Monday-10-21-2024

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Cacoday Radio program phone number eight eight eight nine three
four seven eight seven four glad to have you a
long Oh boy, boy, old boy. I kind of felt
bad center ross all the audio I sent him, although
it wasn't like you had to cut up twenty cackling
comboly cuts, so you know, you had that going for

(00:24):
you versus you know, some big event. That being said.
That being said, man, there's some crazy stuff, crazy stuff
over the weekend. Look, and let me say this because
somebody did mentioned it. They're like, you know, I don't
know if you guys, he said, I don't know if
you're going to talk about the McDonald's thing. But isn't

(00:46):
this one of those stunts you talked about? And I
was trying to fire out, and so I wrote back
with a question mark and he's like, you know, the
guy brought the snowball in. And I'm like, you know what,
that is a very good discussion. That's a very good
point because if you haven't listened to the show very often.
One of the things that I absolutely hate, and I
don't know if it's just the curmudgeon in me, is

(01:08):
I hate the stupid gotcha stunts The politicians love to do, like,
you know, there's a reply camera which Republican it was there.
It was snowing in DC, which it does sometimes, Okay,
snow's in North Carolina sometimes, so it snows in DC sometimes, okay.
And he brings a snowball into like the House chamber.

(01:29):
He's like, see no global and I'm just like, this
is just also dumb. Do you know what it is?
It's like disingenuous mini trolling on Twitter or after the
Chick fil A thing, you had the one Democrat senator
I think he was, who brought in the bucket a
KFC and put it right on the podium in front

(01:51):
of him and then just ate it to show I'm
not going to Chick fil A. The genius, of course
being is the product that he has. You can't buy
a Chick fil A comparably, right, They don't have a
family bucket. So whatever, Now Trump going to McDonald's is it?

(02:14):
Is it stunty? Yes? Is it stunty in the same
way as a sitting member of Congress bringing a prop
in like their carrot top to an actual hearing. No,
he's on the campaign trail. I have to be honest.

(02:35):
I thought the whole thing was kind of pointless. But
I rethought that for two reasons. One, the video of
and photos that emerge of Donald Trump leaning through a
McDonald's window in the guard well, kind of right in
the apron over the suit. I thought he wouldn't wear

(02:56):
his tie because he was running a deep friar and
he likes to let the high's diplow. But no, he
contained it in an apron. There he did the fry thing.
He did the the the at the window. And at
the window you got Donald Trump, a billionaire, leaning his

(03:20):
head out the window like he's Ray Kroc. It's as
you see the photo I retweeted that I said, would
be good for deportation center. Uh wallposters.

Speaker 2 (03:31):
I've seen like all the photos and all the things
with this thing.

Speaker 1 (03:34):
Yes, okay, I'm curious your take, because you get annoyed
with this stuff too sometimes. But here's my last point
that I'm curious your thoughts, and and so I look
at it through the lens of a campaign thing, and
then I have to judge it in the same way
that I see Kamala in a kitchen or uh, you know,
Cal Cunningham running his grill, right, remember that, And there

(03:56):
there are things that candidates do, and most of the
time they don't move the needle because they're trying to
make a point that is already a political point that
the candidate's making. In this case, there was some of that,
and it immediately became clear to me when I saw
the headline from like in this case, ABC eleven was

(04:17):
one of them. They just had the most concise headline
on this, and basically it was Donald Trump goes to
hold on, let me read the let me read this
for batim. I realized I had my other story open here.
All right, So here we go Trump Trump was Trump
divis McDonald's as he offers no evidence for saying Harris

(04:41):
didn't work there in college. Okay, I have a question.
Both of these candidates have told you a lie at
some point, right Trump? People don't tell me Donald Trump
is a is is an embellisher at times, and also
he uh, he says things that he knows people are

(05:03):
going to react to.

Speaker 3 (05:05):
Right.

Speaker 1 (05:05):
You know how I feel about that little slice of it.
Sometimes it's incredibly amusing. Sometimes it's wildly unhelpful. As he
goes deeper, though, I feel like him doing that is
more helpful, right because because like you get a little
analysis with it, and the analysis is this, I don't
know if she worked at McDonald's for five minutes in college, Like,

(05:29):
there's probably a lot of people out there who spent
a few weeks at a job and I'm out, and
we don't know the details of what she's claiming other
than the the geographic region, right, think about that. That's
really that's that's crazy for something that has become a
contentious point. And there's two explanations. One, she's lying, right,

(05:53):
and she the reason you will never get these specific
details is because then they could check it. Or two
and this is a possibility in something that uh they
that can't politicians do to each other. It's it's they
feel it's more beneficial for her that he looked crazy
screaming she never worked there, So they'll never they'll always

(06:16):
leave it as one of those, you know, those mysteries
that are out there. I don't think that works here though,
because immediately I looked at I looked at the way
that people were reacting to this, and not just on
on on the Twitter, right, but how they were interacting
specifically with ABC within their own with our local affiliate
here and I'm not picking on them, I kind of am,

(06:38):
but because it's an ap story that they re ran,
it would be incredibly easy if reporters still operated under
their Well, let's figure this out, because how can Trump
prove a negative? Right? Go to every McDonald's that has
ever existed in this region or you know, maybe the

(07:02):
state of California for that matter. Plus you got to
look for McDonald's that existed elsewhere or clothed or they
moved the store, and so it doesn't track within that
specific area. You're certain, like, how how is Trump supposed
to prove that? So you by you putting that in
the headline and not pointing out that she's offered no

(07:23):
evidence other than her word. And we know she's lied
every and for and for journalists because I saw getting
called on this.

Speaker 4 (07:32):
Uh.

Speaker 1 (07:33):
Some moonbats are like, she just doesn't lie. And I'm like,
her main campaign points are not true, right, and you
know they're not true and you have to as the media.
You just got caught with your pants down over the Biden. Uh,
you know, debate where clearly you and if you if

(07:56):
you want to say it's not you, but clearly Kamala
Harris and others in that circle lied to you. So
why wouldn't you take five minutes to check Sie if
you worked at Mickey D's. Man, And I think that
this right here at least allows people to scream that
enough that some folks may hear go, you know what,

(08:17):
that's a good question. Why wouldn't they just be like, hey,
what McDonald's real quick? Hell, you would think they'd want
to find a photo of her as a young woman
working a fry thing considering the photo of her as
a young girl with the bus thing. None of it
makes sense? So was it a waste of time? Was
it good meme material? Or do you think it moved

(08:39):
the needle? Ross? All right, I set it up. Where
are you at on this thing? Or do you just
don't care?

Speaker 2 (08:44):
So the reason that they're not supplying a video or
not a video but a photo or a paste ub
or a person coming forward saying I've worked with her
before at McDonald's is because they can't do it because
she is lying. Oh and the reason this is a
big point is because, like you've already said, it goes
against everything that she says her campaign is about. Right,
I was born in a middle class family. No, you

(09:06):
were not, No, you were not.

Speaker 1 (09:08):
But here's the other thing. But also, I like, even
if you're not, even if you're born in a wealthy family,
some people, even if they're a wealthy family, want their
kids to have a job for the sure.

Speaker 2 (09:17):
Sure, but my point is that wasn't her in this
case her what is it on her father's side, he
owned the biggest slave plantation in all of Jamaica.

Speaker 1 (09:25):
Well, her family the lineage y, Yeah, that's her parents, right,
her her parents.

Speaker 2 (09:31):
I mean, if we if we're i mean going back
to the to the to the plantation slavery thing, if
we're talking about generational wealth, well there you go. Her
parents were both professors. She was raised in Berkeley and
then moved to Montreal. Upon moving to Montreal, she was
given a gift by her family of sixty thousand dollars.
This is not middle class. She did not work in McDonald's.
If she did, and we know this because we know

(09:51):
she has a thin skin, because of how she reacted
when actually being confronted by an actual interview with Brett Baer,
she would this would piss her off. So if she
could prove it wrong, and if they could prove Donald
Trump to be a liar on this issue. They would
have provided everything that have already stated.

Speaker 1 (10:07):
Or or you put it in a headline. Yeah yeah,
and you think that's gonna work. And I don't think
it works as well as anymore.

Speaker 2 (10:14):
And then you have people saying, oh, well, it was
just a campaign stunt him being there, and he's just
using this, it's just a prop. Well, the point goes back,
he's trolling her because her use of this, of this,
her working at McDonald's, which is false. Is a is
a prop it is.

Speaker 1 (10:29):
It is one of the things property of her campaign
as a middle class person, which is false. And here's
what I saw people rebut that point, here's what they'd say.
They'd be like, yes, but even if you don't think
she was middle class, Trump is a billionaire. The difference
is I saw somebody put this into better words. I

(10:50):
don't want to read from their tweak the This is
where I'm at on it, too, So let me let
me try to be as concise as possible. Rumps in
on it. Okay, he's in on the joke.

Speaker 2 (11:03):
He understands it.

Speaker 1 (11:04):
He knows he's a billionaire. He's not pretending that he
is a fry cook. You know what I'm saying. I mean,
he's right, he's having fun with it, and he's talking
to everybody and you know, Ron McDonald and they're laughing.
And it might be just be polite. Maybe they do
or don't want to work with him. It doesn't matter,
and people are showing up and he's joyful about it.

Speaker 2 (11:25):
He understands the joke when he's putting the april on,
he understand the apron on, he understands the meme that
it is. Yeah, he's part of it. He can laugh along.
This goes back to the Al Smith dinner this past
weekend where she did not show up because she can't
handle it. She's not she can't pretend to be human
because everything about her is completely is a falsehood.

Speaker 1 (11:45):
And Trump would never be like, oh, I'm just I'm
just a fry cook, right, I'm just a humble guy.
He's serving the damn.

Speaker 2 (11:53):
He's serving the fries, and he's saying, these are the
best greatest fries they've ever made here, and well he's
passing him out. Here's the best Mealia ever had here.
And he's part of the joke and he's playing along
with people, and it is very I don't see how
it's anything but a net positive.

Speaker 1 (12:07):
Yeah yeah, so uh no, the long way about it's
not It's not a guy walking into a committee hearing
with the snowball. It's a candidate doing how you do
this thing where you you Microw, I call it Mike Rowing, right, yeah, yeah,
I mean you're Mike Rowe. If you ever watch Dirty Jobs,

(12:29):
here's here's the Here's why Micro is such a good
host with that. Micro is such a good host with
that because if a lot of ps TV presenters or
news hosts or others who might find themselves doing a
documentary style show like that would also they would have
zero ability to connect with the people. Right And if

(12:53):
you you know, if Mike Row every time he goes there,
in the back of the mind of a lot of
the people who do those jobs, because I've done some
of those jobs, some of you are going to do
those jobs, right, you will never no one will shovel
as much cowpoop as I have listening to the show
right now, I'm almost sure of it, right, And that

(13:14):
was one of the features that they did on there,
essentially a ranch hand out there. But I but I
feel like he genuinely is interested, and he connects with people.
And most of the time when you see a politician
go in there and they got their their you know,
their apron, but you know with the folds in it,
or they're they're purporting that this is normal. Chuck Schumer

(13:38):
is he wants you to believe that He normally girls
hamburgers where he puts the cheese on at the same
time he puts the meat on the grill as you
do ross. That's that's how you grow, right, You take
raw hamburger, put the cheese right on it, put it
on the grill first, right.

