December 7, 2024 • 35 mins
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
All right, let's talk about what's going on with the
picks for the cabinet positions under Donald Trump. This is
a moment where I want to encourage you to start
calling your senators and putting maximum pressure on senators to
actually do their damn job and confirm and not screw
(00:21):
over people that they don't like, because really it comes
down to they don't like Donald Trump and they don't
want to say yes to Donald Trump on every issue.
I put up a list just to remind people of
how extreme Republicans have been. And when I say extreme,
I'm saying extremely kind to Democrats and their nominees compared
(00:44):
to what they are now doing right now. And I
put this list up on social media on Facebook. You
can follow it there and go look at the lists, right.
I hope you'll get it the list and share it around.
But this is something that someone posted and I put
it up there because I think it's a great perspective.
Speaker 2 (00:59):
It says this quote. Let's let me get this straight.
Speaker 1 (01:02):
These fourteen active Republican senators voted to confirm Merrick Garland
for the Attorney General, but have concerns about headseth says
a lot wow. Roy Blunt Missouri, for example, mil Cassidy Louisiana,
Susan Collins, Main, John Cornyn Texas, Texas, johny Urs Ohio
(01:22):
or Iowa. Excuse me, Lindsey Graham South Carolina, Ron Johnson Wisconsin,
James Langford, Oklahoma, Mitch McConnell, Jerry Moran Kansas, Lisa Murkowski Alaska,
Mike Brown South Dakota, John Thune, and Tom Tillis. Now
I give you that list to just say, how the
(01:43):
hell can they vote for Merrick Garland for age? But
now all of a sudden, they're like, well, I don't
know about you know, some of Trump's picks, and I've
got real questions about a guy by the name of Headseth.
Really like, what were your questions with Merrick Garland? Did
you ask gim any tough questions because you voted to
confirm them. Let me go to another list for you,
(02:05):
and again I put this up on Facebook. Follow me there,
Ben Ferguson, and you can share this list.
Speaker 2 (02:10):
But the second list I put up was this.
Speaker 1 (02:13):
It says, these Republicans vote to confirm my orcis. That
would be Alejandro myorcis, a guy that has said out
loud that he has broken the law. He has lied
and said the border is secure when the border is
not secure, and he knew he was lying to the
American people. This is a guy that has been impeached.
You want to know who actually voted to confirm my orcis.
(02:35):
Shelley Moore West Virginia, Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Bob Portman,
Mitt Romney, and Dan Sullivan. Now, of those lists I
just gave you, three of them are still going to
be in the Senate. Shelley Moore, Lisa Murkowski, and Dan Sullivan, Portman,
Romney and Collins.
Speaker 2 (02:55):
No more.
Speaker 1 (02:56):
You look at these for example, and and I again,
they confirm my orcus was confirmed fifty six to forty three,
meaning you had all these Republicans go with Alejandro Majorcis.
And yet some of these people are still saying, well,
we've got real tough questions for Pete Hedgseth.
Speaker 2 (03:19):
Let me also say something else about this.
Speaker 1 (03:22):
There were Republicans that voted for Levine.
Speaker 2 (03:26):
Remember like they were in favor of Levin.
Speaker 1 (03:29):
That's a dude dressed like a chick that's serving in
our military. And then Republicans are now saying, well, I
got to.
Speaker 2 (03:36):
Ask more questions about Pete.
Speaker 1 (03:39):
My point is this is fake It is fate, fake outrage,
and they're acting like, well, we've got all these questions asked,
when reality is they don't want to lose control of
a Pentagon and all of their donors that come into
them that are contractors, that are lobbyists in the industries.
(04:01):
You follow the money on this. Okay, why are they
afraid of Pete getting the job? Because I think Pete
has said very clearly that one of the things he's
not going to do is put us an endless wars.
Well for defense contractors and lobbyists and those on the take,
that's not good news. Okay, Like that's bad news. That's
not good news. That's really really bad news. So they
(04:25):
don't like Pete because they're like, all right, like, this
guy's not going to get us into a bunch of wars.
This guy's not going to do what we want him
to do to make money, what we need him to
do to make money. That's what ultimately this is all about.
It is about the money. It's about making money for them.
(04:45):
And so when you look at these Republicans right now,
and by the way, many of these Republicans that are saying, well,
we've got questions on Pete. Are the same Republicans that
are that are advocating and supporting a unlimited funding of
you and the war with Russia that can get us
into World War three.
Speaker 2 (05:04):
So you also need to understand when I say.
Speaker 1 (05:06):
Follow the money, follow the money that they're advocating and supporting,
going that you're paying for for us to get into
a war with Russia. Now I say all of that
to move on to something else in the cabinet, and
that comes down the issue of Cash Patel. Now, look,
I know Cash. I know Pete. Cash is a guy
(05:27):
that Democrats and some Republicans are ripping on saying, wow,
he's got an enemy's list.
Speaker 2 (05:35):
I laugh at that.
Speaker 1 (05:36):
He called out democrats that are abusing their power, and
now they've decided to describe that as an enemy's list.
That is not an enemy's list. That is a bad
actors list. That is a list of corrupt Democrats that
he has been man enough to actually name.
Speaker 2 (05:50):
That is exactly what we should want from leaders.
Speaker 1 (05:52):
It's not an enemy's list, it is a these are
the people that are bad actors. These are the democrats
that are abusing their power. The people in the Deep
State that are abusing their power. I am willing to
call them out. Is that an enemy's let's know, that
is a list of bad actors, and that is exactly
what Cash Hotel has done. Now. I think he would
do an excellent job as the FBI director because he
(06:15):
also understands a government that abuses their power and just
how dangerous they can be. Why do I say that
Cashpttel was actually spied on. I don't know if many
people actually know this, but Cash Patel was spied on.
I want to play for you Cash telling a story
because I think this is part of what has not
(06:37):
been well stated by conservatives. And I want you to
take what I'm going to play for you, and I
want you to share it on social media because it's
really important. Cash Battel is a guy that the deep
State is terrified of because the deep State abused their
power to go after this guy, and he understands now
what he needs to do as the FBI director to
(06:58):
make sure that this doesn't happen to all abiding citizens,
whether you're Republican or a Democrat. That is why they
can't stand him. Listen to him in his own words
explain how he found out that he was being spied
on by our own government.
Speaker 3 (07:14):
Who cares if you've ever followed Russigate or any of
this other stuff about the deep state. Chris Ray, the
director of the FBI, and Rob Rosenstein, the Deputy Attorney
General and of the DOJ, were tasked with helping us
at Congress, where I ran the Rushigate investigation to expose Russigate.
We went to them and said, look, you guys didn't
do this, help us expose it, and they both doubled down.
Speaker 4 (07:37):
You know what they did.
Speaker 3 (07:39):
They launched an investigation against me, the senior congressional investigator
for Russigate on the House Intelligence Committee, and six other staffers.
They used grand jury subpoenas to get my personal information,
my banking information, my emails, my cell phone information, and
everything else. I didn't find out until five years later
when Google called me and said, hey, our five year
(08:00):
notification has laps. We can now tell you the DOJ
surveiled you and we had to turn over documents.
Speaker 4 (08:07):
So that became that.
Speaker 3 (08:08):
We exploded that into a federal lawsuit that's still ongoing
in the DOJNFPI.
Speaker 4 (08:12):
But those two guys hold on what.
Speaker 5 (08:16):
So Google informed you that you're being surveilled five years
after the investigation started, right? What what I mean?
Speaker 4 (08:23):
What more did they tell.
Speaker 3 (08:25):
You they're not allowed to say anything but that you
can be informed now since it's five years later.
