July 28, 2025 • 31 mins
🛢️ 1. Trump-EU Historic Trade Deal
- Announcement: Former President Donald Trump announced a sweeping trade agreement with the European Union during a press conference at his Turnberry golf course in Scotland.
- Key Terms of the Deal:
- The EU will purchase $750 billion worth of U.S. energy.
- The EU will invest an additional $600 billion into the U.S. economy.
- European countries will open their markets to U.S. goods with zero tariffs.
- The EU will purchase hundreds of billions of dollars in U.S. military equipment.
- A 15% tariff will be applied to European imports into the U.S., including automobiles.
- Impact: The document frames this as a massive win for American businesses, especially the auto and agriculture sectors, which had previously faced barriers in European markets.
🖊️ 2. Autopen Pardons Controversy
- Allegations: Senator Rand Paul and others raise concerns about the use of an autopen (a mechanical signature device) for issuing presidential pardons during the final days of President Joe Biden’s term.
- Key Figures Mentioned:
- Jill Biden and Dr. Anthony Fauci are named as potential subjects of a congressional probe.
- Jeff Zients, Biden’s former chief of staff, is alleged to have authorized the autopen use.
- Concerns Raised:
- Questions about the legitimacy of pardons not personally signed by Biden.
- Claims that Biden may not have been cognitively aware of the pardons issued.
- Calls for indicting Anthony Fauci to test the validity of his pardon in court.
- Hunter Biden: His pardon was reportedly signed by Biden personally, unlike others.
- Political Implications: The narrative suggests a lack of transparency and potential misuse of executive power.
🕵️ 3. Russia Investigation Revisited
- Lindsey Graham appears on NBC, questioning the original narrative of Russian interference in the 2016 election.
- He calls for a special counsel to investigate new information suggesting that the Obama administration may have influenced intelligence assessments.
- The document criticizes media outlets like the New York Times and Washington Post for their past reporting and accuses them of bias.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. Thanks for Listening
#seanhannity #hannity #marklevin #levin #charliekirk #megynkelly #tucker #tuckercarlson #glennbeck #benshapiro #shapiro #trump #sexton #bucksexton
#rushlimbaugh #limbaugh #whitehouse #senate #congress #thehouse #democrats
#republicans #conservative #senator #congressman #congressmen #congresswoman #capitol #president #vicepresident #POTUS #presidentoftheunitedstatesofamerica
#SCOTUS #Supremecourt #DonaldTrump #PresidentDonaldTrump #DT #TedCruz #Benferguson #Verdict
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Donald Trump reaches a historic trade deal with the European Union.
Europe is going to buy seven hundred and fifty billion,
we're now being told.
Speaker 2 (00:13):
In US energy. This is massive.
Speaker 1 (00:19):
President Trump announcing the sweeping trade agreement with the European
Union on Sunday, setting a baseline fifteen percent tariff on
European imports, including automobiles, while keeping existing fifty percent duties
on steel and aluminum in place. Now, as part of
the deal, the EU committed to purchasing seven hundred and
(00:42):
fifty billion in US energy production. Trump announcing the agreement
during a press conference with the European Commission president after
a private meeting at the Trump Turnberry golf.
Speaker 2 (00:53):
Course in Scotland.
Speaker 1 (00:55):
Here is part of what was said by the President
of United States of America at that event, where.
Speaker 2 (01:02):
They say, we've reached a deal.
Speaker 3 (01:03):
So we're going to do the following. The European Union
is going to agree to purchase from the United States
seven hundred and fifty billion.
Speaker 4 (01:17):
Dollars worth of energy.
Speaker 3 (01:19):
Seven hundred and fifty billion dollars worth of energy. They
are going to agree to invest into the United States
six hundred billion dollars more than they're investing already, so
they're investing a large amount of money.
Speaker 4 (01:39):
You know what that amount of money.
Speaker 3 (01:41):
Is, it's very substantial, but they're going to invest an
additional six hundred billion dollars.
Speaker 4 (01:48):
They're agreeing to.
Speaker 3 (01:50):
Open up their countries to trade at zero tariff, so
that's a very big factor opening up their countries. All
of the countries will be opened up to trade with
the United States at zero traff and they're agreeing to
purchase a vast amount of military equipment. We don't know
(02:10):
what that number is, but it's The good news is
we make the best military equipment in the world, so
sort of you have to do that until somebody tops us,
which is not.
Speaker 2 (02:19):
Going to happen.
Speaker 3 (02:20):
We're way ahead of every other country in terms of
the quality of the military equipment. You saw that recently
in Iran, and you see that unfortunately, you see that
often for.
Speaker 4 (02:32):
All the wrong reasons.
Speaker 3 (02:33):
Right, So those things are seven hundred and fifty billion,
six hundred billion. Opening up the country. We are agreeing
that the tariff straight across for automobiles and everything else
will be a straight across tariff of fifteen percent. So
(02:56):
we have a tariff of fifteen percent we have the
opening up of all of the European countries, which I
think I could.
Speaker 4 (03:05):
Say we're essentially closed.
Speaker 3 (03:06):
I mean, you weren't exactly taking our orders, you weren't
exactly taking our agriculture, and then you would have smaller things.
Speaker 4 (03:14):
But for the most part, it was closed. And now
it's open.
Speaker 3 (03:19):
It's open for our companies to go in and do
a good job with it. I think you'll like them.
I think you'll like it, and we will. Very importantly.
They'll be investing a lot of money. But the military
is a big number, but that's one number. We're not
determining it's going to be whatever it is, but they're
going to be purchasing hundreds of billions of dollars.
Speaker 2 (03:38):
Worth of military equipment.
Speaker 4 (03:40):
There very important.
Speaker 3 (03:42):
That they're going to purchase seven hundred and fifty seven
hundred and fifty billion dollars worth of energy, so that's
going to be great, and six hundred billion dollars worth
of investments into the United States over and above what
they have, and I think that basically concludes the deal.
I mean, those are the main factors. I don't think
(04:04):
there are too many other factors other than we're going
to get along great, and we have a great relationship
now with NATO, which is largely the same I mean
not exactly but pretty close right largely, and with NATO,
as you know, they're going up to five percent from
two percent, and the relationship is very strong with NATO.
(04:27):
So I just want to congratulate you.
Speaker 4 (04:28):
I think it's I think it's.
Speaker 3 (04:31):
Great that we made a deal today instead of playing
games and maybe not making a deal at all. I
think it's I'm going to let you say, but I
think it's the biggest deal ever made.
Speaker 2 (04:40):
Thank you very much, Graduation.
Speaker 1 (04:47):
This is happening live in Turnberry, Scotland at the Trump
Club there announcing this landmark deal. Now, the EU will
purchase three quarters of a trillion dollars in US energy
well also investing six hundred billion into America on top
of his existing investments. Additionally, the EU countries will be
setting tariffs on US goods and this is massive at
(05:11):
zero percent, and Europe agreed to purchase a vast amount
of military equipment as well, saying quote, we don't know
what the number is, but went on to note the
purchase of the military equipment would be in the hundreds
of billions of dollars. Moreover, the EU will pay a
fifteen percent tariff rate to import products into the US,
(05:32):
ranging from automobiles and other goods. Now, look, they had
virtually shut off much of Europe to our automobiles and
to our agriculture, beef, pork.
