top rope, Except
in this case, everybody was jumping over the top rope
intentionally because they wanted nothing to do with the PAC
twelve Royal Rumble. And so now Callen Stanford are having
exploratory discussions quote unquote, and you've still got Washington State
and Oregon State just kind of sitting around, going all right,
what's the plan? What we got here? So that's the
(04:47):
latest on conference realignment in college football, which has completely
overtaken any of the coaches pulls that have come out
with Georgia rank number one overall. That's completely over take
in any of the discussions about Alabama's quarterback decision going
into the season. Everything is conference realignment which will not
(05:07):
take place until next year, right, kind of wild man?
Speaker 1 (05:12):
Can we be real about this? Clearly cal and Stanford
are trying to explore leaving the Pac twelve going elsewhere,
and maybe the ACC is entertaining those discussions, as I've
said in the past, unless they're willing to take a
significant discount, which it's hard to do that with at
(05:34):
least the ACC, only because the rights aren't that big,
you know. I think the two things that we pointed
out yesterday the fact that if you are not on
linear television, you're not going to be seen nationally, and
that's it plays a big role in impact into the
perception of your you know, your sports programs, your university,
(05:57):
and I think even for the athletes, for a lot
of the athletes and their family and everyone else. I mean, yeah,
it's great to be able to sign up for a
streaming platform and watch their games, but there's also an
element of like mommy and daddy, you know, sir, that's
my baby, that's my baby boy. You know, like that's
still part of it, and you don't have that right
(06:18):
now in the PAC twelve with what was on the table.
And so even though they've tried to go to a
model that they felt like could be a competitive economically
with a streaming platform in Apple, there's that element of
linear TV that still has the prestige of if you're
a Stanford player, like so many other the greats, whether
it's Andrew Luck or Christian McCaffrey, Toby Gear are guys
(06:40):
who were up for the Heisman. I mean you could
make the case that, you know, two of those three
maybe should have won it, and instead, you know, you're
looking at with a streaming platform, maybe they're not getting
any attention at all, maybe they're not even a finalist,
and it's almost an afterthought because no one's able to
see those highlights. So there's a ton of concerns that
(07:04):
I think consideration for why cal Stanford other pactual schools
have looked elsewhere. I mean, basically what they were presented
wasn't competitive economically. We went through the numbers yesterday, right yah.
To get one point seven million subscribers, you would be
doing something the MLS as a league has not been
able to do as a league, and that includes, you know,
(07:27):
incentives such as signing up for season tickets. Right where,
or at least from late July when those numbers came
out and they surpassed a million subscribers for the MLS
I believe season pass or whatever it's called. When Messi
signed up or when he you know, came to Inner Miami.
It's almost a I mean, you know, a thirty percent
(07:47):
of what they had had at that point was from incentives. So,
you know, we don't know exact all the details. We
only know what's been reported, but it's it seems pretty
clear with the way schools react acted to what George
Kleevekoff had presented from Apple that none of the schools
are interested in a streaming only platform at this time.
(08:09):
That could change in the future, maybe it changes that
the next media writes deal and most of these around
like twenty thirty where you can you know they could
start some of those negotiations, but at this point it
just doesn't make any sense. And so, yeah, of course
Callan Stanford are gonna be searching other options. But you know,
when you look at the dire position they're in right now,
(08:30):
because everyone keeps talking about how like, oh, does anyone
have the student athletes well being in mind? Yeah, a
lot of the coaches and administrators are obviously cognizant of
the impact traveling from Berkeley, California, or Palo Alto all
the way across the country to Atlantic Coast. Clearly they
are understanding of the impact they would play on those
(08:52):
other teams. But what else do you want them to do?
Do you want them to just go be absorbed in
the Mountain West, Because clearly the PAC twelve isn't going
to be considered an autonomous five, that it's not going
to be considered a power five anymore. So with the
transfer portal, you're either are going to have a mass
exodus of student athletes leaving if you're going to join
a smaller conference because that's not what they want, or
(09:14):
you've got to try to go find a better opportunity
elsewhere so you can support your athletics program. Even if
it's all the way across the country in which we
put it out again yesterday, the PAC twelve travel is
already difficult as it is. I mean, outside of Stanford
playing Cow, which is in close proximity, you're taking flights.
