Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
You may have heard the saying Fauci lied and people died.
It was a trend after we found out just how
corrupt the government was and how wrong they were on
actually dealing with COVID. What you may not realize is
how accurate that saying Fauci lied and people die may
actually be until today when we found out a lot
(00:24):
more about what Anthony Fauci thought about COVID and what
he made up what wasn't even close to reality. Anthony
Fauci went before Congress and had to admit on Monday
that the effectiveness of the coronavirus vaccines was a complicated
issue quote unquote, I'm not kidding.
Speaker 2 (00:45):
A complicated issue.
Speaker 1 (00:48):
That's how he described it, saying the effectiveness of the
coronavirus vaccines as they did not quote prevent the transmission
of the coronavirus as originally promised and pitched to the
American people.
Speaker 2 (01:03):
He said it was a complicated issue.
Speaker 1 (01:05):
During the line of questioning before the House Selects Subcommittee
on the coronavirus Pandemic, the chairman, Brad Winthrop, a Republican
from Ohio, asked Fauci about the effectiveness or lack thereof,
of the coronavirus vaccine, knowing that they did not stop
the transmission of the virus, even though he promised that
it would save your life and that it would stop
(01:27):
the transmission. Member two weeks to stop the spread. Quote
Did the COVID vaccine stop transmission of the virus? He
was asked, very simply. The response Fauci, That is a
complicated issue because in the beginning, the first iteration of
the vaccines did have an effect, not one hundred percent,
but a high effect, Fauci admitted, although he claimed they
(01:51):
quote did prevent infection and subsequently obviously transmission quote unquote, However,
it's important to point out something that we did not
know early on, and that became evident as the months
went by.
Speaker 2 (02:05):
He said.
Speaker 1 (02:05):
It was the durability of protection against infection and hence
transmission was relatively limited, whereas the duration of the protection
against the disease hospitalization deaths was more prolonged. Fauci claimed,
asserting that they quote did not know that in the beginning.
In the beginning, it was felt that in fact it
(02:26):
did prevent infection and thus transmission, but that was proven
as time went by not to be a durable effect.
He concluded, adding and admitting that the vaccine was not
everything they touted as it was originally sold to the
American people. This is just the tip of the iceberg.
I'm going to tell you even more, but first I
(02:46):
want to tell you about my friends at ammo Squared.
Ammo Squared helps you stock up on ammunition each and
every month automaticmatically. It is a true set it and
forget it ammo perch programs, so you pay the best
price on the market, You pick your caliber, you set
your budget, and then you select a shipping trigger and
(03:08):
that's it. Your AMMO grows slowly over time, and it
is stored for free at amo squared as it builds
up and is shipped with just a click of a
button automatically when you want it. It's like an ammunition
four oh one K or an ammunition subscription on steroids
because you aren't forced into a set budget and shipment
(03:30):
every month. Instead, you decide your budget and schedule when
you want your AMMO ship to you. Ammo Squared offers
over sixty different caliber options, and each shipment contains a
carefully curated mix of factory new ammunition from brands you
know and love. It's budget friendly and customizable by as
little as a few dollars a month, and use dollar
(03:52):
cost averaging to your advantage. Everything is managed online using
a simple web app. Forget about moving heavy case of ammunition.
You can literally exchange your AMMO with Amosquared's inventory from
one caliber to another as well, if you ever change calibers,
and if you want to sell that AMO back one
day for well big profits. If the price of AMMO
(04:14):
goes through the roof like we saw during COVID, then
you can do that as well. That's why I said,
it's like an AMO four oh one k. Sign up
at amosquared dot com slash ben today. That's ammosquared dot com,
slash ben today, and you're gonna get free AMMO in
your account. That's right, You'll get free MO in your
account amosquare dot com, slash ben now. He was then
(04:38):
asked if the coronavirus vaccine was one hundred percent effective,
and he said, I don't believe any vaccine is one
hundred percent effective. Well, President Biden's among those that does
believe that the vaccine is one hundred percent effective. In fact,
he's the one that claimed it in twenty twenty one,
the vaccine individuals could not contract the virus.
Speaker 2 (04:59):
And let me remind you, one year after.
