July 31, 2025 • 32 mins
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:04):
It's that time, time, time, time, luck and load. Michael
Very show is on the air.
Speaker 2 (00:14):
Right, not that easy trust doct disease that everyone mixed up.
You think my proctology is used to be a photographer. Hey,
he took X ray told me to bend over and
say cheese.
Speaker 3 (00:27):
While we didn't know that much about Joe Biden's health,
we know even less about Donald Trump's health. He was
completely untransparent during the twenty twenty three eight twenty twenty
four campaign. He has not been transparent.
Speaker 4 (00:40):
Then we're in the midst of a presidential cover up
of Donald Trump's mental and physical condition. And it's his
doctors aren't part of the cover up under his orders
that much we know that makes his fact, but it
is essential. But Republicans especially, and I've talked to some
Republicans on the heel, and indeed they are Republicans in
the Senate who are furious, concerned, worried about the president's
(01:04):
mental health, physical health, and they too want some disclosure
of what the real facts are here. But it's time
for them to step up and demand because we've never
had a presidential crisis of leadership such as this. We
don't know what damage may have been done. We don't
know the test to his vital signs. We need full
(01:25):
disclosure and immediately the real possibility that this is a
time that the twenty fifth Amendment needs to be considered.
This is a cover up. It is a cover up
clearly directed by the President of the United States, whose
closest aids in the in the White House and his family.
There are people in the national security of bureaucracy who
are terribly worried about what is going on in terms
(01:48):
of America's adversaries and particularly the Russians and the Chinese
taking advantage of this situation.
Speaker 5 (01:54):
It's ongoing.
Speaker 4 (01:55):
I believe Director Ray is very very the FBI is
very concerned about the President's health, mental and physical, and
how it is undermining this lack of disclosure the national
security interests in this trunk that.
Speaker 6 (02:08):
He doesn't have heart disease. She said, he doesn't have
heart disease.
Speaker 7 (02:11):
Yes, before that shows coorinary.
Speaker 6 (02:15):
But yes, I think so.
Speaker 7 (02:17):
Technically he has non clinical athroscratic cornary corniathroscorosis.
Speaker 8 (02:24):
Some of is maybe Samante Sanderson, I mean, you've heard
these terms before, cornary athoscrosis, coronary art disease, heart disease.
People use these terms interchangeably. And you know, I think
what the test has shown that he does have a
mild form common form of heart disese.
Speaker 5 (02:41):
Isn't a seventy nine years old. If he didn't have
any plaque in his arteries, he would be a freak
of nature. What does it matter? It doesn't, doesn't. It's
as simple as that. These are not people concerned for
his health. These are not people who love him. There's
not people who are wishing the best for him. They're
(03:02):
rooting for his success. These are not people concerned that
let's make sure we get him the best medical care.
He is the president of all of US and our nation.
He's negotiating great deals, like the new deal with South Korea,
which is in America's best interest. These are not people
(03:23):
who wish him well and wish our country well.
Speaker 6 (03:26):
These are evil people.
Speaker 5 (03:28):
Saying evil things, and they are not to be trusted
or believed. They're silly and absurd. You shouldn't do business
with them, you shouldn't hire them, you shouldn't marry them,
you shouldn't associate with them. You can't fix them. They
are sick people. They are disturbed people. I don't have
to tell you that they didn't ask any questions about
(03:48):
Joe Biden's health. I don't have to tell you that
they weren't concerned that Joe Biden was selling our country
to the Chinese, to the Ukrainians.
Speaker 6 (03:59):
I don't have to tell you all.
Speaker 5 (04:00):
The evil they stood by and watched him do and
then wrote books about it afterwards, as if they weren't
part of it all, when in fact they were. Nancy
Pelosi is an evil human being, and Donald Trump is
having a blast exposing her for who and what she is.
He has called for an investigation into what every American
(04:21):
wants to know. How does Nancy Pelosi become a multi
millionaire on one hundred and seventy five thousand dollars a
year salary.
Speaker 9 (04:29):
I like it conceptually, and you know, Nancy Pelosi became
rich by having inside information. She made a fortune with
her husband, and I think that's disgraceful.
Speaker 6 (04:40):
So in that sense, i'd like it, but I'd have to.
Speaker 9 (04:42):
Really see the you know, I study these things very carefully,
and this just happened, so I'll take a look at it.
But conceptually I like it, and what I do think
is Nancy Pelosi should be investigated because what she has
the highest return of anybody practically in the history of
Wall Street save a few.
Speaker 6 (05:04):
And how did that happen.
Speaker 9 (05:06):
It happened by she knows exactly what's going to happen,
what's going.
Speaker 6 (05:09):
To be announced, you by stock, and then the sock goes.
Speaker 9 (05:11):
Up after the announcements made, and she had to be investigated.
Speaker 6 (05:18):
She should be investigated again.
Speaker 5 (05:23):
This is the whole point. We're talking about things bigger
than today's news or tomorrow's news or yesterday's news. We're
talking about whether the people in our government are selling secrets.
We're talking about whether the people in our government are
committing crimes. You know, the reason Pete Rose was hammered
(05:47):
so hard was if the fans believe that the game
is rigged, then the game is over. I think he
should have been forgiven, should have been fairness toward him,
and eventually there will be, but unfortunately he won't get
to see it. The reason it's so important to preserve
(06:10):
not just the integrity of the game, but the perception
of integrity of the game, is that when people no
longer believe there is integrity in the game, they stop
watching President Trump understands that the moment people no longer
trust that the government can be exposed and fixed, they
(06:33):
stop voting. And that's what the left wants. They want
you convinced that you can't fix this. It's too big,
it's too broad. That's what they told us about illegal immigration. Remember,
you can't stop illegal immigration. It's multi pronged. There're too
many people involved. It's too far, far flung. You can't
(06:56):
do anything about it. So just accept it and let
it get a hond Town's worse. So Nancy Pelosi is
very unhappy. We're going to talk about wat Michael Mary Show.
President Trump did not come to the Nancy Pelosi undo
(07:20):
self dealing point lightly. He's been on this for a while.
Back in May, he was on Meet the Press with
Kristen Welker when he said basically the same thing.
Speaker 10 (07:35):
If I own stock in something and I do a
good job and the stock market goes up, I guess
I'm profiting. But who really profits to somebody like Nancy
Pelosi who uses inside information. She worked for one hundred
and seventy five thousand dollars a year, and that's at
the high end, and she's worth one.
Speaker 6 (07:55):
Hundred and fifty two hundred million dollars.
Speaker 10 (07:58):
Okay, you gotta look at Nancy, and you ought to
look at some of these politicians at a.
Speaker 6 (08:02):
Stone called crooks.
Speaker 10 (08:04):
I was very wealthy when I came in being president.
I probably cost me money if you really look.
Speaker 5 (08:11):
Martha Stewart went to prison for five months for Technically
she didn't go to prison for insider trading, and as
is often the case, when the government can't prove the charge,
(08:33):
they use something during the investigation to hang you up.
