December 13, 2024 • 28 mins
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
We've got major news that includes Joe Biden granting a
record thirty nine presidential pardons, and then on top of that,
he commutes one thousand, five hundred sentences. If you want
to know why the Biden crime family should be investigated,
(00:24):
I'm going to tell you the reasons in a moment.
Because people on this list include Chinese spies and how
much money came into the Biden crime family from China.
The list might be the most disgusting list I have
ever seen. Now this is not involving directly his family
members yet, and more pardons are expecting to come forward,
(00:46):
but I'm going to have that for you in a second.
But there's also another story that I want to put
on your radar screen as well, and that is the.
Speaker 2 (00:53):
Department of Justice has officially.
Speaker 1 (00:55):
Admitted and I hope every one of you will share
the podcasts of this show because this needs to be
known by.
Speaker 2 (01:04):
Everyone in the country.
Speaker 1 (01:06):
The Department of Justice has now officially and revealed that
there were, in fact a number of FBI confidential sources
on the ground during January the sixth. This is the
first time they have actually admitted to it that yes,
(01:27):
we did the highly anticipated report said. There were more
than two dozen confidential human sources in the crowd on
January the sixth of twenty twenty one, they said, quote,
but only three were assigned by the FBI to be present. Now,
I'm going to explain more of the details on that
coming up after we deal with the presidential pardons. Now,
(01:51):
this is the part that I want you to understand
about these presidential pardons is many of these seem to
be nothing more than payback, saying thank you to some
of the most corrupt people in the world who have
friends that have been convicted of crimes in the United
States of America. The days are counting down until US
(02:13):
President Joe Biden exit.
Speaker 2 (02:14):
The White House.
Speaker 1 (02:15):
Before he goes, he is doing some major housekeeping. When
he delivered these presidential pardons to thirty nine Americans convicted
of what the White House described as non violent crimes,
and then commuting the sentences of nearly one five hundred
other people in the largest single day of clemency in
(02:38):
modern history. The White House has not given the names
of people involved in the mass commutations. The Associated Press
is reporting. Now, let's be clear. The US Constitution decrees
a present has the quote broad power to grant reprieves
and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in
(02:58):
cases of impeachment. Now, earlier this month, Biden issued that
obviously not shocking but extremely controversial mass pardon to his
son Hunter Biden, and now it looks like he's moving
on to even bigger pardons. What's the most shocking thing
about this list, and the part that makes me extremely
(03:21):
angry is the White House says that these individuals and
they had convictions of a quote non violent set of crimes.
So they're trying to tell you that this isn't a
big deal. Well, you want to know who's on the list.
They included Chinese spies and even an individual convicted of
(03:44):
possessing child pornography, which the White House is now describing
as well, we're just giving out this to individuals convicted
of quote unquote nonviolent crimes. Child pornography is a violent
crime against children. Being a spy, a Chinese spy, where
(04:05):
you're either taking out humans marking them. Maybe people are
dying in your country, maybe people are dying in this country,
this level of espionage. Saying it's a non violent individual,
give me a break. This might be the worst I've
(04:27):
ever seen of just how corrupt the Biden crime family is,
where they're having to now pay off basically people that
gave them millions of dollars hooking them up with these
types of pardons. Now, before I tell you specifically the
names about these people and what their offenses were and
how they got these pardons, I want to tell you
(04:47):
real quick about my friends over at Patriot Mobile. If
you are sick and tired of having your money go
to companies that actually are fighting against your conservative Christian values.
Speaker 2 (04:56):
While in the cell phone industry, they're one of the worst.
Speaker 1 (04:59):
The big mobile providers out there give big donations to
democratic causes, candidates and organizations. And that is exactly why
I want you to switch to Patriot Mobile like I've
done in twenty twenty four. It's so easy to switch,
and when you do, you're going to be making a
difference every time you pay your bill, every time you
make a phone call, every time you send a text.
(05:20):
Because of Patriot Mobile, they actually give about five percent
of your bill back to conservative causes, candidates and organizations.
It is incredible what they do. Every time you pay
your bill. You also are fighting for the rights of
unborn children. When you're with Patriot Mobile, because they give
money to those organizations. They are making sure that your
(05:43):
dollars are spent to support everything that we believe in. Now,
Big Mobile they're fighting against you. They give big donations
to the hardcore liberal causes and candidates, including organizations to
pay for abortions on demand. I don't want my money
going there, and that's why I switch to Patriot Mobile.
Speaker 2 (05:58):
Now.
Speaker 1 (05:58):
I want to give you a free month of service
and you're also gonna get their coverage guarantee. They are
not worried about coverage because in twenty twenty four, everybody
now is using the same networks in the same towers.
You'll get the same coverage you have now without the
radical left agenda that you would be funding with Big Mobile.
Speaker 2 (06:14):
So check out Patriot Mobile.
Speaker 1 (06:16):
Go online to Patriot Mobile dot com slash ferguson. That's
Patriotmobile dot com slash ferguson. Or you can call them
nine to seven to two Patriot that's nine to seven
two Patriot nine seven to two Patriot or Patriot Mobile
dot com slash ferguson. You'll get one month of free service.
(06:37):
All right, So let me tell you about a couple
of the different people that were pardoned. Because this information
we now know for a fact, and I want you
to understand just how evil Joe Biden is and just
how compromise he has been as president, and how compromised
his family has been. Let me tell you first about
(06:58):
a guy by the name of jan John Jue. This
is an individual in the Southern District of Ohio that
has been convicted on November sixteenth of twenty twenty two.
Speaker 2 (07:12):
Look at the.
Speaker 1 (07:13):
Time right now, this was just a couple of years ago.
He was in prison for two hundred and forty months.
Do you know how long two hundred and forty months is.
It's a long time. It is twenty years. So this
guy went to jail for twenty years. What did he do?
(07:36):
Here is his offense on the official Whiteouse dot gov website.
Conspiracy to commit espionage, economic espionage, conspiracy to commit trade
secret theft, Attempted economic espionage by theft or fraud, attempted
theft of trade secrets by taking or deception. This individual
(08:02):
clearly with direct ties to China.