Speaker 1 (05:01):
Biden claimed that he was twice vaccinated and twice boosted
in what happened, we know Joe Biden got COVID nineteen. Yes,
after months of demonizing those that chose not to get
the vaccine. In twenty twenty one, Biden also falsely claimed
that the vaccine could not those that were vaccinated could
(05:24):
quote not spread the disease.
Speaker 2 (05:27):
We also now know that that is a lie.
Speaker 1 (05:31):
Now, Fauci had a lot of questions that he was asked,
and I'm going to play some of them for you
because i want you to hear just not only how arrogant.
Speaker 2 (05:42):
But also how corrupt.
Speaker 1 (05:43):
Fauci is and how many lies he actually told when
it came to all of these issues. One of the
big things that I think is extremely important for people
to remember is that doctor Fauci was the highest paid
member of the United States government. Yes, the highest paid
(06:04):
member of the United States government, a man that was
elected by no one, that locked down our entire country.
Congressman Brad Winthrop, the Republican from Ohio, he said this,
and I want you to listen carefully.
Speaker 3 (06:19):
We have senior officials from your office in their own
writing discussing breaking federal law, deleting official records, and sharing
private government information with grant recipients. The office you directed
and those serving under your leadership chose to flout the
law and bragged about it. Why did you allow your
(06:41):
office to be unaccountable to the American people? You were
the highest paid person in the government. This makes you
more accountable to the people, not less, Doctor Fauci, whether
intentional or not, you became so powerful that any disagreements
the public had with you were forbidden and censored on
social and legacy media time and time again. This is
(07:03):
why so many Americans became so angry, because this was
fundamentally un American.
Speaker 1 (07:11):
I couldn't agree with that statement more. And it brings
up the bigger point. It wasn't just the lockdowns. It
wasn't just a silencing, It wasn't just a shutting down
of the schools. The biggest problem with what doctor Fauci did,
the most important point that we should all remind people of,
is he went after his critics and made sure they
were taken off of social media and everything that they
(07:35):
said he would flag to Twitter and Facebook and Instagram
things he didn't like that were controversial, right, that were
mean spirited to him and his psychopaths at the NIH.
Speaker 2 (07:50):
He made sure that.
Speaker 1 (07:51):
If you said anything negative about the vaccine or asked
questions or about ivermectin, that you were banished from social media.
And that is exactly the point that was being made
there by the congressman. Whether you like it or not,
you became way too powerful. I would argue that he
had a god complex. A god complex is what Fauci
(08:14):
was all about. And Fauci was a guy that loved
being in charge. Doctor Fauci also was asked another question,
and it was about the taxpayer's dollars.
Speaker 2 (08:28):
Listen to this.
Speaker 3 (08:30):
Does it concern you if US tax payer dollars are
funding someone like this.
Speaker 4 (08:37):
Grants that are submitted to the NIAI D go through
a very Does it concern you.
Speaker 3 (08:43):
I'm not talking about the process. I don't know if
it concerned you that the U that US taxpayer dollars
would be going to someone who's a high ranking Chinese
PLA official.
Speaker 5 (08:53):
Yes or no.
Speaker 4 (08:53):
I would have to know more about that, mister check
because I don't even know me talking.
Speaker 3 (08:58):
About are you or were you ever awhere that the
US State Department in two thousand and five issued warnings
that the Chinese government was working on the creation of bioweapons.
Speaker 1 (09:08):
Notice how dumb, all of a sudden, Fauci becomes there.
I don't even know what you're talking about. Simple question
from the congressman. Does it concern you that used taxpayer
dollars would be going to someone who's a high ranking
Chinese PLA official. I don't even know you're talking about.
Fauci says right, I'm just an ignorant scientist. All of
a sudden, you were the most important. You were the
guy that locked us down. You were the guy that
(09:29):
shut the schools down and shut the businesses out down,
made up rules that you just pulled out of your
abless right six foot rule wear a mask in ninety five.
That mask isn't good enough. This mask is gonna do it.
You get the vaccine, you're going to be protected. But
when you ask him about US taxpayer dollars going to
someone and it was a high ranking Chinese PLA officially,
(09:52):
he's like, I don't even know what you're talking about.
