Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Good Morning, Cooner contry. Okay, a lot of news over
the weekend, but one of the big stories, and I
put it up on X last night, is that now
there is absolutely no question about it, the infamous debate
(00:20):
moderated by Lindsay Davis and David muirr. Of ABC News
was clearly rigged in favor of Kamala Harris. And here
is now, my friends, the bombshell AFFI David that was
signed by an ABCU staffer who remains anonymous. Now, this
(00:43):
is what is fascinating about all of this. This ABC
U staffer, someone at the network with intimate knowledge of
what took place, signed an affid David and this is
very important, and then mailed it out to her lawyer
(01:04):
before the debate ever took place. So, in other words,
she's not just saying I saw it and now she's
blowing the whistle on it. She's saying I saw it,
blowing the whistle on it, and here's what's going to
happen at the debate. And she she sent this Affidavid
(01:29):
out again before that infamous debate took place.
Speaker 2 (01:34):
And here is exactly.
Speaker 1 (01:35):
Now what she is now claiming. And I believe her.
This whistle blower is one thousand percent credible. Why because
everything she predicted what happened happened. So according now to
this ABC News whistleblower number one, Kamala Harris was given
(01:56):
sample questions by ABC News use that were, as she
puts it, appeared almost exactly the same as the questions
that were asked during the actual debate. In other words,
they will resemble. She said, Look, the sample questions will
(02:19):
resemble very closely what they're going to ask her at
the debate. So essentially, she had the questions ahead of time.
And not only did she have the questions ahead of time,
but they gave it to her in enough advanced time
so that she could prep and have scripted answers again
(02:41):
and again and again. But there's more, There's so much more.
According to this bombshell Affi David, the whistleblower now says,
listen to this, listen to this, that Kammalus people specifically
told the David Murr and Lindsey Davis ABC News to
(03:04):
not ask questions about specific topics, that certain topics were
off limits. And the one there are several, but the
one in particular that they were adamant on is about
her brother in law, Kamala's brother in law, Tony West.
(03:26):
You may ask Jeheff, Jeff Jeef, who the hell is
Tony West. He is married to Kamala's sister Maya. He
is the brother in law of Kamala through marriage, and
that he's part also of an intimate part of her campaign.
(03:48):
He is playing a key role in the campaign of
Kamala Harris. He has now apparently been accused of embezzlement
and fraud to the tune of millions and millions and
millions of dollars. In other words, her family is doing
exactly what the Biden family is doing. Who did exactly
(04:11):
what the Clintons did and what the Obamas did.
Speaker 2 (04:15):
Grift and fraud come in.
Speaker 1 (04:19):
It's pay to play, enrich your family members with kickbacks
going and not this time to the big guy, but
to the big gal. And she said, please, whatever you do,
Trump will crucify me on this issue. Do not ask
about my brother in law, the sleazy brother in law.
Speaker 2 (04:40):
Furthermore, not only were.
Speaker 1 (04:43):
The questions given to her ahead of time, not only
were they told certain topics must be off limits, which
ABC News agreed to. But listen now to this ABC
News and Kamala Harris went back and forth in negotiations
in which Kamala Harris's people urged ABC.
Speaker 2 (05:05):
ABC agreed agreed to fact check Trump.
Speaker 1 (05:12):
Under the in other words, or as they put it,
to debate Trump under the guise of fact checking, but
not to fact check Kamala. So in essence, they had
they colluded, They had an arrangement, They had an agreement
in which this would be three on one And as
(05:33):
this person said in the Affidavid, you will see at
the debate Trump will be constantly fact checked, which turned
out to be true, and that under the guise of
fact checking, the moderators in fact will start to debate
and seek to undermine Trump, but they will never fact
(05:53):
check Kamala. And this person says, not only is this
blatantly unfair, not only is this blatantly election interference, but
also it violates every ethics of any news organization.
Speaker 2 (06:08):
But furthermore, according.
Speaker 1 (06:11):
To ABC News, they said that they must be negotiations,
if any with one campaign, it must be open and
transparent to the other campaign. The Trump campaign never knew
of their intention to be fact checked, while Kamala would
not be fact checked.
Speaker 2 (06:30):
That the moderators, in effect, would.
Speaker 1 (06:33):
Be assistance the wingmen and the wingwomen of Kamala Harris
against Trump. And so, as she put it, they have
they're gonna make the debate so biased, so one sided,
so blatantly unfair that a it's going to undermine the
(06:53):
integrity of ABC News. B most importantly, it will try
to have a direct impact on the election. Now, there
are some brave journalists who are trying to get answers
from ABC News about the Affidavid, about the whistleblower, about
(07:15):
all of the explosive allegations and accusations in that Affidavid, which.
Speaker 2 (07:20):
By the way, is signed.
Speaker 1 (07:23):
ABC News has issued a non denial denial. So now
you know they're guilty, because first they came out and
said this is all much ado about nothing. Finally there
was more pressure saying well, I'm sorry, could you at
least answer the specifics in the Affidavid, to which ABC
(07:45):
News then said, and here's the rub.
Speaker 2 (07:48):
We never sent.
Speaker 1 (07:50):
The questions, the actual questions asked at the debate, to
either Kamala Harris and her campaign or to Donald Trump
and his campaign, and we considered this matter closed. Now
everybody's wondering, boy, They seem really eager to move beyond,
(08:14):
to move beyond this story. But you're not answering the
fundamental accusations were sample questions given. The whistleblower never alleged
they were the exact identical questions.
Speaker 2 (08:30):
What she said was sample questions that.
Speaker 1 (08:34):
Will resemble very closely the actual questions were given to
Kamala and to her campaign. ABC News will not address
this issue. You know why, because they're guilty. It's obvious.
As for them fact checking Trump and not fact checking Kamala,
(08:56):
it happened at the debate, the moderators acting as code
debaters against Trump. That happened at the debate, not asking
about Tony West and the countless millions that he embezzled
and his ties to the Kamala Harris campaign. Never asked
the question, never mind anything else deeply embarrassing about Kamala
(09:20):
or anything resulting in or affecting her the corruption and
the fraud that has plagued her entire career. In other words,
many key areas about Kamala's background were deliberately not asked.
So as many people are pointing out the fact that
the affid David was mailed before the debate, signed before
(09:45):
the debate, and then we saw what happened. That the
debate vindicates everything she said was going to happen. Now,
as I pointed out on X and I want to
repeat this, the debate bait was rigged, and it was
rigged six ways to Sunday. Where is Congress? This woman
(10:11):
needs to be put under oath. Sure story needs to
be told to the entire country. ABC News executives need
to be put under oath. David Murr needs to be
put under oath. Lindsey Davis needs to be put under oath,
and people in the Kamala Harris campaign must be put
under oath. We want the emails, we want the text messages,
(10:34):
we want the correspondence. We want it all because my friends,
what they did was illegal. It wasn't just direct election interference.
The media colluded with Harris and they engaged in actual crimes.
(10:56):
Six ' twenty now on the Great WRKO Jeff Kooner,
Boston's bulldozer six one seven two six, six sixty eight
sixty eight is the number.
Speaker 2 (11:06):
Okay.
Speaker 1 (11:06):
I want to give a big hat tip to There's
many now that have come out and broken this story.
Speaker 2 (11:11):
But one of the big.
Speaker 1 (11:12):
Ones is Adam mill mi ill from a magazine that
I used to work at, Chronicles, a magazine of American culture.
It's a conservative magazine. I used to work there before
I went to The Washington Times. And it's an excellent magazine.
I mean, I don't agree with them on everything, obviously,
(11:32):
I don't agree with any magazine on everything, but they
are an absolutely excellent, excellent magazine. And anyway, so according
to Adam mill In a brilliant piece, so here is
the affid David. The Affidavid is now online by an
anonymous ABC employee signed anyway. So and it was again
(11:56):
sent prior to the debate. So the whistleblower signed a
copy of the AFFI David and mailed it before the debate.
Speaker 2 (12:06):
To her lawyer.
Speaker 1 (12:08):
So she's this Affidavid is saying, here's what they agreed to,
and here is exactly what's going to happen at the
ABC News presidential debate. So one of them was that
sample questions were given to the Harris campaign that, as
she put it, would resemble and did resemble the actual
(12:29):
debate questions. Furthermore, that there were discussions between the Harris
campaign and the moderators, specifically that they would be debating
Trump all it would be three on one under the
guise of quote unquote fact checking.
Speaker 2 (12:47):
Quote Here's from the Affidavid.
Speaker 1 (12:50):
It was agreed that Donald Trump would be subjected to
fact checking during the debate, while Kamala Harris would not
face come parable scrutiny.
Speaker 2 (13:01):
The Affidavid reads. It continues, quote in.
Speaker 1 (13:06):
Fact, Harris campaign required assurance that Donald Trump would be
fact checked, and this was done via multiple communications with
the Harris campaign, whereas the Trump campaign was not included
in the negotiations. To my understanding, any rules, negotiations and
(13:27):
conversations pertaining to the debate should have had both the
Trump and Harris campaign involved. Now completely right, I mean
a thousand percent correct. Now again, I know I've said
this multiple times. This is what makes this Affidavid to
me so devastating. It was signed and then nailed before
(13:52):
the debate.
Speaker 2 (13:55):
Saying this is.
Speaker 1 (13:56):
What will happen, And it happened. Everything happened. Trump was
fact checked quote unquote fact check. Really they lied about
him repeatedly. Kamala never certain topics which were kind of
bizarre because there's the Tony West allegations have been huge
against Kamala Harris. This is her brother in law, accused
(14:20):
of embezzling millions of dollars, engaged in all kinds of fraud.
