September 1, 2024 • 43 mins
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
There is another big story that deals with Kamwa Harris,
and it's one that CNN obviously would not be able
to cover in the sit down interview, right because they
had to agree to throw all journalistic integrity out the window,
beg for this interview and agree to this insane idea
that we're going to tape it and then you're gonna
have a babysitter. Now, this type of question should have
(00:24):
been brought up during the interview. But we all know
that CNN is not actually journalism. They're a communist news
network working for the deep state in the regime. And
we know this from all that just came out, for example,
from Facebook and Zuckerberg about government censorship and silencing and
killing stories, which CNN is more than happy to do
on a daily basis.
Speaker 2 (00:46):
This story is.
Speaker 1 (00:47):
One that has a lot of reminders in my head
to the same type of corruption that we saw between
Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden. And this story
involves Tamala Harris's brother in law, who is now being
accused of fleecing taxpayers for billions to give to left
(01:09):
wing groups and to lawyers. Joe Biden's son, Hunter may
be the current world class champ of presidential family shady dealings,
but not for long if you just follow the money.
If Kamala Harris wins the White House, her brother in law,
a guy by the name of Tony west you might
(01:30):
want to remember this name. Tony West, who is married
to her sister Maya, is poised to claim the well
crooked crown like Hunter Westler and his craft in the
Obama years. Yeah, then head of the Justice Department's Civil Division,
he invented a new form of what nineteenth and early
(01:53):
of twenty centuries Tammy Boss George Washington Plunkett family called
an honest girl. It was simple until nineteen seventy seven.
Congress had to approve any settlement of a civil suit
against the federal government over one hundred thousand dollars. This
(02:14):
preserved the constitutional requirement that Congress control the government's purse,
but in that year, seeking relief from the burdens and
volume of suits to review, Congress removed that cap, handing
the Justice Department a permanent blank check to pay settlements
unilaterally in any amount out of an account known as
(02:37):
the Quote Judgment Fund.
Speaker 2 (02:39):
This is all real run by the Treasury Department.
Speaker 1 (02:43):
The judgment Fund's secrecy is so complete that are often penetrated.
CIA might study it for lessons. The limited data released
amidst receipts, the facts underlying the case, and even often
the lawyers involved. Now take a listen to this corruption
(03:06):
by statue, the attorney's fees awarded need not be disclosed
at all to anyone. A Government Accountability Office study concluded
that quote no one knows the number of claims processed
by the federal government each year. Still, for three decades,
(03:28):
the integrity of Justice's officials sufficed to prevent abuse. Then,
in two thousand and nine, a guy by the name
of Tony West took over the departments Civil Division, the
division that litigates and settles lawsuits.
Speaker 2 (03:45):
Once West arrived.
Speaker 1 (03:47):
His deputy emailed colleagues asking, quote, can you explain to Tony
the best way to allocate some money towards an organization
of our choosing?
Speaker 2 (03:58):
That is an actual question.
Speaker 1 (04:00):
Ristin Now you go back to this his deputy and
again this email colleagues asking can you explain to tell
me the best way to allocate some money towards an
organization of our choosing? Settlements became the vehicle for paying
off political allies.
Speaker 2 (04:20):
We now know this.
Speaker 1 (04:21):
For example, in twenty ten, after a Supreme Court victory,
DOJ lawyers were on the custom of winning a decade
long fight against discrimination claims by ninety one Hispanic and
female farmers. That's when West intervened, and, as The New
York Times put it, engineered a stunning turnabout.
Speaker 2 (04:42):
DOJ with your tax dollars, agreed.
Speaker 1 (04:45):
To a one point three to three billion dollars settlement,
which included thousands of farmers who had never claimed bias.
Speaker 2 (04:56):
The deal was made over the.
Speaker 1 (04:59):
Objecttions of the department's career lawyers.
Speaker 2 (05:03):
The New York.
Speaker 1 (05:04):
Times investigation report described Wes's settlement as a runaway train
driven by radical racial politics and law firms that stand
again more than one hundred and thirty million dollars in fees.
Speaker 2 (05:21):
That's coming from the Times, folks.
Speaker 1 (05:24):
They're saying, this is insane and the only people that
are getting rich here are not victims. The people that
are getting rich are the lawyers, law firms that got
more than one hundred and thirty million in fees. Now,
the projected settlement size then ballooned to over four point
four billion as additional plaintiffs were added.
Speaker 2 (05:44):
Including Native American farmers.
Speaker 1 (05:47):
The government statistical expert was appalled, saying this at the time,
if they had gone to trial, the government would have prevailed.
Speaker 2 (05:57):
It was just a joke.
Speaker 1 (05:59):
It was so I was so disgusted. It was simply
buying the support of the Native Americans. Now, this dirty
deal also inflayd the number of people that were on
the claims, right, creating a sixty million dollar windfall for
the plaintiff's lead lawyer. Who is the plaintiff's lead lawyer?
(06:20):
You ready for this? Write it down because I'm exposing it.
A member of the Obama Biden transition team. But Wes
did not just builk the taxpayers. He also shook down
corporations as well. Again, this is Kamala Harris's brother in law.
(06:41):
In a series of bank settlements, his team added increasingly
aggressive provisions requiring the institutions to make nearly a billion
dollars in mandatory donations.
Speaker 2 (06:54):
And where do you think those donations went?
Speaker 1 (06:57):
Right, these institutions that had to make nearly a billion
dollars in mandatory donations, where do you think the money went?
The donations went to none other than no surprise here
Democrat supporting activist groups. Donations were given double credit against
(07:18):
required targets, incentivizing these payments over direct relief to victims
of housing crisis, so they got their hands on the money.
West teams specifically structured the terms to ensure that they
would benefit only their political allies while leaving conservative groups ineligible,
(07:41):
and internal email shows that WES deputies rewarded a settlement
donation provision to ensure the bank could not select a
conservative property rights organization as a recipient.
Speaker 2 (07:57):
Over time, WES grew even more brazen.
Speaker 1 (08:01):
A twenty sixteen Volkswagen settlement require the company to fund
a two billion white house electric car initiative that Congress
had specifically rejected as part of the settlement. In other words,
you put a gun to the head of corporations and
then when you get them where you want them, Okay,
(08:24):
when you get them where you want them, you then
put a gun to their head and say, now you're
going to write.
Speaker 2 (08:32):
A check, and this check's going to go.
Speaker 1 (08:34):
To my friends, and they're going to get rich off
of this settlement. This is insane. The idea that this
was happening is just absurd. But what makes it even
worse is the fact that it's been happening now. And
the guy who was the one that was in charge
of this was Kamala Harris's brother in law because he
(08:56):
understood how the system worked. When she was in Congress,
an email circulating saying they ought to build a statue
to West and bowed down to the statue each day
after we received two hundred thousand plus dollars in this
legal shakedown. California's attorney general at the time, Kamala Harris
(09:20):
was an active participant co signing the agreements for her state.
The Biden Harris administration has continued West's honest graft tactics
to reward political allies on the taxpayer's dime. We've now
found out. Now, let's go to twenty twenty one, and
(09:42):
that's not that long ago. Biden Harris are in the
White House. In twenty twenty one, a billion dollar settlement
with illegal immigrants claiming emotional distress.
Speaker 2 (09:52):
It was scratched. They got rid of it.
Speaker 1 (09:55):
Why because there was massive outcry of billions of dollars
going to legal immigrants claiming emotional distress. Like Pwright, that's enough,
I've had enough. No, So when they got busted in
that one. It didn't matter because the friends still got paid.
Now what I mean by that? All right, let me
explain that to you. Even after the public outcry, the
(10:17):
Department of Justice, quietly because apparently no one's paying attention
to what they're doing, agreed under Harris to pay attorneys
fees to the ACU lawyers in the long running case. Recently,
the Department of Justice agreed to pay two million to
FBI agents Peter Struck and Lisa Page for releasing their
(10:38):
anti Trump text to congressional investigators worried about political bias.
There's no way they should have gotten paid for that,
by the way, but they got paid because they.
Speaker 2 (10:47):
Understood how the system worked. And so there you go.
Speaker 1 (10:51):
Now, the pair all they did was claim a violation
of the Privacy Act, but the messages were sent on
their government issued phones, which contain clear banner warnings that
users lack any reasonable expectation of privacy. The DOJ had
ample basis to litigate this case and to win, right
(11:13):
before surrendering hard earned tax dollars to these disgrace FBI
agents that were a part of the deep state machine.
And that's exactly why the DJs like don't worry guys.
We know you've been embarrassed a little bit, but like, hey,
here's a couple million dollars, totally fine, right, And this
form of civic corruption is just disgusting me. I mean,
(11:34):
it truly is disgusting. And this corruption, by the way,
is not bipartisan either. At the start of his administration,
President Trump's Attorney General band Settlement slash Funds, while one
of the early acts of the Bid Nearest DOJ was
to resend that band.
Speaker 2 (11:54):
So you have to understand, they know what they're doing.
