February 6, 2025 • 32 mins
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
It's that time, time, time, time, luck and load. Michael
Very Show is on the air.
Speaker 2 (00:11):
Let's get out of here, out Canada.
Speaker 3 (00:15):
Canada won't be there before these so that you know
what hit him.
Speaker 4 (00:37):
The Fox News Decision desk can now officially project that
Donald Trump will be gone the forty seventh president of
the United States.
Speaker 5 (00:46):
You guys know that my husband turned Republican this term.
I don't know why I threw his ass out of
the house. I think I'm going to sleep with his friends.
I think that's the only way forby movement starting.
Speaker 6 (00:56):
We're not going to die her hair anymore. If we're
not going to do makeup, gonna use filters, We're not
gonna go get the skin stuff. We're not gonna dress
up and look nice. Why so that they can come
and act like they own us because we look like
this absolutely not know y'all. The four B movement means
like we gonna be cozy, comfy in our own skin,
(01:17):
and everyone over here is like, yeah, good strapped, get ready,
get prepared. But you know what, it's fine, let's go
bring it on. You want to fight, I'm ready to fight.
Speaker 5 (01:26):
There is a highly trained professional assassin out there right
now and you have one job.
Speaker 7 (01:40):
I'm a firm believer in karma as well as three
times a term.
Speaker 2 (01:49):
I'm saying I knows that someone in the White House
is going to take their saw right now. I'm gonna
not miss My doors are open for you. For need
a safe house, I would purchase the clock.
Speaker 8 (01:58):
And if you and I are walking on the same
street in it's darkout and you're a white male, you
have to be white for.
Speaker 2 (02:05):
This to count. Okay, even if you don't approach me,
I will shoot you. Yeah, I know. Just so we're clear.
Speaker 8 (02:11):
Okay, little white boys and more of your little white boys.
Speaker 2 (02:15):
I didn't delete my video. I would never do such
a thing.
Speaker 9 (02:18):
Okay.
Speaker 2 (02:19):
What I say, I mean unlike most of your friends.
Speaker 8 (02:22):
Okay, if your families are hurt and you're triggered, it
means you're going to hell.
Speaker 2 (02:27):
That's what it means. So I don't.
Speaker 8 (02:29):
Really care how you feel, and I never will.
Speaker 9 (02:43):
Okay, So since Trump won the election, we're cooked up.
I'm gonna be leaving the US and I'm gonna be
moving to Hawaii. So we'll see how it goes, and
I'll update you guys.
Speaker 10 (02:54):
Now that we're all saying what we're thinking. I'm gonna
go ahead and say that. I think if you want
it for Donald Trump, you're ugly. I think you're all
for ugly, and I think you're dumb as bricks. I
also not only won't care when all the bad stuff
that's gonna happen happens too, I actually want it to
happen to you. I want your taxes to go up.
I want things to be more expensive for you. I
want you to have a complicated pregnancy. I want all
(03:14):
that bad stuff to happen to you, because that's what
you deserve. Also, like, the only silver lining is it's
actually gonna suck for all you Trump voters way more
than it's gonna suck for us Blue voters, because we
actually have educations and good jobs. Y'all are broke as weeks,
So it's really gonna suck for you when he embraises
your taxes.
Speaker 2 (03:29):
A ton is this cutting off hair.
Speaker 11 (03:32):
I'm gonna have to kind of short being skinny, being
hot and all the things that the patriarchy wants us
to be because clearly they don't give me about us.
Speaker 2 (03:42):
We're cutting it off because you that's flack.
Speaker 4 (03:45):
We're all it's outraged at what we are learning about USAID,
just USAID, what they're doing. But I want to stop
for a moment, and some people are just not capable
of this mental exercise. I've come to that conclusion. But
I want to stop for a moment, and I want
(04:06):
to fully acknowledge and appreciate a tip of the hat
to how brilliant the Democrats scheme has been. They have
been right in front of our eyes funneling billions with
(04:28):
a b of dollars to themselves, to their own media outlets,
to their own charities. Chelsea Clinton getting a bunch of
it with her tied S corporated. I saw a flow
chart with all the money flowing into her charity alone.
Speaker 2 (04:47):
What has she ever done?
Speaker 4 (04:49):
She's the daughter of a former president and a failed
presidential candidate. That family has so scammed the taxpayers of
government in this country. It is baggering what they've done,
the Clinton Global Initiative and their network of people that
they place in different media outlets and nonprofits.
Speaker 2 (05:10):
It really is.
Speaker 4 (05:12):
You have to stop for a moment and not be angry.
You have to stop for a moment and look at
it as wow. They are evil, They are awful. But
just as you would say for a bank robber or
any other complex, multifaceted scheme, you have to admit what
(05:34):
they've done is amazing. They all need to go to prison,
don't get me wrong, but it is amazing. Let's start
with Politico. It has now been revealed that Politico received
millions of dollars millions of dollars. According to USA Spending
dot gov, Politico received just over thirty four million dollars
(05:58):
from various government a why there's supposed to be a
journalism outfit. White House Press Secretary Carolyn Levitt announced that
USAID paid millions to Politico.
Speaker 12 (06:12):
And I can confirm that the more than eight million
taxpayer dollars that have gone to essentially subsidizing subscriptions to Politico,
I the American taxpayer's dying will no longer be happening.
The DOGE team is working on canceling those payments. Now again,
this is a whole of government effort to ensure that
we are going line by line when it comes to
(06:33):
the federal of government's books. And this president and his
team are are making decisions across the board on do
these receipts serve the interests of the American people. Is
this a good use of the American taxpayers money? If
it is not, that funding will no longer be sent
abroad and American taxpayers will see significant savings because.
Speaker 2 (06:53):
Of that effort.
Speaker 4 (06:55):
So eight million of the dollars given to Politico went
to subsidize subscriptions for government officials and put political and
bureaucratic and media officials. That went to newsletters and data
(07:19):
aggregation that was then used by those people in their
campaigns and their articles in their hit pieces. So the
government is basically funding which means controlling a media outlet.
That's Pravda, that's state news. It is literally state owned
(07:44):
media because that which you pay for, you own. And
that's exactly what was happening. And how did why is
that a bad thing? Why is that so bothers? Well,
we're going to get into some of the stories that
Politico quote unquote broke and you go, oh wow.
Speaker 2 (08:09):
Now it all makes sense. It's a great day in America, folks.
I'm going to the biggest fables from within.
Speaker 13 (08:17):
No ability for the oil industry to continue to drill, period.
Speaker 4 (08:21):
See sick radical people from within. But we now know
that Politico e was receiving millions and millions of dollars
through us AID, and they tell us, you can't stop
the payments for USII D, all the poor people will die.
(08:43):
The poor people in third world countries. We can argue
over whether we should be feeding them or not. But
Politico is not one of them. So why were we
giving them money? Well, I'll tell you why we were
giving them money so they would do the bidding of
the government. Because once they break the story, everybody reports
on the fact that they've broken the story.
