November 14, 2024 • 33 mins
ICYMI: Hour Three of ‘Later, with Mo’Kelly’ Presents – Special Guest Host Chris Merrill filling in ‘Later, for Mo’Kelly’ with thoughts on John Krasinski being named People magazine's ‘Sexiest Man Alive’ for 2024 AND Amazon shutting down its ad-supported video streaming service ‘Freevee’…PLUS – A look at Joe Rogan, the Fifth Estate and the power of Podcasters - on KFI AM 640…Live everywhere on the iHeartRadio app
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six from.
Speaker 2 (00:07):
O Kelly k if I AM six forty listening anytime
on demand of the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 3 (00:11):
I once had a a uh oh.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
He's one of the programmers I worked with, and we
were talking about you know, good days, bad days. Uh
you know what happens when you go in the in
the studio, but you had a bad day. Guys, you've
all been there right where whatever's going on, whatever turmoil
is going on. When you're in the studio, you have
to put all that aside, right, I mean you kind
(00:36):
of you have to lock in. And he used to say,
as soon as you cracked that mic, it's showtime, baby,
and I thought, that's so true.
Speaker 3 (00:44):
It's so true.
Speaker 4 (00:45):
I mean, yeah, absolutely, because I mean there's there. Well, honestly,
I leave it at the door.
Speaker 3 (00:50):
That's good.
Speaker 4 (00:51):
You know, it sucks because it's like you have that
whatever you're going through and then I get to the
through those doors that's gone.
Speaker 2 (00:58):
For nets to pause. And I don't know about you,
but I use that kind of as a coping mechanism.
And my therapist says, you know, you compartmentalize and I said, yeah,
that's that's how you that's how you do life.
Speaker 3 (01:12):
And he says, no, a.
Speaker 2 (01:13):
Lot of people will work through their emotions, like, well,
I can't do that because I got to go in
the air. I can't go on the air and work
through my emotions. It's showtime, baby, showtime. I bring that
up because I love doing I love talking about what's
happening in the world of show biz.
Speaker 3 (01:31):
I wish I were better versed.
Speaker 2 (01:32):
It's one of the reasons I like working with you guys,
because I know Mo is so well connected, and then
by extension, you are as well and twelve. I've worked
with you a number of times, even when Moe was
doing weekends and I had the privilege of filling in,
and of course Mark, Mark was the the last man
on the Totem Pull and it got stuck with me
on some Sunday shows. And you guys are just connected,
(01:54):
you know what you're talking about. I love that, and
so I love being able to talk about show business.
I'd love to do more about the business of show
business because I'm fascinated by all the other goings on.
Right the fact I've got a story coming up here
in the next segment. I got to share with you
that we've got a major streamer that is getting rid
of their ADS supported product because they have a new
(02:19):
AD supported product. They have too many AD supported products
to keep supporting AD supporting products.
Speaker 3 (02:25):
What a mess that is fascinated by that. We'll get
to that in a second.
Speaker 2 (02:28):
But one of the things that we see in let's
say publishing, is somebody likes to come up with a
benchmark something that is massive. Time Magazine, Person of the Year, Right,
there's something big, Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition. They want to
have this big, splashy thing. It doesn't necessarily define who
(02:50):
they are, but it doesn't violate the definition of their
brand either.
Speaker 3 (02:55):
Sports Illustrated Magazine for.
Speaker 2 (02:58):
Guys who like sport and girls swimsuit edition.
Speaker 3 (03:05):
Right, Time Magazine.
Speaker 2 (03:06):
We were on top of all the most important things
in Time, and boom, here is the highlight of the year.
Speaker 3 (03:12):
People Magazine.
Speaker 2 (03:14):
We have all the different we know all there is
to know about the celebrities. We're big on the celebrities
we know from top to bottom, and then we create
a ranking system to make the celebrities who are already
full of vanity even vaniteer Vanadier whatever. So Stephen Colbert
is doing the Late Show last night. He dives into
(03:35):
what People magazine has come up with as the sexiest
man Alive.
Speaker 3 (03:38):
Maybe you saw, without.
Speaker 5 (03:39):
Further ado, Joe, A drum roll please, this year's People's
Sexiest Man Alive is.
Speaker 6 (03:49):
John Krasinski.
Speaker 2 (03:51):
All right, well, all right, and then he goes on
to make the same joke everybody he makes. I was
a little this pointed because I like Colbert, but he said,
oh I thought this was.
Speaker 3 (04:03):
Gonna be my year. Come on, that's the that's like
the uh, it's like the token expression. You have to
say it. My god, I know.
Speaker 2 (04:15):
It's like it's like a morning show from a bad
CHR station in my hometown. Right Like that is entry
level radio comedy. I thought it was my year.
Speaker 3 (04:27):
Oh yeah, me too.
Speaker 2 (04:29):
The Jimbo and Bimbo Show will be right back, jim
We thought you were gonna be this exsiest man Alive
this year.
Speaker 3 (04:39):
God, I hate that crap.
Speaker 2 (04:40):
You actually sound like some of those crafty shows.
Speaker 3 (04:44):
A good imprisination of it. Listen.
Speaker 2 (04:46):
One thing that he drove me nuts because I used
to do morning radio on music stations. I was never
in very large market, so but I did you know,
talk radio is where I had a little more success.
But uh, I did have some female co hosts and
I liked it. I just I hated that it was
so easy to fall into. I always called it the
jim Bo and Bimbo Show. I just hated that, and
(05:09):
I always wanted to have a little bit more depth.
And that's why we got questioned in the ratings, because,
let's face it, people just wanted that. Yeah, here's a
guy saying something crazy and then a giggle box. It
reinforces his stupid humor. Yeah, I hate that crap so bad. Anyway,
Emily Blunt, what does she have to say about her
husband being named the Sexiest Man Alive?
Speaker 3 (05:31):
You think that's a turn on or turno off?
Speaker 7 (05:33):
John Krasinski's new title is that's from e News People
magazine Sexiest Man Alive is not going to let him
off easy at home. The forty five year old jokes
that while his wife, Emily Blunt was very excited by
the news, she isn't going to ease up on him.
In fact, quite the opposite. The Office star tells people
in the cover story quote, I think it's going to
make me do more household yours. After this comes out,
(05:55):
she'll be like, all right, that means you're going to
really earn it.
Speaker 8 (05:57):
Here at home.
Speaker 3 (05:59):
What does that mean You're gonna earn what?
Speaker 7 (06:01):
However, the Mary Poppins return star, who shares daughters Hazel
and Violet with John, also insists on some heavy ribbing,
joking that she plans to wallpaper the house with his
sexy new cover. John tells the bag quote, my children
will love that.
Speaker 6 (06:15):
It won't be weird at all.
Speaker 7 (06:16):
The Quiet Place director and star says jokes aside, there
was a lot of joy in sharing the news with
his wife of fourteen years. As for the Jack Ryan
Starrs initial reaction to the new title, He tells Stephen
Colbert during the November twelfth episode of his Late Night
show that when he learned the news, he thought he
was the butt of a joke.
Speaker 2 (06:34):
Okay, all right, you get it. It's all light and
fluffy and all that stuff. I do like when actors
who I think are genuinely nice. I love John Krasinski
and I love Emily Blunt, and I love that they're together.
That's one of those Hollywood couples that I hope stays together. Forever,
and I'll be devastated if they break up because I
like them so much and so it makes me happy
when people like that win these accolades.
Speaker 3 (06:57):
Great? Do that more love it?
Speaker 2 (07:00):
Do you suppose, though, that if you come home and
tell your wife I just got named the sexiest man alive,
do you think that's a turn on? Or do you
think it's a turn off, because then it's like, oh,
you think you're something now? Is there a is there
an air of maybe he thinks he's better than me
(07:22):
now other women are going to be oggling him. Or
do you think it's a total sense of pride, like, Wow,
I'm gonna be with the sexiest man alive. I've never
been so proud of my husband, and and look what
I you know, I'm with the sexiest man alife. If
I were with the sexiest woman alife, which I am,
of course my wife is, of course, I mean I
would feel like I would feel like, uh, I got
(07:44):
the best trophy.
Speaker 3 (07:44):
On my arm. Yeah, but this is Hollywood, Now, I'll Hollywood.
Speaker 9 (07:49):
You know, couples looking like that, it's almost like, you know,
if you're if your husband or wife wins an Academy
award and is thing in Hollywood and you're not, you know,
just you're supportive and you're like, this is a part
of it's winning Sexiest Woman Live or Sexist Man Alive.
You know, you listen to anyone who's won it, and
nothing changes at home.
Speaker 3 (08:09):
You know, they're not like I can't believe you want
to know, they're just like, man, like this what you've
been working for?