Speaker 2 (13:54):
I just eat the meat raw. It's better for you.

Speaker 1 (13:56):
Oh all right, liverking here, yeah, right. But Micro connects
with him and Donald Trump. And the reason is is
Mike Rowe is a millionaire, multi millionaire. He's a producer.
He's got some credits on stuff people don't even realize.
But at no points you go in and he's like, no,
I'm just a ditch digger too. He is a guy
who is genuinely interested, not necessarily just in the job

(14:17):
that they're doing, but the motivation that people have to
do that job. And it comes across as more genuine
and I'm not saying that's necessarily Trump because there's the
tinge of the politics there. But like, people don't think
he's being fake except for the media.

Speaker 2 (14:34):
Right, But they would these people on the left would say, oh,
Micro doesn't really work for the sewage system. You know,
he was just down there in the hole, but he
wasn't actually working for it. It was like a bit
for the show. Well he was down in the sewage man,
standing there doing what they do. So what do you
want to meet?

Speaker 1 (14:46):
But the point of his show is not to show
that Mike Row, I don't know, do whatever the sewage
you gotta do. The point is to spotlight the intensity
of some of these jobs that we don't even think about.
And people who choose to do him. It's this is
a it's a people feature. So now Donald Trump, here's

(15:07):
where it's a little Donald Trump. Is there to feature
Donald Trump and specifically his his race with the Kamala
and this this is how he chose to go about
doing it, and I I gotta tell you, I think
it will be in net positive. Remember this is a
guy who's kicked off his weekend with the Atlantics new

(15:27):
article about where he is worse than the combination currently
is Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini.

Speaker 2 (15:35):
Yeah, and then you see him hanging out the window
waving with that red tie with the yellow and he
looks like he could be like the McDonald's mascot.

Speaker 1 (15:41):
Yeah, it's a great.

Speaker 2 (15:42):
Photo of him outside the drive through. Fantastic. I'm telling you,
it's Uh.

Speaker 1 (15:47):
It worked, and it worked at a time when the
joy is gone, as they say over over on the
other side and you're putting out he's literally Mussolini, Stalin
and Hitler, which, by the way, is it downgrade? You
guys like him more because if you remember previously, he
was Hitler, Stalin and Mao, and really Mao was adding

(16:10):
some punch to those numbers. So anyway, Yeah, well we'll
get some sound from all of this and much more
coming up.

Speaker 5 (16:17):
Hang on.

Speaker 1 (16:18):
Everybody's up, even people and and and I mean especially
people who disagree, but I can seemingly disagree with out
screaming names at each other. I'm I'm always down for that,
and I hate that that has become more and more rare,
uh in in doing this job. But I mean that's
that's where we are. Yeah, here we go, are you?

Speaker 4 (16:42):
So?

Speaker 1 (16:42):
Uh, it's it sounds as though your favorability of Trump
doing this and being able to blend in the microw
as you say, might be based on your bias. And
and he lists off Bill Clinton and Barack Obama. No, look,
here's the deal. This isn't my mind. Now, there are
politicians that can go in and I don't just mean

(17:05):
to a favorable room and uh, and are very likable
to people. And I gave you an example. One of
the very first politicians that I ever met up in
Minnesota and had a chance to interview was Paul Wellstone.
And Paul Wellstone was a Democrat, but the guy was
inherently likable and came across who's genuine even when he

(17:27):
would tell you things, You're like, I don't think you
should vote that for that that sounds crazy. So yes,
and Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton could schmooz the room man.
Bill Clinton is very and I don't just mean speaking
to a popular audience. I saw Bill Clinton speak when
I was in college, and it was not just college students.

(17:48):
It was in a red area coupled with college students,
and arguably it had a little bit of everybody there.

Speaker 2 (17:55):
Now that was about Bill Clinton's superpower.

Speaker 1 (17:58):
Yeah, I'd go in and and inherently you'd want to
go have a beer with him.

Speaker 2 (18:02):
There was that scene remember that movie Primary Colors with
John Travolta played Clinton, Right, yeah, there's a scene it
towards the end of the movie where he's sitting down
at the counter by himself and like a you know,
a diner.

Speaker 1 (18:11):
This is after he raped the thirteen year old in
that movie.

Speaker 2 (18:14):
Believe so, yes, But yeah, he's just having a conversation there.
And that's the point of the scene, is that he
had the ability to just connect with people.

Speaker 1 (18:22):
Yeah, very powerful, Barack Obama did. There was some other
stuff going on there. I think he would sometimes come
across his smug. Now he very much does.

Speaker 3 (18:33):
No.

Speaker 2 (18:33):
I mean it's like, you know, if it was an RPG,
you have these politicians where their charismas up to like
an eleven, right, yeah, yeah, yeah, And that's what it is.
Because if you put Kamala Harrison that same situation, right, well,
I'm now going to go do the fries it, dude,
it would be so cringey. It would be more produced.
And they're saying this thing was produced and she doesn't
have that human to human interactive factor. It's just not there.

Speaker 1 (18:56):
It would look equally as stupid. Yeah, yep, of course
I need murder people with the fry oil and ingest
their souls or whatever slender Man does. Yeah, so this
isn't I'm giving you my analysis based on the people
that are running here and also the way that the
media is handling it. I don't for a moment throw

(19:18):
out the idea that politicians, even ones you don't agree with,
can either come across as genuine or completely full of crap,
but it doesn't necessarily have to be from what they
how they vote.

Speaker 2 (19:29):
And I also think that the Trump campaign knows that
she's full of crap on this issue. They've had to
do their own research, right, you have charity records, well now,
I mean you have Social Security records, you have payte ubs,
And like I said, if at this point in fact,
I was kind of thinking, if they had this proof,
it would have dropped yesterday or today, right, if they
have like a pay ste Ub or somebody that that's

(19:50):
worked with her, that verifiable photo anything at that time,
But she didn't even put it on her resume at
the time of working photo.

Speaker 1 (19:57):
Paste ub of what looks like a at this point
because I mean people are going.

Speaker 2 (20:02):
To buy it anything, Well, they would have produced it,
and the fact that they have not produced it, and
as much as they hate Donald Trump, proves that she
never worked there. Yeah, it just does just say this
is a bigger issue, yeah than him working at McDonald's.
It proves that her whole middle class I you know,
I was raised in a middle class family is bull crap. Well,

(20:23):
I mean she's it's it's almost arguably the least bull
crappy thing as far as how people evaluate when she
keeps saying it, do you know what I mean? Like
I do, Like a lot of people will just be
all right, whatever, we have different definitions of class, Like
people would move on from it. But then you threw
this one other verifiable thing in there, and and you're right,

(20:47):
the Trump campaign seesed on it. But for the media,
who's like, well, why would we're going to just look
at the two and decide that.

Speaker 1 (20:54):
He's lying and she's not. She lies every single time
she gets up and does a stump because she always
includes because they all sound the same. I don't know
if you've noticed this. Something different volumes and then sometimes
she wanders, but core components of her stump speeches are

(21:14):
Trump's Project twenty twenty five. That is a lie. And
the media knows that. They understand. They understand the Heritage Foundation.
The Heritage Foundation has been around for years. They understand
the difference of a think tank policy positions and a
platform of a candidate. Okay, don't let them tell you otherwise.

Speaker 2 (21:31):
She lies about all of his positions all the time.
What's that She lies about all these positions all the time.

Speaker 1 (21:38):
Yeah, and so you knowing that even if you justified
in your mind as a journalist for whoever the AP
reporter is here, she lies about that. She lies about
the Charlottesville thing, the fine people still so is Biden?
What was the suckers and losers? She sometimes that's more
of a Biden thing? What was the other big one

(22:00):
was saying about Trump? Like those are the easily verifiable things.
There's also there's lots of stuff about Trump. You can
you cannot, you can quote him accurately and probably still
rile up your base. So they know that, and then
they don't bother the check it all right, But here
here's where the rubber meets the road. Here's Trump on

(22:20):
the ground. I wish there was slightly better audio, but
that's okay. So here he is, he's he's greeted outside
of the McDonald's by a manager's whole sequence there. They
walk him in. There's obviously a customer service like front
of house lead. This woman she has what sounds like
a Hispanic accent, and I saw people go, well, they

(22:42):
did that intentionally. I don't know if all those people
work exclusively, though I know two of them work at
the McDonald's because they said it. But what's your point?
What's your if I go to McDonald's right over by
the station in the morning, not the one I can capital,
but the the other one down on wake Forest there

(23:03):
half the morning lead is Hispanic at the bow Jangles
half the morning lead has a a an accent. What's
your point that somebody at the McDonald's that Trump put
into how to wait? What?

Speaker 4 (23:17):
Yeah?

Speaker 1 (23:18):
Yeah, they were Oh so the woman what the woman
at the front who gives him the apron listen, let's
play this audience.

Speaker 6 (23:25):
Everybody is here.

Speaker 1 (23:27):
She has she has.

Speaker 5 (23:32):
I think I should take off the should I take
off my jackets?

Speaker 6 (23:37):
Wants to say this for you?

Speaker 1 (23:40):
You are well.

Speaker 6 (23:41):
They guy he knows a lot of McDonald.

Speaker 4 (23:45):
That's great, thank you.

Speaker 7 (23:46):
All right.

Speaker 1 (23:47):
So it's a little it's a low park here, but
I'm like, I didn't even notice. I honestly, it didn't
even click with me until I saw somebody. So they
what they're accusing Trump? U is getting some woman with
an accent sticking her McDonald's uniform for the show, so
that he I don't I don't know what they think
he's getting there. So she she's a plant, she's a

(24:11):
crisis actor from McDonald's christ unt. I don't know.

Speaker 2 (24:14):
She's not an employee from that franchise.

Speaker 1 (24:17):
Except I think I think she is. I don't know
if it's that location. Clearly, the guy who owns the
McDonald's where they did this owns a bunch of but
which is not unusual. I know a guy who owns
a few McDonald's.

Speaker 2 (24:27):
Or are they shocked that there's a minority that works
in McDonald's because.

Speaker 1 (24:30):
What it's like, you're telling on yourself. I don't even
understand why you're bringing this up.

Speaker 2 (24:34):
Have you Have you not been to McDonald's drive through lately?
Because I have?

Speaker 1 (24:38):
Oh?

Speaker 2 (24:39):
Really, So what's the opposite of that? So he hires
only white people to work at this fake.