So she was charged with obstruction of justice and lying
to investigators. The stocking question was called m Clone. I
am clone. She was friends with the founder, and I
(08:54):
believe he was chairman and president of the company at
the time. It was a relatively minimal amount of money
that was salvaged from the trade, so we're not talking
about an earth shattering amount of money the case of
insider trading. I know you know this, but sometimes I
(09:18):
think we talk over our audience and so people may
not grasp one hundred percent of what we're saying. So
let me try to bring that down to a very
simple level that I can understand. Let's say Ramone is
the CEO of a company, and that company is a
public company, so you have shareholders out there. It's traded
on the New York Stock Exchange.
Speaker 6 (09:39):
Make this easy.
Speaker 5 (09:41):
And Ramone lives next door to me. So Ramone and
I are sitting out and he's barbecuing, which he does
do that's not hypothetical. And while we're out there, he says,
I'm going to be leaving the company in a week.
I go, oh, no, you love the company. What's wrong. Well,
we've got some real any bad stuff that's going to
(10:01):
be revealed in a couple of weeks that I want
to leave before it is revealed. It's going to be very,
very bad. Our stock price is currently thirty dollars. It's
going to go down to probably five dollars. Okay, So
if I own a thousand shares of that stock, I've
got thirty thousand dollars in holdings of Ramon's company stock,
(10:27):
and it's going to go from thirty down to five.
My thirty thousand's going to be worth five thousand. So
I profited, which it's the equivalent of profiting if I
prevented a loss of twenty five thousand, or we flip that.
Ramon could say my company just got a patent on
a new drug.
Speaker 6 (10:48):
We're going to.
Speaker 5 (10:49):
Reveal that in a week, and our stock is going
to go from thirty dollars a share to one thousand
dollars a share, and you should buy all the stock
you can right now. If that information is not public,
if it has not been released publicly, either by the
company in their stock filings or by the media, then
(11:10):
it is insider information. The only people who would know
it are people who are have key control inside positions.
The public doesn't have equal access to that information the
way the public does with information that is provided by
the media or their filings with the SEC. So to
(11:33):
trade on that information is to trade on inside information,
which makes you insider trading. That is a seriously taken crime. Now,
if you are the Speaker of the House, a senior
governmental official, you are aware of investigations, you are aware
(11:58):
of patent applications, you are aware of all sorts of
information that the public does not have access to. I
do not believe that members of the government of all
three branches should be allowed to trade stocks at all period,
(12:18):
end of story. I think that when you go into
public life, just as you make financial filings, you should
be required to put your holdings in a blind trust.
We are asking for people to break the law on this.
The problem is these are people who break the law
and are never prosecuted because they both make and break
(12:38):
the law. Well as luck would have it. Nancy Pelosi
was on CNN. It was the sixtieth anniversary of Lyndon Johnson,
of Lyndon Johnson's Medicare Medicaid government giveaway program, and she
goes on with Jake Tapper to talk about that, and
Jake Tapper asks her about what Donald Trump said, and
(13:01):
she is not happy.
Speaker 11 (13:03):
This afternoon, President Trump mentioned you, and he made an
allegation about your investments. I want to roll that clip
and then give you a chance to respond. Seemed to
be having some sort of indy. Yeah, let me just
read what he said. I'm sorry that we had some
sort of technolistion. Nancy pelosih became rich.
Speaker 12 (13:20):
I might have to read that. We're here to talk
about the sixtieth anniversary of Medicaid. That's what I agreed to.
Speaker 6 (13:26):
Come to talk.
Speaker 12 (13:27):
Yeah, but I want what that means in the election.
Speaker 11 (13:29):
I wanted to give you a chances to respond. He
accused you of insider trading. What's your response to that.
Speaker 12 (13:34):
That's very ridiculous. In fact, I very much support the
stop the trading of members of coms. Not that I
think anybody's.
Speaker 6 (13:42):
Doing anything long.
Speaker 12 (13:42):
If they are, they are prosecuted and they go to jail.
But because of the confidence that it stills in American
people don't worry about this. But I have no concern
about the obvious investments that had been made over to
I'm not into it. My husband is, but it isn't
(14:03):
anything to do with anything insider her. But the president
has his own exposure, so he's always projecting. He's always projecting,
and let's not give him any more time on that.
Speaker 6 (14:12):
Please.
Speaker 12 (14:13):
We're going forward here, and I'm very proud of my family.
And while he might make fun of us, while somebody
inspired by him breaks into our home and hits my
husband in a deadly fashion, hits my husband over the head,
and he thinks that's a riot, I'd rather not go
into some of my other complaints about him right now.
Speaker 5 (14:33):
Oh well, go ahead. I mean, are you holding back, Nancy?
Is that it? Are you holding back? Did you need
time to readjust your dentures?
Speaker 6 (14:45):
Listen?
Speaker 5 (14:46):
I realize that the media told people that you should
be ashamed of laughing that Paul Pelosi, who is nothing
short of a mess This was the guy who was
drooling drunk on the side of the road. He could
have killed someone. And a matter of days later, there's
a dude in his house and they're partially clothed, and
(15:09):
we're supposed to believe that Paul is a victim in
all of this. And everybody was embarrassed and no, yeah,
I'm gonna go ahead and laugh. Yeah, I am.
Speaker 6 (15:21):
Michael Barry's show well music.
Speaker 5 (15:24):
Pelosi managed to win the messaging battle that the Paul
Pelosi situation wasn't creepy and weird. But just like a
lot of other things, I don't believe it. I think
it's a cover up.
Speaker 6 (15:38):
I think it's.
Speaker 5 (15:38):
Very, very, very weird. Of course, I'm the crazy guy
that still questions Michelle and Barack Obama's marriage and his
private life and the things that happened around them, and
how his chef died, and why so many people around
the Clintons die. You're a conspiracy theory. We don't know
(16:00):
what even that means. I don't know what it means.
I just know that every time I'm told I'm not
allowed to think about something or talk about something, and
it's ridiculous and absurd, and it didn't happen. There's no
way it can happen. In three years later, Jake Tapper's
writing a book about it. I After a while, you
start to wonder maybe we should question things more. But
(16:23):
in case you forgot about the Paul Pelosi story coming
soon to a theater near you.
Speaker 13 (16:31):
He was a powerful edge fund manager with an itch
he couldn't scratch.
Speaker 6 (16:35):
You can't just keep coming here when my wife is
away in Washington. I'm a married man.
Speaker 13 (16:40):
His lover, a nwtist from Berkeley who supposedly wrote a
MAGA manifesto even though he also supports Black Lives Matter,
couldn't take no for an answer.
Speaker 14 (16:51):
I love you, Paul, and I need to see you
at two in the morning.
Speaker 13 (16:55):
Tell your security team to let me inside back. But
his wife was away in Washington, DC. She grew suspicious
and called home.
Speaker 10 (17:05):
Who is that naked man I'm seeing on the remote
security footage?
Speaker 6 (17:11):
And where are your pants?
