April 9, 2025 • 38 mins
Boston City Councilor Ed Flynn is once again pushing for ethics reform after City Councilor Tania Fernandes Anderson's recent plea deal and resignation agreement. “Elected officials placed in positions of public trust should demonstrate the highest standards of positive leadership,” Flynn has outlined in the past. Councilor Flynn joined Dan to discuss.
Listen to WBZ NewsRadio on the NEW iHeart Radio app and be sure to set WBZ NewsRadio as your #1 preset!
Listen to WBZ NewsRadio on the NEW iHeart Radio app and be sure to set WBZ NewsRadio as your #1 preset!
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
It's Night Side with Dan Ray. I'm WBSY, Boston's Radio.
Speaker 2 (00:06):
Well, welcome back everyone, Thanks very much, Carol, and we
moved to the second hour tonight, nine o'clock and we're
going to talk with Boston City Councilor Ed Flynn. For
a long time council of Flynn has talking about some
ethics reform at the Boston City Council. I'm suggesting there
should be ethics reform throughout Boston City Hall. Ed Flynn,
(00:29):
welcome back to Nightside. How are you.
Speaker 3 (00:31):
I'm doing well, Dan, It's great to be with you.
It's great to be with your listening audience as well.
Speaker 4 (00:36):
Well.
Speaker 2 (00:36):
I really appreciate the way you have conducted yourself over
over your career and of course over your when your
dad was mayor. This we've got some we've had some problems.
This is the second city councilor that has really, I
think disgraced the council. And we're talking about Boston City
(01:00):
Councilor Tania Fernandez Anderson. It was interesting The Globe today,
I think described her in their front page article as
an embattled counselor. And I just think that that's an interesting,
uh choice of adjective to describe the situation that she
(01:22):
finds herself in. I mean she she apparently has agreed,
has has agreed to plead guilty. She's not been sentenced yet,
but she could be facing up to a year and
a day in jail under the under the agreement. That
should not reflect on other members of the City Council,
(01:43):
but it does. Would you agree?
Speaker 3 (01:46):
And Dan, I definitely agree. It should not reflect on us,
but it certainly does. And I was at three events
last night and people coming up to me and asking
me about the case, and they were saying, well, Ed,
what is the city Council going to do about it?
(02:08):
You know, we don't want the status quo? Ed, what
changes are you making? How are you going to improve
the ethics on the city council. This is a poor
reflection on the city of Boston, the residents of Boston,
Dan so ys to answer you directly, It's a reflection
on every residence of the City of Boston, whether we
(02:29):
like it or not. It is a reflection on us,
especially elected officials as well.
Speaker 2 (02:33):
So what can be done? When you think about ethics,
you sort of draw the line between ethics and a
criminal act and Obviously the councilor, Tanya Fernandez Anderson was
indicted and now she has pled guilty, apparently to this
(02:57):
sort of payoff system where she gave she gave a raise,
as I understand the charge to a relative, but with
the understanding that part of that thirteen thousand dollars raise
that she gave to the relative would be kicked back.
My question is why are city councilors employing relatives.
Speaker 3 (03:19):
Well, they're not allowed to dan by law. She hired
her a relative anyway, and maybe the relative didn't have
the same last name. I don't know exactly what the
circumstance was. It's going back several years. But by law,
you're not able to hire your relative.
Speaker 2 (03:39):
How did they define relative? In other words, obviously a
member of your immediate family as a relative. What about
if I'm your brother in law and I need a job.
Am I a relative as your brother in law?
Speaker 3 (03:51):
I believe so. I believe that would disqualify you from
working for a city councilor who is a member of
the family, whether it's a brother in law or sister
in law. But I think that would preclude you from
working in a city council's office.
Speaker 2 (04:07):
So how how is that then at this point without
the ethics reform that I guess you're looking for, how
is that monitored? Or who's in charge? I mean you
see someone in their office and there they have a
different last name. Uh, and are they supposed to prove it?
(04:29):
Who has the burden of proof? Is the burden of
proof on the the counselor that that they have not
had any relatives on their staff? How does how does
that work? I mean, how does that happen? I guess
is what I'm saying.
Speaker 3 (04:44):
Well, it's not. It's not necessarily monitored as as strictly
as as it could be. And you know when an
elected official does. When the elected official is sworn in,
they signed documents saying that they would not hire relatives,
and they understand what the rules are. And if you
(05:07):
have a different last name, you know, it can be
challenging to prove otherwise.
Speaker 2 (05:14):
No, I've never been an elected official, and god knows
the people of Massachusetts, I'm sure would be appalled at
the possibility of me being an elected official in Massachusetts.
But I would think from a point of view of
an elected official, it would be good to have an
ethical rule because as long as you had that ethical rule,
you can say to some cousin who says, jeez, i'm
(05:37):
kind of hitting on tough times here, I wouldn't mind.
They're doing a little work for you if you could
find me a spot on your staff.
Speaker 5 (05:44):
Right.
Speaker 2 (05:45):
It gives the elected official not only the obligation, but
it kind of gives them the ability to say to
that relative, gee, you know I was up to me.
But it's a different story. But I'm precluded by by
I assume it's as simple it's a city council regulation
that does that, or is that a City of Boston regulation.
Speaker 3 (06:10):
That the city council regulation? A city councilor cannot hire
someone from their immediate family and I do know that's
sister in law or brother in law.
Speaker 2 (06:21):
Okay, So how long has that been on the books?
Is if that's on the books, it should be enforced.
Was that I assume there must have been a time
when that wasn't on the books.
Speaker 3 (06:33):
Yeah, it's been on the books for a while, and
it is. It has been enforced in the past under
various scenarios. But each city councilor knows clearly that that's
against the rule, and you cannot do that.
Speaker 2 (06:50):
Okay, let's do this. We'll take a break. I want
to come back and talk about it. And I also
want to talk this particular counselor. And I don't want
to dance on anyone's grave. But she's been very controversial
even today at the at city Hall. I watched some
of the reporting on the local news to and she
(07:11):
doesn't seem at all ashamed of this. She was very
overtly arrogant to some of the reporters. She picked which
reporters she would talk to. She hasn't actually announced she's
announced an intention to resign, but she hasn't given a
date by which she will resigned. Do you when I
(07:33):
get back, I want to ask you about that. And again,
I'm not looking to, you know, kick someone when they're down.
That's not my style. But I was kind of appalled
by the demeanor that she appeared to strike. I was
watching some of the newscast tonight and it seemed to
me inconsistent with with her situation, with her circumstance. If
(07:54):
you get my drift, we'll come back with Boston City
Councilor Ed Flynn, And I'd also like to hear from
residents not only of Boston, but in the surrounding area.
I don't think it's too much to ask elected officials
that they don't put their own relatives on the payroll. Uh.
And it's also not too much to ask elected officials,
(08:16):
UH if they do ever elective or anyone in the payroll,
don't give them a raise and then expect to get
a kickback in cash in a bathroom, which is what
Fernandez Anderson I believe has has played guilty to. That's
that was the primary allegation for which he was indicted.
(08:36):
We'll talk with Ed Flynn and you if you'd like
six one seven, two, five, four ten thirty six one seven,
nine thirty And if you are a Boston resident, you
know Ed Flynn's done a good job for the city
of Boston. Wouldn't be a bad idea to give us
a call and uh and give him a pat on
the back, because frankly, we need more Ed Flynn's in
the Boston City Council. In my humble opinion, more people
(08:58):
like Ed Flynn, longtime Boston residents who are there for
the right reason. Back on night said, right after.
Speaker 1 (09:03):
This, it's Night Side Boston's news radio.
