Media Advocates for Corrupt Biden Officials to Skate w Presidential Pardons

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:01):
We've got a lot to cover today, including what we're
being told now could be mass pardons coming from the
President Joe Biden for anyone around his administration, his family,
or around the Biden crime family businesses who may have
committed crimes. Now, you can expect if these pardons do

(00:22):
come out, they will be massive, as in the timeframe,
since his son got an eleven year pardon for anything
illegally he's done in eleven year period, you can expect
that many more things just like this could happen moving forward,
which is honestly totally shocking. We also had the president
falling asleep on the world stage again, the President United

(00:46):
States of America for the next forty seven days totally
asleep on the job. It's an embarrassing video that has
now gone viral, which allows for people around the world
to do whatever the hell they wanted knowing that the
President United States of America is basically asleep at the wheel.
We'll talk about that also. In another shocking moment at

(01:10):
the Supreme Court, we have a Supreme Court justice that
is now referred to trans rights and allowing kids to
be able to get transitional surgeries as no different You
ready for this than discrimination between a black and a
white person who were married. Yes, Justice Jackson, who wouldn't

(01:34):
define a woman, now claims that trans drugs and a
ban on them is sex discrimination. I'll break down that
story coming up in a moment as well. Now let's
get back to the pardon issue here, and you need
to understand the backstory on this. Democrats and the media
have gone into a full court press now trying to

(01:58):
convince you that Donald Trump has an enemy's list. Now,
to be clear, the list that they put together as
an enemy's list is actually their list that they created
a people they believe may have committed crimes and are
going to need presidential pardons. The Democrats are now using

(02:19):
the media to sell this list, claiming it is Donald
Trump's enemies list, even though it is actually their list
of people that they believe may have committed crimes. They're
going on TV and they're selling this as we are
now expecting there could be massive pardons given out to
people with the last name Biden, including the President possibly

(02:41):
pardoning himself, and many other members of the family that
were working in the crime business. The Biden crime family
and including their associates, members of Congress, people that work
the FBI, the Department of Justice, the CIA, and worked
in the White House. I want you to take a
listen to one Democrat calling for Joe Biden to pardon

(03:04):
his entire administration brant of clemency.

Speaker 2 (03:09):
I hope that President Biden will also issue preemptive pardons
to all of those people threatened by the unjustice of
what will become the Department of Justice in the Trump administration.
That of course includes Jack Smith and all of his staff,
many Department of Justice lawyers. It includes President Biden himself,

(03:29):
although we don't know that anyone can legally pardon themselves,
he will need a pardon because he is going to
be harassed and charged for no crimes whatsoever. Donald Trump
has promised that.

Speaker 1 (03:42):
By the way, Donald Trump has not promised that, but
this is what the Democrats are now trying to convince
you of that. Well, they're all going to get dragged
through the mind and they're on an enemy's list. So therefore,
just in case, you just pardon everybody, everybody that was
involved in Biden crime, family corruption, everybody that was involved
in weaponizing of the DOJ and the FBI to go

(04:03):
after their political opponents just pardon them all because somehow
this is Donald Trump's fault. That's what this woman just
said on National TV. Now, this is a woman, I
want to be clear about this that as an individual
that has been around for a while. Her name is
Joe Wene Banks, a former assistant Watergate prosecutor who was

(04:28):
relieved and thrilled that Joe Biden pardoned Hunter and then said,
not only does he need to pardon Hunter, but you
gotta know, preemptively pardon anyone who you believe may be
threatened by the injustice of the American people voting in
a free and fair election to elect Donald Trump. Again,

(04:48):
she wasn't the only one, by the way, putting this
out there. There was another list that was put out
and it said breaking preemptive pardons being considered for Joe Biden.
That would be the first leg Alejandro Myorcis, James Comey,
Andrew McCabe, Peter Struck, Bruce Orr, Nelly Orr, Rod Rosenstein.