Speaker 2 (08:15):
I don't know, man, because but okay, do you think
that there's fear that he's going to start looking somewhere
else thinking he can do whatever he wants? And I'll
tell you what, how many times have we seen people
in Hollywood who have an equal relationship as far as
their their career paths when they get together and then
all of a sudden, one person's career takes off and
then the other one is put out the pasture. You know,
(08:39):
I'm thinking Jim Carrey like, oh, you know what I
could be with Jenny McCarthy.
Speaker 3 (08:43):
So I guess bye, bye, honey, I'm with Jenny. Now. Yeah,
that's just guys period. I mean you know that I
don't think there's any insecurity on her part.
Speaker 9 (08:52):
No, No, I don't, because you got to think about
guys who are married, who individuals that people think are
the most beautiful women on the planet Earth. You know,
Brady was married Toselle and there were allegations of infidelity.
And it's like, but that's Gazelle, what are you doing?
(09:14):
You know, It's like, guys are guys, And it's unfortunate
that that being named sexiguest man alive if that's what
makes him step out, you know. And and and I'm
no partner, no, because she's also a star. She's also star.
And she's also a mega star, you know, so it's
(09:35):
not like she's some scrub. She's been probably in more
feature films than him by now.
Speaker 3 (09:41):
Oh yeah, you know, she's incredible. He needs this. He
just keep up. He needs this. He needs a little shine.
Otherwise she's gonna start thinking she can do better. Like like, hey,
so are you ever going to be anything else? Why
an't you gonna get your career off the ground here?
Speaker 2 (09:58):
I know you did the office, but that's been Maybe
you start doing something else there, little Jack, Ryan, that's good.
Speaker 3 (10:04):
Okay, a little jack all right? I like that.
Speaker 2 (10:08):
All right, we'll talk about the ad supported service that
had too many ads to support the service of the
ad supported service.
Speaker 3 (10:15):
It turned very inception, very fast. That's next.
Speaker 1 (10:18):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (10:23):
Chris merrill In from O Kelly Listen anytime on demand
of the iHeartRadio app. You're gonna want to check out
tonight's program when you get a chance, mostly because uh
Twalla made an a mission that nobody expected him to
make in today's program. I can tell you that when
we put the show together today, at no point that
I expect that he would admit that he'd try cannibalism
(10:44):
if given the opportunity. That was just weird man, And
I just wonder how long he spent thinking about that
before the words came out of his mouth.
Speaker 3 (10:52):
Okay, fascinating.
Speaker 9 (10:54):
Look, look be clear, I said, you don't know what
your eating at any given time. At any given time,
and I don't believe that everything we're eating is beef.
We don't know where these bodies are going. We don't
know what's being buried, we don't We don't know where
(11:16):
these horses are going at the race track. We don't
know where the people are going in Forest Lawn. We
don't know. But we still have our behinds in the
drive through nightly got all able. We got to get
a burger. I gotta run and get some Taco Bell.
I gotta go and get some done.
Speaker 3 (11:32):
You don't know what you're eating.
Speaker 9 (11:34):
Silent breed is paper.
Speaker 3 (11:37):
Yeah, that's what you're eating.
Speaker 9 (11:39):
I'm to say if you can tell me for a
fact that you know what you're eating.
Speaker 3 (11:44):
Yeah, I'm looking at you like you're crazy.
Speaker 2 (11:46):
All of a sudden, that pink slime that the Taco
Bell had a problem with a few years back, that sounds.
Speaker 3 (11:50):
Really good right now? You remember that? Of course? Do
you know why I remember that? This is so funny.
Speaker 2 (11:56):
I remember that because we got a memo saying don't
talk about it on the air.
Speaker 3 (12:01):
Do you remember that?
Speaker 10 (12:02):
Yeah?
Speaker 3 (12:02):
Yeah, yeah, yeah yeah.
Speaker 2 (12:04):
They said, you know, listen, Taco Bell doesn't want us
talking about this. News can talk about it, but Taco
Bell is an advertiser. Don't talk about it on the air. Yeah,
And now I can't forget it. Yeah, although I think
it just violated that memo.
Speaker 9 (12:18):
But isn't it past the statute on that Yeah, statute
of limitations on memo of that.
Speaker 3 (12:23):
Yeah, yeah, definitely, yeah, Yeah, that's what it is.
Speaker 10 (12:26):
Uh.
Speaker 2 (12:26):
Imagine if you run a company and you acquire another company,
and then all of a sudden, you in your acquisition
decide that the company you just acquired does it better
than you've been doing it, and so you start doing
it the way the company that you acquired does it,
and then you are redundant and you don't need the
company that you acquired any longer. I know it's weird, right,
(12:48):
It sounds like inception. It's a dream within a dream.
That's what's happening with Amazon.
Speaker 4 (12:53):
Uh.
Speaker 2 (12:53):
From the award winning cord Cutter News. You're going to
hear the professionalism in this broadcast right here, which was
found exclusively on the internet.
Speaker 5 (13:03):
Welcome back to the Corcars News Tech Lab. We've got
some breaking news that just broke this afternoon.
Speaker 3 (13:08):
See Rodner, Are you paying attention? That's how you write
a story.
Speaker 4 (13:13):
Thank you for that. No, I was actually busy writing
a story. No, listen, this is just good writing at lab.
Speaker 6 (13:18):
We've got some breaking news that just broke.
Speaker 2 (13:20):
That's how you know it's breaking news, Roder, because it
just broke. Of course, bingo, what do you get when
you work your fingers to the bone. By the way,
bony fingers, thank you very much.
Speaker 5 (13:29):
Yep, Amazon, preev is shutting down. It's the free AD
supported streaming service from Amazon. Oh no, probably heard this
before because this was reported earlier this year from Adweek.
Speaker 2 (13:40):
So I love that it's breaking news that you probably
heard earlier this year.
Speaker 3 (13:44):
That is just amazing. Yeah, they're shutting down FREEV. I
like FREEV.
Speaker 4 (13:49):
Yeah, yeah, I just watched all of Hell on Wheels
on FREEV.
Speaker 3 (13:53):
Freev's great. Do you know what I think they're doing here?
Speaker 2 (13:57):
I think free V, which was an AD supported streaming
service like tob right isn't to be an AD supported
streaming service, but freebe was all movies.
Speaker 4 (14:06):
No, FREEB was a little bit of everything. Okay, it
was pretty similar to to B.
Speaker 3 (14:10):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (14:10):
Yeah, donate on Tube. That's Mark's bread and butter. Don't
you dare nothing.
Speaker 2 (14:14):
Wrong with tub? I got nothing wrong. I love to
Be's new ads. By the way, have you heard their
new ads?
Speaker 3 (14:19):
No?
Speaker 2 (14:19):
That are like I don't remember the specifics, but it'll
be like uh uh, Toob is there.
Speaker 3 (14:25):
If you're a little old lady who had her.
Speaker 2 (14:27):
Wallet stolen from an evil mugger, Tooby's got you covered.
We won't charge you anything, and if you're a mugger
who just stole a little old lady's last dollar, to
be's free for you too, because two be's free for everyone.
Speaker 3 (14:42):
It's great.
Speaker 4 (14:43):
I love that that had some genius marketing, right, I
love it. Yeah, it's it's fantastic. It's pretty smart because
I was like, where are they going with this? But right, oh,
there it is. That's good.
Speaker 2 (14:52):
Yeah, I'm like, how are you going to know if
it's an old lady who just got mug that you're
gonna get free to all?
Speaker 3 (14:57):
I get at. Yeah, it was good.
Speaker 6 (14:59):
I like that said I had heard it was going
to happen.
Speaker 2 (15:01):
Okay, so ad we heard that freeb was going away
from Amazon Prime?
Speaker 3 (15:06):
Why?
Speaker 6 (15:06):
They said probably in the summer.
Speaker 5 (15:08):
They weren't too far off because come fall, Amazon made
it official and is shutting down.
Speaker 2 (15:12):
All right, So thank you very much to the cord
Cut of News for telling us how seasons work.
Speaker 5 (15:17):
We got all the details about this, including where is
this content going, how are you going to still be
able to access it? And what does this mean for
the future of the Amazon free v exclusive content.
Speaker 3 (15:28):
I mean, the way he enunciates is just top notch too.
Speaker 6 (15:31):
We'll tell you all that in a quick second.
Speaker 3 (15:32):
Okay, oh any quick sit? That felt like a tease.
Speaker 5 (15:36):
I do have a story about this. We're at corecardsnews
dot com. If you want to read about it, I'll
pull link to it in the first pin comment.
Speaker 3 (15:41):
But wait a minute, I thought you were telling us
about it.
Speaker 5 (15:43):
Pull link to it in the first pin comment and
the show notes down below. If you like what we
do here, please consider hinnight subscribe bun hinnut thumbs up.
Speaker 3 (15:51):
We're going to do? What do the subscribe button?
Speaker 5 (15:53):
Hinnut thumb we're hinde. Please consider hinnight subscribe bun flush.