Speaker 2 (09:10):
We're talking with Boston City Councilor Ed Flynn, and we've we've,
we've you know, uh, the I was watching. I don't
know if you saw any of her demeanor today the
city councilor who is now you know facing apparently is
(09:31):
going to plead guilty, has signed an agreement to plead guilty,
and it's facing actual jail time for you know, what
you would say is a fairly craven exercise of not
only authority over a subordinate but also, you know, something
that a politician should not be doing. I mean, she
should have, she should not. She does not necessarily need
(09:54):
to know all the rules and regulations of the Boston
City councilor the What she did was wrong in my opinion,
and she walked around there today like she almost had
something to be proud of. Did you did you watch
any of that today play out outside of the chamber
(10:14):
or no. I don't want to put you on the
spot here, but I just want to find out if
what I saw on television you may have seen yourself.
Speaker 3 (10:22):
Dan, I didn't see any of it. I didn't see
any of any of it play out. I didn't see
the television stations. I did hear about it, but I
didn't witness it myself.
Speaker 2 (10:33):
Okay, last last question before we get to start to
get the phone calls. Do you know when she's going
to resign? Is she just going to hang in there
as long as she can until the court date.
Speaker 3 (10:45):
No, I think she's going to resign in the immediate future.
I would I would expect that she would resign in
the next seven days, although she hasn't committed.
Speaker 2 (10:59):
Twenty things is I think that in order to have
a special election in that district, if she can hang on,
I think to like May seventh or something like that,
then there would be no special election, and even when
she vacates the seat, the people in that district would
not have representation. You're I'm sure you're aware of that
loophole in the law. They would not have a special
(11:21):
election that close to an election because it would be
a lot of money to have somebody serve for two
or three months. That's apparently the underlying reason for that.
Speaker 3 (11:31):
Yeah, that's accurate, Dan. So I think she would have
to resign by mid mid May for there to be
a special election, and then so there would be literally
two elections in that short period of time. So it'd
be basically like July and August and then September and November.
Speaker 2 (11:54):
So what other reforms ethics reforms are you proposing and
what sort of reaction are you getting from it? Colleagues,
give us some examples that people will understand that, in
your opinion, need to be adopted by the city council.
Speaker 3 (12:06):
Well, Dan, several months ago, I proposed having a standalone
ethics committee like the State House does. The mass House
of Representatives has a ethics committee. I would want one
for the Boston City Council. I propose this, and my
colleagues voted it down for various reasons. But I think
(12:31):
it's time for us to revisit that. And maybe it
would not be just city council is on the ethics
committee itself. Maybe it might be people throughout the city,
maybe some type of college professors or ethics professors or
(12:52):
business people. But I do think we need some type
of committee that would hold city councilors accountable. That was
voted down, but I'm I'm going forward with it again.
Maybe a different type of opportunity for us to do that.
Speaker 2 (13:13):
How close was the vote when when it came? What
was the vote? Do you remember?
Speaker 6 (13:18):
No?
Speaker 3 (13:18):
I don't, but I don't believe it was close. My
colleagues advocated against it. They didn't think it was necessary
for various reasons. In one of the reasons was they
didn't want city councilors holding other city councilors, you know,
responsible or accountable.
Speaker 2 (13:39):
But you would you just addressed that if you could,
they could put together a committee. I have, you know,
a couple of former judges. There are retired judges who
who are always you know, involved in sort of these things, mediations, arbitration.
They could be easy to put together a five member
committee which would which would not meet very often, and
(14:01):
I suspect they would probably do it at for for
no cost, and that a lot of the judges would
be willing to give back some time. I suspect a
couple of judges, a couple of lawyers or whatever, maybe
a citizen representative. I think that there's a lot of
ways to do that so that none of the councilors
are put in the position where they have to stand
in judgment or sit in judgment of their colleagues.
Speaker 1 (14:23):
Yeah, right, I agree.
Speaker 3 (14:25):
I think that's a great, a great avenue to pursue.
And that's that's something I would like to pursue. And
the other the other couple of options besides having an
ethics committee, which I desperately think we need to, but
i'd also like city councilors in the mayor, but focused
(14:45):
on the city councilors to release their state in federal taxes.
I think I think that's important and maybe over the
over the past five years. And we also dan have
to to file a form a financial interest form Statement
(15:06):
of financial interest in that form is yearly. It goes
to the city clerk and we signed it under the
pains and penalties of perjury. But I think we also
we also should be sending that document as well to
the mass State Ethics Committee, not just to the city clerk.
(15:27):
And I think that form should be public.
Speaker 6 (15:30):
It is.
Speaker 3 (15:30):
It is public now if you if you go into
the city clerk in person and request it. But I
do think any state or reason why you want it.
But I do think that type of form should be
should be public inaccessible as well.
Speaker 2 (15:46):
In this day and age of you know, the Internet
and UH and computers and AI. No reason why because
at that point obviously the you know, they probably can
play all sorts of games well you've got to file
a Freedom of the Nation request and then you have
to pay ten dollars a page, and they that's that's
many ways in which people get frustrated when they're trying
(16:09):
to figure out what's going on. I agree with you.
It should. It just should be made public and there
for everyone, for all the world to say. Simple, simple
as that. And I want to take a break, and
I want to hear what people think. The lines are
full at six one, seven, two, five, four, ten thirty.
We got Jack, Bob and Ron there and I got
a couple of lines at six one, seven, nine three, one,
(16:31):
ten thirty. We'll be back on night side right after
the news at the bottom of the era. My guess
is Boston City Councilor Ed Flynn. His dad was mayor
of this city for about ten years from nineteen eighty
three to on nineteen ninety three. Uh did a great
job as mayor. Just you know, I thought one of
(16:51):
the series of great mayors in Boston. UH and UH.
And Ed is following in his footsteps. As you probably know,
Ed served in the US Navy for over twenty years,
and then he's following in the footsteps of his father
as a Boston City councilor family that gives a lot
of genuine service, genuine service, not self service, but genuine
(17:15):
service to residents in Boston. We'll be back on Nightside
right after this.
Speaker 1 (17:20):
It's Nightside with Dan Ray on Boston's news radio.
Speaker 2 (17:25):
My guess Boston City council Ed Flynn, councilor. Let's get
some phone calls, see what people think about this. This
is this is a stunning fall from grace for a
Boston City councilor who actually came here from another part
of the world. And I don't know, maybe maybe somehow
(17:48):
Someway didn't understand what the standards of in this country are.
But boy, she disgraced herself, and she disgraced the city
council and disgrace the city of Boston. Let me go next. First,
Jack is a Newton Hey, Jack, welcome you. Next on
night Side, you're on with Boston City councilor Ed Flynn.
Speaker 5 (18:09):
Hi, how do you do, Jack Porter or pleasure to
talk to you. I think I have.
Speaker 6 (18:16):
On this.
Speaker 5 (18:17):
Yeah, thank you. I handle on this as a sociologist,
uh mental health stress. I know that people in the
Cape Verde and community. I've talked to psychologists there. They
have a lot of stress. In one case where you
know sister guys in childbirth and cavebrity. Another one, a
(18:40):
brother you know dies in an accident. If you told
me that, you know, death and is very prominent. And
that's one stress. The other is if you're a woman,
if you're a woman of color, if you're a single
woman of color, there's going to be you know, more
stress on you. So you need to have mental health.
(19:01):
Part of your bill that you want to introduce is
mental health. It's not an excuse, though you're right, you
can't excuse.
Speaker 7 (19:10):
I don't know.
Speaker 5 (19:10):
I think Professor Dershwitz wrote this book called the excuse defense.
That's because you have this doesn't mean you can get
away with breaking the law. You still have to be punished.
