January 23, 2025 • 31 mins
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
And one of the first things that he talked about
was a big mistake that the Big Guy may have
actually made. That's right, Joe Biden gave a lot of
pardons to a lot of family members and their spouses,
but there were two names that he left off the list.
The two people on that list would be the Big
Guy himself and the former First Lady Joe Biden. Both
(00:23):
of them have money directly connecting them to the Biden
crime family activities.
Speaker 2 (00:28):
That's not all.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
Donald Trump also was asked during his first interview with
Sean Handy about other people that were begging, apparently for pardons,
like Adam shift and Benny Thompson. I want you to
hear Donald Trump's back and forth with Sean Handy about
what this could mean for the Big Guy, maybe not
getting away with all the Biden crime family activities.
Speaker 3 (00:51):
Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer, Adam Schiff, who got a preemptive pardon,
all these people that got pardoned. Anthony Fauci, did he
know that NAH money through the Eco Health Alliance was
funding the Wuhan virology lab. There seems to be texted
the messages and emails that went back and forth. You
(01:11):
talk about the Unselect Committee, as you call the January
sixth committee. They had a predetermined outcome. General Milly, all
these people, the Biden family members. Joe Biden ran and
said he would never do preemptive pardons. It was an
issue that came up when you were leaving in your.
Speaker 4 (01:29):
Personal He thought he heard that I was going to
do I didn't want to do it. I was given
the option. They said, sir, would you like to pardon everybody,
including yourself? I said, I'm not going to pardon anybody.
We didn't do anything wrong. And we had people that suffered,
their incredible patriots.
Speaker 5 (01:45):
We had people that suffered.
Speaker 4 (01:48):
You had Bannon put in jail, you had Peter Navarro
put in jail. You had people that suffered, and far
worse than that. They've lost their fortune, They've lost there
whatever their nest egg, paying it to lawyers and those
people and people said to you, and they don't even
they wouldn't have even taken most of those people.
Speaker 5 (02:11):
They wouldn't have even taken apart. This guy went around
giving everybody pardons.
Speaker 4 (02:15):
And you know that the funny thing, maybe the sad
thing is he didn't give himself a part. And if
you look at it. It all had to do with him.
I mean, the money went to him.
Speaker 6 (02:29):
Should Congress investigate that?
Speaker 5 (02:31):
Well, I don't know.
Speaker 6 (02:31):
It's you know, I've always.
Speaker 4 (02:34):
Been Look, he didn't give himself a pardon, and he
didn't give some.
Speaker 5 (02:39):
Other people a pardon that needed it.
Speaker 4 (02:41):
And I heard Schiff went to him and just begged
him for a parton because Schiff is a crook.
Speaker 5 (02:46):
Schiff is a crooked guy. He's a crooked politician.
Speaker 4 (02:50):
He made up the story about Russia, Russia Rush.
Speaker 5 (02:53):
He totally made it up as long as the storyteller.
Speaker 4 (02:55):
And then after he made it up, they found out
that there was a tape of the conversation made by
you know, I guess the State Department.
Speaker 5 (03:06):
I don't know.
Speaker 4 (03:06):
When you make calls, they make tapes sometimes not all
the time.
Speaker 6 (03:09):
It was to the Russians.
Speaker 4 (03:11):
So he, in the meantime made up the conversation, totally
made it up about quid pro quail. There was no
quit bro quo. Just yeah, there was a perfect call.
Tim Scott was the first one to come.
Speaker 5 (03:21):
He read it.
Speaker 4 (03:22):
He said, this is a perfect call. What are you doing?
You're you're impeaching a man for perfect call. It was Shiff, Schiff,
Hillary Dahl hald Up. You know what they should shift
is just a bad, sick guy. And he went to
Biden and he demanded a part because he thought he
(03:45):
did something he knew it did.
Speaker 6 (03:46):
Thompson would have won the chairman of that committee.
Speaker 4 (03:48):
Anytimes and destroyed, destroyed along with that unselect committee, destroyed
all of the work that took place over two years.
Speaker 5 (03:59):
You know, it showed that I was right.
Speaker 1 (04:02):
Now, the question now is do the American people want
there to be an investigation? Right, because that's what this
would take. Now, is this something the American voters say, yes,
we voted for because what Trump is suggesting here is
that Biden and those he pardoned should be investigated. I
did it the hard way, he said, right, referring to
(04:23):
as legal challenges, it's really hard to say they shouldn't
have to go through it. Also, that's again a question
he is now asking to attorney generals around the country.
President Trump suggesting that former President Joe Biden should be
investigated and should even have parton himself on the way
out of the White House brings even more speculation that
(04:44):
maybe there are members in the legal community that are
willing to ask these same questions. Now, look, let's be clear,
Donald Trump did not specify what offenses the former president
may have committed, only that his predecessor should endure the
kind of legal screa rutiny that he endured before he
was re elected. I went through four years of hell,
(05:06):
quote by this scum that we had to deal with.
I went through four years of hell. I spent millions
of dollars of legal fees, and I won. But I
did it the hard way. It's really hard to say
they shouldn't have to go through this. Also, he's underscoring
this point that Joe Biden actually has a lot more
fire around him when it comes to Biden crime family
(05:29):
and the fact that Biden gave pardons to several of
his family members as well as political allies, and pointed
out one person the former president did not pardon himself.
He's saying, guys, this isn't necessarily over look at what
I'm having to go through. Look at what I went through,
and there was nothing that should have put me in
(05:50):
the crosshairs of the government. This guy's got millions of
dollars through LLC's laundering money from the worst people in
the world, from China and Russia and Ukraine, in Romania.
The list goes on and on, shady business deals that
he knew were so bad that his family needed pardons,
but he didn't pardon himself. So the question now is
(06:13):
is there an appetite in America for this type of
investigation or do the American voter say, look, we won,
we won, we got rid of the liberals were ready
to move on. That is going to be the biggest
debate in Washington, probably over the next couple of weeks.
And it's an important one because you want to make
(06:35):
sure you're working for the American people, because if you
get it wrong and it looks like you're using your
political power to just attack your opponent, it is what
divides the present and makes him lose momentum, which you
need that you need to get things done, like being
above fifty percent support on any basic issues that you
start working on. I go back to another poll and
(07:00):
there's a poll out that says the majority, overwhelming American majority,
is in favor of deporting illegal immigrants. If the President
decides to then go after Joe Biden, does that poll change.
There is honestly a very good chance that yes, that
poll could change. And if it does change and then
(07:23):
the president loses the mandate to act on those issues,
does that well put us in a worse position than
we're in right now. These are the questions that are
going to have to be asked and also answered by
those around the president of United States of America. I
think that's also the reason why you noticed there that
the President said it in more of a calm manner, saying, Hey,
(07:47):
I went through hell and I won. There is real
scrutiny that I went under. And the president who just left,
who didn't pardon himself but pardon his family members, maybe
he should have to deal the exact same thing. I
can't blame Donald Trump for doing it this way. What
I'll also say about this moment is one other thing.
