Who put the Atlantic Monthly on the Call?

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Okay, cooner country, please, I want all of you to
listen to this multo importante okay, really important information for
all of you out there. The owner of the Atlantic Monthly,
which Goldberg is the editor in chief. Basically, he's the
hired gun of the ex wife of Bill Gates. Her

(00:21):
best friend, literally, her best friend, her buddy for years
and years, just pictures of them partying together on the
beach together, vacationing together.

Speaker 2 (00:32):
Was Chilaane Maxwell.

Speaker 1 (00:35):
And if that name rings a bell, she's in jail
now because she was effectively, I mean, I don't know
how else to say this, she was the female pimp,
a madam. Okay, sorry, she was the madam, I guess
is the better way to say it. Of Jeffrey Epstein.
She was pimping out these young girls to Epstein. Literally

(01:00):
her job, she would groom. She would recruit these twelve, thirteen,
fourteen year old underage girls and send them to you know,
Epstein's fantasy island on the Lolita Express. And this is
who the owner of the Atlantic. And remember she bought
the Atlantic for the express purpose, she said it, to

(01:23):
bring down Donald Trump. This sole purpose, as the French
would say, the Raizone Diype. The very reason of being
for the Atlantic and for Goldberg's salary and existence and
position as editor in chief is to destroyed, is to
is to politically bury and assassinate Donald Trump. And she's

(01:50):
her best friend was Julie Maxwell. So that tells you
the kind of morals, the kind of scum that owns
the Atlantic, runs the Atlantic, and writes for the Atlantic. Now,
two very very quick things. I want to read this
text message. It is an absolutely brilliant text message. Is

(02:12):
from somebody I know, I trust, very smart, and this
is what the person wrote. Jeff, I agree with you.
I've read the Atlantic article and signal messages, the text
messages twice, completely, top to bottom, all of it. Most

(02:33):
of those on social media who are calling for Hegseth
to resign are ringing alarm bells and repeating talking points
have not read the messages or the article. Should Goldberg
have been added to the group chat?

Speaker 3 (02:48):
No?

Speaker 1 (02:50):
Did Goldberg gain access to quote unquote secret information kind
of he found out we'd strike the whu thies two early.
What Goldberg and the Atlantic are calling pop secret war
plants is a massive embellishment. Any butter bar fresh out

(03:14):
of ROTC could tell you that these aren't war plans.
These aren't even school board notes. See that's what I thought.

Speaker 2 (03:24):
I'm like, is it just me?

Speaker 1 (03:26):
I read the article, I'm going through the messages. I
went through the messages again, and I'm like, what war plans?

Speaker 2 (03:33):
Anyway?

Speaker 1 (03:34):
The person continues their quote, Okay, we're ready to do
that thing. Everyone knew we were going to do yep.
Neat Also Europe sucks unquote and by the way, that
sums it up really good. Everybody knew we were gonna
bomb Yemen. Trumpet said We're gonna bomb Yemen. And they're like, okay,

(03:58):
are we on board? How do we do this? What's
our messaging? And and you know, okay, we're gonna do it. Yeah, okay,
And they're just bashing the European governments. And really, I
gotta tell you, Europe sucks. They keep saying it over
and over and over again. He ends with this Watergate

(04:20):
this is not it's a final informal check in after
things are already planned and assigned. Bingo, I mean, just
a brilliant description, an accurate description of what Goldberg had

(04:40):
access to, what those that text chain revealed, and what
they were discussing. Now, let me just throw one last
log on the fire, because there is a theory out
there and many of you are holding to it, not all,
but many of you, and so I want to read
to you. This is from seven oh three Jeff to

(05:04):
all the liberals out there, if they believe for one
minute that Pete Hegseth, Marco Rubio, Mike Waltz, John Ratcliffe,
Tulca Gabbard, and JB. Vance randomly and accidentally added this

(05:25):
most rabidly anti Trump journalist to a quote unquote national
security group Chap. Then I've got some swamp land in
Florida you may be interested in. These are some of
the most competent people in the country, and you believe
they would just screw up like this, It's simply not possible.