He's now directly tied to her campaign. In fact, The
New York Times did a huge profile piece on Tony
West and going on about how he's all over her campaign,
that her sister and Tony West, the husband of Kamala's sister,
(14:43):
are two of the key players running most of her campaign,
and that was never asked. Other questions were never asked anyway,
So and on and on and went. Now, so ABC
News has been evading, they have been giving non denials.
(15:05):
And in fact, what is noteworthy, as Adam Mill points
out in his piece, is that ABC News issued a
statement by an unidentified spokesman. So the person who issued
the statement on behalf of ABC News won't even put
his or her name to the statement. And if you notice,
(15:26):
they're not doing any you know, they didn't address any
of the key factual allegations. They're just doing the whole Hey,
we have a statement. Here's the statement. The statement says,
we never directly gave the actual questions to Harris and
the campaign to Trump and his campaign. Well, that's not
the allegation. They're being evasive. They're dodging. And I'll tell
(15:54):
you why they're being evasive. And they're dodging because ABC
News illegal colluded with the Harris campaign to rig the
debate against Donald Trump. And if you remember, we all
said that the day after the debate, we said, it's
(16:15):
just so obvious. They gave her the questions ahead of time,
the way she was so scripted, the way she could
anticipate every.
Speaker 2 (16:24):
Question that was going to be asked.
Speaker 1 (16:27):
How they kept coordinating David Murr, Lindsey Davis Kamala, how
they even knew exactly what they were going to fact
check Trump on.
Speaker 2 (16:37):
I mean, it's so obvious.
Speaker 1 (16:39):
Now many of you are rightly saying, and I agree
with you, Jeff, but why have Congress investigate? I don't
trust Congress. I don't trust the mealy mouthed, yellow livered,
you know, cowardly Republicans.
Speaker 2 (16:52):
I hear you.
Speaker 1 (16:54):
I'm not saying Congress is gonna get you know. I'm
not saying wait for a report from Congress, but get
people under oath, issue subpoenas. Let's see what they say. Okay,
A couple lines are open. If you want to jump on,
I'm going to go to the phones very very soon.
You can text us seven zero four seven zero seven
(17:16):
zero four seven zero. This is from seven to eight
to one. And it's a doozy Jeff. So when can
we expect ABC to declare and pay the penalty for
not disclosing as an in kind campaign contribution to the
Federal Election Commission. Answer? Never, obviously. I mean this to
(17:41):
me is unbelievable. This breaks campaign finance rules. I mean,
I could go on and on and on. It was rigged,
and now we know it was rigged. And if I'm
Donald Trump, this is it. You've got her. Now you've
got her by the tonsils. Her people colluded with ABC News,
(18:01):
and as Adam Mill points out really in a very
strong piece in Chronicles, this is part of the larger
deception campaign against the American people by the Harris campaign
in the media.
Speaker 2 (18:15):
They were the ones.
Speaker 1 (18:17):
Who overthrew Joe Biden. They were the ones who installed
her in this secretive, undemocratic process to make her the nominee.
And now you know, to ask her basic questions to
know who are we electing as president? I think we
have the right to know where she stands on basic
(18:39):
issues and aspects about her record that need to be
addressed and confronted. ABC News is continuing this deception campaign
against the American people. They're trying to protect and cover
up and hide who the real Kamala is. And they're
(19:00):
trying to pass her off as somehow competent when we
know she's blatantly incompetent. This woman couldn't even do a
debate without direct assistance from ABC News. Now, big story
over the weekend. So, in other words, to sum it up,
(19:21):
ABC has been caught colluding with Kamala Harris. Now, if
I'm Trump, if this thing breaks wide open, how the
hell does Kamala survive this?
Speaker 2 (19:32):
She's so incompetent.
Speaker 1 (19:34):
Forget being in the White House, forget having your finger
on the nuclear button.
Speaker 2 (19:39):
This woman could even do a straight up debate.
Speaker 1 (19:42):
Without getting assistance and collaboration and collusion from her allies
in the media. Now, as for doing another debate, Kamala
Harris's people now see the polls are now tilting against her.
I'm getting all these emails. I can't tell you how
many people are panicking and they're blaming me. I don't
(20:06):
know what I've done, but they're blaming me, and they're saying,
Jeff Trump's gonna lose this thing. The polls are against him,
He's gonna lose. I'm like, I don't know what polls
you're looking at. Here The New York Times, Siena Pole,
this is the New York Times. Okay, the Democrats bible
(20:28):
Trump pulling ahead now in Arizona and has a lead
in both Georgia and North Carolina.
Speaker 2 (20:35):
And that's from a group.
Speaker 1 (20:36):
The New York Times always oversamples Democrats. So Kamala's people
are in trouble. Their internal polls show they're.
Speaker 2 (20:47):
In trouble and they know it. So Kamala is now.
Speaker 1 (20:52):
Her campaign issued a challenge to Donald Trump over the weekend.
They said, let's do one more debate.
Speaker 2 (21:01):
On This is CNN.
Speaker 1 (21:03):
So they want to go back to CNN, and they
want to do it October twenty third, which is what
what is it? Thirteen days basically almost two weeks before
the election. Here was Trump's response, And I want all
of you to weigh in on this. Let me know
if you agree or disagree. Here is now what Trump
(21:25):
said at a raucus rally in North Carolina about Kamala's
challenge for one more debate near the end of October
on CNN World Cut sixteen, Mike.
Speaker 3 (21:40):
ABC was three on one, but I was given credit
for having done a very very good job. I appreciate
that we did a great job.
Speaker 2 (21:48):
It was three on one.
Speaker 3 (21:54):
The problem with another debate is that it's just too late.
Voting has already started. She's had her chance to do
it with Fox. You know, Fox invited us on and
I waited and waited, and they turned it down.
Speaker 2 (22:07):
They turned it down.
Speaker 3 (22:08):
But now she wants to do it debate right before
the election with CNN because she's losing badly. You know,
it's like a fighter. She sees the pole, she sees
what's happening. She's losing badly. But it's like a fighter
who goes into the ring and gets knocked out.
Speaker 4 (22:22):
The first thing he says is I want to rematch.
I want to rematch. Well, in other words, he's not
going to do it. He's not going to do it,
and you hurt part of his reasons A. He says,
it's true.
Speaker 1 (22:35):
By October twenty third, over half the American electorate will
have voted because of early voting and mail in voting,
So he's basically saying why bother most half the country
at a minimum will have voted. The other reason he gave,
and I agree with him completely, is that CNN took
such blowback, they took such a pounding, such criticism from
(22:58):
other media outlets for being semi fair to Trump and
that infamous debate with Joe Biden, that the pressure on
them is going to be immense to do to him
what ABC News tried to do, in other words, set
up an ambush for him, do another three on one
(23:19):
and try to tilt this thing in favor of Kamala
one more time.
Speaker 2 (23:23):
So we said, no, CNN is not going to be fair.
Speaker 1 (23:27):
They're going to be under tremendous pressure not to be fair.
And my point is in the wake of what we
just found out now about ABC News. Remember this is
the same CNN when Donna Brazil. By the way, Brazil
worked for both ABC and CNN. Okay, so you can
(23:49):
see all the ethics of these so called news networks.
She was the one who infamously gave the question stay
Hillary Clinton before her debate with Bernie'say. So this idea
of the network's giving questions ahead of time to the candidates.
It's nothing new. That's how sleazy and corrupt these people are.
(24:12):
So I'm thinking I'm not trusting CNN with a fair debate,
No way, especially in light now of the stunning revelations
and what's been unearthed with ABC News.
Speaker 2 (24:25):
So unless it's Fox.
Speaker 1 (24:27):
News or Newsmax or some neutral platform on x Trump
is leading in the polls, her campaign is sinking. Why
would you do another debate so it can be three
on one again, so they could rig it again, so
(24:47):
they could try to embarrass and humiliate Trump again.
Speaker 2 (24:51):
No, no, no, no, no no.
Speaker 1 (24:53):
After this, the media has no credibility whatsoever, and in
particular to me. You may agree, you may disagree, they
have no right to conduct any more debates from this
point forward.
Speaker 2 (25:11):
I'm looking at.
Speaker 1 (25:12):
ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, I don't care, take your pick, NPR, PBS.
Speaker 2 (25:19):
I'm sorry.
Speaker 1 (25:21):
You have been so biased, so propagandizing against Trump. You
have been so blatantly partisan that you cannot be trusted
to ever do another presidential debate again.
Speaker 2 (25:38):
Now, this to me is ABC Gate. Until we get.
Speaker 1 (25:42):
To the bottom of this, and until people are fired
and careers are destroyed, especially David Murr and Lindsay Davis.
Then I'm sorry. We can never have a debate again
with these networks as the moderators because they're in the
tank for the Democrats. This wasn't a debate, that was
(26:04):
a journalistic assassination attempt. And you have this explosive whistleblower
now who has come out and said, yeah, the whole
thing was set up between Kamala and ABC News and
their job was to take down Trump. So if I'm
Donald Trump, this is the scandal that will bury her
(26:27):
and the fake news media once and for all.
Speaker 2 (26:30):
I jump all over this baby.
Speaker 1 (26:34):
And pound it and pound it and pound it and
pound it, and put ABC News right on the spot
and demand that Republicans hold hearings right now, televised hearings,
issue subpoenis they don't show up contempt of Congress, and
then the ABC News will have egg all over its face.
(26:57):
What are you hiding for? What are you stonewalling?
Speaker 2 (26:59):
Why?
Speaker 1 (27:00):
I want David Murr under oath. I want Lindsay Davis
under oath. I want her producers under oath, and I
want all of this correspondence and emails to the public.