Speaker 1 (08:32):
Can you just stop for a second and understand how
earth shattering this is. You got the guy that is
Trump's nominee for the FBI director, who, while he was
working on Russia Gate, instead of getting help from the
people that he was saying, hey, we know you didn't
do this, right that defis of court was supposed to
(08:53):
oversee the process. We know you guys didn't do this,
but Russia Gate's going on, all this happening, we need
your help. Instead, what they do they turned on him
and went to survey him because they didn't like what
he was doing. Do you understand why they hate him
and they wanted to take him down? Cash Pateel is
warning that Chris Ray was caught illegally using seven hundred
(09:14):
and two collection methods against Americans two hundred and seventy
four thousand times. That's not his number, by the way,
as he talks about it's in the report that the
FEISA Court wrote. He was investigating at Russia Gate, and
when they realized they couldn't control him he was a
Trump guy, they're like, all right, we'll just open investigation.
Speaker 2 (09:35):
On this guy.
Speaker 1 (09:35):
And the only reason why he found out he was
ever under an investigation, which is quickly a witch hunt,
is because Google had to tell him about it five
years after the fact. And then he says, as you
just heard him a moment ago. He's like, well, like,
what was this about? Like what Evan's say that. They
can't tell me that what they get him, They can't
tell me that. All they can tell me is they
got all your intel. Keep listening.
Speaker 3 (09:58):
Oh, as a former asteraty Prize, I know you don't
just go to Google. You go to every provider, you
go to all the telecomps, you go to the bank,
You got everybody.
Speaker 4 (10:06):
If you're going to run investigation, that's what you do.
Speaker 3 (10:08):
But these two guys who were running the FBI DOJ
sat in a room with the Chairman of the House
Intelligence Committee and lied to our faces. They threatened to
investigate us, which was bad enough, right, they actually did it,
and then these two guys would get exposed for Rob Rosenstein,
specifically for signing a FIZA that was totally bogus, and
(10:29):
we've caught Chris Ray lying time and time again as
the director.
Speaker 4 (10:32):
Of the FBI. Put these guys over here for a second.
Speaker 3 (10:36):
Gina Haspell, who was the director of the CIA, was
London station chief in England when Russia Gate kicked off.
Speaker 2 (10:42):
Listen to this, by the way, carefully.
Speaker 1 (10:44):
Okay, when Russia Gate kicked off, Gina Haskos, he said,
was over in England.
Speaker 2 (10:49):
Pay attention. As part of the story.
Speaker 1 (10:51):
All of you need to take this intel, by the
way and put it on social media because if you
want to know why you're hearing so many people on
Capitol Hill saying, oh, we can't have a cash hotel,
it's because he's telling you what they've been doing. And
that is a direct threat to America's surveillance being able
to abuse power and survey, have surveillance on you, to
(11:13):
look at all your text messages, to get your phone calls,
all the fights of warrants, everything else they can do.
Speaker 2 (11:18):
Keep listening.
Speaker 3 (11:19):
Under the rule of law in America, if you want
the Federal view of investigation to launch an investigation overseas,
you have to get permission from the head and tel rep.
Speaker 4 (11:27):
In the England it's the excuse me the station chief.
Speaker 3 (11:32):
So she allowed Russiagate to occur on British soil where
there was a barroom operation to try to record some
nub into spilling the beans on Donald Trump, and they
would use that to launch the whole Russigate offensive. Gena
Haspital would later become Trump's CIA director. And then when
these guys got out of the administration, Dina Regina Haspital
(11:54):
and Rod Rosen steam work today were at Christopher Ray's
old law firm as senior named partners, making seven and
eight figars.
Speaker 1 (12:03):
Just stop for a second, and now you understand why
Donald Trump had when he ran for office this time,
said I got to clean it out. Like I now
understand how bad the swamp is because when Donald Trump
said he wanted to drain the swamp last time, what
people I don't think understood last time in and around Trump,
because they were very green, is the swamp. There's there's
(12:26):
areas of the government that you think that you can
support that aren't the swamp. Right, you would think going
in green, that the CIA is not the swamp, that
the FBI isn't the swamp. Right, You're talking about Capitol Hill,
and Congress and and and maybe you know the EPA
and the regulators. You're not thinking about the DOJ, You're
not thinking about the FBI, you're not thinking about the CIA,
(12:49):
You're not thinking about the Department of Home Security, because
you come in thinking that those are the good guys.
And so Donald Trump was trusting of James Comey. He
should have fired him day one. He was trusting of
the CIA, he was trusting of Gena Hausker, he was
trusting hew General Flynn trusted the FBI. Remember when the
FBI sent over a couple of guys and they and
(13:10):
they bragged about it later, James Comy, I just sent
over a couple of agents.
Speaker 2 (13:15):
Why because I can? And they were stupid enough to
let him in.
Speaker 1 (13:18):
And General Flynn was stupid enough to believe that if
the government that you work for, that you've risked your
life for that, you've fought to protect an offendoment a
career out of it.
Speaker 2 (13:28):
As a general, you.
Speaker 1 (13:31):
Shouldn't have to worry about getting an attorney when you're
sitting in the situation room answering questions to the FBI.
Now we know now that you'd never talked to the
FEDS right, we all know that, but there was a
level of trust in sixteen that this was not part
of the swamp, that somehow this was separate. Clearly, we
(13:51):
were all wrong, including Donald Trump, and he kept people
around him because it's hard to even imagine that there's
this let level of nepotism and corruption in places that
you have respect for, like the FBI and the CIA
and the Department of Defense and the Department of Justice.
(14:12):
You think that's where politics should stop at the water's edge.
But what we found out is no that has been
infiltrated by hard core radical extremists who are terrified because
Castrotel has now experienced all this, dealt with them and
understands how deep the rot goes and would understand how
to clean house, which is exactly what you would want
(14:34):
to happen.
Speaker 5 (14:35):
Keep listening, How is this going to get broken up?
It seems so deep. I mean, you just mentioned they're
they're they're embedded in politics, They're embedded in mainstream media,
They're embedded in intelligence agencies. They are former top leadership
of the military that's now embedded within the military industrial
(14:57):
complex companies. I mean, it's how many people are involved
in this thousand deep state thousands. How would you even
begin to dismantle it?
Speaker 3 (15:08):
Well, I think the first Trump administration was the beachhead right.
People were just like, you guys are full of it,
and we continued to put out the truth. And years
later people are catching up to a lot of that truth, saying,
wait a second, you guys weren't lying back then, people
being the American public, that's the weapon we need, And
you guys weren't lying about impeachment. They literally made up
(15:29):
a piece of a phone call to launch a presidential
impeachment and then put me in the middle of it
by making up a meeting that never occurred, but it
sounded dirty at the time. And then when we finally
released the transcript, everybody was like, oh yeah, there was
no quick pro qull nothing illegal happened here, but the.
Speaker 4 (15:50):
Narrative had been out there.
Speaker 3 (15:51):
And now now you have President Trump as a president
who was impeached for the first time in however many years,
And so they get their narratives right. They don't necessarily
care about the conclusory portion of their mission. They use
the mainstream media to say Trump's a Russian asset, He's
been impeached. Cash Mattel is under DOJ surveillance for whatever
(16:14):
investigation when he was never them. I've had more mainstream
media hits on me than I can count. But they
want the title narrative to carry the day. Hunter Biden's
laptop is Russian disinformation.
Speaker 4 (16:29):
They don't care about the actual truth.
Speaker 3 (16:31):
And so once you start stacking these together and you
show the American public you were lied to, you based
your vote at the polls on information that the government
purposely withheld from you so that you would vote a
particular way, well let's.
Speaker 2 (16:47):
Go down that rabbit hole for a second.
Speaker 1 (16:50):
I have no doubt that if the truth would have
been told about the Hunter Biden laptop and the media
would have done their job and not been state sponsored
media a government and would have said the laptop is
real and report on the on the what was in
that laptop instead of suppressing it and silencing it and
making sure that it's not on Facebook, that it's not
(17:11):
on X or Twitter at the time, and that the
story is suppressed and ABCNBC and CBS refused to cover
at CNN, MSNBC refused to cover it.
Speaker 2 (17:19):
I have no doubt that Joe Biden would have lost
in twenty twenty.