Speaker 2 (08:04):
He is a Chinese spy.
Speaker 1 (08:07):
And it was so clear that he was a Chinese
spy that they decided that he was such a threat
to this country for what he was doing that they
put him in jail for twenty years. That is who
Joe Biden just set free with the stroke of his pen. Now,
the question you have to ask yourself is how important
(08:28):
was this person the Chinese Communist government or to those
that were paying Joe Biden and the Biden crime family.
This isn't some random guy that you would pardon out
of nowhere. This is a guy that in twenty twenty
two in the Southern district of Ohio where we spent
I'm sure millions of tax dollars, following gaining evidence, then
(08:52):
finally arresting, then trying, and then putting.
Speaker 2 (08:55):
In jail for twenty years.
Speaker 1 (08:58):
And Joe Biden said, I don't know, and I'm still
trying to figure out the connection. We know it's a
Chinese spy. We know that the Biden crime family's been
taking tens of millions of dollars from China. But somebody said,
sign your name on a piece of paper and let
this guy come home to China because he was working
(09:18):
for the Chinese government. When you are a spy from China,
the chances that you are a non violent individual or
have people involved in around you that aren't involved in
violence is about zero percent. And the White House wants
you to believe that a guy that was put into
jail for twenty years, that's how much of a threat
(09:39):
to this country he was was somehow this is a
nonviolent person, so therefore it's not a threat to you.
Speaker 2 (09:45):
Are you kidding? Now?
Speaker 1 (09:46):
I'm going to tell you more about this person in
a moment, but I want to move on to someone
else that was also pardoned, and I want you to
I go back to what I said, follow the money.
This was not in the Southern District of Ohio. The
next case I'm going to tell you about this was
in the Northern District of Illinois.
Speaker 2 (10:03):
A guy by the name of g Chai Chong.
Speaker 1 (10:07):
Ninety six months imprisonment.
Speaker 2 (10:10):
When did he go into prison?
Speaker 1 (10:11):
You ready for the state January the twenty fifth of
twenty twenty three. Just went into jail about a year ago.
A little over a year ago. This guy was going
to jail g for eight years. What was he convicted
of and why the hell would it be in the
(10:31):
interest of the President of the United States America to
pardon him? Here are the charges conspiracy to defraud the
United States seems pretty serious. Impersonating agents of foreign governments
seems pretty serious. Statements or entries generally that deal with espionage.
(10:53):
This is another individual, another individual that Joe Biden clearly
somebody in China's said, make this happen.
Speaker 2 (11:01):
Let's do it.
Speaker 1 (11:03):
It gets even worse. There's another guy by the name
of shan Lyn Jen. This is a case out of
the Eastern District of Texas. Now this gets even more
complicated because apparently this was actually a part of a
prison swap with China. So this is part of Again
(11:23):
the this is complicated, and I think it was made
complicated so you and I wouldn't know about this. So
from what I'm being told now, this is not technically
a part of this the part in comeancy handed out
by Biden on Thursday. This happened in November, and we're
now just finding out about it. All right, So let
me explain this to you. Shanling Jen, who was not
(11:49):
included in Biden's latest comeancy roundup, had pled guilty and
possession of child porn after forty seven thousand images child
pornography were found in his computer and was included in
a quote November prisoner swap to go back to China.
(12:11):
So some of what we're now seeing, and I'm also
being told now that some of these these other two
individuals may have technically been a part of this quote
prisoner swap to give Joe Biden cover that we're now
just now finding out about who they are and what
they actually did. So to recap and again, this is
(12:33):
why I love doing this, because this is bring news.
You have all these people that have been given clemency
and all these people that they say are nonviolent, and
then we find out, oh and by the way, there
were some spies that we, you know, let out, and
we did it in the name of a quote prisoner swap.
It doesn't change the premise of their crimes. It doesn't
(12:54):
change what I said to you earlier. What it does
mean is that President Joe Biden decided today to use
this moment moment just to reiterate and again, this is
breaking as I'm talking and as I'm recording this, that
he's like, Hey, here's a bunch of people I'm gonna
give clemency too.
Speaker 2 (13:08):
Here's a bunch of people I'm going to pardon, and oh,
By the way, we.
Speaker 1 (13:11):
Also had a shadiest hell deal we did to get
some prisoners out of China, and I gave them back
some of their worst people that were committing espionage in
the United States of America and some of them that
had a bunch of child pornography on them, that were
also you know, abusing children. But don't worry, well, I'm
going to go out there and say they're all non violent.
This sweeping act of abusive power. Joe Biden would just say, oh,
(13:35):
it's clemency. It's just clemency. It's not a big deal.
This is an individual that has been bought and paid
for by the highest bidder, and now he is handing
out favors to the worst people among us. The White
House announcing the one thousand, five hundred individuals convicted of quote,
nonviolent crimes would be gramming clemency a reduction of a
criminal penalty, is how the White House described it. Many
(13:57):
of the individuals on the list were convicted of drug
possession or distribution charges that were not associated.
Speaker 2 (14:03):
With violence in any way.
Speaker 1 (14:05):
So again here's where I disagree with the premise of this,
and I want to make it clear, Whine, what you
have And what is being said now is that if
you are a drug dealer and we didn't actually catch
you like popping a cap in somebody, we consider you
to be nonviolent. Okay, what if your drugs killed somebody?
(14:28):
What if your drugs were laced with fetanyl? What if
you were selling fetanyl? What if people overdose? Is that
not a violent crime? Now they lost track of your
drugs and who may have died at the hands of
your drugs? But we know you're a drug dealer. In
the white I was like, no, no, no, that's non violent.
There's no violence there. Can we also just for a second,
(14:49):
backup and talk about the violence is involved in drug trade.
How many people die every year from drug deals gone bad?
