Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight
Anthony in Plainville. Thanks for holding Anthony and welcome.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Hey, good morning, Jeff.
Speaker 3 (00:11):
I have for taking my polity, my pleasure.
Speaker 2 (00:13):
I just wanted to I just wanted to.
Speaker 4 (00:14):
Really set up kind of agree with Ted Cruz. You know,
Trump has got to get on the stage one way
or the other.
Speaker 2 (00:21):
Was COMMLA.
Speaker 4 (00:21):
And here's why the You know, she can have her
note cards, but the policies on them are not going
to change. She can he can directly confront and respond
to anything she says, whether she's reading it from a
note card or from memory. I also think the reason
why that they.
Speaker 2 (00:41):
Don't want them standing.
Speaker 4 (00:43):
You know, Trump is all of sixty three, Kamala is
five to five, and if you notice at the DNC
her her podium was significantly lower than a normal podium, made.
Speaker 2 (00:54):
Her look taller.
Speaker 4 (00:55):
They're trying to create this image. It's just a false image,
and they can do that if everything is scripted and
pre planned. I do agree that ABC will probably give
her the questions, but definitely mean Trump can't follow up
with something that maybe she wasn't prepared for catch her
a little bit. I just think that they really need
(01:15):
to have the debate where the star contrasts. There's no
question it's one verse one. He can respond directly. I
think he's more disciplined. I'm not too concerned about the mics.
Speaker 3 (01:28):
You know.
Speaker 2 (01:28):
This is I think he's.
Speaker 4 (01:29):
Taken this a lot, far more serious than when he
was debating at twenty twenty. This is the new Trump,
and I think that they should definitely be on stage together.
Speaker 3 (01:37):
One verse one, Anthony.
Speaker 1 (01:40):
I'm just curious, what do you say to the argument,
because this is what Jason Miller, one of his top
advisors in surrogates, is saying and other people close to
Trump that he doesn't need to do this debate, that
he's got this huge endorsement now from Robert F. Kennedy
Junior Taulca Gabber just officially endorsed him. Yes, that in
(02:01):
other words, he's got all the momentum now behind him,
and that eventually she's going to have to do interviews,
and she's going to have to give press conferences and
she's going to have to answer questions, and that's when
she's going to start to unravel. And so just wait,
bide your time, and as her numbers begin to crumble.
(02:23):
She's going to come to him and need a debate
and want a debate, and then he can set all
the terms. What do you say to that argument that,
in other words, she needs the debate more than he does.
Speaker 4 (02:37):
I certainly believe that she needs debate more than he does.
But that's risky, Jeff, because what if that doesn't happen.
What if that doesn't happen and they follow the playbook
of Kamala You wait, you wait, you buy your time.
You don't need to explain anything to anybody. You don't
have anything up on your website yet. People can ask,
but you're not doing anything. It's almost like Trump has
to force out the enemy to destroy the enemy. And
(02:59):
I don't mean in a physical way.
Speaker 3 (03:00):
Oh why got you smoke her out?
Speaker 5 (03:02):
Right?
Speaker 1 (03:02):
In other words, flush her out, smoke her out so
that he can then politically annihilate her.
Speaker 3 (03:07):
Correct. Hello, Anthony, Yes, I'm here. Yeah, I'm sorry. I
missed what you said forgive me?
Speaker 4 (03:17):
Yeah, No, just just to smoke her out, like you said,
but to expose we like you said. You said all
the time, Jeff, sunlight is the best disinfection, well disinfectant.
But you know, if she's hiding. There's no guarantee that
she's going to come to him for a debate. There's
no guarantee that there's going to be interviews that are
hard hitting. And so that's why I'm saying, you know,
I can see both sides, Jeff, I really can't.
Speaker 3 (03:39):
I understand.
Speaker 1 (03:39):
I really know, I understand Anthony. Believe me, Anthony. Look,
let me ask you this, and I'm asking all of
you this, not just Anthony, all of you. Let's play
this out, okay, because there's a possibility now she's going
to pull out of the debate and use the excuse
that Trump did not agree to the changes that she
that she pushes, that she advocated. What if she does
(04:01):
this today, It's seventy days until the election, so basically
it's two months and ten days. What if for the
next seventy days, she doesn't give an interview, she doesn't
do a single press conference, she doesn't answer any unscripted questions,
there are no presidential debates, none, and she doesn't put
(04:23):
a single policy up on her website.
Speaker 3 (04:26):
Seventy days, she just.
Speaker 1 (04:28):
Hides, and they run ad after ad, and the media
just keeps propping her and propping her and propping her.
Can she still win in November? What say you, Anthony?
Speaker 4 (04:42):
I mean unfortunately, yes, I think she can. I don't
think she will. But that was the strategy with Biden.
They hit him, they kept him. And with Kamala they
understand her faults, they understand her weaknesses. And what do
you do if you're a good campaign, you try and
hide those faults, tie those weaknesses. They don't want her,
you know, they know her. The policies are weak and
(05:04):
not popular, So Jeff, why not try and do that?
And you know what if they did that, then who's
going to push back? Not the mainstream media. You'll have you,
and you'll have other podcasters and conservatives calling it out.
But what if that doesn't happen? I mean that to
me wouldn't surprise me. Unfortunately in this world, it's it's
(05:24):
with everything that we have at our disposal. She should
be out there every day left Trump, you know, talking
to the people.
Speaker 2 (05:29):
But it's not happening.
Speaker 4 (05:30):
And unless it starts happening, what evidence do we have
that it's going to interesting?
Speaker 1 (05:34):
Interesting, really interesting, Anthony, very good call, Thank you so
much for that call. So look, let me ask you this,
because I'm telling you if they could get away with this,
That's exactly what they want because the weakness is Yes,
Anthony's right, it's her policies, no question. The policies are garbage,
The policies are destructive, the policies are evil. But the
(05:56):
bigger problem is is her. She's the we can miss.
That's the problem. And again I'm not trying to be insulting.
I'm just telling you we're talking about chronic alcoholism over
many years, and chronic drug abuse, especially weed, over many, many,
many many years, and you can see it's taking its
toll on this woman's brain. There's nothing, really, there's nothing
(06:19):
between the years, so they want to hide her. Okay,
we may not even have a presidential debate the only
single one scheduled for on ABC on September tenth, between
Comrade Kamala and President Trump. She now wants changes to
the rules that frankly her campaign agreed upon, but too bad.
(06:41):
Now she wants to change them, saying she wants a
hot mike. In other words, the MIC's are on for
all ninety minutes. You know they were turned off when
unless you were speaking, They were turned off during the
Biden Trump debate. They want to change that. They want
to keep the MIC's hot or live on for the
full ninety minutes, and they want Kamma to be able
(07:03):
to bring in as many notes, cheat cards, notes, pieces
of paper, documents as so that she can look read. Obviously,
it's a script my suspicion, and it's just a suspicion.
The ABC is going to give the questions ahead of time,
and I think she's honestly so stupid that she can't
(07:26):
even memorize the answers to the questions. So she wants
to have the answers to the questions on paper in
front of her, so when they're asked, you can just
read them. As Mike put it, it's like a portable teleprompter,
except it's on paper. And so that's why now they
(07:46):
want notes and as many notes as you can bring in. Now,
I'm sorry, but if you can't do a debate for
ninety minutes without relying on cheat sheets and notes, you
are not fit to be president of the United States.
I mean, you clearly don't have the most basic, rudimentary
grasp of the issues. Agree disagree. Listen now to Donald Trump.
(08:11):
He was at a Vietnamese restaurant this is after visiting
Arlington National Cemetery, and he says, yep, she wants to
change the rules, and I don't know if I'm going
to allow it. Roll cut to A Mike.
Speaker 3 (08:27):
They also want to change the rules. You know, the
deal was we keep the same rules.
Speaker 6 (08:30):
Now all of a sudden, they want to make a
change of the rules because she can't answer questions. Why
doesn't she do a couple of question answer why does
she do something like I'm doing right now?
Speaker 3 (08:41):
She can't talk.
Speaker 6 (08:42):
We can't have another dummy as a president.
Speaker 7 (08:44):
Okay, we cannot have am and the people from Vietnam
agree with that.
Speaker 1 (08:56):
Now listen to him saying, and look, I'm going into
the hostile enemy territory.
Speaker 3 (09:01):
This is ABC News.
Speaker 1 (09:03):
This is George Stephanopoulos, This is Rachel Scott, this is
Jonathan carl. I mean, they make CNN look by partisan
in comparison. And he said, look, let me tell you
what's really going on. She's looking for a way out.
