September 12, 2024 • 34 mins
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
It's that time, time, time, time, luck and load.
Speaker 2 (00:11):
Michael Verie Show is on the air.
Speaker 3 (00:21):
If you're MSNBC and you want to know about Haitians
eating the neighborhood family pets in Springfield, Ohio, you have
to call Maxine Waters.
Speaker 2 (00:31):
You got them.
Speaker 3 (00:33):
I know you're thinking, but she's from California. So what
did Maxine Waters have to say about Haitians eating house
pets in Ohio? She said, people are only angry about
the Haitians eating their house pet, their cat because the
Haitians are black.
Speaker 4 (00:51):
Well, let me just say this that Haitians have been
the victims of you know, not only our country but Canada, and.
Speaker 5 (01:00):
For years historically.
Speaker 4 (01:02):
They're black, they're poor, It's supports country in the Hemisphere.
They have been exploited and it continues all the time
they are It does not appear that they're seen in
the same way that they see others. Haitians have been
the victims because they were the first country to fight
(01:22):
off the repression of France, and of course France have.
Speaker 5 (01:26):
Made them pay a big price for it. Yes, I
think they're treated.
Speaker 4 (01:29):
Differently because they're black, because they are Haitians, and because
traditionally they have not been treated as human beings.
Speaker 3 (01:38):
Since Maxine Waters is in the news again, the woman
who refers to Republicans as white devils, and since it
was just Bill O'Reilly's birthday, it only seemed right to
dig out this one from the archives of Bill O'Reilly
poking fun of Maxine Waters for wearing a James Brown wig.
Speaker 1 (01:59):
We love this.
Speaker 2 (02:00):
I didn't hear a word she said.
Speaker 6 (02:02):
I was looking at the James Brown week If we
haven't vision of James, it's the same.
Speaker 5 (02:08):
It's the same one, right, and he's not.
Speaker 7 (02:09):
Using you're all wrong just on that.
Speaker 5 (02:14):
She's You can't go after a woman's looks. I think
she's very attractive.
Speaker 6 (02:17):
But I didn't say she wasn't attractive. I love James Brown.
Speaker 5 (02:20):
But it's the same hair. James Brown are the.
Speaker 8 (02:23):
Godfather or souls, so he had girl hair.
Speaker 6 (02:26):
Whatever it is, I just couldn't get by it. I
was you're all wrong about Maxine Waters. Number one. She's
a sincere individual. Whatever she says, she believes, she's not
a phony.
Speaker 2 (02:35):
All right, that's right, and that's old school. Peter Doocy
deserves a great deal of credit. He is the Fox
White House reporter.
Speaker 3 (02:44):
He walks into the White House briefing room every.
Speaker 2 (02:49):
Day knowing that they hate him. I mean, they despise him.
Speaker 3 (02:55):
You only see a few seconds of his interaction every day, but.
Speaker 2 (03:00):
He has to badge in every day.
Speaker 3 (03:01):
He's got his fob, probably doesn't work every day. They
probably make it as difficult as they can talk bad
about him. And that might not seem like a lot,
but most people couldn't do that, and he does it
with a plumb. I mean, hats off to Peter Doocy.
He is one of the guys that And I'll tell
(03:23):
you another guy, this guy Scott Jennings. I never heard
of him before, who's at CNN. He is doing Yeoman's work,
and really Herculean Yeoman's work for that matter. And you
may say, well, why is he bothering over there? There's
still some independent people who are very naive who are
(03:45):
watching CNN, and he is the only counterbalance. He is
the only one saying no, that's not true. And I
think he's doing a fantastic job of it. And I
credit him for that. Back to Peter Doocy, So he
got under the skin of the Affirmative Action White House
(04:06):
Press secretary with a question about Kamala Harris's sudden southern accent,
black accent, Detroit accent when she speaks to certain audiences,
and it's so obvious and it's so cringe, and the
Affirmative Action Press secretary wanted to act like she doesn't
even know what he's talking about.
Speaker 2 (04:26):
Listen to this.
Speaker 9 (04:27):
Since when does the vice president have what sounds like
a southern accent?
Speaker 10 (04:32):
I have no idea what you're talking about.
Speaker 5 (04:34):
Well, I mean.
Speaker 9 (04:35):
This is she was talking about unions.
Speaker 5 (04:37):
In Detroit using one tone of voice. Is this something?
Speaker 1 (04:42):
Same line?
Speaker 9 (04:43):
Okay, Peter, She's the same line in Pittsburgh, and it
sounded like she at least had some kind of a
southern at all.
Speaker 5 (04:49):
I mean, do you hear the question that?
Speaker 10 (04:50):
I mean, do you think Americans seriously think that this
is an important question?
Speaker 5 (04:54):
They care? You know, what they care about.
Speaker 10 (04:56):
What they care about the economy, they care about louring costs,
they care about healthcare. That's what Americans care about. So
that's what they want care about. Your colleague just asked
me about what basically we talked about, went back and
forth on democracy and freedom.
Speaker 5 (05:11):
That's what they care about.
Speaker 10 (05:12):
I'm not even going to entertain some question about the present.
It's just it's just hearing it sounds so ridiculous. Well,
but hearing it is. The question I'm talking about. The
questions is just insane.
Speaker 5 (05:26):
It's how she talks in meetings. I'm just here, kind Peter,
We're moving on.
Speaker 3 (05:32):
There is no way she doesn't know what he's talking about.
Everybody knows what he's talking about. Hell, we got an
entire song devoted to it.
Speaker 11 (05:45):
Your MoMA godradiction.
Speaker 5 (05:50):
Now you're not.
Speaker 12 (05:52):
All your counrig your prosecute and that for good.
Speaker 7 (06:00):
You don't know. You just don't know.
Speaker 13 (06:06):
Malai.
Speaker 3 (06:10):
You did.
Speaker 7 (06:13):
You send.
Speaker 13 (06:36):
My mama, Mama, Mama, Mama, mama, mama, mala.
Speaker 7 (07:01):
You live blaw your blaw blahlahla dah mala la la
bathera community.
Speaker 5 (07:12):
You better thank our union member for sick leave.
Speaker 10 (07:14):
You better thank a union member for paid leave.
Speaker 14 (07:17):
You better thank a union member for vacation time.
Speaker 15 (07:27):
Let's just get through the next sixty four days.
Speaker 11 (07:34):
And you all helped us win in twenty twenty and
we don't do it again in twenty twenty four.
Speaker 5 (07:42):
Yes, you know, you know. The one thing about all
of us is we lay hard work. Hard work is
good work. Hard work is good work.
Speaker 11 (07:53):
The thing that we like about heartwork is we have
fun doing hard work.
Speaker 5 (07:58):
Why can I get a witness? All my life? I
had to fight.
Speaker 7 (08:10):
It ain't over.
Speaker 11 (08:16):
With us.
Speaker 5 (08:16):
In government, we campaign with the plan. Uppercase T uppercase
t the plan, and then the environment is such that
we're expected to defend the plan.
Speaker 7 (08:29):
Ma ma, ma, ma ma. Married a.
Speaker 16 (08:51):
Jackie.
Speaker 5 (08:51):
You here jack a crash that killed Congresswoman Jackie.
Speaker 2 (08:56):
Or there have been more and more people.
Speaker 3 (09:01):
I'm not a big one for endorsements that don't matter
so much to me, but it is interesting how many
more public people with big audiences like podcasters are willing
to step forward. Theovonn interviewed President Trump. Alan Parr. I
did not know him, is, apparently, according to the numbers,
(09:24):
a very popular Christian YouTuber.
Speaker 2 (09:26):
You may know him, or somebody you know may know him,
young guy.
Speaker 3 (09:31):
He released a powerful video explaining why he will be
voting for President Trump in order to amplify in order
to amplify his powerful message.
Speaker 1 (09:42):
Here it is my brothers and sisters.
Speaker 17 (09:44):
I'm going to go on record and say, listen, these
issues may not be important to you, although I believe
that they should be.
Speaker 1 (09:51):
But for me.