Speaker 3 (15:58):
Is that how the young kins talk? Like out of touch? Here?
Is this guy just bad at heat works? Well?
Speaker 4 (16:03):
I think he's trying to make it like a younger
thing the way he's saying it, because the kids are
always smashed that like button or that's a subscribe button.
But he's trying to like cool with it, like hidden it, hidden.
Speaker 6 (16:15):
It, Hey night, subscribe hitting it.
Speaker 3 (16:17):
You can help us out by hidden it.
Speaker 5 (16:19):
Please consider hynight subscribe bunnnut thumbs up, hidden it.
Speaker 4 (16:22):
Yeah, see the first one. I give him the first
one because maybe he was just talking too fast. He
said it the same way the second time. That's how
he says hitting it instinctually. Yeah, hidden, hidden.
Speaker 5 (16:32):
Head, please consider hey night subscribe bunn Nut thumbs up,
Hidden doing one or balls YouTube know you enjoy what
we do here, So YouTube recommends our video some more people.
Speaker 3 (16:40):
Yeah, no, I'm not gonna do that.
Speaker 2 (16:42):
Uh No, I think I handed it potted and a
pen in it is what he's put.
Speaker 3 (16:50):
His comments below.
Speaker 2 (16:51):
What Uh so, here's the deal though, Why does Amazon
Prime need an ad supported uh free V when Amazon
Prime is now AD supported and they're charging so I
think they're going to maintain They're going to keep all
of the content that freeb had access to, but they
don't need to give it away for free. They must
(17:12):
have done some math on this roder. You got Prime
or were you just stealing FREEV?
Speaker 3 (17:17):
No? No, you're watching it.
Speaker 4 (17:18):
I mean, okay, how else is Jeff Bezos going to
afford his massive yachts I have to subscribe to Prime?
Speaker 3 (17:24):
Well?
Speaker 2 (17:25):
Yeah, especially when he keeps screwing up his newspaper investment.
Speaker 3 (17:29):
Yeah, how can I not support all that? Right? You
have me? Yeah, look at that disaster.
Speaker 4 (17:33):
I think we were also working our way through the
Rockford Files on freev too.
Speaker 3 (17:36):
They had a lot of good stuff on there. That's good.
Oh yeah, my neighbor lady used to watch the rock
I love that. Yeah, it's not just good on its own.
Speaker 4 (17:47):
It's good if you like old La, because you get
to see La in the early seventies before it's so cool.
Speaker 2 (17:53):
Yeah, it's really good. I love that show. James Garner
had attitude. That guy pulled it off, all right. One
of the things that is breaking through and I'm gonna
call twenty twenty four. They were one of the biggest
success stories of twenty twenty four, not the politicians, but
the people who made the politicians real life podcasters. The
world of politics has changed forever because we are forever
(18:14):
stuck with podcasters.
Speaker 3 (18:16):
That's next.
Speaker 1 (18:17):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (18:25):
Hi, It's Chris Merril caf I AM six forty. I'm
from O'Kelly. Listen anytime on to Man and the iHeartRadio app. God,
I should have been a singer. You guys hear that
nailed it?
Speaker 3 (18:36):
Man? Yeah, foush, I hope you had that.
Speaker 2 (18:38):
You're running tape on this right, nie sure an perfect,
All right, just take what I did, just rip it,
send it off, publish that. We'll make a good jillion dollars.
That's platinum. It felt platinum to me. Yeah, like a DJ.
Speaker 4 (18:51):
Just take the the lyrics out and just put a
beat to it. Right, Yeah, let's it. You have to
sample it, you can do that. Just do that in
the next commercial break. All right, throw it together. Sounds good.
Speaker 2 (19:02):
See if you can get mister worldwide open for my
next tour exactly, let's see, we'll work roll.
Speaker 3 (19:09):
Uh oh, you know what.
Speaker 2 (19:10):
This election, there's a lot of debate about Trump and
Harris and where they were spending their time making their
media appearances. I was reading an article in Variety, and
I don't know if if you guys happen to see this,
but it talked about Joe Rogan and the Fifth Estate,
how the podcaster and a group of cable news exiles
(19:32):
became more powerful than traditional media. So it goes on
to talk about the podcasters and how Trump really reached
people because he understood the importance of Joe Rogan, whereas
Kamala Harris didn't. And Kamala Harris was invited to be
on Rogan's show, but instead she was on Saturday Night
(19:55):
Live Loser, And I think Variety misses something here. I
think it's it's a post mortem where you try to
create a narrative using and then you cherry pick evidence.
So in fact they what they go on to say,
uh in the article is let me see, let me
(20:20):
find it the part about the snl Yeah. Here it
is us Harris's campaign decision to snub the Joe Rogan
Experience podcast.
Speaker 3 (20:27):
They turned it down because she was too busy.
Speaker 2 (20:30):
This according to Andrew Yang, a CNN commentator, and also
Andrew Yang. Instead of Trump's excuse me, Instead, Trump hit
Rogan's Austin, Texas studio in the final days of the campaign,
racking up a massive audience on YouTube.
Speaker 3 (20:43):
Alone forty eight million views.
Speaker 2 (20:46):
On a night when Harris could have fielded easy questions
about some of Rogan's favorite topics, from the benefits of
psychedelics to the existence of extraterrestrial life, she chose to
make a surprise Saturday Live visit for a ninety second cameo. Yeah,
but I saw that all over the socials. News was
(21:06):
writing about that. News is writing about the Joe Rogan Experience.
Speaker 3 (21:09):
Too.
Speaker 2 (21:10):
But Trump was supposed to do an hour with Joe Rogan,
and Brogan give him three hours. Would he have given
Kamala Harris three hours?
Speaker 3 (21:19):
Now?
Speaker 2 (21:19):
My understanding was as well that Rogan said he didn't
want to talk politics with Kamala Harris. He wanted to
get to know her, but he didn't want to talk politics.
Wait a minute, Goose, Gander, gander, goose, how's that working out?
Do you get to say, I'm I'm gonna direct, I'm
gonna allow for one candidate to talk about their policy,
(21:39):
but I'm gonna tell the other candidate they're not allowed to.
Doesn't that seem a bit bizarre? I also happen to
think about something that Okay, I'm gonna crucify for this,
not literally crucified, because that would be painful and I
would cry. Is it time that we take a good
hard look at applying some of the same rules that
(22:01):
we have in legacy media to new media, for instance?
And I know I know what the difference is. Look,
I've been in the business long enough, I get it.
I know that we are that we are licensed by
the FCC. I know that we have to play by
certain broadcast rules because of the spectrum that we operate under.
(22:24):
But I just kind of wonder, forget the FCC, Maybe
this is a Federal Elections Commission situation. If you've got
Joe Rogan hitting forty eight million people and he doesn't
have to play by equal time rules, why is it
that a radio station in Perughkeepsie that has an average
(22:47):
listener listenership of twenty five hundred has to play by
these these equal time I was gonna call it, Marcaine.
Speaker 3 (22:55):
They really aren't.
Speaker 2 (22:56):
They're not bad, these equal time rules. See, I'm fine
with equal time. I know a lot of people don't
like it because they've positioned their entire radio program as
either a showcase for the left or a showcase for
the right, and they don't want to offer equal time.
Or a radio station's entire brand is we are a
showcase for the right or a showcase for the left,
(23:16):
and they don't want to offer equal time. But the
way it works in broadcast is that if I have
Trump on this show, and Harris calls and says, hey,
I heard Jed Trump on, I'd like equal time. I
have to offer equal time, not necessarily on the same show,
but it has to be on the same station, and
it has to be in a day part with an
equivalent audience size.
Speaker 3 (23:35):
That's the rules.
Speaker 2 (23:37):
But Joe Rogan can pick and choose, and he can say,
I'm a podcaster.
Speaker 3 (23:40):
I don't have to play by those rules.
Speaker 2 (23:43):
And yet doesn't that then mean that you've got a
major media influencer who is tipping the scales for a
political candidate of one party or the other. I'm so
frustrated with the with the divisiveness in our country that
(24:05):
maybe I'm looking to cast blame. I just don't know
that it's beneficial that we have become such a a
micro targeted genre society. Does that make sense where our
brands are all right or all left? Or we've got
(24:28):
a podcaster has a tremendous influence and they just up
and decide who they want to win. Or you've got
a satellite radio company where you've got Howard Stern who's
gonna interview Harris but he won't have Trump on again. Well,
he doesn't have to play by the same rules as
everybody else because he's not he's not govern by the FCC.
(24:52):
I mean, he had Trump on a long time ago.
But doesn't it seem bizarre to you. Maybe it's just
sour grapes, Maybe it's just feeling like there's something unfair
going on, but I gotta believe it. It's not beneficial
to the country that we have rules in place in
(25:13):
order to ensure equal access to potential voters when it
comes to broadcast licenses, but we don't ensure equal access
when it comes to even more.
