Who Will Be Indicted Next?

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight. Okay,
let's take a few more calls and then a big story,
huge story. I promise I'm gonna get to it. But
first let's go to Luke in Havid, Luke and Harvard.
Thanks for holding Luke, and welcome.

Speaker 2 (00:24):
Jeff.

Speaker 3 (00:25):
I'll tell you there's there's someone's gotta do an ai
image of John Bolton and Biden and with the top
down on the Mustang driving through the streets of Scranton, Pennsylvania,
with the classified documents flying out of the back of it.

Speaker 1 (00:47):
Luke, were you surprised when the news broke yesterday that
Bolton had been indicted?

Speaker 3 (00:54):
I mean in a sense. I mean, I'll tell you this,
He's just one guide, and there's I mean Biden himself.
I mean, pick a card, any card. They're all guilty
of the same thing. Go to Pence, Go to Lindsey Graham.

Speaker 1 (01:07):
For heaven's sake.

Speaker 3 (01:08):
Those two were buddies, aren't they. Like, Yes, you think
that he wasn't given those paperwork, all that paperwork to
Lindsay while he was over there talking with Putin and
making arrangements with with the Ukrainian president. There I mean,
you know, pick a card, any card. They're all guilty
of it, and we're just we're picking on one guy

(01:29):
that looks like a walrus, you know what I mean.

Speaker 1 (01:33):
Luke, is it me or I mean, look, obviously they
indicted him, God bless him. But you're right, you know
you were. You know, you listed some great names, Hillary Clinton,
Joe Biden, Lindsey Graham, you could go on and on
guilty of the exact same crimes, maybe even worse, much worse.
Yet nothing has happened to them, Luke. Has something changed

(01:54):
in our culture and in our country when it comes
to classified information popsiecurity. I mean I remember growing up,
really the worst thing you could do, you know, in
the United States, but frankly in other countries, is betray
your country and give away or be sloppy with top secrets,

(02:15):
with you know, sensitive classified information. I mean, when a
story like this broke, it wasn't just that it was
twenty four to seven wal to wall media coverage, but
it was like complete condemnation. I mean, it was the
highest possible scandal. It was considered the worst thing you
could ever do. And now it's ah, this is retribution,

(02:42):
this is selective prosecution. This is Trump going after his enemies.
That's all this is. And I'm looking around and I'm like,
doesn't any of this matter to people? What say you, Luke?

Speaker 3 (02:57):
Well, I could tell you that it would matter what
what flavor ice cream Trump was eating. If he was
had chocolate chocolate chip on a waffle cone, right, that
would matter more than any of this, right, Like that's oh,
by the way, Donald Trump took two scoops of ice cream,

(03:18):
two scoops of ice cream, because that's more important than
I mean, we we were long past that. You know,
Barney Fife and Andy Griffith show you know what I
mean where I I mean, I don't really know what
to tell you.

Speaker 1 (03:33):
I mean, honestly, Okay, No, you're completely right. Like Trump
breathes and they indict him. You're right, he has two
scoops of ice cream and it's the wrong flavor or whatever.
And what's a crime. What's a crime, and pitch them
and pitach them and this well you know again, WMD programs,
missile systems, our spy networks. Uh, his email account hacked

(03:58):
by the Iranians and he keeps it from the FBI
or the fact that he had classified information. He kept
that from the FBI. That could go on and on.
He sends it to his wife and his daughter. And
by the way, have you noticed, Luke, why aren't his
wife and daughter indicted as well? I mean, I know
the term is unindicted co conspirator, but why aren't his

(04:21):
wife and I mean they were with they were, you know,
in on it with him from the very beginning. Is it?
You know, is it gonna be like Mike Flynn? Are
they going to hold the family against Bolton to try
to get him to cop to a plea or you know,
get a guilty plea out of him. But I'm thinking, well,
there were three of them involved in this conspiracy, why
only get one of them? Get them all? Am I wrong?

Speaker 3 (04:45):
You're not wrong? I mean these people will start wars
to cover up their crimes. I mean they'll they'll kill
millions of people just to cover up their crimes. I mean,
you're you're dealing with, You're dealing with the sadistic that's
beyond I don't even think that, Uh, I don't even
think of storyteller could could do this to this level.
It's so it's so deep and corrupt.

Speaker 1 (05:04):
Yeah, and diabolic.