But I think we have to understand distresses that Dominican
uh death for American women and capability and women I'm
(19:32):
talking about, I mean Wilkinson member, she also built the
law term that.
Speaker 2 (19:38):
Was the state senator who stuff who stuff pictures of
dead presidents in her in her bra on camera. If
I'm not mistaken, she was under a lot of stress.
Speaker 5 (19:47):
Do you think that that that's a factor here.
Speaker 2 (19:51):
You're asking me or ed Flynn. Yeah, go ahead, go ahead.
Speaker 3 (19:56):
Counsel Jack, I don't know. I don't want to dismiss
that outright. I just don't know the answer to it.
I do know what what what I do. What I
know about is, you know, she she entered the guilty
play today and she she accepted or she's going to
(20:20):
accept responsibility. I think there will be some type of
commitment to federal prison. But I could not speak about
mental health related issues at all. I'm sorry. I don't
have a I really don't have an answer or an
opinion on that.
Speaker 2 (20:38):
You know, Jack, I think you I think you're painting
with a broad brush. I really do. I think that
there's a lot of people in different groups, different groups, men, women,
older folks. There are folks who are more your age
and my age who are are seeing the sunset of
their lives approaching, and some of them, you know, are
facing financial problems. I mean, a lot of people have stress.
(21:01):
It doesn't justify doing you're familiar with what this city
councilor has admitted to doing. I assume you're familiar with
the case. I'm not gonna yeah, yeah, right, that's what
I'm saying, I mean, this is this is not someone
who understress blew up and yelled inappropriate words during a
(21:21):
city council hearing. This is someone who engaged in what
would be considered to be a pretty craven act. I mean,
giving money to a raised to a relative who shouldn't
be on the payroll.
Speaker 5 (21:33):
See how angry she is. You can see that it's
just not normal behavior. Cal lend her actions not normal.
Speaker 2 (21:43):
The woman that that that that crashed the car. Yeah,
well again, I don't know. I think that there were
plenty of people of Cape Verdian extraction and and and
all sorts of groups of minority and majority who conduct
themselves very well. I mean, we could turn around and
we could we could say, look at the stress that
(22:03):
Harvey Weinstein was under. The Hollywood producer.
Speaker 4 (22:06):
Maybe he was.
Speaker 2 (22:07):
Maybe, you know, Jack, you can't. You can't use stress
for every person who breaks the wall.
Speaker 5 (22:12):
I know that I agree with Hill. They should bear.
And I'm saying it's a factor to understand what is happening.
You know, stress on baseball players, the stress on people
who are in politics, one of the factors is that
they are women and a minority. It doesn't mean I'm.
Speaker 2 (22:31):
Feeling stress right now, Jack is a talk show host.
Because they think you're getting angry at me, Jack, I'm
feeling stress. I need to get to a counselist. Oh yeah, okay, Jack,
I appreciate that point of view. Very thoughtful. As always,
we you and I might see it a little differently,
But thank you for your call. Have a good mine.
Let's keep thank you, Jack, Let's keep rolling. He're going
(22:53):
to go to Bob and Walpole. Bob, you got any
stress you'd like to let us know about.
Speaker 4 (22:58):
Yeah, look, work, what's the maximum sentence that she can reserve?
Speaker 2 (23:05):
I don't know what the maximum sentence is. I will
tell you that apparently the US Attorney's Office is apparently
going to recommend a year and a day in custody
and the three years of supervised probation upon release. You
got to turn that radio down, Barb. We got a
lot of noise in the background. I don't know if
(23:26):
that's going to cause your stress.
Speaker 4 (23:29):
Okay, I shut off the radio. But here's my thing.
She knew exactly what she was doing. Why do they
always get off almost scott free? Why don't they get
the maximum sentence? She knew on purpose.
Speaker 5 (23:46):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (23:47):
Well, well, first of all, it's part of a plean
a plea negotiation. Uh. And the the U. S. Attorney's
Office probably takes into consideration a lot of factors. The
fact that she did this while in a public in
elected public office, that works against her, frankly, because the
(24:11):
argument is that she would have betrayed the trust not
only of all the City of Boston residents, but also
the people who elected her. Think she was elected twice
to the council, maybe three times, Ed, you would know
that better than she's been elected twice or three.
Speaker 3 (24:28):
Times, I believe to him twice twice.
Speaker 2 (24:31):
Okay, go ahead, Bob. I interrupted you to go ahead
and made your act. Go ahead, Bob.
Speaker 4 (24:35):
But you know, listen, she know what she was doing.
I've been around a long time on some of you,
and you know, these elected officials are supposed to take
care of the people, and they don't, and they go
out and they try to rob people.
Speaker 2 (24:48):
Well rule, not all of them, not all of them,
particularly Ed Flynn, who comes from a family that has
really given a lot of service to you know, Ray
Flynn ran a very clean mayor's office for ten years
at a top time in the city. Okay, so let's
not paint with that broadbrush. But go ahead, go ahead,
(25:10):
your point.
Speaker 4 (25:11):
No, my point is, why should she get off without
a maximum sentence when she knew she was doing wrong.
You can't say that she didn't know what she was doing. No, no, no.
Speaker 2 (25:24):
I would assume the lawyer sat with the prosecutor and said, look,
would you consider a plea, or maybe she was offered
a plea, and maybe her lawyer counselor then said, look,
they kind of have you dead to write, and you
go to trial, You're going to get convicted, You're going
to spend more time, and therefore this is probably the
(25:46):
best deal you can get under the circumstances. Let's deal
with it. Do with it. You're forty, I think she's
forty six years of age, learn from it, come back
and pick up the rest of your life. I mean,
some lawyers will say that to their clients. Because you
go through a trial, it's more expensive, the lawyer is
(26:06):
going to get paid. And if all of a sudden
you get a conviction, and if the case, if the
evidence is overwhelming, now you might be looking at five
to ten years.
Speaker 5 (26:15):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (26:16):
I think I think you're right. Dan, and and the
the federal government. And when I was in the Probation Depontment,
we did guidelines, sentencing guidelines, and you know, the guideline
range could be you know, one year to ten years.
But when you do plead guilty, you do get a
(26:37):
better deal. And in one of the factors is they
do consider if you have a previous criminal background. That
plays into it. And also if you accept responsibility by
entering a guilty plea, that's also factored in in your
in your favor as well. So there's there's a lot
(26:57):
of there's a lot of pluses in terms of lead
and guilty, especially if you've done something something wrong and
you know you've done something wrong, you're going to be
found guilty, so you might as well take the best
deal you can that. That's that's what I'm what, That's
what I'm thinking.
Speaker 4 (27:13):
Ye well, oh tell me what what's your opinion, Dan?
Speaker 2 (27:18):
Well, my opinion is exactly what what ed Ed said.
And again I've you know, been involved in legal situations, uh,
not only as a journalist, but as a lawyer. And
your client comes to you, you have an obligation to
the client. You can't say to the client, let me
take this, I'll take it to the Supreme Court, and
(27:38):
we'll win at the Supreme Court and raise money. And
you have to be honest, and you have to uh,
you ethically, have to sit across from your client and
sometimes deliver them to the bad news that this case
is not very winnable again, depending they may have audio tapes,
they may have videotapes. They they you know, in the
case of Diane Wilkinson, they had pictures of her stuffing
(27:59):
money inside her bra I mean, you know, do you
remember when they had the abscam case back in the
early nineteen eighties and they had several members of Congress.
They set up a sting and these guys walked into
the hotel room and they accepted the money, and oh
they was. They were glad, handing and shaking hands and
patting each other on the back. They were dealing with
(28:23):
undercover agents who you know, the only the only argument
you can make in that case is entrapman and that
and that wouldn't have worked either. So so on I
understand rather, Bob, I understand your frustration. As a citizen.
