August 30, 2024 • 43 mins
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
So Kama Harris and her babysitter VP candidate Walls went
on CNN and I'm going to break it all down
for you. But let me first just say to CNN,
you guys are disgusting. You put interview up on TV,
and if you watch, you saw it too, so you
know exactly what I'm talking about. And before they even
(00:24):
started speaking, they were already selling you propaganda. They were
lying to you. They put up on the screen the
word live. Now, CNN is obsessed with putting up the
word live.
Speaker 2 (00:38):
We're live, We're live.
Speaker 1 (00:40):
Right, They're always live from live from this breaking news
live in the Sana news room. I know this because
for seven years I was a conservative fighting the fight
in hell at CNN as a commentator. They were obsessed
with everything being live. The problem is this, this interview
(01:01):
was not live. It was taped, and we don't know
what was edited. We don't know what questions were asked
of Kamala Harris or Walls that didn't see the light
of day. But if you turned on CNN and you
were watching this interview, you saw it clearly stating in
(01:24):
the corner of the screen the word live. When you
tape an interview.
Speaker 2 (01:29):
It is not live. I'm gonna say it again.
Speaker 1 (01:33):
Apparently the dumba's at CNN, actually they know exactly what
they were doing.
Speaker 2 (01:36):
They were lying to you.
Speaker 1 (01:37):
But apparently the dumba's in America that vote for Kamala
Harris and Walls are so stupid they don't understand that
a taped interview is not live.
Speaker 2 (01:50):
It is not live.
Speaker 1 (01:52):
Now that I've gotten that out of the way, the
fact that we're even having to have this conversation is asinine.
Speaker 2 (01:58):
Let's deal with these substance.
Speaker 1 (02:00):
There was a big moment in this conversation, and number one,
I understand why they send her with a babysitter this interview,
and even Democrats are saying this right afterwards. It ain't good, folks. Okay,
this interview is not a very good interview. She's terrible
Without a teleprompter. You write her something. She's a decent
actress and she can read a teleprompter. You take that
(02:22):
away from her, she's pretty much screwed. Let me take
a quick moment to tell you about an incredible company
that stands up and fights for our First and her
Second Amendment rights. They fight for the rights of unborn children,
and they fight every time you pay your bill to
them for our veterans, our first responders, and our wounded warriors.
(02:44):
I'm talking about Patriot Mobile. They're the only conservative Christian
wireless provider in the country. And when you pay your
bill to them every month, they actually take about five
percent of your bill and give it back to the
causes that I just mentioned at no extra cost to you. Now,
the reason why that's incredible is because if you're with
(03:05):
Big Mobile, you're actually supporting and funding the Left in
a very big way. Big Mobile gives big donations to
organizations that pay and advocate for abortion on demand. They
give big donations to Democratic candidates and causes at the local, state,
and national level. Another reason why you should make the
(03:30):
switch to a company that stands with your values. Now,
making the switch space your at Mobile is easy. You
can keep your same cell phone you have right now,
keep your same cell phone number, or you can upgrade
to a new phone, and you don't have to worry
about coverage because in twenty twenty four, it is actually
really easy to make the switch and you're gonna have
(03:50):
the same exact coverage that you are used to because
they use the same exact towers that you're using right now,
So call right now nine Patriot that's nine seven two
Patriot or patriotmobile dot com slash ferguson. Now when you
use the promo code ferguson, you're gonna get a free
(04:12):
month of service.
Speaker 2 (04:14):
So don't wait any longer.
Speaker 1 (04:16):
Stop giving your money to comings that literally hate your
family values and hate your Christian values. Make the switch,
get nationwide coverage and make a difference with every phone
call you make. Nine seven to two Patriot that's nine
seven to two Patriot or patriotmobile dot com slash ferguson.
Promo code ferguson. You'll get one month of service for free,
(04:40):
all right now. One person described it as a human
Chernobyl without a teleprompter, because everything just starts exploding in
her head. She was asked a question about her values changing,
and I'm gonna play for you how she explained that
on CNN, trying to tell you that her values had
not changed, when clearly they have changed recently.
Speaker 2 (05:01):
They're not real changes. It's just too pander to voters.
Speaker 1 (05:05):
Listen to what she says carefully, because I'm going to
play for you a montage of what Kamwa Harris actually
believes after I play this first part from CNN where
it says on the screen live even though it's a taped,
damn interview.
Speaker 3 (05:18):
Generally speaking, how should voters look at some of the
changes that you've made that you've explained some of here
in your policy. Is it because you have more experience
now and you've learned more about the information. Is it
because you were running for president in a Democratic primary?
And should they feel comfortable and confident that what you're
(05:41):
saying now is going to be your policy moving forward?
Speaker 4 (05:44):
Dana, I think the most important and most significant aspect
of my policy perspective and decisions is my values have
not changed. You've mentioned the Green New Deal. I have
always believed and I have worked on it, that the
climate crisis is real, that it is an urgent matter
(06:05):
to which we should apply metrics that include holding ourselves
to deadlines around time. We did that with the Inflation
Reduction Act. We have set goals for the United States
of America and by extension, the globe around when we
should meet certain standards for reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.
As an example, that value has not changed. My value
(06:28):
around what we need to do to secure our border.
That value has not changed. I spent two terms as
the Attorney General of California prosecuting transnational criminal organizations violations
of American laws regarding the passage illegal passage of guns, drugs,
and human beings across our border. My values have not changed.
Speaker 1 (06:49):
My values have not changed. Okay, so she says at
the end, her values have not changed. Now I'm going
to play for your saying my values have not changed
and remind you of what she says her values are.
Listen carefully to who Kamala Harris is.
Speaker 4 (07:08):
My values have non changed.
Speaker 5 (07:10):
Dou spread meat specifically, Yes, Boston Marathon bomber. They should
be able to vote.
Speaker 2 (07:14):
I think we should have that conversation.
Speaker 5 (07:15):
Abolish ice yes, Would you ban off shore drilling?
Speaker 3 (07:18):
Yes?
Speaker 4 (07:18):
And I'm in favor of banning frack. I am prepared
to pass agreeing the deal, and I support a mandatory
buyback program. We're not going to treat people who are
undocumented across the borders criminals. The idea that more police
equals more safety, that's just wrong.
Speaker 6 (07:31):
Policing as we know goes all the way back to
slave patrols, and that idea, and you are absolutely right.
Speaker 2 (07:36):
Where do you stand on defund the police?
Speaker 5 (07:38):
We need to take a look at these budgets. Do
you ban plastic straws? And we should seventy to eighty
percent tax rate?
Speaker 4 (07:44):
I think that's fantastic.
Speaker 5 (07:45):
Chipping now to the Minnesota Freedom Funds. How dare we
speak Merry Christmas?
Speaker 4 (07:50):
Yeah?
Speaker 2 (07:50):
I am rap.
Speaker 4 (07:51):
I do believe that we need to get radical about
what we are doing.
Speaker 1 (07:56):
That is who Kamala Harris is. So at the very end,
she makes it very clear her values have not changed.
Comrade Kammwa answered to a very weekly phrased question, a
question that was put in more as a matter of
defense and curiosity. Donald Trump tweeted out, but her answer
(08:18):
rambled incoherently and declared her quote values haven't changed. On that,
I agree her values haven't changed. Trump said, the border
is going to remain open, not close. There will be
free healthcare for illegal aliens, sanctuary cities, no cash bail,
gun confiscation, zero fracking, a ban on gasoline powered cars,
(08:44):
private health care will be abolished, a seventy to eighty
percent tax rate will be put in place, and she will.
Speaker 2 (08:52):
Defund the police.
Speaker 1 (08:54):
America, he says, will become a wasteland. He's absolutely by
the way, and what she said there. Now, Kamala Harris
says she has no regrets as well about the biggest
coup and cover up of Joe Biden and his massive
is obvious, massive cognitive decline, which goes back to can
(09:16):
you trust Kamala Harris? The answer, I think is very
clear based on the montage I just played, you know,
but I want you to also think about this. Kamala
Harris lied to you over and over again telling you
that Joe Biden was fit and was an amazing commander
in chief, that there was nothing wrong, that everything was fine.
(09:40):
And then once the first debate happened and everyone saw
the massive cognitive decline of Joe Biden, Kamala Harris what
did she do? She then helped overthrow the president of
the United States of America in a coup. Where now
she she walks in to what she believes is I'm
(10:03):
now the next president. How did she pull it off?
I don't know if it's blackmail, I don't know what
you want to call it, but no one has voted
for Kama Harris to this day. Listen to what Kama
Harris says when she says, I have no regrets about
lying about covering up for crooked Joe Biden and his
massive cognitive decline. If she'll lie to you about that,
(10:26):
what else is she going to lie to you about?
Speaker 3 (10:29):
Vice President Harris, you were a very staunch defender of
President Biden's capacity to serve another four years. Right after
the debate, you insisted that President Biden is extraordinarily strong
given where we are now, do you have any regrets
about what you told the American people?
Speaker 4 (10:46):
No, not at all, not at all. I have.