Speaker 3 (25:24):
Popular media figures.
Speaker 2 (25:26):
Because, let's be honest, forty eight million people ain't here
in this show tonight. There was something else going on
in Capitol Hill today. Forget about politics. There was something
even more important that was going on in Capitol Hill.
And it's bipartisan and they're about to really screw up
society all by letting the cat out of the bag.
Speaker 1 (25:46):
That is next you're listening to Later with Moe Kelly
on demand from KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 3 (25:57):
Ok I AM six forty right after the mokel Show.
Speaker 2 (26:00):
As always, the Great George Norian Coast and Coast George,
Big day for you.
Speaker 3 (26:04):
Congress was right up your ally.
Speaker 8 (26:07):
Today they're doing that thing. We'll be talking about that
for a little bit tonight, Chris. One day we'll get
the answers I hold and for the rest of the show,
artificial intelligence will at play havoc with our financial self
and later on hunting for Bigfoot on Coast to Coast.
Speaker 3 (26:24):
Always a great lineup.
Speaker 2 (26:25):
Looking forward to it, George, Thank you so much, my friend,
looking forward to it.
Speaker 3 (26:29):
I was listening to George my way home. Love it.
Great way to wrap up my evening.
Speaker 2 (26:33):
So here's one of the things that I wanted to touch
on this going into Georgie's show. So the house did
this hearing on UFOs today and they had some pretty
recognizable people in there, and George is going to dive
deeper into it obviously during Coast to Coast, but they're
basically saying there's a massive cover up going on.
Speaker 11 (26:54):
NASA has whole archives of data, much of which I
believe will likely have information that will help inform UAP.
We need only look and again in an error with AIML,
we can relatively quickly and easily go through it. So
I think it's something that we should encourage an asset
to do.
Speaker 12 (27:11):
Because is a presentation from the UATP Task Force. This
is completely absurd. It's nuts, this level of censorship of
redaction on a document. It shows the redaction of how
many reports they've collected for how many years? Two of
the three potential explanations are blacked out the Pentagon.
Speaker 2 (27:31):
Yeah, why do you think they're blacked out? I mean, actually,
in this case, kind of blacking that stuff out allows
your brain to go crazy. Doesn't it like they're blacking
something out. They're not saying it's aliens, which means they
must have blacked out that it's aliens. Right, But it's
kind of where you it's kind of where you go
with it, all right, So back to it.
Speaker 12 (27:53):
The intelligence community is treating us like children. It's time
for us to know the truth about this. I think
that we can handle.
Speaker 2 (28:00):
No, we cannot. Just to be very clear, no we cannot.
How's the government? No, we we would panic. Did you
guys ever see Mars attacks? Of course it would panic.
Speaker 3 (28:12):
That would be it. That would pretty much be what
would happened. I think. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (28:15):
Look, even even maybe one of the more uh tame
alien movies signs everybody freaked out, right, it's just total
freak out times.
Speaker 13 (28:27):
Has the government conducted secret UAP crash rechieval programs?
Speaker 4 (28:30):
Yes?
Speaker 3 (28:30):
Or no? Yes?
Speaker 2 (28:32):
Okay u A P for those I'm famili I think
most people know now that it is the unidentified anomalous
phenomena phenomena.
Speaker 3 (28:41):
Yeah, thanks, oh, thank you very much. I appreciate that.
Speaker 2 (28:44):
The unidentified anomalists phenomena.
Speaker 3 (28:47):
Okay, all right, I get it. Thanks, yeah, phenomena. You're
gonna love this. Guards all right, thank you very much,
appreciate it.
Speaker 2 (28:58):
So they want to get to the the unidentified anomalous phenomena,
which is like UFOs, but they wanted to expand it
a little bit further. So that because now we've got
unidentified underwater phenomena and other things. Okay, so what else?
She gave a big yes or no? Do you have evidence?
Yes or no?
Speaker 13 (29:18):
The government conducted secret UAP crash retrieval programs?
Speaker 3 (29:21):
Yes or no?
Speaker 2 (29:22):
Yes, And she's doing the old trick where it's like
you have to answer the question yes or no. In
other words, I'm not going to allow any context in
my question. Have they done secret UAP retrieval things?
Speaker 3 (29:34):
Yes or no? Yes?
Speaker 2 (29:36):
In other words, we saw something, we didn't know what
it was. We sent the military out to go get
it because we didn't know what it was. All right,
have you done secret UAP retrieval projects? Yes or no?
Speaker 3 (29:48):
Yes?
Speaker 2 (29:49):
Now, how do we take that we obviously they're going
after a spaceship.
Speaker 8 (29:54):
No.
Speaker 2 (29:55):
I you see something in the air and you know
that it lands somewhere, and you're gonna go figure out
what that is is. That would be a but you
don't want to tell anybody that you're after it. That
would be a secret UAP of retrieval project. Kind of
like if a Chinese weather balloon happens to fly over
Montana and somebody shoots it down, you gotta go pick
it up.
Speaker 3 (30:12):
Okay.
Speaker 13 (30:13):
Were they designed to identify and reverse engineer alien craft?
Speaker 3 (30:16):
Yes?
Speaker 10 (30:16):
Or no? Yes?
Speaker 3 (30:17):
Yeah, I'm not so sure about that.
Speaker 13 (30:18):
In your book, you mentioned government employees who've been injured
by UAPs placed on leave and receiving government compensation for
their injuries.
Speaker 3 (30:25):
Is that correct? That is correct. I feel like he's
kind of given away classified information here.
Speaker 13 (30:29):
How can the government deny we have recovered craft if
they're paying people because they've been injured by recovered craft.
Speaker 2 (30:37):
Again, she's jumping to the conclusion that all UAPs are
recovered alien spacecraft.
Speaker 3 (30:45):
I'm not ready to buy that yet, ma'am. That's a
great question. That's why I think we're here again.
Speaker 10 (30:49):
I really believe that we should use this hearing to
as a catalyst to improve in bolster our air defense capabilities,
in our maritime awayne demandness capability, because obviously they're holes.
Speaker 2 (31:01):
In it, and now we're getting into the whole all
UAPs are threats or could we even take the risk
that they're not, whether it be.
Speaker 10 (31:09):
UAP of non Hi direction or Nhi direction or like
as you say, sir China or any other adversaries.
Speaker 2 (31:16):
So that was the interesting part he's had. At one
point during this this entire conversation conversation with these these witnesses,
and many of them were pretty respectable individuals, they talked
about the UAPs being spotted in large numbers around nuclear
sites or military installations, and these witnesses of course said, yeah, yeah,
(31:37):
it's happening.
Speaker 3 (31:37):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (31:38):
They said, could it be Chinese or Russian aircraft? Well, yeah, yeah,
of course it could be. Meanwhile, the next person says,
could it be aliens? Well, yeah, yeah, it could be aliens.
But at this point they're just they're loving the spotlight
is what's happening, and the politicians are loving that we're
talking about it. But if it's a national security threat
(32:00):
is a major concern. If we've got Russia or China
spying on us. Now, maybe that's just so that they
can grow their own intelligence. Maybe they have nefarious plans
for the future. But actually we can we can comprehend that.
If it is, say, something extraterrestrial or ethereal, even yeah,
(32:23):
we can't handle that. We would go into absolute meltdown.
That would be it just raining cats and dogs. Now
forget it all over at that point, couldn't handle it.
Speaker 4 (32:35):
And not too done the severity of it. But that
interviewer should have been the one to interview the new
CEO at Red Lobster.
Speaker 2 (32:43):
Oh my gosh, you're right good callback Yeah, And then
he would he would have given her all kinds of
really great buzzwords on everything we see. I think I've
hold on. Where's my Red Lobster cut? I closed it here,
I've got it.
Speaker 3 (32:55):
He's got the What are you gonna do for Red Lobster?
He's like, ah, we're gonna energize it.
Speaker 6 (32:59):
Is it relevant compelling? Yeah and exciting?
Speaker 3 (33:04):
Yes or no? We'll Redlabster be relevant, compelling and exciting,
Yes or no?
Speaker 6 (33:08):
Relevant, compelling and exciting.
Speaker 2 (33:12):
It's good enough. What are the aliens? Aliens are relevant? Compelling, exciting,
just like tomorrow show promises to be. Can't wait to
see you then, Mark Ronerd, love you man. Twala couldn't
have done it without you. Foosh, you keep me laughing
all night. Thanks guys, appreciate it. Chris Marriland from O
Kelly kf I AM six forty. We live everywhere in
the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 1 (33:30):
If there's news, if things shift, if they stay the same,
things change.
Speaker 3 (33:34):
For better or worse.
Speaker 1 (33:36):
Regardless of what's happening, you're going to hear in here.
Speaker 3 (33:39):
It's what we do.
Speaker 6 (33:41):
Kf I M KOSG HD two
Speaker 7 (33:44):
Los Angeles, Orange County Lot everywhere on the eart radio
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six from.