I think we're looking at a very different Donald Trump
(08:09):
now than we did in twenty sixteen, Because in twenty sixteen,
I think Donald Trump would have been jumping up and
down saying it's time to arrest, lock up Joe Biden
for what he just did. You notice that's not his
demeanor this time, because he understands he needs to put
wins on the board, runs on the board. That is
(08:31):
his job. He has a mandate to get things done
for the American people that are suffering, to secure the border,
and so he's looking at this, I think, very very
differently than he would have back in twenty sixteen. You
want to talk about the art of the deal, Well,
Donald Trump clearly is the master of the art of
the deal. And this is a perfect example of how
(08:53):
quickly he is altering and changing even his demeanor right
now as president with a mandate he doesn't want to
lose quick break Ben Ferguson's show More Coming Up and
Donald Trump's interview with Sean Hannity. He also touched on
another issue that is one that I think goes back
to what I was saying a moment ago about the
(09:14):
art of the deal, and this Donald Trump in twenty
twenty five is very different than Donald Trump of twenty sixteen.
I do believe a lot of this comes down to
the fact that he believes that God saved him and
spared his life to go back to the White House
and to save this country. He was asked about that
in the first sit down interview in the Oval Office
(09:36):
with Sean Hendy.
Speaker 2 (09:37):
Take a listen, You've been through two.
Speaker 6 (09:40):
Would be assassine.
Speaker 3 (09:42):
You came within a millimeter of losing your life in
this whole process.
Speaker 6 (09:47):
I know you kind of are for.
Speaker 3 (09:49):
Somebody that compartmentalizes because I've known you so long. But
do you ever think, and you said this in your inaugural,
that you really believe God saved your life so that
this was your destiny?
Speaker 6 (10:01):
Explain that?
Speaker 5 (10:02):
Well, I do believe that. I've had.
Speaker 4 (10:06):
People that really know a lot about guns, and they
said that gun, in that particular gun.
Speaker 5 (10:12):
In that beautiful field as I.
Speaker 4 (10:13):
Called it in Pennsylvania, which it is, Butler, that that
gun's a very accurate gun, and that a bad shooter
would hit the target one hundred percent of the time.
You can't miss, Okay, from that from that distance. I
mean to me, I didn't know. I don't know as
much about it. They said, it's like for a golfer
sinking a one foot putt from that distance. And my
(10:38):
son Don and my son both of them Eric, they're
great shooters. Both of them are great shooters, and they
said it's amazing, it's a miracle. I think it affected
them because they can't believe that that happened. I turned.
If I didn't turn, it, you know the turn was
like split second, perfect timing. So something happened, and I
(11:00):
don't think you can call it just luck.
Speaker 5 (11:03):
It was.
Speaker 4 (11:03):
The chance was like one eighth of a second, or
we wouldn't be sitting here. I think of it in
a volume of time. One eighth of a second. I
was in the right position.
Speaker 3 (11:15):
Do you believe that moment people say to me they
see a change in you.
Speaker 6 (11:21):
Do you believe you've changed?
Speaker 3 (11:23):
Is this, for example, increased your faith in God?
Speaker 5 (11:26):
Yes, I think so.
Speaker 4 (11:27):
I don't think I've changed, but I think that has
taken place here because when you look at statistically, I
should never be here. I mean, if I don't tell it,
I'm looking at an immigration chart, my favorite chart ever
in history. Even it was a bad even if the
numbers were bad, I wouldn't mean.
Speaker 3 (11:47):
We're talking about assassination and nothing.
Speaker 5 (11:49):
You believe it no terrible? Remember that day like when
I when.
Speaker 4 (11:53):
I turned and I had to be at exactly ninety
degree angle, and I said throw it down the chart
or something to that effect, and they bring the charge
and I'm literally looking exactly at.
Speaker 5 (12:04):
The right angle. I couldn't have even been a little
further or a little.
Speaker 4 (12:07):
Bit less it would have whacked because it was an
eighth of an inch. The entire ride was an eighth
of an inch.
Speaker 3 (12:13):
Will you investigate these assassination attempts? And you stated that
you will release the files, all the files as it
relates to the JFK assassination.
Speaker 6 (12:24):
And by the way, this this is his desk.
Speaker 5 (12:26):
Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 6 (12:27):
This is where that's John Kenny a little that's a
movable door.
Speaker 5 (12:31):
Yeah, it's a little door there. Let's where John John
John John.
Speaker 3 (12:35):
And RFK and also Martin Luther King Junior. And that
you will be transparent. This was going to happen in
the first Many people have asked me to and I did.
Speaker 4 (12:49):
I did it with Kennedy to an extent, but I
was asked by some of our government officials not to,
you know, you have to respect. Then I was actually
asked by Mike Pompey was Secretary of State not too
and I felt he knew something that maybe you know,
when he asked you not to, he sort of say why,
(13:11):
and he felt that it was just.
Speaker 5 (13:13):
Not a good time to release him.
Speaker 4 (13:16):
And you might ask him why, maybe he'll maybe he'll
deny that even but he did. He asked me and
some others also though they didn't want the Kennedy stuff release,
and they're professionals and I respect them, and they're working
for me and the country. They're working for the country,
and so I didn't release but I'm going to release
(13:37):
them immediately upon getting We're going to see the information.
Speaker 5 (13:42):
We're looking at it right now.
Speaker 1 (13:44):
I got to tell you, it's amazing because if someone
tried to kill me and they're like, you can investigate,
I think my initial response would be like, yeah, hell yeah,
I'm going to investigate it. We're going to look into this.
That would be a normal response. You noticed right there
he really wasn't that worried about that. He was more
of the big picture, like, look, there's some things that
(14:05):
Americans want to know, and JFK assassination is one of them.
I also think that there is a real chance in
the JFK assassination that there's going to be such damning
information in there about our government that's going to raise
even more questions about Donald Trump's assassination. And then people
are going to say, well, we demand to know that,
so it gives you a mandate to investigate it. We'll see,
(14:27):
But I do think It's going to be very interesting
to see what the American people think about our government
after we find out what we find out for them
from our government about the assassination of a former president. Now, look,
I want there to be an investigation at Donald Trump's
assassination tip. I want to know how the hell you
can have somebody get up on a roof that closed
with a clear line of sight and and pull that off.
(14:51):
I want to know was an incompetency from the Secret
Service director? Was it done on purpose by our government
to not give adequate protection to the President United S?
It's America, Like I want to know. I really genuinely
want to know. Was this a byproduct of DEI? And
I bring up to EI to go to another example.
