Reopen Jan 6 Investigation?

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight
is the number.

Speaker 2 (00:05):
Okay, this is a really good text that I got.
This is from nine to one seven.

Speaker 1 (00:09):
You can text as seven zero four seven zero seven
zero four seven zero. And this is referencing my debate
with Bill from Sudbury about maybe ooh, what is it?
Maybe forty five minutes ago about January sixth and nine
one seven, says Jeff, your liberal caller, Bill from Sudbury

(00:33):
is the perfect example of so many people I know.

Speaker 2 (00:37):
They are so.

Speaker 1 (00:38):
Consumed with a raging hatred for President Trump. That is emotions,
objective facts, that is, reality doesn't matter. This psychological phenomenon
becomes self referential. Anything and everything magnifies the rage. Well

(00:59):
see that's the point he's you know, they call in
and they say, well, he did nothing between one and
four o'clock on January sixth, twenty twenty one, and you're like, well, no,
he issued tweet after tweet, he delivered, produced a video
and said stop, leave go home. What else could he do?

(01:20):
He can't call in the National Guard. He doesn't have
that power. If you remember, during all of the riots
of twenty twenty, when he saw Kenosha burning to the ground,
Portland burning to the ground. When he saw riots breaking
out in state after state, he kept urging governors call
in the National Guard. I don't have that power, you

(01:43):
do so when they breached the capitol, if this was
such a threat to democracy as the Democrats claim, and
if these members of Congress were so afraid for their lives,
like for example, AOC claims, even though she was in
a completely different building blocks away from the Capitol.

Speaker 2 (02:04):
But let that go.

Speaker 1 (02:06):
Well, then why didn't Pelosi call in the National Guard?
She had the authority, Muriel Bowser had the authority. General
Millie had the authority. Trump didn't have the authority. It
doesn't matter. They still blame Trump. It's just incredible. So facts,
objective reality means nothing. And notice the more you refute them,

(02:33):
the more angry they get.

Speaker 2 (02:35):
They hate him even more.

Speaker 1 (02:37):
Instead of saying, you know, geez, maybe we're being a
little unfair to the guy, I don't know, maybe we're
being lied to and manipulated and misled. No, no, no, no,
they get even angrier and angrier and angrier.

Speaker 2 (02:52):
Because ultimately, I think it's a cult.

Speaker 1 (02:54):
If you really want to know my honest opinion, the
Democratic Party has become a modern day cult and their
followers are like you know, which you consider like you know,
religious fanatics of a cult, and they can't accept any
challenge to their worldview. But now reality is starting to

(03:15):
descend upon him. And you know, as I go back
to my call with Jimmy Man, look that I've been
here in Canada now for what is it, seven eight
days because of my dad's passing away. Privately, many liberals
who hated Trump before are all telling me now things
are really bad.

Speaker 2 (03:34):
I hope he succeeds.

Speaker 1 (03:35):
So even here in Canada, and you want to talk
about Trump derangement syndrome, this is the heartland of Trump
derangement syndrome. And even they are saying, the gas has
to come down, energy has to come down, inflation has
to come down, the cost of living has to come down.
This is just unsustainable. So even now, many of them

(04:00):
are privately hoping that Trump succeeds. Six one seven two
six six sixty eight sixty eight. Mark in New Hampshire,
Thanks for holding Mark, and welcome we lost Mark. Gary
in the Freedom State, Florida, Thanks for holding Gary, and welcome.

Speaker 3 (04:23):
Good morning, Jeff. First of all, condolences on losing your father.
I lost mine Oles January, a tremendous man of faith,
and I miss him. I can empathize with you. I
also want to maybe disagree with you a little bit
about remembering January sixth as an insurrection. Anytime that our

(04:44):
seat of government, the perimeter of the ced of government,
is breached, it needs to be remembered so we can
prevent it and not let it happen again. And we
did have federal agents fatally shoot an American citizen. You
touched on that, and that, you know, a very big
thing to remember again so it doesn't happen again. But

(05:04):
also I think it needs to be remembered as an
insurrection because it blocked the last chance to have a
free and fair election, to bring the electors. The count
up to Congress was the last chance we had for
a check and balance for a free election, and that
didn't happen, and of course the wrong president was installed.