Speaker 2 (00:07):
O Kelly k if I AM six forty listening anytime
on demand of the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 3 (00:11):
I once had a a uh oh.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
He's one of the programmers I worked with, and we
were talking about you know, good days, bad days. Uh
you know what happens when you go in the in
the studio, but you had a bad day. Guys, you've
all been there right where whatever's going on, whatever turmoil
is going on. When you're in the studio, you have
to put all that aside, right, I mean you kind
(00:36):
of you have to lock in. And he used to say,
as soon as you cracked that mic, it's showtime, baby,
and I thought, that's so true.
Speaker 3 (00:44):
It's so true.
Speaker 4 (00:45):
I mean, yeah, absolutely, because I mean there's there. Well, honestly,
I leave it at the door.
Speaker 3 (00:50):
That's good.
Speaker 4 (00:51):
You know, it sucks because it's like you have that
whatever you're going through and then I get to the
through those doors that's gone.
Speaker 2 (00:58):
For nets to pause. And I don't know about you,
but I use that kind of as a coping mechanism.
And my therapist says, you know, you compartmentalize and I said, yeah,
that's that's how you that's how you do life.
Speaker 3 (01:12):
And he says, no, a.
Speaker 2 (01:13):
Lot of people will work through their emotions, like, well,
I can't do that because I got to go in
the air. I can't go on the air and work
through my emotions. It's showtime, baby, showtime. I bring that
up because I love doing I love talking about what's
happening in the world of show biz.
Speaker 3 (01:31):
I wish I were better versed.
Speaker 2 (01:32):
It's one of the reasons I like working with you guys,
because I know Mo is so well connected, and then
by extension, you are as well and twelve. I've worked
with you a number of times, even when Moe was
doing weekends and I had the privilege of filling in,
and of course Mark, Mark was the the last man
on the Totem Pull and it got stuck with me
on some Sunday shows. And you guys are just connected,
(01:54):
you know what you're talking about. I love that, and
so I love being able to talk about show business.
I'd love to do more about the business of show
business because I'm fascinated by all the other goings on.
Right the fact I've got a story coming up here
in the next segment. I got to share with you
that we've got a major streamer that is getting rid
of their ADS supported product because they have a new
(02:19):
AD supported product. They have too many AD supported products
to keep supporting AD supporting products.
Speaker 3 (02:25):
What a mess that is fascinated by that. We'll get
to that in a second.
Speaker 2 (02:28):
But one of the things that we see in let's
say publishing, is somebody likes to come up with a
benchmark something that is massive. Time Magazine, Person of the Year, Right,
there's something big, Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition. They want to
have this big, splashy thing. It doesn't necessarily define who
(02:50):
they are, but it doesn't violate the definition of their
brand either.
Speaker 3 (02:55):
Sports Illustrated Magazine for.
Speaker 2 (02:58):
Guys who like sport and girls swimsuit edition.
Speaker 3 (03:05):
Right, Time Magazine.
Speaker 2 (03:06):
We were on top of all the most important things
in Time, and boom, here is the highlight of the year.
Speaker 3 (03:12):
People Magazine.
Speaker 2 (03:14):
We have all the different we know all there is
to know about the celebrities. We're big on the celebrities
we know from top to bottom, and then we create
a ranking system to make the celebrities who are already
full of vanity even vaniteer Vanadier whatever. So Stephen Colbert
is doing the Late Show last night. He dives into
(03:35):
what People magazine has come up with as the sexiest
man Alive.
Speaker 3 (03:38):
Maybe you saw, without.
Speaker 5 (03:39):
Further ado, Joe, A drum roll please, this year's People's
Sexiest Man Alive is.
Speaker 6 (03:49):
John Krasinski.
Speaker 2 (03:51):
All right, well, all right, and then he goes on
to make the same joke everybody he makes. I was
a little this pointed because I like Colbert, but he said,
oh I thought this was.
Speaker 3 (04:03):
Gonna be my year. Come on, that's the that's like
the uh, it's like the token expression. You have to
say it. My god, I know.
Speaker 2 (04:15):
It's like it's like a morning show from a bad
CHR station in my hometown. Right Like that is entry
level radio comedy. I thought it was my year.
Speaker 3 (04:27):
Oh yeah, me too.
Speaker 2 (04:29):
The Jimbo and Bimbo Show will be right back, jim
We thought you were gonna be this exsiest man Alive
this year.
Speaker 3 (04:39):
God, I hate that crap.
Speaker 2 (04:40):
You actually sound like some of those crafty shows.
Speaker 3 (04:44):
A good imprisination of it. Listen.
Speaker 2 (04:46):
One thing that he drove me nuts because I used
to do morning radio on music stations. I was never
in very large market, so but I did you know,
talk radio is where I had a little more success.
But uh, I did have some female co hosts and
I liked it. I just I hated that it was
so easy to fall into. I always called it the
jim Bo and Bimbo Show. I just hated that, and
(05:09):
I always wanted to have a little bit more depth.
And that's why we got questioned in the ratings, because,
let's face it, people just wanted that. Yeah, here's a
guy saying something crazy and then a giggle box. It
reinforces his stupid humor. Yeah, I hate that crap so bad. Anyway,
Emily Blunt, what does she have to say about her
husband being named the Sexiest Man Alive?
Speaker 3 (05:31):
You think that's a turn on or turno off?
Speaker 7 (05:33):
John Krasinski's new title is that's from e News People
magazine Sexiest Man Alive is not going to let him
off easy at home. The forty five year old jokes
that while his wife, Emily Blunt was very excited by
the news, she isn't going to ease up on him.
In fact, quite the opposite. The Office star tells people
in the cover story quote, I think it's going to
make me do more household yours. After this comes out,
(05:55):
she'll be like, all right, that means you're going to
really earn it.
Speaker 8 (05:57):
Here at home.
Speaker 3 (05:59):
What does that mean You're gonna earn what?
Speaker 7 (06:01):
However, the Mary Poppins return star, who shares daughters Hazel
and Violet with John, also insists on some heavy ribbing,
joking that she plans to wallpaper the house with his
sexy new cover. John tells the bag quote, my children
will love that.
Speaker 6 (06:15):
It won't be weird at all.
Speaker 7 (06:16):
The Quiet Place director and star says jokes aside, there
was a lot of joy in sharing the news with
his wife of fourteen years. As for the Jack Ryan
Starrs initial reaction to the new title, He tells Stephen
Colbert during the November twelfth episode of his Late Night
show that when he learned the news, he thought he
was the butt of a joke.
Speaker 2 (06:34):
Okay, all right, you get it. It's all light and
fluffy and all that stuff. I do like when actors
who I think are genuinely nice. I love John Krasinski
and I love Emily Blunt, and I love that they're together.
That's one of those Hollywood couples that I hope stays together. Forever,
and I'll be devastated if they break up because I
like them so much and so it makes me happy
when people like that win these accolades.
Speaker 3 (06:57):
Great? Do that more love it?
Speaker 2 (07:00):
Do you suppose, though, that if you come home and
tell your wife I just got named the sexiest man alive,
do you think that's a turn on? Or do you
think it's a turn off, because then it's like, oh,
you think you're something now? Is there a is there
an air of maybe he thinks he's better than me
(07:22):
now other women are going to be oggling him. Or
do you think it's a total sense of pride, like, Wow,
I'm gonna be with the sexiest man alive. I've never
been so proud of my husband, and and look what
I you know, I'm with the sexiest man alife. If
I were with the sexiest woman alife, which I am,
of course my wife is, of course, I mean I
would feel like I would feel like, uh, I got
(07:44):
the best trophy.
Speaker 3 (07:44):
On my arm. Yeah, but this is Hollywood, Now, I'll Hollywood.
Speaker 9 (07:49):
You know, couples looking like that, it's almost like, you know,
if you're if your husband or wife wins an Academy
award and is thing in Hollywood and you're not, you know,
just you're supportive and you're like, this is a part
of it's winning Sexiest Woman Live or Sexist Man Alive.
You know, you listen to anyone who's won it, and
nothing changes at home.
Speaker 3 (08:09):
You know, they're not like I can't believe you want
to know, they're just like, man, like this what you've
been working for?
Speaker 2 (08:15):
I don't know, man, because but okay, do you think
that there's fear that he's going to start looking somewhere
else thinking he can do whatever he wants? And I'll
tell you what, how many times have we seen people
in Hollywood who have an equal relationship as far as
their their career paths when they get together and then
all of a sudden, one person's career takes off and
then the other one is put out the pasture. You know,
(08:39):
I'm thinking Jim Carrey like, oh, you know what I
could be with Jenny McCarthy.
Speaker 3 (08:43):
So I guess bye, bye, honey, I'm with Jenny. Now. Yeah,
that's just guys period. I mean you know that I
don't think there's any insecurity on her part.