The narcissism and godlike complex that this country had to
endure from doctor Fauci because you couldn't question the science,
you couldn't question him as a dictator, a man elected
by no one in many ways had more power than
the president of the United States of America.
Speaker 2 (10:13):
And now accountability time is coming.
Speaker 1 (10:16):
And look how stupid all of a sudden he gets
he knew everything about COVID and how you had to
run your life and admitted he made a bunch of
it up.
Speaker 2 (10:25):
And now he's like, I don't know what you're talking about.
Speaker 1 (10:27):
I don't remember that person, I don't know what I
was saying in my emails.
Speaker 2 (10:31):
I'm not really sure where you're getting this information.
Speaker 1 (10:33):
Because he knows he's now caught as a liar, and
Fauci lied and people died. Has never been more important
of a point to make than it is right now,
because we have the facts to back it up. Doctor
Fauci was also asked some other interesting questions, questions that
you would be asking only if you probably knew the
(10:54):
answer to your question before you would even think to
ask this type of question. One of it was about communication,
ever conduct government business and private emails?
Speaker 5 (11:07):
Ever delete an official record?
Speaker 6 (11:09):
No doctor Fauci, did you ever conduct official business via email?
Speaker 4 (11:15):
To the best of my recollection and knowledge, I have
never conducted official business via my private email.
Speaker 2 (11:22):
To the best of my recollection.
Speaker 1 (11:24):
If that's not a cover your a double s statement,
I don't know what is. Like that is a cover
your a doubles statement, like in a very very very
big way. And it's one that again makes me laugh
because it's so clearly obvious that.
Speaker 2 (11:46):
He's not wanting to tell you the truth.
Speaker 1 (11:47):
He's not going to be intellectually honest with you about
any of this.
Speaker 2 (11:52):
He also was asked about the Wuhan Institute.
Speaker 1 (11:55):
Remember when he said it was a conspiracy theory and
he ripped on anyone that said that Wuhan may have
leaked this.
Speaker 2 (12:01):
Remember that? What did he say?
Speaker 4 (12:03):
Listen, do you do you agree that there was a
push to downplay the lab leak theory?
Speaker 5 (12:09):
Not on my part? Really really wow? Well, I think
I think most of the country will find that find
that amazing. I said eleven seconds, but look at the facts.
Speaker 4 (12:17):
I've kept an open mind throughout the entire process.
Speaker 5 (12:20):
All right, Hi, you back?
Speaker 1 (12:22):
I mean Jordan's face right there was like this is
a SoundBite that's going to live forever.
Speaker 2 (12:29):
He sits there and he says, I kept an open mind.
No he didn't.
Speaker 1 (12:33):
He was the guy that was telling you it was
it was it was bats, you remember that. Then he
was the guy telling you that it was you know,
KRK dogs and carcasses at the at the wet market.
And then he's like, no, no, it couldn't be from a
lab that we were sending countless millions of dollars to.
Speaker 2 (12:53):
Couldn't have been a leak from that lab. No, No,
it was a bat.
Speaker 1 (12:56):
And then it was dogs, and it was maybe cats
and other like arm animals in the market.
Speaker 2 (13:01):
That's what it was.
Speaker 1 (13:03):
We don't want you to know that me, doctor Fauci,
was sending millions of your taxpayers dollars the WU hunt
Endseudi virology and that maybe they were using getting to
function research.
Speaker 2 (13:11):
No, we would never want to talk about that.
Speaker 1 (13:14):
All right, let me take a moment and talk to
you real quick about your retirement and inflation and the
eroding of the power of the dollar. Right now, inflation
is well above what the Fed's target rate is. You
know what's happened. Consumer prices are much higher than they
were last year or the year before and the year
before that. That's why all of us need a financial
(13:35):
plan that ensures that money that we save today will
be enough for us tomorrow. And that's why I've diversified
my investments to include gold and silver. Now, there are
a lot of gold and silver companies. You hear them
every day if you listen to conservative podcasts or talk radio,
if you watch TV conservative networks, you'll see tons of companies.
Speaker 2 (13:55):
Well, let me tell you about Freedom Gold USA. Reason
why I love them.