Speaker 17 (09:53):
For me, these issues that I just share with you
in this chart way so heavy on my spirit. They
weigh more for me personally than issues of health care
and criminal justice reform, although those are very important, But
these issues weighs so much more heavily for me that
(10:15):
I cannot, in good conscience support a party that wants
to redefine what family looks like, family the very core
of our society. I cannot vote to pass laws that
would encourage and allow children to mutilate their bodies, sometimes
(10:35):
not even requiring parental consent.
Speaker 1 (10:38):
I cannot vote for a party that wants to.
Speaker 17 (10:43):
Enforce laws that would allow LGBTQ plus couples to get.
Speaker 1 (10:47):
Married to one another.
Speaker 17 (10:49):
I cannot support a party that's in favor of a
parent possibly losing custody of their child because they don't
affirm that child's decision to transition. I cannot vote for
a party that is in favor of little children of
opposite sexes sharing bathrooms together. I cannot vote for my
daughter to one day have to compete athletically against a
(11:11):
biological mail.
Speaker 1 (11:12):
I just can't. I just can't.
Speaker 17 (11:16):
And for that reason, I'm going to go on record
and say I cannot support that party. You have the
right to vote however you want, and this is not
me pushing my perspective on you. I'm just simply sharing
with you where I'm at and the reasons why I
am choosing to vote the way I'm going to vote.
Here's the final question that I want to leave you
(11:38):
with today. I think we're asking the wrong question when
you place your vote. I don't think we should be
asking the question does this party promote values that are biblical? Because,
as I've shared with you in this video, you can
make an argument that both parties are promoting some.
Speaker 1 (11:55):
Values that are biblical.
Speaker 17 (11:57):
But rather, I think we need to be asking the
question and which party is promoting values that are unbiblical
that directly go against the scriptures and directly against a
Christian biblical worldview. I can I tell you who to
vote for or how to vote, but I can tell
you from me these issues weigh more for me. And
(12:21):
even though they're all important and should not be minimized,
these issues are the ones that I believe are the
weightier matters of the laws.
Speaker 3 (12:29):
Alan Parr is not the only one voting for Donald Trump.
Pastor Greg Locke took it a step further, he told
his congregation. If you vote Democrat, you are no longer
welcome in this church. If you support evil, if you
assist in the downthrow of our free expression of our
(12:53):
love of the Lord, You're not welcome here anymore.
Speaker 18 (12:58):
Now.
Speaker 16 (12:58):
If you vote Democrat, I don't even wote you around it.
You didn't get out, couldn't get out, you demon. You
can't get out, you baby butchering election fief. You cannot
be a Christian and vote Democrat in this nation.
Speaker 1 (13:11):
I don't care how mad that makes you. You get
kissed off as you want to.
Speaker 16 (13:14):
You cannot be Atrician and vote Democrat in this nation.
Speaker 5 (13:18):
They are God.
Speaker 16 (13:18):
Denying demons that butcher babies and hate this nation.
Speaker 3 (13:24):
They hate this nation.
Speaker 2 (13:26):
Get mad all you want to.
Speaker 16 (13:28):
I don't take a stand. I don't care if you
throw tomatoes, boise God. I'm about to throw a microphone up.
Speaker 18 (13:31):
In his house.
Speaker 16 (13:33):
See it in can eat my dirty sox. You cannot
be a Democrat and a Christian.
Speaker 5 (13:37):
You cannot.
Speaker 16 (13:38):
Somebody say, amen, the rest of you get out.
Speaker 3 (13:43):
But Mago, that's not very Christian, and neither are you.
You're the one bragging. You're an atheist. Stop telling Christians
they're not Christian enough when you're not Christian. Amy Horowitz
is a gorilla journalist who you may have seen outside
of the DNC talk looking to pro Palestinian protesters under
the theory, just let these people talk, the more people
(14:08):
see them talk, not in a in an adversarial manner.
Just ask a question, open ended and let them go.
Sunlight's sebast disinfectant. Let them show exactly who they are.
This is my favorite of his videos.
Speaker 2 (14:25):
He's done like this.
Speaker 3 (14:26):
He talks to liberal whites about voter ID and then
he goes to Harlem and talks to blacks about the
same topic.
Speaker 2 (14:35):
The results are not what liberals expected.
Speaker 5 (14:39):
Good opinion of Yeah, they're.
Speaker 19 (14:42):
Usually pretty racist, and if they're bad, I think voter
ide laws are a way to perpetuate raacism.
Speaker 18 (14:47):
Say as you go as far as either those laws
are racist, for sure, the beauties suppressor is doing Americay
because they're less likely to have state id's.
Speaker 6 (14:58):
Minority voters are left slightly to have the kinds of
ideas that have been described or required.
Speaker 12 (15:05):
These type of people don't live in areas with easy
access to d mds or other place.
Speaker 18 (15:10):
Who didn't get identification can always good ideas you do
over the internet. Is that also would make it difficult
for black people in particularly.
Speaker 1 (15:17):
Yeah, you have to have access to the incident.
Speaker 17 (15:18):
You have to be able to pay an incident service
provider for certain face.
Speaker 18 (15:21):
Do you think that's harder for black people to go online?
Speaker 19 (15:24):
Well, I feel like they don't have the knowledge of
how of like how it works.
Speaker 5 (15:27):
A lot of people have smartphones, they might not have
data for.
Speaker 19 (15:30):
Most of the communities, they don't really know what is
out there just because they're not aware or like they're
not informed. I also think there's a repression of like
black voting with how they how if you're a convicted pelon,
like you're not allowed to vote and everything. And when
you look at swing states like Florida, that's a huge
population of the of the like African Americans.
Speaker 18 (15:49):
Now I'm here in East Harlem to ask black people
their thoughts on what you just heard. Do you have ideas?
By yes, that's a good idea. Do you carry ideas?
Speaker 12 (15:59):
Yes?
Speaker 18 (15:59):
I do you know anybody any black person doesn't carry IDY? No,
that's one that I know has a ID.
Speaker 5 (16:04):
Why would they think you don't have ID?
Speaker 10 (16:07):
That's a lot.
Speaker 14 (16:08):
Why would they say.
Speaker 18 (16:09):
That, Do you have ID?
Speaker 6 (16:10):
Yes?
Speaker 18 (16:11):
I have my ID and my friends have their IVY, so.
Speaker 5 (16:13):
We know what we need to carry around.
Speaker 1 (16:15):
Everybody that I know have ID, Like that's one of
the things you need to walk the round with New
York with I D.
Speaker 18 (16:21):
Do you know any black adult who does not have ID?
Speaker 11 (16:24):
No?
Speaker 16 (16:24):
I don't.
Speaker 18 (16:25):
Is it a weird thing to even say that?
Speaker 5 (16:27):
Yes it is?
Speaker 7 (16:28):
What is there some some type of chick candy canvas?
I know, right, That's the only thing I brought with me,
those legit id's.
Speaker 18 (16:35):
I heard a lot also that black people can't figure
out how to get to the DMV. Maybe that's that's
that say, I know what's that on twenty fifth year?
Speaker 1 (16:44):
Do you know where the idea the DMV is right now?
It's one hundred and twenty fifth Street, And I believe you.
Speaker 18 (16:48):
Know how to get there. Yeah, if you have a
problem getting there, if you have to get there, no,
I know you sound like a silly questions. You know
how to get the EV?
Speaker 5 (16:55):
I know where it is, Yeah, can get there, no.
Speaker 18 (16:57):
Problem, no problem, that's checking okay. And I also heard
a lot of black people if as you pull back
to people have no access to the internet, can't figure
out how to use the Internet.
Speaker 1 (17:07):
Yes, that's as defici.
Speaker 19 (17:10):
Honestly, everybody has access to the Internet, even a little
kid to figure out how I work.
Speaker 1 (17:14):
Incident, I had access to.
Speaker 18 (17:16):
The internet for us, no to use it properly, not
do it at work, So of course I'm not to
use it.
Speaker 7 (17:21):
Did not use it.
