“The Viral Load” with Tiffany Hobbs & Rehashed ‘Diddy’ Allegations

ICYMI: Hour Three of ‘Later, with Mo’Kelly’ Presents – An in-depth analysis of the most viral stories of the week in “The Viral Load” with regular guest contributor Tiffany Hobbs weighing in on everything from a new restaurant in St. Louis that’s going viral because of its age restriction policy, to retired NFL player, Jason Kelce going viral for admitting that he doesn't wash his feet…PLUS – Thoughts on an online news outlets attempt to rehash old reports that claimed music mogul Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs allegedly ordered a hit on rapper/actor Tupac - on KFI AM 640…Live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app

Episode Transcript

(00:00):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kellyon demand from KFI AM six forty.
Now it's Sun with Tiffany b BCamleta with Jilly. She'll talk about the
time this on social media. Littleby Lone with Tiffany Hubbs, can't I

(00:28):
am sixty Later with Keller. Welove everybody. iHeartRadio app and let me
get out of the way because TiffanyHobbs is here with the viral load.
Gosh, Eric Lesarto, thank youso very much. That fantastic. I
am so honored to have a songby Eric Lezardo. I spoke to him
on X. I reached out andhe reached back and we talked a little

(00:52):
bit, and I didn't expect thisso quickly, and I'm thrilled that I
have it, So thank you somuch, Eric, This was wonderful.
All right, let's get into ourstories. So the very first story is
about a restaurant in Saint Louis andit deals with an age restriction policy.
There are age restriction policies all aroundthe country. You might have noticed in

(01:12):
certain areas. There may be arestriction policy at your local movie theater.
People under a certain age, usuallyeighteen can't attend the movie theater without a
chaperone. Over eighteen. Malls aredoing this. This has been present at
clubs and different sorts of social venues. Well, a restaurant has now taken
it upon themselves to try and mitigatewhat they feel is a problem with patrons

(01:38):
who bring a certain level of toxicity. This restaurant is called Bliss Again.
It's in Saint Louis, Missouri,and they're going viral because of their new
age restriction policy that says women mustbe thirty years old to enter, and
men get this, must be thirtyfive what like they're running for president?

(02:02):
Like they're running for president. Youcannot be president and you cannot enter this
restaurant if you are under thirty fiveyears old and mail. The quote from
the owner says, we don't haveto worry about the young folks who bring
that drama. So this is theirattempt to mitigate what they feel is this
ongoing drama issues, whatever it maybe in their establishment. I'm all for

(02:25):
it, and capitalism will decide.If people want to support the restaurant,
they will, If they don't,they won't. Of course, the internet
is divide it. You have peoplelike you mo who are in full support
of this, who say that theyhave noticed that there's a certain level of
immaturity and amongst patrons who are ofa certain age or perceived to be a
certain age, so they would likethis restriction in place. And then there

(02:47):
are others who are saying that thisis agist at its core, and that
you should give people the opportunity todine at your restaurant, that not everyone
should be painted with the same brush, YadA YadA. Look, we're not
talking about a civil rights violation here. We're talking about winning a car at
the age of twenty five. We'retalking about, like you said, going

(03:08):
to the movies at the age ofif you have to be you have to
be with the chaperone. Shopping malls, it's the same thing, and I
go out. I don't want tohave to deal with knuckleheads, and by
and large, knuckleheads spend less moneythan the older folks. They do,
they hang around more, and theycan cause issues. I think this also

(03:30):
says something about the idea that menand women mature at different rates, because
women, again are allowed to bethirty, whereas men have to be a
whole whopping five years older. Toenter. Not only that, if there's
going to be a fight, it'snot going to be the women. Most
likely it's going to be the men. Well, social media might tell you
otherwise nowadays, but in a restaurantsituation, I'm expecting it's going to be

(03:53):
the men before the women. Probably. Let's get into another story. A
few weeks ago I talked to youabout something called a trad wife. Trad
wife short for traditional wife. There'sa movement on social media. It's gone
viral across multiple platforms where women aretaking to their platforms and uploading videos of