Speaker 9 (08:52):
No, No, I don't, because you got to think about
guys who are married, who individuals that people think are
the most beautiful women on the planet Earth. You know,
Brady was married Toselle and there were allegations of infidelity.
And it's like, but that's Gazelle, what are you doing?
(09:14):
You know, It's like, guys are guys, And it's unfortunate
that that being named sexiguest man alive if that's what
makes him step out, you know. And and and I'm
no partner, no, because she's also a star. She's also star.
And she's also a mega star, you know, so it's
(09:35):
not like she's some scrub. She's been probably in more
feature films than him by now.
Speaker 3 (09:41):
Oh yeah, you know, she's incredible. He needs this. He
just keep up. He needs this. He needs a little shine.
Otherwise she's gonna start thinking she can do better. Like like, hey,
so are you ever going to be anything else? Why
an't you gonna get your career off the ground here?
Speaker 2 (09:58):
I know you did the office, but that's been Maybe
you start doing something else there, little Jack, Ryan, that's good.
Speaker 3 (10:04):
Okay, a little jack all right? I like that.
Speaker 2 (10:08):
All right, we'll talk about the ad supported service that
had too many ads to support the service of the
ad supported service.
Speaker 3 (10:15):
It turned very inception, very fast. That's next.
Speaker 1 (10:18):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (10:23):
Chris merrill In from O Kelly Listen anytime on demand
of the iHeartRadio app. You're gonna want to check out
tonight's program when you get a chance, mostly because uh
Twalla made an a mission that nobody expected him to
make in today's program. I can tell you that when
we put the show together today, at no point that
I expect that he would admit that he'd try cannibalism
(10:44):
if given the opportunity. That was just weird man, And
I just wonder how long he spent thinking about that
before the words came out of his mouth.
Speaker 3 (10:52):
Okay, fascinating.
Speaker 9 (10:54):
Look, look be clear, I said, you don't know what
your eating at any given time. At any given time,
and I don't believe that everything we're eating is beef.
We don't know where these bodies are going. We don't
know what's being buried, we don't We don't know where
(11:16):
these horses are going at the race track. We don't
know where the people are going in Forest Lawn. We
don't know. But we still have our behinds in the
drive through nightly got all able. We got to get
a burger. I gotta run and get some Taco Bell.
I gotta go and get some done.
Speaker 3 (11:32):
You don't know what you're eating.
Speaker 9 (11:34):
Silent breed is paper.
Speaker 3 (11:37):
Yeah, that's what you're eating.
Speaker 9 (11:39):
I'm to say if you can tell me for a
fact that you know what you're eating.
Speaker 3 (11:44):
Yeah, I'm looking at you like you're crazy.
Speaker 2 (11:46):
All of a sudden, that pink slime that the Taco
Bell had a problem with a few years back, that sounds.
Speaker 3 (11:50):
Really good right now? You remember that? Of course? Do
you know why I remember that? This is so funny.
Speaker 2 (11:56):
I remember that because we got a memo saying don't
talk about it on the air.
Speaker 3 (12:01):
Do you remember that?
Speaker 10 (12:02):
Yeah?
Speaker 3 (12:02):
Yeah, yeah, yeah yeah.
Speaker 2 (12:04):
They said, you know, listen, Taco Bell doesn't want us
talking about this. News can talk about it, but Taco
Bell is an advertiser. Don't talk about it on the air. Yeah,
And now I can't forget it. Yeah, although I think
it just violated that memo.
Speaker 9 (12:18):
But isn't it past the statute on that Yeah, statute
of limitations on memo of that.
Speaker 3 (12:23):
Yeah, yeah, definitely, yeah, Yeah, that's what it is.
Speaker 10 (12:26):
Uh.
Speaker 2 (12:26):
Imagine if you run a company and you acquire another company,
and then all of a sudden, you in your acquisition
decide that the company you just acquired does it better
than you've been doing it, and so you start doing
it the way the company that you acquired does it,
and then you are redundant and you don't need the
company that you acquired any longer. I know it's weird, right,
(12:48):
It sounds like inception. It's a dream within a dream.
That's what's happening with Amazon.
Speaker 4 (12:53):
Uh.
Speaker 2 (12:53):
From the award winning cord Cutter News. You're going to
hear the professionalism in this broadcast right here, which was
found exclusively on the internet.
Speaker 5 (13:03):
Welcome back to the Corcars News Tech Lab. We've got
some breaking news that just broke this afternoon.
Speaker 3 (13:08):
See Rodner, Are you paying attention? That's how you write
a story.
Speaker 4 (13:13):
Thank you for that. No, I was actually busy writing
a story. No, listen, this is just good writing at lab.
Speaker 6 (13:18):
We've got some breaking news that just broke.
Speaker 2 (13:20):
That's how you know it's breaking news, Roder, because it
just broke. Of course, bingo, what do you get when
you work your fingers to the bone. By the way,
bony fingers, thank you very much.
Speaker 5 (13:29):
Yep, Amazon, preev is shutting down. It's the free AD
supported streaming service from Amazon. Oh no, probably heard this
before because this was reported earlier this year from Adweek.
Speaker 2 (13:40):
So I love that it's breaking news that you probably
heard earlier this year.
Speaker 3 (13:44):
That is just amazing. Yeah, they're shutting down FREEV. I
like FREEV.
Speaker 4 (13:49):
Yeah, yeah, I just watched all of Hell on Wheels
on FREEV.
Speaker 3 (13:53):
Freev's great. Do you know what I think they're doing here?
Speaker 2 (13:57):
I think free V, which was an AD supported streaming
service like tob right isn't to be an AD supported
streaming service, but freebe was all movies.
Speaker 4 (14:06):
No, FREEB was a little bit of everything. Okay, it
was pretty similar to to B.
Speaker 3 (14:10):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (14:10):
Yeah, donate on Tube. That's Mark's bread and butter. Don't
you dare nothing.
Speaker 2 (14:14):
Wrong with tub? I got nothing wrong. I love to
Be's new ads. By the way, have you heard their
new ads?
Speaker 3 (14:19):
No?
Speaker 2 (14:19):
That are like I don't remember the specifics, but it'll
be like uh uh, Toob is there.
Speaker 3 (14:25):
If you're a little old lady who had her.
Speaker 2 (14:27):
Wallet stolen from an evil mugger, Tooby's got you covered.
We won't charge you anything, and if you're a mugger
who just stole a little old lady's last dollar, to
be's free for you too, because two be's free for everyone.
Speaker 3 (14:42):
It's great.
Speaker 4 (14:43):
I love that that had some genius marketing, right, I
love it. Yeah, it's it's fantastic. It's pretty smart because
I was like, where are they going with this? But right, oh,
there it is. That's good.
Speaker 2 (14:52):
Yeah, I'm like, how are you going to know if
it's an old lady who just got mug that you're
gonna get free to all?
Speaker 3 (14:57):
I get at. Yeah, it was good.
Speaker 6 (14:59):
I like that said I had heard it was going
to happen.
Speaker 2 (15:01):
Okay, so ad we heard that freeb was going away
from Amazon Prime?
Speaker 3 (15:06):
Why?
Speaker 6 (15:06):
They said probably in the summer.
Speaker 5 (15:08):
They weren't too far off because come fall, Amazon made
it official and is shutting down.
Speaker 2 (15:12):
All right, So thank you very much to the cord
Cut of News for telling us how seasons work.
Speaker 5 (15:17):
We got all the details about this, including where is
this content going, how are you going to still be
able to access it? And what does this mean for
the future of the Amazon free v exclusive content.
Speaker 3 (15:28):
I mean, the way he enunciates is just top notch too.
Speaker 6 (15:31):
We'll tell you all that in a quick second.
Speaker 3 (15:32):
Okay, oh any quick sit? That felt like a tease.
Speaker 5 (15:36):
I do have a story about this. We're at corecardsnews
dot com. If you want to read about it, I'll
pull link to it in the first pin comment.
Speaker 3 (15:41):
But wait a minute, I thought you were telling us
about it.
Speaker 5 (15:43):
Pull link to it in the first pin comment and
the show notes down below. If you like what we
do here, please consider hinnight subscribe bun hinnut thumbs up.
Speaker 3 (15:51):
We're going to do? What do the subscribe button?
Speaker 5 (15:53):
Hinnut thumb we're hinde. Please consider hinnight subscribe bun flush.
Speaker 3 (15:58):
Is that how the young kins talk? Like out of touch? Here?
Is this guy just bad at heat works? Well?
Speaker 4 (16:03):
I think he's trying to make it like a younger
thing the way he's saying it, because the kids are
always smashed that like button or that's a subscribe button.
But he's trying to like cool with it, like hidden it, hidden.
Speaker 6 (16:15):
It, Hey night, subscribe hitting it.
Speaker 3 (16:17):
You can help us out by hidden it.