(05:48):
This is called media strategy, and Trump is famous for
stuff like this. Now, the theory is that whoever adds
Goldberg to this group chat knew that the one guy
they could count on to leak, to leak it all,

(06:13):
to get it everywhere, I mean everywhere across cable TV,
print media, social media. It would be Goldberg and his
minions at the Atlantic. And the reason why it was
deliberately leaked, meaning Trump wanted it out there or his
national security team on his behalf wanted it out there.

(06:36):
And this is the theory was they wanted the world
and the Europeans in particular to know how much we
don't like them, in particular because the Europeans are just
bashed incessantly the governments again, how much they're freeloading off
of us, how much they take advantage of us, how

(06:59):
much we do so for them, and how we're essentially
going to war. We're you know, we're bombing Yemen and
the Ruthie Rebels fundamentally on their behalf. Jd Vance makes
that point. Heg Seth makes that point. Steven Miller makes
that point. Okay, my friends, it's becoming pretty obvious now

(07:22):
already within the first couple hours of the show, with
further developments now on this and I'm putting it in
air quotes this scandal, that it's coordinated. It's clearly now coordinated.
We're going to find out why Goldberg was on that
group chat. I think we're going to get the answers
to that. But now Goldberg, listen to this, they're trying

(07:43):
to turn this into Watergate. Two point zero. So the
Democrats now have issued a statement. They don't just want
Pete hegg Seth to resign. Listen now to this, they
want Trump's entire national security team, basically half his cabinet
to resign. One on that group chat now they say,
must go, endangering I swear to you, endangering American lives,

(08:08):
endangering operational security implicated in the leak of classified information
and so called war plans. So heg Seth has to go,
Waltz has to go, Gabert Toulci has to go, Rubio
has to go, the CIA director Radcliffe has to go, everybody,
Everybody's got to go.

Speaker 2 (08:27):
Now they want the resign.

Speaker 1 (08:29):
They basically want to blow up Trump's national security team.
And Goldberg is now claiming, and you want to talk
about a real pos I'm sorry, he's a real piece
of you know what, he's a comeback. Now, Goldberg is
claiming listen to this that after he got you know,

(08:50):
put onto this group chat and was notified of the
so called war plans, he contacted the White House. This
is what he's now claiming. I called the White House
to warn the President that classified information your Yemen war

(09:12):
plans have been compromised. They've been leaked to me. And
if they were leaked to me, who else were they
leaked to? And so now what he's trying to he said,
Trump knew. So now he's claiming that when Trump yesterday
had a press conference, was asked about this story that
came up in the Atlantic yesterday and was pushed hard

(09:35):
on social media and by the damson by the media,
this so called firestorm. And when Trump said, this is
the first time I'm hearing about it. No, he's lying.
It's Nixon, It's watergate. Trump not only knew, Trump was warned.
Trump did nothing. This is what Goldberg is now peddling.

(09:56):
So this is clearly a coordinated attack on the administration.
There's no question now in my mind. Let me replay
that cut and then go right to the phone lines.
By the way, a couple lines are open if you
want to jump on six one seven two, six, six,
sixty eight sixty eight. So this is Trump. The Atlantic

(10:18):
drops their story, the Democrats pounds, the media pounds they
were waiting for it. Listen now to Trump, He's confronted
by a reporter. What's your reaction of this signal? App
and this group chat in which allegedly sensitive material war

(10:39):
plans classified info was allegedly leaked to this so called reporter,
This Trump hater, Jeffrey Goldberg roll cut one a mic.

Speaker 4 (10:51):
Your reaction to the story of The Atlantic that said
that some of your top the CAB officials and aids
have been discussing very sense of material signal and included
an Atlantic report for that. What is your response to
that in our.

Speaker 5 (11:04):
I don't know anything about it. I'm not a big
fan of The Atlantic. It's to me, it's a magazine
that's going out of business. I think it's not much
of a magazine. But I know nothing about it. You're
saying that they had.