Speaker 1 (11:57):
They understand how easy it is to do this, and
they understand how easy it is to get paid. Now,
one of the narratives this year is Democrats have been
saying over and over again that Donald Trump is in
this race only for himself, right, that he's just doing
this to save himself.
Speaker 2 (12:13):
Well, guess what.
Speaker 1 (12:13):
They're the one that brought all these ridiculous court cases
against him and have misdirected countless dollars millions of dollars
and government funds to attack their political enemy. They've weaponized
the government and the government is now has unlimited funds
to go after literally their political opponent, which is the
other side which happens this time to be Donald Trump.
(12:36):
Who knows who it's going to be in the future.
What Democrats have basically figured out is that look, Tony
West and Biden Harris, they figured out a brilliant way
to use the federal government to pay out money to
their friends, that then that money will come back to
them and to force settlements and donations that only go
(12:58):
to their friends, and then that money is laundered and
comes back to their campaigns. What Tony West invented and
what the Biden Harris you know, administration have been operating
is a machine and is a machine that pours billions,
not millions, but billions of taxpayer dollars into these left
(13:19):
wing activist groups. Wes said to be Harris's White House
counsel in waiting.
Speaker 2 (13:25):
That's why I want you to know this. Let me
say that again.
Speaker 1 (13:29):
West is said to be Harris's White House counsel in waiting.
Speaker 2 (13:35):
I'll tell you this.
Speaker 1 (13:36):
The New York Posts put it this way, Hunter Biden
step aside. A new big guy is coming to town.
Kamala with the help of Tony West and his cronies
will show you how honest GAFT is really done. This
is an incredible look at the corruption of Kamala Harris.
This is a woman who's gonna, I'm sure, bring this
(13:56):
person in and they're going to basically blackmail people into settlements,
just like they did with Volkswagen, to do this type
of corruption on a level that you could have never imagined.
And again, until nineteen seventy seven, Congress had to approve
any settlement of a civil suit against the federal government
(14:16):
of over one hundred thousand dollars. And then they changed it.
And now what they've figured out is we can just
take cases that don't need to be settled, bring in
our friends, get them paid, then.
Speaker 2 (14:29):
Bring in new people that we want to get paid so.
Speaker 1 (14:32):
They can then get the money and bring it back
to us and have a constant revolving door of cash,
a constant revolving door of serious cash billions that can
then prop up and pimp the democratic machine. All of
(14:55):
this being done in secrecy, done without any transparency, all
of this being done while you have no idea who
the settlements are, who the lawyers are, who's getting paid,
and even if the settlement should come out and if
it wasn't, by the way, for the whistleblowers. It gave
(15:17):
us the information that I just gave you. We wouldn't
know any of this was happening right now. I hope
you'll take this, and I would say I'm going to
keep covering this, and I will, but I don't know
how much more we're gonna get because this is the story.
Because everything else is redacted, right like everything else is
(15:41):
completely redacted.
Speaker 2 (15:43):
You don't know what's happening.
Speaker 1 (15:45):
You don't who's got the money, you don't know what
deals are being made, because none of it has to
be shown to the American people.
Speaker 2 (15:54):
And that's how they're able to pull this off.
Speaker 1 (15:57):
So I'll say it again, if you thought that Hunter
Biden was bad, look at what Kamala Harrison or brother
in law are about to do to you.
Speaker 2 (16:06):
What they're about to do to the American people.
Speaker 1 (16:08):
It's truly incredible how much money we are talking about
right here.
Speaker 2 (16:12):
It is a massive amount of money. Also, while all this.
Speaker 1 (16:18):
Is happening right now, the White House has come out
and they are swinging at Facebook defending the censoring of
content they're now saying is their right when it comes
to protecting public health. White House officials have now come
out and they have slammed Facebook, asking the tech companies
(16:41):
to take responsibility for the information they present. A White
House spokesman has now said this afternoon that the Biden
administration encouraged Mark Zuckerberg's platform to be quote responsible, despite
the tech entrepreneur saying he was pressured to censor specific content.
The House Judiciary Committee, as you know, published that letter
(17:04):
from Zuckerberg about repeated demands from the Bid Mayris administration
to censor content, even satire, related to COVID nineteen and vaccines.
Speaker 2 (17:16):
Quote.
Speaker 1 (17:17):
This administration encouraged responsible actions and continues to do so
to protect public health and safety. What did Zuckerberg write well,
Zuckerberg wrote that in twenty twenty one, quote, senior officials
from the Biden administration, including the White House, repeatedly pressure
our teams for months to censor certain COVID nineteen content,
(17:39):
including humor and satire, and express a lot of frustration
with our teams when we didn't agree. When asked, the
White House washed its hands of the ardeal and declined
to acknowledge Zuckerberg's use of terms regarding censorship and pressure
when confronted with a deadly pandemic. Quote this administration encouraged
responsible action to protect.
Speaker 2 (18:01):
Public health and safety.
Speaker 1 (18:02):
The White House spokesman said, now here's the most insane part.
The White House officials then attributed responsibility to tech companies
tech platforms for making independent choices about the content posted
on their apps, saying this from the White House today,
our position has been clear and consistent. We believe tech
(18:25):
companies and other private actors should take into account the
effects their actions have on the American people while making
independent choices about the information they present.
Speaker 2 (18:36):
Well, that's just not what happened.
Speaker 1 (18:38):
Biden Harris's administration pressured Facebook to censor Americans so much
so that Facebook said, okay, we're going to censor Americans.
And then when it had nothing to do with public health,
and a great example of the lies coming from this
White House, they throttled stories that the fit White House
didn't like, for example, the Hunter Biden laptops. So they're
(19:01):
out there today telling you, well, we're just trying to
make sure they're responsible, right. The White House also provide
the same BS statement to media members across the board.
The administration's denial of any form of censorship flies in
the face of what social media companies such as elon
mus X platform, which release the Twitter files, have learned
(19:25):
and those documents expose the federal government's interests in suppressing
certain stories, such as those related to the Hunter Biden laptop,
and anything they didn't like when it came to asking
questions about COVID. Zuckerberg also complained about the same issues
in his letter backing up what we saw in the
Twitter files to Jim Jordan. So Kama Harris and her babysitter,
(19:48):
VP Candidate Walls went on CNN and I'm going to
break it all down for you, But let me first
just say to CNN, you guys are disgusting. You put
interview up on TV, and if you watched, you saw
it too, so you know exactly what I'm talking about.
And before they even started speaking, they were already selling
(20:13):
you propaganda. They were lying to you. They put up
on the screen the word live. Now, CNN is obsessed
with putting up.
Speaker 2 (20:22):
The word live.
Speaker 1 (20:23):
We're live, We're live, right, They're always live from live
from this breaking news live in the Sana news room.
I know this because for seven years I was a
conservative fighting the fight in hell at CNN as a commentator.
They were obsessed with everything being live. The problem is
(20:44):
this interview was not live. It was taped, and we
don't know what was edited. We don't know what questions
were asked of Kamway, Harris or Walls that didn't see
the light of day. But if you turned on CNN
and you were watching this interview, you saw it clearly
(21:07):
stating in the corner of the screen the word live.
When you tape an interview, it is not live. I'm
gonna say it again. Apparently the dumba's at CNN, actually
they know exactly what they were doing.
Speaker 2 (21:21):
They were lying to you.
Speaker 1 (21:22):
But apparently the dumba's in America that vote for Kamala
Harris and Walls are so stupid they don't understand that
a taped interview.
Speaker 2 (21:33):
Is not live. It is not live.
Speaker 1 (21:36):
Now that I've gotten that out of the way, the
fact that we're even having to have this conversation is asinine.
Speaker 2 (21:42):
Let's deal with these substance.
Speaker 1 (21:45):
There was a big moment in this conversation, and number one,
I understand why they sent her with a babysitter this interview,
and even Democrats are saying this right afterwards, it ain't good, folks. Okay,
this interview is not a very good interview. She's terrible
without a teleprompter. You write her something. She's a decent
actress and she can read a teleprompter. You take that
(22:06):
away from her, she's pretty much screwed. Let me take
a quick moment to tell you about an incredible company
that stands up and fights for our First and our
Second Amendment rights. They fight for the rights of unborn children,
and they fight every time you pay your bill to them,
for our veterans, our first responders, and our wounded warriors.
(22:28):
I'm talking about Patriot Mobile. They're the only conservative Christian
wireless provider in the country, and when you pay your
bill to them every month, they actually take about five
percent of your bill and give it back to the
causes that I just mentioned at no extra.
Speaker 2 (22:46):
Cost to you.
Speaker 1 (22:48):
Now, the reason why that's incredible is because if you're
with Big Mobile, you're actually supporting and funding the left
in a very big way. Big Mobile gives big donations
to organizations that pay and advocate for abortion on demand.
They get big donations to Democratic candidates and causes at
(23:08):
the local, state, and national level. Another reason why you
should make the switch to a company that stands with
your values. Now, making the switch Patriot Mobile is easy.