Speaker 1 (17:22):
But you had all these former directors the CIA and
the FBI that signed a level letter, fifty plus high
level intel officials, not the high level, the highest level.
Speaker 2 (17:34):
Of intel officials.
Speaker 1 (17:35):
It signed a letter saying this had all the markings
of Russian disinformation and don't believe it. And that gave
the cover for Facebook to ban it, for X, for
Twitter to suppress it and to say we're never going
to allow you guys to talk about this. And the
news network said you couldn't talk about it. I was
at CNN at the time. They said you couldn't talk
about it.
Speaker 2 (17:55):
We weren't. It wasn't allowed to be brought up on air.
Speaker 1 (17:58):
The newspapers didn't report on and the reason why was
simple because they were told that this was quote, Russian
disinformation by the federal government at the highest levels, and
they were lying to you, and it altered and changed
an election.
Speaker 2 (18:13):
Do you want to know what a coup is? That's
a coup. This is what we.
Speaker 1 (18:17):
Do, by the way our country is done throughout history
in third world countries. This is what Russia does, Cuba
does in Venezuela does. Let me also just I want
to hit pause on everything I just said, And I
want you to ask yourself this question. If Cashpatel is
such a threat to this country was under investigation, as
(18:38):
the media saying, and that he is such a danger
to our safety and security, do you think the National
Police Association would come out and strongly endorse someone that
they actually believe is a bad guy. And the reason
why I say that is because right now the National
Police Association has just endorsed Cashel does serve as the
(19:00):
FBI director in president like Donald Trump's incoming administration, citing
his extensive career in national security, law enforcement, and public service.
The reason why they're slandering this guy, to say, is
the same reason why they weaponized the government to try
to go after him, is because he was somebody that
was telling truth to power when they when the federal
(19:24):
government turned when the deep state turned on Patel. This
is a guy that was a former chief of staff
to the Department of Defense and they were They turned
on him then because they didn't like that he wouldn't
do what they wanted him to do, which was to
start wars and spend money. He was a deputy director
of the National of National Intelligence. But he wouldn't start wars,
or advocate for wars, or get into wars, or help
(19:46):
other countries get into wars. He was deputy assistant to
then President Trump. Well, that's another reason why they wanted
to investigate. They wanted to they wanted to end his career.
They wanted to put him in in jail. There's this
is no different than what happened to General Flynn. And
that's exactly why the National Police Association is strongly not
just endorsing, but strongly endorsing Cashptel. He has seen what
(20:09):
they do to people. He's one of them. He understands
just how dangerous these people are. Keep listening to what
he says the second part of his story.
Speaker 3 (20:19):
Once you show enough Americans that, then I think you
have the movement that you need behind the leadership that
we have in Donald Trump. Is my position to take
a wrecking ball to the deep state. How so you
go to DC and you remove all these positions, right,
and you start enacting measures not of retribution but of
(20:40):
legal consequence.
Speaker 4 (20:41):
Y'all acted one way.
Speaker 3 (20:42):
For instance, the people that signed the fifty one Intel
letter right permanently suspend their security clearances forever. Every one
of those guys lie. Every one of those guys got
caught lying. You're talking about two former CIA directors, a
former NSA director, and a former Secretary of Defense, all
intentionally to this day continue to lie and won't take
back their letter. Okay, you can stop making money from
(21:04):
your security clearance.
Speaker 4 (21:05):
There's a start.
Speaker 3 (21:07):
Then you go in and you get the Eric Charmel's
of the world, who've been publicly outed as utilizing intel
to inject a political narrative across mainstream America, and you
remove these people from government. You have to go in there.
The same thing we're talking about the voting, it's the
same thing here. You got to cleanse the scrolls. Government
(21:27):
service is a service. We're not making you do it,
and if you break the rules and regulations, you're out.
Speaker 4 (21:33):
So that's a big part of it. Right.
Speaker 3 (21:35):
Then you bring in the new bench, the new team.
Then you're going to have to keep fighting the media.
And I think we're slowly, over the years, have starting
to win that fight because the more and more of
someone thing I learned when I started to restigating my
name was outed for the first time, that the media
is attacking you. The more you're over the target who
(21:57):
is at the head of it. I don't think there's
one person or one group. I think it's people who
know they're going to benefit from each other if they
sign up for the program. Let's call it right and
so again not a Republican or democratic. In the glossary
(22:18):
of this book, in alphabetical order, I think there's like
sixty five people I name by title and name, just
to show people.
Speaker 2 (22:25):
How excited by the way.
Speaker 1 (22:27):
You know, he just said, I give by title and name,
sixty five different people. Now that is where this quote
enemies list has come from. This is what the media
will not tell you. Cashpertel just said, Look in the book,
I tell you I got sixty five people in order.
In the book did he say it was an enemy's list?
(22:51):
Do you say wanted to lock up sixty five different people?
Speaker 6 (22:53):
No?
Speaker 1 (22:54):
Do you hear anybody in the media playing for you
what I just played for you. He wrote a book,
He talked about who the abusers were. He explained to
you what they had done, the laws they had broken,
the abuse of power in spying on Americans. And then
he's like, yeah, there's sixty five different names. You can
go read it in the book. Because this is when
(23:16):
he was promoting his book, and they're like, now to me,
He's like, well, Caspittel has an enemy's list. No, he doesn't.
He has eight list of people that were bad actors.
He has a list of people that abuse their power.
That's not an enemy's list. That's exposing people. And by
the way, he's absolutely right. These people that lie to you,
they deserve to lose their security clearances, which means that
(23:37):
it shuts off their money because that's how they make
their money is off of having their security clearances when
they leave government. I want you to listen very carefully
to how he explains he's sixty five people. I'm going
to back it up like ten seconds just to make
sure you get full in context here of what he's saying.
Speaker 3 (23:54):
Listen, Republican or Democratic in the glossary of this book
in alphabetical order. I think there's like sixty five people
I name by title and name, just to show people
how expansive the deep state is. And so there is
no like one shain of command they report to. Instead,
what I believe they do is they bring in people
that they can control. The Obama still have heavy sway
(24:16):
in that entire operation, and so do people that have
been around for ten twenty thirty years in Washington.
Speaker 5 (24:24):
I mean, I think it's already out there for them.
I mean, how corrupt it is. I mean, that's why
I think that's why podcasts are doing so well right now.
And I mean, somebody just came in here in media
and said that CNN's viewership is only about fifty thousand
at any particular point in time during the day.
Speaker 4 (24:45):
That's pretty bad. It's pretty bad. It's atrocious.
Speaker 3 (24:49):
And I'll give you an example from sort of the
other end of the spectrum, when Tucker was on Fox.
And this is not an attack on the reporting, it's
just the it's just the way the pendulum has swung
away from mainstream media in general. When Tucker was on
Fox and he was at the peak of his show's viewership,
(25:10):
he was still one third less than Bill O'Reilly when
Bill O'Reilly.
Speaker 4 (25:14):
Was on Fox in terms of viewership. Wow.
Speaker 3 (25:17):
So it had already started. And it's again, not because
of the reporting. I think it's because other people started
to say, I don't want to watch mainstream media anymore anywhere,
and the shows, the podcasts, the radios, the series started
becoming more and more and more and more popular.
Speaker 1 (25:36):
He's right, by the way, this is how Donald Trump
won because there are so many people that are doing
and going around the media. The media is not getting
to control everything any longer. The media is actually having
to deal with the fact that they've lost influence. And
I think this last election is great proof of that.
(25:57):
If it wasn't for podcasts, I don't think Donald Trump
would have won.
Speaker 2 (26:01):
I really don't.
Speaker 1 (26:03):
This story I just told you is not being sold
told to anyone if it isn't for podcasts. You listen
to what I just played for you. He doesn't have
an enemy's list. He had a list of sixty five
different people in alphabetical order in his book of people
(26:23):
in our government that were abusing their power.
Speaker 2 (26:26):
And what did the media do with that list? They're
like breaking news.