Speaker 4 (11:14):
What they were using signal to ordinate on sets of materials.

Speaker 2 (11:19):
And having to do with what, having to do with what?
What were they talking about with the hooties, the hoodies?

Speaker 5 (11:26):
You mean the attack on the hood is, Well, it
couldn't have been very effective, because the attack was very effective.
I can tell you that I don't know anything about it.
You're telling me about it for the first time.

Speaker 1 (11:36):
So Goldberg is now claiming that that's a lie, that
what you just heard now that Trump's making this up
because apparently he warned the White House, so Trump knew
this is what he's now claiming. The question to me
now is very simple. Who made the decision to include
Goldberg on that group chat? That that, to me, is

(12:00):
at the heart of this story. Now, agree disagree? Was
this Is this a conspiracy like a mole, a saboteur
who's trying to blow up hegseth and blow up Trump?
Was this really an accident? Was this a hack? Was
this something that they gave to Goldberg after the fact.

(12:23):
To me, there's no question now that I believe it
was deliberate and intentional. Agree, disagree. Harry in Maine. Thanks
for holding Harry, and welcome.

Speaker 6 (12:35):
Good morning, Jeff. Great call. I'm going to just give
a quick shout out first, and I'm going to get
into this heg set stuff and Goldberg, But I want
to shout out Tom Holman because yesterday's call was all
about what wasn't happening in Boston. He arrested three hundred
and seventy illegal violent criminals yesterday and you can talk
about that another time in Boston, and so a shout

(12:55):
out going on.

Speaker 1 (12:56):
He made good on his promise, Harry. I pointed that
out on my ex account. Last night he got three
hundred day rounded up three hundred and seventy illegal alien criminals, including,
by the way, murderers, child rapists, fentinyl dealers, weapons traffickers,
trendo arragua, MS thirteen, gangbangers. Harry, the only one he

(13:19):
didn't arrest was Michelle Wou As I said on X
he should have arrested her. That's the only thing. Otherwise,
there was an incredible sweep. But you're dead on Harry.
He came to Boston and he delivered. But please keep going, Harry.

Speaker 6 (13:36):
She'll be next God Willings.

Speaker 2 (13:37):
Yeah.

Speaker 6 (13:38):
But Jeff, this is a rhetorical question. Do we believe
that we have completely rid ourselves of the deep state
that existed in the FBI or the CIA. That's just
a rhetorical question. We all know the answer at this
point in time is no way that we've completely rid
ourselves of the despicable people that still exist in both

(14:01):
of those parts of government. So I'm going to put
that to the side for a minute. But you ask
is there was there decision made who made a decision
to include Goldberg on that call. There was no decision made.
No one in that cabinet would have made a decision
that would have put him on that call. But I
want to point back to what a couple of your
callers said earlier. Janis, your second caller in the morning,

(14:24):
nailed it. This is another Mike Flynn moment. Okay, in
carry I think was the other caller that said, was
he on the call or did he just get a
copy of the thread? Now, according to what I read
in a Newsmax article this morning, Goldberg claims to have
quote unquote received a connection request for that call on
March eleventh. But is you laid out very nicely just

(14:48):
a moment ago, some of the context of the actual
script the thread, and you read through it from what
your text message came a moment ago from one of
your calls your listeners. There's a lot of questions just
how much he knew and when he knew it, And
I just feel that at this point in time, it's premature.
It's a nothing burger. Also, David from Brookline, he stated

(15:10):
all the other stuff that happened in the Biden administration
and going back to Obama, and then you put the
cherry on the cake, you know, talking about Hillary Clinton
and the emails and so forth, that she deleted. You
can also throw to a degree that's kind of analogous
is what happened with Ben Gazzi and how that that
came out to the public and all the lives that
were covered up there. But at this point they need

(15:32):
to get to the bottom of it. I just think,
as Janas said, it's way too early in the game.
Let them do their.

Speaker 2 (15:38):
I agree, they've got to do an internal investigation.