Speaker 5 (17:22):
They all have iPads, iPods, whatever.
Speaker 18 (17:25):
Your phone has data, unlimited data.
Speaker 20 (17:29):
I use my phone as a hot spot.
Speaker 18 (17:30):
What does that say to you the people who have
this perception by.
Speaker 5 (17:33):
Me, Oh, they're pretty much ignorant.
Speaker 18 (17:36):
That that's why my process I did.
Speaker 19 (17:39):
Think that's ignorant, ignorant, ignorant, that's the way, very ignorant.
Speaker 5 (17:43):
It's very very ignorant.
Speaker 18 (17:44):
Does it sound racist for somebody to say that.
Speaker 4 (17:47):
I think it is a little racist, because you know,
you're putting people in a category and you.
Speaker 18 (17:52):
Have no idea what you're talking about.
Speaker 4 (17:53):
Maybe a little bit of racist in it, But like
I said, I think it's more stupidity ignorant judges.
Speaker 5 (17:58):
Somebody like, well you judged it them for they black,
stay that they all got it.
Speaker 18 (18:01):
What are people are they talking to? Who are your
people talking to? Do you have a problem that if
you go to vote and they say quickly to see
your idea to make sure you are who say you are?
Speaker 5 (18:10):
I love showing Mike you.
Speaker 18 (18:11):
Got no problem with that?
Speaker 1 (18:12):
Nope.
Speaker 18 (18:13):
Would you have a problem if when you go to vote,
if they say quickly site see your idea to make
sure you are say you are? Do you have to
show that? Would you have a problem there was a
rule where you have to show your ID in order
to vote. I don't think we would you have an
issue if there was a rule, say you got to
show your idea before you vote.
Speaker 2 (18:31):
Do you cool that you got Michael Berry's the sery.
Speaker 3 (18:35):
Senator Josh Holly was on Fox News or Jesse Waters
when he revealed the latest jaw dropping information regarding the
assassination attempt on President Trump. As it turns out, the
security detail around President Trump, we're not actually Secret Service agents.
They were Homeland Security agents and their training an online
(18:59):
training video.
Speaker 2 (19:00):
You can't make this stuff up.
Speaker 8 (19:01):
But what I've heard tonight Jse is that most of
the agents who were there at that rally and Butler
were not Secret Service agents. They were in fact Homeland
security agents. And get this, most of those Homeland Security agents.
The only training that they received was an online webinar,
a two hour online webinar, and I'm told that about
half the time the sound of the webinar didn't even work.
(19:23):
So think about this, the President of the United States,
for President of United States, Donald Trump is sent out
on stage. Most of the people there aren't trained, they're
not qualified. They only got a webinar training, and even
that didn't work. It is absolutely outrageous, you're saying.
Speaker 21 (19:37):
And if we're to believe that there's this big Iranian threat,
that this is coming down the pike, and they had
the beef up security, their idea of beefing up security was.
Speaker 5 (19:46):
Not putting more secret service agents.
Speaker 21 (19:48):
And counter snipers, was just throwing in a bunch of
guys that have never done this before from Homeland Security
and sending them into some zoom training that didn't work.
Speaker 2 (20:00):
Zactly right.
Speaker 8 (20:00):
I'm told that actually agents of landsecurity agents were pulled
off of child exploitation cases, child endangerment cases, the stuff
they normally do. They don't normally do protective detail work
at all. They were pulled off those cases that here
you're going to go guard the former president of the
United States. Watch this webinar. Oops, it doesn't really work.
Oh that's all right, go out into the field anyway, Jessee.
This is a nightmare, and we still have no answers.
(20:21):
The only reason we know this stuff is because of whistleblowers.
Speaker 2 (20:24):
It's out right.
Speaker 3 (20:27):
We air a lot of things we may not necessarily
agree with wholeheartedly or have come to a conclusion on,
but we air them because we trust you to hear
new and different things and to come to your own conclusions.
So with that in mind, economist Eric Weinstein was on
(20:48):
the Modern Wisdom podcast with Chris Williamson when he said
he doesn't know if Donald Trump will be allowed to
become president.
Speaker 22 (20:58):
You said, one of the odds that Joe bye and
has a debilitating event between now and November, including death,
so he runs a one and twenty chance of dying
in any given year or above that. I don't think
you know whether he's even going to make it to November.
Debilitating event could have been a debilitating public event.
Speaker 23 (21:16):
I purposely left it vague, and I didn't say the
other part of it, which I now feel comfortable saying,
which is I don't know whether I don't know whether
Donald Trump will be allowed to become president.
Speaker 1 (21:35):
What do you mean by that?
Speaker 23 (21:40):
I think that there's a remarkable story and we're in
a funny game, which is are we allowed to say
what that story is? Because to say it, to analyze it,
to name it is to bring it into view. I
think we don't understand why the censors is behaving the
(22:01):
way it is. We don't understand why it's in the shadows.
We don't understand why our news is acting in a
bizarre fashion. So let's just set the stage. Given that
that was in February. There is something that I think
Mike Ben's is just referred to as the rules based
(22:22):
international order. It's an interlocking series of agreements, TACIT understandings,
explicit understandings, klindestine understandings about how the most important structures
keep the world free of war and keep markets open.
And there has been a system in place, whether understood
(22:45):
explicitly or behind the scenes or implicitly. It says that
the purpose of the two American parties is to prune
the field of populist candidate so that whatever two candidates
exist in a face off are both acceptable to that
(23:08):
world order. So what you're trying to do from the
point of view let's take it from the point of
view of let's say the State Department of the Intelligence community,
the Defense Department, and major corporations that have to do
with international issues from arms trade to oh, I don't
know food. They have a series of agreements that are
(23:32):
fragile and could be overturned if a president entered the
Oval office who didn't agree with them. And the mood
of the country was why do we pay taxes into
these structures? Why are we hamstrung? Why aren't we a
free people. So what the two parties would do is
that they would run primaries. You have populist candidates, and
you'd pre commit the populist candidates to support the candidates
(23:55):
who won the primaries as long as that took place,
and you had two candidates that were both acceptable to
the international order, that is that they aren't going to
rethink NAFTO or NATO or what have you. We called
that democracy, and so democracy was the illusion of choice.
What's called magician's choice, where the choice is not actually,
(24:17):
you know, pick a card, any card, but somehow the
magician makes sure that the card that you pick is
the one that he knows. In that situation, you have
magicians choice in the primaries, and then you'd have the
duopoly field two candidates, either of which was acceptable, and
you could actually afford to hold an election and the
populace would vote, and that way, the international order wasn't
(24:39):
put at risk every four years because you can't have
alliances that are subject to the whim of the people
in plebiscites. So under that structure, everything was going fine
until twenty sixteen, and then the first candidate ever to
not hold any position in the mid military or position
(25:01):
in government in the history of the republic, ender of
the Oval office, Donald Trump, broke through the primary structure.
So then there was a full court press. Okay, we
only have one candidate that's acceptable to the international order.
Donald Trump will be under constant pressure that he's a loser,
he's a wild man, he's an idiot, and he's under
(25:21):
the control of the Russians. And then he was going
to be, you know, a twenty to one underdog and
then he wins. And there was no precedent for this.
They learned their lesson. You cannot afford to have candidates
who are not acceptable to the international order and continue
to have these alliances.
Speaker 1 (25:42):
This is an unsolved problem.
Speaker 2 (25:44):
A little bit about these whore houses I know all about.
Ramon wants to know what around the world is whistling.
Speaker 16 (25:50):
Bungholes, spleen splitters, whisker biscuits, honkey riders, hooskerdoes hohosker, don'ts
nips and dazers with it.
Speaker 5 (25:57):
Without the scooter stick or one single whistler. A kid Jason.
Speaker 3 (26:03):
Is suffering from a personality disorder. Let's go back one year.
This is Congressman Jamie Raskin being grilled by Jake Tapper
about Kamala Harris and her viability as Joe Biden's running mate.
They didn't want Kamala running because she was going to
drag down Joe Biden.