Speaker 5 (16:19):
Please consider hynight subscribe bunnnut thumbs up, hidden it.
Speaker 4 (16:22):
Yeah, see the first one. I give him the first
one because maybe he was just talking too fast. He
said it the same way the second time. That's how
he says hitting it instinctually. Yeah, hidden, hidden.
Speaker 5 (16:32):
Head, please consider hey night subscribe bunn Nut thumbs up,
Hidden doing one or balls YouTube know you enjoy what
we do here, So YouTube recommends our video some more people.
Speaker 3 (16:40):
Yeah, no, I'm not gonna do that.
Speaker 2 (16:42):
Uh No, I think I handed it potted and a
pen in it is what he's put.
Speaker 3 (16:50):
His comments below.
Speaker 2 (16:51):
What Uh so, here's the deal though, Why does Amazon
Prime need an ad supported uh free V when Amazon
Prime is now AD supported and they're charging so I
think they're going to maintain They're going to keep all
of the content that freeb had access to, but they
don't need to give it away for free. They must
(17:12):
have done some math on this roder. You got Prime
or were you just stealing FREEV?
Speaker 3 (17:17):
No? No, you're watching it.
Speaker 4 (17:18):
I mean, okay, how else is Jeff Bezos going to
afford his massive yachts I have to subscribe to Prime?
Speaker 3 (17:24):
Well?
Speaker 2 (17:25):
Yeah, especially when he keeps screwing up his newspaper investment.
Speaker 3 (17:29):
Yeah, how can I not support all that? Right? You
have me? Yeah, look at that disaster.
Speaker 4 (17:33):
I think we were also working our way through the
Rockford Files on freev too.
Speaker 3 (17:36):
They had a lot of good stuff on there. That's good.
Oh yeah, my neighbor lady used to watch the rock
I love that. Yeah, it's not just good on its own.
Speaker 4 (17:47):
It's good if you like old La, because you get
to see La in the early seventies before it's so cool.
Speaker 2 (17:53):
Yeah, it's really good. I love that show. James Garner
had attitude. That guy pulled it off, all right. One
of the things that is breaking through and I'm gonna
call twenty twenty four. They were one of the biggest
success stories of twenty twenty four, not the politicians, but
the people who made the politicians real life podcasters. The
world of politics has changed forever because we are forever
(18:14):
stuck with podcasters.
Speaker 3 (18:16):
That's next.
Speaker 1 (18:17):
You're listening to Later with Moe Kelly on demand from
KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 2 (18:25):
Hi, It's Chris Merril caf I AM six forty. I'm
from O'Kelly. Listen anytime on to Man and the iHeartRadio app. God,
I should have been a singer. You guys hear that
nailed it?
Speaker 3 (18:36):
Man? Yeah, foush, I hope you had that.
Speaker 2 (18:38):
You're running tape on this right, nie sure an perfect,
All right, just take what I did, just rip it,
send it off, publish that. We'll make a good jillion dollars.
That's platinum. It felt platinum to me. Yeah, like a DJ.
Speaker 4 (18:51):
Just take the the lyrics out and just put a
beat to it. Right, Yeah, let's it. You have to
sample it, you can do that. Just do that in
the next commercial break. All right, throw it together. Sounds good.
Speaker 2 (19:02):
See if you can get mister worldwide open for my
next tour exactly, let's see, we'll work roll.
Speaker 3 (19:09):
Uh oh, you know what.
Speaker 2 (19:10):
This election, there's a lot of debate about Trump and
Harris and where they were spending their time making their
media appearances. I was reading an article in Variety, and
I don't know if if you guys happen to see this,
but it talked about Joe Rogan and the Fifth Estate,
how the podcaster and a group of cable news exiles
(19:32):
became more powerful than traditional media. So it goes on
to talk about the podcasters and how Trump really reached
people because he understood the importance of Joe Rogan, whereas
Kamala Harris didn't. And Kamala Harris was invited to be
on Rogan's show, but instead she was on Saturday Night
(19:55):
Live Loser, And I think Variety misses something here. I
think it's it's a post mortem where you try to
create a narrative using and then you cherry pick evidence.
So in fact they what they go on to say,
uh in the article is let me see, let me
(20:20):
find it the part about the snl Yeah. Here it
is us Harris's campaign decision to snub the Joe Rogan
Experience podcast.
Speaker 3 (20:27):
They turned it down because she was too busy.
Speaker 2 (20:30):
This according to Andrew Yang, a CNN commentator, and also
Andrew Yang. Instead of Trump's excuse me, Instead, Trump hit
Rogan's Austin, Texas studio in the final days of the campaign,
racking up a massive audience on YouTube.
Speaker 3 (20:43):
Alone forty eight million views.
Speaker 2 (20:46):
On a night when Harris could have fielded easy questions
about some of Rogan's favorite topics, from the benefits of
psychedelics to the existence of extraterrestrial life, she chose to
make a surprise Saturday Live visit for a ninety second cameo. Yeah,
but I saw that all over the socials. News was
(21:06):
writing about that. News is writing about the Joe Rogan Experience.
Speaker 3 (21:09):
Too.
Speaker 2 (21:10):
But Trump was supposed to do an hour with Joe Rogan,
and Brogan give him three hours. Would he have given
Kamala Harris three hours?
Speaker 3 (21:19):
Now?
Speaker 2 (21:19):
My understanding was as well that Rogan said he didn't
want to talk politics with Kamala Harris. He wanted to
get to know her, but he didn't want to talk politics.
Wait a minute, Goose, Gander, gander, goose, how's that working out?
Do you get to say, I'm I'm gonna direct, I'm
gonna allow for one candidate to talk about their policy,
(21:39):
but I'm gonna tell the other candidate they're not allowed to.
Doesn't that seem a bit bizarre? I also happen to
think about something that Okay, I'm gonna crucify for this,
not literally crucified, because that would be painful and I
would cry. Is it time that we take a good
hard look at applying some of the same rules that
(22:01):
we have in legacy media to new media, for instance?
And I know I know what the difference is. Look,
I've been in the business long enough, I get it.
I know that we are that we are licensed by
the FCC. I know that we have to play by
certain broadcast rules because of the spectrum that we operate under.
(22:24):
But I just kind of wonder, forget the FCC, Maybe
this is a Federal Elections Commission situation. If you've got
Joe Rogan hitting forty eight million people and he doesn't
have to play by equal time rules, why is it
that a radio station in Perughkeepsie that has an average
(22:47):
listener listenership of twenty five hundred has to play by
these these equal time I was gonna call it, Marcaine.
Speaker 3 (22:55):
They really aren't.
Speaker 2 (22:56):
They're not bad, these equal time rules. See, I'm fine
with equal time. I know a lot of people don't
like it because they've positioned their entire radio program as
either a showcase for the left or a showcase for
the right, and they don't want to offer equal time.
Or a radio station's entire brand is we are a
showcase for the right or a showcase for the left,
(23:16):
and they don't want to offer equal time. But the
way it works in broadcast is that if I have
Trump on this show, and Harris calls and says, hey,
I heard Jed Trump on, I'd like equal time. I
have to offer equal time, not necessarily on the same show,
but it has to be on the same station, and
it has to be in a day part with an
equivalent audience size.
Speaker 3 (23:35):
That's the rules.
Speaker 2 (23:37):
But Joe Rogan can pick and choose, and he can say,
I'm a podcaster.
Speaker 3 (23:40):
I don't have to play by those rules.
Speaker 2 (23:43):
And yet doesn't that then mean that you've got a
major media influencer who is tipping the scales for a
political candidate of one party or the other. I'm so
frustrated with the with the divisiveness in our country that
(24:05):
maybe I'm looking to cast blame. I just don't know
that it's beneficial that we have become such a a
micro targeted genre society. Does that make sense where our
brands are all right or all left? Or we've got
(24:28):
a podcaster has a tremendous influence and they just up
and decide who they want to win. Or you've got
a satellite radio company where you've got Howard Stern who's
gonna interview Harris but he won't have Trump on again. Well,
he doesn't have to play by the same rules as
everybody else because he's not he's not govern by the FCC.
(24:52):
I mean, he had Trump on a long time ago.
But doesn't it seem bizarre to you. Maybe it's just
sour grapes, Maybe it's just feeling like there's something unfair
going on, but I gotta believe it. It's not beneficial
to the country that we have rules in place in
(25:13):
order to ensure equal access to potential voters when it
comes to broadcast licenses, but we don't ensure equal access
when it comes to even more.
Speaker 3 (25:24):
Popular media figures.
Speaker 2 (25:26):
Because, let's be honest, forty eight million people ain't here
in this show tonight. There was something else going on
in Capitol Hill today. Forget about politics. There was something
even more important that was going on in Capitol Hill.
And it's bipartisan and they're about to really screw up
society all by letting the cat out of the bag.
Speaker 1 (25:46):
That is next you're listening to Later with Moe Kelly
on demand from KFI AM six forty.