Speaker 13 (17:14):
Don't miss bros too. The Paul Pelosi Story rated PG. Thirteen.
Speaker 5 (17:22):
Since we're talking about Paul Pelosi, do you remember just
before that, when he was busted for dui. We happened
to have the body kim audio of that arrest.
Speaker 6 (17:37):
Mister Pelosi, do you know why I pulled you over?
Because of my life? Wanted to defund it, defunnel. No,
that's not that defund you. No, Sarah, you were speeding
driving a radically they your partner, officer.
Speaker 15 (17:54):
I'm many two years old and i haven't been erotic
in many years.
Speaker 6 (18:01):
Please step out of the car, sir. Okay, sir, how
much have you had to drink tonight?
Speaker 15 (18:11):
I'm married to a dog in gray painting. How much
do you think I've had to drinking? Young man, I've
gotta pee, sir. Let's have a seat in the back
of my cruiser. There you go, watch your head. No,
you watch your head might tell you what to do,
You're not tell me.
Speaker 6 (18:32):
My tell you. I've got a pee. Okay, sir, We're
gonna take you down to the precinct. You'll have to
catch right first copper. You're already in my car, sir.
I'm getting way too old for this wander. Then.
Speaker 5 (18:54):
I do believe that some members of Congress are taking
information they have that is not available to the overall
marketplace in general public and making stock trades on that
and making money that would qualify as inside trading gains.
I also believe the SEC has been reluctant to prosecute
(19:17):
them and should I think it's a crime. I think
most Americans recognize it's going on. Dan Crenshaw, from outside
of Houston, has had a phenomenal return as a stock picker. Well,
that's odd. He didn't have that return before he was
in Congress. What happened? It's almost like he started getting
(19:37):
inside information. He has been criticized for this multiple times.
His defense is I only had twenty thousand dollars to trade. Okay.
An illegal inside trade is an illegal inside trade, whether
you trade a ten dollars stock one of them or
(19:57):
ten million. The point is the source of the information
and the availability of that information to the general public.
If that is information restricted to insiders, that is shared
with you in one way or another, and you trade
upon it before the marketplace has that information, that is cheating.
(20:21):
It is illegal, period, end of story. Congress I believe
is doing it, not every one of them, not every
trade they engage in as such, But isn't it odd
that people enter Congress like Dan Crenshaw and all of
a sudden become very active traders overnight. Gosh, you had
(20:44):
all the time in the world before you got elected.
Now you got a day job and you're trading stocks
all day. Well, that seems odd, doesn't it. Since we're
on the subject of Nancy Pelosi, she wanted to go
on with Ja tap her and not talk about her
insider trading or that of all the other members of Congress,
(21:04):
most of them Democrats, some of them are Republicans. But
she wanted you to know that on the sixtieth anniversary
of Medicare and Medicaid that Democrats were holding a sixty
hour vigil for the sixtieth anniversary of the passage of
a bill. You held a vigil like you were observing
(21:28):
some religious ceremony.
Speaker 6 (21:32):
You creeps, you weirdos.
Speaker 5 (21:34):
It's almost as if legislation and government is your God,
because you are replacing religious rituals related to God and
faith as a way to pay tribute to the state,
(21:57):
to government, almost as is if you worship government having
replaced the church. That's creepy, weird, and completely unsurprising.
Speaker 12 (22:13):
Here's what she said the sixtieth anniversary of Medicaid and
medicare what a triumph, a great pillar of economic and
health security for the American people. We had over the weekend,
carrying across generations initiative of a sixty hour a sixty
hour vigil of all of us taking turns, myself, my daughter,
(22:36):
my granddaughter, and all the rest taking turns over sixty
hours to tell stories of how all of this, well,
all this means in people's lives.
Speaker 6 (22:46):
We since.
Speaker 12 (22:48):
Just since all this has emerged, have had three hundred
thousand calls from our Californians, two people in public health
districts for them to thes to call their their Republican
members of Congress who have voted for this shameful, shameful, dirty, filthy,
(23:09):
stink and lollsey rotten, anything but beautiful act. And now
we are engaged in the Save Medicaid Summer. So today
is the sixtieth analygy. It's something to be very very
proud of. And instead of what the Republicans are doing
to deprive people of access to healthcare who needed so badly,
(23:29):
people with disabilities who needed for the children.
Speaker 6 (23:33):
Let me ask you for the children, for the children. Yes,
to quote name se.
Speaker 5 (23:37):
Pelosi That's how I described her entire life, anything but beautiful.
Speaker 6 (23:42):
Captain some King Wong. Well, something must be right. You
are listening to Michael Barry did get into this yesterday.
Speaker 5 (23:50):
I meant too. It's Trump at his best, and I
really want to focus on what he's done here. Uhi
Trum was talking to Miranda Devine, who is a conservative
influencer commentator.
Speaker 16 (24:07):
I like her.
Speaker 5 (24:09):
The podcast is called pod Force one. It's published by
the New York Post. She's affiliated with the New York Post.
They do good work, I think. And this is Trump
saying something without saying something, saying that he's not saying something,
but actually putting it into the middle of the table
(24:30):
for everybody to look at. It's like in Austin Powers
when he doesn't want to say mole, but he says
mole a hundred times. Trump has a way of saying
something and then he has plausible deniabilities saying I didn't
say put Hillary in prison. What I said was that
people want to put her in prison. I didn't say
(24:52):
I wanted to put her in people want to. But
he knows what he's doing is he's causing the chattering class,
of which we are a part to go off and
requote it in saying Trump's trying about putting Hillary in prison.
And I'm gonna tell you this. I know your thought
is they're never gonna put Hillary in prison. But if
(25:13):
you're Hillary Clinton, you can go on every show and
talk tough. You can claim that he doesn't scare you.
Speaker 6 (25:20):
You know that in the.
Speaker 5 (25:22):
Back of his mind, if Trump gets a chance, he's
putting you in the hoose gal.
Speaker 6 (25:27):
You know it.
Speaker 5 (25:28):
You knew it. And this is not a pleasant thing
for an old hag like that to think about. This
is not a pleasant thing to go to bed thinking about.
The whole country is talking about you going to prison.
And even if some people are arguing that you shouldn't
go to prison, you're being talked about. Is going to prison.
That can't be good, that can't be enjoyable.
Speaker 10 (25:47):
Yeah.
Speaker 17 (25:47):
So, you know, we had Hillary Clinton down to whatever
we wanted to do with it, and I felt it
was inappropriate. She's the wife of a president, she was
a Secretary of State, and we could have done a
very big number. Yeah, and I said, we don't want
to be doing that. Let's, you know, put it into
the country and not the concept of putting her in jail,
(26:08):
indicting her all the things that you have to do,
you know, stuff, stuff, and I said, we don't want
to do that. Do you remember I made speeches When
I mentioned her name, they started, it's at locklock or hockey, yeah,
and I said no, no, this is after we won.
We just want And I said, you want to think
we have to get back to we want to heal.