How many people die every year at the hands of
violence around turf wars, around drugs. How many people die
in Mexico or around the world that are involved in
the drug trade and the cartels. How many people that
(15:12):
he has just said are nonviolent are actually involved in
some of the worst violence. You know, there's beheadings that
are involved in the drug trade. There is torture involved
in the drug trade. There is executions involved in the
drug trade. There is the dismembering of bodies involved in
the drug trade. There is dragging of people behind cars
(15:35):
until they die in the drug trade. You ever watched Narcos.
If you've never watched it, go watch it. The entire
series about the cartels is solely based around influencing but
through violence. And they say the White House, like, wow,
there's nothing violent about these people.
Speaker 2 (15:57):
They were just drug dealers.
Speaker 1 (16:00):
Many of the individuals on the lists we're convicted of
drug possession or distribution charges. They were not associated with
violence in any way. The massive clemency action, tout as
the most ever in a single day, comes on the
heels of the pardon Biden provided to a son.
Speaker 2 (16:12):
Hunter Biden earlier in the week.
Speaker 1 (16:14):
Members of the Progressive Squad pushed the present to quote
act and House Republicans say, that's why it's not a
good look for Biden.
Speaker 2 (16:23):
He doesn't care. He doesn't care at all.
Speaker 1 (16:26):
Joe Biden is cranting the largest act of clemency ever
while giving his son Hunter his own pardon on a
separate day.
Speaker 2 (16:34):
That's what this is all about.
Speaker 1 (16:36):
And who's he giving out these favors to people that
clearly had connections to him? And I would argue there's
a very good chances because the Biden crime family activities
and by the way, they're not done. Not only they
lie about Hunter Biden. I just want to be clear
about that, like, they're not done. Hunter Biden's the tip
(16:59):
of the ice.
Speaker 2 (17:00):
Folks.
Speaker 1 (17:01):
We are being told there's a lot more that's coming
for Biden crime family members.
Speaker 2 (17:06):
We're being told.
Speaker 1 (17:07):
That there is significant number of individuals that are in
around the Biden crime family that are going to get
pardons next. So what you do is you normalize pardons
by giving out so many of them. This is the
same White House right now that can't explain and I
this is what they're focused on right now instead of
national security issues. Have any of you seen like this,
(17:29):
the mystery drones that are happening right now over New
Jersey and we have no idea where they're from the
White House saying it's not the US military and they
don't think it's Ford and controlled. So we've just got
random drones flying around New Jersey over sensitive sites and
we don't know who they are and we're not shooting
them down. Sounds like the Chinese by balloon, right. Well,
(17:51):
if you're China and you got a payday coming from
the Biden crime family. Fly balloon and make sure you
don't shoot it down until after it leaves. All the
areas that's hovering around, that's trying to get intel. That
is exactly what has happened here. It is disgusting, and this,
I have a feeling is actually the beginning, not the
end of this. Now, look, I want to get to
this other important issue that I mentioned at the beginning,
(18:14):
and that is, for the first time, the Department of
Justice is having to admit that there were twenty six
FBI informants that were present on January the sixth. Now
they say the FBI only directed three confidential human sources
(18:36):
to attend the events of January the sixth, twenty twenty one.
Speaker 2 (18:39):
That is what they are now claiming.
Speaker 1 (18:42):
This is I really have to go back to this
and talk about how shocking this is. But what we
are hearing right now is that this is the report
from the Department of Justice Inspector General, who is being
forced to answer questions about whether there were federal confidential
humans in the January sixth crowd, and this is what
(19:03):
they have found out. This came from Fox News from
Brett Baer, Take a listen.
Speaker 3 (19:08):
High ranking officer in the Justice Department is suggesting something
some Trump supporters have been saying for years, that there
was more to the twenty twenty one Capital riot the
security around it than we have been told. Republican accusations
that the Biden Harris administration has weaponized the federal government.
With the subject of a House subcommittee hearing today and
One Question and Answer is now getting a lot of scrutiny.
(19:32):
Senior Congressional correspondent Chad Program shows us what happened live
from Capitol Hill. Get even Jed.
Speaker 4 (19:38):
Brett Good Evening, DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz did not
deny an assertion from Republican Thomas Massey that there may
have been federal confidential sources in the crowd at the
Capitol riot. This is the closest any DOJ official has
come to confirming the allegation.
Speaker 5 (19:57):
Do you have evidence of the number of confidential human
sources that were operating on the Capital grounds on January sixth?
Speaker 2 (20:05):
Our report will include the information in that regard.
Speaker 5 (20:09):
Can you tell us today how many there were? Were
there more than one hundred.
Speaker 2 (20:13):
I'm not in a position to say that.
Speaker 4 (20:16):
As he left the hearing of Horowitz ignored a follow
up about potential Feds in the crowd at the Capitol.
Speaker 5 (20:22):
Mister Horowitz, is impossible that confidence of human sources made
things worse on January sixth.
Speaker 4 (20:32):
Democrats dismissed suggestions the Feds may have been secretly at
the Capitol on January sixth.
Speaker 3 (20:38):
As far as I know, there's no evidence of that,
no evidence of federal informants.
Speaker 2 (20:43):
Why would they be federal.
Speaker 3 (20:44):
Informants in Trump's crowd when Trump was trying to overturn
the election and committing grievous crimes in doing so.
Speaker 4 (20:54):
The House panel investigating Weaponization of Government probe claims that
the FBI retaliated again Conservatives and its ranks their allegations
that the FBI punished whistleblower Marcus Allen, who raised questions
about January sixth, calling him a quote insider threat.
Speaker 5 (21:11):
The FBI accused me of promoting conspiratorial views and unreliable information.
Speaker 2 (21:16):
The FBI questioned my allegiance to the United States.
Speaker 4 (21:19):
Horowitz signaled his report about the riot will come out
between the election and inauguration. House Speaker Mike Johnson called
information about the fed's quote alarming, he wants classified briefings.
Speaker 1 (21:32):
There were so many people that were screaming about this,
and of course, because the Biden and the DOJ and
the FBI had to save their own a blesses, they
couldn't admit until Joe.
Speaker 2 (21:44):
Biden and then Kamala Harris lost that.