You know, the President said DEI officers are going to
(15:13):
be shut down five o'clock. Right, that's happened, and then
there's going to be a bunch of people that have
these jobs, they are going to lose their jobs. Well, we
have found out that the federal government, the deep state,
is fighting back. How do we know this, Well, the
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, it was the ATF
was caught red handed. Yes, rebranding their Chief Diversity Officer
(15:38):
on their website. That was the title to chief Officer
to circumvent President Donald Trump's order to get rid of
all of the DEI leadership. This was on the website
and it was one of those things that happens and
you're like, are you kidding me? Where If you look
at the website on one of twenty twenty five, it
(15:59):
clearly states a woman's name and then underneath it says
that she is the Chief Diversity Officer. They then if
you look at the same website with the same pictures
in the same order on one twenty two, just two
days after the twentieth when Donald Trump was inaugurated, they
have changed her title to circumvent President Trump's order clearly
(16:24):
to chief Officer getting rid of the Diversity aspect aka DEI.
I think this is the biggest problem that we're the
Donald Trump is gonna have right now is even when
he is making these types of orders that clearly the
American people are in favor of, that, the deep state
(16:44):
and those that are hardcore partisan hacks in our government
are going to say, we're just gonna outs smart you, dude.
We're just going to change our title so that yeah, okay,
so you say we're getting rid of all the diversity bill, Fine,
we're gonna keep them higher.
Speaker 2 (17:00):
We're just going to change what we call them.
Speaker 1 (17:03):
And then they're still going to be into the government,
fighting and undermining you every step of the way. That is, honestly,
the biggest concern that I have right now is that
is that there are so many people in our government
that are so corrupt, and there's so many that are
willing to protect each other that no matter what, they're like, no, no,
(17:24):
we got this, Like, don't worry, we got this. We'll
just change your title. We'll move you around. I wonder
how many of the people that are supposed to lose
their jobs and DEI offices are just going to immediately
show up in another part of the same office building
with a new title. Now, it could be a blessing
(17:46):
that we found out that at the top levels of
the ATF this is what they're doing, because then it's
going to give you, you know, a blueprint of Okay, well,
let's start looking at names, and let's see who the
people are that are we're in de office before I
took office. Let's find that out and then let's see
how many of them are still around.
Speaker 2 (18:08):
That, my friends, is how.
Speaker 1 (18:09):
Donald Trump's gonna have to deal with this and his team,
because you cannot assume that these radicals that have infiltrated
our government are going to play by the rules. They
don't respect the president, they don't respect the rule of law,
they don't respect the commander in chief, and they don't
respect the orders coming down from the commander in chief.
(18:29):
They are going to be there to undermine him, and
that is clearly what they were trying to do with
the ATF as well. I want to move to another
big issue, and that is the war with Ukraine and Russia.
Donald Trump seems to be focusing in on this subject,
and we know this because he said, Hey, I'm going
to be the guy that is going to end this war,
(18:51):
and I'm going to put maximum pressure on Vladimir Putin
and Ukraine to get to the table. Donald Trump said
this just a few days ago.
Speaker 5 (19:00):
Zelenski wants to make a deal. I don't know if
Putin does, you might not know. He should make a deal.
Speaker 7 (19:08):
I think he's destroying Russia. Why not making a deal.
I think Russia's going to be in big trouble. You
take a look at their economy, You take a look
at the inflation in Russia.
Speaker 1 (19:20):
Now, Donald Trump is clearly telegraphing there to Vladimir Putin
that hey, the other side is ready to come to
the table and start talking and let's make a deal. Well,
now Donald Trump has put out a new statement demanding
that Vladimir Putin make a deal on the Ukrainian War
or face the consequences. Now you've got to ask yourself,
(19:40):
all right, So what are the consequences? Because I think
we all know that Donald Trump has no desire to
get into an actual war, a military war with anyone,
including Russia. Well, what's the leverage. Then It's going to
be taxes and tariffs and sanctions. That is the new
announcement coming for the White House. President Donald Trump encouraged
(20:04):
the Russian president Viatamir Putin to quote make a deal
and shut down the Ukrainian War or face the economic
punishment of the United States of America. Trump vowed on
the campaign trail that he would bring the Ukrainian War
to close after President Joe Piden appeared to only fuel
the war with arms and economic aid to Ukraine that
(20:24):
allowed the war to continue indefinitely. Russia, as you know,
invaded Ukraine after the Biden administration took power, and before
the invasion, Russia indicated that it was worried about the
administration's invited overtures for Ukraine to join NATO. That was
at least their argument, a political and military alliance of countries.
(20:47):
They said, we can't have this the doorstep of Russia.
That was what they used as the reason to invade. Now,
Russia repeatedly claimed any expansion of NATO into Ukraine was
quote unquote a red line. Now, Biden refused to speak
with Putin about a peace deal, as many Ukrainians continue
(21:07):
to die in these mandatory military service that they are
in right now in Ukraine. For God's sakes, this man
cannot remain in power, Biden said of Putin in the
off the cuff remarks during.
Speaker 2 (21:21):
His speech in twenty twenty two.
Speaker 1 (21:23):
He clearly believes that it's time for there to be
new leadership, but he also knows that's stopping the war
is the most important thing now. Trump said in a
true social post on Wednesday that he loves the Russian
people and has a very good relationship with Putin. But
demanded the Russian president in the war. If Putin does not,
Trump said the United States would place taxes, tariffs, and
(21:46):
sanctions on Russia, saying it this way, I'm not looking
to hurt Russia. I love the Russian people and always
have had a good relationship with President Putin. And this
despite the radical lefts Russia Russia Russia hoax, we must
never forget that Russia helped us win the Second World
War after losing almost sixty million lives in the process.
(22:09):
All of that being said, I'm going to do Russia,
whose economy is failing and President Putin a very big favor,
settle now and stop this ridiculous war. It's only going
to get worse. Trump said, if we don't make a
deal in soon, I have no other choice but to
(22:30):
put high levels of taxes, tariffs, and sanctions on anything
being sold by Russia to the United States and various
other participating countries. Let's get this war, which never would
have started if I were president, over with. We can
do it the easy way or the hard way, and
(22:50):
the easy way is always better, he added, It's time
to make a deal. No more lives should be lost now.
This is clearly a huge, huge move in diplomacy from
what we had with Joe Biden. As he is, the
President was accurate in saying Joe Biden refused to even
talk about a piece deal with Vladimir Putin, whether it
(23:13):
was because he knew that Putin had no respect for him,
or he knew that the war was good for his
friends in Ukraine financially sending this the amounts of money
we were spending to Ukraine, to the Ukrainian oligarchs, and
the corruption over in Ukraine well was making people like
Zelensky very rich in his friends. That's part of the
(23:34):
reason why I believe that Joe Biden didn't want the
war to end and wasn't trying to stop it. Something
that very clearly is different this time. This president actually
cares about the loss of human life and doesn't want
us to put ourselves in a situation where we're dealing
with this type of uncertainty in the world. As he
described it, it's bad for business, it's bad for everybody.
