Trump Responds to Kangaroo Court Verdict

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
It begins, Joe Biden is now praising the justice system,
the same justice system that he is consistently undermined, including
the Supreme Court when he doesn't get his way, now
saying that the system is honest and Donald Trump is
a convicted felon. That was the whole goal of this

(00:20):
trial all along, to give the opportunity for Joe Biden
to walk out there and say he is a convicted felon.
Many were shocked by creepy Joe Biden and his devilish
grin when he at when he was asked, is Trump
a political prisoner? I'm going to get into that, and

(00:41):
Joe Biden mocking Donald Trump by saying no one is
above the law, even though clearly Joe Biden is above
the law when it comes to the corruption of the
Biden crime family. Now we're going to get into all
of that. Plus you're gonna hear from Senator Ted Cruz
on what happen happens next legally and what could happen

(01:03):
with a president of the United States of America either
being put under house arrests or even in jail over this.
Will it happen Before we get to any of that, though,
the President of the United States of America held a
press conference, and I want you to hear it in
its entirety. This is the present's first time to have
a major press conference after he was found guilty on

(01:27):
all charges in a rigged court case. Here is Donald
Trump in his own words.

Speaker 2 (01:33):
This is a case where if they can do this
to me, they can do this to anyone. And these
are bad people. These are, in many cases, I believe,
sick people. When you look at our country, what's happening
where millions and millions of people are flowing in from
all parts of the world, not just South America, from Africa,

(01:55):
from Asia, from the Middle East, and they're coming in
from jails and and they're coming in from mental institutions
and insane asylums, and they're coming in from all over
the world into our country. And we have a president
and a group of fascists that don't want to do
anything about it because they could. Right now today he

(02:18):
could stop it, but he's not. They're destroying our country.
Our country is in very bad shape, and they're very
much against me saying these things. They want to raise
your taxes by four times, they want to stop you
from having cars with their ridiculous mandates that make it
impossible for you to get a car Ford a car,

(02:40):
but make it very possible for China to build all
of our cars. It's a very serious problem that we have.
We just went through one of many experiences where we
had a conflicted judge, highly conflicted. There's never been a
more conflicted judge. I'm under a gag order, which nobody's

(03:01):
ever been under. No presidential candidate's ever been under a
gag order before. I'm under a gag order, nasty gag
order where I've had to pay thousands of dollars in
penalties and fines and was threatened with jail. Think of it.
I'm the leading candidate, I'm leading Biden by a lot,
and I'm leading the Republicans to the point where that's over.

(03:27):
So I'm the leading person for president and I'm under
a gag order by a man that can't put two
sentences together given by a court, and they are in
total conjunction with the White House and the dj Just
so you understand, this is all done by Biden and
his people, maybe his people more importantly, I don't know
if Biden knows too much about it, because I don't

(03:47):
know if he knows about anything, but he's nevertheless the president,
so we have to use his name. And this is
done by Washington, and nobody's ever seen anything like that.
So we have a judge who's highly conflicted. You know
what the confliction is. Nobody wants to write about it,
and I'm not allowed to talk about it. If I do,

(04:09):
he said, I get put in jail. So we'll play
that game a little bit longer. We won't talk about it,
but you're allowed to talk about it. I hope you do,
because there's never been anybody so conflicted. It says. As
far as the trial itself, it was very unfair. We
weren't allowed to use our election expert under any circumstances.

(04:35):
You saw what happened to some of the witnesses that
were on our side. They were literally crucified by this
man who looks like an angel, but he's really a devil.
He looks so nice and soft. People say, oh, he
seems like such a nice man. No, unless you saw
him in action, and you saw that with a certain

(04:55):
witness that went through hell. And when we wanted to
do things, he wouldn't let him. He wouldn't let us
do those things. But when the government wanted something, they
got everything. They got everything they wanted. It's a rigged
it was a rig trial. We wanted a venue change
where we could have a fair trial. We didn't get it.

