Thursday August 22 - Full Show - The Dana Show with Dana Loesch

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Because in Minnesota, we respect our neighbors and the personal
choices they make, and even if we wouldn't make those
same choices for ourselves, we've got a golden rule, mind
your own damn business.

Speaker 2 (00:19):
How many times are we going to hear this? I
noted last night after because I moved my son into
his college dorm. It was a super long day, and
then drove hours back and then had to dive into
this DNC nonsense. And I noted that that this is
his unburdened by what has been, like the thing that

(00:41):
Kamala Harris always says, it's his unburdened by what has been.
He says it so many times, like mind your own
damn business, and I you know, I'm I don't. This
is again the guy who created the snitch line, just
you know, just to remind everybody he created the snitch line,
and this this doesn't. It just seems so cheesy for

(01:01):
him to keep saying this stupid crap over and over again.
I watched I'm a Crappy because I was up late
watching this stupid mess because none of these people running
this thing know how to keep anything on time. I
want to point out that he didn't go on. He
literally did not go on until what was my time
stamp on my notes. I mean he was speaking at

(01:23):
like eleven, It was like eleven something o'clock, so that
that that's midnight on the East Coast, right, So can
I just point something out how stupid it is. This
is your vice presidential guy, and your your your ticket,
the guy on your ticket, and you're you're trying to
introduce him to the nation because nobody, if you're not

(01:43):
a political nerd, and even some of the political nerds
don't even know much about him. They this is like
the first time that he's being introduced to the nation.
And you've got you know, East coasters out there on
the East Coast. You know, Georgia's on East Coast time, Yeah,
George's on these cost time zone. That's a state that
there that Democrats are really are wanting to win. And

(02:08):
he's speaking towards the end of the whole night when
they're like going to bed, and so I don't understand
the point of having him speak at the very end
of all of that, at the very end of the night,

(02:30):
when everybody's going to sleep, and you need those voters,
you need the DNC people in Georgia. You need those
people and they're in bed because he's at the end
of the damn night. Welcome to the show. It's uh
good to be with you. This what is it? Thursday?
Got Lee? We saw many days we have of this stuff.

(02:54):
Did you watch it?

Speaker 3 (02:55):
Came?

Speaker 4 (02:57):
No, I watched some highlights Twitter X Sorry.

Speaker 2 (03:02):
So welcome to the program. Dane lash with you. We're
at the top of this very first hour Channel thirty
forty seven Direct TV conversation at Rumble. Also on X
the the length of this number one, they had Bill
Clinton who got up there and went forever. He went
forever and over and over and over and over. He
got up there and just talked forever. His voice made

(03:25):
my throat hurt. I'm gonna be honest, this is just
listening to him talk. I don't know whose voice gets
me more. RFK juniors or Clinton's. They just both have
that gravelly a lot, But I don't understand what they're about.
And I thought it was really weird to bring up
your vice presidential candidate, the guy that you are having
at the very you know, he's your vice presidential ticket

(03:46):
on your ticket, and you have him at the very
end of the night, when half of the people have
gone to bed, and he doesn't give a speech about
any of what he really believes. He doesn't introduce himself,
and he kind of talked about Kamala Harris, I mean
a little bit, he sort of talk about her. I mean,
he just that really wasn't much either, he didn't It

(04:08):
was just a bad speech. I thought. He went out
there and they acted did that was the Do you
see all the white guys that they had on the stage,
So that was all people. I guess. He was assistant
coach for like a year, right, and like four a year.
Why did they keep calling him coach? I got questions.
I mean, I don't know, why do they keep calling

(04:29):
him coach? Just not sure about that anyway. So he's
out there, A bunch of white dudes out there too,
and I don't know. I was just bored to death
by his speech. I didn't you know then he did this.
This was excuse me audio sound.

Speaker 1 (04:41):
By fourteen, I had twenty four kids in my high
school class and none of them went to Yale. I
had twenty.