Speaker 2 (05:41):
Chick in.
Speaker 1 (05:41):
The list goes on and on. So the President saying there, quote,
so we have a so we have a tariff of
fifteen percent. We have the opening up of all of
the European countries, which I think I would say, we're
essentially closed. I mean, you weren't exactly taking our orders,
you weren't exactly taking our agriculture, and and you would
have smaller things. But for the most part, it was closed.
(06:03):
And now it's open. So what does that mean for
American businesses? Well, number one, this is going to be
huge because American businesses are going to be able to
now actually have the ability to get into these markets
that we've been virtually shut out of completely. The auto
industry is a great example of that, where American cars
(06:24):
were just unfortunately not making its way into the European
markets in any significant way.
Speaker 2 (06:30):
That is a big problem.
Speaker 1 (06:32):
It was unfair because we were allowing their automobiles into
this country. And this goes back to the Donald Trump promise.
He promised he was going to get us into these markets.
He promised that we was going to get us into
these markets so it would be fair for American workers
and American manufacturing. And that is exactly what just happened.
(06:55):
You have a present that made good on that promise.
It was a simple promise. It was one about being
about fairness. That's the simplest way I can describe it
is the President wanted it to be fair. The President
wanted it not only to be fair, but he wanted
to make sure that American workers were not left behind.
(07:18):
American manufacturing was at a disadvantage and we were importing
a significant amount of goods from European countries. This is massive.
Congratulations to the President of the United States America for
mania manufacturing American workers. This is huge anyway you look
at it, well done. All right, I want to take
(07:39):
a moment talk about the economy. You've been seeing what's
happening on Wall Street. You've seen what's been happening with
interest rates, and you've probably seen gold prices hitting all
time record highs. Why because there is uncertainty all over
the world right now, and when there is uncertain times
you want real answers about your financial stability, Well it
(07:59):
Kurt Elliot Precious Metals. You get more than gold and silver.
You get trusted guidance from a team that puts people
first always. You also get transparency. This is why I
recommend them. Their mission is clear. They want to help
you protect what matters most with real metals, real service,
and real clarity. Now here's why I love what they
(08:23):
do at kirk Elliott Precious Metals number one bullyon only approach.
They focus on investment grade metals, not overpriced quote collectibles
or gimmick products that cost you an insane amount of
money for what you're actually getting. What they do is
they sell you more metal for your money and fair
value when it's time for you to actually sell. They
(08:45):
also have upfront transparent pricing just eight percent when you
buy and zero commissions when you go to sell. There
are no hidden fees on top of that. Ever, that
is the reason why I reckon amend them. They also
make sure they give you personalized guidance for you. You're never
(09:06):
just a number, no pressure, always real answers and they
make sure that you are in control. So if you're
ready for real, honest clarity and all of the BS
taken out, visit k e PM dot com slash ben
that's k e PM dot com slash ben to schedule
(09:28):
your personal portfolio review. Ask about today's unique market window
and how the current silver to gold ratio might work
in your favor. Protect what matters, plan with clarity k
e PM dot com slash ben or seven two zero
six oh five thirty nine hundred. That's seven two zero
(09:50):
six oh five thirty nine hundred. Kurt Elliott Precious Metals
Smarter Metal Investing starts with them. There's another major story
that is happening and the media is not covering it.
Senator rand Paul is now signaling very clearly that Jill Biden,
the former First Lady of the United States of America,
(10:10):
the wife of former President Joe Biden, as well as
Anthony Fauci, you remember the COVID guy, they could be
looked at in the Auto pen probe. Senator Paul saying
that the former First Lady, Joe Biden, and Anthony Fauci
absolutely could be examined during the Congress's autopen examination President
(10:34):
Trump has railed against his predecessor, the former President Biden,
for using the art autopen to pardon individuals during his
last few months in office. The President ordered a probe
into the signatures on various pardons in June, while GOP
lawmakers requested interviews now with several former White House staffers,
including the former first ladies and the president's doctor who
(10:58):
pled the fifth. They've now also gone to staffers to
testify and guess.
Speaker 2 (11:03):
What they pleaded the fifth as well.
Speaker 1 (11:05):
All of this playing out before the House Oversight and
Government Reform Committee. Even though Anthony Fauci has been pardoned,
there is some question whether it's a legitimate pardon. His
pardon was not signed by President Biden. That's what Senator
Paul said in a statement. It's unclear quote whether President
(11:27):
Biden is mentally cognitive enough of the situation to know
even who he pardoned. Hundreds and hundreds of people were
pardoned in a day by a mechanical signature from a machine.
We do know there's been testimony from the people running
the machine that they never talked to the president, and
(11:49):
that they talked to an assistant that works for the
President's wife, that is where the first lady comes in now.
Speaker 2 (11:57):
Biden had previously argued that.
Speaker 1 (12:00):
Past administrations have used the autopendicign government paperwork, proving its legality. However,
Republicans have well refused to let go of the criticism
regarding his signature on multiple pardons that he may not
have known about, meaning they would be in theory no
and void. Who knew we weren't being led by Joe
(12:24):
Biden but were being run by some kind of chief
of staff, some chief of staff that worked for his wife.
That's something to a lot of Americans to know. They
want to know who was the person that was granting
power of pardons, who was the person that could have
taken the country to war, who was the person that
was never elected?
Speaker 2 (12:45):
Senator Paul went on to say, adding.
Speaker 1 (12:48):
Quote, so I think the way the best way to
sort this out is you have to go to court.
And I think the easiest way to get this into
court is is they should indicate.
Speaker 2 (13:00):
What's gonna happen next.
Speaker 1 (13:01):
They should indict, for example, Anthony Fauci for lying to Congress,
and he will make a defense that he's been pardon
That's what again, the senator said today. Senator Paul also
pointed out that the autopen was not used to sign
the pardon for Hunter Biden. We know that Hunter Biden's
pardon was signed directly by the President of the United
(13:22):
States of America. He went on to say, quote, I
think there is a question whether these pardons are even valid.
Interestingly enough, when he had to pardon his son, he
didn't take any chances.
Speaker 2 (13:33):
By running it through the auto pen.
Speaker 1 (13:36):
The pardon f Rountter Biden for any crimes committed over
the last decade. Any crimes was done by personal hand
signature by Joe Biden himself, and not by the auto pen.
So if you look at this story, there's two major
questions that everyone should be asking. Number one, why not
(13:56):
indict a guy like Anthony Fauci for line to Congress
and see if he uses the I've been pardoned in
court argument? And then it brings up the big question,
does an auto pen signature that the President may not
have known about does it actually count?
Speaker 2 (14:15):
In fact?
Speaker 1 (14:16):
How many different And this is an even bigger question.
Pardons came through the White House that the President had
no clue even happened. These are the real questions that
the American people deserve answers to and the President obviously
making it clear that he's willing to get to the
(14:36):
bottom of it to make sure it was done the
right way.
Speaker 2 (14:41):
I got to ask you a question.