Speaker 1 (15:41):
Six seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight is
the number. Let me read to you all a text
that I think really pretty much sums it up. I think,
really well, this is from six one seven. You can
text us, by the way, seven zero four to seven
zero seven zero four to seven zero. Jeff no one

(16:02):
shared any war plans. Goldberg fabricated that part, just like
he's fabricated countless other Trump hoaxes. He took a dumb
but ultimately trivial screw up by National security advisor Mike
Waltz and blew it up into Watergate two point zero.

(16:26):
The only remaining question is why Waltz had Jeffrey Goldberg
in his contact list. I agree that if I'm Trump,
that's a question, a central question I would need to
get answered from Waltz. I completely agree with why what's Mike?

(16:47):
What's going on? Why would you talk to this guy?
Why would he be part of your contacts? Do you
speak to him regularly? Why would you speak to someone
like him? I think that issue need needs to be resolved. Agree, disagree.
Listen now to Goldberg. He's on MSNBC with Jen Saki.

(17:11):
Jen Saki on the his allegations that war plans were
inadvertently leaked to him. And notice he's going after heg
Seth and he's going after heg Seth hard roll cuts
six a Mike.

Speaker 7 (17:30):
The whole thing is just very flum mixing to me,
because I haven't seen this kind of unseerious behavior before.
And you know, and the Secretary of Defense, all due respect,
in that presentation, seems like a person who's unserious and
is trying to deflect from the fact that he participated
in a conversation on an unclassified commercial messaging app that

(17:54):
he probably shouldn't have participated in it.

Speaker 1 (17:57):
Oh, you mean like Hillary Clinton on her private service
for years and god knows how many messages back and forth. No,
they's no problem there, Aun Jeffrey, or when she deleted
all those emails, Jeffrey, No, no problem there, huh. I'm
just how about when they kept using the Signal app
during the Biden regime. It's all coming out now how

(18:20):
in fact it was the Biden regime.

Speaker 2 (18:21):
This is unbelievable. Literally installed the app.

Speaker 1 (18:26):
On government phones, government devices, and on government computers. So
when the Biden regime is doing it, it's okay. But now,
and don't get me wrong, I don't think Biden did
it as an excuse, like you want to undo everything
that Biden did. So I'm like, what do you mean

(18:47):
he's got everything on Signal? Are you serious that idiot
put everything up? Yeah, undo it, undo it.

Speaker 2 (18:56):
Okay.

Speaker 1 (18:56):
But my point is you weren't screaming Holy hell when
Biden was doing it. But now under heg seth, suddenly
he's got to go. He's not serious, he's unserious, he's incompetent.
He's a frat boy. He's a drunk. He's an alcoholic.
That's the other thing they're peddling on social media. He

(19:19):
was so drunk he had no idea who was in
on this group chat. If you read the texts, the
last thing you would say about heg Seth is that
he's drunk. I mean he's vigorously going back and forth.
He's I wouldn't say debating with Vans. It's a strong word,
but you know, rebutting Evans and taking some of his

(19:41):
points and pushing back on other points and drawing other
people in. And he is sharp as a sharp as
a whip. So no, they're going after heg Seth the
way they went after Flynn and they took down Flynn,
and they think they can take down Hegseeth. Agree, disagree?

(20:02):
So let me ask all of you, should heg Seth
resign or should Trump stand by Pete Hegseth and his
national security team. Apparently today Democrats now are going to
go all out to get Hegseth to step down. The
media is already demanding his resignation, as is Schumer, as

(20:26):
is Jeffries, as is pretty much every establishment media outlet
in the country. Should heg Seth be forced to go?
I say, no way in hell, But that's me I
want to hear from you six one seven two six
six sixty eight sixty eight. And let me add this

(20:49):
has this incident, let's call it, that shaken your confidence
in hegseeth in Mike Waltz, the National security and in
Trump's national security team in general. Is this just a
trivial screw up, as many of you are saying, or

(21:12):
does this show a serious lapse in judgment and almost
an amateurish quality, say to hag Seth and some of
the other people involved. Six two six six sixty eight
sixty eight, Tommy in Brookton, Thanks for holding Tommy, and welcome.