You probably have worked your entire life, done the right things,
and now you turn around and you realize that. Hey,
(28:44):
you know some some people look at it differently. So
I appreciate your your comments and your observation. I appreciate
you call to night Okay.
Speaker 4 (28:54):
Thank you for taking my call. You're very good. I
listened to you every single life.
Speaker 2 (28:58):
Well, Bob, I appreciate you doing that, and I hope
you call more off and I really enjoyed the conversation. Thanks.
We got Ron and Newton coming up, and Paul and
need him. Maybe a little room for you if you
want to join us. Back with Boston City councilor Ed
Flynn talking about some real substantive and specific ethics reform
that the Boston City Council should adopt, in my opinion,
(29:21):
and they need to adopt at this point. Back on
Nightside after.
Speaker 1 (29:24):
This, you're on Night Side with Dan Ray on w
Boston's news radio.
Speaker 2 (29:31):
All right, we got three calls. We're going to try
to get to. Let me go to Ron and Newton. Hey,
we're on next on Nightside. You're on with the City
Council of Boston City Councilor Ed Flynn Grudhead.
Speaker 7 (29:41):
Hi, Dan, thank you very much.
Speaker 8 (29:44):
I think I want to thank you for the service
the public service that you've given to our country, both
you and your dad and the military service. My dad
was in the Navy, and so currently my nephew is
on an aircraft here somewhere. But thank you for your service.
Thank you for saying that I have what could be
(30:08):
a very simple question.
Speaker 7 (30:10):
I don't know if it's naive or not, but Dan
has always encouraged us to ask the question, regardless of
how how simple it may seem. I'm paraphrasing, but anyway,
it's a part of the reform. I'm wondering. I work
(30:32):
as a part of our disaster medical response system, and
every year we have to pass an ethics exam as
a part of our annual tournament. We have to pass
not only that ethics exam, but we also are issued
United States government credit cards for which we can only
(30:55):
use for certain purposes. We have to we have to
satisfy one hundred percent of the UH of the exam.
We have to pass with one hundred percent before we
are deployable. So I'm wondering whether I don't know, if
it were to help put the ethical matters more in
(31:17):
the fourth snag on sprain, if you have to satisfy
that standard annually or I'm not sure. It may be
a very I'm not sure practical gat question.
Speaker 2 (31:29):
It's a great question. Let's see. Let's let's see what
ED says.
Speaker 3 (31:32):
Go ahead, Ed, Yeah, it's a good question.
Speaker 6 (31:35):
We do.
Speaker 3 (31:36):
We are required to attend some ethics training annually, but
it's nothing like it should be. It should be more,
as you say, Ron, I think there should be probably
an exam, a more hands on, instructed based approach to it.
(31:57):
Interactive with city council is interactive with the person given
the training, But just listening to a couple electure for
an hour and a half and two hours and signing in,
I don't think that covers it. I think it has
to be extensive. And you know, in the military, we
had ethics training and you're held to a higher standard.
(32:20):
And when you're a city councilor or you're an elected
official and you're placed in you're placed in a in
a position with authority, you owe it to the public
to be ethical, transparent and held accountable. And I don't
think we have a system right now that holds elected
officials accountable in city government in Boston.
Speaker 2 (32:43):
All right, great answer, Ron, I got two more. I
want to try to get in here. Okay, buddy, appreciate,
Thank you very much, thank you, you're welcome. PAULI got
time for you and one more go ahead, Paul, Paul
and need him his own with Boston City Councilor Ed Flynn.
Speaker 6 (32:56):
Yes, mister Flynn, thank you for your service. You're a
good man.
Speaker 3 (32:59):
Thanks.
Speaker 6 (33:00):
As an outsider looking in, I live in Needham, it
appears to me Boston has a strong mayor for a
weak council. The city council is a body very seldom
questions the mayor on some of her actions, and an
example is this. Then I'll get off the air. She
(33:21):
went down to Washington testify in front of Congress. In
prior to going down there, she spent six hundred and
fifty thousand dollars on legal fees in getting coached on
how to testify in front of Congress. Did you or
any of your fellow counselors question that type of an expense.
(33:42):
She's an attorney. What counseling does she need to get
down to testify in front of It's.
Speaker 2 (33:47):
A good question. Did you have any authority? Were you
knowledgeable of that expenditure? Did seem to be a bit much?
Speaker 3 (33:54):
No, we didn't know about it. We didn't know how
much it costs until it was reported in the paper.
But I think I think you are right that the
city council does not hold the mayor accountable. We don't
ask tough questions. We're more of a rubbish stamp. And
(34:15):
you know, a lot of city councils, it's about the
next election. And when you're concerned about the next election,
you want to cozy up to the mayor and to
the mayor's administration so you'll you'll get re elected the
next term. That's what most of my city city council
colleagues believe. That's how they conduct themselves. City councilor Aaron
(34:38):
Murphy is not like that. She's very honest woman. She
challenges the city on neighborhood services and quality life issues.
But most of them just go along to get along,
and it hurts the city, it hurts the residents.
Speaker 6 (34:54):
I'd love to see a breakdown of that legal bill.
And well, well.
Speaker 2 (35:00):
Let's uh, I think that's a great question, and uh,
maybe maybe we will, maybe a Freedom of Infmation Act.
Maybe the Globe of the Herald, more likely the Herald
will get a hold of it. That'd be a good one, Paul,
I gotta grab one more here. I got a Boston
resident want to get in as well. Thank you for
ask you great real quickly, Michael, you've called late, but
we got about a minute and a half for you. What
can you do with it?
Speaker 7 (35:21):
Oh, I can do it. I just wondered I have
been wondering for several years when she took miss Anderson
the oath of office and she refused to put her
hand on the Bible or raise her hand, what was
theo Didn't that raise a red flag and tell us
all there's going to be here? How did that end?
Speaker 3 (35:42):
Mister Flynn, Yeah, you are right. The city council in
question did not raise her hand or did not did
not did not say the oath of office. I believe
she went to the city clerk a couple of days Lada.
She may or may not have given the oath there
(36:03):
as well. I don't know. It's there's add of questions
that remained unanswered.
Speaker 2 (36:10):
I think she said a style from the from the
day that she was elected, or probably even before that,
she was going to do things differently. And obviously the
one thing that she did very differently was to solicit
funds from an aide who was a relative and who
in fact she now is admitting she took part of
(36:30):
that raise from. So you know she she pushed. She
pushed it in a lot of ways, and this is
the one that got her in big trouble.
Speaker 7 (36:38):
Dan that do I have fifteen seconds?
Speaker 2 (36:40):
Shoot?
Speaker 7 (36:40):
Go ahead, well, compleat squid. I live in Copley Player,
I've been here for thirty six years. The tents went up.
You got garbage around the bottom of the fence there.
This has been ongoing for will be four years. We've
missed tourist seasons. It's on the tourists lists. Couple he
squared the library scene at church. What is the underlying
(37:04):
problem there? It can't positively take over through years to
put some brick, take out some gratch.
Speaker 2 (37:12):
They've done, You've done the thirty seconds. You've put it
on ed Flynn's radar, and that's a good thing, and
I suspect you'll see some action on it. Michael, thank
you for your call, Thank you for raising that issue,
and I hope that you get a chance to maybe
do something for that constituent, even though he may not
be a consent of yours. He's still a citizen in
Boston and Flint. Thank you so much. Keep us posted.
(37:35):
We'd love to come have you come back.
Speaker 3 (37:37):
Thank you Dan. It was great to be with Ian.
It was great to be with the listening audience tonight
as well.
