April 16, 2025 • 33 mins
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
It's that time, time, time, time, walking load. The Michael
Verie Show is on the air.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Will you tell somebody something?
Speaker 3 (00:12):
It depends on what part of the United States you're
standing the ass of just how dum you are.
Speaker 4 (00:16):
There's a accent. Where come from?
Speaker 5 (00:27):
Being somebody in this.
Speaker 1 (00:28):
Society starts with education.
Speaker 2 (00:33):
Well, first of all, thank you for the question.
Speaker 6 (00:35):
I hope your family is okay and your home is okay,
and you.
Speaker 5 (00:39):
All help us win in twenty twenty and we don't
do it again.
Speaker 7 (00:42):
In twenty twenty four.
Speaker 5 (00:45):
You better thank a union member for sickly.
Speaker 7 (00:48):
You better thank a union member.
Speaker 5 (00:50):
For paid lee.
Speaker 6 (00:51):
You better thank a union member for vacation time.
Speaker 4 (00:54):
It is accent.
Speaker 8 (01:01):
We're I'm proud to be a bartender.
Speaker 9 (01:08):
Ain't nothing wrong with that.
Speaker 5 (01:11):
There's nothing wrong with working retail, folding clothes for.
Speaker 10 (01:15):
Other people to buy.
Speaker 5 (01:17):
There is nothing wrong with preparing the food that your.
Speaker 2 (01:21):
Neighbors will eat.
Speaker 8 (01:23):
There is nothing wrong with driving the buses that.
Speaker 2 (01:26):
Take your family to work.
Speaker 5 (01:28):
There is nothing wrong with being a working person in
the United States of America, and there is everything dignified
about it.
Speaker 11 (01:36):
I don't feel no ways tired.
Speaker 1 (01:40):
I count you bar This is sweet, sweet justice my friends,
sweet sweet justice from the New York Post. New York
Attorney General Letitia James. Boy do I dislike this woman
who infamously declared that no one is above the law
when she was targeting and persecuting Donald Trump.
Speaker 7 (02:02):
That's simple but fundamental pillar of our democracy, that the
rule of law applies to all of us equally, fairly
and justly.
Speaker 1 (02:15):
Oh is she righteous? She claimed that the properties that
were put up in order to get loans for buildings
were not worth the value at which they were appraised.
Turns out they were, but she ran him through the
ringer and caused him a lot of hassle in the meantime.
That would be mortgage fraud if it had happened, but
(02:36):
it didn't. So now Letitia James was hit with a
federal criminal referral for instances alleged mortgage fraud. Yes, according
to a letter obtained by the Post, Federal Housing Finance
Agency Director William Poulti sent the missive to Attorney General
Pam Bondi and Deputy ag Ton Todd Blanche, alleging that
(03:02):
James had falsified records to get home loans for a
property in Virginia that she claimed was her principal residence
in twenty twenty three while still serving as a New
York State prosecutor. That occurred in late August of twenty
twenty three, weeks before she began her civil fraud trial
against the Trump Organization for inflating the values of many
(03:26):
of his properties, which ended in a four hundred and
fifty four million dollar judgment. Well. The letter stated quote
Miss James was the sitting Attorney General of New York
and is required by law to have her primary residence
in the state of New York, even though her mortgage
applications list her intent to have the Norfolk, Virginia property
as her primary home. It appears Miss James's property and
(03:48):
mortgage related misrepresentations may have continued to her recent twenty
twenty three Norfolk, Virginia property purchase in order to secure
a lower interest rate and more favorable loan terms. In
February two thousand and one, James also purchased a five
family dwelling in Brooklyn, but has quote consistently misrepresented the
(04:09):
same property as only having four units in both building
permit applications and numerous mortgage documents and applications. Polti attached
several documents, also showing that James purchased another property with
her father as a co signer, but falsely listed the
pair as husband and wife in nineteen eighty three and
(04:30):
two thousand. Who do you think you are, Lady ilhan Omar? Meanwhile,
if Letitia James wasn't the face of the party, Joe
Biden certainly is. They woke him up to give a
speech about social Security, and he talked about the first
time he remembered seeing quote, colored kids can't make this up.
Speaker 12 (04:51):
And I had never seen I'd never seen hardly any
black people scrattin. It's the time when and I was
only going on fourth grade, and I remember seeing the
kids going by at a time called cord kids on
a bus going by.
Speaker 1 (05:05):
Okay, all right, that must have made quite the impression,
you know, the colored kids, as he said, who touched
the hair on his legs in the pool. And then
he got out and he's like you know legend of
Billy Joe. He gets out and he has to go, Remember,
he has to go pick up a pipe or a
chain because who was a corn corn pop was coming
after him, and he had to show those blacks. He
(05:26):
meant business. Remember when he told Howard Stern that he
was arrested as a kid for standing on the porch
at the home of a black family.
Speaker 13 (05:33):
And I looked at my mom. I said, honey, you
haven't said anything. She said, Joey, let me remember true story.
Remember true storygregate.
Speaker 1 (05:40):
Anybody, hold on anybody who has to say in the middle,
true story. Why wouldn't we assume your story is true?
Why are you trying to embellrash your story with true story?
Are your other stories not true?
Speaker 5 (05:52):
True story?
Speaker 13 (05:52):
So remember when they were desegregating Lynnfield, a neighborhood into us,
you know, seventy homes bill of one suburbia. And I
told you, and there was a black family moving in
and there was people who are down there protesting. I
told you not to go down there. And you went
down remember that, and you came you got to rest up.
He standing on the porch of the black family, right,
(06:14):
And they brought you back, the police, And I said, yeah,
well I remember that.
Speaker 4 (06:18):
True story.
Speaker 1 (06:20):
He has even claimed that he would attend black church
services after going to seven thirty Mass. Well, he was, well,
what a great kid. He would just want to see
how those blacks worshiped.
Speaker 13 (06:31):
Unless say one thing to rest, I may be a
practicing Catholic.
Speaker 12 (06:34):
I used to go to seven thirty Mass every morning
in high school and been on college before I went
to the Black church.
Speaker 13 (06:42):
Not a joke.
Speaker 12 (06:43):
And you know this.
Speaker 1 (06:45):
Not a joke. Remember it's not a joke. Telling the truth,
true story, not a joke. Why would we think it
was a joke. Joe, of course, after seeing those colored kids,
as he said all those years ago, he knows what
it means to be black.
Speaker 12 (07:01):
You have a problem figuring out whether you're Premi or Trump.
Speaker 2 (07:04):
And you ain't black.
Speaker 1 (07:05):
Okay, So let's see who we've got as Democrats. We've
got Letitia James, We've got Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, and
now we have their nominee. In twenty twenty eight, Alexandria
Ocassio Cortez. She was hired off the casting couch as
the social justice Soros candidate, and she's been running around
the country screaming about billionaires. She does not like the billionaires.
(07:28):
She's against the billionaires. There's an oligarchy. Well in the
great Democrat tradition. She tried out a new accent.
Speaker 5 (07:35):
Here we go, Donald Trump is a criminal who was
found guilty of thirty.
Speaker 4 (07:43):
Four flity counts, a fraud liable for sexual abuse.
Speaker 5 (07:52):
Of course he's lying, I'm abusing. I'm manipulating the stock
market too.
Speaker 11 (08:02):
When he talks about rapists and criminals, he should look.
Speaker 2 (08:05):
In the mirror.
Speaker 1 (08:09):
Did you hear how she said the word too as
in meaning also.
Speaker 3 (08:13):
Too two two.
Speaker 2 (08:20):
The Michael Barry Show, Michael Barry Show.
Speaker 1 (08:25):
I've said several times that Carolyn Levitt part of her
job is debunking the lies that the left is telling.
Remember when President Trump recently was giving his Joint Session
speech and he said, no matter what I say, they
won't stand up and cheer. Ever, they won't ever applaud
And you remember when DJ was named an honorary Secret
(08:48):
Service agent and they wouldn't stand up for that. I mean,
it's just evil, It's sure evil. Well that's what we're
They're going to tell lies no matter what he does.
