Would Gun Control Have Prevented Kirk's Murder?

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
The short answer is no. In fact, a very suggestion
now being peddled by Democrats, liberals, those on the left,
especially in the media, that somehow the answer to Charlie
Kirk's political assassination is more gun control is absolutely preposterous,
it's dishonest, and frankly, it's imoral. Why because the shooter

(00:26):
in this case, Tyler Robinson, didn't use a glock, didn't
use an AR fifteen or a so called semi automatic weapon. No, no, no,
he used a bolt action hunting rifle. In other words,
he used the very kind of rifle, a long gun

(00:49):
that Democrats insist they support. Whenever they push gun control,
they say, oh no, we're not against guns. We just
don't want handguns or assault weapons or the AR fifteen,
but we won't take away your hunting rifles. Of course,
you could have a bolt action hunting rifle. Well, that's

(01:10):
exactly the kind of gun that was used to shoot
and murder Kirk in the neck. So no, more gun
control would not have prevented the murder of Charlie Kirk.
And the left knows it. What murdered Charlie Kirk is
a climate of hatred, a climate of intolerance, frankly, a

(01:34):
climate of left wing assassination culture that has now metastasized
like a cancer. And this has come from Obama, from
Hillary Clinton, from Joe Biden, from Nancy Pelosi, from the
leading lights and the leaders of the Democratic Party who
continue to insist on calling Trump and his supporters Nazis, fascists, bigots, racists, authoritarians,

(02:05):
and white supremacists. They are deliberately dehumanizing Conservatives, Maga and
Trumps supporters and the result is now a mass client
climate of political terrorism and political violence. The Democrats created

(02:27):
this environment. They are responsible for Charlie Kirk's murder, not guns,
not the Second Amendment, not the weapon that was used.
Democrats need to look themselves in the mirror and ask
themselves a very simple question. Do they have Charlie Kirk's

(02:47):
blood on their hands? And the sad, honest answer is yes.