We can all see that this was done in the
dark and behind Trump's back.
Speaker 2 (27:18):
So my question to you double barreled question number one.
Trump now says.
Speaker 1 (27:27):
He will no longer do any more debates. He will
not do the CNN debate that Kamala Harris challenged him
to in late October.
Speaker 2 (27:36):
He says it's way too late.
Speaker 1 (27:38):
People will have many half the country will have voted,
and it's going to be unfair and rigged the.
Speaker 2 (27:44):
Way ABC News was So why bother?
Speaker 5 (27:48):
So?
Speaker 1 (27:48):
Was Trump right or wrong to not debate Kamala? Okay,
this is from Larry on messenger question the Kamala has
did you assist Kamala Harris? Sorry, questioned the ABC News
did you assist Kamala Harris during the debate? ABC? We
(28:10):
grew up middle class, which is Colins's answer to everything.
I grew up in the middle class family. Okay, let's
go to Dave in the great state of Pennsylvania.
Speaker 2 (28:24):
Thanks for holding Dave, and welcome.
Speaker 6 (28:29):
Good morning, Jeff. How are you, buddy good?
Speaker 2 (28:31):
Feeling much better? Thank you, Dave?
Speaker 6 (28:34):
Good? Hey, Jeff? How about this we bring the line
along with the middle class. You'm going to be called
the lying class, Jeff.
Speaker 2 (28:42):
First of all, Da Dave, are you shocked.
Speaker 1 (28:45):
I mean, I know we all had our suspicions, but
are you shocked now that this whistleblower is essentially confirmed
what we all suspected that they rigged that debate.
Speaker 2 (28:55):
It was all planned ahead of time.
Speaker 6 (29:00):
I'll lance you, but ABC stands for all boprop. That's
a stand for Buddy. And no, I'm not surprised, Jeff,
because you know what, the media has been liberal since
Bernie Goldberg came out with his book. You know Bernard Goldberg,
he used to work at Seed the b S news
to quote to give ahead tip the RUSS. Remember he
used to work at CBS with Dn Rather, he called
him Dan I'd rather not work with. He had the
(29:22):
insight on the media bias. Jeff, you remember Bernard Goldberg?
Speaker 2 (29:25):
Yes, yes, Bernie Goldberg, Yeah, of course. Yeah.
Speaker 6 (29:28):
And also there's a book I forget the name of
the author, Jeff. It came out I think Media Busters.
They used to have a part of their site called
the Gospel. According to the New York Times, there was
a book. I forget the author, but he was a
really really good author. Was John something, John Proctor or
John Smith or something like that. But there was I
know you know the book. It's got like the cover
of the New York Times. It's a soft paperback cover
(29:50):
book and it was called The Gospel according to the
New York Times. Do you remember the book, Jeff, I.
Speaker 1 (29:56):
Mean it rings a bell, but I can't I can't
pinpoint an author. But what you're saying, Dave is we've
known about the lying liberal media now for decades. So
you're saying at this point we shouldn't be surprised.
Speaker 6 (30:09):
Correct, be surprised, and thank God for people like you,
some of Fox, who's not all the Fox. But in Newsmatch,
no An, Jeff, we got the news that comes out
the tooth like George Snapphalpekes came out about a couple
of years ago, you know, criticizing Fox, knowing in the Newsmatch.
But when he did that, Jeff, it just shows that
(30:31):
he makes his own point. It just shows how far left, ABC, NBC,
NPR and everybody else is, you know, in the print media,
The New York Times, the Washington Compost, even here in
Pittsburgh the Post Case att thell liberal. But we get
the Tribune Review, which is kind of like the Herald
back there, more to the right. But still they do
go center. But Jeff, it just that he made his
point that he admits he's a liberal. You know what
(30:53):
I'm saying, Dave.
Speaker 1 (30:54):
If you were advising the Trump campaign and he says, hey,
Kamala just came to me. Her people they want one
more debate on CNN October twenty third, about two weeks
before the election. Should I say yay or nay? What
would you tell him, Dave? What would be your advice
to Trump? Do it or don't do it?
Speaker 6 (31:17):
Wouldn't do it, but unless it was either on I'm
going to be honest with Trump friendly network. That way,
she wouldn't be caught cheating. I wouldn't say Trump friendly,
but more middle or to the neutrala in your news match.
Speaker 2 (31:29):
I agree.
Speaker 1 (31:30):
No, I completely agree with you, and that's why she
won't agree to it. And that's why Trump said, no,
let's not even bother Dave, thank you very much for
that call. Really good points as always. Six one seven
two six, six sixty eight sixty eight. No, that's why
Trump said there's going to be no more debates, Why
so we can have another ABC News fiasco. You know,
(31:54):
and and look again the scandal here. Yes, it was
completely biased. Yes, it was rigged. Yes, it was an ambush,
but it was all planned and coordinated, colluded between ABC
News and Kamala. That's why this affidavit and this whistleblower
(32:14):
at ABC is so explosive. And so if I'm Trump,
I'm like, you want to see how rigged it is.
You want to see how bad the fake news media is,
why you shouldn't believe a word that comes out of
their mouth.
Speaker 2 (32:29):
Look at this and just he goes. Look.
Speaker 1 (32:33):
Ask if I was Trump, I'd say every day, I'd say,
ask ABC. Did they give her sample questions yes or no?
Speaker 2 (32:43):
Yes or no?
Speaker 1 (32:45):
Did they give her assurances they were gonna quote unquote
fact check me but not fact check her? Did they
specifically talk about certain areas that were no go areas
for Kamala? I just yes or no? Is the whistleblower
line or not lying? Ask Kamala every day? Ask ABC
every day. Let the truth come out. It will be devastating,
(33:11):
not just for the media, which to me already has
lost all credibility, but I mean it'll wipe them out
once and for it will completely wipe It'll be a
scandal they'll never be able to recover from. But also
frankly for Kamala. You're that pathetic. You can't even handle
(33:31):
one debate on your own. So if I'm Trump, look now,
especially with the Poles, I don't know what polls some
people are looking at. I told you I'm getting you know,
even now I'm getting emails blaming me, saying, Jeff, how
dare you talk about some of these polls showing Trump
is in the lead?
Speaker 2 (33:52):
We all know Trump is behind. Trump's gonna lose.
Speaker 7 (33:54):
What you're giving people a full sense of hope? Okay, Hey,
I don't you want to jump off a bridge. Jump
off a bridge. I don't know what else to tell you.
It just broke this morning. New York Times SIENA poll.
It's one of the biggest polling firms in the country,
and they oversample Democrats they always have, And they're saying
(34:19):
Trump now is on the path to a narrow victory.
They're saying it what was? What do you want me
tell you?
Speaker 2 (34:26):
Not report it?
Speaker 1 (34:29):
Well, look as things stand right now, I'm just going
by the New York Times now, not that their gospel
is that they're the other side, and they load up
their polls to make sure that it always tilts left.
So they're tilting tilts some more. Let me tilt a
little bit more. In Arizona, Trump is starting to run
(34:53):
away with it. Nevada, He's starting to run away with it.
He now has, according to The New York Times, a
small but clear lead in both Georgia and North Carolina.
The governor of Pennsylvania has now come out and said
that if the election were held today, a Democrat Josh Shapiro,
(35:15):
Trump would win. Fetterman, I can play you with the cut.
Fetterman was at The Atlantic magazine, who was at a festival,
and he said, you're really underestimating all of you Trump's
strength in Florida and sorry, in Pennsylvania. Basically, Fetterman, you know,
he's kind of brain damaged, frankly from that Stroker Art attack.
(35:35):
But so he kind of meanders and he's incoherent and
his mind jumps and it's kind of hard to follow him.
But basically saying, if the election, like Shapiro, he's a Democrat,
he goes, if the election were held today in Pennsylvania,
Harris is gonna lose. Now, I'm telling you this already.
What I just discussed now is enough for Trump to
(35:57):
win if he wins Arison and he will. And he
wins Nevada and he will. And he wins North Carolina
and he will. And he wins Georgia and he will.
And the big one, the Keystone state, Pennsylvania.
Speaker 2 (36:12):
It's over.
Speaker 1 (36:14):
He's got the electoral College. Good night, Irene. I don't
care what the national poll. You know what the national
popular vote is irrelevant. He could lose New Hampshire, which
I don't want him to, but I'm just saying he
loses New Hampshire, he loses Michigan, he loses Wisconsin.
Speaker 2 (36:33):
He still wins. Now one other quick point.
Speaker 1 (36:39):
Okay, because there's been so much news over the weekend,
you need to hear this. The Muslim mayor, and I'm
going to say one more time. The Muslim mayor of
a key town in Wayne County, Michigan. Wayne County is
(36:59):
Horn is home to Dearborn. It's the largest population of
Muslim and Arab Americans in the United States. He's from Yemen.
He's a Yemeny immigrant. Staunch Democrat has now come out
and endorsed Donald Trump. It is hit Michigan. I'm telling
(37:22):
you it has been a shock. You want to talk
about shock and awe this Muslim mayor, and not just
that he endorsed them, but that he got so much
support from the Muslim and Arab American community by endorsing Trump.
(37:42):
It is a thunderblow to the Democrats and to Kamala Harris.
And so why and by the way, this is the guy,
this mayor is the guy a mere Gilab or glib.
I forget how. I don't mean to mangle his name.
I don't know exactly imnunciation is accurate. But anyway, Galib
(38:04):
Amir Ghalib is one of the leaders of the uncommitted
movement in the Democratic primary. Remember those one hundred thousand
plus Democrats in Michigan that said, we're not We're gonna
vote uncommitted. We're so against Joe Biden and Kamala Harris
for the way they're handling the war in Gaza that
we will not vote for them.
