December 16, 2024 • 33 mins
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
It's that time, time, time, time, luck and load. The
Michael Varie Show is on the air. What are we
(00:28):
going to make of these drones.
Speaker 2 (00:31):
Off the coast of New Jersey. There have been multiple sightings.
You can't just say you're crazy if you saw it.
They're being reported as drones or drone light. And then
you've got members of the administration, people who should be
(00:55):
very well aware of anything penetrating American airspace, if for
no other reason than our national security, saying yeah, we
don't know what it is. Well, I guess if you're
Adam kin Singer, you think it's reasonable to say, oh,
(01:15):
those aren't drones at all. We'll just say it didn't happen.
You remember the old Eddie Murphy line, I can't remember
if it was delirious or raw, where he talks.
Speaker 1 (01:26):
About the guide.
Speaker 2 (01:27):
His wife comes home and he's sleeping with another woman,
and he first denies that the woman's there.
Speaker 1 (01:36):
I saw her there.
Speaker 2 (01:38):
I saw her in the bed with you, and he said,
we weren't doing anything. And when I said, yeah you were,
I saw what you were doing and she's Chris And
he said, okay, yeah she was there, and yeah I
was doing it. But I don't love her, I love you.
We are at the phase where the people on the left,
the Adam Kin singers, the defenders of the Biden administration,
(02:00):
this guy was supposed to be a Republican, are now
at the No, y'all don't see drones. Those aren't drones.
Speaker 3 (02:09):
What I'm hearing from FBI is we don't see a
threat here. And look, honestly, every video I've seen, and
I've spent the last couple of days looking at every
one of these videos, every video I have seen on
Twitter on the Internet, are all airplanes.
Speaker 1 (02:24):
They're literally all airplanes.
Speaker 3 (02:25):
Some of them will show an airplane that's kind of
stable out there and says that's a drone, And actually
it's an airplane flying towards you at thirty thousand feet
and I can see the lighting on it. And if
there are drones out there, by the way, and if
any of these pictures that they have shown are actual drones,
these drones then are complying with FAA lighting requirements, agreeing
on the right, a red on the left with a strobe,
(02:46):
and so it's not a ron, it's not aliens. If
there are drones, my guess is, if there are drones again,
because again, all I've seen are airplanes, and it is
more than likely some company that's out testing drones or
something like that and has no requirement to tell the
public that they're doing it, because they're actually operating these
things legally. There have been no accusations of illegal operations.
(03:09):
By the way, as a pilot myself, I can fly
over a military base whenever I want. Those restricts don't exist.
So I think there's a lot of mass hysteria. And
I've heard stories of people pointing lasers at these quote
unquote drones and then the drones lights go off. Actually,
let's be clear, I've been lazed as a pilot before.
You're supposed to turn off all your lights once you
(03:30):
get lazed, so that they can't find you because it
can actually damage your eyes. So yeah, I think there's
a lot of hysteria here.
Speaker 2 (03:38):
Yes, hysteria. The same hysteria that drove him from office,
the same hysteria that led people to react when he
tried to bring down Donald Trump, the same hysteria people
have over his false January sixth support of Liz Cheney's committee. Yeah,
that hysteria. Everybody is hysterical. Who doesn't agree with his nonsense.
(04:00):
So those aren't drones, Okay, all right, Adam Kin Singer
says they're not drones. I've seen them.
Speaker 1 (04:05):
They're not drones.
Speaker 2 (04:07):
Well, I don't quote Alejandro Majorcas, the Director of Homeland Security,
very often, but he says, yeah, they're drones.
Speaker 4 (04:16):
There's no question that people are seeing drones. And I
want to assure the American public that we in the
federal government have deployed additional resources, personnel technology to assist
the New Jersey State Police in addressing the drone sightings.
Some of those drone sightings are in fact drones, some
(04:37):
are manned aircraft that are commonly mistaken for drones, and
we do see duplicative reporting, but there's no question that
drones are being cited. Let me set the record straight here, George.
There are thousands of drones flown every day in the
United States, recreational drones, commercial drones. That is the reality.
(05:00):
And in September of twenty twenty three, the Federal Aviation
Administration the FAA, change the rules so that drones could
fly at night, and that may be one of the
reasons why now people are seeing more drones than they
did before, especially from dawn to dusk. And so that
is the reality. But I want to assure the American
(05:21):
public that we are on it. We are working in
close coordination with state and local authorities, and it is critical,
as we all have said for a number of years,
that we need from Congress additional authorities to address the
drone situation. Our authorities currently are limited and they are
(05:42):
set to expire. We need them extended and expanded.
Speaker 1 (05:46):
What exactly do you need.
Speaker 4 (05:47):
We want state and local authorities to also have the
ability to counter drone activity under federal supervision. That is
one important element that we have requested and we've heard
it echoed by the state and local officials themselves.
Speaker 2 (06:05):
Yeah, this is the same guy who would not secure
the Texas border. So when the State of Texas, through
our state government, secured the Texas border, he threatened they
were sending in troops, and they did. They sent in
troops to remove the barber that we had to keep
the bad guys out. So is that the state and
(06:28):
local officials under the supervision of the Feds. Well, we
don't trust you, majorcas, not even a little bit. This
is yet another example of where our nation is. We
don't trust our government, nor frankly should we. They are
(06:49):
unworthy of being trusted. Here's Krispy Kremes Chris Christie who
was on George Stephanopolis. He said he saw a drone too.
Speaker 1 (06:59):
Here in New Jersey. Resident, have you seen any drones?
Speaker 5 (07:01):
Yeah, two mornings ago over my house at six fifteen
in the morning. Saw them myself, so did my wife,
and so yeah, they're there. And I've been traveling around
New Jersey as I normally do, all week and I
can't tell you the number of people have called it
to me, concerned about it, and that is.
Speaker 1 (07:19):
This a mass esterary of some sort?
Speaker 5 (07:21):
Well, here's why, George, because of answers, like the secretary
just gave, they're not answering the questions.
Speaker 1 (07:27):
Well, he said that.
Speaker 4 (07:28):
He said that they're monitoring, that they haven't seen any
unusual activity, and they need more authority.