Speaker 1 (21:48):
All right, we'll give you what you all knew was real,
which yes, there was in fact more than two dozen
confidence of human sources in the crowd on January the
sixth the Capitol, and yes, three of them were assigned
by the FBI to be present at the event, something
that they'd lied about for a long time. Stressing that
none of the sources sources was authorized or directed by
(22:10):
the bureau to quote break the law quote unquote. That's
a very interesting way of putting that. Hey, we think
people broke the law right in and around them to
break the law or encourage others to commit illegal acts.
Horowitz also released this report on the FPI's handling of
its confidential human sources and intelligence collection efforts in the
(22:33):
lead up to the January sixth election certification.
Speaker 2 (22:37):
Quote.
Speaker 1 (22:38):
Today's report also details our fundings regarding FBI confidential human
sources who were in Washington, DC on January sixth. The
report states are review determined that none of these FI
confidential human sources was authorized by the FBI. Notice the
word authorized, Okay, well, was it off the record? Like, Hey,
guys go in there and get people riled up and
(22:58):
try to get them to store in the Capitol and
then we can arrest a bunch of them and blame
it all on Trump.
Speaker 2 (23:02):
But hey, that's off the record.
Speaker 1 (23:04):
I mean, I doubt they put it in writing, because
if something's authorized, I'm assuming it's in writing. I doubt
someone's gonna be stupid enough to put in writing, like
in actual writing what he just said there. Like, I really, really,
really really doubt it. I doubt that the FBI director
in that moment or some of the FBI's like put
it in writing that we're authorizing FBI agents to actually
(23:26):
break the law.
Speaker 2 (23:28):
Okay, Like they're not stupid, They're not gonna do that. Now.
Speaker 1 (23:32):
The report reveals that the FBI had a minor supporting
role is what they're calling it, minor supporting role and
respond to January six largely because the event was not
deemed the highest security level by the Department of Home insecurity.
By the way, that is such a smoke screen and
it doesn't matter, Okay, Like that's that's another way, like, oh,
we really weren't involved. Well, if you're undercover and you're
(23:54):
putting confidential human sources in the crowd in and before
January the six to infiltrate the crowd and maybe get
the crowd fired up to maybe go in to commit crimes,
They're like, well, they weren't authorized to do that.
Speaker 2 (24:07):
Okay.
Speaker 1 (24:08):
Then the question I have now is since and again
I'm not a lawyer, but I've been around a hell
of a lot of lawyers in politics, and I know
how they say things when they're trying to cover their
a dobles or when they're trying to not answer the question.
Speaker 2 (24:19):
So here's my question. I want somebody in Congress.
Speaker 1 (24:22):
To ask, were they told not to instigate and not
to agitate? Did you direct them to just only observe
or did you direct them to get involved? And they're like, well,
we didn't tell them to get violent. Did you tell
them to not get violent? Did you tell them the
(24:42):
rules of engagement? Like that's the question I want to know,
and that they said, well, we didn't authorize them to
break the law. Right, we didn't authorize them to break
the law or to do illegal acts. Right, So okay,
you didn't authorize them, but did you tell them they
(25:04):
couldn't do it?
Speaker 2 (25:05):
Because I go back to the statement.
Speaker 1 (25:07):
Our review determines that none of these FBI confident of
human sources was authorized by the FAID and their capital. Okay, Well,
then my question is did they enter the capitol? And
if they did, why didn't you charge them with insurrection?
Did they not get charged with insurrection because they could
probably have the goods.
Speaker 2 (25:28):
On you guys? Is that it? I mean, that's a
question that they should ask. Quote.
Speaker 1 (25:33):
Our review determined that none of these FBI confident of
human sources was authorized by the FBID and end of
the capitol. Well, how many of them did? I'm gonna
bet all of them did. I'm gonna go out and
a limb and say all of them went? So why
were they not held accountable if they were disobeying the
orders of the FBI they also then write this or
(25:54):
a restricted area or to otherwise break the law? Okay,
how many of them broke the law, but you didn't
charge them with crimes because they were your human sources.
How many of them did break into the capitol, How
many of them did go into restricted areas?
Speaker 2 (26:09):
How many of your confidential human sources.
Speaker 1 (26:11):
We know none of them were charge of crimes, but
how many of them actually did in fact commit crimes
and you guys covered their ass That's the question that
should be asked now by Congress. And then when they
say we had a minor role, Dude, we've got that
one guy on video.
Speaker 2 (26:30):
That is inspiring a.
Speaker 1 (26:32):
Lot of people to break the law, break down the barriers,
chanting and encouraging. It only takes one coach of a
team to make it. To have a success or a victory.
You don't have to have fifty of you. You're gonna
have one that's in the group going let's get in there. Oh,
let's get in there. And then they'll be like, yeah,
let's get in there. And we saw it happen on tape.
(26:53):
According to report, there were a total of twenty six
confidential human sources in the crowd that day. And then
they use this but only three of them were signed
by the bureau to be there. Okay, well, then who
who assigned the others? Were they working off the books
that day? Because I doubt a bunch of confidence human
sources just randomly are like, Hey, let's go rogue on
(27:15):
January the sixth and go up in there and start
problems and start trouble. Somebody told them, Hey, wink wink,
nod nod, we need you to be involved in this.
One of the three confidential human sources tasked by the
FBI to attend the rally enter the Capitol building. Oh well,
that's interesting information. Well, the other two entered the restricted
areas around the Capitol. So you're telling me that basically
(27:37):
all three of the FBI human sources that you're admitting
you put there on purpose broke.
Speaker 2 (27:43):
The law that day.
Speaker 1 (27:45):
If a confidential human source is directed to be at
a certain event, they are paid by the FBI for
their time. So did we pay? Did the FBI pay
for insurrectionists to commit insurrection? Another question I one answered.
I'm not gonna let this one go. I can promise
you that we're gonna keep covering it. I'm gonna keep
(28:08):
telling you what happens. Make sure you share this podcast
with your family and your friends. I'll see you back
here tomorrow.
