April 19, 2024 • 30 mins
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Have you ever wondered why Democrats are allowing so many
illegal immigrants to come into liberal cities sanctuary cities.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Well, we now understand a little bit more why this
is happening.
Speaker 1 (00:13):
Now. You may say, when I asked that in't a question.
Ben of course we know why they're trying to change
this country. That is true, But there's also something else
that's happening that we're now seeing, and it is very
clear why this is happening.
Speaker 2 (00:26):
It is the great replacement. Let me explain what I
mean by that.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
I'm not talking about replacing Americans in general, right, like
overpowering them traditional Americans who are citizens with illegal immigrants. No,
what we're now talking about is apparently something else, and
it's much deeper than that. Democrats are watching the cities
that they control, some of the biggest cities in America
(00:50):
and some of the biggest states like California, losing population
at record numbers because of anarchy and chaos and high taxes.
Speaker 2 (00:58):
I'll give you a great example.
Speaker 1 (01:00):
My hometown of Memphis has the highest property taxes of
any city in Tennessee.
Speaker 2 (01:08):
It is also the murder capital of America.
Speaker 1 (01:10):
Right now, it's the most dangerous city in America by
the FBI's definition, with their related stats that have come out,
And what did the new mayor of Memphis, a hardcore
leftist Democrat African American man, do in his big address
after being in office for just one hundred days, he said,
we're going to have a big tax increase.
Speaker 2 (01:31):
He was also backed up by the.
Speaker 1 (01:32):
County mayor who also said the same exact thing, that
we are going to have a tax increase. Now, why
on earth would you raise taxes when you're the most
dangerous city in America.
Speaker 2 (01:45):
I'll tell you exactly why.
Speaker 1 (01:46):
Because they're so out of touch with reality, and they
have so many people that are leaving the city going
to other places that now they're running out of money
because if you don't have any money, how do you
take money from people. It's very much now what Democrats
are doing. But they're doing it just from a simple
standpoint of they have to replace liberal voters that they're
(02:07):
losing or moderate voters that vote Democrat. They're having to
replace the people they're losing to keep their power, which
brings me to a bigger point.
Speaker 2 (02:18):
US Representative Chuck Fleischmann.
Speaker 1 (02:21):
He's a Tennessee Republican from the third district released the
following statement about his support of a new bill.
Speaker 2 (02:28):
This bill is h R seven to one zero nine.
Speaker 1 (02:32):
It's called the Equal Representation at What this bill does
ensure that only legal American citizens are factored into the
official count for congressional districts and the electoral college map
that determines the outcome of presidential elections. In other words,
(02:52):
you can't replace Americans with illegal immigrants and then count
them when it comes to the electoral Basically, the numbers
of each state.
Speaker 2 (03:02):
Now you know how this works, right. The electoral college
is simple.
Speaker 1 (03:05):
It's your senators and then your congressmen of that state combined,
and that's the number. That's the reason why South Dakota
and North Dakota have three, right, because they have they
actually have two senators and they have one congressman. And
so it's not a big deal to win or lose
that state in theory, because it's only worth three. That's
why people don't spend a lot of time there campaigning.
But you spend a hell of a lot of time
in places like Florida, New York, Texas, and California because
(03:29):
the prize there is so big. What Democrats have figured
out is that if you can flood a state with illegals,
count them in the census, you get more congress people
that will represent your state, and that means the electoral
College votes. Then those numbers go up, which means if
you can flood a state like Texas and win it,
(03:50):
you're going to get a really big number of electoral
College votes. Fourd to the same way Nevada, right Arizona, California.
Speaker 2 (03:59):
This is their total plan.
Speaker 1 (04:02):
Let me also tell you real quick about my friends
at Patriot Mobile.
Speaker 2 (04:05):
I got to tell you I made a promise this year.
Speaker 1 (04:08):
I am not giving my money to companies that hate me,
hate my family values, hate what I believe in, hate
that I'm a Christian, hate that I'm a conservative, and
Big Mobile let me tell you they hate you. In fact,
Big Mobile has been giving massive donations because you pay
a bill every month to them, and they take a
portion of that bill and they're giving it back to
(04:29):
liberal causes, including Planned parenthood. Now, when I found that out,
I switched to Patriot Mobile. They're the only Christian conservative
wireless provider in the country. Now, most people don't switch
cell phones often. The reason why is they think it's
hard to do, but with technology now it's actually incredibly easy.
Speaker 2 (04:47):
How do I know.
Speaker 1 (04:48):
I just switched the line over it the other day.
It is done easily over the phone. And when you
call Patriot Mobile, they can switch and you get to
keep your same cell phone number. You get to keep
your same phone or up great to a new one.
Now coverage is no longer an issue. It used to
be you'd pick a company based on coverage, not anymore.
In fact, you're going to be using the same towers
(05:09):
that you're using right now. But what you're doing is
not giving your money to democratic causes candidates, including organizations
like Planned Parenthood any longer. You're going to be supporting
Patriot Mobile that then takes your money every month, five
percent of your bill at no extra cost to you,
and they give it back to conservative causes and organizations
that protect our First and our Second Amendment rights, and
(05:30):
most importantly to me, they support organizations that support the
lives of unborn children. Yeah, so when I use my
phone and when I pay my bill, I know I'm
sending up for what I believe in, and I'm making
a real difference. Check out Patriot Mobile Patriot Mobile Dot
com slash ben, Patriot mobile dot com slash ben, or
(05:51):
call them nine seven two Patriot. That's nine seven to
two Patriot nine seven to two Patriot or Patriot mobile
dot com slash ben. All right, so back to the
great replacement. This is actually very simple. Democrats are losing
and democratic cities are losing at record number people. California
(06:14):
has more people leaving the state than are moving to
the state. And that's partly because of high taxes, that's
partly because of high crime. It is partly because of
just the cost of living is so out of control,
and that's an important thing to understand, but a lot
of it is the liberal policies and we're seeing this
in places like New York City. We've seen a lot
(06:35):
of people move out of New York City, especially when
they had the COVID lockdowns, that they're never coming back. Well,
if you want to stay powerful, you've got to bring
in people, right, you have to. You've got to bring
in people to keep that power. So how do you
do it. You bring in illegal immigrants. And that's how
you keep places like California extremely powerful. When it comes
(06:57):
to the electoral college. If you're losing a couple million
people who are moving out. Then they're saying, all right,
we got to figure out how to bring in a
couple of million people. And this is exactly what Democrats
are now doing. Let me also tell you what Representative
Fleischman had to say.
Speaker 2 (07:14):
He said quote.
Speaker 1 (07:15):
Since day one of this administration, President Biden, the DC
Democrats have gone out of their way to open our
borders and incentivize millions of illegal aliens to break into
our country. Currently, illegal immigrants are counted towards congressional district
appointments and allocation of electoral College votes, which is unacceptable.