Speaker 5 (07:33):
Let me say something. I agreed that they need more authority,
but to not say that this is not that, to
say this is not unusual activity, it's just wrong. I
lived in New Jersey my whole life. This is the
first time that I've noticed drones over my house. And
I was in a restaurant in Mammoth County on Friday night,
had people at the bar coming up to me and saying,
Governor Murphy won't tell me anything. The President won't tell
(07:54):
me anything. Do you know, Like, well, I don't know,
but I will tell you this. I think this is
what happens in our society now, George, because we're used
to having things so rapidly. If you don't fill that vacuum,
then all the conspiracy theories get filled in there. So
you've got people that Congressman Jeff Andrew saying there's an
Iranian mothership off the coast of New Jersey.
Speaker 2 (08:18):
Not true. How do you know it's not true?
Speaker 1 (08:19):
George?
Speaker 2 (08:19):
You say, we don't know what it is. Then you go,
but it's not that over there. We don't believe you.
We don't believe any of them.
Speaker 1 (08:25):
It's Michael Barry shows.
Speaker 2 (08:28):
So we're talking about the drones or whatever these things
are that are flying over American soil. I'll tell you this.
The Russians would not allow unidentified flying objects into their airspace.
They would shoot them down. The Iranis would not allow this,
(08:53):
they would shoot them down. So when we say we're
concerned that these unidentified flying objects are flying over American soil?
What are they and what are you doing? And our
government says, you don't need to know, we just need
(09:15):
more power. I'm going to tell you what's going to happen.
Americans are going to start shooting them down. There are
already shots being fired at them. Americans are not going
to wait around on the Biden administration to protect us
by land, sea, or air. Americans are going to do
(09:37):
what we have to do to protect ourselves. That's just
going to happen, and you're not going to stop it. So, yeah,
there will be lasers in the eyes, there will be
shots fired, there will.
Speaker 1 (09:48):
Be all sorts of other things. What would you expect
to happen?
Speaker 2 (09:54):
This is supposed to be the role of the federal
government first to defend our borders, to provide for our
national defense. But see they don't want to provide for
our defense. They want to provide for the defense of
Ukraine billions and billions of dollars, and then they want
(10:19):
to laugh at us and taunt us for trying to
protect our own homes. At a minimum, those unidentified flying objects,
whether they be drones or not, could be taking photos,
They could be releasing chemicals into the air. They could
be lining up their shot to take some folks out.
(10:43):
There are a number of things. They remember the Chinese
fire balloons that were allowed to float around the United States.
One of the reasons that I have heard that Mark Kelly,
the Senator from Arizona, did not agree to be the
vice presidential running mate because he was who Barack Obama
(11:05):
wanted as Kama's running it he actually wanted Mark Telly
to be the candidate was because he had an interest
in that Chinese spy balloon company. That was an allegation
I heard. I cannot verify that to be the case.
So Americans are not being hysterical or conspiracy theorists. Look
(11:30):
at what we've just learned in the last week, a
confirmation from the Department of Justice Inspector General that the
FBI did have plans at the Capitol to encourage and
incite an insurrection. It didn't happen, but they sure as
hell tried. What about Ray Epps, Well, any government that
(11:57):
would do that, any government that had evidence that the
clot shot could kill you and still mandated it for
federal employees and pushed private companies to do the same
when it became when it became abundantly clear that the
shot was doing more harm than good, that it wasn't
(12:19):
actually a vaccine, that it never stopped the spread of COVID.
We had the President saying, if you take this shot,
you will never get COVID, and you will never spread COVID.
And then how many times did the old fella get it?
Incoming National Security advisor that means from the Trump administration,
(12:42):
the forthcoming Trump administration.
Speaker 1 (12:45):
Mike Waaltz.
Speaker 2 (12:47):
Was on Face the Nation with Margaret Bryan when Mike
Walls speculated that the drones could be coming offshore.
Speaker 6 (12:58):
Given the intelligence you've seen, is there any reason for
the public to be worried? Well, look, when you have
sensitive sites like piccatind the Arsenal, you have of course
President Trump's residents at Bedminster, and you have other no
fly areas. Those need to be enforced. We need to
know who's behind it. But right now I think law
(13:21):
enforcement seems to be the Department Home Land Security and
the Defense Department are kind of all doing this and
pointing at each other. So when we come in, you know,
how do we enforce these low level long loitering could
be dangerous? Drones and one thing for people to appreciate.
You know, they're evolving so rapidly. It's not necessarily somebody
(13:43):
that's just on the other end flying it. They could
be following pre positioned GPS coordinates, they could be coming
from offshore.
Speaker 2 (13:53):
You know, we're about to learn a lot. We're about
to learn a whole lot in this country when the
Trump administration comes into office, things that have been done
to the American people, lies that had been told. Meanwhile,
Rosio Donald says, those drones are aliens.
Speaker 1 (14:20):
You decide.
Speaker 7 (14:24):
That's just a plane, not a drone. Now, can we
stop calling them drones? They're obviously UFOs.
Speaker 4 (14:30):
People.
Speaker 7 (14:30):
Come on, it's all over the world now, It's not
just in a little thing in New Jersey. Just saw
one from China today. It's all over the world. What
do you think that some country Iran as the capacity
and the capability to monitor and fly these drones all
over the world at the same time doing the maneuvers
(14:52):
that they're doing. I mean, not trying to scare everybody,
but they're here. They're here, and the powers that be
don't want to acknowledge that because that leaves them with
a higher authority nobody's going to care about Trump or
Putin or all of the strong men in the world
who are dictators and cruel and evil. No, they're not
(15:15):
going to have the power that they have.
Speaker 3 (15:17):
If this is true.
Speaker 7 (15:18):
The aliens are here and they're obviously superior to us
in many many ways. Let's hope they don't want to
just you.
Speaker 3 (15:26):
Know, blow us up.
Speaker 2 (15:29):
Let's hope.
Speaker 7 (15:31):
And I wonder why I'm not sleeping right, but I
think it's ridiculously head in the sand to think these
are drones that are from another country that just happen
to be all over the world at the same time.
It makes no sense, people, it makes no sense. You
can't be afraid to look at the truth. That's what
I'm saying. You've got to face it head on, right,
(15:53):
and what's the truth here? There are so many in
this guys above our planet, and the government is not
having daily press conferences to tell us what's going on.
Question that a lot. I question that a lot.
Speaker 2 (16:14):
Can you imagine what a rough decade Rosie o'donnald has
had because she's a big fat bully and the one
person she picked on the wrong person with Donald.
Speaker 1 (16:25):
Ask you about it, Michael Barry Show continues.
Speaker 7 (16:34):
We told you.