Speaker 6 (26:26):
And yet they did it to me. Yeah, so I
feel differently.
Speaker 17 (26:29):
I mean, I'm a human being. I have my feelings too,
and so I feel differently about it. Obama, what he
did was terrible, what Brendan did, and Clapper and Calli
and all these lightweights said, I mean the supid people actually,
but what they did and so unnecessary and they made
it really hard. But ultimately, I don't know they toughened
(26:54):
you up. You either learned that you can do that.
How many people can handle that? I've had so many
people said how did you handle that? Every day and
they come up with these different different scams who are
all scams, and they're still doing it.
Speaker 6 (27:06):
You know they're doing it now.
Speaker 5 (27:08):
Since we're talking about genetics, you might not remember a
media that was concerned about the health of an American president.
Four years of Biden's obvious decline and the media showed
zero interest, and the minute he's out, Jake Tapper publishes
a book which he had to have been working on
(27:30):
during that time, where he said, Yeah, everybody knew. Everybody
knew Biden was brain dead and physically dead. Everybody knew it,
you never talked about it. This is from one press
conference with President Trump's physician during his first term. The
credit for this it's a montage comes from a fellow
who posts under the name Mays m Aze on x,
(27:53):
which is Twitter, so if you want to follow him there,
we sometimes use his material.
Speaker 18 (27:57):
It's pretty good, Amy, How a guy who eats McDonald's
and CONTI fried chicks and all.
Speaker 7 (28:02):
Those diet cokes and who never exercises easing as good
a shape as you say in if you mentioned.
Speaker 19 (28:07):
That you view the president a cognitive test, was that
the mini mental state examination.
Speaker 6 (28:12):
Or the full successor and not?
Speaker 19 (28:14):
Can you tell us what specific cognitive tests do you have.
Speaker 6 (28:17):
A life expectancy range for him?
Speaker 13 (28:19):
Based on this results number?
Speaker 4 (28:21):
Is?
Speaker 5 (28:22):
What exactly does the exercise and eating.
Speaker 4 (28:24):
Plan look like?
Speaker 19 (28:24):
Is that you're going to put an elytrical machine next
to the bedroom and you can use it.
Speaker 6 (28:28):
What does that look like?
Speaker 19 (28:29):
And then also number three, did you see any evidence
of bones furst, which the President said that he suffered from.
Speaker 7 (28:34):
There isn't anything that's a part of the president's health
records or is overall physical fitness or any medications that
he's taking that you're not permitted.
Speaker 6 (28:44):
To tell us.
Speaker 7 (28:44):
Is there anything you're keeping from us for privacy reasons?
Speaker 19 (28:47):
Can you say, given that there's scrutiny of what was
overlooked at the time with President drag and in terms
of Alzheimer's and things he was then known to suffer
from at a later date, can you say that whether
the test that you ran once the exclude any of
those things, and what the possibility of overlooking something like
that would be.
Speaker 6 (29:05):
Are you shnfident of his prostate health? You recited a
very low psa.
Speaker 7 (29:11):
You're certain that's not a product of finaster admasking.
Speaker 6 (29:13):
It's a waste measurement for the president his weight.
Speaker 19 (29:15):
I think he's a two thirty nine, right, that's it.
Speaker 6 (29:18):
It's just shy of obesity.
Speaker 16 (29:20):
In continuing his physicals in the future, will you also
continue to found me to test.
Speaker 20 (29:24):
Is that recommended that fos baby bloomers gets screened for
hepatitis seed?
Speaker 6 (29:28):
Did you do a f SEA test.
Speaker 7 (29:29):
Or has he had one previously?
Speaker 12 (29:30):
He's talked a little bit about his diet here at
the White House.
Speaker 6 (29:33):
Can you flush that out a little bit?
Speaker 19 (29:35):
What specifically is eating is eating lots of chicken and.
Speaker 6 (29:38):
Fishes and white meat.
Speaker 19 (29:40):
And also does he take any sleep aits but basic
whether your prediction of good health and no serious events
for years to come still fold if the President does
not make changes to his diet.
Speaker 7 (29:50):
And start to exercise, is that still your.
Speaker 5 (29:52):
Professional medical opinion?
Speaker 19 (29:54):
And then also can you just tell us how long
the examination was or to start to finish, how many
people were involved.
Speaker 14 (29:58):
Was there anything that the President or anyone else specifically
said for you not to mention today. Some of the
President's friends have told the poors in the past they
think he's a germophobe, that he washes his hands obsessively
and is concerned about that.
Speaker 6 (30:11):
You've seen any indication of that type.
Speaker 16 (30:13):
Of behavior with how he characterized the President's help to
an average seventy one year old American mail, he has
evidence of heart disease, any borderline OBEs. Can you characterize
it as excellent help?
Speaker 6 (30:23):
There's the president.
Speaker 7 (30:24):
When the President has called out to via the next visible,
will you be seated?
Speaker 16 (30:28):
There's been a lot of speculation out out there about
his cognitive state. Did he express any change in how
stressful this job or lack of stress.
Speaker 7 (30:37):
That he has experienced as a result of becoming president.
Speaker 16 (30:40):
Would you take us through some specific exercises that you
and the president are considering.
Speaker 19 (30:44):
The seated sort of aspect of helpion watching versus the
active lifestyle.
Speaker 6 (30:48):
Quite a bit.
Speaker 19 (30:48):
All the doctors and clinicians all across the country who
have seen it in this president, they see symptoms of
this that THEA said here. You're not sure how much
did you get tonight.
Speaker 7 (30:57):
But you assume that the three four fives?
Speaker 5 (31:00):
Does that concern you?
Speaker 14 (31:01):
And does this president ask you about how he could
follow his predecess's example to be as fitch as Barack
Obama was?
Speaker 7 (31:09):
Doesn't take any medications that you haven't disclosed here today.
Give us an idea of exactly what that cognitive exam
involved over that half hour, and does that conclusively roll
out any further psychological exam?
Speaker 18 (31:20):
There are other questions I asked you about the president's
emotional health. Is there anyone on the president's medical team,
such as a psychiatrist or psychologist whose job it is
to monitor the president's emotional state or watch for potential
psychiatric problems or indicators of those that they can.
Speaker 20 (31:39):
Expect the president to be in good health for the
duration of his terms or even a second term if
he gets it. Was there specific request from the president
to make that statement or from anyone in the administration
or anyone in White House.
Speaker 16 (31:52):
One more question about the new Montreal exam and others.
Sort of many mental status exams, but pretty good, but
they're not really sensitive. Some very high functioning, they're not
really good at finding.
Speaker 6 (32:03):
Early stages that they're mentioning.
Speaker 16 (32:05):
If the president's worried about it, would you recommend more
sophisticated exams.
Speaker 7 (32:09):
Could you have a sense of how involve a first
family as the first Lady, his daughter, others encouraging him
to the step up on the exercise.
Speaker 5 (32:20):
Now that was President Trump's first term and the media
obsessed over his health. Now here's a montage of the
media asking questions about Joe Biden's health. Of Joe Biden's
physician
It's that time, time, time, time, luck and load. Michael
Very show is on the air.