Speaker 2 (38:24):
That's the guy.
Speaker 1 (38:26):
And he came out and said, I had a twenty
minute conversation with Trump. We met in Flint, Michigan. The
man the media portrays him to be is not the
man that I met. This is a man of peace.
This is a man of principles and under his leadership,
(38:47):
the Middle East was at peace. Whatever you think about
the Israeli Palestinian issue, we at peace, the Abraham Accords,
we at peace. And so he is now urging all
Arab Americans, Muslim Americans to now vote for Donald Trump.
(39:07):
It's one of the biggest endorsements of the entire election.
Kamala and Biden have alienated the Arabs and the Muslims
in Dearborn and that is a significant voting block. It's
the key voting block for the Democrats. Trump now is
(39:27):
on the verge of taking Michigan. If he takes Michigan,
the blue wall is destroyed for the Democrats. So what
I'm saying is Kamala's campaign is starting to collapse on
multiple fronts. That's why all of the energy, the momentum
is now behind Trump. That's why she's asking him for
(39:50):
a debate. If she would be leading, if she's leading
in the polls, why would she be asking Trump for
a debate.
Speaker 2 (39:57):
And so Trump came out and said, look, I'm winning.
Speaker 1 (40:00):
I'm sorry, but I'm winning. The polls show it, our
internal polls show it. Now it's just a question of
executing the ground game and preventing them from stealing the election.
So with all this in play, I'm like, you got
to be crazy to one another debate, Like seriously, after
what just came out now about ABC News, Like seriously,
(40:23):
you need your head examined.
Speaker 2 (40:25):
So I'm a firm no.
Speaker 1 (40:28):
Now my question to you, should Trump make an issue
now of the fact that this debate was clearly rigged
and did he make a mistake in saying no to
one more debate with Kamala six one seven two six
six sixty eight sixty eight. I want to hear from
(40:49):
you the great audience of Kooner Country, Judy Ian Vermont,
thanks for holding Judy, and welcome.
Speaker 5 (40:58):
Hi, Jeff, Hi, Judy to Hi. We went to see
JD Vans with Tucker Carlson on Tucker's tour in Pennsylvania
this weekend and it was amazing. He spoke in an
a packed stadium. JD didn't have a teleprompter. He's the
entire time and he was clear and talked about his
(41:19):
policies at the place. Was just like spellbound by him.
And I really think the Republican Party is or the
America First Party is is changing. They're young, they're they're
they're well spoken, they're on fire. And do you know
that Hillary Clinton even had a teleprompter when she was
(41:42):
with Hillary, when she was with sorry, Oprah Winfrey, she
couldn't even do that without a teleprompter.
Speaker 2 (41:48):
And then argue Kamala, Right.
Speaker 5 (41:52):
Yeah, I don't know who, I said.
Speaker 1 (41:53):
Hillary Clinton, that's okay. So when Kamala did Oprah, this
is incredible. She even had a tell prompter for that.
Speaker 5 (42:01):
Seriously, And then I just wanted to say, in our
hotel they had the first day, the other had ABC
News on in the morning on all the TVs, and
then the next morning it was on Fox, and I
met this gentleman. Everybody everybody that you talk to in
Pennsylvania is so nice and they're they're show and I
think they're all voting for Trump, and they don't have
a problem talking about it, like they don't care if
(42:23):
people over heear them. They're just like, we're not hiding anymore.
We're not the silent majority anymore. We talk openly and
we are and there everybody that I talked to was
totally for Trump. And I know this.
Speaker 1 (42:35):
Fox was on the.
Speaker 5 (42:35):
Next morning and he goes, yeah, I went right over.
He says, we don't need to listen. You go, he goes.
No matter where you go, you go up to the
concierge or no matter where you are, you find out
who's controlling the stations and you tell them to change it.
We don't have to listen to it. It's a dying media.
The legacy media is gone. Nobody's listening to it.
Speaker 8 (42:54):
It's up.
Speaker 1 (42:55):
Good for you, good for you, No, Judy, Look, that's
why they're in a panic. That's why the elites are
losing their collective minds. It's not just that Trump is
coming back, of course, and him coming back is going
to be a huge body blow, but JD Vance is
going to be set up to do eight years after Trump,
(43:17):
We're looking at twelve years of real, powerful, brilliant maga rule.
I mean, this will wipe the left out and they
know it. That's why they're desperate to beat him now
at all costs. And Judy, when you're in Pennsylvania, your
sense is we're you're in Trump country, correct?
Speaker 5 (43:42):
Yep, yeah, you see, that's what's the hotel where they stayed.
Go ahead, Judy, and JD was unbelievable. Oh my god,
it was crazy.
Speaker 1 (43:53):
No, Look, I can't wait for that debate between him
and Tim Waltz October. First, all you want to talk
about rolling out the popcorn and the diet coke. Oh, Judy,
it's gonna be a show. He is going to clean
Waltz's clock. Oh, it's going to be a thing of beauty. Judy,
thank you very very much for that call.
Speaker 2 (44:15):
Look just to return it.
Speaker 1 (44:17):
That's why Fetterman is telling everybody, guys, we're gonna lose Pennsylvania. Like,
if things don't turn around, you're going down in Pennsylvania.
Like hello, so and by the way, uh, Kamala needs Pennsylvania.
If Pennsylvania falls to Trump, her path to the two
(44:37):
hundred and seventy electoral College votes. I'm not saying it's impossible,
but it becomes extremely difficult.
Speaker 2 (44:45):
So look, I.
Speaker 1 (44:46):
Don't want to be over confident. The last thing I
am is over confident. But what I'm just saying is,
right now, the wind is a Trump's back. Agree, disagree
six one seven sixty eight sixty eight. Charles in West Springfield,
Thanks for holding Charles, and welcome.
Speaker 2 (45:08):
Hey Jiff, Hi Charles.
Speaker 8 (45:11):
I want to see what the American people are going
to do about this. They have a chance to do
something about this. But I just I can't stand it
when people complain and say how angry they are and
they have a chance to do something, but they don't
want to be inconvenience, then they'll let somebody else do it.
What I mean by this is how much of the
American people now going to stop buying Disney products? Forget ABC,
(45:34):
hit Disney with this, Stop going to Disney World, stop
buying their products, get out in front of Disney World,
stop holding some protests. Are the American people willing to
give up Disney, be a little inconvenience and send a message.
I don't think so. I don't have faith in them.
That's why I don't have faith in the American people,
because they're willing to let somebody else be inconvenience. But
(45:56):
when it comes to them, well, I don't know if
I can do it. This is a chance to send
them out, just as a chance to hit Disney with it.
That'll get world attention, that'll let people know they can't
hide from that. Hit Disney's numbers. The American people have
a chance to do it, Will they do it? I
don't think so.
Speaker 1 (46:13):
Well, Charles, just to reinforce what you're saying, and you're
making a really, really good point. Apparently Kamala Harris is
very good friends with one of the top executives at Disney.
I mean one of the top top executives. So as
as you pointed out, Disney owns ABC News, So this
(46:34):
really wasn't just a hit job done by ABC. It
was ultimately a hit job done by Disney. Because I'll
tell you this, this would not have been done, no question,
without at least the tacit understanding and support of the
ownership and management of Disney. Because if Trump wants to
go to the wall on this, and I'm urging him
(46:57):
to do it, we're talking massive fine, I mean this
could be I mean we're talking, you know, not only
huge finds, but a permanent, devastating blow to their credibility.
So Disney clearly had a hand in this. And look,
I agree with you. You know, maybe people will boycott
(47:18):
ABC News, but they'll still go to Disney. I guarantee it.
They'll still buy Disney products, they'll still rent their movies
or whatever, go on their network, and you know, download
their shows and pay their subscription fees. Now I'm boycotting Disney,
and for some reason, I can't believe this, but my
(47:38):
daughter's actually listening to me, my little Ava, So I
think she's turning on Disney as well because she's interested
in other things right now. But I can tell you this,
in our home, I don't buy anything from Disney, none, nothing, zero, nata.
But most Americans, you're right, Charles, Charles, What is it
(48:00):
about most Americans? Is it they just can't They have
to have the creature comforts? No matter?
Speaker 2 (48:06):
What is that? What it is?
Speaker 3 (48:08):
No?
Speaker 8 (48:09):
I think that a lot of it is is that
people want to do something. I think you can hear
it in the American people. They want to do something,
but they don't know how. Because you can see that
if they feel like they're all alone because there's no
groups to join, there's nobody that they can understand. Hey,
if this happens to me, I got somebody protecting my back,
(48:29):
and you know, I'm going to make sure that I'm
you know, safe from this. You can see what happens
one at a time. They can nail you one at
a time. So if you're all alone, just look at
Steve Bannon. They got to him, one guy, They got
to him. So the American people are like, well, I'm
just one. Where's the group? You know, there is no
leader anymore, There is no like George Washington. There is
(48:51):
nobody to say this is what we need to do. Here,
you go do this, you go do this, and we're
going to support each other. There's no faith that you're
not going to be caught out there all alone because
they can hit you one at a time, they can
nail you, but if we work together, they can't. But
I think they are just like, where's the organization. I
can't be all alone? And they feel like they're the
(49:12):
only one and there's nothing, you know, nothing they can
do about it.