So here's kind of some of the stuff that she's
had to debunk in the last week and a half.
(09:08):
This is ramon. This is going to be five h
six Carolyn Levitt, White House Press Secretary. They were asking
about the contrast in transparency between this administration and Joe Biden's.
I mean, what kind of question.
Speaker 10 (09:20):
Is at Everybody in this room has access to the
most transparent and accessible president in American history. The cabinet
meeting yesterday was further proof. President Trump asked each secretary
to provide an update to all of you and the
media on the critical work they are doing at their
respected agencies to deliver on his agenda. And according to
(09:40):
new reporting from The Washington Times, who I believe is
in this room today. President Trump answered nearly one hundred
questions from the press all of you during his first
three open press cabinet meetings this year. That's nearly twenty
times the number answered by Joe Biden in cabinet meetings
during his entire four years in office.
Speaker 1 (09:58):
FA Then you have the conce arguing that the tariffs
are some sort of a crisis for the country. I
would argue so far, they've been a success.
Speaker 10 (10:12):
More than seventy five countries have now reached out to
the Trump administration, eager to address the trade issues that
have exploited America and hurt our workers in the process.
The phones have been ringing off the hook to make deals,
and these countries wisely heated President Trump's warning not to retaliate,
and as a result, they were rewarded with a ninety
day pause in substantially lower reciprocal tariff rates during this period,
(10:35):
so potential solutions can be achieved. Past presidents just willingly
accepted the failed status quo on trade that ripped off
our workers and our companies. But that's not who this
president is. He creates his own leverage and negotiates deals
better than anyone else who has sat in the Oval
Office before him. And that process is currently underway.
Speaker 1 (10:55):
And that's true. Why would Joe Biden know how to negotiate,
He's never negotiated in his life. Why would George W.
Bush think you think he was a great negotiator? He
was born a Bush. Why would Barack Obama? But what
had he done? He was a community agitator. Until you've
had to do deals, until you've had to walk a
deal to get a better term, until you've had someone
(11:18):
try to renegotiate a deal because they were in a
stronger position, you don't know how to put yourself in
a stronger position. So Carolyn Levitt was asked why any
of our allies would work with us to isolate China
in a trade war if we're imposing tariffs on them
as well. These people don't understand we're in the catbird seat.
We shouldn't be getting shafted. We should be demanding and
(11:42):
ensuring the best deals because we have the greatest marketplace
that we can withhold. If you don't do what we want,
we take away the American consumer from you. Why would
any of.
Speaker 2 (11:55):
Our allies work with us to isolate China in a
trade war?
Speaker 5 (11:58):
If we're treating a.
Speaker 4 (11:59):
Friend and friend.
Speaker 10 (12:01):
You'll have to talk to our allies who are reaching
out to us. The phones are ringing off of the hooks.
They've made it very clear they need the United States
of America. They need our markets, they need our consumer base.
You saw Prime Minister Benjamin and Yahoo in the Oval
Office with the President saying that he was going to
bring down all of their monetary tariffs and their non
monetary tariff trade barriers as well. We've heard from South Korea,
(12:22):
We've heard from Japan, the President has spoken to Vietnam.
We have Italy coming too the White House next week.
There's a reason for that, Sean, and it's because they
need the United States of America and our business model
and our markets to survive, and the President is using
that leverage to our advantage.
Speaker 1 (12:36):
But here's the part that really gets me. Carolyn Levitt
points out what we all know to be true. For decades,
Republicans and Democrats have talked about taking on China. We're
getting a bad deal from China. We've got to fight back,
We've got to stand up for our country. And they
(12:56):
talked about it, and they never did anything about it.
And she's pointing out Trump's finally doing what everybody was
promising to do, but nobody ever did.
Speaker 10 (13:07):
The tariff rate on China remains where it was yesterday,
at the one hundred and forty five percent level. The
President made it very clear when the United States is punched,
he will punch back harder, and he hopes to make
a deal that benefits the American worker and our companies
that have been ripped off for far too long. And
he's finally taking bold and courageous action to do that.
You take it on China is in the terms of
(13:29):
trade and tariffs, is something that both Democrats and Republicans
alike have spoken about for decades. President Trump is finally
doing it.
Speaker 1 (13:35):
And here's the proof in the pudding. In twenty fifteen,
Obama said, if we don't write the rules, China will
and will lose jobs. So why was he saying that
in twenty fifteen and Trump and to applause from the media,
and Trump's saying it today, and they're acting like he's
going to end the world.
Speaker 14 (13:54):
The argument is, Number one, that's the biggest market in
the world. Number two is those countries are already selling
to US. I keep on pointing out there are a
lot of Japanese cars here in the United States, almost
no US cars in Tokyo. Number three is that if
we don't write the rules, China will write the rules
out in that region. We will be shut out American businesses,
(14:14):
American agriculture. That will mean a loss of US jobs.
Speaker 1 (14:18):
Oh you don't say, how about Hillary in twenty sixteen
running for president against Trump the first time talking about listen,
carefully targeted tariffs against anyone who takes advantage of American workers.
Speaker 2 (14:33):
What about trade?
Speaker 11 (14:36):
After all Trump talks about it all the time. Well,
let's start with this. It is true that too often
past trade deals have been sold to the American people
with rosy scenarios that did not pan out. Those promises
now ring hollow in many communities across Michigan and our
(14:56):
country that have seen factories, clothes, and jobs disappear. Too
many companies lobbied for trade deals so they could sell
products abroad, but then they instead moved abroad and sold
back into the United States. It is also true that
China and other countries have gained the system for too long. Enforcement,
(15:21):
particularly during the Bush administration, has been too lex Investments
at home that would make us more competitive have been
completely blocked in Congress, and American workers and communities have
paid the price.
Speaker 6 (15:35):
But the answer is not to.
Speaker 11 (15:37):
Rant and raid or cut ourselves off from the world
that would end up killing even more jobs. The answer
is to finally make trade work for us, not against us.
So as President, I will stand up to China and
anyone else who tries to take advantage of American workers
and companies. And I'm going to ramp up enforcement by
(16:06):
appointing for the first time a cheap trade prosecutor. I
will triple the number of enforcement officers, and when countries
break the rules, we won't hesitate to impose targeted tariffs.
Speaker 1 (16:22):
You're listening to the Michael Berry Show.
Speaker 15 (16:26):
Give them the things that we know kill viral replication,
zinc and anything that enhances zinc like I dropped the
chloric when I remcdin, and one hundred other remedies that
we now know dramatically reduce the spread of this disease.
And what was our protocol. Our protocol was to do
none of that, no treatment until you go to the
(16:48):
hospital and then your treatment. Are two things that are
bound to kill you, ventilators and remdezevie. And Johnny Vauchi
knew that remed azevir would kill you. He knew that
because in twenty nineteen he tried to use it for
a bowl. Of twenty nineteen, he tried to use it
for a bowl and within five days of treatment it
(17:10):
gave lethal side effect to fifty four percent of the
people in the Safety Monitoring Board ordered him to terminate
the use of that drug, and he threw a phony, contrived,
absolutely fraudulent study that he manipulator and orchanestrated of that
drug made standard of carry. It is homicide. And if
(17:32):
you look how does it kill people? Two ways, three
ways kidney failure, heart failure, and all organ collapse and
what happened to the people who died in the pandemic?
What were they dying of kidney failure? All the doctor said,
you heard it again and again. We've never seen a
(17:53):
virus that attacks the kidneys because it wasn't the virus,
it was.
Speaker 2 (17:58):
The rem desipor.
Speaker 1 (18:00):
Health and Human Services Secretary RFK. Junior points out that
when studies have been done comparing kids and whether vaccines
work and any number of other medical issues, they never
looked at the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated because they didn't
want you to know that the vaccines in many cases
(18:23):
cause more problems than they solve or protect against.