(04:14):
them engaging and what they feel istraditional wife behavior, very stereotypical cooking,
cleaning. They're dressed kind of inthis style reminiscent of the fifties with the
apron and everything. It's very it'svery that right. Well, there's a
woman who is a well known TikTokerand she's a trad wife. This is

(04:36):
what she's done. She's been uploadingvideo after video and pushing this platform or
pushing this ideology. Well, inone of her recent videos, this woman
dropped the inWORD. Now, thisis why this is problematic. She is
white, she is a trad wifeand she was talking about cooking, and

(05:00):
in the middle of this diatribe aboutcooking or whatever she was saying, she
referred to her friend's husbands as brokea inwards. Just right that, just
like that, right there on thevideo in front of her fifty thousand plus
TikTok followers. Let me defend herbecause she wants to be a traditional wife

(05:21):
from the nineteen fifties or so.That is consistent with that. She took
it back to Alabama nineteen fifty nine. She did. That's a great point.
Perhaps she was costplaying, and shedid it very well. She definitely
held that integrity. Yep. Butthis is twenty twenty four, and you
can be held accountable and swiftly onsocial media. Because people then contacted her

(05:45):
employer. Because people don't keep anythingsecret nowadays. We put all of our
business out there, so where sheworked was known to her fifty thousand plus
followers. They contacted the employer,and the employer as of Tuesday evening or
Tuesday, has fired her. HerTikTok has been taken down. But she
is doubling down. She is notapologizing. She is thanking the people who

(06:10):
are upset and saying that you havenow made her a right wing superstar.
I have a rhetorical question here.If it's about being a traditional wife,
why would she have a social mediapresence, why would she have a job.
I'm old enough to remember the ideaof a traditional wife, going back
to Harrison, Butker had to behad to be a homemaker and was not

(06:33):
speaking unless spoken to. I mean, if you really want to have that
conversation, Yeah, it's moving thegoalpost. It is appealing to this stage
in our social media world and peopleare wanting to again present themselves as one
thing. But unless you see it, does it really happen? And that's

(06:57):
kind of what social media is about, right, depends on views and exposure.
So unless you see it, unlessyou are engaging with this content,
does it actually exist. It's kindof like the proverbial tree in the forest.
I was aware of the story,I saw the story, but it
doesn't change my life. And clearlyshe's trying to use this as a stepping
stone to something else, which againgoes against the archetype of a trag wife.

(07:23):
It does, and again it goesagainst what is happening currently because there's
this idea and you've spoken about thisa lot more about cancel culture. Does
it exist? Does it not exist? Well, there are ramifications to this.
You can say whatever you want.There's free speech, and she doubles
down on this, This is myfree speech. And that's not what free

(07:45):
that's not what free speech is.Free speech means they're not going to take
your ass to jail, that's all. Yeah, it doesn't mean that you
won't lose your job and your livelihoodand your social media presence, which for
her has all been stripped away thisweek. Too bad, so sad,
Too bad, so sad. Whenwe well, I'll get into a little
bit of it now, I'll givea little teaser. The next story is

(08:05):
about a woman who's going viral againon social media because she engaged in a
kind of back and forth with herboyfriend on social media. They both posted
things on their platforms the exact samethings. Actually, it's even more specific
than that. This woman posted something. I believe her boyfriend re shared it

(08:28):
because that's what happened. So thecontent is the same across both of their
platforms. But here's the difference.This woman found out about algorithms and how
inequitable they can be, because eventhough they had the exact same post on
both of their platforms, the topcomments were different, and that therein is

(08:50):
the algorithm. What both of thesepeople were able to see once they opened
up their posts, the comments fromtheir followers. The engagement was complet completly
different. It was skewed in oneway toward the man's post and skewed in
another way towards the woman's, andboth of their posts were essentially trying to

(09:11):
get them to be combative against eachother. No, can you imagine they
would never do anything like that,never not to you know, force engagement.
Yeah. Yeah, So I'll tellyou a little bit more about that
when we come back, and thenwe'll get into Jason Kelsey making it admission
that has him in i'd say,hot water, but only in certain parts

(09:33):
of his body. You're listening tolater with Moe Kelly on demand from KFI
AM six boarding. Let's continue withthe viral load and Tiffany Hops. So
we last were talking about a womangoing viral because of her discovery, and
Moe you reacted and went, ohwow, how could she ever be so
surprised because what she's talking about ispretty known. If you follow social media

(09:56):
and you see the trends and howyour timeline can shift depending on what you
engage with. Well, this womanis going viral because she was in fact
very surprised by the results of herfindings. And again she found that her
algorithm was different from her boyfriends whenthey were engaging on the exact same posts.