(07:38):
The congressman goes on to say, for every illegal immigrant
that is counted towards congressional appointment or the allocation of
electoral College votes, a legal American citizen is disenfranchised of
their right to be properly represented. This is actually a
brilliant move by Democrats. They don't care where you are
(08:02):
as long as you're in a liberal state, because that
gives them more power if you can flood, for example,
even in Texas places like Houston and San Antonio. In
Dallas and Austin with legal immigrants, they don't care about
the back country.
Speaker 2 (08:16):
They don't care about the suburbs.
Speaker 1 (08:18):
Because they know they're going to then get more representatives
representing those areas, which then then can help them when
it comes to flipping a state that's been conservative to
a liberal state. In other words, Democrats are playing the
long game here. Every illegal immigrant that's coming across the border,
if they are counted, and they are counted now, all right,
(08:40):
as a just like an American citizen, it will fundamentally
change the number of votes that they receive in presidential
elections and the number of appointments to Congress. That is
the game plan here. So do they care if you're
killed by an illegal immigrant. No. There's also something else
that's happening in Washington right now, and this is important
(09:01):
and by the way, I'm going to talk to US
Center Marsha Blackburn in a minute about this because it's important.
But there's also something else that's happening right now, and
that is people in Washington serving their own best interests
and not caring about the American people. We've seen this
with my Orchis and the failed impeachment. He doesn't care
about you, he doesn't care about American citizens. He cares
about power, and that means bringing in more illegal immigrants.
(09:25):
He cares not if your kids are dying from fetanyl
for example, which there was a massive warning came from Garland,
the Attorney General about fetnyl, saying that we are seeing
a pandemic in this country. People dine young people from
fetnel coming across to the border. They don't care because
they want the power that comes across the border. But
there's also something else. They're getting rich while they're doing this.
(09:50):
You may not realize just how rich people in Congress
are getting because of purposeful loopholes that allow them to
an essence insider trade. In fact, there are bots all right,
computers that will automatically trade the same way that Nancy
Pelosi trades.
Speaker 3 (10:10):
Now.
Speaker 1 (10:10):
Nancy Pelosi has made millions and millions of dollars off
of trading while she has been a congresswoman. She is
now a multi multi, multi millionaire because of the trades
that her husband has done while she's been making, you know,
one hundred and eighty thousand dollars a year. There's no
way to accumulate that much money when you're making one
hundred and eighty thousand dollars a year unless you're able
to trade stocks that have massive conflicts of interests send her.
(10:35):
Josh Holly from Missouri had the opportunity this week to
talk to the Energy Secretary, Jennifer.
Speaker 2 (10:43):
Grayholme about her own.
Speaker 1 (10:47):
Massive conflicts of interests which are making her insane amounts
of money.
Speaker 2 (10:53):
This is not being covered by the media.
Speaker 1 (10:55):
In fact, you probably hadn't even heard about this moment,
which would be a bombshell if this was a Republican
that was right the Energy Secretary and was acting in
such an egregious corrupt way. I want you to listen
carefully to this back and forth, and it gets heated.
Speaker 4 (11:14):
When you were here last I talked with you about
the fact that more than one hundred and thirty officials
in the Energy Department reported more than two thousand, seven
hundred trades of shares, bonds, and options and companies that
ethics officers said was directly related to the agency's work.
Speaker 5 (11:29):
This is institutionalized corruption.
Speaker 4 (11:32):
And I asked you point blank, do you own any
individual stock?
Speaker 5 (11:36):
And you told me.
Speaker 4 (11:38):
No, Let's just look at it. It was not a
difficult question. Do you own individual stocks, Madame Secretary? You
said no.
Speaker 5 (11:44):
In fact, you repeated it three times to me.
Speaker 4 (11:46):
No, no, no, turns out that was false. You did
own multiple individual stocks and you neglected to report it
to this committee for months afterwards. Why did you mislead
this commit Oh my goodness, that was exactly my response.
So why did I leave this committee?
Speaker 6 (12:07):
I believed that I had sold all individual stocks, and
I was incorrect.
Speaker 5 (12:14):
So I came back. I just don't know your portfolio
pretty much. It's a big one, I guess.
Speaker 6 (12:19):
Huh, No, it's extremely small.
Speaker 5 (12:22):
Apparently not someone manages it for you.
Speaker 6 (12:25):
So I came back as soon as I found out that,
in fact, I had not sold all individuals.
Speaker 4 (12:29):
Wait wait, wait, wait, no, that's not true either. Let's
just look at the timeline. I just remind you you're
under oath, Madam Secretary, you testified you didn't own any
individual stocks, you didn't sell the stocks for a whole
other month, and after you sold the stocks, you waited
another month before you informed this committee. Why did you
(12:50):
mislead us of? What were you hiding? Why did you
wait so long? Why did you hide this?
Speaker 6 (12:56):
I did not hide it because I brought it forth
to the committee when I realized that we had made
a mistake.
Speaker 4 (13:01):
Really what what what explains the delay. Why did you
wait for a full month to explo to explain your
actions to this committee your false testimony.
Speaker 6 (13:09):
That's less than a month and I sent a letter
explaining what had happened. Fifteen I owned a Ford stock
that was.
Speaker 4 (13:17):
You misled this committee. And you wait, what were the stocks?
What were the stocks that you owned?
Speaker 6 (13:22):
It was a Ford stock that my husband had owned
since he was very young, and I just was not
aware of it.
Speaker 5 (13:29):
And what were the others? You sold six stocks? Who
were the other five?
Speaker 6 (13:32):
I sold non conflicting stocks?
Speaker 5 (13:35):
What were they?
Speaker 6 (13:36):
I don't, honestly, I don't even know. I do know
the Ford one because that was a conflict.
Speaker 5 (13:41):
You don't. That's why I don't this.
Speaker 4 (13:44):
You're here before this committee a year later, after actively
misleading to us, after denying and delaying and delaying, and
now you won't.
Speaker 5 (13:51):
Tell us it was one of them.
Speaker 4 (13:52):
Pro Tara, No, you sat on the board of directors
at Protera, You made millions in in reports and stock
options at Protera. Then you you promoted pro Tera stock
and Protera products as Energy secretary. Was that one of
the stocks that you sold?
Speaker 6 (14:08):
This is so, I mean, really.
Speaker 5 (14:11):
Was that one of the stocks.
Speaker 4 (14:12):
So yes, really no, you are presiding over institutionalized corruption
in your energy department. You have violated the Stock Act
nine separate times. You have been referred by the Inspector
General for violations.
Speaker 5 (14:24):
Of the Hatch Act.
Speaker 4 (14:26):
It is institutionalized corruption that you are now the face of.
And here's what I'm trying to figure out. I just
want to know who really runs the energy department?