Speaker 2 (16:37):
About Crystal Mangum, or Crystal Magnum, who was the the
stripper who accused the Duke lacrosse players eighteen years ago
of raping her. It absolutely. I don't say it ruined
(17:00):
their lives, because they've gone on with their lives, but
the phrase we use is ruined their lives. The lives
they had will never be the same. The loss of innocence,
the fortunes their parents had to spend. Thank god they
had it, otherwise they had gone to prison. The number
(17:23):
of people who will always secretly believe, well, you wouldn't
be charged if you weren't guilty. There are people that
believe that. And it's not until you know about the
fat Alvin Bragg kind of people, which is what Mike Nifong,
the district attorney there was like that. You understand there
are people in law enforcement who will bring a case
(17:50):
against you knowing good and well you didn't do anything wrong.
I don't think they're the majority, I don't think they're
the standard, but they're there, and this is why we
have and you've heard this phrase, a presumption of innocence.
You never assume that because someone is charged, they are guilty.
Speaker 1 (18:13):
It has to be proven.
Speaker 2 (18:17):
Because mistakes can be made, and we would always rather
let a guilty man go free than convict the innocent.
That's what our system is based on, because anybody, anybody,
can be falsely charged, including you. Donald Trump, can be
(18:37):
convicted on three dozen charges in front of the nation,
with the whole nation watching, with the judge behaving in
the most inappropriate manner, with it being as clear as
it could possibly be if they were railroading him. Even
he well, when that happens, most people don't want to
(18:59):
stand up for you. You couldn't find anybody at Duke
who would stand up for the Duke lacrosse players. We
used to spend every day on it. But there was
a man, There was a student. He was a columnist
for the school newspaper. He was a student at the time.
His name was Steven Miller, and you might recognize that
name because Steven Miller, eighteen years later is now Trump's
(19:21):
deputy chief of staff. Here's what he had to say
when those charges were leveled back then.
Speaker 8 (19:26):
I think I speak for many students when I say
that we're very, very concerned that two innocent people may
have possibly just said you lies ruined.
Speaker 7 (19:35):
Or your first concern is that somebody's falsely as kid.
Speaker 1 (19:39):
Don't tell me what my first concern is.
Speaker 8 (19:40):
I was disturbed to see how people were saying, why
aren't they coming forward, Why aren't they saying what happened?
Why haven't they they spoken out against other players? But
no one said, wait, hold on a moment, what if
they're innocent?
Speaker 1 (19:51):
What if they didn't do it at all?
Speaker 9 (19:53):
We are out of time, But I will say that
these things don't happen in a vacuum. I understand your point,
but it's also freedom is speech. People have a righteous
like you're expressing Europeia.
Speaker 8 (20:02):
They do.
Speaker 1 (20:02):
But it was very prosecuted as a witch hunt. From
the beginning.
Speaker 8 (20:05):
People presumed their guilt, and in America, we don't do that. Well,
let's put it this way. The only person in this
whole case that has any real significant evidence of wrongdoing
against them is one district attorney by the name of
Mike Kniphong. Well, that's the truly depressing thing about this
is you could have a situation where they might have said,
all right, look, we rushed the judgment. We thought something happened.
(20:26):
It looks like absolutely nothing happened. Now, we made a mistake,
we shouldn't have done it. But instead they're standing by
the original statement, which speaks to the fact that for
them this was never about what happened to this particular woman,
according to her testimony, Nor was it ever about these players.
It was always for them about their political agenda. And
I'll say this, the one person again who without question
(20:48):
has behaved in an unethical, immoral, and sinister fashion is
District Attorney Mike Kniphong. He's pursued a case not because
of the evidence, in spite of the evidence, and the
idea that in America you would pursue a case against
three people when the evidence suggests not that they did it,
but that they didn't do it, to me is beyond unconscionable.
Speaker 9 (21:12):
You're not willing to say she's lying just yet, But
I want to go to a man that I think
might disagree with that, Stephen Miller, executive director of the
de Conservative Union. You have been outspoken on this case
from the start. Do you still give her the benefit
of the doubt?
Speaker 1 (21:26):
I don't think he ever did.
Speaker 8 (21:27):
Did you, well, I never gave her the benefit of
the doubt.
Speaker 1 (21:31):
If you look at the evidence in this totality. It
was clear from very early on.
Speaker 8 (21:35):
In this case that this was indeed a bogus case,
and Jane, I think both you and I can agree that.
Speaker 1 (21:41):
All the charges should be drawn. This is absolutely unbelievable.
Speaker 8 (21:44):
On the night in question, just that night alone, she
had several different versions of events.
Speaker 1 (21:49):
In one version of events that night, she claimed she
was only groped and not even raped.
Speaker 8 (21:53):
She changed the number of attackers in the photo line
of she identified different people. She identified one of the
people as having a mustache, have a mustache. This whole
case has been wrought with irregularities.
Speaker 1 (22:03):
And nonsense and deceptions.
Speaker 8 (22:05):
Mike Naifong keeping exculpatory evidence away from the defense. You're
talking about a guy that did seventy press interviews.
Speaker 1 (22:12):
Used to get re elected.
Speaker 8 (22:13):
There was never any real evidence against these players. The
DNA didn't match on any count in any way, in
any capacity this entire time, you have absolutely no reason
to believe these players committed this crime. One of the
players has a solid alibi during the time the crime
was supposed to have occurred. You've got all this stuff.
I cannot think of one case, one case of equivalent
or near profile in the United States of America, where
(22:34):
there has been so little reason for three people or
one person or anybody to.
Speaker 1 (22:38):
Be brought to trial. This is insane.
Speaker 9 (22:41):
I know you think they should never have been filed,
but given that report.
Speaker 1 (22:45):
Should they have been dropped back in May? They should
have been dropped. And let me add this thought.
Speaker 8 (22:49):
If this had not been a situation where you had
three apparently well to do white lacrosse players accused of
raping four black strippers mother in Durham, if you hadn't
had that racial element, there's no way this kiss could
continue for that long. But because of the incredibly toxic
racial environment you have in America, and specifically in Durham,
(23:10):
where ninety six percent is estimated of the black population
voted for a Nifong's reelection, you have a situation where
people are afraid to intervene because they'll be perceived as
doing it for the wrong motivation.
Speaker 1 (23:23):
The only do the matters here is justice.
Speaker 9 (23:24):
And I want to know Stephen Miller of the Conservative
UNI for the big picture here, because you could argue.
Speaker 1 (23:30):
That if she's making this up.
Speaker 9 (23:32):
You know, people have a tendency to want to get
even when racial slurs are uttered at them, and that
the ugliness began with those slurs. Your thoughts on that,
because I know you're saying that that does not fairly
represent Duke, and I certainly agree, But this ugliness came
from somewhere.