Speaker 3 (21:34):
Yeah, number one. I hope Trump's people are listening. Everybody
that was involved with this communication, they need to take
a lie detector test. Okay, So that's first and foremost.
All right, everybody's got to take a let me, everybody's

(21:55):
everybody has to take a lie detector test, jeff And
this was obviously a setup. And when I say everybody,
that includes Marco Rubio, Tulsey, Gabbard, all the above they've
got to take. He has to find out who the
mole is, and I think possibly maybe Mike Walls, maybe

(22:19):
the culprit, because like you say, why would he have
contact information with regards to that guy that whatever his
name is for the Atlantic? He's done?

Speaker 2 (22:32):
Hit Goldberg, Yeah, Goldberg, Jeffrey Goldberg.

Speaker 3 (22:34):
All right, right, And you know you had a couple
of callers ago, the good David from Brookline bring up
the fact about Biden that they're parading him out now
to show that he's saying he's very observant. He's one
of my favorite callers. But I have to say, when
you first started in the old days, I used to

(22:56):
love when David from Brookline would call in, who coach
Jeff and then Bill and then Bill Bill from Roxbury
whose dexters used to fall out when he was talking
to me. But anyway, so they're doing this deliberately, and

(23:17):
now they're calling for Trump's whole administration to tank. This
is no this is no ifs hands or but these
are people that are embedded in the deep State that
want to sabotage Trump's second president presidency. And Trump needs
to just come out very forcefully and say, look, uh, honestly,

(23:40):
I think he should ask Pete Exists to resign. I
like the guy, I love him, But this is where
you have to fall on your sword because the damage
is done. Whether Koner Country wants to admit it or not,
the damage is done. And you're going to have every
single news outlet crying, Oh my God, this is a

(24:02):
national security issue. These are the hooties over in Yemen.
These people don't amount to a hill of beans. And
but like I say, perception is everything, and Trump is
very good about reading what's going on. But my god,
mister President, make them all take a lie detector test.

(24:26):
And if it turns out anybody of his cabinet picks
refuses to take it, he needs to have his famous
line of you're fired, Tommy.

Speaker 1 (24:38):
Do you think this was deliberate or just to play
Devil's advocate Walt screwed up? Whatever it was, you know,
it was a dumb move. It was a boneheaded Let's
just say we accept the narrative that's out there that
you know he organized his group chat on signal. Maybe

(24:58):
he has Goldberg in his car. You can say, look,
I have everybody in my contacts. Reporters call me all
the time. Just because I have a guy on my
contact list doesn't mean he's a friend of mine or
a contact. I mean a mole or a I'm working
with him, you know, surreptitiously. I've got everybody in my
contact list.

Speaker 2 (25:14):
That's what I do.

Speaker 1 (25:15):
I give interviews. So he can say, look, it's all innocent.
I just mistakenly added the guy to the list. It
was an innocent, stupid screw up. In other words, Tommy,
could this possibly just be an accidental leak? Wasn't intentional,
It's not something to bring down the Trump administration. It

(25:38):
was just, you know, a boneheaded move. People make mistakes.
This was an honest mistake.

Speaker 3 (25:44):
What say you, No, this was not a mistake. This
was deliberate. Somebody inside the administration was looking to set
heg Zepp up, and it could be the people closest
to him. No, there is no mistaking one. You're using

(26:06):
a social media app to talk to everybody. Now this
was a setup. Definitely, mister Trump, find out who the
rat is and fire them, and then Pete hagg Zef
fall on your sword.

Speaker 1 (26:22):
Tommy, thank you very much for that call. I really
appreciate it. Look this, Sandy was adamant to me, as
I said, she's really hot about this story and this.
She was adamant to me in the pre show production
meeting and frankly throughout the whole show. And her argument is,
you're there to protect the president on top of your

(26:43):
other duties and responsibilities whatever. You run the Pentagon, your
hegg Seth. You you know you do national security. You're
Mike Waltz, whatever State Department for Marco Rubio, whatever your
cabinet position is. You also have to protect the president.
That's part of your He's the one that was elected.