(05:28):
So I don't know what else you'd call it but
an insurrection. And then the damage that has happened to
the country since then, January sixth needs to be remembered
as a horrible, horrible day, not the way Liz Cheney,
and all right, let's go right.

Speaker 1 (05:43):
Back to Gary in Florida. He's got an absolutely fascinating,
there's no other way to put it, really interesting argument
saying that, no, Jeff, January six was an insurrection. January
sixth was a very dark day in American history, but

(06:03):
not for the reasons of Pelosi or Liz Cheney, or
the Democrats or the liberal media. It was, in fact,
a very dark day against Donald Trump and against his supporters.

Speaker 2 (06:19):
Gary, please elaborate.

Speaker 3 (06:23):
Well, you said it a little while ago, Jeff, when
you mentioned Coobono, who benefited from the insurrection or the
events that happened that day. You can go back on
the c SPAN feed on YouTube and watch it. They
were going to at least discuss the discrepancies of the election,
and all that stopped because the capital was breached. And

(06:47):
I think that's just what Pelosi and the others wanted.
They didn't want Matt Gates and the others to show
their evidence. And so when it all calmed down, I
guess they all lost the spine and just one of
the days to end and they just went through without
doing any more of the objections. But they had already
broken up that general session in where both houses meet

(07:11):
and both the House and the Center meeting separately to
discuss it, which never, to my recollection, never happened in
American history before. And then the capital was breached and
so it all stopped, so a lot of evidence didn't
come out. The insurrection or those events on January sixth
are just another and a long line of taking the election,

(07:34):
starting way back from COVID and changing the election laws,
and then even afterwards continue about lying about it and
the law fair Particularly was Rudy Giuliani and what they're
doing to him. It was also Donald Trump couldn't stay
in power, and again they continued the lie so it
would affect this election cycle. And so that's I think

(07:57):
the key point in the whole process of trying to
steal the election was last January sixth.

Speaker 1 (08:04):
If you were advising Trump, Dave, what would you tell
him to do. Should he launch an all out investigation
into January sixth, Should he have cash Patel, who most
likely is going to be the director of the FBI
or his attorney general most likely Pambondi launch an internal investigation?

(08:26):
And you know, ask basic questions as you're asking who.

Speaker 2 (08:30):
Gave the order to open the doors.

Speaker 1 (08:33):
Why was Pelo Seed so determined not to bring in
the National Guard? Was this an inside job? Were they
deliberately wanted people to breach the capital so they could
then suspend the debate in the Senate about which, you know,
the stolen elections and the four critical states? In other words,

(08:55):
should we have the Trump administration officially investigate what really
happened on January sixth and have it all come out?

Speaker 3 (09:07):
So, Jeff, I really do, I really do a lot
of us who follow this stuff, you know, we know
a lot of the stuff that's been going on. But again,
the bills in Sudgbury, I don't know if you can
change their mind because they're so blocked. But somehow, some way,
the truth has to come out. And if I'm wrong
on what I think is the truth, I'm fine with that.

(09:28):
But let's get down and find the truth because I
don't think we know half of it. Even the way
the January sixth committee was designed, people that the majority
leader wanted on the on the committee were bumped off
for anti trumpers. That just stinks.

Speaker 1 (09:49):
Well, it's unconstitutional, I mean that's the other thing. It
was illegally that whole committee was illegally put together from
the and by the way, they also check change the
composition of the committee. Normally committees are thirteen people. They
shrank it to nine. Like in other words, they did
things that literally were unconstitutional and illegal just to go

(10:13):
after Trump. And then we find out, Dave, just to
reinforce what you're saying, that they destroyed evidence that exculpated Trump.
He was exonerated. They had evidence again and again and
again that he gave the order for days before the
request forgive me the request for ten to twenty thousand

(10:33):
National Guard troops, that it was Pelosi who said no,
that it was Millie who said no, that it was
Bowser who said no, that Trump in fact repeatedly said
stop go home. I don't need this, I don't want this.
In other words, there was so much evidence there that
showed beyond the shadow of a doubt that the last

(10:55):
thing this was was an insurrection from the against uh
of Trump, and that the last thing it was was
a conspiracy orchestrated or masterminded by Trump. And yet instead
of exposing all of that, they literally hit it. And
then when the committee ended, they destroyed the evidence. To me,

(11:19):
that's why Liz Cheney needs to go to jail, among others.
She perpetrated a massive fraud upon the American people. Dave,
am I wrong?