(23:56):
It's bad for the people in Ukraine, and it's bad
for the people in Russia. And there are countless people
whose lives are being lost. Now there seems to be
a real theme with Donald Trump right now, whether it
is dealing with Ukraine or Russia, and that is he's
just telling you exactly what the problem is and saying,
(24:17):
we've got to figure out a way.
Speaker 2 (24:18):
To fix it.
Speaker 1 (24:19):
It's not just about saying they're doing it wrong. It's
about him saying we got to figure out a way
to make it better for everyone involved. A great example
of that is the issue of crime in sanctuary cities.
This is something the American people, as I mentioned earlier,
are obsessed with. The majority of Americans believe that all
(24:41):
illegal immigrants in this country should be deported. There's also
a lot of Americans that are very angry who are
stuck in sanctuary cities where the violent crime and the
illegal immigrants have just destroyed cities. I just came back
from New York City. They still have a massive problem
there with illegal immigrants who have taken over New York
(25:02):
City and the crime is out of control. The dormant
at the hotel warn many of the people that are
there be careful when you're out at night because they're
these illegal immigrant gangs that are willing to take your belongings.
They are not afraid of being arrested. They are in charge.
They're selling illegal goods, the fake Gucci and prod of
(25:23):
bags you can find now in almost every street corner
around Times Square. And then when they see police coming,
they just put them all in the bag and take
off running to another street corner.
Speaker 2 (25:35):
They are running the city now.
Speaker 1 (25:37):
The President was asked about this issue of sanctuary cities
in his interview with Hannity, and I want you to
hear what he said, what do you.
Speaker 3 (25:45):
Do sanctuary states by definition or sanctuary cities. They're aiding
in a bedding and the law breaking. Okay, they're going
to get federal funds.
Speaker 5 (25:55):
Would really to get rid of them.
Speaker 4 (25:56):
We're trying to end them in a lot of other
people in those communities don't want them.
Speaker 5 (26:00):
California is a big.
Speaker 4 (26:01):
Examle off their money. I might have to do that
sometimes that's the only thing you can do. Look, California
is a great example of it if you actually pull
the people. They don't want sanctuary cities, but Gavin Newsom does,
and these radical left politicians too. And you know if
you asked them why they couldn't even I watched Gavin
Newsom try to answer that question. He was unable to
(26:23):
even answer. He looked like an idiot. He was unable
to answer. I asked him one other question, why is
it that you don't want millions of gallons of water a.
Speaker 5 (26:32):
Day pouring throughout California.
Speaker 4 (26:35):
You know, the farmland in California is they say, the
equivalent of Iowa great Land. But it's got no water.
And you sit there and it's literally you can see
it burning. It's unflamed. All they need is water on
that big farmland. And I asked him, why, how is
it possible that you're not allowing this water? They diverted
out to the Pacific Ocean where it drops into the ocean.
(26:58):
And in what it's like, it's like to the Pacific Ocean,
It's like it's like two glasses of water.
Speaker 5 (27:05):
It's nothing.
Speaker 4 (27:06):
Millions of gallons of water is diverted way up north
in California into the Pacific Ocean.
Speaker 5 (27:15):
That water.
Speaker 4 (27:16):
You know they have the pipes center, it's half pipes.
You see them all the time, half pipes. People live
in those half pipes. Now you know they have homeless
living in those half types.
Speaker 5 (27:26):
But this is.
Speaker 4 (27:27):
Water that millions of gallons of water a week and
a day in some cases, you know, depending on the
flow so much water, they wouldn't know what to do
with it. Your sprinklers would be filled. They can even
remember when I took criticism because they said, you.
Speaker 5 (27:44):
Have to manage, you manage your first.
Speaker 4 (27:46):
The head of a country that lives in forest, a
number of them, actually, Finland told me this. Austria told
me this head of Austria, head of Finland, and it
was beautiful the way they expressed it. They said, we
live in a forest. We are a forest nation. That's beautiful.
It's not to say that we have trees that are
(28:08):
the most magnificent in the world, far more beautiful than
what they have in California, and much more flammable. He said,
we don't have forest fires. We manage your forests. You
can get a degree in forest. Well they'll do cuts, yeah,
can you imagine, but you don't need much. You have
to clean the floors of the forest. You know, when
(28:29):
they had forest I go to see some other sites.
I watched a California. They use billions of dollars of
money and they just said, you know, and look at
what happened Los Angeles. It's like a nuclear weapon went off.
What's happened to Los Angeles, and you know that thing
went for four or five days. Nobody was even fighting
it because they didn't have any water. The fire departments
(28:52):
that aren't funded properly, and the firefighters were brave as hell.
Speaker 5 (28:56):
They were fighting without water. I mean, they turn on
a fire hid.
Speaker 4 (29:00):
There's no water that comes out, and they said, and
the fires are rushing at him at thirty forty miles
an hour. Those firefighters who were brave. What happened to
that state is incredible. And then you listen to me.
I remember when Rohnda Santis and Gavin news Can were
debating on your show and talking like everything's great, Oh,
(29:23):
everything's great, just great, just great. More people left California
this year than ever have left in history before the fire.
Speaker 5 (29:33):
But look at it. Take a look, and you know.
Speaker 4 (29:35):
The amazing thing. These are wealthy people. Many wealthy people
lost their homes. I saw somebody on television, one of
the wealthiest people, one of the most powerful people in
the country, being interviewed as though he were a vagrant
his shirt and you have to know him.
Speaker 5 (29:50):
He's a mean, horrible human being.
Speaker 4 (29:52):
He's a tough guy, very tough guy, a horrible person.
But he's very rich, and he's rich, but he's a
horrible No, he's a horrible human being.
Speaker 5 (30:00):
I know rich people that are, but this guy's a
terrible person.
Speaker 4 (30:03):
So I say, that's so he said to Maloney, I said,
look at it if they were.
Speaker 5 (30:10):
Interview him as a guy that lost his house.
Speaker 1 (30:13):
You listen to President Trump here and I just got
to say, he understands, whether it is dealing with these
world leaders or these sanctuary cities or states, that incompetency
is something he's going to have to keep calling out.
And since he's been sworn in as the forty seventh
president I to America, and since the assassination attempt against
(30:36):
him that not one, but two that we know of,
and almost getting his head blown off by that first assassin,
he's coming in with a very different level of focus there,
whether it's going after the sanctuary cities and the mayors
or the governors and calling them out for what he
just said there, Like this is one of those moments
(30:56):
where it's like this administration is going to be very different,
very very different. Make sure you share this podcast with
your family and friends. Rights to five sorre review to
help us reach more people, please, and I'll see you
back here tomorrow.