Speaker 1 (49:16):
Charles, that is an absolutely brilliant, brilliant, brilliant point. Thank
you very much for that call. You know the expression
there's strength in numbers, Well, there's strength in numbers and
there's strengthened groups. So let me throw this quick log
on the fire. Is Charles right,
Good Morning, Cooner contry. Okay, a lot of news over
the weekend, but one of the big stories, and I
put it up on X last night, is that now
there is absolutely no question about it, the infamous debate
(00:20):
moderated by Lindsay Davis and David muirr. Of ABC News
was clearly rigged in favor of Kamala Harris. And here
is now, my friends, the bombshell AFFI David that was
signed by an ABCU staffer who remains anonymous. Now, this
(00:43):
is what is fascinating about all of this. This ABC
U staffer, someone at the network with intimate knowledge of
what took place, signed an affid David and this is
very important, and then mailed it out to her lawyer
(01:04):
before the debate ever took place. So, in other words,
she's not just saying I saw it and now she's
blowing the whistle on it. She's saying I saw it,
blowing the whistle on it, and here's what's going to
happen at the debate. And she she sent this Affidavid
(01:29):
out again before that infamous debate took place.
Speaker 2 (01:34):
And here is exactly.
Speaker 1 (01:35):
Now what she is now claiming. And I believe her.
This whistle blower is one thousand percent credible. Why because
everything she predicted what happened happened. So according now to
this ABC News whistleblower number one, Kamala Harris was given
(01:56):
sample questions by ABC News use that were, as she
puts it, appeared almost exactly the same as the questions
that were asked during the actual debate. In other words,
they will resemble. She said, Look, the sample questions will
(02:19):
resemble very closely what they're going to ask her at
the debate. So essentially, she had the questions ahead of time.
And not only did she have the questions ahead of time,
but they gave it to her in enough advanced time
so that she could prep and have scripted answers again
(02:41):
and again and again. But there's more, There's so much more.
According to this bombshell Affi David, the whistleblower now says,
listen to this, listen to this, that Kammalus people specifically
told the David Murr and Lindsey Davis ABC News to
(03:04):
not ask questions about specific topics, that certain topics were
off limits. And the one there are several, but the
one in particular that they were adamant on is about
her brother in law, Kamala's brother in law, Tony West.
(03:26):
You may ask Jeheff, Jeff Jeef, who the hell is
Tony West. He is married to Kamala's sister Maya. He
is the brother in law of Kamala through marriage, and
that he's part also of an intimate part of her campaign.
(03:48):
He is playing a key role in the campaign of
Kamala Harris. He has now apparently been accused of embezzlement
and fraud to the tune of millions and millions and
millions of dollars. In other words, her family is doing
exactly what the Biden family is doing. Who did exactly
(04:11):
what the Clintons did and what the Obamas did.
Speaker 2 (04:15):
Grift and fraud come in.
Speaker 1 (04:19):
It's pay to play, enrich your family members with kickbacks
going and not this time to the big guy, but
to the big gal. And she said, please, whatever you do,
Trump will crucify me on this issue. Do not ask
about my brother in law, the sleazy brother in law.
Speaker 2 (04:40):
Furthermore, not only were.
Speaker 1 (04:43):
The questions given to her ahead of time, not only
were they told certain topics must be off limits, which
ABC News agreed to. But listen now to this ABC
News and Kamala Harris went back and forth in negotiations
in which Kamala Harris's people urged ABC.
Speaker 2 (05:05):
ABC agreed agreed to fact check Trump.
Speaker 1 (05:12):
Under the in other words, or as they put it,
to debate Trump under the guise of fact checking, but
not to fact check Kamala. So in essence, they had
they colluded, They had an arrangement, They had an agreement
in which this would be three on one And as
(05:33):
this person said in the Affidavid, you will see at
the debate Trump will be constantly fact checked, which turned
out to be true, and that under the guise of
fact checking, the moderators in fact will start to debate
and seek to undermine Trump, but they will never fact
(05:53):
check Kamala. And this person says, not only is this
blatantly unfair, not only is this blatantly election interference, but
also it violates every ethics of any news organization.
Speaker 2 (06:08):
But furthermore, according.
Speaker 1 (06:11):
To ABC News, they said that they must be negotiations,
if any with one campaign, it must be open and
transparent to the other campaign. The Trump campaign never knew
of their intention to be fact checked, while Kamala would
not be fact checked.
Speaker 2 (06:30):
That the moderators, in effect, would.
Speaker 1 (06:33):
Be assistance the wingmen and the wingwomen of Kamala Harris
against Trump. And so, as she put it, they have
they're gonna make the debate so biased, so one sided,
so blatantly unfair that a it's going to undermine the
(06:53):
integrity of ABC News. B most importantly, it will try
to have a direct impact on the election. Now, there
are some brave journalists who are trying to get answers
from ABC News about the Affidavid, about the whistleblower, about
(07:15):
all of the explosive allegations and accusations in that Affidavid, which.
Speaker 2 (07:20):
By the way, is signed.
Speaker 1 (07:23):
ABC News has issued a non denial denial. So now
you know they're guilty, because first they came out and
said this is all much ado about nothing. Finally there
was more pressure saying well, I'm sorry, could you at
least answer the specifics in the Affidavid, to which ABC
(07:45):
News then said, and here's the rub.
Speaker 2 (07:48):
We never sent.
Speaker 1 (07:50):
The questions, the actual questions asked at the debate, to
either Kamala Harris and her campaign or to Donald Trump
and his campaign, and we considered this matter closed. Now
everybody's wondering, boy, They seem really eager to move beyond,
(08:14):
to move beyond this story. But you're not answering the
fundamental accusations were sample questions given. The whistleblower never alleged
they were the exact identical questions.
Speaker 2 (08:30):
What she said was sample questions that.
Speaker 1 (08:34):
Will resemble very closely the actual questions were given to
Kamala and to her campaign. ABC News will not address
this issue. You know why, because they're guilty. It's obvious.
As for them fact checking Trump and not fact checking Kamala,
(08:56):
it happened at the debate, the moderators acting as code
debaters against Trump. That happened at the debate, not asking
about Tony West and the countless millions that he embezzled
and his ties to the Kamala Harris campaign. Never asked
the question, never mind anything else deeply embarrassing about Kamala
(09:20):
or anything resulting in or affecting her the corruption and
the fraud that has plagued her entire career. In other words,
many key areas about Kamala's background were deliberately not asked.
So as many people are pointing out the fact that
the affid David was mailed before the debate, signed before
(09:45):
the debate, and then we saw what happened. That the
debate vindicates everything she said was going to happen. Now,
as I pointed out on X and I want to
repeat this, the debate bait was rigged, and it was
rigged six ways to Sunday. Where is Congress? This woman
(10:11):
needs to be put under oath. Sure story needs to
be told to the entire country. ABC News executives need
to be put under oath. David Murr needs to be
put under oath. Lindsey Davis needs to be put under oath,
and people in the Kamala Harris campaign must be put
under oath. We want the emails, we want the text messages,
(10:34):
we want the correspondence. We want it all because my friends,
what they did was illegal. It wasn't just direct election interference.
The media colluded with Harris and they engaged in actual crimes.
(10:56):
Six ' twenty now on the Great WRKO Jeff Kooner,
Boston's bulldozer six one seven two six, six sixty eight
sixty eight is the number.
Speaker 2 (11:06):
Okay.
Speaker 1 (11:06):
I want to give a big hat tip to There's
many now that have come out and broken this story.
Speaker 2 (11:11):
But one of the big.
Speaker 1 (11:12):
Ones is Adam mill mi ill from a magazine that
I used to work at, Chronicles, a magazine of American culture.
It's a conservative magazine. I used to work there before
I went to The Washington Times. And it's an excellent magazine.
I mean, I don't agree with them on everything, obviously,
(11:32):
I don't agree with any magazine on everything, but they
are an absolutely excellent, excellent magazine. And anyway, so according
to Adam mill In a brilliant piece, so here is
the affid David. The Affidavid is now online by an
anonymous ABC employee signed anyway. So and it was again
(11:56):
sent prior to the debate. So the whistleblower signed a
copy of the AFFI David and mailed it before the debate.
Speaker 2 (12:06):
To her lawyer.
Speaker 1 (12:08):
So she's this Affidavid is saying, here's what they agreed to,
and here is exactly what's going to happen at the
ABC News presidential debate. So one of them was that
sample questions were given to the Harris campaign that, as
she put it, would resemble and did resemble the actual
(12:29):
debate questions. Furthermore, that there were discussions between the Harris
campaign and the moderators, specifically that they would be debating
Trump all it would be three on one under the
guise of quote unquote fact checking.
Speaker 2 (12:47):
Quote Here's from the Affidavid.
Speaker 1 (12:50):
It was agreed that Donald Trump would be subjected to
fact checking during the debate, while Kamala Harris would not
face come parable scrutiny.
Speaker 2 (13:01):
The Affidavid reads. It continues, quote in.
Speaker 1 (13:06):
Fact, Harris campaign required assurance that Donald Trump would be
fact checked, and this was done via multiple communications with
the Harris campaign, whereas the Trump campaign was not included
in the negotiations. To my understanding, any rules, negotiations and
(13:27):
conversations pertaining to the debate should have had both the
Trump and Harris campaign involved. Now completely right, I mean
a thousand percent correct. Now again, I know I've said
this multiple times. This is what makes this Affidavid to
me so devastating. It was signed and then nailed before
(13:52):
the debate.
Speaker 2 (13:55):
Saying this is.
Speaker 1 (13:56):
What will happen, And it happened. Everything happened. Trump was
fact checked quote unquote fact check. Really they lied about
him repeatedly. Kamala never certain topics which were kind of
bizarre because there's the Tony West allegations have been huge
against Kamala Harris. This is her brother in law, accused
(14:20):
of embezzling millions of dollars, engaged in all kinds of fraud.