Speaker 1 (24:43):
Yeah, no, no, no, this is you're already. This is why
when you actually think about it, you shouldn't think about it. Ross,
don't think about it. Don't think about that statement where
immediately in your mind like nine red flags go off,
just just you know, yeah, obviously say you sound like
you know who you You sound like Alex Jones. The

(25:07):
you know who is you know, among the the greatest
of Satan's probably in your mind. All right, let's go
and get over the fries. That's why we're here, French fries.
And uh, they have this guy who is by the
owner is is sold as a guy who spent what

(25:27):
like a decade cooking fries, so obviously it's a long
time employee there. He does work at that franchise. The
way that they worded how it was written by one
of the reporters, so like, I guess you can't say
he's a plant. Who the hell knows? And then they
just have a conversation of like two people, granted one

(25:50):
as a former president, but a guy showing another dude
how to do something on a job site, which we've
all been there, right, Ross, how many guys have you
showed how to use a piece of equipment over the
years that were new or interns or any of the
red Like, that's a very normal conversation that was going on.
Granted it's under the harsh lights of camera, and it's clearly,

(26:13):
you know, a political thing. But Trump and this is
this is what it is. It's not high pitch going
oh oh right the whole time. Like he seems genuinely interested.
He also seems like somebody who's consumed those fries a bunch, right,
because he has some opinions. But it doesn't feel fake.

(26:35):
It just feels produced because it is produced and you
can't get away from that. But it doesn't feel fake.

Speaker 5 (26:43):
Of course, my hand's a nice kind. These guys are
good instructor.

Speaker 1 (26:49):
I appreciate it.

Speaker 6 (26:50):
I'm going to give a really big one so that
whether that is pouring out of.

Speaker 4 (26:54):
The hill, how good is that?

Speaker 5 (26:56):
Morgo him Margo?

Speaker 1 (26:58):
All right, So he's handing out the fries. Man, he's
just doing his thing, And I I like, there wasn't
I didn't sense any awkward, anything more awkward than a
guy in a suit with a tie under it and
an apron dipping fries.

Speaker 2 (27:17):
Yeah, it's as awkward as a billionaire who's running for president. Yeah,
working at a McDonald's, he understands how how goofy that is.

Speaker 1 (27:25):
But but like, here's the deal, Trump isn't. Trump could
never undercover Boss. Okay, for those of you who watched
the show, is that show even still on? I don't know.
Can you imagine Trump trying to undercover Boss? By the way,
SNL there's a funny skit for you.

Speaker 2 (27:40):
Yeah, no, they did it before. I remember with the
Kyler Wren Kylo.

Speaker 1 (27:44):
Red was fantastic. Try to pretend he's just a regular stormtrooper,
but he keeps murdering everybody. Oh, it's great, it's great.
You could do that with Trump. Can you imagine Trump?
You know what, how do you get a fake wig?
What do you do?

Speaker 2 (28:00):
You'd have to put a wig on top of the wig.

Speaker 1 (28:03):
You put a fro. He's got a frow, right. But
his mannerisms, the way like he it's so unique in
the way that he deals with I know some of
you just hate this and you feel that I'm fangirl.

Speaker 2 (28:15):
I'm not.

Speaker 7 (28:16):
So.

Speaker 1 (28:17):
There's so many times that Trump does something I'm like,
I don't why why did you?

Speaker 2 (28:22):
I think a lot of it.

Speaker 1 (28:23):
I'll give you an example, And why is Antonio Brown
at Trump's Pennsylvania thing this weekend? That guy's a lunatic?
Am I wrong? Is it? Is he not a lunatic?
Why is Trump hugging Antonio Brown? This is That's the
stuff where I'm just like, what is going on? But

(28:43):
McDonald's thing isn't one of them. I'm sure, what were
you gonna say?

Speaker 2 (28:45):
I think a lot of it is Barack Obama won
in two thousand and eight. You saw a lot of
focus on Wow, look at this guy. He gets that
this is a new form of media and he's using
the Internet to find his supporters and bring them together.

Speaker 1 (28:59):
Sure it is.

Speaker 2 (29:00):
We are living in a different world than even in
twenty sixteen. It doesn't seem that far ago, but we are.
Social media is even more powerful, and so is the
power of memes. And I saw somebody mention it on Twitter.
It was our friend josh Sir Joshua, and he was
talking about I think Trump's just doing it for the memes.
And it's a very good point because this is a

(29:20):
new way to spread information in a campaign message.

Speaker 1 (29:25):
You've seen me and your stuff in there. Yeah, but
it also is risky because either comes across it's super fake.

Speaker 2 (29:32):
But you also see it in the way that he's
been doing interviews where he's been doing it with a
lot of big podcasters as opposed to traditional media.

Speaker 1 (29:40):
And this is why I didn't criticize Kamla for going
on the call, like I understand that you and I
understand demographic reach within broadcast.

Speaker 2 (29:47):
When you look at these podcasts he's been doing with
podcasters that maybe might not be familiar to an older audience,
but definitely is with a younger demo. Yeah, he's crushing it.
We're talking about total, like god, close to one hundred
million views on these podcasts. Just absolutely ridiculous. Think of
how many when you think about this Trump campaign, how
many epic, iconic photos we've gotten out of it from

(30:11):
the Trump campaign. Some of them they didn't wish to have,
like the picture of him jumping up with a bloody
face with the fist saying fight, But that's just another
example of it. Then yesterday him outside the window smiling
looking like he could be the McDonald's mascot. It's a
powerful image and these images will go further than words can. Right,
you know what they say about a photo, right, it's
worth a thousand words or whatever. Yeah, I mean it

(30:34):
is smart and it is good and a lot of
the cod what you're seeing from the left now is
a lot of cope realizing that their candidate does not
have the ability to do this.

Speaker 1 (30:43):
No, it just doesn't.

Speaker 2 (30:44):
He's undefeated in this category during this campaign, and I
think it's done wonders for his campaign, especially when you
see that she's been out talking to the press and
her numbers have been tanking, and he just keeps coming
out win after win after win, and his numbers are
going up. I think it's about you.

Speaker 1 (30:58):
Can start picking around the edges, like yeah, because then
you have the family and the you know, the family
that comes up to get their order at the drive
through and they're like those people were pre checked by
the secret Yes, but it's the interaction, right, Sorry, didn't
want an arsenal rolling up to the window, right, you
want somebody doing the third assassination attempt through the window? No,
I'll pass on that one. But it's just his interaction.

(31:18):
Even if they are supporters who wanted who won the
ability to be in line at this. McDonald's right for
this way of trolling Kamala, which is that's what it was.
It was it was a trolling on her and her
quote and her fake middle class family lie. Right, That's
that's what it is. The interaction he has with these people,
even if they are supporters, they are genuine and they
are good yeah yeah, and uh, and people like him

(31:44):
and and want to like him personally, and I don't know,
maybe he's a monster when you get on the plane
and and they've all just like, I don't know, but one,
they're not going to send random people, at least ones
who haven't been security screen inside of a vehicle where
they would have essentially a limited site interaction with the

(32:05):
president or the former president maybe future president like that
just wouldn't happen. What is this the fact that you've
had It's just sad that we're in a state where
we have to I somebody said, it's just say, we
have to talk about this. I don't feel that I'm
defending myself. I wanted to make a delineation there because
I think that a fair question was asked, right, because

(32:27):
it's a bigger question more than just what I think.
It's also, should we ignore stunts like this, because for
the most part I do, But I felt that this
was different, and I wanted to lay out the case
for why. So the article on ari Elsa's Kamala just
says it works. You work for McDonald's source kamala. Okay,

(32:48):
that's the trust me bro meme. But I digress. Sorry,
let's get to the the drive through interaction.

Speaker 6 (32:57):
Good working do Hello everybody, this is not a normal
situation that I want a good exam Right, how do
you give the dews?

Speaker 4 (33:10):
They look like they look like.

Speaker 1 (33:13):
Ready, I got that right, you appreciate.

Speaker 4 (33:17):
That, kid, and there'll be no charge.

Speaker 6 (33:20):
Trump is tank.

Speaker 1 (33:21):
Oh, I got you.

Speaker 2 (33:25):
Okay, this is on on Trump.

Speaker 1 (33:28):
I'm allowed to do that.

Speaker 2 (33:29):
Yeah, lets you check a bike shirts.

Speaker 1 (33:31):
Everything you said it was better.

Speaker 2 (33:33):
It's gonna be the best year.

Speaker 5 (33:34):
I made it myself.

Speaker 1 (33:37):
Can you imagine when they finally get them. It's for
giving chicken nuggets the kids. I'm paying for it. So
he's bribing them. Oh dear god, all right, we got
one more cut there. Unfortunately I'm up against it. But
uh that and uh there's some amazing elon audio you
have to hear. And uh, if you like sea creatures,

(34:00):
it's got sea creatures in it. So fun for the
whole family. We'll get to all that and much more
coming your way in just a few Your news also
coming up. It's the CaCO Day Radio program. Hang on
CaCO Day Radio Program, Ross, you said some of the
first in our previous segment. You said you were comparing

(34:21):
to contrasting how different things are today, and I would
agree with you, Like if you'd have told me five
years ago that I would have to ask Ross where
he found a picture of Hitler dressed as a McDonald's worker,
or if he himself rendered, I would never have this conversation.

(34:42):
And yet I happen to swing by the show Twitter
account there because I saw a bunch of you know,
you can just see the notifications coming in, you know
who else worked in McDonald's. I can't see the pictures.
I'm like, well, what is that? I thought maybe Ross
worked You post a picture of him back in the day,
and it's a it's it's not and I understand the reference,
But like, did GROC do that for you? Is that

(35:04):
thing floating around on the internet? It did? Oh, such
a which is another great reason to invest in an
ex premium because you get access to Groc and then
it can make you black and white photos of Hitler
sitting there working at McDonald's. Well, look, the other ones
will make you photos of black people working for Hitler.

(35:25):
So right, six and one half a dozen of the
other What did I what did I try to render
the other day? And on one of the other ones,
and it was like, oh, I wanted I wanted a
gun safe, a gun safe behind a road clothes sign.
This was back when they wouldn't do the inspections. They're

(35:45):
a chimney rock. And I was mocking that and I
was like, we can't REDI, we can't do a safe
or a gun safe. It has the word gun. And
I'm like, all right, can I have a safe? And
then I described it so it would look very similar
to gun safe and it would even render me one
that looked kind of like I mean, they had like
an old timey safe. They had a huge bank vault.
This is so point.

Speaker 2 (36:06):
There's probably like a safeguard on that whatever program you
were using against firearms or something.

Speaker 1 (36:12):
Yeah, but it's a safe. I don't even want to open.
I don't even want to open. I just want one
that stands about I said, I want one that stands
about six feet tall, big metal safe. And I even
list off a couple brands, and it wouldn't do it.

Speaker 2 (36:25):
That you sound dangerous and should be investigated.

Speaker 1 (36:27):
You made a hitler McDonald's mean this morning, that's what
you did with your mourning. Well he dubbed the audio and.

Speaker 2 (36:35):
That took me like two seconds, I know.

Speaker 1 (36:40):
Can you imagine. I'm just glad he wasn't around to
see bagel breakfast sandwiches. Can you imagine after the reaction
we saw from the Columbia students over bagels, if you
don't remember that, when they're in the first they're still
going on. But during the first bout, it's weird. I
don't know if you guys know this. The college things
are still going on. Why aren't they the focus of

(37:01):
the media?