Speaker 2 (09:04):
So that crackhead Hunter Biden.
Speaker 4 (09:07):
Leaves not one, but two different computers at the computer
repair store, never pays for it, so the guy turns
it over to the FBI. They don't want to pursue
the case, so he hands it over to Rudy Giuliani,
who then hands it over to some folks who did
want to pursue it.
Speaker 2 (09:24):
And the story is breaking because.
Speaker 4 (09:26):
All of the documentation of the bribes being paid to
Joe Biden through Hunter Biden are on that laptop. But
Politico broke the story that fifty one intelligence officials. Remember
these are the experts. You don't know what's happening. You're
not sure you know we say they did it, they
(09:48):
say they didn't. Well, these intelligence officials, they have no
no dog in this hunt. So they just step forward
and they go, we are senior intelligence officials and we're
the experts, and we're here to protect you and Donald Trump.
And these Republicans are just lying on Hunter Biden and
it's not true. And this is what they do. This
(10:08):
was Hillary. Hillary Clinton used to call the vast right
wing conspiracy. There it is out here saying crazy stuff.
Speaker 2 (10:14):
It's just not true.
Speaker 4 (10:15):
And to prove it, here are fifty one bipartisan Bush administration,
Clinton administration, Obama administration, by partisan intelligence officials stepping forward
to tell you that's Russian.
Speaker 2 (10:31):
That's what the Russians do.
Speaker 4 (10:32):
The Russians don't want Biden in there because he's so tough,
and they want Trump because they can control him.
Speaker 2 (10:39):
And so what they did is they made up this
whole story.
Speaker 4 (10:41):
This is a class We've seen this a million times.
Did you look at the laptop?
Speaker 7 (10:45):
No?
Speaker 4 (10:45):
No, but nobody asked them that. See, so you get
the Russian disinformation defense. And so Twitter takes down the
Hunter Biden laptop story, because fifty one intelligence officials can't
be wrong, can they so.
Speaker 2 (11:02):
The story doesn't get any air.
Speaker 4 (11:05):
After the election, one in six people who voted for
Joe Biden said that they were not aware of the
laptop story and what was on it, and that if
they had been, they would have voted for Trump stead
of Biden.
Speaker 2 (11:23):
That's enough to swing the election. Even with all the
cheating that was done.
Speaker 4 (11:27):
They managed by breaking this story to squash all the
negative stories about Hunter Biden, which were negative stories about
Joe Biden who was on the ballot in twenty twenty.
And now we know, oh yeah, they were getting paid.
Of course they were getting paid. They were doing their job.
(11:49):
They were doing the bidding of the government that was
paying their bills. So here are former political reporters Mark
Capudo and Tara Paul Mary talking about the fact that
Politico they worked there, they were senior folks there. Politico
was blocking negative stories about Joe Biden. Well, of course
(12:10):
they were. He was giving them millions of dollars to
do it.
Speaker 14 (12:14):
Another great example, when Politico did that terrible, ill fated headline.
Fifty one intelligence agents or former intelligence agents say that
the Hunter Biden laptop was disinformation or bore the hallmarks
of disinformation. It turns out that story was closer to
disinformation because the Hunter Biden laptop appeared to be true.
Speaker 11 (12:32):
But then Facebook also pulled all stories down about the
Hunter Biden laptop, and I think right at the same time,
too correct.
Speaker 2 (12:37):
They punished the New York Post. It didn't help.
Speaker 14 (12:40):
I mean, Politico, my former employer, and I knew at
the time, didn't do itself any favors. I was covering
by it at the time, and I remember coming to
my editor and saying, Hey, we need to write about
the Hunter Biden laptop.
Speaker 2 (12:50):
And I was told this came from on high at Politico.
Speaker 14 (12:52):
Don't write about the laptop, don't talk about the laptop,
and don't tweet about the laptop. And the only thing
Politico wound up writing was that piece that called it disinformation,
which charitably could be called disinformation at the least.
Speaker 11 (13:04):
Yeah, I mean I had a hard time. You know,
I wrote some pretty serious reporting on Hunter Biden, which
actually ended up getting him prosecuted, the story on the gun.
Speaker 14 (13:12):
And I remember the consulting with me because you had
you did the original report of the Yeah, and you
came to me like, how do I write about this?
Speaker 2 (13:18):
Like I'm like honestly, I don't know.
Speaker 11 (13:20):
Yeah, but it was hard to get it. I spent
three three months on it. I went to the laptop
shop and I did all of the reporting and Delaware
and I did all of that. But yeah, I had
it had to be like much. It had to be
one hundred percent nailed down, and I had everything, you know,
the police reports, every like I you know, I'm a
solid reporter, But I do wonder if it could have
(13:41):
it would have been published a little quicker, those different.
Speaker 5 (13:43):
Type of story.
Speaker 14 (13:44):
Well, since we're spilling tea about a former employer. I
still have a copy of the story on my ejournal
hard drive. In twenty nineteen, a rival presidential Democratic campaign
of Joe Biden's gave to me the tax line the
oppo research the tax line on Hunter Biden for the
period of time that it worked a barisma, and I
(14:05):
wrote what would have been a classic story saying, you know,
the former vice president's son was slapped with a big
tax line for the period of time that he worked
for this controversial Ukrainian oil concern or natural gas concern,
which is haunting his father on the campaign trail. That
story was killed by the editors and they gave no
explanation for that either, So that general experience. You know,
(14:29):
obviously the public doesn't know about those things. But as
a reporter, having witnessed the way in which the.
Speaker 11 (14:35):
Two weeks which we're just getting called like the terrible
mainstream media, it's like, you don't understand the process there.
Speaker 2 (14:40):
We also don't understand the dumb decision.
Speaker 11 (14:42):
The man cowardly editors, the man above us when we're
trying to do our jobs. You know what I mean,
we're just looking for scoops.
Speaker 15 (14:48):
Man.
Speaker 4 (14:50):
The big bias is toward a good story. Do you
remember Joe Biden's quote unquote disinformations are Remember they created
that this was the person who was going to point
out all the di information, Nina Jankowitz. How could you
forget Nina? She even sang this song about this information. Remember,
honoring is really quite Faroe, and she.
Speaker 5 (15:10):
Sits when it hucks to take some lies and makes
them sound pracocious by.
Speaker 6 (15:13):
Saying them in Congress or a mainstream out that soon
this information's origins.
Speaker 12 (15:18):
Are slightly loss atrocious.
Speaker 6 (15:21):
It's how you had a delighted lie, It's how you
had a little idled lie.
Speaker 2 (15:25):
It's how you had a little Idol's lie. When Rudy
Julianni shared I didn't tell some Ukraine, or when TikTok
and Blue and Su say COVID can cause Kaine.