Speaker 1 (23:50):
It didn't it did happen.
Speaker 8 (23:52):
Those slurs were uttered. Well, it doesn't fairly represent Duke.
It also doesn't fairly represent the lacrosse team because first
of all, we're talking about a few individuals that are
alleged to have said these things.
Speaker 1 (24:03):
But the three players that are on that have.
Speaker 8 (24:06):
Been indicted, that are about to face trial are not
the ones that are.
Speaker 1 (24:10):
Supposed to have said these things.
Speaker 8 (24:12):
The majority of the players on the team, no one's
accused them of saying anything racist.
Speaker 1 (24:16):
So you can't take a brush and paint the whole.
Speaker 8 (24:19):
Team because of what a few people said, which is heinous,
but doesn't reflect on the team as a whole.
Speaker 1 (24:23):
That would be absolutely absurd, and I'm not doing that.
Speaker 9 (24:25):
But what I'm saying is that we talk about this,
this horrible situation, and this racially polarizing situation, and its
stemmed from those words, and people say, oh, words are meaningless,
but words count, words count.
Speaker 1 (24:39):
A lot, and it cant and there's no question.
Speaker 8 (24:41):
Let me tell you someone, if somebody said to a
black person or an Asian person, or a Jewish person
or any person something like that, and I was around,
I would put them in their place, because there's no
place for that in America. But that cannot be the
justification for a bogus trial.
Speaker 2 (24:55):
They remain scared the death of you, and they remain
scared to death of tru show. You're not going anywhere,
even if Trump does, You're not. I'm fifty three, so
you can kind of gauge when I came of age.
I've been precociously fascinated with politics and government since I
(25:18):
was a very young man. Not that my parents were.
I was just a little weirdo that was fascinated by
an elementary school. And when I think about where we
are right now, and I think about all of the elections,
the two most critical elections in my lifetime, or nineteen
(25:46):
eighty in twenty twenty four, the results of me now.
The reason I don't say twenty sixteen is you have
to understand where the nation was in nineteen eighty, very
similar to where it is today. The Republican brand was
(26:10):
terribly tarnished with the Nixon scandal. Nixon was no saint,
but I am certain and I always have been, that
Nixon was smeared as part of the deep state and
the media not just to take Nixon down, but to
(26:32):
take down what was effectively a Trump like coalition that
got him elected in sixty eight and seventy two. It
was a populist agenda that was very reactionary to Lyndon
Johnson's nineteen sixty five quote unquote great society, which was
(26:55):
anything but. And that was the rise of the medicare,
cad state, the rise of race based politics and government,
the massive rise and explosion in government size and control
over the everyday person and corporations. The Nixon election in
(27:20):
sixty eight was a reaction to that, and that's why
the media referred to it as racist. If you didn't
like the fact that blacks would be put in front
of whites simply because of race, then that made you racist.
But it doesn't. Not only are the people who are
(27:43):
stepped over to put somebody in a position angry, you
should be angry at the loss of merit as the
basis of hiring, promotion, admission, you name it, because yuess what.
We can't control our we can't control our sex, we
(28:03):
can't control where we're born. But we can control how
hard we work, what time we show up, what performance
we deliver, what score we get, how many sales we close,
how many widgets we make, and the efficiency of the
(28:25):
marketplace to determine who shall be employed, promoted, what they'll
be paid. And the light was destroyed by the Democrats
during that time. So Nixon gets elected in sixty eight
and seventy two, and by seventy four he's done, and
a swamp creature is put in charge, and that was
(28:47):
jeral Ford. Jerald Ford was like John Bayner. Gerald Ford
was a creature of Congress who played by the congressional rules.
He was not a true believer in Conservatism by any stretch.
(29:07):
I don't think he was a bad man. I think
he was probably on a personal level, a very good man.
But he was no conservative and he was no populist.
Then in seventy six he loses to Carter, and then
in eighty which Carter's administration was much like the Obama
(29:28):
administration and the Biden administration, the country had collapsed. Does
any of this sound familiar? The rise of Iran instability
in the Middle East. Let's see historic levels of inflation. Yeah,
(29:50):
that's what happened under Carter and Ronald Reagan, who had
been pushed aside in seventy six as the Republican nominee,
who had very strong support with the base under the
banner of America is off track. Let's this was Reagan's phrase,
make America great again. People are always surprised when I
(30:16):
tell them that's who said that. Reagan said make America
great again. That's what he ran. Under Trump very wisely
remembered that and brought it back. People have a short
memory for these sorts things, because that's what people want.
People want America to be great. We want our nation
(30:36):
to be great in every way. That's what we expect,
that's what we demand, and we'll tolerate nothing short of it.
So the Reagan win was an opportunity for the everyman
to have a president. That's where they got Reagan Democrats.
Working class voters came back. Working class voters abandoned the
(31:02):
Democrat Party, came back to vote, which they hadn't, and
they voted Republican. That was transformative for American politics until
nineteen eighty eight, George HW. Bush wins, but by ninety
two people said this kind of deep state, big money,
(31:23):
Northeastern vo tie wearing, even though Bush himself didn't Republicanism doesn't.
I don't identify with that NAFTA, the Americans with Disabilities Act,
which hurt a lot of small businesses. Clinton comes in
with this southern strategy to bring back working class voters
(31:43):
to the Democrat Party, and it got him reelected in
ninety six. By two thousand, his scandals were such that
George W. Bush gets elected but without a real mandate,
and four the same two thousand and eight, Obama's elected
twenty twelve idiot Romney. Obama's elected twenty sixteen is the
(32:08):
other is the other? What would be the third? In
the most important elections, Trump brought working class voters back
to the Democrat Party on the basis of what the
establishment was doing the uniparty. Then they stole the election
from him in twenty The more important election was twenty
(32:30):
twenty four, because this is where it was all revealed.
In these next four years. I pray for his health nightly.
I pray for his security and his health every single night,
because I think this is going to be, as he said,
a golden age for America, and I am looking forward
(32:54):
to it for myself, for our show, for my family,
for you.
Speaker 1 (33:01):
We've waited, we've been patient, and it is time.
Speaker 6 (33:17):
H
It's that time, time, time, time, luck and load. The
Michael Varie Show is on the air. What are we
(00:28):
going to make of these drones.
Speaker 2 (00:31):
Off the coast of New Jersey. There have been multiple sightings.
You can't just say you're crazy if you saw it.