Speaker 5 (37:02):
Right?

Speaker 2 (37:02):
That was at Columbia, right where they put in.

Speaker 1 (37:04):
Columbia, they put out a list of things they need
because you know, they're all so poor at their eighty
thousand dollars a year college, and but the list included
also something they specifically didn't want, which was bagels. It's
just so weird.

Speaker 2 (37:23):
And at the time, people like couldn't figure it out.
They're like, well, why do you why we figured it
out immediately?

Speaker 1 (37:28):
Because yeah, you associate bagels with with the Jewish. Jewish
people can't have no, you can't have no Jewish foods,
right you big it's cheeze. Yeah, that was I thinking.
All right, man, real quick. Oh yeah, I'm sorry. We
got one other Trump cut. Let me go ahead and
play this, and well because we got a bunch of

(37:50):
audio and you do not want to miss this Elon
Musk stuff. This dude, this story that'll be here in
just a moment. So then it came down to the
reason for Trump being at the McDonald's, make no make
no bones about it, because he didn't This was about, uh,

(38:10):
this is trolling Kamala, right, which most stunts are. They're
about trolling your political opponent. But one, it's in a
campaign setting. In two, I think he did a good
job of it. That's the that's the far more hurtful
part for for Harris and the uh he did a
good job of it. And then you had people like

(38:31):
where's the Palmer report thing, some big dem accounts that
were tweeting things like he has dementia. This is it's
so embarrassing the humiliation they subjected him to for a
photo op. Okay, one, that's projection, right, But two, you

(38:57):
say that and then you delete he deleted it. The
report is just it's moonback. It's not commona HQ, but
it wishes it was so, and they delete it. You
know why, because every person who works at a fast
food joint thinks you're saying what they do is embarrassing
and like that never occurred to you, So like you're

(39:23):
doing the work for him if you hate him so much.
And let me tell you a lot of people who
work a lot of uh, you know, jobs that are
poverty line jobs, they don't they're not they're not listening
to you about abortion and stuff. Okay, they don't care.

(39:45):
Some of them do. I I'm sure care, but it's
not the thing that's driving their lives. But's driving their
lives is people's inability to pay for things. And it
gets and it's that much harder when you're on the
lower end of the so shoe economic ladder. You're still
building or whatever whatever reason you're doing that. And so

(40:07):
for you to sit there and imply that it's just
it's just embarrassing that he would allow himself to be
thought that they would do that, they'd put him into
McDonald's saying, Oh, it's just so embarrassing. Why is that embarrassing? What? What?
What kind of jobs have you had in the past.
I haven't always worked in radio, but I make no

(40:28):
bones about where I've worked in the past. I've done roofing, hypelon, welding,
I've shoveled all the cow poop, all the horse poop. Right,
I kind of got indentured servitude into that one. But yeah,
that's that's how it goes. Your kid, uh work, I
delivered pizzas. There's no shame in the game there if

(40:50):
you're out there working. I mean, that's the that's the
thing that that people find frustrating is those who would
sit there and and not even not even attempt to
engage in it, and just sit back and take the check,
which is I think what you guys are counting.

Speaker 2 (41:03):
I was about to say, there's nothing shameful in working
to try to support yourself or your family. That is
to be commended, because it's a lot easier to sit
in your ass and collected check, like you said, you've bet.
We recently found out my fifteen year old nephew Liam,
he can now work. He's down in Georgia. He wants
to work so bad for Donald's or Chick fil A.
And get this, he says he wants to work for

(41:23):
Chick fil A because quote, they have good benefits, they do.

Speaker 1 (41:27):
And for that, for that, for that level of where
that entry level work, it's it's pretty it's like BUCkies.
Did you see the thing for BUCkies who they're hiring? Yeah,
thing right.

Speaker 2 (41:36):
Yes, I have.

Speaker 1 (41:37):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (41:38):
And you know, we had explained to him, his parents
had explained, you have to worry about the benefits you have.
You know, we we have benefits through our jobs.

Speaker 5 (41:44):
Right.

Speaker 2 (41:45):
But just the fact that he's at age and he's
thinking that far ahead, right, and he wants to contribute
to the household, and the fact that he wants to
work to make money as opposed to just getting money
from his parents, that is exceptional. I told Marky said,
this is fantastic.

Speaker 1 (41:57):
And let me say and let me say this too
as somebody who's had to be involved in hiring as well,
especially when you go to a job where there's going
to be a higher propensity for there to be people
who don't excel because it's entry level, like you don't
know how well you're going to do in there. But Also,
you have some people that those are those jobs can

(42:18):
be easier to get so they'll get themselves in there,
and they're almost more of a liability. If you how
many how many of you have been to a fast
food restaurant since that's where we are and things were
you know, it was crazy, it was busy. People are
you know, running around behind there. Maybe there was a
problem that somebody's trying to do and but there is
an employee that deals with it exceptionally well. Good customers,

(42:43):
like they stand out so much, right, somebody in there
who immediately is able to, like I don't know, level
up to a skill set that isn't necessarily required for
where they are, but they are able to demonstrate it,
especially when things are crazy. I'm telling you that doesn't

(43:03):
go it doesn't go unnoticed. It may go unnoticed in
that one setting because your boss is a jerk and
it's nepotism. Like I'm trying to think of the worst
case scenario, but that attitude doesn't go unnoticed in the
same way that ross when he I don't know who
told you that, maybe your mom or whatever. Hey, your
first thing was like respect bro right, uh, with your

(43:26):
with your fifteen year old nephew. Like, that's that's awesome, right,
that's great because you recognize that there's work ethic there.
So to just lay waste to everyone who was working
there by saying, oh, Trump, even having to appear there,
they put him into this thing of embarrassment. What are
you talking about? One, I one hundred percent believe that

(43:48):
was his idea. Broz, Do you think somebody pitched at
McDonald's or do you think that was Trump's idea?

Speaker 7 (43:54):
No?

Speaker 2 (43:54):
I think that's his.

Speaker 1 (43:55):
That's his idea. Nobody put him in there like Biden,
where you got to fill his schedule with three things
and note cards telling them where to poop. Right, you gotta,
like Trump say I'm gonna go work with They probably
tried to talk about of it.

Speaker 2 (44:08):
But that's the thing too, Like did he look embarrassed
in the photos in the video saw at all?

Speaker 1 (44:13):
Not at all, not for a moment. And but more importantly,
he also didn't make anyone that we saw feel embarrassed.
He didn't go in there and be like, oh, yeah,
I used I always pull my lambou through to get
these fried. He's amazing.

Speaker 2 (44:25):
He took it very seriously.

Speaker 1 (44:27):
Yeah, he took it seriously but also cutting up in
the same way that like employees.

Speaker 2 (44:33):
Do, right, how people talk to each other.

Speaker 1 (44:35):
Yeah, I'm sorry, I know I'm hammering this, but like
it's I've given it a lot of thought. And it's
also why you're seeing people freak out over the weekend.
It's why you're getting the Stalin Mussolini Hitler stuff. It's
why you're getting what I would argue if you honestly
believe that, you know, journalists have a spot's ability to

(44:57):
not put things in a way that could be you
to fuel insanit, you know, some insane person to do something.
I think I found this story. It's not titled go
shoot Trump, but it could have been a subtitle. And
they did it to Elon too. Uh what is it?
Their Spiegel? Their Spiegel is running a cover of Elon

(45:19):
must it says, and world enemy number two. I'll let
you guess who number one is. All right, So here
is Trump real quick, and look, this is the reason.

Speaker 5 (45:31):
Hey, you know, if you look at really what's happened.
You look at the crowd over it, look out happy,
happy because they want.

Speaker 8 (45:38):
To hope, they need to hope.

Speaker 1 (45:40):
Well, that's what we do that's what they do when
give there's hope. Because it was like, you actually have
worked at McDonald's.

Speaker 6 (45:46):
Now is now I have worked I've now worked for
fifteen minutes.

Speaker 1 (45:50):
For the cava all right. Like the whole thing was
for that line, because you got it. You gotta bottle
stuff up. The whole thing was for that line and
it went too well in I think people's opinion. Meanwhile,
you got headlines. Dude, this is this is abs absolutely brutal.

(46:16):
Uh and I well, let me do this. I'm just
looking up at the clock here. Oh plus uh, ladies,
I gotta I'm gonna have a question for you, but
I want you and then let me do this. I
want you to make sure you're in a room alone
and you're safe. No prioneers, prian eyes, okay away from

(46:42):
that medieval husband of yours. Don't worry. It's not nothing like.
I just I have a question and I want I
want honesty, and I feel like that's only we're gonna
get it because apparently there's an issue I was not
aware of, and I'm concerned. I don't know if I
should be concerned, but I'm gonna be concerned until we
get an answer. So we will get into that, and yes,

(47:05):
Jonathan Lemire is the journalist from MSNBC. I'm going to
share with you the story that he ran over the
weekend and then go ahead and tell me about charged
language and stuff. Okay, can't wait to be lectured by
my intellectual betters over at MSNBC on why this isn't
a giant problem. But we'll get into that much more

(47:26):
coming up here on the KCO Day Radio program KCO
Day Radio program. So yeah, let's let's check out MSNBC,
because remember it was we've graduated over the weekend, and
we did this last time around, and we talked about
it on this show, probably about you know, a couple
two three weeks before the twenty twenty election, and even

(47:49):
the twenty sixteen for that matter. But the whole thing
was once you've gone worse than Hitler, where do you go?
And then I was like, oh, they got me because
they last time around when he's Hitler MAO installing. And
I'm like, touche right, because when you add up the
numbers there, like that's that's Hall of Fame bag guide numbers.

(48:12):
You're dealing with times, you know, times three, but also
probably top five of all time. And so we're back
there again, and this time they ejected Mao and throw
Mussolini in there. But it's the same thing. And over
at MSNBC, Jonathan Lemire ran this article and I if

(48:38):
you don't think this is crazy, crazy person fuel, then
I don't know what to tell you. All Right, you ready,
this is Politico an MSNBC guys writer and then contributor.
All right, quote the very real scenario Trump loses and

(49:01):
takes power. Anyway, what do you do? What are you
talking about? So let me dig in four years ago
as sitting president, rejected by voters, attempted to seize the
second term. Blah blah blah. I just recap. Now. Trump's
political comeback has revived a sense of dread among officials

(49:23):
and institutions who stood in his way last time. Are
you referring to the fortification, which, by the way, was
also something that you guys did prior to the election
and then bragged about where you literally talked about doing
things that fall outside of what people expect journalists and
many of these you know, interior government officials to be doing.