Speaker 2 (18:26):
The studies that they did were very, very narrow, and
there were about seventeen studies. The Institute of Medicine, which
is part of the National Academy of Science that says
that fourteen those studies are invalid. And the biggest weakness
in those studies is they never studied vaccinated for a
sun vaccinated group, which is the only way that you
can really make this determination. And more importantly, none of
(18:51):
the vaccines are given to children during the first six
months of life. We're ever studied. We're going to look
at vaccine or we're going to look at everything. Everything
is on the table, our food system, our water, our air,
different ways of parenting, all the kind of changes that
may have triggered this epidemic. It is an epidemic. Epidemics
(19:11):
are not caused by genes. Genes can provide a vulnerability,
but you need an environmental toxin. So we know that
it is an environmental toxin that is causing this cataclysm,
and we are going to identify it. We are narrowly
focused on identifying it and using as many scientists as
we can from universities and research centers all over the world,
(19:33):
focus them through NIH, through Ja Bodichara, to focus them
on answering this question.
Speaker 1 (19:40):
Cheryl Atkinson does is such a great journalist, and she
points out she does such great work that the CDC
changed the definition of vaccine in twenty twenty one. Why
would you need to do that at the very time
you're putting a vaccine in people. We told you all
along it wasn't a vaccine.
Speaker 6 (19:58):
Sometimes getting a keeping a vaccine on the market requires
sleight of hand. The Centers for Disease Control, our premier
infectious disease Federal Health agency, is happy to give a
little help to its vaccine industry partners, or, as the
CDC calls them, stakeholders. The agency's best and brightest can
even adjust the veritable meaning of the word vaccine. The
(20:22):
CDC used to define vaccines quite simply as agents that
prevent disease, but in twenty twenty one that had to
be changed. It became undeniable that COVID vaccines didn't prevent
the disease or transmission or even illness. Logic might suggest
that the COVID vaccines would have to be withdrawn from
(20:43):
the market, after all, they didn't even meet the definition
of a vaccine. Instead, the CDC quietly redefined the word
vaccine to make the COVID shots seem successful after all.
On the CDC's vaccine web page, sometime between September first
and September second, twenty twenty one, somebody removed a key
(21:06):
phrase from the definition. On September first, the CDC defined
a vaccine as quote a product that stimulates a person's
immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting
the person from that disease. But on September second, the
phrase protecting the person from that disease was removed like
(21:28):
it never even happened. Now, the CDC says vaccines merely
stimulate the body's immune response. Think of it. The CDC
unilaterally redefined two hundred years of the world's understanding of
what constitutes a vaccine without so much as an explanation,
public discussion, hearing, or vote. Once you understand that our
(21:51):
top trusted medical authorities are willing to sneakily move goalposts
and change meanings of words to protect a market, your
law way to beginning to understand how deep the corruption goes.
Speaker 1 (22:04):
OURFK Junior Health and Human Service Secretary at a recent
cabinet meeting, made the statement that by September we will
know what has caused the autism epidemic. They believe they
are very close to being able to analyze the data
and find out why there's been an explosion in the
number of cases of autism. I'm gonna tell you something.
(22:24):
Some people are going to be hop and mad.
Speaker 2 (22:26):
Oh we have now the autism rates have gone from
now most recent numbers we think are going to be
about one in thirty one one in twelve, So they're
going up again from one in ten thousand when I
was a kid, and we are going at your direction,
we are going to know by September. We've launched a
(22:48):
massive testing and research effort that's going to involve hundreds
of scientists from around the world. By September, we will
know what has caused the autism epidemic and we'll be
able to eliminate those exposures.
Speaker 14 (23:03):
So think of that.
Speaker 3 (23:04):
So it was one in ten thousand children had autism,
and now it's one in thirty one, not thirty one
thousand thirty one.
Speaker 16 (23:15):
That is a that's a horrible statistic is in and
there's got to be something artificial out there that's doing this.
So you think you're going to have a pretty good ideah.
Speaker 2 (23:24):
We will not September.
Speaker 3 (23:26):
There will be no.
Speaker 4 (23:27):
Bigger news conference and that So that's that's it.
Speaker 16 (23:29):
If you can come up with that answer where you
stop taking something, you stop eating something, or maybe it's
a shot, but something's causing it, it can't be. It
can't be from ten thousand to can you imagine that market?
Speaker 3 (23:44):
That's a big that's a big number.
Speaker 16 (23:46):
Thank you very much doing it great, Thank you.
Speaker 1 (23:48):
Buy RFK Junior talking about the crises in crisis in
fertility in teenagers. Today, an American teenager has less to
stosterone than a sixty eight year old man.
Speaker 2 (24:02):
This is a problem. We're seeing crazies in fertility. Had
a teenager today, an American teenager has less testaserone than
a sixty eight year old man. Our seams firm counts
got dropped to fifty percent of historical rates. Girls in
(24:23):
our country are reaching puberty six years early. I'm ten
to thirteen years old.
Speaker 17 (24:29):
We're seeing an explosion of cancers, including we talked just
recently about correctal cancers, which will never occurred in young people,
and now we're.
Speaker 2 (24:40):
Seeing kids in their teens with correctal cancer and it's exploded.
Speaker 9 (24:44):
You've got the Michael Berry's show, all right.
Speaker 1 (24:48):
I've dedicated an entire segment to this because I want
you to hear it, and because I believe Anthony Fauci
should be in prison. This is a montage matt Or
Flea put it together of Anthony foul She contradicting himself
about masks. Do you remember how you had to wear
the mask and if you didn't wear the mask, you'd
be arrested and accosted and all these things. He kept
(25:10):
going back and forth on the masks again and again,
and the end result there was no honor, There was.
Speaker 18 (25:17):
No truth to the masks. This is not rocket science.
We know exactly what we can do and what we
should be doing.
Speaker 19 (25:24):
Please wear a mask.
Speaker 18 (25:25):
No reason to be walking around with a mask.
Speaker 5 (25:27):
I often myself wear two masks.
Speaker 8 (25:29):
Every email from you, including I, do not recommend that
you wear a mask.
Speaker 2 (25:32):
Everybody should be wearing a mask when they're outside.
Speaker 19 (25:34):
We should not be walking around with masks.
Speaker 2 (25:36):
I wear a mask when I'm outside.
Speaker 19 (25:38):
You don't need a mask when you're outside.
Speaker 2 (25:39):
Wear a mask at all times when you're outside.
Speaker 18 (25:43):
So even if you are vaccinated, you should wear a mask.
Speaker 19 (25:46):
If you are vaccinated, you do not need to wear
a mask.
Speaker 13 (25:49):
Oct pouch, thank you for your clarity.
Speaker 18 (25:50):
You wear a mask, you can decrease a likelihood transmitting or.
Speaker 1 (25:54):
Required COVID nineteen by sixty SEV.
Speaker 10 (25:59):
Masks work margins maybe ten percent.
Speaker 2 (26:04):
You're a master communicator.
Speaker 18 (26:05):
Wear a mask all the time consistently when you're outside.
Speaker 19 (26:09):
It's not like I always wear one, always wear a mask.
Speaker 5 (26:12):
You cannot recommend people wear a mask.
Speaker 19 (26:14):
Children should still wear a mask at least one mask.
Speaker 5 (26:17):
Don't need to be walking around with a mask.
Speaker 1 (26:19):
Absolutely, we should have universal wearing a.
Speaker 18 (26:21):
Mask mandating masks.
Speaker 19 (26:23):
Yes, let's do it.
Speaker 18 (26:25):
If it doesn't happen nationally, then I think that the
mayors and the governors should do it.
Speaker 1 (26:33):
Mask mandates did nothing.
Speaker 19 (26:36):
Forget the politics.
Speaker 2 (26:37):
Look at the data.
Speaker 5 (26:39):
Mask mandate states fared no better than states without mask commandates.
Speaker 10 (26:46):
In hindsight, though, when you look at this, do you
think the mask mandates we were a mistake?
Speaker 18 (26:54):
You know, I want kaylen, I don't want to say
a mistake, but I think we really need to remember.
Speaker 11 (27:00):
High school student ended up in handcuffs after she refused
to wear a mask.
Speaker 5 (27:04):
Wear a mask.
Speaker 1 (27:04):
A man was removed from a sep of bus who
were not wearing a mask.