Speaker 1 (10:51):
Served with let me just pleasure. She said, no, not
at all. I lied to you, guys. I lied to
you because this was how I kept my power. And
then once I realize he was losing his ability to
keep his own power, then I decided to throw him
under the bus and overthrow the will of the people
and slide in to get the nomination. That's what she's
(11:14):
telling you. Like, she's like, I don't have any regret
about like mine? Would I have regrets? I don't have regrets.
It's were out great for me. I accused Joe Biden
of being a racist. He needed a woman of whatever
color you want it to be right, like he needs
he needed a woman of color, and that was going
(11:39):
to get rid of the racism.
Speaker 2 (11:40):
So then I became the VP, and it was amazing.
Speaker 1 (11:44):
And then I was a good soldier and I lied
to the American people to cover up what the corruption
of this administration and it worked flawlessly.
Speaker 2 (11:52):
And then when he was done, I slid on in there.
Speaker 1 (11:56):
It's her entire career, by the way, right, it is
her entire career has been like this. And she's laughing
at all of us because she's like, this is amazing.
I'm playing you guys. Oh lie to you about everything,
alled to you about his cognitive decline. I lied you
about who the president is right now, I don't care,
(12:19):
And she says, I have no regrets, And honestly, why
would you.
Speaker 4 (12:22):
President Biden for almost four years now? And I'll tell
you it's one of the greatest honors of my career. Truly.
He cares so deeply about the American people. He is
so smart.
Speaker 1 (12:36):
And notice, by the way, she's not answering the question.
The question was, do you regret saying, even after the
debate that he was in great shape when Quilly wasn't.
Speaker 4 (12:47):
And loyal to the American people, and I have spent
hours upon hours with him, be it in the Oval
office or the situation room. He has the intelligence, the commitment,
and the judge and disposition that I think the American
people rightly deserve in their president.
Speaker 1 (13:08):
So with that being said, we decided to, you know,
just overthrow the government and get rid of him and
have a soft coup. And now you got me like,
that's what she's telling you, that he's amazing but won't
answer the damn question. You lie to the American people,
and you covered up for years a massive cognitive decline
of the president United States of America, who's taking another
(13:31):
nap on the beach while you're doing this interview, and
then you throw him out after midnight on Monday night
at the Democratic Convention, and then now you're the woman.
This is just pure scumbaggery. That's the only way I
know how to put it. The interview. If you watch it,
it's daytime outside the windows, and the thing aired at nighttime,
(13:51):
and they have the audacity to put the word live
up there on the screen, see an exclusive CNN Live.
Speaker 2 (13:57):
It's not live.
Speaker 1 (13:58):
And I'm sorry I harp on that again because it
just shows you how much disrespect they have for the
American voter. They don't, and this is the reason why
they don't mind overthrowing the will of the people. Whether
it's a coup attempt the first time against Donald Trump
with the impeachment over Russian collusion, whether it's lying to
you about the Steele Dalsier, whether it's lying about who
funded it, which was Hillary Clinton and the Democrat National Committee,
(14:19):
Whether it's lying to you about COVID nineteen in vaccines,
whether it's lying to you about six feet distancing, whether
it's lying to you about Donald Trump on every issue
with his court cases. Are lying about how there's no
cognitive cline of Joe Biden until there is a cognitive
decline of Joe Biden. When it only serves them because
they're afraid they're going to lose, they lie to you
(14:41):
on all of it. Joe Kanca over at Fox News
Channel had a great line after this interview.
Speaker 2 (14:49):
Listen to what he said, and.
Speaker 7 (14:50):
She said she made it clear in twenty twenty that
when she ran for president on a debate, state that
she was not for banning fracking.
Speaker 2 (14:56):
Well, there's one problem.
Speaker 7 (14:57):
She wasn't even a candidate in twenty twenty.
Speaker 2 (15:00):
She dropped out before then.
Speaker 7 (15:01):
I can't find any proof, yes, exactly, and I can't
find any proof I look for it. She said that
she said she supported fracking four years ago. It doesn't exist.
In fact, the Biden Harris administration on day one Janine
banned fracking on federal land. So there goes that argument.
But of course Dana Bash didn't bother to bring that
part up.
Speaker 5 (15:20):
And by the way, during a town hall.
Speaker 7 (15:22):
During that campaign in twenty nineteen, Kamala Harris said she
was quote one hundred percent against banning fracking. The big
picture here, judge, and we've talked about this before that
when you take away a teleprompter and the prescript remarks
from Kamala Harris, she becomes a human chernobyl. Let's read
this money quote again from this interview, because I've read
it ten times and I still had zero idea. When
(15:43):
she's talking about Kamala Harris quote, you mentioned the Green
New Deal. I've always believed and I've worked on it,
that climate change is real, that it is an urgent
matter to which we should apply metrics that include holding
ourselves to deadlines around time. Yeah, deadline should apply to
time how utterly.
Speaker 5 (16:00):
Found this did not go well at all.
Speaker 7 (16:02):
And this is a big turning point in this election,
no question about it.
Speaker 2 (16:06):
Counsch is right.
Speaker 1 (16:07):
You fact check Harris and she is a flip flopper
on virtually every issue, including fracking, and and he described
it perfectly. She is a human chernobyl when you take
out the teleprompter, he is absolutely right. I mean one
of the one of the latest lies that even Snoops
has had to admit, and it's like become a center
(16:28):
point of her campaign was that, like she pulled herself
up by her bootstraps and she worked at McDonald's. There's
a problem. There was zero evidence that Kamala Harris ever
worked at McDonald's. It's it's just a it's an amazing story.
It's a lie. It's it's like the vice president, you know,
(16:49):
her running mate running you know about about being in war.
Speaker 2 (16:54):
What do you say about being in war?
Speaker 1 (16:55):
Right? Oh, I saw combat and I carried a gun
into combat. And he got a big you know, he
got a you've got a bigger pause the convention for
that line.
Speaker 2 (17:02):
He was asked about it, by the way, and this
guy is a liar. How do I know it. Listen
to what he says here.
Speaker 3 (17:09):
Governor wils the country is just starting to get to
know you.
Speaker 2 (17:13):
I want to ask you.
Speaker 3 (17:14):
A question about how you've described your service in the
National Guard. You said that you carried weapons in war,
but you have never deployed actually in a war zone.
A campaign official said that you misspoke, did you well?
Speaker 8 (17:29):
First of all, I'm incredibly proud I've done twenty four
years of wearing uniform of this country. Equally proud of
my service in a public school classroom, whether it's Congress
or the governor. My record speaks for itself. But I
think people are coming to get to know me. I
speak like they do. I speak candidly, I wear my
emotions on my sleeves, and I speak especially passionately about
(17:51):
our children being shot in schools and around guns. So
I think people know me, they know who I am,
they know where my heart is. And again, my record
has been out there for over forty years to just
be for itself.
Speaker 3 (18:03):
And the idea that you said that you were in war,
did you miss speak, as the campaign has said, yeah.
Speaker 8 (18:09):
I said we were talking about in this case, this
was after school shooting. The ideas of carrying these weapons
of war, and my wife the English telling my grammar's
not always correct. But again, if it's not this, it's
an attack on my children for showing love for me,
or it's an attack on my dog. I'm not going
to do that. And the one thing I'll never do
is I'll never demean another member's service in any way.
I never have and I never will.
Speaker 2 (18:32):
I mean, the guys just a fraught out wire.
Speaker 1 (18:35):
And now when you lie as a Democrat, you can
just wash it all away by saying, oh, I was
misspeaking about being in war, right, my wife is your
excuse now told me that my grammar is not always correct.
This has nothing to do with your grammar. You said
you saw combat, you said you went to war. You
said that you were a rank in which you were not.
(18:58):
This is stolen valor. It is scumbaggery if you just
want to look at it from that perspective, And then
he goes on to say, well, I won't apologize for
speaking passionately about my feelings. What I'm sorry what. Scott
Jennings on CNN had a moment tonight as well. He's
(19:20):
the only conservative on there that CNN allows on the air.
He's their token one. I was one of them for
seven years. Now Scott's got this job. And he said
this about the interview and about Harris and her lies
tonight just on the cognate decline of Joe Biden screen.
Speaker 6 (19:39):
So at the beginning, when she's talking about Biden and
their record, our screen said this is called the chirron.
The headline at the bottom it said, Harris stands by
biden administration economic record. She is making it clear that
she will embrace and be a continuation of Biden's economic policy,
his record what they've done. She didn't offer sufferd no remorse,
(20:01):
no regrets, no introspection about anything they've done. She continued
to blame inflation on this fantasy price gouging idea. She
had no additional thoughts on the economic situation in the
country or what they've done beyond just saying Joe Biden
and I have done a great job.
Speaker 5 (20:15):
Now, if I were the Trump people, I.
Speaker 6 (20:18):
Would be salivating over the idea that that's how they
are going to run the race.
Speaker 5 (20:22):
I don't believe it's tenable.
Speaker 6 (20:24):
I also thought it was interesting that she didn't take
any responsibility at the end for telling the American people
that Joe Biden was fine and he was strong, when
we all know that's not true.
Speaker 5 (20:33):
That's why he's out of the race.
Speaker 6 (20:34):
And she's still standing by the idea that he was
fine and he's strong, and that he's fine.