They're being reported as drones or drone light. And then
you've got members of the administration, people who should be
(00:55):
very well aware of anything penetrating American airspace, if for
no other reason than our national security, saying yeah, we
don't know what it is. Well, I guess if you're
Adam kin Singer, you think it's reasonable to say, oh,
(01:15):
those aren't drones at all. We'll just say it didn't happen.
You remember the old Eddie Murphy line, I can't remember
if it was delirious or raw, where he talks.
Speaker 1 (01:26):
About the guide.
Speaker 2 (01:27):
His wife comes home and he's sleeping with another woman,
and he first denies that the woman's there.
Speaker 1 (01:36):
I saw her there.
Speaker 2 (01:38):
I saw her in the bed with you, and he said,
we weren't doing anything. And when I said, yeah you were,
I saw what you were doing and she's Chris And
he said, okay, yeah she was there, and yeah I
was doing it. But I don't love her, I love you.
We are at the phase where the people on the left,
the Adam Kin singers, the defenders of the Biden administration,
(02:00):
this guy was supposed to be a Republican, are now
at the No, y'all don't see drones. Those aren't drones.
Speaker 3 (02:09):
What I'm hearing from FBI is we don't see a
threat here. And look, honestly, every video I've seen, and
I've spent the last couple of days looking at every
one of these videos, every video I have seen on
Twitter on the Internet, are all airplanes.
Speaker 1 (02:24):
They're literally all airplanes.
Speaker 3 (02:25):
Some of them will show an airplane that's kind of
stable out there and says that's a drone, And actually
it's an airplane flying towards you at thirty thousand feet
and I can see the lighting on it. And if
there are drones out there, by the way, and if
any of these pictures that they have shown are actual drones,
these drones then are complying with FAA lighting requirements, agreeing
on the right, a red on the left with a strobe,
(02:46):
and so it's not a ron, it's not aliens. If
there are drones, my guess is, if there are drones again,
because again, all I've seen are airplanes, and it is
more than likely some company that's out testing drones or
something like that and has no requirement to tell the
public that they're doing it, because they're actually operating these
things legally. There have been no accusations of illegal operations.
(03:09):
By the way, as a pilot myself, I can fly
over a military base whenever I want. Those restricts don't exist.
So I think there's a lot of mass hysteria. And
I've heard stories of people pointing lasers at these quote
unquote drones and then the drones lights go off. Actually,
let's be clear, I've been lazed as a pilot before.
You're supposed to turn off all your lights once you
(03:30):
get lazed, so that they can't find you because it
can actually damage your eyes. So yeah, I think there's
a lot of hysteria here.
Speaker 2 (03:38):
Yes, hysteria. The same hysteria that drove him from office,
the same hysteria that led people to react when he
tried to bring down Donald Trump, the same hysteria people
have over his false January sixth support of Liz Cheney's committee. Yeah,
that hysteria. Everybody is hysterical. Who doesn't agree with his nonsense.
(04:00):
So those aren't drones, Okay, all right, Adam Kin Singer
says they're not drones. I've seen them.
Speaker 1 (04:05):
They're not drones.
Speaker 2 (04:07):
Well, I don't quote Alejandro Majorcas, the Director of Homeland Security,
very often, but he says, yeah, they're drones.
Speaker 4 (04:16):
There's no question that people are seeing drones. And I
want to assure the American public that we in the
federal government have deployed additional resources, personnel technology to assist
the New Jersey State Police in addressing the drone sightings.
Some of those drone sightings are in fact drones, some
(04:37):
are manned aircraft that are commonly mistaken for drones, and
we do see duplicative reporting, but there's no question that
drones are being cited. Let me set the record straight here, George.
There are thousands of drones flown every day in the
United States, recreational drones, commercial drones. That is the reality.
(05:00):
And in September of twenty twenty three, the Federal Aviation
Administration the FAA, change the rules so that drones could
fly at night, and that may be one of the
reasons why now people are seeing more drones than they
did before, especially from dawn to dusk. And so that
is the reality. But I want to assure the American
(05:21):
public that we are on it. We are working in
close coordination with state and local authorities, and it is critical,
as we all have said for a number of years,
that we need from Congress additional authorities to address the
drone situation. Our authorities currently are limited and they are
(05:42):
set to expire. We need them extended and expanded.
Speaker 1 (05:46):
What exactly do you need.
Speaker 4 (05:47):
We want state and local authorities to also have the
ability to counter drone activity under federal supervision. That is
one important element that we have requested and we've heard
it echoed by the state and local officials themselves.
Speaker 2 (06:05):
Yeah, this is the same guy who would not secure
the Texas border. So when the State of Texas, through
our state government, secured the Texas border, he threatened they
were sending in troops, and they did. They sent in
troops to remove the barber that we had to keep
the bad guys out. So is that the state and
(06:28):
local officials under the supervision of the Feds. Well, we
don't trust you, majorcas, not even a little bit. This
is yet another example of where our nation is. We
don't trust our government, nor frankly should we. They are
(06:49):
unworthy of being trusted. Here's Krispy Kremes Chris Christie who
was on George Stephanopolis. He said he saw a drone too.
Speaker 1 (06:59):
Here in New Jersey. Resident, have you seen any drones?
Speaker 5 (07:01):
Yeah, two mornings ago over my house at six fifteen
in the morning. Saw them myself, so did my wife,
and so yeah, they're there. And I've been traveling around
New Jersey as I normally do, all week and I
can't tell you the number of people have called it
to me, concerned about it, and that is.
Speaker 1 (07:19):
This a mass esterary of some sort?
Speaker 5 (07:21):
Well, here's why, George, because of answers, like the secretary
just gave, they're not answering the questions.
Speaker 1 (07:27):
Well, he said that.
Speaker 4 (07:28):
He said that they're monitoring, that they haven't seen any
unusual activity, and they need more authority.
Speaker 5 (07:33):
Let me say something. I agreed that they need more authority,
but to not say that this is not that, to
say this is not unusual activity, it's just wrong. I
lived in New Jersey my whole life. This is the
first time that I've noticed drones over my house. And
I was in a restaurant in Mammoth County on Friday night,
had people at the bar coming up to me and saying,
Governor Murphy won't tell me anything. The President won't tell
(07:54):
me anything. Do you know, Like, well, I don't know,
but I will tell you this. I think this is
what happens in our society now, George, because we're used
to having things so rapidly. If you don't fill that vacuum,
then all the conspiracy theories get filled in there. So
you've got people that Congressman Jeff Andrew saying there's an
Iranian mothership off the coast of New Jersey.