Speaker 1 (26:30):
Cash Patel has an enemy's list from Donald Trump, sixty
five plus long. And Donald Trump is what's going to
happen now, is they're going to come in and blow
up our government. Sounds scary, right, Orange Man bad, Cash
Patel bad, Deep State good, Donald Trump evil. Donald Trump
(26:53):
is the bad one. Donald Trump is the evil one.
Donald Trump's the one that you cannot trust.
Speaker 2 (27:01):
I'm going to go back to what I said earlier.
I'm going to say it again.
Speaker 1 (27:04):
This is when you need to be calling your senators
and you need to be telling them that they better
do their damn job. This is when you call your
senator and you say to your senator, hey, guess what,
you better vote the right way, because if you don't
vote the right way, then what I'm going to do
is I'm going to make sure that I do everything
(27:24):
I can that you lose your job, that there is
a countability, that there is a countability for the way
that you vote. I go back to what I said
earlier on that list I gave you earlier, and I
went through all the Republicans that voted for my orcis,
that voted for radicals on the left and confirm them.
(27:50):
Let's just call it what it is. They actually confirmed them. Okay,
they confirmed them. We're talking about Levine, a dude dressed
like a chick that's got a high level job in
our government. A guy that was dressed like a chick
at the White House, for example. They didn't protest the
same dude that was stealing women's clothes and luggage at airports.
(28:11):
Remember that guy who's in charge of like nuclear waste.
These are the same Republicans that had no problem confirming
Merrick Garland, but now they're like, oh, I don't know
if I can vote for somebody like Cashpittel or somebody
like Pete Edseth. If you don't remind them of what
you just voted for and you don't call them, I'm
(28:33):
gonna tell you this, they will be successful.
Speaker 2 (28:36):
They will end up getting rid of some great people.
Speaker 1 (28:40):
And now's the time you pick up the phone and
you email, and you go on social media, and you
share the info I gave you and this show, share
the podcast so that people know what they're actually doing
and why they hate them so much. Because if they
understand Cash's story, I think the majority of the American
people love him that much more. Let me give you
(29:01):
just another story that ties into all of this. And
you may have seen this, like underreported story from a
couple days ago, China spy campaign nabs US mobile phone
users data. There should be outrage, there's not because the
media is not wanting to cover this story. They just
(29:21):
tell you about it once and kind of move on
from that, like, oh, nothing to see here, you go,
It's just normal like we get somebody else got hacked, right,
Like there's just another hacking and you should just kind
of assume that they know everything about everything about your life.
Really well, you want to know how they spun the story.
They spun it into somehow a Cash Patel story that
you can't have cashpatl and others because they've been hacked
(29:44):
and quote now they're compromise. Let me give you a
headline ABC News Cashpatel, Trump's pick to lead the FBI
hit with Iranian cyber attack. Sources say, now they don't
want to talk about the Chinese espionage here, as US
officials suspected a recently just covered Chinese hacking and espionage
campaign quote scooped up data one hundred of thousands of
(30:05):
American mobile phone users, likely stealing information about more than
one million customers. ABC News has learned, Okay, is there
a chance that one of those million could be an
elected official to Democrat? Because if that's the case, then
you should be running stories that there are Democrats that
are now compromised by China.
Speaker 2 (30:24):
But they're not gonna do that. No, Instead, they're gonna.
Speaker 1 (30:27):
Say, look over here, we've got a problem with Cashperttel
because Cashpttel is a guy that has been picklid the FBI.
He's been hit with the Iranian saber attacking, so therefore
they may have info on him, and so he can't
have the job. Are you kidding me? Listen to this
from ABC news, Good Morning America.
Speaker 6 (30:44):
Latest now in the Chinese hacking and espionage campaign the
targeted mobile phone users. ABC News has learned that information
about more than one million customers was likely stolen. Chief
just course wind to Pere Thomas's in watching with the
exclusive details.
Speaker 4 (30:56):
Good Winning, Pierre George, Good Morning.
Speaker 7 (30:58):
ABC News has learned that the US officials suspected a
sweeping Chinese hacking and espionage campaign scooped up data on
hundreds of thousands of US mobile phone users, possibly stealing
information of more than one million customers. Sources familiar with
the investigation for the first time, giving us a sense
of the vast scope of what US officials are calling
a major intelligence gathering operation by the People's Republic of
(31:22):
China exploding weaknesses in the networks of the nation's top
telecommunications companies like AT and T and Verizon. The PRC
initially appeared to have focused on a huge swap of
mobile phone users, many living in and around the nation's capital.
FBI and Homeland security officials brief reporters Tuesday that the
large amount of stolen data included who the phone users
(31:42):
were talking to, when they spoke, and where they were
communicating from. The brief was declined to provide specific numbers,
but ABC News was able to get a sense of
the scale of victims through various sources. Once the hackers
had infiltrated mobile phone networks, they then zeroed in on
a smaller group of high profile targets. It's secretly gaining
access to their audio recordings and text messages. Some of
(32:04):
those targeted included top of officials in the Biden administration.
Speaker 4 (32:08):
The hackers had clear.
Speaker 7 (32:09):
Goals, source of telling ABC News they had their sites
on at least one Cabinet secretary and a top White
House homeland security advisor.
Speaker 4 (32:16):
Is our operation still going on?
Speaker 7 (32:19):
Officials admit that they cannot say with certainly that China's
hackers have been fully kicked out of these telecommunications networks,
and they acknowledge that they're still trying to understand the
scope of this activity. And George, we're also learning in
a separate case Iranian hackers have targeted Cashpatel, President Alex
Trump's nominee for FBI director.
Speaker 2 (32:37):
Well, isn't that interesting At the very end there how
they're like.
Speaker 1 (32:39):
Hey, we'll name Cash Paatel as Trump's pic to lead
the FBI, but we won't name any of the cabinet secretaries,
which I'm sure they know their names who were targeted
by China. By the way, I'm going to go out
on a limb here and say, who do I think
is going to be more successful at hacking. It's probably
going to be China going after the Biden administration officials,
(33:02):
then Iran going after quote Cash Pattel. But why are
they telling you this story and using Patel's name because
they want to give another reason why, Well, he might
be compromised. Now, maybe this FBI director nominee, Cashpatel that
was hit to be hit with what is believed to
be a cyber attack from Iran, according to quote two
sources familiar with the situation.
Speaker 2 (33:23):
So therefore, you shouldn't vote for the guy.
Speaker 1 (33:24):
The guy shouldn't get confirmed because he could be compromised
because they may have information on him.
Speaker 2 (33:30):
And that's just not that we can't take that risk.
We got to move on.
Speaker 1 (33:33):
We'll also tell you in the same story that a
million people, including high level people with the White House
and the Democratic Party, had been targeted and surveyed and
maybe even been listened to, and their text messages read
that are in our government right now.
Speaker 2 (33:49):
But we won't tell you those names.
Speaker 1 (33:51):
Oh no, no, no, no, no, no, no, absolutely not, we
will not do that. You understand the bias here. You
understand just how corrupt these We don't have a media anymore.
The audio I just played for you is proof that
we don't have a media any longer, because the real
headline should have been Biden administration officials, including cabinet secretaries
(34:13):
were attacked by Chinese spies in an active espionage. By
the way, have they come out at the White House
and announces have they kicked out anybody from China?
Speaker 2 (34:23):
Have they seized any assets yet? Have they done anything?
Not a damn thing.
Speaker 1 (34:28):
They then say, hey, they got data on It could
be many of you listening to me right now.
Speaker 2 (34:32):
Hell, it could be me. I don't know, But that's
not what they want to tell you about.
Speaker 1 (34:36):
They want you to think, Oh, but Cashptel may have
gotten hacked with some real info from China, and so
therefore that is what you need to know about, and
that should be the issue that you understand is where
your concern should be. Nothing right now is as it seems.