A lot of people on the East Coast don't really
understand how spread out the PAC twelve schools are from
(09:36):
one another, with the exception of schools that are in
the same state and close to one another. What it's Oregon,
Oregon State, Stanford Cow in that case, USCUCLA, But it's
not like a southern California school's busting up to northern California.
They're flying no different than you know, Arizona, Zona State.
It's same thing. They're obviously busting one another. Outside of that,
they're flying. So there's a bit of a misconception as
(09:56):
to the burden that's placed on some of these student athletes.
They're flying the majority of the case as it is now,
the trip's just got a little bit longer. But in
this case, I just don't know how it makes sense
for the ACCDD Stanford and col I understand how it
makes sense for Stanford and Cow at this point. And
that's where like when we keep talking about realignment expansion,
unless Callen Stanford are willing to take a steep discount,
(10:18):
which I think the ACC is getting over thirty some
million a year. Maybe Lee can check on what exactly
that number looks like. And another odd thing about k
Stanford looking at the ACC is you've got FSUC and
they want out, Like they're openly saying they want to
leave the ACC. Yet you're now, this is the conference
you select or you choose to explore joining. So maybe
(10:40):
Jim Phillips, the ACC, you know, conference commissioner, knows something
we don't, and he's saying, if we're gonna lose FSU,
and if we're gonna lose someone else, we might as
well then kind of backload with a couple of the
programs that at least help, you know, fill out that void.
Speaker 3 (10:56):
Washington State's president, Kirk Schultz wrote a letter to Cougar
Nation on Monday, and he talked about just how Washington
and Oregon joining the Big ten quote sealed the fate
of the PAC twelve. He talked about being shocked. He
also just asked for support for the Washington State program,
which I'm sure Nick Rollovitch could have used a few
(11:17):
years ago. But the point is I feel bad for
just the players and the fan base for these schools
because they're probably thinking to themselves, all right, we're finally
done with COVID, finally done with having a deal with
all that stuff. That was kind of a crazy time
for everybody. At least now we can just focus on
football and get ready for the season. Oh, by the way,
(11:38):
there's four teams, Like just like nobody knows. Everything is
so fluid, it's moving around.
Speaker 1 (11:45):
It's just for this year. It's the future though, I know,
but I just got time. It's not like, oh, this
is going to change for this upcoming year where we're going.
Speaker 3 (11:52):
I just I think there's a portion of people and
I'm kind of falling in line with this to where
I just want whatever it's going to be. I just
wanted to be locked in and set to go. If
we're just going to have conferences, all right, So this
is going to be continued every year.
Speaker 1 (12:06):
We're starting to settle into a model now where you're
essentially going to have four at least, you know, autonomous
conferences or the power for if you will. Yeah, and
we're getting to a point where the age old model
that used to be, and we probably talked about this
on our Sunday Night show, was sixty teams, you know,
sixty teams that are probably worthy of of a the
(12:26):
money and revenue they're generating based on their football and
basketball programs and competitively speaking, like those sixty teams are
the teams that we feel like could ultimately win a
national championship. But those are probably the teams that are
starting to kind of form into this whether you want
to call it Power four or whatever you will, with
the way the realignment's occurring, and maybe it evolves from
(12:50):
four to two as the SEC and Big ten just
look to absorb everyone. But again I keep harkening back
to you, this is all being motivated and pushed by
the TV networks behind it, at least right now in
linear TV, for the platform that it provides, the money
that it provides to help these programs continue to be
(13:10):
able to build and make money and compete with one another. Now,
what's going to change in college sports that could potentially
change the entirety of you know, the economics and how
this works is is if student athletes are considered to
be employees of this of the school or if this
(13:31):
goes to a professional model in some way, whereas I
said you know yesterday, if this turns into football and
men's women's basketball, then becoming essentially a minor league. Now
again we can go into that down that rabble and
talk about whether or not there's reasons for like whether
or not that even works like right now, I would
always say, well, look, you already have a minor league
(13:52):
in basketball, right you have the G League, you have
you know, professional leagues overseas. If players out of high
school don't want to play in college, they don't have to.
They can go elsewhere and then eventually enter into the
NFL or an NBA draft in that case, So there
are avenues there. For football players, it's different because you're
limited and you have to be three years room from
high school. And so in essence, the college football programs
(14:16):
are a minor league program. They are what's preparing that
next wave of employment in the NFL every single year.