She's looking for any excuse to pull out. So now
(09:25):
the excuse is I wanted these rule changes. He didn't agree.
I'm sorry, I'm not doing the debate. Roll cut to
c Mike.
Speaker 3 (09:37):
They're trying to change it.
Speaker 6 (09:39):
The truth is they're trying to get out of it
because she doesn't want a debate. She's not a good debater,
she's not a smart person. She doesn't want a debate.
But when I looked at the hostility during the weekend.
You watch it this week with George Slappadopolis.
Speaker 1 (09:55):
Okay, D in Middleborough, thanks for holding D and welcome.
Speaker 8 (10:02):
That's all you.
Speaker 3 (10:04):
I'm good, How are.
Speaker 9 (10:04):
You, D?
Speaker 8 (10:06):
I am fine. I think Trump should go ahead with
the debate. I think her note should be limited to
one index card and that's it, and then she has
to speak from there from her mind, which I don't
think she has. And I think the reason they want
the open mic is so that Trump will interrupt her.
She'll hear him interrupt her, say something under his breath,
(10:27):
and she'll have a chance to say, I'm speaking, I'm speaking.
So he needs to avoid that. He needs to just
sit there and let her rambles. I mean, what is
she going to do when she meets with foreign nationals.
She's going to have an index card in front of her,
so she knows what to say. It's ridiculous, but let
(10:48):
her have it. D.
Speaker 1 (10:51):
What do you say to the argument that Trump Trump
has the momentum, he has the energy, he's got RF
he's got this big endorsement, he's going to start to
run away with this. He's killing her now with these
brutally effective ads. Let her numbers tumble, and then set
(11:12):
the terms of the debate. That he's already in other words,
that he's already given too much. You have these anti
Trump moderators, it's ABC News. They're already going to give
her the questions ahead of time. It's already rigged in
her favor, and that these are the rules they already
agreed upon. That you know, in other words, he's basically
(11:34):
given away the store to begin with. Why give even more,
because then at this point it's not a debate. She's
just going to be reading from the Q cards.
Speaker 8 (11:45):
Well, she can't read Q card. If she only has
one index card, that fate's going to ask a lot
more questions, what hope it does? Then she can be
prepared one on an index card. And I do believe
school of thought that if he sits back and just
lets herself distruct, there is a point to that. But
(12:07):
I think the debate.
Speaker 5 (12:08):
Is for us.
Speaker 8 (12:10):
I think it's for the people.
Speaker 1 (12:12):
In other words, we deserve a debate, and we should
have a debate, even if the rules are tilted against
Trump or rigged against Trump. Where the American people are
owed to debate. This is the only one that's scheduled,
So let's have it. Come hell or high water.
Speaker 5 (12:27):
Correct, That's what I think.
Speaker 8 (12:30):
It's Trump's strong, He's a good debater, and I think
he can stand on his own well, I guess he's
going to be sitting now, not standing on his own
two feet, But either way, I think he I mean,
she's been doing the job for three and a half years.
Why does she need notes that shows how weak she is?
Speaker 1 (12:49):
D thank you very much for that call, Bruce and Woburn.
Thanks for holding Bruce and welcome.
Speaker 3 (13:04):
Bruce.
Speaker 1 (13:05):
What say you should Trump agree to Kamalist terms? Yes
or no?
Speaker 10 (13:11):
Hey, I'm in to change, Jeff, Jeff, I'm into change.
You know what change stands for? Come help, Come help,
and not achieve a get elected? Are you kidding me?
And I like what they said Jeff about Trump's handlers.
(13:31):
He doesn't have handlers. She can't handle him, and she's
afraid of us, not him, us, Jeff.
Speaker 1 (13:41):
So, Bruce, you think that Basically Trump is right that
she's just looking for an excuse to get out of
the debate, and that's why she's coming up with these
preposterous new rules, and that's the only reason why. So
basically he'll say, no, this is ridiculous, and then she
pulls out and then she doesn't have to debate him
at all.
Speaker 10 (14:00):
Correct, that's what she's She's she's fishing for that, Jeff.
But it's not going to work because he'll debate her
no matter what, how, when, where, how why, And if
he does debate her, then she should accept the fact
that she has to go on Fox with him, and
(14:25):
she won't. He's going to eat her up and spit
her out, Jeff. Everybody I know that was the Democrat
is not votent for her. No way, Trump's gonna win
in Massachusetts, for God's sakes, I really believe this deep talent.
(14:45):
And listen, you just keep kicking, kicking button, taking names,
and Grace and everybody in Sandy and everybody in corner country,
they know what time it is. It's time to get
Trump back in office.
Speaker 3 (15:02):
Amen.
Speaker 1 (15:03):
Amen, Bruce, thank you very very much for that call. Personally,
I think Massachusetts is a lost cause. I mean, I
you know, I hear you, Bruce. I love you man,
I love your spirit, I love your fight, I love
your passion. But to me, Massachusetts, to me, that's why
there's a reason why they call this the Commonwealth of Marksachusetts.
(15:25):
New Hampshire, on the other hand, that Trump's gonna win.
I think we got a real, real shot at winning
New Hampshire. And that's why I've been urging President Trump
to come to New Hampshire. Keep coming to New Hampshire,
because I think New Hampshire Cooner Country will deliver New
Hampshire for President Trump. Lenny in Ipswich, Thanks for holding Lenny,
(15:46):
and welcome.
Speaker 3 (15:48):
How you doing, Jeff great? How are you, Lenny?
Speaker 2 (15:52):
Fantastic? I hear I listen to you every day.
Speaker 9 (15:55):
Thank you for what you do.
Speaker 3 (15:56):
Oh, thank you, Lenny.
Speaker 9 (15:58):
You know, Trump's the leire. Trump doesn't need to bend
a mean all they're gonna do is attack him any if.
Speaker 2 (16:07):
In any way.
Speaker 9 (16:08):
So you can't trust the media, you can't trust the Democrats.
You got to disestablish yourself as who you are, and
that's what he's done. Why bother bending the need for her?
You don't want to debate, don't worry, don't debate. That's
my philosophy. I think if they go in there, it's
going to be a hostile environment and they're gonna they're
(16:29):
gonna try to expose something on him, and why bother,
Why should he do that at this stage of the game.
Speaker 1 (16:37):
Yeah, Lenny, So basically what you're saying is, and this
is what Trump was saying yesterday. They agree to the
rules beforehand. These are the rules. It was good enough
for Biden, it was good enough for Harris then, it
should be good enough now now they want to change
it two weeks before the rules? Are the rules up
(16:58):
or down? You want them? You don't want them correctly?
Speaker 3 (17:00):
Correct, Lenny, Yes, think about it.
Speaker 9 (17:04):
They want to change our history, they want to change
our life. They want to change the government.
Speaker 2 (17:09):
They want to.
Speaker 9 (17:10):
Change the rules that our our forefathers brought to this country.
Why give them that opportunity.
Speaker 2 (17:16):
These are the rules.
Speaker 1 (17:17):
Play by the rules, Lenny, Thank you very much for
that call. Well, that's what Trump was saying yesterday. Six
one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight is
the number. Okay, if you want to see what Trump
is up against, just by agreeing to be on ABC
News to do the debate. You know, you know the
(17:39):
name Stephanopolis, Jonathan Carl, Rachel Scott, Donna Brazil. I could
go on and on and on. Uh, these are rabbid
Trump haters. In fact, Jonathan Carl, Stephie, Stephanopolis have openly
said openly on their shows that their mission, their goal
(18:02):
is to defeat and destroy Trump in November. So when
I say they're rabbit partisans, they are completely openly in
the tank for Harris and for the Democrats. So we're
not dealing with journalists, quote unquote even by his journalists.
We're dealing with activists, propagandists for the Democratic Party.
Speaker 3 (18:26):
And this is how bad it is.
Speaker 1 (18:28):
Okay, this this shows you really the level of the
propaganda media. Here is Jonathan Carl on ABC this week.
He's interviewing Senator Tom Cotton from Arkansas, and Senator Tom
Cotton makes the obvious point that when Kamala Harris ran
for president in twenty twenty on on Jake Tapper on CNN,
(18:54):
we have the video she repeatedly called not just for
a single payer, government run healthcare system i e. Socialized medicine,
but she said we must abolish all private health insurance
so it is what one hundred and fifty million Americans
or on private health insurance, including by the way yours,
(19:14):
truly the cornerman, get rid of it, eliminate it, abolish it. Now,
this alone should disqualify her from being president of the
United States. Carl comes out and says, she never said that,
And Tom Cotton is, what are you talking about? We
have it on tape. Of course she said that. Then
(19:38):
Carl turns around and says, well, okay, well she's changed
that position. She no longer holds that position. And Cotton
is like, where did you get that from? What do
you mean she changed her position. She hasn't changed her position.