Speaker 5 (20:38):
Today nobody believes that. And I just think, at some point,
then why isn't he running because he's too old?
Speaker 4 (20:46):
One blank san reason why donaldrup probably shouldn't be running
because he's too old and out of touch.
Speaker 5 (20:50):
I think most Americans know the truth.
Speaker 6 (20:52):
And when you're running to be president and you're willing
to look them in the face and tell them something.
Speaker 5 (20:56):
They know that you know is not true, it does
speak a little.
Speaker 2 (21:00):
Bit to your Scott and curious what you think about
this acts.
Speaker 1 (21:04):
I love how think I kind of just say, all right,
we're gonna we're gonna move on from that, right, I love,
I love She's like I believe, I believe her.
Speaker 2 (21:12):
Then why isn't Joe Biden ray always just too old?
Speaker 1 (21:17):
It's not because he's too old, Okay, it's not because
he is too old. It is clearly because of a
massive cognitive decline. And Kamala Harris lied to the American
people about that cognitive decline.
Speaker 2 (21:37):
Let me also just go to this, and it's in this.
Speaker 1 (21:39):
This deals with the issue of her and her radical agenda,
and it is a radical agenda that she has on
the crisis.
Speaker 2 (21:53):
She believes that.
Speaker 1 (21:54):
Climate crisis is like the number one thing now that
you should be folkocused on. So go get your solar
panels and your green and your you know, electric vehicle everybody,
because when I'm in charge, you can kiss those gas
guzzlers goodbye.
Speaker 4 (22:10):
That the climate crisis is real, that it is an
urgent matter to which we should apply metrics that include
holding ourselves to deadlines around time. We did that with
the Inflation Reduction Act.
Speaker 1 (22:24):
We have what we did that with the Inflation Reduction Act.
Like what the hell is she even talking about? Like
what on earth is she talking about? Look, I wish
I had enough faith in this country right now to
think that people would have watched this and realized this
was a really, really bad interview and that she just
(22:45):
lies a lot, and that his answer, for example, the
VP candidate wal his answer on stolen vower was just
a pathetic answer. And we deserve better. But unfortunately I
don't anymore. I really don't. I don't have any faith.
I don't have any faith at all that the American
(23:05):
people are going to look at this interview and actually
be able to understand just how bad things are. I also,
and it's sad, but I don't have any faith that
the American people, a lot of them anymore, are even
insulted by the fact that CNN will lie to them
with the interview, putting it up there that it's live
(23:26):
when the damn thing's taped and you can see the
sun outside the windows while they're doing the interview. But
that really tells you about where we are as a country.
We have raised a generation of incompetent idiots in our
public school systems that can't read, write, and do arithmetic
at grave level, and now we are raising this next
generation on a smartphone where instead of parenting, we throw
(23:50):
it in front of their face. And this is the
consequences of those actions. There is another big story that
deals with Kamwa Harris, and it's one that sees obviously
would not be able to cover in the sit down
interview right because they had to agree to throw all
journalistic integrity out the window, beg for this interview and
(24:11):
agree to this insane idea that we're gonna tape it
and then you're gonna have a babysitter. Now, this type
of question should have been brought up during the interview.
But we all know that CNN is not actually journalism.
They're a communist news network working for the deep state
in the regime. And we know this from all that
just came out, for example, from Facebook and Zuckerberg about
(24:33):
government censorship and silencing and killing stories, which CNN is
more than happy to do on a daily basis. This
story is one that has a lot of reminders in
my head to the same type of corruption that we
saw between Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden. And
this story involves Kamwa Harris's brother in law, who is
(24:58):
now being accused of fleecing ten taxpayers for billions to
give to left wing groups and to lawyers. Joe Biden's
son Hunter may be the current world class champ of
presidential family shady dealings, but not for long if you
just follow the money. If Kama Harris wins the White House,
(25:20):
her brother in law, a guy by the name of
Tony West, you might want to remember this name, Tony West,
who is married to her sister Maya is poised to
claim the well crooked crown. Like Hunter, West learned his
craft in the Obama years. Yeah then head of the
(25:41):
Justice Department's Civil Division, he invented a new form of
what nineteenth and early of twenty centuries Tammy Boss George
Washington Plunkett family called an honest graft. It was simple
until nineteen seventy seven, has had to approve any settlement
(26:02):
of a civil suit against the federal government over one
hundred thousand dollars. This preserved the constitutional requirement that Congress
control the government's purse, but in that year, seeking relief
from the burdens and volume of suits to review, Congress
removed that cap, handing the Justice Department a permanent blank
(26:26):
check to pay settlements unilaterally in any amount, out of
an account known as the Quote Judgment Fund.
Speaker 2 (26:34):
This is all real run by the Treasury Department.
Speaker 1 (26:38):
The Judgment Fund's secrecy is so complete that are often penetrated.
CIA might study it for lessons. The limited data released
amidst receipts the facts underlying the case, and even often
the lawyers involved. Now take a listen to this correct
(27:01):
by statue. The attorney's fees awarded need not be disclosed
at all to anyone. A Government Accountability Office study concluded
that quote no one knows the number of claims processed
by the federal government each year. Still, for three decades,
(27:23):
the integrity of Justice's officials sufficed to prevent abuse. Then,
in two thousand and nine, a guy by the name
of Tony West took over the department's Civil Division, the
division that litigates and settles lawsuits. Once West arrived, his
deputy emailed colleagues asking, quote, can you explain to Tony
(27:47):
the best way to allocate some money towards an organization
of our choosing?
Speaker 2 (27:53):
That is an actual question.
Speaker 1 (27:56):
Now you go back to this his deputy and again
this email colleagues asking can you explain to tell me
the best way to allocate some money.
Speaker 2 (28:06):
Towards an organization of our choosing?
Speaker 1 (28:09):
Settlements became the vehicle for paying off political allies.
Speaker 2 (28:15):
We now know this.
Speaker 1 (28:16):
For example, in twenty ten, after a Supreme Court victory,
DOJ lawyers were on the custom of winning a decade
long fight against discrimination claims by ninety one Hispanic and
female farmers. That's when West intervened, and as the new
York Times put it engineered a stunning turnaboutdj with your
(28:39):
tax dollars, agreed to a one point three to three
billion dollars settlement, which included thousands of farmers who had
never claimed bias.
Speaker 2 (28:51):
The deal was made over the.
Speaker 1 (28:54):
Vehement objections of the department's career lawyers.
Speaker 2 (28:58):
The New York.
Speaker 1 (28:59):
Times and investigation report described Wes's settlement as a runaway
train driven by radical racial politics and law firms that
stand again more than one hundred and thirty million dollars
in fees.
Speaker 2 (29:16):
That's coming from the Times, folks.
Speaker 1 (29:19):
They're saying this is insane, and the only people that
are getting rich here are not victims. The people that
are getting rich are the lawyers, law firms that got
more than one hundred and thirty million in fees. Now,
the projected settlement size then ballooned to over four point
four billion as additional plaintifs were added, including Native American farmers.
(29:42):
The government statistical expert was appalled, saying this at the time,
if they had gone to trial, the government would have prevailed.
Speaker 2 (29:52):
It was just a joke. It was so just. I
was so disgusted.
Speaker 1 (29:58):
It was simply buying the support of the Native Americans. Now,
this dirty deal also inflayd the number of people that
were on the claims, right, creating a sixty million dollar
windfall for the plaintiff's lead lawyer. Who was the plaintiff's
lead lawyer. You ready for this? Write it down because
I'm exposing it. A member of the Obama Biden transition team.
(30:25):
But Wes did not just builk the taxpayers. He also
shook down corporations as well. Again, this is Kamala Harris's
brother in law. In a series of bank settlements, his
team added increasingly aggressive provisions requiring the institutions to make
nearly a billion dollars in mandatory donations.
Speaker 2 (30:49):
And where do you think those donations went?
Speaker 1 (30:52):
Right, these institutions that had to make nearly a billion
dollars in mandatory donations, where do you think the money went?
The donations went to none other than no surprise here, Democrat.
Speaker 2 (31:05):
Supporting activist groups.
Speaker 1 (31:09):
Donations were given double credit against required targets, incentivizing these
payments over direct relief to victims of housing crisis, so
they got their hands on the money. West teams specifically
structured the terms to ensure that they would benefit only
(31:31):
their political allies while leaving conservative groups ineligible, and internal
email shows that WES deputies rewarded a settlement donation provision
to ensure the bank could not select a conservative property
rights organization as a recipient. Over time, WES grew even
(31:55):
more brazen. A twenty sixteen Volkswagen settlement required the company
to fund a two billion white house electric car initiative
that Congress had specifically rejected as part of the settlement.
In other words, you put a gun to the head
of corporations and then when you get them where you
(32:17):
want them, Okay, when you get them where you want them,
you then put a gun to their head and say,
now you're going to write a check, and this check's
going to go to my friends and they're going to
get rich off of this settlement. This is insane. The
idea that this was happening is is just absurd. But
(32:41):
what makes it even worse is the fact that it's
been happening now. And the guy who was the one
that was in charge of this was Kamala Harris's brother
in law, because he understood how the system worked when
she was in Congress. An email circulating saying they ought
to build a statue to West and bowed down to
(33:02):
the statue each day after we received two hundred thousand
plus dollars in this legal shakedown. California's Attorney general at
the time, Kamala Harris, was an active participant co signing
the agreements for her state. The Biden Harris administration has
(33:23):
continued West's honest graft tactics to reward political allies on
the taxpayer's dime.