Speaker 3 (11:32):
No, You're absolutely right, Jeff. And that's why we do
need some type of other investigation because we all thought
it was important for the House Committee to investigate it,
but their investigation was a sham. Let's have a real
one and let's get down to the real truth.

Speaker 1 (11:48):
Dave, as always, thank you very much for that call.
Sixty one seven. I couldn't have said it better myself.
Six one seven two six six sixty eight. Sixty eight
is the number, right? Who you want me to go
to next? Mike Scott in Revere. Scott, Happy New Year

(12:09):
to you and your family.

Speaker 4 (12:10):
My friend, Jeff, I just want to say this, shil
all goes to dad. I love you sexual.

Speaker 1 (12:18):
Way, Thank you very much. Scott Scott, buddy, what's on
your mind?

Speaker 5 (12:27):
I thank you right now, thank you exactly right.

Speaker 4 (12:30):
And this is the guy who you were you just
you just had on I forgot his name already, but Dave,
Dave Scott, the last one was a humans. I mean everything, everything,
if you take it step by step, if it was
all a lie, a big lie to stealing them. And

(12:53):
it's that simple. I mean, it's really you can you
commit the case that that was the whole reason that.

Speaker 1 (13:02):
Scott you're breaking up on us. Let's see if we
can re establish a connection with Scott.

Speaker 2 (13:07):
Mike. No.

Speaker 1 (13:08):
Look, but what I managed to get from you, Scott,
was that the whole thing was a lie. Step by step,
it was that. To me is what's most shocking about this.
Everything I could go down, you know, from A to Z.
Everything they said about January sixth turned out to be
a lie that this was an insurrection against the government,

(13:29):
a lie that this was an attempt to overthrow our democracy.
A lie that this was somehow a coup on the
part of Trump and his supporters. My god, what a
lie that this was somehow organized and planned by Trump
ahead of time. A complete lie that police officers were

(13:52):
killed that day, A lie that this was and then
going on comparing it to World War two, comparing it
to nine to eleven, aring it to Pearl Harbor, comparing
it to slavery, now to the Holocaust. I mean, this
is outrageous. Honestly, it's insulting, really seriously, so everything that
they said about that day turned out to be an

(14:12):
absolute lie. In fact, if there was a conspiracy, and
again I keep going back to this fundamental fact, who
gave the order for the Capitol Hill police to open
up that massive iron dome door which can only be
opened from the inside.

Speaker 2 (14:31):
If that thing had been left closed.

Speaker 1 (14:34):
Nobody could have reached the Capitol nobody, So they wanted
them to enter the Capitol. We see the police officers
waving people in, We see them pulling back the barricades.
Now this wasn't one or two you could say, oh,
they're Trump supporters, Jeff, No, it was almost all of
the Capitol police. So clearly there was an order from

(14:57):
the top. Who gave the order and who gave the
order to the person who gave the order? In other words,
did this come from Pelosi? Did this come from Mitch McConnell,
because remember he also refused to say the ten thousand
National Guard troops who gave the order. And then the

(15:17):
person who ultimately benefited was Joe Biden because that sealed
his steel. The coup against Trump was fulfilled by what
happened on January sixth. And remember it came out the
FBI had assets, they had their operatives, their people embedded

(15:39):
into the crowd, four of them that we know of,
breached the capital, and nothing ever happened to them. No
one was punished, no one was charged, no one was
sent to jail.

Speaker 2 (15:51):
Why is that?