Speaker 2 (27:02):
Not you.

Speaker 1 (27:04):
You were appointed by him, confirmed by the Senate, but
ultimately he picked you. He was the one that was
elected by the American people. So you have to protect
the integrity of the presidency. And her argument is, why
is Trump now having to protect hag Seth. Trump now

(27:24):
has to protect Mike Waltz. He's got to go out
there and go to bath for his guys because of
the position and the predicament that he's been put in now,
and instead it should be his guys who are out
protecting him. And she says, that's not the way it's
supposed She goes, I'm sorry, that's not the way it's
supposed to be. They have put the president in a

(27:47):
very very bad position. Now she's not saying heg Seth
should go, but she's saying, look, man, the buck stops
with him, and at a minimum, Trump should ream the
hell out of him just for having agreed to do it.
On signal and just for having agreed to shoot his

(28:07):
mouth off again, not that he gave away war plans,
but still you got I'm just giving you Sandy's argument.
He's got a big mouth, and you know, he's throwing
his weight around, and he's like, she goes, look, you
don't do it on a commercial messaging app. And you
say as little as possible if you're going to do
it on a commercial messaging app. And so she's saying, look,

(28:31):
now the president's got to go out there and spend
political capital, valuable capital propping up Hegseth or propping up
Mike Waltz. And her argument is it should be the
exact opposite. They should be out there defending him, not
him defending them. Do you agree? Six one seven two
six six sixty eight sixty eight Steven inactin Thanks for

(28:56):
holding Steven, and welcome.

Speaker 8 (28:59):
I thank you so much for taking my call, my pleasure.
I agree with everything you and your and the previous
cause of setting, including that I do believe someone needs
to be held accountable for this. And I'm kind of
all over the place about this, to be honest, I
think this the Scoldberg guy. This, I know he's lied
before but this is a this is kind of a

(29:20):
big thing to lie about in the sense that this
is a this is a big risk that he's taking,
a big public risk that he's taking to claim something
like this.

Speaker 5 (29:30):
Uh.

Speaker 8 (29:31):
And I know there's going to be a hearing today.
Apparently Tulca Gabbert's going to be there, Ratcliff's going to
be there. Trump's going to sign some orders. I think
at too. He's probably going to comment on this. They're
going to be asking about it, and I don't know.
I just feel that, you know, everybody is all of
the administration's enemies, the Democrats, the media, everyone has been

(29:52):
waiting for something like this. They already have them in
a corner. They're waiting for them to slip up. They're
waiting for a mistake to be made like this. This
is the golden opportunity that they've been waiting for. And
so they're going to pounce all over this. And we
know that they're going to latch onto this for the
next six months. And my worry is that this is
now going to become the next impeachment situation or Russia

(30:17):
hoape situation. And the inbinguity of hex Set's answer yesterday
when asked about this does trouble me. I do think
that this was an inside job. All evidence seems to
be pointing to that that we know of. But somebody
needs to be held accountable for this. And unless the
administration can dismantle this Goldberg guy's argument with laser precision

(30:41):
and provide evidence without a doubt he was not in
on these plans, I think they're going to jump all
over this. And I'm concerned that if I know, Trump
had nothing to do with this, but I'm concerned that
they're going to try and use this now to take
down his administration. I don't know what your opinion on
that is.

Speaker 2 (30:57):
Well, look, Steven, I think you really put your face
on the pulse. I think you have.

Speaker 1 (31:02):
Look, Gabbard and Ratcliffe and others are going to be
testifying in front of Congress today. It's everywhere. Now the
Democrats are going to hammer them. That's all they're going
to talk about is this issue. They're not going to
talk about anything else. The media is now running with
this twenty four to seven. You can tell now they're
sensing blood in the water. They sense something. They're sensing

(31:23):
something in the water, and they're going Now they want
to get to Trump through Hegseeth. And remember what I
said about Mike Flynn, and almost any people forgot, but
I was against Trump throwing Flynn overboard. I was saying,
I don't believe Mike Pence. And I said, even if
you believe Mike Pence, don't throw Flynn overboard. Why you

(31:45):
cut off your right arm, then you cut off your
left arm, then you cut off your right leg, then
you cut off your left leg. And by the time
you're done, your presidency's finished, you're dead in the water.
And that's what they're trying to do.

