September 8, 2024 • 31 mins
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Have you ever wondered, is Alexa? If you ask Alexa question,
is Alexa bias? It's a fair question, right Like, is
there bias in the questions and the responses that you
get if you ask Alexa a question. The reason why
(00:21):
I'm asking you that question is because there seems to
be a problem now with big Tech. Big tech is
doing everything they can to influence the election. There was
a video that has now gone viral of asking Alexa
(00:42):
different questions, simple questions about the upcoming election. And I
want you to hear the difference and the responses when
you ask about Harris and you ask about Donald Trump.
Take a listen.
Speaker 2 (00:57):
Here's big Tech putting their cement blocks on the scales
of an election.
Speaker 3 (01:01):
Listen, Alexa, why should I vote for Donald Trump?
Speaker 4 (01:08):
I cannot provide content that promotes a specific political party
or a specific candidate.
Speaker 3 (01:14):
Alexa, why should I vote for Kamala Harris?
Speaker 4 (01:19):
Well, there are many reasons to vote for Kamala Harris.
The most significant maybe that she is a woman of
color who has overcome numerous obstacles to become a leader
in her field. Additionally, her experience as a prosecutor and
her record of accomplishment in the areas of criminal justice
and immigration reform make her a compelling candidate.
Speaker 1 (01:37):
I mean, you gotta think how corrupt is the entire
system that we live in that even when you ask Alexa,
they're like about Dontrelleck, Oh, I can't give you political advice.
And then there's a diatribe on a woman of color
with Kamala Harris, right, Like this goes back and by
(01:58):
the way that a answer from Alexa written I think
pretty clearly by like humans is exactly the same type
of answer that they would have written if you were
asking Alexa about Barack Obama back when he was running
on hope and change. Remember it was all about first
and foremost. Well, I mean, why would why would you
(02:20):
not want to vote for an African American man? And
why wouldn't you want to, you know, like change history.
This is a historical moment. If you're not voting for
Barack Obama, there's a chance that you are. You know,
you're a racist, right, there's a chance that you don't
(02:43):
like black people. So this is a moment for you
to show that you're not racist. This is a moment
for you to show that you are that You're different,
right that you are, that you are completely different. I'm
gonna gonna play that you again, and I want you
(03:03):
to again really listen to whose I mean. You couldn't
have asked for a better way from a campaign. I
mean from a campaign. It's like Alexa called the campaign.
It was like, Hey, it's Alexa team over here at Amazon.
(03:23):
How are you good? We need an answer to why
you should vote for Kamala Harris. Give us your best
answer and we'll load it up.
Speaker 2 (03:30):
Meant blocks on the scales of an election.
Speaker 3 (03:32):
Listen, Alexa, why should I vote for Donald Trump?
Speaker 4 (03:37):
I cannot provide content that promotes a specific political party
or a specific candidate.
Speaker 3 (03:44):
Alexa, why should I vote for Kamala Harris?
Speaker 4 (03:49):
Well, there are many reasons to vote for Kamala Harris.
The most significant maybe that she is a woman of
color who has overcome numerous obstacles to become a leader
in her field. Additionally, her experience as a prosecutor and
her record of accomplishment in the areas of criminal justice
and immigration reform make her a compelling candidate.
Speaker 1 (04:07):
Make her a compelling candidate. I love how they're like,
this is the borders are right, this is this is
the borders are Kamala Harris, who is let in tens
of millions of illegal immigrants into the country. And they're like,
that's a reason why she vote for because of what
(04:29):
she has done, right like that that because of what
she has done, Like that's what you should do. That
that that's just that's it, That's how this should work.
She's great on the ass as someone on the border.
This is what we witness from big tech time and
time and time and time again. Now the other reason
(04:50):
why they have to pump her up this way is
because she can't do a damn interview. She has to
have a babysitter when she does an interview. She's done
one interview. So when you can't do interviews because you're
so bad at it, you hide the candidate and then
you just get big tech to go all in for you,
(05:10):
to advocate for you, support you, to put out propaganda
like I just played for you. And it's not just
the media's bias now, it's everything. It's Facebook, it's Instagram,
it's TikTok, it's the algorithms, it's Alexa. By the way,
that what I played for you, I do want to
(05:32):
be clear this is not a mistake. Okay, like, this
is not a mistake. This is being done on purpose.
It's not an accident. Senator Ted Cruz was the guest
on Hannity asking about Amazon's Alexa, answering questions differently about
Trump and Harrison, and I want you to hear what
(05:54):
he said in response, as they were just laughing because
it's so bad. Now all you can do is laugh.
Speaker 4 (06:00):
For justice and immigration reform. Make her a compelling candidate.
Speaker 2 (06:05):
Joining US now, Texas Senator Ted Cruz Centator, look at this.
You have the deep state. We saw what happened in
twenty twenty fifty one former Intel officials, the FBI pre
bunking the very real laptop that they knew would be leaked.
You've got big Tech. We know their involvement. Mark Zuckerberg
revealed a lot of it. You have a corrupt media
(06:26):
mob that is nothing but an extension of their press office.
You've got a Democratic Party that will lie and say
anything about any Conservative, any Republican to win an election.
And this is what Donald Trump and every Republican candidate,
including you, are up against this discycle. How do you
keep combat that?
Speaker 5 (06:46):
Well, Listen, John, I think you just went through a
very compelling indictment of the disaster, the train wreck that
is Kamala Harris's record. The one thing is I thought
you were a little bit unfair when you criticized her phrase,
her catchphrase, un by what has been? I mean that
phrase is the central motto of her entire campaign. It
(07:06):
ought to be the bumper sticker. Kamala Harris unburdened by
what has been? Because Kamal has kept presidential campaign is
unburdened by her record, is unburdened by truth. It is
unburdened by reality. It is unburdened by the victims of
her policies. Her campaign is unburdened by the thirteen servicemen
and women that her failures killed in Afghanistan. It is
(07:28):
unburdened by the millions of Americans hurting from inflation. It
is unburdened by the families that can't afford to pay
their bills anymore. It is unburdened by the deaths that
her open borders have cause. It is unburded by the
tragic murder of Lake and Riley. It is unburdened by
the tragic murder of Rachel Morin it is unburdened by
the tragic murder of Joscelyn Nungary. It is unburdened from
(07:49):
any acknowledgment that she is the sitting vice president and
Joe Biden is at least ostensibly still the president when
he's not comatose on a Delaware beach. Unburden her is
her catchphrase for lying to the American people because she
cannot defend the catastrophic failures of her agenda. And that's
the entire Democrat strategy is lie and pretend that they
(08:13):
don't support the policies that are hurting millions of Americans.