And so that you know, makes a little more sense
in regards to how football is viewed and buy and large,
the football program drives the most revenue, and on top
of that, it's you know, even some men's basketball programs
aren't necessarily even profitable, so it's all going to be
(14:39):
driven and pushed by football, even though it impacts all
their sports. However, there could be a world we live
in where football is looked at as an employee or
professional as opposed to a student athlete. And then how
does that work within the rest of these schools, you know,
are there are they still having the same amount of
scholarships for you know, men's in women's student athletes. There's
(15:01):
so many questions that still need to be answered. So
to go back to the initial point, this isn't going
to be solved by the time this season starts and
then the realignment calms down. There's still gonna be subtle
movement here and there until we really kind of iron
out what we view student athletes in football and men's
women's basketball are and how it relates to the schools
(15:22):
that they're at. And that's still going to be decided,
probably in court when it's all said and done.
Speaker 3 (15:28):
I wonder what Beino Coke would say about all this,
probably be just disgusted with all this movement conference realignment.
Just once the good old days, you know, just bring
back the BCS let's just get back to simpler times.
That's that's when college football was at its best.
Speaker 1 (15:44):
And now that wouldn't mind bringing back the BCS to
determine the twelve team playoff, that's for sure.
Speaker 3 (15:49):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (15:49):
I mean that model of at least you know, factoring
in the ranking. And I know there's people who weren't
a fan of it, but if you think about it,
there was a human component, there was the computer component
of it. You knew how far back your team was
based on the actual I guess BCS rankings because it
showed you like a number. You know. Now we have
(16:09):
to have someone come out from the College Football Playoff
Committee and basically tell us like, hey, we think this
team's really good. We think this team should be here.
And you're saying, okay, you're really just setting this up
to let the schedule play itself out.
Speaker 3 (16:23):
You want to how far we've come. Nick Saban his
argument for last year's Alabama's team is that according to
the Gamblers, Alabama would have been favored against this many
teams that were in the College Football Playoff, like that's
where we're at now, where it used to be BCS,
or you would have a split share of the national title,
like I think Colorado and Miami had, or Miami and
(16:45):
Washington had back in the day. Now you got a
Nick Saban for the second time in Alabama history being
left out of the college football Playoff and saying, well,
we would have been favored over three of these teams anyway,
so that's why we should have been in. Like, that's
how far we've come in college football. Good news for
the Gamblers, bad news for the Pac twelve, but good
news for us because we had college football lesson a
(17:05):
month away. So everybody get fired up. It is Two
Pros and a Cup of Joe here on Fox Sports Radio.
Coming up next, though, we have a team in the
NFL that is looking after their well being, all right.
They want to make sure they've got everything covered, everything
buttoned up, just in case they've got a problem at quarterback.
We'll tell you who that is.
Speaker 1 (17:25):
That's next.
Speaker 2 (17:26):
Be sure to catch live editions of Two Pros and
a Cup of Joe with Brady Quinn, LeVar Errington and
Jonas Knox weekdays at six am Eastern three am Pacific
on Fox Sports Radio and the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 3 (17:40):
Two Pros and a Cup of Joe, Fox Sports Radio
Brady Quinn, Jonas Knox with you here. Coming up later
on this hour, we're gonna have another edition of would
you rather hard hitting question sports and non sports from
the great lead to lap here, So we're gonna have
to answer those for you again. Coming up a little
over twenty minutes from now. How about But you know
(18:01):
we were talking about Jared Goff. You had some sort
of a claim that you wondered if Jared Goff's dad's
first name was Jack. I don't even know what you
were getting out there. I'm not quite sure what you
were trying to say there, but I found it to
be a bit strange. But here's what's not strange. Teddy
Bridgewater finding a new home because he is back, and
(18:21):
it looks like the deal is going to be finalized
and Teddy Bridgewater is going to be a Detroit Lion.
That according to Jeremy Fowler of ESPN, who reported it
on Monday night. So Teddy Bridgewater is going to be back. Obviously,
he's got a previous relationship with Dan Campbell, who was
an assistant coach in New Orleans when Teddy Bridgewater was
(18:41):
there with the Saints. So Teddy Bridgewater is going to
be the backup quarterback there for the Detroit Lions. Hendon
Hooker obviously drafted at A Tennessee but dealing with the
knee injury, and so they got Teddy b in there
just in case anything happens for son of Jack Jared Goff.