Speaker 6 (15:33):
They're wandering discinper when we really should take notes, cannot
support their lies with.
Speaker 2 (15:38):
Our wallet voice or note.
Speaker 6 (15:40):
Information wandering is really quite ferocious.
Speaker 4 (15:42):
That's why I has to take the lines and makes
them sound precocious by saying Clem in Congress or.
Speaker 6 (15:47):
Masory mounted to this information's origin seems slightly less atrocious.
Speaker 3 (15:56):
Disinformation Again, it's disinformation.
Speaker 2 (15:58):
Right, Michael.
Speaker 3 (16:00):
It's all they're good at, cheating on elections and disinformation.
Speaker 4 (16:05):
So by an administration creates a position called the Disinformations
Are and they put Nana Jenkowitz in there and she
sings that stupid song. Because anything that is critical of
what the Democrats are doing, not just Joe Biden, any Democrat,
anything that makes their agenda look bad, we don't argue
over it because we can't win that. So we'll call
(16:26):
it disinformation and we'll say that's just the Russians. These
people are all helping the Russians and they're lying to you.
It's disinformation. It's it's all cooked up by them evil Russians.
Speaker 2 (16:37):
Is this is so George Orwell's nineteen eighty four It shock.
Speaker 4 (16:42):
If you've never read it, you can't understand it, and
you should read it because it will give you a
whole new framework within which to understand exactly what they're doing.
Speaker 2 (16:50):
None of this is new. This is what idiots do.
Speaker 4 (16:53):
So after they create the disinformations are she sings the
dumb song, there's a huge public outcry. Even demos were going,
oh guys, that's come on, that's a bad look.
Speaker 2 (17:02):
Stop.
Speaker 4 (17:03):
So they eliminated her position in early twenty two. But
that wasn't the end of Nina Jenkowitz's career. She launched
the Hypatia project. I don't know if I'm pronouncing that correctly, Hypatia,
which she conducted at the British based Center for Information Resilience,
the Center for Information Resilience.
Speaker 2 (17:24):
Does that not sound like a.
Speaker 4 (17:25):
Soviet department or what should be the Ministry of Information Resilience.
The project stated aim was to combat gendered abuse and
disinformation online. The Center for Information Resilience the CIUR was
funded by British grants as well as our State Department
(17:46):
and you guessed it. USAID. It's going to be a
common theme journalists in the University of Austin. Professor Michael
Schellenberger told Jesse Waters that USAID and the CIA are
linked to President Trump's impeachment. They were using government money
to fund their efforts to destroy Trump. Here's Michael Schellenberger
(18:11):
on Fox News with Jesse Waters explaining.
Speaker 2 (18:13):
You have this new piece on substack that the.
Speaker 14 (18:15):
USAID and the CIA helped orchestrate Trump's impeachment.
Speaker 2 (18:21):
Yeah, I mean, Jesse, it's a crazy story. I mean,
you might forget that.
Speaker 16 (18:24):
You know, the House of Representatives impeached President Trump in
December of twenty nineteen. Many people may may not remember
that it was a CIA analyst who was left over
from the Obama White House who wrote the memo that
led to the impeachment.
Speaker 2 (18:38):
It was all based on hearsay. The person had not
actually been in the room with Trump. Nonetheless, this memo
that he.
Speaker 16 (18:43):
Wrote relied heavily on a report done by an organization
funded by USAD.
Speaker 2 (18:49):
In fact, it's initial founding funding.
Speaker 16 (18:52):
I mean, now it's tens of millions of dollars had
gone into this scroup called the Organized Crime and Corruption
Reporting Project a name that's not very memoryle OCCRP, but
it was basically created as an extension of the State
Department and then of USAID. And as you know justin
this is very serious to be involved in an effort
to do regime change at home. As we've been discovering,
(19:13):
as the files have come out with what Elon Musk
has been doing, we know that USAID was really about
regime change abroad. It was a kind of public facing part,
you know, regime change operation like CIA, but not.
Speaker 2 (19:25):
Covert more overt.
Speaker 16 (19:26):
Well, now you see a similar blowback, just like they
did censorship abroad and brought censorship tools back home. They
were doing this sort of thing abroad, creating a predicate
essentially for Trump's impeachment. So I think it's just one
of many revelations that we'll see coming out in the
next So the.
Speaker 1 (19:40):
USAID was involved in the regime change abroad end here
at home.
Speaker 4 (19:47):
Six months into Joe Biden's administration, Alejandro Majorcis, the head
of Department of Homeland Security, proudly announced that some of
the USAID money this is going to be in August
of twenty twenty time one, he announces this was going
to Central American countries.
Speaker 17 (20:05):
USAID already has launched a series of new initiatives to
promote good governance and expand opportunities that will enable the
people of El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras to build better
futures in their home countries. This includes the region wide
five million dollar Regional Challenge to advance gender equality in Honduras,
(20:28):
nearly twenty four million dollars to expand employment opportunities and
promote civic and elect election participation and integrity in El
Salvador nearly twelve million dollars to help small businesses recover
from the impact of COVID, as well as new multi
year solicitations for up to one hundred and fifteen million
dollars to address crime and violence, including gender based violence,
(20:53):
and provide opportunities to youth and others. In Guatemala more
than nineteen million dollars strengthen anti corruption efforts. These are
but a few of the examples of the efforts that
are already underweight.
Speaker 4 (21:09):
The head of the USAID under Joe Biden, which is
a very powerful position, Samantha Power, said that USAID employees
are worried about the vulnerable people of the world that
they're not able to help. Now, democrats always claim that
giving them money and power helps the helpless, the vulnerable.
(21:33):
Those are their human hostages. They're human shields. That's what
they use as they grab all the power and money.
Speaker 7 (21:40):
Listen, well, you can imagine when you suddenly in your
inbox find a termination.
Speaker 2 (21:47):
Notice or a sieve of.
Speaker 7 (21:49):
Absence notice that you didn't expect to get on a
flawed predicate that you're doing radical leftist in subordination. It's
pretty jarring. And because there's so many eyes and falsehood circulating,
and so many claims that people are sort of not
with the program, I think people are just completely dislocated.
There's no stable ground on which to walk. And then,
(22:12):
of course most of them have been laid off, so
they're worried about how they're going to pay the bills
and how they're going to make rent. But maybe the
part that is the most striking and for me inspiring,
if not surprising, having worked there for four years, is
that the people who work at USA did not come
to work at USAD for the money. The civil servants,
the foreign servants, the contractors. They came to USAID because
(22:33):
they wanted to make a difference in the world because
they saw America's interests as tied up with the interests
of people, vulnerable people around the world. And so even
as they're struggling to figure out how to make rent,
all of a sudden, they're most struggling with the fear
that so many millions of people who relied on US
as a country, on USAID as an agency, but on
(22:55):
them as individuals, that those individuals out in the world
have place to turn. And indeed they're showing up and
finding health clinics shuttered and soup kitchens closed, and advisors
who are helping governments renegotiate debt with China, those advisors,
you know, now taking off the books. So just the
wreckage in the world is what the USA staff that
(23:18):
I'm in touch with are carrying with them. That's what's
keeping them up at night, as much as the question
of what am I going.