We've got major news that includes Joe Biden granting a
record thirty nine presidential pardons, and then on top of that,
he commutes one thousand, five hundred sentences. If you want
to know why the Biden crime family should be investigated,
(00:24):
I'm going to tell you the reasons in a moment.
Because people on this list include Chinese spies and how
much money came into the Biden crime family from China.
The list might be the most disgusting list I have
ever seen. Now this is not involving directly his family
members yet, and more pardons are expecting to come forward,
(00:46):
but I'm going to have that for you in a second.
But there's also another story that I want to put
on your radar screen as well, and that is the.
Speaker 2 (00:53):
Department of Justice has officially.
Speaker 1 (00:55):
Admitted and I hope every one of you will share
the podcasts of this show because this needs to be
known by.
Speaker 2 (01:04):
Everyone in the country.
Speaker 1 (01:06):
The Department of Justice has now officially and revealed that
there were, in fact a number of FBI confidential sources
on the ground during January the sixth. This is the
first time they have actually admitted to it that yes,
(01:27):
we did the highly anticipated report said. There were more
than two dozen confidential human sources in the crowd on
January the sixth of twenty twenty one, they said, quote,
but only three were assigned by the FBI to be present. Now,
I'm going to explain more of the details on that
coming up after we deal with the presidential pardons. Now,
(01:51):
this is the part that I want you to understand
about these presidential pardons is many of these seem to
be nothing more than payback, saying thank you to some
of the most corrupt people in the world who have
friends that have been convicted of crimes in the United
States of America. The days are counting down until US
(02:13):
President Joe Biden exit.
Speaker 2 (02:14):
The White House.
Speaker 1 (02:15):
Before he goes, he is doing some major housekeeping. When
he delivered these presidential pardons to thirty nine Americans convicted
of what the White House described as non violent crimes,
and then commuting the sentences of nearly one five hundred
other people in the largest single day of clemency in
(02:38):
modern history. The White House has not given the names
of people involved in the mass commutations. The Associated Press
is reporting. Now, let's be clear. The US Constitution decrees
a present has the quote broad power to grant reprieves
and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in
(02:58):
cases of impeachment. Now, earlier this month, Biden issued that
obviously not shocking but extremely controversial mass pardon to his
son Hunter Biden, and now it looks like he's moving
on to even bigger pardons. What's the most shocking thing
about this list, and the part that makes me extremely
(03:21):
angry is the White House says that these individuals and
they had convictions of a quote non violent set of crimes.
So they're trying to tell you that this isn't a
big deal. Well, you want to know who's on the list.
They included Chinese spies and even an individual convicted of
(03:44):
possessing child pornography, which the White House is now describing
as well, we're just giving out this to individuals convicted
of quote unquote nonviolent crimes. Child pornography is a violent
crime against children. Being a spy, a Chinese spy, where
(04:05):
you're either taking out humans marking them. Maybe people are
dying in your country, maybe people are dying in this country,
this level of espionage. Saying it's a non violent individual,
give me a break. This might be the worst I've
(04:27):
ever seen of just how corrupt the Biden crime family is,
where they're having to now pay off basically people that
gave them millions of dollars hooking them up with these
types of pardons. Now, before I tell you specifically the
names about these people and what their offenses were and
how they got these pardons, I want to tell you
(04:47):
real quick about my friends over at Patriot Mobile. If
you are sick and tired of having your money go
to companies that actually are fighting against your conservative Christian values.
Speaker 2 (04:56):
While in the cell phone industry, they're one of the worst.
Speaker 1 (04:59):
The big mobile providers out there give big donations to
democratic causes, candidates and organizations. And that is exactly why
I want you to switch to Patriot Mobile like I've
done in twenty twenty four. It's so easy to switch,
and when you do, you're going to be making a
difference every time you pay your bill, every time you
make a phone call, every time you send a text.
(05:20):
Because of Patriot Mobile, they actually give about five percent
of your bill back to conservative causes, candidates and organizations.
It is incredible what they do. Every time you pay
your bill. You also are fighting for the rights of
unborn children. When you're with Patriot Mobile, because they give
money to those organizations. They are making sure that your
(05:43):
dollars are spent to support everything that we believe in. Now,
Big Mobile they're fighting against you. They give big donations
to the hardcore liberal causes and candidates, including organizations to
pay for abortions on demand. I don't want my money
going there, and that's why I switch to Patriot Mobile.
Speaker 2 (05:58):
Now.
Speaker 1 (05:58):
I want to give you a free month of service
and you're also gonna get their coverage guarantee. They are
not worried about coverage because in twenty twenty four, everybody
now is using the same networks in the same towers.
You'll get the same coverage you have now without the
radical left agenda that you would be funding with Big Mobile.
Speaker 2 (06:14):
So check out Patriot Mobile.
Speaker 1 (06:16):
Go online to Patriot Mobile dot com slash ferguson. That's
Patriotmobile dot com slash ferguson. Or you can call them
nine to seven to two Patriot that's nine to seven
two Patriot nine seven to two Patriot or Patriot Mobile
dot com slash ferguson. You'll get one month of free service.
(06:37):
All right, So let me tell you about a couple
of the different people that were pardoned. Because this information
we now know for a fact, and I want you
to understand just how evil Joe Biden is and just
how compromise he has been as president, and how compromised
his family has been. Let me tell you first about
(06:58):
a guy by the name of jan John Jue. This
is an individual in the Southern District of Ohio that
has been convicted on November sixteenth of twenty twenty two.
Speaker 2 (07:12):
Look at the.
Speaker 1 (07:13):
Time right now, this was just a couple of years ago.
He was in prison for two hundred and forty months.
Do you know how long two hundred and forty months is.
It's a long time. It is twenty years. So this
guy went to jail for twenty years. What did he do?
(07:36):
Here is his offense on the official Whiteouse dot gov website.
Conspiracy to commit espionage, economic espionage, conspiracy to commit trade
secret theft, Attempted economic espionage by theft or fraud, attempted
theft of trade secrets by taking or deception. This individual
(08:02):
clearly with direct ties to China.