Speaker 3 (05:05):
They say deep they say deep state, but it's like
it's it's deeper than you can possibly imagine. It's it's
you could anything that you could come up with in
your mind could be plausible as to the level of
which these people will go to to cover up their crimes.

Speaker 1 (05:23):
Luke very well said, And I'm happy you called my friend.
It's been a while. Please don't be a stranger, Luke,
call again, buddy. Six one seven two six six sixty
eight sixty eight. Okay, Uh, lines are popping. Ugh, you know,
just when I want to get out, Yeah, pull me
back in, all right, So I'm gonna take a few

(05:45):
more calls. Uh, big story. Don't touch that dial. Six
one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight. Will
be right back after this break. Six one seven two
six six six eight. Couple lines are open if you
want to jump on Ron in Halliston. Thanks for holding Ron,

(06:08):
and welcome.

Speaker 2 (06:11):
Jeff.

Speaker 4 (06:11):
Come on and can you hear me?

Speaker 1 (06:12):
I can hear you, Ron, Can you hear me?

Speaker 4 (06:16):
Absolutely?

Speaker 2 (06:18):
So?

Speaker 4 (06:18):
You asked who we would like to see as the
next indictment following Bolton, And if I'm going to be
the only one to say it, let me say it
Fauci Fauci for the COVID coup. That was an absolute
political coup that was pulled off with that virus released
from the Wuhan lab funded by the NIH through doctor Fauci.

(06:44):
And then as an add on, we have to get
out there tomorrow morning for No Kings. We can't let
them have the prevailing message in the town square. I'm
going to be out in Walpole. And recently in Portland
there were some patriots with American flags that intervened in

(07:04):
the Antifa protest and they didn't even.

Speaker 2 (07:08):
Know what to do.

Speaker 4 (07:09):
So if No Kings is all about democracy, that includes
our message, and if we're not out there, then people
won't see our message. It'll look like we have no support.

Speaker 1 (07:20):
Well, Ron, the only thing I would advise is that
please bring others with you to protect you. I have
a little bit of you know, people that can watch
your back because there's a lot of Antifa people out,
a lot of crazed militant leftists, and they're itching now.
The level of violence is getting worse. It's getting worse

(07:43):
in Boston, it's getting worse in Chicago, in Portland, in
La in San Francisco, it's getting bad. It's really getting bad.
So you know, I'm not telling you not to go, obviously,
but I'm just saying, please, you gotta be careful. You
got to watch yourself. Don't go well. Make sure you
bring people who are with you, who will stand by you,

(08:05):
who can protect you, or at least watch your back.
And make sure that there's a camera on the whole time.
Make sure somebody's phone iPhone is videotaping the whole time,
because if something does happen, you want the documented proof
right there. And you know, I want to ask you this, Ron,

(08:25):
because the left is making such a big deal now
about this no King's rally tomorrow. Apparently Elizabeth Warren is
going to participate, AOC is gonna participate, Mom, Donnie is
gonna participate, Bernie is gonna participate, Pritzker is participating, Brandon Johnson,
Michelle wu is literally going to be leading the rally

(08:46):
in Boston. By the way, doesn't she have anything better
to do? But anyway, let that go. This is what
I can't wrap my mind around, Ron. If Trump was
truly a king, as they claim, a dictator an audit,
you can't hold a rally against an autocrat dictators kings

(09:06):
never allow you to hold an opposition rally. So the
fact that they're able to have a no King's rally,
another one shows that what they're saying is completely false
because if he was, if he was a king, you
wouldn't be able to rally to begin with. So in

(09:28):
a way, they look so honestly absurd, idiotic. And there's
a certain point, Ron and then I want to get
your take on this. It's almost becoming now an addiction.
It's yes, it's Trump de arrangement syndrome. It's a poison.
It's toxic. You can see it. It's it's it's it's

(09:51):
it's it's inciting this irrational hatred and this irrational violent behavior.
But it's becoming almost like an addiction where it's self destructive.
You look at them, you almost feel sorry for them.
And I'd love to hear their response when someone says, well,
if Trump was a king, you wouldn't even be here

(10:13):
right now. There would be no rally because he would
order the rally to be canceled or suppressed, and you'd
have the military here smashing all your heads open and
putting you all in jail. Instead, you're going to be
here blocking traffic, making fools of yourselves and spitting on
this guy. How is this guy a king? How can

(10:36):
an opposition party shut down the entire government if he's
a king? How could the entire media be a rayed
against him? If he's a king? I mean, I could
go on and on and on and on. How could
he have all these federal judges blocking him again and
again and again if he's a king? Like hello, and

(10:58):
they're so consumed with this bile, this hatred that they
can't see all that is true. Instead, God knows how
they're gonna last out. So, Ron, I'm just curious, what
do you think they're trying to achieve tomorrow? Ultimately? What's
their objective to paralyze the country to start an uprising

(11:21):
against Trump? What do you think their ultimate goal is?