Speaker 2 (37:42):
Okay, please say how do your dad and mom. I
saw them the other day at the Mary at the
Mary Beth, Mary and Brett food pantry and they look great.
They thank you all right. Thanks you. I talk to
you soon when we come back. We're going to talk
about the stock market, and I have a very interesting
guest on the other side of the ten o'clock news
It's Night Side with Dan Ray. I'm WBSY, Boston's Radio.
Speaker 2 (00:06):
Well, welcome back everyone, Thanks very much, Carol, and we
moved to the second hour tonight, nine o'clock and we're
going to talk with Boston City Councilor Ed Flynn. For
a long time council of Flynn has talking about some
ethics reform at the Boston City Council. I'm suggesting there
should be ethics reform throughout Boston City Hall. Ed Flynn,
(00:29):
welcome back to Nightside. How are you.
Speaker 3 (00:31):
I'm doing well, Dan, It's great to be with you.
It's great to be with your listening audience as well.
Speaker 4 (00:36):
Well.
Speaker 2 (00:36):
I really appreciate the way you have conducted yourself over
over your career and of course over your when your
dad was mayor. This we've got some we've had some problems.
This is the second city councilor that has really, I
think disgraced the council. And we're talking about Boston City
(01:00):
Councilor Tania Fernandez Anderson. It was interesting The Globe today,
I think described her in their front page article as
an embattled counselor. And I just think that that's an interesting,
uh choice of adjective to describe the situation that she
(01:22):
finds herself in. I mean she she apparently has agreed,
has has agreed to plead guilty. She's not been sentenced yet,
but she could be facing up to a year and
a day in jail under the under the agreement. That
should not reflect on other members of the City Council,
(01:43):
but it does. Would you agree?
Speaker 3 (01:46):
And Dan, I definitely agree. It should not reflect on us,
but it certainly does. And I was at three events
last night and people coming up to me and asking
me about the case, and they were saying, well, Ed,
what is the city Council going to do about it?
(02:08):
You know, we don't want the status quo? Ed, what
changes are you making? How are you going to improve
the ethics on the city council. This is a poor
reflection on the city of Boston, the residents of Boston,
Dan so ys to answer you directly, It's a reflection
on every residence of the City of Boston, whether we
(02:29):
like it or not. It is a reflection on us,
especially elected officials as well.
Speaker 2 (02:33):
So what can be done? When you think about ethics,
you sort of draw the line between ethics and a
criminal act and Obviously the councilor, Tanya Fernandez Anderson was
indicted and now she has pled guilty, apparently to this
(02:57):
sort of payoff system where she gave she gave a raise,
as I understand the charge to a relative, but with
the understanding that part of that thirteen thousand dollars raise
that she gave to the relative would be kicked back.
My question is why are city councilors employing relatives.
Speaker 3 (03:19):
Well, they're not allowed to dan by law. She hired
her a relative anyway, and maybe the relative didn't have
the same last name. I don't know exactly what the
circumstance was. It's going back several years. But by law,
you're not able to hire your relative.
Speaker 2 (03:39):
How did they define relative? In other words, obviously a
member of your immediate family as a relative. What about
if I'm your brother in law and I need a job.
Am I a relative as your brother in law?
Speaker 3 (03:51):
I believe so. I believe that would disqualify you from
working for a city councilor who is a member of
the family, whether it's a brother in law or sister
in law. But I think that would preclude you from
working in a city council's office.
Speaker 2 (04:07):
So how how is that then at this point without
the ethics reform that I guess you're looking for, how
is that monitored? Or who's in charge? I mean you
see someone in their office and there they have a
different last name. Uh, and are they supposed to prove it?
(04:29):
Who has the burden of proof? Is the burden of
proof on the the counselor that that they have not
had any relatives on their staff? How does how does
that work? I mean, how does that happen? I guess
is what I'm saying.
Speaker 3 (04:44):
Well, it's not. It's not necessarily monitored as as strictly
as as it could be. And you know when an
elected official does. When the elected official is sworn in,
they signed documents saying that they would not hire relatives,
and they understand what the rules are. And if you
(05:07):
have a different last name, you know, it can be
challenging to prove otherwise.
Speaker 2 (05:14):
No, I've never been an elected official, and god knows
the people of Massachusetts, I'm sure would be appalled at
the possibility of me being an elected official in Massachusetts.
But I would think from a point of view of
an elected official, it would be good to have an
ethical rule because as long as you had that ethical rule,
you can say to some cousin who says, jeez, i'm
(05:37):
kind of hitting on tough times here, I wouldn't mind.
They're doing a little work for you if you could
find me a spot on your staff.
Speaker 5 (05:44):
Right.
Speaker 2 (05:45):
It gives the elected official not only the obligation, but
it kind of gives them the ability to say to
that relative, gee, you know I was up to me.
But it's a different story. But I'm precluded by by
I assume it's as simple it's a city council regulation
that does that, or is that a City of Boston regulation.
Speaker 3 (06:10):
That the city council regulation? A city councilor cannot hire
someone from their immediate family and I do know that's
sister in law or brother in law.
Speaker 2 (06:21):
Okay, So how long has that been on the books?
Is if that's on the books, it should be enforced.
Was that I assume there must have been a time
when that wasn't on the books.
Speaker 3 (06:33):
Yeah, it's been on the books for a while, and
it is. It has been enforced in the past under
various scenarios. But each city councilor knows clearly that that's
against the rule, and you cannot do that.
Speaker 2 (06:50):
Okay, let's do this. We'll take a break. I want
to come back and talk about it. And I also
want to talk this particular counselor. And I don't want
to dance on anyone's grave. But she's been very controversial
even today at the at city Hall. I watched some
of the reporting on the local news to and she
(07:11):
doesn't seem at all ashamed of this. She was very
overtly arrogant to some of the reporters. She picked which
reporters she would talk to. She hasn't actually announced she's
announced an intention to resign, but she hasn't given a
date by which she will resigned. Do you when I
(07:33):
get back, I want to ask you about that. And again,
I'm not looking to, you know, kick someone when they're down.
That's not my style. But I was kind of appalled
by the demeanor that she appeared to strike. I was
watching some of the newscast tonight and it seemed to
me inconsistent with with her situation, with her circumstance. If
(07:54):
you get my drift, we'll come back with Boston City
Councilor Ed Flynn, And I'd also like to hear from
residents not only of Boston, but in the surrounding area.
I don't think it's too much to ask elected officials
that they don't put their own relatives on the payroll. Uh.
And it's also not too much to ask elected officials,
(08:16):
UH if they do ever elective or anyone in the payroll,
don't give them a raise and then expect to get
a kickback in cash in a bathroom, which is what
Fernandez Anderson I believe has has played guilty to. That's
that was the primary allegation for which he was indicted.
(08:36):
We'll talk with Ed Flynn and you if you'd like
six one seven, two, five, four ten thirty six one seven,
nine thirty And if you are a Boston resident, you
know Ed Flynn's done a good job for the city
of Boston. Wouldn't be a bad idea to give us
a call and uh and give him a pat on
the back, because frankly, we need more Ed Flynn's in
the Boston City Council. In my humble opinion, more people
(08:58):
like Ed Flynn, longtime Boston residents who are there for
the right reason. Back on night said, right after.
Speaker 1 (09:03):
This, it's Night Side Boston's news radio.