I'm just gonna say it again. Nothing right now is
(34:58):
what you want. They want you to believe. It is
not real. Make sure you share this podcast with your
family and your friends, please, and I'll see you back
here tomorrow
All right, let's talk about what's going on with the
picks for the cabinet positions under Donald Trump. This is
a moment where I want to encourage you to start
calling your senators and putting maximum pressure on senators to
actually do their damn job and confirm and not screw
(00:21):
over people that they don't like, because really it comes
down to they don't like Donald Trump and they don't
want to say yes to Donald Trump on every issue.
I put up a list just to remind people of
how extreme Republicans have been. And when I say extreme,
I'm saying extremely kind to Democrats and their nominees compared
(00:44):
to what they are now doing right now. And I
put this list up on social media on Facebook. You
can follow it there and go look at the lists, right.
I hope you'll get it the list and share it around.
But this is something that someone posted and I put
it up there because I think it's a great perspective.
Speaker 2 (00:59):
It says this quote. Let's let me get this straight.
Speaker 1 (01:02):
These fourteen active Republican senators voted to confirm Merrick Garland
for the Attorney General, but have concerns about headseth says
a lot wow. Roy Blunt Missouri, for example, mil Cassidy Louisiana,
Susan Collins, Main, John Cornyn Texas, Texas, johny Urs Ohio
(01:22):
or Iowa. Excuse me, Lindsey Graham South Carolina, Ron Johnson Wisconsin,
James Langford, Oklahoma, Mitch McConnell, Jerry Moran Kansas, Lisa Murkowski Alaska,
Mike Brown South Dakota, John Thune, and Tom Tillis. Now
I give you that list to just say, how the
(01:43):
hell can they vote for Merrick Garland for age? But
now all of a sudden, they're like, well, I don't
know about you know, some of Trump's picks, and I've
got real questions about a guy by the name of Headseth.
Really like, what were your questions with Merrick Garland? Did
you ask gim any tough questions because you voted to
confirm them. Let me go to another list for you,
(02:05):
and again I put this up on Facebook. Follow me there,
Ben Ferguson, and you can share this list.
Speaker 2 (02:10):
But the second list I put up was this.
Speaker 1 (02:13):
It says, these Republicans vote to confirm my orcis. That
would be Alejandro myorcis, a guy that has said out
loud that he has broken the law. He has lied
and said the border is secure when the border is
not secure, and he knew he was lying to the
American people. This is a guy that has been impeached.
You want to know who actually voted to confirm my orcis.
(02:35):
Shelley Moore West Virginia, Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Bob Portman,
Mitt Romney, and Dan Sullivan. Now, of those lists I
just gave you, three of them are still going to
be in the Senate. Shelley Moore, Lisa Murkowski, and Dan Sullivan, Portman,
Romney and Collins.
Speaker 2 (02:55):
No more.
Speaker 1 (02:56):
You look at these for example, and and I again,
they confirm my orcus was confirmed fifty six to forty three,
meaning you had all these Republicans go with Alejandro Majorcis.
And yet some of these people are still saying, well,
we've got real tough questions for Pete Hedgseth.
Speaker 2 (03:19):
Let me also say something else about this.
Speaker 1 (03:22):
There were Republicans that voted for Levine.
Speaker 2 (03:26):
Remember like they were in favor of Levin.
Speaker 1 (03:29):
That's a dude dressed like a chick that's serving in
our military. And then Republicans are now saying, well, I
got to.
Speaker 2 (03:36):
Ask more questions about Pete.
Speaker 1 (03:39):
My point is this is fake It is fate, fake outrage,
and they're acting like, well, we've got all these questions asked,
when reality is they don't want to lose control of
a Pentagon and all of their donors that come into
them that are contractors, that are lobbyists in the industries.
(04:01):
You follow the money on this. Okay, why are they
afraid of Pete getting the job? Because I think Pete
has said very clearly that one of the things he's
not going to do is put us an endless wars.
Well for defense contractors and lobbyists and those on the take,
that's not good news. Okay, Like that's bad news. That's
not good news. That's really really bad news. So they
(04:25):
don't like Pete because they're like, all right, like, this
guy's not going to get us into a bunch of wars.
This guy's not going to do what we want him
to do to make money, what we need him to
do to make money. That's what ultimately this is all about.
It is about the money. It's about making money for them.
(04:45):
And so when you look at these Republicans right now,
and by the way, many of these Republicans that are saying, well,
we've got questions on Pete. Are the same Republicans that
are that are advocating and supporting a unlimited funding of
you and the war with Russia that can get us
into World War three.
Speaker 2 (05:04):
So you also need to understand when I say.
Speaker 1 (05:06):
Follow the money, follow the money that they're advocating and supporting,
going that you're paying for for us to get into
a war with Russia. Now I say all of that
to move on to something else in the cabinet, and
that comes down the issue of Cash Patel. Now, look,
I know Cash. I know Pete. Cash is a guy
(05:27):
that Democrats and some Republicans are ripping on saying, wow,
he's got an enemy's list.
Speaker 2 (05:35):
I laugh at that.
Speaker 1 (05:36):
He called out democrats that are abusing their power, and
now they've decided to describe that as an enemy's list.
That is not an enemy's list. That is a bad
actors list. That is a list of corrupt Democrats that
he has been man enough to actually name.
Speaker 2 (05:50):
That is exactly what we should want from leaders.
Speaker 1 (05:52):
It's not an enemy's list, it is a these are
the people that are bad actors. These are the democrats
that are abusing their power. The people in the Deep
State that are abusing their power. I am willing to
call them out. Is that an enemy's let's know, that
is a list of bad actors, and that is exactly
what Cash Hotel has done. Now. I think he would
do an excellent job as the FBI director because he
(06:15):
also understands a government that abuses their power and just
how dangerous they can be. Why do I say that
Cashpttel was actually spied on. I don't know if many
people actually know this, but Cash Patel was spied on.
I want to play for you Cash telling a story
because I think this is part of what has not
(06:37):
been well stated by conservatives. And I want you to
take what I'm going to play for you, and I
want you to share it on social media because it's
really important. Cash Battel is a guy that the deep
State is terrified of because the deep State abused their
power to go after this guy, and he understands now
what he needs to do as the FBI director to
(06:58):
make sure that this doesn't happen to all abiding citizens,
whether you're Republican or a Democrat. That is why they
can't stand him. Listen to him in his own words
explain how he found out that he was being spied
on by our own government.
Speaker 3 (07:14):
Who cares if you've ever followed Russigate or any of
this other stuff about the deep state. Chris Ray, the
director of the FBI, and Rob Rosenstein, the Deputy Attorney
General and of the DOJ, were tasked with helping us
at Congress, where I ran the Rushigate investigation to expose Russigate.
We went to them and said, look, you guys didn't
do this, help us expose it, and they both doubled down.
Speaker 4 (07:37):
You know what they did.
Speaker 3 (07:39):
They launched an investigation against me, the senior congressional investigator
for Russigate on the House Intelligence Committee, and six other staffers.
They used grand jury subpoenas to get my personal information,
my banking information, my emails, my cell phone information, and
everything else. I didn't find out until five years later
when Google called me and said, hey, our five year
(08:00):
notification has laps. We can now tell you the DOJ
surveiled you and we had to turn over documents.
Speaker 4 (08:07):
So that became that.
Speaker 3 (08:08):
We exploded that into a federal lawsuit that's still ongoing
in the DOJNFPI.
Speaker 4 (08:12):
But those two guys hold on what.
Speaker 5 (08:16):
So Google informed you that you're being surveilled five years
after the investigation started, right? What what I mean?
Speaker 4 (08:23):
What more did they tell.
Speaker 3 (08:25):
You they're not allowed to say anything but that you
can be informed now since it's five years later.