Speaker 2 (00:14):
Right, not that easy trust doct disease that everyone mixed up.
You think my proctology is used to be a photographer. Hey,
he took X ray told me to bend over and
say cheese.
Speaker 3 (00:27):
While we didn't know that much about Joe Biden's health,
we know even less about Donald Trump's health. He was
completely untransparent during the twenty twenty three eight twenty twenty
four campaign. He has not been transparent.
Speaker 4 (00:40):
Then we're in the midst of a presidential cover up
of Donald Trump's mental and physical condition. And it's his
doctors aren't part of the cover up under his orders
that much we know that makes his fact, but it
is essential. But Republicans especially, and I've talked to some
Republicans on the heel, and indeed they are Republicans in
the Senate who are furious, concerned, worried about the president's
(01:04):
mental health, physical health, and they too want some disclosure
of what the real facts are here. But it's time
for them to step up and demand because we've never
had a presidential crisis of leadership such as this. We
don't know what damage may have been done. We don't
know the test to his vital signs. We need full
(01:25):
disclosure and immediately the real possibility that this is a
time that the twenty fifth Amendment needs to be considered.
This is a cover up. It is a cover up
clearly directed by the President of the United States, whose
closest aids in the in the White House and his family.
There are people in the national security of bureaucracy who
are terribly worried about what is going on in terms
(01:48):
of America's adversaries and particularly the Russians and the Chinese
taking advantage of this situation.
Speaker 5 (01:54):
It's ongoing.
Speaker 4 (01:55):
I believe Director Ray is very very the FBI is
very concerned about the President's health, mental and physical, and
how it is undermining this lack of disclosure the national
security interests in this trunk that.
Speaker 6 (02:08):
He doesn't have heart disease. She said, he doesn't have
heart disease.
Speaker 7 (02:11):
Yes, before that shows coorinary.
Speaker 6 (02:15):
But yes, I think so.
Speaker 7 (02:17):
Technically he has non clinical athroscratic cornary corniathroscorosis.
Speaker 8 (02:24):
Some of is maybe Samante Sanderson, I mean, you've heard
these terms before, cornary athoscrosis, coronary art disease, heart disease.
People use these terms interchangeably. And you know, I think
what the test has shown that he does have a
mild form common form of heart disese.
Speaker 5 (02:41):
Isn't a seventy nine years old. If he didn't have
any plaque in his arteries, he would be a freak
of nature. What does it matter? It doesn't, doesn't. It's
as simple as that. These are not people concerned for
his health. These are not people who love him. There's
not people who are wishing the best for him. They're
(03:02):
rooting for his success. These are not people concerned that
let's make sure we get him the best medical care.
He is the president of all of US and our nation.
He's negotiating great deals, like the new deal with South Korea,
which is in America's best interest. These are not people
(03:23):
who wish him well and wish our country well.
Speaker 6 (03:26):
These are evil people.
Speaker 5 (03:28):
Saying evil things, and they are not to be trusted
or believed. They're silly and absurd. You shouldn't do business
with them, you shouldn't hire them, you shouldn't marry them,
you shouldn't associate with them. You can't fix them. They
are sick people. They are disturbed people. I don't have
to tell you that they didn't ask any questions about
(03:48):
Joe Biden's health. I don't have to tell you that
they weren't concerned that Joe Biden was selling our country
to the Chinese, to the Ukrainians.
Speaker 6 (03:59):
I don't have to tell you all.
Speaker 5 (04:00):
The evil they stood by and watched him do and
then wrote books about it afterwards, as if they weren't
part of it all, when in fact they were. Nancy
Pelosi is an evil human being, and Donald Trump is
having a blast exposing her for who and what she is.
He has called for an investigation into what every American
(04:21):
wants to know. How does Nancy Pelosi become a multi
millionaire on one hundred and seventy five thousand dollars a
year salary.
Speaker 9 (04:29):
I like it conceptually, and you know, Nancy Pelosi became
rich by having inside information. She made a fortune with
her husband, and I think that's disgraceful.
Speaker 6 (04:40):
So in that sense, i'd like it, but I'd have to.
Speaker 9 (04:42):
Really see the you know, I study these things very carefully,
and this just happened, so I'll take a look at it.
But conceptually I like it, and what I do think
is Nancy Pelosi should be investigated because what she has
the highest return of anybody practically in the history of
Wall Street save a few.
Speaker 6 (05:04):
And how did that happen.
Speaker 9 (05:06):
It happened by she knows exactly what's going to happen,
what's going.
Speaker 6 (05:09):
To be announced, you by stock, and then the sock goes.
Speaker 9 (05:11):
Up after the announcements made, and she had to be investigated.
Speaker 6 (05:18):
She should be investigated again.
Speaker 5 (05:23):
This is the whole point. We're talking about things bigger
than today's news or tomorrow's news or yesterday's news. We're
talking about whether the people in our government are selling secrets.
We're talking about whether the people in our government are
committing crimes. You know, the reason Pete Rose was hammered
(05:47):
so hard was if the fans believe that the game
is rigged, then the game is over. I think he
should have been forgiven, should have been fairness toward him,
and eventually there will be, but unfortunately he won't get
to see it. The reason it's so important to preserve
(06:10):
not just the integrity of the game, but the perception
of integrity of the game, is that when people no
longer believe there is integrity in the game, they stop
watching President Trump understands that the moment people no longer
trust that the government can be exposed and fixed, they
(06:33):
stop voting. And that's what the left wants. They want
you convinced that you can't fix this. It's too big,
it's too broad. That's what they told us about illegal immigration. Remember,
you can't stop illegal immigration. It's multi pronged. There're too
many people involved. It's too far, far flung. You can't
(06:56):
do anything about it. So just accept it and let
it get a hond Town's worse. So Nancy Pelosi is
very unhappy. We're going to talk about wat Michael Mary Show.
President Trump did not come to the Nancy Pelosi undo
(07:20):
self dealing point lightly. He's been on this for a while.
Back in May, he was on Meet the Press with
Kristen Welker when he said basically the same thing.
Speaker 10 (07:35):
If I own stock in something and I do a
good job and the stock market goes up, I guess
I'm profiting. But who really profits to somebody like Nancy
Pelosi who uses inside information. She worked for one hundred
and seventy five thousand dollars a year, and that's at
the high end, and she's worth one.
Speaker 6 (07:55):
Hundred and fifty two hundred million dollars.
Speaker 10 (07:58):
Okay, you gotta look at Nancy, and you ought to
look at some of these politicians at a.
Speaker 6 (08:02):
Stone called crooks.
Speaker 10 (08:04):
I was very wealthy when I came in being president.
I probably cost me money if you really look.
Speaker 5 (08:11):
Martha Stewart went to prison for five months for Technically
she didn't go to prison for insider trading, and as
is often the case, when the government can't prove the charge,
(08:33):
they use something during the investigation to hang you up.