He's now directly tied to her campaign. In fact, The
New York Times did a huge profile piece on Tony
West and going on about how he's all over her campaign,
that her sister and Tony West, the husband of Kamala's sister,
(14:43):
are two of the key players running most of her campaign,
and that was never asked. Other questions were never asked anyway,
So and on and on and went. Now, so ABC
News has been evading, they have been giving non denials.
(15:05):
And in fact, what is noteworthy, as Adam Mill points
out in his piece, is that ABC News issued a
statement by an unidentified spokesman. So the person who issued
the statement on behalf of ABC News won't even put
his or her name to the statement. And if you notice,
(15:26):
they're not doing any you know, they didn't address any
of the key factual allegations. They're just doing the whole Hey,
we have a statement. Here's the statement. The statement says,
we never directly gave the actual questions to Harris and
the campaign to Trump and his campaign. Well, that's not
the allegation. They're being evasive. They're dodging. And I'll tell
(15:54):
you why they're being evasive. And they're dodging because ABC
News illegal colluded with the Harris campaign to rig the
debate against Donald Trump. And if you remember, we all
said that the day after the debate, we said, it's
(16:15):
just so obvious. They gave her the questions ahead of time,
the way she was so scripted, the way she could
anticipate every.
Speaker 2 (16:24):
Question that was going to be asked.
Speaker 1 (16:27):
How they kept coordinating David Murr, Lindsey Davis Kamala, how
they even knew exactly what they were going to fact
check Trump on.
Speaker 2 (16:37):
I mean, it's so obvious.
Speaker 1 (16:39):
Now many of you are rightly saying, and I agree
with you, Jeff, but why have Congress investigate? I don't
trust Congress. I don't trust the mealy mouthed, yellow livered,
you know, cowardly Republicans.
Speaker 2 (16:52):
I hear you.
Speaker 1 (16:54):
I'm not saying Congress is gonna get you know. I'm
not saying wait for a report from Congress, but get
people under oath, issue subpoenas. Let's see what they say. Okay,
A couple lines are open. If you want to jump on,
I'm going to go to the phones very very soon.
You can text us seven zero four seven zero seven
(17:16):
zero four seven zero. This is from seven to eight
to one. And it's a doozy Jeff. So when can
we expect ABC to declare and pay the penalty for
not disclosing as an in kind campaign contribution to the
Federal Election Commission. Answer? Never, obviously. I mean this to
(17:41):
me is unbelievable. This breaks campaign finance rules. I mean,
I could go on and on and on. It was rigged,
and now we know it was rigged. And if I'm
Donald Trump, this is it. You've got her. Now you've
got her by the tonsils. Her people colluded with ABC News,
(18:01):
and as Adam Mill points out really in a very
strong piece in Chronicles, this is part of the larger
deception campaign against the American people by the Harris campaign
in the media.
Speaker 2 (18:15):
They were the ones.
Speaker 1 (18:17):
Who overthrew Joe Biden. They were the ones who installed
her in this secretive, undemocratic process to make her the nominee.
And now you know, to ask her basic questions to
know who are we electing as president? I think we
have the right to know where she stands on basic
(18:39):
issues and aspects about her record that need to be
addressed and confronted. ABC News is continuing this deception campaign
against the American people. They're trying to protect and cover
up and hide who the real Kamala is. And they're
(19:00):
trying to pass her off as somehow competent when we
know she's blatantly incompetent. This woman couldn't even do a
debate without direct assistance from ABC News. Now, big story
over the weekend. So, in other words, to sum it up,
(19:21):
ABC has been caught colluding with Kamala Harris. Now, if
I'm Trump, if this thing breaks wide open, how the
hell does Kamala survive this?
Speaker 2 (19:32):
She's so incompetent.
Speaker 1 (19:34):
Forget being in the White House, forget having your finger
on the nuclear button.
Speaker 2 (19:39):
This woman could even do a straight up debate.
Speaker 1 (19:42):
Without getting assistance and collaboration and collusion from her allies
in the media. Now, as for doing another debate, Kamala
Harris's people now see the polls are now tilting against her.
I'm getting all these emails. I can't tell you how
many people are panicking and they're blaming me. I don't
(20:06):
know what I've done, but they're blaming me, and they're saying,
Jeff Trump's gonna lose this thing. The polls are against him,
He's gonna lose. I'm like, I don't know what polls
you're looking at. Here The New York Times, Siena Pole,
this is the New York Times. Okay, the Democrats bible
(20:28):
Trump pulling ahead now in Arizona and has a lead
in both Georgia and North Carolina.
Speaker 2 (20:35):
And that's from a group.
Speaker 1 (20:36):
The New York Times always oversamples Democrats. So Kamala's people
are in trouble. Their internal polls show they're.
Speaker 2 (20:47):
In trouble and they know it. So Kamala is now.
Speaker 1 (20:52):
Her campaign issued a challenge to Donald Trump over the weekend.
They said, let's do one more debate.
Speaker 2 (21:01):
On This is CNN.
Speaker 1 (21:03):
So they want to go back to CNN, and they
want to do it October twenty third, which is what
what is it? Thirteen days basically almost two weeks before
the election. Here was Trump's response, And I want all
of you to weigh in on this. Let me know
if you agree or disagree. Here is now what Trump
(21:25):
said at a raucus rally in North Carolina about Kamala's
challenge for one more debate near the end of October
on CNN World Cut sixteen, Mike.
Speaker 3 (21:40):
ABC was three on one, but I was given credit
for having done a very very good job. I appreciate
that we did a great job.
Speaker 2 (21:48):
It was three on one.
Speaker 3 (21:54):
The problem with another debate is that it's just too late.
Voting has already started. She's had her chance to do
it with Fox. You know, Fox invited us on and
I waited and waited, and they turned it down.
Speaker 2 (22:07):
They turned it down.
Speaker 3 (22:08):
But now she wants to do it debate right before
the election with CNN because she's losing badly. You know,
it's like a fighter. She sees the pole, she sees
what's happening. She's losing badly. But it's like a fighter
who goes into the ring and gets knocked out.
Speaker 4 (22:22):
The first thing he says is I want to rematch.
I want to rematch. Well, in other words, he's not
going to do it. He's not going to do it,
and you hurt part of his reasons A. He says,
it's true.
Speaker 1 (22:35):
By October twenty third, over half the American electorate will
have voted because of early voting and mail in voting,
So he's basically saying why bother most half the country
at a minimum will have voted. The other reason he gave,
and I agree with him completely, is that CNN took
such blowback, they took such a pounding, such criticism from
(22:58):
other media outlets for being semi fair to Trump and
that infamous debate with Joe Biden, that the pressure on
them is going to be immense to do to him
what ABC News tried to do, in other words, set
up an ambush for him, do another three on one
(23:19):
and try to tilt this thing in favor of Kamala
one more time.
Speaker 2 (23:23):
So we said, no, CNN is not going to be fair.
Speaker 1 (23:27):
They're going to be under tremendous pressure not to be fair.
And my point is in the wake of what we
just found out now about ABC News. Remember this is
the same CNN when Donna Brazil. By the way, Brazil
worked for both ABC and CNN. Okay, so you can
(23:49):
see all the ethics of these so called news networks.
She was the one who infamously gave the question stay
Hillary Clinton before her debate with Bernie'say. So this idea
of the network's giving questions ahead of time to the candidates.
It's nothing new. That's how sleazy and corrupt these people are.
(24:12):
So I'm thinking I'm not trusting CNN with a fair debate,
No way, especially in light now of the stunning revelations
and what's been unearthed with ABC News.
Speaker 2 (24:25):
So unless it's Fox.
Speaker 1 (24:27):
News or Newsmax or some neutral platform on x Trump
is leading in the polls, her campaign is sinking. Why
would you do another debate so it can be three
on one again, so they could rig it again, so
(24:47):
they could try to embarrass and humiliate Trump again.
Speaker 2 (24:51):
No, no, no, no, no no.
Speaker 1 (24:53):
After this, the media has no credibility whatsoever, and in
particular to me. You may agree, you may disagree, they
have no right to conduct any more debates from this
point forward.
Speaker 2 (25:11):
I'm looking at.
Speaker 1 (25:12):
ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, I don't care, take your pick, NPR, PBS.
Speaker 2 (25:19):
I'm sorry.
Speaker 1 (25:21):
You have been so biased, so propagandizing against Trump. You
have been so blatantly partisan that you cannot be trusted
to ever do another presidential debate again.
Speaker 2 (25:38):
Now, this to me is ABC Gate. Until we get.
Speaker 1 (25:42):
To the bottom of this, and until people are fired
and careers are destroyed, especially David Murr and Lindsay Davis.
Then I'm sorry. We can never have a debate again
with these networks as the moderators because they're in the
tank for the Democrats. This wasn't a debate, that was
(26:04):
a journalistic assassination attempt. And you have this explosive whistleblower
now who has come out and said, yeah, the whole
thing was set up between Kamala and ABC News and
their job was to take down Trump. So if I'm
Donald Trump, this is the scandal that will bury her
(26:27):
and the fake news media once and for all.
Speaker 2 (26:30):
I jump all over this baby.
Speaker 1 (26:34):
And pound it and pound it and pound it and
pound it, and put ABC News right on the spot
and demand that Republicans hold hearings right now, televised hearings,
issue subpoenis they don't show up contempt of Congress, and
then the ABC News will have egg all over its face.
(26:57):
What are you hiding for? What are you stonewalling?
Speaker 2 (26:59):
Why?
Speaker 1 (27:00):
I want David Murr under oath. I want Lindsay Davis
under oath. I want her producers under oath, and I
want all of this correspondence and emails to the public.