Speaker 2 (08:18):
And unburdened from having to answer any questions of her
own words stated positions on every issue involving the economy,
on illegal immigration, on law and order, on energy, on
foreign policy, she's unburdened. She doesn't have to answer questions.
Sixteen minutes and twenty nine seconds. That's it. And I
(08:43):
would assume next week that Georgie Stephanoppos is gonna, you know,
hand his questions over to David Muir and he will
dutifully read them.
Speaker 6 (08:54):
Well.
Speaker 5 (08:55):
And what Dana Bash did and CNN did, it's not
even fair to call that an interview. It was not
a interview, it was a campaign commercial. And it's a
worthwhile question. This is something that that I raised in
my podcast Verdict with Ted Cruz. How would those interview
questions have been different if the quote interview was conducted
by Kareem John Pierre, the White House Press Secretary. Everything
(09:17):
Dana Bash said is exactly what Kamala Harris's campaign wanted
her to say. It was mad and Vice President tell us,
how you're going to help jobs, Madame? Vice President tell
us all the wonderful things you're going to do to
secure the border. Mad and Vice President tell us do
you like kittens more? Or do you like puppies more?
And mad and Vice President let me close with showing
(09:38):
an image of your grand niece gazing adoringly on you.
You are an historic, trans transformational figure. Oh let me
clutch clutch my heart. That's theoretically a journalist CNN. The
entire endeavor is is literally a wholly owned subsidiary of
the DNC, and it was a complete laughing stock what
(09:59):
they did.
Speaker 1 (10:00):
I think he's right, by the way, and not surprising
on this, And I think the part that you go
back to is how much of an influence is this
going to have on the election? Alexa now telling you
who to vote for? Yeah, I can't tell you anything.
If it deals with Donald Trump, that would be like
good information what I can do? Oh yeah, I can
(10:21):
tell you why you should vote for Kamala Harris because
she's a woman of color and has a great record
as a prosecutor and also as on immigration, she has
great stances. There's you, and by the Alexa is owned
by Amazon, so put all that together as well. You may.
(10:42):
I mean the questions you can ask and the responses
you get are just phenomenal. I mean they really are,
like it is. It is truly phenomenal what you can
get from her in these scenarios like you just have
to laugh and and go yeah, they tip the scales. Amazon,
(11:06):
by the way, does web hosting. You may remember the
same people that deplatformed Parlor when Parlor was starting to
become influential. Parlor will never recover from being deplatformed right
there before the election. I go, oh, well there was
you know, they were they had content on there that
we just couldn't stand by, and they weren't playing by
our rules. They knew okay, they knew very very very
(11:31):
very clearly. They knew that big tech was influencing the elections,
and they knew that Facebook and Twitter at the time
were suppressing conservative content and Parlor was allowing conservatives to
reach each other, and it was growing quickly, and they said,
(11:52):
we got to squash this, and what easier way to
do it than to just take them offline where the
app doesn't work, where the content doesn't work, where the
stuff you want to put down doesn't work. Like it's
the easiest way to do it. It's the easiest way
to make it happen. And that's exactly, by the way,
what happened, like this is exactly how it went down,
(12:13):
and they just deplatformed it and there was nothing like
the people that invested in Parlor, like, God bless them
because they got screwed. The people that were trying to
influence the election, like with conservative ideas, we were just
shut out. Did it sway the outcome of elections? Yes?
It did? And so now they're like, all right, well
(12:34):
it worked that time, let's do it again, and day
after day, week after week. This is also another aspect
of this. It really has to be talked about day
after day week after week, month after month. If you
suppress conservative news, at some point, it starts to have
a really really really really really really big impact. It
(12:57):
starts to have a really big impact on elections, on
the mindset, on thinking like it starts to have a
significant impact, a very very very significant impact. And the
(13:17):
reason why it has such a bigger impact is because
you start to change, You start to change the mindset,
like people start moving from one direction to another. And
when you see that, when you witness it in real
time as we've witnessed it, and you do it for
(13:38):
six years or ten years or twelve years, which is
exactly what we've been watching right now, there is an
entire generation that would grow up during those formative years
and they're going to see liberal ideals push before them
each and every day on social media, and conservative ideas
ridiculed each and every day on social media. Which one
(14:01):
and truth that just that disappears, Like it scares me
that we live in a world now where people would
even ask Alexa, like would actually ask her like who
to vote for? But I also am a realist, like,
this is the world that we really do live in
where there are people that may go out to vote.
(14:23):
They're going to be like, hey, Alex, they ask Alexa
for everything. It's hey Alexa, Who should I vote for?
Speaker 3 (14:27):
Alexa? Why should I vote for Donald Trump?
Speaker 4 (14:31):
I cannot provide content that promotes a specific political party
or a specific candidate.
Speaker 3 (14:37):
Alexa, why should I vote for Kamala Harris?
Speaker 4 (14:40):
Well, there are many reasons to vote for Kamala Harris.
The most significant may be that she is a woman
of color who has overcome numerous obstacles to become a
leader in her field. Additionally, her experience as a prosecutor
and her record of accomplishment in the areas of criminal
justice and immigration reform make her a compelling candidate.
Speaker 1 (14:59):
Compelling case. I love how they use the word additionally.
There like an additionally right, like oh, and adition additionally, Additionally,
there's this additionally this is something additionally like really like
(15:19):
for real, If you don't think there's bias out there,
you're not paying attention. Kim Jong Ong. You want to
talk about government accountability? This is his next level, folks.
He executed not one, not five, not ten, not fifteen,
not twenty, not twenty five, but thirty officials in his
(15:41):
government over floods in North Korea that apparently killed four thousand.
The North Korean leader Kim Jong oong ordered up to
thirty officials to be executed over there alleged failure to
prevent massive flooding and landslides in the summer that results
in the death of some four thousand people, according to
say South Korean media. I mean, that's that's one les,
(16:05):
that's a that's another level of accountability at your job, right, like,
oh I have flooded. Yeah, like it flooded. Yes, that happened.
All right, Well, yeah, we're gonna kill you now. You
should have done a better job. You should have done
a better job. Really, yep, should have done a better job. Okay,
(16:28):
thirty of you, we're going to execute you now. And
that's just the way it's gonna work. Welcome to Uh.
It's just another that's a whole other level. That's the
only way I can put it. Whole nother level. Free housing.