Speaker 5 (14:35):
Is it you?
Speaker 4 (14:36):
Or is it the mega corporations whose stock that you
own that you're making profits in, Oh my goodness. Or
maybe it's the foreign billionaires who fund your conferences.
Speaker 5 (14:43):
Let's try something else.
Speaker 4 (14:44):
Do you know the names of the foreign billionaires who
fund the conferences you go to? Since you don't know
the socks, do you know the names of the foreign billionaires?
Speaker 5 (14:53):
This is unbelievable to me. Let me help Easter chairman.
Speaker 4 (14:56):
One of them is Ord Weiss, a Swiss billion theire
who has used various dark money front I do not
know what you to funnel various dark money's front groups
to funnel foreign money into American politics.
Speaker 5 (15:11):
He has used the Burger Action.
Speaker 4 (15:13):
Fund twenty million dollars that then sent money to the
Fund for a Better Future that then sent money to
the Climate Power Group that has funded conferences you've attended.
Speaker 5 (15:24):
Do you know who this is? I think it's a
no idea to idea foreign billionaires.
Speaker 6 (15:29):
I have no idea what you're talking.
Speaker 4 (15:31):
You don't know the stocks, you don't know the billionaires.
You would take no responsibility. Meanwhile, your Energy Department executives
in your Energy department are trading stocks and companies that
they have direct oversight over, and you were too.
Speaker 2 (15:44):
That is incorrect.
Speaker 6 (15:45):
Nobody in my in the Department of Energy, and we
have a strong ethics office, does not trade stocks in
anything that they have oversight over.
Speaker 5 (15:53):
That's that.
Speaker 4 (15:56):
Crew, Madam Secretary, Sir. Wall Street Journal has reported on
this civil Wall Streets.
Speaker 3 (16:00):
If I'm a Senator, if I might just ask the question,
is it possible that maybe we can continue this at
a later time, but if you had any questions on
the energy direct energy policies.
Speaker 4 (16:10):
Mister Chairman, this is directly relevant to institutionalize corruption in
the Department of Energy that she oversees. I think about
to say that the Wall Street General report's wrong.
Speaker 6 (16:20):
The Wall Street General Report did not say that people
over whom they were in areas where they were directly
overseeing headstocks.
Speaker 2 (16:27):
They did not.
Speaker 6 (16:28):
Our Ethics office consults with all of our employees that
need to be that have a rere reporting requirement about
their stockholdings. They do not own stocks in areas that
they have any influence over, Nor do I.
Speaker 4 (16:41):
Matter, Secretary. All I have to say is this record
is just deplorable. It is despicable. It is outrageous that
hundreds of officers in the Energy Department are trading shares.
It is outrageous that you misled us. It is outrageous.
It's correct that you are continuing to mislead us, and
it is outrageous you're going to conferences and events funded
by foreign billlionaires using dark money to try to influence
(17:02):
our politics.
Speaker 5 (17:03):
This has got to change.
Speaker 1 (17:05):
By the way, what's even more shocking than this is
the fact that she's sitting there and acting like she
can't believe she's being asked these tough questions. What's even
more shocking and egregious is the fact that ninety nine
percent of you, this is the first time you've even
heard about what is happening.
Speaker 2 (17:25):
You probably had no idea.
Speaker 1 (17:29):
By the ways, I'm in the same boat that this
is something that's going on. The people with the Department
of Energy are actually trading stocks. They are trading stocks
and companies that they're involved with that have insider trading
information and they have oversight on I mean, I laugh
because I go back to who was it Martha Stewart
(17:51):
that was put in jail.
Speaker 2 (17:53):
Do you remember when they put her in jail because
they want to show.
Speaker 1 (17:55):
Oh, we're cracking down on insider trading, YadA YadA, YadA.
Speaker 2 (17:58):
Like, really, look at how.
Speaker 1 (18:01):
Much money Nancy Pelosi has made while being a United
States congresswoman supposed to be serving her country. Look at
her returns compared to the best returns in the marketplace
and the best money managers out there, and she kicks
the living crap out of them every year. Look at
Secretay Grayholme here, she's sitting there and she's like, this
(18:25):
is agreedious. I can't even believe that you're asking these questions.
She lied to Congress. She said that she didn't own
any stocks. Then she was like, oh crap, they caught me.
All right, I gotta sell those stocks, and then saw
the stocks and then waited another thirty days to then
form Congress. Oh wait, my bad. Yeah, I actually did
have a bunch of stocks. Sorry about that. Sorry that happened,
(18:47):
Like my bad. So if you want to know who
they're representing, that like, if you want to know why
this country is under the Democratic leadership has gone to
hell in a handbasket, this is exactly why the people
that are there are basically like, I don't care about
what's actually happening, right Like I don't actually care if
(19:07):
people are.
Speaker 2 (19:08):
Dying with feentanyl coming across the southern.
Speaker 1 (19:10):
Border because we're all getting rich and we're making money
off of this. Now, I want to bring in US
Senator from Tennessee, Marsha Blackburn, because there's two things. One,
I want you to have an update on what happened
with my orcis so you understand how they were able
to shut it down so quickly. And then I want
you to hear what she has to say about the
(19:31):
great replacement and bringing in millions of voters into Democrat
cities who are losing population of people that are getting
out as fast as they can. Take a listen, Senator,
always a pleasure to chat with you. This seems like
a very big defeat for conservatives. There's a lot of
frustration from conservatives right now because they feel like we're
(19:53):
losing all over the place. We have infighting on the House,
a real prospect of losing another speaker.
Speaker 2 (19:58):
Then we have the maorcis and each that doesn't go anywhere.
Speaker 1 (20:02):
Explain how this happened yesterday and what people need to know.
Speaker 3 (20:06):
Yes, Church Schumer did as we assembled and were sworn
in into a court of impeachment, he made a point
of order and then deemed that Article one was unconstitutional
and did not meet the threshold for removal of may Orcus,
(20:31):
and every single Democrat voted with him. Now, we sent
a lot of time, about three hours trying to refute
this and make our points of order, and then following
the closure, we made certain that we went to the
(20:53):
floor and spent another few hours laying out what may
Orcus had done. But this has what Chuck Schumer did
yesterday has never been done. Twenty one impeachments. In four
of them the individual either died or resigned. And in
seventeen when the impeachment by the House went to the
(21:16):
Senate for trial, the trial was held, and so Senators
Lee and Kennedy had organizing resolutions that mirrored the Trump
won in Trump two impeachments. Senator Cruz had won that
a motion that would have formed a trial committee, but
Chuck Schumer would have none of it, and so Patty
(21:40):
Murray was the presiding officer and repeatedly we were just
we were shut out of trying to move to a trial.