Speaker 2 (33:31):
We've now found out.
Speaker 1 (33:33):
Now, let's go to twenty twenty one, and that's not
that long ago.
Speaker 2 (33:39):
Biden Harris are in the White House.
Speaker 1 (33:41):
In twenty twenty one, a billion dollars settlement with illegal
immigrants claiming emotional distress.
Speaker 2 (33:47):
It was scratched. They got rid of it.
Speaker 1 (33:50):
Why because there was massive outcry of billions of dollars
going to illegal immigrants claiming emotional distress.
Speaker 2 (33:57):
Like p Wright, that's enough, I've had enough.
Speaker 1 (33:59):
No, So when they got busted in that one, it
didn't matter because the friends still got paid.
Speaker 2 (34:06):
Now what I mean by that? All right, let me
explain that to you.
Speaker 1 (34:09):
Even after the public outcry, the Department of Justice quietly
because apparently no one's paying attention to what they're doing.
Agreed under Harris to pay attorney's fees to the ACOU
lawyers in the long running case. Recently, the Department of
Justice agreed to pay two million to FBI agents Peter
(34:31):
Struck and Lisa Page for releasing their anti Trump text
to congressional investigators worried about political bias. There's no way
they should have gotten paid for that, by the way,
but they got paid because they understood how the system worked.
Speaker 2 (34:44):
And so there you go.
Speaker 1 (34:46):
Now, the pair all they did was claim a violation
of the Privacy Act, but the messages were sent on
their government issued phones, which contain clear banner warnings that
users lack any reasonable expectation of privacy. The DOJ had
ample basis to litigate this case and to win, right
(35:08):
before surrendering hard earned tax dollars to these disgrace FBI
agents that were a part of the deep state machine.
And that's exactly why the DJ's like, don't worry, guys,
we know you've been embarrassed a little bit, Like, hey,
here's a couple million dollars. Totally fine, right, And this
form of civic corruption is just disgusting me. I mean,
(35:29):
it truly is disgusting and This corruption, by the way,
is not bipartisan either. At the start of his administration,
President Trump's Attorney General band Settlement slash Funds, while one
of the early acts of the Bid Nearest DOJ was
to resind that band. So you have to understand they
(35:51):
know what they're doing, they understand how easy it is
to do this, and they understand how easy it is
to get paid.
Speaker 2 (35:58):
Now.
Speaker 1 (35:58):
One of the narratives this year is Democrats have been
saying over and over again that Donald Trump is in
this race only for himself, right, that he's just doing
this to save himself.
Speaker 2 (36:08):
Well, guess what.
Speaker 1 (36:08):
They're the one that brought all these ridiculous court cases
against him and have misdirected countless dollars millions of dollars
and government funds to attack their political enemy. They've weaponized
the government, and the government is now has unlimited funds
to go after literally their political opponent, which is the
other side, which happens this time to be Donald Trump.
Speaker 2 (36:31):
Who knows who it's going to be in the future.
Speaker 1 (36:35):
What Democrats have basically figured out is that look Tony
West and Biden Harris, they figured out a brilliant way
to use the federal government to pay out money to
their friends that then that money will come back to them,
and to force settlements and donations that only go to
their friends, and then that money is laundered and comes
(36:56):
back to their campaigns. What Tony West and vined and
what the Biden Harris you know administration have been operating
is a machine.
Speaker 2 (37:06):
It is a.
Speaker 1 (37:06):
Machine that pours billions, not millions, but billions of taxpayer
dollars into these left wing activist groups. Wes said to
be Harris's White House counsel in waiting.
Speaker 2 (37:20):
That's why I want you to know this. Let me
say that again.
Speaker 1 (37:24):
West is said to be Harris's White House counsel in waiting.
Speaker 2 (37:31):
I'll tell you this.
Speaker 1 (37:32):
The New York Posts put it this way, Hunter Biden
step aside.
Speaker 2 (37:35):
A new big guy is coming to town.
Speaker 1 (37:37):
Kamala with the help of Tony West and his cronies
will show you how honest GAFT is really done. This
is an incredible look at the corruption of Kamala Harris.
This is a woman who's gonna, I'm sure, bring this
person in and they're going to basically blackmail people into settlements,
(37:58):
just like they did with Volkswagen. To do this type
of corruption on a level that you could have never imagined.
And again, until nineteen seventy seven, Congress had to approve
any settlement of a civil suit against the federal government
of over one hundred thousand dollars.
Speaker 2 (38:14):
And then they changed it. And now what.
Speaker 1 (38:16):
They've figured out is we can just take cases that
don't need to be settled, bring in our friends, get
them paid, then bring in new people that we want
to get paid so they can then get the money
and bring it back to us, and have a constant
revolving door of cash, a constant revolving door of serious
(38:42):
cash billions that can then prop up and pimp the
democratic machine. All of this being done in secrecy, all
of this being done without any transparency, all of this
being done while you have no idea who the settlements are,
(39:05):
who the lawyers are, who's getting paid. And even if
the settlement should come out, and if it wasn't, by
the way, for the whistleblowers, it gave us the information
that I just gave you, we wouldn't know any of
this was happening right now. I hope you'll take this,
and I would say I'm gonna keep covering this, and
I will but I don't know how much more we're
(39:28):
gonna get because this is the story because everything else
is redacted, right like everything else is completely redacted.
Speaker 2 (39:39):
You don't know what's happening.
Speaker 1 (39:41):
You don't who's got the money, you don't know what
deals are being made, because none of it has to
be shown to the American people. And that's how they're
able to pull this off. So I'll say it again.
If you thought that Hunter Biden was bad, look at
what Kamala Harrison brother in law are about to do
to you.
Speaker 2 (40:02):
What they're about to do to the American people.
Speaker 1 (40:04):
It's truly incredible how much money we are talking about
right here.
Speaker 2 (40:08):
It is a massive amount of money. Also, while all this.
Speaker 1 (40:14):
Is happening right now, the White House has come out
and they are swinging at Facebook, defending the censoring of
content they're now saying is their right when it comes
to protecting public health. White House officials have now come
out and they have slammed Facebook, asking the tech companies
(40:38):
to take responsibility for the information they present. A White
House spokesman has now said this afternoon that the Biden
administration encouraged Mark Zuckerberg's platform to be quote responsible despite
the tech entrepreneur, saying he was pressured to censor specific content.
The House Judiciary Committee, as you know, published that letter
(41:00):
from Zuckerberg about repeated demands from the bid Mayris administration
to censor content, even satire, related to COVID nineteen and vaccines.
Speaker 2 (41:12):
Quote.
Speaker 1 (41:14):
This administration encouraged responsible actions and continues to do so
to protect public health and safety. What did Zuckerberg write Well,
Zuckerberg wrote that in twenty twenty one, quote, senior officials
from the Biden administration, including the White House, repeatedly pressure
our teams for months to censor certain COVID nineteen content,
(41:35):
including humor and satire, and express a lot of frustration
with our teams when we didn't agree. When asked, the
White House washed its hands of the ardeal and declined
to acknowledge Zuckerberg's use of terms regarding censorship and pressure
when confronted with a deadly pandemic. Quote, this administration encouraged
responsible actions to protect public health and safety, the White
(41:58):
House spokesman said.
Speaker 2 (42:01):
Now here's the most insane part.
Speaker 1 (42:02):
The White House officials then attributed responsibility to tech companies
tech platforms for making independent choices about the content posted
on their apps, saying this from the White House today,
our position has been clear and consistent. We believe tech
companies and other private actors should take into account the
(42:25):
effects their actions have on the American people while making
independent choices about the information they present.
Speaker 2 (42:32):
Well, that's just not what happened.
Speaker 1 (42:34):
Biden Harris's administration pressured Facebook to censor Americans so much
so that Facebook said, Okay, we're going to censor Americans,
and then when it had nothing to do with public health,
and a great example of the lies coming from this
White House, they throttled stories that the fit White House
didn't like, for example, the Hunter Biden laptop story. So
(42:57):
they're out there today telling you, well, we're just trying
to make sure they're responsible, right. The White House also
provide the same BS statement to media members across the board.
The administration's denial of any form of censorship flies in
the face of what social media companies such as Elon
must X platform, which release the Twitter files, have learned,
(43:21):
and those documents expose the federal government's interests in suppressing
certain stories, such as those related to the Hunter Biden
laptop and anything they didn't like when it came to
asking questions about COVID. Zuckerberg also complained about the same
issues in his letter, backing up what we saw in
the Twitter files to Jim Jordan
So Kama Harris and her babysitter VP candidate Walls went
on CNN and I'm going to break it all down
for you. But let me first just say to CNN,
you guys are disgusting. You put interview up on TV,
and if you watch, you saw it too, so you
know exactly what I'm talking about. And before they even
(00:24):
started speaking, they were already selling you propaganda. They were
lying to you. They put up on the screen the
word live. Now, CNN is obsessed with putting up the
word live.