Speaker 2 (09:10):
We're talking with Boston City Councilor Ed Flynn, and we've we've,
we've you know, uh, the I was watching. I don't
know if you saw any of her demeanor today the
city councilor who is now you know facing apparently is
(09:31):
going to plead guilty, has signed an agreement to plead guilty,
and it's facing actual jail time for you know, what
you would say is a fairly craven exercise of not
only authority over a subordinate but also, you know, something
that a politician should not be doing. I mean, she
should have, she should not. She does not necessarily need
(09:54):
to know all the rules and regulations of the Boston
City councilor the What she did was wrong in my opinion,
and she walked around there today like she almost had
something to be proud of. Did you did you watch
any of that today play out outside of the chamber
(10:14):
or no. I don't want to put you on the
spot here, but I just want to find out if
what I saw on television you may have seen yourself.
Speaker 3 (10:22):
Dan, I didn't see any of it. I didn't see
any of any of it play out. I didn't see
the television stations. I did hear about it, but I
didn't witness it myself.
Speaker 2 (10:33):
Okay, last last question before we get to start to
get the phone calls. Do you know when she's going
to resign? Is she just going to hang in there
as long as she can until the court date.
Speaker 3 (10:45):
No, I think she's going to resign in the immediate future.
I would I would expect that she would resign in
the next seven days, although she hasn't committed.
Speaker 2 (10:59):
Twenty things is I think that in order to have
a special election in that district, if she can hang on,
I think to like May seventh or something like that,
then there would be no special election, and even when
she vacates the seat, the people in that district would
not have representation. You're I'm sure you're aware of that
loophole in the law. They would not have a special
(11:21):
election that close to an election because it would be
a lot of money to have somebody serve for two
or three months. That's apparently the underlying reason for that.
Speaker 3 (11:31):
Yeah, that's accurate, Dan. So I think she would have
to resign by mid mid May for there to be
a special election, and then so there would be literally
two elections in that short period of time. So it'd
be basically like July and August and then September and November.
Speaker 2 (11:54):
So what other reforms ethics reforms are you proposing and
what sort of reaction are you getting from it? Colleagues,
give us some examples that people will understand that, in
your opinion, need to be adopted by the city council.
Speaker 3 (12:06):
Well, Dan, several months ago, I proposed having a standalone
ethics committee like the State House does. The mass House
of Representatives has a ethics committee. I would want one
for the Boston City Council. I propose this, and my
colleagues voted it down for various reasons. But I think
(12:31):
it's time for us to revisit that. And maybe it
would not be just city council is on the ethics
committee itself. Maybe it might be people throughout the city,
maybe some type of college professors or ethics professors or
(12:52):
business people. But I do think we need some type
of committee that would hold city councilors accountable. That was
voted down, but I'm I'm going forward with it again.
Maybe a different type of opportunity for us to do that.
Speaker 2 (13:13):
How close was the vote when when it came? What
was the vote? Do you remember?
Speaker 6 (13:18):
No?
Speaker 3 (13:18):
I don't, but I don't believe it was close. My
colleagues advocated against it. They didn't think it was necessary
for various reasons. In one of the reasons was they
didn't want city councilors holding other city councilors, you know,
responsible or accountable.
Speaker 2 (13:39):
But you would you just addressed that if you could,
they could put together a committee. I have, you know,
a couple of former judges. There are retired judges who
who are always you know, involved in sort of these things, mediations, arbitration.
They could be easy to put together a five member
committee which would which would not meet very often, and
(14:01):
I suspect they would probably do it at for for
no cost, and that a lot of the judges would
be willing to give back some time. I suspect a
couple of judges, a couple of lawyers or whatever, maybe
a citizen representative. I think that there's a lot of
ways to do that so that none of the councilors
are put in the position where they have to stand
in judgment or sit in judgment of their colleagues.
Speaker 1 (14:23):
Yeah, right, I agree.
Speaker 3 (14:25):
I think that's a great, a great avenue to pursue.
And that's that's something I would like to pursue. And
the other the other couple of options besides having an
ethics committee, which I desperately think we need to, but
i'd also like city councilors in the mayor, but focused
(14:45):
on the city councilors to release their state in federal taxes.
I think I think that's important and maybe over the
over the past five years. And we also dan have
to to file a form a financial interest form Statement
(15:06):
of financial interest in that form is yearly. It goes
to the city clerk and we signed it under the
pains and penalties of perjury. But I think we also
we also should be sending that document as well to
the mass State Ethics Committee, not just to the city clerk.
(15:27):
And I think that form should be public.
Speaker 6 (15:30):
It is.
Speaker 3 (15:30):
It is public now if you if you go into
the city clerk in person and request it. But I
do think any state or reason why you want it.
But I do think that type of form should be
should be public inaccessible as well.
Speaker 2 (15:46):
In this day and age of you know, the Internet
and UH and computers and AI. No reason why because
at that point obviously the you know, they probably can
play all sorts of games well you've got to file
a Freedom of the Nation request and then you have
to pay ten dollars a page, and they that's that's
many ways in which people get frustrated when they're trying
(16:09):
to figure out what's going on. I agree with you.
It should. It just should be made public and there
for everyone, for all the world to say. Simple, simple
as that. And I want to take a break, and
I want to hear what people think. The lines are
full at six one, seven, two, five, four, ten thirty.
We got Jack, Bob and Ron there and I got
a couple of lines at six one, seven, nine three, one,
(16:31):
ten thirty. We'll be back on night side right after
the news at the bottom of the era. My guess
is Boston City Councilor Ed Flynn. His dad was mayor
of this city for about ten years from nineteen eighty
three to on nineteen ninety three. Uh did a great
job as mayor. Just you know, I thought one of
(16:51):
the series of great mayors in Boston. UH and UH.
And Ed is following in his footsteps. As you probably know,
Ed served in the US Navy for over twenty years,
and then he's following in the footsteps of his father
as a Boston City councilor family that gives a lot
of genuine service, genuine service, not self service, but genuine
(17:15):
service to residents in Boston. We'll be back on Nightside
right after this.
Speaker 1 (17:20):
It's Nightside with Dan Ray on Boston's news radio.
Speaker 2 (17:25):
My guess Boston City council Ed Flynn, councilor. Let's get
some phone calls, see what people think about this. This
is this is a stunning fall from grace for a
Boston City councilor who actually came here from another part
of the world. And I don't know, maybe maybe somehow
(17:48):
Someway didn't understand what the standards of in this country are.
But boy, she disgraced herself, and she disgraced the city
council and disgrace the city of Boston. Let me go next. First,
Jack is a Newton Hey, Jack, welcome you. Next on
night Side, you're on with Boston City councilor Ed Flynn.
Speaker 5 (18:09):
Hi, how do you do, Jack Porter or pleasure to
talk to you. I think I have.
Speaker 6 (18:16):
On this.
Speaker 5 (18:17):
Yeah, thank you. I handle on this as a sociologist,
uh mental health stress. I know that people in the
Cape Verde and community. I've talked to psychologists there. They
have a lot of stress. In one case where you
know sister guys in childbirth and cavebrity. Another one, a
(18:40):
brother you know dies in an accident. If you told
me that, you know, death and is very prominent. And
that's one stress. The other is if you're a woman,
if you're a woman of color, if you're a single
woman of color, there's going to be you know, more
stress on you. So you need to have mental health.
(19:01):
Part of your bill that you want to introduce is
mental health. It's not an excuse, though you're right, you
can't excuse.
Speaker 7 (19:10):
I don't know.
Speaker 5 (19:10):
I think Professor Dershwitz wrote this book called the excuse defense.
That's because you have this doesn't mean you can get
away with breaking the law. You still have to be punished.
But I think we have to understand distresses that Dominican
uh death for American women and capability and women I'm
(19:32):
talking about, I mean Wilkinson member, she also built the
law term that.
Speaker 2 (19:38):
Was the state senator who stuff who stuff pictures of
dead presidents in her in her bra on camera. If
I'm not mistaken, she was under a lot of stress.