And for the first time ever they dismissed the impeachment
articles and to the American people. But then I will
tell you this. These Democrats that are up for reelection
(22:04):
this year, and they have very tough, close races and
you're looking at New Mexico, Nevada, Montana, Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania,
these and the race in Maryland, the race in West Virginia.
Democrats are going to have to answer for that because
(22:28):
it was unprecedented. It plays into that two tiers of
justice that they keep pushing. There's one tier for the
Democrats in the elite. There's a different tier if your
name is Trump, or if you're a Republican or a Conservative.
And people are sick and tired of this.
Speaker 1 (22:45):
Harry Reid said something that was very interesting that I
do think should be used and I hope every Republican
running for office in the Senate uses it especially, and
he said about this impeachment, we're going to get through
this quick.
Speaker 2 (22:59):
We're going to move quick, to move past this.
Speaker 1 (23:02):
He also made a admission, and it was an important one.
He said that you should never have someone impeached over
a policy disagreement. Now what that means is he's admitting
that the policy of the Democratic Party of the Biden
administration is to have wide open southern borders and to
allow as many illegal immigrants into this country as possible.
(23:25):
That's the first time that he's ever admitted that publicly,
and it was very very clear. He was saying, this
is just a policy disagreement. Now they haven't said that
before publicly. We knew it was their policy of the
Biden administration to get rid of all the executive orders
that secured our border. That was very clear, and Harry
(23:46):
Reid was like acting like, oh, no, this is just
no big deal. This is just this is you know,
just a normal day. You know, we just have a
simple policy disagreement. Well, now we know they're admitting this
is their policy chaos in the southern border, and.
Speaker 3 (24:03):
They've been very clear and very intentional. And when I
was with some of our Senate conservatives. Last night on
the floor, I talked a little bit about the intentionality
that they have used in opening this southern border. We
know exactly what they're doing. These big boy states have
(24:25):
lost population. That affects the amount of money you get
from the federal government, That effects your congressional seats, that
effects the electoral college. So they are quickly moving the
people into these areas. Why do you think the California
is saying, hey, illegal aliens, come here, we will give
(24:47):
you free husk care. It is because California laws seven
hundred and seventy thousand people last year. That is just
shy of the eight hundre undred and fifty thousand people
that make up a congressional district. California has already lost
a couple of congressional seats, so you know, we know
(25:10):
what they're doing. We also are a team to the
fact that some areas will allow those illegally in the
country to get a driver's license, and we're concerned about
they're having the ability to vote and those voter registrations,
and we're looking at what we can do to be
(25:31):
sure that they are not voting in those federal elections.
The presidential elections.
Speaker 1 (25:41):
I may have said the word Harry Read earlier I
met Chuck Schumer. I want people to hear what Chuck
Schumer had to say in his own words at this
press conference. If you're really say you're going to offer
avotion to dismiss the keep your charges on Thursday, are
you all concerned to solve the Democrats to.
Speaker 2 (25:55):
Races over that and come back to talk. Look, we're
going to try and resolve this is you as quickly
as possible.
Speaker 4 (26:02):
Impeachment should never be used to settle policy disagreements.
Speaker 2 (26:07):
Should never be used to settle policy disagreements.
Speaker 1 (26:10):
So if Republicans use this the right way, what you're
basically saying is, yes, this was a big victory for
Democrats yesterday protecting my Orchis from impeachment and also having
to admit and for the American people to see the
disaster of the southern border. We also had testimony yesterday
on the same day that you guys are dealing with
(26:31):
this coming from our Attorney General Garland on the issue
of fetanol, saying it's the biggest threat to this country
and the biggest killer for Americans. He's admitting that the
fetanyl is flowing across the open border on the same
day that they're saying, oh, no, no, everything's fine at
the southern border.
Speaker 3 (26:47):
That's exactly right. The contradictory nature of all of that
is really a standing. And you know, I think it
is just a standing for Chuck Schumer to just pristas
aside as a policy difference. As I said, when we
know the intentionality, they move forward, and it is an
(27:09):
unconstitutional move because we take an oath of office that
we are going to defend this country. And when you
have that border wide open and you do not know
who is coming in, you do not know the threats.
You know that China is literally invading us. They have
(27:33):
pushed nearly twenty five thousand single adult males into this
country since the beginning of the fiscal year. And this
secretary does nothing. The Secretary comes to Congress and the
lies and says the border is secure and people can
see with their own eyes this border is not secure.
(27:56):
You have the Department of Justice telling us that law
is killing more Americans than anything else, and they're having
a tough time running down these cartels and getting them
off of American streets. You have the FBI director saying,
I see flashing the lights everywhere, flashing red lights every
(28:18):
fair I look, and this border. We have three hundred
plus known terrorist watchless names that have been apprehended at
that southern border. We have thousands of people from countries
of interests, and the Secretary of Homeland Security that does
(28:40):
not believe in securing the homeland. The Democrats defend him.
I hope every single one of them. Louise is just horrendous.
Last last question on this into this country.
Speaker 1 (28:53):
Is there any accountability? And I think this is part
of the frustration center for so many. You know, you
go to April of this year, and this is what
my arc has said.
Speaker 5 (29:02):
Now, I have never minimized the challenge that the southern
border presents.
Speaker 1 (29:06):
It is, I've never minimized the challenge of southern border presents.
You go back to April twenty twenty three. This is
in testimony to Congress. So you're lying to Congress.
Speaker 2 (29:15):
He said this.
Speaker 5 (29:16):
It is my testimony that the order is secure.
Speaker 2 (29:20):
That's a lie. He knew he was lying. He knew
it was a wide open border.
Speaker 1 (29:24):
He's admitting it now that okay, I'm changing my story,
But I guess you can just light to Congress down
and there's zero accountability for that. That's what Democrats have
basically said, when we're in charge, we can lie to
the American people and lie to you, and our officials
can lie to Congress about anything they want to with
zero accountability.
Speaker 2 (29:41):
Is that the new world we live in.
Speaker 3 (29:42):
Yes, one for them and one for other people. And
that's the way they look at it. And they just
were so proud of themselves yesterday. You should have seen
them smiling and rolling eyes, and they were so happy
to get off the floor and on with their day.
I'm sure they all had fancy DC cocktail parties to
(30:06):
go to last night, and they were just so pleased
they had handled this and talk to deplorables. Another lesson
about how DC really works. It is sickening and people
are suffering. We have Tennessee insteader losing their lives. Every
sheriff I meet with tells me the number one issue
(30:28):
they have, drugs and crime and communities cannot be addressed
until the southern border is secured.
Speaker 1 (30:35):
All right, don't forget Please hit at the share button
on this podcast, put it up wherever you are on
social media so other people can hear, especially that Secretary
of energy debate or whatever you throw down there. It
was incredible and people need to hear that, so makes
you share it wherever you are on social media, and
I'll see you back here tomorrow
Have you ever wondered why Democrats are allowing so many
illegal immigrants to come into liberal cities sanctuary cities.