(05:18):
We wanted a judge change, We wanted a judge. It
wasn't conflicted. And obviously he didn't do that. Nobody's ever
seen anything like it. We had a DA who is
a failed DA. Crime is rampant in New York. Violent crime,
that's what he's really supposed to be looking at. Crime

(05:38):
is rampant in New York. Yesterday in McDonald's you had
a man hitting him up with with machetes. A machete.
Whoever can imagine even a machete being wielded in a store,
in a place where they're eating. And he's going rampant
and Bragg is down watching a true on what they

(06:01):
call crimes crimes. They're falsifying business records. That sounds so
bad to me. It sounds very bad. You know, it's
only a misdemeanor, but to me, it sounds so bad.
When they say falsifying business, that's a bad thing for me.
I've never had that before. I'm falsified. You know what
falsifying business records is. In the first degree, They say,

(06:25):
falsifying business records sounds so good, right. It means that
legal expense I paid a lawyer, totally legal. I paid
a lawyer a legal expense, and a bookkeeper without any
knowledge from me, correctly marked it down in the books.
A very professional woman, highly respected, she testified. Marked it

(06:48):
down in the books. Is a legal expense. So a
legal expense paid a lawyer is a legal expense in
the books. It's not a sheet rock construction or any
other thing. It's a legal expense. Think of that. This
is what the falsification of business records were. And I said,

(07:09):
what else are you going to call it? What else
are you going to call it? Now? I would have testified.
I wanted to testify. The theory is you never testify
because as soon as you testify anybody, if it were
George Washington, don't testify because they'll get you in something
that you said slightly wrong and then they sue you
for perjury. But I didn't care about that. I wanted to,
but the judge allowed them to go into everything that

(07:31):
I was ever involved in, not this case, everything that
I was ever involved in, which is a first. In
other words, you could go into every single thing that
I ever did. Was he a bad boy? Here? Was
he a bad boy? There? Emma lays said, what do
you need to go through? And all you wanted to
do is testify simply on this case because I would

(07:52):
have loved to have testified to this day, I would
have liked to have testified, but you would have been
you would have said something out of whack, like it
was a beautiful sunny day and was actually rating out.
And I very much appreciate the big crowd of people outside.
That's incredible what's happening. The level of support has been incredible.
So the whole thing is legal expense. Was marked down

(08:16):
as legal expense. Think of this, this is my this
is the crime that I committed that I'm supposed to
go to jail for one hundred and eighty seven years, for.

Speaker 1 (08:26):
One hundred and eighty seven years for I just want
to hit pause there, because the President's been dealing with
this now for months and months and months years of harassment.
I don't think he really even thinks about the reality
of one hundred and eighty seven years. It's just now

(08:46):
an insane number in an insane case where the rules
were never followed. It was a kangaroo court what you
would find in a third world country. This is what
Vladimir Putin does to his political enemies. It's what he does.
And yet here we are, and this is what's happening
to the president of the United States of America. I

(09:09):
want you to hear more of what Donald Trump had
to say at this press conference. And again, this is
a man who is actually facing one hundred plus years
hypothetically in jail for a crime that no one else
has ever been charged with this way in the history

(09:30):
of this country. They made it up the way they
had to do it, even to get him into court.

Speaker 2 (09:37):
When you have violent crime all over this city at
levels that nobody's ever seen before, where you have businesses leaving,
and businesses are leaving because of this because heads of
businesses say, man, we don't want to get involved with that.
I could go through the books of any business person
in the city and I could find things that in theory,

(09:59):
I guess, let's indict him, let's destroy his life. But
I'm out there, and I don't mind being out there
because I'm doing something for this country and I'm doing
something for our constitution. It's very important, far beyond me,
and this can't be allowed to happen to other presidents.
It should never be allowed to happen in the future.

(10:20):
But this is far beyond me. This is bigger than Trump.
This is bigger than me. This is bigger than my presidency.
And the people understand it because I just see a
poll just came out the Daily Mail. That was the
first one came out. It was done last night, right
after the verdict, where I'm up six points, six points

(10:40):
from what we already were. We were leading fairly substantially.
We're up six points in the Daily Mail poll. Now,
maybe other polls come out and says something differently, but
a lot of people have predicted it because the public
understands and they understand what's going on. This is a scam.
There's a rig trial. It shouldn't have been in that venue.

(11:02):
We shouldn't have had that judge. He should allowed us
to have an election expert. We had the best expert,
most respected expert, head of the Federal Elections Commission. He
was all set to testify. He was waiting for two
days and when it was his turn, Braggs. People protested

(11:22):
and the judge knocked him out said you can't testify.
He actually said, you can't testify for anything happen to
do with the trial. You can say what the federal
elections is. Well, that doesn't help. Everybody knows that, but
you can't testify. So essentially he wasn't able to testify.
Other people weren't able to testify. But with these people,

(11:42):
they were able to use people salatious, by the way,
and nothing ever happened. There was no anything, nothing ever happened,
and they know it. But they were as salacious as
they could be. And it had nothing to do with
the case, but it had to do with politics. And

(12:02):
do you notice the timing. The timing was perfect. This
case was dead. It was dropped by every agency, every
governmental board. It was dropped by the highly respected Southern District.
They said, no, there's no case here. It was dropped
by federal election. And that's what it's about. This about
a federal election, not a state election. You're not even

(12:23):
allowed to look at it. They took the state and
the city and they went into a federal election. They're
not allowed the people from federal elections. Southern district and
Washington dropped the case. Everybody dropped the case. There was
no case. Cybans dropped the case. And when Brad came in,
he said, this is the most ridiculous case I've ever seen.