(05:10):
These individuals they say need pardons. Why because many of
them have acted in illegal activity. This is their list.
They're telling you who the criminals are, who those are
that abuse their power in office, whether it's the FBI director,
whether it's Andrew McCabe, whether it's Alejandro Majorcis with illegal
immigrants and border crossings, whether it's Peter Struck who said

(05:32):
I'm going to stop the president from being the president
back in twenty sixteen, remember that story, Rod Rosenstein. The
list goes on and on, and that's not all they're saying.
They're saying there's even more people that should be on
that list. And I'm going to play that for you
in just a second. But first I want to talk
to you real quick about the USCCA. There are over

(05:55):
eight hundred thousand Americans that are members of the USCCA. Why. Well,
because of what you receive when you're a member. I've
had to carry a firearm, and I've had to pull
the trigger, and i had to save my life one night,
and I'm so thankful that i was able to exercise
my Second Amendment right or I wouldn't be here talking
to you right now. But what I will tell you
that is even more shocking than that is now our

(06:18):
twisted legal system, especially with activist das, are wanting to
put law abiding citizens who exercise their Second Amendment rights
just like you, behind bars because they cannot stand that
so many of us carry a firearm. Well, you've got
to protect yourself and protect your Second Amendment rights, and
you don't want to lose everything because you actually had

(06:39):
to save your own life or the life of someone
in danger. And that's why I want you to join
the USCCA, Because not only do you get access to
their Protector Academy where you learn vital skills like precision
shooting and how to fortify your home against criminals, but
you also get access to the twenty four to seven
Critical Response Team and the benefit of the Self Defense

(07:03):
Liability Insurance to make sure you and your family are
prepared for anything. Now, I also want to give you
a chance to win something amazing. You can win right now,
any seventeen hundred dollars to buy any self defense gear
that you need before it's too late. How do you
do it? Text the word America to eight seven two

(07:24):
two two right now. Let's text the word America to
eight seven two two two right now to get the
uscca's free Life Saving Concealed Carry and Family Defense God
and a chance to win seventeen hundred dollars to buy
any self defense gear that you need before it's too late,
so text the word America eight seven two to two
right now, all right, So let me play this second
piece of audio that I want you to hear. And

(07:47):
this is even more shocking. This is Paul Rosenwig. He
went on MSNBC and wrote an article for the Atlantic,
and the title of that article is is pardon Trump's
critics now? Now? Why would you write that article Pardon
Trump's critics now? Because he understands that there are a

(08:11):
lot of people in and around Joe Biden that have
committed crimes and he is afraid that those people are
going to be held accountable for the crimes that committed
just like Hunter Biden. Take a listen to him saying
it needs an extensive list of all of these people
receiving decade old basically pardons to cover that much time.

Speaker 3 (08:30):
When twenty seventeen you argued, we defend norms by defending norms,
not preaching them. A lot of tappens between now and then,
And I wonder how you're thinking about the president's pardon
power today and how he should wield it.

Speaker 4 (08:46):
Well back in twenty seventeen, I thought that Trump was
an aberration and unusual.

Speaker 1 (08:53):
And black Swan if you will.

Speaker 4 (08:57):
And my thought was that you had to defend the
norms of the rule of law, the governance, and the
only way to do that was to maintain them even
in the face of his aberrational behavior. Today, I think
we know that Trump is not an aberration. He's a phenomenon.
He's a movement, and as such, what we have to

(09:21):
do is recalibrate how we respond to that. And it
now strikes me as essential to at least begin to
play to the edge of the field, to go as
far as the law permits in combating the authoritarian excesses
of Trump. And the way I wrote about in The

(09:42):
Atlantic is the pardon power.

Speaker 1 (09:45):
A pardon for.

Speaker 4 (09:48):
Hunter Biden, a pardon for Trump's critics would be completely
normative breaking, and it would be out of character, out
of historical tradition. But at this point I was listening
to you, your earlier broadcaster.

Speaker 1 (10:05):
You were talking about Kash Patel.

Speaker 4 (10:07):
He's got a list of sixty people he wants to prosecute.

Speaker 1 (10:11):
That's a real list. Will he do all of them?
I don't know.

Speaker 4 (10:14):
Will there be resistance of the FBI, probably, But one
of the realities of being investigated is that investigation has
a cost, even if you're not prosecuted in the end,
you have to hire a lawyer, the mental cost, the time,
the resources. And so it strikes me as perfectly reasonable

(10:36):
to ask, what can President Biden do within the bounds
of law, even if it would not be normatively traditional,
to save his allies from that, And the answer is
obviously pardon them.