Speaker 1 (14:42):
Are you one of those that is just so tired
of giving your money to radical left woke companies that
actually are fighting against your values every day?
Speaker 2 (14:51):
Well, there are certain bills that you pay.
Speaker 1 (14:53):
Every month that if you can go with a conservative company,
why not do it?
Speaker 2 (14:58):
In fact, why not go.
Speaker 1 (15:00):
With a conservative company that actually takes part of your
bill every month that you're going to pay to somebody,
and they give it back to organizations that support your
First and your Second Amendment rights, that support the rights
of unborn children, that stand with our military, are first responders,
and so many wounded warriors that need help. Well, that
(15:20):
bill I'm talking about is your cell phone bill. And
I've been telling you for a long time about Patriot Mobile.
But there's no better time to switch than right now.
Not only does Patriot Mobile operate on all three major
networks in this country, yeah, all three. That means you
get the same great coverage you're used to right now,
but you also make a difference with every call you
(15:41):
make and every text.
Speaker 2 (15:42):
You make, And why would you want to give your
money to Big Mobile?
Speaker 1 (15:45):
Big Mobile has been giving big donations to democratic causes,
democratic candidates, and radical left organizations. I'm talking about organizations
that actually support abortion. That is why I want you
to switch right now to Patriot Mobile. Go ahead and
make the switch, and it's so easy. All you have
(16:07):
to do is simply call Patriot Mobiles one hundred percent
US based team from the comfort of your home or
your office and they'll have you activated in minutes. And
if you're still locked in a contract, not a problem.
Patriots Mobile contract buyout program covers up to five hundred
dollars per device. Keep your same number, keep your phone,
or upgrade do a new one. So back to my point,
(16:28):
what are you waiting for? Call Patriot Mobile today and
make a difference every single day with every call you make.
Patriot Mobile dot com slash ferguson. That's Patriot Mobile dot
com slash ferguson or nine seven to two Patriot And
if you use the promo code ferguson, you're gonna get
a free month of service on top of that Patriot
(16:50):
Mobile dot com slash ferguson or nine seven two Patriot.
That's Patriot mobile dot com slash Ferguson or nine seven
to two Patriot. Let me also one other thing about
these pardons. I don't think that there is anyone out
there that it looks at this in an honest way
that actually believes that Joe Biden knew who was getting pardoned.
Speaker 2 (17:14):
I believe that he knew his son. I do.
Speaker 1 (17:17):
I do believe he knew his son was getting a pardon.
He signed it. It was important to him. It was
something that he wanted to happen. He wanted to make
sure it was done the right way. But Senator Paul
and the way that he described it, he's absolutely right.
Speaker 2 (17:33):
Take a listen to this.
Speaker 5 (17:35):
But I've got to get to another issue with you, sir,
because the New York Times is reporting that Biden's Joe
Biden's former chief of staff, Jeff Ziance.
Speaker 4 (17:43):
Was the one who approved the auto.
Speaker 5 (17:45):
Pens use for the eleventh hour pardons. That's the night
before Joe Biden left office, they started pardoning all these people.
The pardons included a preemptive partum for General Mark Millie,
a preemptive pardum for doctor Anthony Fauci. Now you are
reissuing your criminal referral of Anthony Fauci to the Department
(18:05):
of Justice. Your reaction to now Jeff Sience being the
one who pardoned Fauci. Okay, it wasn't Joe Biden.
Speaker 6 (18:13):
He was pardoned by Jeff Sience.
Speaker 2 (18:16):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (18:16):
My first question is who knew?
Speaker 7 (18:18):
Who knew that there was a president Jeff Zience and
he was in charge of pardons. I mean, it is
really shocking and on all likelihood criminal. Now will they
try to backpedal and say Biden was somethow involved?
Speaker 2 (18:31):
I think that's what they'll try.
Speaker 7 (18:33):
But an autopen pardon, preemptive pardon, there's a lot to
go on here. The only way we could actually get
this into court is hopefully the DOJ would do.
Speaker 2 (18:42):
Their job and died Anthony Fauci.
Speaker 7 (18:44):
For the felony of Lyne to Congress and then take
it to court and then they can plead that you know,
he has been pardoned, But then the court could judge
whether the pardon is valid. So the only way we
get this into court is someone who's been pardoned will
have to be indicted, and I would promote the Anthony
Falci is a prime specimen for this.
Speaker 2 (19:03):
A prime specimen for this.
Speaker 1 (19:07):
It is clear that Senator ram Paul is giving a
play to the Republican leadership of this is how you
do this, This is what we should do. Senator Van Holland,
by the way, on CNN, adding this again to what
has happened so far, and I want you to hear
(19:30):
what he had to say to John Berman at CNN.
Speaker 6 (19:34):
The New York Times spoke to former President Biden and
published a story overnight on the use of autopens for
some of the commutations impartans at the end of his term,
and one of the things that was reported was that
President Biden, while he approved of the commutations on classes
of people, he didn't necessarily sign off on every individual
(19:56):
one directly. How important do you feel that is and
where you think this issue goes now.
Speaker 8 (20:02):
John, I was just reading those reports this morning as well.
My understanding is that you know, President Biden did look
at these pardons, whether or not they came in classes
of pardons, like these are people being pardoned because they
had mandatory minimum sentences for certain drug offenses, and he
didn't think that that was appropriate that they'd served their
(20:24):
time well as opposed to each individual one I will
have to take a look at that entire issue.
Speaker 1 (20:30):
Wow, my understanding is that you know, President Biden did
look at these pardons. So the question now becomes, who's
Lyne who is lying to the American people, an old
senile man that covered up the cognitive decline and the
auto pen that is proof that he wasn't signing these
(20:50):
or or could it be that the people around the
President of the United States America knew exactly what was
going on and they say we're going to hand out
pardons like candy to anybody that wants won using an
auto pen without the president even knowing about it.
Speaker 2 (21:09):
I think we all know the real answer to that question.
Speaker 1 (21:14):
Center Lindsey Graham went on Meet the Press and was
very angry. He was angry about the lies the medium
told over Russian intelligence and the Russian collusion story. Back
in two thoy and sixteen. Lindsey Graham having this to say,
he was in Congress, you may remember then, and he
(21:37):
knew exactly what was going on in sixteen, and now
he's got three seats to show what the Biden regime
was doing to try to overthrow the will of the
people with a coup attempt against Donald Trump.
Speaker 2 (21:48):
Here is Lindsey on NBC. Take a listen.
Speaker 9 (21:53):
All right, well, let me ask you about this twist
that happened this week. President Trump that seemed to want
to try to shut down questions about the Epstein files
by accusing former President Obama of treason. This came as
his Director of National Intelligence, Toulci Gabbert, declassified documents which
alleged top Obama officials manufactured information related to Russian interference
(22:16):
in the twenty sixteen election. Now, Senator, as you are
well aware, this actually contradicts a bipartisan Senate intelligence report
led by Marco Rubio, which found that Russia did, in
fact interfere in the election. Do you actually believe that
for President Obama committed treason?
Speaker 10 (22:35):
Well, I think somebody needs to look at what we found.
The Intel Committee looked at the matter, and they said,
in twenty seventeen, the intelligence analysis of twenty seventeen showing
that Russia was trying to interfere.