Speaker 6 (31:57):
Now.

Speaker 1 (31:57):
It's obvious they want to cut his right arm, heg Seth,
Mike Waltz his left arm, gabbered his right leg, Rubio
his left leg. I mean, that's it's clear that's their strategy,
so to torpedo his presidency. And I agree with you.
Trump has to come out swinging today. He's got I

(32:19):
love the way you phrased it, laser precision. He's got
a dismantle this narrative. And to dismantle it, you got
to put heg Seth in the room with you, Waltz
in the room with you. In other words, what the
f happened. How did this guy get on the group
chat or did he get on the group chat or
was he fed this information afterwards? Like Trump's got he's

(32:42):
got to get to the bottom of this. And my fear, Stephen,
is this, My fear is that Goldberg. Look, he's a worm.
He's a worm. If he's involved, it's because there's something
I don't believe was accident, no way in hell. So

(33:02):
if he's involved, there is someone trying to destroy and
sabotage Trump from within. To me, that's why if you're Trump,
you've got to get to the bottom of it, and
you've got to really Now, it's got to be like
a praetorian guard. You don't give the Democrats anything anything

(33:26):
because in other words, you are rock solid and you say,
I'm not throwing anybody overboard. I mean unless they were involved.
If they're involved, that's something else. Then that's a cancer,
and you got to excise the cancer. But if they're
telling you, well, hey, look this wasn't me. I did
not Hey I didn't put them on that group chap,
and you believe them and the evidence shows that they're

(33:47):
telling you the truth, you got to find the mole
and you don't sacrifice anybody, because I saw what happened
in Trump. This is Repeter Trump's first term. And then
remember it then Jeff Sessions, I mean, they just see
they bled them after they got Mike Flynn, then they
started to go after everybody. Then they realized we can

(34:07):
pick this administration apart. And then that's when eventually they
pushed out Jeff Sessions. And then it was just one
after another after another. Then they pushed out the National
Security advisors. Then they pushed out the Secretary of State.
Then I mean it was just it was like musical chairs.
So he cannot allow himself now to be boxed in

(34:31):
by the media, the Democrats, and the deep state, and
that's exactly what they're going to try to do to me.
This is war, and you don't surrender. You don't give
an inch to the Democrats. And you've got to find
out if you're being sabotaged or stabbed in the back.
And you got to find out who the judas.

Speaker 2 (34:52):
Is immediately immediately.

Speaker 1 (34:56):
Now let me just add one last thing, Steven, to
your excellent call. Goldberg maybe revealed something we'll see. He
gave the names of everybody that was on the group
chat except one, and he openly says this. He says
it's a CIA official, and he's claiming because it's the

(35:18):
CIA official, ie intelligence, he doesn't want to reveal that
person's name. My antenna went up when I read that.
I'm like, well, you're naming everybody that was on the
group chat, but you're not naming a CIA official. Knowing
the CIA, knowing the Deep State, knowing how they leaked,

(35:41):
knowing how they undermined and attacked Trump viciously during his
first term, and we're out to get him well the
last couple of years when he was in the political wilderness.
Would I want to know who that official is and
was that person really on that group chat? And if
they were, I'd look at them hard because that's the

(36:02):
person I would look at as a suspect. So, but
you're right, Trump's gotta come out fighting because if they show.

Speaker 2 (36:10):
Any weakness, now, this thing can go on for months.

Speaker 1 (36:15):
I mean, they can just blow this up and blow
this up and blow this up and whether and then
by after a while, you're taking on so much political water.
Even if you think the guy's innocent, you're gonna cut
him loose just to end the freaking scandal, so anyway
we shall see