Speaker 1 (19:00):
Quinn, Yeah, I think it sends the message that clearly
Hendon Hooker is not going to be physically and probably
mentally where they need him to be at for where
they feel like they are at, you know, a betting
favorite obviously to win the NFC North. And on top
of that, I think they've built this roster point where
they don't want an injury to Jared Goff to stop
(19:20):
them from being able to make the playoffs and potentially
make a run in the NFC, which, again, outside of
a handful or not even a handful, outside of a
two or three teams, I think you'd say it's pretty
wide open. And I think the Lions like the shot
that they've got of getting in there and then making
a run in a one game you know, playoff scenario.
So I love the signing from the standpoint that you know,
(19:42):
Teddy bees the ultimate pro. He's played a lot of games.
He's played some good football, and I think he could
fit well in Ben Johnson's system, their offensive coordinator. He's
Ben's one of the bright butting stars in this league.
I think after this year, if things go the way
we expect them to, he's gonna be a name you're
gonna hear interviewing for head coaching jobs and what they're
Jared or Teddy Bee behind center. He'll put them in
(20:03):
a position to succeed. So this is just one of
those signings that I think gives you a sense of
I think one with the Lions are thinking, but also
too you know, for a veteran guy like Teddy Be,
and you might be saying, well, he might not have
had any other opportunities. We don't know that he might have,
and this might have been the team that he selected,
which would also lead you to say, you know, even
(20:23):
if he didn't at this point, you know, he could
have waited until they got deeper in the season to
see if a team maybe had an injury to a
player or a quarterback and they needed to bring him
in either to play or for some depth. But he
took this opportunity, So it lends you to to you know,
see a little bit of what players who are free
agents also think about Detroit and the difference of maybe
how that compared in the past.
Speaker 3 (20:43):
Do you think that maybe they reached out to Carson
Wentz also, but he couldn't stomach the fact that he
would have to be number two behind Jared Goff again
like he was in the draft. You think that was
part of why maybe Carson Wentz might have turned down
the opportunity.
Speaker 1 (20:54):
I think they wanted to avoid the awkwardness altogether.
Speaker 3 (20:57):
Is that a real thing? By the way, would would
that be? Some think they would actually contemplate this could
get awkward for him if he's got to be the
number two to Jared Goff again like he was in
twenty sixteen in the draft.
Speaker 1 (21:08):
I'm not sure they care about where they were taking
the draft, but they definitely care about when you sign
a quarterback, how that quarterback fits into the quarterback room.
There's been plenty of guys who have stayed on as
a long time backup, and reason being is because they
were never threatening to their starter and people might hear
them go wait what, but that's the truth.
Speaker 3 (21:29):
Oh yeah, I buy it.
Speaker 1 (21:30):
They want that working environment to be copeacetic. They want
the backup and even the third string guy them all
to be working to help prepare the first string quarterback,
to make sure that room is operating in a manner
that there's no distractions. They're all working together and supporting
the starter. And that's the hard part about when you've
got a quarterback competition going into the season, and especially
(21:52):
if it's close or depending on the scenario between the
two guys, it could be tough to be able to
keep both at least more than one year. And so
guys that you've seen that have hung on the league
forever and haven't played many games, one of the reasons
is they've they've been a good backup quarterback to the starter.
They've been a good guy in the meeting rooms and
(22:13):
maybe probably a future coach one day. But that's usually
the rationale for it is they're not ruffling any feathers.
They're not trying to push to get in the field
anytime soon. Now, if they do get on the field,
they've got to do well enough to be able to
make people think, Okay, this guy is capable if we
need them. But they don't want to get on the
field either, trust me, like that. The team doesn't want
them to get on the field. They don't want to
get on the field, and those guys a lot of
(22:35):
times be able to play and last forever in the league.
Speaker 3 (22:37):
Well look, Blaine Gabbert, Blaine Gabert was a top ten
pick in twenty eleven, and the guy's still in the
league because it's like, well he backed up Tom Brady. Yeah,
it makes some sense, so back up Patrick Mahomes. Like,
no issues, no problem. Him and Brady got close when
he was in Tampa Bay.
Speaker 1 (22:53):
Like it.
Speaker 3 (22:53):
Apparently he's got a great reputation. Good dude, no issues whatsoever.
That guy can just keep collecting checks and making money
for what the next five six years.
Speaker 1 (23:01):
And it helps too if you get in with certain
coaching circles, because if you get in a few different systems,
you know, then those coaches can really vouch for you.
But but to your point, I mean, Blayne Gabbertt hasn't
started a game since twenty eighteen. He back back in Tennessee.