Speaker 2 (00:38):
We're live, We're live.
Speaker 1 (00:40):
Right, They're always live from live from this breaking news
live in the Sana news room. I know this because
for seven years I was a conservative fighting the fight
in hell at CNN as a commentator. They were obsessed
with everything being live. The problem is this, this interview
(01:01):
was not live. It was taped, and we don't know
what was edited. We don't know what questions were asked
of Kamala Harris or Walls that didn't see the light
of day. But if you turned on CNN and you
were watching this interview, you saw it clearly stating in
(01:24):
the corner of the screen the word live. When you
tape an interview.
Speaker 2 (01:29):
It is not live. I'm gonna say it again.
Speaker 1 (01:33):
Apparently the dumba's at CNN, actually they know exactly what
they were doing.
Speaker 2 (01:36):
They were lying to you.
Speaker 1 (01:37):
But apparently the dumba's in America that vote for Kamala
Harris and Walls are so stupid they don't understand that
a taped interview is not live.
Speaker 2 (01:50):
It is not live.
Speaker 1 (01:52):
Now that I've gotten that out of the way, the
fact that we're even having to have this conversation is asinine.
Speaker 2 (01:58):
Let's deal with these substance.
Speaker 1 (02:00):
There was a big moment in this conversation, and number one,
I understand why they send her with a babysitter this interview,
and even Democrats are saying this right afterwards. It ain't good, folks. Okay,
this interview is not a very good interview. She's terrible
Without a teleprompter. You write her something. She's a decent
actress and she can read a teleprompter. You take that
(02:22):
away from her, she's pretty much screwed. Let me take
a quick moment to tell you about an incredible company
that stands up and fights for our First and her
Second Amendment rights. They fight for the rights of unborn children,
and they fight every time you pay your bill to
them for our veterans, our first responders, and our wounded warriors.
(02:44):
I'm talking about Patriot Mobile. They're the only conservative Christian
wireless provider in the country. And when you pay your
bill to them every month, they actually take about five
percent of your bill and give it back to the
causes that I just mentioned at no extra cost to you. Now,
the reason why that's incredible is because if you're with
(03:05):
Big Mobile, you're actually supporting and funding the Left in
a very big way. Big Mobile gives big donations to
organizations that pay and advocate for abortion on demand. They
give big donations to Democratic candidates and causes at the local, state,
and national level. Another reason why you should make the
(03:30):
switch to a company that stands with your values. Now,
making the switch space your at Mobile is easy. You
can keep your same cell phone you have right now,
keep your same cell phone number, or you can upgrade
to a new phone, and you don't have to worry
about coverage because in twenty twenty four, it is actually
really easy to make the switch and you're gonna have
(03:50):
the same exact coverage that you are used to because
they use the same exact towers that you're using right now,
So call right now nine Patriot that's nine seven two
Patriot or patriotmobile dot com slash ferguson. Now when you
use the promo code ferguson, you're gonna get a free
(04:12):
month of service.
Speaker 2 (04:14):
So don't wait any longer.
Speaker 1 (04:16):
Stop giving your money to comings that literally hate your
family values and hate your Christian values. Make the switch,
get nationwide coverage and make a difference with every phone
call you make. Nine seven to two Patriot that's nine
seven to two Patriot or patriotmobile dot com slash ferguson.
Promo code ferguson. You'll get one month of service for free,
(04:40):
all right now. One person described it as a human
Chernobyl without a teleprompter, because everything just starts exploding in
her head. She was asked a question about her values changing,
and I'm gonna play for you how she explained that
on CNN, trying to tell you that her values had
not changed, when clearly they have changed recently.
Speaker 2 (05:01):
They're not real changes. It's just too pander to voters.
Speaker 1 (05:05):
Listen to what she says carefully, because I'm going to
play for you a montage of what Kamwa Harris actually
believes after I play this first part from CNN where
it says on the screen live even though it's a taped,
damn interview.
Speaker 3 (05:18):
Generally speaking, how should voters look at some of the
changes that you've made that you've explained some of here
in your policy. Is it because you have more experience
now and you've learned more about the information. Is it
because you were running for president in a Democratic primary?
And should they feel comfortable and confident that what you're
(05:41):
saying now is going to be your policy moving forward?
Speaker 4 (05:44):
Dana, I think the most important and most significant aspect
of my policy perspective and decisions is my values have
not changed. You've mentioned the Green New Deal. I have
always believed and I have worked on it, that the
climate crisis is real, that it is an urgent matter
(06:05):
to which we should apply metrics that include holding ourselves
to deadlines around time. We did that with the Inflation
Reduction Act. We have set goals for the United States
of America and by extension, the globe around when we
should meet certain standards for reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.
As an example, that value has not changed. My value
(06:28):
around what we need to do to secure our border.
That value has not changed. I spent two terms as
the Attorney General of California prosecuting transnational criminal organizations violations
of American laws regarding the passage illegal passage of guns, drugs,
and human beings across our border. My values have not changed.
Speaker 1 (06:49):
My values have not changed. Okay, so she says at
the end, her values have not changed. Now I'm going
to play for your saying my values have not changed
and remind you of what she says her values are.
Listen carefully to who Kamala Harris is.
Speaker 4 (07:08):
My values have non changed.
Speaker 5 (07:10):
Dou spread meat specifically, Yes, Boston Marathon bomber. They should
be able to vote.
Speaker 2 (07:14):
I think we should have that conversation.
Speaker 5 (07:15):
Abolish ice yes, Would you ban off shore drilling?
Speaker 3 (07:18):
Yes?
Speaker 4 (07:18):
And I'm in favor of banning frack. I am prepared
to pass agreeing the deal, and I support a mandatory
buyback program. We're not going to treat people who are
undocumented across the borders criminals. The idea that more police
equals more safety, that's just wrong.
Speaker 6 (07:31):
Policing as we know goes all the way back to
slave patrols, and that idea, and you are absolutely right.
Speaker 2 (07:36):
Where do you stand on defund the police?
Speaker 5 (07:38):
We need to take a look at these budgets. Do
you ban plastic straws? And we should seventy to eighty
percent tax rate?
Speaker 4 (07:44):
I think that's fantastic.
Speaker 5 (07:45):
Chipping now to the Minnesota Freedom Funds. How dare we
speak Merry Christmas?
Speaker 4 (07:50):
Yeah?
Speaker 2 (07:50):
I am rap.
Speaker 4 (07:51):
I do believe that we need to get radical about
what we are doing.
Speaker 1 (07:56):
That is who Kamala Harris is. So at the very end,
she makes it very clear her values have not changed.
Comrade Kammwa answered to a very weekly phrased question, a
question that was put in more as a matter of
defense and curiosity. Donald Trump tweeted out, but her answer
(08:18):
rambled incoherently and declared her quote values haven't changed. On that,
I agree her values haven't changed. Trump said, the border
is going to remain open, not close. There will be
free healthcare for illegal aliens, sanctuary cities, no cash bail,
gun confiscation, zero fracking, a ban on gasoline powered cars,
(08:44):
private health care will be abolished, a seventy to eighty
percent tax rate will be put in place, and she will.
Speaker 2 (08:52):
Defund the police.
Speaker 1 (08:54):
America, he says, will become a wasteland. He's absolutely by
the way, and what she said there. Now, Kamala Harris
says she has no regrets as well about the biggest
coup and cover up of Joe Biden and his massive
is obvious, massive cognitive decline, which goes back to can
(09:16):
you trust Kamala Harris? The answer, I think is very
clear based on the montage I just played, you know,
but I want you to also think about this. Kamala
Harris lied to you over and over again telling you
that Joe Biden was fit and was an amazing commander
in chief, that there was nothing wrong, that everything was fine.
(09:40):
And then once the first debate happened and everyone saw
the massive cognitive decline of Joe Biden, Kamala Harris what
did she do? She then helped overthrow the president of
the United States of America in a coup. Where now
she she walks in to what she believes is I'm
(10:03):
now the next president. How did she pull it off?
I don't know if it's blackmail, I don't know what
you want to call it, but no one has voted
for Kama Harris to this day. Listen to what Kama
Harris says when she says, I have no regrets about
lying about covering up for crooked Joe Biden and his
massive cognitive decline. If she'll lie to you about that,
(10:26):
what else is she going to lie to you about?
Speaker 3 (10:29):
Vice President Harris, you were a very staunch defender of
President Biden's capacity to serve another four years. Right after
the debate, you insisted that President Biden is extraordinarily strong
given where we are now, do you have any regrets
about what you told the American people?
Speaker 4 (10:46):
No, not at all, not at all. I have.
Speaker 1 (10:51):
Served with let me just pleasure. She said, no, not
at all. I lied to you, guys. I lied to
you because this was how I kept my power. And
then once I realize he was losing his ability to
keep his own power, then I decided to throw him
under the bus and overthrow the will of the people
and slide in to get the nomination. That's what she's
(11:14):
telling you. Like, she's like, I don't have any regret
about like mine? Would I have regrets? I don't have regrets.
It's were out great for me. I accused Joe Biden
of being a racist. He needed a woman of whatever
color you want it to be right, like he needs
he needed a woman of color, and that was going
(11:39):
to get rid of the racism.