Speaker 4 (11:26):
So the goal is to keep us in fear. So
you know what they're doing is they're creating large groups
in small towns. So, yes, they look ridiculous. I agree,
we know they look ridiculous, but to the onlookers, we
have to try to make them. The onlookers may or

(11:47):
may not know if they are ridiculous or not. So
for the onlookers, we have to. We have to help
them see that those people are ridiculous, and if the groups,
if we're out there, and the groups might be embarrassed
that we're out there, and they might not continue the
protests in the future. But I think the big picture

(12:09):
of view is they're trying to create enough chaos and
lawlessness on a big picture, a grand scale, enough chaos
and lawlessness to bend our will and go their way.
So they would have to create chaos, and out of
that comes anarchy, which is synonymous, and then from there

(12:31):
we're going to be digging for someone to come in
and make things right. So I think that if they
think we're in autocracy now now, if we keep on
going this way with the left, then we will get
an autocracy, and it's probably not going to be the
autocracy that American patriots want.

Speaker 1 (12:56):
Ron. You've said it very well. I could not have
said it better myself. Ron. Please be careful, Please be
safe tomorrow. Thank you very much for that call. Ron
six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight.
Alex in New York, Thanks for holding Alex, and welcome.

Speaker 2 (13:15):
I'm doing Jeff, Alex just wondering I'm no lawyer, But
is there any chance that the Russian hoaxers could be
swept up in a Rico statute precedent? If possible? And

(13:38):
January six ers too, the instigators, I've.

Speaker 1 (13:43):
Been urging them to do that. I agree with you.
I think it's that's almost what Rico I know, was
invented for the mob. But this is like a political mafia,
write a political mob. I think it's tailor made for Rico.
I think both the Russia collusion hoax and January sixth.
And by the way, Alex, I'm very happy you called
because I want to play this cut of Nancy Pelosi.

(14:06):
Now listen to this, and I want to get your reaction, Alex.
This is Pelosi snapping at a TV reporter for Mike
Lindell that Mike Lindella as an outlet, and she's just
simply asking a basic question to Pelosi, why didn't you
call or accept Trump's request for the national Guard on

(14:27):
January sixth? Why did you know Trump asked for ten
to twenty thousand National Guard troops? You're the one that
turned him down. Why? Alex listened to Pelosi's response, Roll
cut nineteen Mike.

Speaker 5 (14:45):
Congress Aran Pelosi jeu. Are you at all concerned that
the new January sixth committee will find you liable for
that that?

Speaker 1 (14:50):
I am right here.

Speaker 5 (14:52):
Are you at all concerned about the new January sixth
committee finding you liable for that day? Why did you
refuse the National Guard on January six Shut up?

Speaker 1 (15:03):
I did not refuse the national Guard. The President didn't
send it. Why are you coming here with Republican talking
points as if you're a serious journal The.

Speaker 5 (15:11):
American people want to know we still have questions? Thank
you well?

Speaker 1 (15:15):
Shut up? Shut up? Shut up. By the way, the
President does not have the authority or the power to
unilaterally send in the National Guard. That was the the
only people that could have allowed that authorized That was
the Mayor of DC at the time, MARYL. Bowser, and
of course the Speaker of the House at the time,
Nancy Pelosi. But Alex, she's very sensitive now when you

(15:39):
ask her about why didn't you authorize the National Guard
to be deployed? Now, Alex, is you know? Alex?

Speaker 2 (15:48):
Now?