Speaker 1 (08:32):
Can you just stop for a second and understand how
earth shattering this is. You got the guy that is
Trump's nominee for the FBI director, who, while he was
working on Russia Gate, instead of getting help from the
people that he was saying, hey, we know you didn't
do this, right that defis of court was supposed to
(08:53):
oversee the process. We know you guys didn't do this,
but Russia Gate's going on, all this happening, we need
your help. Instead, what they do they turned on him
and went to survey him because they didn't like what
he was doing. Do you understand why they hate him
and they wanted to take him down? Cash Pateel is
warning that Chris Ray was caught illegally using seven hundred
(09:14):
and two collection methods against Americans two hundred and seventy
four thousand times. That's not his number, by the way,
as he talks about it's in the report that the
FEISA Court wrote. He was investigating at Russia Gate, and
when they realized they couldn't control him he was a
Trump guy, they're like, all right, we'll just open investigation.
Speaker 2 (09:35):
On this guy.
Speaker 1 (09:35):
And the only reason why he found out he was
ever under an investigation, which is quickly a witch hunt,
is because Google had to tell him about it five
years after the fact. And then he says, as you
just heard him a moment ago. He's like, well, like,
what was this about? Like what Evan's say that. They
can't tell me that what they get him, They can't
tell me that. All they can tell me is they
got all your intel. Keep listening.
Speaker 3 (09:58):
Oh, as a former asteraty Prize, I know you don't
just go to Google. You go to every provider, you
go to all the telecomps, you go to the bank,
You got everybody.
Speaker 4 (10:06):
If you're going to run investigation, that's what you do.
Speaker 3 (10:08):
But these two guys who were running the FBI DOJ
sat in a room with the Chairman of the House
Intelligence Committee and lied to our faces. They threatened to
investigate us, which was bad enough, right, they actually did it,
and then these two guys would get exposed for Rob Rosenstein,
specifically for signing a FIZA that was totally bogus, and
(10:29):
we've caught Chris Ray lying time and time again as
the director.
Speaker 4 (10:32):
Of the FBI. Put these guys over here for a second.
Speaker 3 (10:36):
Gina Haspell, who was the director of the CIA, was
London station chief in England when Russia Gate kicked off.
Speaker 2 (10:42):
Listen to this, by the way, carefully.
Speaker 1 (10:44):
Okay, when Russia Gate kicked off, Gina Haskos, he said,
was over in England.
Speaker 2 (10:49):
Pay attention. As part of the story.
Speaker 1 (10:51):
All of you need to take this intel, by the
way and put it on social media because if you
want to know why you're hearing so many people on
Capitol Hill saying, oh, we can't have a cash hotel,
it's because he's telling you what they've been doing. And
that is a direct threat to America's surveillance being able
to abuse power and survey, have surveillance on you, to
(11:13):
look at all your text messages, to get your phone calls,
all the fights of warrants, everything else they can do.
Speaker 2 (11:18):
Keep listening.
Speaker 3 (11:19):
Under the rule of law in America, if you want
the Federal view of investigation to launch an investigation overseas,
you have to get permission from the head and tel rep.
Speaker 4 (11:27):
In the England it's the excuse me the station chief.
Speaker 3 (11:32):
So she allowed Russiagate to occur on British soil where
there was a barroom operation to try to record some
nub into spilling the beans on Donald Trump, and they
would use that to launch the whole Russigate offensive. Gena
Haspital would later become Trump's CIA director. And then when
these guys got out of the administration, Dina Regina Haspital
(11:54):
and Rod Rosen steam work today were at Christopher Ray's
old law firm as senior named partners, making seven and
eight figars.
Speaker 1 (12:03):
Just stop for a second, and now you understand why
Donald Trump had when he ran for office this time,
said I got to clean it out. Like I now
understand how bad the swamp is because when Donald Trump
said he wanted to drain the swamp last time, what
people I don't think understood last time in and around Trump,
because they were very green, is the swamp. There's there's
(12:26):
areas of the government that you think that you can
support that aren't the swamp. Right, you would think going
in green, that the CIA is not the swamp, that
the FBI isn't the swamp. Right, You're talking about Capitol Hill,
and Congress and and and maybe you know the EPA
and the regulators. You're not thinking about the DOJ, You're
not thinking about the FBI, you're not thinking about the CIA,
(12:49):
You're not thinking about the Department of Home Security, because
you come in thinking that those are the good guys.
And so Donald Trump was trusting of James Comey. He
should have fired him day one. He was trusting of
the CIA, he was trusting of Gena Hausker, he was
trusting hew General Flynn trusted the FBI. Remember when the
FBI sent over a couple of guys and they and
(13:10):
they bragged about it later, James Comy, I just sent
over a couple of agents.
Speaker 2 (13:15):
Why because I can? And they were stupid enough to
let him in.
Speaker 1 (13:18):
And General Flynn was stupid enough to believe that if
the government that you work for, that you've risked your
life for that, you've fought to protect an offendoment a
career out of it.
Speaker 2 (13:28):
As a general, you.
Speaker 1 (13:31):
Shouldn't have to worry about getting an attorney when you're
sitting in the situation room answering questions to the FBI.
Now we know now that you'd never talked to the
FEDS right, we all know that, but there was a
level of trust in sixteen that this was not part
of the swamp, that somehow this was separate. Clearly, we
(13:51):
were all wrong, including Donald Trump, and he kept people
around him because it's hard to even imagine that there's
this let level of nepotism and corruption in places that
you have respect for, like the FBI and the CIA
and the Department of Defense and the Department of Justice.
(14:12):
You think that's where politics should stop at the water's edge.
But what we found out is no that has been
infiltrated by hard core radical extremists who are terrified because
Castrotel has now experienced all this, dealt with them and
understands how deep the rot goes and would understand how
to clean house, which is exactly what you would want
(14:34):
to happen.
Speaker 5 (14:35):
Keep listening, How is this going to get broken up?
It seems so deep. I mean, you just mentioned they're
they're they're embedded in politics, They're embedded in mainstream media,
They're embedded in intelligence agencies. They are former top leadership
of the military that's now embedded within the military industrial
(14:57):
complex companies. I mean, it's how many people are involved
in this thousand deep state thousands. How would you even
begin to dismantle it?
Speaker 3 (15:08):
Well, I think the first Trump administration was the beachhead right.
People were just like, you guys are full of it,
and we continued to put out the truth. And years
later people are catching up to a lot of that truth, saying,
wait a second, you guys weren't lying back then, people
being the American public, that's the weapon we need, And
you guys weren't lying about impeachment. They literally made up
(15:29):
a piece of a phone call to launch a presidential
impeachment and then put me in the middle of it
by making up a meeting that never occurred, but it
sounded dirty at the time. And then when we finally
released the transcript, everybody was like, oh yeah, there was
no quick pro qull nothing illegal happened here, but the.
Speaker 4 (15:50):
Narrative had been out there.
Speaker 3 (15:51):
And now now you have President Trump as a president
who was impeached for the first time in however many years,
And so they get their narratives right. They don't necessarily
care about the conclusory portion of their mission. They use
the mainstream media to say Trump's a Russian asset, He's
been impeached. Cash Mattel is under DOJ surveillance for whatever
(16:14):
investigation when he was never them. I've had more mainstream
media hits on me than I can count. But they
want the title narrative to carry the day. Hunter Biden's
laptop is Russian disinformation.
Speaker 4 (16:29):
They don't care about the actual truth.
Speaker 3 (16:31):
And so once you start stacking these together and you
show the American public you were lied to, you based
your vote at the polls on information that the government
purposely withheld from you so that you would vote a
particular way, well let's.
Speaker 2 (16:47):
Go down that rabbit hole for a second.
Speaker 1 (16:50):
I have no doubt that if the truth would have
been told about the Hunter Biden laptop and the media
would have done their job and not been state sponsored
media a government and would have said the laptop is
real and report on the on the what was in
that laptop instead of suppressing it and silencing it and
making sure that it's not on Facebook, that it's not
(17:11):
on X or Twitter at the time, and that the
story is suppressed and ABCNBC and CBS refused to cover
at CNN, MSNBC refused to cover it.
Speaker 2 (17:19):
I have no doubt that Joe Biden would have lost
in twenty twenty.
Speaker 1 (17:22):
But you had all these former directors the CIA and
the FBI that signed a level letter, fifty plus high
level intel officials, not the high level, the highest level.