In fact, it's still my understanding, it goes, it's still
her position. Here you have a so called reporter who
(20:01):
a is so ignorant or willfully ignorant that he doesn't
know that she called for abolishing the private health insurance
plans of every single American, and then, when he's caught
with his own ignorance, lies to the senator's face saying, oh, no, no, no,
she changed on that. No, no, she's abandoned that position.
(20:22):
No she didn't, she didn't, and you know she didn't
And This is what Trump is up against. It is
the media propaganda industrial complex. Listen to the exchange. It
is unbelievable. This was on Sunday this week with ABC
(20:47):
News anti Trump hit man Jonathan carl And he's supposedly
interviewing Tom Cotton. It was more of a debate than
an interview. Roll cut twenty three, Mike.
Speaker 11 (21:02):
President Trump is going to draw a sharp contrast with
Kamala Harris, who has supported things like decriminalizing illegal immigration,
or giving taxpayer funded health insurance to illegal aliens, or
taking away health insurance on the job for one hundred
and seventy million Americans, banning gas cars, confiscating firearms.
Speaker 12 (21:21):
Taking away health insurance. What are you talking about?
Speaker 11 (21:23):
She said when she ran for president that she wants
to eliminate private health insurance on the job seventy million americans.
Speaker 12 (21:29):
John, Yeah, I mean, I mean that that is not
her position. Now she knows how do you know that's
not stramatic? But do you know that's not her position.
I mean she says, you know what she has said,
he she.
Speaker 11 (21:37):
Has not said that. Maybe anonymous aids on a Friday
night have said that.
Speaker 3 (21:42):
She never said it.
Speaker 1 (21:44):
So you see, look he's literally making this is a reporter. Okay.
Remember he's supposed to be a quote unquote journalist. He's
not an opinion guy who's shooting his mouth off on
some podcast. Okay, I'm talking this guy's and by the ways,
supposed to be the pop reporter for ABC News. And
he's like, boh, no, she changed that. She didn't change that.
(22:07):
But what are you talking about. You're literally making it
up now on her behalf. It continues, Roll cut twenty three.
Speaker 12 (22:16):
A Mike, this was not a radical convention. I mean she,
as you heard me go through with Bernie Sanders, she
is not taking the positions of the far left of
her party. She's clearly making an effort to move to
the medal.
Speaker 11 (22:32):
I did hear what you said to Sader Sanders, and
I thought it was clear that he's very disappointed that
she's taking these efforts not to change her positions, but
to hide her positions. The American people are totally justified
to conclude that Kamala Harris is a dangerous San Francisco
liberal based on what she campaigned on the last time
she ran for president and what this administration has done
(22:54):
the last four years. Again, you would have thought watching
the Democratic Convention last week, the Democrats are not in office,
but they're not in power, that they're campaigning against an
incumbent Republican when in reality, she's been part of the
failures of the Biden Harris administration for four years, and
when she campaigned for president in her own right, she did,
in fact promise sayings like decriminalizing illegal immigration, taking away open.
Speaker 5 (23:18):
To the.
Speaker 1 (23:20):
Sounds like Bill and Sudbury when he calls in, by
the way, and you're and you're a reporter, Hey, remember that.
You know you're supposed to be a reporter. So hey,
if you want to work for the Harris campaign, they're
hiring goal. But if you want to be a journalist,
do your freaking job now. Has she called for decriminalizing
the border. Of course, she wants the whole war, she said,
(23:44):
the whole world can come. She wants to decriminalize all
laws preventing people from coming into our country illegally. She
wants to abolish all private health insurance. She wants to
give free health care and free education and free college
tuition to every illegal alien in the entire country. She
(24:07):
wants to give them full amnesty. I could go on
and on and on. This is not the most radical
left wing candidate in the history of the United States?
Speaker 3 (24:17):
Are you kidding me?
Speaker 1 (24:18):
And by the way, Cotton is completely right about Bolshevik Bernie.
Bernie isn't saying, oh, no, she's flip flopped. Bernie is saying, well, no,
I just don't want her to run from her positions.
I don't want her to hide. I want her to
tell us exactly what she's been doing in her record
and her agenda of the last three and a half
(24:39):
four years. I want her to be proud when she
says she wants open borders, or once she wants to
abolish ice, or once she wants to give illegals amnesty
and free health insurance, or when she wants to abolish
all private health insurance plans of every single American to proud.
(25:00):
And by the way, just so that everybody knows, Kamala Harris,
you want to see how radical this woman is. Is
calling for a five trillion dollar tax increase five trillion.
Now she's going to try to package it as, oh,
it's for the rich as for corporations, Yeah, who do
(25:23):
you think they're going to pass the costs off to?
It's going to be absorbed by the American people. This
is going to destroy us. The tax increase alone is
going to send us into a depression. Then, I don't
know if you've heard about this insane idea. She now
says she supports taxing unrealized capital gains. Jeff, Jeff, Jeff,
(25:47):
what the hell are unrealized capital gains? Say you buy
a Bitcoinay, just indulge me, and you buy it and
it's worth fifty thousand dollars and it ends up doubling
the saying you to one hundred thousand dollars. But you
haven't touched it, you haven't sold it, you haven't done anything. Well,
now they're going to tax you for the extra fifty
(26:08):
thousand dollars you made on your investment, even though you
haven't sold it. So they're gonna ta that. It's called
unrealized capital gains. You just made a big gain, it's
not realized.
Speaker 3 (26:20):
It doesn't matter. We're going to tax it.
Speaker 1 (26:22):
You're four to oh one k. Say you're four to
oh one k. You have half a million dollars. I'm
just going to make up a figure. And now, through
good investments, good financial advisor, it's a million dollars. Well,
that's a five hundred thousand dollars unrealized capital gains.
Speaker 3 (26:38):
We're going to tax you. So now I'm going.
Speaker 1 (26:42):
To get taxed for assets and investments and four to
oh one k's that I haven't even sold, that I
haven't even cashed in. They're just sitting there because she's
got to pay for the Green New Deal. She's got
to pay for socialized medicine. She's got to pay for
(27:06):
all this free health care which is taxpayer funded healthcare,
and college tuition for illegals. That's why Trump is warning us.
He goes, what did I tell you with Biden? I'm
telling you now with her, she's going to crash the economy.
Allen nineteen twenty nine, You're going to have a great depression,
(27:28):
and this idiot with your cue cards is going to
lead us into World War III against Russia. That's what
you're going to get. And that's why they don't want
her vetted. That's why the Democrats are hiding her. That's
why the media wants her in the basement. That's why
if you notice, when have you ever seen this? Journalists,
(27:50):
you don't want to do an interview, you don't want
to ask any questions you don't want to do a
press conference, openly collaborating with Kamala the way they openly
collaborated with Joe Biden. And never forget that Kamala Harris
lied through her teeth again and again and again. She
(28:14):
was asked for three and a half years, have you
seen any evidence of mental cognitive decline? Oh no, oh
a short as a talk Joe, Oh my god, Joe
has more energy than anybody. She lied to our faces
and she covered up that we had a senile, decrepit
(28:35):
buffoon in the White House who was bought and paid
for by communist China. And we're gonna give her now
the White House, the most important position, not just in America,
but in the entire world, where literally the free world
hangs in the balance. She's gonna have her finger on
(28:57):
the nuclear button. Listen now to Donald Trump saying, they
they want me to debate her on ABC and to
change the rules, and to give her cheat notes and
(29:17):
to give her a hot mic, and to have her
sit seated. He goes, hey, come on, come on. These
are the very same people like Donna Brazil who gave
the questions to Hillary Clinton beforehand enough is enough. They're
trying to desperately carry her over the finish line. This
(29:38):
is no longer media. This is out and out election interference,
out and out propaganda. Roll cut two. This is Trump
after visiting National Arlington National Cemetery at a Vietnamese restaurant.
Speaker 3 (29:52):
Roll cut two. Mike, I think ABC is a disgrace.
Speaker 6 (29:59):
I think having died Brazil, sitting on that panel, and
she's the one that gave the answers and the questions
to Hillary Clinton before a debate, I think ABC is
really should be shut out. I'd much rather do it
on NBC. I'd much rather do it on CBS. Frankly,
I think CBS is very unfair, but the best of
(30:20):
the group, and certainly i'd do it on Fox. I'd
even do it on CNN. I thought CNN treated us
very fairly the last time. I think Jake Tapper was
very fair and Dana Banish was very fair.