Speaker 1 (15:53):
And why was the FBI infiltrating the crowd and why
were their people storming the capitol? I think to create
an incident. In other words, they wanted the capital breached,
and by having the and by ensuing at creating chaos
and and and anarchy and basically a mini riot to

(16:17):
break out, because that would have That's exactly what have
that prevented the case being made by the senators on
the Senate floor about how they stole Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin,
and Michigan. So literally, I think the story they got

(16:38):
it exactly backwards. This was an insurrection, This was a coup.
This was an assault on our quote unquote democracy. Six
one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight is
the number. Okay, my friends, let me throw another log

(16:58):
on the fire, as I like to say. So now
the liberals, their heads are exploding over what they say
is definitive proof that Trump really is a fascist, imperialist
monster and what is this smoking gun evidence that the

(17:21):
Dems and the Moonbaths and these you know, socialist progressives
have now uncovered. Well, it looks like Donald Trump is
very serious about purchasing Greenland. Now, if he pulls this off,
this would be I think one of the most consequential

(17:43):
achievements of any president in modern memory. So just for that,
people to understand what's going on. Greenland massive territory between
North America and Europe, closer to the Arctic Circle. It's
basically cold, freezing cold Arctic temperatures almost all year round.
I believe they even have snow in June. I think

(18:06):
July and August are the only two months where they
have no snow. So, look, it's cold. Not only is
it cold, it's sparsely inhabited and populated. Population is about
fifty six fifty seven thousand people, so it's barely the
size of a small city in terms of population. It

(18:28):
is a territory of the Kingdom of Denmark. Now, what
is happening is that the people of Greenland, all fifty
six fifty seven thousand of them, are chafing under the
control of the Danes. They many of them want to
be independent or autonomous. Many of them no longer want

(18:50):
to have this colonial tie to Denmark. They believe that
Denmark is preventing them from trading with other countries like
the United States or Canada, or countries around the world,
which would make them much more prosperous bring in business investment.
So they feel that this relationship with Denmark is seriously

(19:12):
holding the entire island back. And it's a massive island.
It is full of natural minerals. It may be very
low in population, honestly because it's so cold, it's very
hard to live there. However, it is resource extremely rich,
very resource rich.

Speaker 2 (19:34):
Trump believes that.

Speaker 1 (19:36):
Greenland's destiny is to become sort of what Alaska was
for a while, maybe not a state initially, but a
territory that would become a state, but like Alaska, that
this would be an incredibly important piece of real estate
for the United States, And so he now says as

(19:59):
one of his key elements of his agenda. He wants
now because he fears that China or Russia will eventually
gobble up Greenland, especially as more and more vast deposits
of oil and natural gas are being found near the
Arctic Circle. The Russians in particular, are being very aggressive

(20:21):
in that area, and so Trump is basically saying, I
don't want Greenland to fall under China's influence or Russia's influence.
Greenland is much closer to North America than it is
to Europe. They don't like this domination or historic domination
of Denmark over that territory. They if they have a referendum,

(20:44):
if they have a ballot initiative, they will vote to
become independent, and then, like Texas, once they become independent,
they will eventually vote to become part of the United States,
especially if the United States can put a really nice
monetary offer on the table, in other words, will buy you,

(21:07):
and the money will stay in Greenland, obviously, which needs
it to build more hospitals, to build schools, to build
better roads infrastructure, to deal with the harsh weather and
the harsh terrain. But the point is Trump is so
determined that he's now sent his son Don Junior to

(21:29):
visit Greenland and to do kind of like an initial
inspection of the island and to visit the island, to
talk to people on the island, to travel the island
to check it out, and then come back to his
father and really find out. In particular popular sentiment are

(21:51):
the people of Greenland, who basically speak Greenlandic, which is
a kind of an Inuit, an indigenous land language. Uh.
There is a lot of Danish there as well, because
it's a Danish territory. But are they in favor of
being annexed or being bought by and becoming part of

(22:13):
the United States. Listen, now, this is a citizen of
Greenland speaking to a filmmaker, and if if this person's
anything to go by, he says, we don't want to
be colonized by the Danish government anymore. We want Trump

(22:34):
to buy Greenland. We'd love to be a part of
the United States. Roll cut seventeen, Amikereland.

Speaker 5 (22:47):
We don't want to be colon lost by Danish government anymore.

Speaker 2 (22:50):
We can rip it.

Speaker 5 (22:51):
Every year about how minerals from Premland.

Speaker 2 (22:54):
Real the Ritish nation in the world, and we don't
get to use it and much using us too much.

Speaker 3 (23:00):
Do you like America?

Speaker 2 (23:01):
I love America people.