Speaker 2 (11:40):
So then I became the VP, and it was amazing.
Speaker 1 (11:44):
And then I was a good soldier and I lied
to the American people to cover up what the corruption
of this administration and it worked flawlessly.
Speaker 2 (11:52):
And then when he was done, I slid on in there.
Speaker 1 (11:56):
It's her entire career, by the way, right, it is
her entire career has been like this. And she's laughing
at all of us because she's like, this is amazing.
I'm playing you guys. Oh lie to you about everything,
alled to you about his cognitive decline. I lied you
about who the president is right now, I don't care,
(12:19):
And she says, I have no regrets, And honestly, why
would you.
Speaker 4 (12:22):
President Biden for almost four years now? And I'll tell
you it's one of the greatest honors of my career. Truly.
He cares so deeply about the American people. He is
so smart.
Speaker 1 (12:36):
And notice, by the way, she's not answering the question.
The question was, do you regret saying, even after the
debate that he was in great shape when Quilly wasn't.
Speaker 4 (12:47):
And loyal to the American people, and I have spent
hours upon hours with him, be it in the Oval
office or the situation room. He has the intelligence, the commitment,
and the judge and disposition that I think the American
people rightly deserve in their president.
Speaker 1 (13:08):
So with that being said, we decided to, you know,
just overthrow the government and get rid of him and
have a soft coup. And now you got me like,
that's what she's telling you, that he's amazing but won't
answer the damn question. You lie to the American people,
and you covered up for years a massive cognitive decline
of the president United States of America, who's taking another
(13:31):
nap on the beach while you're doing this interview, and
then you throw him out after midnight on Monday night
at the Democratic Convention, and then now you're the woman.
This is just pure scumbaggery. That's the only way I
know how to put it. The interview. If you watch it,
it's daytime outside the windows, and the thing aired at nighttime,
(13:51):
and they have the audacity to put the word live
up there on the screen, see an exclusive CNN Live.
Speaker 2 (13:57):
It's not live.
Speaker 1 (13:58):
And I'm sorry I harp on that again because it
just shows you how much disrespect they have for the
American voter. They don't, and this is the reason why
they don't mind overthrowing the will of the people. Whether
it's a coup attempt the first time against Donald Trump
with the impeachment over Russian collusion, whether it's lying to
you about the Steele Dalsier, whether it's lying about who
funded it, which was Hillary Clinton and the Democrat National Committee,
(14:19):
Whether it's lying to you about COVID nineteen in vaccines,
whether it's lying to you about six feet distancing, whether
it's lying to you about Donald Trump on every issue
with his court cases. Are lying about how there's no
cognitive cline of Joe Biden until there is a cognitive
decline of Joe Biden. When it only serves them because
they're afraid they're going to lose, they lie to you
(14:41):
on all of it. Joe Kanca over at Fox News
Channel had a great line after this interview.
Speaker 2 (14:49):
Listen to what he said, and.
Speaker 7 (14:50):
She said she made it clear in twenty twenty that
when she ran for president on a debate, state that
she was not for banning fracking.
Speaker 2 (14:56):
Well, there's one problem.
Speaker 7 (14:57):
She wasn't even a candidate in twenty twenty.
Speaker 2 (15:00):
She dropped out before then.
Speaker 7 (15:01):
I can't find any proof, yes, exactly, and I can't
find any proof I look for it. She said that
she said she supported fracking four years ago. It doesn't exist.
In fact, the Biden Harris administration on day one Janine
banned fracking on federal land. So there goes that argument.
But of course Dana Bash didn't bother to bring that
part up.
Speaker 5 (15:20):
And by the way, during a town hall.
Speaker 7 (15:22):
During that campaign in twenty nineteen, Kamala Harris said she
was quote one hundred percent against banning fracking. The big
picture here, judge, and we've talked about this before that
when you take away a teleprompter and the prescript remarks
from Kamala Harris, she becomes a human chernobyl. Let's read
this money quote again from this interview, because I've read
it ten times and I still had zero idea. When
(15:43):
she's talking about Kamala Harris quote, you mentioned the Green
New Deal. I've always believed and I've worked on it,
that climate change is real, that it is an urgent
matter to which we should apply metrics that include holding
ourselves to deadlines around time. Yeah, deadline should apply to
time how utterly.
Speaker 5 (16:00):
Found this did not go well at all.
Speaker 7 (16:02):
And this is a big turning point in this election,
no question about it.
Speaker 2 (16:06):
Counsch is right.
Speaker 1 (16:07):
You fact check Harris and she is a flip flopper
on virtually every issue, including fracking, and and he described
it perfectly. She is a human chernobyl when you take
out the teleprompter, he is absolutely right. I mean one
of the one of the latest lies that even Snoops
has had to admit, and it's like become a center
(16:28):
point of her campaign was that, like she pulled herself
up by her bootstraps and she worked at McDonald's. There's
a problem. There was zero evidence that Kamala Harris ever
worked at McDonald's. It's it's just a it's an amazing story.
It's a lie. It's it's like the vice president, you know,
(16:49):
her running mate running you know about about being in war.
Speaker 2 (16:54):
What do you say about being in war?
Speaker 1 (16:55):
Right? Oh, I saw combat and I carried a gun
into combat. And he got a big you know, he
got a you've got a bigger pause the convention for
that line.
Speaker 2 (17:02):
He was asked about it, by the way, and this
guy is a liar. How do I know it. Listen
to what he says here.
Speaker 3 (17:09):
Governor wils the country is just starting to get to
know you.
Speaker 2 (17:13):
I want to ask you.
Speaker 3 (17:14):
A question about how you've described your service in the
National Guard. You said that you carried weapons in war,
but you have never deployed actually in a war zone.
A campaign official said that you misspoke, did you well?
Speaker 8 (17:29):
First of all, I'm incredibly proud I've done twenty four
years of wearing uniform of this country. Equally proud of
my service in a public school classroom, whether it's Congress
or the governor. My record speaks for itself. But I
think people are coming to get to know me. I
speak like they do. I speak candidly, I wear my
emotions on my sleeves, and I speak especially passionately about
(17:51):
our children being shot in schools and around guns. So
I think people know me, they know who I am,
they know where my heart is. And again, my record
has been out there for over forty years to just
be for itself.
Speaker 3 (18:03):
And the idea that you said that you were in war,
did you miss speak, as the campaign has said, yeah.
Speaker 8 (18:09):
I said we were talking about in this case, this
was after school shooting. The ideas of carrying these weapons
of war, and my wife the English telling my grammar's
not always correct. But again, if it's not this, it's
an attack on my children for showing love for me,
or it's an attack on my dog. I'm not going
to do that. And the one thing I'll never do
is I'll never demean another member's service in any way.
I never have and I never will.
Speaker 2 (18:32):
I mean, the guys just a fraught out wire.
Speaker 1 (18:35):
And now when you lie as a Democrat, you can
just wash it all away by saying, oh, I was
misspeaking about being in war, right, my wife is your
excuse now told me that my grammar is not always correct.
This has nothing to do with your grammar. You said
you saw combat, you said you went to war. You
said that you were a rank in which you were not.
(18:58):
This is stolen valor. It is scumbaggery if you just
want to look at it from that perspective, And then
he goes on to say, well, I won't apologize for
speaking passionately about my feelings. What I'm sorry what. Scott
Jennings on CNN had a moment tonight as well. He's
(19:20):
the only conservative on there that CNN allows on the air.
He's their token one. I was one of them for
seven years. Now Scott's got this job. And he said
this about the interview and about Harris and her lies
tonight just on the cognate decline of Joe Biden screen.
Speaker 6 (19:39):
So at the beginning, when she's talking about Biden and
their record, our screen said this is called the chirron.
The headline at the bottom it said, Harris stands by
biden administration economic record. She is making it clear that
she will embrace and be a continuation of Biden's economic policy,
his record what they've done. She didn't offer sufferd no remorse,
(20:01):
no regrets, no introspection about anything they've done. She continued
to blame inflation on this fantasy price gouging idea. She
had no additional thoughts on the economic situation in the
country or what they've done beyond just saying Joe Biden
and I have done a great job.
Speaker 5 (20:15):
Now, if I were the Trump people, I.
Speaker 6 (20:18):
Would be salivating over the idea that that's how they
are going to run the race.
Speaker 5 (20:22):
I don't believe it's tenable.
Speaker 6 (20:24):
I also thought it was interesting that she didn't take
any responsibility at the end for telling the American people
that Joe Biden was fine and he was strong, when
we all know that's not true.
Speaker 5 (20:33):
That's why he's out of the race.
Speaker 6 (20:34):
And she's still standing by the idea that he was
fine and he's strong, and that he's fine.
Speaker 5 (20:38):
Today nobody believes that. And I just think, at some point,
then why isn't he running because he's too old?
Speaker 4 (20:46):
One blank san reason why donaldrup probably shouldn't be running
because he's too old and out of touch.
Speaker 5 (20:50):
I think most Americans know the truth.
Speaker 6 (20:52):
And when you're running to be president and you're willing
to look them in the face and tell them something.
Speaker 5 (20:56):
They know that you know is not true, it does
speak a little.
Speaker 2 (21:00):
Bit to your Scott and curious what you think about
this acts.