Speaker 7 (27:08):
Just wear a mask, Ohio woman, after refusing to wear a.
Speaker 1 (27:11):
Mask, wear your mask.
Speaker 5 (27:16):
Make sure you have a mask.
Speaker 1 (27:17):
Mask, wear a mask, your hand follow the science.
Speaker 6 (27:21):
The officer's body slamming a woman when she refused to
wear a.
Speaker 1 (27:24):
Mask based purely on the science.
Speaker 10 (27:27):
They were yanked out of a Scuboard meeting after refusing
to wear mask.
Speaker 2 (27:31):
Wear a mask.
Speaker 1 (27:32):
She didn't gal over a dispute on whether or not
to wear a mask.
Speaker 5 (27:35):
Wear a mask.
Speaker 19 (27:35):
She was walking on a mask when everybody should wear
a mask. It was told to wear a mask, but
refuge got to wear a mask.
Speaker 9 (27:41):
A mother is arrested in front of her young child,
You should be wearing a mask.
Speaker 6 (27:45):
Do you wear a mask when you're not on television?
Speaker 18 (27:51):
Well, you know, my life is pretty different.
Speaker 2 (27:54):
I can say as a public health.
Speaker 19 (27:55):
Official, but I would urge the leaders, the local political
leaders in states.
Speaker 2 (28:01):
And cities and towns, to be as.
Speaker 5 (28:05):
Forceful as possible in getting your.
Speaker 2 (28:08):
Citizen treat to wear masks. Be as forceful as.
Speaker 5 (28:12):
Possible, forced out in a handcuff.
Speaker 2 (28:15):
Wear a mask, masks of very important.
Speaker 8 (28:24):
You should be wearing a mask just days in front
of his wife and child.
Speaker 18 (28:27):
Purely by just sorry that sixty six year handgun because
he didn't wear a mask.
Speaker 7 (28:31):
Look at the science.
Speaker 1 (28:32):
There is just no evidence that they masks make any difference,
full stop. The N ninety five masks, surgical or cloth
masks makes no difference.
Speaker 10 (28:42):
Okay, then why was I wearing a mask?
Speaker 1 (28:43):
For so many times? Policymakers to impose masks mandates were
convinced by non randomized, flawed observational studies.
Speaker 19 (28:51):
But there's nothing to indicate that wearing a mask has
deleterious effects.
Speaker 9 (28:57):
It does have costs. I can't count how many parents
have called me and said, look, my kid can't wear
a mask. It's really hurting, or parents telling me that
the kids didn't learn how to read or have verbal
problems as a result of the masking. It has costs.
It absolutely has harms, and there's no avis of working.
Speaker 19 (29:15):
Obviously, children were older than two years old should be
wearing a mask.
Speaker 1 (29:21):
Mass mandates for children under five.
Speaker 18 (29:23):
And going back to what I said before, all of
that is in the context of at the time.
Speaker 5 (29:31):
Five days scientomic evidence for that.
Speaker 8 (29:33):
Excuse me, mass mandates for children under five, their scientific
evidence supporting that.
Speaker 5 (29:38):
There was no study that did masks one kids before.
Speaker 18 (29:41):
You couldn't do the study.
Speaker 19 (29:43):
Children of a certain age greater than two years old
should be wearing.
Speaker 5 (29:46):
Masks, no doubt about that.
Speaker 2 (29:49):
Children should be wearing the masks.
Speaker 6 (29:51):
They were kicked off of play because their two year
old wouldn't put on her mask.
Speaker 4 (29:56):
Have the children have masks.
Speaker 1 (29:57):
Her family was also kicked off the flo.
Speaker 2 (30:00):
To see fresh fries boarding the plane and have a mask.
Speaker 5 (30:03):
It is really not proud in full masks, well, children,
When the children go out into the community.
Speaker 18 (30:10):
You want them to continue to wear masks.
Speaker 8 (30:12):
A mom is bold to get off of flight because
two year old.
Speaker 1 (30:16):
Would not wear a mask.
Speaker 2 (30:17):
Children should be wearing masks from two years old.
Speaker 18 (30:21):
You're dealing with science.
Speaker 5 (30:22):
Two year old as a thrownoff of flight for not
wearing a mask. Thick put the science disable.
Speaker 15 (30:27):
Ten year old kick out of the market.
Speaker 2 (30:29):
For not wearing a mask.
Speaker 5 (30:30):
Should children be wearing masks?
Speaker 6 (30:31):
Yes, a little girl suspended for not wearing her masks.
Speaker 18 (30:34):
Everybody mask police were called over the child's face mask.
Speaker 19 (30:38):
Wear a mask.
Speaker 9 (30:39):
If you're not wearing your mask, you will be sus mained.
Speaker 2 (30:40):
You should be wearing the mask.
Speaker 1 (30:42):
And the best way for me to prevent getting an
infectious disease is wearing a mask.
Speaker 14 (30:46):
No, no, no, no, you do that.
Speaker 18 (30:48):
You avoid all the paranoid aspects and do something positive.
Get some exercise, that's correct, you get good sleep. I
think that the normal, low tech, healthy things are the
best thing that you can do. David's state, all right,
well I'm going to try to do that.
Speaker 19 (31:03):
So that was the reason for what is considered inconsistencies
about recommendations of wearing masks.
Speaker 5 (31:13):
Doctor Doughty.
Speaker 4 (31:14):
Before I begin to fight questions.
Speaker 2 (31:15):
Just wanted to ask you, does wearing masks stop this
credit COVID or help prevent this credit covid?
Speaker 19 (31:21):
I'm sorry, so I didn't hear your questions.
Speaker 5 (31:24):
Doctor Fi. Does wearing masks help stop this thread of covid?
Speaker 1 (31:28):
Absolutely?
Speaker 2 (31:30):
Should people keep wearing masks?
Speaker 13 (31:31):
Absolutely?
Speaker 8 (31:33):
What specific studies do you cite to argue that the
public should be wearing masks well into twenty twenty two.
Speaker 18 (31:44):
I'm not sure I understand the connection of what you're saying.
Speaker 8 (31:48):
You're not telling everybody to wear a mask. Isn't it
just theater? No, it's not a vaccine, and you weren't too.
Speaker 6 (31:54):
Mask. Isn't that theater? No, it's not.
Speaker 5 (31:56):
Here we go again with the theater. Let's get down
to the facts.
Speaker 1 (32:00):
There's no science behind it.
Speaker 5 (32:01):
Well, let me just state for the record that masks
are not theater. Masks are protected.
Speaker 1 (32:07):
There's no science behind it.
Speaker 4 (32:09):
Here we go again with the theater.
Speaker 1 (32:10):
Isn't that theater? Isn't it just theater?
Speaker 5 (32:13):
Well, let me just state for the record that masks
are not theater.
Speaker 8 (32:17):
There's no science behind Here we go again with the
isn't that theater?
Speaker 6 (32:21):
Isn't it just theater?
Speaker 2 (32:22):
Well?
Speaker 5 (32:23):
Let me just state for the record that masks are
not theater.
Speaker 8 (32:26):
There's no science behind Here we go again, right around
in two masks or show.
Speaker 5 (32:32):
Well, let me just stink for the record that masks
are not theater.
Speaker 8 (32:36):
There's no science behind Here we go again with the theater.
You won't be able to wear a mask for in
a couple of years.
Speaker 5 (32:41):
Well, let me just stink for the record that masks
are not theater.
Speaker 8 (32:46):
There's no science behind it. Here we go again with
the theater. Isn't that theater?
Speaker 1 (32:50):
Isn't it just theater?
Speaker 8 (32:51):
Well, let me.
Speaker 5 (32:52):
Just stink for the record that masks are not theater.
Speaker 8 (32:55):
There's no science behind me.
Speaker 5 (32:57):
Here we go again with the theater. Let's get down
of facts.
Speaker 19 (33:01):
If you need to be in society, just wear a
protective cloth clothing that would essentially be a functionally equivalent
of a mask.
Speaker 18 (33:10):
You've got to get a well fitted mask that has
a high quality, and the two we know are high quality.
Speaker 2 (33:20):
For me, Thank you, and goodnight.