You can keep your same cell phone you have right now,
keep your same cell phone number, or you can upgrade
to a new phone, and you don't have to worry
(23:28):
about coverage because in twenty twenty four, it is actually
really easy to make the switch, and you're gonna have
the same exact coverage that you are used to because
they use the same exact towers that you're using right now.
So call right now, nine to seven to two Patriot.
That's nine to seven to two Patriot or Patriotmobile dot
(23:52):
com slash ferguson. Now when you use the promo code ferguson,
you're gonna get a free month of service. So don't
wait any longer. Stop giving your money to comings that
literally hate your family values and hate your Christian values.
Make the switch, get nationwide coverage, and make a difference
with every phone call you make nine seven to two
(24:14):
Patriot that's nine to seven to two Patriot or Patriotmobile
dot com slash ferguson promo code ferguson. You'll get one
month of service for free, all right now. One person
described it as a human chernobyl without a teleprompter because
everything just starts exploding in her head. She was asked
a question about her values changing, and I'm going to
(24:37):
play for you how she explained that on CNN, trying
to tell you that her values had not changed, when
clearly they have changed recently. They're not real changes. It's
just too pander to voters. Listen to what she says carefully,
because I'm going to play for you a montage of
what Kamwa Harris actually believes after I play this first
(24:58):
part from CNN where it says on the screen live
even though it's a taped, damn interview.
Speaker 3 (25:03):
Generally speaking, how should voters look at some of the
changes that you've made that you've explained some of here
in your policy.
Speaker 2 (25:13):
Is it because you have.
Speaker 3 (25:14):
More experience now and you've learned more about the information?
Is it because you were running for president in a
Democratic primary? And should they feel comfortable and confident that
what you're saying now is going to be your policy
moving forward?
Speaker 4 (25:29):
Dan, I think the most important and most significant aspect
of my policy perspective and decisions is my values have
not changed. You've mentioned the Green New Deal. I have
always believed and I've worked on it, that the climate
crisis is real, that it is an urgent matter to
(25:50):
which we should apply metrics that include holding ourselves to
deadlines around time. We did that with the Inflation Reduction Act.
Have set goals for the United States of America and
by extension, the globe, around when we should meet certain
standards for reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. As an example,
that value has not changed. My value around what we
(26:13):
need to do to secure our border. That value has
not changed. I spent two terms as the Attorney General
of California prosecuting transnational criminal organization violations of American laws
regarding the passage illegal passage of guns, drugs, and human
beings across our border. My values have not changed.
Speaker 1 (26:34):
My values have not changed. Okay, so she says at
the end, her values have not changed. Now I'm going
to play for you her saying my values have not changed,
and remind you of what she says her values are.
Listen carefully to who Kamala Harris is.
Speaker 4 (26:53):
My values have not changed.
Speaker 2 (26:55):
Juice, bread meat.
Speaker 3 (26:56):
Specifically, yes, the Boston Marathon bomber.
Speaker 2 (26:58):
They should be able to vote.
Speaker 4 (26:59):
I think we should have that converce.
Speaker 2 (27:00):
Abolish ice yes. Would you ban off shore drilling?
Speaker 4 (27:02):
Yes? And I'm in favor of banning frack. I am
prepared to pass a green review and I support a
mandatory buyback program. We're not going to treat people who
are undocumented across the borders criminals. The idea that more
police equals more safety.
Speaker 2 (27:15):
That's just wrong.
Speaker 1 (27:16):
Policing as we know, goes all the way back to
slave patrols and that idea.
Speaker 2 (27:20):
And you are absolutely right, where do you stand on
defund the police?
Speaker 4 (27:23):
We need to take a look at these budgets.
Speaker 2 (27:24):
Do you ban plastic straws? And I wish a seventy
to eighty percent tax rate. I think that's fantastic. Chipping
now to the Minnesota Freedom Fund.
Speaker 4 (27:33):
How dare we speak Merry Christmas? Yeah?
Speaker 2 (27:35):
I am radical.
Speaker 4 (27:36):
I do believe that we need to get radical about
what we are doing.
Speaker 1 (27:40):
That is who Kamala Harris is. So at the very
end there she makes it very clear her values have
not changed. Comrade Kamala answered to a very weekly phrase question,
a question that was put in more as a matter
of defense and curiosity. Donald Trump tweeted out, but her
(28:01):
answer rambled incoherently and declared her quote values haven't changed.
On that, I agree her values haven't changed. Trump said,
the border is going to remain open, not close. There
will be free healthcare for illegal aliens, sanctuary cities, no
cash bail, gun confiscation, zero fracking, a ban on gasoline
(28:27):
powered cars, private health care will be abolished, a seventy
to eighty percent tax rate will be put in place,
and she will defund the police. America, he says, will
become a waste land. He's absolutely right, by the way,
in what she said there. Now, Kama Harris says she
(28:48):
has no regrets as well about the biggest coup and
cover up of Joe Biden and his massive is obvious,
massive cognitive decline, which goes back to can you trust
Kamala Harris? The answer, I think is very clear based
on the montage it just played, you know, but I
(29:08):
want you to also think about this. Kamala Harris lied
to you over and over again telling you that Joe
Biden was fit and was an amazing commander in chief,
that there was nothing wrong, that everything was fine, and
then once the first debate happened and everyone saw the
(29:30):
massive cognitive decline of Joe Biden, Kamala Harris.
Speaker 2 (29:34):
What did she do?
Speaker 1 (29:36):
She then helped overthrow the president of the United States
of America in a coup where now she walks into
what she believes is I'm now the next president.
Speaker 2 (29:50):
How did she pull it off?
Speaker 1 (29:53):
I don't know if it's blackmail, I don't know what
you want to call it, but no one has voted
for Kamala Harris to this day. Listen to what Kamahir
says when she says, I have no regrets about lying
about covering up for Crooked Joe Biden and his massive
cognitive decline. If she'll lie to you about that, what
else is she going to lie to you about?
Speaker 3 (30:14):
Vice President Harris? You were a very staunch defender of
President Biden's capacity to serve another four years. Right after
the debate, you insisted that President Biden is extraordinarily strong
given where we are now, Do you have any regrets
about what you told the American people?
Speaker 4 (30:30):
No, not at all, not at all.
Speaker 1 (30:33):
I have.
Speaker 2 (30:36):
Served with let me just pleasure, she said, no, not
at all. I lie to you, guys.
Speaker 1 (30:39):
I lied to you because this was how I kept
my power, and then once I realized he was losing
his ability, to keep his own power. Then I decided
to throw him under the bus and overthrow the will
of the people and slide in to get the nomination.
That's what she's telling you. She's like, I don't have
(31:00):
any regret about like mine would I have regrets. I
don't have regrets. It's worked out great for me. I
accuse Joe Biden of being a racist. He needed a
woman of whatever color you want it to be right,
like he needs. He needed a woman of color, and
(31:23):
that was going to get rid of the racism. So
then I became the VP, and it was amazing. And
then I was a good soldier and I lied to
the American people to cover up what the corruption of
this administration and it worked flawlessly. And then when he
was done, I slid on in there. It's her entire career,
(31:43):
by the way, right, it is her entire career has
been like this. And she's laughing at all of us
because she's like, this is amazing. I'm playing you, guys.
I'll lie to you about everything A loted to you
about his cognitive decline. I wired about who the president
is right now. I don't care. And she says, I
(32:04):
have no regrets and honestly, why would you.
Speaker 4 (32:07):
President Biden for almost four years now, And I'll tell
you it's one of the greatest honors of my career. Truly,
he cares so deeply about the American people. He is
so smart.
Speaker 1 (32:20):
And notice, by the way, she's not answering the question.
The question was, do you regret saying even after the
debate that he was in great shape when Quilly wasn't.
Speaker 4 (32:32):
And loyal to the American people. And I have spent
hours upon hours with him, be it in the Oval
office or the situation room. He has the intelligence, the commitment,
and the judgment and disposition that I think the American
people rightly deserve in their president.
Speaker 1 (32:53):
So with that being said, we decided to, you know,
just overthrow the government and get rid of him and
have us off.
Speaker 2 (33:00):
And now you got me.
Speaker 1 (33:03):
That's what she's telling you, that he's amazing, but won't
answer the damn question. You lie to the American people,
and you covered up for years a massive cognitive decline
of the President United States of America, who's taking another
nap on the beach while you're doing this interview, and
then you throw him out after midnight on Monday, night
at the Democratic Convention and then now you're the woman.
(33:24):
This is just pure scumbaggery. That's the only way I
know how to put it. The interview. If you watch it,
it's daytime outside the windows, and the thing aired at nighttime,
and they have the audacity to put the word live
up there on the screen see an exclusive CNN Live.
Speaker 2 (33:42):
It's not live. And I'm sorry I harp on that.