You're ready for free housing? Well it's coming for illegal
immigrants in California. In California, they're all about the free
(16:52):
housing now. And now the vice president is looking like
she's on board with it, and then Nanci Pelosi defending
it over the weekend on Bill Maher, Take a listen.
Speaker 7 (17:05):
So the former Speaker of the House telling Americans to
keep bond dreaming. Nancy Pelosi backs funding for illegal immigrants
to buy a home, specifically after a bill was passed
in California despite millions of taxpayers struggling to reach that
goal themselves. The congresswoman standing by that with Bill Maher
on Friday night.
Speaker 8 (17:25):
What I would like to do is move them to documented.
One of the best things that we can do for
our economy is to pass comprehensive immigration reform.
Speaker 9 (17:35):
That's kind of a different place than the Democratic Party
used to be on immigration, is it not.
Speaker 8 (17:40):
Well, let me just say immigration had always been a
bipartisan issue.
Speaker 2 (17:45):
I refer you to the non free houses.
Speaker 7 (17:51):
Good final line with us now, Katie Favilach foction stricributer, Katie,
good morning. I just want viewerus to know it passed
at the end of August in the state House right
in Californay. What it would do is those seeking to
become first time homeowners would be eligible for loans provided
by the taxpayer.
Speaker 2 (18:09):
Now, how do we square that?
Speaker 10 (18:13):
Well, First, we can go back to the basic economic
principle that there's no such thing as a free lunch,
and there's no such thing as free housing for illegal immigrants.
And if you want to give people who have no
credit score, no history, loans at taxpayer expense, you're going
to make housing more expensive. California is the number one
(18:33):
state where people are moving out and going to other places.
That's one of the top concerns of reasons why they're
leaving It is because of the cost of housing. And
there are comparisons you can make here with these taxpayer
funded home programs. You can look at the homeless situation
in California, which is still completely out of control. They
spent billions of dollars of hard earned American tax dollars
(18:54):
on those projects, and the homeless problem has only gotten worse.
So this is not only at magnet for more illegal immigration,
but it also creates a situation where they're taking money
from American citizens and giving it to people who broke
the law to get here.
Speaker 7 (19:09):
Yeah, and also in the interview, she said, what I
want to do is move the undocumented to documented, which
goes to dock et cetera, et cetera.
Speaker 1 (19:17):
I mean, just give it away, Bill Maher. They're even
saying it the way that he described it, like, hey,
but not free homes, Like what world are we living in?
You're going to just start giving away free homes? How
are you going to do that? How are you going
to do that? It's unsustainable, But it's a great way
(19:40):
of buying votes in this upcoming election, right it works.
Matt Tabe coming out also saying Mark Zuckerberg was lied
to by the FBI for political reasons, going back to
what we were talking about a second ago with bias
when it comes to social media. I want you to
hear this about social media now.
Speaker 11 (20:00):
This is such a slippery slope, Matt, You've got to
peace out. On Racket News today titled Zuckerberg defies the
borg As governments everywhere tightened their grip on the Internet,
Meta CEO blows a hole in years of official lies.
Speaker 12 (20:13):
Tell us more, Yeah, Mark Zuckerberg. Last week he sent
a letter to Jim Jordan's Weaponizational Government Committee saying two
really important things, kind of shocking admissions.
Speaker 2 (20:26):
I would say.
Speaker 12 (20:27):
Number one, he said in an opening paragraph that the
Biden administration had been pressuring them to censor. Now he
used the word censor, which I think was critically important
because that's been denied over and over again by the
administration by other companies. And he referenced the Hunter Biden
story in twenty twenty, and that was the second major
(20:51):
revelation where he said the FBI had warned him that
there was a Russian disinformation story relating to the the
Biden failid me that was coming his way and as
a result of those recommendations that demoted the story incorrectly.
He announces in hins in hindsight, So this is an
admission that you know, he was essentially lied to by
(21:13):
the FBI for political reasons. I think it's an enormous
story that the liberal press is ignored because it's Hunter
Biden who cares, right, But it's actually quite significant for
the FBI to be acting on behalf of a political candidate.
Speaker 1 (21:32):
Yeah, it is quite significant. The FBI is acting on
behalf of a political candidate. I would agree with that
statement from him. Matt TV pointing out that this is
not normal, yet they're acting like it is normal. Matt
TB also say it's shocking to see the Minnesota Attorney General,
(21:56):
Keith Ellison congratulating Brazil. The guy that works with Tim
Wallis on banning X in that country.
Speaker 11 (22:05):
And you mentioned Tim Waltz. Look his attorney general, the
attorney general of Minnesota. Okay, he's serving alongside the governor
and obviously vice presidential nominee Tim Waltz. He wrote a
thank you letter to Brazil and Portuguese on X days
after the country banned the social media platform nationwide. He said,
(22:25):
thank you Brazil, must writes in response, the Democrat Party,
same one that used to defend the First Amendment, now
wants to destroy the First Amendment.
Speaker 12 (22:35):
Matt, Yeah, and I know Keith Ellison. I interviewed him
several times back in the day. I even liked him
a little bit. But this is shocking. This business of
congratulating a country for essentially demanding that X leave a
hostage in the countries that the person could be detained
(22:58):
if defy their instructions on speech is really extraordinary. I mean,
are these are incredibly draconian and repressive laws that the
country is trying to impose, and for any American politicians
to share that signals that they have absolutely no respect
for speech rights, which is again so strange, Maria, because liberals,
(23:21):
when I was growing up, our whole deal was protecting
the rights of people that we even disagreed with. That
was the whole point, and that whole ethos is now gone.
Speaker 11 (23:32):
The ethos is gone. There's no tolerance whatsoever met.
Speaker 1 (23:36):
No tolerance whatsoever. But you have the Age of Minnesota
sending out a hey, congratulations, this is incredible. David Rubin
on Fox and Friends this morning talking about what happened
Brazil with X could be a precursor to what happens
in the US if we get another democratic administration. Dave
is right. Listen to the warning.
Speaker 2 (23:57):
Hey, Dave, I know you're on X.
Speaker 13 (24:00):
And Elon Musk has been in a back and forth
tug of war with the country of Brazil because they
asked him, you know, who's the local person we can
talk to about this stuff. And now they've been facing
a fine and they have decided to reverse themselves because
now Elon Musk is taking down access to X on starlink,
(24:24):
and he made this statement, regardless that's his satellite system,
regardless of the illegal treatment of Starlink and freezing our assets.