Speaker 1 (15:48):
Her line is shut up. Don't even ask the question.
Final word to you, Alex. Six one seven two six
six sixty eight sixty eight is the number. Okay, Hey,
my friends in front of the Supreme Court right now
is an absolutely historic voting rights redistricting case which involves

(16:14):
the state of Louisiana, but it will impact not just Louisiana,
it will impact states across the entire country. And on
this decision, and this is no exaggeration or hyperbole, will
probably determine the results of the midterm elections. And the

(16:36):
way oral arguments have been going, it appears it appears
that the Supreme Court, either five to four conservative majority
or even six' three With John, roberts are poised now
to deliver a, landmark historic ruling that will probably lead

(16:58):
to nineteen up to nineteen extra seats For republicans in
the twenty twenty six midterm. Elections, meaning if they vote
the way everybody thinks they're going to vote based on oral,
arguments The republicans are not just going to win the,

(17:18):
Midterms they're going to expand their majority by a good
fifteen to twenty, seats and so very. Quickly this is
now and the stakes couldn't be. Higher so at issue
is a specific district congressional district In louisiana which was

(17:40):
carved out based On section two of the historic nineteen
sixty Five Voting Rights, Act And i'll make it as
simple and clear as possible without all the legal mumbo.
Jumbo if you, remember in nineteen sixty four nineteen sixty,
five you Have Martin Luther, king you Have Lyndon johnson
and is in The White, house and of course you

(18:02):
had the historic civil rights movement to Overthrow Jim crow and.
Segregation So congress passed both The Civil Rights, act which
undid segregation And Jim, crow and of course The Voting Rights,
act which finally Gave African americans the right to vote
in The south and the Segregated Jim Crow south because

(18:25):
of the existence and prevalence of white. Supremacy section two
was added to The Voting Rights act because at the
time in The, south Blocks African, americans however you want
to call, them were denied access to the, polls they

(18:48):
were not able to, vote or they were constantly being
intimidated or terrorized or hindered or prevented from being able
to cast their. Ballot and so as a way to
help encourage A African americans to vote and b to
give them some extra, Protection congress allowed for race based congressional,

(19:15):
districts meaning that when you do a census and you
apportion congressional districts in, states you can set aside certain
districts that will guarantee predominantly a minority majority. Area in other,
words say this this district In. Louisiana it is predominantly,

(19:38):
black deliberately carved out from different areas to make it
a predominantly black district with black, voters so they can
elect a black, politician usually a Black. Democrat now much
has changed in the last fifty to sixty. Years segregation is,

(20:00):
gone long gone and. Buried Jim crow long gone and.
Buried poll taxes that were, used or the clan going
around terrorizing black, voters those days long gone and. Buried
and so the government of the state, government the governor

(20:23):
Of louisiana is now, saying, look we have six congressional.
Districts we send six members to The United States house Of.
Congress it is currently four to, two but it really
should be five to one because they've artificially, created going
back To section two of The Voting Rights, act a

(20:45):
specific district that is a race based. District you've cobbled
it together to make sure that the black community has
a majority in this district so they can elect a
Black democrat is, Unconstitutional it is, Unfair it violates equality

(21:07):
under the, law and it is. Discrimination you're discriminating against
people In louisiana in favor of one race over another.
Race that you should have congressional districts based on, merit on,
fairness and on a color, blind racially blind. Standard in other,

(21:32):
words on a non discriminatory. Standard you shouldn't want to
encourage white districts Or latino, districts Or asian districts or
black districts or. Whatever that this is now clearly an, unfair, illegal,
unconstitutional Un american. Practice it appears That louisiana is going

(22:01):
to win its argument based on What alito was saying
And Justice kavanaugh And Justice Clarence, thomas it appears now
The Supreme court is willing to say yes that though
the days of a race based districts are, over and
if that, happens you will then see redistricting take place

(22:24):
in Many southern, states which is going to lead without
question to fifteen up to nineteen. Districts now that we're
Formerly democrat that will now Go. Republican so The republican
majority is going to be added, significantly The democrats are
going to lose the midterms and they're in a full blown.

(22:47):
Panic so to try to justify the, Unjustifiable Katanji Brown
jackson advanced an argument THAT i cannot believe came out
of her. Mouth and just as a quick, aside if
you remember, yesterday there was a couple of, callers very good,

(23:11):
callers called in and, said you, know believe it or,
not In New York, city there are some Liberal Jewish
democrats who are going to vote for A muslim, militant
a pro cherial law Pro hamas candidate Like Zaron, mundani
A jew, hater a naked Anti. Semite and they, said you,

(23:34):
Know i'm, sorry but these are self Hating. Jews what
you're gonna hear now From Cantangi Brown. Jackson i'm, sorry
but you want to talk, about you, know self Hating.
Jews here's a self hating Black this is a self
hating black. Woman, frankly a self hating black. Person she

(23:59):
actually says that being black is the equivalent of being
disabled or being. HANDICAPPED i swear to, you you gotta
hear it to believe. It this Is Ketanji Brown jackson
oral Arguments louisiana VERSUS i think it's Pronounced calais Or calais.