Speaker 4 (22:51):
In our election was real. They didn't achieve their goal.
Speaker 10 (22:55):
But what she found, miss Gabbert, is that in twenty sixteen,
the intelligence community, he told President Obama.
Speaker 4 (23:04):
There's no evidence that Russia was involved.
Speaker 10 (23:06):
In trying to change the outcome of the election, and
he supposedly told a group of people keep looking and
the analysis changed.
Speaker 4 (23:15):
So what we're looking at is.
Speaker 10 (23:17):
Did what role did Obama play in twenty sixteen to
change the narrative that resulted in twenty seventeen. I'm not
alleging he committed treason, but I am saying it bothers me.
It's disturbing that this is new information. Now you got
the number two guy at the FBI, don mister Bongino,
saying he's seeing things that has changed his life. And
(23:40):
I assume now he's referring to Russia. So the best
way to handle this is if there are if there
is evidence of a crime being committed or suspected evidence
of a crime being committed, create a special counsel to
look at it.
Speaker 4 (23:54):
I think that's the best way to go.
Speaker 9 (23:56):
Okay, let me follow up with you on your calls
for a special council investigation.
Speaker 2 (24:02):
Let's just pause there.
Speaker 1 (24:04):
Lindsey Graham just called for a special prosecutor to investigate this.
Speaker 2 (24:10):
He knows what he's saying. By the way, when he
said this.
Speaker 1 (24:14):
He also went after the Washington Post and The New
York Times, and he went after the media for how
they covered the Russian collusion story, and then in essence
they were in on it as well.
Speaker 4 (24:28):
I think that's the best way to go.
Speaker 9 (24:30):
Okay, let me follow up with you on your calls
for a special council investigation. As you know, Senator, there
was already a Trump appointed special council at the time
investigating the origins of the Russia probe, but did not
find any evidence of political interference. And Senator, at the time,
you agreed with the findings of the intelligence community. I
(24:52):
want to play back what you said at the time.
Speaker 10 (24:54):
Take a look, ye, the Russians did it. It was
the Russians who tried to interfere in our election. Every
memory where the committee agrees it was the Russians. They
didn't change the outcome, but they did release information embarrassing
to the Democratic Party.
Speaker 4 (25:07):
It did affect Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 10 (25:09):
There's only one person in Washington that I know of
that has any doubt about what Russia did in our
election as President Trump.
Speaker 9 (25:16):
Senator, are you now saying that you don't believe that
Russia tried to interfere in the twenty.
Speaker 10 (25:22):
Sixteen election, Well, what I am saying is that you
left a lot out.
Speaker 4 (25:27):
Here's called the Horowitz report.
Speaker 10 (25:29):
Is the Mueller investigation was crooked and rotten to the corps.
The Washington Post and the New York Times got a
pull up surprise for reporting on Trump's campaigns relationship with Russia.
It was all bs at the time. I didn't know
any of that. At the time. I didn't know that
they were manufacturing evidence to get PHISA warrants.
Speaker 4 (25:50):
There was a confirmation bias.
Speaker 10 (25:52):
Durham didn't say there was no political bias. He said
quite the opposite. He said, every time a FISA warrant
would saw it in the Muhler world, they got it.
And the errors made to get warrants in this space
were a lot greater than they were in anything not
involving Trump. But what I'm saying is that this is
(26:14):
new evidence. This is something I didn't know. You didn't
know that. In twenty sixteen, Obama suggested, I don't like
the outcome that there's no evidence Russia was involved. Well,
now we all say Russia was involved, but in twenty
sixteen they said Russia wasn't involved.
Speaker 4 (26:30):
What's that happened. Let's get a special counsel hold on
et Center.
Speaker 9 (26:33):
As you know, former President Obama has waited.
Speaker 1 (26:36):
Through her spokes By the way, do you notice how
nervous Christian Welker is at NBC News over this. She's
nervous because she feels that they're losing the narrative. And
then Lindsey Graham goes into NBC News's reporting. He's like,
I talked about Washington posting your time, so I'll talk
about you guys too.
Speaker 10 (26:57):
Let's get a special counsel hold on, et cetera.
Speaker 9 (26:59):
As you know, former President Obama has waded through a spokesperson.
Speaker 4 (27:02):
He says, that's just patently false.
Speaker 9 (27:04):
I actually spoke to Susan Miller, who's a former senior
CIA officer who helped oversee the twenty seventeen intelligence assessment
on Russian interference. She says it's completely false that Obama
or anyone else asked them to change or sway their investigators.
She says, they all, she says, and she's a Republican,
says they all want to quit if that had happened. Senator,
(27:26):
are you trying to rewrite history to distract from the
Epstein matter?
Speaker 10 (27:30):
Senator No, I'm trying to let you know and the
media know that we found something we.
Speaker 4 (27:37):
Didn't know before. At the end of the day, I'm
not calling.
Speaker 10 (27:40):
For a prosecution against President Obama for treason, but I
am calling for an investigation. Mister Miller also said there
was no credible evidence that President Trump colluded with the Russians.
For years and months and days and weeks, people had
their lives turned upside down, chasing the mullered narrative that
(28:02):
Trump was in bed with the Russians, that the Trump
campaign was colluding with the Russians.
Speaker 4 (28:08):
The only people colluding with the Russians.
Speaker 10 (28:10):
Were the hill or a Clinton campaign and Christopher Steel
manufacturing a document to get warrants against Carter Page based
on lies and falsehoods.
Speaker 4 (28:20):
So yeah, I'm very familiar with it.
Speaker 10 (28:22):
What you don't seem to acknowledge is there something new
being found. Rather than reinventing the wheel here, let's go
back to a special Council model to look at this
something new, something new as statements by President Obama.
Speaker 4 (28:37):
I don't like your analysis.
Speaker 10 (28:39):
Russia wasn't involved here in twenty sixty Center.
Speaker 4 (28:42):
You're saying there's something new.
Speaker 9 (28:43):
This report goes back to twenty twenty.
Speaker 4 (28:46):
It's five years old.
Speaker 9 (28:47):
There's actually nothing new in this report and nothing that
changes any conlusion.
Speaker 4 (28:51):
But I want to talk about nover is new to me.
I did say it's new to me trying to speak
this stuff fronder the rug, and that's not right.
Speaker 9 (29:00):
But Senator, you know that at the time you said
you did believe the assessments and the multiple investigations.
Speaker 4 (29:06):
But let me move on to Gaza. Let's talk about that.
Speaker 1 (29:08):
I love how fast by the way She's like, let's
move on to Gaza. Lindsey Graham making it pretty clear.
I'm not calling for prosecution Obama for Trees. I'm calling
for an investigation, and you're trying to sweep this stuff
under the rug.
Speaker 2 (29:22):
And that's not right. And what we've learned now is.
Speaker 1 (29:25):
Completely different than what we were told in twenty sixteen
we relied to. So what I said then is completely
different than the reality in twenty twenty five of what
we're now learning because of these documents that have been released.
Speaker 2 (29:43):
And I think it's pretty clear that the.