Speaker 2 (04:53):
So he does this thing where he I don't understand.
He does this thing where he keeps hitting out at
Yale because jd Vance went to Yale. I thought they
loved Yale. I thought they loved Ivy League schools. That's
a big thing with the Left. They love Ivy League schools,

(05:14):
they love all of that stuff. Apparently they don't if
a Republican goes there, so they I don't know, he
just going. He keeps hitting that, he keeps hitting the
whole mindor damn business. But the thing with the Yale
I made mention of this last night. The left absolutely
hates jd Vance's overcoming poverty story. They do. They hate it.

(05:40):
They hate his story of overcoming poverty for a very
big reason. They do not like poor people thinking that
they the poor people, can change their status themselves without
government help. And JD Vance's story disproves that narrative. They

(06:03):
want poor people to think that they are forever stuck
in this economic status and that the only way that
you can get out of it is with the assistance
of the government. And when you have examples of that
that undermine the narrative that they used to control people,
they get very very offended and they are very very

(06:27):
caustic towards it. Like that's why they keep hitting this,
They keep hitting Jdvans like, oh well, Jadvans, By the way,
you know how many people up there on stage went
to Yale. And that's the other thing the irony. I mean,
Bill Clinton was up there. That doesn't make any sense
to me. I don't understand why why they keep making

(06:48):
that point. Especially didn't he go out? He went on
after Jadvances, on, after book Clinton. Bill Clinton spoke several
people ahead of Tim Walls. Also on stage that night
was Cool Booker, who also went to Yale. Then you
had Amy Klobuchar who spoke up there. Guess where she went.
She went to Yale. You had Jamie Harrison who spoke

(07:10):
up there. Guesshe Jamie Harrison went to Yale. I mean
de Gorman went to Harvard, Pete Booty Juice went to Harvard.
You had all of these people out there that all
went to these Ivy League schools. I mean, Oprah Winfrey
got an honorary degree from Harvard. So what is he
going on about. He went up there and was railing
against the school that half of the people on stage attended.

(07:32):
But it's supposed to be a stickler because it's vance
and I don't get it. So Vance made himself from
nothing and achieved the American dream, and that's a bad thing.
We're gonna talk more about this because this is a
very weird thing that they found themselves in. They keep
talking about wealth inequality, and the weird thing is it's
all these billionaires that get up on stage, people like JB.
Pritzger and Oprah the coult up on stage and talk

(07:52):
about it, and then everyone else doesn't recognize the irony
of it. It's just wild. So this it was. I
stayed up and watched it. Like I said, we moved
in one of my kids to their college drum yesterday,
came back and immediately had DNC stuff. So it's a
very full day. And if you get the Prep New newsletter,

(08:14):
it went out a little bit late today because your
girl was burning to midnight oil. Working late. It didn
me so sent that out and I included some of
the stuff in there. There's some very We're going to
highlight it so you can follow along with it, but
there's some There was some interesting moments and some very
interesting soundbites that highlight what I think is the complete Marxist,

(08:35):
the final Marxist takeover it's been proceeding for quite some time,
but it's in it's full now. And that it was
evident in every single comment from every single speaker. And
they all talked about joy. That's the other thing they
all it was like they all had to mention how
joyous they were and how much joy they felt. And
I don't understand that either, because they all they were

(08:55):
doing was just bitching about the people who've been in
charge the last several years. Oh that's them, by the way,
they were the ones. They were the ones who were
in charge. They're still in charge. They keep saying, Kamala
Harris is going to do this, Kamala Harris is going
to do that, and she's why can't she do it now?
That's the why can't she do it now? That doesn't
make any sense. She's there as the vice president now.

(09:20):
And then you had this audio some by twelve, Nancy
Pelosi also spoke, she went up there, listen to this.

Speaker 3 (09:27):
January sixth was a perilous moment for our democracy. Never
before had a president of the United States so brazenly
assaulted the bedrock of our democracy, so leefully embraced political violence,
so willfully betrayed his oath of office. Let us not
forget who assaulted democracy on January sixth he did.

Speaker 2 (09:53):
What about leading up into the election? What about the
assault on democracy that took place when you locked every
down and shoved them into their homes under threat of
penalty if they left them. If you want to have
a discussion about assault on democracy, what about the rioting
that took place the night of the inauguration in twenty sixteen,
and you had and after that the summers after that,

(10:16):
where you had cities burned, someone tried to set fire
to the church that's there in the capitol. That's that's
never brought up by these people. Well the other thing too,
they're sitting here talking about J six. J six can
go pound sand I don't give a rats ass about
J six. I don't give a rats ass about Jay six,
because this entire election should be a reckoning about what
lockdown did to everyone, and the fact that it's not.