And one of the first things that he talked about
was a big mistake that the Big Guy may have
actually made. That's right, Joe Biden gave a lot of
pardons to a lot of family members and their spouses,
but there were two names that he left off the list.
The two people on that list would be the Big
Guy himself and the former First Lady Joe Biden. Both
(00:23):
of them have money directly connecting them to the Biden
crime family activities.
Speaker 2 (00:28):
That's not all.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
Donald Trump also was asked during his first interview with
Sean Handy about other people that were begging, apparently for pardons,
like Adam shift and Benny Thompson. I want you to
hear Donald Trump's back and forth with Sean Handy about
what this could mean for the Big Guy, maybe not
getting away with all the Biden crime family activities.
Speaker 3 (00:51):
Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer, Adam Schiff, who got a preemptive pardon,
all these people that got pardoned. Anthony Fauci, did he
know that NAH money through the Eco Health Alliance was
funding the Wuhan virology lab. There seems to be texted
the messages and emails that went back and forth. You
(01:11):
talk about the Unselect Committee, as you call the January
sixth committee. They had a predetermined outcome. General Milly, all
these people, the Biden family members. Joe Biden ran and
said he would never do preemptive pardons. It was an
issue that came up when you were leaving in your.
Speaker 4 (01:29):
Personal He thought he heard that I was going to
do I didn't want to do it. I was given
the option. They said, sir, would you like to pardon everybody,
including yourself? I said, I'm not going to pardon anybody.
We didn't do anything wrong. And we had people that suffered,
their incredible patriots.
Speaker 5 (01:45):
We had people that suffered.
Speaker 4 (01:48):
You had Bannon put in jail, you had Peter Navarro
put in jail. You had people that suffered, and far
worse than that. They've lost their fortune, They've lost there
whatever their nest egg, paying it to lawyers and those
people and people said to you, and they don't even
they wouldn't have even taken most of those people.
Speaker 5 (02:11):
They wouldn't have even taken apart. This guy went around
giving everybody pardons.
Speaker 4 (02:15):
And you know that the funny thing, maybe the sad
thing is he didn't give himself a part. And if
you look at it. It all had to do with him.
I mean, the money went to him.
Speaker 6 (02:29):
Should Congress investigate that?
Speaker 5 (02:31):
Well, I don't know.
Speaker 6 (02:31):
It's you know, I've always.
Speaker 4 (02:34):
Been Look, he didn't give himself a pardon, and he
didn't give some.
Speaker 5 (02:39):
Other people a pardon that needed it.
Speaker 4 (02:41):
And I heard Schiff went to him and just begged
him for a parton because Schiff is a crook.
Speaker 5 (02:46):
Schiff is a crooked guy. He's a crooked politician.
Speaker 4 (02:50):
He made up the story about Russia, Russia Rush.
Speaker 5 (02:53):
He totally made it up as long as the storyteller.
Speaker 4 (02:55):
And then after he made it up, they found out
that there was a tape of the conversation made by
you know, I guess the State Department.
Speaker 5 (03:06):
I don't know.
Speaker 4 (03:06):
When you make calls, they make tapes sometimes not all
the time.
Speaker 6 (03:09):
It was to the Russians.
Speaker 4 (03:11):
So he, in the meantime made up the conversation, totally
made it up about quid pro quail. There was no
quit bro quo. Just yeah, there was a perfect call.
Tim Scott was the first one to come.
Speaker 5 (03:21):
He read it.
Speaker 4 (03:22):
He said, this is a perfect call. What are you doing?
You're you're impeaching a man for perfect call. It was Shiff, Schiff,
Hillary Dahl hald Up. You know what they should shift
is just a bad, sick guy. And he went to
Biden and he demanded a part because he thought he
(03:45):
did something he knew it did.
Speaker 6 (03:46):
Thompson would have won the chairman of that committee.
Speaker 4 (03:48):
Anytimes and destroyed, destroyed along with that unselect committee, destroyed
all of the work that took place over two years.
Speaker 5 (03:59):
You know, it showed that I was right.
Speaker 1 (04:02):
Now, the question now is do the American people want
there to be an investigation? Right, because that's what this
would take. Now, is this something the American voters say, yes,
we voted for because what Trump is suggesting here is
that Biden and those he pardoned should be investigated. I
did it the hard way, he said, right, referring to
(04:23):
as legal challenges, it's really hard to say they shouldn't
have to go through it. Also, that's again a question
he is now asking to attorney generals around the country.
President Trump suggesting that former President Joe Biden should be
investigated and should even have parton himself on the way
out of the White House brings even more speculation that
(04:44):
maybe there are members in the legal community that are
willing to ask these same questions. Now, look, let's be clear,
Donald Trump did not specify what offenses the former president
may have committed, only that his predecessor should endure the
kind of legal screa rutiny that he endured before he
was re elected. I went through four years of hell,
(05:06):
quote by this scum that we had to deal with.
I went through four years of hell. I spent millions
of dollars of legal fees, and I won. But I
did it the hard way. It's really hard to say
they shouldn't have to go through this. Also, he's underscoring
this point that Joe Biden actually has a lot more
fire around him when it comes to Biden crime family
(05:29):
and the fact that Biden gave pardons to several of
his family members as well as political allies, and pointed
out one person the former president did not pardon himself.
He's saying, guys, this isn't necessarily over look at what
I'm having to go through. Look at what I went through,
and there was nothing that should have put me in
(05:50):
the crosshairs of the government. This guy's got millions of
dollars through LLC's laundering money from the worst people in
the world, from China and Russia and Ukraine, in Romania.
The list goes on and on, shady business deals that
he knew were so bad that his family needed pardons,
but he didn't pardon himself. So the question now is
(06:13):
is there an appetite in America for this type of
investigation or do the American voter say, look, we won,
we won, we got rid of the liberals were ready
to move on. That is going to be the biggest
debate in Washington, probably over the next couple of weeks.
And it's an important one because you want to make
(06:35):
sure you're working for the American people, because if you
get it wrong and it looks like you're using your
political power to just attack your opponent, it is what
divides the present and makes him lose momentum, which you
need that you need to get things done, like being
above fifty percent support on any basic issues that you
start working on. I go back to another poll and
(07:00):
there's a poll out that says the majority, overwhelming American majority,
is in favor of deporting illegal immigrants. If the President
decides to then go after Joe Biden, does that poll change.
There is honestly a very good chance that yes, that
poll could change. And if it does change and then
(07:23):
the president loses the mandate to act on those issues,
does that well put us in a worse position than
we're in right now. These are the questions that are
going to have to be asked and also answered by
those around the president of United States of America. I
think that's also the reason why you noticed there that
the President said it in more of a calm manner, saying, Hey,
(07:47):
I went through hell and I won. There is real
scrutiny that I went under. And the president who just left,
who didn't pardon himself but pardon his family members, maybe
he should have to deal the exact same thing. I
can't blame Donald Trump for doing it this way. What
I'll also say about this moment is one other thing.