Speaker 5 (19:47):
Do you think that that that's a factor here.
Speaker 2 (19:51):
You're asking me or ed Flynn. Yeah, go ahead, go ahead.
Speaker 3 (19:56):
Counsel Jack, I don't know. I don't want to dismiss
that outright. I just don't know the answer to it.
I do know what what what I do. What I
know about is, you know, she she entered the guilty
play today and she she accepted or she's going to
(20:20):
accept responsibility. I think there will be some type of
commitment to federal prison. But I could not speak about
mental health related issues at all. I'm sorry. I don't
have a I really don't have an answer or an
opinion on that.
Speaker 2 (20:38):
You know, Jack, I think you I think you're painting
with a broad brush. I really do. I think that
there's a lot of people in different groups, different groups, men, women,
older folks. There are folks who are more your age
and my age who are are seeing the sunset of
their lives approaching, and some of them, you know, are
facing financial problems. I mean, a lot of people have stress.
(21:01):
It doesn't justify doing you're familiar with what this city
councilor has admitted to doing. I assume you're familiar with
the case. I'm not gonna yeah, yeah, right, that's what
I'm saying, I mean, this is this is not someone
who understress blew up and yelled inappropriate words during a
(21:21):
city council hearing. This is someone who engaged in what
would be considered to be a pretty craven act. I mean,
giving money to a raised to a relative who shouldn't
be on the payroll.
Speaker 5 (21:33):
See how angry she is. You can see that it's
just not normal behavior. Cal lend her actions not normal.
Speaker 2 (21:43):
The woman that that that that crashed the car. Yeah,
well again, I don't know. I think that there were
plenty of people of Cape Verdian extraction and and and
all sorts of groups of minority and majority who conduct
themselves very well. I mean, we could turn around and
we could we could say, look at the stress that
(22:03):
Harvey Weinstein was under. The Hollywood producer.
Speaker 4 (22:06):
Maybe he was.
Speaker 2 (22:07):
Maybe, you know, Jack, you can't. You can't use stress
for every person who breaks the wall.
Speaker 5 (22:12):
I know that I agree with Hill. They should bear.
And I'm saying it's a factor to understand what is happening.
You know, stress on baseball players, the stress on people
who are in politics, one of the factors is that
they are women and a minority. It doesn't mean I'm.
Speaker 2 (22:31):
Feeling stress right now, Jack is a talk show host.
Because they think you're getting angry at me, Jack, I'm
feeling stress. I need to get to a counselist. Oh yeah, okay, Jack,
I appreciate that point of view. Very thoughtful. As always,
we you and I might see it a little differently,
But thank you for your call. Have a good mine.
Let's keep thank you, Jack, Let's keep rolling. He're going
(22:53):
to go to Bob and Walpole. Bob, you got any
stress you'd like to let us know about.
Speaker 4 (22:58):
Yeah, look, work, what's the maximum sentence that she can reserve?
Speaker 2 (23:05):
I don't know what the maximum sentence is. I will
tell you that apparently the US Attorney's Office is apparently
going to recommend a year and a day in custody
and the three years of supervised probation upon release. You
got to turn that radio down, Barb. We got a
lot of noise in the background. I don't know if
(23:26):
that's going to cause your stress.
Speaker 4 (23:29):
Okay, I shut off the radio. But here's my thing.
She knew exactly what she was doing. Why do they
always get off almost scott free? Why don't they get
the maximum sentence? She knew on purpose.
Speaker 5 (23:46):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (23:47):
Well, well, first of all, it's part of a plean
a plea negotiation. Uh. And the the U. S. Attorney's
Office probably takes into consideration a lot of factors. The
fact that she did this while in a public in
elected public office, that works against her, frankly, because the
(24:11):
argument is that she would have betrayed the trust not
only of all the City of Boston residents, but also
the people who elected her. Think she was elected twice
to the council, maybe three times, Ed, you would know
that better than she's been elected twice or three.
Speaker 3 (24:28):
Times, I believe to him twice twice.
Speaker 2 (24:31):
Okay, go ahead, Bob. I interrupted you to go ahead
and made your act. Go ahead, Bob.
Speaker 4 (24:35):
But you know, listen, she know what she was doing.
I've been around a long time on some of you,
and you know, these elected officials are supposed to take
care of the people, and they don't, and they go
out and they try to rob people.
Speaker 2 (24:48):
Well rule, not all of them, not all of them,
particularly Ed Flynn, who comes from a family that has
really given a lot of service to you know, Ray
Flynn ran a very clean mayor's office for ten years
at a top time in the city. Okay, so let's
not paint with that broadbrush. But go ahead, go ahead,
(25:10):
your point.
Speaker 4 (25:11):
No, my point is, why should she get off without
a maximum sentence when she knew she was doing wrong.
You can't say that she didn't know what she was doing. No, no, no.
Speaker 2 (25:24):
I would assume the lawyer sat with the prosecutor and said, look,
would you consider a plea, or maybe she was offered
a plea, and maybe her lawyer counselor then said, look,
they kind of have you dead to write, and you
go to trial, You're going to get convicted, You're going
to spend more time, and therefore this is probably the
(25:46):
best deal you can get under the circumstances. Let's deal
with it. Do with it. You're forty, I think she's
forty six years of age, learn from it, come back
and pick up the rest of your life. I mean,
some lawyers will say that to their clients. Because you
go through a trial, it's more expensive, the lawyer is
(26:06):
going to get paid. And if all of a sudden
you get a conviction, and if the case, if the
evidence is overwhelming, now you might be looking at five
to ten years.
Speaker 5 (26:15):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (26:16):
I think I think you're right. Dan, and and the
the federal government. And when I was in the Probation Depontment,
we did guidelines, sentencing guidelines, and you know, the guideline
range could be you know, one year to ten years.
But when you do plead guilty, you do get a
(26:37):
better deal. And in one of the factors is they
do consider if you have a previous criminal background. That
plays into it. And also if you accept responsibility by
entering a guilty plea, that's also factored in in your
in your favor as well. So there's there's a lot
(26:57):
of there's a lot of pluses in terms of lead
and guilty, especially if you've done something something wrong and
you know you've done something wrong, you're going to be
found guilty, so you might as well take the best
deal you can that. That's that's what I'm what, That's
what I'm thinking.
Speaker 4 (27:13):
Ye well, oh tell me what what's your opinion, Dan?
Speaker 2 (27:18):
Well, my opinion is exactly what what ed Ed said.
And again I've you know, been involved in legal situations, uh,
not only as a journalist, but as a lawyer. And
your client comes to you, you have an obligation to
the client. You can't say to the client, let me
take this, I'll take it to the Supreme Court, and
(27:38):
we'll win at the Supreme Court and raise money. And
you have to be honest, and you have to uh,
you ethically, have to sit across from your client and
sometimes deliver them to the bad news that this case
is not very winnable again, depending they may have audio tapes,
they may have videotapes. They they you know, in the
case of Diane Wilkinson, they had pictures of her stuffing
(27:59):
money inside her bra I mean, you know, do you
remember when they had the abscam case back in the
early nineteen eighties and they had several members of Congress.
They set up a sting and these guys walked into
the hotel room and they accepted the money, and oh
they was. They were glad, handing and shaking hands and
patting each other on the back. They were dealing with
(28:23):
undercover agents who you know, the only the only argument
you can make in that case is entrapman and that
and that wouldn't have worked either. So so on I
understand rather, Bob, I understand your frustration. As a citizen.
You probably have worked your entire life, done the right things,
and now you turn around and you realize that. Hey,
(28:44):
you know some some people look at it differently. So
I appreciate your your comments and your observation. I appreciate
you call to night Okay.