(10:16):
And so lastly, MO, Ijust wanted to say, and you
brought this up, how could,whyever would social media want to cause people
to be combative towards each other.It's because if you argue what happens,
Mo, it increases engagement, andit increases unique users, it increases traffic
on the site absolutely, And youhave been a victim of this, I

(10:41):
would say, or I'm not avictim. I'm not a victim a person
who's been involved. You've been involved, and if you've seen it firsthand where
people want to engage with you ina certain way that will draw you into
an argument, and then you startto see more and more people who want
to are with you, and youstart to see less people who are agreeing
with you. It's like the timelinestarts to give you what they feel you

(11:05):
want. The algorithm will give yousomething based on your history the likelihood of
you responding to something that you don'tagree with. Yeah, absolutely, it
will Taylor itself to you. Here'sanother story that is kind of related to
Taylor, and you'll see what Ido with this. It involves the brother

(11:28):
of Taylor Swift's boyfriend. This brotheris Jason Kelsey, former NFL player now
retired, who is known to bea very talkative, very open, very
friendly person. He's making the roundson different platforms speaking about things that he's
involved with now post NFL career,and he didn't appear on this talk show,

(11:52):
but he was referenced then. Thetalk show is called The Talk.
It features Jerry McDonald as one ofthe hosts, Sherry Shepherd and others,
and they were talking about Jason Kelsey'srecent admission that when he is in the
shower, he does not specifically focuson his feet. That's probably pretty common

(12:18):
amongst men. And that's what Iwas going to ask Himo, because what
Jason Kelsey says is that he justfor I don't want to get too explicit
here, because this is a thing. He just hits the hot spot.
He hits the hot spots and helets the water trickle down to his feet,
but he doesn't actually wash them,he doesn't actually tend to them.
And this cause and has caused becauseto come back around now seems like it

(12:39):
comes back around every few months,this conversation about what to wash in the
shower. There are people who aresaying they only wash, like you said,
the hot spots and the other partsjust get the kind of the kind
of blowback or kind whatever you mightwant to rest just a little considering.

(13:00):
And others say, no, youspend that time really really washing every part
of your body so that you're coveringyour basis, so to speak. Jason
Kelsey says he doesn't mow. Doyou wash your feet? Do you wash
it in between your toes? Yes? I have to, And the reason
I do is I don't think ofmyself as special. I just do it
because my lifestyle requires it on barefootall the time on the hop ko mat,

(13:24):
and it's very easy that you canget a fung gus or infection,
that kind of thing. So youneed to keep your feet very clean if
you're not wearing martial arts shoes.So I'm always I'm obsessive with washing my
feet and also cutting my toenails.Yes, but I don't think that's the
I don't think that's the standard formost men. It I don't think it
is either, not that I've evermet most men, but I can say

(13:45):
that I in looking at social mediaand seeing the responses to Jason Kelce's admission,
a lot of people are not engagingin hygiene to that extent or consistent.
Yeah, it doesn't surprise me atall. I assume that guys are
nasty. Like, for example,Twla and I had gone to the movies

(14:07):
one time and we were leaving themovie, so you know, we're men
of a certain age. We goto the bathroom and we see a guy
come out of the stall, andhe's coming out of the stall, all
right, He's not just adjusting hispants, he's coming out of the stall,
didn't wash his hands and walking out, And Twala and I just looked
at each other like, this fooljust did not walk by. He didn't

(14:28):
have enough shame to think like orat least they're looking at me, I
might as well throw some water onmy hands, I think, And I
can't speak for women. I thinkthat's typical of a lot of guys.
Yeah, you know, being inwomen's bathrooms I can say, and there
are probably a bunch of women listeningright now who are like, yeah,
that happens in our bathrooms as well. And I don't know if you do