He's been that long since he was back. Even asked
to play spot duty, you know. I mean he got
drafted Jacksonville, what twelve years ago, and that was where
(23:25):
he got his opportunity to start and play, and it
was a tough situation I think for any quarterback to
enter into. And then since then he's been able to
kind of, you know, slowly find his way of you know,
building himself out and into being a very capable and
quality backup. And that's a great career if you can
find the opportunity to get that. It's a it's a
great position to be in. So he's he's obviously talented
(23:47):
enough too. I mean, I think that obviously plays a role.
But now he's found himself in a position where he
can back up a guy like Patch Mahomes and play
another I don't know, four years backing up a guy
like that, hoping, you know, again that he doesn't have
to play too much, at least in his mind. That's
probably what the organization is thinking. When you've got Patch
Mahlomes as your starter.
Speaker 3 (24:07):
Now, I know what you're probably thinking to yourself, like, man,
is he at least gonna throw a game show at me?
Is he at least gonna give me a game show?
Speaker 1 (24:14):
If you bet?
Speaker 3 (24:14):
You're asked, Brady Quinn, We've got ourselves a game show
for you. A little improp to game show here to
test the knowledge of the great Brady Quinn. We're calling
it the Teddy six. Can you, without cheating, name these
six teams that Teddy Bridgewater has been a part of
(24:35):
the Lions. Would mark team number six? Can you Brady
Quinn named the previous five?
Speaker 1 (24:41):
Yes? All right? He was drafted to Minnesota in the
first round. That is the first one. Yeah, I know
he recently played with the Miami Dolphins.
Speaker 3 (24:52):
That is correct. That is too.
Speaker 1 (24:54):
I do remember his stint with the New Orleans Saints
because he played so well. It helped him get that
contract and opportunity in Carolina.
Speaker 3 (25:02):
That is correct. So there are two. There was one remaining. Uh,
this would be the most difficult one because I actually
forgot about this as well too.
Speaker 1 (25:13):
Let me think, let me think, Oh, I think I
know this one Denver that is correct, which, by the way,
he didn't. I mean that was during the Vic Fangio
era and he uh, he actually did decent. Like he
did decent that I don't know why.
Speaker 3 (25:33):
Seven and seven they were.
Speaker 1 (25:34):
Well well even statistically speaking, like what's it like? He
played bad? I remember I'd like once I was like,
oh yeah, he was a Denver and I remember, because
I think he wore a visor at one point out there.
I'm not sure why that is the image I have
of Teddy Bridgewort in Denver as him wearing a Broncos
elbow advisor, But I remember he played well and I
thought to myself, like, all right, like maybe they'd bring
(25:55):
him back and didn't happen, end up signing I think
with Miami the next year.
Speaker 3 (25:59):
He's not like he's never played bad, like people like
if you just look at him, like look the Carolina
experiment they gave him. Remember the quote unquote three year
deal he got, which was just a bunch of crap.
It was a one year deal and it was like, Okay,
clearly the writing was on the wall, they're going to
go in a different direction. But if you go through
the course of his career, he never played bad. When
(26:21):
he was in Minnesota, he had the injury and he
was never quite the same there afterwards. But when he
went to New Orleans, he was phenomenal. He was undefeated
when he started games for Drew Brees when Breeze got injured, like,
he's always played pretty good football. And to the personality standpoint,
there's never an issue like there's never a problem with
you know, I mean he spoke out a little bit
about how Carolina practiced and Matt Ruhle and just sort
(26:44):
of how everything was kind of, you know, a little
bit off and kind of up in the air when
they would go through some of the pregame festivities and
get ready, like all the preparation. But other than that,
there's never been an issue. Like, always been a stand
up guy, and he's getting another opportunity and just keep
collecting those checks. Man be a backup quarterback. That's the move.
Is he gonna make Chase Daniel money? He's probably made
(27:06):
more than Chase Daniel at this point, I would think,
thank Chase Teddy B.
Speaker 1 (27:10):
Yeah, I don't know. I mean I would I would
assume he has only because with the first round pick
that helps. But Chase Daniels went a long time, so
you know, maybe it's kind of tough to come Lee.
Speaker 3 (27:23):
Can we can we double check who's made more money,
Chase Daniel or Teddy Bridgewater?
Speaker 1 (27:28):
He is Teddy B. Okay, Yeah, I think it's probably
a safe bet.