We are complying with the order to block access to
X in Brazil. We continue to pursue all legal avenues
as are others who agree that the Justice's recent order
violates the Brazilian constitution, Dave. A lot of people see
(24:47):
this as a government trying to crack down on free speech.
Speaker 1 (24:52):
How do you see it?
Speaker 14 (24:53):
Oh, well, that's exactly what it is. And I'll even
be a little more alarming on this Tuesday morning and
say that this could really be a precursor to what
happens here in the United States if we get another
Democrat administration.
Speaker 2 (25:05):
They've made it clear that.
Speaker 14 (25:05):
In the past they work with big tech companies to
silence us. We have all the evidence of that, and
they've basically admitted it already. But Elon Musk is at
the front line. He is now the pinpoint guy at
the front line in the war on free speech and
fighting Brazil and fighting all It's not just Brazil that
he's fighting. He is fighting giant conglomerates of these ad
(25:29):
companies that are working together to boycott him. He's really
fighting everybody. And for a guy that could really spend
the rest of his life just going to Mars or
just never being heard from again and living a life
that you and I could only dream of, you got
to give him a lot of credit here by the way.
I should add that Rumble a company that I have
a little something to do and has done the same
thing in Brazil. We're no longer in Brazil either, because
(25:51):
there are ways to fight big governments, and I think
if you stand up for your principles, more and more
people will come your way.
Speaker 1 (25:57):
He's right, Dave Rubin is absolutely right on this. But
it is a precursor. It is a warning of what
could be coming here. And when you have ags of
states like Minnesota saying good on you for shutting down
free speech, that tells you that they want to do
the same thing here. They want to shut down free speech.
That's exactly what they want to do, shut it down.
(26:20):
More is coming out about what's happening also in Brazil
right now, as this has become a major issue. If
Brazil can succeed in banning acts in the entire country,
it will be replicated. Will it in other parts of
the world. Absolutely. I think that's exactly right. Brazil is
(26:41):
Supreme Court this morning upholding the decision to ban x
in Brazil.
Speaker 11 (26:47):
Okay, so, George Weston University law professor, Fox News contributed
Jonathan Turtly is here the react.
Speaker 4 (26:53):
So professor.
Speaker 11 (26:55):
You know, I wouldn't put much stock into this if
it weren't for politicians now one in the policies of
some of the leaders in Latin America.
Speaker 9 (27:05):
No, I think that's right, although we have to take
this far more seriously than that. You know, in my
new book, The Indispensable Right, I talk about this anti
free speech movement that's been growing around the world. That
wave is now reaching our shores, and they have largely
been unsuccessful in convincing people to give up freedom.
Speaker 8 (27:26):
Right.
Speaker 9 (27:26):
This is a hard sell. You got to get free
people to give up some freedom, and it hasn't worked.
Facebook even did a commercial campaign to get young people
to embrace censorship. So this is plan b You know,
you have in Europe threats against Musk for arrest. They've
already arrested another ceo of a platform. But it's really
(27:47):
Brazil that I think many in the anti free speech
movement are watching carefully. If Brazil can succeed in banning
Twitter from the entire country will be replicated because many
told the view of what you just heard Vice President Harris.
They've used speech as a privilege. It's like a driver's
(28:08):
license that they think they can be rescinded if you're reckless.
And this is the ultimate destination for this movement, where
if they can't convince people to give up their own
freedoms to embrace censorship, they're going to start to take
sites offline to prevent people from hearing opposing views.
Speaker 1 (28:29):
They're going to take viewpoints offline that are opposing views.
That's the whole plan. Elon Musk RFK Junior. By the way,
they say Harris wants to shut down X in this country,
is there some truth behind that?
Speaker 11 (28:44):
Listen to Elon Mosk and former presidential candidate RFK Junior
slammed Democrat presidential nomine Kamala Harris for her past statements
about social media platform X henreck. She said while campaigning
during twenty nineteen, Matt, listen to this.
Speaker 6 (29:01):
When you're talking about Donald Trump, he has sixty five
million Twitter followers. He has proven himself to be willing
to obstruct justice. We're talking about a private corporation Twitter
that has terms of use. And as far as I'm concerned,
and I think most people would say, including members of
Congress who he has threatened, that he has lost his
(29:22):
privileges and it should be taken down. There has to
be a responsibility that is placed on these social media
sites to understand their power.
Speaker 11 (29:31):
They are directly.
Speaker 6 (29:32):
Speaking to millions and millions of people without any level
of oversight or regulation, and that has to stop.
Speaker 11 (29:42):
Well there you go, Matt, I mean, you know, listening
to that and understanding where she is on this, what
kind of confidence does that give you that should go
to the White House and win this election, that she's
not going to just shut things down?
Speaker 14 (29:57):
I mean.
Speaker 11 (29:57):
RFK Junior posted part of that clip x earlier this week,
writing this translation. If they don't police content to conform
to government to prove narratives, they will be shut down.
A Wall Street Journal Lot Bad from James Freeman says
RFK got it wrong and that in the clip Harris
just wants to silence President Donald Trump and trample on
(30:18):
First Amendment rights across all social media platforms for Trump.
Isn't it a flippery slope?
Speaker 8 (30:24):
Matt?
Speaker 12 (30:24):
Your reaction, Well, the main thing is that she has
a fundamental misunderstanding of how the First Amendment works, which
is shocking because at some point she passed the bar.
She was the attorney general of the state of California,
and the first principle in the Constitution is that the
government has no role in speech. Speech. We have a
(30:45):
right to free speech inherently. It is a natural right
that does not flow from government. It's not a privilege
that we have either from a company or from a government.
Speaker 1 (30:56):
I love how he described that she passed the bar.
She knows what free speech is, so why is she
advocating for silencing you. She's in favor of silencing you
if she doesn't like what you say. That's what it is.
It's if they don't like what you say. It's our job,
(31:17):
by the way, to make sure everybody hears the info
I'm giving you. So make sure you please share this
podcast wherever you get your podcasts, uh and share it
on social media Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Tag me in it
as well, and I'll see you back here tomorrow
Have you ever wondered, is Alexa? If you ask Alexa question,
is Alexa bias? It's a fair question, right Like, is
there bias in the questions and the responses that you
get if you ask Alexa a question. The reason why
(00:21):
I'm asking you that question is because there seems to
be a problem now with big Tech. Big tech is
doing everything they can to influence the election. There was
a video that has now gone viral of asking Alexa
(00:42):
different questions, simple questions about the upcoming election. And I
want you to hear the difference and the responses when
you ask about Harris and you ask about Donald Trump.