Speaker 2 (08:04):
He is a Chinese spy.
Speaker 1 (08:07):
And it was so clear that he was a Chinese
spy that they decided that he was such a threat
to this country for what he was doing that they
put him in jail for twenty years. That is who
Joe Biden just set free with the stroke of his pen. Now,
the question you have to ask yourself is how important
(08:28):
was this person the Chinese Communist government or to those
that were paying Joe Biden and the Biden crime family.
This isn't some random guy that you would pardon out
of nowhere. This is a guy that in twenty twenty
two in the Southern district of Ohio where we spent
I'm sure millions of tax dollars, following gaining evidence, then
(08:52):
finally arresting, then trying, and then putting.
Speaker 2 (08:55):
In jail for twenty years.
Speaker 1 (08:58):
And Joe Biden said, I don't know, and I'm still
trying to figure out the connection. We know it's a
Chinese spy. We know that the Biden crime family's been
taking tens of millions of dollars from China. But somebody said,
sign your name on a piece of paper and let
this guy come home to China because he was working
(09:18):
for the Chinese government. When you are a spy from China,
the chances that you are a non violent individual or
have people involved in around you that aren't involved in
violence is about zero percent. And the White House wants
you to believe that a guy that was put into
jail for twenty years, that's how much of a threat
(09:39):
to this country he was was somehow this is a
nonviolent person, so therefore it's not a threat to you.
Speaker 2 (09:45):
Are you kidding? Now?
Speaker 1 (09:46):
I'm going to tell you more about this person in
a moment, but I want to move on to someone
else that was also pardoned, and I want you to
I go back to what I said, follow the money.
This was not in the Southern District of Ohio. The
next case I'm going to tell you about this was
in the Northern District of Illinois.
Speaker 2 (10:03):
A guy by the name of g Chai Chong.
Speaker 1 (10:07):
Ninety six months imprisonment.
Speaker 2 (10:10):
When did he go into prison?
Speaker 1 (10:11):
You ready for the state January the twenty fifth of
twenty twenty three. Just went into jail about a year ago.
A little over a year ago. This guy was going
to jail g for eight years. What was he convicted
of and why the hell would it be in the
(10:31):
interest of the President of the United States America to
pardon him? Here are the charges conspiracy to defraud the
United States seems pretty serious. Impersonating agents of foreign governments
seems pretty serious. Statements or entries generally that deal with espionage.
(10:53):
This is another individual, another individual that Joe Biden clearly
somebody in China's said, make this happen.
Speaker 2 (11:01):
Let's do it.
Speaker 1 (11:03):
It gets even worse. There's another guy by the name
of shan Lyn Jen. This is a case out of
the Eastern District of Texas. Now this gets even more
complicated because apparently this was actually a part of a
prison swap with China. So this is part of Again
(11:23):
the this is complicated, and I think it was made
complicated so you and I wouldn't know about this. So
from what I'm being told now, this is not technically
a part of this the part in comeancy handed out
by Biden on Thursday. This happened in November, and we're
now just finding out about it. All right, So let
me explain this to you. Shanling Jen, who was not
(11:49):
included in Biden's latest comeancy roundup, had pled guilty and
possession of child porn after forty seven thousand images child
pornography were found in his computer and was included in
a quote November prisoner swap to go back to China.
(12:11):
So some of what we're now seeing, and I'm also
being told now that some of these these other two
individuals may have technically been a part of this quote
prisoner swap to give Joe Biden cover that we're now
just now finding out about who they are and what
they actually did. So to recap and again, this is
(12:33):
why I love doing this, because this is bring news.
You have all these people that have been given clemency
and all these people that they say are nonviolent, and
then we find out, oh and by the way, there
were some spies that we, you know, let out, and
we did it in the name of a quote prisoner swap.
It doesn't change the premise of their crimes. It doesn't
(12:54):
change what I said to you earlier. What it does
mean is that President Joe Biden decided today to use
this moment moment just to reiterate and again, this is
breaking as I'm talking and as I'm recording this, that
he's like, Hey, here's a bunch of people I'm gonna
give clemency too.
Speaker 2 (13:08):
Here's a bunch of people I'm going to pardon, and oh,
By the way, we.
Speaker 1 (13:11):
Also had a shadiest hell deal we did to get
some prisoners out of China, and I gave them back
some of their worst people that were committing espionage in
the United States of America and some of them that
had a bunch of child pornography on them, that were
also you know, abusing children. But don't worry, well, I'm
going to go out there and say they're all non violent.
This sweeping act of abusive power. Joe Biden would just say, oh,
(13:35):
it's clemency. It's just clemency. It's not a big deal.
This is an individual that has been bought and paid
for by the highest bidder, and now he is handing
out favors to the worst people among us. The White
House announcing the one thousand, five hundred individuals convicted of quote,
nonviolent crimes would be gramming clemency a reduction of a
criminal penalty, is how the White House described it. Many
(13:57):
of the individuals on the list were convicted of drug
possession or distribution charges that were not associated.
Speaker 2 (14:03):
With violence in any way.
Speaker 1 (14:05):
So again here's where I disagree with the premise of this,
and I want to make it clear, Whine, what you
have And what is being said now is that if
you are a drug dealer and we didn't actually catch
you like popping a cap in somebody, we consider you
to be nonviolent. Okay, what if your drugs killed somebody?
(14:28):
What if your drugs were laced with fetanyl? What if
you were selling fetanyl? What if people overdose? Is that
not a violent crime? Now they lost track of your
drugs and who may have died at the hands of
your drugs? But we know you're a drug dealer. In
the white I was like, no, no, no, that's non violent.
There's no violence there. Can we also just for a second,
(14:49):
backup and talk about the violence is involved in drug trade.
How many people die every year from drug deals gone bad?