Speaker 4 (28:54):
Thank you for taking my call. You're very good. I
listened to you every single life.
Speaker 2 (28:58):
Well, Bob, I appreciate you doing that, and I hope
you call more off and I really enjoyed the conversation. Thanks.
We got Ron and Newton coming up, and Paul and
need him. Maybe a little room for you if you
want to join us. Back with Boston City councilor Ed
Flynn talking about some real substantive and specific ethics reform
that the Boston City Council should adopt, in my opinion,
(29:21):
and they need to adopt at this point. Back on
Nightside after.
Speaker 1 (29:24):
This, you're on Night Side with Dan Ray on w
Boston's news radio.
Speaker 2 (29:31):
All right, we got three calls. We're going to try
to get to. Let me go to Ron and Newton. Hey,
we're on next on Nightside. You're on with the City
Council of Boston City Councilor Ed Flynn Grudhead.
Speaker 7 (29:41):
Hi, Dan, thank you very much.
Speaker 8 (29:44):
I think I want to thank you for the service
the public service that you've given to our country, both
you and your dad and the military service. My dad
was in the Navy, and so currently my nephew is
on an aircraft here somewhere. But thank you for your service.
Thank you for saying that I have what could be
(30:08):
a very simple question.
Speaker 7 (30:10):
I don't know if it's naive or not, but Dan
has always encouraged us to ask the question, regardless of
how how simple it may seem. I'm paraphrasing, but anyway,
it's a part of the reform. I'm wondering. I work
(30:32):
as a part of our disaster medical response system, and
every year we have to pass an ethics exam as
a part of our annual tournament. We have to pass
not only that ethics exam, but we also are issued
United States government credit cards for which we can only
(30:55):
use for certain purposes. We have to we have to
satisfy one hundred percent of the UH of the exam.
We have to pass with one hundred percent before we
are deployable. So I'm wondering whether I don't know, if
it were to help put the ethical matters more in
(31:17):
the fourth snag on sprain, if you have to satisfy
that standard annually or I'm not sure. It may be
a very I'm not sure practical gat question.
Speaker 2 (31:29):
It's a great question. Let's see. Let's let's see what
ED says.
Speaker 3 (31:32):
Go ahead, Ed, Yeah, it's a good question.
Speaker 6 (31:35):
We do.
Speaker 3 (31:36):
We are required to attend some ethics training annually, but
it's nothing like it should be. It should be more,
as you say, Ron, I think there should be probably
an exam, a more hands on, instructed based approach to it.
(31:57):
Interactive with city council is interactive with the person given
the training, But just listening to a couple electure for
an hour and a half and two hours and signing in,
I don't think that covers it. I think it has
to be extensive. And you know, in the military, we
had ethics training and you're held to a higher standard.
(32:20):
And when you're a city councilor or you're an elected
official and you're placed in you're placed in a in
a position with authority, you owe it to the public
to be ethical, transparent and held accountable. And I don't
think we have a system right now that holds elected
officials accountable in city government in Boston.
Speaker 2 (32:43):
All right, great answer, Ron, I got two more. I
want to try to get in here. Okay, buddy, appreciate,
Thank you very much, thank you, you're welcome. PAULI got
time for you and one more go ahead, Paul, Paul
and need him his own with Boston City Councilor Ed Flynn.
Speaker 6 (32:56):
Yes, mister Flynn, thank you for your service. You're a
good man.
Speaker 3 (32:59):
Thanks.
Speaker 6 (33:00):
As an outsider looking in, I live in Needham, it
appears to me Boston has a strong mayor for a
weak council. The city council is a body very seldom
questions the mayor on some of her actions, and an
example is this. Then I'll get off the air. She
(33:21):
went down to Washington testify in front of Congress. In
prior to going down there, she spent six hundred and
fifty thousand dollars on legal fees in getting coached on
how to testify in front of Congress. Did you or
any of your fellow counselors question that type of an expense.
(33:42):
She's an attorney. What counseling does she need to get
down to testify in front of It's.
Speaker 2 (33:47):
A good question. Did you have any authority? Were you
knowledgeable of that expenditure? Did seem to be a bit much?
Speaker 3 (33:54):
No, we didn't know about it. We didn't know how
much it costs until it was reported in the paper.
But I think I think you are right that the
city council does not hold the mayor accountable. We don't
ask tough questions. We're more of a rubbish stamp. And
(34:15):
you know, a lot of city councils, it's about the
next election. And when you're concerned about the next election,
you want to cozy up to the mayor and to
the mayor's administration so you'll you'll get re elected the
next term. That's what most of my city city council
colleagues believe. That's how they conduct themselves. City councilor Aaron
(34:38):
Murphy is not like that. She's very honest woman. She
challenges the city on neighborhood services and quality life issues.
But most of them just go along to get along,
and it hurts the city, it hurts the residents.
Speaker 6 (34:54):
I'd love to see a breakdown of that legal bill.
And well, well.
Speaker 2 (35:00):
Let's uh, I think that's a great question, and uh,
maybe maybe we will, maybe a Freedom of Infmation Act.
Maybe the Globe of the Herald, more likely the Herald
will get a hold of it. That'd be a good one, Paul,
I gotta grab one more here. I got a Boston
resident want to get in as well. Thank you for
ask you great real quickly, Michael, you've called late, but
we got about a minute and a half for you. What
can you do with it?
Speaker 7 (35:21):
Oh, I can do it. I just wondered I have
been wondering for several years when she took miss Anderson
the oath of office and she refused to put her
hand on the Bible or raise her hand, what was
theo Didn't that raise a red flag and tell us
all there's going to be here? How did that end?
Speaker 3 (35:42):
Mister Flynn, Yeah, you are right. The city council in
question did not raise her hand or did not did
not did not say the oath of office. I believe
she went to the city clerk a couple of days Lada.
She may or may not have given the oath there
(36:03):
as well. I don't know. It's there's add of questions
that remained unanswered.
Speaker 2 (36:10):
I think she said a style from the from the
day that she was elected, or probably even before that,
she was going to do things differently. And obviously the
one thing that she did very differently was to solicit
funds from an aide who was a relative and who
in fact she now is admitting she took part of
(36:30):
that raise from. So you know she she pushed. She
pushed it in a lot of ways, and this is
the one that got her in big trouble.
Speaker 7 (36:38):
Dan that do I have fifteen seconds?
Speaker 2 (36:40):
Shoot?
Speaker 7 (36:40):
Go ahead, well, compleat squid. I live in Copley Player,
I've been here for thirty six years. The tents went up.
You got garbage around the bottom of the fence there.
This has been ongoing for will be four years. We've
missed tourist seasons. It's on the tourists lists. Couple he
squared the library scene at church. What is the underlying
(37:04):
problem there? It can't positively take over through years to
put some brick, take out some gratch.
Speaker 2 (37:12):
They've done, You've done the thirty seconds. You've put it
on ed Flynn's radar, and that's a good thing, and
I suspect you'll see some action on it. Michael, thank
you for your call, Thank you for raising that issue,
and I hope that you get a chance to maybe
do something for that constituent, even though he may not
be a consent of yours. He's still a citizen in
Boston and Flint. Thank you so much. Keep us posted.
(37:35):
We'd love to come have you come back.
Speaker 3 (37:37):
Thank you Dan. It was great to be with Ian.
It was great to be with the listening audience tonight
as well.
Speaker 2 (37:42):
Okay, please say how do your dad and mom. I
saw them the other day at the Mary at the
Mary Beth, Mary and Brett food pantry and they look great.
They thank you all right. Thanks you. I talk to
you soon when we come back. We're going to talk
about the stock market, and I have a very interesting
guest on the other side of the ten o'clock news
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.