Speaker 20 (26:20):
I want to play this clip from Anderson Cooper's show
last night where he interviewed former Speaker Pelosi.
Speaker 1 (26:25):
Take a listen. He's a vice president, Harris.
Speaker 5 (26:28):
The best running mate for this president, he thinks so,
and that's what matters.
Speaker 1 (26:33):
Do you think she is the best running mate.
Speaker 5 (26:35):
Though she's a vice president of the United States? So
people say to me, why isn't she doing.
Speaker 7 (26:39):
This or that?
Speaker 5 (26:40):
Is because she's a vice president? That's of description.
Speaker 20 (26:45):
You don't do that much, not exactly a ringing endorsement.
Do you think Vice President Kamala Harris is the best
running mate for President Biden? And what do you make
a Speaker Pelosi's answer there?
Speaker 14 (26:56):
I mean, there didn't seem to be anything wrong with
that answer. Obviously, President Biden, Vice President Harris, Speaker Pelosi
for that matter, all of us have been laboring under
just a deluge of propaganda, disinformation, and criticism by the magarey.
Speaker 20 (27:14):
You are doing what Speaker Pelosi did, which is not
answering the question do you think Kamala Harris is the
best running made for President Biden?
Speaker 14 (27:22):
Well, obviously she gave the right answer. That's President Biden's choice.
Speaker 2 (27:25):
It's just a simple question.
Speaker 20 (27:27):
Do you think Kamala Harris is the best running made
for President Biden? You've said she's excellent, that's farther than
Speaker Pelosi went, But do you think she's at I'm
not trying to throw anything into turmoil. I actually think
it's a pretty simple question. Do you think Amala Harris
is the best running mate for President Biden?
Speaker 7 (27:43):
Yes?
Speaker 11 (27:43):
Or no?
Speaker 14 (27:44):
I mean, I don't know what else I can say
other than she you can say yes, excellent running mate
and an excellent vice president. I don't know whether President
Biden has named his running mate. We're going to a
convention next summer. It's you know, a year away from now,
and we're going to go through that process.
Speaker 20 (28:02):
So I mean, you say, I don't know why say?
The answer is you could say yes. You could say yes,
I think Kamala Harris is the best vice president and
the best running mate for president by And that's the
answer you could be giving right now, Yes she is.
Speaker 1 (28:16):
So I have not seen any public opinion polling.
Speaker 14 (28:20):
You know, you might be a stronger vice presidential running
mate than her, or me or anybody else.
Speaker 1 (28:25):
I don't know.
Speaker 3 (28:26):
I haven't seen polling data. That's awesome, he meant, I
don't know what I was supposed to say. I wasn't
expecting this from CNN. You didn't prep me. We have
Russian interference again. Oddly, this is the third presidential election
in a row where those pesky Russians have gone and
interfered in our election. Wait, it wasn't the Russians in
(28:47):
the past two It was actually the Democrats who blamed
the Russians to keep you from noticing what they were doing.
Tom Cotton was on CNN with Dana Bash when she
asked about Russian interference, he reminded her it wasn't the
Russians who've interfered in the past two elections.
Speaker 11 (29:09):
I want to turn to a very different topic, and
that is something that the Justice Department said this week.
They detailed a Russian government effort to stoke divisions in
the US using front organizations and social media. Prominent right
wing influencers like Dave Rubin and Benny Johnson who have
ties to Tenet Media. Now that's a company that the
(29:31):
Justice Department says was being funded by Russian operatives. You
said on the Intelligence Committee, how worried are you that
right wing influencers, people who do have an impact on
your constituents are being funded either directly or indirectly by
the Russian government in order to make an impact on
(29:54):
this election.
Speaker 12 (29:56):
Well, first off, Vanner, we haven't been in sessions. I'mn't
saying any intelligence this matter. Seeing the allegations I've read
in the newspaper, people should not knowingly take money from
the government of Russia or iron or China or any
other adversarial nation to try to influence the election. But
I also think it's fair to say that a few
memes or videos in the vast sea of political commentary
is not going to make much of a difference in
(30:17):
this election, nor has it in past election as well.
What did make a difference in the last election is
the lies about Hunter Biden's laptop that more than four
dozen former intelligence officials lied about in the middle of
that campaign. And most networks include this one bought that lie,
hook line and sinker. That did make a difference in
the election. But I think a few videos or commentaries,
which again you shouldn't do if you're out there in
(30:38):
the business of commentating on elections, is not going to
make a difference in the vast see of commentary.
Speaker 16 (30:43):
We see.
Speaker 3 (30:47):
Lawrence O'Donnell of MSNBC has a terminal case of TDS.
Speaker 2 (30:53):
That's Trump delusion syndrome.
Speaker 1 (30:55):
He's eat up with it.
Speaker 3 (30:57):
It's become all consuming for poor Larry. He has nightmares
about Donald Trump. He's obsessed with him, and while he's
wide awake, he's having nightmares. He went on an eleven
minute rant about Donald Trump and Tariff's recently. I won't
subject you to all eleven months because you don't deserve that.
(31:18):
That's a punishment, that's cruel and unusual. But I will
play you a couple of minutes of it so you
can just revel in it. You can enjoy how miserable
he is. He says, the media doesn't report the insane
ramblings and President Trump, what Trump's going The media is
going easy on Trump. They report on what he says,
(31:42):
but they saine wash it. Listen to this, Well, they
are finally trying. Here, they are trying. Here's the latest
attempt at trying. See elements of the news media that
have been accused of sine washing Donald Trump know that
they are guilty exactly that. And now some of them,
(32:02):
like the New York Times, they really really are trying
to do something about it.
Speaker 1 (32:07):
But this is their first try, so it's not perfect.
Speaker 15 (32:11):
The New York Times first try was published tonight under
the headline as debate looms, Trump is now the one
facing questions about age and capacity, with a sub headline
reading his rambling, sometimes incoherent public statements have stirred concern
among voters. The Times article does not use the term
saine washing, which describes the way some in the news
(32:33):
media edit Donald Trump's crazy statements down to a shape
that allows them to then try to make sense of them.
Speaker 3 (32:42):
And it's because of this sane washing that Larry says
Kamala Harris won't just be wasn't just debating Donald Trump,
but she was debating the media as well. This audio
was before the debate. I've been sitting on it, but
I wanted to make sure you get to it so
you can see how crazed these people are.
Speaker 15 (33:04):
The one person working at ABC News who I know
knows what a tariff is is George Deteffanoppolis, who worked
on that issue as a staffer in the House of
Representatives and then worked on that issue and many others
in the White House with President Clinton. But George Steffanopolis
has no role in tomorrow night's debate hosted by ABC News,
So when daughter of Eyes Love tariffs, it will be
(33:24):
Vice President Harris's job alone, with no help from the moderators,
she try to undo ten years of lying to America
about what a tariff is and who pays a tariff,
and that that is how unbalanced this debate is going
(33:44):
to be before it even starts. Kamala Harris won't just
have to fend off new Trump lies. Tomorrow night, she
will have to fend off ten years of the accumulated
weight of Trump lying, including on subjects that the news
media has ever made an attempt of any kind to
challenge Donald Trump. What's the toughest question you've ever heard
(34:05):
a reporter ask Donald Trump about tariffs? The answer is none.
There has never been a Trump a tough question put
to Donald Trump about tariffs. Twenty four hours from now,
you will be hearing many commentators say washing much of
what Donald Trump has to say tomorrow night. In that sense,
Donald Harris won't just be debating Donald Trump tomorrow night.
She will also be debating the news media reviewers of
(34:28):
the debate, many of whom do not comprehend the fundamental
facts of government
It's that time, time, time, time, luck and load.
Speaker 2 (00:11):
Michael Verie Show is on the air.
Speaker 3 (00:21):
If you're MSNBC and you want to know about Haitians
eating the neighborhood family pets in Springfield, Ohio, you have
to call Maxine Waters.
Speaker 2 (00:31):
You got them.