Speaker 1 (21:04):
I love how think I kind of just say, all right,
we're gonna we're gonna move on from that, right, I love,
I love She's like I believe, I believe her.
Speaker 2 (21:12):
Then why isn't Joe Biden ray always just too old?
Speaker 1 (21:17):
It's not because he's too old, Okay, it's not because
he is too old. It is clearly because of a
massive cognitive decline. And Kamala Harris lied to the American
people about that cognitive decline.
Speaker 2 (21:37):
Let me also just go to this, and it's in this.
Speaker 1 (21:39):
This deals with the issue of her and her radical agenda,
and it is a radical agenda that she has on
the crisis.
Speaker 2 (21:53):
She believes that.
Speaker 1 (21:54):
Climate crisis is like the number one thing now that
you should be folkocused on. So go get your solar
panels and your green and your you know, electric vehicle everybody,
because when I'm in charge, you can kiss those gas
guzzlers goodbye.
Speaker 4 (22:10):
That the climate crisis is real, that it is an
urgent matter to which we should apply metrics that include
holding ourselves to deadlines around time. We did that with
the Inflation Reduction Act.
Speaker 1 (22:24):
We have what we did that with the Inflation Reduction Act.
Like what the hell is she even talking about? Like
what on earth is she talking about? Look, I wish
I had enough faith in this country right now to
think that people would have watched this and realized this
was a really, really bad interview and that she just
(22:45):
lies a lot, and that his answer, for example, the
VP candidate wal his answer on stolen vower was just
a pathetic answer. And we deserve better. But unfortunately I
don't anymore. I really don't. I don't have any faith.
I don't have any faith at all that the American
(23:05):
people are going to look at this interview and actually
be able to understand just how bad things are. I also,
and it's sad, but I don't have any faith that
the American people, a lot of them anymore, are even
insulted by the fact that CNN will lie to them
with the interview, putting it up there that it's live
(23:26):
when the damn thing's taped and you can see the
sun outside the windows while they're doing the interview. But
that really tells you about where we are as a country.
We have raised a generation of incompetent idiots in our
public school systems that can't read, write, and do arithmetic
at grave level, and now we are raising this next
generation on a smartphone where instead of parenting, we throw
(23:50):
it in front of their face. And this is the
consequences of those actions. There is another big story that
deals with Kamwa Harris, and it's one that sees obviously
would not be able to cover in the sit down
interview right because they had to agree to throw all
journalistic integrity out the window, beg for this interview and
(24:11):
agree to this insane idea that we're gonna tape it
and then you're gonna have a babysitter. Now, this type
of question should have been brought up during the interview.
But we all know that CNN is not actually journalism.
They're a communist news network working for the deep state
in the regime. And we know this from all that
just came out, for example, from Facebook and Zuckerberg about
(24:33):
government censorship and silencing and killing stories, which CNN is
more than happy to do on a daily basis. This
story is one that has a lot of reminders in
my head to the same type of corruption that we
saw between Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden. And
this story involves Kamwa Harris's brother in law, who is
(24:58):
now being accused of fleecing ten taxpayers for billions to
give to left wing groups and to lawyers. Joe Biden's
son Hunter may be the current world class champ of
presidential family shady dealings, but not for long if you
just follow the money. If Kama Harris wins the White House,
(25:20):
her brother in law, a guy by the name of
Tony West, you might want to remember this name, Tony West,
who is married to her sister Maya is poised to
claim the well crooked crown. Like Hunter, West learned his
craft in the Obama years. Yeah then head of the
(25:41):
Justice Department's Civil Division, he invented a new form of
what nineteenth and early of twenty centuries Tammy Boss George
Washington Plunkett family called an honest graft. It was simple
until nineteen seventy seven, has had to approve any settlement
(26:02):
of a civil suit against the federal government over one
hundred thousand dollars. This preserved the constitutional requirement that Congress
control the government's purse, but in that year, seeking relief
from the burdens and volume of suits to review, Congress
removed that cap, handing the Justice Department a permanent blank
(26:26):
check to pay settlements unilaterally in any amount, out of
an account known as the Quote Judgment Fund.
Speaker 2 (26:34):
This is all real run by the Treasury Department.
Speaker 1 (26:38):
The Judgment Fund's secrecy is so complete that are often penetrated.
CIA might study it for lessons. The limited data released
amidst receipts the facts underlying the case, and even often
the lawyers involved. Now take a listen to this correct
(27:01):
by statue. The attorney's fees awarded need not be disclosed
at all to anyone. A Government Accountability Office study concluded
that quote no one knows the number of claims processed
by the federal government each year. Still, for three decades,
(27:23):
the integrity of Justice's officials sufficed to prevent abuse. Then,
in two thousand and nine, a guy by the name
of Tony West took over the department's Civil Division, the
division that litigates and settles lawsuits. Once West arrived, his
deputy emailed colleagues asking, quote, can you explain to Tony
(27:47):
the best way to allocate some money towards an organization
of our choosing?
Speaker 2 (27:53):
That is an actual question.
Speaker 1 (27:56):
Now you go back to this his deputy and again
this email colleagues asking can you explain to tell me
the best way to allocate some money.
Speaker 2 (28:06):
Towards an organization of our choosing?
Speaker 1 (28:09):
Settlements became the vehicle for paying off political allies.
Speaker 2 (28:15):
We now know this.
Speaker 1 (28:16):
For example, in twenty ten, after a Supreme Court victory,
DOJ lawyers were on the custom of winning a decade
long fight against discrimination claims by ninety one Hispanic and
female farmers. That's when West intervened, and as the new
York Times put it engineered a stunning turnaboutdj with your
(28:39):
tax dollars, agreed to a one point three to three
billion dollars settlement, which included thousands of farmers who had
never claimed bias.
Speaker 2 (28:51):
The deal was made over the.
Speaker 1 (28:54):
Vehement objections of the department's career lawyers.
Speaker 2 (28:58):
The New York.
Speaker 1 (28:59):
Times and investigation report described Wes's settlement as a runaway
train driven by radical racial politics and law firms that
stand again more than one hundred and thirty million dollars
in fees.
Speaker 2 (29:16):
That's coming from the Times, folks.
Speaker 1 (29:19):
They're saying this is insane, and the only people that
are getting rich here are not victims. The people that
are getting rich are the lawyers, law firms that got
more than one hundred and thirty million in fees. Now,
the projected settlement size then ballooned to over four point
four billion as additional plaintifs were added, including Native American farmers.
(29:42):
The government statistical expert was appalled, saying this at the time,
if they had gone to trial, the government would have prevailed.
Speaker 2 (29:52):
It was just a joke. It was so just. I
was so disgusted.
Speaker 1 (29:58):
It was simply buying the support of the Native Americans. Now,
this dirty deal also inflayd the number of people that
were on the claims, right, creating a sixty million dollar
windfall for the plaintiff's lead lawyer. Who was the plaintiff's
lead lawyer. You ready for this? Write it down because
I'm exposing it. A member of the Obama Biden transition team.
(30:25):
But Wes did not just builk the taxpayers. He also
shook down corporations as well. Again, this is Kamala Harris's
brother in law. In a series of bank settlements, his
team added increasingly aggressive provisions requiring the institutions to make
nearly a billion dollars in mandatory donations.
Speaker 2 (30:49):
And where do you think those donations went?
Speaker 1 (30:52):
Right, these institutions that had to make nearly a billion
dollars in mandatory donations, where do you think the money went?
The donations went to none other than no surprise here, Democrat.
Speaker 2 (31:05):
Supporting activist groups.
Speaker 1 (31:09):
Donations were given double credit against required targets, incentivizing these
payments over direct relief to victims of housing crisis, so
they got their hands on the money. West teams specifically
structured the terms to ensure that they would benefit only
(31:31):
their political allies while leaving conservative groups ineligible, and internal
email shows that WES deputies rewarded a settlement donation provision
to ensure the bank could not select a conservative property
rights organization as a recipient. Over time, WES grew even
(31:55):
more brazen. A twenty sixteen Volkswagen settlement required the company
to fund a two billion white house electric car initiative
that Congress had specifically rejected as part of the settlement.
In other words, you put a gun to the head
of corporations and then when you get them where you
(32:17):
want them, Okay, when you get them where you want them,
you then put a gun to their head and say,
now you're going to write a check, and this check's
going to go to my friends and they're going to
get rich off of this settlement. This is insane. The
idea that this was happening is is just absurd. But
(32:41):
what makes it even worse is the fact that it's
been happening now. And the guy who was the one
that was in charge of this was Kamala Harris's brother
in law, because he understood how the system worked when
she was in Congress. An email circulating saying they ought
to build a statue to West and bowed down to
(33:02):
the statue each day after we received two hundred thousand
plus dollars in this legal shakedown. California's Attorney general at
the time, Kamala Harris, was an active participant co signing
the agreements for her state. The Biden Harris administration has
(33:23):
continued West's honest graft tactics to reward political allies on
the taxpayer's dime.
Speaker 2 (33:31):
We've now found out.
Speaker 1 (33:33):
Now, let's go to twenty twenty one, and that's not
that long ago.
Speaker 2 (33:39):
Biden Harris are in the White House.