(24:25):
Anyway this is the Historic Supreme court. Case ay ya.
Yai you need race based congressional. Districts you need districts
that will guarantee the election of Black democrats because blocks

(24:45):
are just too, incompetent too, disabled too handicapped to vote
on their own roll cut to a.

Speaker 6 (24:56):
MIC i Guess i'm thinking of it of the fact
that remedial action absent discriminatory intent is really not a
new idea in the civil rights. Laws and my kind
of paradigmatic example of this is something like The Ada

(25:20):
congress passed The americans With Disabilities act against the backdrop
of a world that was generally not accessible to people with,
disabilities and so it was discriminatory in effect because these
folks were not able to access these. Buildings and it
didn't matter whether the person who built the building or

(25:41):
the person who owned the building intended for them to be,
exclusionary that's. Irrelevant congress, said the facilities have to be
made equally open to people with, disabilities if readily.

Speaker 1 (25:54):
POSSIBLE. Ii Now i'm telling You alito's, face his, jaw
practically dropped to the. Floor according to people who are
in The Supreme court at the, time the justices were,

(26:15):
stunned stunned that this came out of her. Mouth Clarence
thomas couldn't believe. It he was staring at, her really,
like what you sound like an old style white. Segregationist
you sound like one of these old style democrats segregationists

(26:38):
that blacks are so, inferior that blacks are, well they're,
handicapped they're, like you, know they it's comparing it to
The americans With Disabilities, act that they're so disabled that
they need all this special treatment and special privileges and
special rights given to. THEM i, mean the courtroom couldn't

(26:58):
they could not believe what came out of her. Mouth
now she follows it. Up listen out of this roll,
cut she's basically, saying, so just as we made special
laws for disabled, people we've got to make special laws for,
blocks and for blocks to, vote and for blocks to

(27:22):
have their own specially specifically designed, districts because only blocks
will elect fellow. Blocks roll cut TWO A, MIKE.

Speaker 6 (27:33):
I GUESS i don't understand why that's not what's happening.
Here the idea in section two is that we are
responding to current day manifestations of past and present decisions
that disadvantage minorities and make it so that they don't
have equal access to the voting. System, right they're. Disabled in,

(27:56):
fact we use the word disabled In. Milligan we, say
that's a way in which you see that these processes
are not equally. Open this is.

Speaker 1 (28:06):
Disgusting i'm, sorry this is. Revolting it's. SICKENING i, mean
this is. Disgusting so hold, on you mean? Sorry you
mean to tell me that what blacks can't can't get
id on their, own but they can't check off a
ballot on their, own they can't register to vote on their.

(28:30):
Own what they can't get on a bus to vote
or get in a car to vote on their?

Speaker 3 (28:36):
OWN a.

Speaker 2 (28:41):
Ya?

Speaker 1 (28:41):
Yai, seriously ay a. Yai now. Listen now it gets
even it it gets even. Crazier so this is The
Principal Deputy Solicitor General Hashim. Moupan and now there's a
back and forth With Justice Sonya. Seto, Mayor, now why

(29:05):
do you need a majority minority? District in other, words
why do you have to carve out these race based?
Districts because listen to. This White republicans and White democrats
will never vote for a black. Candidate that the color

(29:27):
of your skin determines who you will vote. For white
people vote for white, People black people vote for black.
PEOPLE i Guess latinos vote For, Latinos asians vote For.
Asians it's kind of like this racial. Determinism roll cut, Three.

Speaker 7 (29:51):
Mike they you could control for partisan. Effect there was
racially polarized voting even within The democratic. Part that's Where
section two, matters where you have a reason to think
that a racial group is being here. Too do you
have proof of that?

Speaker 6 (30:07):
Here?

Speaker 7 (30:07):
No you know what you have here is That republicans
And democrats are. Different there's no you have some that
even White republicans or White democrats won't vote for black. Candidates,
right but if these were White, democrats there's no reason
to think they would have a second. District. None and
so what is happening here is their argument is because

(30:29):
These democrats happen to be, black they get a second.
District if they were all, white we all agree they
wouldn't get a second. District that is literally the definition
of race subordinating traditional.