Speaker 1 (13:59):
They preached protection and diversifying your assets. They will not
take you to put all your money in gold and silver.
Now here's the other thing that is really important to you.
You work hard for your money, just like I do.
And on average, they charge twenty five to thirty percent
less than most major gold and silver firms. So the
ones that you hear from, they're gonna charge you, on
(14:20):
average twenty five to thirty percent more than what you're
gonna pay. When you call my friends at Freedom Goold USA.
Now you can take control your financial future right now,
and you can also get free silver in your account.
They will walk you through the process, talk to you
about about diversifying your investments, your Ira, you're four oh
one k or having just physical gold in your safe
(14:44):
take control. Now visit Freedomgoldusa dot com slash ben. That's
freedom goold USA dot com slash ben, or you can
call them one eight hundred six y fifty five eight
eight four three that's one eight hundred six five five
eight eight four three, or online it freedom goold Usa
dot com slash ben. Let's move on to an easier subject, right, Like,
(15:09):
there's got to be an easier subject for him. Okay,
so let's move on to the lockdowns. You're the guy
that decided to shut it all down. So what did
you say and how did that work? Take a listen
to this back and forth.
Speaker 6 (15:27):
I'm going to go through a list of COVID mitigation
measures that you supported over the course of the pandemic
and ask you to give me a yes or no
as to whether you believe these measures were justified.
Speaker 4 (15:34):
Business closures early on when five thousand people were dying
a day. Yes, church closers, same things. These were important
when we were trying to stop the tsunami of death.
Speaker 6 (15:47):
Mass mandates for adults, mass mandates for children, mass mandates
for children under five.
Speaker 4 (15:52):
And going back to what I said before, all of
that is in the context of at the time.
Speaker 6 (15:59):
Masteriflo under five days scientific evidence for that, excuse me,
mass mandates for children under five, their scientific evidence supporting that.
Speaker 4 (16:07):
There was no study that did masks on kids before.
Speaker 2 (16:11):
You couldn't do the study.
Speaker 4 (16:12):
You had to respond to an epidemic that was killing
four to five thousand Americans.
Speaker 6 (16:18):
Vaccine mandates for employees, vaccine mandates for students, vaccine mandates
for military.
Speaker 4 (16:24):
Vaccines save lives.
Speaker 2 (16:26):
It is very very clear that Vue I love this, right,
He's like vaccines for military.
Speaker 1 (16:31):
You understand, we lost some of the best men and
women in our military because the vaccine mandate in our
military and destroyed people's service this country and their lives
in many ways. Like that's something that I do think
needs to be very clearly stated here, is that there
were countless men and women that were treated like leopards
in the Bible because they wouldn't get the vaccine and
(16:51):
lost We lost some our most brilliant men and women
and warriors and minds in our military because of vaccine mandates.
Speaker 2 (17:00):
And then he admits, right.
Speaker 1 (17:02):
Because we talked about this just a few minutes ago,
that the vaccine was not as effective as we said
it was, and in fact, it didn't stop the transmission,
and we mocked and ridiculed and silenced anyone that asked questions.
And then he's asked a question about like, hey, were
was this too extreme to have these mandates and our
women in the military, And he's like, vaccines work, damn it,
(17:22):
they work. I tell you they work.
Speaker 4 (17:24):
Well.
Speaker 2 (17:24):
Did this vaccine work? Well? No, But that's beside the point.
Vaccines work.
Speaker 1 (17:28):
How dare you question me, doctor Fauci about the effectives
of vaccines in general?
Speaker 2 (17:33):
Right, because now you're one of those people.
Speaker 1 (17:35):
And that's the line, by the way, that that congressman
just said that would have gotten him kicked off of
social media two years ago. If he would have asked
these same exact questions, Fauci and the NIH would have
sent an email to Twitter or to Instagram or to
YouTube saying take down this misinformation, and they would have
done it and shut down your account.
Speaker 4 (17:56):
Things have saved hundreds of thousands of Americans.
Speaker 5 (18:00):
And I'm not debateing.
Speaker 6 (18:01):
We're talking about the COVID nineteen did or do the vaccines.
The COVID nineteen vaccines stopped anyone from getting COVID.