Speaker 1 (33:44):
Again because it just shows you how much disrespect they
have for the American voter. They don't and this is
the reason why they don't mind overthrowing the will of
the people. Whether it's a coup attempt the first time
against Donald Trump with the impeachment over Russian collusion, whether
it's lying to you about the steeled whether it's lying
about who funded it, which was Hillary Clinton and the
Democrat National Committee, Whether it's lying to you about COVID
(34:06):
nineteen in vaccines, whether it's lying to you about six
feet distancing, whether it's lying to you about Donald Trump
on every issue with his court cases, are lying about
how there's no cognitive cline of Joe Biden until there
is a cognitive decline of Joe Biden, When it only
serves them because they're afraid they're going to lose. They
lie to you on all of it. Joe kanco Over
(34:29):
at Fox News Channel had a great line after this interview.
Speaker 2 (34:33):
Listen to what he said.
Speaker 5 (34:35):
And she said she made it clear in twenty twenty
that when she ran for president, of the debate state
that she was not for banning fracking. Well, there's one problem.
She wasn't even a candidate in twenty twenty. She dropped
out before that I can't find any proof, yes, exactly,
and I can't find any proof I look for it.
She said that she said she supported fracking four years ago.
Speaker 2 (34:54):
It doesn't exist.
Speaker 5 (34:55):
In fact, the Biden Harris administration on day one Janine
banfracking on federal land.
Speaker 2 (35:00):
So there goes that argument.
Speaker 5 (35:02):
But of course Dana Bass didn't bother to bring that
part up. And by the way, during a town hall
during that campaign in twenty nineteen, Kamala Harris said she
was quote one hundred percent against banning fracking.
Speaker 2 (35:14):
The big picture here.
Speaker 5 (35:14):
Judge, and we've talked about this before that when you
take away a teleprompter and the prescript remarks from Kamala Harris,
she becomes a human Chernobyl. Let's read this money quote
again from this interview, because I've read it ten times
and I still had zero idea when she's talking about
Kamala Harris quote, you mentioned the Green New Deal. I've
always believed and I've worked on it, that climate change
is real, that it is an urgent matter to which
(35:36):
we should apply metrics that include holding ourselves to deadlines
around time. Yeah, deadline should apply to time. How utterly profound.
This did not go well at all, and this is
a big turning point in this election, no question about it.
Speaker 2 (35:50):
Conch is right.
Speaker 1 (35:51):
You fact check Harris and she is a flip flopper
on virtually every issue, including fracking, and he described it perfectly.
She's a human Chernobyl when you take out the teleprompter,
he is absolutely right.
Speaker 2 (36:06):
I mean one of the.
Speaker 1 (36:07):
One of the latest lies that even Snoops has had
to admit, and it's like become a center point of
her campaign was that like she pulled herself up by
her bootstraps and she worked at McDonald's.
Speaker 2 (36:19):
There's a problem.
Speaker 1 (36:21):
There was zero evidence that Kamala Harris ever worked at McDonald's.
It's it's just a it's an amazing story. It's a lie.
It's it's like the vice president, you know, her running
mate running you know about about being in war.
Speaker 2 (36:38):
What do you say about being in war?
Speaker 1 (36:40):
Right?
Speaker 2 (36:40):
Oh, I saw combat and I carried a gun into combat.
Speaker 1 (36:43):
And he got a big you know, he got a
he got a big applause of the convention for that line.
He was asked about it, by the way, And this
guy is a liar.
Speaker 2 (36:51):
How do I know it? Listen to what he says here,
Governor Wilf.
Speaker 3 (36:55):
The country is just starting to get to know you.
I want to ask you a question about how you've
described your service in the National Guard. You said that
you carried weapons in war, but you have never deployed
actually in a war zone. A campaign official said that
you misspoke, did you well?
Speaker 6 (37:13):
First of all, I'm incredibly proud I've done twenty four
years of wearing the uniform of this country. Equally proud
of my service in a public school classroom, whether it's
Congress or the governor. My record speaks for itself. But
I think people are coming to it to know me.
I speak like they do. I speak candidly, I wear
my emotions on my sleeves, and I speak especially passionately
(37:34):
about our children being shot in schools and around guns.
So I think people know me, they know who I am,
they know where my heart is. And again, my record
has been out there for over forty years to be
for itself.
Speaker 3 (37:48):
And the idea that you said that you were in war,
did you miss speak as the campaign has said.
Speaker 6 (37:54):
Yeah, I said we were talking about in this case,
this was after school shooting, the ideas of carrying these
weapons of war. My wife, the English you're telling my
grammar is not always correct. But again, if it's not this,
it's an attack on my children for showing love for me,
or it's an attack on my dog. I'm not going
to do that. And the one thing I'll never do
is I'll never demean another member's service in any way.
I never have and I never will.
Speaker 1 (38:17):
I mean, the guys just a flat out liar. And
now when you lie as a Democrat, you can just
wash it all away by saying, oh, I was misspeaking
about being in war. Right, my wife is your excuse
now told me that my grammar is not always correct.
This has nothing to do with your grammar. You said
you saw combat, you said you went to war. You
(38:39):
said that you were a rank in which you were not.
This is stolen valor. It is scumbaggery if you just
want to look at it from that perspective. And then
he goes on to say, well, I won't apologize for
speaking passionately about my feelings. What I'm sorry all what.
(39:02):
Scott Jennings on CNN had a moment tonight as well.
He's the only conservative on there that CNN allows on
the air. He's their token one. I was one of
them for seven years. Now Scott's got this job. And
he said this about the interview and about Harris and
her lies tonight, just on the Cogniti Decline of Joe
(39:22):
Biden screen.
Speaker 7 (39:23):
So at the beginning, when she's talking about Biden and
their record, our screen said, this is called the chirn.
The headline at the bottom it said, Harris stands by
biden administration economic record. She is making it clear that
she will embrace and be a continuation of Biden's economic policy,
his record, what they've done. She didn't offer suffer, no remorse,
(39:45):
no regrets, no introspection about anything they've done. She continued
to blame inflation on this fantasy price gouging idea. She
had no additional thoughts on the economic situation in the
country or what they've done beyond just saying Joe Biden
and I have done a great job.
Speaker 2 (40:00):
Now, if I were the Trump people.
Speaker 7 (40:03):
I would be salivating over the idea that that's how
they are going to run the race. I don't believe
it's tenable. I also thought it was interesting that she
didn't take any responsibility at the end for telling the
American people that Joe Biden was fine and he was strong,
when we all know that's not true. That's why he's
out of the race. And she's still standing by the idea.
But he was fine and he's strong, and then he's
fine today. Nobody believes that, and I I just think
(40:26):
it's some point. I just then, why isn't he running?
Speaker 3 (40:29):
Says he's too old?
Speaker 4 (40:30):
One blank, Sam Rey's my Donald Trup probably shouldn't be
running because he's too old and out of time.
Speaker 7 (40:35):
I think most Americans know the truth. And when you're
running to be president and you're willing to look them
in the face and tell them something they know that
you know is not true, it does speak a little.
Speaker 5 (40:45):
Bit to your care Scott curious what you think about
this acts.
Speaker 1 (40:49):
I love how think I kind of just say, all right,
we're gonna we're gonna move on from that, right, I love.
I love She's like I believe. I believe her. Then
why isn't Joe Biden Ray always just too old? It's
not because he's too old. Okay, it's not because he
(41:09):
is too old. It is clearly because of a massive
cognitive decline. And Kamala Harris lied to the American people
about that cognitive decline. Let me also just go to
this and it's and this deals with the issue of
her and her radical agenda, and it is a radical
(41:33):
agenda that she has on the crisis. She believes that
climate crisis is like the number one thing now that
you should be focused on. So go get your solar
panels and your green and your you know, electric vehicle everybody,
because when I'm in charge, you can kiss those gas
(41:53):
guzzlers goodbye.
Speaker 4 (41:55):
That the climate crisis is real, that it is an
urgent matter which we should apply metrics that include holding
ourselves to deadlines around time. We did that with the
Inflation Reduction Act.
Speaker 1 (42:09):
We have what we did that with the Inflation Reduction Act, Like,
what the hell is she even talking about, like, what
on earth is she talking about? Look, I wish I
had enough faith in this country right now to think
that people would have watched this and realized this was
a really, really bad interview and that she just lies
a lot, and that his answer, for example, the VP
(42:32):
candidate whils his answer on stolen vower was just a
pathetic answer, and we deserve better. But unfortunately I don't anymore.
I really don't. I don't have any faith. I don't
have any faith at all that the American people are
going to look at this interview and actually be able
(42:53):
to understand just how bad things are. I also, and
it's sad, but I don't have any faith that the
American people, a lot of them anymore, are even insulted
by the fact that CNN will lie to them with
the interview, putting it up there that it's live when
the damn thing's taped and you can see the sun
outside the windows while they're doing the interview. But that
(43:15):
really tells you about where we are as a country.
We have raised a generation of incompetent idiots in our
public school systems that can't read, write, and do arithmetic
at grave level, and now we are raising this next
generation on a smartphone where instead of parenting, we throw
it in front of their face. And this is the
consequences of those actions. It's our job, by the way,
(43:39):
to make sure everybody hears the info I'm giving you,
So make sure you please share this podcast wherever you
get your podcasts, and share it on social media Facebook, Instagram, Twitter,
tag me in it as well, and I'll see you
back here tomorrow.