Speaker 1 (23:03):
I'm over there, so I mean he speaks with a
little bit of an accent obviously, actually, but his English
is actually quite good, saying, look, we're one of the
richest nations in the world when it comes to resources
and minerals, and yet we're being pillaged by the Danish government.
They take most of our resources and they give us

(23:23):
very little in return. And we'd love to be able
to develop our full potential. And look, you know, Alaska
was a territory then became a state. Look how prosperous
Alaska is. Hawaii was initially a territory, became a state.
You have other you know, Guam is a territory. They're flourishing,
the Virgin Islands a territory. They're flourishing, Puerto Rico a

(23:47):
territory compared to the rest of the Caribbean.

Speaker 2 (23:50):
They're flourishing. So the people of.

Speaker 1 (23:53):
Greenland, many of them anyway, are saying, why are we
under the thumb of the Danes by this relationship with
Denmark which benefits us little but benefits the mother country
Denmark tremendously. No colonization is over. We want to go
our own way and fifty six thousand people. You know,

(24:16):
you may be independent in theory, but you can't defend
your island. And if Putin wants to make a move,
or if the Chinese make a move, there's nothing an
independent Greenland can do. That's why many people in Greenland
are saying we'd love to be a territory of the
United States. Why because they'll let us develop our resources,

(24:38):
our wealth, attract investment, and it'll all stay here in Greenland.
So Trump believes that if he can get Greenland, he
will secure American greatness for the rest of the twenty
first century. That he will have given us a vital

(24:58):
strategic piece of real estate, not just in terms of
its massive mineral and resource wealth, but also strategically between
North America and Europe, hire in the Arctic Circle to
deter the rise of Russia and China.

Speaker 2 (25:16):
He says, if we can acquire.

Speaker 1 (25:18):
Greenland, it would vastly increase the national interest of the
United States and the national security and strength of the
United States. So let me ask all of you, do
you support Trump putting an offer? Now, no money has
been talked yet, but I assume it'd be you know,

(25:39):
billions of dollars at a minimum to buy Greenland. Now,
let me be brutally honest with you.

Speaker 2 (25:47):
I like it.

Speaker 1 (25:49):
I like the idea, if only if the people of
Greenland want, there has to be a referendum. I don't
want to just seize the country. Obviously I'm not an imperialist,
but if the peace full of Greenland hold a referendum
and a majority of them decide that they want to
be part of the United States, you know this has

(26:09):
to be settled with Denmark, and it's got to be
done right. I would be in favor of acquiring or
annexing or purchasing Greenland. Why because I agree with Trump.
I think it would strongly improve our position in the
North Atlantic. I think it would strongly improve our position
in the Arctic. But above all, I think the vast wealth,

(26:32):
the vast minerals, the vast resources, would be a tremendous
asset to the United States.

Speaker 2 (26:39):
And my fear is as they.

Speaker 1 (26:42):
Discover more and more and more oil in that part
of the world, the Russians and the Chinese are going
to not be able to fend off the temptation to
take Greenland. So better us than them.

Speaker 2 (26:58):
Now.

Speaker 1 (26:59):
The counter argument is that this smacks of imperialism, that
we're now acquiring a massive territory with an indigenous population
that is not American. I mean, they speak a completely
different language, Greenlandic, and that we're already too big as

(27:20):
a country that we have enough territory as it is,
we don't need to keep acquiring more and more, and
that this focus on Greenland is going to deter us
from prioritizing what we need to do here at home,
whether it be on the border, whether it be with crime,

(27:41):
whether it be with foreign policy, ending these endless wars.
In other words, that Trump is being distracted by this
crown jewel, this ultimate art of.

Speaker 2 (27:51):
The deal, which is what Greenland would be.

Speaker 1 (27:55):
I mean, this is a really this would be the
mother of all real estate deals.

Speaker 2 (28:01):
This is him buying a.

Speaker 1 (28:03):
Massive piece of property that he believes would considerably augment
the value of the United States to put it in
crude business real estate terms. Now, personally, I think I
think they would vote. I think the people of Greenland
would vote to join America on heartbeat, and I think

(28:25):
in the end it would be win win, a win
for us and a win for them. But that's me
I want to hear from you. This is no longer speculation,
This is no longer Trump just tweeting. He is deadly serious.
He wants to end his second term with purchasing and
acquiring Greenland and basically now giving us another vast new territory,

(28:51):
this time in the North Atlantic. Six one seven two
six six sixty eight sixty eight should be United States
by Greenland. I want to hear from you six one
seven two sex six sixty eight sixty eight. Is is
this the right thing to do? Or is this nineteenth

(29:15):
century imperialism and that we should just leave the people
of Greenland alone? Geno in Buffalo, Thanks for holding Gino,
and welcome.