Speaker 1 (23:25):
To do tomorrow?
Speaker 7 (23:25):
And you know, how do I take care of mine?
Speaker 4 (23:28):
Remember, the Democrats are the party of disinformation. What the
economy is up, price inflation is down, reel and comes
are up.
Speaker 2 (23:34):
Gas prices are down, Michael.
Speaker 4 (23:38):
One of the tricks are terrorists news and to varying effect.
Hamas is very very very good at this because theirs
is a is a pr campaign is so after Hamas
on October seventh struck Israel in America because they took
(23:59):
America hostage, and they knew what they were doing in
a vicious, well organized, well executed.
Speaker 2 (24:08):
Plan.
Speaker 4 (24:10):
They knew that Israel would strike back. So what they
did is they set up their headquarters beneath a hospital,
a trioge hospital, so when you strike their headquarters, you
have to hit the hospital. And that makes for a
great image to blast the world. Look at these Jews,
(24:34):
look at these Israelis, Look at these Americans. They're evil.
They're striking hospitals. So Hamas will use children, they'll use civilians,
they'll use women, and they basically hide behind that person
so that in order to strike back, there's a civilian,
(24:56):
there's a collateral damage.
Speaker 2 (24:58):
And they say, look what they done.
Speaker 4 (25:01):
There are videos of Palestinian fathers holding what is supposed
to be a dead baby in there in their hands,
in their arms and crying and they just love their baby.
Speaker 2 (25:17):
They don't want to be part of this old war.
And look what the Israelis have.
Speaker 4 (25:20):
Done, and there's footage where once the camera turns off,
then the child gets up and then walks off. It
was all staged. It's brilliant. This is what America's leftists do.
They're always out to protect the poor, stupid black people.
(25:40):
They're always out to protect the poor, weak children. They're
always out to protect Granny. They're always it's always this
image they create of black people is very stupid and
poor and unable to help themselves, or Hispanics as living
in the shadow even though they've lived in this country
(26:01):
for one hundred years, and the poor children, and they
play this little game but it's not true. That's just
what they try to win sympathy with sweet suburban moms
over because it up until recently, people didn't believe that
all of this could be a sham, but they do
(26:24):
now they've seen it for what it is. So here
is Democrat Senator Chris Murphy. He's on MSNBC and he's
claiming hundreds of thousands of babies will die if USAID closes.
This money doesn't go to those people. They claim it does,
(26:46):
but it doesn't.
Speaker 13 (26:47):
The consequences are that people die, babies die. I mean,
right now, we are involved in Gaza and in Sudan
in providing food to malnourished babies. Literally there will be
dead children, the hundreds thousands of them, and China will
very quickly jump into the void. Remember we're in a
(27:07):
contest with China as to who owns the piping of
the international economy for the next fifty years. And when
the United States disappears from Africa, when we are not
helping Africa with economic development projects or security projects or
clean water projects, China will be there and do it
for us. And then when there's a contract for five
(27:28):
G or port infrastructure or a critical mineral deposit, it'll
be China that will get that contract, and it'll be
the US that loses out, both.
Speaker 2 (27:35):
In influence and in jobs.
Speaker 13 (27:37):
So it's immediately catastrophics in the United States in terms
of our influence around the world and our ability to
protect ourselves from China, Russia and nonstate actors.
Speaker 2 (27:47):
Untrue, this is not about poor people.
Speaker 4 (27:51):
This is about This is one of the funding mechanisms,
the revenue streams that goes to the media and organizations
that run the deep state, that run the Democrat media,
that run the Democrat Party.
Speaker 2 (28:11):
They all live off of it.
Speaker 4 (28:13):
The Clintons and the Clinton Global Initiative, and Chelsea and
all of them. They're all living off these things. Bill Crystal,
who spends his whole day trying to troll Republicans that,
you know, the deep state is better than the Trump State.
And he's constantly trying to convince somebody somewhere that Republicans
(28:35):
don't like Trump, that Trump's not conservative, that Trump's not good.
And then you find out, oh, he's getting paid by USAID.
You find out that Lindsey Graham has an association. What's
he doing as a director on one of these organizations
getting millions of dollars.
Speaker 2 (28:48):
They are in.
Speaker 4 (28:49):
Complete crisis mode, the Democrats, the Republicans associated with all this,
the media, because if you if you shut all this down,
they're finished. This is transformative, this is multi generation change
happening overnight. And that's why Trump is staking everything on
(29:14):
making this happen. Here's joy Read losing her mind because
she understands what's happening here.
Speaker 15 (29:20):
But we begin tonight with a full on crisis in
our democracy as federal workers are literally locked out of
their offices while operatives working for a private citizen essentially
take over our government in their tactics include turning off
our federal websites, deleting government funded research that you, the taxpayer,
(29:42):
paid for, to impose speech codes, bullying news organizations by
demanding interview transcripts, into implementing an FBI purge, locking federal
workers out of their computers, and even turning them away
at their offices, while giving themselves, without congressional or any
other author is, a full access to the personal data
(30:03):
of tens of millions of Americans, including Social Security recipients,
FBI agents and officials, military and government contractors, and every
single employee of the federal government, all of that data
in private hands that you did not authorize, even if
you voted for Donald Trump.
Speaker 2 (30:23):
This as Trump.
Speaker 15 (30:24):
Installs unqualified minions at the heads of every federal agency,
knowing that they wouldn't stop this even if they knew how,
at least when he's not threatening multiple trade wars or
vowing to launch a new age of American imperialism by
colonizing the indigenous people of Greenland and the Panama Canal,
all while Congressional Democrats issue strongly worded letters plus holding
(30:47):
a press conference today, and Congressional Republicans sit back and
let the federal government they work for collapse all around them,
while they occasionally begged Trump for care of mercy for
their states. If this were happening in any other country
right now, I promise you I'd be on the air
calling it a coup. This was the scene today at
(31:10):
the United States Agency for International Development, better known as USAGE,
where protests erupted after workers were ordered by email if
they could even access their emails, to not report to
the office and to work from home instead, despite the
so called DOGE directives just a week ago that all
workers must work from the office five days a week.
A group of Senate and House Democrats were blocked from
(31:32):
even entering the agency's headquarters in Washington, DC.
Speaker 2 (31:37):
Boo boo boo.
Speaker 4 (31:41):
Do you know that Republican Senator Jonie Ernst demanded answers
as to where USAID money was going during the Biden
administration and they threatened to sue her. All of this
has been kept from you. The tables have turned, and
(32:02):
it's a good one.