Speaker 1 (10:48):
Pardon them all. We know this is crazy, we know
this is insane, We know that this is out of
the norm, we know that this is, you know, something
that's outside of what would be normally traditional. But he's
got to save his allies, right In other words, he's
got to save those in and around him that were

(11:08):
a part of the Biden crime family. He's got to
save the members of the mafia that have been doing
the corrupt job with him. That is the argument that
the media is now making, saying, just pardon everyone. So
this idea that all of this has come from Donald Trump,

(11:30):
and that there is an enemy's list that Trump has
out there that he's going to go after that is
the biggest part of this lie in propaganda. This list
has been clearly put together by Joe Biden's allies and
the members of the media who are telling you that

(11:51):
we have a lot of bad actors, a lot of
criminals that we need to say because they're on our team,
and we are okay with criminal activity. We are fine
with criminals committing crimes as long as you are on
our side, right, as long as you're on our team.

(12:13):
Abuse power twenty four to seven. We don't care, just
abuse power. We want you to abuse power. We're in
favor of you abusing the power. We don't care if
you're going after political opponents. In fact, we're giving you
jobs so that you will, in fact go after your
political opponents. That is what is being said here. He

(12:35):
wasn't done, by the way, MSNBC pushing this radical idea
not done either. Take a listen MSNBC continuing trying to
sell this like, oh, yeah, great idea, we should do this.
Keep listening Part two.

Speaker 4 (12:50):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (12:50):
I mean, it seems and to you, and I think
to other folks as well, that the argument about the
institutional preservation in this moment is best relegated to academics,
and that in reality it's time to play political hardball.
And it sounds like you're extending that not just to
the pardon power, but to other levers that the Democrats

(13:11):
might be able to pull. I'll read an excerpt from
your Atlantic piece. It has become painfully self evident. The
democratic self restraint is a form of unilateral disarmament that
neither persuades Trump to refrain from bad behavior nor wins
points among the undecided. It is time, well pastime for
responsible Democrats to use every tool in their tool kit.
Does any part of that, I guess worry you, you know,

(13:33):
I mean one it could have said the Democrats, when
they were in control of the Cena ship have gotten
rid of the filibuster and done stuff.

Speaker 1 (13:39):
Well, now, by the way, I love how they go this,
Like basically they're telling you we should have just overthrown
democracy so that we could do what we want to
do when we want to do it. That's what was
just stated there, Like, we should have gotten rid of
the filibuster so we can just do whatever the hell
we want to. We should, you know, we should be

(14:01):
able to make sure that we guarantee that we win
elections so that we don't have to deal with people
that we don't like, and now we have to deal
with Donald Trump and the American people. In fact, we
should just cancel the American people in voting all together.
We put in our stooges, we steal elections, and we
lock up our political opponents. And if we can just
lock up our political opponents, we're going to be in

(14:22):
great shape. That's what they're advocating for and normalizing it.
These are the same people, by the way, that wanted
you to go kill Supreme Court justices when they released
the decision early on Roe v. Wade. The same Department
of Justice that refuse to lock up people that were intimidating,
which is a federal offense judges. It is a federal

(14:46):
offense to try to intimidate a judge, much less Supreme
Court judges and then putting out their addresses is a
kill list and having people show up to try to
change their opinion on ro wait. And I don't believe
for a second that they couldn't figure out who in
a very small and intimate Supreme Court setting released that preliminary,

(15:11):
you know, opinion from the court that had not officially
been put out from the court. I don't believe for
a half a second that they couldn't figure out who
the hell that was, Like, I don't believe for a
second that they don't know who leaked it. Did they
find that person? Nope, couldn't find them. Really, you can't
find out who leaked a opinion from the Supreme Court.

(15:33):
And then when people start intimidating those Supreme Court justice
you don't prosecute. This is the lawlessness and the radical
extremism of the left. There are no rules for them.
They will put tons by the way of rules on you,
but there are no rules for them. Listen to this

(15:53):
next part where they continue to talk about since things
in garway, we should just be able to overthrow the
people who know by the way part of anybody that
breaks along in the process.

Speaker 3 (16:03):
Oh, it seems like the philibuster is the only thing
that's actually going to stop Trump from enacting probably the broadest,
most pernicious parts of his agenda. So how do you,
I mean, how do you think about the cost benefit
analysis here?

Speaker 1 (16:15):
Well, of course it worries me.