Speaker 2 (08:18):
Not true. How do you know it's not true?
Speaker 1 (08:19):
George?
Speaker 2 (08:19):
You say, we don't know what it is. Then you go,
but it's not that over there. We don't believe you.
We don't believe any of them.
Speaker 1 (08:25):
It's Michael Barry shows.
Speaker 2 (08:28):
So we're talking about the drones or whatever these things
are that are flying over American soil. I'll tell you this.
The Russians would not allow unidentified flying objects into their airspace.
They would shoot them down. The Iranis would not allow this,
(08:53):
they would shoot them down. So when we say we're
concerned that these unidentified flying objects are flying over American soil?
What are they and what are you doing? And our
government says, you don't need to know, we just need
(09:15):
more power. I'm going to tell you what's going to happen.
Americans are going to start shooting them down. There are
already shots being fired at them. Americans are not going
to wait around on the Biden administration to protect us
by land, sea, or air. Americans are going to do
(09:37):
what we have to do to protect ourselves. That's just
going to happen, and you're not going to stop it. So, yeah,
there will be lasers in the eyes, there will be
shots fired, there will.
Speaker 1 (09:48):
Be all sorts of other things. What would you expect
to happen?
Speaker 2 (09:54):
This is supposed to be the role of the federal
government first to defend our borders, to provide for our
national defense. But see they don't want to provide for
our defense. They want to provide for the defense of
Ukraine billions and billions of dollars, and then they want
(10:19):
to laugh at us and taunt us for trying to
protect our own homes. At a minimum, those unidentified flying objects,
whether they be drones or not, could be taking photos,
They could be releasing chemicals into the air. They could
be lining up their shot to take some folks out.
(10:43):
There are a number of things. They remember the Chinese
fire balloons that were allowed to float around the United States.
One of the reasons that I have heard that Mark Kelly,
the Senator from Arizona, did not agree to be the
vice presidential running mate because he was who Barack Obama
(11:05):
wanted as Kama's running it he actually wanted Mark Telly
to be the candidate was because he had an interest
in that Chinese spy balloon company. That was an allegation
I heard. I cannot verify that to be the case.
So Americans are not being hysterical or conspiracy theorists. Look
(11:30):
at what we've just learned in the last week, a
confirmation from the Department of Justice Inspector General that the
FBI did have plans at the Capitol to encourage and
incite an insurrection. It didn't happen, but they sure as
hell tried. What about Ray Epps, Well, any government that
(11:57):
would do that, any government that had evidence that the
clot shot could kill you and still mandated it for
federal employees and pushed private companies to do the same
when it became when it became abundantly clear that the
shot was doing more harm than good, that it wasn't
(12:19):
actually a vaccine, that it never stopped the spread of COVID.
We had the President saying, if you take this shot,
you will never get COVID, and you will never spread COVID.
And then how many times did the old fella get it?
Incoming National Security advisor that means from the Trump administration,
(12:42):
the forthcoming Trump administration.
Speaker 1 (12:45):
Mike Waaltz.
Speaker 2 (12:47):
Was on Face the Nation with Margaret Bryan when Mike
Walls speculated that the drones could be coming offshore.
Speaker 6 (12:58):
Given the intelligence you've seen, is there any reason for
the public to be worried? Well, look, when you have
sensitive sites like piccatind the Arsenal, you have of course
President Trump's residents at Bedminster, and you have other no
fly areas. Those need to be enforced. We need to
know who's behind it. But right now I think law
(13:21):
enforcement seems to be the Department Home Land Security and
the Defense Department are kind of all doing this and
pointing at each other. So when we come in, you know,
how do we enforce these low level long loitering could
be dangerous? Drones and one thing for people to appreciate.
You know, they're evolving so rapidly. It's not necessarily somebody
(13:43):
that's just on the other end flying it. They could
be following pre positioned GPS coordinates, they could be coming
from offshore.
Speaker 2 (13:53):
You know, we're about to learn a lot. We're about
to learn a whole lot in this country when the
Trump administration comes into office, things that have been done
to the American people, lies that had been told. Meanwhile,
Rosio Donald says, those drones are aliens.
Speaker 1 (14:20):
You decide.
Speaker 7 (14:24):
That's just a plane, not a drone. Now, can we
stop calling them drones? They're obviously UFOs.
Speaker 4 (14:30):
People.
Speaker 7 (14:30):
Come on, it's all over the world now, It's not
just in a little thing in New Jersey. Just saw
one from China today. It's all over the world. What
do you think that some country Iran as the capacity
and the capability to monitor and fly these drones all
over the world at the same time doing the maneuvers
(14:52):
that they're doing. I mean, not trying to scare everybody,
but they're here. They're here, and the powers that be
don't want to acknowledge that because that leaves them with
a higher authority nobody's going to care about Trump or
Putin or all of the strong men in the world
who are dictators and cruel and evil. No, they're not
(15:15):
going to have the power that they have.
Speaker 3 (15:17):
If this is true.
Speaker 7 (15:18):
The aliens are here and they're obviously superior to us
in many many ways. Let's hope they don't want to
just you.
Speaker 3 (15:26):
Know, blow us up.
Speaker 2 (15:29):
Let's hope.
Speaker 7 (15:31):
And I wonder why I'm not sleeping right, but I
think it's ridiculously head in the sand to think these
are drones that are from another country that just happen
to be all over the world at the same time.
It makes no sense, people, it makes no sense. You
can't be afraid to look at the truth. That's what
I'm saying. You've got to face it head on, right,
(15:53):
and what's the truth here? There are so many in
this guys above our planet, and the government is not
having daily press conferences to tell us what's going on.
Question that a lot. I question that a lot.
Speaker 2 (16:14):
Can you imagine what a rough decade Rosie o'donnald has
had because she's a big fat bully and the one
person she picked on the wrong person with Donald.
Speaker 1 (16:25):
Ask you about it, Michael Barry Show continues.
Speaker 7 (16:34):
We told you.
Speaker 2 (16:37):
About Crystal Mangum, or Crystal Magnum, who was the the
stripper who accused the Duke lacrosse players eighteen years ago
of raping her. It absolutely. I don't say it ruined
(17:00):
their lives, because they've gone on with their lives, but
the phrase we use is ruined their lives. The lives
they had will never be the same. The loss of innocence,
the fortunes their parents had to spend. Thank god they
had it, otherwise they had gone to prison. The number
(17:23):
of people who will always secretly believe, well, you wouldn't
be charged if you weren't guilty. There are people that
believe that. And it's not until you know about the
fat Alvin Bragg kind of people, which is what Mike Nifong,
the district attorney there was like that. You understand there
are people in law enforcement who will bring a case
(17:50):
against you knowing good and well you didn't do anything wrong.