(14:48):
this. I'll get into the nextstory in a second. But do you
when you're at the washing basin towash your hands in a public restroom?
If you are there and someone walksup at the same time, do you
kind of spin time washing your handsto make it a parent that you are
engaging in good hygiene, that you'reclean, or do you do your kind
of normal get in, get out. No, I don't worry about the

(15:09):
person next to me as far aswhat they may think of me, because
I know I'm washing my hands.I am using soap, and I'm making
sure I'm cleaning my hands as bestI can and hopefully not touching the knob
with the handle on the way out. I don't want to finish before they
do. Oh see, I don'tthink about that. I don't think about
that because I'm using in my ownhead, my own world. I'm just
going about my way, washing myhands and getting onto the next thing.

(15:30):
But I'm not gonna just rinse myhands. I'm gonna have some soap and
everything and wash them thoroughly. Gladto know. Since we're sharing Mike's and
stuff, let's do the last story. Okay, So this last story is
a viral videos posted by a momand a content creator named Bree Wymar.
She's Goodbye twenties on TikTok. Sheshows a three hundred and seventy dollars Venmo

(15:52):
request. When Venmo is a moneysharing app where you can just send someone
money or receive money. People canalso request money from you. It's very
new age begging, right, yeah. And it's also a good way for
small businesses to make purchases. It'svery easy. In this case, this
isn't a small business. Brie saysthat she received a three hundred and seventy

(16:15):
dollars Venmo request from her son's teacherbecause her son, excuse me, the
teacher alleges that the son has brokenmany items during this school year. So
the teacher sent worry three hundred andseventy dollars requests. Hey, your son
broke this pencils and did this withthat in a sharpener here, and all

(16:38):
of this amounted to three hundred andseventy bucks, and she sent it to
the mom and said, hey,lady, pay up. So Brie of
course took to her social media andall of her followers because she is a
content creator. This is what shedoes. And she just laid into the
teacher and said that this isn't anormal thing that teachers do. I under

(17:00):
stand asking four donations. I understandsaying hey, can you send some tissue
or can you send some pencils orpaper, But to accuse my son of
these sorts of grievances and then toattach prices to them, to monetize it
or to quantify it, and thento have and breathe mine the ever loving
nerve to send me a request isjust out of this world. This is

(17:22):
simple. Kids can't get a tab. Okay, they can't, you know,
develop a tab. If imagine ifthat was so right, if there
was a problem, let's hit it, hit it in the first ten to
fifteen dollars. Don't come back tome at the end of the school year,
presumably with a three hundred and seventydollars bill. Get the f out
of here with that, you know, take that up with the school,

(17:45):
take that up with the school district. But I have to assume that you're
not charging these other parents, Andthere was no understanding or agreement that I'm
going to bill you at the endof a certain amount of time if your
child should break a pencil or losesa book or whatever. Yeah, so
I would I would send it backwith a few note. I wouldn't send
it back with that. I sympathize. I sympathize with teachers, and I

(18:07):
also don't think that this teacher wentabout it the right way. You take
this up with administration. Yeah,yeah, that's it. That's it.
That's all we have for tonight.But they're still getting an f you note.
Nah. And I'm pro teacher,but I'm really anti a holes.
And that was an ahole move.That was an a hole move. That's
an a yeah. Nothing. It'slike asking for a tip for something you
didn't do. It's a hidden servicefee. It's all the same. Hey,

(18:30):
mo, canight borrow five dollars?Hell's no get out of here.
You're listening to Later with Moe Kellyon Demand from KFI AM six forty.
In nineteen ninety six, I wasworking at the Grammy Awards. In fact,
I not too long before that,did my very first radio interview as
a guest of Twala the Poetists onninety two point three Defeat. I use

(18:53):
that just as a marker because Iwas still in the business, but I
was kind of on the outside.I wasn't working at a radio label at
that particular moment, and I rememberthat time when Tupac was shot and killed,
almost instantaneously, there was talk inthe industry that Diddy had something to

(19:14):
do with it, that he hadeither ordered the hit, participated in the
hit, was connected to it onsome level. When it's reported in Radar
Online as if it's an exclusive thatSean Ditty Combs allegedly ordered a hit on
Tupac's to course life just months beforethe late rapper's murder, I throw my
hands up in the air because ifyou worked in the business on any level