Speaker 1 (30:38):
Principles he's completely, right he's completely. Right it's a bit
of a convoluted constitutional legal argument they're, making but he's completely.
Right you. Know in other, words if we took race
out of, this then we would all agree it would
be five to. One it would be straight. Redistricting, right
you drop up the congressional, lines it'd be Five republicans One.

(30:59):
Democrat wouldn't say you need a second district for The.
Democrats you're only arguing for the second district because you
want to cobble, together carve out you, know a black,
district you, know a minority, district but in this, case
a specifically black. District, well that's you, know as he put,
it that's race subordinating equality under the, law fair application

(31:22):
of the, law the you, know a color blind. Law
so he, goes it's it's blatant, discrimination blatant. RACISM i,
mean it's it's. There now WHAT i found incredible in that.
Exchange so hold, on you never heard Of Barack, Obama,
like think about how ridiculous this. Is by the, way
he's the one that appointed. Her do you know how

(31:43):
many White democrats voted For? Obama do you know how
many white liberals voted For? Obama just to give you an,
example do you know how MANY i don't. Know Take Larry.
ELDER i know he lost when he ran Against newsom In,
California but do you know how many White republicans voted

(32:04):
For Larry? Elder a Black? Conservative Like, hello IF i
lived In, CALIFORNIA i would have voted for. HIM i
don't care about the color of his. SKIN i agree
with his, ideas his, policies his, values his. Principles BUT
i don't care if he's, black, purple, white, GREEN i don't.
Care but what is stunning, here, honestly it's stunning is

(32:30):
that An African american woman on The Supreme court would
literally directly make the analogy that being black In, america
that being a black person is the equivalent of being
someone who is quote unquote disabled or. Handicapped, Now i'm

(32:55):
telling you this is the same racism that you. Saw
The Democratic party has not changed their. Racism i'm telling
you they. Haven't this this is something A democrat white
segregationist would have said in the fifties and. Sixties, well,
yeah they're basically they're. Inferior, yah, yeah, yeah look at.

(33:18):
Them they're like handicapped. People they're like disabled now she's
using it for a different. Reason she, says, no, no
they need extra. Protection they need to have their own specific.
Districts they would, argue, no don't give them the right to,
Vote but it doesn't. Matter the condescension is the, Same

(33:40):
the insulting worldview is the. Same so what blacks are
now that pathetic in her? Eyes so what they can't
drive on their, own they can't get id on their,
own but they can't go vote on their, own they
can't think for themselves on their. Own and, finally let

(34:03):
me just say, this and this really is critical race,
theory And i'm telling you it's going to tear this country.
Apart and that's WHY i so support The Supreme court
if they rule in favor Of louisiana on. This not
just because politically it will put a dagger through The
democrat attempts to take back The house in the midterms

(34:26):
and Impeach Donald, trump but for the principle, Itself blacks
are people. Too they don't need extra. Help they're not
inferior To whites Or latinos Or. Asians it's not an

(34:49):
undue burden for them to get a driver's. License it's
not an undue burden for them to go out and
drive themselves or get themselves to the polls and think
about how think about how they view the. World so,
what white people only vote for white? People since when that?

(35:12):
Blacks what there's such racial tribalism that they only vote
for black? People? Really, well that's that's news To Donald,
trump BECAUSE i got to tell you a lot of
black men voted For. Trump so is this now what The?
Democrats how they want to see our? Country and why

(35:32):
don't want To they want a country to operate like
a racially balkanized country where your skin color determines how you,
vote and that you only vote for the member of your,
race or your tribe or your skin. Color this is

(35:55):
not My, america and this is not The america of
the overwhelming majority of The american. People And i'm telling
you you want to know why The democrats are going
down in. Flames you want to know why they're increasingly
now a minority party because the likes Of Mom, donnie
the likes Of Elizabeth, warren the likes Of Bernie, sanders

(36:18):
the likes OF aoc and, yes the likes Of Katangi Brown.
Jackson this is a form of Racial. Marxism this is
a form of primitive tribalism That i'm telling you will
destroy this, country and Most americans know. It SO i

(36:42):
want to ask all of you a double barrel. Question number,
one are blocks like handicapped or disabled? People this is
From Katangi Brown. Jackson this is what she, said that
they need extra, help extra protections because they just can't

(37:03):
vote properly on their. Own and, furthermore should we only
vote based on our race and our racial? Identity do white?
People should they only vote for white? People should black
people only vote for black? People Should latinos only vote For?

(37:28):
Latinos and to the liberals and the, moonbats