It's that time, time, time, time, luck and load. Michael
Very Show is on the air.
Speaker 2 (00:11):
Let's get out of here, out Canada.
Speaker 3 (00:15):
Canada won't be there before these so that you know
what hit him.
Speaker 4 (00:37):
The Fox News Decision desk can now officially project that
Donald Trump will be gone the forty seventh president of
the United States.
Speaker 5 (00:46):
You guys know that my husband turned Republican this term.
I don't know why I threw his ass out of
the house. I think I'm going to sleep with his friends.
I think that's the only way forby movement starting.
Speaker 6 (00:56):
We're not going to die her hair anymore. If we're
not going to do makeup, gonna use filters, We're not
gonna go get the skin stuff. We're not gonna dress
up and look nice. Why so that they can come
and act like they own us because we look like
this absolutely not know y'all. The four B movement means
like we gonna be cozy, comfy in our own skin,
(01:17):
and everyone over here is like, yeah, good strapped, get ready,
get prepared. But you know what, it's fine, let's go
bring it on. You want to fight, I'm ready to fight.
Speaker 5 (01:26):
There is a highly trained professional assassin out there right
now and you have one job.
Speaker 7 (01:40):
I'm a firm believer in karma as well as three
times a term.
Speaker 2 (01:49):
I'm saying I knows that someone in the White House
is going to take their saw right now. I'm gonna
not miss My doors are open for you. For need
a safe house, I would purchase the clock.
Speaker 8 (01:58):
And if you and I are walking on the same
street in it's darkout and you're a white male, you
have to be white for.
Speaker 2 (02:05):
This to count. Okay, even if you don't approach me,
I will shoot you. Yeah, I know. Just so we're clear.
Speaker 8 (02:11):
Okay, little white boys and more of your little white boys.
Speaker 2 (02:15):
I didn't delete my video. I would never do such
a thing.
Speaker 9 (02:18):
Okay.
Speaker 2 (02:19):
What I say, I mean unlike most of your friends.
Speaker 8 (02:22):
Okay, if your families are hurt and you're triggered, it
means you're going to hell.
Speaker 2 (02:27):
That's what it means. So I don't.
Speaker 8 (02:29):
Really care how you feel, and I never will.
Speaker 9 (02:43):
Okay, So since Trump won the election, we're cooked up.
I'm gonna be leaving the US and I'm gonna be
moving to Hawaii. So we'll see how it goes, and
I'll update you guys.
Speaker 10 (02:54):
Now that we're all saying what we're thinking. I'm gonna
go ahead and say that. I think if you want
it for Donald Trump, you're ugly. I think you're all
for ugly, and I think you're dumb as bricks. I
also not only won't care when all the bad stuff
that's gonna happen happens too, I actually want it to
happen to you. I want your taxes to go up.
I want things to be more expensive for you. I
want you to have a complicated pregnancy. I want all
(03:14):
that bad stuff to happen to you, because that's what
you deserve. Also, like, the only silver lining is it's
actually gonna suck for all you Trump voters way more
than it's gonna suck for us Blue voters, because we
actually have educations and good jobs. Y'all are broke as weeks,
So it's really gonna suck for you when he embraises
your taxes.
Speaker 2 (03:29):
A ton is this cutting off hair.
Speaker 11 (03:32):
I'm gonna have to kind of short being skinny, being
hot and all the things that the patriarchy wants us
to be because clearly they don't give me about us.
Speaker 2 (03:42):
We're cutting it off because you that's flack.
Speaker 4 (03:45):
We're all it's outraged at what we are learning about USAID,
just USAID, what they're doing. But I want to stop
for a moment, and some people are just not capable
of this mental exercise. I've come to that conclusion. But
I want to stop for a moment, and I want
(04:06):
to fully acknowledge and appreciate a tip of the hat
to how brilliant the Democrats scheme has been. They have
been right in front of our eyes funneling billions with
(04:28):
a b of dollars to themselves, to their own media outlets,
to their own charities. Chelsea Clinton getting a bunch of
it with her tied S corporated. I saw a flow
chart with all the money flowing into her charity alone.
Speaker 2 (04:47):
What has she ever done?
Speaker 4 (04:49):
She's the daughter of a former president and a failed
presidential candidate. That family has so scammed the taxpayers of
government in this country. It is baggering what they've done,
the Clinton Global Initiative and their network of people that
they place in different media outlets and nonprofits.
Speaker 2 (05:10):
It really is.
Speaker 4 (05:12):
You have to stop for a moment and not be angry.
You have to stop for a moment and look at
it as wow. They are evil, They are awful. But
just as you would say for a bank robber or
any other complex, multifaceted scheme, you have to admit what
(05:34):
they've done is amazing. They all need to go to prison,
don't get me wrong, but it is amazing. Let's start
with Politico. It has now been revealed that Politico received
millions of dollars millions of dollars. According to USA Spending
dot gov, Politico received just over thirty four million dollars
(05:58):
from various government a why there's supposed to be a
journalism outfit. White House Press Secretary Carolyn Levitt announced that
USAID paid millions to Politico.
Speaker 12 (06:12):
And I can confirm that the more than eight million
taxpayer dollars that have gone to essentially subsidizing subscriptions to Politico,
I the American taxpayer's dying will no longer be happening.
The DOGE team is working on canceling those payments. Now again,
this is a whole of government effort to ensure that
we are going line by line when it comes to
(06:33):
the federal of government's books. And this president and his
team are are making decisions across the board on do
these receipts serve the interests of the American people. Is
this a good use of the American taxpayers money? If
it is not, that funding will no longer be sent
abroad and American taxpayers will see significant savings because.
Speaker 2 (06:53):
Of that effort.
Speaker 4 (06:55):
So eight million of the dollars given to Politico went
to subsidize subscriptions for government officials and put political and
bureaucratic and media officials. That went to newsletters and data
(07:19):
aggregation that was then used by those people in their
campaigns and their articles in their hit pieces. So the
government is basically funding which means controlling a media outlet.
That's Pravda, that's state news. It is literally state owned
(07:44):
media because that which you pay for, you own. And
that's exactly what was happening. And how did why is
that a bad thing? Why is that so bothers? Well,
we're going to get into some of the stories that
Politico quote unquote broke and you go, oh wow.
Speaker 2 (08:09):
Now it all makes sense. It's a great day in America, folks.
I'm going to the biggest fables from within.
Speaker 13 (08:17):
No ability for the oil industry to continue to drill, period.
Speaker 4 (08:21):
See sick radical people from within. But we now know
that Politico e was receiving millions and millions of dollars
through us AID, and they tell us, you can't stop
the payments for USII D, all the poor people will die.
(08:43):
The poor people in third world countries. We can argue
over whether we should be feeding them or not. But
Politico is not one of them. So why were we
giving them money? Well, I'll tell you why we were
giving them money so they would do the bidding of
the government. Because once they break the story, everybody reports
on the fact that they've broken the story.