Speaker 1 (29:46):
Media now is trying to act like there's nothing there, right,
that there's no there there, like they just oh, there's
nothing to nothing to see here, nothing to talk about here,
nothing to men, nothing at all, just no, no, everything's.
Speaker 2 (30:03):
You know, look the other way.
Speaker 1 (30:05):
There's nothing here here, everything's just it's totally different.
Speaker 2 (30:08):
And he's saying, we got new intel. We were lied to.
Speaker 1 (30:12):
What I said back then was based on a different
set of of intel was based on a different set
of information. It was based on a very different set
of information and intel we.
Speaker 2 (30:27):
Were lied to.
Speaker 1 (30:29):
So you want to act like what I was saying
back then is somehow accurate. I guess back then, but
not now. We have new information. And if we have
new information, why would I not change my assessment? And
you're trying to sweep it under the rug by the way,
(30:49):
he's absolutely right about that, like absolutely one thousand percent
right about all of this. Don't forget share this podcast
please with your family and your friends wherever they are,
and I will see you back here tomorrow
Donald Trump reaches a historic trade deal with the European Union.
Europe is going to buy seven hundred and fifty billion,
we're now being told.
Speaker 2 (00:13):
In US energy. This is massive.
Speaker 1 (00:19):
President Trump announcing the sweeping trade agreement with the European
Union on Sunday, setting a baseline fifteen percent tariff on
European imports, including automobiles, while keeping existing fifty percent duties
on steel and aluminum in place. Now, as part of
the deal, the EU committed to purchasing seven hundred and
(00:42):
fifty billion in US energy production. Trump announcing the agreement
during a press conference with the European Commission president after
a private meeting at the Trump Turnberry golf.
Speaker 2 (00:53):
Course in Scotland.
Speaker 1 (00:55):
Here is part of what was said by the President
of United States of America at that event, where.
Speaker 2 (01:02):
They say, we've reached a deal.
Speaker 3 (01:03):
So we're going to do the following. The European Union
is going to agree to purchase from the United States
seven hundred and fifty billion.
Speaker 4 (01:17):
Dollars worth of energy.
Speaker 3 (01:19):
Seven hundred and fifty billion dollars worth of energy. They
are going to agree to invest into the United States
six hundred billion dollars more than they're investing already, so
they're investing a large amount of money.
Speaker 4 (01:39):
You know what that amount of money.
Speaker 3 (01:41):
Is, it's very substantial, but they're going to invest an
additional six hundred billion dollars.
Speaker 4 (01:48):
They're agreeing to.
Speaker 3 (01:50):
Open up their countries to trade at zero tariff, so
that's a very big factor opening up their countries. All
of the countries will be opened up to trade with
the United States at zero traff and they're agreeing to
purchase a vast amount of military equipment. We don't know
(02:10):
what that number is, but it's The good news is
we make the best military equipment in the world, so
sort of you have to do that until somebody tops us,
which is not.
Speaker 2 (02:19):
Going to happen.
Speaker 3 (02:20):
We're way ahead of every other country in terms of
the quality of the military equipment. You saw that recently
in Iran, and you see that unfortunately, you see that
often for.
Speaker 4 (02:32):
All the wrong reasons.
Speaker 3 (02:33):
Right, So those things are seven hundred and fifty billion,
six hundred billion. Opening up the country. We are agreeing
that the tariff straight across for automobiles and everything else
will be a straight across tariff of fifteen percent. So
(02:56):
we have a tariff of fifteen percent we have the
opening up of all of the European countries, which I
think I could.
Speaker 4 (03:05):
Say we're essentially closed.
Speaker 3 (03:06):
I mean, you weren't exactly taking our orders, you weren't
exactly taking our agriculture, and then you would have smaller things.
Speaker 4 (03:14):
But for the most part, it was closed. And now
it's open.
Speaker 3 (03:19):
It's open for our companies to go in and do
a good job with it. I think you'll like them.
I think you'll like it, and we will. Very importantly.
They'll be investing a lot of money. But the military
is a big number, but that's one number. We're not
determining it's going to be whatever it is, but they're
going to be purchasing hundreds of billions of dollars.
Speaker 2 (03:38):
Worth of military equipment.
Speaker 4 (03:40):
There very important.
Speaker 3 (03:42):
That they're going to purchase seven hundred and fifty seven
hundred and fifty billion dollars worth of energy, so that's
going to be great, and six hundred billion dollars worth
of investments into the United States over and above what
they have, and I think that basically concludes the deal.
I mean, those are the main factors. I don't think
(04:04):
there are too many other factors other than we're going
to get along great, and we have a great relationship
now with NATO, which is largely the same I mean
not exactly but pretty close right largely, and with NATO,
as you know, they're going up to five percent from
two percent, and the relationship is very strong with NATO.
(04:27):
So I just want to congratulate you.
Speaker 4 (04:28):
I think it's I think it's.
Speaker 3 (04:31):
Great that we made a deal today instead of playing
games and maybe not making a deal at all. I
think it's I'm going to let you say, but I
think it's the biggest deal ever made.
Speaker 2 (04:40):
Thank you very much, Graduation.
Speaker 1 (04:47):
This is happening live in Turnberry, Scotland at the Trump
Club there announcing this landmark deal. Now, the EU will
purchase three quarters of a trillion dollars in US energy
well also investing six hundred billion into America on top
of his existing investments. Additionally, the EU countries will be
setting tariffs on US goods and this is massive at
(05:11):
zero percent, and Europe agreed to purchase a vast amount
of military equipment as well, saying quote, we don't know
what the number is, but went on to note the
purchase of the military equipment would be in the hundreds
of billions of dollars. Moreover, the EU will pay a
fifteen percent tariff rate to import products into the US,
(05:32):
ranging from automobiles and other goods. Now, look, they had
virtually shut off much of Europe to our automobiles and
to our agriculture, beef, pork.
Speaker 2 (05:41):
Chick in.
Speaker 1 (05:41):
The list goes on and on. So the President saying there, quote,
so we have a so we have a tariff of
fifteen percent. We have the opening up of all of
the European countries, which I think I would say, we're
essentially closed. I mean, you weren't exactly taking our orders,
you weren't exactly taking our agriculture, and and you would
have smaller things. But for the most part, it was closed.
(06:03):
And now it's open. So what does that mean for
American businesses? Well, number one, this is going to be
huge because American businesses are going to be able to
now actually have the ability to get into these markets
that we've been virtually shut out of completely. The auto
industry is a great example of that, where American cars
(06:24):
were just unfortunately not making its way into the European
markets in any significant way.
Speaker 2 (06:30):
That is a big problem.
Speaker 1 (06:32):
It was unfair because we were allowing their automobiles into
this country. And this goes back to the Donald Trump promise.
He promised he was going to get us into these markets.
He promised that we was going to get us into
these markets so it would be fair for American workers
and American manufacturing. And that is exactly what just happened.
(06:55):
You have a present that made good on that promise.
It was a simple promise. It was one about being
about fairness. That's the simplest way I can describe it
is the President wanted it to be fair. The President
wanted it not only to be fair, but he wanted
to make sure that American workers were not left behind.