Speaker 4 (16:18):
It has to be, It has to worry any sensible
thinking person to argue for breaching norms that have guided
our country for two hundred and fifty years. On the
other hand, I don't think the democratic self restraint is
what is going to stop Trump from acting. If in
the end, Trump and the Republican majority think that the

(16:39):
filibuster is a barrier to whatever it is that they want,
for example, they're going to get rid of it anyway,
whether or not. The Democrats have done so in the
in the prior Congress, And so it strikes me as
essential to begin trying to take steps that can't be
reversed or irreversible steps in defense of safe voting rights,

(17:00):
for example, expanding the franchise guaranteeing federally against state entrepreneces.
We would still have to contend, obviously with the Supreme Court.
But for two years the Democrats had a majority in
both houses, and instead of doing transgressive, normative things like

(17:24):
changing the electoral rules to prevent Trump's cheating, they did
normal democratic things.

Speaker 1 (17:31):
They passed the.

Speaker 4 (17:32):
Inflation Reduction Act and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Act, and all
good things, I'm sure from their perspective. But they thought
that that would be how to reclaim America, and turned
out they were wrong.

Speaker 1 (17:46):
So there you go. The American people aren't with us,
so we need to just take matters into our own hands.
And it's personally perfectly quote reasonable for Biden to parton
Trump critics so that they don't ever have to worry.
In other words, if we get in power again, right
when we win the White House again, and Democrats will

(18:07):
win the White House again, I have no doubt about it.
Based on history. There are ebbs and flows of politics
and what people like and what they don't like, and
it goes one way to the other, and it will happen.
And what they're saying is, when we get back in charge,
take every check and balance, throw it out the window,
lock up political opponents, and give your staff the ability
to get the job done regardless of what the law says,

(18:29):
and then let them know that when they do this,
we've got their back and we will give them the
pardons that they need so they don't have to worry
about being prosecuted for breaking the law. That is what
they're now advocating for. So let me just be clear.
I think that there are mass pardons coming. I think

(18:51):
this is going to happen, and I think the wheels
have come off, and the Left is like, screw all
of y'all. We're going to do whatever the hell we
want to do, whenever we want to do it, wherever
we want to do it, and there's nothing that you
can do to stop us. Let me also just and
I go back to lawlessness real quick. You may remember
there's a guy that has a show named Charlemagne the God.
He interviewed Biden Harris. You know, he's a big you know,

(19:14):
been a big lib but even he like learned from
the election and realized that, like, hey, you might want
to listen to the American people a little bit. He
was on the View and he called out Sunny Houston
for having to constantly read legal notes because the lawyers
of the View are like, hey, you can't say that

(19:34):
on TV. Hey, you can't say that on TV. Hey
you can't say that on TV. And so what she's
now having to do is go on the show on
a regular basis and say, I have a legal note,
which is where I have to get my foot out
of my mouth before we get sued at ABC. And
and this is the lawlessness that I talk about. They

(19:55):
don't believe that anything applies him. I'll give you another
example I did. I did Piers Morgan's show, and on
that show, one of the guests accused Pete Headseth of
rape being a rapist, and I said on the show
out loud. You're gonna get sued for that. That is slander.
That is liable, and I hope you lose everything. You're

(20:16):
a terrible person because they for so long, they've been
able to do and say whatever they want to without
any repercussions for their actions because they knew that no
one was going to enforce the laws. That's why Sonny
Houston has been able to say whatever the hellse she
wants for so long. And just now because there's been
a change and law and order is coming back, is

(20:38):
she having to actually give all these legal notes to say, Okay,
what I said was a lie, wasn't true, and I
got to go back and fix it real quick so
it don't get sued.

Speaker 5 (20:49):
Listen, now that Trumps won, you say that you don't
think cable news will ever truly cover him honestly again,
why not even just.

Speaker 6 (20:57):
Cable to Know network nobody because they didn't do it before.

Speaker 1 (21:00):
Why would they do it? Noted? Yeah, well, well, let's
be honest.

Speaker 6 (21:07):
You have to apologize a couple of times last monks.

Speaker 1 (21:09):
So somebody's coming through some notes from.

Speaker 3 (21:10):
Downtow apologizing but making a legal note as an attorney
of law.

Speaker 6 (21:14):
Because you know, we have a penny president, a couple
Houns that is going to be very litigious, litigious, but
we check ourselves.