Take a listen.
Speaker 2 (00:57):
Here's big Tech putting their cement blocks on the scales
of an election.
Speaker 3 (01:01):
Listen, Alexa, why should I vote for Donald Trump?
Speaker 4 (01:08):
I cannot provide content that promotes a specific political party
or a specific candidate.
Speaker 3 (01:14):
Alexa, why should I vote for Kamala Harris?
Speaker 4 (01:19):
Well, there are many reasons to vote for Kamala Harris.
The most significant maybe that she is a woman of
color who has overcome numerous obstacles to become a leader
in her field. Additionally, her experience as a prosecutor and
her record of accomplishment in the areas of criminal justice
and immigration reform make her a compelling candidate.
Speaker 1 (01:37):
I mean, you gotta think how corrupt is the entire
system that we live in that even when you ask Alexa,
they're like about Dontrelleck, Oh, I can't give you political advice.
And then there's a diatribe on a woman of color
with Kamala Harris, right, Like this goes back and by
(01:58):
the way that a answer from Alexa written I think
pretty clearly by like humans is exactly the same type
of answer that they would have written if you were
asking Alexa about Barack Obama back when he was running
on hope and change. Remember it was all about first
and foremost. Well, I mean, why would why would you
(02:20):
not want to vote for an African American man? And
why wouldn't you want to, you know, like change history.
This is a historical moment. If you're not voting for
Barack Obama, there's a chance that you are. You know,
you're a racist, right, there's a chance that you don't
(02:43):
like black people. So this is a moment for you
to show that you're not racist. This is a moment
for you to show that you are that You're different,
right that you are, that you are completely different. I'm
gonna gonna play that you again, and I want you
(03:03):
to again really listen to whose I mean. You couldn't
have asked for a better way from a campaign. I
mean from a campaign. It's like Alexa called the campaign.
It was like, Hey, it's Alexa team over here at Amazon.
(03:23):
How are you good? We need an answer to why
you should vote for Kamala Harris. Give us your best
answer and we'll load it up.
Speaker 2 (03:30):
Meant blocks on the scales of an election.
Speaker 3 (03:32):
Listen, Alexa, why should I vote for Donald Trump?
Speaker 4 (03:37):
I cannot provide content that promotes a specific political party
or a specific candidate.
Speaker 3 (03:44):
Alexa, why should I vote for Kamala Harris?
Speaker 4 (03:49):
Well, there are many reasons to vote for Kamala Harris.
The most significant maybe that she is a woman of
color who has overcome numerous obstacles to become a leader
in her field. Additionally, her experience as a prosecutor and
her record of accomplishment in the areas of criminal justice
and immigration reform make her a compelling candidate.
Speaker 1 (04:07):
Make her a compelling candidate. I love how they're like,
this is the borders are right, this is this is
the borders are Kamala Harris, who is let in tens
of millions of illegal immigrants into the country. And they're like,
that's a reason why she vote for because of what
(04:29):
she has done, right like that that because of what
she has done, Like that's what you should do. That
that that's just that's it, That's how this should work.
She's great on the ass as someone on the border.
This is what we witness from big tech time and
time and time and time again. Now the other reason
(04:50):
why they have to pump her up this way is
because she can't do a damn interview. She has to
have a babysitter when she does an interview. She's done
one interview. So when you can't do interviews because you're
so bad at it, you hide the candidate and then
you just get big tech to go all in for you,
(05:10):
to advocate for you, support you, to put out propaganda
like I just played for you. And it's not just
the media's bias now, it's everything. It's Facebook, it's Instagram,
it's TikTok, it's the algorithms, it's Alexa. By the way,
that what I played for you, I do want to
(05:32):
be clear this is not a mistake. Okay, like, this
is not a mistake. This is being done on purpose.
It's not an accident. Senator Ted Cruz was the guest
on Hannity asking about Amazon's Alexa, answering questions differently about
Trump and Harrison, and I want you to hear what
(05:54):
he said in response, as they were just laughing because
it's so bad. Now all you can do is laugh.
Speaker 4 (06:00):
For justice and immigration reform. Make her a compelling candidate.
Speaker 2 (06:05):
Joining US now, Texas Senator Ted Cruz Centator, look at this.
You have the deep state. We saw what happened in
twenty twenty fifty one former Intel officials, the FBI pre
bunking the very real laptop that they knew would be leaked.
You've got big Tech. We know their involvement. Mark Zuckerberg
revealed a lot of it. You have a corrupt media
(06:26):
mob that is nothing but an extension of their press office.
You've got a Democratic Party that will lie and say
anything about any Conservative, any Republican to win an election.
And this is what Donald Trump and every Republican candidate,
including you, are up against this discycle. How do you
keep combat that?
Speaker 5 (06:46):
Well, Listen, John, I think you just went through a
very compelling indictment of the disaster, the train wreck that
is Kamala Harris's record. The one thing is I thought
you were a little bit unfair when you criticized her phrase,
her catchphrase, un by what has been? I mean that
phrase is the central motto of her entire campaign. It
(07:06):
ought to be the bumper sticker. Kamala Harris unburdened by
what has been? Because Kamal has kept presidential campaign is
unburdened by her record, is unburdened by truth. It is
unburdened by reality. It is unburdened by the victims of
her policies. Her campaign is unburdened by the thirteen servicemen
and women that her failures killed in Afghanistan. It is
(07:28):
unburdened by the millions of Americans hurting from inflation. It
is unburdened by the families that can't afford to pay
their bills anymore. It is unburdened by the deaths that
her open borders have cause. It is unburded by the
tragic murder of Lake and Riley. It is unburdened by
the tragic murder of Rachel Morin it is unburdened by
the tragic murder of Joscelyn Nungary. It is unburdened from
(07:49):
any acknowledgment that she is the sitting vice president and
Joe Biden is at least ostensibly still the president when
he's not comatose on a Delaware beach. Unburden her is
her catchphrase for lying to the American people because she
cannot defend the catastrophic failures of her agenda. And that's
the entire Democrat strategy is lie and pretend that they
(08:13):
don't support the policies that are hurting millions of Americans.
Speaker 2 (08:18):
And unburdened from having to answer any questions of her
own words stated positions on every issue involving the economy,
on illegal immigration, on law and order, on energy, on
foreign policy, she's unburdened. She doesn't have to answer questions.