There is another big story that deals with Kamwa Harris,
and it's one that CNN obviously would not be able
to cover in the sit down interview, right because they
had to agree to throw all journalistic integrity out the window,
beg for this interview and agree to this insane idea
that we're going to tape it and then you're gonna
have a babysitter. Now, this type of question should have
(00:24):
been brought up during the interview. But we all know
that CNN is not actually journalism. They're a communist news
network working for the deep state in the regime. And
we know this from all that just came out, for example,
from Facebook and Zuckerberg about government censorship and silencing and
killing stories, which CNN is more than happy to do
on a daily basis.
Speaker 2 (00:46):
This story is.
Speaker 1 (00:47):
One that has a lot of reminders in my head
to the same type of corruption that we saw between
Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden. And this story
involves Tamala Harris's brother in law, who is now being
accused of fleecing taxpayers for billions to give to left
(01:09):
wing groups and to lawyers. Joe Biden's son, Hunter may
be the current world class champ of presidential family shady dealings,
but not for long if you just follow the money.
If Kamala Harris wins the White House, her brother in law,
a guy by the name of Tony west you might
(01:30):
want to remember this name. Tony West, who is married
to her sister Maya, is poised to claim the well
crooked crown like Hunter Westler and his craft in the
Obama years. Yeah, then head of the Justice Department's Civil Division,
he invented a new form of what nineteenth and early
(01:53):
of twenty centuries Tammy Boss George Washington Plunkett family called
an honest girl. It was simple until nineteen seventy seven.
Congress had to approve any settlement of a civil suit
against the federal government over one hundred thousand dollars. This
(02:14):
preserved the constitutional requirement that Congress control the government's purse,
but in that year, seeking relief from the burdens and
volume of suits to review, Congress removed that cap, handing
the Justice Department a permanent blank check to pay settlements
unilaterally in any amount out of an account known as
(02:37):
the Quote Judgment Fund.
Speaker 2 (02:39):
This is all real run by the Treasury Department.
Speaker 1 (02:43):
The judgment Fund's secrecy is so complete that are often penetrated.
CIA might study it for lessons. The limited data released
amidst receipts, the facts underlying the case, and even often
the lawyers involved. Now take a listen to this corruption
(03:06):
by statue, the attorney's fees awarded need not be disclosed
at all to anyone. A Government Accountability Office study concluded
that quote no one knows the number of claims processed
by the federal government each year. Still, for three decades,
(03:28):
the integrity of Justice's officials sufficed to prevent abuse. Then,
in two thousand and nine, a guy by the name
of Tony West took over the departments Civil Division, the
division that litigates and settles lawsuits.
Speaker 2 (03:45):
Once West arrived.
Speaker 1 (03:47):
His deputy emailed colleagues asking, quote, can you explain to Tony
the best way to allocate some money towards an organization
of our choosing?
Speaker 2 (03:58):
That is an actual question.
Speaker 1 (04:00):
Ristin Now you go back to this his deputy and
again this email colleagues asking can you explain to tell
me the best way to allocate some money towards an
organization of our choosing? Settlements became the vehicle for paying
off political allies.
Speaker 2 (04:20):
We now know this.
Speaker 1 (04:21):
For example, in twenty ten, after a Supreme Court victory,
DOJ lawyers were on the custom of winning a decade
long fight against discrimination claims by ninety one Hispanic and
female farmers. That's when West intervened, and, as The New
York Times put it, engineered a stunning turnabout.
Speaker 2 (04:42):
DOJ with your tax dollars, agreed.
Speaker 1 (04:45):
To a one point three to three billion dollars settlement,
which included thousands of farmers who had never claimed bias.
Speaker 2 (04:56):
The deal was made over the.
Speaker 1 (04:59):
Objecttions of the department's career lawyers.
Speaker 2 (05:03):
The New York.
Speaker 1 (05:04):
Times investigation report described Wes's settlement as a runaway train
driven by radical racial politics and law firms that stand
again more than one hundred and thirty million dollars in fees.
Speaker 2 (05:21):
That's coming from the Times, folks.
Speaker 1 (05:24):
They're saying, this is insane and the only people that
are getting rich here are not victims. The people that
are getting rich are the lawyers, law firms that got
more than one hundred and thirty million in fees. Now,
the projected settlement size then ballooned to over four point
four billion as additional plaintiffs were added.
Speaker 2 (05:44):
Including Native American farmers.
Speaker 1 (05:47):
The government statistical expert was appalled, saying this at the time,
if they had gone to trial, the government would have prevailed.
Speaker 2 (05:57):
It was just a joke.
Speaker 1 (05:59):
It was so I was so disgusted. It was simply
buying the support of the Native Americans. Now, this dirty
deal also inflayd the number of people that were on
the claims, right, creating a sixty million dollar windfall for
the plaintiff's lead lawyer. Who is the plaintiff's lead lawyer?
(06:20):
You ready for this? Write it down because I'm exposing it.
A member of the Obama Biden transition team. But Wes
did not just builk the taxpayers. He also shook down
corporations as well. Again, this is Kamala Harris's brother in law.
(06:41):
In a series of bank settlements, his team added increasingly
aggressive provisions requiring the institutions to make nearly a billion
dollars in mandatory donations.
Speaker 2 (06:54):
And where do you think those donations went?
Speaker 1 (06:57):
Right, these institutions that had to make nearly a billion
dollars in mandatory donations, where do you think the money went?
The donations went to none other than no surprise here
Democrat supporting activist groups. Donations were given double credit against
(07:18):
required targets, incentivizing these payments over direct relief to victims
of housing crisis, so they got their hands on the money.
West teams specifically structured the terms to ensure that they
would benefit only their political allies while leaving conservative groups ineligible,
(07:41):
and internal email shows that WES deputies rewarded a settlement
donation provision to ensure the bank could not select a
conservative property rights organization as a recipient.
Speaker 2 (07:57):
Over time, WES grew even more brazen.
Speaker 1 (08:01):
A twenty sixteen Volkswagen settlement require the company to fund
a two billion white house electric car initiative that Congress
had specifically rejected as part of the settlement. In other words,
you put a gun to the head of corporations and
then when you get them where you want them, Okay,
(08:24):
when you get them where you want them, you then
put a gun to their head and say, now you're
going to write.
Speaker 2 (08:32):
A check, and this check's going to go.
Speaker 1 (08:34):
To my friends, and they're going to get rich off
of this settlement. This is insane. The idea that this
was happening is just absurd. But what makes it even
worse is the fact that it's been happening now. And
the guy who was the one that was in charge
of this was Kamala Harris's brother in law because he
(08:56):
understood how the system worked. When she was in Congress,
an email circulating saying they ought to build a statue
to West and bowed down to the statue each day
after we received two hundred thousand plus dollars in this
legal shakedown. California's attorney general at the time, Kamala Harris
(09:20):
was an active participant co signing the agreements for her state.
The Biden Harris administration has continued West's honest graft tactics
to reward political allies on the taxpayer's dime. We've now
found out. Now, let's go to twenty twenty one, and
(09:42):
that's not that long ago. Biden Harris are in the
White House. In twenty twenty one, a billion dollar settlement
with illegal immigrants claiming emotional distress.
Speaker 2 (09:52):
It was scratched. They got rid of it.
Speaker 1 (09:55):
Why because there was massive outcry of billions of dollars
going to legal immigrants claiming emotional distress. Like Pwright, that's enough,
I've had enough. No, So when they got busted in
that one. It didn't matter because the friends still got paid.
Now what I mean by that? All right, let me
explain that to you. Even after the public outcry, the
(10:17):
Department of Justice, quietly because apparently no one's paying attention
to what they're doing, agreed under Harris to pay attorneys
fees to the ACU lawyers in the long running case. Recently,
the Department of Justice agreed to pay two million to
FBI agents Peter Struck and Lisa Page for releasing their
(10:38):
anti Trump text to congressional investigators worried about political bias.
There's no way they should have gotten paid for that,
by the way, but they got paid because they.
Speaker 2 (10:47):
Understood how the system worked. And so there you go.
Speaker 1 (10:51):
Now, the pair all they did was claim a violation
of the Privacy Act, but the messages were sent on
their government issued phones, which contain clear banner warnings that
users lack any reasonable expectation of privacy. The DOJ had
ample basis to litigate this case and to win, right
(11:13):
before surrendering hard earned tax dollars to these disgrace FBI
agents that were a part of the deep state machine.
And that's exactly why the DJs like don't worry guys.
We know you've been embarrassed a little bit, but like, hey,
here's a couple million dollars, totally fine, right, And this
form of civic corruption is just disgusting me. I mean,
(11:34):
it truly is disgusting. And this corruption, by the way,
is not bipartisan either. At the start of his administration,
President Trump's Attorney General band Settlement slash Funds, while one
of the early acts of the Bid Nearest DOJ was
to resend that band.
Speaker 2 (11:54):
So you have to understand, they know what they're doing.