Speaker 2 (00:10):
Well, we now understand a little bit more why this
is happening.
Speaker 1 (00:13):
Now. You may say, when I asked that in't a question.
Ben of course we know why they're trying to change
this country. That is true, But there's also something else
that's happening that we're now seeing, and it is very
clear why this is happening.
Speaker 2 (00:26):
It is the great replacement. Let me explain what I
mean by that.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
I'm not talking about replacing Americans in general, right, like
overpowering them traditional Americans who are citizens with illegal immigrants. No,
what we're now talking about is apparently something else, and
it's much deeper than that. Democrats are watching the cities
that they control, some of the biggest cities in America
(00:50):
and some of the biggest states like California, losing population
at record numbers because of anarchy and chaos and high taxes.
Speaker 2 (00:58):
I'll give you a great example.
Speaker 1 (01:00):
My hometown of Memphis has the highest property taxes of
any city in Tennessee.
Speaker 2 (01:08):
It is also the murder capital of America.
Speaker 1 (01:10):
Right now, it's the most dangerous city in America by
the FBI's definition, with their related stats that have come out,
And what did the new mayor of Memphis, a hardcore
leftist Democrat African American man, do in his big address
after being in office for just one hundred days, he said,
we're going to have a big tax increase.
Speaker 2 (01:31):
He was also backed up by the.
Speaker 1 (01:32):
County mayor who also said the same exact thing, that
we are going to have a tax increase. Now, why
on earth would you raise taxes when you're the most
dangerous city in America.
Speaker 2 (01:45):
I'll tell you exactly why.
Speaker 1 (01:46):
Because they're so out of touch with reality, and they
have so many people that are leaving the city going
to other places that now they're running out of money
because if you don't have any money, how do you
take money from people. It's very much now what Democrats
are doing. But they're doing it just from a simple
standpoint of they have to replace liberal voters that they're
(02:07):
losing or moderate voters that vote Democrat. They're having to
replace the people they're losing to keep their power, which
brings me to a bigger point.
Speaker 2 (02:18):
US Representative Chuck Fleischmann.
Speaker 1 (02:21):
He's a Tennessee Republican from the third district released the
following statement about his support of a new bill.
Speaker 2 (02:28):
This bill is h R seven to one zero nine.
Speaker 1 (02:32):
It's called the Equal Representation at What this bill does
ensure that only legal American citizens are factored into the
official count for congressional districts and the electoral college map
that determines the outcome of presidential elections. In other words,
(02:52):
you can't replace Americans with illegal immigrants and then count
them when it comes to the electoral Basically, the numbers
of each state.
Speaker 2 (03:02):
Now you know how this works, right. The electoral college
is simple.
Speaker 1 (03:05):
It's your senators and then your congressmen of that state combined,
and that's the number. That's the reason why South Dakota
and North Dakota have three, right, because they have they
actually have two senators and they have one congressman. And
so it's not a big deal to win or lose
that state in theory, because it's only worth three. That's
why people don't spend a lot of time there campaigning.
But you spend a hell of a lot of time
in places like Florida, New York, Texas, and California because
(03:29):
the prize there is so big. What Democrats have figured
out is that if you can flood a state with illegals,
count them in the census, you get more congress people
that will represent your state, and that means the electoral
College votes. Then those numbers go up, which means if
you can flood a state like Texas and win it,
(03:50):
you're going to get a really big number of electoral
College votes. Fourd to the same way Nevada, right Arizona, California.
Speaker 2 (03:59):
This is their total plan.
Speaker 1 (04:02):
Let me also tell you real quick about my friends
at Patriot Mobile.
Speaker 2 (04:05):
I got to tell you I made a promise this year.
Speaker 1 (04:08):
I am not giving my money to companies that hate me,
hate my family values, hate what I believe in, hate
that I'm a Christian, hate that I'm a conservative, and
Big Mobile let me tell you they hate you. In fact,
Big Mobile has been giving massive donations because you pay
a bill every month to them, and they take a
portion of that bill and they're giving it back to
(04:29):
liberal causes, including Planned parenthood. Now, when I found that out,
I switched to Patriot Mobile. They're the only Christian conservative
wireless provider in the country. Now, most people don't switch
cell phones often. The reason why is they think it's
hard to do, but with technology now it's actually incredibly easy.
Speaker 2 (04:47):
How do I know.
Speaker 1 (04:48):
I just switched the line over it the other day.
It is done easily over the phone. And when you
call Patriot Mobile, they can switch and you get to
keep your same cell phone number. You get to keep
your same phone or up great to a new one.
Now coverage is no longer an issue. It used to
be you'd pick a company based on coverage, not anymore.
In fact, you're going to be using the same towers
(05:09):
that you're using right now. But what you're doing is
not giving your money to democratic causes candidates, including organizations
like Planned Parenthood any longer. You're going to be supporting
Patriot Mobile that then takes your money every month, five
percent of your bill at no extra cost to you,
and they give it back to conservative causes and organizations
that protect our First and our Second Amendment rights, and
(05:30):
most importantly to me, they support organizations that support the
lives of unborn children. Yeah, so when I use my
phone and when I pay my bill, I know I'm
sending up for what I believe in, and I'm making
a real difference. Check out Patriot Mobile Patriot Mobile Dot
com slash ben, Patriot mobile dot com slash ben, or
(05:51):
call them nine seven two Patriot. That's nine seven to
two Patriot nine seven to two Patriot or Patriot mobile
dot com slash ben. All right, so back to the
great replacement. This is actually very simple. Democrats are losing
and democratic cities are losing at record number people. California
(06:14):
has more people leaving the state than are moving to
the state. And that's partly because of high taxes, that's
partly because of high crime. It is partly because of
just the cost of living is so out of control,
and that's an important thing to understand, but a lot
of it is the liberal policies and we're seeing this
in places like New York City. We've seen a lot
(06:35):
of people move out of New York City, especially when
they had the COVID lockdowns, that they're never coming back. Well,
if you want to stay powerful, you've got to bring
in people, right, you have to. You've got to bring
in people to keep that power. So how do you
do it. You bring in illegal immigrants. And that's how
you keep places like California extremely powerful. When it comes
(06:57):
to the electoral college. If you're losing a couple million
people who are moving out. Then they're saying, all right,
we got to figure out how to bring in a
couple of million people. And this is exactly what Democrats
are now doing. Let me also tell you what Representative
Fleischman had to say.
Speaker 2 (07:14):
He said quote.
Speaker 1 (07:15):
Since day one of this administration, President Biden, the DC
Democrats have gone out of their way to open our
borders and incentivize millions of illegal aliens to break into
our country. Currently, illegal immigrants are counted towards congressional district
appointments and allocation of electoral College votes, which is unacceptable.