Speaker 4 (18:10):
I answered that question to the chairman. Early on, it
became clear that they did no, actually no. In the beginning,
it clearly prevented infection in a certain percentage of people,
but the durability of its ability to prevent infection was
not long.
Speaker 2 (18:27):
It was measured in months.
Speaker 5 (18:29):
And they didn't stop you from spreading it either.
Speaker 4 (18:32):
Early on it did if it prevented infection, but what
became clear that it did not prevent transmission when the
ability to prevent infection way.
Speaker 6 (18:43):
I think what's troubling is when the American people look
at the certainty in my area that did not have
a single case of COVID in their rural community that
had to shut down and people not get care that
they did need for cancer and passed away because of
those kind.
Speaker 5 (19:01):
Of things, and.
Speaker 6 (19:05):
Time after timing in people's lives are destroyed. And we
have not seen the same sort of once the new
data came available, we did not see a change, of course.
And you'll point out, for example, in the schools that
the CDC you know, put out the guidelines for example,
but we know that those guidelines end up being protection
(19:26):
from lawsuits if you don't want to be sued, you
better follow the guidelines. So they're not mandates to facto mandates,
but they turn out to be such a mandate. And
when the science began to change and begin we all
understand that in the first couple of weeks, first few weeks,
even a couple months, we were all trying to figure
it out.
Speaker 5 (19:45):
I think there's a lot of grace for that.
Speaker 6 (19:47):
The concern is that as the science became available, there
wasn't like a, oh, maybe we should consider the lab leak.
Never heard these messaging coming from you or from anyone
else who stood on the sidelines talking about out these things,
and it's left the American people with a tremendous distrust.
I want to talk a little bit about the grant process.
My understanding from your testimony to US, it says that
(20:09):
the NAH process for rewarding grants is that basically, research
proposal goes to peer review committee to receive a priority score,
then it goes to an advisory council for NIH personnel,
it receives a final basically the group votes on it,
and then eventually it ends up on your desk for signature.
Right now, you said in that that sometimes if I
(20:30):
recall correctly, is those grants are often approved in block
in mass when they're voted on, and then you sign
off on them.
Speaker 2 (20:37):
That's correct.
Speaker 5 (20:38):
I I this.
Speaker 2 (20:39):
This is one of the.
Speaker 6 (20:40):
Things that's really troubling to the American people because they
look at their lives being destroyed. And so your name
is on every single grant, but yet you absolve yourself
of any sort of responsibility by saying, well, you know,
it goes to this committee that's you know, that has
a number of people on it, and they're approved in block,
and so there's no accountability for anything any of the
taxpayer dollars that are going forth.
Speaker 2 (21:02):
I disagree with.
Speaker 1 (21:02):
By the way, isn't that amazing the way that he
just described that, And that's the reason why I want
to play it for you. Fauci's alibi is, well, I
approved every grant, but it was in a block, and
it was other people telling me that everything was good,
and a peer committee that was good, and so you
really just can't hold me accountable for this because what
(21:23):
I was doing was I was just doing my job.
You want to know why Americans will never trust health
officials again anytime in the near future, It's because when
you hear what I just played.
Speaker 2 (21:38):
For you, you.
Speaker 1 (21:40):
Understand that these these individuals are psychotic people in our government.
Speaker 2 (21:45):
Why would you ever trust them? Again?
Speaker 1 (21:49):
Fauci has also come under fire for something else, and
that is an issue with a big article that came
out about royalties, royalties from big pharma that have been
going to the NIH in a very big way since
you know, twenty twenty one, as there's been a lot
of money. Fauci was asked about this, like, hey, like
(22:12):
you guys have been getting rich off royalties over there,
like y'aff got a lot of cash coming in the door.
He was asked this question by congresswoman from New York
where they had a lot of people that died from COVID,
including elderly, when they put elderly people with COVID into
retirement facilities and then massive numbers.
Speaker 2 (22:28):
Of people died. Listen to what Fauci had to say
about that.
Speaker 4 (22:34):
A that they should really not be talking about a
lab lead.
Speaker 2 (22:38):
Thank you, that's the CONSPIRA.