It's that time, time, time, time, walking load. The Michael
Verie Show is on the air.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Will you tell somebody something?
Speaker 3 (00:12):
It depends on what part of the United States you're
standing the ass of just how dum you are.
Speaker 4 (00:16):
There's a accent. Where come from?
Speaker 5 (00:27):
Being somebody in this.
Speaker 1 (00:28):
Society starts with education.
Speaker 2 (00:33):
Well, first of all, thank you for the question.
Speaker 6 (00:35):
I hope your family is okay and your home is okay,
and you.
Speaker 5 (00:39):
All help us win in twenty twenty and we don't
do it again.
Speaker 7 (00:42):
In twenty twenty four.
Speaker 5 (00:45):
You better thank a union member for sickly.
Speaker 7 (00:48):
You better thank a union member.
Speaker 5 (00:50):
For paid lee.
Speaker 6 (00:51):
You better thank a union member for vacation time.
Speaker 4 (00:54):
It is accent.
Speaker 8 (01:01):
We're I'm proud to be a bartender.
Speaker 9 (01:08):
Ain't nothing wrong with that.
Speaker 5 (01:11):
There's nothing wrong with working retail, folding clothes for.
Speaker 10 (01:15):
Other people to buy.
Speaker 5 (01:17):
There is nothing wrong with preparing the food that your.
Speaker 2 (01:21):
Neighbors will eat.
Speaker 8 (01:23):
There is nothing wrong with driving the buses that.
Speaker 2 (01:26):
Take your family to work.
Speaker 5 (01:28):
There is nothing wrong with being a working person in
the United States of America, and there is everything dignified
about it.
Speaker 11 (01:36):
I don't feel no ways tired.
Speaker 1 (01:40):
I count you bar This is sweet, sweet justice my friends,
sweet sweet justice from the New York Post. New York
Attorney General Letitia James. Boy do I dislike this woman
who infamously declared that no one is above the law
when she was targeting and persecuting Donald Trump.
Speaker 7 (02:02):
That's simple but fundamental pillar of our democracy, that the
rule of law applies to all of us equally, fairly
and justly.
Speaker 1 (02:15):
Oh is she righteous? She claimed that the properties that
were put up in order to get loans for buildings
were not worth the value at which they were appraised.
Turns out they were, but she ran him through the
ringer and caused him a lot of hassle in the meantime.
That would be mortgage fraud if it had happened, but
(02:36):
it didn't. So now Letitia James was hit with a
federal criminal referral for instances alleged mortgage fraud. Yes, according
to a letter obtained by the Post, Federal Housing Finance
Agency Director William Poulti sent the missive to Attorney General
Pam Bondi and Deputy ag Ton Todd Blanche, alleging that
(03:02):
James had falsified records to get home loans for a
property in Virginia that she claimed was her principal residence
in twenty twenty three while still serving as a New
York State prosecutor. That occurred in late August of twenty
twenty three, weeks before she began her civil fraud trial
against the Trump Organization for inflating the values of many
(03:26):
of his properties, which ended in a four hundred and
fifty four million dollar judgment. Well. The letter stated quote
Miss James was the sitting Attorney General of New York
and is required by law to have her primary residence
in the state of New York, even though her mortgage
applications list her intent to have the Norfolk, Virginia property
as her primary home. It appears Miss James's property and
(03:48):
mortgage related misrepresentations may have continued to her recent twenty
twenty three Norfolk, Virginia property purchase in order to secure
a lower interest rate and more favorable loan terms. In
February two thousand and one, James also purchased a five
family dwelling in Brooklyn, but has quote consistently misrepresented the
(04:09):
same property as only having four units in both building
permit applications and numerous mortgage documents and applications. Polti attached
several documents, also showing that James purchased another property with
her father as a co signer, but falsely listed the
pair as husband and wife in nineteen eighty three and
(04:30):
two thousand. Who do you think you are, Lady ilhan Omar? Meanwhile,
if Letitia James wasn't the face of the party, Joe
Biden certainly is. They woke him up to give a
speech about social Security, and he talked about the first
time he remembered seeing quote, colored kids can't make this up.
Speaker 12 (04:51):
And I had never seen I'd never seen hardly any
black people scrattin. It's the time when and I was
only going on fourth grade, and I remember seeing the
kids going by at a time called cord kids on
a bus going by.
Speaker 1 (05:05):
Okay, all right, that must have made quite the impression,
you know, the colored kids, as he said, who touched
the hair on his legs in the pool. And then
he got out and he's like you know legend of
Billy Joe. He gets out and he has to go, Remember,
he has to go pick up a pipe or a
chain because who was a corn corn pop was coming
after him, and he had to show those blacks. He
(05:26):
meant business. Remember when he told Howard Stern that he
was arrested as a kid for standing on the porch
at the home of a black family.
Speaker 13 (05:33):
And I looked at my mom. I said, honey, you
haven't said anything. She said, Joey, let me remember true story.
Remember true storygregate.
Speaker 1 (05:40):
Anybody, hold on anybody who has to say in the middle,
true story. Why wouldn't we assume your story is true?
Why are you trying to embellrash your story with true story?
Are your other stories not true?
Speaker 5 (05:52):
True story?
Speaker 13 (05:52):
So remember when they were desegregating Lynnfield, a neighborhood into us,
you know, seventy homes bill of one suburbia. And I
told you, and there was a black family moving in
and there was people who are down there protesting. I
told you not to go down there. And you went
down remember that, and you came you got to rest up.
He standing on the porch of the black family, right,
(06:14):
And they brought you back, the police, And I said, yeah,
well I remember that.
Speaker 4 (06:18):
True story.
Speaker 1 (06:20):
He has even claimed that he would attend black church
services after going to seven thirty Mass. Well, he was, well,
what a great kid. He would just want to see
how those blacks worshiped.
Speaker 13 (06:31):
Unless say one thing to rest, I may be a
practicing Catholic.
Speaker 12 (06:34):
I used to go to seven thirty Mass every morning
in high school and been on college before I went
to the Black church.
Speaker 13 (06:42):
Not a joke.
Speaker 12 (06:43):
And you know this.
Speaker 1 (06:45):
Not a joke. Remember it's not a joke. Telling the truth,
true story, not a joke. Why would we think it
was a joke. Joe, of course, after seeing those colored kids,
as he said all those years ago, he knows what
it means to be black.
Speaker 12 (07:01):
You have a problem figuring out whether you're Premi or Trump.
Speaker 2 (07:04):
And you ain't black.
Speaker 1 (07:05):
Okay, So let's see who we've got as Democrats. We've
got Letitia James, We've got Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, and
now we have their nominee. In twenty twenty eight, Alexandria
Ocassio Cortez. She was hired off the casting couch as
the social justice Soros candidate, and she's been running around
the country screaming about billionaires. She does not like the billionaires.
(07:28):
She's against the billionaires. There's an oligarchy. Well in the
great Democrat tradition. She tried out a new accent.
Speaker 5 (07:35):
Here we go, Donald Trump is a criminal who was
found guilty of thirty.
Speaker 4 (07:43):
Four flity counts, a fraud liable for sexual abuse.
Speaker 5 (07:52):
Of course he's lying, I'm abusing. I'm manipulating the stock
market too.
Speaker 11 (08:02):
When he talks about rapists and criminals, he should look.
Speaker 2 (08:05):
In the mirror.
Speaker 1 (08:09):
Did you hear how she said the word too as
in meaning also.
Speaker 3 (08:13):
Too two two.
Speaker 2 (08:20):
The Michael Barry Show, Michael Barry Show.
Speaker 1 (08:25):
I've said several times that Carolyn Levitt part of her
job is debunking the lies that the left is telling.
Remember when President Trump recently was giving his Joint Session
speech and he said, no matter what I say, they
won't stand up and cheer. Ever, they won't ever applaud
And you remember when DJ was named an honorary Secret
(08:48):
Service agent and they wouldn't stand up for that. I mean,
it's just evil, It's sure evil. Well that's what we're
They're going to tell lies no matter what he does.
So here's kind of some of the stuff that she's
had to debunk in the last week and a half.