So she was charged with obstruction of justice and lying
to investigators. The stocking question was called m Clone. I
am clone. She was friends with the founder, and I
(08:54):
believe he was chairman and president of the company at
the time. It was a relatively minimal amount of money
that was salvaged from the trade, so we're not talking
about an earth shattering amount of money the case of
insider trading. I know you know this, but sometimes I
(09:18):
think we talk over our audience and so people may
not grasp one hundred percent of what we're saying. So
let me try to bring that down to a very
simple level that I can understand. Let's say Ramone is
the CEO of a company, and that company is a
public company, so you have shareholders out there. It's traded
on the New York Stock Exchange.
Speaker 6 (09:39):
Make this easy.
Speaker 5 (09:41):
And Ramone lives next door to me. So Ramone and
I are sitting out and he's barbecuing, which he does
do that's not hypothetical. And while we're out there, he says,
I'm going to be leaving the company in a week.
I go, oh, no, you love the company. What's wrong. Well,
we've got some real any bad stuff that's going to
(10:01):
be revealed in a couple of weeks that I want
to leave before it is revealed. It's going to be very,
very bad. Our stock price is currently thirty dollars. It's
going to go down to probably five dollars. Okay, So
if I own a thousand shares of that stock, I've
got thirty thousand dollars in holdings of Ramon's company stock,
(10:27):
and it's going to go from thirty down to five.
My thirty thousand's going to be worth five thousand. So
I profited, which it's the equivalent of profiting if I
prevented a loss of twenty five thousand, or we flip that.
Ramon could say my company just got a patent on
a new drug.
Speaker 6 (10:48):
We're going to.
Speaker 5 (10:49):
Reveal that in a week, and our stock is going
to go from thirty dollars a share to one thousand
dollars a share, and you should buy all the stock
you can right now. If that information is not public,
if it has not been released publicly, either by the
company in their stock filings or by the media, then
(11:10):
it is insider information. The only people who would know
it are people who are have key control inside positions.
The public doesn't have equal access to that information the
way the public does with information that is provided by
the media or their filings with the SEC. So to
(11:33):
trade on that information is to trade on inside information,
which makes you insider trading. That is a seriously taken crime. Now,
if you are the Speaker of the House, a senior
governmental official, you are aware of investigations, you are aware
(11:58):
of patent applications, you are aware of all sorts of
information that the public does not have access to. I
do not believe that members of the government of all
three branches should be allowed to trade stocks at all period,
(12:18):
end of story. I think that when you go into
public life, just as you make financial filings, you should
be required to put your holdings in a blind trust.
We are asking for people to break the law on this.
The problem is these are people who break the law
and are never prosecuted because they both make and break
(12:38):
the law. Well as luck would have it. Nancy Pelosi
was on CNN. It was the sixtieth anniversary of Lyndon Johnson,
of Lyndon Johnson's Medicare Medicaid government giveaway program, and she
goes on with Jake Tapper to talk about that, and
Jake Tapper asks her about what Donald Trump said, and
(13:01):
she is not happy.
Speaker 11 (13:03):
This afternoon, President Trump mentioned you, and he made an
allegation about your investments. I want to roll that clip
and then give you a chance to respond. Seemed to
be having some sort of indy. Yeah, let me just
read what he said. I'm sorry that we had some
sort of technolistion. Nancy pelosih became rich.
Speaker 12 (13:20):
I might have to read that. We're here to talk
about the sixtieth anniversary of Medicaid. That's what I agreed to.
Speaker 6 (13:26):
Come to talk.
Speaker 12 (13:27):
Yeah, but I want what that means in the election.
Speaker 11 (13:29):
I wanted to give you a chances to respond. He
accused you of insider trading. What's your response to that.
Speaker 12 (13:34):
That's very ridiculous. In fact, I very much support the
stop the trading of members of coms. Not that I
think anybody's.
Speaker 6 (13:42):
Doing anything long.
Speaker 12 (13:42):
If they are, they are prosecuted and they go to jail.
But because of the confidence that it stills in American
people don't worry about this. But I have no concern
about the obvious investments that had been made over to
I'm not into it. My husband is, but it isn't
(14:03):
anything to do with anything insider her. But the president
has his own exposure, so he's always projecting. He's always projecting,
and let's not give him any more time on that.
Speaker 6 (14:12):
Please.
Speaker 12 (14:13):
We're going forward here, and I'm very proud of my family.
And while he might make fun of us, while somebody
inspired by him breaks into our home and hits my
husband in a deadly fashion, hits my husband over the head,
and he thinks that's a riot, I'd rather not go
into some of my other complaints about him right now.
Speaker 5 (14:33):
Oh well, go ahead. I mean, are you holding back, Nancy?
Is that it? Are you holding back? Did you need
time to readjust your dentures?
Speaker 6 (14:45):
Listen?
Speaker 5 (14:46):
I realize that the media told people that you should
be ashamed of laughing that Paul Pelosi, who is nothing
short of a mess This was the guy who was
drooling drunk on the side of the road. He could
have killed someone. And a matter of days later, there's
a dude in his house and they're partially clothed, and
(15:09):
we're supposed to believe that Paul is a victim in
all of this. And everybody was embarrassed and no, yeah,
I'm gonna go ahead and laugh. Yeah, I am.
Speaker 6 (15:21):
Michael Barry's show well music.
Speaker 5 (15:24):
Pelosi managed to win the messaging battle that the Paul
Pelosi situation wasn't creepy and weird. But just like a
lot of other things, I don't believe it. I think
it's a cover up.
Speaker 6 (15:38):
I think it's.
Speaker 5 (15:38):
Very, very, very weird. Of course, I'm the crazy guy
that still questions Michelle and Barack Obama's marriage and his
private life and the things that happened around them, and
how his chef died, and why so many people around
the Clintons die. You're a conspiracy theory. We don't know
(16:00):
what even that means. I don't know what it means.
I just know that every time I'm told I'm not
allowed to think about something or talk about something, and
it's ridiculous and absurd, and it didn't happen. There's no
way it can happen. In three years later, Jake Tapper's
writing a book about it. I After a while, you
start to wonder maybe we should question things more. But
(16:23):
in case you forgot about the Paul Pelosi story coming
soon to a theater near you.
Speaker 13 (16:31):
He was a powerful edge fund manager with an itch
he couldn't scratch.
Speaker 6 (16:35):
You can't just keep coming here when my wife is
away in Washington. I'm a married man.
Speaker 13 (16:40):
His lover, a nwtist from Berkeley who supposedly wrote a
MAGA manifesto even though he also supports Black Lives Matter,
couldn't take no for an answer.
Speaker 14 (16:51):
I love you, Paul, and I need to see you
at two in the morning.
Speaker 13 (16:55):
Tell your security team to let me inside back. But
his wife was away in Washington, DC. She grew suspicious
and called home.
Speaker 10 (17:05):
Who is that naked man I'm seeing on the remote
security footage?
Speaker 6 (17:11):
And where are your pants?