Speaker 3 (30:31):
But when I.
Speaker 6 (30:32):
Watched this interview of Tom Cott, unfortunately, he's a total pro.
He knows what he's doing. And then want to watch
the roundtable after that, I said, the hostility is crazy.
So we're thinking about it, we're thinking about it.
Speaker 3 (30:46):
Should he do the debate on these new terms? Yes
or no?
Speaker 1 (30:51):
Dave, Ian Beverly, thanks for holding Dave, and welcome.
Speaker 5 (30:57):
Hey Jeff, it's been a long time, buddy, but you
got the Italian stallion on the line.
Speaker 3 (31:02):
Italian stallion. How are you, my friend?
Speaker 5 (31:05):
I am doing great, Jeff. How are you doing, my friend?
Speaker 1 (31:08):
Good?
Speaker 3 (31:08):
Good, good? Dave? What do you make of this debate?
Should Trump do it? Yes or no?
Speaker 5 (31:14):
I think he should, but I think rules have to
be put in place here, Jeff. Listen, let me just
tell you it's bad. It's really bad. That stupidity isn't painful.
Kamala wants index cards right, and she wants a separate
word on each card so she can stand there and
poss up a word salad, you know, like today was today, yesterday,
(31:37):
Tomorrow will be today, tomorrow and tomorrow I'll still be
several fries short about happy mail.
Speaker 2 (31:43):
You know what I'm saying, Jeff. You know what I'm saying.
She wants the world.
Speaker 5 (31:47):
To think she's, you know, happy, because she gets up
there and cackles like a h hyena helium.
Speaker 10 (31:54):
Dave.
Speaker 1 (31:55):
So you're saying, listen, look, Trump should just debater a
greeter or silly turned because she's that stupid, she's that
much of a lightweight. He'll clean her clock, correct.
Speaker 5 (32:08):
Jeff, He's gonna beat her like a redheaded step child
on Super Bowl Sunday.
Speaker 3 (32:15):
Dave, thank you very very much for that call. I
appreciate it. Thank you, Dave.
Speaker 1 (32:20):
All Right, so look, many of you are saying, do it.
It doesn't matter. Yes it's outrageous, Yes it's ridiculous, Yes
it's insulting, but still do it. You can beat her
with both hands tied behind your back. Dan in North Andover,
thanks for holding Dan and welcome.
Speaker 13 (32:41):
Hey Jeff, Hey, it's doom and gloom Dan. Hey, I honestly,
I think we are still in a lot of trouble.
Speaker 10 (32:55):
Jet.
Speaker 13 (32:56):
There's a lot of people out there that are just
listening to the hype media.
Speaker 2 (33:00):
So let me tell you.
Speaker 13 (33:02):
I'm in town this week to take my father to
his medical appointments.
Speaker 2 (33:05):
Right, so the other day I take him to his
heart surgeon.
Speaker 13 (33:09):
Okay, he Now this.
Speaker 2 (33:11):
Is probably someone that's pretty smart.
Speaker 13 (33:14):
Right, she's a heart surgeon, she says to me. She says,
you know, thank hey, did you watch the primary? I
mean the convention? Thank god, we've got Kamela.
Speaker 2 (33:29):
And I said, thank god. I said why, I said.
Speaker 13 (33:34):
She says, I said, I said, you realize. I said,
what about the fact that when she ran in twenty
twenty she got less than one percent of the She says, oh, well, yeah,
because this is what she says. She says, well, that's
because she was running against Elizabeth Warren and Amy Kloba.
Show both of them, I'm much smarter. I said, okay,
(33:56):
i'll give you that. I'll give you that.
Speaker 2 (33:58):
I don't think so, but i'll give you that.
Speaker 13 (34:00):
She says to me, I said, so, why wouldn't we
want them?
Speaker 2 (34:04):
Well, they're not.
Speaker 13 (34:04):
Running, I said, Kamila wasn't running. I said, this is
there was no primary. I said, there was no nomination.
They did an Jeff, They did an electronic nomination on
a Sunday night at ten o'clock at night.
Speaker 2 (34:21):
I said, that's that. Literally.
Speaker 13 (34:24):
You know, anytime this has happened before, where someone's bowing
out and it goes to convention, it's called from the floor,
and from the floor they vote. I said, this is
not the way it works. So she says to me,
she says, well, you know this is.
Speaker 2 (34:39):
Why I like her. She's a good talker. That's what
we need. I said, you don't think we need someone smart.
Speaker 13 (34:46):
She says she can put smart people around her, but
she's a good talker, and that's what we need. We
don't need people that are going to be condescending and meeting.
I said, okay, sorry, So that's that's one discussion.
Speaker 3 (34:59):
Sorry. Sorry. And she's a heart surgeon.
Speaker 2 (35:03):
Okay, now lash forward?
Speaker 3 (35:06):
Yeah?
Speaker 1 (35:07):
Sorry, sorry, Dan. I'm gonna let you finish, I promise.
But maybe, Dan, maybe you should have your father see
a different heart surgeon. I mean, I'm just throwing it
out there, Dan, I mean they let her operate on
people's hearts. Holy mackerel. All right, Dan, please keep going.
Speaker 10 (35:27):
This.
Speaker 13 (35:27):
So on Saturday, I'm on the phone with a client
of mine down in Miami. Very smart woman, very successful woman.
And she says to me, so, I had posted on
Instagram the the endorsement by by Kennedy the Trump And
she texts me back and she says, no, that's AI
(35:51):
And I said, no.
Speaker 2 (35:52):
It's real. So I get her on the phone and
I said to her, I said, what.
Speaker 13 (35:56):
Makes you think of She goes Kennedy takes her he
would never endorse Trump. I said, no, it's it's real.
So then we start talking about why she loves Tamala,
and she can't give me any any reason except that
she's a good talker.
Speaker 2 (36:12):
So that's two relatively smart people. Jeff.
Speaker 13 (36:16):
So I bring up to her, you know, look, you're
in real estate. What's going to happen if she forget
about all the other stuff she does?
Speaker 2 (36:25):
What about a forty six percent capital game? What do
you mean?
Speaker 13 (36:29):
I said, Well, that's her proposal, a forty six percent
capital game. I said, you realize your your clients, your
your elderly clients, will never sell their homes. Ever, I said,
the families will keep them in trust and pass them
down to the children's homes will never trade. The rich
will keep all the houses. And she said, well why,
(36:50):
and I had explained to her how, I said, even
if we keep the waiver of capital gains up to
five hundred thousand dollars, there's so many houses in the
country now that'll worth a million that people bought the
twenty five thousand dollars theyen never going to sell.
Speaker 2 (37:08):
That's why. Well I didn't think about that.
Speaker 13 (37:10):
And so when you get a statticit about it, I said,
what about the fact that you let eight million people
over the southern border. Don't you think that caused the
housing shortage? Yeah, we take a country that had a
housing shortage and we that eight million people over the
southern border.
Speaker 2 (37:22):
Doesn't that cause a problem.
Speaker 13 (37:24):
So she actually converted. I converted her on Saturday to
vote Trump.
Speaker 1 (37:28):
So, ah, great job, damn great job. I got to say,
you're very good at it. But Dan, if you don't mind,
can I just go back to that heart surgeon for
a second. What if I said to someone, well, you know, yeah,
this heart surgeon's a bit mean and condescending and says
a bit nasty things. But man, they know your heart.
(37:49):
I mean they can. They can get a triple bypass,
quadruple bypass. It doesn't matter. This person will really take
care of your heart. Or I have someone who's a
good talker but doesn't know your heart from your kidney
or your liver. Then who would you want operating on
your heart?
Speaker 13 (38:09):
I think I'll take I'll think I'll take the person
that's condescending, because chances down I'm.
Speaker 2 (38:13):
Gonna be sleeping during the surgery anyways.
Speaker 1 (38:17):
Right, I'd be like, hey, man, as long as you
fix my heart, you can insult me all you want,
then phenomenal call.
Speaker 3 (38:26):
Thank you for that call, Dan. But no, he he
nailed it.
Speaker 1 (38:30):
It's just like you know, all she's presentable, all, she
talks nice, all look at her story. Oh we're gonna
break some glass ceilings. This is for president of the
United States. I don't the stake. She's gonna have control
over much of our lives, our country, our children, our grandchildren.
(38:56):
I don't care how good she in other words, how
good she can read a script. This is not about
script reading.
Speaker 3 (39:02):
Okay.
Speaker 1 (39:03):
If you want to be a good script reader, I
don't know, go to the local news, do the weather
or something on a local news channel.
Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight
Anthony in Plainville. Thanks for holding Anthony and welcome.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Hey, good morning, Jeff.
Speaker 3 (00:11):
I have for taking my polity, my pleasure.
Speaker 2 (00:13):
I just wanted to I just wanted to.
Speaker 4 (00:14):
Really set up kind of agree with Ted Cruz. You know,
Trump has got to get on the stage one way
or the other.
Speaker 2 (00:21):
Was COMMLA.
Speaker 4 (00:21):
And here's why the You know, she can have her
note cards, but the policies on them are not going
to change. She can he can directly confront and respond
to anything she says, whether she's reading it from a
note card or from memory. I also think the reason
why that they.
Speaker 2 (00:41):
Don't want them standing.
Speaker 4 (00:43):
You know, Trump is all of sixty three, Kamala is
five to five, and if you notice at the DNC
her her podium was significantly lower than a normal podium, made.
Speaker 2 (00:54):
Her look taller.
Speaker 4 (00:55):
They're trying to create this image. It's just a false image,
and they can do that if everything is scripted and
pre planned. I do agree that ABC will probably give
her the questions, but definitely mean Trump can't follow up
with something that maybe she wasn't prepared for catch her
a little bit. I just think that they really need
(01:15):
to have the debate where the star contrasts. There's no
question it's one verse one. He can respond directly. I
think he's more disciplined. I'm not too concerned about the mics.
Speaker 3 (01:28):
You know.
Speaker 2 (01:28):
This is I think he's.
Speaker 4 (01:29):
Taken this a lot, far more serious than when he
was debating at twenty twenty. This is the new Trump,
and I think that they should definitely be on stage together.
Speaker 3 (01:37):
One verse one, Anthony.
Speaker 1 (01:40):
I'm just curious, what do you say to the argument,
because this is what Jason Miller, one of his top
advisors in surrogates, is saying and other people close to
Trump that he doesn't need to do this debate, that
he's got this huge endorsement now from Robert F. Kennedy
Junior Taulca Gabber just officially endorsed him. Yes, that in
(02:01):
other words, he's got all the momentum now behind him,
and that eventually she's going to have to do interviews,
and she's going to have to give press conferences and
she's going to have to answer questions, and that's when
she's going to start to unravel. And so just wait,
bide your time, and as her numbers begin to crumble.
(02:23):
She's going to come to him and need a debate
and want a debate, and then he can set all
the terms. What do you say to that argument that,
in other words, she needs the debate more than he does.
Speaker 4 (02:37):
I certainly believe that she needs debate more than he does.
But that's risky, Jeff, because what if that doesn't happen.
What if that doesn't happen and they follow the playbook
of Kamala You wait, you wait, you buy your time.
You don't need to explain anything to anybody. You don't
have anything up on your website yet. People can ask,
but you're not doing anything. It's almost like Trump has
to force out the enemy to destroy the enemy. And
(02:59):
I don't mean in a physical way.
Speaker 3 (03:00):
Oh why got you smoke her out?
Speaker 5 (03:02):
Right?
Speaker 1 (03:02):
In other words, flush her out, smoke her out so
that he can then politically annihilate her.
Speaker 3 (03:07):
Correct. Hello, Anthony, Yes, I'm here. Yeah, I'm sorry. I
missed what you said forgive me?
Speaker 4 (03:17):
Yeah, No, just just to smoke her out, like you said,
but to expose we like you said. You said all
the time, Jeff, sunlight is the best disinfection, well disinfectant.
But you know, if she's hiding. There's no guarantee that
she's going to come to him for a debate. There's
no guarantee that there's going to be interviews that are
hard hitting. And so that's why I'm saying, you know,
I can see both sides, Jeff, I really can't.
Speaker 3 (03:39):
I understand.
Speaker 1 (03:39):
I really know, I understand Anthony. Believe me, Anthony. Look,
let me ask you this, and I'm asking all of
you this, not just Anthony, all of you. Let's play
this out, okay, because there's a possibility now she's going
to pull out of the debate and use the excuse
that Trump did not agree to the changes that she
that she pushes, that she advocated. What if she does
(04:01):
this today, It's seventy days until the election, so basically
it's two months and ten days. What if for the
next seventy days, she doesn't give an interview, she doesn't
do a single press conference, she doesn't answer any unscripted questions,
there are no presidential debates, none, and she doesn't put
(04:23):
a single policy up on her website.
Speaker 3 (04:26):
Seventy days, she just.
Speaker 1 (04:28):
Hides, and they run ad after ad, and the media
just keeps propping her and propping her and propping her.
Can she still win in November? What say you, Anthony?
Speaker 4 (04:42):
I mean unfortunately, yes, I think she can. I don't
think she will. But that was the strategy with Biden.
They hit him, they kept him. And with Kamala they
understand her faults, they understand her weaknesses. And what do
you do if you're a good campaign, you try and
hide those faults, tie those weaknesses. They don't want her,
you know, they know her. The policies are weak and
(05:04):
not popular, So Jeff, why not try and do that?
And you know what if they did that, then who's
going to push back? Not the mainstream media. You'll have you,
and you'll have other podcasters and conservatives calling it out.
But what if that doesn't happen? I mean that to
me wouldn't surprise me. Unfortunately in this world, it's it's
(05:24):
with everything that we have at our disposal. She should
be out there every day left Trump, you know, talking
to the people.
Speaker 2 (05:29):
But it's not happening.
Speaker 4 (05:30):
And unless it starts happening, what evidence do we have
that it's going to interesting?
Speaker 1 (05:34):
Interesting, really interesting, Anthony, very good call, Thank you so
much for that call. So look, let me ask you this,
because I'm telling you if they could get away with this,
That's exactly what they want because the weakness is Yes,
Anthony's right, it's her policies, no question. The policies are garbage,
The policies are destructive, the policies are evil. But the
(05:56):
bigger problem is is her. She's the we can miss.
That's the problem. And again I'm not trying to be insulting.
I'm just telling you we're talking about chronic alcoholism over
many years, and chronic drug abuse, especially weed, over many, many,
many many years, and you can see it's taking its
toll on this woman's brain. There's nothing, really, there's nothing
(06:19):
between the years, so they want to hide her. Okay,
we may not even have a presidential debate the only
single one scheduled for on ABC on September tenth, between
Comrade Kamala and President Trump. She now wants changes to
the rules that frankly her campaign agreed upon, but too bad.
(06:41):
Now she wants to change them, saying she wants a
hot mike. In other words, the MIC's are on for
all ninety minutes. You know they were turned off when
unless you were speaking, They were turned off during the
Biden Trump debate. They want to change that. They want
to keep the MIC's hot or live on for the
full ninety minutes, and they want Kamma to be able
(07:03):
to bring in as many notes, cheat cards, notes, pieces
of paper, documents as so that she can look read. Obviously,
it's a script my suspicion, and it's just a suspicion.
The ABC is going to give the questions ahead of time,
and I think she's honestly so stupid that she can't
(07:26):
even memorize the answers to the questions. So she wants
to have the answers to the questions on paper in
front of her, so when they're asked, you can just
read them. As Mike put it, it's like a portable teleprompter,
except it's on paper. And so that's why now they
(07:46):
want notes and as many notes as you can bring in. Now,
I'm sorry, but if you can't do a debate for
ninety minutes without relying on cheat sheets and notes, you
are not fit to be president of the United States.
I mean, you clearly don't have the most basic, rudimentary
grasp of the issues. Agree disagree. Listen now to Donald Trump.
(08:11):
He was at a Vietnamese restaurant this is after visiting
Arlington National Cemetery, and he says, yep, she wants to
change the rules, and I don't know if I'm going
to allow it. Roll cut to A Mike.
Speaker 3 (08:27):
They also want to change the rules. You know, the
deal was we keep the same rules.
Speaker 6 (08:30):
Now all of a sudden, they want to make a
change of the rules because she can't answer questions. Why
doesn't she do a couple of question answer why does
she do something like I'm doing right now?
Speaker 3 (08:41):
She can't talk.
Speaker 6 (08:42):
We can't have another dummy as a president.
Speaker 7 (08:44):
Okay, we cannot have am and the people from Vietnam
agree with that.
Speaker 1 (08:56):
Now listen to him saying, and look, I'm going into
the hostile enemy territory.
Speaker 3 (09:01):
This is ABC News.
Speaker 1 (09:03):
This is George Stephanopoulos, This is Rachel Scott, this is
Jonathan carl. I mean, they make CNN look by partisan
in comparison. And he said, look, let me tell you
what's really going on. She's looking for a way out.