(09:08):
This is ramon. This is going to be five h
six Carolyn Levitt, White House Press Secretary. They were asking
about the contrast in transparency between this administration and Joe Biden's.
I mean, what kind of question.
Speaker 10 (09:20):
Is at Everybody in this room has access to the
most transparent and accessible president in American history. The cabinet
meeting yesterday was further proof. President Trump asked each secretary
to provide an update to all of you and the
media on the critical work they are doing at their
respected agencies to deliver on his agenda. And according to
(09:40):
new reporting from The Washington Times, who I believe is
in this room today. President Trump answered nearly one hundred
questions from the press all of you during his first
three open press cabinet meetings this year. That's nearly twenty
times the number answered by Joe Biden in cabinet meetings
during his entire four years in office.
Speaker 1 (09:58):
FA Then you have the conce arguing that the tariffs
are some sort of a crisis for the country. I
would argue so far, they've been a success.
Speaker 10 (10:12):
More than seventy five countries have now reached out to
the Trump administration, eager to address the trade issues that
have exploited America and hurt our workers in the process.
The phones have been ringing off the hook to make deals,
and these countries wisely heated President Trump's warning not to retaliate,
and as a result, they were rewarded with a ninety
day pause in substantially lower reciprocal tariff rates during this period,
(10:35):
so potential solutions can be achieved. Past presidents just willingly
accepted the failed status quo on trade that ripped off
our workers and our companies. But that's not who this
president is. He creates his own leverage and negotiates deals
better than anyone else who has sat in the Oval
Office before him. And that process is currently underway.
Speaker 1 (10:55):
And that's true. Why would Joe Biden know how to negotiate,
He's never negotiated in his life. Why would George W.
Bush think you think he was a great negotiator? He
was born a Bush. Why would Barack Obama? But what
had he done? He was a community agitator. Until you've
had to do deals, until you've had to walk a
deal to get a better term, until you've had someone
(11:18):
try to renegotiate a deal because they were in a
stronger position, you don't know how to put yourself in
a stronger position. So Carolyn Levitt was asked why any
of our allies would work with us to isolate China
in a trade war if we're imposing tariffs on them
as well. These people don't understand we're in the catbird seat.
We shouldn't be getting shafted. We should be demanding and
(11:42):
ensuring the best deals because we have the greatest marketplace
that we can withhold. If you don't do what we want,
we take away the American consumer from you. Why would
any of.
Speaker 2 (11:55):
Our allies work with us to isolate China in a
trade war?
Speaker 5 (11:58):
If we're treating a.
Speaker 4 (11:59):
Friend and friend.
Speaker 10 (12:01):
You'll have to talk to our allies who are reaching
out to us. The phones are ringing off of the hooks.
They've made it very clear they need the United States
of America. They need our markets, they need our consumer base.
You saw Prime Minister Benjamin and Yahoo in the Oval
Office with the President saying that he was going to
bring down all of their monetary tariffs and their non
monetary tariff trade barriers as well. We've heard from South Korea,
(12:22):
We've heard from Japan, the President has spoken to Vietnam.
We have Italy coming too the White House next week.
There's a reason for that, Sean, and it's because they
need the United States of America and our business model
and our markets to survive, and the President is using
that leverage to our advantage.
Speaker 1 (12:36):
But here's the part that really gets me. Carolyn Levitt
points out what we all know to be true. For decades,
Republicans and Democrats have talked about taking on China. We're
getting a bad deal from China. We've got to fight back,
We've got to stand up for our country. And they
(12:56):
talked about it, and they never did anything about it.
And she's pointing out Trump's finally doing what everybody was
promising to do, but nobody ever did.
Speaker 10 (13:07):
The tariff rate on China remains where it was yesterday,
at the one hundred and forty five percent level. The
President made it very clear when the United States is punched,
he will punch back harder, and he hopes to make
a deal that benefits the American worker and our companies
that have been ripped off for far too long. And
he's finally taking bold and courageous action to do that.
You take it on China is in the terms of
(13:29):
trade and tariffs, is something that both Democrats and Republicans
alike have spoken about for decades. President Trump is finally
doing it.
Speaker 1 (13:35):
And here's the proof in the pudding. In twenty fifteen,
Obama said, if we don't write the rules, China will
and will lose jobs. So why was he saying that
in twenty fifteen and Trump and to applause from the media,
and Trump's saying it today, and they're acting like he's
going to end the world.
Speaker 14 (13:54):
The argument is, Number one, that's the biggest market in
the world. Number two is those countries are already selling
to US. I keep on pointing out there are a
lot of Japanese cars here in the United States, almost
no US cars in Tokyo. Number three is that if
we don't write the rules, China will write the rules
out in that region. We will be shut out American businesses,
(14:14):
American agriculture. That will mean a loss of US jobs.
Speaker 1 (14:18):
Oh you don't say, how about Hillary in twenty sixteen
running for president against Trump the first time talking about listen,
carefully targeted tariffs against anyone who takes advantage of American workers.
Speaker 2 (14:33):
What about trade?
Speaker 11 (14:36):
After all Trump talks about it all the time. Well,
let's start with this. It is true that too often
past trade deals have been sold to the American people
with rosy scenarios that did not pan out. Those promises
now ring hollow in many communities across Michigan and our
(14:56):
country that have seen factories, clothes, and jobs disappear. Too
many companies lobbied for trade deals so they could sell
products abroad, but then they instead moved abroad and sold
back into the United States. It is also true that
China and other countries have gained the system for too long. Enforcement,
(15:21):
particularly during the Bush administration, has been too lex Investments
at home that would make us more competitive have been
completely blocked in Congress, and American workers and communities have
paid the price.
Speaker 6 (15:35):
But the answer is not to.
Speaker 11 (15:37):
Rant and raid or cut ourselves off from the world
that would end up killing even more jobs. The answer
is to finally make trade work for us, not against us.
So as President, I will stand up to China and
anyone else who tries to take advantage of American workers
and companies. And I'm going to ramp up enforcement by
(16:06):
appointing for the first time a cheap trade prosecutor. I
will triple the number of enforcement officers, and when countries
break the rules, we won't hesitate to impose targeted tariffs.
Speaker 1 (16:22):
You're listening to the Michael Berry Show.
Speaker 15 (16:26):
Give them the things that we know kill viral replication,
zinc and anything that enhances zinc like I dropped the
chloric when I remcdin, and one hundred other remedies that
we now know dramatically reduce the spread of this disease.
And what was our protocol. Our protocol was to do
none of that, no treatment until you go to the
(16:48):
hospital and then your treatment. Are two things that are
bound to kill you, ventilators and remdezevie. And Johnny Vauchi
knew that remed azevir would kill you. He knew that
because in twenty nineteen he tried to use it for
a bowl. Of twenty nineteen, he tried to use it
for a bowl and within five days of treatment it
(17:10):
gave lethal side effect to fifty four percent of the
people in the Safety Monitoring Board ordered him to terminate
the use of that drug, and he threw a phony, contrived,
absolutely fraudulent study that he manipulator and orchanestrated of that
drug made standard of carry. It is homicide. And if
(17:32):
you look how does it kill people? Two ways, three
ways kidney failure, heart failure, and all organ collapse and
what happened to the people who died in the pandemic?
What were they dying of kidney failure? All the doctor said,
you heard it again and again. We've never seen a
(17:53):
virus that attacks the kidneys because it wasn't the virus,
it was.
Speaker 2 (17:58):
The rem desipor.
Speaker 1 (18:00):
Health and Human Services Secretary RFK. Junior points out that
when studies have been done comparing kids and whether vaccines
work and any number of other medical issues, they never
looked at the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated because they didn't
want you to know that the vaccines in many cases
(18:23):
cause more problems than they solve or protect against.