(10:37):
I don't care about any of your other grievances. If
people cannot be enraged still over what the lockdown and
pandemic did to everyone, did to the economy, did to
their kids, did to their families, their relationships, and the
very psyche of this nation, then I don't care what
the outcome of the election is. I hope we all
get hit by a giant asteroid because we deserve the burning,

(10:59):
fiery death that will be the consequence of that. I'm
not kidding. I don't care, Kaine, I'm I'm past being
a cynic. I don't care.

Speaker 5 (11:07):
I feel it.

Speaker 2 (11:08):
I don't care. I mean, you know, if there were
people who watched their loved ones die alone on the
other side of hospital glass, and we're gonna sit here,
Jay six, you had some people that broke some stuff
in the Capitol. No one's saying that that's okay, you
absolute rat bastard. It's no one's saying that's okay. Of course,
you know, when you guys set off a bomb in
the Senate heart building, that's all right. When you guys

(11:29):
tried to undermine a free and fair election in twenty
sixteen by trying to lock up your political opponent, that's
all right. That's okay. Right, when you do in trattment
with big gretch up there, that's all right. I mean,
how long you keep going when you get fed boys
out there to try to do the observance of j
six and they're literally fed boys and they're on camera

(11:49):
having to show their badge because they get they get
caught by another fed boy. That's okay. I'm just tired
of all of it. I'm tired of this whole political
culture is garbage, and I the fact that there is
not it almost makes me. It used to be fun
to do politics, and lately I feel like we live
in an idiocracy. And I was watching it on stage
last night, in full on stage last night. We're gonna

(12:13):
highlight some of this also some of the uh because
we've Harris speaks tonight, so she talks tonight. She's apparently
she's everyone's like, she's got to give this speech of
her life. She's got to give that. I am just
waiting to see what her what kind of circus they
do to introduce her. We've got that to preview. We're

(12:37):
going to highlight some of a little bit of the
policy that we're kind of seen from this. And of
course the massive scandal after a million jobs just vanish
from the jobs report right up into the ether. We're
going to hit on that as well as we move.
I agree with Annie Oakley who said quote, I would
like to see every woman know how to handle guns
as naturally as they know how to handle babies. Now,

(12:58):
I myself regularly concealed carrying nine millimeter. Now that's said,
not every woman is like me, has had the hours
of training that I've had, or it feels comfortable around
firearms due to years of use, or maybe they're by
a gun free zone. I'd like to change that what
I can, while encouraging self defense at the same time.
So this is where Burna comes in. It's kind of
like a starter weapon. It's they make a non firearm firearm.

(13:18):
I like the idea of incredible force sending chemical irritants
towards a threat as an additional option for women, and
the Berna SD model shoots chemical irritant projectiles sixty eight
caliber rounds that can deter threats in their tracks up
to fifty feet away. I mean it is hard, easy
target acquisition, zero recoil. Burna is legal in all fifty states.

(13:42):
There's no background checks, no permits required, It's shipped directly
to your door. Gun free isn't applicable to Berna. It's
great for wherever guns are banned. Visit burna dot com
slash data for ten percent off. That's b y r
ina dot com slash data.

Speaker 6 (13:57):
And now all of the news you would pro miss.
It's time for Dana's Quick five.

Speaker 2 (14:03):
So apparently, okay, I neither Cain Cain nor I find
this to be scientific. They say eating meat raises risk
of type two diabetes, says the study. What regular consumption
of fifty grams of process to meat today you're supposed
to see, You're supposed to eat bugs instid in the desert.