I don't think they're the majority, I don't think they're
the standard, but they're there, and this is why we
have and you've heard this phrase, a presumption of innocence.
You never assume that because someone is charged, they are guilty.
Speaker 1 (18:13):
It has to be proven.
Speaker 2 (18:17):
Because mistakes can be made, and we would always rather
let a guilty man go free than convict the innocent.
That's what our system is based on, because anybody, anybody,
can be falsely charged, including you. Donald Trump, can be
(18:37):
convicted on three dozen charges in front of the nation,
with the whole nation watching, with the judge behaving in
the most inappropriate manner, with it being as clear as
it could possibly be if they were railroading him. Even
he well, when that happens, most people don't want to
(18:59):
stand up for you. You couldn't find anybody at Duke
who would stand up for the Duke lacrosse players. We
used to spend every day on it. But there was
a man, There was a student. He was a columnist
for the school newspaper. He was a student at the time.
His name was Steven Miller, and you might recognize that
name because Steven Miller, eighteen years later is now Trump's
(19:21):
deputy chief of staff. Here's what he had to say
when those charges were leveled back then.
Speaker 8 (19:26):
I think I speak for many students when I say
that we're very, very concerned that two innocent people may
have possibly just said you lies ruined.
Speaker 7 (19:35):
Or your first concern is that somebody's falsely as kid.
Speaker 1 (19:39):
Don't tell me what my first concern is.
Speaker 8 (19:40):
I was disturbed to see how people were saying, why
aren't they coming forward, Why aren't they saying what happened?
Why haven't they they spoken out against other players? But
no one said, wait, hold on a moment, what if
they're innocent?
Speaker 1 (19:51):
What if they didn't do it at all?
Speaker 9 (19:53):
We are out of time, But I will say that
these things don't happen in a vacuum. I understand your point,
but it's also freedom is speech. People have a righteous
like you're expressing Europeia.
Speaker 8 (20:02):
They do.
Speaker 1 (20:02):
But it was very prosecuted as a witch hunt. From
the beginning.
Speaker 8 (20:05):
People presumed their guilt, and in America, we don't do that. Well,
let's put it this way. The only person in this
whole case that has any real significant evidence of wrongdoing
against them is one district attorney by the name of
Mike Kniphong. Well, that's the truly depressing thing about this
is you could have a situation where they might have said,
all right, look, we rushed the judgment. We thought something happened.
(20:26):
It looks like absolutely nothing happened. Now, we made a mistake,
we shouldn't have done it. But instead they're standing by
the original statement, which speaks to the fact that for
them this was never about what happened to this particular woman,
according to her testimony, Nor was it ever about these players.
It was always for them about their political agenda. And
I'll say this, the one person again who without question
(20:48):
has behaved in an unethical, immoral, and sinister fashion is
District Attorney Mike Kniphong. He's pursued a case not because
of the evidence, in spite of the evidence, and the
idea that in America you would pursue a case against
three people when the evidence suggests not that they did it,
but that they didn't do it, to me is beyond unconscionable.
Speaker 9 (21:12):
You're not willing to say she's lying just yet, But
I want to go to a man that I think
might disagree with that, Stephen Miller, executive director of the
de Conservative Union. You have been outspoken on this case
from the start. Do you still give her the benefit
of the doubt?
Speaker 1 (21:26):
I don't think he ever did.
Speaker 8 (21:27):
Did you, well, I never gave her the benefit of
the doubt.
Speaker 1 (21:31):
If you look at the evidence in this totality. It
was clear from very early on.
Speaker 8 (21:35):
In this case that this was indeed a bogus case,
and Jane, I think both you and I can agree that.
Speaker 1 (21:41):
All the charges should be drawn. This is absolutely unbelievable.
Speaker 8 (21:44):
On the night in question, just that night alone, she
had several different versions of events.
Speaker 1 (21:49):
In one version of events that night, she claimed she
was only groped and not even raped.
Speaker 8 (21:53):
She changed the number of attackers in the photo line
of she identified different people. She identified one of the
people as having a mustache, have a mustache. This whole
case has been wrought with irregularities.
Speaker 1 (22:03):
And nonsense and deceptions.
Speaker 8 (22:05):
Mike Naifong keeping exculpatory evidence away from the defense. You're
talking about a guy that did seventy press interviews.
Speaker 1 (22:12):
Used to get re elected.
Speaker 8 (22:13):
There was never any real evidence against these players. The
DNA didn't match on any count in any way, in
any capacity this entire time, you have absolutely no reason
to believe these players committed this crime. One of the
players has a solid alibi during the time the crime
was supposed to have occurred. You've got all this stuff.
I cannot think of one case, one case of equivalent
or near profile in the United States of America, where
(22:34):
there has been so little reason for three people or
one person or anybody to.
Speaker 1 (22:38):
Be brought to trial. This is insane.
Speaker 9 (22:41):
I know you think they should never have been filed,
but given that report.
Speaker 1 (22:45):
Should they have been dropped back in May? They should
have been dropped. And let me add this thought.
Speaker 8 (22:49):
If this had not been a situation where you had
three apparently well to do white lacrosse players accused of
raping four black strippers mother in Durham, if you hadn't
had that racial element, there's no way this kiss could
continue for that long. But because of the incredibly toxic
racial environment you have in America, and specifically in Durham,
(23:10):
where ninety six percent is estimated of the black population
voted for a Nifong's reelection, you have a situation where
people are afraid to intervene because they'll be perceived as
doing it for the wrong motivation.
Speaker 1 (23:23):
The only do the matters here is justice.
Speaker 9 (23:24):
And I want to know Stephen Miller of the Conservative
UNI for the big picture here, because you could argue.
Speaker 1 (23:30):
That if she's making this up.
Speaker 9 (23:32):
You know, people have a tendency to want to get
even when racial slurs are uttered at them, and that
the ugliness began with those slurs. Your thoughts on that,
because I know you're saying that that does not fairly
represent Duke, and I certainly agree, But this ugliness came
from somewhere.
Speaker 1 (23:50):
It didn't it did happen.
Speaker 8 (23:52):
Those slurs were uttered. Well, it doesn't fairly represent Duke.
It also doesn't fairly represent the lacrosse team because first
of all, we're talking about a few individuals that are
alleged to have said these things.