Speaker 2 (17:34):
Of intel officials.
Speaker 1 (17:35):
It signed a letter saying this had all the markings
of Russian disinformation and don't believe it. And that gave
the cover for Facebook to ban it, for X, for
Twitter to suppress it and to say we're never going
to allow you guys to talk about this. And the
news network said you couldn't talk about it. I was
at CNN at the time. They said you couldn't talk
about it.
Speaker 2 (17:55):
We weren't. It wasn't allowed to be brought up on air.
Speaker 1 (17:58):
The newspapers didn't report on and the reason why was
simple because they were told that this was quote, Russian
disinformation by the federal government at the highest levels, and
they were lying to you, and it altered and changed
an election.
Speaker 2 (18:13):
Do you want to know what a coup is? That's
a coup. This is what we.
Speaker 1 (18:17):
Do, by the way our country is done throughout history
in third world countries. This is what Russia does, Cuba
does in Venezuela does. Let me also just I want
to hit pause on everything I just said, And I
want you to ask yourself this question. If Cashpatel is
such a threat to this country was under investigation, as
(18:38):
the media saying, and that he is such a danger
to our safety and security, do you think the National
Police Association would come out and strongly endorse someone that
they actually believe is a bad guy. And the reason
why I say that is because right now the National
Police Association has just endorsed Cashel does serve as the
(19:00):
FBI director in president like Donald Trump's incoming administration, citing
his extensive career in national security, law enforcement, and public service.
The reason why they're slandering this guy, to say, is
the same reason why they weaponized the government to try
to go after him, is because he was somebody that
was telling truth to power when they when the federal
(19:24):
government turned when the deep state turned on Patel. This
is a guy that was a former chief of staff
to the Department of Defense and they were They turned
on him then because they didn't like that he wouldn't
do what they wanted him to do, which was to
start wars and spend money. He was a deputy director
of the National of National Intelligence. But he wouldn't start wars,
or advocate for wars, or get into wars, or help
(19:46):
other countries get into wars. He was deputy assistant to
then President Trump. Well, that's another reason why they wanted
to investigate. They wanted to they wanted to end his career.
They wanted to put him in in jail. There's this
is no different than what happened to General Flynn. And
that's exactly why the National Police Association is strongly not
just endorsing, but strongly endorsing Cashptel. He has seen what
(20:09):
they do to people. He's one of them. He understands
just how dangerous these people are. Keep listening to what
he says the second part of his story.
Speaker 3 (20:19):
Once you show enough Americans that, then I think you
have the movement that you need behind the leadership that
we have in Donald Trump. Is my position to take
a wrecking ball to the deep state. How so you
go to DC and you remove all these positions, right,
and you start enacting measures not of retribution but of
(20:40):
legal consequence.
Speaker 4 (20:41):
Y'all acted one way.
Speaker 3 (20:42):
For instance, the people that signed the fifty one Intel
letter right permanently suspend their security clearances forever. Every one
of those guys lie. Every one of those guys got
caught lying. You're talking about two former CIA directors, a
former NSA director, and a former Secretary of Defense, all
intentionally to this day continue to lie and won't take
back their letter. Okay, you can stop making money from
(21:04):
your security clearance.
Speaker 4 (21:05):
There's a start.
Speaker 3 (21:07):
Then you go in and you get the Eric Charmel's
of the world, who've been publicly outed as utilizing intel
to inject a political narrative across mainstream America, and you
remove these people from government. You have to go in there.
The same thing we're talking about the voting, it's the
same thing here. You got to cleanse the scrolls. Government
(21:27):
service is a service. We're not making you do it,
and if you break the rules and regulations, you're out.
Speaker 4 (21:33):
So that's a big part of it. Right.
Speaker 3 (21:35):
Then you bring in the new bench, the new team.
Then you're going to have to keep fighting the media.
And I think we're slowly, over the years, have starting
to win that fight because the more and more of
someone thing I learned when I started to restigating my
name was outed for the first time, that the media
is attacking you. The more you're over the target who
(21:57):
is at the head of it. I don't think there's
one person or one group. I think it's people who
know they're going to benefit from each other if they
sign up for the program. Let's call it right and
so again not a Republican or democratic. In the glossary
(22:18):
of this book, in alphabetical order, I think there's like
sixty five people I name by title and name, just
to show people.
Speaker 2 (22:25):
How excited by the way.
Speaker 1 (22:27):
You know, he just said, I give by title and name,
sixty five different people. Now that is where this quote
enemies list has come from. This is what the media
will not tell you. Cashpertel just said, Look in the book,
I tell you I got sixty five people in order.
In the book did he say it was an enemy's list?
(22:51):
Do you say wanted to lock up sixty five different people?
Speaker 6 (22:53):
No?
Speaker 1 (22:54):
Do you hear anybody in the media playing for you
what I just played for you. He wrote a book,
He talked about who the abusers were. He explained to
you what they had done, the laws they had broken,
the abuse of power in spying on Americans. And then
he's like, yeah, there's sixty five different names. You can
go read it in the book. Because this is when
(23:16):
he was promoting his book, and they're like, now to me,
He's like, well, Caspittel has an enemy's list. No, he doesn't.
He has eight list of people that were bad actors.
He has a list of people that abuse their power.
That's not an enemy's list. That's exposing people. And by
the way, he's absolutely right. These people that lie to you,
they deserve to lose their security clearances, which means that
(23:37):
it shuts off their money because that's how they make
their money is off of having their security clearances when
they leave government. I want you to listen very carefully
to how he explains he's sixty five people. I'm going
to back it up like ten seconds just to make
sure you get full in context here of what he's saying.
Speaker 3 (23:54):
Listen, Republican or Democratic in the glossary of this book
in alphabetical order. I think there's like sixty five people
I name by title and name, just to show people
how expansive the deep state is. And so there is
no like one shain of command they report to. Instead,
what I believe they do is they bring in people
that they can control. The Obama still have heavy sway
(24:16):
in that entire operation, and so do people that have
been around for ten twenty thirty years in Washington.
Speaker 5 (24:24):
I mean, I think it's already out there for them.
I mean, how corrupt it is. I mean, that's why
I think that's why podcasts are doing so well right now.
And I mean, somebody just came in here in media
and said that CNN's viewership is only about fifty thousand
at any particular point in time during the day.
Speaker 4 (24:45):
That's pretty bad. It's pretty bad. It's atrocious.
Speaker 3 (24:49):
And I'll give you an example from sort of the
other end of the spectrum, when Tucker was on Fox.
And this is not an attack on the reporting, it's
just the it's just the way the pendulum has swung
away from mainstream media in general. When Tucker was on
Fox and he was at the peak of his show's viewership,
(25:10):
he was still one third less than Bill O'Reilly when
Bill O'Reilly.
Speaker 4 (25:14):
Was on Fox in terms of viewership. Wow.
Speaker 3 (25:17):
So it had already started. And it's again, not because
of the reporting. I think it's because other people started
to say, I don't want to watch mainstream media anymore anywhere,
and the shows, the podcasts, the radios, the series started
becoming more and more and more and more popular.
Speaker 1 (25:36):
He's right, by the way, this is how Donald Trump
won because there are so many people that are doing
and going around the media. The media is not getting
to control everything any longer. The media is actually having
to deal with the fact that they've lost influence. And
I think this last election is great proof of that.
(25:57):
If it wasn't for podcasts, I don't think Donald Trump
would have won.
Speaker 2 (26:01):
I really don't.
Speaker 1 (26:03):
This story I just told you is not being sold
told to anyone if it isn't for podcasts. You listen
to what I just played for you. He doesn't have
an enemy's list. He had a list of sixty five
different people in alphabetical order in his book of people
(26:23):
in our government that were abusing their power.
Speaker 2 (26:26):
And what did the media do with that list? They're
like breaking news.