Speaker 2 (18:26):
The studies that they did were very, very narrow, and
there were about seventeen studies. The Institute of Medicine, which
is part of the National Academy of Science that says
that fourteen those studies are invalid. And the biggest weakness
in those studies is they never studied vaccinated for a
sun vaccinated group, which is the only way that you
can really make this determination. And more importantly, none of
(18:51):
the vaccines are given to children during the first six
months of life. We're ever studied. We're going to look
at vaccine or we're going to look at everything. Everything
is on the table, our food system, our water, our air,
different ways of parenting, all the kind of changes that
may have triggered this epidemic. It is an epidemic. Epidemics
(19:11):
are not caused by genes. Genes can provide a vulnerability,
but you need an environmental toxin. So we know that
it is an environmental toxin that is causing this cataclysm,
and we are going to identify it. We are narrowly
focused on identifying it and using as many scientists as
we can from universities and research centers all over the world,
(19:33):
focus them through NIH, through Ja Bodichara, to focus them
on answering this question.
Speaker 1 (19:40):
Cheryl Atkinson does is such a great journalist, and she
points out she does such great work that the CDC
changed the definition of vaccine in twenty twenty one. Why
would you need to do that at the very time
you're putting a vaccine in people. We told you all
along it wasn't a vaccine.
Speaker 6 (19:58):
Sometimes getting a keeping a vaccine on the market requires
sleight of hand. The Centers for Disease Control, our premier
infectious disease Federal Health agency, is happy to give a
little help to its vaccine industry partners, or, as the
CDC calls them, stakeholders. The agency's best and brightest can
even adjust the veritable meaning of the word vaccine. The
(20:22):
CDC used to define vaccines quite simply as agents that
prevent disease, but in twenty twenty one that had to
be changed. It became undeniable that COVID vaccines didn't prevent
the disease or transmission or even illness. Logic might suggest
that the COVID vaccines would have to be withdrawn from
(20:43):
the market, after all, they didn't even meet the definition
of a vaccine. Instead, the CDC quietly redefined the word
vaccine to make the COVID shots seem successful after all.
On the CDC's vaccine web page, sometime between September first
and September second, twenty twenty one, somebody removed a key
(21:06):
phrase from the definition. On September first, the CDC defined
a vaccine as quote a product that stimulates a person's
immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting
the person from that disease. But on September second, the
phrase protecting the person from that disease was removed like
(21:28):
it never even happened. Now, the CDC says vaccines merely
stimulate the body's immune response. Think of it. The CDC
unilaterally redefined two hundred years of the world's understanding of
what constitutes a vaccine without so much as an explanation,
public discussion, hearing, or vote. Once you understand that our
(21:51):
top trusted medical authorities are willing to sneakily move goalposts
and change meanings of words to protect a market, your
law way to beginning to understand how deep the corruption goes.
Speaker 1 (22:04):
OURFK Junior Health and Human Service Secretary at a recent
cabinet meeting, made the statement that by September we will
know what has caused the autism epidemic. They believe they
are very close to being able to analyze the data
and find out why there's been an explosion in the
number of cases of autism. I'm gonna tell you something.
(22:24):
Some people are going to be hop and mad.
Speaker 2 (22:26):
Oh we have now the autism rates have gone from
now most recent numbers we think are going to be
about one in thirty one one in twelve, So they're
going up again from one in ten thousand when I
was a kid, and we are going at your direction,
we are going to know by September. We've launched a
(22:48):
massive testing and research effort that's going to involve hundreds
of scientists from around the world. By September, we will
know what has caused the autism epidemic and we'll be
able to eliminate those exposures.
Speaker 14 (23:03):
So think of that.
Speaker 3 (23:04):
So it was one in ten thousand children had autism,
and now it's one in thirty one, not thirty one
thousand thirty one.
Speaker 16 (23:15):
That is a that's a horrible statistic is in and
there's got to be something artificial out there that's doing this.
So you think you're going to have a pretty good ideah.
Speaker 2 (23:24):
We will not September.
Speaker 3 (23:26):
There will be no.
Speaker 4 (23:27):
Bigger news conference and that So that's that's it.
Speaker 16 (23:29):
If you can come up with that answer where you
stop taking something, you stop eating something, or maybe it's
a shot, but something's causing it, it can't be. It
can't be from ten thousand to can you imagine that market?
Speaker 3 (23:44):
That's a big that's a big number.
Speaker 16 (23:46):
Thank you very much doing it great, Thank you.
Speaker 1 (23:48):
Buy RFK Junior talking about the crises in crisis in
fertility in teenagers. Today, an American teenager has less to
stosterone than a sixty eight year old man.
Speaker 2 (24:02):
This is a problem. We're seeing crazies in fertility. Had
a teenager today, an American teenager has less testaserone than
a sixty eight year old man. Our seams firm counts
got dropped to fifty percent of historical rates. Girls in
(24:23):
our country are reaching puberty six years early. I'm ten
to thirteen years old.
Speaker 17 (24:29):
We're seeing an explosion of cancers, including we talked just
recently about correctal cancers, which will never occurred in young people,
and now we're.
Speaker 2 (24:40):
Seeing kids in their teens with correctal cancer and it's exploded.
Speaker 9 (24:44):
You've got the Michael Berry's show, all right.
Speaker 1 (24:48):
I've dedicated an entire segment to this because I want
you to hear it, and because I believe Anthony Fauci
should be in prison. This is a montage matt Or
Flea put it together of Anthony foul She contradicting himself
about masks. Do you remember how you had to wear
the mask and if you didn't wear the mask, you'd
be arrested and accosted and all these things. He kept
(25:10):
going back and forth on the masks again and again,
and the end result there was no honor, There was.
Speaker 18 (25:17):
No truth to the masks. This is not rocket science.
We know exactly what we can do and what we
should be doing.
Speaker 19 (25:24):
Please wear a mask.
Speaker 18 (25:25):
No reason to be walking around with a mask.
Speaker 5 (25:27):
I often myself wear two masks.
Speaker 8 (25:29):
Every email from you, including I, do not recommend that
you wear a mask.
Speaker 2 (25:32):
Everybody should be wearing a mask when they're outside.
Speaker 19 (25:34):
We should not be walking around with masks.
Speaker 2 (25:36):
I wear a mask when I'm outside.
Speaker 19 (25:38):
You don't need a mask when you're outside.
Speaker 2 (25:39):
Wear a mask at all times when you're outside.
Speaker 18 (25:43):
So even if you are vaccinated, you should wear a mask.
Speaker 19 (25:46):
If you are vaccinated, you do not need to wear
a mask.
Speaker 13 (25:49):
Oct pouch, thank you for your clarity.
Speaker 18 (25:50):
You wear a mask, you can decrease a likelihood transmitting or.
Speaker 1 (25:54):
Required COVID nineteen by sixty SEV.
Speaker 10 (25:59):
Masks work margins maybe ten percent.
Speaker 2 (26:04):
You're a master communicator.
Speaker 18 (26:05):
Wear a mask all the time consistently when you're outside.
Speaker 19 (26:09):
It's not like I always wear one, always wear a mask.
Speaker 5 (26:12):
You cannot recommend people wear a mask.
Speaker 19 (26:14):
Children should still wear a mask at least one mask.
Speaker 5 (26:17):
Don't need to be walking around with a mask.
Speaker 1 (26:19):
Absolutely, we should have universal wearing a.
Speaker 18 (26:21):
Mask mandating masks.
Speaker 19 (26:23):
Yes, let's do it.
Speaker 18 (26:25):
If it doesn't happen nationally, then I think that the
mayors and the governors should do it.
Speaker 1 (26:33):
Mask mandates did nothing.
Speaker 19 (26:36):
Forget the politics.
Speaker 2 (26:37):
Look at the data.
Speaker 5 (26:39):
Mask mandate states fared no better than states without mask commandates.
Speaker 10 (26:46):
In hindsight, though, when you look at this, do you
think the mask mandates we were a mistake?
Speaker 18 (26:54):
You know, I want kaylen, I don't want to say
a mistake, but I think we really need to remember.
Speaker 11 (27:00):
High school student ended up in handcuffs after she refused
to wear a mask.
Speaker 5 (27:04):
Wear a mask.
Speaker 1 (27:04):
A man was removed from a sep of bus who
were not wearing a mask.
Speaker 7 (27:08):
Just wear a mask, Ohio woman, after refusing to wear a.