Speaker 5 (22:39):
Appreciate that, doctor Fauci.
Speaker 7 (22:41):
How much have you earned from royalties from pharmaceutical companies
since the pandemic began in twenty twenty one?
Speaker 3 (22:48):
Zero?
Speaker 7 (22:50):
It says NIH scientists made seven hundred and ten million
in royalties from drug makers. You're saying that you did
not receive any of the seven hundred and ten million dollars.
How much have you received in royalties between twenty twenty
one and twenty twenty three.
Speaker 5 (23:06):
I think none.
Speaker 7 (23:08):
Okay, So somebody received the seven hundred and ten somebody did,
but not me. You didn't receive any royalties, Okay.
Speaker 4 (23:14):
I see no royalties associated with COVID I mentioned, yeah,
I said, I want to just I'm on the record,
and I want to make sure that this is clear
that I've developed a monoclonal antibody about twenty five years
ago that's used as a diagnostic that has nothing to
do with COVID, and I receive an average of about
one hundred and twenty dollars a year from that.
Speaker 2 (23:35):
Okay.
Speaker 7 (23:35):
But the bottom line here is that scientists at NIH
did receive seven ten million dollars in royalties, And I
guess my question is, don't you think that if these
experiments are made using American tax dollars at any of
those royalties, this nearly billions of dollars should be going
back to the American taxpayer, not in the pockets of
the scientists. Do you believe that's a law that we
should consider changing.
Speaker 4 (23:57):
If you want to change the patent laws and the
and the Bidole Act, then go ahead. That's not for
me to say.
Speaker 5 (24:05):
I'm asking your opinion.
Speaker 7 (24:07):
Okay, Well, anyway, moving on, I just want to say.
Speaker 2 (24:10):
That I love this guy. Like this guy is still
sitting there and he's so arrogant.
Speaker 1 (24:15):
I want you to think about these patents, Okay, that
we came out with all this information, seven hundred and
ten million dollars, seven hundred and ten million dollars in
royalties went back to n iate scientists who use your
tax dollars to do their research, use your tax dollars
(24:35):
for their labs, their offices, and their technology.
Speaker 2 (24:40):
You're underwriting all of that.
Speaker 1 (24:44):
But then when they put their patents on it, when
there is an outbreak like this, seven hundred and ten
million dollars in royalties from drug makers went back into
the hands of these scientists. Sounds like a pretty good
reason to you know, have a pandemic. To me, you
(25:08):
look at the people in China and this lab leak.
We know it was a lab leak. The question that
should be asked about the lab leak.
Speaker 2 (25:20):
Is number one.
Speaker 1 (25:21):
This were there people in China that financially benefited directly
from the lab leak? And I'm talking about these types
of royalties. That's question number one that I have. Okay,
Number two, how many other scientists around the world are
reving up for another pandemic because they realize that it
(25:42):
is a multi billion dollar opportunity for profits. And I'm
not exaggerating when I say multi billion dollar ability to
profit like that is incredibly accurate. There are a lot
of people that got really rich in the pharmaceutical world
(26:04):
when COVID happened. There were a lot of people that
got really rich rich when it came to personal protection
or a PPE and this, and there were hospital systems
and other systems that became incredibly rich. We're talking life
changing money, that was generational wealth that.
Speaker 2 (26:25):
Was changing hands.
Speaker 1 (26:27):
And in a future pandemic, people will know how to
make even more money off the next one because they'll understand.
Speaker 2 (26:36):
Quickly how to exploit it for their gain.
Speaker 1 (26:42):
You're a scientist, and I want to be clear, I'm
not trying to be mean to those in this community,
but I am calling out the NIH for clear abuse
of the system when I'm paying for all of the
ability for you to do all the research, and I'm
paying a taxpayer for your lab and I'm paying for
(27:04):
your beakers, and I'm paying for everything you've got, and
then you patent something and then you make seven hundred
somebody made over seven hundred million. It'll be well over
a billion by the end of this year in royalties
from research that we as taxpayers paid for. Now, again,
(27:24):
for me, that is a big problem. I have a
huge issue with it. And that is the point that
was being made there by the congressman. Now, of course
he's like, well, you know, if you want to change
the law, it's fine by me. I think he knows
it won't be changed. But you have to understand doctor Fauci.