She's looking for any excuse to pull out. So now
(09:25):
the excuse is I wanted these rule changes. He didn't agree.
I'm sorry, I'm not doing the debate. Roll cut to
c Mike.
Speaker 3 (09:37):
They're trying to change it.
Speaker 6 (09:39):
The truth is they're trying to get out of it
because she doesn't want a debate. She's not a good debater,
she's not a smart person. She doesn't want a debate.
But when I looked at the hostility during the weekend.
You watch it this week with George Slappadopolis.
Speaker 1 (09:55):
Okay, D in Middleborough, thanks for holding D and welcome.
Speaker 8 (10:02):
That's all you.
Speaker 3 (10:04):
I'm good, How are.
Speaker 9 (10:04):
You, D?
Speaker 8 (10:06):
I am fine. I think Trump should go ahead with
the debate. I think her note should be limited to
one index card and that's it, and then she has
to speak from there from her mind, which I don't
think she has. And I think the reason they want
the open mic is so that Trump will interrupt her.
She'll hear him interrupt her, say something under his breath,
(10:27):
and she'll have a chance to say, I'm speaking, I'm speaking.
So he needs to avoid that. He needs to just
sit there and let her rambles. I mean, what is
she going to do when she meets with foreign nationals.
She's going to have an index card in front of her,
so she knows what to say. It's ridiculous, but let
(10:48):
her have it. D.
Speaker 1 (10:51):
What do you say to the argument that Trump Trump
has the momentum, he has the energy, he's got RF
he's got this big endorsement, he's going to start to
run away with this. He's killing her now with these
brutally effective ads. Let her numbers tumble, and then set
(11:12):
the terms of the debate. That he's already in other words,
that he's already given too much. You have these anti
Trump moderators, it's ABC News. They're already going to give
her the questions ahead of time. It's already rigged in
her favor, and that these are the rules they already
agreed upon. That you know, in other words, he's basically
(11:34):
given away the store to begin with. Why give even more,
because then at this point it's not a debate. She's
just going to be reading from the Q cards.
Speaker 8 (11:45):
Well, she can't read Q card. If she only has
one index card, that fate's going to ask a lot
more questions, what hope it does? Then she can be
prepared one on an index card. And I do believe
school of thought that if he sits back and just
lets herself distruct, there is a point to that. But
(12:07):
I think the debate.
Speaker 5 (12:08):
Is for us.
Speaker 8 (12:10):
I think it's for the people.
Speaker 1 (12:12):
In other words, we deserve a debate, and we should
have a debate, even if the rules are tilted against
Trump or rigged against Trump. Where the American people are
owed to debate. This is the only one that's scheduled,
So let's have it. Come hell or high water.
Speaker 5 (12:27):
Correct, That's what I think.
Speaker 8 (12:30):
It's Trump's strong, He's a good debater, and I think
he can stand on his own well, I guess he's
going to be sitting now, not standing on his own
two feet, But either way, I think he I mean,
she's been doing the job for three and a half years.
Why does she need notes that shows how weak she is?
Speaker 1 (12:49):
D thank you very much for that call, Bruce and Woburn.
Thanks for holding Bruce and welcome.
Speaker 3 (13:04):
Bruce.
Speaker 1 (13:05):
What say you should Trump agree to Kamalist terms? Yes
or no?
Speaker 10 (13:11):
Hey, I'm in to change, Jeff, Jeff, I'm into change.
You know what change stands for? Come help, Come help,
and not achieve a get elected? Are you kidding me?
And I like what they said Jeff about Trump's handlers.
(13:31):
He doesn't have handlers. She can't handle him, and she's
afraid of us, not him, us, Jeff.
Speaker 1 (13:41):
So, Bruce, you think that Basically Trump is right that
she's just looking for an excuse to get out of
the debate, and that's why she's coming up with these
preposterous new rules, and that's the only reason why. So
basically he'll say, no, this is ridiculous, and then she
pulls out and then she doesn't have to debate him
at all.
Speaker 10 (14:00):
Correct, that's what she's She's she's fishing for that, Jeff.
But it's not going to work because he'll debate her
no matter what, how, when, where, how why, And if
he does debate her, then she should accept the fact
that she has to go on Fox with him, and
(14:25):
she won't. He's going to eat her up and spit
her out, Jeff. Everybody I know that was the Democrat
is not votent for her. No way, Trump's gonna win
in Massachusetts, for God's sakes, I really believe this deep talent.
(14:45):
And listen, you just keep kicking, kicking button, taking names,
and Grace and everybody in Sandy and everybody in corner country,
they know what time it is. It's time to get
Trump back in office.
Speaker 3 (15:02):
Amen.
Speaker 1 (15:03):
Amen, Bruce, thank you very very much for that call. Personally,
I think Massachusetts is a lost cause. I mean, I
you know, I hear you, Bruce. I love you man,
I love your spirit, I love your fight, I love
your passion. But to me, Massachusetts, to me, that's why
there's a reason why they call this the Commonwealth of Marksachusetts.
(15:25):
New Hampshire, on the other hand, that Trump's gonna win.
I think we got a real, real shot at winning
New Hampshire. And that's why I've been urging President Trump
to come to New Hampshire. Keep coming to New Hampshire,
because I think New Hampshire Cooner Country will deliver New
Hampshire for President Trump. Lenny in Ipswich, Thanks for holding Lenny,
(15:46):
and welcome.
Speaker 3 (15:48):
How you doing, Jeff great? How are you, Lenny?
Speaker 2 (15:52):
Fantastic? I hear I listen to you every day.
Speaker 9 (15:55):
Thank you for what you do.
Speaker 3 (15:56):
Oh, thank you, Lenny.
Speaker 9 (15:58):
You know, Trump's the leire. Trump doesn't need to bend
a mean all they're gonna do is attack him any if.
Speaker 2 (16:07):
In any way.
Speaker 9 (16:08):
So you can't trust the media, you can't trust the Democrats.
You got to disestablish yourself as who you are, and
that's what he's done. Why bother bending the need for her?
You don't want to debate, don't worry, don't debate. That's
my philosophy. I think if they go in there, it's
going to be a hostile environment and they're gonna they're
(16:29):
gonna try to expose something on him, and why bother,
Why should he do that at this stage of the game.
Speaker 1 (16:37):
Yeah, Lenny, So basically what you're saying is, and this
is what Trump was saying yesterday. They agree to the
rules beforehand. These are the rules. It was good enough
for Biden, it was good enough for Harris then, it
should be good enough now now they want to change
it two weeks before the rules? Are the rules up
(16:58):
or down? You want them? You don't want them correctly?
Speaker 3 (17:00):
Correct, Lenny, Yes, think about it.
Speaker 9 (17:04):
They want to change our history, they want to change
our life. They want to change the government.
Speaker 2 (17:09):
They want to.
Speaker 9 (17:10):
Change the rules that our our forefathers brought to this country.
Why give them that opportunity.
Speaker 2 (17:16):
These are the rules.
Speaker 1 (17:17):
Play by the rules, Lenny, Thank you very much for
that call. Well, that's what Trump was saying yesterday. Six
one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight is
the number. Okay, if you want to see what Trump
is up against, just by agreeing to be on ABC
News to do the debate. You know, you know the
(17:39):
name Stephanopolis, Jonathan Carl, Rachel Scott, Donna Brazil. I could
go on and on and on. Uh, these are rabbid
Trump haters. In fact, Jonathan Carl, Stephie, Stephanopolis have openly
said openly on their shows that their mission, their goal
(18:02):
is to defeat and destroy Trump in November. So when
I say they're rabbit partisans, they are completely openly in
the tank for Harris and for the Democrats. So we're
not dealing with journalists, quote unquote even by his journalists.
We're dealing with activists, propagandists for the Democratic Party.
Speaker 3 (18:26):
And this is how bad it is.
Speaker 1 (18:28):
Okay, this this shows you really the level of the
propaganda media. Here is Jonathan Carl on ABC this week.
He's interviewing Senator Tom Cotton from Arkansas, and Senator Tom
Cotton makes the obvious point that when Kamala Harris ran
for president in twenty twenty on on Jake Tapper on CNN,
(18:54):
we have the video she repeatedly called not just for
a single payer, government run healthcare system i e. Socialized medicine,
but she said we must abolish all private health insurance
so it is what one hundred and fifty million Americans
or on private health insurance, including by the way yours,
(19:14):
truly the cornerman, get rid of it, eliminate it, abolish it. Now,
this alone should disqualify her from being president of the
United States. Carl comes out and says, she never said that,
And Tom Cotton is, what are you talking about? We
have it on tape. Of course she said that. Then
(19:38):
Carl turns around and says, well, okay, well she's changed
that position. She no longer holds that position. And Cotton
is like, where did you get that from? What do
you mean she changed her position. She hasn't changed her position.