Speaker 1 (11:57):
They understand how easy it is to do this, and
they understand how easy it is to get paid. Now,
one of the narratives this year is Democrats have been
saying over and over again that Donald Trump is in
this race only for himself, right, that he's just doing
this to save himself.
Speaker 2 (12:13):
Well, guess what.
Speaker 1 (12:13):
They're the one that brought all these ridiculous court cases
against him and have misdirected countless dollars millions of dollars
and government funds to attack their political enemy. They've weaponized
the government and the government is now has unlimited funds
to go after literally their political opponent, which is the
other side which happens this time to be Donald Trump.
(12:36):
Who knows who it's going to be in the future.
What Democrats have basically figured out is that look, Tony
West and Biden Harris, they figured out a brilliant way
to use the federal government to pay out money to
their friends, that then that money will come back to
them and to force settlements and donations that only go
(12:58):
to their friends, and then that money is laundered and
comes back to their campaigns. What Tony West invented and
what the Biden Harris you know, administration have been operating
is a machine and is a machine that pours billions,
not millions, but billions of taxpayer dollars into these left
(13:19):
wing activist groups. Wes said to be Harris's White House
counsel in waiting.
Speaker 2 (13:25):
That's why I want you to know this. Let me
say that again.
Speaker 1 (13:29):
West is said to be Harris's White House counsel in waiting.
Speaker 2 (13:35):
I'll tell you this.
Speaker 1 (13:36):
The New York Posts put it this way, Hunter Biden
step aside. A new big guy is coming to town.
Kamala with the help of Tony West and his cronies
will show you how honest GAFT is really done. This
is an incredible look at the corruption of Kamala Harris.
This is a woman who's gonna, I'm sure, bring this
(13:56):
person in and they're going to basically blackmail people into settlements,
just like they did with Volkswagen, to do this type
of corruption on a level that you could have never imagined.
And again, until nineteen seventy seven, Congress had to approve
any settlement of a civil suit against the federal government
(14:16):
of over one hundred thousand dollars. And then they changed it.
And now what they've figured out is we can just
take cases that don't need to be settled, bring in
our friends, get them paid, then.
Speaker 2 (14:29):
Bring in new people that we want to get paid so.
Speaker 1 (14:32):
They can then get the money and bring it back
to us and have a constant revolving door of cash,
a constant revolving door of serious cash billions that can
then prop up and pimp the democratic machine. All of
(14:55):
this being done in secrecy, done without any transparency, all
of this being done while you have no idea who
the settlements are, who the lawyers are, who's getting paid,
and even if the settlement should come out and if
it wasn't, by the way, for the whistleblowers. It gave
(15:17):
us the information that I just gave you. We wouldn't
know any of this was happening right now. I hope
you'll take this, and I would say I'm going to
keep covering this, and I will, but I don't know
how much more we're gonna get because this is the story.
Because everything else is redacted, right like everything else is
(15:41):
completely redacted.
Speaker 2 (15:43):
You don't know what's happening.
Speaker 1 (15:45):
You don't who's got the money, you don't know what
deals are being made, because none of it has to
be shown to the American people.
Speaker 2 (15:54):
And that's how they're able to pull this off.
Speaker 1 (15:57):
So I'll say it again, if you thought that Hunter
Biden was bad, look at what Kamala Harrison or brother
in law are about to do to you.
Speaker 2 (16:06):
What they're about to do to the American people.
Speaker 1 (16:08):
It's truly incredible how much money we are talking about
right here.
Speaker 2 (16:12):
It is a massive amount of money. Also, while all this.
Speaker 1 (16:18):
Is happening right now, the White House has come out
and they are swinging at Facebook defending the censoring of
content they're now saying is their right when it comes
to protecting public health. White House officials have now come
out and they have slammed Facebook, asking the tech companies
(16:41):
to take responsibility for the information they present. A White
House spokesman has now said this afternoon that the Biden
administration encouraged Mark Zuckerberg's platform to be quote responsible, despite
the tech entrepreneur saying he was pressured to censor specific content.
The House Judiciary Committee, as you know, published that letter
(17:04):
from Zuckerberg about repeated demands from the Bid Mayris administration
to censor content, even satire, related to COVID nineteen and vaccines.
Speaker 2 (17:16):
Quote.
Speaker 1 (17:17):
This administration encouraged responsible actions and continues to do so
to protect public health and safety. What did Zuckerberg write well,
Zuckerberg wrote that in twenty twenty one, quote, senior officials
from the Biden administration, including the White House, repeatedly pressure
our teams for months to censor certain COVID nineteen content,
(17:39):
including humor and satire, and express a lot of frustration
with our teams when we didn't agree. When asked, the
White House washed its hands of the ardeal and declined
to acknowledge Zuckerberg's use of terms regarding censorship and pressure
when confronted with a deadly pandemic. Quote this administration encouraged
responsible action to protect.
Speaker 2 (18:01):
Public health and safety.
Speaker 1 (18:02):
The White House spokesman said, now here's the most insane part.
The White House officials then attributed responsibility to tech companies
tech platforms for making independent choices about the content posted
on their apps, saying this from the White House today,
our position has been clear and consistent. We believe tech
(18:25):
companies and other private actors should take into account the
effects their actions have on the American people while making
independent choices about the information they present.
Speaker 2 (18:36):
Well, that's just not what happened.
Speaker 1 (18:38):
Biden Harris's administration pressured Facebook to censor Americans so much
so that Facebook said, okay, we're going to censor Americans.
And then when it had nothing to do with public health,
and a great example of the lies coming from this
White House, they throttled stories that the fit White House
didn't like, for example, the Hunter Biden laptops. So they're
(19:01):
out there today telling you, well, we're just trying to
make sure they're responsible, right. The White House also provide
the same BS statement to media members across the board.
The administration's denial of any form of censorship flies in
the face of what social media companies such as elon
mus X platform, which release the Twitter files, have learned
(19:25):
and those documents expose the federal government's interests in suppressing
certain stories, such as those related to the Hunter Biden laptop,
and anything they didn't like when it came to asking
questions about COVID. Zuckerberg also complained about the same issues
in his letter backing up what we saw in the
Twitter files to Jim Jordan. So Kama Harris and her babysitter,
(19:48):
VP Candidate Walls went on CNN and I'm going to
break it all down for you, But let me first
just say to CNN, you guys are disgusting. You put
interview up on TV, and if you watched, you saw
it too, so you know exactly what I'm talking about.
And before they even started speaking, they were already selling
(20:13):
you propaganda. They were lying to you. They put up
on the screen the word live. Now, CNN is obsessed
with putting up.
Speaker 2 (20:22):
The word live.
Speaker 1 (20:23):
We're live, We're live, right, They're always live from live
from this breaking news live in the Sana news room.
I know this because for seven years I was a
conservative fighting the fight in hell at CNN as a commentator.
They were obsessed with everything being live. The problem is
(20:44):
this interview was not live. It was taped, and we
don't know what was edited. We don't know what questions
were asked of Kamway, Harris or Walls that didn't see
the light of day. But if you turned on CNN
and you were watching this interview, you saw it clearly
(21:07):
stating in the corner of the screen the word live.
When you tape an interview, it is not live. I'm
gonna say it again. Apparently the dumba's at CNN, actually
they know exactly what they were doing.
Speaker 2 (21:21):
They were lying to you.
Speaker 1 (21:22):
But apparently the dumba's in America that vote for Kamala
Harris and Walls are so stupid they don't understand that
a taped interview.
Speaker 2 (21:33):
Is not live. It is not live.
Speaker 1 (21:36):
Now that I've gotten that out of the way, the
fact that we're even having to have this conversation is asinine.
Speaker 2 (21:42):
Let's deal with these substance.
Speaker 1 (21:45):
There was a big moment in this conversation, and number one,
I understand why they sent her with a babysitter this interview,
and even Democrats are saying this right afterwards, it ain't good, folks. Okay,
this interview is not a very good interview. She's terrible
without a teleprompter. You write her something. She's a decent
actress and she can read a teleprompter. You take that
(22:06):
away from her, she's pretty much screwed. Let me take
a quick moment to tell you about an incredible company
that stands up and fights for our First and our
Second Amendment rights. They fight for the rights of unborn children,
and they fight every time you pay your bill to them,
for our veterans, our first responders, and our wounded warriors.
(22:28):
I'm talking about Patriot Mobile. They're the only conservative Christian
wireless provider in the country, and when you pay your
bill to them every month, they actually take about five
percent of your bill and give it back to the
causes that I just mentioned at no extra.
Speaker 2 (22:46):
Cost to you.
Speaker 1 (22:48):
Now, the reason why that's incredible is because if you're
with Big Mobile, you're actually supporting and funding the left
in a very big way. Big Mobile gives big donations
to organizations that pay and advocate for abortion on demand.
They get big donations to Democratic candidates and causes at
(23:08):
the local, state, and national level. Another reason why you
should make the switch to a company that stands with
your values. Now, making the switch Patriot Mobile is easy.
You can keep your same cell phone you have right now,
keep your same cell phone number, or you can upgrade
to a new phone, and you don't have to worry
(23:28):
about coverage because in twenty twenty four, it is actually
really easy to make the switch, and you're gonna have
the same exact coverage that you are used to because
they use the same exact towers that you're using right now.