(14:24):
They say, it's equivalent. It's equipp processed meat today. I
know that's the problem. They go, if you eat regularly,
if you eat processed meat equivalent to two slices of ham,
that's associated with the fifteen percent higher risk of developing diabetes,
they said. Eating one hundred grams of unprocessed red meat,

(14:48):
they said, raises the risk by ten percent. I don't
even believe that either. I think that's the why I
eat red meat as often as I can. You should
eat red meat, you know why, because you have can nineteenth.
You have enzymes in your liver and different a chemical
for the lack of a better way to put a
biome in your gut, to process meat. Because we are carnivores.
The end. You could choose not to be, you know,

(15:10):
but that doesn't change the fact of it. This is
just them trying to swindle you into not eating red
meat because they want you to eat bugs and be
sickly and anemic and sad and live in the desert
in a tiny house like you see on httv's Tiny
House Nation and own nothing. That's what they want. That's
the whole point for aging men. They said. Finding a spouse,
unlike unlocks the fountain of youth. This is a bad

(15:33):
this is bad news for the taint brothers.

Speaker 7 (15:35):
Uh.

Speaker 2 (15:35):
Finding a spouse unlocks the fountain of youth. A happy
marriage actually helps I think everyone men and women age
gracefully and live with vigor and vitality, is it? Did
you really need to study for that? Though, No you didn't.
Let's see Comma Yanism four delays a new EV plant
and cancels electric three row SUVs as it shifts strategy.

(15:56):
I couldn't. I'm happier about this, I think more than
anybody got know because you guys know, I hate evs,
not because I don't like the gadgetry of it, because
I'm tired of the proselytizing about evs, and that's what
all of this has been so now for It's like
nobody's buying our dumb cars. Guess guess we're gonna have
to make fewer cars than we planned. They said they're
shifting to deliver better, capital efficient, profitable evs maybe in

(16:19):
the future, but they also have been like Ulso shifting
to hybrids. So Americans think it takes two and a
half million dollars to be considered wealthy in twenty twenty four, Well,
none of us here are wealthy then, wow, No, that's crazy.
Thanks bidnomics, Thanks inflation. So coming up, which of the
billionaires on the DNC stage took more than they needed?

(16:41):
I'm curious. We're gonna talk about that coming up. If
you even switched to Patriot Mobile and you use your
cell phone service, dare I say more than Netflix or Amazon?
I don't even know what you're upset about. If you
have not made the switch, I have no idea what
you're complaining about. They could not make it more easier
if they broke up into your house and actually switched
over your cell phone service on your phone for you.

(17:03):
They make it so simple. They want to save you money.
I mean, maybe people aren't broke, and maybe inflation isn't real, right,
or maybe it's just an imaginary thing and you're fine
with being on your super expensive cell phone service. Switch
to Patrion Mobile. My gosh, they make it so easy,
and they actually give a lot of momentum. Put a
lot of momentum behind the things that you vote to protect.
Every time you go to the ballot box. You get

(17:25):
great nationwide coverage all three major networks. Keep your phone
or your number upgrade. You get a free month of
service when you use code Data, and they have one
hundred percent US based crew. Visit Patriotmobile dot com, slash
data or call nine seven two Patriot and get a
free month when you use offer code Data. Don't be
fooled by pretenders. Go with the real thing. Patriot Mobile
dot Com, slash Data nine seven to two Patriot.

Speaker 8 (17:46):
Keep your finger on the pulse with a Data show
podcast delivering timely news with insightful analysis whenever you want,
straight to you on YouTube, Apple or wherever you get
your podcasts.

Speaker 9 (18:00):
You see, my mom, in her steady, quiet way, lived
out that striving sense of hope every single day of
her life. She believed that all children, all people, have value,
that anyone can succeed have given the opportunity. She and

(18:24):
my father didn't aspire to be wealthy. In fact, they
were suspicious of folks who took more than they needed.
They understood that it wasn't enough for their kids to
thrive if everyone else around us was drowning.

Speaker 2 (18:43):
So my mother, okay, follow what this is. I wanted
to play this. I know this is from the other night,
but I have other audio from tonight that gets from
last night. They gets into this because this is this
Marxist garbage that is permeated and it's just it's this
is what the DNC is now. Welcome back to the
program Dana Lash with you Finus Channel three forty seven

(19:04):
Direct TV, and also a Rumble where the conversation happens
the audacity of lecturing people about well, you know, they
don't want people who take too much, took more than
they needed. How many houses is more than you need?
How many houses is that is more than you need?