Speaker 2 (09:04):
So that crackhead Hunter Biden.
Speaker 4 (09:07):
Leaves not one, but two different computers at the computer
repair store, never pays for it, so the guy turns
it over to the FBI. They don't want to pursue
the case, so he hands it over to Rudy Giuliani,
who then hands it over to some folks who did
want to pursue it.
Speaker 2 (09:24):
And the story is breaking because.
Speaker 4 (09:26):
All of the documentation of the bribes being paid to
Joe Biden through Hunter Biden are on that laptop. But
Politico broke the story that fifty one intelligence officials. Remember
these are the experts. You don't know what's happening. You're
not sure you know we say they did it, they
(09:48):
say they didn't. Well, these intelligence officials, they have no
no dog in this hunt. So they just step forward
and they go, we are senior intelligence officials and we're
the experts, and we're here to protect you and Donald Trump.
And these Republicans are just lying on Hunter Biden and
it's not true. And this is what they do. This
(10:08):
was Hillary. Hillary Clinton used to call the vast right
wing conspiracy. There it is out here saying crazy stuff.
Speaker 2 (10:14):
It's just not true.
Speaker 4 (10:15):
And to prove it, here are fifty one bipartisan Bush administration,
Clinton administration, Obama administration, by partisan intelligence officials stepping forward
to tell you that's Russian.
Speaker 2 (10:31):
That's what the Russians do.
Speaker 4 (10:32):
The Russians don't want Biden in there because he's so tough,
and they want Trump because they can control him.
Speaker 2 (10:39):
And so what they did is they made up this
whole story.
Speaker 4 (10:41):
This is a class We've seen this a million times.
Did you look at the laptop?
Speaker 7 (10:45):
No?
Speaker 4 (10:45):
No, but nobody asked them that. See, so you get
the Russian disinformation defense. And so Twitter takes down the
Hunter Biden laptop story, because fifty one intelligence officials can't
be wrong, can they so.
Speaker 2 (11:02):
The story doesn't get any air.
Speaker 4 (11:05):
After the election, one in six people who voted for
Joe Biden said that they were not aware of the
laptop story and what was on it, and that if
they had been, they would have voted for Trump stead
of Biden.
Speaker 2 (11:23):
That's enough to swing the election. Even with all the
cheating that was done.
Speaker 4 (11:27):
They managed by breaking this story to squash all the
negative stories about Hunter Biden, which were negative stories about
Joe Biden who was on the ballot in twenty twenty.
And now we know, oh yeah, they were getting paid.
Of course they were getting paid. They were doing their job.
(11:49):
They were doing the bidding of the government that was
paying their bills. So here are former political reporters Mark
Capudo and Tara Paul Mary talking about the fact that
Politico they worked there, they were senior folks there. Politico
was blocking negative stories about Joe Biden. Well, of course
(12:10):
they were. He was giving them millions of dollars to
do it.
Speaker 14 (12:14):
Another great example, when Politico did that terrible, ill fated headline.
Fifty one intelligence agents or former intelligence agents say that
the Hunter Biden laptop was disinformation or bore the hallmarks
of disinformation. It turns out that story was closer to
disinformation because the Hunter Biden laptop appeared to be true.
Speaker 11 (12:32):
But then Facebook also pulled all stories down about the
Hunter Biden laptop, and I think right at the same time,
too correct.
Speaker 2 (12:37):
They punished the New York Post. It didn't help.
Speaker 14 (12:40):
I mean, Politico, my former employer, and I knew at
the time, didn't do itself any favors. I was covering
by it at the time, and I remember coming to
my editor and saying, Hey, we need to write about
the Hunter Biden laptop.
Speaker 2 (12:50):
And I was told this came from on high at Politico.
Speaker 14 (12:52):
Don't write about the laptop, don't talk about the laptop,
and don't tweet about the laptop. And the only thing
Politico wound up writing was that piece that called it disinformation,
which charitably could be called disinformation at the least.
Speaker 11 (13:04):
Yeah, I mean I had a hard time. You know,
I wrote some pretty serious reporting on Hunter Biden, which
actually ended up getting him prosecuted, the story on the gun.
Speaker 14 (13:12):
And I remember the consulting with me because you had
you did the original report of the Yeah, and you
came to me like, how do I write about this?
Speaker 2 (13:18):
Like I'm like honestly, I don't know.
Speaker 11 (13:20):
Yeah, but it was hard to get it. I spent
three three months on it. I went to the laptop
shop and I did all of the reporting and Delaware
and I did all of that. But yeah, I had
it had to be like much. It had to be
one hundred percent nailed down, and I had everything, you know,
the police reports, every like I you know, I'm a
solid reporter, But I do wonder if it could have
(13:41):
it would have been published a little quicker, those different.
Speaker 5 (13:43):
Type of story.
Speaker 14 (13:44):
Well, since we're spilling tea about a former employer. I
still have a copy of the story on my ejournal
hard drive. In twenty nineteen, a rival presidential Democratic campaign
of Joe Biden's gave to me the tax line the
oppo research the tax line on Hunter Biden for the
period of time that it worked a barisma, and I
(14:05):
wrote what would have been a classic story saying, you know,
the former vice president's son was slapped with a big
tax line for the period of time that he worked
for this controversial Ukrainian oil concern or natural gas concern,
which is haunting his father on the campaign trail. That
story was killed by the editors and they gave no
explanation for that either, So that general experience. You know,
(14:29):
obviously the public doesn't know about those things. But as
a reporter, having witnessed the way in which the.
Speaker 11 (14:35):
Two weeks which we're just getting called like the terrible
mainstream media, it's like, you don't understand the process there.
Speaker 2 (14:40):
We also don't understand the dumb decision.
Speaker 11 (14:42):
The man cowardly editors, the man above us when we're
trying to do our jobs. You know what I mean,
we're just looking for scoops.
Speaker 15 (14:48):
Man.
Speaker 4 (14:50):
The big bias is toward a good story. Do you
remember Joe Biden's quote unquote disinformations are Remember they created
that this was the person who was going to point
out all the di information, Nina Jankowitz. How could you
forget Nina? She even sang this song about this information. Remember,
honoring is really quite Faroe, and she.
Speaker 5 (15:10):
Sits when it hucks to take some lies and makes
them sound pracocious by.
Speaker 6 (15:13):
Saying them in Congress or a mainstream out that soon
this information's origins.
Speaker 12 (15:18):
Are slightly loss atrocious.
Speaker 6 (15:21):
It's how you had a delighted lie, It's how you
had a little idled lie.
Speaker 2 (15:25):
It's how you had a little Idol's lie. When Rudy
Julianni shared I didn't tell some Ukraine, or when TikTok
and Blue and Su say COVID can cause Kaine.