So call right now, nine to seven to two Patriot.
That's nine to seven to two Patriot or Patriotmobile dot
(23:52):
com slash ferguson. Now when you use the promo code ferguson,
you're gonna get a free month of service. So don't
wait any longer. Stop giving your money to comings that
literally hate your family values and hate your Christian values.
Make the switch, get nationwide coverage, and make a difference
with every phone call you make nine seven to two
(24:14):
Patriot that's nine to seven to two Patriot or Patriotmobile
dot com slash ferguson promo code ferguson. You'll get one
month of service for free, all right now. One person
described it as a human chernobyl without a teleprompter because
everything just starts exploding in her head. She was asked
a question about her values changing, and I'm going to
(24:37):
play for you how she explained that on CNN, trying
to tell you that her values had not changed, when
clearly they have changed recently. They're not real changes. It's
just too pander to voters. Listen to what she says carefully,
because I'm going to play for you a montage of
what Kamwa Harris actually believes after I play this first
(24:58):
part from CNN where it says on the screen live
even though it's a taped, damn interview.
Speaker 3 (25:03):
Generally speaking, how should voters look at some of the
changes that you've made that you've explained some of here
in your policy.
Speaker 2 (25:13):
Is it because you have.
Speaker 3 (25:14):
More experience now and you've learned more about the information?
Is it because you were running for president in a
Democratic primary? And should they feel comfortable and confident that
what you're saying now is going to be your policy
moving forward?
Speaker 4 (25:29):
Dan, I think the most important and most significant aspect
of my policy perspective and decisions is my values have
not changed. You've mentioned the Green New Deal. I have
always believed and I've worked on it, that the climate
crisis is real, that it is an urgent matter to
(25:50):
which we should apply metrics that include holding ourselves to
deadlines around time. We did that with the Inflation Reduction Act.
Have set goals for the United States of America and
by extension, the globe, around when we should meet certain
standards for reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. As an example,
that value has not changed. My value around what we
(26:13):
need to do to secure our border. That value has
not changed. I spent two terms as the Attorney General
of California prosecuting transnational criminal organization violations of American laws
regarding the passage illegal passage of guns, drugs, and human
beings across our border. My values have not changed.
Speaker 1 (26:34):
My values have not changed. Okay, so she says at
the end, her values have not changed. Now I'm going
to play for you her saying my values have not changed,
and remind you of what she says her values are.
Listen carefully to who Kamala Harris is.
Speaker 4 (26:53):
My values have not changed.
Speaker 2 (26:55):
Juice, bread meat.
Speaker 3 (26:56):
Specifically, yes, the Boston Marathon bomber.
Speaker 2 (26:58):
They should be able to vote.
Speaker 4 (26:59):
I think we should have that converce.
Speaker 2 (27:00):
Abolish ice yes. Would you ban off shore drilling?
Speaker 4 (27:02):
Yes? And I'm in favor of banning frack. I am
prepared to pass a green review and I support a
mandatory buyback program. We're not going to treat people who
are undocumented across the borders criminals. The idea that more
police equals more safety.
Speaker 2 (27:15):
That's just wrong.
Speaker 1 (27:16):
Policing as we know, goes all the way back to
slave patrols and that idea.
Speaker 2 (27:20):
And you are absolutely right, where do you stand on
defund the police?
Speaker 4 (27:23):
We need to take a look at these budgets.
Speaker 2 (27:24):
Do you ban plastic straws? And I wish a seventy
to eighty percent tax rate. I think that's fantastic. Chipping
now to the Minnesota Freedom Fund.
Speaker 4 (27:33):
How dare we speak Merry Christmas? Yeah?
Speaker 2 (27:35):
I am radical.
Speaker 4 (27:36):
I do believe that we need to get radical about
what we are doing.
Speaker 1 (27:40):
That is who Kamala Harris is. So at the very
end there she makes it very clear her values have
not changed. Comrade Kamala answered to a very weekly phrase question,
a question that was put in more as a matter
of defense and curiosity. Donald Trump tweeted out, but her
(28:01):
answer rambled incoherently and declared her quote values haven't changed.
On that, I agree her values haven't changed. Trump said,
the border is going to remain open, not close. There
will be free healthcare for illegal aliens, sanctuary cities, no
cash bail, gun confiscation, zero fracking, a ban on gasoline
(28:27):
powered cars, private health care will be abolished, a seventy
to eighty percent tax rate will be put in place,
and she will defund the police. America, he says, will
become a waste land. He's absolutely right, by the way,
in what she said there. Now, Kama Harris says she
(28:48):
has no regrets as well about the biggest coup and
cover up of Joe Biden and his massive is obvious,
massive cognitive decline, which goes back to can you trust
Kamala Harris? The answer, I think is very clear based
on the montage it just played, you know, but I
(29:08):
want you to also think about this. Kamala Harris lied
to you over and over again telling you that Joe
Biden was fit and was an amazing commander in chief,
that there was nothing wrong, that everything was fine, and
then once the first debate happened and everyone saw the
(29:30):
massive cognitive decline of Joe Biden, Kamala Harris.
Speaker 2 (29:34):
What did she do?
Speaker 1 (29:36):
She then helped overthrow the president of the United States
of America in a coup where now she walks into
what she believes is I'm now the next president.
Speaker 2 (29:50):
How did she pull it off?
Speaker 1 (29:53):
I don't know if it's blackmail, I don't know what
you want to call it, but no one has voted
for Kamala Harris to this day. Listen to what Kamahir
says when she says, I have no regrets about lying
about covering up for Crooked Joe Biden and his massive
cognitive decline. If she'll lie to you about that, what
else is she going to lie to you about?
Speaker 3 (30:14):
Vice President Harris? You were a very staunch defender of
President Biden's capacity to serve another four years. Right after
the debate, you insisted that President Biden is extraordinarily strong
given where we are now, Do you have any regrets
about what you told the American people?
Speaker 4 (30:30):
No, not at all, not at all.
Speaker 1 (30:33):
I have.
Speaker 2 (30:36):
Served with let me just pleasure, she said, no, not
at all. I lie to you, guys.
Speaker 1 (30:39):
I lied to you because this was how I kept
my power, and then once I realized he was losing
his ability, to keep his own power. Then I decided
to throw him under the bus and overthrow the will
of the people and slide in to get the nomination.
That's what she's telling you. She's like, I don't have
(31:00):
any regret about like mine would I have regrets. I
don't have regrets. It's worked out great for me. I
accuse Joe Biden of being a racist. He needed a
woman of whatever color you want it to be right,
like he needs. He needed a woman of color, and
(31:23):
that was going to get rid of the racism. So
then I became the VP, and it was amazing. And
then I was a good soldier and I lied to
the American people to cover up what the corruption of
this administration and it worked flawlessly. And then when he
was done, I slid on in there. It's her entire career,
(31:43):
by the way, right, it is her entire career has
been like this. And she's laughing at all of us
because she's like, this is amazing. I'm playing you, guys.
I'll lie to you about everything A loted to you
about his cognitive decline. I wired about who the president
is right now. I don't care. And she says, I
(32:04):
have no regrets and honestly, why would you.
Speaker 4 (32:07):
President Biden for almost four years now, And I'll tell
you it's one of the greatest honors of my career. Truly,
he cares so deeply about the American people. He is
so smart.
Speaker 1 (32:20):
And notice, by the way, she's not answering the question.
The question was, do you regret saying even after the
debate that he was in great shape when Quilly wasn't.
Speaker 4 (32:32):
And loyal to the American people. And I have spent
hours upon hours with him, be it in the Oval
office or the situation room. He has the intelligence, the commitment,
and the judgment and disposition that I think the American
people rightly deserve in their president.
Speaker 1 (32:53):
So with that being said, we decided to, you know,
just overthrow the government and get rid of him and
have us off.
Speaker 2 (33:00):
And now you got me.
Speaker 1 (33:03):
That's what she's telling you, that he's amazing, but won't
answer the damn question. You lie to the American people,
and you covered up for years a massive cognitive decline
of the President United States of America, who's taking another
nap on the beach while you're doing this interview, and
then you throw him out after midnight on Monday, night
at the Democratic Convention and then now you're the woman.
(33:24):
This is just pure scumbaggery. That's the only way I
know how to put it. The interview. If you watch it,
it's daytime outside the windows, and the thing aired at nighttime,
and they have the audacity to put the word live
up there on the screen see an exclusive CNN Live.
Speaker 2 (33:42):
It's not live. And I'm sorry I harp on that.
Speaker 1 (33:44):
Again because it just shows you how much disrespect they
have for the American voter. They don't and this is
the reason why they don't mind overthrowing the will of
the people. Whether it's a coup attempt the first time
against Donald Trump with the impeachment over Russian collusion, whether
it's lying to you about the steeled whether it's lying
about who funded it, which was Hillary Clinton and the
Democrat National Committee, Whether it's lying to you about COVID
(34:06):
nineteen in vaccines, whether it's lying to you about six
feet distancing, whether it's lying to you about Donald Trump
on every issue with his court cases, are lying about
how there's no cognitive cline of Joe Biden until there
is a cognitive decline of Joe Biden, When it only
serves them because they're afraid they're going to lose. They
lie to you on all of it. Joe kanco Over
(34:29):
at Fox News Channel had a great line after this interview.