Speaker 3 (00:33):
I know you're thinking, but she's from California. So what
did Maxine Waters have to say about Haitians eating house
pets in Ohio? She said, people are only angry about
the Haitians eating their house pet, their cat because the
Haitians are black.
Speaker 4 (00:51):
Well, let me just say this that Haitians have been
the victims of you know, not only our country but Canada, and.
Speaker 5 (01:00):
For years historically.
Speaker 4 (01:02):
They're black, they're poor, It's supports country in the Hemisphere.
They have been exploited and it continues all the time
they are It does not appear that they're seen in
the same way that they see others. Haitians have been
the victims because they were the first country to fight
(01:22):
off the repression of France, and of course France have.
Speaker 5 (01:26):
Made them pay a big price for it. Yes, I
think they're treated.
Speaker 4 (01:29):
Differently because they're black, because they are Haitians, and because
traditionally they have not been treated as human beings.
Speaker 3 (01:38):
Since Maxine Waters is in the news again, the woman
who refers to Republicans as white devils, and since it
was just Bill O'Reilly's birthday, it only seemed right to
dig out this one from the archives of Bill O'Reilly
poking fun of Maxine Waters for wearing a James Brown wig.
Speaker 1 (01:59):
We love this.
Speaker 2 (02:00):
I didn't hear a word she said.
Speaker 6 (02:02):
I was looking at the James Brown week If we
haven't vision of James, it's the same.
Speaker 5 (02:08):
It's the same one, right, and he's not.
Speaker 7 (02:09):
Using you're all wrong just on that.
Speaker 5 (02:14):
She's You can't go after a woman's looks. I think
she's very attractive.
Speaker 6 (02:17):
But I didn't say she wasn't attractive. I love James Brown.
Speaker 5 (02:20):
But it's the same hair. James Brown are the.
Speaker 8 (02:23):
Godfather or souls, so he had girl hair.
Speaker 6 (02:26):
Whatever it is, I just couldn't get by it. I
was you're all wrong about Maxine Waters. Number one. She's
a sincere individual. Whatever she says, she believes, she's not
a phony.
Speaker 2 (02:35):
All right, that's right, and that's old school. Peter Doocy
deserves a great deal of credit. He is the Fox
White House reporter.
Speaker 3 (02:44):
He walks into the White House briefing room every.
Speaker 2 (02:49):
Day knowing that they hate him. I mean, they despise him.
Speaker 3 (02:55):
You only see a few seconds of his interaction every day, but.
Speaker 2 (03:00):
He has to badge in every day.
Speaker 3 (03:01):
He's got his fob, probably doesn't work every day. They
probably make it as difficult as they can talk bad
about him. And that might not seem like a lot,
but most people couldn't do that, and he does it
with a plumb. I mean, hats off to Peter Doocy.
He is one of the guys that And I'll tell
(03:23):
you another guy, this guy Scott Jennings. I never heard
of him before, who's at CNN. He is doing Yeoman's work,
and really Herculean Yeoman's work for that matter. And you
may say, well, why is he bothering over there? There's
still some independent people who are very naive who are
(03:45):
watching CNN, and he is the only counterbalance. He is
the only one saying no, that's not true. And I
think he's doing a fantastic job of it. And I
credit him for that. Back to Peter Doocy, So he
got under the skin of the Affirmative Action White House
(04:06):
Press secretary with a question about Kamala Harris's sudden southern accent,
black accent, Detroit accent when she speaks to certain audiences,
and it's so obvious and it's so cringe, and the
Affirmative Action Press secretary wanted to act like she doesn't
even know what he's talking about.
Speaker 2 (04:26):
Listen to this.
Speaker 9 (04:27):
Since when does the vice president have what sounds like
a southern accent?
Speaker 10 (04:32):
I have no idea what you're talking about.
Speaker 5 (04:34):
Well, I mean.
Speaker 9 (04:35):
This is she was talking about unions.
Speaker 5 (04:37):
In Detroit using one tone of voice. Is this something?
Speaker 1 (04:42):
Same line?
Speaker 9 (04:43):
Okay, Peter, She's the same line in Pittsburgh, and it
sounded like she at least had some kind of a
southern at all.
Speaker 5 (04:49):
I mean, do you hear the question that?
Speaker 10 (04:50):
I mean, do you think Americans seriously think that this
is an important question?
Speaker 5 (04:54):
They care? You know, what they care about.
Speaker 10 (04:56):
What they care about the economy, they care about louring costs,
they care about healthcare. That's what Americans care about. So
that's what they want care about. Your colleague just asked
me about what basically we talked about, went back and
forth on democracy and freedom.
Speaker 5 (05:11):
That's what they care about.
Speaker 10 (05:12):
I'm not even going to entertain some question about the present.
It's just it's just hearing it sounds so ridiculous. Well,
but hearing it is. The question I'm talking about. The
questions is just insane.
Speaker 5 (05:26):
It's how she talks in meetings. I'm just here, kind Peter,
We're moving on.
Speaker 3 (05:32):
There is no way she doesn't know what he's talking about.
Everybody knows what he's talking about. Hell, we got an
entire song devoted to it.
Speaker 11 (05:45):
Your MoMA godradiction.
Speaker 5 (05:50):
Now you're not.
Speaker 12 (05:52):
All your counrig your prosecute and that for good.
Speaker 7 (06:00):
You don't know. You just don't know.
Speaker 13 (06:06):
Malai.
Speaker 3 (06:10):
You did.
Speaker 7 (06:13):
You send.
Speaker 13 (06:36):
My mama, Mama, Mama, Mama, mama, mama, mala.
Speaker 7 (07:01):
You live blaw your blaw blahlahla dah mala la la
bathera community.
Speaker 5 (07:12):
You better thank our union member for sick leave.
Speaker 10 (07:14):
You better thank a union member for paid leave.
Speaker 14 (07:17):
You better thank a union member for vacation time.
Speaker 15 (07:27):
Let's just get through the next sixty four days.
Speaker 11 (07:34):
And you all helped us win in twenty twenty and
we don't do it again in twenty twenty four.
Speaker 5 (07:42):
Yes, you know, you know. The one thing about all
of us is we lay hard work. Hard work is
good work. Hard work is good work.
Speaker 11 (07:53):
The thing that we like about heartwork is we have
fun doing hard work.
Speaker 5 (07:58):
Why can I get a witness? All my life? I
had to fight.
Speaker 7 (08:10):
It ain't over.
Speaker 11 (08:16):
With us.
Speaker 5 (08:16):
In government, we campaign with the plan. Uppercase T uppercase
t the plan, and then the environment is such that
we're expected to defend the plan.
Speaker 7 (08:29):
Ma ma, ma, ma ma. Married a.
Speaker 16 (08:51):
Jackie.
Speaker 5 (08:51):
You here jack a crash that killed Congresswoman Jackie.
Speaker 2 (08:56):
Or there have been more and more people.
Speaker 3 (09:01):
I'm not a big one for endorsements that don't matter
so much to me, but it is interesting how many
more public people with big audiences like podcasters are willing
to step forward. Theovonn interviewed President Trump. Alan Parr. I
did not know him, is, apparently, according to the numbers,
(09:24):
a very popular Christian YouTuber.
Speaker 2 (09:26):
You may know him, or somebody you know may know him,
young guy.
Speaker 3 (09:31):
He released a powerful video explaining why he will be
voting for President Trump in order to amplify in order
to amplify his powerful message.
Speaker 1 (09:42):
Here it is my brothers and sisters.
Speaker 17 (09:44):
I'm going to go on record and say, listen, these
issues may not be important to you, although I believe
that they should be.
Speaker 1 (09:51):
But for me.
Speaker 17 (09:53):
For me, these issues that I just share with you
in this chart way so heavy on my spirit. They
weigh more for me personally than issues of health care
and criminal justice reform, although those are very important, But
these issues weighs so much more heavily for me that
(10:15):
I cannot, in good conscience support a party that wants
to redefine what family looks like, family the very core
of our society. I cannot vote to pass laws that
would encourage and allow children to mutilate their bodies, sometimes
(10:35):
not even requiring parental consent.