Speaker 1 (21:24):
I love it. That's not it. I love it. And
he's like, look, you guys are constantly having to give
out legal notes, and of course I blame Trump for that, Like, oh, well,
it's Trump's fault. No, you guys get busted saying things
that aren't true. And when you say things that aren't true,
there should be consequences for your actions. And let me

(21:45):
give you another example of them, and I'm talking about
the left in general. There have been zero consequences for
the lies that they've been telling against good people in
this country. Anyone that's around Donald Trump is a great
example of this. If you want your life to be real,
and support Donald Trump. I was on Piers Morgan's show earlier, Uncensored,

(22:05):
and we were having a debate on there about these
mass pardons, and then we were having a conversation about
different people that he is appointed to his cabinet positions.
One of them is Pete Headseth. I know him, I've
known him for a long time. He works at Fox,
and now he's up for the Department of Defense and

(22:28):
this is the stuff just like they have to do
on the view where they just lie and they lie
and slander and they tried to destroy people's lives. They're
doing it right now to Pete saying, oh, he's an alcoholic,
and everybody around that works and was like, no, he's
not all he was drunk on the airbody that worked
with him putting out statements No he didn't, and they

(22:49):
don't care because they want to take him down. And
we're having a conversation about Pete and then this radical
leftists says this on National TV.

Speaker 6 (23:01):
Take a listen, Ben, Can I just say that I
do think that Pete he actually is a good choice
to oversee the US military.

Speaker 1 (23:08):
I think they have a lot in common.

Speaker 6 (23:09):
Like just like the US military, Pete Hexath doesn't practice consent,
you know, when raping and pillaging other people, and I
think the US military does the same thing.

Speaker 1 (23:17):
They rape and.

Speaker 6 (23:18):
Pillage at operating budgets. He was able to tank you.

Speaker 1 (23:31):
Budget US.

Speaker 6 (23:35):
And as someone who doesn't want to see more wars abroad,
if you can take depended on budget, discussing about it,
discussing is drugs.

Speaker 1 (23:48):
Her husband and her childs in the same hotel room.
She wakes up, no memory what happened.

Speaker 6 (23:55):
And pete her A n d A want to play
her any An.

Speaker 1 (24:05):
Ben Well, for goodness sakes, I don't think I could
have said it differently. She just said that Peter Headseth
is out there raping and pillaging women. I hope she

(24:26):
gets sued for this. There should be accountability when you
go on TV and you try to destroy people's lives.
And this is what the Left has been able to
do for the last four years without any accountability for
their actions, zero accountability for their actions, and this is

(24:47):
what they've gotten away with. Now you understand why they're
willing to pardon everyone because they are afraid of what
is about to happen. They're afraid they're going to be
held accountable for their lives and their deceit and trying
to destroy people's lives and weaponizing the government to destroy
people's lives. That is what they are truly afraid of. Now,

(25:12):
let me just put an exclamation point on this by
saying two things. One, I'm expecting that Biden's going to
pardon everyone with the last name Biden that he needs to.
I expect he's going to give out mass pardons to people,
probably covering more than a decade of time, because this
is how they're going to basically ensure that people will
continue to break the law when Democrats are in power

(25:32):
in the future, saying look, we always take care of you.
Look what we did the last time we left office.
I'm going to keep covering it. I'm going to keep
exposing it. I want to take a moment and talk
to you about IFCJ, the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews,
wants to wish you a blessed beginning of the holiday
season as you gather with your families, grateful for the
blessings that God has given us all, but let's also

(25:56):
remember those who are facing unbelievable hardship in need of food, fellowship,
and hope. That includes the people of the Israel, who
are threatened daily by attacks from enemies on all sides.
And during these hard times, Israelis are thankful for the
Fellowship for food and basic assistance, truly life saving aid

(26:17):
when the rest of the world seems to have turned
its back on them. Your gift of twenty five dollars
will help provide a food box to an elderly Jew
or a Jewish family who are suffering and in desperate need.
A gift of one hundred dollars will help provide four
of these life saving food boxes this holiday season. Please

(26:37):
consider standing with Israel and the Jewish people. You can
go to SUPPORTIFCJ dot org. That's support IFCJ dot org.
To make a gift now that SUPPORTIFCJ dot org. Or
you can call to give at eight to eight for
eight eight IFCJ. That's eight eight eight eight eight four

(27:01):
three two five. Now I want to get to the
other issue I mentioned earlier, and that was Justice Jackson
says laws banning sex changes for young children are sort
of the same thing as banning interracial marriage. This was
part of the Supreme Court's oral arguments on should you

(27:24):
be able to do sex change operations on very young children?
Take a listen being drawn.