(19:26):
I was just looking at the beautiful Obama property portfolio.
I don't know if you're aware with us aware of it.
I mean they're worth what eighty million? Dollars net worth.
They have multiple properties all around the world, luxury real
estate holdings in Chicago. They have a beautiful estate in Hawaii.
In fact, did they buy the old magnu Pi estate
and then they ended up getting they paid off the

(19:48):
government so that they could do something to the shoreline
that they that apparently actually hurts the shoreline. But they're
the Obamas, and they got millions of dollars. So you
know the difference between them and everyone else following these
rules is that they got money and they got property
in Massachusetts, Washington, d C. In fact, Homes and Gardens
did a huge tour of their coastal retreat on the
beautiful Massachusetts Island. Looking up at the Hamptons Martha's a Vineyard,

(20:13):
they said, it's one of the more impressive properties on
Martha's Vineyard. And I will say, after looking at the
aerial shot, I can't disagree with this. It's a beautiful
piece of property. When you have a huge circle drive,
you have this huge courtyard that you pull into, you
have a nice walk all the way out to the beach.
It's ocean front property that's worth over twelve million dollars

(20:35):
and it's right there. It's considered one of the world's
best homes. It's a twenty eight acre compound coastal decor
detached barn. And as if being right there on the
edge of the sea wasn't enough, you also have a
huge swimming pool. It's a seven thousand plus square foot house.
It's on thirty secluded acres, and you also have you're
right there between two coves, and you have a pond.

(20:57):
It's beautiful. I mean, it was built in two thousand
and one. A well known local contractor built it. And
they love this property. There there all the time in
the summer. It's the big one showing you right that
that's part of their pool. That's just part of the house.
It's a huge estate. I mean, is that too much?

Speaker 5 (21:13):
Is that?

Speaker 2 (21:14):
Is that? I'm curious? Is that what you would consider
more than you need? Is that more than one needs?
I'm really curious about this. I mean, she's millions of dollars.
They left the office worth millions of dollars, went in
not worth as much. I mean, I'm just curious. You
have Jack Schlossberg, one of the most ridiculous, egregious NEPO

(21:36):
babies of all time. Caroline Kennedy's kid. He's going to
inherit over one hundred million dollars.

Speaker 9 (21:41):
You have JB.

Speaker 2 (21:42):
Pritzker, his family worth is about four billion dollars. I
mean the second Dougie Doug Imhoff, He's worth about ten million,
though Obama's over seventy million. So how much is more
than you need? I love these people that hold their
wealth and then lecture everyone else if they dare reach
beyond the status to which they are expected to stay.

(22:07):
Now that's more than you need. As though it is
a moral failing to want to do well for one's
self and one's family, this is what they do. This
is one of the reasons why they run this identity politics.
They want to make everything that they dislike a moral
failing so that they can the moral actual moral failings
they elevate, but non real moral failings they turn to

(22:31):
moral failings so that they can emotionally blackmail you and
can control you. And that's what this is. So I'm
just curious, is this more than one needs? I don't
have kin I last I checked in my very humble
property portfolio, which consists of and property. Uh, I don't
have a beautiful estate in Martha's vineyard.

Speaker 4 (22:53):
No, nope, it's kind of absurd. Yeah, it's kind of absurd.

Speaker 2 (22:58):
Is that inequity sounds like it feels like it. I
would love to be equitable with the Obamas.

Speaker 4 (23:04):
Based on what we were hearing last night.

Speaker 2 (23:06):
Yeah, because that means we get three houses and like
luxury vacations and all kinds of chefs. You know, mine
won't drown, but you know us. Yeah, I'm just saying so,
I don't I don't know. And it's not just her,
Oprah Wimfrey. Now this is what really gets me. Oprah
Winfrey was talking about this too. Audio sound by seven.
Let's play this.

Speaker 10 (23:27):
From the Redwood Forest, love those Redwoods to the Gulf
stream waters. I've seen racism and sexism and income inequality
and division. I've not only seen it at times, I've
been on the receiving end of it well.

Speaker 2 (23:44):
And yet she was still able, in this amazing capitalist,
free society to make herself a billionaire and have all
kinds of businesses, properties, you know, fame everything she could
ask or influence power. She can be a king maker.