How many people die every year at the hands of
violence around turf wars, around drugs. How many people die
in Mexico or around the world that are involved in
the drug trade and the cartels. How many people that
(15:12):
he has just said are nonviolent are actually involved in
some of the worst violence. You know, there's beheadings that
are involved in the drug trade. There is torture involved
in the drug trade. There is executions involved in the
drug trade. There is the dismembering of bodies involved in
the drug trade. There is dragging of people behind cars
(15:35):
until they die in the drug trade. You ever watched Narcos.
If you've never watched it, go watch it. The entire
series about the cartels is solely based around influencing but
through violence. And they say the White House, like, wow,
there's nothing violent about these people.
Speaker 2 (15:57):
They were just drug dealers.
Speaker 1 (16:00):
Many of the individuals on the lists we're convicted of
drug possession or distribution charges. They were not associated with
violence in any way. The massive clemency action, tout as
the most ever in a single day, comes on the
heels of the pardon Biden provided to a son.
Speaker 2 (16:12):
Hunter Biden earlier in the week.
Speaker 1 (16:14):
Members of the Progressive Squad pushed the present to quote
act and House Republicans say, that's why it's not a
good look for Biden.
Speaker 2 (16:23):
He doesn't care. He doesn't care at all.
Speaker 1 (16:26):
Joe Biden is cranting the largest act of clemency ever
while giving his son Hunter his own pardon on a
separate day.
Speaker 2 (16:34):
That's what this is all about.
Speaker 1 (16:36):
And who's he giving out these favors to people that
clearly had connections to him? And I would argue there's
a very good chances because the Biden crime family activities
and by the way, they're not done. Not only they
lie about Hunter Biden. I just want to be clear
about that, like, they're not done. Hunter Biden's the tip
(16:59):
of the ice.
Speaker 2 (17:00):
Folks.
Speaker 1 (17:01):
We are being told there's a lot more that's coming
for Biden crime family members.
Speaker 2 (17:06):
We're being told.
Speaker 1 (17:07):
That there is significant number of individuals that are in
around the Biden crime family that are going to get
pardons next. So what you do is you normalize pardons
by giving out so many of them. This is the
same White House right now that can't explain and I
this is what they're focused on right now instead of
national security issues. Have any of you seen like this,
(17:29):
the mystery drones that are happening right now over New
Jersey and we have no idea where they're from the
White House saying it's not the US military and they
don't think it's Ford and controlled. So we've just got
random drones flying around New Jersey over sensitive sites and
we don't know who they are and we're not shooting
them down. Sounds like the Chinese by balloon, right. Well,
(17:51):
if you're China and you got a payday coming from
the Biden crime family. Fly balloon and make sure you
don't shoot it down until after it leaves. All the
areas that's hovering around, that's trying to get intel. That
is exactly what has happened here. It is disgusting, and this,
I have a feeling is actually the beginning, not the
end of this. Now, look, I want to get to
this other important issue that I mentioned at the beginning,
(18:14):
and that is, for the first time, the Department of
Justice is having to admit that there were twenty six
FBI informants that were present on January the sixth. Now
they say the FBI only directed three confidential human sources
(18:36):
to attend the events of January the sixth, twenty twenty one.
Speaker 2 (18:39):
That is what they are now claiming.
Speaker 1 (18:42):
This is I really have to go back to this
and talk about how shocking this is. But what we
are hearing right now is that this is the report
from the Department of Justice Inspector General, who is being
forced to answer questions about whether there were federal confidential
humans in the January sixth crowd, and this is what
(19:03):
they have found out. This came from Fox News from
Brett Baer, Take a listen.
Speaker 3 (19:08):
High ranking officer in the Justice Department is suggesting something
some Trump supporters have been saying for years, that there
was more to the twenty twenty one Capital riot the
security around it than we have been told. Republican accusations
that the Biden Harris administration has weaponized the federal government.
With the subject of a House subcommittee hearing today and
One Question and Answer is now getting a lot of scrutiny.
(19:32):
Senior Congressional correspondent Chad Program shows us what happened live
from Capitol Hill. Get even Jed.
Speaker 4 (19:38):
Brett Good Evening, DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz did not
deny an assertion from Republican Thomas Massey that there may
have been federal confidential sources in the crowd at the
Capitol riot. This is the closest any DOJ official has
come to confirming the allegation.
Speaker 5 (19:57):
Do you have evidence of the number of confidential human
sources that were operating on the Capital grounds on January sixth?
Speaker 2 (20:05):
Our report will include the information in that regard.
Speaker 5 (20:09):
Can you tell us today how many there were? Were
there more than one hundred.
Speaker 2 (20:13):
I'm not in a position to say that.
Speaker 4 (20:16):
As he left the hearing of Horowitz ignored a follow
up about potential Feds in the crowd at the Capitol.
Speaker 5 (20:22):
Mister Horowitz, is impossible that confidence of human sources made
things worse on January sixth.
Speaker 4 (20:32):
Democrats dismissed suggestions the Feds may have been secretly at
the Capitol on January sixth.
Speaker 3 (20:38):
As far as I know, there's no evidence of that,
no evidence of federal informants.
Speaker 2 (20:43):
Why would they be federal.
Speaker 3 (20:44):
Informants in Trump's crowd when Trump was trying to overturn
the election and committing grievous crimes in doing so.
Speaker 4 (20:54):
The House panel investigating Weaponization of Government probe claims that
the FBI retaliated again Conservatives and its ranks their allegations
that the FBI punished whistleblower Marcus Allen, who raised questions
about January sixth, calling him a quote insider threat.
Speaker 5 (21:11):
The FBI accused me of promoting conspiratorial views and unreliable information.
Speaker 2 (21:16):
The FBI questioned my allegiance to the United States.
Speaker 4 (21:19):
Horowitz signaled his report about the riot will come out
between the election and inauguration. House Speaker Mike Johnson called
information about the fed's quote alarming, he wants classified briefings.
Speaker 1 (21:32):
There were so many people that were screaming about this,
and of course, because the Biden and the DOJ and
the FBI had to save their own a blesses, they
couldn't admit until Joe.
Speaker 2 (21:44):
Biden and then Kamala Harris lost that.