(12:45):
And who would have a certain person again gag order,
who would have a certain person like this ever testify?
He said, this is essentially one of the worst people
I've ever seen ever to testify. He said, the craziest
case I've ever see this is Bragg. Then one I
announced I was running for president. A long time later,

(13:07):
they decided to revive this case and they got a judge,
Judge marsha And who was responsible for another case that
was also brought. Destroyed the life of a very good man,
by the way, destroyed the life of a very good
man who went to prison once and then he just

(13:30):
put him in prison again because they said he he lied.
He didn't lie. I looked at the statements he made.
In fact, he didn't remember something, and they put him
in jail again. They've destroyed him. With me for many years,
he was an honorable person. He was an honest man.
And if you look at what he did, supposedly it

(13:51):
never happened there's never been anything like this. Over the
education of his grandchildren. Over he didn't report that he
had a car or two cars on his income. I
don't know. I wonder how many people here have cars.
I wonder how many people said, oh, you have a
car that's worth X doars? How to even figure it?
And I guess you do have to report it, but

(14:12):
I would say probably almost nobody does. Nobody even thinks
about it. They put this man, they destroyed this man,
but they put him in jail again because they didn't
want him to testify. They didn't want him to testify.
That's why he went to jail. They put him in
jail twice. He's seventy seven years old. Now, normally I'd

(14:34):
say that's an old guy, but I don't feel seventy seven.
Nobody ever says that about me. I'd like them to say, gee,
we have to have a little sorrow for this man,
because they just don't say that about me. But maybe
I'm better off that way. I think I'm probably better
off that way. But they put him in jail twice,

(14:54):
and you have to see what They put him in jail,
and he was threatened by the judge. This man was
told you're gonna get fifteen years in jail if you
don't give up Trump. And he was told that you're
gonna get fifteen years in jail. And he made a

(15:14):
plea deal because he didn't want to spend the rest
of his life. And he was told that viciously. We're
living in a fascist state. He was told that viciously.
So you can go to jail for four months, five months,
or you can get fifteen years in jail. So do

(15:35):
a plea. Almost who wouldn't do that plea? Everyone does
those please it's a horrible thing. There's a whole group
of lawyers that fight that. It's so unfair. It's so unfair.
But they destroyed his life so many other things. You
look at Southern District didn't want to bring the case,

(15:56):
nobody wanted to bring the case. And then you know
who didn't want to bring the case most of all
is brag Bragg. Didn't want to bring it. But then
he brought it, and they tried to make it a
different case. They didn't say legal expense equal legal expense. Again,
if I wrote down and paid a lawyer, and by
the way, this was a highly qualified lawyer. Now I'm

(16:18):
not allowed to use his name because of the gear order.
But you know, he's a sleeves bag. Everybody knows. That
took me a while to find out. But he was effective.
He did work. But he wasn't a fixer. He was
a lawyer. You know, they like to use the word fixer.
He wasn't a fixer. He was a lawyer at the time.
He was a fully accredited lawyer. Now he got into
trouble not because of me. He got into trouble because

(16:40):
he made outside deals and he had something to do
with taxi cabs and medallions that he borrowed money, and
that's why he went. And then he pled to three
three election violations. And as soon as I saw that,
I said, I wonder why he did that. He pled
He took a deal. Now I took a deal because

(17:01):
he wanted to get off. In other words, I'll take
a plea deal and I want to get off. And
he wanted to make a deal with the Southern District.
And they wrote the worst report I think I've ever
seen on any human being other than the report that
was written on James Comy by the Inspector General, A

(17:22):
very great inspector General actually wrote a report that was
so bad. This one was possibly worse the Southern district.
The judge didn't let us use it. He said it's hearsay.
I said, it's not here saying wouldn't let us use it.
This is about the man. But he got in trouble
for a very simple reason because he was involved with

(17:45):
borrowing a lot of money and he did something with
the banks. I don't know if it's defraud at the banks,
but something happened. You guys know what it is. And
then in addition to that, he gave up in three
things where he wasn't guilty. In fact, they were going
to testify in that the head of the FEC, the
Brad Smith, the election expert number one raided in the country,

(18:06):
who was going to testify. She took a plea in
three things. He just added them in because that gave
him more bargaining power with the respect to me. But
the three things that he pled on having to do
with the election and having to do essentially a little
bit with me, they weren't crimes. They weren't crimes. Nor

(18:27):
is paying money under an NDA. So we have an
NDA non disclosure agreement. It's a big deal in non
disclosure agreement. Totally honorable, totally good, totally accepted. Everybody has them.
Every company has non disclosure agreements.