Speaker 7 (27:30):
By the statute that was sort of like the starting point.
The question was whether it was discriminatory because it applied
to both races and it wasn't necessarily invidious or whatever.
But you know, as I read the statute here, excuse
me the case here. You know, the court starts off
by saying that Virginia is now one of sixteen states
which prohibit and punished marriages on the basis of racial classifications.

(27:53):
And when you look at the structure of that law,
it looks in terms of incontinued you can't do something
that is inconstant with your own characteristics.

Speaker 1 (28:02):
Is sort of the same thing.

Speaker 7 (28:03):
So it's interesting to me that we now have this
different argument, And I wonder whether Virginia could have gotten
away with what they did here by just making a
classification argument the way that Tennessee is in this case.

Speaker 1 (28:16):
Yes, I think that's exactly right.

Speaker 7 (28:18):
That there is absolutely a parallel between any law that
says you can't act and consistent with a protected characteristic
in all other county.

Speaker 1 (28:26):
Now, let's just break down a little bit of this.
This law states that there's a compelling interest to protect
minors from physical and emotional harm in Tennessee. And what
she is saying in this argument here is the Department
of Justice and the planiffs are arguing that the law
discriminates on the basis of both sex and transgender status

(28:48):
of young children. They're arguing what the Supreme Court justice
is arguing there is is that you should be able
to literally cut off body parts of young children if
you believe that they are transgender. So if you're a parent,
and let's say you're crazy and you believe that you
should have had a daughter, but some you had a son,

(29:10):
and you indoctrinate that little kid to believe that they
are in the wrong sex, which you can get a
kid to believe just about anything when they're young. If
you don't believe me, look at al Kaita and suicide bombers.
For goodness sakes. Then they believe the parents should have
the right to do all of the transition surgeries of
puberty blockers, take the medicines that will literally destroy their

(29:31):
chances of ever having a child in the future. If
you got it wrong, if they kid in fact doesn't
really want to transition when they get older, and what
Supreme Court Justice Jackson saying there is well, no, no,
She believes that you should be able to do this.
In other words, you should be able to decide whatever
you want to cut off. You want to cut off
with a young girl's breasts. You want to give them
puberty bokers, You want to give them medicine that we

(29:53):
give to sexual offenders to castrate them chemically. That's what
they give kids when they're going through transitioning for goodness sakes,
and she's saying, totally fine, a law banning sex changes
for young children, sorry, the same thing as banning interracial marriage.

(30:14):
They're not the same thing. The banning of interracial marriage
is a completely different scenario than a law banning sex
changes for young children. By the way, at eighteen, they're
sending you to do what the hell you want. But
when you are young and a little child, the job
of a parent is not to cut off their genitals.
That is not what they're supposed to do. Here. The

(30:36):
media all in on this as well. CNN had one
of the most disgusting segments I've ever heard outside of
the Supreme Court on this exact issue. I love how
networks send out partisan hacks. Especially it's seeing it and
they're like, oh, well, we've got to correspond out there.
They're supposed to be a journalist. They're supposed to just

(30:57):
tell you the who, what, when, we're and why not anymore. No, No,
they push pure propaganda. And this may be one of
the most disgusting segments I've ever watched and seen, and
that's saying something. They have a correspondent by the name
of Lucy, I don't even know what her last name is,
denouncing those quote unquote against gender firming care for minors,

(31:20):
saying they put a quote unquote exhausted young children in
the crosshair, in the crossfire of this cultural war. So
you got a culture war and it's the kids that
are in the crosshairs. Well, who put them there? Wasn't Republicans.
It was these radical extremists at Vanderbilt University who we

(31:41):
have on tape bragging and demanding that doctors get on
board with transitional care. Because if you get a kid
in transition, guess what they're worth millions of dollars because
their body, their entire life, is fighting against what you're
artificially trying to accomplish. That your entire life, your body

(32:03):
is on medications when you go through a transition because
your DNA knows that what you're trying to do is
not real. There's a reason why a dude will never
get pregnant. There's a reason why a chick that becomes
a dude, we've seen them quote get pregnant because there's