(19:37):
that was I can't say a knownquantity, but it was pretty much accepted
as truth back then twenty eight yearsago. Yeah, when that happened,
he was literally the first suspect withinthe neighborhood, within the community, within
all rap trade, herb radio period. Across the board, they was like,

(20:02):
it's bad boy, it's Diddy.I mean true or not. He
was automatically the first person that peoplewere looking at because he was the figureheads
so to speak of, or apart of the East Coast West Coast beef.
And no disrespect to Radar Online,but come on, y'all, it
says quote in a sensational development tocome. Nearly twenty eight years after Shakur

(20:25):
twenty five, was fatally shot duringa drive by shooting in Las Vegas on
the night of September seventh, nineteenninety six, new allegations have emerged connecting
Ditty to Tupac's murder. Even moresurprising with the accusations that Diddy told Dwayne
Keith D. Davis that he wantedboth Shakur and Shug Knight dead and placed
a one million dollar bounty on thepair's heads. That's literally almost word for

(20:48):
word what was had been said twentyeight years ago. Yeah, and now
the reporting is like breaking news.Diddy is now fault to me the murder
of Tupaksha kor this is like RadarOnline, have you been living in a
cave or something? This isn't Thesearen't new allegations, not at all.

(21:10):
The difference is people look at Diddydifferently in the larger community because of what
has been happening more recently. Thatgoes back to what I was talking about
last night with Howard University rescinding thedoctoral degree. When I'm saying, like,
wait a minute, this is thesame dude from back then you all
knew. And I read down allthe allegations, the arrests, the controversies

(21:32):
that he was embroiled in prior toreceiving that degree in twenty fourteen, And
this is what I really dislike aboutthe media in a general sense. And
I say this as a person whois a member of the media. It's
dishonest how they put some of thisinformation out here as if they it's a
breaking news story. No it isn't. It is not a breaking new story.

(21:53):
This had been long alleged years ago, years years, years ago.
Literally Raider Online is acting as ifthey haven't just comb through old issues of
The Source or five Pages or Vibeor any of the magazines that existed,
print magazines that existed back then,who all had these stories with witness testimonies

(22:18):
and all these stories from different peoplewithin the industry who were pointing fingers.
And because people saw the violence ofDiddy on video, maybe they're more inclined
to believe it, but I toldpeople I saw him whooping. Executives asked,
with his henchman, Steve Stout,you don't have to believe me.

(22:38):
It's in the La Times. Theycovered it all. This was well known,
and now people want to get brandnew and act like, oh my
gosh, Didney might have had somethingto do with a hit on someone?
Yes, quite possibly, quite probably, if you ask me, I mean,
look, it's it's shameful. Howvarious magazines, various news outlets.

(23:02):
When I say magazines, I meanonline bags, news outlets and everyone else
who was trying to cover this storyis looking for one sensational aspect or another,
and they're digging into a past andreally rehashing a lot of things we've
already suspected. But nobody cared.No one cared to hear about it.
When anyone was telling any of thestories, when anyone was telling any of

(23:26):
the truths, no one wanted tohear it. I guess it wasn't newsworthy.
Back then. It wasn't. Wedidn't have social media, and by
and large, those who were mogulsare very influential in the rap world were
not not seen as important or influentialin the crossover community or the general community,

(23:47):
because when Biggie Small's Notorious Big waskilled and Tupac was killed, they
were news stories, but it waslooked at, Ah, that's what's going
on in rap that really doesn't haveanything to do with anything. And then
you have people like a doctor Dre, like a Diddy or a Russell Simmons,
and they become household names or ajay Z and then people say like,

(24:07):
oh, my goodness, now theremight be a story here. I'd
be willing to bet whoever wrote thisstory wasn't even alive when this happened.
They have no understanding. Because ifI were the editor, I would say,
don't you don't don't put that storyout like that, because you're acting
like you're putting out something that isactually new, or you're breaking news,
or you're giving a viewpoint or avantage point on the story that no one
else had. No. It's shameful. This is really shameful reporting. Shame