Speaker 1 (10:38):
I cannot vote for a party that wants to.
Speaker 17 (10:43):
Enforce laws that would allow LGBTQ plus couples to get.
Speaker 1 (10:47):
Married to one another.
Speaker 17 (10:49):
I cannot support a party that's in favor of a
parent possibly losing custody of their child because they don't
affirm that child's decision to transition. I cannot vote for
a party that is in favor of little children of
opposite sexes sharing bathrooms together. I cannot vote for my
daughter to one day have to compete athletically against a
(11:11):
biological mail.
Speaker 1 (11:12):
I just can't. I just can't.
Speaker 17 (11:16):
And for that reason, I'm going to go on record
and say I cannot support that party. You have the
right to vote however you want, and this is not
me pushing my perspective on you. I'm just simply sharing
with you where I'm at and the reasons why I
am choosing to vote the way I'm going to vote.
Here's the final question that I want to leave you
(11:38):
with today. I think we're asking the wrong question when
you place your vote. I don't think we should be
asking the question does this party promote values that are biblical? Because,
as I've shared with you in this video, you can
make an argument that both parties are promoting some.
Speaker 1 (11:55):
Values that are biblical.
Speaker 17 (11:57):
But rather, I think we need to be asking the
question and which party is promoting values that are unbiblical
that directly go against the scriptures and directly against a
Christian biblical worldview. I can I tell you who to
vote for or how to vote, but I can tell
you from me these issues weigh more for me. And
(12:21):
even though they're all important and should not be minimized,
these issues are the ones that I believe are the
weightier matters of the laws.
Speaker 3 (12:29):
Alan Parr is not the only one voting for Donald Trump.
Pastor Greg Locke took it a step further, he told
his congregation. If you vote Democrat, you are no longer
welcome in this church. If you support evil, if you
assist in the downthrow of our free expression of our
(12:53):
love of the Lord, You're not welcome here anymore.
Speaker 18 (12:58):
Now.
Speaker 16 (12:58):
If you vote Democrat, I don't even wote you around it.
You didn't get out, couldn't get out, you demon. You
can't get out, you baby butchering election fief. You cannot
be a Christian and vote Democrat in this nation.
Speaker 1 (13:11):
I don't care how mad that makes you. You get
kissed off as you want to.
Speaker 16 (13:14):
You cannot be Atrician and vote Democrat in this nation.
Speaker 5 (13:18):
They are God.
Speaker 16 (13:18):
Denying demons that butcher babies and hate this nation.
Speaker 3 (13:24):
They hate this nation.
Speaker 2 (13:26):
Get mad all you want to.
Speaker 16 (13:28):
I don't take a stand. I don't care if you
throw tomatoes, boise God. I'm about to throw a microphone up.
Speaker 18 (13:31):
In his house.
Speaker 16 (13:33):
See it in can eat my dirty sox. You cannot
be a Democrat and a Christian.
Speaker 5 (13:37):
You cannot.
Speaker 16 (13:38):
Somebody say, amen, the rest of you get out.
Speaker 3 (13:43):
But Mago, that's not very Christian, and neither are you.
You're the one bragging. You're an atheist. Stop telling Christians
they're not Christian enough when you're not Christian. Amy Horowitz
is a gorilla journalist who you may have seen outside
of the DNC talk looking to pro Palestinian protesters under
the theory, just let these people talk, the more people
(14:08):
see them talk, not in a in an adversarial manner.
Just ask a question, open ended and let them go.
Sunlight's sebast disinfectant. Let them show exactly who they are.
This is my favorite of his videos.
Speaker 2 (14:25):
He's done like this.
Speaker 3 (14:26):
He talks to liberal whites about voter ID and then
he goes to Harlem and talks to blacks about the
same topic.
Speaker 2 (14:35):
The results are not what liberals expected.
Speaker 5 (14:39):
Good opinion of Yeah, they're.
Speaker 19 (14:42):
Usually pretty racist, and if they're bad, I think voter
ide laws are a way to perpetuate raacism.
Speaker 18 (14:47):
Say as you go as far as either those laws
are racist, for sure, the beauties suppressor is doing Americay
because they're less likely to have state id's.
Speaker 6 (14:58):
Minority voters are left slightly to have the kinds of
ideas that have been described or required.
Speaker 12 (15:05):
These type of people don't live in areas with easy
access to d mds or other place.
Speaker 18 (15:10):
Who didn't get identification can always good ideas you do
over the internet. Is that also would make it difficult
for black people in particularly.
Speaker 1 (15:17):
Yeah, you have to have access to the incident.
Speaker 17 (15:18):
You have to be able to pay an incident service
provider for certain face.
Speaker 18 (15:21):
Do you think that's harder for black people to go online?
Speaker 19 (15:24):
Well, I feel like they don't have the knowledge of
how of like how it works.
Speaker 5 (15:27):
A lot of people have smartphones, they might not have
data for.
Speaker 19 (15:30):
Most of the communities, they don't really know what is
out there just because they're not aware or like they're
not informed. I also think there's a repression of like
black voting with how they how if you're a convicted pelon,
like you're not allowed to vote and everything. And when
you look at swing states like Florida, that's a huge
population of the of the like African Americans.
Speaker 18 (15:49):
Now I'm here in East Harlem to ask black people
their thoughts on what you just heard. Do you have ideas?
By yes, that's a good idea. Do you carry ideas?
Speaker 12 (15:59):
Yes?
Speaker 18 (15:59):
I do you know anybody any black person doesn't carry IDY? No,
that's one that I know has a ID.
Speaker 5 (16:04):
Why would they think you don't have ID?
Speaker 10 (16:07):
That's a lot.
Speaker 14 (16:08):
Why would they say.
Speaker 18 (16:09):
That, Do you have ID?
Speaker 6 (16:10):
Yes?
Speaker 18 (16:11):
I have my ID and my friends have their IVY, so.
Speaker 5 (16:13):
We know what we need to carry around.
Speaker 1 (16:15):
Everybody that I know have ID, Like that's one of
the things you need to walk the round with New
York with I D.
Speaker 18 (16:21):
Do you know any black adult who does not have ID?
Speaker 11 (16:24):
No?
Speaker 16 (16:24):
I don't.
Speaker 18 (16:25):
Is it a weird thing to even say that?
Speaker 5 (16:27):
Yes it is?
Speaker 7 (16:28):
What is there some some type of chick candy canvas?
I know, right, That's the only thing I brought with me,
those legit id's.
Speaker 18 (16:35):
I heard a lot also that black people can't figure
out how to get to the DMV. Maybe that's that's
that say, I know what's that on twenty fifth year?
Speaker 1 (16:44):
Do you know where the idea the DMV is right now?
It's one hundred and twenty fifth Street, And I believe you.
Speaker 18 (16:48):
Know how to get there. Yeah, if you have a
problem getting there, if you have to get there, no,
I know you sound like a silly questions. You know
how to get the EV?
Speaker 5 (16:55):
I know where it is, Yeah, can get there, no.
Speaker 18 (16:57):
Problem, no problem, that's checking okay. And I also heard
a lot of black people if as you pull back
to people have no access to the internet, can't figure
out how to use the Internet.
Speaker 1 (17:07):
Yes, that's as defici.
Speaker 19 (17:10):
Honestly, everybody has access to the Internet, even a little
kid to figure out how I work.
Speaker 1 (17:14):
Incident, I had access to.
Speaker 18 (17:16):
The internet for us, no to use it properly, not
do it at work, So of course I'm not to
use it.
Speaker 7 (17:21):
Did not use it.
Speaker 5 (17:22):
They all have iPads, iPods, whatever.
Speaker 18 (17:25):
Your phone has data, unlimited data.
Speaker 20 (17:29):
I use my phone as a hot spot.
Speaker 18 (17:30):
What does that say to you the people who have
this perception by.
Speaker 5 (17:33):
Me, Oh, they're pretty much ignorant.