Speaker 1 (33:41):
In twenty twenty one, a billion dollars settlement with illegal
immigrants claiming emotional distress.
Speaker 2 (33:47):
It was scratched. They got rid of it.
Speaker 1 (33:50):
Why because there was massive outcry of billions of dollars
going to illegal immigrants claiming emotional distress.
Speaker 2 (33:57):
Like p Wright, that's enough, I've had enough.
Speaker 1 (33:59):
No, So when they got busted in that one, it
didn't matter because the friends still got paid.
Speaker 2 (34:06):
Now what I mean by that? All right, let me
explain that to you.
Speaker 1 (34:09):
Even after the public outcry, the Department of Justice quietly
because apparently no one's paying attention to what they're doing.
Agreed under Harris to pay attorney's fees to the ACOU
lawyers in the long running case. Recently, the Department of
Justice agreed to pay two million to FBI agents Peter
(34:31):
Struck and Lisa Page for releasing their anti Trump text
to congressional investigators worried about political bias. There's no way
they should have gotten paid for that, by the way,
but they got paid because they understood how the system worked.
Speaker 2 (34:44):
And so there you go.
Speaker 1 (34:46):
Now, the pair all they did was claim a violation
of the Privacy Act, but the messages were sent on
their government issued phones, which contain clear banner warnings that
users lack any reasonable expectation of privacy. The DOJ had
ample basis to litigate this case and to win, right
(35:08):
before surrendering hard earned tax dollars to these disgrace FBI
agents that were a part of the deep state machine.
And that's exactly why the DJ's like, don't worry, guys,
we know you've been embarrassed a little bit, Like, hey,
here's a couple million dollars. Totally fine, right, And this
form of civic corruption is just disgusting me. I mean,
(35:29):
it truly is disgusting and This corruption, by the way,
is not bipartisan either. At the start of his administration,
President Trump's Attorney General band Settlement slash Funds, while one
of the early acts of the Bid Nearest DOJ was
to resind that band. So you have to understand they
(35:51):
know what they're doing, they understand how easy it is
to do this, and they understand how easy it is
to get paid.
Speaker 2 (35:58):
Now.
Speaker 1 (35:58):
One of the narratives this year is Democrats have been
saying over and over again that Donald Trump is in
this race only for himself, right, that he's just doing
this to save himself.
Speaker 2 (36:08):
Well, guess what.
Speaker 1 (36:08):
They're the one that brought all these ridiculous court cases
against him and have misdirected countless dollars millions of dollars
and government funds to attack their political enemy. They've weaponized
the government, and the government is now has unlimited funds
to go after literally their political opponent, which is the
other side, which happens this time to be Donald Trump.
Speaker 2 (36:31):
Who knows who it's going to be in the future.
Speaker 1 (36:35):
What Democrats have basically figured out is that look Tony
West and Biden Harris, they figured out a brilliant way
to use the federal government to pay out money to
their friends that then that money will come back to them,
and to force settlements and donations that only go to
their friends, and then that money is laundered and comes
(36:56):
back to their campaigns. What Tony West and vined and
what the Biden Harris you know administration have been operating
is a machine.
Speaker 2 (37:06):
It is a.
Speaker 1 (37:06):
Machine that pours billions, not millions, but billions of taxpayer
dollars into these left wing activist groups. Wes said to
be Harris's White House counsel in waiting.
Speaker 2 (37:20):
That's why I want you to know this. Let me
say that again.
Speaker 1 (37:24):
West is said to be Harris's White House counsel in waiting.
Speaker 2 (37:31):
I'll tell you this.
Speaker 1 (37:32):
The New York Posts put it this way, Hunter Biden
step aside.
Speaker 2 (37:35):
A new big guy is coming to town.
Speaker 1 (37:37):
Kamala with the help of Tony West and his cronies
will show you how honest GAFT is really done. This
is an incredible look at the corruption of Kamala Harris.
This is a woman who's gonna, I'm sure, bring this
person in and they're going to basically blackmail people into settlements,
(37:58):
just like they did with Volkswagen. To do this type
of corruption on a level that you could have never imagined.
And again, until nineteen seventy seven, Congress had to approve
any settlement of a civil suit against the federal government
of over one hundred thousand dollars.
Speaker 2 (38:14):
And then they changed it. And now what.
Speaker 1 (38:16):
They've figured out is we can just take cases that
don't need to be settled, bring in our friends, get
them paid, then bring in new people that we want
to get paid so they can then get the money
and bring it back to us, and have a constant
revolving door of cash, a constant revolving door of serious
(38:42):
cash billions that can then prop up and pimp the
democratic machine. All of this being done in secrecy, all
of this being done without any transparency, all of this
being done while you have no idea who the settlements are,
(39:05):
who the lawyers are, who's getting paid. And even if
the settlement should come out, and if it wasn't, by
the way, for the whistleblowers, it gave us the information
that I just gave you, we wouldn't know any of
this was happening right now. I hope you'll take this,
and I would say I'm gonna keep covering this, and
I will but I don't know how much more we're
(39:28):
gonna get because this is the story because everything else
is redacted, right like everything else is completely redacted.
Speaker 2 (39:39):
You don't know what's happening.
Speaker 1 (39:41):
You don't who's got the money, you don't know what
deals are being made, because none of it has to
be shown to the American people. And that's how they're
able to pull this off. So I'll say it again.
If you thought that Hunter Biden was bad, look at
what Kamala Harrison brother in law are about to do
to you.
Speaker 2 (40:02):
What they're about to do to the American people.
Speaker 1 (40:04):
It's truly incredible how much money we are talking about
right here.
Speaker 2 (40:08):
It is a massive amount of money. Also, while all this.
Speaker 1 (40:14):
Is happening right now, the White House has come out
and they are swinging at Facebook, defending the censoring of
content they're now saying is their right when it comes
to protecting public health. White House officials have now come
out and they have slammed Facebook, asking the tech companies
(40:38):
to take responsibility for the information they present. A White
House spokesman has now said this afternoon that the Biden
administration encouraged Mark Zuckerberg's platform to be quote responsible despite
the tech entrepreneur, saying he was pressured to censor specific content.
The House Judiciary Committee, as you know, published that letter
(41:00):
from Zuckerberg about repeated demands from the bid Mayris administration
to censor content, even satire, related to COVID nineteen and vaccines.
Speaker 2 (41:12):
Quote.
Speaker 1 (41:14):
This administration encouraged responsible actions and continues to do so
to protect public health and safety. What did Zuckerberg write Well,
Zuckerberg wrote that in twenty twenty one, quote, senior officials
from the Biden administration, including the White House, repeatedly pressure
our teams for months to censor certain COVID nineteen content,
(41:35):
including humor and satire, and express a lot of frustration
with our teams when we didn't agree. When asked, the
White House washed its hands of the ardeal and declined
to acknowledge Zuckerberg's use of terms regarding censorship and pressure
when confronted with a deadly pandemic. Quote, this administration encouraged
responsible actions to protect public health and safety, the White
(41:58):
House spokesman said.
Speaker 2 (42:01):
Now here's the most insane part.
Speaker 1 (42:02):
The White House officials then attributed responsibility to tech companies
tech platforms for making independent choices about the content posted
on their apps, saying this from the White House today,
our position has been clear and consistent. We believe tech
companies and other private actors should take into account the
(42:25):
effects their actions have on the American people while making
independent choices about the information they present.
Speaker 2 (42:32):
Well, that's just not what happened.
Speaker 1 (42:34):
Biden Harris's administration pressured Facebook to censor Americans so much
so that Facebook said, Okay, we're going to censor Americans,
and then when it had nothing to do with public health,
and a great example of the lies coming from this
White House, they throttled stories that the fit White House
didn't like, for example, the Hunter Biden laptop story. So
(42:57):
they're out there today telling you, well, we're just trying
to make sure they're responsible, right. The White House also
provide the same BS statement to media members across the board.
The administration's denial of any form of censorship flies in
the face of what social media companies such as Elon
must X platform, which release the Twitter files, have learned,
(43:21):
and those documents expose the federal government's interests in suppressing
certain stories, such as those related to the Hunter Biden
laptop and anything they didn't like when it came to
asking questions about COVID. Zuckerberg also complained about the same
issues in his letter, backing up what we saw in
the Twitter files to Jim Jordan
Host
Ben Ferguson
Popular Podcasts
My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark
My Favorite Murder is a true crime comedy podcast hosted by Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark. Each week, Karen and Georgia share compelling true crimes and hometown stories from friends and listeners. Since MFM launched in January of 2016, Karen and Georgia have shared their lifelong interest in true crime and have covered stories of infamous serial killers like the Night Stalker, mysterious cold cases, captivating cults, incredible survivor stories and important events from history like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921. My Favorite Murder is part of the Exactly Right podcast network that provides a platform for bold, creative voices to bring to life provocative, entertaining and relatable stories for audiences everywhere. The Exactly Right roster of podcasts covers a variety of topics including historic true crime, comedic interviews and news, science, pop culture and more. Podcasts on the network include Buried Bones with Kate Winkler Dawson and Paul Holes, That's Messed Up: An SVU Podcast, This Podcast Will Kill You, Bananas and more.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com