Speaker 5 (29:26):
Hey, Happy New Year, Jeff, and my deepest sympathies and
condolences to you and your family. Thank you, very legacy,
what a beautiful legacy your father is left behind.

Speaker 2 (29:37):
Thank you, Thank you, Gino.

Speaker 5 (29:39):
And I say I say yes to Greenland. And if
they put it up for a referendum, that's not imperialism.
You're giving people a choice and they can make that choice.
And if we can help them happen and make them
be more prosperous, then it's good for us and good
for them. And that's the way the world works.

Speaker 1 (29:58):
So, Geno, you think you think this would be a
great move on the part of Trump and it would
greatly benefit the United States.

Speaker 5 (30:06):
I believe so. I believe that with the way that
China and Russia are sneaking around the world usurping territory
all over, putting their you know, their their minds and
their workforces everywhere. They want to that that we need
to start watching out for ourselves. And if we can
be peaceful and help out other countries and that help

(30:27):
us to in the long run, then I believe that's
what we need to do.

Speaker 2 (30:31):
Interesting.

Speaker 1 (30:32):
Interesting, Gino, what's the sense that you get? Because this
would be a massive territorial expansion for the United States. Now,
you're right, I agree with you. I mean, how can
it be imperialism if the people of Greenland want it
and we don't even have to go by opinion polls.

Speaker 2 (30:48):
I'm with you.

Speaker 1 (30:49):
Hold a referendum, a free and fair referendum and election,
a vote.

Speaker 2 (30:54):
And say do you want to be part of the
United States? Yes or no?

Speaker 1 (30:58):
And if they vote, I think it would be like
sixty seventy percent, maybe even eighty percent.

Speaker 2 (31:03):
I think the numbers would be overwhelming.

Speaker 1 (31:05):
So, if you have the will of the people of
Greenland who want to join US, where's the imperialism? So
I'm with you, But Gino, do you think the American
public want to see this kind of massive expansion of territory.

Speaker 5 (31:21):
That if you put in the terms of security for
our country and making a more peaceful world, and explaining
and putting on the table how far China has gone
and what Russia is doing to secure their own countries,
I believe you make a good case for it. And
if you make them a territory first and let them
go about their business, and let's say they don't want

(31:43):
to become part of the United States, but we've become
a better ally to them, then also that benefits us
in the long run too.

Speaker 2 (31:51):
I love that. I love it. Love it.

Speaker 1 (31:53):
Great analysis, Gino, Happy New Year, and thank you again,
my friend six.

Speaker 2 (31:58):
I love it. In other words, what do we got
to lose?

Speaker 1 (32:03):
And if the people of Greenland say, you know, it's
just not working out for us, okay, then.

Speaker 2 (32:08):
At least we're allies and we're very good friends. So
for us it's win win. Now. My fear is if.

Speaker 1 (32:15):
And I think this is Trump's thinking, if you know,
it's like a like a really nice piece of real estate,
and he's thinking, he's thinking, as a businessman, someone's going
to snatch it up. It's just sitting there. It's sitting there.
They're growing increasingly unhappy with Denmark. They're starting to pull away.
In fact, the Prime Minister of Greenland this came out

(32:37):
just a couple of days ago, addressed the country and
held a huge press. I mean huge, it's fifty six
thousand people. I'm not trying to be insulting, but I mean,
how huge can it be? But for Greenland it was huge.
And he said, no, we want independence from Denmark. This
relationship is not working for us anymore.

Speaker 2 (32:54):
We want out.

Speaker 1 (32:56):
And so he says he's going to keep pushing to
put the legal framework his words, not mine, the legal
framework in place for the people of Greenland to declare
independence and secede breakaway from Denmark. And then the question
is will they want to remain independent or will they
want to join the United States? Now, honestly, if I'm

(33:18):
some person up in Greenland and it's freezing, I mean
it's so you know, ten months of the year you
can barely go outside. And I'm asking myself fifty six
fifty seven thousand, A couple of Russian submarines and we're done,
A couple of Chinese warships and we're done. Can we
really defend this country of ours? But under the American umbrella.