(07:18):
American manufacturing was at a disadvantage and we were importing
a significant amount of goods from European countries. This is massive.
Congratulations to the President of the United States America for
mania manufacturing American workers. This is huge anyway you look
at it, well done. All right, I want to take
(07:39):
a moment talk about the economy. You've been seeing what's
happening on Wall Street. You've seen what's been happening with
interest rates, and you've probably seen gold prices hitting all
time record highs. Why because there is uncertainty all over
the world right now, and when there is uncertain times
you want real answers about your financial stability, Well it
(07:59):
Kurt Elliot Precious Metals. You get more than gold and silver.
You get trusted guidance from a team that puts people
first always. You also get transparency. This is why I
recommend them. Their mission is clear. They want to help
you protect what matters most with real metals, real service,
and real clarity. Now here's why I love what they
(08:23):
do at kirk Elliott Precious Metals number one bullyon only approach.
They focus on investment grade metals, not overpriced quote collectibles
or gimmick products that cost you an insane amount of
money for what you're actually getting. What they do is
they sell you more metal for your money and fair
value when it's time for you to actually sell. They
(08:45):
also have upfront transparent pricing just eight percent when you
buy and zero commissions when you go to sell. There
are no hidden fees on top of that. Ever, that
is the reason why I reckon amend them. They also
make sure they give you personalized guidance for you. You're never
(09:06):
just a number, no pressure, always real answers and they
make sure that you are in control. So if you're
ready for real, honest clarity and all of the BS
taken out, visit k e PM dot com slash ben
that's k e PM dot com slash ben to schedule
(09:28):
your personal portfolio review. Ask about today's unique market window
and how the current silver to gold ratio might work
in your favor. Protect what matters, plan with clarity k
e PM dot com slash ben or seven two zero
six oh five thirty nine hundred. That's seven two zero
(09:50):
six oh five thirty nine hundred. Kurt Elliott Precious Metals
Smarter Metal Investing starts with them. There's another major story
that is happening and the media is not covering it.
Senator rand Paul is now signaling very clearly that Jill Biden,
the former First Lady of the United States of America,
(10:10):
the wife of former President Joe Biden, as well as
Anthony Fauci, you remember the COVID guy, they could be
looked at in the Auto pen probe. Senator Paul saying
that the former First Lady, Joe Biden, and Anthony Fauci
absolutely could be examined during the Congress's autopen examination President
(10:34):
Trump has railed against his predecessor, the former President Biden,
for using the art autopen to pardon individuals during his
last few months in office. The President ordered a probe
into the signatures on various pardons in June, while GOP
lawmakers requested interviews now with several former White House staffers,
including the former first ladies and the president's doctor who
(10:58):
pled the fifth. They've now also gone to staffers to
testify and guess.
Speaker 2 (11:03):
What they pleaded the fifth as well.
Speaker 1 (11:05):
All of this playing out before the House Oversight and
Government Reform Committee. Even though Anthony Fauci has been pardoned,
there is some question whether it's a legitimate pardon. His
pardon was not signed by President Biden. That's what Senator
Paul said in a statement. It's unclear quote whether President
(11:27):
Biden is mentally cognitive enough of the situation to know
even who he pardoned. Hundreds and hundreds of people were
pardoned in a day by a mechanical signature from a machine.
We do know there's been testimony from the people running
the machine that they never talked to the president, and
(11:49):
that they talked to an assistant that works for the
President's wife, that is where the first lady comes in now.
Speaker 2 (11:57):
Biden had previously argued that.
Speaker 1 (12:00):
Past administrations have used the autopendicign government paperwork, proving its legality. However,
Republicans have well refused to let go of the criticism
regarding his signature on multiple pardons that he may not
have known about, meaning they would be in theory no
and void. Who knew we weren't being led by Joe
(12:24):
Biden but were being run by some kind of chief
of staff, some chief of staff that worked for his wife.
That's something to a lot of Americans to know. They
want to know who was the person that was granting
power of pardons, who was the person that could have
taken the country to war, who was the person that
was never elected?
Speaker 2 (12:45):
Senator Paul went on to say, adding.
Speaker 1 (12:48):
Quote, so I think the way the best way to
sort this out is you have to go to court.
And I think the easiest way to get this into
court is is they should indicate.
Speaker 2 (13:00):
What's gonna happen next.
Speaker 1 (13:01):
They should indict, for example, Anthony Fauci for lying to Congress,
and he will make a defense that he's been pardon
That's what again, the senator said today. Senator Paul also
pointed out that the autopen was not used to sign
the pardon for Hunter Biden. We know that Hunter Biden's
pardon was signed directly by the President of the United
(13:22):
States of America. He went on to say, quote, I
think there is a question whether these pardons are even valid.
Interestingly enough, when he had to pardon his son, he
didn't take any chances.
Speaker 2 (13:33):
By running it through the auto pen.
Speaker 1 (13:36):
The pardon f Rountter Biden for any crimes committed over
the last decade. Any crimes was done by personal hand
signature by Joe Biden himself, and not by the auto pen.
So if you look at this story, there's two major
questions that everyone should be asking. Number one, why not
(13:56):
indict a guy like Anthony Fauci for line to Congress
and see if he uses the I've been pardoned in
court argument? And then it brings up the big question,
does an auto pen signature that the President may not
have known about does it actually count?
Speaker 2 (14:15):
In fact?
Speaker 1 (14:16):
How many different And this is an even bigger question.
Pardons came through the White House that the President had
no clue even happened. These are the real questions that
the American people deserve answers to and the President obviously
making it clear that he's willing to get to the
(14:36):
bottom of it to make sure it was done the
right way.
Speaker 2 (14:41):
I got to ask you a question.
Speaker 1 (14:42):
Are you one of those that is just so tired
of giving your money to radical left woke companies that
actually are fighting against your values every day?
Speaker 2 (14:51):
Well, there are certain bills that you pay.
Speaker 1 (14:53):
Every month that if you can go with a conservative company,
why not do it?
Speaker 2 (14:58):
In fact, why not go.
Speaker 1 (15:00):
With a conservative company that actually takes part of your
bill every month that you're going to pay to somebody,
and they give it back to organizations that support your
First and your Second Amendment rights, that support the rights
of unborn children, that stand with our military, are first responders,
and so many wounded warriors that need help. Well, that
(15:20):
bill I'm talking about is your cell phone bill. And
I've been telling you for a long time about Patriot Mobile.
But there's no better time to switch than right now.
Not only does Patriot Mobile operate on all three major
networks in this country, yeah, all three. That means you
get the same great coverage you're used to right now,
but you also make a difference with every call you
(15:41):
make and every text.
Speaker 2 (15:42):
You make, And why would you want to give your
money to Big Mobile?
Speaker 1 (15:45):
Big Mobile has been giving big donations to democratic causes,
democratic candidates, and radical left organizations. I'm talking about organizations
that actually support abortion. That is why I want you
to switch right now to Patriot Mobile. Go ahead and
make the switch, and it's so easy. All you have
(16:07):
to do is simply call Patriot Mobiles one hundred percent
US based team from the comfort of your home or
your office and they'll have you activated in minutes. And
if you're still locked in a contract, not a problem.