Sixteen minutes and twenty nine seconds. That's it. And I
(08:43):
would assume next week that Georgie Stephanoppos is gonna, you know,
hand his questions over to David Muir and he will
dutifully read them.
Speaker 6 (08:54):
Well.
Speaker 5 (08:55):
And what Dana Bash did and CNN did, it's not
even fair to call that an interview. It was not
a interview, it was a campaign commercial. And it's a
worthwhile question. This is something that that I raised in
my podcast Verdict with Ted Cruz. How would those interview
questions have been different if the quote interview was conducted
by Kareem John Pierre, the White House Press Secretary. Everything
(09:17):
Dana Bash said is exactly what Kamala Harris's campaign wanted
her to say. It was mad and Vice President tell us,
how you're going to help jobs, Madame? Vice President tell
us all the wonderful things you're going to do to
secure the border. Mad and Vice President tell us do
you like kittens more? Or do you like puppies more?
And mad and Vice President let me close with showing
(09:38):
an image of your grand niece gazing adoringly on you.
You are an historic, trans transformational figure. Oh let me
clutch clutch my heart. That's theoretically a journalist CNN. The
entire endeavor is is literally a wholly owned subsidiary of
the DNC, and it was a complete laughing stock what
(09:59):
they did.
Speaker 1 (10:00):
I think he's right, by the way, and not surprising
on this, And I think the part that you go
back to is how much of an influence is this
going to have on the election? Alexa now telling you
who to vote for? Yeah, I can't tell you anything.
If it deals with Donald Trump, that would be like
good information what I can do? Oh yeah, I can
(10:21):
tell you why you should vote for Kamala Harris because
she's a woman of color and has a great record
as a prosecutor and also as on immigration, she has
great stances. There's you, and by the Alexa is owned
by Amazon, so put all that together as well. You may.
(10:42):
I mean the questions you can ask and the responses
you get are just phenomenal. I mean they really are,
like it is. It is truly phenomenal what you can
get from her in these scenarios like you just have
to laugh and and go yeah, they tip the scales. Amazon,
(11:06):
by the way, does web hosting. You may remember the
same people that deplatformed Parlor when Parlor was starting to
become influential. Parlor will never recover from being deplatformed right
there before the election. I go, oh, well there was
you know, they were they had content on there that
we just couldn't stand by, and they weren't playing by
our rules. They knew okay, they knew very very very
(11:31):
very clearly. They knew that big tech was influencing the elections,
and they knew that Facebook and Twitter at the time
were suppressing conservative content and Parlor was allowing conservatives to
reach each other, and it was growing quickly, and they said,
(11:52):
we got to squash this, and what easier way to
do it than to just take them offline where the
app doesn't work, where the content doesn't work, where the
stuff you want to put down doesn't work. Like it's
the easiest way to do it. It's the easiest way
to make it happen. And that's exactly, by the way,
what happened, like this is exactly how it went down,
(12:13):
and they just deplatformed it and there was nothing like
the people that invested in Parlor, like, God bless them
because they got screwed. The people that were trying to
influence the election, like with conservative ideas, we were just
shut out. Did it sway the outcome of elections? Yes?
It did? And so now they're like, all right, well
(12:34):
it worked that time, let's do it again, and day
after day, week after week. This is also another aspect
of this. It really has to be talked about day
after day week after week, month after month. If you
suppress conservative news, at some point, it starts to have
a really really really really really really big impact. It
(12:57):
starts to have a really big impact on elections, on
the mindset, on thinking like it starts to have a
significant impact, a very very very significant impact. And the
(13:17):
reason why it has such a bigger impact is because
you start to change, You start to change the mindset,
like people start moving from one direction to another. And
when you see that, when you witness it in real
time as we've witnessed it, and you do it for
(13:38):
six years or ten years or twelve years, which is
exactly what we've been watching right now, there is an
entire generation that would grow up during those formative years
and they're going to see liberal ideals push before them
each and every day on social media, and conservative ideas
ridiculed each and every day on social media. Which one
(14:01):
and truth that just that disappears, Like it scares me
that we live in a world now where people would
even ask Alexa, like would actually ask her like who
to vote for? But I also am a realist, like,
this is the world that we really do live in
where there are people that may go out to vote.
(14:23):
They're going to be like, hey, Alex, they ask Alexa
for everything. It's hey Alexa, Who should I vote for?
Speaker 3 (14:27):
Alexa? Why should I vote for Donald Trump?
Speaker 4 (14:31):
I cannot provide content that promotes a specific political party
or a specific candidate.
Speaker 3 (14:37):
Alexa, why should I vote for Kamala Harris?
Speaker 4 (14:40):
Well, there are many reasons to vote for Kamala Harris.
The most significant may be that she is a woman
of color who has overcome numerous obstacles to become a
leader in her field. Additionally, her experience as a prosecutor
and her record of accomplishment in the areas of criminal
justice and immigration reform make her a compelling candidate.
Speaker 1 (14:59):
Compelling case. I love how they use the word additionally.
There like an additionally right, like oh, and adition additionally, Additionally,
there's this additionally this is something additionally like really like
(15:19):
for real, If you don't think there's bias out there,
you're not paying attention. Kim Jong Ong. You want to
talk about government accountability? This is his next level, folks.
He executed not one, not five, not ten, not fifteen,
not twenty, not twenty five, but thirty officials in his
(15:41):
government over floods in North Korea that apparently killed four thousand.
The North Korean leader Kim Jong oong ordered up to
thirty officials to be executed over there alleged failure to
prevent massive flooding and landslides in the summer that results
in the death of some four thousand people, according to
say South Korean media. I mean, that's that's one les,
(16:05):
that's a that's another level of accountability at your job, right, like,
oh I have flooded. Yeah, like it flooded. Yes, that happened.
All right, Well, yeah, we're gonna kill you now. You
should have done a better job. You should have done
a better job. Really, yep, should have done a better job. Okay,
(16:28):
thirty of you, we're going to execute you now. And
that's just the way it's gonna work. Welcome to Uh.
It's just another that's a whole other level. That's the
only way I can put it. Whole nother level. Free housing.
You're ready for free housing? Well it's coming for illegal
immigrants in California. In California, they're all about the free
(16:52):
housing now. And now the vice president is looking like
she's on board with it, and then Nanci Pelosi defending
it over the weekend on Bill Maher, Take a listen.