In fact, it's still my understanding, it goes, it's still
her position. Here you have a so called reporter who
(20:01):
a is so ignorant or willfully ignorant that he doesn't
know that she called for abolishing the private health insurance
plans of every single American, and then, when he's caught
with his own ignorance, lies to the senator's face saying, oh, no, no, no,
she changed on that. No, no, she's abandoned that position.
(20:22):
No she didn't, she didn't, and you know she didn't
And This is what Trump is up against. It is
the media propaganda industrial complex. Listen to the exchange. It
is unbelievable. This was on Sunday this week with ABC
(20:47):
News anti Trump hit man Jonathan carl And he's supposedly
interviewing Tom Cotton. It was more of a debate than
an interview. Roll cut twenty three, Mike.
Speaker 11 (21:02):
President Trump is going to draw a sharp contrast with
Kamala Harris, who has supported things like decriminalizing illegal immigration,
or giving taxpayer funded health insurance to illegal aliens, or
taking away health insurance on the job for one hundred
and seventy million Americans, banning gas cars, confiscating firearms.
Speaker 12 (21:21):
Taking away health insurance. What are you talking about?
Speaker 11 (21:23):
She said when she ran for president that she wants
to eliminate private health insurance on the job seventy million americans.
Speaker 12 (21:29):
John, Yeah, I mean, I mean that that is not
her position. Now she knows how do you know that's
not stramatic? But do you know that's not her position.
I mean she says, you know what she has said,
he she.
Speaker 11 (21:37):
Has not said that. Maybe anonymous aids on a Friday
night have said that.
Speaker 3 (21:42):
She never said it.
Speaker 1 (21:44):
So you see, look he's literally making this is a reporter. Okay.
Remember he's supposed to be a quote unquote journalist. He's
not an opinion guy who's shooting his mouth off on
some podcast. Okay, I'm talking this guy's and by the ways,
supposed to be the pop reporter for ABC News. And
he's like, boh, no, she changed that. She didn't change that.
(22:07):
But what are you talking about. You're literally making it
up now on her behalf. It continues, Roll cut twenty three.
Speaker 12 (22:16):
A Mike, this was not a radical convention. I mean she,
as you heard me go through with Bernie Sanders, she
is not taking the positions of the far left of
her party. She's clearly making an effort to move to
the medal.
Speaker 11 (22:32):
I did hear what you said to Sader Sanders, and
I thought it was clear that he's very disappointed that
she's taking these efforts not to change her positions, but
to hide her positions. The American people are totally justified
to conclude that Kamala Harris is a dangerous San Francisco
liberal based on what she campaigned on the last time
she ran for president and what this administration has done
(22:54):
the last four years. Again, you would have thought watching
the Democratic Convention last week, the Democrats are not in office,
but they're not in power, that they're campaigning against an
incumbent Republican when in reality, she's been part of the
failures of the Biden Harris administration for four years, and
when she campaigned for president in her own right, she did,
in fact promise sayings like decriminalizing illegal immigration, taking away open.
Speaker 5 (23:18):
To the.
Speaker 1 (23:20):
Sounds like Bill and Sudbury when he calls in, by
the way, and you're and you're a reporter, Hey, remember that.
You know you're supposed to be a reporter. So hey,
if you want to work for the Harris campaign, they're
hiring goal. But if you want to be a journalist,
do your freaking job now. Has she called for decriminalizing
the border. Of course, she wants the whole war, she said,
(23:44):
the whole world can come. She wants to decriminalize all
laws preventing people from coming into our country illegally. She
wants to abolish all private health insurance. She wants to
give free health care and free education and free college
tuition to every illegal alien in the entire country. She
(24:07):
wants to give them full amnesty. I could go on
and on and on. This is not the most radical
left wing candidate in the history of the United States?
Speaker 3 (24:17):
Are you kidding me?
Speaker 1 (24:18):
And by the way, Cotton is completely right about Bolshevik Bernie.
Bernie isn't saying, oh, no, she's flip flopped. Bernie is saying, well, no,
I just don't want her to run from her positions.
I don't want her to hide. I want her to
tell us exactly what she's been doing in her record
and her agenda of the last three and a half
(24:39):
four years. I want her to be proud when she
says she wants open borders, or once she wants to
abolish ice, or once she wants to give illegals amnesty
and free health insurance, or when she wants to abolish
all private health insurance plans of every single American to proud.
(25:00):
And by the way, just so that everybody knows, Kamala Harris,
you want to see how radical this woman is. Is
calling for a five trillion dollar tax increase five trillion.
Now she's going to try to package it as, oh,
it's for the rich as for corporations, Yeah, who do
(25:23):
you think they're going to pass the costs off to?
It's going to be absorbed by the American people. This
is going to destroy us. The tax increase alone is
going to send us into a depression. Then, I don't
know if you've heard about this insane idea. She now
says she supports taxing unrealized capital gains. Jeff, Jeff, Jeff,
(25:47):
what the hell are unrealized capital gains? Say you buy
a Bitcoinay, just indulge me, and you buy it and
it's worth fifty thousand dollars and it ends up doubling
the saying you to one hundred thousand dollars. But you
haven't touched it, you haven't sold it, you haven't done anything. Well,
now they're going to tax you for the extra fifty
(26:08):
thousand dollars you made on your investment, even though you
haven't sold it. So they're gonna ta that. It's called
unrealized capital gains. You just made a big gain, it's
not realized.
Speaker 3 (26:20):
It doesn't matter. We're going to tax it.
Speaker 1 (26:22):
You're four to oh one k. Say you're four to
oh one k. You have half a million dollars. I'm
just going to make up a figure. And now, through
good investments, good financial advisor, it's a million dollars. Well,
that's a five hundred thousand dollars unrealized capital gains.
Speaker 3 (26:38):
We're going to tax you. So now I'm going.
Speaker 1 (26:42):
To get taxed for assets and investments and four to
oh one k's that I haven't even sold, that I
haven't even cashed in. They're just sitting there because she's
got to pay for the Green New Deal. She's got
to pay for socialized medicine. She's got to pay for
(27:06):
all this free health care which is taxpayer funded healthcare,
and college tuition for illegals. That's why Trump is warning us.
He goes, what did I tell you with Biden? I'm
telling you now with her, she's going to crash the economy.
Allen nineteen twenty nine, You're going to have a great depression,
(27:28):
and this idiot with your cue cards is going to
lead us into World War III against Russia. That's what
you're going to get. And that's why they don't want
her vetted. That's why the Democrats are hiding her. That's
why the media wants her in the basement. That's why
if you notice, when have you ever seen this? Journalists,
(27:50):
you don't want to do an interview, you don't want
to ask any questions you don't want to do a
press conference, openly collaborating with Kamala the way they openly
collaborated with Joe Biden. And never forget that Kamala Harris
lied through her teeth again and again and again. She
(28:14):
was asked for three and a half years, have you
seen any evidence of mental cognitive decline? Oh no, oh
a short as a talk Joe, Oh my god, Joe
has more energy than anybody. She lied to our faces
and she covered up that we had a senile, decrepit
(28:35):
buffoon in the White House who was bought and paid
for by communist China. And we're gonna give her now
the White House, the most important position, not just in America,
but in the entire world, where literally the free world
hangs in the balance. She's gonna have her finger on
(28:57):
the nuclear button. Listen now to Donald Trump saying, they
they want me to debate her on ABC and to
change the rules, and to give her cheat notes and
(29:17):
to give her a hot mic, and to have her
sit seated. He goes, hey, come on, come on. These
are the very same people like Donna Brazil who gave
the questions to Hillary Clinton beforehand enough is enough. They're
trying to desperately carry her over the finish line. This
(29:38):
is no longer media. This is out and out election interference,
out and out propaganda. Roll cut two. This is Trump
after visiting National Arlington National Cemetery at a Vietnamese restaurant.
Speaker 3 (29:52):
Roll cut two. Mike, I think ABC is a disgrace.
Speaker 6 (29:59):
I think having died Brazil, sitting on that panel, and
she's the one that gave the answers and the questions
to Hillary Clinton before a debate, I think ABC is
really should be shut out. I'd much rather do it
on NBC. I'd much rather do it on CBS. Frankly,
I think CBS is very unfair, but the best of
(30:20):
the group, and certainly i'd do it on Fox. I'd
even do it on CNN. I thought CNN treated us
very fairly the last time. I think Jake Tapper was
very fair and Dana Banish was very fair.