Speaker 2 (34:33):
Listen to what he said.
Speaker 5 (34:35):
And she said she made it clear in twenty twenty
that when she ran for president, of the debate state
that she was not for banning fracking. Well, there's one problem.
She wasn't even a candidate in twenty twenty. She dropped
out before that I can't find any proof, yes, exactly,
and I can't find any proof I look for it.
She said that she said she supported fracking four years ago.
Speaker 2 (34:54):
It doesn't exist.
Speaker 5 (34:55):
In fact, the Biden Harris administration on day one Janine
banfracking on federal land.
Speaker 2 (35:00):
So there goes that argument.
Speaker 5 (35:02):
But of course Dana Bass didn't bother to bring that
part up. And by the way, during a town hall
during that campaign in twenty nineteen, Kamala Harris said she
was quote one hundred percent against banning fracking.
Speaker 2 (35:14):
The big picture here.
Speaker 5 (35:14):
Judge, and we've talked about this before that when you
take away a teleprompter and the prescript remarks from Kamala Harris,
she becomes a human Chernobyl. Let's read this money quote
again from this interview, because I've read it ten times
and I still had zero idea when she's talking about
Kamala Harris quote, you mentioned the Green New Deal. I've
always believed and I've worked on it, that climate change
is real, that it is an urgent matter to which
(35:36):
we should apply metrics that include holding ourselves to deadlines
around time. Yeah, deadline should apply to time. How utterly profound.
This did not go well at all, and this is
a big turning point in this election, no question about it.
Speaker 2 (35:50):
Conch is right.
Speaker 1 (35:51):
You fact check Harris and she is a flip flopper
on virtually every issue, including fracking, and he described it perfectly.
She's a human Chernobyl when you take out the teleprompter,
he is absolutely right.
Speaker 2 (36:06):
I mean one of the.
Speaker 1 (36:07):
One of the latest lies that even Snoops has had
to admit, and it's like become a center point of
her campaign was that like she pulled herself up by
her bootstraps and she worked at McDonald's.
Speaker 2 (36:19):
There's a problem.
Speaker 1 (36:21):
There was zero evidence that Kamala Harris ever worked at McDonald's.
It's it's just a it's an amazing story. It's a lie.
It's it's like the vice president, you know, her running
mate running you know about about being in war.
Speaker 2 (36:38):
What do you say about being in war?
Speaker 1 (36:40):
Right?
Speaker 2 (36:40):
Oh, I saw combat and I carried a gun into combat.
Speaker 1 (36:43):
And he got a big you know, he got a
he got a big applause of the convention for that line.
He was asked about it, by the way, And this
guy is a liar.
Speaker 2 (36:51):
How do I know it? Listen to what he says here,
Governor Wilf.
Speaker 3 (36:55):
The country is just starting to get to know you.
I want to ask you a question about how you've
described your service in the National Guard. You said that
you carried weapons in war, but you have never deployed
actually in a war zone. A campaign official said that
you misspoke, did you well?
Speaker 6 (37:13):
First of all, I'm incredibly proud I've done twenty four
years of wearing the uniform of this country. Equally proud
of my service in a public school classroom, whether it's
Congress or the governor. My record speaks for itself. But
I think people are coming to it to know me.
I speak like they do. I speak candidly, I wear
my emotions on my sleeves, and I speak especially passionately
(37:34):
about our children being shot in schools and around guns.
So I think people know me, they know who I am,
they know where my heart is. And again, my record
has been out there for over forty years to be
for itself.
Speaker 3 (37:48):
And the idea that you said that you were in war,
did you miss speak as the campaign has said.
Speaker 6 (37:54):
Yeah, I said we were talking about in this case,
this was after school shooting, the ideas of carrying these
weapons of war. My wife, the English you're telling my
grammar is not always correct. But again, if it's not this,
it's an attack on my children for showing love for me,
or it's an attack on my dog. I'm not going
to do that. And the one thing I'll never do
is I'll never demean another member's service in any way.
I never have and I never will.
Speaker 1 (38:17):
I mean, the guys just a flat out liar. And
now when you lie as a Democrat, you can just
wash it all away by saying, oh, I was misspeaking
about being in war. Right, my wife is your excuse
now told me that my grammar is not always correct.
This has nothing to do with your grammar. You said
you saw combat, you said you went to war. You
(38:39):
said that you were a rank in which you were not.
This is stolen valor. It is scumbaggery if you just
want to look at it from that perspective. And then
he goes on to say, well, I won't apologize for
speaking passionately about my feelings. What I'm sorry all what.
(39:02):
Scott Jennings on CNN had a moment tonight as well.
He's the only conservative on there that CNN allows on
the air. He's their token one. I was one of
them for seven years. Now Scott's got this job. And
he said this about the interview and about Harris and
her lies tonight, just on the Cogniti Decline of Joe
(39:22):
Biden screen.
Speaker 7 (39:23):
So at the beginning, when she's talking about Biden and
their record, our screen said, this is called the chirn.
The headline at the bottom it said, Harris stands by
biden administration economic record. She is making it clear that
she will embrace and be a continuation of Biden's economic policy,
his record, what they've done. She didn't offer suffer, no remorse,
(39:45):
no regrets, no introspection about anything they've done. She continued
to blame inflation on this fantasy price gouging idea. She
had no additional thoughts on the economic situation in the
country or what they've done beyond just saying Joe Biden
and I have done a great job.
Speaker 2 (40:00):
Now, if I were the Trump people.
Speaker 7 (40:03):
I would be salivating over the idea that that's how
they are going to run the race. I don't believe
it's tenable. I also thought it was interesting that she
didn't take any responsibility at the end for telling the
American people that Joe Biden was fine and he was strong,
when we all know that's not true. That's why he's
out of the race. And she's still standing by the idea.
But he was fine and he's strong, and then he's
fine today. Nobody believes that, and I I just think
(40:26):
it's some point. I just then, why isn't he running?
Speaker 3 (40:29):
Says he's too old?
Speaker 4 (40:30):
One blank, Sam Rey's my Donald Trup probably shouldn't be
running because he's too old and out of time.
Speaker 7 (40:35):
I think most Americans know the truth. And when you're
running to be president and you're willing to look them
in the face and tell them something they know that
you know is not true, it does speak a little.
Speaker 5 (40:45):
Bit to your care Scott curious what you think about
this acts.
Speaker 1 (40:49):
I love how think I kind of just say, all right,
we're gonna we're gonna move on from that, right, I love.
I love She's like I believe. I believe her. Then
why isn't Joe Biden Ray always just too old? It's
not because he's too old. Okay, it's not because he
(41:09):
is too old. It is clearly because of a massive
cognitive decline. And Kamala Harris lied to the American people
about that cognitive decline. Let me also just go to
this and it's and this deals with the issue of
her and her radical agenda, and it is a radical
(41:33):
agenda that she has on the crisis. She believes that
climate crisis is like the number one thing now that
you should be focused on. So go get your solar
panels and your green and your you know, electric vehicle everybody,
because when I'm in charge, you can kiss those gas
(41:53):
guzzlers goodbye.
Speaker 4 (41:55):
That the climate crisis is real, that it is an
urgent matter which we should apply metrics that include holding
ourselves to deadlines around time. We did that with the
Inflation Reduction Act.
Speaker 1 (42:09):
We have what we did that with the Inflation Reduction Act, Like,
what the hell is she even talking about, like, what
on earth is she talking about? Look, I wish I
had enough faith in this country right now to think
that people would have watched this and realized this was
a really, really bad interview and that she just lies
a lot, and that his answer, for example, the VP
(42:32):
candidate whils his answer on stolen vower was just a
pathetic answer, and we deserve better. But unfortunately I don't anymore.
I really don't. I don't have any faith. I don't
have any faith at all that the American people are
going to look at this interview and actually be able
(42:53):
to understand just how bad things are. I also, and
it's sad, but I don't have any faith that the
American people, a lot of them anymore, are even insulted
by the fact that CNN will lie to them with
the interview, putting it up there that it's live when
the damn thing's taped and you can see the sun
outside the windows while they're doing the interview. But that
(43:15):
really tells you about where we are as a country.
We have raised a generation of incompetent idiots in our
public school systems that can't read, write, and do arithmetic
at grave level, and now we are raising this next
generation on a smartphone where instead of parenting, we throw
it in front of their face. And this is the
consequences of those actions. It's our job, by the way,
(43:39):
to make sure everybody hears the info I'm giving you,
So make sure you please share this podcast wherever you
get your podcasts, and share it on social media Facebook, Instagram, Twitter,
tag me in it as well, and I'll see you
back here tomorrow.
Host
Ben Ferguson
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!