Speaker 1 (21:48):
All right, we'll give you what you all knew was real,
which yes, there was in fact more than two dozen
confidence of human sources in the crowd on January the
sixth the Capitol, and yes, three of them were assigned
by the FBI to be present at the event, something
that they'd lied about for a long time. Stressing that
none of the sources sources was authorized or directed by
(22:10):
the bureau to quote break the law quote unquote. That's
a very interesting way of putting that. Hey, we think
people broke the law right in and around them to
break the law or encourage others to commit illegal acts.
Horowitz also released this report on the FPI's handling of
its confidential human sources and intelligence collection efforts in the
(22:33):
lead up to the January sixth election certification.
Speaker 2 (22:37):
Quote.
Speaker 1 (22:38):
Today's report also details our fundings regarding FBI confidential human
sources who were in Washington, DC on January sixth. The
report states are review determined that none of these FI
confidential human sources was authorized by the FBI. Notice the
word authorized, Okay, well, was it off the record? Like, Hey,
guys go in there and get people riled up and
(22:58):
try to get them to store in the Capitol and
then we can arrest a bunch of them and blame
it all on Trump.
Speaker 2 (23:02):
But hey, that's off the record.
Speaker 1 (23:04):
I mean, I doubt they put it in writing, because
if something's authorized, I'm assuming it's in writing. I doubt
someone's gonna be stupid enough to put in writing, like
in actual writing what he just said there. Like, I really, really,
really really doubt it. I doubt that the FBI director
in that moment or some of the FBI's like put
it in writing that we're authorizing FBI agents to actually
(23:26):
break the law.
Speaker 2 (23:28):
Okay, Like they're not stupid, They're not gonna do that. Now.
Speaker 1 (23:32):
The report reveals that the FBI had a minor supporting
role is what they're calling it, minor supporting role and
respond to January six largely because the event was not
deemed the highest security level by the Department of Home insecurity.
By the way, that is such a smoke screen and
it doesn't matter, Okay, Like that's that's another way, like, oh,
we really weren't involved. Well, if you're undercover and you're
(23:54):
putting confidential human sources in the crowd in and before
January the six to infiltrate the crowd and maybe get
the crowd fired up to maybe go in to commit crimes,
They're like, well, they weren't authorized to do that.
Speaker 2 (24:07):
Okay.
Speaker 1 (24:08):
Then the question I have now is since and again
I'm not a lawyer, but I've been around a hell
of a lot of lawyers in politics, and I know
how they say things when they're trying to cover their
a dobles or when they're trying to not answer the question.
Speaker 2 (24:19):
So here's my question. I want somebody in Congress.
Speaker 1 (24:22):
To ask, were they told not to instigate and not
to agitate? Did you direct them to just only observe
or did you direct them to get involved? And they're like, well,
we didn't tell them to get violent. Did you tell
them to not get violent? Did you tell them the
(24:42):
rules of engagement? Like that's the question I want to know,
and that they said, well, we didn't authorize them to
break the law. Right, we didn't authorize them to break
the law or to do illegal acts. Right, So okay,
you didn't authorize them, but did you tell them they
(25:04):
couldn't do it?
Speaker 2 (25:05):
Because I go back to the statement.
Speaker 1 (25:07):
Our review determines that none of these FBI confident of
human sources was authorized by the FAID and their capital. Okay, Well,
then my question is did they enter the capitol? And
if they did, why didn't you charge them with insurrection?
Did they not get charged with insurrection because they could
probably have the goods.
Speaker 2 (25:28):
On you guys? Is that it? I mean, that's a
question that they should ask. Quote.
Speaker 1 (25:33):
Our review determined that none of these FBI confident of
human sources was authorized by the FBID and end of
the capitol. Well, how many of them did? I'm gonna
bet all of them did. I'm gonna go out and
a limb and say all of them went? So why
were they not held accountable if they were disobeying the
orders of the FBI they also then write this or
(25:54):
a restricted area or to otherwise break the law? Okay,
how many of them broke the law, but you didn't
charge them with crimes because they were your human sources.
How many of them did break into the capitol, How
many of them did go into restricted areas?
Speaker 2 (26:09):
How many of your confidential human sources.
Speaker 1 (26:11):
We know none of them were charge of crimes, but
how many of them actually did in fact commit crimes
and you guys covered their ass That's the question that
should be asked now by Congress. And then when they
say we had a minor role, Dude, we've got that
one guy on video.
Speaker 2 (26:30):
That is inspiring a.
Speaker 1 (26:32):
Lot of people to break the law, break down the barriers,
chanting and encouraging. It only takes one coach of a
team to make it. To have a success or a victory.
You don't have to have fifty of you. You're gonna
have one that's in the group going let's get in there. Oh,
let's get in there. And then they'll be like, yeah,
let's get in there. And we saw it happen on tape.
(26:53):
According to report, there were a total of twenty six
confidential human sources in the crowd that day. And then
they use this but only three of them were signed
by the bureau to be there. Okay, well, then who
who assigned the others? Were they working off the books
that day? Because I doubt a bunch of confidence human
sources just randomly are like, Hey, let's go rogue on
(27:15):
January the sixth and go up in there and start
problems and start trouble. Somebody told them, Hey, wink wink,
nod nod, we need you to be involved in this.
One of the three confidential human sources tasked by the
FBI to attend the rally enter the Capitol building. Oh well,
that's interesting information. Well, the other two entered the restricted
areas around the Capitol. So you're telling me that basically
(27:37):
all three of the FBI human sources that you're admitting
you put there on purpose broke.
Speaker 2 (27:43):
The law that day.
Speaker 1 (27:45):
If a confidential human source is directed to be at
a certain event, they are paid by the FBI for
their time. So did we pay? Did the FBI pay
for insurrectionists to commit insurrection? Another question I one answered.
I'm not gonna let this one go. I can promise
you that we're gonna keep covering it. I'm gonna keep
(28:08):
telling you what happens. Make sure you share this podcast
with your family and your friends. I'll see you back
here tomorrow.
Host
Ben Ferguson
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!