Patriots Mobile contract buyout program covers up to five hundred
dollars per device. Keep your same number, keep your phone,
or upgrade do a new one. So back to my point,
(16:28):
what are you waiting for? Call Patriot Mobile today and
make a difference every single day with every call you make.
Patriot Mobile dot com slash ferguson. That's Patriot Mobile dot
com slash ferguson or nine seven to two Patriot And
if you use the promo code ferguson, you're gonna get
a free month of service on top of that Patriot
(16:50):
Mobile dot com slash ferguson or nine seven two Patriot.
That's Patriot mobile dot com slash Ferguson or nine seven
to two Patriot. Let me also one other thing about
these pardons. I don't think that there is anyone out
there that it looks at this in an honest way
that actually believes that Joe Biden knew who was getting pardoned.
Speaker 2 (17:14):
I believe that he knew his son. I do.
Speaker 1 (17:17):
I do believe he knew his son was getting a pardon.
He signed it. It was important to him. It was
something that he wanted to happen. He wanted to make
sure it was done the right way. But Senator Paul
and the way that he described it, he's absolutely right.
Speaker 2 (17:33):
Take a listen to this.
Speaker 5 (17:35):
But I've got to get to another issue with you, sir,
because the New York Times is reporting that Biden's Joe
Biden's former chief of staff, Jeff Ziance.
Speaker 4 (17:43):
Was the one who approved the auto.
Speaker 5 (17:45):
Pens use for the eleventh hour pardons. That's the night
before Joe Biden left office, they started pardoning all these people.
The pardons included a preemptive partum for General Mark Millie,
a preemptive pardum for doctor Anthony Fauci. Now you are
reissuing your criminal referral of Anthony Fauci to the Department
(18:05):
of Justice. Your reaction to now Jeff Sience being the
one who pardoned Fauci. Okay, it wasn't Joe Biden.
Speaker 6 (18:13):
He was pardoned by Jeff Sience.
Speaker 2 (18:16):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (18:16):
My first question is who knew?
Speaker 7 (18:18):
Who knew that there was a president Jeff Zience and
he was in charge of pardons. I mean, it is
really shocking and on all likelihood criminal. Now will they
try to backpedal and say Biden was somethow involved?
Speaker 2 (18:31):
I think that's what they'll try.
Speaker 7 (18:33):
But an autopen pardon, preemptive pardon, there's a lot to
go on here. The only way we could actually get
this into court is hopefully the DOJ would do.
Speaker 2 (18:42):
Their job and died Anthony Fauci.
Speaker 7 (18:44):
For the felony of Lyne to Congress and then take
it to court and then they can plead that you know,
he has been pardoned, But then the court could judge
whether the pardon is valid. So the only way we
get this into court is someone who's been pardoned will
have to be indicted, and I would promote the Anthony
Falci is a prime specimen for this.
Speaker 2 (19:03):
A prime specimen for this.
Speaker 1 (19:07):
It is clear that Senator ram Paul is giving a
play to the Republican leadership of this is how you
do this, This is what we should do. Senator Van Holland,
by the way, on CNN, adding this again to what
has happened so far, and I want you to hear
(19:30):
what he had to say to John Berman at CNN.
Speaker 6 (19:34):
The New York Times spoke to former President Biden and
published a story overnight on the use of autopens for
some of the commutations impartans at the end of his term,
and one of the things that was reported was that
President Biden, while he approved of the commutations on classes
of people, he didn't necessarily sign off on every individual
(19:56):
one directly. How important do you feel that is and
where you think this issue goes now.
Speaker 8 (20:02):
John, I was just reading those reports this morning as well.
My understanding is that you know, President Biden did look
at these pardons, whether or not they came in classes
of pardons, like these are people being pardoned because they
had mandatory minimum sentences for certain drug offenses, and he
didn't think that that was appropriate that they'd served their
(20:24):
time well as opposed to each individual one I will
have to take a look at that entire issue.
Speaker 1 (20:30):
Wow, my understanding is that you know, President Biden did
look at these pardons. So the question now becomes, who's
Lyne who is lying to the American people, an old
senile man that covered up the cognitive decline and the
auto pen that is proof that he wasn't signing these
(20:50):
or or could it be that the people around the
President of the United States America knew exactly what was
going on and they say we're going to hand out
pardons like candy to anybody that wants won using an
auto pen without the president even knowing about it.
Speaker 2 (21:09):
I think we all know the real answer to that question.
Speaker 1 (21:14):
Center Lindsey Graham went on Meet the Press and was
very angry. He was angry about the lies the medium
told over Russian intelligence and the Russian collusion story. Back
in two thoy and sixteen. Lindsey Graham having this to say,
he was in Congress, you may remember then, and he
(21:37):
knew exactly what was going on in sixteen, and now
he's got three seats to show what the Biden regime
was doing to try to overthrow the will of the
people with a coup attempt against Donald Trump.
Speaker 2 (21:48):
Here is Lindsey on NBC. Take a listen.
Speaker 9 (21:53):
All right, well, let me ask you about this twist
that happened this week. President Trump that seemed to want
to try to shut down questions about the Epstein files
by accusing former President Obama of treason. This came as
his Director of National Intelligence, Toulci Gabbert, declassified documents which
alleged top Obama officials manufactured information related to Russian interference
(22:16):
in the twenty sixteen election. Now, Senator, as you are
well aware, this actually contradicts a bipartisan Senate intelligence report
led by Marco Rubio, which found that Russia did, in
fact interfere in the election. Do you actually believe that
for President Obama committed treason?
Speaker 10 (22:35):
Well, I think somebody needs to look at what we found.
The Intel Committee looked at the matter, and they said,
in twenty seventeen, the intelligence analysis of twenty seventeen showing
that Russia was trying to interfere.
Speaker 4 (22:51):
In our election was real. They didn't achieve their goal.
Speaker 10 (22:55):
But what she found, miss Gabbert, is that in twenty sixteen,
the intelligence community, he told President Obama.
Speaker 4 (23:04):
There's no evidence that Russia was involved.
Speaker 10 (23:06):
In trying to change the outcome of the election, and
he supposedly told a group of people keep looking and
the analysis changed.
Speaker 4 (23:15):
So what we're looking at is.
Speaker 10 (23:17):
Did what role did Obama play in twenty sixteen to
change the narrative that resulted in twenty seventeen. I'm not
alleging he committed treason, but I am saying it bothers me.
It's disturbing that this is new information. Now you got
the number two guy at the FBI, don mister Bongino,
saying he's seeing things that has changed his life. And
(23:40):
I assume now he's referring to Russia. So the best
way to handle this is if there are if there
is evidence of a crime being committed or suspected evidence
of a crime being committed, create a special counsel to
look at it.
Speaker 4 (23:54):
I think that's the best way to go.
Speaker 9 (23:56):
Okay, let me follow up with you on your calls
for a special council investigation.
Speaker 2 (24:02):
Let's just pause there.
Speaker 1 (24:04):
Lindsey Graham just called for a special prosecutor to investigate this.
Speaker 2 (24:10):
He knows what he's saying. By the way, when he
said this.