(07:38):
The congressman goes on to say, for every illegal immigrant
that is counted towards congressional appointment or the allocation of
electoral College votes, a legal American citizen is disenfranchised of
their right to be properly represented. This is actually a
brilliant move by Democrats. They don't care where you are
(08:02):
as long as you're in a liberal state, because that
gives them more power if you can flood, for example,
even in Texas places like Houston and San Antonio. In
Dallas and Austin with legal immigrants, they don't care about
the back country.
Speaker 2 (08:16):
They don't care about the suburbs.
Speaker 1 (08:18):
Because they know they're going to then get more representatives
representing those areas, which then then can help them when
it comes to flipping a state that's been conservative to
a liberal state. In other words, Democrats are playing the
long game here. Every illegal immigrant that's coming across the border,
if they are counted, and they are counted now, all right,
(08:40):
as a just like an American citizen, it will fundamentally
change the number of votes that they receive in presidential
elections and the number of appointments to Congress. That is
the game plan here. So do they care if you're
killed by an illegal immigrant. No. There's also something else
that's happening in Washington right now, and this is important
(09:01):
and by the way, I'm going to talk to US
Center Marsha Blackburn in a minute about this because it's important.
But there's also something else that's happening right now, and
that is people in Washington serving their own best interests
and not caring about the American people. We've seen this
with my Orchis and the failed impeachment. He doesn't care
about you, he doesn't care about American citizens. He cares
about power, and that means bringing in more illegal immigrants.
(09:25):
He cares not if your kids are dying from fetanyl
for example, which there was a massive warning came from Garland,
the Attorney General about fetnyl, saying that we are seeing
a pandemic in this country. People dine young people from
fetnel coming across to the border. They don't care because
they want the power that comes across the border. But
there's also something else. They're getting rich while they're doing this.
(09:50):
You may not realize just how rich people in Congress
are getting because of purposeful loopholes that allow them to
an essence insider trade. In fact, there are bots all right,
computers that will automatically trade the same way that Nancy
Pelosi trades.
Speaker 3 (10:10):
Now.
Speaker 1 (10:10):
Nancy Pelosi has made millions and millions of dollars off
of trading while she has been a congresswoman. She is
now a multi multi, multi millionaire because of the trades
that her husband has done while she's been making, you know,
one hundred and eighty thousand dollars a year. There's no
way to accumulate that much money when you're making one
hundred and eighty thousand dollars a year unless you're able
to trade stocks that have massive conflicts of interests send her.
(10:35):
Josh Holly from Missouri had the opportunity this week to
talk to the Energy Secretary, Jennifer.
Speaker 2 (10:43):
Grayholme about her own.
Speaker 1 (10:47):
Massive conflicts of interests which are making her insane amounts
of money.
Speaker 2 (10:53):
This is not being covered by the media.
Speaker 1 (10:55):
In fact, you probably hadn't even heard about this moment,
which would be a bombshell if this was a Republican
that was right the Energy Secretary and was acting in
such an egregious corrupt way. I want you to listen
carefully to this back and forth, and it gets heated.
Speaker 4 (11:14):
When you were here last I talked with you about
the fact that more than one hundred and thirty officials
in the Energy Department reported more than two thousand, seven
hundred trades of shares, bonds, and options and companies that
ethics officers said was directly related to the agency's work.
Speaker 5 (11:29):
This is institutionalized corruption.
Speaker 4 (11:32):
And I asked you point blank, do you own any
individual stock?
Speaker 5 (11:36):
And you told me.
Speaker 4 (11:38):
No, Let's just look at it. It was not a
difficult question. Do you own individual stocks, Madame Secretary? You
said no.
Speaker 5 (11:44):
In fact, you repeated it three times to me.
Speaker 4 (11:46):
No, no, no, turns out that was false. You did
own multiple individual stocks and you neglected to report it
to this committee for months afterwards. Why did you mislead
this commit Oh my goodness, that was exactly my response.
So why did I leave this committee?
Speaker 6 (12:07):
I believed that I had sold all individual stocks, and
I was incorrect.
Speaker 5 (12:14):
So I came back. I just don't know your portfolio
pretty much. It's a big one, I guess.
Speaker 6 (12:19):
Huh, No, it's extremely small.
Speaker 5 (12:22):
Apparently not someone manages it for you.
Speaker 6 (12:25):
So I came back as soon as I found out that,
in fact, I had not sold all individuals.
Speaker 4 (12:29):
Wait wait, wait, wait, no, that's not true either. Let's
just look at the timeline. I just remind you you're
under oath, Madam Secretary, you testified you didn't own any
individual stocks, you didn't sell the stocks for a whole
other month, and after you sold the stocks, you waited
another month before you informed this committee. Why did you
(12:50):
mislead us of? What were you hiding? Why did you
wait so long? Why did you hide this?
Speaker 6 (12:56):
I did not hide it because I brought it forth
to the committee when I realized that we had made
a mistake.
Speaker 4 (13:01):
Really what what what explains the delay. Why did you
wait for a full month to explo to explain your
actions to this committee your false testimony.
Speaker 6 (13:09):
That's less than a month and I sent a letter
explaining what had happened. Fifteen I owned a Ford stock
that was.
Speaker 4 (13:17):
You misled this committee. And you wait, what were the stocks?
What were the stocks that you owned?
Speaker 6 (13:22):
It was a Ford stock that my husband had owned
since he was very young, and I just was not
aware of it.
Speaker 5 (13:29):
And what were the others? You sold six stocks? Who
were the other five?
Speaker 6 (13:32):
I sold non conflicting stocks?
Speaker 5 (13:35):
What were they?
Speaker 6 (13:36):
I don't, honestly, I don't even know. I do know
the Ford one because that was a conflict.
Speaker 5 (13:41):
You don't. That's why I don't this.
Speaker 4 (13:44):
You're here before this committee a year later, after actively
misleading to us, after denying and delaying and delaying, and
now you won't.
Speaker 5 (13:51):
Tell us it was one of them.
Speaker 4 (13:52):
Pro Tara, No, you sat on the board of directors
at Protera, You made millions in in reports and stock
options at Protera. Then you you promoted pro Tera stock
and Protera products as Energy secretary. Was that one of
the stocks that you sold?
Speaker 6 (14:08):
This is so, I mean, really.
Speaker 5 (14:11):
Was that one of the stocks.
Speaker 4 (14:12):
So yes, really no, you are presiding over institutionalized corruption
in your energy department. You have violated the Stock Act
nine separate times. You have been referred by the Inspector
General for violations.
Speaker 5 (14:24):
Of the Hatch Act.
Speaker 4 (14:26):
It is institutionalized corruption that you are now the face of.
And here's what I'm trying to figure out. I just
want to know who really runs the energy department?