Speaker 3 (27:33):
Yeah, all right, so we will have an update for
you on that on what the the W two's look
like for Chase Daniel and Teddy Bridgewater. It is two
pros and a cup of Joe here on FSR. By
the way, let's tell you about ty Iraq. And congratulations
to Anthony K. Because be sure to enter the Summer
of Tyraq Sweepstakes just like Anthony K from Huntingburg, Indiana did.
(27:55):
And congratulations to Anthony. He was our first winner to
receive a set of four brand new tires. Now it's
your turn to win. Our next winner will be selected
this Sunday and then our third winner will be picked
on August twenty seventh, So Anthony from Indiana and two
more winners will have the opportunity to win a set
(28:17):
of four tires plus installation, taxes and fees. Check this
out valued it up to fifteen hundred dollars thanks to
tire Rack. Enter daily to continue getting new entries into
the contest every day at Foxsports Radio dot com. Again
to enter and get rules, visit Foxsports Radio dot com
(28:37):
sponsored by tire rack dot com. The way tire buying
should be so lead to laft. We have a confirmation
on who made more money, Chase Daniel or Teddybridgewater.
Speaker 4 (28:46):
Yeah, Teddy by about a little over twenty million Teddy's made.
So's close at least as Teddy's made about sixty two
Chase forty one.
Speaker 3 (28:54):
Yeah, I mean it's close. I mean kind of the same.
You know, if you think about it, you know minus
like nineteen million. That's fine. So you're writing in, Brady Quinn,
you are a Teddy Bridgewater Teddy six Pack game show winner,
first time in sports radio TV. Yeah, love Teddy Bee.
So welcome to August, everybody, Two Pros and a Cup
of Joe here on Fox Sports Radio. So coming up,
we are going to have another edition of would You
(29:16):
Rather Hear? From the tirak dot Com studios. We are
going to be asked hard hitting questions in the world
of sports and beyond, and it's yours here, a Tuesday
tradition on FSR.
Speaker 2 (29:26):
Be sure to catch live editions of Two Pros and
a Cup of Joe with Brady Quinn, LeVar Errington, and
Jonas Knox weekdays at six am Eastern three am Pacific.
Speaker 5 (29:41):
Listen to comeback stories. I'm Darren Waller. You may know
me best as a tied end for the New York Giants.
You may also know me for my story of overcoming addiction, alcoholism.
You may have heard a few of my tracks as
an artist or a producer, and you may have seen
the work that I've done through my foundation. And you
may know my friend and co host Donnie Starkins as well.
(30:03):
He said, mindfulness teacher, a yoga instructor, a life coach,
a man fully invested in seeing people reach their fullest potential.
And we've come to form this platform of Comeback Stories
to really highlight not only our own adversity, but adversity
in the lives of well known guests with amazing stories.
(30:25):
Catch us every week on Comeback Stories on the iHeartRadio app,
Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 3 (30:37):
Two pros and a cup of Joe. Fox Sports Radio,
Brady Quinn, Jonas Knox with you here. Coming up top
the next hour. We have a decision that was made
in the NFL and it's the right one and a
little surprising it hasn't been done more often. We will
get into that for you again a little over. We'll
call it twelve minutes from now here on FSR. Before
(30:58):
we get to another edition of Would You Rather, I
want to let you know we are brought to you
by Progressive Insurance. Progressive makes bundling easy and affordable. Get
a multi policy discount by combining your motorcycle, RB, boat,
ATV and more all your protection in one place. Bundle
and save at Progressive dot com. Let's make history and now, would.
Speaker 1 (31:19):
Would you rather your.
Speaker 2 (31:21):
Random topics, sports or otherwise?
Speaker 3 (31:24):
All right? Lead to lap? What we got guys?
Speaker 4 (31:26):
The Mega millions is up to one point five to
five billion dollars Woo woo. And if you were to
win the Mega millions, what would you would you rather
take the lump sum which would come out to about
seven hundred and fifty seven million lump sum pre tax,
or the thirty annual lomp some see.
Speaker 3 (31:43):
I saw Mark Cuban, who says, go the other way.
Speaker 1 (31:47):
There's no debate.
Speaker 3 (31:48):
Mark Cuban's a pretty smart business guy, said, goeah.
Speaker 1 (31:51):
Most people will talk about time value money. You'd rather
take it all up front. The other thing is you
have the factor in is you want to take out
the annuities, right, You're gonna take them the payments. That's fine.