(49:45):
Time is running out, so now you got to rapid fire,
right and you'll get a few more of these random
stories with anonymous sourcing, like the uh who try. There
were two authors on that piece, but the Atlantic piece
where not the one I just told you about, but
rather the one previously. We're like, oh, yeah, more proof

(50:08):
that Trump is, you know, Putin's puppet. And then the
proof is because there's no other explanation, right, and and
so you'll get more of that garbage. But when you
react poorly to it, I mean you're just heightening it.
So yeah, one account, the Palmer Report, and they're they're like, ah,
they embarrassed him from making him do this embarrassing job. Ugh,

(50:31):
people do this job. Ugh, that's not good. That's not
going to be helpful for you. And the Kamala Wins account,
this one's a doozy. Here's what they tweeted, breaking they
did the breaking in caps breaking that McDonald's location, the
the McDonald's excuse me, the McDonald's location Trump quote worked

(50:53):
at was cited earlier this year for health code violations.
Disc So what happened is they had an inspection and
this you know, we do those in North Carolina a
lot of states too, and as part of the inspection,
they cited a couple issues there, but they still have

(51:17):
a very high grade because that's not unusual. And they
come in for a restaurant inspection. Like almost everybody in
the sound of my voice understands this. But they don't
walk into restaurants and go everything's perfect, everything's perfect. Remember
I don't know. I guess it depends on your parents.

(51:38):
My mom would come in and inspect on when we
had to clean our rooms, inspect it like like ar
Lee Ermey's character partly Ermie's character in Full Metal Jacket Van,
you just know you're gonna get by any of you
military guys. I suspect you know what I'm talking about there.

(51:58):
I I hell, I got treat to do it as
a kid, not in a negative way. But she had
very high standards, which is good. Like guess that good thing,
young mes, like this is bs right, But she gonna
go in there and find something I don't remember. I
don't remember a one room inspection. Well, but that's how

(52:19):
it works with restaurants too, Like they go in and
they'll be like a the grease trap isn't properly cleaned
on this one cooking station, or we found some mop
water in a bucket, just sitting in a room. They
don't like that. Does that make it inherently, you know,
a poison palace? No, but they just tweeted out, oh yeah,

(52:40):
so your reaction to Trump going there is to try
to get everyone fired from there if you got to
close the location. I mean, like feasibly you want you
want a bunch of people that make far less money
than you, because remember you're you're disgusted by this job
ough you just can't even. But also you want them
not to have a job anymore because Trump went there

(53:02):
and dipped some fries. You guys are pathological. Man. And
just to prove my point that no government official would
come in that quickly, I would like to present to
you one of the most insane overregulation stories that I've heard.
And Elon Musk has put out some doozies.

Speaker 3 (53:20):
Right.

Speaker 1 (53:20):
Remember remember when they were criticizing him for not hiring
migrants at his rocket factory, and it was pointed out
even though the media knows this, I pointed this out.
Elon pointed this out. If you make rockets, all right,
Let's say that Ross instead of twitch twitch streaming, had
a side hustle where he built rockets at his house. Okay,

(53:45):
rockets that are capable of delivering.

Speaker 5 (53:51):
A nuke or.

Speaker 1 (53:54):
Obviously this a twenty story building as we saw with
that booster, Right, you are weapons Manufet, you're a weapons manufacturer.
I know you don't make weapons, you make spaceship. But
you're wet because the technology that is involved there is
not just proprietary to the business model. Because remember Elon

(54:14):
Musk rockets use a third of the resources, not just
the fuel but also the financial resources with development building
all a third of what NASA was building them for.

Speaker 5 (54:27):
And that's fine.

Speaker 1 (54:28):
I'm not even up on NASA. I mean, somebody had
to go there first. It's very expensive, but they've refined
the technology. But the more you refine it, the more
common it becomes. And and so you have to keep
an eye on it because the last thing you want
some crazy goat love and terrorist dude all upset because

(54:48):
Yolo got greased to have access to is a higher
technologically advanced rocket, maybe one that the Iron Dome has
trouble with. So if you you are in a manufacturing
business like Elon's in with that, you are you have
a greater threshold for how you can hire people, and

(55:09):
one of them is you can't hire people that are
currently in this country under that migrant program. It's not allowed.
I don't know what the percentage of employees at SpaceX
with actual security clearances, but it's not low. It's not low.
So you see stuff like that and you're just you know,

(55:32):
there's the political nature California Coastal Commission saying that they're
not going to allow must to launch an additional I
think whether they want fourteen additional launches out of what
sixty because him because of politics. They're literally they would
rather not further space exploration people who purport to be

(55:56):
progressive than to allow somebody they disagree with to just
do their thing and compensate. By the way, SpaceX compensates
the state of California in the form of the permitting,
but also in the form of maintaining business offices there.
I know that they moved and obviously he set up

(56:17):
the whole thing down in Texas, but they still he
has a ton of employees still in California. One because
you kind of have to. But two, why do you
have to if you can't launch rockets there anymore? What's
the point? But all that pales in comparison. I mean,
that's I don't say pales in comparison, it's just that's
not funny. This is kind of funny while also being insane.

(56:41):
So here is must telling a he says he's got
a bunch of these stories. But here is an absolute
doozy that he told an audience over the weekend.

Speaker 7 (56:50):
SpaceX had to do the study to see if starship
would hit a shark.

Speaker 1 (56:56):
And I'm like, oh, okay, by the way, that whole
sentence sounds crazy, even when you know what he's talking
about and you're trying to prouse. What do you mean
the spaceship's going to hit a shark? They mean on
re entry, right or possibility? They have protocols for bailing,
you know, do they have? That's why they have a
destruct button on a rocket, which is always I would

(57:18):
always it sounds so disconcerting, pretty kid who wants to
be an astronaut. I mean, even though you see that
in movies, you don't think about it. But yeah, there's
a blowout. The smotherings button that is a thing. That
is a thing. Remember, a lot of these rockets are
not manned, so that's one. Two. You're sitting there like,

(57:40):
well is the charge, so you have re entry, but
you also have the the things go wrong, what happens.
So they are literally the federal government is concerned that
at the precise moment that a an uncatchable booster or
other parts like the re entry of of some of
the capsule on the smaller model, because that does land

(58:04):
in the ocean, that it's going to land on a shark,
which means there is a crap ton more sharks than
I ever thought. But this thing, I'm going to play
it now. It's entirety. I just want you to understand
the setup. That's what they're implying, so you understand the ridiculousness.

Speaker 7 (58:24):
SpaceX have to do the study to see if starship
would would hit a shark, and I'm like, it's a
big ocean, you know, there's a lot of sharks. It's
not impossible, but it's very unlikely. And we said, okay,
we'll find we'll do the analysis, and then well, can

(58:45):
you give us the shark data. They're like, no, we
can't give you the shark data. Well, okay, well then
we're a bit.

Speaker 1 (58:52):
Of a quandary.

Speaker 7 (58:53):
How do we solve this difficult this this shock probability issue,
and they said, well, well, we could give it to
our Western division, but we don't trust them.

Speaker 1 (59:04):
And I'm like, am I in a comedy sketch.

Speaker 7 (59:06):
Here, Like they're worried about the shock density data, like
the people who hunt sharks for shark fins somehow getting
their hands on this shock dance the shock data. And
so eventually I think we got the data and we
could you know, run the analysis to say like, yeah,

(59:26):
the shocks are going to be fine. But what they
wouldn't let us proceed with launch until we did this
crazy shark data. And then we said, okay, now we're done,
and they said, but what about whales.

Speaker 1 (59:36):
I'm like, that's a good point.

Speaker 7 (59:39):
When you look at a picture of the Pacific, what
percentage of the surface area the Pacific do you see
is whale? And honestly, if the ship did hit a whale,
it's like, honestly, that well had it coming because it's
like the odds are so low, you know, it's like
like Final Destination, the Whale edition. It's like fate had

(01:00:01):
it in for that whale, you know, and so we
have to do the whale analysis. It's like okay, yeah,
the whales will be fine too. You know, it goes
on and on and then there's like, well what if
the rocket goes underwater it then explodes and then the
whales have hearing damage.

Speaker 1 (01:00:22):
You never thought of that. Ross used to live on
the coast in North I've never lived on the coast
in North Carolina. How many on average, say, in a
week marine animals? Did you see murdered by space debris?

Speaker 2 (01:00:33):
We did a bunch during our turkey drop.

Speaker 1 (01:00:36):
Oh wow, yeah, it was a space debris though, or
you guys were ind a helicopter right now, we dropped
him from space? Oh wow? Correct. Oh would you go
on the moon and do that thing that the Washington
Post chicks said where you could throw rocks off the
moon and kill people on Earth? No, but we did.
We did do it in the middle of summer. Or
was that No, that was gamer gate lady. Yeah, oh

(01:00:56):
you did in the middle of summer.

Speaker 2 (01:00:57):
Yeah, I mean the turkeys are cheaper than yeah.

Speaker 1 (01:01:00):
No, I mean yeah, no, you're like, uh yeah, that's
very economically minded, all right, raced agic from the Weather Channel.
Oh Man, government regulations, So I don't know, have you
heard that Elon was saying when they were doing the
thing to to launch the rockets and set up down
in Texas. The government made him do studies to ensure
that the capsules upon re entry wouldn't land on whales

(01:01:23):
or sharks. Can you imagine?

Speaker 5 (01:01:26):
Interesting? Yeah? I can't. I mean, how do you do
such a study?

Speaker 1 (01:01:30):
I don't know, but expects nuts. So how was your weekend, sir?
It was great.

Speaker 5 (01:01:38):
Didn't have to worry about anything yesterday?

Speaker 1 (01:01:40):
Yeah? Are you five? And any guys? I told you,
don't pull that crap. I know what happens with us.

Speaker 5 (01:01:46):
That was a tough one. That was a tough one. Hey,
but listen, at least the Lions are a good team.

Speaker 1 (01:01:51):
So yeah, no, no, no, the whole division anyway. Can
you imagine, though, if you say the power rankings Jacksonville
Jags like waste? Can you imagine being so bad that
you lose to the team that's the worst team by far? Yeah?
I can't. Ross. Can you Can you imagine sitting in
Boston trying to you know, nurse your eighth Guinness that morning?

Speaker 5 (01:02:13):
Right?

Speaker 1 (01:02:14):
And then you gotta.

Speaker 2 (01:02:15):
Well, I mean the Patriots, I mean, I mean personally,
I have no interest. I have no say in the
matter of this year when it comes to football. Thank you.

Speaker 1 (01:02:22):
Okay, I don't want to.

Speaker 5 (01:02:24):
I don't think yeah, well, I mean, I'm not gonna
say the Patriots are a good team. Is that what
you're saying, Jackson? No, okay, so.

Speaker 1 (01:02:33):
Making fun of two page I think three Patriots listeners.

Speaker 5 (01:02:37):
So I just say, because I don't have you a
pretty bad time another you know, pick on, I would
say one pretty bad team be another pretty bad team.

Speaker 1 (01:02:47):
Yeah, you see the chis run on the field during
the Steelers game yes day. I did not hold the
hold holding the pro Trump sign, but obviously who's uh,
he's in tough economic times could bear afford a shirt,
and let me tell you, she needed a lot more.
I don't know she needed it.

Speaker 5 (01:03:04):
But if she needed to, I'm sure we could have
found her or.

Speaker 1 (01:03:07):
A sports bra. But in fact, we tweeted the video
so people can see this crazy moment. O.

Speaker 5 (01:03:12):
Thanks, we appreciate that.