Speaker 1 (26:30):
Cash Patel has an enemy's list from Donald Trump, sixty
five plus long. And Donald Trump is what's going to
happen now, is they're going to come in and blow
up our government. Sounds scary, right, Orange Man bad, Cash
Patel bad, Deep State good, Donald Trump evil. Donald Trump
(26:53):
is the bad one. Donald Trump is the evil one.
Donald Trump's the one that you cannot trust.
Speaker 2 (27:01):
I'm going to go back to what I said earlier.
I'm going to say it again.
Speaker 1 (27:04):
This is when you need to be calling your senators
and you need to be telling them that they better
do their damn job. This is when you call your
senator and you say to your senator, hey, guess what,
you better vote the right way, because if you don't
vote the right way, then what I'm going to do
is I'm going to make sure that I do everything
(27:24):
I can that you lose your job, that there is
a countability, that there is a countability for the way
that you vote. I go back to what I said
earlier on that list I gave you earlier, and I
went through all the Republicans that voted for my orcis,
that voted for radicals on the left and confirm them.
(27:50):
Let's just call it what it is. They actually confirmed them. Okay,
they confirmed them. We're talking about Levine, a dude dressed
like a chick that's got a high level job in
our government. A guy that was dressed like a chick
at the White House, for example. They didn't protest the
same dude that was stealing women's clothes and luggage at airports.
(28:11):
Remember that guy who's in charge of like nuclear waste.
These are the same Republicans that had no problem confirming
Merrick Garland, but now they're like, oh, I don't know
if I can vote for somebody like Cashpittel or somebody
like Pete Edseth. If you don't remind them of what
you just voted for and you don't call them, I'm
(28:33):
gonna tell you this, they will be successful.
Speaker 2 (28:36):
They will end up getting rid of some great people.
Speaker 1 (28:40):
And now's the time you pick up the phone and
you email, and you go on social media, and you
share the info I gave you and this show, share
the podcast so that people know what they're actually doing
and why they hate them so much. Because if they
understand Cash's story, I think the majority of the American
people love him that much more. Let me give you
(29:01):
just another story that ties into all of this. And
you may have seen this, like underreported story from a
couple days ago, China spy campaign nabs US mobile phone
users data. There should be outrage, there's not because the
media is not wanting to cover this story. They just
(29:21):
tell you about it once and kind of move on
from that, like, oh, nothing to see here, you go,
It's just normal like we get somebody else got hacked, right,
Like there's just another hacking and you should just kind
of assume that they know everything about everything about your life.
Really well, you want to know how they spun the story.
They spun it into somehow a Cash Patel story that
you can't have cashpatl and others because they've been hacked
(29:44):
and quote now they're compromise. Let me give you a
headline ABC News Cashpatel, Trump's pick to lead the FBI
hit with Iranian cyber attack. Sources say, now they don't
want to talk about the Chinese espionage here, as US
officials suspected a recently just covered Chinese hacking and espionage
campaign quote scooped up data one hundred of thousands of
(30:05):
American mobile phone users, likely stealing information about more than
one million customers. ABC News has learned, Okay, is there
a chance that one of those million could be an
elected official to Democrat? Because if that's the case, then
you should be running stories that there are Democrats that
are now compromised by China.
Speaker 2 (30:24):
But they're not gonna do that. No, Instead, they're gonna.
Speaker 1 (30:27):
Say, look over here, we've got a problem with Cashperttel
because Cashpttel is a guy that has been picklid the FBI.
He's been hit with the Iranian saber attacking, so therefore
they may have info on him, and so he can't
have the job. Are you kidding me? Listen to this
from ABC news, Good Morning America.
Speaker 6 (30:44):
Latest now in the Chinese hacking and espionage campaign the
targeted mobile phone users. ABC News has learned that information
about more than one million customers was likely stolen. Chief
just course wind to Pere Thomas's in watching with the
exclusive details.
Speaker 4 (30:56):
Good Winning, Pierre George, Good Morning.
Speaker 7 (30:58):
ABC News has learned that the US officials suspected a
sweeping Chinese hacking and espionage campaign scooped up data on
hundreds of thousands of US mobile phone users, possibly stealing
information of more than one million customers. Sources familiar with
the investigation for the first time, giving us a sense
of the vast scope of what US officials are calling
a major intelligence gathering operation by the People's Republic of
(31:22):
China exploding weaknesses in the networks of the nation's top
telecommunications companies like AT and T and Verizon. The PRC
initially appeared to have focused on a huge swap of
mobile phone users, many living in and around the nation's capital.
FBI and Homeland security officials brief reporters Tuesday that the
large amount of stolen data included who the phone users
(31:42):
were talking to, when they spoke, and where they were
communicating from. The brief was declined to provide specific numbers,
but ABC News was able to get a sense of
the scale of victims through various sources. Once the hackers
had infiltrated mobile phone networks, they then zeroed in on
a smaller group of high profile targets. It's secretly gaining
access to their audio recordings and text messages. Some of
(32:04):
those targeted included top of officials in the Biden administration.
Speaker 4 (32:08):
The hackers had clear.
Speaker 7 (32:09):
Goals, source of telling ABC News they had their sites
on at least one Cabinet secretary and a top White
House homeland security advisor.
Speaker 4 (32:16):
Is our operation still going on?
Speaker 7 (32:19):
Officials admit that they cannot say with certainly that China's
hackers have been fully kicked out of these telecommunications networks,
and they acknowledge that they're still trying to understand the
scope of this activity. And George, we're also learning in
a separate case Iranian hackers have targeted Cashpatel, President Alex
Trump's nominee for FBI director.
Speaker 2 (32:37):
Well, isn't that interesting At the very end there how
they're like.
Speaker 1 (32:39):
Hey, we'll name Cash Paatel as Trump's pic to lead
the FBI, but we won't name any of the cabinet secretaries,
which I'm sure they know their names who were targeted
by China. By the way, I'm going to go out
on a limb here and say, who do I think
is going to be more successful at hacking. It's probably
going to be China going after the Biden administration officials,
(33:02):
then Iran going after quote Cash Pattel. But why are
they telling you this story and using Patel's name because
they want to give another reason why, Well, he might
be compromised. Now, maybe this FBI director nominee, Cashpatel that
was hit to be hit with what is believed to
be a cyber attack from Iran, according to quote two
sources familiar with the situation.
Speaker 2 (33:23):
So therefore, you shouldn't vote for the guy.
Speaker 1 (33:24):
The guy shouldn't get confirmed because he could be compromised
because they may have information on him.
Speaker 2 (33:30):
And that's just not that we can't take that risk.
We got to move on.
Speaker 1 (33:33):
We'll also tell you in the same story that a
million people, including high level people with the White House
and the Democratic Party, had been targeted and surveyed and
maybe even been listened to, and their text messages read
that are in our government right now.
Speaker 2 (33:49):
But we won't tell you those names.
Speaker 1 (33:51):
Oh no, no, no, no, no, no, no, absolutely not, we
will not do that. You understand the bias here. You
understand just how corrupt these We don't have a media anymore.
The audio I just played for you is proof that
we don't have a media any longer, because the real
headline should have been Biden administration officials, including cabinet secretaries
(34:13):
were attacked by Chinese spies in an active espionage. By
the way, have they come out at the White House
and announces have they kicked out anybody from China?
Speaker 2 (34:23):
Have they seized any assets yet? Have they done anything?
Not a damn thing.
Speaker 1 (34:28):
They then say, hey, they got data on It could
be many of you listening to me right now.
Speaker 2 (34:32):
Hell, it could be me. I don't know, But that's
not what they want to tell you about.
Speaker 1 (34:36):
They want you to think, Oh, but Cashptel may have
gotten hacked with some real info from China, and so
therefore that is what you need to know about, and
that should be the issue that you understand is where
your concern should be. Nothing right now is as it seems.
I'm just gonna say it again. Nothing right now is
(34:58):
what you want. They want you to believe. It is
not real. Make sure you share this podcast with your
family and your friends, please, and I'll see you back
here tomorrow
Host
Ben Ferguson
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!