Speaker 13 (17:14):
Don't miss bros too. The Paul Pelosi Story rated PG. Thirteen.
Speaker 5 (17:22):
Since we're talking about Paul Pelosi, do you remember just
before that, when he was busted for dui. We happened
to have the body kim audio of that arrest.
Speaker 6 (17:37):
Mister Pelosi, do you know why I pulled you over?
Because of my life? Wanted to defund it, defunnel. No,
that's not that defund you. No, Sarah, you were speeding
driving a radically they your partner, officer.
Speaker 15 (17:54):
I'm many two years old and i haven't been erotic
in many years.
Speaker 6 (18:01):
Please step out of the car, sir. Okay, sir, how
much have you had to drink tonight?
Speaker 15 (18:11):
I'm married to a dog in gray painting. How much
do you think I've had to drinking? Young man, I've
gotta pee, sir. Let's have a seat in the back
of my cruiser. There you go, watch your head. No,
you watch your head might tell you what to do,
You're not tell me.
Speaker 6 (18:32):
My tell you. I've got a pee. Okay, sir, We're
gonna take you down to the precinct. You'll have to
catch right first copper. You're already in my car, sir.
I'm getting way too old for this wander. Then.
Speaker 5 (18:54):
I do believe that some members of Congress are taking
information they have that is not available to the overall
marketplace in general public and making stock trades on that
and making money that would qualify as inside trading gains.
I also believe the SEC has been reluctant to prosecute
(19:17):
them and should I think it's a crime. I think
most Americans recognize it's going on. Dan Crenshaw, from outside
of Houston, has had a phenomenal return as a stock picker. Well,
that's odd. He didn't have that return before he was
in Congress. What happened? It's almost like he started getting
(19:37):
inside information. He has been criticized for this multiple times.
His defense is I only had twenty thousand dollars to trade. Okay.
An illegal inside trade is an illegal inside trade, whether
you trade a ten dollars stock one of them or
(19:57):
ten million. The point is the source of the information
and the availability of that information to the general public.
If that is information restricted to insiders, that is shared
with you in one way or another, and you trade
upon it before the marketplace has that information, that is cheating.
(20:21):
It is illegal, period, end of story. Congress I believe
is doing it, not every one of them, not every
trade they engage in as such, But isn't it odd
that people enter Congress like Dan Crenshaw and all of
a sudden become very active traders overnight. Gosh, you had
(20:44):
all the time in the world before you got elected.
Now you got a day job and you're trading stocks
all day. Well, that seems odd, doesn't it. Since we're
on the subject of Nancy Pelosi, she wanted to go
on with Ja tap her and not talk about her
insider trading or that of all the other members of Congress,
(21:04):
most of them Democrats, some of them are Republicans. But
she wanted you to know that on the sixtieth anniversary
of Medicare and Medicaid that Democrats were holding a sixty
hour vigil for the sixtieth anniversary of the passage of
a bill. You held a vigil like you were observing
(21:28):
some religious ceremony.
Speaker 6 (21:32):
You creeps, you weirdos.
Speaker 5 (21:34):
It's almost as if legislation and government is your God,
because you are replacing religious rituals related to God and
faith as a way to pay tribute to the state,
(21:57):
to government, almost as is if you worship government having
replaced the church. That's creepy, weird, and completely unsurprising.
Speaker 12 (22:13):
Here's what she said the sixtieth anniversary of Medicaid and
medicare what a triumph, a great pillar of economic and
health security for the American people. We had over the weekend,
carrying across generations initiative of a sixty hour a sixty
hour vigil of all of us taking turns, myself, my daughter,
(22:36):
my granddaughter, and all the rest taking turns over sixty
hours to tell stories of how all of this, well,
all this means in people's lives.
Speaker 6 (22:46):
We since.
Speaker 12 (22:48):
Just since all this has emerged, have had three hundred
thousand calls from our Californians, two people in public health
districts for them to thes to call their their Republican
members of Congress who have voted for this shameful, shameful, dirty, filthy,
(23:09):
stink and lollsey rotten, anything but beautiful act. And now
we are engaged in the Save Medicaid Summer. So today
is the sixtieth analygy. It's something to be very very
proud of. And instead of what the Republicans are doing
to deprive people of access to healthcare who needed so badly,
(23:29):
people with disabilities who needed for the children.
Speaker 6 (23:33):
Let me ask you for the children, for the children. Yes,
to quote name se.
Speaker 5 (23:37):
Pelosi That's how I described her entire life, anything but beautiful.
Speaker 6 (23:42):
Captain some King Wong. Well, something must be right. You
are listening to Michael Barry did get into this yesterday.
Speaker 5 (23:50):
I meant too. It's Trump at his best, and I
really want to focus on what he's done here. Uhi
Trum was talking to Miranda Devine, who is a conservative
influencer commentator.
Speaker 16 (24:07):
I like her.
Speaker 5 (24:09):
The podcast is called pod Force one. It's published by
the New York Post. She's affiliated with the New York Post.
They do good work, I think. And this is Trump
saying something without saying something, saying that he's not saying something,
but actually putting it into the middle of the table
(24:30):
for everybody to look at. It's like in Austin Powers
when he doesn't want to say mole, but he says
mole a hundred times. Trump has a way of saying
something and then he has plausible deniabilities saying I didn't
say put Hillary in prison. What I said was that
people want to put her in prison. I didn't say
(24:52):
I wanted to put her in people want to. But
he knows what he's doing is he's causing the chattering class,
of which we are a part to go off and
requote it in saying Trump's trying about putting Hillary in prison.
And I'm gonna tell you this. I know your thought
is they're never gonna put Hillary in prison. But if
(25:13):
you're Hillary Clinton, you can go on every show and
talk tough. You can claim that he doesn't scare you.
Speaker 6 (25:20):
You know that in the.
Speaker 5 (25:22):
Back of his mind, if Trump gets a chance, he's
putting you in the hoose gal.
Speaker 6 (25:27):
You know it.
Speaker 5 (25:28):
You knew it. And this is not a pleasant thing
for an old hag like that to think about. This
is not a pleasant thing to go to bed thinking about.
The whole country is talking about you going to prison.
And even if some people are arguing that you shouldn't
go to prison, you're being talked about. Is going to prison.
That can't be good, that can't be enjoyable.
Speaker 10 (25:47):
Yeah.
Speaker 17 (25:47):
So, you know, we had Hillary Clinton down to whatever
we wanted to do with it, and I felt it
was inappropriate. She's the wife of a president, she was
a Secretary of State, and we could have done a
very big number. Yeah, and I said, we don't want
to be doing that. Let's, you know, put it into
the country and not the concept of putting her in jail,
(26:08):
indicting her all the things that you have to do,
you know, stuff, stuff, and I said, we don't want
to do that. Do you remember I made speeches When
I mentioned her name, they started, it's at locklock or hockey, yeah,
and I said no, no, this is after we won.
We just want And I said, you want to think
we have to get back to we want to heal.
Speaker 6 (26:26):
And yet they did it to me. Yeah, so I
feel differently.