Speaker 5 (14:35):
Is it you?
Speaker 4 (14:36):
Or is it the mega corporations whose stock that you
own that you're making profits in, Oh my goodness. Or
maybe it's the foreign billionaires who fund your conferences.
Speaker 5 (14:43):
Let's try something else.
Speaker 4 (14:44):
Do you know the names of the foreign billionaires who
fund the conferences you go to? Since you don't know
the socks, do you know the names of the foreign billionaires?
Speaker 5 (14:53):
This is unbelievable to me. Let me help Easter chairman.
Speaker 4 (14:56):
One of them is Ord Weiss, a Swiss billion theire
who has used various dark money front I do not
know what you to funnel various dark money's front groups
to funnel foreign money into American politics.
Speaker 5 (15:11):
He has used the Burger Action.
Speaker 4 (15:13):
Fund twenty million dollars that then sent money to the
Fund for a Better Future that then sent money to
the Climate Power Group that has funded conferences you've attended.
Speaker 5 (15:24):
Do you know who this is? I think it's a
no idea to idea foreign billionaires.
Speaker 6 (15:29):
I have no idea what you're talking.
Speaker 4 (15:31):
You don't know the stocks, you don't know the billionaires.
You would take no responsibility. Meanwhile, your Energy Department executives
in your Energy department are trading stocks and companies that
they have direct oversight over, and you were too.
Speaker 2 (15:44):
That is incorrect.
Speaker 6 (15:45):
Nobody in my in the Department of Energy, and we
have a strong ethics office, does not trade stocks in
anything that they have oversight over.
Speaker 5 (15:53):
That's that.
Speaker 4 (15:56):
Crew, Madam Secretary, Sir. Wall Street Journal has reported on
this civil Wall Streets.
Speaker 3 (16:00):
If I'm a Senator, if I might just ask the question,
is it possible that maybe we can continue this at
a later time, but if you had any questions on
the energy direct energy policies.
Speaker 4 (16:10):
Mister Chairman, this is directly relevant to institutionalize corruption in
the Department of Energy that she oversees. I think about
to say that the Wall Street General report's wrong.
Speaker 6 (16:20):
The Wall Street General Report did not say that people
over whom they were in areas where they were directly
overseeing headstocks.
Speaker 2 (16:27):
They did not.
Speaker 6 (16:28):
Our Ethics office consults with all of our employees that
need to be that have a rere reporting requirement about
their stockholdings. They do not own stocks in areas that
they have any influence over, Nor do I.
Speaker 4 (16:41):
Matter, Secretary. All I have to say is this record
is just deplorable. It is despicable. It is outrageous that
hundreds of officers in the Energy Department are trading shares.
It is outrageous that you misled us. It is outrageous.
It's correct that you are continuing to mislead us, and
it is outrageous you're going to conferences and events funded
by foreign billlionaires using dark money to try to influence
(17:02):
our politics.
Speaker 5 (17:03):
This has got to change.
Speaker 1 (17:05):
By the way, what's even more shocking than this is
the fact that she's sitting there and acting like she
can't believe she's being asked these tough questions. What's even
more shocking and egregious is the fact that ninety nine
percent of you, this is the first time you've even
heard about what is happening.
Speaker 2 (17:25):
You probably had no idea.
Speaker 1 (17:29):
By the ways, I'm in the same boat that this
is something that's going on. The people with the Department
of Energy are actually trading stocks. They are trading stocks
and companies that they're involved with that have insider trading
information and they have oversight on I mean, I laugh
because I go back to who was it Martha Stewart
(17:51):
that was put in jail.
Speaker 2 (17:53):
Do you remember when they put her in jail because
they want to show.
Speaker 1 (17:55):
Oh, we're cracking down on insider trading, YadA YadA, YadA.
Speaker 2 (17:58):
Like, really, look at how.
Speaker 1 (18:01):
Much money Nancy Pelosi has made while being a United
States congresswoman supposed to be serving her country. Look at
her returns compared to the best returns in the marketplace
and the best money managers out there, and she kicks
the living crap out of them every year. Look at
Secretay Grayholme here, she's sitting there and she's like, this
(18:25):
is agreedious. I can't even believe that you're asking these questions.
She lied to Congress. She said that she didn't own
any stocks. Then she was like, oh crap, they caught me.
All right, I gotta sell those stocks, and then saw
the stocks and then waited another thirty days to then
form Congress. Oh wait, my bad. Yeah, I actually did
have a bunch of stocks. Sorry about that. Sorry that happened,
(18:47):
Like my bad. So if you want to know who
they're representing, that like, if you want to know why
this country is under the Democratic leadership has gone to
hell in a handbasket, this is exactly why the people
that are there are basically like, I don't care about
what's actually happening, right Like I don't actually care if
(19:07):
people are.
Speaker 2 (19:08):
Dying with feentanyl coming across the southern.
Speaker 1 (19:10):
Border because we're all getting rich and we're making money
off of this. Now, I want to bring in US
Senator from Tennessee, Marsha Blackburn, because there's two things. One,
I want you to have an update on what happened
with my orcis so you understand how they were able
to shut it down so quickly. And then I want
you to hear what she has to say about the
(19:31):
great replacement and bringing in millions of voters into Democrat
cities who are losing population of people that are getting
out as fast as they can. Take a listen, Senator,
always a pleasure to chat with you. This seems like
a very big defeat for conservatives. There's a lot of
frustration from conservatives right now because they feel like we're
(19:53):
losing all over the place. We have infighting on the House,
a real prospect of losing another speaker.
Speaker 2 (19:58):
Then we have the maorcis and each that doesn't go anywhere.
Speaker 1 (20:02):
Explain how this happened yesterday and what people need to know.
Speaker 3 (20:06):
Yes, Church Schumer did as we assembled and were sworn
in into a court of impeachment, he made a point
of order and then deemed that Article one was unconstitutional
and did not meet the threshold for removal of may Orcus,
(20:31):
and every single Democrat voted with him. Now, we sent
a lot of time, about three hours trying to refute
this and make our points of order, and then following
the closure, we made certain that we went to the
(20:53):
floor and spent another few hours laying out what may
Orcus had done. But this has what Chuck Schumer did
yesterday has never been done. Twenty one impeachments. In four
of them the individual either died or resigned. And in
seventeen when the impeachment by the House went to the
(21:16):
Senate for trial, the trial was held, and so Senators
Lee and Kennedy had organizing resolutions that mirrored the Trump
won in Trump two impeachments. Senator Cruz had won that
a motion that would have formed a trial committee, but
Chuck Schumer would have none of it, and so Patty
(21:40):
Murray was the presiding officer and repeatedly we were just
we were shut out of trying to move to a trial.