(33:44):
I mean, not only can we defend ourselves, we're going
to live like Alaska. I mean we're going to live
extra The standard of living is going to go through
the roof, and America will develop Greenland the way we've
developed Alaska. So if I'm sitting in Greenland, I'm like, baby,
please put up that American flag.

Speaker 2 (34:05):
But that's me.

Speaker 1 (34:07):
But Trump's thinking is that's a key piece of and
a nice piece of real estate, and he's thinking, if
we don't snatch it up, somebody else will so better
us than them.

Speaker 2 (34:19):
Agree, disagree?

Speaker 1 (34:21):
Six one seven two six, six sixty eight sixty eight
is the number, Mike, Maestro, who do I go do next?
Jeff in Ohio, Jeff, thanks for holding and as always.

Speaker 6 (34:36):
Welcome well, thank you, Jeff. I'm good morning, and I'm
very sorry for your loss and your family law.

Speaker 2 (34:43):
Thank you, Thank you, Jeff.

Speaker 6 (34:45):
Time will take care.

Speaker 4 (34:47):
So uh.

Speaker 6 (34:48):
As far as what Greenland, I understand the ambitions of
Trump wanting to do that, but to me it's like
if I'm running my household. It just went through the
four years of being raped from all our resources, being diminished,
even from the oil strategic to you name it. I

(35:11):
understand where he's going. He's got big thoughts, but I
feel like we need to get our house in order.
And I just finished it up Cage Betail's book, and
my god, we got our hands full. I think it's
going to take one hundred and ten percent just to
get our house in order for the next four years.
I hate to be a Debbie Downer, but I just

(35:32):
don't see how we can move forward when we are
dragging the past with us.

Speaker 4 (35:38):
So that's my two steps.

Speaker 2 (35:39):
Jeff, No, no, no, no, I hear you. Jeff.

Speaker 1 (35:42):
Look, let me tell you what I think the big
picture is, and you tell me if you agree or disagree,
if you like it or don't like it. They as
you know yesterday, and trust me, this will all make
sense to you.

Speaker 2 (35:52):
Jeff.

Speaker 1 (35:52):
In thirty seconds yesterday, Justin Trudeau, the Prime Minister of Canada,
basically the Obama of Canada. Okay, that woke left wing
idiot who has run Canada into the ground, the worst
prime minister in Canadian history. There's no debate, announced his resignation. Okay,
he's basically going to leave in a couple months. He's out.

Speaker 2 (36:15):
Trump tweeted again.

Speaker 1 (36:17):
Now the first couple of times people said, oh, he's trolling.
You know, he's just getting under Trudeau scan he's trying
to annoy all the Canadian moonbats. But this time people
are saying, no, this is not trolling. Now he's very serious.
He came out yesterday and said, I would love ultimately

(36:37):
for Canada to be the fifty first state of the Union.
Now they wouldn't, they'd have to cut it up into
multiple states.

Speaker 2 (36:45):
But what he means is, I would like.

Speaker 1 (36:48):
To absorb Canada into the United States. And he says
that most Canadians would agree, they would vote for it,
they would support it. Most America, and he says, would
support it. Canada is a very wealthy country to begin with,
with all the resources they have, and the way it

(37:09):
could be developed by the United States, it would be
even wealthier. And he wants a basically a North American,
a greater America, a great America from you know, all
the way from the Rio Grande to the Arctic, because
Canada reaches the Arctic, and so all of North America

(37:32):
would now be the United States of America. And so
I think one of the reasons and so he's saying, look,
he goes, I really want Canadians to consider this because
I'm going to put a big tariff on you guys,
and you keep telling me you can't survive economically if
I slap you at a twenty five percent tariff. So
if you guys can't survive on a twenty five percent tariff, really,

(37:55):
how much you know? How much you know? How are
you guys able to really run your country effectively? Let
us run your country for you. So I think his play,
Jeff is he wants Greenland. Think about it. Greenland is
to the right of Canada, you know, so you get
Greenland and eventually that'll be the play for all of Canada.

Speaker 6 (38:17):
What say you, Well, at first thing I'd want to
know is I'd want to look at the books of
Canada to make sure