I think we're looking at a very different Donald Trump
(08:09):
now than we did in twenty sixteen, Because in twenty sixteen,
I think Donald Trump would have been jumping up and
down saying it's time to arrest, lock up Joe Biden
for what he just did. You notice that's not his
demeanor this time, because he understands he needs to put
wins on the board, runs on the board. That is
(08:31):
his job. He has a mandate to get things done
for the American people that are suffering, to secure the border,
and so he's looking at this, I think, very very
differently than he would have back in twenty sixteen. You
want to talk about the art of the deal, Well,
Donald Trump clearly is the master of the art of
the deal. And this is a perfect example of how
(08:53):
quickly he is altering and changing even his demeanor right
now as president with a mandate he doesn't want to
lose quick break Ben Ferguson's show More Coming Up and
Donald Trump's interview with Sean Hannity. He also touched on
another issue that is one that I think goes back
to what I was saying a moment ago about the
(09:14):
art of the deal, and this Donald Trump in twenty
twenty five is very different than Donald Trump of twenty sixteen.
I do believe a lot of this comes down to
the fact that he believes that God saved him and
spared his life to go back to the White House
and to save this country. He was asked about that
in the first sit down interview in the Oval Office
(09:36):
with Sean Hendy.
Speaker 2 (09:37):
Take a listen, You've been through two.
Speaker 6 (09:40):
Would be assassine.
Speaker 3 (09:42):
You came within a millimeter of losing your life in
this whole process.
Speaker 6 (09:47):
I know you kind of are for.
Speaker 3 (09:49):
Somebody that compartmentalizes because I've known you so long. But
do you ever think, and you said this in your inaugural,
that you really believe God saved your life so that
this was your destiny?
Speaker 6 (10:01):
Explain that?
Speaker 5 (10:02):
Well, I do believe that. I've had.
Speaker 4 (10:06):
People that really know a lot about guns, and they
said that gun, in that particular gun.
Speaker 5 (10:12):
In that beautiful field as I.
Speaker 4 (10:13):
Called it in Pennsylvania, which it is, Butler, that that
gun's a very accurate gun, and that a bad shooter
would hit the target one hundred percent of the time.
You can't miss, Okay, from that from that distance. I
mean to me, I didn't know. I don't know as
much about it. They said, it's like for a golfer
sinking a one foot putt from that distance. And my
(10:38):
son Don and my son both of them Eric, they're
great shooters. Both of them are great shooters, and they
said it's amazing, it's a miracle. I think it affected
them because they can't believe that that happened. I turned.
If I didn't turn, it, you know the turn was
like split second, perfect timing. So something happened, and I
(11:00):
don't think you can call it just luck.
Speaker 5 (11:03):
It was.
Speaker 4 (11:03):
The chance was like one eighth of a second, or
we wouldn't be sitting here. I think of it in
a volume of time. One eighth of a second. I
was in the right position.
Speaker 3 (11:15):
Do you believe that moment people say to me they
see a change in you.
Speaker 6 (11:21):
Do you believe you've changed?
Speaker 3 (11:23):
Is this, for example, increased your faith in God?
Speaker 5 (11:26):
Yes, I think so.
Speaker 4 (11:27):
I don't think I've changed, but I think that has
taken place here because when you look at statistically, I
should never be here. I mean, if I don't tell it,
I'm looking at an immigration chart, my favorite chart ever
in history. Even it was a bad even if the
numbers were bad, I wouldn't mean.
Speaker 3 (11:47):
We're talking about assassination and nothing.
Speaker 5 (11:49):
You believe it no terrible? Remember that day like when
I when.
Speaker 4 (11:53):
I turned and I had to be at exactly ninety
degree angle, and I said throw it down the chart
or something to that effect, and they bring the charge
and I'm literally looking exactly at.
Speaker 5 (12:04):
The right angle. I couldn't have even been a little
further or a little.
Speaker 4 (12:07):
Bit less it would have whacked because it was an
eighth of an inch. The entire ride was an eighth
of an inch.
Speaker 3 (12:13):
Will you investigate these assassination attempts? And you stated that
you will release the files, all the files as it
relates to the JFK assassination.
Speaker 6 (12:24):
And by the way, this this is his desk.
Speaker 5 (12:26):
Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 6 (12:27):
This is where that's John Kenny a little that's a
movable door.
Speaker 5 (12:31):
Yeah, it's a little door there. Let's where John John
John John.
Speaker 3 (12:35):
And RFK and also Martin Luther King Junior. And that
you will be transparent. This was going to happen in
the first Many people have asked me to and I did.
Speaker 4 (12:49):
I did it with Kennedy to an extent, but I
was asked by some of our government officials not to,
you know, you have to respect. Then I was actually
asked by Mike Pompey was Secretary of State not too
and I felt he knew something that maybe you know,
when he asked you not to, he sort of say why,
(13:11):
and he felt that it was just.
Speaker 5 (13:13):
Not a good time to release him.
Speaker 4 (13:16):
And you might ask him why, maybe he'll maybe he'll
deny that even but he did. He asked me and
some others also though they didn't want the Kennedy stuff release,
and they're professionals and I respect them, and they're working
for me and the country. They're working for the country,
and so I didn't release but I'm going to release
(13:37):
them immediately upon getting We're going to see the information.
Speaker 5 (13:42):
We're looking at it right now.
Speaker 1 (13:44):
I got to tell you, it's amazing because if someone
tried to kill me and they're like, you can investigate,
I think my initial response would be like, yeah, hell yeah,
I'm going to investigate it. We're going to look into this.
That would be a normal response. You noticed right there
he really wasn't that worried about that. He was more
of the big picture, like, look, there's some things that
(14:05):
Americans want to know, and JFK assassination is one of them.
I also think that there is a real chance in
the JFK assassination that there's going to be such damning
information in there about our government that's going to raise
even more questions about Donald Trump's assassination. And then people
are going to say, well, we demand to know that,
so it gives you a mandate to investigate it. We'll see,
(14:27):
But I do think It's going to be very interesting
to see what the American people think about our government
after we find out what we find out for them
from our government about the assassination of a former president. Now, look,
I want there to be an investigation at Donald Trump's
assassination tip. I want to know how the hell you
can have somebody get up on a roof that closed
with a clear line of sight and and pull that off.
(14:51):
I want to know was an incompetency from the Secret
Service director? Was it done on purpose by our government
to not give adequate protection to the President United S?
It's America, Like I want to know. I really genuinely
want to know. Was this a byproduct of DEI? And
I bring up to EI to go to another example.