(32:24):
still a chick. And dudes that become chicks will never
get pregnant because they have different DNA. Now, you can
fight your body and dope yourself up for decades, it
doesn't mean you're actually the opposite sex. So if you
want to know how we got to where we are now,

(32:47):
for those on the left that don't understand this issue,
it wasn't me or you conservatives that were out there.
It wasn't us. Okay that we're out there going, oh,
let's let's fight on the issue transmient. You brought it
into our classrooms, you brought it into our bathrooms, You've
forced it on our college campuses. You're trying to force

(33:07):
it on our kids. And you're trying to make money
millions and millions and millions off of these patients doing
something that is impossible to do. And as Vanderbilt put it,
there's a lot of money here. It's lucrative. So you
want to know who started this war, it wasn't me.
By the way, I'm defending not mutilating a child. I'm

(33:29):
very comfortable standing here before you and before God one
day saying what did you do with your life? I
can tell you one thing I did. I made sure
that they didn't mutilate children to make money off of them.
But listen, to CNN and the way they described this
at the Supreme Court.

Speaker 5 (33:45):
Transgender Americans, the Americans who identify a transgender make up
less than two percent of the entire population, but especially
in the selectoral campaign, they have taken on this outsized role.
They become clawed in the cross fires of this culture war.

Speaker 1 (33:59):
And we've actually.

Speaker 5 (33:59):
Been time with some of the families and the teenagers
and the kids who are be impacted by these bands,
by these laws. We spent time with three families who
traveled on their own time, time, missing school, missing work
to be here in DC, all the way from Arizona
to have their voices heard because they feel that there
are a lot of politicians, lawyers, talking heads.

Speaker 1 (34:22):
Discussing their rights. They're not being heard from themselves.

Speaker 5 (34:25):
And I want to give you a sense of what
one ten year old Violin demon told me when I
asked her what it feels like to be a transgender
kid in America today.

Speaker 1 (34:34):
Take a listen to.

Speaker 5 (34:36):
What concerns have you had about speaking out.

Speaker 1 (34:39):
I'm going to be like murdered.

Speaker 6 (34:41):
Like one day I'm going to be walking down the
street and somebody's going to come up and like shoot
me or something.

Speaker 1 (34:50):
Mother, let me just hit pause here. I feel bad
for this little boy that the parents are turning into
a little girl, and that they've indoctrinated this little boy
to believe that not only she's a little girl, but
also that someone's going to kill her on the street.
You want to talk about the power of parents, This

(35:12):
segment is the power of parenting. Why do you think
this little boy, who they have dresses a little girl,
thinks that someone's going to walk up and shoot him
or now her on the street. It's because of the parents.

Speaker 5 (35:26):
That's a really scary thing to be worrying about at
ten years old.

Speaker 1 (35:30):
Yeah, that should not be a worry Michelle. What's going
through your mind as you hear your daughter say this?

Speaker 7 (35:39):
I'm sorry to hear it say that.

Speaker 5 (35:43):
And one of the things that all of these families
emphasizes gender affirming care, things like hormones, puberty blockers, and
these are deeply personal, intimate decisions that they are making
with their pediatricians, whether psychiatrists, with the children over the course.

Speaker 1 (35:57):
Of many, many years.

Speaker 5 (35:58):
These are not you know, Nelly Willy decisions that they're
making carelessly, and for these children.

Speaker 1 (36:04):
It's I mean, these aren't Nelly willy decisions. Do you
hear what you're saying. This isn't a news segment. This
is pure blown propaganda. Do you know how many kids
that transition when they're younger, when they get older, say
they wish they would have never had this happen. And

(36:27):
many are in pain for the rest of their lives
after they try to detransition because of the mutilation that
they've done to their bodies. Does anybody talk about that?
By the way, if you're eighteen and you want to
do this, like you're sixteen seventeen and you want to
have peer but knock yourself out. But to do this
to like this ten year old little boy that they

(36:48):
have as a little girl, this is child abuse. Okay,
Like that's what it is. It's child abuse. And the
fact that they're putting this propaganda out there and I
want to do this to your kids is sick and perverted.
Make sure you share this podcast with your family and
your friends, shared on social media wherever you are. We

(37:08):
do the show every day, So hit that subscribe or
auto download button and I'll see you back here tomorrow.