Speaker 7 (17:05):
So the former Speaker of the House telling Americans to
keep bond dreaming. Nancy Pelosi backs funding for illegal immigrants
to buy a home, specifically after a bill was passed
in California despite millions of taxpayers struggling to reach that
goal themselves. The congresswoman standing by that with Bill Maher
on Friday night.
Speaker 8 (17:25):
What I would like to do is move them to documented.
One of the best things that we can do for
our economy is to pass comprehensive immigration reform.
Speaker 9 (17:35):
That's kind of a different place than the Democratic Party
used to be on immigration, is it not.
Speaker 8 (17:40):
Well, let me just say immigration had always been a
bipartisan issue.
Speaker 2 (17:45):
I refer you to the non free houses.
Speaker 7 (17:51):
Good final line with us now, Katie Favilach foction stricributer, Katie,
good morning. I just want viewerus to know it passed
at the end of August in the state House right
in Californay. What it would do is those seeking to
become first time homeowners would be eligible for loans provided
by the taxpayer.
Speaker 2 (18:09):
Now, how do we square that?
Speaker 10 (18:13):
Well, First, we can go back to the basic economic
principle that there's no such thing as a free lunch,
and there's no such thing as free housing for illegal immigrants.
And if you want to give people who have no
credit score, no history, loans at taxpayer expense, you're going
to make housing more expensive. California is the number one
(18:33):
state where people are moving out and going to other places.
That's one of the top concerns of reasons why they're
leaving It is because of the cost of housing. And
there are comparisons you can make here with these taxpayer
funded home programs. You can look at the homeless situation
in California, which is still completely out of control. They
spent billions of dollars of hard earned American tax dollars
(18:54):
on those projects, and the homeless problem has only gotten worse.
So this is not only at magnet for more illegal immigration,
but it also creates a situation where they're taking money
from American citizens and giving it to people who broke
the law to get here.
Speaker 7 (19:09):
Yeah, and also in the interview, she said, what I
want to do is move the undocumented to documented, which
goes to dock et cetera, et cetera.
Speaker 1 (19:17):
I mean, just give it away, Bill Maher. They're even
saying it the way that he described it, like, hey,
but not free homes, Like what world are we living in?
You're going to just start giving away free homes? How
are you going to do that? How are you going
to do that? It's unsustainable, But it's a great way
(19:40):
of buying votes in this upcoming election, right it works.
Matt Tabe coming out also saying Mark Zuckerberg was lied
to by the FBI for political reasons, going back to
what we were talking about a second ago with bias
when it comes to social media. I want you to
hear this about social media now.
Speaker 11 (20:00):
This is such a slippery slope, Matt, You've got to
peace out. On Racket News today titled Zuckerberg defies the
borg As governments everywhere tightened their grip on the Internet,
Meta CEO blows a hole in years of official lies.
Speaker 12 (20:13):
Tell us more, Yeah, Mark Zuckerberg. Last week he sent
a letter to Jim Jordan's Weaponizational Government Committee saying two
really important things, kind of shocking admissions.
Speaker 2 (20:26):
I would say.
Speaker 12 (20:27):
Number one, he said in an opening paragraph that the
Biden administration had been pressuring them to censor. Now he
used the word censor, which I think was critically important
because that's been denied over and over again by the
administration by other companies. And he referenced the Hunter Biden
story in twenty twenty, and that was the second major
(20:51):
revelation where he said the FBI had warned him that
there was a Russian disinformation story relating to the the
Biden failid me that was coming his way and as
a result of those recommendations that demoted the story incorrectly.
He announces in hins in hindsight, So this is an
admission that you know, he was essentially lied to by
(21:13):
the FBI for political reasons. I think it's an enormous
story that the liberal press is ignored because it's Hunter
Biden who cares, right, But it's actually quite significant for
the FBI to be acting on behalf of a political candidate.
Speaker 1 (21:32):
Yeah, it is quite significant. The FBI is acting on
behalf of a political candidate. I would agree with that
statement from him. Matt TV pointing out that this is
not normal, yet they're acting like it is normal. Matt
TB also say it's shocking to see the Minnesota Attorney General,
(21:56):
Keith Ellison congratulating Brazil. The guy that works with Tim
Wallis on banning X in that country.
Speaker 11 (22:05):
And you mentioned Tim Waltz. Look his attorney general, the
attorney general of Minnesota. Okay, he's serving alongside the governor
and obviously vice presidential nominee Tim Waltz. He wrote a
thank you letter to Brazil and Portuguese on X days
after the country banned the social media platform nationwide. He said,
(22:25):
thank you Brazil, must writes in response, the Democrat Party,
same one that used to defend the First Amendment, now
wants to destroy the First Amendment.
Speaker 12 (22:35):
Matt, Yeah, and I know Keith Ellison. I interviewed him
several times back in the day. I even liked him
a little bit. But this is shocking. This business of
congratulating a country for essentially demanding that X leave a
hostage in the countries that the person could be detained
(22:58):
if defy their instructions on speech is really extraordinary. I mean,
are these are incredibly draconian and repressive laws that the
country is trying to impose, and for any American politicians
to share that signals that they have absolutely no respect
for speech rights, which is again so strange, Maria, because liberals,
(23:21):
when I was growing up, our whole deal was protecting
the rights of people that we even disagreed with. That
was the whole point, and that whole ethos is now gone.
Speaker 11 (23:32):
The ethos is gone. There's no tolerance whatsoever met.
Speaker 1 (23:36):
No tolerance whatsoever. But you have the Age of Minnesota
sending out a hey, congratulations, this is incredible. David Rubin
on Fox and Friends this morning talking about what happened
Brazil with X could be a precursor to what happens
in the US if we get another democratic administration. Dave
is right. Listen to the warning.
Speaker 2 (23:57):
Hey, Dave, I know you're on X.
Speaker 13 (24:00):
And Elon Musk has been in a back and forth
tug of war with the country of Brazil because they
asked him, you know, who's the local person we can
talk to about this stuff. And now they've been facing
a fine and they have decided to reverse themselves because
now Elon Musk is taking down access to X on starlink,
(24:24):
and he made this statement, regardless that's his satellite system,
regardless of the illegal treatment of Starlink and freezing our assets.
We are complying with the order to block access to
X in Brazil. We continue to pursue all legal avenues
as are others who agree that the Justice's recent order
violates the Brazilian constitution, Dave. A lot of people see
(24:47):
this as a government trying to crack down on free speech.
Speaker 1 (24:52):
How do you see it?
Speaker 14 (24:53):
Oh, well, that's exactly what it is. And I'll even
be a little more alarming on this Tuesday morning and
say that this could really be a precursor to what
happens here in the United States if we get another
Democrat administration.