(24:32):
on you, Radar. I meanI lived through this. Yeah, this
was the this was the thought fromthe very beginning. It was an When
I say it was an open secret, people were wondering how much involvement.
He had not if he was involved, but just to what degree. Yeah,

(24:52):
that was the belief. Because again, there was this thing called the
East Coast West Coast Beef, whichwas seen by many people who had no
idea what it meant outside of hearingthose names. The most publicized names associated
with that were the Notorious Big andbad Boy and all them and Tupac and
death Row and everyone says it startedwith an incident having to do with Source

(25:18):
magazine versus having to do with individualsconnected to the streets that were tied to
both of those camps, and howall of that's spilled out into the music
industry. But this is old MTVnews, b E two news stories.
This is ridiculous that to me thatthere are so many different outlets that are

(25:40):
profiting now all the old news.What bothers me even more is these outlets
want to act like not only arethey going to try to profit, but
they actually care about the lives impacted. They care about the brutality against the
women, They care about the liveswhich have been ruined or the people who

(26:00):
were killed. Now you don't care, it's just now that you know how
to monetize it. Through clickbait.And that's why I tell people you need
to listen to Later with Mo Kellymore often, especially when it comes to
these entertainment stories. A lot ofthis, we've lived through a lot of
this. We know the actual principalplayers. In fact, one of my
bosses I talk about someone by thename of Kevin Black Hughes, one of

(26:22):
the original promo people at death RowRecords. One of my original mentors was
Dick Griffy, person who financed thebeginning of death Row Records. Radar Online
can't tell me anything about death RowRecords, not a damn thing. You
need to keep listening to the Laterwith Mo Kelly. If you care about
the ditty story, if you careabout what the truth is, we'll have
it for you here and not inthese other fly by night websites who have

(26:48):
no idea what any of this meansor its significance rags. It's Later with
mo Kelly. If I am sixforty, we're live everywhere on the iHeartRadio
app. You're listening to Later withMo Kelly on demand from KFI AM six
forty before we get out of here. Got to let you know or remind
you do not miss Born on thefourth of July. The Broadway music of

(27:10):
George Mcohen tap along with patriotic prideto miss your Broadways flag waving classics like
You're a grand old flag. Remembersinging that in school? Stars and Stripes
forever. I remember playing that forthe Armed Forces Day Parade when I was
in high school. Yankee Doodle Dandyand over there. You know the songs.
But there's also a pre and postshow concert and a world premiere of

(27:33):
unperformed Cohn songs. It's all happeningSunday, June thirtieth at Lamarada Theater for
the Performing Arts. Get your ticketsright now at Lamarada Theater dot com.
That's Lamarada t h E a tr E dot com. And I meant
that George, you know, Georgeand I we talked, I don't know
three four times a day, andI go over the things that he needs

(27:56):
to put in his show just formy enjoyment. And I know that sounds
selfish. I know that, buthe and I have a level of rapport
that most people don't understand, andmore times than not, he'll he'll be
pliable and just put some things ina show. For me, and I
appreciate him for it. Well,when you come right down to it,

(28:17):
he owes his success to you,all of it. I wouldn't say all
of it large percentage, you know. I put the am in coast to
coast. It's very humble of it. It is, it is, it
is. It's a true story thoughthat I made it. Nobody doubts a
word of it. No, butMark, let me just ask you real
quick, in light of what TiffanyHobbs was saying earlier this evening, do

(28:37):
you wash your feet? I waskind of coming in and out of the
news booth and I didn't hear thediscussion. That's okay, it's a very
simple question. Do you wash myfeet? Okay? He gives some I
don't need to know the context.There's no need to hedge my best.
I mean, look, if Iasked you, do you use toilet paper,
it's just a yes or no question. You don't need to know yes
to both habitual foot washer and toiletpaper user. Okay, Golly, why

(29:03):
do you make things so damn difficult? What was the background on this?
Very quickly? Jason Kelsey, whois the brother of Travis Kelcey, who
is the boyfriend of Taylor Swift,who is the biggest music artist in the
world. Jason Kelcey just retired fromthe Philadelphia Eagles. In some conversation,
he acknowledged revealed admitted that when heshowers, he often doesn't wash his feet