Speaker 1 (01:03:15):
Check it out while Ray twit your dooms your weather.

Speaker 5 (01:03:19):
Yeah no, there's no doom here. Listen. We got plenty
of time to talk about anything. But because I could
just do this, sunny mid seventies to upper seventies all
week overnight Low's start the week in the low to
mid forties, go up to the mid to upper forties,
maybe fifty degrees by the weekend. Might be a day
where we're closer to seventy degrees, that would be Friday.

(01:03:40):
But it is going to be dry, it's going to
be mild, and I don't see it changing for the
rest of the month, which takes us through next Thursday.
Not seeing any big changes around. So it's good on
one breath, said it before another couple of weeks, maybe
we may start talking about, hey, you know what, we
can actually use a little bit of rainfall, because you
don't really want it all to come at once as

(01:04:01):
it did with Lean. You kind of wanted to come in,
you know, little spits and triples every few days. Get rained,
then it's nice everything, you know, just like we don't
want these extended periods of dry weather. That's what we got. Dry,
mild for the rest of the week, maybe the rest
of the month.

Speaker 1 (01:04:13):
Okay, all right, thank you, sir. Go check that video
out that I told you about it.

Speaker 5 (01:04:18):
Okay, I don't even know what that means.

Speaker 1 (01:04:20):
The woman you run on the field on the Twitter.
You said, yeah, yeah, on the Twitter. Yeah, get on.
All right, we'll talk to you in an hour. There
you go, race Agic from the Weather Channel. Yeah. Man,
this running on the field there. It's the the red

(01:04:40):
Trump Secure Border, Kamala open Border. And what's funny too,
is like they immediately seize her and put her into custody,
which kind of spoke to what her sign says, but
also clearly clearly this woman is facing the same economic
pressures as us, judging the amount of fabric there. All right,

(01:05:01):
seven point fifty hang on, a few weeks out from
the election, everybody's lost their damn minds. The journalists have
had to flip on the Mussolini Stalin Hitler scripts and also, uh,
make a huge deal out of a campaign stop for
French fries, which is in a way telling on yourself
because if you just ignore it. But they didn't, and

(01:05:27):
they didn't because they get it. They understand that that
that's not helpful for their preferred candidate. So I'm sitting
there and I'm reading about all this stuff and then
oh wait, hold on, hold on, oh no, no, Ross, Ross,
we got a problem combo that and that and that

(01:05:51):
is for Trump's campaign. Ah, oh jeez.

Speaker 2 (01:05:54):
Oh no.

Speaker 1 (01:05:56):
Newsweek rumors circular iating that former President Trump's visit to
the popular fast food chain McDonald's was staged. What does
that even mean? What? What do you mean by what
do you mean stage?

Speaker 2 (01:06:15):
This is what I was referencing before earlier.

Speaker 1 (01:06:18):
I know, I know, but I had to put the
because this one's got a twist. But go ahead, I'm
saying it's crazy.

Speaker 2 (01:06:24):
Yeah, they're like, oh, well, you know, they actually shut
down to McDonald's and they weren't actual like customers, and
he didn't actually work for the entire day, and they
knew he was coming and all this kind of stuff.
It's nuts, right, He's not sitting around waiting for his
first check. So you can have that video moment like
the kid who first figures out how taxes work, right
because he knows. Yeah, they wanted they wanted ran those

(01:06:45):
just showing up at the windows so they could pull
off the third assassination attempt.

Speaker 1 (01:06:49):
Oh yeah, but like what do you mean stage? And
and and by the way, uh ross, what do you
think they're sources? This is the best part. Uh what
do you think? Because knew we had to have a
source for this. Kamala hq uh close? Uh there are
you ready? According to an anonymous post on Reddit, why'd

(01:07:19):
you do it? You know it's really you know who
does read it? Lot Kyle. Kyle always sends me read
at lengths. I think you think Kyle did it.

Speaker 2 (01:07:27):
I mean it is possible.

Speaker 1 (01:07:30):
According to an anonymous post on Reddit, you use that
is your the source line of your article? I I
I took mass com in high school, like sophomore year.
It's actually how I ended up visiting our radio stage
to put in an application and here we are. Thank

(01:07:51):
you Janette Baxwell for hiring me. But like in that
mass Colm class, we also learned to write stuff and
that's when I got a genuine interest in it. And
sophomore Missus Barrett. I still remember the teacher because her
husband was my football coach. Missus Barrett would have absolutely

(01:08:14):
thrown me out of class if I source something. Maybe
not on Reddit at the time, and I don't even
know if Reddit was even in its inflace. Like the
Weekly World News says yeah, but no, the Weekly World
News at least is trackable, do you know what I'm saying? Like,
because even if you don't know who the reporter is,
you can hold the editor or owner responsible for this
sourcing there.

Speaker 2 (01:08:33):
I'm trying to figure out what would be the equivalent
equivalent to Reddit in like nineteen ninety six or ninety
a Ouiji.

Speaker 1 (01:08:38):
Board, right, I went to we went to that magic
shop you worked at. I'm sure obviously when you guys
sold Wigi boards.

Speaker 2 (01:08:47):
Probably we actually didn't because the owner thought they were demonic.

Speaker 1 (01:08:51):
Oh my mom did too, so yeah that's also. I
wasn't allowed to watch the Smurfs. I don't know why,
because no gargamel will get you. Yeah I watched them anyway,
Sorry mom, So anyway, yeah, yeah, Ouiji board. I don't
know a speaking say no because you know who built
this speak. I don't know, man, I know that Reddit,

(01:09:13):
even the good stuff when you know the good stuff
of Reddit, if there is such a thing anymore. The
mods there have destroyed that place, right like you Like
every day there's a new example of just some inc
Oh I remember I remember read it was banning Japanese
people who were critical of the Assassin's Creed game for

(01:09:35):
being racist. They were banning Japanese people, but even not
just Japanese people complain about that, but Japanese people claiming
the game designers didn't even bother to figure out how
rice was used as currency then and the trees like
they're nitpicking them, but Reddit was banning people. So that's
the lunatics you're dealing with. So for Newsweek to run
this article saying it was stage, which it was, because

(01:09:59):
it was, because it has to be, But the level
of staging is different. The staging that people are looking
for is did Trump go in there and was he
able to human around people? And the answer is it
kind of looks like it and could Kamala do it?

Speaker 2 (01:10:13):
Yeah know, we're saying like it's like the micro thing, right, like, oh,
Mike Road, doesn't you know he staged the hole. He
doesn't really work for the sue, you know, he's not
actually yeah yeah, for the sewage or whatever.

Speaker 1 (01:10:23):
No, he's down in the hole, man, he's keeping it.
Like and there's Trump. I mean, he's getting the fries,
he's serving, he's talking to the people. What do you
wanted to do? I don't know. Well they had a
health food vile. They'll probably blame the health violation on him.
I mean, it's still more than Kamala did or she's
ever done, because that's a big lie. She's never done it.
Which comes to her middle class lie. Well, unfortunately, Newsweek's

(01:10:47):
got the goods from an anonymous post on Reddit.

Speaker 2 (01:10:52):
Sighting.

Speaker 1 (01:10:52):
Okay, so here's are the post sites. It cites a
letter that was posted on the storefront. So what you
have is you have a picture of a white piece
of paper with a handwritten note on it. I don't
know if you know this those It probably is real,
by the way, because there is some printing and logoing,
but also it could be fake. But it doesn't matter.

(01:11:12):
I just assumed they controlled access to the restaurant when
the guy who's been trying they've tried to murder twice
this year shows up, and they're going to control access
to the interior, the exterior. The couple in the truck
is purportedly customers, but vehicles were checked and people were vetted.

(01:11:36):
It's he's under Secret Service protection. And it doesn't make
it if if if Kamala poses for a photo with
somebody at her rally, right, here's a teacher from you know, uh, Saginaw, Michigan, whatever, right,
arm and arm That woman who got into that rally
underwent security vetting obviously the search on the way in there,

(01:12:01):
and depending on I guess if she's part of the
program or a labor person or somebody who has meetings
with her, she may have undergun because that's how it works.
Even before I heard about this a lunatic moonbat theory
right there, Yeah, I was, I just assumed. But the
theory's correct.

Speaker 2 (01:12:16):
It was stage you know, no, no, But what I'm saying,
like before before you know I heard it, they're making
a thing, or they're trying to make it a thing.
I when I watched the video of him at the
window talking to people, I assumed, or at least I
hoped that before they got to that window, there was
a bunch of Secret Service guys right looking through the
truck going, hey, are you a lunatic who's going to
try to shoot the fan president?

Speaker 1 (01:12:36):
Yeah, a family of four, you all have guns, you know? Okay? Great? Yeah,
and you know what, I want that to be the thing.

Speaker 2 (01:12:44):
And the other thing is, see they're trying to say, oh,
those actual people that worked there, they lost out on
pay for a day.

Speaker 1 (01:12:50):
They did they lose that on pay for a day?

Speaker 2 (01:12:52):
I'm assuming they did not, right, you would assume they'd
still pay them because I mean that that rest they're
there the franchise owners of the McDonald's are getting a
hell of a lot of promotion out of it.

Speaker 1 (01:13:01):
But yeah, the same people, so, the same people that
think they may have missed out on a day of
pay are trying to get them shut down for health
co violations. It make it make sense kind of? I
can't all right back to this, ladies, Is this the
monster we're just saying? Is this who your husband, under
a threat of who the heck knows, has ordered you

(01:13:22):
to vote for? Is this how it works? Again, I'm
not married. I didn't know. Ross. Do you just hand
Markie a note or how does that work? I'm I'm
unclear on how husbands are ordering their wives to vote
for because.

Speaker 2 (01:13:35):
I'm not sure that happens well.

Speaker 1 (01:13:37):
And here's the thing again, I'm not married. But any
woman that I've dated for a reasonable amount of time,
if I handed her a piece of paper and said
here's who you're going to vote for, she would laugh
at me and I would get it right like because
And don't get me wrong, are there some people out
there that are very subservient on both sides? By the

(01:13:59):
way you do you think is more subservient some maga dude,
and his wife, you know, out on the boat with
their nine Trump flags. Do you think that she's being
coerced into voting or do you think that it's every
Kamala dude who literally has to hear people in his
periphery constantly suggesting that if men don't fall in line,

(01:14:21):
they should withhold sex and affection from them. The Kamala
Harris people ran a parody of a web series. You've
probably seen clips from it, where like a bachelor walk in,
they'll be like six women standing there holding a balloon
and then is they kind of Q and A and
if they don't have any interest anymore, they pop the balloon.