Speaker 18 (17:36):
That that's why my process I did.
Speaker 19 (17:39):
Think that's ignorant, ignorant, ignorant, that's the way, very ignorant.
Speaker 5 (17:43):
It's very very ignorant.
Speaker 18 (17:44):
Does it sound racist for somebody to say that.
Speaker 4 (17:47):
I think it is a little racist, because you know,
you're putting people in a category and you.
Speaker 18 (17:52):
Have no idea what you're talking about.
Speaker 4 (17:53):
Maybe a little bit of racist in it, But like
I said, I think it's more stupidity ignorant judges.
Speaker 5 (17:58):
Somebody like, well you judged it them for they black,
stay that they all got it.
Speaker 18 (18:01):
What are people are they talking to? Who are your
people talking to? Do you have a problem that if
you go to vote and they say quickly to see
your idea to make sure you are who say you are?
Speaker 5 (18:10):
I love showing Mike you.
Speaker 18 (18:11):
Got no problem with that?
Speaker 1 (18:12):
Nope.
Speaker 18 (18:13):
Would you have a problem if when you go to vote,
if they say quickly site see your idea to make
sure you are say you are? Do you have to
show that? Would you have a problem there was a
rule where you have to show your ID in order
to vote. I don't think we would you have an
issue if there was a rule, say you got to
show your idea before you vote.
Speaker 2 (18:31):
Do you cool that you got Michael Berry's the sery.
Speaker 3 (18:35):
Senator Josh Holly was on Fox News or Jesse Waters
when he revealed the latest jaw dropping information regarding the
assassination attempt on President Trump. As it turns out, the
security detail around President Trump, we're not actually Secret Service agents.
They were Homeland Security agents and their training an online
(18:59):
training video.
Speaker 2 (19:00):
You can't make this stuff up.
Speaker 8 (19:01):
But what I've heard tonight Jse is that most of
the agents who were there at that rally and Butler
were not Secret Service agents. They were in fact Homeland
security agents. And get this, most of those Homeland Security agents.
The only training that they received was an online webinar,
a two hour online webinar, and I'm told that about
half the time the sound of the webinar didn't even work.
(19:23):
So think about this, the President of the United States,
for President of United States, Donald Trump is sent out
on stage. Most of the people there aren't trained, they're
not qualified. They only got a webinar training, and even
that didn't work. It is absolutely outrageous, you're saying.
Speaker 21 (19:37):
And if we're to believe that there's this big Iranian threat,
that this is coming down the pike, and they had
the beef up security, their idea of beefing up security was.
Speaker 5 (19:46):
Not putting more secret service agents.
Speaker 21 (19:48):
And counter snipers, was just throwing in a bunch of
guys that have never done this before from Homeland Security
and sending them into some zoom training that didn't work.
Speaker 2 (20:00):
Zactly right.
Speaker 8 (20:00):
I'm told that actually agents of landsecurity agents were pulled
off of child exploitation cases, child endangerment cases, the stuff
they normally do. They don't normally do protective detail work
at all. They were pulled off those cases that here
you're going to go guard the former president of the
United States. Watch this webinar. Oops, it doesn't really work.
Oh that's all right, go out into the field anyway, Jessee.
This is a nightmare, and we still have no answers.
(20:21):
The only reason we know this stuff is because of whistleblowers.
Speaker 2 (20:24):
It's out right.
Speaker 3 (20:27):
We air a lot of things we may not necessarily
agree with wholeheartedly or have come to a conclusion on,
but we air them because we trust you to hear
new and different things and to come to your own conclusions.
So with that in mind, economist Eric Weinstein was on
(20:48):
the Modern Wisdom podcast with Chris Williamson when he said
he doesn't know if Donald Trump will be allowed to
become president.
Speaker 22 (20:58):
You said, one of the odds that Joe bye and
has a debilitating event between now and November, including death,
so he runs a one and twenty chance of dying
in any given year or above that. I don't think
you know whether he's even going to make it to November.
Debilitating event could have been a debilitating public event.
Speaker 23 (21:16):
I purposely left it vague, and I didn't say the
other part of it, which I now feel comfortable saying,
which is I don't know whether I don't know whether
Donald Trump will be allowed to become president.
Speaker 1 (21:35):
What do you mean by that?
Speaker 23 (21:40):
I think that there's a remarkable story and we're in
a funny game, which is are we allowed to say
what that story is? Because to say it, to analyze it,
to name it is to bring it into view. I
think we don't understand why the censors is behaving the
(22:01):
way it is. We don't understand why it's in the shadows.
We don't understand why our news is acting in a
bizarre fashion. So let's just set the stage. Given that
that was in February. There is something that I think
Mike Ben's is just referred to as the rules based
(22:22):
international order. It's an interlocking series of agreements, TACIT understandings,
explicit understandings, klindestine understandings about how the most important structures
keep the world free of war and keep markets open.
And there has been a system in place, whether understood
(22:45):
explicitly or behind the scenes or implicitly. It says that
the purpose of the two American parties is to prune
the field of populist candidate so that whatever two candidates
exist in a face off are both acceptable to that
(23:08):
world order. So what you're trying to do from the
point of view let's take it from the point of
view of let's say the State Department of the Intelligence community,
the Defense Department, and major corporations that have to do
with international issues from arms trade to oh, I don't
know food. They have a series of agreements that are
(23:32):
fragile and could be overturned if a president entered the
Oval office who didn't agree with them. And the mood
of the country was why do we pay taxes into
these structures? Why are we hamstrung? Why aren't we a
free people. So what the two parties would do is
that they would run primaries. You have populist candidates, and
you'd pre commit the populist candidates to support the candidates
(23:55):
who won the primaries as long as that took place,
and you had two candidates that were both acceptable to
the international order, that is that they aren't going to
rethink NAFTO or NATO or what have you. We called
that democracy, and so democracy was the illusion of choice.
What's called magician's choice, where the choice is not actually,
(24:17):
you know, pick a card, any card, but somehow the
magician makes sure that the card that you pick is
the one that he knows. In that situation, you have
magicians choice in the primaries, and then you'd have the
duopoly field two candidates, either of which was acceptable, and
you could actually afford to hold an election and the
populace would vote, and that way, the international order wasn't
(24:39):
put at risk every four years because you can't have
alliances that are subject to the whim of the people
in plebiscites. So under that structure, everything was going fine
until twenty sixteen, and then the first candidate ever to
not hold any position in the mid military or position
(25:01):
in government in the history of the republic, ender of
the Oval office, Donald Trump, broke through the primary structure.
So then there was a full court press. Okay, we
only have one candidate that's acceptable to the international order.
Donald Trump will be under constant pressure that he's a loser,
he's a wild man, he's an idiot, and he's under
(25:21):
the control of the Russians. And then he was going
to be, you know, a twenty to one underdog and
then he wins. And there was no precedent for this.
They learned their lesson. You cannot afford to have candidates
who are not acceptable to the international order and continue
to have these alliances.
Speaker 1 (25:42):
This is an unsolved problem.
Speaker 2 (25:44):
A little bit about these whore houses I know all about.
Ramon wants to know what around the world is whistling.
Speaker 16 (25:50):
Bungholes, spleen splitters, whisker biscuits, honkey riders, hooskerdoes hohosker, don'ts
nips and dazers with it.
Speaker 5 (25:57):
Without the scooter stick or one single whistler. A kid Jason.
Speaker 3 (26:03):
Is suffering from a personality disorder. Let's go back one year.
This is Congressman Jamie Raskin being grilled by Jake Tapper
about Kamala Harris and her viability as Joe Biden's running mate.
They didn't want Kamala running because she was going to
drag down Joe Biden.
Speaker 20 (26:20):
I want to play this clip from Anderson Cooper's show
last night where he interviewed former Speaker Pelosi.
Speaker 1 (26:25):
Take a listen. He's a vice president, Harris.
Speaker 5 (26:28):
The best running mate for this president, he thinks so,
and that's what matters.
Speaker 1 (26:33):
Do you think she is the best running mate.