(24:06):
But is she instead of focusing on the blessings that
freedom allowed her to achieve? She wants to use those
things as a way to hold other people down, and
that is the big irony of it all. I mean,
imagine someone like Oprah Wimfrey, who also has a beautiful

(24:30):
Hawaii state, lecturing other people on income inequality. I mean
I would also like to be equal or equitable with
Oprah Wimfrey. That would be great. But there is no
country on earth, and some countries are infinitely worse that
does not have its own issues to some degree. But

(24:51):
what makes the United States so different is that we
have freedom, and we have the ability for one to
make their free will decisions and choose to at chief
things for themselves. The problem is that we have this
Karl Marx laziness amongst some people that think any kind
of effort is tantamount to torture and they should be
given it because someone else's hard work is not the

(25:13):
same thing. They don't have to aspire to that, so
they call it equity and demand what other people have
worked for and the irony of someone and the Left
totally missed this, by the way, because I made mention
of this on social media, kind of like a Warshop test,
and I was doing this in combination with the discussion
about Jade Vance right, and I said, it was kind

(25:35):
of weird for Oprah with Hawaiian state, her multiple homes,
her expensive wardrobes, her frequent luxury vacations to talk about
income inequality, and someone's saying, and they're going. Someone responded, well,
how dare people come from nothing and who've experienced this
along the way? Tell Americans the stories to where they are,
especially if they're people of color. Yes, thank you for

(25:57):
completely proving my point. Left, which has literally spent three
days denigrating the American dream, wants to invoke it only
to defend the sheer irony. These people have zero moorings none,
that's it. So it's okay if they're a people, if

(26:18):
Marxists somehow succeed, but anyone else it's disallowed because then
you are committing the moral failing of ambition. You are
taking more than you need. Well, who gets to determine
how much someone needs? I think that what determines how

(26:40):
much you need is how much work you're willing to
put in the choices that you're willing to make. That's
that's it. No one's holding you down. I reject that
that's such. You know what that's a lie that Marxists
tell you to hold you in place, and the people
who perpetuate it are evil. It is one of the

(27:00):
most evil things told people in this country that no, no, no,
hm hmm. You know you you're you're you have to
stay in the status to which you're born. That if
you try to exceed too much, then that you go
in for more than you deserve. It's emotional blackmail. But
there is a lot of this, a lot of this.

(27:23):
Then you had this from Obrah audio sound bite eight.
This was wild Listen to this.

Speaker 10 (27:27):
We are not so different from our neighbors.

Speaker 5 (27:30):
When a house is on fire, we don't ask about.

Speaker 10 (27:33):
The homeowner's race or religion. We don't wander maui, who
their partner is or how they voted. No, we just
try to do the best we can to save them.

Speaker 5 (27:45):
And if the place happens to.

Speaker 10 (27:48):
Belong to a childless cat.

Speaker 5 (27:50):
Lady of It was read of how it.

Speaker 2 (28:00):
Turned to that woman she heart Then she jd vance
and she got a lot of criticisms speaking of wildfire.
She got a lot of criticism because they said that
she was taking focus away from the people impacted. And
there was a lot of criticism about because she was
asking people for money for the victims of the Maui
wildfires and all of this, and she got a lot

(28:21):
of criticism for it. But here's what I find, you know,
absolutely fascinating about her remark here, because again she's saying
this about JD. Vance. This was you know, she said, well,
you know they I guess when she says they are,
I suppose she's talking about Democrats, but she's saying that, well,
they don't ask about the homeowner's life if their house
is burning down. But interestingly enough, they did ask about vaccinations,

(28:45):
and they did threaten to deny care for people who
opted not to get shots or who had natural immunity.
That's what's so interesting about this. You actually did do that.
You did threaten to withhold care in hospitals to people
who didn't the knee and get the shot, even if
they already had the virus and thus developed natural immunity,
which for the first time in you know, history, apparently

(29:09):
natural immunity didn't work. Crazy crazy, So I don't know,
I I just I thought that was I thought that
was fascinating. By the way, she also add another by
the way in there she was one of the first
people that told to tell Trump to go and run
for office. She was one of the first people. In fact,

(29:33):
there was a letter and Trump's campaign posted it. There
was a letter that camee found where she was encouraging him.
You know, too bad, We're not running for office but
a team. She did an interview with him too at
one point. This was like back in the nineties when
she had encouraged him to run for office. So it's
not their fault. There you go, they're mad. They can
be mad. But do you see what I'm saying? This
is this I it's this shaming of ambition, shaming of motivation.