(01:14:41):
I'm sure you've seen this, right, So they did one
and I'll spoiler on it. They did it where he
said he didn't have a plan to vote and then
all the women popped it. But you don't understand, if
you've even seen one clip of that series, the women
that they bring in are all delusional, insane women, right,

(01:15:03):
and it's it's for the thing. It's like it's like
you're the booking agent for Mory okay, right, they bring
these women in who all have no uh you know,
no big time not I shouldn't say any of them,
but really, the ones who stand out have no long term,
you know, career thing. They probably in many cases they
already have kids, which that's not a knock. But my

(01:15:26):
point is they're standing there and they're demanding the sixty
six to six guy. Do you know what that is?
I'm not going to explain it all to you, but
basically they want every guy there to be more than
six foot, have a six finger income or more. Some
of these women are delusional, and so a guy will
step in there, seems like a nice enough guy, right,
not a bad looking dude. He works, he's got a

(01:15:47):
good job. But if he's five like ten, all the
women pop their balloons. And the reason people watch that
series is because of the delusion, right of the women there.
Who you know, some woman who's clearly a four or
five in the looks department but doesn't have any personality
to bolster that thinks she deserves Prince Charming.

Speaker 2 (01:16:10):
No, it's the same reason they watch like the Real
Housewives series, because the women are nuts.

Speaker 1 (01:16:14):
Yes, so for you to parody that and not realize
that those are the bad guys, so to speak, in
this little arc of a stoke. But what are you doing, lunacy?
Oh somebody said magic eight ball. Yeah, that'd probably be better,
the magic eight ball versus the reddit source. I think
that would be pretty comparable. Oh man, all right, so

(01:16:36):
any of you, So, how many women voters out there
are under the thumb of your husband and you're only
voting how he wants because he's telling you. Because I'm
being told that's the reason that they're so concerned and
not just a future excuse as to why they may lose, or.

Speaker 2 (01:16:53):
It just couldn't be the possibility that when couples get
together a lot of times it's because they vibe on
a lot of issues, including those point involving politics, right,
Like I don't.

Speaker 1 (01:17:03):
I've dated people who I've never did anyone who was
actively super political in either sense, which is good for
me because then they just want to talk about work.
But very You know, most couples that I run into,
and you do too, they think a lot alike Like
I know this. I know that when the Kamala Ads
come on TV, yeah, we both mark and we audibly grown,

(01:17:28):
and she's so upset that she's not being allowed to
cast her own vote. I know you're making her. Is
that what you know?

Speaker 2 (01:17:34):
No, I know when the commercials come on the radio
and Kamal is like Donald Trump's can increase the prices
of groceries, Mark, He's like, really blank, Really, I don't
understand these couples that can be together and be so
far apart in politics.

Speaker 1 (01:17:48):
Like, dude, I know, I know a couple. They are
far apart. They are great, But I've never met anyone
like him, and I don't understand they probably are serial
killers together like.

Speaker 2 (01:17:58):
The killing and Conway and are husband or who's the
rage and Cajun? Uh yeah, yeah, Carville, Carful and his
his wife that I don't get that, Like, I couldn't
function with this job. I couldn't function. Yeah, so that's uh.

Speaker 1 (01:18:13):
So, I'm sorry that's happening to you, ladies. Donna, what's up?

Speaker 2 (01:18:17):
Good morning, Casey morning.

Speaker 9 (01:18:20):
Jeez, you get so many ideas run it through my head.
One the Newsweek thing. I get a kick out of
how it starts with the word rumors. Yeah, it sounds
like something fallacious is coming right.

Speaker 1 (01:18:31):
Our fleet song, yeah right?

Speaker 9 (01:18:34):
And then yeah the stage thing. I mean, yeah, everybody
knows you can't just walk into any McDonald's off the
street and go work the window.

Speaker 1 (01:18:42):
You can, you can if you're an a hole TikTok streamer,
and then that's your thing. And you run in there
and defri stuff, which some lunatic has been doing. I
think they arrested him, but yeah, it didn't go all so,
so obviously the organization is necessary.

Speaker 3 (01:18:56):
Yes, And as far as these women go talking about
the husbands telling him how to vote, isn't that the
reason why you can't go into the voting booth with
someone you know?

Speaker 9 (01:19:11):
Because back in the day maybe an archie bunker would
go in with Edith and make her vote.

Speaker 1 (01:19:16):
You want the reason, the reason that which I tend
to disagree with, but the reason in North Carolina you
can't even film, you can't even photo your ballot, and
they literally they they tried to drill down on some
female candidate. It was a GOP candidate for doing so,
I think it's a dumb lob. But the reason was
is because back in the day things were so corrupt

(01:19:38):
that people were selling and this is an actual story,
you can look it up. In Lumberton they were selling
votes for five dollars huddle house gift certificates. And but
the way you get paid is to take a photo
of your ballot and and then it gives you the dollars.
That is the that is the reasoning behind it.

Speaker 3 (01:19:58):
Yeah, makes sense.

Speaker 9 (01:20:01):
So yeah, nobody's ever told me how to vote, although
my ex didn't vote at all, and I would tell
him every year to register and vote. How I tell
you that we all have two votes.

Speaker 1 (01:20:14):
Would say, let's say you're you get married again and
get your husband and he walks on hand, puts a
list in your hand and says, hey, you're going down
to I'm assuming that wouldn't sit well with you.

Speaker 9 (01:20:24):
Just have no I have a very powerful personality and
go right in the garbage.

Speaker 1 (01:20:32):
Like the neighbors would be like, what is going on
over there? I don't know. He screwed up? So yeah,
all right, all right, thanks, don I appreciate it. Yeah,
like maybe with that button every day every day it's
a little something, all right. So yeah, that's so, that's
apparently the rumor out there and from a Reddit user

(01:20:55):
on the staging and then of course from this this
a secondhand narrative, by the way, you'll note, actually it's
a third hand narrative. It's a woman talking about her
mother's interaction with her cousin, and then what the cousin said,
So but it was on Reddit, so it must be true.
All right, look at that creeping up on twenty three.

(01:21:17):
Lots more sound to get to. Who got some more
Elon Musk stuff? And I mentioned Lizzo. I'll explain why
next hang on. Over the weekend, the New York Times
ran a big piece on Elon Musk, but more specifically
about his company's Tesla SpaceX neuralink and then Twitter x right,
and then they put this chart together. And here's the thing.

(01:21:40):
The New York Times is excited. They're excited because they
think this chart shows how corrupt and evil Elon Musk
is based on not a Reddit post at least, but
rather an entire list of federal agencies and cabinet departments who,
in way, shape or form are challenging, investigating, suing in

(01:22:05):
some cases, or and or denying permitting to his companies,
all of which has really ramped up at a fever
pitch over the last two years. And the chart shows this, right,
it shows So these are all of the different agencies
that are currently after Musk, and only after Musk within

(01:22:27):
the last about eighteen months. Two years, but not before
the dot Justice Department, Labor Department, Interior, Department of Interior,
maybe that's the Whales, and I don't know, in the
Department of Agriculture. Actually that's probably the Whales, National Labor

(01:22:48):
Relations Board EEOC, Environmental EPA, Securities in Exchange FCC, and
the Federal Trade Commission, all of which has charted in
this thing which I am Where you retweet that thing
I just sent to you. I'm sorry, I was going
to do it and then I just sent it to you.
It's far more convincing if you're and they know this.

(01:23:11):
That chart is far more convincing to me to make
the argument that you guys are going full lawfair on this, dude, right,
because I can I can look at how Elon Musk
was perceived and we all noticed the change. We also
know what caused people's opinions to change. It wasn't just
the Trump thing. It started earlier than that, right, It's

(01:23:33):
because he had ideas and he had thoughts, and then
he had forty four billion dollars and from that moment
on you can almost track this thing. And they even
word it that way, mister Musk. Companies are increasingly facing
regulatory battles and overlapping federal investigations, right, and they just
talk about how could a man of this stature think

(01:23:54):
he could get away with this. That's not what I see.
And I don't know, maybe look with that many businesses,
are there things that are probably a technical violation? Sure,
there's that many laws. Remember this guy was doing studies
about whales getting hit by rockets or losing their hearing. Yes,
the same people who detonated two dozen nukes on in

(01:24:19):
a toll in the middle of the ocean. And I
would also point out under the ocean is where a
lot of those detonations took place, is where it is
given is stopping space exploration on the off chance a
booster lands on a humpback. So yeah, yeah, your chart

(01:24:41):
is helpful, but not for the reasons that you think.

Speaker 2 (01:24:44):
Dude, they're so pissed off at him. Yeah, they're so
pissed because he took away their propaganda sensoring toy. Not
only did he take it away ready bought it, but
then he exposed it with the Twitter files and we
learned how much they were doing. I mean, it was
election interference, it really was. And they're pissed off because
that advantage had been taken away from them.

Speaker 1 (01:25:00):
Meanwhile, they're doing this. They had a law professor up
in Pennsylvania saying that he's breaking the law. You've seen
a million dollar thing he's doing with the petition. They're like, oh,
oh yeah, no's he's doing this thing with a petition
and he needs to go to jail for five years.
Who was it one of them deported? I mean people,
And the thing is is a petition. This is a
law professor and he the law clearly states that it

(01:25:24):
is somebody who's involved in the election process who is
then paying people. Elon doesn't meet those requirements because it's
a petition. He's doing random lotteries on a petition which
have outlined rules. I look them up, so like he's
not even in violation of the Federal Trade Commission, like
you have to do rules for contesting, we do it

(01:25:45):
in radio. Elon did it. And so when you have
that and you have all of these bureaucrats, this is
the only way they know how to fight back because
this is where their power lies. So yeah, they'll come
be a giant painting your butt absolutely because they think
they're right. The Coastal Commission will say no more, you know,

(01:26:06):
no more new rockets. And by the way, let's review
the current ones. They would have us, they would have
us literally explore space slower because they don't like who's
doing it. Absolute lunatics. Meanwhile, you want to get folks
riled up, you send in Lizzo man. And look, it's

(01:26:26):
a thing. I understand celebrity is going to go there.
I don't think it's probably a good look. If Lizo's
standing in front of a private jet before she flies
to Detroit saying that this is how you save democracy
and quote you hose can't spell democracy. I I maybe
that connects with somebody. But let's but let's hear what

(01:26:46):
she said in person. All right, let's let's hear what
she told the crowd at the rally in Detroit for
Kamala over the weekend. Take it away losing, you know.

Speaker 5 (01:26:57):
They say, if Kamala wins, then the so proud to
be from this city.

Speaker 8 (01:27:02):
You know, they say, if Kamala wins, then the whole country.

Speaker 9 (01:27:06):
Will be like Detroit, like Detroit, resilient like Detroit.

Speaker 1 (01:27:15):
I'm sorry, Ross, is that a Trump Lizzo AI thing?
You just dubbed in there is it? So if Kamala wins,
everything will be like Detroit. I can't even wrapt Ross.
Can you rap battle?

Speaker 2 (01:27:29):
Yeah? You can rap battle? Oh okay, I don't even know.
I don't need a clock. I can go a cappella.

Speaker 1 (01:27:34):
Oh wow, yeah, it's impressive. Do you go by Ross
or does it? Oh? No, that's right. You have your
your your wrap right?

Speaker 2 (01:27:42):
Like my rap name is stolen ATM machine falling on
your head?

Speaker 1 (01:27:46):
Yo?

Speaker 2 (01:27:47):
It is yo wo yo right, falling in your head?