And for the first time ever they dismissed the impeachment
articles and to the American people. But then I will
tell you this. These Democrats that are up for reelection
(22:04):
this year, and they have very tough, close races and
you're looking at New Mexico, Nevada, Montana, Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania,
these and the race in Maryland, the race in West Virginia.
Democrats are going to have to answer for that because
(22:28):
it was unprecedented. It plays into that two tiers of
justice that they keep pushing. There's one tier for the
Democrats in the elite. There's a different tier if your
name is Trump, or if you're a Republican or a Conservative.
And people are sick and tired of this.
Speaker 1 (22:45):
Harry Reid said something that was very interesting that I
do think should be used and I hope every Republican
running for office in the Senate uses it especially, and
he said about this impeachment, we're going to get through
this quick.
Speaker 2 (22:59):
We're going to move quick, to move past this.
Speaker 1 (23:02):
He also made a admission, and it was an important one.
He said that you should never have someone impeached over
a policy disagreement. Now what that means is he's admitting
that the policy of the Democratic Party of the Biden
administration is to have wide open southern borders and to
allow as many illegal immigrants into this country as possible.
(23:25):
That's the first time that he's ever admitted that publicly,
and it was very very clear. He was saying, this
is just a policy disagreement. Now they haven't said that
before publicly. We knew it was their policy of the
Biden administration to get rid of all the executive orders
that secured our border. That was very clear, and Harry
(23:46):
Reid was like acting like, oh, no, this is just
no big deal. This is just this is you know,
just a normal day. You know, we just have a
simple policy disagreement. Well, now we know they're admitting this
is their policy chaos in the southern border, and.
Speaker 3 (24:03):
They've been very clear and very intentional. And when I
was with some of our Senate conservatives. Last night on
the floor, I talked a little bit about the intentionality
that they have used in opening this southern border. We
know exactly what they're doing. These big boy states have
(24:25):
lost population. That affects the amount of money you get
from the federal government, That effects your congressional seats, that
effects the electoral college. So they are quickly moving the
people into these areas. Why do you think the California
is saying, hey, illegal aliens, come here, we will give
(24:47):
you free husk care. It is because California laws seven
hundred and seventy thousand people last year. That is just
shy of the eight hundre undred and fifty thousand people
that make up a congressional district. California has already lost
a couple of congressional seats, so you know, we know
(25:10):
what they're doing. We also are a team to the
fact that some areas will allow those illegally in the
country to get a driver's license, and we're concerned about
they're having the ability to vote and those voter registrations,
and we're looking at what we can do to be
(25:31):
sure that they are not voting in those federal elections.
The presidential elections.
Speaker 1 (25:41):
I may have said the word Harry Read earlier I
met Chuck Schumer. I want people to hear what Chuck
Schumer had to say in his own words at this
press conference. If you're really say you're going to offer
avotion to dismiss the keep your charges on Thursday, are
you all concerned to solve the Democrats to.
Speaker 2 (25:55):
Races over that and come back to talk. Look, we're
going to try and resolve this is you as quickly
as possible.
Speaker 4 (26:02):
Impeachment should never be used to settle policy disagreements.
Speaker 2 (26:07):
Should never be used to settle policy disagreements.
Speaker 1 (26:10):
So if Republicans use this the right way, what you're
basically saying is, yes, this was a big victory for
Democrats yesterday protecting my Orchis from impeachment and also having
to admit and for the American people to see the
disaster of the southern border. We also had testimony yesterday
on the same day that you guys are dealing with
(26:31):
this coming from our Attorney General Garland on the issue
of fetanol, saying it's the biggest threat to this country
and the biggest killer for Americans. He's admitting that the
fetanyl is flowing across the open border on the same
day that they're saying, oh, no, no, everything's fine at
the southern border.
Speaker 3 (26:47):
That's exactly right. The contradictory nature of all of that
is really a standing. And you know, I think it
is just a standing for Chuck Schumer to just pristas
aside as a policy difference. As I said, when we
know the intentionality, they move forward, and it is an
(27:09):
unconstitutional move because we take an oath of office that
we are going to defend this country. And when you
have that border wide open and you do not know
who is coming in, you do not know the threats.
You know that China is literally invading us. They have
(27:33):
pushed nearly twenty five thousand single adult males into this
country since the beginning of the fiscal year. And this
secretary does nothing. The Secretary comes to Congress and the
lies and says the border is secure and people can
see with their own eyes this border is not secure.
(27:56):
You have the Department of Justice telling us that law
is killing more Americans than anything else, and they're having
a tough time running down these cartels and getting them
off of American streets. You have the FBI director saying,
I see flashing the lights everywhere, flashing red lights every
(28:18):
fair I look, and this border. We have three hundred
plus known terrorist watchless names that have been apprehended at
that southern border. We have thousands of people from countries
of interests, and the Secretary of Homeland Security that does
(28:40):
not believe in securing the homeland. The Democrats defend him.
I hope every single one of them. Louise is just horrendous.
Last last question on this into this country.
Speaker 1 (28:53):
Is there any accountability? And I think this is part
of the frustration center for so many. You know, you
go to April of this year, and this is what
my arc has said.
Speaker 5 (29:02):
Now, I have never minimized the challenge that the southern
border presents.
Speaker 1 (29:06):
It is, I've never minimized the challenge of southern border presents.
You go back to April twenty twenty three. This is
in testimony to Congress. So you're lying to Congress.
Speaker 2 (29:15):
He said this.
Speaker 5 (29:16):
It is my testimony that the order is secure.
Speaker 2 (29:20):
That's a lie. He knew he was lying. He knew
it was a wide open border.
Speaker 1 (29:24):
He's admitting it now that okay, I'm changing my story,
But I guess you can just light to Congress down
and there's zero accountability for that. That's what Democrats have
basically said, when we're in charge, we can lie to
the American people and lie to you, and our officials
can lie to Congress about anything they want to with
zero accountability.
Speaker 2 (29:41):
Is that the new world we live in.
Speaker 3 (29:42):
Yes, one for them and one for other people. And
that's the way they look at it. And they just
were so proud of themselves yesterday. You should have seen
them smiling and rolling eyes, and they were so happy
to get off the floor and on with their day.
I'm sure they all had fancy DC cocktail parties to
(30:06):
go to last night, and they were just so pleased
they had handled this and talk to deplorables. Another lesson
about how DC really works. It is sickening and people
are suffering. We have Tennessee insteader losing their lives. Every
sheriff I meet with tells me the number one issue
(30:28):
they have, drugs and crime and communities cannot be addressed
until the southern border is secured.
Speaker 1 (30:35):
All right, don't forget Please hit at the share button
on this podcast, put it up wherever you are on
social media so other people can hear, especially that Secretary
of energy debate or whatever you throw down there. It
was incredible and people need to hear that, so makes
you share it wherever you are on social media, and
I'll see you back here tomorrow
Host
Ben Ferguson
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!