Speaker 1 (27:11):
Mask, wear your mask.
Speaker 5 (27:16):
Make sure you have a mask.
Speaker 1 (27:17):
Mask, wear a mask, your hand follow the science.
Speaker 6 (27:21):
The officer's body slamming a woman when she refused to
wear a.
Speaker 1 (27:24):
Mask based purely on the science.
Speaker 10 (27:27):
They were yanked out of a Scuboard meeting after refusing
to wear mask.
Speaker 2 (27:31):
Wear a mask.
Speaker 1 (27:32):
She didn't gal over a dispute on whether or not
to wear a mask.
Speaker 5 (27:35):
Wear a mask.
Speaker 19 (27:35):
She was walking on a mask when everybody should wear
a mask. It was told to wear a mask, but
refuge got to wear a mask.
Speaker 9 (27:41):
A mother is arrested in front of her young child,
You should be wearing a mask.
Speaker 6 (27:45):
Do you wear a mask when you're not on television?
Speaker 18 (27:51):
Well, you know, my life is pretty different.
Speaker 2 (27:54):
I can say as a public health.
Speaker 19 (27:55):
Official, but I would urge the leaders, the local political
leaders in states.
Speaker 2 (28:01):
And cities and towns, to be as.
Speaker 5 (28:05):
Forceful as possible in getting your.
Speaker 2 (28:08):
Citizen treat to wear masks. Be as forceful as.
Speaker 5 (28:12):
Possible, forced out in a handcuff.
Speaker 2 (28:15):
Wear a mask, masks of very important.
Speaker 8 (28:24):
You should be wearing a mask just days in front
of his wife and child.
Speaker 18 (28:27):
Purely by just sorry that sixty six year handgun because
he didn't wear a mask.
Speaker 7 (28:31):
Look at the science.
Speaker 1 (28:32):
There is just no evidence that they masks make any difference,
full stop. The N ninety five masks, surgical or cloth
masks makes no difference.
Speaker 10 (28:42):
Okay, then why was I wearing a mask?
Speaker 1 (28:43):
For so many times? Policymakers to impose masks mandates were
convinced by non randomized, flawed observational studies.
Speaker 19 (28:51):
But there's nothing to indicate that wearing a mask has
deleterious effects.
Speaker 9 (28:57):
It does have costs. I can't count how many parents
have called me and said, look, my kid can't wear
a mask. It's really hurting, or parents telling me that
the kids didn't learn how to read or have verbal
problems as a result of the masking. It has costs.
It absolutely has harms, and there's no avis of working.
Speaker 19 (29:15):
Obviously, children were older than two years old should be
wearing a mask.
Speaker 1 (29:21):
Mass mandates for children under five.
Speaker 18 (29:23):
And going back to what I said before, all of
that is in the context of at the time.
Speaker 5 (29:31):
Five days scientomic evidence for that.
Speaker 8 (29:33):
Excuse me, mass mandates for children under five, their scientific
evidence supporting that.
Speaker 5 (29:38):
There was no study that did masks one kids before.
Speaker 18 (29:41):
You couldn't do the study.
Speaker 19 (29:43):
Children of a certain age greater than two years old
should be wearing.
Speaker 5 (29:46):
Masks, no doubt about that.
Speaker 2 (29:49):
Children should be wearing the masks.
Speaker 6 (29:51):
They were kicked off of play because their two year
old wouldn't put on her mask.
Speaker 4 (29:56):
Have the children have masks.
Speaker 1 (29:57):
Her family was also kicked off the flo.
Speaker 2 (30:00):
To see fresh fries boarding the plane and have a mask.
Speaker 5 (30:03):
It is really not proud in full masks, well, children,
When the children go out into the community.
Speaker 18 (30:10):
You want them to continue to wear masks.
Speaker 8 (30:12):
A mom is bold to get off of flight because
two year old.
Speaker 1 (30:16):
Would not wear a mask.
Speaker 2 (30:17):
Children should be wearing masks from two years old.
Speaker 18 (30:21):
You're dealing with science.
Speaker 5 (30:22):
Two year old as a thrownoff of flight for not
wearing a mask. Thick put the science disable.
Speaker 15 (30:27):
Ten year old kick out of the market.
Speaker 2 (30:29):
For not wearing a mask.
Speaker 5 (30:30):
Should children be wearing masks?
Speaker 6 (30:31):
Yes, a little girl suspended for not wearing her masks.
Speaker 18 (30:34):
Everybody mask police were called over the child's face mask.
Speaker 19 (30:38):
Wear a mask.
Speaker 9 (30:39):
If you're not wearing your mask, you will be sus mained.
Speaker 2 (30:40):
You should be wearing the mask.
Speaker 1 (30:42):
And the best way for me to prevent getting an
infectious disease is wearing a mask.
Speaker 14 (30:46):
No, no, no, no, you do that.
Speaker 18 (30:48):
You avoid all the paranoid aspects and do something positive.
Get some exercise, that's correct, you get good sleep. I
think that the normal, low tech, healthy things are the
best thing that you can do. David's state, all right,
well I'm going to try to do that.
Speaker 19 (31:03):
So that was the reason for what is considered inconsistencies
about recommendations of wearing masks.
Speaker 5 (31:13):
Doctor Doughty.
Speaker 4 (31:14):
Before I begin to fight questions.
Speaker 2 (31:15):
Just wanted to ask you, does wearing masks stop this
credit COVID or help prevent this credit covid?
Speaker 19 (31:21):
I'm sorry, so I didn't hear your questions.
Speaker 5 (31:24):
Doctor Fi. Does wearing masks help stop this thread of covid?
Speaker 1 (31:28):
Absolutely?
Speaker 2 (31:30):
Should people keep wearing masks?
Speaker 13 (31:31):
Absolutely?
Speaker 8 (31:33):
What specific studies do you cite to argue that the
public should be wearing masks well into twenty twenty two.
Speaker 18 (31:44):
I'm not sure I understand the connection of what you're saying.
Speaker 8 (31:48):
You're not telling everybody to wear a mask. Isn't it
just theater? No, it's not a vaccine, and you weren't too.
Speaker 6 (31:54):
Mask. Isn't that theater? No, it's not.
Speaker 5 (31:56):
Here we go again with the theater. Let's get down
to the facts.
Speaker 1 (32:00):
There's no science behind it.
Speaker 5 (32:01):
Well, let me just state for the record that masks
are not theater. Masks are protected.
Speaker 1 (32:07):
There's no science behind it.
Speaker 4 (32:09):
Here we go again with the theater.
Speaker 1 (32:10):
Isn't that theater? Isn't it just theater?
Speaker 5 (32:13):
Well, let me just state for the record that masks
are not theater.
Speaker 8 (32:17):
There's no science behind Here we go again with the
isn't that theater?
Speaker 6 (32:21):
Isn't it just theater?
Speaker 2 (32:22):
Well?
Speaker 5 (32:23):
Let me just state for the record that masks are
not theater.
Speaker 8 (32:26):
There's no science behind Here we go again, right around
in two masks or show.
Speaker 5 (32:32):
Well, let me just stink for the record that masks
are not theater.
Speaker 8 (32:36):
There's no science behind Here we go again with the theater.
You won't be able to wear a mask for in
a couple of years.
Speaker 5 (32:41):
Well, let me just stink for the record that masks
are not theater.
Speaker 8 (32:46):
There's no science behind it. Here we go again with
the theater. Isn't that theater?
Speaker 1 (32:50):
Isn't it just theater?
Speaker 8 (32:51):
Well, let me.
Speaker 5 (32:52):
Just stink for the record that masks are not theater.
Speaker 8 (32:55):
There's no science behind me.
Speaker 5 (32:57):
Here we go again with the theater. Let's get down
of facts.
Speaker 19 (33:01):
If you need to be in society, just wear a
protective cloth clothing that would essentially be a functionally equivalent
of a mask.
Speaker 18 (33:10):
You've got to get a well fitted mask that has
a high quality, and the two we know are high quality.
Speaker 2 (33:20):
For me, Thank you, and goodnight.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!