(27:44):
Here is dug in. Doctor Fauci wanted to be very
clear that he believes that there's no wrongdoing, and not
only that he saved lives, including with social decency, which
was distancing, which was not based in science.
Speaker 2 (28:00):
And now during.
Speaker 8 (28:03):
During your two day closed door interview in January, discussed
a number of topics regarding the public health response to
COVID nineteen pandemic, some of which we've touched on briefly,
but I just want to dive in a little bit
deeper here. For example, you discussed both then and here
with Congresswoman Caster the recommendation, and you discussed how social
(28:27):
distancing recommendations were developed, that you yourself didn't pick this
six feet and it was just really kind of a
guideline in the moment. In your view, though, do social
distancing recommendations and other public health measures to reduce transmission
save lives?
Speaker 2 (28:49):
Definitely? Definitely, one word answer, definitely.
Speaker 1 (28:55):
There's no science to back it up to the six
foot rules save lives or the stupid plexiglass at the
grocery store saved lives. But doctor Fauci makes it clear
not only were the lockdowns appropriate, not only did he
get nothing wrong, but also he believes that everything that
(29:16):
they had done was important and basically saying I would
have done it again.
Speaker 2 (29:23):
I would have done this again. He says he denies.
Speaker 1 (29:27):
Any wrongdoing at all in his opening statement, like I've
done nothing wrong, mister.
Speaker 4 (29:32):
Chairman, ranking MEMBERUS members of the subcommittee, thank you for
this opportunity to testify. Prior to my retirement from federal
service in December twenty twenty two. I had been at
the NIH for fifty four years and Director of NIAID
for more than thirty eight years. In those posts that
was deeply involved in the songs diseases outbreaks and the
(29:52):
AIDS pandemic flu ebola and zeka, and so under my leadership,
we were well positioned to respond to COD nineteen. For
at least two decades prior to the COVID outbreak, we
at NIID had invested billions of dollars in research on
mRNA technology and immagen design, both of which led to
(30:12):
the swift development of COVID vaccines. Less than eleven months
after the identification of this new virus, safe and highly
effective vaccines were widely available, and unprecedented accomplishment in the
history of vaccinology that saved tens of millions of lives worldwide.
I will now use my remaining time to directly address
(30:34):
certain issues that have been seriously distorted concerning me. The
first issue concerns my actions regarding the possibility that SAWS
COVID two might have resulted from a lab league. On
January thirty first, twenty twenty, I was informed through phone
calls with Jeremy Ferrara then director of the Welcome Trust
in the UK, and then with Christian Andersen, a highly
(30:57):
regarded scientist that Scripts Research Institute, that they and Eddie Holmes,
a world class evolutionary biologists from Australia, were concerned that
the genomic sequence of saws Kobe two suggested that the
virus could have been manipulated in a lab.
Speaker 1 (31:14):
You notice in his opening statement here it's a I
did nothing wrong.
Speaker 2 (31:18):
I did everything right.
Speaker 1 (31:20):
I'm now covering my abs and I'm not going to
admit that i did anything wrong because I'm so good
at my job that how could i have possibly gotten
anything wrong. Fauci lied and people died, was what I
said at the beginning, and I believe it now more
than ever before. After this man went before Congress, he
(31:42):
lied to the American people, took advantage of his power,
abused his power, and lied to you. And it will
cost people their lives, not just this in the past tense,
but in the future because the next time they may
get it right, and people are going to say, I
screw off.
Speaker 2 (31:57):
You're the government.
Speaker 1 (31:57):
You're the one that locked us down last time and
lied to us and said we couldn't sing at church
and then we couldn't gather, and then we had to
be six feet apart, and we couldn't see our families,
and that we couldn't go to funerals, and we couldn't
go to the birth of our children in the hospitals
because we got to separate the mom from the dead.
Speaker 2 (32:13):
Remember all that, That's what Fauci did. Not only do
you do it, He's not sorry. He did it.
Speaker 1 (32:19):
Please make sure you share this podcast everywhere you can
on social media, and I will see you back here tomorrow.