Speaker 6 (15:33):
They're wandering discinper when we really should take notes, cannot
support their lies with.
Speaker 2 (15:38):
Our wallet voice or note.
Speaker 6 (15:40):
Information wandering is really quite ferocious.
Speaker 4 (15:42):
That's why I has to take the lines and makes
them sound precocious by saying Clem in Congress or.
Speaker 6 (15:47):
Masory mounted to this information's origin seems slightly less atrocious.
Speaker 3 (15:56):
Disinformation Again, it's disinformation.
Speaker 2 (15:58):
Right, Michael.
Speaker 3 (16:00):
It's all they're good at, cheating on elections and disinformation.
Speaker 4 (16:05):
So by an administration creates a position called the Disinformations
Are and they put Nana Jenkowitz in there and she
sings that stupid song. Because anything that is critical of
what the Democrats are doing, not just Joe Biden, any Democrat,
anything that makes their agenda look bad, we don't argue
over it because we can't win that. So we'll call
(16:26):
it disinformation and we'll say that's just the Russians. These
people are all helping the Russians and they're lying to you.
It's disinformation. It's it's all cooked up by them evil Russians.
Speaker 2 (16:37):
Is this is so George Orwell's nineteen eighty four It shock.
Speaker 4 (16:42):
If you've never read it, you can't understand it, and
you should read it because it will give you a
whole new framework within which to understand exactly what they're doing.
Speaker 2 (16:50):
None of this is new. This is what idiots do.
Speaker 4 (16:53):
So after they create the disinformations are she sings the
dumb song, there's a huge public outcry. Even demos were going,
oh guys, that's come on, that's a bad look.
Speaker 2 (17:02):
Stop.
Speaker 4 (17:03):
So they eliminated her position in early twenty two. But
that wasn't the end of Nina Jenkowitz's career. She launched
the Hypatia project. I don't know if I'm pronouncing that correctly, Hypatia,
which she conducted at the British based Center for Information Resilience,
the Center for Information Resilience.
Speaker 2 (17:24):
Does that not sound like a.
Speaker 4 (17:25):
Soviet department or what should be the Ministry of Information Resilience.
The project stated aim was to combat gendered abuse and
disinformation online. The Center for Information Resilience the CIUR was
funded by British grants as well as our State Department
(17:46):
and you guessed it. USAID. It's going to be a
common theme journalists in the University of Austin. Professor Michael
Schellenberger told Jesse Waters that USAID and the CIA are
linked to President Trump's impeachment. They were using government money
to fund their efforts to destroy Trump. Here's Michael Schellenberger
(18:11):
on Fox News with Jesse Waters explaining.
Speaker 2 (18:13):
You have this new piece on substack that the.
Speaker 14 (18:15):
USAID and the CIA helped orchestrate Trump's impeachment.
Speaker 2 (18:21):
Yeah, I mean, Jesse, it's a crazy story. I mean,
you might forget that.
Speaker 16 (18:24):
You know, the House of Representatives impeached President Trump in
December of twenty nineteen. Many people may may not remember
that it was a CIA analyst who was left over
from the Obama White House who wrote the memo that
led to the impeachment.
Speaker 2 (18:38):
It was all based on hearsay. The person had not
actually been in the room with Trump. Nonetheless, this memo
that he.
Speaker 16 (18:43):
Wrote relied heavily on a report done by an organization
funded by USAD.
Speaker 2 (18:49):
In fact, it's initial founding funding.
Speaker 16 (18:52):
I mean, now it's tens of millions of dollars had
gone into this scroup called the Organized Crime and Corruption
Reporting Project a name that's not very memoryle OCCRP, but
it was basically created as an extension of the State
Department and then of USAID. And as you know justin
this is very serious to be involved in an effort
to do regime change at home. As we've been discovering,
(19:13):
as the files have come out with what Elon Musk
has been doing, we know that USAID was really about
regime change abroad. It was a kind of public facing part,
you know, regime change operation like CIA, but not.
Speaker 2 (19:25):
Covert more overt.
Speaker 16 (19:26):
Well, now you see a similar blowback, just like they
did censorship abroad and brought censorship tools back home. They
were doing this sort of thing abroad, creating a predicate
essentially for Trump's impeachment. So I think it's just one
of many revelations that we'll see coming out in the
next So the.
Speaker 1 (19:40):
USAID was involved in the regime change abroad end here
at home.
Speaker 4 (19:47):
Six months into Joe Biden's administration, Alejandro Majorcis, the head
of Department of Homeland Security, proudly announced that some of
the USAID money this is going to be in August
of twenty twenty time one, he announces this was going
to Central American countries.
Speaker 17 (20:05):
USAID already has launched a series of new initiatives to
promote good governance and expand opportunities that will enable the
people of El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras to build better
futures in their home countries. This includes the region wide
five million dollar Regional Challenge to advance gender equality in Honduras,
(20:28):
nearly twenty four million dollars to expand employment opportunities and
promote civic and elect election participation and integrity in El
Salvador nearly twelve million dollars to help small businesses recover
from the impact of COVID, as well as new multi
year solicitations for up to one hundred and fifteen million
dollars to address crime and violence, including gender based violence,
(20:53):
and provide opportunities to youth and others. In Guatemala more
than nineteen million dollars strengthen anti corruption efforts. These are
but a few of the examples of the efforts that
are already underweight.
Speaker 4 (21:09):
The head of the USAID under Joe Biden, which is
a very powerful position, Samantha Power, said that USAID employees
are worried about the vulnerable people of the world that
they're not able to help. Now, democrats always claim that
giving them money and power helps the helpless, the vulnerable.
(21:33):
Those are their human hostages. They're human shields. That's what
they use as they grab all the power and money.
Speaker 7 (21:40):
Listen, well, you can imagine when you suddenly in your
inbox find a termination.
Speaker 2 (21:47):
Notice or a sieve of.
Speaker 7 (21:49):
Absence notice that you didn't expect to get on a
flawed predicate that you're doing radical leftist in subordination. It's
pretty jarring. And because there's so many eyes and falsehood circulating,
and so many claims that people are sort of not
with the program, I think people are just completely dislocated.
There's no stable ground on which to walk. And then,
(22:12):
of course most of them have been laid off, so
they're worried about how they're going to pay the bills
and how they're going to make rent. But maybe the
part that is the most striking and for me inspiring,
if not surprising, having worked there for four years, is
that the people who work at USA did not come
to work at USAD for the money. The civil servants,
the foreign servants, the contractors. They came to USAID because
(22:33):
they wanted to make a difference in the world because
they saw America's interests as tied up with the interests
of people, vulnerable people around the world. And so even
as they're struggling to figure out how to make rent,
all of a sudden, they're most struggling with the fear
that so many millions of people who relied on US
as a country, on USAID as an agency, but on
(22:55):
them as individuals, that those individuals out in the world
have place to turn. And indeed they're showing up and
finding health clinics shuttered and soup kitchens closed, and advisors
who are helping governments renegotiate debt with China, those advisors,
you know, now taking off the books. So just the
wreckage in the world is what the USA staff that
(23:18):
I'm in touch with are carrying with them. That's what's
keeping them up at night, as much as the question
of what am I going.