Speaker 3 (30:31):
But when I.
Speaker 6 (30:32):
Watched this interview of Tom Cott, unfortunately, he's a total pro.
He knows what he's doing. And then want to watch
the roundtable after that, I said, the hostility is crazy.
So we're thinking about it, we're thinking about it.
Speaker 3 (30:46):
Should he do the debate on these new terms? Yes
or no?
Speaker 1 (30:51):
Dave, Ian Beverly, thanks for holding Dave, and welcome.
Speaker 5 (30:57):
Hey Jeff, it's been a long time, buddy, but you
got the Italian stallion on the line.
Speaker 3 (31:02):
Italian stallion. How are you, my friend?
Speaker 5 (31:05):
I am doing great, Jeff. How are you doing, my friend?
Speaker 1 (31:08):
Good?
Speaker 3 (31:08):
Good, good? Dave? What do you make of this debate?
Should Trump do it? Yes or no?
Speaker 5 (31:14):
I think he should, but I think rules have to
be put in place here, Jeff. Listen, let me just
tell you it's bad. It's really bad. That stupidity isn't painful.
Kamala wants index cards right, and she wants a separate
word on each card so she can stand there and
poss up a word salad, you know, like today was today, yesterday,
(31:37):
Tomorrow will be today, tomorrow and tomorrow I'll still be
several fries short about happy mail.
Speaker 2 (31:43):
You know what I'm saying, Jeff. You know what I'm saying.
She wants the world.
Speaker 5 (31:47):
To think she's, you know, happy, because she gets up
there and cackles like a h hyena helium.
Speaker 10 (31:54):
Dave.
Speaker 1 (31:55):
So you're saying, listen, look, Trump should just debater a
greeter or silly turned because she's that stupid, she's that
much of a lightweight. He'll clean her clock, correct.
Speaker 5 (32:08):
Jeff, He's gonna beat her like a redheaded step child
on Super Bowl Sunday.
Speaker 3 (32:15):
Dave, thank you very very much for that call. I
appreciate it. Thank you, Dave.
Speaker 1 (32:20):
All Right, so look, many of you are saying, do it.
It doesn't matter. Yes it's outrageous, Yes it's ridiculous, Yes
it's insulting, but still do it. You can beat her
with both hands tied behind your back. Dan in North Andover,
thanks for holding Dan and welcome.
Speaker 13 (32:41):
Hey Jeff, Hey, it's doom and gloom Dan. Hey, I honestly,
I think we are still in a lot of trouble.
Speaker 10 (32:55):
Jet.
Speaker 13 (32:56):
There's a lot of people out there that are just
listening to the hype media.
Speaker 2 (33:00):
So let me tell you.
Speaker 13 (33:02):
I'm in town this week to take my father to
his medical appointments.
Speaker 2 (33:05):
Right, so the other day I take him to his
heart surgeon.
Speaker 13 (33:09):
Okay, he Now this.
Speaker 2 (33:11):
Is probably someone that's pretty smart.
Speaker 13 (33:14):
Right, she's a heart surgeon, she says to me. She says,
you know, thank hey, did you watch the primary? I
mean the convention? Thank god, we've got Kamela.
Speaker 2 (33:29):
And I said, thank god. I said why, I said.
Speaker 13 (33:34):
She says, I said, I said, you realize. I said,
what about the fact that when she ran in twenty
twenty she got less than one percent of the She says, oh, well, yeah,
because this is what she says. She says, well, that's
because she was running against Elizabeth Warren and Amy Kloba.
Show both of them, I'm much smarter. I said, okay,
(33:56):
i'll give you that. I'll give you that.
Speaker 2 (33:58):
I don't think so, but i'll give you that.
Speaker 13 (34:00):
She says to me, I said, so, why wouldn't we
want them?
Speaker 2 (34:04):
Well, they're not.
Speaker 13 (34:04):
Running, I said, Kamila wasn't running. I said, this is
there was no primary. I said, there was no nomination.
They did an Jeff, They did an electronic nomination on
a Sunday night at ten o'clock at night.
Speaker 2 (34:21):
I said, that's that. Literally.
Speaker 13 (34:24):
You know, anytime this has happened before, where someone's bowing
out and it goes to convention, it's called from the floor,
and from the floor they vote. I said, this is
not the way it works. So she says to me,
she says, well, you know this is.
Speaker 2 (34:39):
Why I like her. She's a good talker. That's what
we need. I said, you don't think we need someone smart.
Speaker 13 (34:46):
She says she can put smart people around her, but
she's a good talker, and that's what we need. We
don't need people that are going to be condescending and meeting.
I said, okay, sorry, So that's that's one discussion.
Speaker 3 (34:59):
Sorry. Sorry. And she's a heart surgeon.
Speaker 2 (35:03):
Okay, now lash forward?
Speaker 3 (35:06):
Yeah?
Speaker 1 (35:07):
Sorry, sorry, Dan. I'm gonna let you finish, I promise.
But maybe, Dan, maybe you should have your father see
a different heart surgeon. I mean, I'm just throwing it
out there, Dan, I mean they let her operate on
people's hearts. Holy mackerel. All right, Dan, please keep going.
Speaker 10 (35:27):
This.
Speaker 13 (35:27):
So on Saturday, I'm on the phone with a client
of mine down in Miami. Very smart woman, very successful woman.
And she says to me, so, I had posted on
Instagram the the endorsement by by Kennedy the Trump And
she texts me back and she says, no, that's AI
(35:51):
And I said, no.
Speaker 2 (35:52):
It's real. So I get her on the phone and
I said to her, I said, what.
Speaker 13 (35:56):
Makes you think of She goes Kennedy takes her he
would never endorse Trump. I said, no, it's it's real.
So then we start talking about why she loves Tamala,
and she can't give me any any reason except that
she's a good talker.
Speaker 2 (36:12):
So that's two relatively smart people. Jeff.
Speaker 13 (36:16):
So I bring up to her, you know, look, you're
in real estate. What's going to happen if she forget
about all the other stuff she does?
Speaker 2 (36:25):
What about a forty six percent capital game? What do
you mean?
Speaker 13 (36:29):
I said, Well, that's her proposal, a forty six percent
capital game. I said, you realize your your clients, your
your elderly clients, will never sell their homes. Ever, I said,
the families will keep them in trust and pass them
down to the children's homes will never trade. The rich
will keep all the houses. And she said, well why,
(36:50):
and I had explained to her how, I said, even
if we keep the waiver of capital gains up to
five hundred thousand dollars, there's so many houses in the
country now that'll worth a million that people bought the
twenty five thousand dollars theyen never going to sell.
Speaker 2 (37:08):
That's why. Well I didn't think about that.
Speaker 13 (37:10):
And so when you get a statticit about it, I said,
what about the fact that you let eight million people
over the southern border. Don't you think that caused the
housing shortage? Yeah, we take a country that had a
housing shortage and we that eight million people over the
southern border.
Speaker 2 (37:22):
Doesn't that cause a problem.
Speaker 13 (37:24):
So she actually converted. I converted her on Saturday to
vote Trump.
Speaker 1 (37:28):
So, ah, great job, damn great job. I got to say,
you're very good at it. But Dan, if you don't mind,
can I just go back to that heart surgeon for
a second. What if I said to someone, well, you know, yeah,
this heart surgeon's a bit mean and condescending and says
a bit nasty things. But man, they know your heart.
(37:49):
I mean they can. They can get a triple bypass,
quadruple bypass. It doesn't matter. This person will really take
care of your heart. Or I have someone who's a
good talker but doesn't know your heart from your kidney
or your liver. Then who would you want operating on
your heart?
Speaker 13 (38:09):
I think I'll take I'll think I'll take the person
that's condescending, because chances down I'm.
Speaker 2 (38:13):
Gonna be sleeping during the surgery anyways.
Speaker 1 (38:17):
Right, I'd be like, hey, man, as long as you
fix my heart, you can insult me all you want,
then phenomenal call.
Speaker 3 (38:26):
Thank you for that call, Dan. But no, he he
nailed it.
Speaker 1 (38:30):
It's just like you know, all she's presentable, all, she
talks nice, all look at her story. Oh we're gonna
break some glass ceilings. This is for president of the
United States. I don't the stake. She's gonna have control
over much of our lives, our country, our children, our grandchildren.
(38:56):
I don't care how good she in other words, how
good she can read a script. This is not about
script reading.
Speaker 3 (39:02):
Okay.
Speaker 1 (39:03):
If you want to be a good script reader, I
don't know, go to the local news, do the weather
or something on a local news channel.
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.