(29:26):
or doesn't go out of his wayto wash his feet. Well, you're
right in there. Why would youskip that because it's too far to reach?
I don't know, I was saying, I don't know, because it's
not something that I overlook. Imean, can you not lift your feet
up? Can you not bend down? It seems seems like that's just part
of the deal. Why would youstop scrubbing when you get to the feet
because people look? And this goesto the other portion of the conversation where

(29:51):
I could speak for men. Menare generally nasty, So that doesn't surprise
me because I think we're generally lazyand washing our whole body is probably something
that most men don't do. AndI was using an example of guys not
even washing their hands after number twoin the bathroom. I remember you guys
talking about that, and that isabsolutely vomitous. You were there that night,

(30:14):
Yeah, I didn't see the guy, but I may have attacked him
if I saw that. Oh look, I'm not gonna attack him because I
don't know what I might catch,because if he punches you, you don't
know what you're getting on your face. Addition to just the fish, absolutely,
and it's one of those moments whereit's awkward because you can't necessarily say
anything. But if like you're usingthe restroom, you hear the the stall
door close and then the bathroom closed, and you're like, okay, well

(30:38):
can't talk to that guy. Well, the thing is Twalla and I were
at the sink. Dude walks behindus. Okay, it wasn't like he
even made it overture to move towardsthe sink and get it subtle. And
I'm looking at him in the mirror, just walking watching him walk on by,
and it's like, this fool isreally going to act like there are
no sinks here. Did you thinkyou were gonna shame him into approaching?

(31:02):
No, No, I wasn't gonnashame him. I was just trying to
see and convince myself I saw whatI thought I saw. And then did
he go in and go back towork behind the snack bar afterwards. Well,
no, he was a patron.I was just thinking, like,
I'm not going to touch that doorhandle. That's the only thing I was
thinking of. That's completely repugnant.He should be shunned from polite society.

(31:23):
But see the thing is, Ibelieve he's one of many. I don't
think he's that special. I thinkthis is what I think. I think
most people will wash their hands inthe bathroom if there's someone else in there,
and if they were by themselves,they wouldn't have washed their hands at
all. Agree with that, Yeah, but that's one of those situations where

(31:44):
if you don't do it, you'rereally just cheating yourself. Well, but
see what mos pointing out too,is he had absolutely no shame. None.
He walked past two people, twopeople and right out and two people
he presumably would see la seconds later. I if I were, let's say,

(32:07):
fifteen years younger, if I wasthe person I used to be,
So if you were fifty, goahead and give it to him. Go
ahead, I'll wait. It's takentoo long enough. Sometimes the tantric nature
of it makes it even more enjoyable. Oh yeah, there's a word for
that. But let's keep moving.Okay. If I were much younger and

(32:30):
of a different mindset one that Iused to be, I would have gone
into the middle of the theater andloud talked him and made a scene,
not only to shame him, butto instigate a situation. I'm right there
with you. But since I nowfollowed the teachings and wisdom of Kwai Chang
Kan, I wouldn't do that either. But I believe that somebody like that

(32:52):
should somehow be confronted and shamed.No, I would have gone out to
hey, hey, you and thegray shirt, Yeah you you. Why
did your nasty ass not wash yourhands after taking a dump? I just
want to know, and then itwould have escalated from there. Yeah,
treat him like he's on trial atthe Hague, because that's what he deserves.

(33:13):
That's what I would have done.But I'm a lot older now.
I have more to lose. Youknow, I'm trying to be calmer in
my old age, I really am. You don't want the guy slapping your
dentures across the room with that handthat hasn't been washed. I think it's
time. He's lucky that the show'sover. I know what, what I'm

(33:34):
just trying to help, following yourlead. Yeah, we're on the same
side for once, so we're not. I don't see what you're complaining.
How I like you. I don'tknow you. You love me. You
probably have a tattoo of me somewhereon your body that I haven't seen.
No, why don't you go justdip your ass and milk like you did
before. Wrong side. You can'tfire you. Six forty We're lived everybody.
I heart radio out. I mKOSTHD two Los Angeles, Orange County

(34:04):
lives everywhere on the radio