Speaker 17 (26:29):
I mean, I'm a human being. I have my feelings too,
and so I feel differently about it. Obama, what he
did was terrible, what Brendan did, and Clapper and Calli
and all these lightweights said, I mean the supid people actually,
but what they did and so unnecessary and they made
it really hard. But ultimately, I don't know they toughened
(26:54):
you up. You either learned that you can do that.
How many people can handle that? I've had so many
people said how did you handle that? Every day and
they come up with these different different scams who are
all scams, and they're still doing it.
Speaker 6 (27:06):
You know they're doing it now.
Speaker 5 (27:08):
Since we're talking about genetics, you might not remember a
media that was concerned about the health of an American president.
Four years of Biden's obvious decline and the media showed
zero interest, and the minute he's out, Jake Tapper publishes
a book which he had to have been working on
(27:30):
during that time, where he said, Yeah, everybody knew. Everybody
knew Biden was brain dead and physically dead. Everybody knew it,
you never talked about it. This is from one press
conference with President Trump's physician during his first term. The
credit for this it's a montage comes from a fellow
who posts under the name Mays m Aze on x,
(27:53):
which is Twitter, so if you want to follow him there,
we sometimes use his material.
Speaker 18 (27:57):
It's pretty good, Amy, How a guy who eats McDonald's
and CONTI fried chicks and all.
Speaker 7 (28:02):
Those diet cokes and who never exercises easing as good
a shape as you say in if you mentioned.
Speaker 19 (28:07):
That you view the president a cognitive test, was that
the mini mental state examination.
Speaker 6 (28:12):
Or the full successor and not?
Speaker 19 (28:14):
Can you tell us what specific cognitive tests do you have.
Speaker 6 (28:17):
A life expectancy range for him?
Speaker 13 (28:19):
Based on this results number?
Speaker 4 (28:21):
Is?
Speaker 5 (28:22):
What exactly does the exercise and eating.
Speaker 4 (28:24):
Plan look like?
Speaker 19 (28:24):
Is that you're going to put an elytrical machine next
to the bedroom and you can use it.
Speaker 6 (28:28):
What does that look like?
Speaker 19 (28:29):
And then also number three, did you see any evidence
of bones furst, which the President said that he suffered from.
Speaker 7 (28:34):
There isn't anything that's a part of the president's health
records or is overall physical fitness or any medications that
he's taking that you're not permitted.
Speaker 6 (28:44):
To tell us.
Speaker 7 (28:44):
Is there anything you're keeping from us for privacy reasons?
Speaker 19 (28:47):
Can you say, given that there's scrutiny of what was
overlooked at the time with President drag and in terms
of Alzheimer's and things he was then known to suffer
from at a later date, can you say that whether
the test that you ran once the exclude any of
those things, and what the possibility of overlooking something like
that would be.
Speaker 6 (29:05):
Are you shnfident of his prostate health? You recited a
very low psa.
Speaker 7 (29:11):
You're certain that's not a product of finaster admasking.
Speaker 6 (29:13):
It's a waste measurement for the president his weight.
Speaker 19 (29:15):
I think he's a two thirty nine, right, that's it.
Speaker 6 (29:18):
It's just shy of obesity.
Speaker 16 (29:20):
In continuing his physicals in the future, will you also
continue to found me to test.
Speaker 20 (29:24):
Is that recommended that fos baby bloomers gets screened for
hepatitis seed?
Speaker 6 (29:28):
Did you do a f SEA test.
Speaker 7 (29:29):
Or has he had one previously?
Speaker 12 (29:30):
He's talked a little bit about his diet here at
the White House.
Speaker 6 (29:33):
Can you flush that out a little bit?
Speaker 19 (29:35):
What specifically is eating is eating lots of chicken and.
Speaker 6 (29:38):
Fishes and white meat.
Speaker 19 (29:40):
And also does he take any sleep aits but basic
whether your prediction of good health and no serious events
for years to come still fold if the President does
not make changes to his diet.
Speaker 7 (29:50):
And start to exercise, is that still your.
Speaker 5 (29:52):
Professional medical opinion?
Speaker 19 (29:54):
And then also can you just tell us how long
the examination was or to start to finish, how many
people were involved.
Speaker 14 (29:58):
Was there anything that the President or anyone else specifically
said for you not to mention today. Some of the
President's friends have told the poors in the past they
think he's a germophobe, that he washes his hands obsessively
and is concerned about that.
Speaker 6 (30:11):
You've seen any indication of that type.
Speaker 16 (30:13):
Of behavior with how he characterized the President's help to
an average seventy one year old American mail, he has
evidence of heart disease, any borderline OBEs. Can you characterize
it as excellent help?
Speaker 6 (30:23):
There's the president.
Speaker 7 (30:24):
When the President has called out to via the next visible,
will you be seated?
Speaker 16 (30:28):
There's been a lot of speculation out out there about
his cognitive state. Did he express any change in how
stressful this job or lack of stress.
Speaker 7 (30:37):
That he has experienced as a result of becoming president.
Speaker 16 (30:40):
Would you take us through some specific exercises that you
and the president are considering.
Speaker 19 (30:44):
The seated sort of aspect of helpion watching versus the
active lifestyle.
Speaker 6 (30:48):
Quite a bit.
Speaker 19 (30:48):
All the doctors and clinicians all across the country who
have seen it in this president, they see symptoms of
this that THEA said here. You're not sure how much
did you get tonight.
Speaker 7 (30:57):
But you assume that the three four fives?
Speaker 5 (31:00):
Does that concern you?
Speaker 14 (31:01):
And does this president ask you about how he could
follow his predecess's example to be as fitch as Barack
Obama was?
Speaker 7 (31:09):
Doesn't take any medications that you haven't disclosed here today.
Give us an idea of exactly what that cognitive exam
involved over that half hour, and does that conclusively roll
out any further psychological exam?
Speaker 18 (31:20):
There are other questions I asked you about the president's
emotional health. Is there anyone on the president's medical team,
such as a psychiatrist or psychologist whose job it is
to monitor the president's emotional state or watch for potential
psychiatric problems or indicators of those that they can.
Speaker 20 (31:39):
Expect the president to be in good health for the
duration of his terms or even a second term if
he gets it. Was there specific request from the president
to make that statement or from anyone in the administration
or anyone in White House.
Speaker 16 (31:52):
One more question about the new Montreal exam and others.
Sort of many mental status exams, but pretty good, but
they're not really sensitive. Some very high functioning, they're not
really good at finding.
Speaker 6 (32:03):
Early stages that they're mentioning.
Speaker 16 (32:05):
If the president's worried about it, would you recommend more
sophisticated exams.
Speaker 7 (32:09):
Could you have a sense of how involve a first
family as the first Lady, his daughter, others encouraging him
to the step up on the exercise.
Speaker 5 (32:20):
Now that was President Trump's first term and the media
obsessed over his health. Now here's a montage of the
media asking questions about Joe Biden's health. Of Joe Biden's
physician
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.