Speaker 3 (25:57):
Ok I AM six forty right after the mokel Show.
Speaker 2 (26:00):
As always, the Great George Norian Coast and Coast George,
Big day for you.
Speaker 3 (26:04):
Congress was right up your ally.
Speaker 8 (26:07):
Today they're doing that thing. We'll be talking about that
for a little bit tonight, Chris. One day we'll get
the answers I hold and for the rest of the show,
artificial intelligence will at play havoc with our financial self
and later on hunting for Bigfoot on Coast to Coast.
Speaker 3 (26:24):
Always a great lineup.
Speaker 2 (26:25):
Looking forward to it, George, Thank you so much, my friend,
looking forward to it.
Speaker 3 (26:29):
I was listening to George my way home. Love it.
Great way to wrap up my evening.
Speaker 2 (26:33):
So here's one of the things that I wanted to touch
on this going into Georgie's show. So the house did
this hearing on UFOs today and they had some pretty
recognizable people in there, and George is going to dive
deeper into it obviously during Coast to Coast, but they're
basically saying there's a massive cover up going on.
Speaker 11 (26:54):
NASA has whole archives of data, much of which I
believe will likely have information that will help inform UAP.
We need only look and again in an error with AIML,
we can relatively quickly and easily go through it. So
I think it's something that we should encourage an asset
to do.
Speaker 12 (27:11):
Because is a presentation from the UATP Task Force. This
is completely absurd. It's nuts, this level of censorship of
redaction on a document. It shows the redaction of how
many reports they've collected for how many years? Two of
the three potential explanations are blacked out the Pentagon.
Speaker 2 (27:31):
Yeah, why do you think they're blacked out? I mean, actually,
in this case, kind of blacking that stuff out allows
your brain to go crazy. Doesn't it like they're blacking
something out. They're not saying it's aliens, which means they
must have blacked out that it's aliens. Right, But it's
kind of where you it's kind of where you go
with it, all right, So back to it.
Speaker 12 (27:53):
The intelligence community is treating us like children. It's time
for us to know the truth about this. I think
that we can handle.
Speaker 2 (28:00):
No, we cannot. Just to be very clear, no we cannot.
How's the government? No, we we would panic. Did you
guys ever see Mars attacks? Of course it would panic.
Speaker 3 (28:12):
That would be it. That would pretty much be what
would happened. I think. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (28:15):
Look, even even maybe one of the more uh tame
alien movies signs everybody freaked out, right, it's just total
freak out times.
Speaker 13 (28:27):
Has the government conducted secret UAP crash rechieval programs?
Speaker 4 (28:30):
Yes?
Speaker 3 (28:30):
Or no? Yes?
Speaker 2 (28:32):
Okay u A P for those I'm famili I think
most people know now that it is the unidentified anomalous
phenomena phenomena.
Speaker 3 (28:41):
Yeah, thanks, oh, thank you very much. I appreciate that.
Speaker 2 (28:44):
The unidentified anomalists phenomena.
Speaker 3 (28:47):
Okay, all right, I get it. Thanks, yeah, phenomena. You're
gonna love this. Guards all right, thank you very much,
appreciate it.
Speaker 2 (28:58):
So they want to get to the the unidentified anomalous phenomena,
which is like UFOs, but they wanted to expand it
a little bit further. So that because now we've got
unidentified underwater phenomena and other things. Okay, so what else?
She gave a big yes or no? Do you have evidence?
Yes or no?
Speaker 13 (29:18):
The government conducted secret UAP crash retrieval programs?
Speaker 3 (29:21):
Yes or no?
Speaker 2 (29:22):
Yes, And she's doing the old trick where it's like
you have to answer the question yes or no. In
other words, I'm not going to allow any context in
my question. Have they done secret UAP retrieval things?
Speaker 3 (29:34):
Yes or no? Yes?
Speaker 2 (29:36):
In other words, we saw something, we didn't know what
it was. We sent the military out to go get
it because we didn't know what it was. All right,
have you done secret UAP retrieval projects? Yes or no?
Speaker 3 (29:48):
Yes?
Speaker 2 (29:49):
Now, how do we take that we obviously they're going
after a spaceship.
Speaker 8 (29:54):
No.
Speaker 2 (29:55):
I you see something in the air and you know
that it lands somewhere, and you're gonna go figure out
what that is is. That would be a but you
don't want to tell anybody that you're after it. That
would be a secret UAP of retrieval project. Kind of
like if a Chinese weather balloon happens to fly over
Montana and somebody shoots it down, you gotta go pick
it up.
Speaker 3 (30:12):
Okay.
Speaker 13 (30:13):
Were they designed to identify and reverse engineer alien craft?
Speaker 3 (30:16):
Yes?
Speaker 10 (30:16):
Or no? Yes?
Speaker 3 (30:17):
Yeah, I'm not so sure about that.
Speaker 13 (30:18):
In your book, you mentioned government employees who've been injured
by UAPs placed on leave and receiving government compensation for
their injuries.
Speaker 3 (30:25):
Is that correct? That is correct. I feel like he's
kind of given away classified information here.
Speaker 13 (30:29):
How can the government deny we have recovered craft if
they're paying people because they've been injured by recovered craft.
Speaker 2 (30:37):
Again, she's jumping to the conclusion that all UAPs are
recovered alien spacecraft.
Speaker 3 (30:45):
I'm not ready to buy that yet, ma'am. That's a
great question. That's why I think we're here again.
Speaker 10 (30:49):
I really believe that we should use this hearing to
as a catalyst to improve in bolster our air defense capabilities,
in our maritime awayne demandness capability, because obviously they're holes.
Speaker 2 (31:01):
In it, and now we're getting into the whole all
UAPs are threats or could we even take the risk
that they're not, whether it be.
Speaker 10 (31:09):
UAP of non Hi direction or Nhi direction or like
as you say, sir China or any other adversaries.
Speaker 2 (31:16):
So that was the interesting part he's had. At one
point during this this entire conversation conversation with these these witnesses,
and many of them were pretty respectable individuals, they talked
about the UAPs being spotted in large numbers around nuclear
sites or military installations, and these witnesses of course said, yeah, yeah,
(31:37):
it's happening.
Speaker 3 (31:37):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (31:38):
They said, could it be Chinese or Russian aircraft? Well, yeah, yeah,
of course it could be. Meanwhile, the next person says,
could it be aliens? Well, yeah, yeah, it could be aliens.
But at this point they're just they're loving the spotlight
is what's happening, and the politicians are loving that we're
talking about it. But if it's a national security threat
(32:00):
is a major concern. If we've got Russia or China
spying on us. Now, maybe that's just so that they
can grow their own intelligence. Maybe they have nefarious plans
for the future. But actually we can we can comprehend that.
If it is, say, something extraterrestrial or ethereal, even yeah,
(32:23):
we can't handle that. We would go into absolute meltdown.
That would be it just raining cats and dogs. Now
forget it all over at that point, couldn't handle it.
Speaker 4 (32:35):
And not too done the severity of it. But that
interviewer should have been the one to interview the new
CEO at Red Lobster.
Speaker 2 (32:43):
Oh my gosh, you're right good callback Yeah, And then
he would he would have given her all kinds of
really great buzzwords on everything we see. I think I've
hold on. Where's my Red Lobster cut? I closed it here,
I've got it.
Speaker 3 (32:55):
He's got the What are you gonna do for Red Lobster?
He's like, ah, we're gonna energize it.
Speaker 6 (32:59):
Is it relevant compelling? Yeah and exciting?
Speaker 3 (33:04):
Yes or no? We'll Redlabster be relevant, compelling and exciting,
Yes or no?
Speaker 6 (33:08):
Relevant, compelling and exciting.
Speaker 2 (33:12):
It's good enough. What are the aliens? Aliens are relevant? Compelling, exciting,
just like tomorrow show promises to be. Can't wait to
see you then, Mark Ronerd, love you man. Twala couldn't
have done it without you. Foosh, you keep me laughing
all night. Thanks guys, appreciate it. Chris Marriland from O
Kelly kf I AM six forty. We live everywhere in
the iHeartRadio app.
Speaker 1 (33:30):
If there's news, if things shift, if they stay the same,
things change.
Speaker 3 (33:34):
For better or worse.
Speaker 1 (33:36):
Regardless of what's happening, you're going to hear in here.
Speaker 3 (33:39):
It's what we do.
Speaker 6 (33:41):
Kf I M KOSG HD two
Speaker 7 (33:44):
Los Angeles, Orange County Lot everywhere on the eart radio
Later, with Mo'Kelly News
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Therapy Gecko
An unlicensed lizard psychologist travels the universe talking to strangers about absolutely nothing. TO CALL THE GECKO: follow me on https://www.twitch.tv/lyleforever to get a notification for when I am taking calls. I am usually live Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays but lately a lot of other times too. I am a gecko.