Speaker 5 (26:35):
Though she's a vice president of the United States? So
people say to me, why isn't she doing.
Speaker 7 (26:39):
This or that?
Speaker 5 (26:40):
Is because she's a vice president? That's of description.
Speaker 20 (26:45):
You don't do that much, not exactly a ringing endorsement.
Do you think Vice President Kamala Harris is the best
running mate for President Biden? And what do you make
a Speaker Pelosi's answer there?
Speaker 14 (26:56):
I mean, there didn't seem to be anything wrong with
that answer. Obviously, President Biden, Vice President Harris, Speaker Pelosi
for that matter, all of us have been laboring under
just a deluge of propaganda, disinformation, and criticism by the magarey.
Speaker 20 (27:14):
You are doing what Speaker Pelosi did, which is not
answering the question do you think Kamala Harris is the
best running made for President Biden?
Speaker 14 (27:22):
Well, obviously she gave the right answer. That's President Biden's choice.
Speaker 2 (27:25):
It's just a simple question.
Speaker 20 (27:27):
Do you think Kamala Harris is the best running made
for President Biden? You've said she's excellent, that's farther than
Speaker Pelosi went, But do you think she's at I'm
not trying to throw anything into turmoil. I actually think
it's a pretty simple question. Do you think Amala Harris
is the best running mate for President Biden?
Speaker 7 (27:43):
Yes?
Speaker 11 (27:43):
Or no?
Speaker 14 (27:44):
I mean, I don't know what else I can say
other than she you can say yes, excellent running mate
and an excellent vice president. I don't know whether President
Biden has named his running mate. We're going to a
convention next summer. It's you know, a year away from now,
and we're going to go through that process.
Speaker 20 (28:02):
So I mean, you say, I don't know why say?
The answer is you could say yes. You could say yes,
I think Kamala Harris is the best vice president and
the best running mate for president by And that's the
answer you could be giving right now, Yes she is.
Speaker 1 (28:16):
So I have not seen any public opinion polling.
Speaker 14 (28:20):
You know, you might be a stronger vice presidential running
mate than her, or me or anybody else.
Speaker 1 (28:25):
I don't know.
Speaker 3 (28:26):
I haven't seen polling data. That's awesome, he meant, I
don't know what I was supposed to say. I wasn't
expecting this from CNN. You didn't prep me. We have
Russian interference again. Oddly, this is the third presidential election
in a row where those pesky Russians have gone and
interfered in our election. Wait, it wasn't the Russians in
(28:47):
the past two It was actually the Democrats who blamed
the Russians to keep you from noticing what they were doing.
Tom Cotton was on CNN with Dana Bash when she
asked about Russian interference, he reminded her it wasn't the
Russians who've interfered in the past two elections.
Speaker 11 (29:09):
I want to turn to a very different topic, and
that is something that the Justice Department said this week.
They detailed a Russian government effort to stoke divisions in
the US using front organizations and social media. Prominent right
wing influencers like Dave Rubin and Benny Johnson who have
ties to Tenet Media. Now that's a company that the
(29:31):
Justice Department says was being funded by Russian operatives. You
said on the Intelligence Committee, how worried are you that
right wing influencers, people who do have an impact on
your constituents are being funded either directly or indirectly by
the Russian government in order to make an impact on
(29:54):
this election.
Speaker 12 (29:56):
Well, first off, Vanner, we haven't been in sessions. I'mn't
saying any intelligence this matter. Seeing the allegations I've read
in the newspaper, people should not knowingly take money from
the government of Russia or iron or China or any
other adversarial nation to try to influence the election. But
I also think it's fair to say that a few
memes or videos in the vast sea of political commentary
is not going to make much of a difference in
(30:17):
this election, nor has it in past election as well.
What did make a difference in the last election is
the lies about Hunter Biden's laptop that more than four
dozen former intelligence officials lied about in the middle of
that campaign. And most networks include this one bought that lie,
hook line and sinker. That did make a difference in
the election. But I think a few videos or commentaries,
which again you shouldn't do if you're out there in
(30:38):
the business of commentating on elections, is not going to
make a difference in the vast see of commentary.
Speaker 16 (30:43):
We see.
Speaker 3 (30:47):
Lawrence O'Donnell of MSNBC has a terminal case of TDS.
Speaker 2 (30:53):
That's Trump delusion syndrome.
Speaker 1 (30:55):
He's eat up with it.
Speaker 3 (30:57):
It's become all consuming for poor Larry. He has nightmares
about Donald Trump. He's obsessed with him, and while he's
wide awake, he's having nightmares. He went on an eleven
minute rant about Donald Trump and Tariff's recently. I won't
subject you to all eleven months because you don't deserve that.
(31:18):
That's a punishment, that's cruel and unusual. But I will
play you a couple of minutes of it so you
can just revel in it. You can enjoy how miserable
he is. He says, the media doesn't report the insane
ramblings and President Trump, what Trump's going The media is
going easy on Trump. They report on what he says,
(31:42):
but they saine wash it. Listen to this, Well, they
are finally trying. Here, they are trying. Here's the latest
attempt at trying. See elements of the news media that
have been accused of sine washing Donald Trump know that
they are guilty exactly that. And now some of them,
(32:02):
like the New York Times, they really really are trying
to do something about it.
Speaker 1 (32:07):
But this is their first try, so it's not perfect.
Speaker 15 (32:11):
The New York Times first try was published tonight under
the headline as debate looms, Trump is now the one
facing questions about age and capacity, with a sub headline
reading his rambling, sometimes incoherent public statements have stirred concern
among voters. The Times article does not use the term
saine washing, which describes the way some in the news
(32:33):
media edit Donald Trump's crazy statements down to a shape
that allows them to then try to make sense of them.
Speaker 3 (32:42):
And it's because of this sane washing that Larry says
Kamala Harris won't just be wasn't just debating Donald Trump,
but she was debating the media as well. This audio
was before the debate. I've been sitting on it, but
I wanted to make sure you get to it so
you can see how crazed these people are.
Speaker 15 (33:04):
The one person working at ABC News who I know
knows what a tariff is is George Deteffanoppolis, who worked
on that issue as a staffer in the House of
Representatives and then worked on that issue and many others
in the White House with President Clinton. But George Steffanopolis
has no role in tomorrow night's debate hosted by ABC News,
So when daughter of Eyes Love tariffs, it will be
(33:24):
Vice President Harris's job alone, with no help from the moderators,
she try to undo ten years of lying to America
about what a tariff is and who pays a tariff,
and that that is how unbalanced this debate is going
(33:44):
to be before it even starts. Kamala Harris won't just
have to fend off new Trump lies. Tomorrow night, she
will have to fend off ten years of the accumulated
weight of Trump lying, including on subjects that the news
media has ever made an attempt of any kind to
challenge Donald Trump. What's the toughest question you've ever heard
(34:05):
a reporter ask Donald Trump about tariffs? The answer is none.
There has never been a Trump a tough question put
to Donald Trump about tariffs. Twenty four hours from now,
you will be hearing many commentators say washing much of
what Donald Trump has to say tomorrow night. In that sense,
Donald Harris won't just be debating Donald Trump tomorrow night.
She will also be debating the news media reviewers of
(34:28):
the debate, many of whom do not comprehend the fundamental
facts of government
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce
Football’s funniest family duo — Jason Kelce of the Philadelphia Eagles and Travis Kelce of the Kansas City Chiefs — team up to provide next-level access to life in the league as it unfolds. The two brothers and Super Bowl champions drop weekly insights about the weekly slate of games and share their INSIDE perspectives on trending NFL news and sports headlines. They also endlessly rag on each other as brothers do, chat the latest in pop culture and welcome some very popular and well-known friends to chat with them. Check out new episodes every Wednesday. Follow New Heights on the Wondery App, YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts. You can listen to new episodes early and ad-free, and get exclusive content on Wondery+. Join Wondery+ in the Wondery App, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. And join our new membership for a unique fan experience by going to the New Heights YouTube channel now!
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.