Speaker 1 (24:03):
But the three players that are on that have.
Speaker 8 (24:06):
Been indicted, that are about to face trial are not
the ones that are.
Speaker 1 (24:10):
Supposed to have said these things.
Speaker 8 (24:12):
The majority of the players on the team, no one's
accused them of saying anything racist.
Speaker 1 (24:16):
So you can't take a brush and paint the whole.
Speaker 8 (24:19):
Team because of what a few people said, which is heinous,
but doesn't reflect on the team as a whole.
Speaker 1 (24:23):
That would be absolutely absurd, and I'm not doing that.
Speaker 9 (24:25):
But what I'm saying is that we talk about this,
this horrible situation, and this racially polarizing situation, and its
stemmed from those words, and people say, oh, words are meaningless,
but words count, words count.
Speaker 1 (24:39):
A lot, and it cant and there's no question.
Speaker 8 (24:41):
Let me tell you someone, if somebody said to a
black person or an Asian person, or a Jewish person
or any person something like that, and I was around,
I would put them in their place, because there's no
place for that in America. But that cannot be the
justification for a bogus trial.
Speaker 2 (24:55):
They remain scared the death of you, and they remain
scared to death of tru show. You're not going anywhere,
even if Trump does, You're not. I'm fifty three, so
you can kind of gauge when I came of age.
I've been precociously fascinated with politics and government since I
(25:18):
was a very young man. Not that my parents were.
I was just a little weirdo that was fascinated by
an elementary school. And when I think about where we
are right now, and I think about all of the elections,
the two most critical elections in my lifetime, or nineteen
(25:46):
eighty in twenty twenty four, the results of me now.
The reason I don't say twenty sixteen is you have
to understand where the nation was in nineteen eighty, very
similar to where it is today. The Republican brand was
(26:10):
terribly tarnished with the Nixon scandal. Nixon was no saint,
but I am certain and I always have been, that
Nixon was smeared as part of the deep state and
the media not just to take Nixon down, but to
(26:32):
take down what was effectively a Trump like coalition that
got him elected in sixty eight and seventy two. It
was a populist agenda that was very reactionary to Lyndon
Johnson's nineteen sixty five quote unquote great society, which was
(26:55):
anything but. And that was the rise of the medicare,
cad state, the rise of race based politics and government,
the massive rise and explosion in government size and control
over the everyday person and corporations. The Nixon election in
(27:20):
sixty eight was a reaction to that, and that's why
the media referred to it as racist. If you didn't
like the fact that blacks would be put in front
of whites simply because of race, then that made you racist.
But it doesn't. Not only are the people who are
(27:43):
stepped over to put somebody in a position angry, you
should be angry at the loss of merit as the
basis of hiring, promotion, admission, you name it, because yuess what.
We can't control our we can't control our sex, we
(28:03):
can't control where we're born. But we can control how
hard we work, what time we show up, what performance
we deliver, what score we get, how many sales we close,
how many widgets we make, and the efficiency of the
(28:25):
marketplace to determine who shall be employed, promoted, what they'll
be paid. And the light was destroyed by the Democrats
during that time. So Nixon gets elected in sixty eight
and seventy two, and by seventy four he's done, and
a swamp creature is put in charge, and that was
(28:47):
jeral Ford. Jerald Ford was like John Bayner. Gerald Ford
was a creature of Congress who played by the congressional rules.
He was not a true believer in Conservatism by any stretch.
(29:07):
I don't think he was a bad man. I think
he was probably on a personal level, a very good man.
But he was no conservative and he was no populist.
Then in seventy six he loses to Carter, and then
in eighty which Carter's administration was much like the Obama
(29:28):
administration and the Biden administration, the country had collapsed. Does
any of this sound familiar? The rise of Iran instability
in the Middle East. Let's see historic levels of inflation. Yeah,
(29:50):
that's what happened under Carter and Ronald Reagan, who had
been pushed aside in seventy six as the Republican nominee,
who had very strong support with the base under the
banner of America is off track. Let's this was Reagan's phrase,
make America great again. People are always surprised when I
(30:16):
tell them that's who said that. Reagan said make America
great again. That's what he ran. Under Trump very wisely
remembered that and brought it back. People have a short
memory for these sorts things, because that's what people want.
People want America to be great. We want our nation
(30:36):
to be great in every way. That's what we expect,
that's what we demand, and we'll tolerate nothing short of it.
So the Reagan win was an opportunity for the everyman
to have a president. That's where they got Reagan Democrats.
Working class voters came back. Working class voters abandoned the
(31:02):
Democrat Party, came back to vote, which they hadn't, and
they voted Republican. That was transformative for American politics until
nineteen eighty eight, George HW. Bush wins, but by ninety
two people said this kind of deep state, big money,
(31:23):
Northeastern vo tie wearing, even though Bush himself didn't Republicanism doesn't.
I don't identify with that NAFTA, the Americans with Disabilities Act,
which hurt a lot of small businesses. Clinton comes in
with this southern strategy to bring back working class voters
(31:43):
to the Democrat Party, and it got him reelected in
ninety six. By two thousand, his scandals were such that
George W. Bush gets elected but without a real mandate,
and four the same two thousand and eight, Obama's elected
twenty twelve idiot Romney. Obama's elected twenty sixteen is the
(32:08):
other is the other? What would be the third? In
the most important elections, Trump brought working class voters back
to the Democrat Party on the basis of what the
establishment was doing the uniparty. Then they stole the election
from him in twenty The more important election was twenty
(32:30):
twenty four, because this is where it was all revealed.
In these next four years. I pray for his health nightly.
I pray for his security and his health every single night,
because I think this is going to be, as he said,
a golden age for America, and I am looking forward
(32:54):
to it for myself, for our show, for my family,
for you.
Speaker 1 (33:01):
We've waited, we've been patient, and it is time.
Speaker 6 (33:17):
H
Popular Podcasts
Boysober
Have you ever wondered what life might be like if you stopped worrying about being wanted, and focused on understanding what you actually want? That was the question Hope Woodard asked herself after a string of situationships inspired her to take a break from sex and dating. She went "boysober," a personal concept that sparked a global movement among women looking to prioritize themselves over men. Now, Hope is looking to expand the ways we explore our relationship to relationships. Taking a bold, unfiltered look into modern love, romance, and self-discovery, Boysober will dive into messy stories about dating, sex, love, friendship, and breaking generational patterns—all with humor, vulnerability, and a fresh perspective.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com