Speaker 1 (18:45):
I want to jump back in here. We're going to
continue to let you hear what Donald Trump had to
say in his first full press conference railing against the
rig convictions. As a campaign is now bringing in serious
donations from first time donors who are now understanding what
is at stake in this country. Let me just say

(19:07):
one other thing about these new time donors that are
coming in to the Trump campaign and the record hall,
and you're going to hear the President talk about that
in a moment. How much money has come in. This
may be the great awakening. There are a lot of
people that are like, oh, things aren't that bad. The
justice system is going to hold up, this will be
thrown out, This isn't really going to happen. And now

(19:30):
it has, and this may be one of the biggest
wake up calls in American history to just how radical
and extreme the Democratic Party is. I've said this before,
I will continue to say it because true, the Democratic
Party is dead. The Democratic Party is dead. They are
filled with Marxists, socialists, and communists, who are acting like

(19:54):
they are a Democrat because they don't believe enough Americans
are ready for them to just say yes we are
Communi or yes we are socialists, yes we are Marxist,
but make no mistake, that is.

Speaker 2 (20:06):
Who they are.

Speaker 1 (20:08):
In this court case against President Trump is proof that
this is where we are. We are a Banana Republic
and Joe Biden is American's Vladimir Putin.

Speaker 2 (20:20):
But the press called it slush fund and all sorts
of other things, hush money, hush money. He's not hush money.
It's called the non disclosure agreement. And most of the
people in this room have a non dislosure agreement with
their company. It's a disgrace. So it's not hush money.
It's a non disclosure agreement, totally legal, totally common, everyone

(20:45):
has it. And what happened is he signed a non
disclosure agreement with this verse. I guess other people, but
it's totally honest. You're allowed to make the payment, could
you don't have to make you can make it any
way you want. It's a non disclosure game. And he
signed that and there was nothing wrong with signing it.

(21:08):
And this should have been a non case and everybody
said it was a non case, including Bragg. Brad said
until I ran for office, and then they saw the polls.
I was leading the Republicans, I was leading the Democrats,
I was leading everybody, and all of a sudden they
brought it back. It's a very sad thing that's happening
in our country, and it's a thing that I'm honored.

(21:32):
In a way, I'm honored. It's not that it's pleasant.
It's very bad for family, it's very bad for friends
and businesses. But I'm honored to be involved in it
because somebody has to do it, and I might as
well keep going and be the one. But I'm very
honored to be involved because we're fighting for a constitution.
The money that was paid was paid legally. There was

(21:57):
nothing illegal. In fact, the lawyer in creating the NDA,
because at that time he was a fully accredited lawyer.
He wasn't a fixer. I never thought of m as
a fixer. The media called him a fixer, or the
prosecutors called him a fix He was a lawyer and
he was fairly good. Later on, I didn't like what

(22:18):
he did. I didn't like for instance, I didn't like
that when I became president, he went around and made
deals with companies. When I heard that he was gone,
he was gone, and he had payments coming to him.
And a lot of this involved things that are very simple.
There was nothing wrong. These were standard. This was standard stuff,

(22:40):
all standard stuff. Everything involved was standard. There was no
crime here. In fact, I just watched a couple of
the reports you watched Jonathan Turley, Andy McCarthy, Greg Jarrett.
You look at all of these people, Mark Levin, all
very talented people, people, many more, many more, and they

(23:04):
don't know me. Essentially, they don't know me, the legal
scholars and experts. But I look at them. I watched
Turly this morning saying there's no crime here. Everybody says,
there's no crime here except for this DA that's got
the city out of control with crime. It's out of
it's absolutely out of control. So we have an NDA

(23:26):
that was signed. We have legal expenses. And here's the thing.
On legal expenses, you have one hundred where they say
if they do it, charge I just recorded this out
falsification of business records in the first degree. It sounds

(23:47):
so bad. I said, wow, And even my old lawyers,
I get very upset with them. Because they don't say
what it is. They say, well, falsification of legal records
is only a felony. Well that's a lot. Is only
a they say, a misdemeanor, But they try and bring