You know, the President said DEI officers are going to
(15:13):
be shut down five o'clock. Right, that's happened, and then
there's going to be a bunch of people that have
these jobs, they are going to lose their jobs. Well, we
have found out that the federal government, the deep state,
is fighting back. How do we know this, Well, the
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, it was the ATF
was caught red handed. Yes, rebranding their Chief Diversity Officer
(15:38):
on their website. That was the title to chief Officer
to circumvent President Donald Trump's order to get rid of
all of the DEI leadership. This was on the website
and it was one of those things that happens and
you're like, are you kidding me? Where If you look
at the website on one of twenty twenty five, it
(15:59):
clearly states a woman's name and then underneath it says
that she is the Chief Diversity Officer. They then if
you look at the same website with the same pictures
in the same order on one twenty two, just two
days after the twentieth when Donald Trump was inaugurated, they
have changed her title to circumvent President Trump's order clearly
(16:24):
to chief Officer getting rid of the Diversity aspect aka DEI.
I think this is the biggest problem that we're the
Donald Trump is gonna have right now is even when
he is making these types of orders that clearly the
American people are in favor of, that, the deep state
(16:44):
and those that are hardcore partisan hacks in our government
are going to say, we're just gonna outs smart you, dude.
We're just going to change our title so that yeah, okay,
so you say we're getting rid of all the diversity bill, Fine,
we're gonna keep them higher.
Speaker 2 (17:00):
We're just going to change what we call them.
Speaker 1 (17:03):
And then they're still going to be into the government,
fighting and undermining you every step of the way. That is, honestly,
the biggest concern that I have right now is that
is that there are so many people in our government
that are so corrupt, and there's so many that are
willing to protect each other that no matter what, they're like, no, no,
(17:24):
we got this, Like, don't worry, we got this. We'll
just change your title. We'll move you around. I wonder
how many of the people that are supposed to lose
their jobs and DEI offices are just going to immediately
show up in another part of the same office building
with a new title. Now, it could be a blessing
(17:46):
that we found out that at the top levels of
the ATF this is what they're doing, because then it's
going to give you, you know, a blueprint of Okay, well,
let's start looking at names, and let's see who the
people are that are we're in de office before I
took office. Let's find that out and then let's see
how many of them are still around.
Speaker 2 (18:08):
That, my friends, is how.
Speaker 1 (18:09):
Donald Trump's gonna have to deal with this and his team,
because you cannot assume that these radicals that have infiltrated
our government are going to play by the rules. They
don't respect the president, they don't respect the rule of law,
they don't respect the commander in chief, and they don't
respect the orders coming down from the commander in chief.
(18:29):
They are going to be there to undermine him, and
that is clearly what they were trying to do with
the ATF as well. I want to move to another
big issue, and that is the war with Ukraine and Russia.
Donald Trump seems to be focusing in on this subject,
and we know this because he said, Hey, I'm going
to be the guy that is going to end this war,
(18:51):
and I'm going to put maximum pressure on Vladimir Putin
and Ukraine to get to the table. Donald Trump said
this just a few days ago.
Speaker 5 (19:00):
Zelenski wants to make a deal. I don't know if
Putin does, you might not know. He should make a deal.
Speaker 7 (19:08):
I think he's destroying Russia. Why not making a deal.
I think Russia's going to be in big trouble. You
take a look at their economy, You take a look
at the inflation in Russia.
Speaker 1 (19:20):
Now, Donald Trump is clearly telegraphing there to Vladimir Putin
that hey, the other side is ready to come to
the table and start talking and let's make a deal. Well,
now Donald Trump has put out a new statement demanding
that Vladimir Putin make a deal on the Ukrainian War
or face the consequences. Now you've got to ask yourself,
(19:40):
all right, So what are the consequences? Because I think
we all know that Donald Trump has no desire to
get into an actual war, a military war with anyone,
including Russia. Well, what's the leverage. Then It's going to
be taxes and tariffs and sanctions. That is the new
announcement coming for the White House. President Donald Trump encouraged
(20:04):
the Russian president Viatamir Putin to quote make a deal
and shut down the Ukrainian War or face the economic
punishment of the United States of America. Trump vowed on
the campaign trail that he would bring the Ukrainian War
to close after President Joe Piden appeared to only fuel
the war with arms and economic aid to Ukraine that
(20:24):
allowed the war to continue indefinitely. Russia, as you know,
invaded Ukraine after the Biden administration took power, and before
the invasion, Russia indicated that it was worried about the
administration's invited overtures for Ukraine to join NATO. That was
at least their argument, a political and military alliance of countries.
(20:47):
They said, we can't have this the doorstep of Russia.
That was what they used as the reason to invade. Now,
Russia repeatedly claimed any expansion of NATO into Ukraine was
quote unquote a red line. Now, Biden refused to speak
with Putin about a peace deal, as many Ukrainians continue
(21:07):
to die in these mandatory military service that they are
in right now in Ukraine. For God's sakes, this man
cannot remain in power, Biden said of Putin in the
off the cuff remarks during.
Speaker 2 (21:21):
His speech in twenty twenty two.
Speaker 1 (21:23):
He clearly believes that it's time for there to be
new leadership, but he also knows that's stopping the war
is the most important thing now. Trump said in a
true social post on Wednesday that he loves the Russian
people and has a very good relationship with Putin. But
demanded the Russian president in the war. If Putin does not,
Trump said the United States would place taxes, tariffs, and
(21:46):
sanctions on Russia, saying it this way, I'm not looking
to hurt Russia. I love the Russian people and always
have had a good relationship with President Putin. And this
despite the radical lefts Russia Russia Russia hoax, we must
never forget that Russia helped us win the Second World
War after losing almost sixty million lives in the process.
(22:09):
All of that being said, I'm going to do Russia,
whose economy is failing and President Putin a very big favor,
settle now and stop this ridiculous war. It's only going
to get worse. Trump said, if we don't make a
deal in soon, I have no other choice but to
(22:30):
put high levels of taxes, tariffs, and sanctions on anything
being sold by Russia to the United States and various
other participating countries. Let's get this war, which never would
have started if I were president, over with. We can
do it the easy way or the hard way, and
(22:50):
the easy way is always better, he added, It's time
to make a deal. No more lives should be lost now.
This is clearly a huge, huge move in diplomacy from
what we had with Joe Biden. As he is, the
President was accurate in saying Joe Biden refused to even
talk about a piece deal with Vladimir Putin, whether it
(23:13):
was because he knew that Putin had no respect for him,
or he knew that the war was good for his
friends in Ukraine financially sending this the amounts of money
we were spending to Ukraine, to the Ukrainian oligarchs, and
the corruption over in Ukraine well was making people like
Zelensky very rich in his friends. That's part of the
(23:34):
reason why I believe that Joe Biden didn't want the
war to end and wasn't trying to stop it. Something
that very clearly is different this time. This president actually
cares about the loss of human life and doesn't want
us to put ourselves in a situation where we're dealing
with this type of uncertainty in the world. As he
described it, it's bad for business, it's bad for everybody.