We can all see that this was done in the
dark and behind Trump's back.
Speaker 2 (27:18):
So my question to you double barreled question number one.
Trump now says.
Speaker 1 (27:27):
He will no longer do any more debates. He will
not do the CNN debate that Kamala Harris challenged him
to in late October.
Speaker 2 (27:36):
He says it's way too late.
Speaker 1 (27:38):
People will have many half the country will have voted,
and it's going to be unfair and rigged the.
Speaker 2 (27:44):
Way ABC News was So why bother?
Speaker 5 (27:48):
So?
Speaker 1 (27:48):
Was Trump right or wrong to not debate Kamala? Okay,
this is from Larry on messenger question the Kamala has
did you assist Kamala Harris? Sorry, questioned the ABC News
did you assist Kamala Harris during the debate? ABC? We
(28:10):
grew up middle class, which is Colins's answer to everything.
I grew up in the middle class family. Okay, let's
go to Dave in the great state of Pennsylvania.
Speaker 2 (28:24):
Thanks for holding Dave, and welcome.
Speaker 6 (28:29):
Good morning, Jeff. How are you, buddy good?
Speaker 2 (28:31):
Feeling much better? Thank you, Dave?
Speaker 6 (28:34):
Good? Hey, Jeff? How about this we bring the line
along with the middle class. You'm going to be called
the lying class, Jeff.
Speaker 2 (28:42):
First of all, Da Dave, are you shocked.
Speaker 1 (28:45):
I mean, I know we all had our suspicions, but
are you shocked now that this whistleblower is essentially confirmed
what we all suspected that they rigged that debate.
Speaker 2 (28:55):
It was all planned ahead of time.
Speaker 6 (29:00):
I'll lance you, but ABC stands for all boprop. That's
a stand for Buddy. And no, I'm not surprised, Jeff,
because you know what, the media has been liberal since
Bernie Goldberg came out with his book. You know Bernard Goldberg,
he used to work at Seed the b S news
to quote to give ahead tip the RUSS. Remember he
used to work at CBS with Dn Rather, he called
him Dan I'd rather not work with. He had the
(29:22):
insight on the media bias. Jeff, you remember Bernard Goldberg?
Speaker 2 (29:25):
Yes, yes, Bernie Goldberg, Yeah, of course. Yeah.
Speaker 6 (29:28):
And also there's a book I forget the name of
the author, Jeff. It came out I think Media Busters.
They used to have a part of their site called
the Gospel. According to the New York Times, there was
a book. I forget the author, but he was a
really really good author. Was John something, John Proctor or
John Smith or something like that. But there was I
know you know the book. It's got like the cover
of the New York Times. It's a soft paperback cover
(29:50):
book and it was called The Gospel according to the
New York Times. Do you remember the book, Jeff, I.
Speaker 1 (29:56):
Mean it rings a bell, but I can't I can't
pinpoint an author. But what you're saying, Dave is we've
known about the lying liberal media now for decades. So
you're saying at this point we shouldn't be surprised.
Speaker 6 (30:09):
Correct, be surprised, and thank God for people like you,
some of Fox, who's not all the Fox. But in Newsmatch,
no An, Jeff, we got the news that comes out
the tooth like George Snapphalpekes came out about a couple
of years ago, you know, criticizing Fox, knowing in the Newsmatch.
But when he did that, Jeff, it just shows that
(30:31):
he makes his own point. It just shows how far left, ABC, NBC,
NPR and everybody else is, you know, in the print media,
The New York Times, the Washington Compost, even here in
Pittsburgh the Post Case att thell liberal. But we get
the Tribune Review, which is kind of like the Herald
back there, more to the right. But still they do
go center. But Jeff, it just that he made his
point that he admits he's a liberal. You know what
(30:53):
I'm saying, Dave.
Speaker 1 (30:54):
If you were advising the Trump campaign and he says, hey,
Kamala just came to me. Her people they want one
more debate on CNN October twenty third, about two weeks
before the election. Should I say yay or nay? What
would you tell him, Dave? What would be your advice
to Trump? Do it or don't do it?
Speaker 6 (31:17):
Wouldn't do it, but unless it was either on I'm
going to be honest with Trump friendly network. That way,
she wouldn't be caught cheating. I wouldn't say Trump friendly,
but more middle or to the neutrala in your news match.
Speaker 2 (31:29):
I agree.
Speaker 1 (31:30):
No, I completely agree with you, and that's why she
won't agree to it. And that's why Trump said, no,
let's not even bother Dave, thank you very much for
that call. Really good points as always. Six one seven
two six, six sixty eight sixty eight. No, that's why
Trump said there's going to be no more debates, Why
so we can have another ABC News fiasco. You know,
(31:54):
and and look again the scandal here. Yes, it was
completely biased. Yes, it was rigged. Yes, it was an ambush,
but it was all planned and coordinated, colluded between ABC
News and Kamala. That's why this affidavit and this whistleblower
(32:14):
at ABC is so explosive. And so if I'm Trump,
I'm like, you want to see how rigged it is.
You want to see how bad the fake news media is,
why you shouldn't believe a word that comes out of
their mouth.
Speaker 2 (32:29):
Look at this and just he goes. Look.
Speaker 1 (32:33):
Ask if I was Trump, I'd say every day, I'd say,
ask ABC. Did they give her sample questions yes or no?
Speaker 2 (32:43):
Yes or no?
Speaker 1 (32:45):
Did they give her assurances they were gonna quote unquote
fact check me but not fact check her? Did they
specifically talk about certain areas that were no go areas
for Kamala? I just yes or no? Is the whistleblower
line or not lying? Ask Kamala every day? Ask ABC
every day. Let the truth come out. It will be devastating,
(33:11):
not just for the media, which to me already has
lost all credibility, but I mean it'll wipe them out
once and for it will completely wipe It'll be a
scandal they'll never be able to recover from. But also
frankly for Kamala. You're that pathetic. You can't even handle
(33:31):
one debate on your own. So if I'm Trump, look now,
especially with the Poles, I don't know what polls some
people are looking at. I told you I'm getting you know,
even now I'm getting emails blaming me, saying, Jeff, how
dare you talk about some of these polls showing Trump
is in the lead?
Speaker 2 (33:52):
We all know Trump is behind. Trump's gonna lose.
Speaker 7 (33:54):
What you're giving people a full sense of hope? Okay, Hey,
I don't you want to jump off a bridge. Jump
off a bridge. I don't know what else to tell you.
It just broke this morning. New York Times SIENA poll.
It's one of the biggest polling firms in the country,
and they oversample Democrats they always have, And they're saying
(34:19):
Trump now is on the path to a narrow victory.
They're saying it what was? What do you want me
tell you?
Speaker 2 (34:26):
Not report it?
Speaker 1 (34:29):
Well, look as things stand right now, I'm just going
by the New York Times now, not that their gospel
is that they're the other side, and they load up
their polls to make sure that it always tilts left.
So they're tilting tilts some more. Let me tilt a
little bit more. In Arizona, Trump is starting to run
(34:53):
away with it. Nevada, He's starting to run away with it.
He now has, according to The New York Times, a
small but clear lead in both Georgia and North Carolina.
The governor of Pennsylvania has now come out and said
that if the election were held today, a Democrat Josh Shapiro,
(35:15):
Trump would win. Fetterman, I can play you with the cut.
Fetterman was at The Atlantic magazine, who was at a festival,
and he said, you're really underestimating all of you Trump's
strength in Florida and sorry, in Pennsylvania. Basically, Fetterman, you know,
he's kind of brain damaged, frankly from that Stroker Art attack.
(35:35):
But so he kind of meanders and he's incoherent and
his mind jumps and it's kind of hard to follow him.
But basically saying, if the election, like Shapiro, he's a Democrat,
he goes, if the election were held today in Pennsylvania,
Harris is gonna lose. Now, I'm telling you this already.
What I just discussed now is enough for Trump to
(35:57):
win if he wins Arison and he will. And he
wins Nevada and he will. And he wins North Carolina
and he will. And he wins Georgia and he will.
And the big one, the Keystone state, Pennsylvania.
Speaker 2 (36:12):
It's over.
Speaker 1 (36:14):
He's got the electoral College. Good night, Irene. I don't
care what the national poll. You know what the national
popular vote is irrelevant. He could lose New Hampshire, which
I don't want him to, but I'm just saying he
loses New Hampshire, he loses Michigan, he loses Wisconsin.
Speaker 2 (36:33):
He still wins. Now one other quick point.
Speaker 1 (36:39):
Okay, because there's been so much news over the weekend,
you need to hear this. The Muslim mayor, and I'm
going to say one more time. The Muslim mayor of
a key town in Wayne County, Michigan. Wayne County is
(36:59):
Horn is home to Dearborn. It's the largest population of
Muslim and Arab Americans in the United States. He's from Yemen.
He's a Yemeny immigrant. Staunch Democrat has now come out
and endorsed Donald Trump. It is hit Michigan. I'm telling
(37:22):
you it has been a shock. You want to talk
about shock and awe this Muslim mayor, and not just
that he endorsed them, but that he got so much
support from the Muslim and Arab American community by endorsing Trump.
(37:42):
It is a thunderblow to the Democrats and to Kamala Harris.
And so why and by the way, this is the guy,
this mayor is the guy a mere Gilab or glib.
I forget how. I don't mean to mangle his name.
I don't know exactly imnunciation is accurate. But anyway, Galib
(38:04):
Amir Ghalib is one of the leaders of the uncommitted
movement in the Democratic primary. Remember those one hundred thousand
plus Democrats in Michigan that said, we're not We're gonna
vote uncommitted. We're so against Joe Biden and Kamala Harris
for the way they're handling the war in Gaza that
we will not vote for them.