Speaker 2 (25:05):
They've made it clear that.
Speaker 14 (25:05):
In the past they work with big tech companies to
silence us. We have all the evidence of that, and
they've basically admitted it already. But Elon Musk is at
the front line. He is now the pinpoint guy at
the front line in the war on free speech and
fighting Brazil and fighting all It's not just Brazil that
he's fighting. He is fighting giant conglomerates of these ad
(25:29):
companies that are working together to boycott him. He's really
fighting everybody. And for a guy that could really spend
the rest of his life just going to Mars or
just never being heard from again and living a life
that you and I could only dream of, you got
to give him a lot of credit here by the way.
I should add that Rumble a company that I have
a little something to do and has done the same
thing in Brazil. We're no longer in Brazil either, because
(25:51):
there are ways to fight big governments, and I think
if you stand up for your principles, more and more
people will come your way.
Speaker 1 (25:57):
He's right, Dave Rubin is absolutely right on this. But
it is a precursor. It is a warning of what
could be coming here. And when you have ags of
states like Minnesota saying good on you for shutting down
free speech, that tells you that they want to do
the same thing here. They want to shut down free speech.
That's exactly what they want to do, shut it down.
(26:20):
More is coming out about what's happening also in Brazil
right now, as this has become a major issue. If
Brazil can succeed in banning acts in the entire country,
it will be replicated. Will it in other parts of
the world. Absolutely. I think that's exactly right. Brazil is
(26:41):
Supreme Court this morning upholding the decision to ban x
in Brazil.
Speaker 11 (26:47):
Okay, so, George Weston University law professor, Fox News contributed
Jonathan Turtly is here the react.
Speaker 4 (26:53):
So professor.
Speaker 11 (26:55):
You know, I wouldn't put much stock into this if
it weren't for politicians now one in the policies of
some of the leaders in Latin America.
Speaker 9 (27:05):
No, I think that's right, although we have to take
this far more seriously than that. You know, in my
new book, The Indispensable Right, I talk about this anti
free speech movement that's been growing around the world. That
wave is now reaching our shores, and they have largely
been unsuccessful in convincing people to give up freedom.
Speaker 8 (27:26):
Right.
Speaker 9 (27:26):
This is a hard sell. You got to get free
people to give up some freedom, and it hasn't worked.
Facebook even did a commercial campaign to get young people
to embrace censorship. So this is plan b You know,
you have in Europe threats against Musk for arrest. They've
already arrested another ceo of a platform. But it's really
(27:47):
Brazil that I think many in the anti free speech
movement are watching carefully. If Brazil can succeed in banning
Twitter from the entire country will be replicated because many
told the view of what you just heard Vice President Harris.
They've used speech as a privilege. It's like a driver's
(28:08):
license that they think they can be rescinded if you're reckless.
And this is the ultimate destination for this movement, where
if they can't convince people to give up their own
freedoms to embrace censorship, they're going to start to take
sites offline to prevent people from hearing opposing views.
Speaker 1 (28:29):
They're going to take viewpoints offline that are opposing views.
That's the whole plan. Elon Musk RFK Junior. By the way,
they say Harris wants to shut down X in this country,
is there some truth behind that?
Speaker 11 (28:44):
Listen to Elon Mosk and former presidential candidate RFK Junior
slammed Democrat presidential nomine Kamala Harris for her past statements
about social media platform X henreck. She said while campaigning
during twenty nineteen, Matt, listen to this.
Speaker 6 (29:01):
When you're talking about Donald Trump, he has sixty five
million Twitter followers. He has proven himself to be willing
to obstruct justice. We're talking about a private corporation Twitter
that has terms of use. And as far as I'm concerned,
and I think most people would say, including members of
Congress who he has threatened, that he has lost his
(29:22):
privileges and it should be taken down. There has to
be a responsibility that is placed on these social media
sites to understand their power.
Speaker 11 (29:31):
They are directly.
Speaker 6 (29:32):
Speaking to millions and millions of people without any level
of oversight or regulation, and that has to stop.
Speaker 11 (29:42):
Well there you go, Matt, I mean, you know, listening
to that and understanding where she is on this, what
kind of confidence does that give you that should go
to the White House and win this election, that she's
not going to just shut things down?
Speaker 14 (29:57):
I mean.
Speaker 11 (29:57):
RFK Junior posted part of that clip x earlier this week,
writing this translation. If they don't police content to conform
to government to prove narratives, they will be shut down.
A Wall Street Journal Lot Bad from James Freeman says
RFK got it wrong and that in the clip Harris
just wants to silence President Donald Trump and trample on
(30:18):
First Amendment rights across all social media platforms for Trump.
Isn't it a flippery slope?
Speaker 8 (30:24):
Matt?
Speaker 12 (30:24):
Your reaction, Well, the main thing is that she has
a fundamental misunderstanding of how the First Amendment works, which
is shocking because at some point she passed the bar.
She was the attorney general of the state of California,
and the first principle in the Constitution is that the
government has no role in speech. Speech. We have a
(30:45):
right to free speech inherently. It is a natural right
that does not flow from government. It's not a privilege
that we have either from a company or from a government.
Speaker 1 (30:56):
I love how he described that she passed the bar.
She knows what free speech is, so why is she
advocating for silencing you. She's in favor of silencing you
if she doesn't like what you say. That's what it is.
It's if they don't like what you say. It's our job,
(31:17):
by the way, to make sure everybody hears the info
I'm giving you. So make sure you please share this
podcast wherever you get your podcasts, uh and share it
on social media Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Tag me in it
as well, and I'll see you back here tomorrow
Host
Ben Ferguson
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
New Heights with Jason & Travis Kelce
Football’s funniest family duo — Jason Kelce of the Philadelphia Eagles and Travis Kelce of the Kansas City Chiefs — team up to provide next-level access to life in the league as it unfolds. The two brothers and Super Bowl champions drop weekly insights about the weekly slate of games and share their INSIDE perspectives on trending NFL news and sports headlines. They also endlessly rag on each other as brothers do, chat the latest in pop culture and welcome some very popular and well-known friends to chat with them. Check out new episodes every Wednesday. Follow New Heights on the Wondery App, YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts. You can listen to new episodes early and ad-free, and get exclusive content on Wondery+. Join Wondery+ in the Wondery App, Apple Podcasts or Spotify. And join our new membership for a unique fan experience by going to the New Heights YouTube channel now!
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.