Speaker 1 (23:25):
To do tomorrow?
Speaker 7 (23:25):
And you know, how do I take care of mine?
Speaker 4 (23:28):
Remember, the Democrats are the party of disinformation. What the
economy is up, price inflation is down, reel and comes
are up.
Speaker 2 (23:34):
Gas prices are down, Michael.
Speaker 4 (23:38):
One of the tricks are terrorists news and to varying effect.
Hamas is very very very good at this because theirs
is a is a pr campaign is so after Hamas
on October seventh struck Israel in America because they took
(23:59):
America hostage, and they knew what they were doing in
a vicious, well organized, well executed.
Speaker 2 (24:08):
Plan.
Speaker 4 (24:10):
They knew that Israel would strike back. So what they
did is they set up their headquarters beneath a hospital,
a trioge hospital, so when you strike their headquarters, you
have to hit the hospital. And that makes for a
great image to blast the world. Look at these Jews,
(24:34):
look at these Israelis, Look at these Americans. They're evil.
They're striking hospitals. So Hamas will use children, they'll use civilians,
they'll use women, and they basically hide behind that person
so that in order to strike back, there's a civilian,
(24:56):
there's a collateral damage.
Speaker 2 (24:58):
And they say, look what they done.
Speaker 4 (25:01):
There are videos of Palestinian fathers holding what is supposed
to be a dead baby in there in their hands,
in their arms and crying and they just love their baby.
Speaker 2 (25:17):
They don't want to be part of this old war.
And look what the Israelis have.
Speaker 4 (25:20):
Done, and there's footage where once the camera turns off,
then the child gets up and then walks off. It
was all staged. It's brilliant. This is what America's leftists do.
They're always out to protect the poor, stupid black people.
(25:40):
They're always out to protect the poor, weak children. They're
always out to protect Granny. They're always it's always this
image they create of black people is very stupid and
poor and unable to help themselves, or Hispanics as living
in the shadow even though they've lived in this country
(26:01):
for one hundred years, and the poor children, and they
play this little game but it's not true. That's just
what they try to win sympathy with sweet suburban moms
over because it up until recently, people didn't believe that
all of this could be a sham, but they do
(26:24):
now they've seen it for what it is. So here
is Democrat Senator Chris Murphy. He's on MSNBC and he's
claiming hundreds of thousands of babies will die if USAID closes.
This money doesn't go to those people. They claim it does,
(26:46):
but it doesn't.
Speaker 13 (26:47):
The consequences are that people die, babies die. I mean,
right now, we are involved in Gaza and in Sudan
in providing food to malnourished babies. Literally there will be
dead children, the hundreds thousands of them, and China will
very quickly jump into the void. Remember we're in a
(27:07):
contest with China as to who owns the piping of
the international economy for the next fifty years. And when
the United States disappears from Africa, when we are not
helping Africa with economic development projects or security projects or
clean water projects, China will be there and do it
for us. And then when there's a contract for five
(27:28):
G or port infrastructure or a critical mineral deposit, it'll
be China that will get that contract, and it'll be
the US that loses out, both.
Speaker 2 (27:35):
In influence and in jobs.
Speaker 13 (27:37):
So it's immediately catastrophics in the United States in terms
of our influence around the world and our ability to
protect ourselves from China, Russia and nonstate actors.
Speaker 2 (27:47):
Untrue, this is not about poor people.
Speaker 4 (27:51):
This is about This is one of the funding mechanisms,
the revenue streams that goes to the media and organizations
that run the deep state, that run the Democrat media,
that run the Democrat Party.
Speaker 2 (28:11):
They all live off of it.
Speaker 4 (28:13):
The Clintons and the Clinton Global Initiative, and Chelsea and
all of them. They're all living off these things. Bill Crystal,
who spends his whole day trying to troll Republicans that,
you know, the deep state is better than the Trump State.
And he's constantly trying to convince somebody somewhere that Republicans
(28:35):
don't like Trump, that Trump's not conservative, that Trump's not good.
And then you find out, oh, he's getting paid by USAID.
You find out that Lindsey Graham has an association. What's
he doing as a director on one of these organizations
getting millions of dollars.
Speaker 2 (28:48):
They are in.
Speaker 4 (28:49):
Complete crisis mode, the Democrats, the Republicans associated with all this,
the media, because if you if you shut all this down,
they're finished. This is transformative, this is multi generation change
happening overnight. And that's why Trump is staking everything on
(29:14):
making this happen. Here's joy Read losing her mind because
she understands what's happening here.
Speaker 15 (29:20):
But we begin tonight with a full on crisis in
our democracy as federal workers are literally locked out of
their offices while operatives working for a private citizen essentially
take over our government in their tactics include turning off
our federal websites, deleting government funded research that you, the taxpayer,
(29:42):
paid for, to impose speech codes, bullying news organizations by
demanding interview transcripts, into implementing an FBI purge, locking federal
workers out of their computers, and even turning them away
at their offices, while giving themselves, without congressional or any
other author is, a full access to the personal data
(30:03):
of tens of millions of Americans, including Social Security recipients,
FBI agents and officials, military and government contractors, and every
single employee of the federal government, all of that data
in private hands that you did not authorize, even if
you voted for Donald Trump.
Speaker 2 (30:23):
This as Trump.
Speaker 15 (30:24):
Installs unqualified minions at the heads of every federal agency,
knowing that they wouldn't stop this even if they knew how,
at least when he's not threatening multiple trade wars or
vowing to launch a new age of American imperialism by
colonizing the indigenous people of Greenland and the Panama Canal,
all while Congressional Democrats issue strongly worded letters plus holding
(30:47):
a press conference today, and Congressional Republicans sit back and
let the federal government they work for collapse all around them,
while they occasionally begged Trump for care of mercy for
their states. If this were happening in any other country
right now, I promise you I'd be on the air
calling it a coup. This was the scene today at
(31:10):
the United States Agency for International Development, better known as USAGE,
where protests erupted after workers were ordered by email if
they could even access their emails, to not report to
the office and to work from home instead, despite the
so called DOGE directives just a week ago that all
workers must work from the office five days a week.
A group of Senate and House Democrats were blocked from
(31:32):
even entering the agency's headquarters in Washington, DC.
Speaker 2 (31:37):
Boo boo boo.
Speaker 4 (31:41):
Do you know that Republican Senator Jonie Ernst demanded answers
as to where USAID money was going during the Biden
administration and they threatened to sue her. All of this
has been kept from you. The tables have turned, and
(32:02):
it's a good one.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.