Speaker 2 (38:24):
That's the guy.
Speaker 1 (38:26):
And he came out and said, I had a twenty
minute conversation with Trump. We met in Flint, Michigan. The
man the media portrays him to be is not the
man that I met. This is a man of peace.
This is a man of principles and under his leadership,
(38:47):
the Middle East was at peace. Whatever you think about
the Israeli Palestinian issue, we at peace, the Abraham Accords,
we at peace. And so he is now urging all
Arab Americans, Muslim Americans to now vote for Donald Trump.
(39:07):
It's one of the biggest endorsements of the entire election.
Kamala and Biden have alienated the Arabs and the Muslims
in Dearborn and that is a significant voting block. It's
the key voting block for the Democrats. Trump now is
(39:27):
on the verge of taking Michigan. If he takes Michigan,
the blue wall is destroyed for the Democrats. So what
I'm saying is Kamala's campaign is starting to collapse on
multiple fronts. That's why all of the energy, the momentum
is now behind Trump. That's why she's asking him for
(39:50):
a debate. If she would be leading, if she's leading
in the polls, why would she be asking Trump for
a debate.
Speaker 2 (39:57):
And so Trump came out and said, look, I'm winning.
Speaker 1 (40:00):
I'm sorry, but I'm winning. The polls show it, our
internal polls show it. Now it's just a question of
executing the ground game and preventing them from stealing the election.
So with all this in play, I'm like, you got
to be crazy to one another debate, Like seriously, after
what just came out now about ABC News, Like seriously,
(40:23):
you need your head examined.
Speaker 2 (40:25):
So I'm a firm no.
Speaker 1 (40:28):
Now my question to you, should Trump make an issue
now of the fact that this debate was clearly rigged
and did he make a mistake in saying no to
one more debate with Kamala six one seven two six
six sixty eight sixty eight. I want to hear from
(40:49):
you the great audience of Kooner Country, Judy Ian Vermont,
thanks for holding Judy, and welcome.
Speaker 5 (40:58):
Hi, Jeff, Hi, Judy to Hi. We went to see
JD Vans with Tucker Carlson on Tucker's tour in Pennsylvania
this weekend and it was amazing. He spoke in an
a packed stadium. JD didn't have a teleprompter. He's the
entire time and he was clear and talked about his
(41:19):
policies at the place. Was just like spellbound by him.
And I really think the Republican Party is or the
America First Party is is changing. They're young, they're they're
they're well spoken, they're on fire. And do you know
that Hillary Clinton even had a teleprompter when she was
(41:42):
with Hillary, when she was with sorry, Oprah Winfrey, she
couldn't even do that without a teleprompter.
Speaker 2 (41:48):
And then argue Kamala, Right.
Speaker 5 (41:52):
Yeah, I don't know who, I said.
Speaker 1 (41:53):
Hillary Clinton, that's okay. So when Kamala did Oprah, this
is incredible. She even had a tell prompter for that.
Speaker 5 (42:01):
Seriously, And then I just wanted to say, in our
hotel they had the first day, the other had ABC
News on in the morning on all the TVs, and
then the next morning it was on Fox, and I
met this gentleman. Everybody everybody that you talk to in
Pennsylvania is so nice and they're they're show and I
think they're all voting for Trump, and they don't have
a problem talking about it, like they don't care if
(42:23):
people over heear them. They're just like, we're not hiding anymore.
We're not the silent majority anymore. We talk openly and
we are and there everybody that I talked to was
totally for Trump. And I know this.
Speaker 1 (42:35):
Fox was on the.
Speaker 5 (42:35):
Next morning and he goes, yeah, I went right over.
He says, we don't need to listen. You go, he goes.
No matter where you go, you go up to the
concierge or no matter where you are, you find out
who's controlling the stations and you tell them to change it.
We don't have to listen to it. It's a dying media.
The legacy media is gone. Nobody's listening to it.
Speaker 8 (42:54):
It's up.
Speaker 1 (42:55):
Good for you, good for you, No, Judy, Look, that's
why they're in a panic. That's why the elites are
losing their collective minds. It's not just that Trump is
coming back, of course, and him coming back is going
to be a huge body blow, but JD Vance is
going to be set up to do eight years after Trump,
(43:17):
We're looking at twelve years of real, powerful, brilliant maga rule.
I mean, this will wipe the left out and they
know it. That's why they're desperate to beat him now
at all costs. And Judy, when you're in Pennsylvania, your
sense is we're you're in Trump country, correct?
Speaker 5 (43:42):
Yep, yeah, you see, that's what's the hotel where they stayed.
Go ahead, Judy, and JD was unbelievable. Oh my god,
it was crazy.
Speaker 1 (43:53):
No, Look, I can't wait for that debate between him
and Tim Waltz October. First, all you want to talk
about rolling out the popcorn and the diet coke. Oh, Judy,
it's gonna be a show. He is going to clean
Waltz's clock. Oh, it's going to be a thing of beauty. Judy,
thank you very very much for that call.
Speaker 2 (44:15):
Look just to return it.
Speaker 1 (44:17):
That's why Fetterman is telling everybody, guys, we're gonna lose Pennsylvania. Like,
if things don't turn around, you're going down in Pennsylvania.
Like hello, so and by the way, uh, Kamala needs Pennsylvania.
If Pennsylvania falls to Trump, her path to the two
(44:37):
hundred and seventy electoral College votes. I'm not saying it's impossible,
but it becomes extremely difficult.
Speaker 2 (44:45):
So look, I.
Speaker 1 (44:46):
Don't want to be over confident. The last thing I
am is over confident. But what I'm just saying is,
right now, the wind is a Trump's back. Agree, disagree
six one seven sixty eight sixty eight. Charles in West Springfield,
Thanks for holding Charles, and welcome.
Speaker 2 (45:08):
Hey Jiff, Hi Charles.
Speaker 8 (45:11):
I want to see what the American people are going
to do about this. They have a chance to do
something about this. But I just I can't stand it
when people complain and say how angry they are and
they have a chance to do something, but they don't
want to be inconvenience, then they'll let somebody else do it.
What I mean by this is how much of the
American people now going to stop buying Disney products? Forget ABC,
(45:34):
hit Disney with this, Stop going to Disney World, stop
buying their products, get out in front of Disney World,
stop holding some protests. Are the American people willing to
give up Disney, be a little inconvenience and send a message.
I don't think so. I don't have faith in them.
That's why I don't have faith in the American people,
because they're willing to let somebody else be inconvenience. But
(45:56):
when it comes to them, well, I don't know if
I can do it. This is a chance to send
them out, just as a chance to hit Disney with it.
That'll get world attention, that'll let people know they can't
hide from that. Hit Disney's numbers. The American people have
a chance to do it, Will they do it? I
don't think so.
Speaker 1 (46:13):
Well, Charles, just to reinforce what you're saying, and you're
making a really, really good point. Apparently Kamala Harris is
very good friends with one of the top executives at Disney.
I mean one of the top top executives. So as
as you pointed out, Disney owns ABC News, So this
(46:34):
really wasn't just a hit job done by ABC. It
was ultimately a hit job done by Disney. Because I'll
tell you this, this would not have been done, no question,
without at least the tacit understanding and support of the
ownership and management of Disney. Because if Trump wants to
go to the wall on this, and I'm urging him
(46:57):
to do it, we're talking massive fine, I mean this
could be I mean we're talking, you know, not only
huge finds, but a permanent, devastating blow to their credibility.
So Disney clearly had a hand in this. And look,
I agree with you. You know, maybe people will boycott
(47:18):
ABC News, but they'll still go to Disney. I guarantee it.
They'll still buy Disney products, they'll still rent their movies
or whatever, go on their network, and you know, download
their shows and pay their subscription fees. Now I'm boycotting Disney,
and for some reason, I can't believe this, but my
(47:38):
daughter's actually listening to me, my little Ava, So I
think she's turning on Disney as well because she's interested
in other things right now. But I can tell you this,
in our home, I don't buy anything from Disney, none, nothing, zero, nata.
But most Americans, you're right, Charles, Charles, What is it
(48:00):
about most Americans? Is it they just can't They have
to have the creature comforts? No matter?
Speaker 2 (48:06):
What is that? What it is?
Speaker 3 (48:08):
No?
Speaker 8 (48:09):
I think that a lot of it is is that
people want to do something. I think you can hear
it in the American people. They want to do something,
but they don't know how. Because you can see that
if they feel like they're all alone because there's no
groups to join, there's nobody that they can understand. Hey,
if this happens to me, I got somebody protecting my back,
(48:29):
and you know, I'm going to make sure that I'm
you know, safe from this. You can see what happens
one at a time. They can nail you one at
a time. So if you're all alone, just look at
Steve Bannon. They got to him, one guy, They got
to him. So the American people are like, well, I'm
just one. Where's the group? You know, there is no
leader anymore, There is no like George Washington. There is
(48:51):
nobody to say this is what we need to do. Here,
you go do this, you go do this, and we're
going to support each other. There's no faith that you're
not going to be caught out there all alone because
they can hit you one at a time, they can
nail you, but if we work together, they can't. But
I think they are just like, where's the organization. I
can't be all alone? And they feel like they're the
(49:12):
only one and there's nothing, you know, nothing they can
do about it.
Speaker 1 (49:16):
Charles, that is an absolutely brilliant, brilliant, brilliant point. Thank
you very much for that call. You know the expression
there's strength in numbers, Well, there's strength in numbers and
there's strengthened groups. So let me throw this quick log
on the fire. Is Charles right,
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.