If you die in three years from now, that three
years would not be as much fun having what ninety
million paid out over this three years versutus seven hundred million.
You get right now.
Speaker 3 (32:12):
I'm just trying. I still look at it. Doesn't mean
we've talked about this. I just we've talked about this before.
I don't understand how there's financial issues all over this country,
but we got one point five billion to throw around
if somebody picks the right five or six numbers.
Speaker 1 (32:27):
I just I'd love to study is how much it's
gone up over time, Like I don't remember. I mean,
maybe it's just it's it's more prevalent, more people are playing.
But I don't remember the lottery being as big like
five years ago.
Speaker 3 (32:41):
Yeah, no way.
Speaker 1 (32:42):
We've now hit over a billion for the Mega Millions
and for the power Ball at least now two times
three times.
Speaker 3 (32:49):
Yeah, in the last three four weeks.
Speaker 1 (32:51):
It's crazy.
Speaker 3 (32:52):
I don't get it, man, I really don't understand. I
don't know how that happens. Have you ever known anybody
that's won a pretty good amount in the lot I've
known a couple of people that have won six figures
in the lottery. No one like that.
Speaker 1 (33:04):
I don't know that many people that play the lottery.
Speaker 3 (33:06):
But here's the thing, though, the people that won it,
they won like I think it was like two hundred
and twenty thousand they won the I think they got
like four out of five numbers or five out of
six whatever it was. The number of times that they
played the lotto. They were a multiple time a week
investor into the lotto. I just wonder, after taxes and
(33:27):
what they put into it, how much they've actually walked
away with. It almost feels like it kind of wasn't
worth it because it wasn't like they really had anything
to show for it at the end of that.
Speaker 1 (33:35):
My advice would be, you play when you get a
pot that's this big, you know, in part because you
could say you got a shot at winning one point
five billion.
Speaker 3 (33:43):
It's pretty arrogant, though, if you think about.
Speaker 1 (33:45):
It, well, to only play this one.
Speaker 3 (33:47):
It's only worth your time if it's one point five billion.
If it's two hundred million, I'm not interested. Once you
get to the billion.
Speaker 2 (33:54):
You know.
Speaker 1 (33:54):
The point is this is the payouts so great, you
know you want to have at least a shot at
doing I'm not saying that two hundred million is not
enough to be paid out, but to the point that
you just made if you play it too often, considering
the odds, they're they're never going to be in your
favor of you winning it, So why not just then
play for the biggest payout?
Speaker 3 (34:12):
Would you tell anybody if you won?
Speaker 1 (34:15):
No, Although there are certain states where I don't believe
you can set it up in a LLC to protect
your identity, I actually think in certain states and leads
I could be able to look into this. I'm pretty
sure in certain states you're gonna have you have to
actually identify yourselfing.
Speaker 3 (34:31):
You know that's a little bit insulting because I try
and text Brady during the breaks and he doesn't get
back to me in time, So it's like, what do
you say?
Speaker 1 (34:37):
This is passive aggressive?
Speaker 3 (34:40):
Are you talking about?
Speaker 1 (34:42):
Yeah, it's not my fault. You try to live in
the nineteen eighties and we try to like follow up
on topics and there's no plow through with the rundown.
Speaker 3 (34:50):
I missed, I listen. I missed the text, and I
also misread the last one you sent me, so it
said tough and not touch and so I kind of,
you know, I wasn't reading it correctly, So that's why.
Speaker 1 (35:04):
I didn't know what you're trying to say? Lee? What
else forgot?
Speaker 3 (35:06):
Ye a?
Speaker 1 (35:06):
Lee?
Speaker 3 (35:07):
What else we have?
Speaker 4 (35:07):
Guys, would you rather soil yourself once a day in
private or once a year in public?
Speaker 1 (35:13):
Hold on the world?
Speaker 3 (35:17):
If you almost trump enough? Did you almost like Kevin
Brown and get suspended Brady Quinn for saying something out
of line?
Speaker 1 (35:25):
I mean, the problem is if you did it once
a day that I just that'd become so bad.
Speaker 3 (35:33):
How does this even this is your brain child, How
does this even happen?
Speaker 1 (35:38):
How public is it? That's what I want to know.
Speaker 4 (35:40):
As public as it can get for you, Brady.
Speaker 1 (35:43):
So I'm sitting on set for bid Dude, and I
frapped myself.