Speaker 5 (01:27:49):
Right?

Speaker 1 (01:27:49):
I thought it was face? Was it head or face?
I changed it like Diddy? Oh I see what you
did there? Is that the only thing you did like Diddy?

Speaker 2 (01:27:56):
That's about it? Yes?

Speaker 1 (01:27:57):
Yeah, okay? What are those boxes? Is over there from Costco?
Let's say a thousand? What are those?

Speaker 2 (01:28:03):
Those are Christmas inflatables? Oh? I have so many of
this I have to keep them here.

Speaker 1 (01:28:07):
It's not baby oil.

Speaker 2 (01:28:08):
No ghp, I'm allergic.

Speaker 1 (01:28:11):
Well well I mean yeah technically kind of what uh so?

Speaker 4 (01:28:17):
So?

Speaker 1 (01:28:17):
Yeah? Yeah, I think that's like a Trump. I appreciate it.
I appreciate you know, getting out uh gets your passion there,
But I don't know that's gonna sound clip the way
that you want. And and here's you're talking about going
back to Elon real quick, just because I only get
these last two cuts in. There's some other video that
like it shows you how effective he is too, Like

(01:28:41):
that's what ramps is. Hatred out. I posted some last
week and I'm it's it's not an original thought, but
it needed to be said with this clip. If if
you are a moderate Democrat, right, and and you look
at part of your party, but and you go just lunatics, right,
And I think that that's people's natural reaction, even within
their own part already. But like when you start seeing

(01:29:02):
it cut deep and then you look at somebody like
Elon Musk, the richest man in the world, and yes,
don't give me, no, we don't need the money. The
top donors in the election cycle for Biden were all Democrats,
the top five, right, They were stire, they were Michael Bloomberg,
they were crypto bro which, by the way, that's all

(01:29:24):
stolen money. Right, So, and I don't remember the Democrats
offering to remunerate the victims of that dude. But I digress, Like,
don't give me that he's an oligarch.

Speaker 9 (01:29:36):
Stuff.

Speaker 1 (01:29:37):
Why because where he is effective is he can even
with you know, when people go, well, you know, his
his delivery and they talk about him, you know, being
on the spectrum and all that stuff. Regardless of the
way that he processes and says things, which is unique.
He's very good at delineating things to be easily un understood,

(01:30:01):
and he's not Pseudo Intellectuals are not going to get
the better of this dude. Case in point, here's a
BBC interview. Listen to the energy change of this thing.

Speaker 8 (01:30:14):
He change the COVID misinformation.

Speaker 1 (01:30:16):
Change he's talking about. Remember when back in the day
you'd post something and then they'd attach the COVID thing
to it, right, all right, you know, you know, so
this is what the guy's talking He changed.

Speaker 8 (01:30:26):
The COVID misinformation.

Speaker 4 (01:30:27):
BBC changes COVID misinformation.

Speaker 8 (01:30:30):
The BBC doesn't not sat the rules on twits sets.

Speaker 4 (01:30:32):
I'm asking you, no, I'm talking about the BBC's misinformation
about COVID.

Speaker 8 (01:30:39):
I'm asking you about you change the labels the cod By.

Speaker 1 (01:30:43):
The way, we talked about pauses being important and ross.
I know it clicked in your brain, that pause, and
then it immediately clicked that stays in because that pause
is him trying to figure out how did we get here?
The reporter and he looks down at his phone. People
are always tech. Somebody's texting. I don't think they is.
I think he has his Q and a bullet points

(01:31:04):
on his phone, which is not unusual, but he is.
His reaction, unable to even engage Elon on this point,
is to pivot and he looks down at his phone
and he's looking for the next questions information labels.

Speaker 8 (01:31:18):
There used to be a policy and then then disappears.
Why do that.

Speaker 4 (01:31:28):
COVID is no longer an issue?

Speaker 10 (01:31:32):
Does the BBC called itself at all responsible for misinformation
regarding masking and side effects of vaccinations.

Speaker 4 (01:31:44):
And not reporting on that at all?

Speaker 10 (01:31:46):
And what about the fact that the BBC was put
under pressure by the British government to change the editorial policy?

Speaker 4 (01:31:52):
Are you aware of that?

Speaker 8 (01:31:54):
And this is this is not an interview about the BBC.

Speaker 4 (01:31:57):
Oh you thought it wasn't?

Speaker 8 (01:32:00):
I see not why you've done Twitter spaces. I am
not a representative of the BBC's editorial policy. I want
to make that clear. Let's talk about something, all right,
Let's let's let's talk about Le's talk about something else.

Speaker 1 (01:32:11):
Yeah, you weren't expecting that. Sorry, I don't want to
walk over that. And here's the thing, the reporter should
have said that initially, because the reporter is correct in
the same way that if you want to ask me
questions about I heard media, I don't speak for them,
and it's you know, that's corporate structure one on one.
I understand that. However, it's comparing policies within media, which

(01:32:33):
Twitter x is and the BBC is. If you're going
to bring it up, you can't tell me, can't respond
like that. But that moment is very powerful when you
watch that video, and that's the tool that they ran
out of their own party. Crazy all right, real quick,
race stagic, very sorry, clock all right, there's not much

(01:32:56):
to give anyway, but buyer was.

Speaker 5 (01:32:59):
It all looks good, feels good. The afternoons mid upper
seventies on average through about Thursday and Friday, when we
go to the low to mid seventies, with Friday being
the coolest day. The nighttime lows will be up from
where we are this morning, seeing some upper thirties, low forties.
The further west you go load to mid forties elsewhere,
but beautiful afternoons as we said, as the overnight lows

(01:33:19):
even come up into the fifties, So expect a couple
of days through Wednesday Sunday. Let's just recap mid to
upper seventies overnight lows and the upper forties to low fifties. Thursday, Friday,
maybe a little cooler load to mid seventies with lows
in the upper forties, and that's probably going to continue
into the weekend, so maybe even next week.

Speaker 1 (01:33:36):
All right, well, look at that raised in ainy water.
We'll talk tomorrow, sir. Have a good one, okay, and
we'll be back.

Speaker 6 (01:33:42):
Hang on, Well, good morning, Casey. Wall Street's major averages
all posted modest gains on Friday, but the futures are lower.
Right across the board. This morning, Dow futures are down
fifty four points. Boweing machinists will vote Wednesday on the
latest contract offer from the company. There is a tentative
agreement on a deal to raise workers pay by thirty

(01:34:02):
five percent over four years. It also calls for a
guaranteed annual bonus of at least four percent and an
additional seven thousand dollars bonus if the pack is approved.
The machinists have been on strike for five weeks. Now,
nearly half of all American adults expect to go on
an overnight leisure trip during the holiday season. This according
to the latest polling by bank Rate, A lot of

(01:34:24):
people who were thinking about flying to their destinations or
modifying their plans because of airfare inflation. The survey found
a quarter of holiday travelers who originally thought they'd be
flying have decided to drive instead or can out. This morning,
with its twenty twenty four ranking of US cities with
the biggest rat problems, Raleigh comes in at number twenty eight. Chicago,

(01:34:47):
Los Angeles, and New York, in that order, are ranked
as the rattiest cities in America. The company says it
uses this data to determine the likelihood of homeowners needing
help with rodent problems. A lot of TV viewers of
cancer cable in favor of streaming services. Now, Charter Communications
is planning a major streaming ad campaign. Charter does business

(01:35:08):
as Spectrum. It has deals with most of the big
streaming services and it's cable TV packages, and starting next year,
Charter is going to promote more than ten streaming services
that it will offer. It no additional cost to customers,
hoping this will discourage cancelations and draw in new subscribers.
And Casey, a horror film was number one at the

(01:35:28):
movie theater box offices as Halloween approaches. comScore estimates Smile
Too from Paramount Pictures took in twenty three million dollars.

Speaker 1 (01:35:37):
Casey, I know the Dodgers beat the Mets, and now
it's a Yankees Dodgers series. Were you rootten for Yankees.

Speaker 6 (01:35:43):
Or Mets with Yeah, I'm I tend to I'm not
a Mets hater, but I tend to be a Yankees fan.

Speaker 1 (01:35:49):
Okay, all right, Well we'll Friday picks off against the
Dodgers World Series. Man, all right, thank you, Okay, take care. Yeah,
there you go. Ross, you're not talking baseball either.

Speaker 2 (01:36:00):
Right, Baseball is stupid and football is stupid, and I
don't have time for stupid things. I'm way you know,
we're not talking about sports.

Speaker 1 (01:36:09):
I think the Dodgers, if they play like they played
against the Mets, it's not that's not good for you guys.
But sometimes the Yankees just say, hey, you want to
see us hit eight home runs? So I don't know,
we'll see even if Ross doesn't want to participate, all right,
and then finally I have one more, one more clip here.
I want to get them all in. So is this

(01:36:31):
the same This is the same interview with the BBC
guy right Ross found this.

Speaker 2 (01:36:35):
Yeah, it's the same interview just a bit later.

Speaker 1 (01:36:38):
Okay, all right again, this is this is very effect.
This is what you pay money.

Speaker 8 (01:36:42):
I mean, I would only just add that, you know,
we have spoken to people who have in sacks that
used to be in content moderation, and we've spoken to
people very recently he were involved in moderation, and they
just say they there's not enough people to police this stuff,
particularly around particularly around hate speech in the common.

Speaker 4 (01:37:01):
You're talking about. I mean, you use Twitter, right, do
you see arise in hate speech? I mean just a
personal anecdote, like what did you?

Speaker 8 (01:37:08):
I don't personally, my for you, I would see I
get I get more of that kind of content. Yeah, personally,
but I'm not going to talk to talk to the
rest of for the rest of Twitter, more hate speech personally,
I would I would see more hateful.

Speaker 7 (01:37:22):
Content in that In that content you don't like or
or hateful What do you mean to describe a hateful thing?

Speaker 8 (01:37:28):
Yeah? I mean, you know, this content that will solicit
a reaction to something that may include something that is
slightly racist or slightly sexist, those kinds of those kinds
of things.

Speaker 4 (01:37:40):
Do you think if something is slightly sexist it should
be banned? I know what you're saying.

Speaker 8 (01:37:44):
I'm not saying anything.

Speaker 7 (01:37:45):
I'm I'm just curious what I'm trying to say, what
you mean by hateful content?

Speaker 4 (01:37:49):
And I'm asking for specific examples.

Speaker 10 (01:37:53):
And if and you just said that if something is
slightly sexist that's hateful.

Speaker 4 (01:37:58):
Content, does that mean that a true be bad?

Speaker 8 (01:38:00):
When you've asked me, you've asked me whether my feed,
whether it's got less or more, I'd say it's got
slightly more.

Speaker 4 (01:38:08):
You think, can you name one example? I honestly don't you. Honestly,
I don't name a single example.

Speaker 8 (01:38:13):
I'll tell you why because I don't actually use that
for you feed anymore, because I just don't particlarly like it.
A lot of people, a lot of people are quite similar.

Speaker 10 (01:38:19):
I only you've said you've seen more hateful content, but
you can't name a single example, not even one