Speaker 1 (24:14):
He also went after the Washington Post and The New
York Times, and he went after the media for how
they covered the Russian collusion story, and then in essence
they were in on it as well.
Speaker 4 (24:28):
I think that's the best way to go.
Speaker 9 (24:30):
Okay, let me follow up with you on your calls
for a special council investigation. As you know, Senator, there
was already a Trump appointed special council at the time
investigating the origins of the Russia probe, but did not
find any evidence of political interference. And Senator, at the time,
you agreed with the findings of the intelligence community. I
(24:52):
want to play back what you said at the time.
Speaker 10 (24:54):
Take a look, ye, the Russians did it. It was
the Russians who tried to interfere in our election. Every
memory where the committee agrees it was the Russians. They
didn't change the outcome, but they did release information embarrassing
to the Democratic Party.
Speaker 4 (25:07):
It did affect Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 10 (25:09):
There's only one person in Washington that I know of
that has any doubt about what Russia did in our
election as President Trump.
Speaker 9 (25:16):
Senator, are you now saying that you don't believe that
Russia tried to interfere in the twenty.
Speaker 10 (25:22):
Sixteen election, Well, what I am saying is that you
left a lot out.
Speaker 4 (25:27):
Here's called the Horowitz report.
Speaker 10 (25:29):
Is the Mueller investigation was crooked and rotten to the corps.
The Washington Post and the New York Times got a
pull up surprise for reporting on Trump's campaigns relationship with Russia.
It was all bs at the time. I didn't know
any of that. At the time. I didn't know that
they were manufacturing evidence to get PHISA warrants.
Speaker 4 (25:50):
There was a confirmation bias.
Speaker 10 (25:52):
Durham didn't say there was no political bias. He said
quite the opposite. He said, every time a FISA warrant
would saw it in the Muhler world, they got it.
And the errors made to get warrants in this space
were a lot greater than they were in anything not
involving Trump. But what I'm saying is that this is
(26:14):
new evidence. This is something I didn't know. You didn't
know that. In twenty sixteen, Obama suggested, I don't like
the outcome that there's no evidence Russia was involved. Well,
now we all say Russia was involved, but in twenty
sixteen they said Russia wasn't involved.
Speaker 4 (26:30):
What's that happened. Let's get a special counsel hold on
et Center.
Speaker 9 (26:33):
As you know, former President Obama has waited.
Speaker 1 (26:36):
Through her spokes By the way, do you notice how
nervous Christian Welker is at NBC News over this. She's
nervous because she feels that they're losing the narrative. And
then Lindsey Graham goes into NBC News's reporting. He's like,
I talked about Washington posting your time, so I'll talk
about you guys too.
Speaker 10 (26:57):
Let's get a special counsel hold on, et cetera.
Speaker 9 (26:59):
As you know, former President Obama has waded through a spokesperson.
Speaker 4 (27:02):
He says, that's just patently false.
Speaker 9 (27:04):
I actually spoke to Susan Miller, who's a former senior
CIA officer who helped oversee the twenty seventeen intelligence assessment
on Russian interference. She says it's completely false that Obama
or anyone else asked them to change or sway their investigators.
She says, they all, she says, and she's a Republican,
says they all want to quit if that had happened. Senator,
(27:26):
are you trying to rewrite history to distract from the
Epstein matter?
Speaker 10 (27:30):
Senator No, I'm trying to let you know and the
media know that we found something we.
Speaker 4 (27:37):
Didn't know before. At the end of the day, I'm
not calling.
Speaker 10 (27:40):
For a prosecution against President Obama for treason, but I
am calling for an investigation. Mister Miller also said there
was no credible evidence that President Trump colluded with the Russians.
For years and months and days and weeks, people had
their lives turned upside down, chasing the mullered narrative that
(28:02):
Trump was in bed with the Russians, that the Trump
campaign was colluding with the Russians.
Speaker 4 (28:08):
The only people colluding with the Russians.
Speaker 10 (28:10):
Were the hill or a Clinton campaign and Christopher Steel
manufacturing a document to get warrants against Carter Page based
on lies and falsehoods.
Speaker 4 (28:20):
So yeah, I'm very familiar with it.
Speaker 10 (28:22):
What you don't seem to acknowledge is there something new
being found. Rather than reinventing the wheel here, let's go
back to a special Council model to look at this
something new, something new as statements by President Obama.
Speaker 4 (28:37):
I don't like your analysis.
Speaker 10 (28:39):
Russia wasn't involved here in twenty sixty Center.
Speaker 4 (28:42):
You're saying there's something new.
Speaker 9 (28:43):
This report goes back to twenty twenty.
Speaker 4 (28:46):
It's five years old.
Speaker 9 (28:47):
There's actually nothing new in this report and nothing that
changes any conlusion.
Speaker 4 (28:51):
But I want to talk about nover is new to me.
I did say it's new to me trying to speak
this stuff fronder the rug, and that's not right.
Speaker 9 (29:00):
But Senator, you know that at the time you said
you did believe the assessments and the multiple investigations.
Speaker 4 (29:06):
But let me move on to Gaza. Let's talk about that.
Speaker 1 (29:08):
I love how fast by the way She's like, let's
move on to Gaza. Lindsey Graham making it pretty clear.
I'm not calling for prosecution Obama for Trees. I'm calling
for an investigation, and you're trying to sweep this stuff
under the rug.
Speaker 2 (29:22):
And that's not right. And what we've learned now is.
Speaker 1 (29:25):
Completely different than what we were told in twenty sixteen
we relied to. So what I said then is completely
different than the reality in twenty twenty five of what
we're now learning because of these documents that have been released.
Speaker 2 (29:43):
And I think it's pretty clear that the.
Speaker 1 (29:46):
Media now is trying to act like there's nothing there, right,
that there's no there there, like they just oh, there's
nothing to nothing to see here, nothing to talk about here,
nothing to men, nothing at all, just no, no, everything's.
Speaker 2 (30:03):
You know, look the other way.
Speaker 1 (30:05):
There's nothing here here, everything's just it's totally different.
Speaker 2 (30:08):
And he's saying, we got new intel. We were lied to.
Speaker 1 (30:12):
What I said back then was based on a different
set of of intel was based on a different set
of information. It was based on a very different set
of information and intel we.
Speaker 2 (30:27):
Were lied to.
Speaker 1 (30:29):
So you want to act like what I was saying
back then is somehow accurate. I guess back then, but
not now. We have new information. And if we have
new information, why would I not change my assessment? And
you're trying to sweep it under the rug by the way,
(30:49):
he's absolutely right about that, like absolutely one thousand percent
right about all of this. Don't forget share this podcast
please with your family and your friends wherever they are,
and I will see you back here tomorrow
Host
Ben Ferguson
Popular Podcasts
Fudd Around And Find Out
UConn basketball star Azzi Fudd brings her championship swag to iHeart Women’s Sports with Fudd Around and Find Out, a weekly podcast that takes fans along for the ride as Azzi spends her final year of college trying to reclaim the National Championship and prepare to be a first round WNBA draft pick. Ever wonder what it’s like to be a world-class athlete in the public spotlight while still managing schoolwork, friendships and family time? It’s time to Fudd Around and Find Out!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.