(23:56):
It's bad for the people in Ukraine, and it's bad
for the people in Russia. And there are countless people
whose lives are being lost. Now there seems to be
a real theme with Donald Trump right now, whether it
is dealing with Ukraine or Russia, and that is he's
just telling you exactly what the problem is and saying,
(24:17):
we've got to figure out a way.
Speaker 2 (24:18):
To fix it.
Speaker 1 (24:19):
It's not just about saying they're doing it wrong. It's
about him saying we got to figure out a way
to make it better for everyone involved. A great example
of that is the issue of crime in sanctuary cities.
This is something the American people, as I mentioned earlier,
are obsessed with. The majority of Americans believe that all
(24:41):
illegal immigrants in this country should be deported. There's also
a lot of Americans that are very angry who are
stuck in sanctuary cities where the violent crime and the
illegal immigrants have just destroyed cities. I just came back
from New York City. They still have a massive problem
there with illegal immigrants who have taken over New York
(25:02):
City and the crime is out of control. The dormant
at the hotel warn many of the people that are
there be careful when you're out at night because they're
these illegal immigrant gangs that are willing to take your belongings.
They are not afraid of being arrested. They are in charge.
They're selling illegal goods, the fake Gucci and prod of
(25:23):
bags you can find now in almost every street corner
around Times Square. And then when they see police coming,
they just put them all in the bag and take
off running to another street corner.
Speaker 2 (25:35):
They are running the city now.
Speaker 1 (25:37):
The President was asked about this issue of sanctuary cities
in his interview with Hannity, and I want you to
hear what he said, what do you.
Speaker 3 (25:45):
Do sanctuary states by definition or sanctuary cities. They're aiding
in a bedding and the law breaking. Okay, they're going
to get federal funds.
Speaker 5 (25:55):
Would really to get rid of them.
Speaker 4 (25:56):
We're trying to end them in a lot of other
people in those communities don't want them.
Speaker 5 (26:00):
California is a big.
Speaker 4 (26:01):
Examle off their money. I might have to do that
sometimes that's the only thing you can do. Look, California
is a great example of it if you actually pull
the people. They don't want sanctuary cities, but Gavin Newsom does,
and these radical left politicians too. And you know if
you asked them why they couldn't even I watched Gavin
Newsom try to answer that question. He was unable to
(26:23):
even answer. He looked like an idiot. He was unable
to answer. I asked him one other question, why is
it that you don't want millions of gallons of water a.
Speaker 5 (26:32):
Day pouring throughout California.
Speaker 4 (26:35):
You know, the farmland in California is they say, the
equivalent of Iowa great Land. But it's got no water.
And you sit there and it's literally you can see
it burning. It's unflamed. All they need is water on
that big farmland. And I asked him, why, how is
it possible that you're not allowing this water? They diverted
out to the Pacific Ocean where it drops into the ocean.
(26:58):
And in what it's like, it's like to the Pacific Ocean,
It's like it's like two glasses of water.
Speaker 5 (27:05):
It's nothing.
Speaker 4 (27:06):
Millions of gallons of water is diverted way up north
in California into the Pacific Ocean.
Speaker 5 (27:15):
That water.
Speaker 4 (27:16):
You know they have the pipes center, it's half pipes.
You see them all the time, half pipes. People live
in those half pipes. Now you know they have homeless
living in those half types.
Speaker 5 (27:26):
But this is.
Speaker 4 (27:27):
Water that millions of gallons of water a week and
a day in some cases, you know, depending on the
flow so much water, they wouldn't know what to do
with it. Your sprinklers would be filled. They can even
remember when I took criticism because they said, you.
Speaker 5 (27:44):
Have to manage, you manage your first.
Speaker 4 (27:46):
The head of a country that lives in forest, a
number of them, actually, Finland told me this. Austria told
me this head of Austria, head of Finland, and it
was beautiful the way they expressed it. They said, we
live in a forest. We are a forest nation. That's beautiful.
It's not to say that we have trees that are
(28:08):
the most magnificent in the world, far more beautiful than
what they have in California, and much more flammable. He said,
we don't have forest fires. We manage your forests. You
can get a degree in forest. Well they'll do cuts, yeah,
can you imagine, but you don't need much. You have
to clean the floors of the forest. You know, when
(28:29):
they had forest I go to see some other sites.
I watched a California. They use billions of dollars of
money and they just said, you know, and look at
what happened Los Angeles. It's like a nuclear weapon went off.
What's happened to Los Angeles, and you know that thing
went for four or five days. Nobody was even fighting
it because they didn't have any water. The fire departments
(28:52):
that aren't funded properly, and the firefighters were brave as hell.
Speaker 5 (28:56):
They were fighting without water. I mean, they turn on
a fire hid.
Speaker 4 (29:00):
There's no water that comes out, and they said, and
the fires are rushing at him at thirty forty miles
an hour. Those firefighters who were brave. What happened to
that state is incredible. And then you listen to me.
I remember when Rohnda Santis and Gavin news Can were
debating on your show and talking like everything's great, Oh,
(29:23):
everything's great, just great, just great. More people left California
this year than ever have left in history before the fire.
Speaker 5 (29:33):
But look at it. Take a look, and you know.
Speaker 4 (29:35):
The amazing thing. These are wealthy people. Many wealthy people
lost their homes. I saw somebody on television, one of
the wealthiest people, one of the most powerful people in
the country, being interviewed as though he were a vagrant
his shirt and you have to know him.
Speaker 5 (29:50):
He's a mean, horrible human being.
Speaker 4 (29:52):
He's a tough guy, very tough guy, a horrible person.
But he's very rich, and he's rich, but he's a
horrible No, he's a horrible human being.
Speaker 5 (30:00):
I know rich people that are, but this guy's a
terrible person.
Speaker 4 (30:03):
So I say, that's so he said to Maloney, I said,
look at it if they were.
Speaker 5 (30:10):
Interview him as a guy that lost his house.
Speaker 1 (30:13):
You listen to President Trump here and I just got
to say, he understands, whether it is dealing with these
world leaders or these sanctuary cities or states, that incompetency
is something he's going to have to keep calling out.
And since he's been sworn in as the forty seventh
president I to America, and since the assassination attempt against
(30:36):
him that not one, but two that we know of,
and almost getting his head blown off by that first assassin,
he's coming in with a very different level of focus there,
whether it's going after the sanctuary cities and the mayors
or the governors and calling them out for what he
just said there, Like this is one of those moments
(30:56):
where it's like this administration is going to be very different,
very very different. Make sure you share this podcast with
your family and friends. Rights to five sorre review to
help us reach more people, please, and I'll see you
back here tomorrow.
Host
Ben Ferguson
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!