Speaker 3 (35:47):
Boulder, Colorado, Week two sea home opener for the Colorado
Bubble Colorado.
Speaker 1 (35:54):
And I'm sitting on set and he's like, what is
that smell? Sorry?
Speaker 3 (35:58):
Brady?
Speaker 1 (35:58):
Sorry? Once a year.
Speaker 3 (36:00):
Brady Quinn's wearing an Armani suit light light in color,
a light gray if you will. And he stands up.
But it looks like you spilled uh some dunk and
all over the front of your pants.
Speaker 1 (36:13):
God, so, but think about the how annoying would be
to do it every single day, even in private.
Speaker 3 (36:20):
I think I'll I would rather go public once, I'll
go public once. Yeah, I'll do it one time.
Speaker 1 (36:27):
I mean maybe if you do it public, it becomes
a thing, you know, you fundraise to go to some
I don't know, some good cause.
Speaker 3 (36:35):
One or two? Lee two? Okay, yeah, no, never mind
that got his nickname stink Stink did it in games?
Speaker 1 (36:44):
Uh number one not number two?
Speaker 3 (36:47):
Yeah, that completely changes things. Yeah, I'll do it in private. Yeah,
I'll do it in private. I'm not gonna do it
not doing it to be private. I'm not sure every
single day though, I mean, listen, that's not that far
of from what the normal routine is, depending on what
what the diet.
Speaker 4 (37:06):
Guys, Lots of celebrities have, you know, liquor own liquor?
Would you rather sip wild turkey with Matthew McConaughey, Kentucky Bourbon?
With Terry Bradshaw? He has Bradshaw Kentucky bourbon. You obviously
got Proper twelve with Connor McGregor, The Rock has a tequila.
Who would you want to sip with on their own liquor?
Speaker 3 (37:29):
Terry Bradshaw? Yeah, it'd be fun, better stories.
Speaker 1 (37:33):
Yeah, he'd be a lot of fun. I don't know.
Connor McGregor would be a lot of fun too.
Speaker 3 (37:37):
Yeah, the problem is you're not quite sure if you're
only having whiskey or if there's some other stuff going on,
maybe a spelling contest. Oh, there's some rumors out there.
Speaker 1 (37:47):
That's not the scenario that Lee played out this more
than it needs to be. I think the hard part
is I would probably after a few drinks, like noting,
be able to understand them. True, you get you get
a few drinks in there, you're like, I have no idea.
What is you? And Sam?
Speaker 3 (38:00):
I've heard that about I've never been to Ireland because
you won't take me for some reason. But I've heard that,
like the accidents are really thick. You would never want
to hang out with me in Ireland.
Speaker 1 (38:11):
Umm, you don't really hang out with people.
Speaker 3 (38:14):
You imagine you and I just like randomly going to
like I don't know, like a Djtsto concert or some
crap like that in Ireland, just maybe going you have to.
Speaker 1 (38:21):
Call it DJ Tiesto or most people just call him Tiesta.
Speaker 3 (38:24):
I call him Djtso, Okay, what else you came from? Lee?
Speaker 4 (38:27):
What do we got million dollars up front? Or ten
million dollars for a thirty yard field goal?
Speaker 1 (38:33):
Oh? Million dollars up front.
Speaker 3 (38:35):
I'll take ten million, Lee.
Speaker 1 (38:37):
No, no, no, you have to make the thirty yard field goal?
Yeah yeah, no I don't know that you could.
Speaker 3 (38:41):
No problem. Now is there?
Speaker 1 (38:43):
Uh wait, that's just for the ten yard line? Right?
Oh no, it's Jesus. That's a well how are we
doing this? I got actual thirty yards, so we're encompassing
the end zone as part of that too. So from
the thirty yard line be really a forty yard er.
Speaker 4 (38:55):
I'm gonna call it just straight thirty yards in the
twenty Oh yeah.
Speaker 3 (38:58):
Okay, all right, now, is there is there.
Speaker 1 (39:04):
For the ten million?
Speaker 3 (39:05):
If there are no defenders, all take my chances.
Speaker 2 (39:07):
Fox Sports Radio has the best sports talk lineup in
the nation. Catch all of our shows at foxsports Radio
dot com and within the iHeartRadio app. Search FSR to
listen live.
Hosts And Creators
Brady Quinn
LaVar Arrington
Jonas Knox
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.