(24:07):
it up to a felony if there's two crimes. They
have all these different things. The other thing is they
missed the Statute of limitations by a lot because this
was very old. They could have brought this seven years
ago instead of bringing it right in the middle of
the election. So they missed the Statute of limitations. They
did everything. Now, let me give you the good news.
The good news is last night we just got to

(24:30):
report this morning. In the history of politics, I believe
maybe I'm wrong. Somebody will find that I'm wrong. Maybe,
but I don't think, sir. They raised with small money donors,
meaning like twenty one dollars, forty two dollars, fifty three dollars,
thirty eight dollars, a record thirty nine million dollars in

(24:54):
about a ten hour period. No think of that. I
like those people because so far, I guess it's backfire.
Now I don't know. I'd rather not have it happen.
I don't want to have it backfire. I don't want
to win this thing legitimately, not because they were stupid

(25:17):
and did things that they shouldn't be doing. They shouldn't
have brought this case. They were saying it this morning,
this is a case that should not have been brought.
I watched Danny McCarthy say this is a case that
should not have been brought, and that was this morning.
But they all say that. Every legal scholar has said
it legal. These are great people that really understand the law.

(25:42):
The other thing, a pole just came out the first poll.
I don't know, maybe others will be bad, but a
pole just came out a little while ago the Daily Mail.
Does anybody read the Daily Mail? It's very good to
have a good poll, at least I like it today
and the Daily Mail just came out with a pole
and it has Trump up six points in the last

(26:05):
twelve hours, six points six points since this happened. Who
thought this could up? Because the people of our country
know it's a hoax. They know it's a hoax. They
get it, you know, they're really smart and it's really something.
So we're going to be appealing this scam. We're going

(26:27):
to be appealing it on many different things. He wouldn't
allow us to have witnesses, he wouldn't allow us to talk,
he wouldn't allow us to do anything. The judge was
a tyrant, and you got to see that with Bob Costello,
a fine man. I've never seen anything like it, and
neither has anybody that was in that courthouse where he
demanded that the courthouse be cleared. Now, the good news

(26:49):
is most of the people in the courthouse, with the
media and anybody that was in the media of your
fair you'll say, Wow, that was anger. That was crazy.
He was crazed. And the reason that Bob Costello acted
a little bit upset, which I think he has a
right to, was that every question he was being asked

(27:15):
was being objected to by the other side and sustained
by the judge. Sustained, sustained. I think he did it
many times. I don't know what the number many times,
even I was sitting there saying and these were basic questions.
And I never saw anybody treated that way by a judge.
And I've been treated very badly by two other judges also,
because it's all the same thing, and it all comes

(27:37):
out of the White House, crooked Joe Biden the worst
president in the history of our country. He's the worst
president in the history of our country, the most incompetent,
He's the dumbest president we've ever had. He's the dumbest president,
most incompetent president, and he's the most dishonest president we've
ever had. And so many of the he's a Manchurian candidate.

(28:00):
You take a look at the way he treats China, Russia,
so many others. You know, I ended the Russian pipeline,
it was dead. He comes in and he approves it,
and he gets three and a half million, meaning three
and a half million is paid to the family, his
family from the mayor of Moscow's wife, And I said,

(28:22):
where did that come from? Nobody wants to talk about it.
But he's a very big danger to our country. And
the only way they think they can win this election
is by doing exactly what they're doing right now. Win
it in the courts, because they can't win it at
the ballot box. So we're going to show them that

(28:43):
we're going to fight. It's actually, I don't know, it's
something where I'm wired in such a way that a
lot of people would have gone away a long time ago.
They would have gone away after Peachmin Hooks number one.
THO was a total hoax. I had great support from
the Republican Party. Though, then you have in Peachman Oaks
number two. And then they formed the committee. How about

(29:04):
they formed the Committee of Thugs, the j sixth Committee
of Thugs, and they took their records and they destroyed
all of the records after the committee was abandoned because
those records were great for us. Now, can you imagine
if Republicans did that, everybody would have been in jail

(29:25):
by now.

Speaker 1 (29:26):
Donald Trump, by the way, is right. Many others would
have just bailed and said it isn't worth it. And
as he described it, he described I think exceptionally well,
I'm not wired that way. I'm not sure there's anybody
else that could handle what has come at him the
way that he has handled it. And the point that

(29:48):
he is making very clear here is that he is
fighting and going to continue to fight, and he needs
our help now to back him because otherwise we are
living in a Banana Republic. Make sure you share this
podcast with your family and your friends. Please and help
us by writing us a five star review and I'll
see you back here tomorrow.