(30:04):
It's the shaming of the spirit that created the American dream.
If you have it, it's considered a moral failing, Like
how dare you want more than what you were allocated
upon birth? It's the weirdest thing. Democrats think that you
have to stay in the economic status to which you're born,

(30:25):
But if you want to change your sex then you
can do that.

Speaker 8 (30:28):
That's weird.

Speaker 2 (30:29):
Isn't that weird? So weird? It's an interesting approach, but
I think it's one. I think more people now, I
will say I feel like more people now listen to
that kind of stuff on the left than they did
so before. Don't you think it's okay that more people,
I think are I'm trying to find the sympathetic. Maybe

(30:51):
that's not the right word to use, but maybe more
receptive to these Marxist tenants than before.

Speaker 4 (30:57):
Right, Oh, absolutely, because they.

Speaker 2 (30:59):
Used to not be this far Marxists on the Editi end.

Speaker 4 (31:02):
Slow creep, Like we've talked about this over a decade
ago on the show. How this is the slow creep.
That's how it's working.

Speaker 2 (31:08):
Also just a creep, so regular creepy creep. Yeah, we
have a lot more on the way the Walts, we
have the Waltz stuff. And I have a question for you.
Is this brat? Wait, No, you're not gonna answer that
until we come back, is it bratt? We're gonna ask
this question. It is a thing that Democrats put out,
Democrat ladies put out, so we just you know, filled

(31:31):
the need to ask. Hey, dudes, listen up. I have
a gift idea that could truly impress the lady in
your life and transform your home into a much needed sanctuary,
all with the luxurious comfort of cozy Earth. It's called
Cozy Earth. She'll be impressed. And Cozy Earth uses only
the finest fabrics and textiles, making their products super soft
and comfortable. So, for example, you could give the gift

(31:53):
of comfort and support with Cozy Earth's durable weave bedshet
fabric that keeps your bed your bedsheets smooth and like
Jurius for years and you can say go bye to pilling.
Also with a ten year guarantee. These sheets are super comfortable.
It's a long lasting investment and ladies, you don't have
to wait for somebody to get this for you. You can
create your own comfort and sanctuary with Cozy Earth's best

(32:14):
selling bamboo sheet set made from one hundred percent premium viscos.
It's very luxurious. So we just got our sheets that
it's the California King size and they had our color
which was Harbor miss That's the one I picked out.
So I love the selection. I love how easy it
is to navigate their website and find what you want.
So if you want to make every bedroom a sanctuary,
do it with Cozy Earth Breathable, ultrasoft and even softer

(32:37):
with every wash. Try them risk free today for one
hundred nights and love them or get a full refund
and that's one of the best money back guarantees in
the business. So your bed's calling and answer it with
the ultimate and comfort and get up to forty percent
off only at cozyearth dot com slash data using code
data and don't forget tell them I sent you in
the post purchase survey and you can get some free sock.

(33:00):
That's cozyearth dot com. Slash Dana and use code Dana
to get up to forty percent off.

Speaker 8 (33:05):
Get the loadown on the latest news with a side
of laughs whenever you want. Subscribe to the Dana Show
podcast on YouTube, Apple or wherever you get your podcast,
like SAMs through the Ali Glass.

Speaker 4 (33:18):
So are the days of the United States.

Speaker 2 (33:23):
So this is a weird flex that Big Gretch put out.
And there's some it's like a song. I don't even
know what song it is, but it's a bunch of
women to keep playing it. It's a bunch of women,
Democrat women at the DNC who are awkwardly posing together
like they're doing a band photo. And it says gangs
all here to protect LBGT reproductive rights, healthcare, blah blah blah,

(33:47):
and Gretchen Witber tweeted it out and said quote finally
made it out of the group chat. My response was,
this is the weirdest boxed wine ad ever, the weirdest
ad ever. And isn't the chick in the middle. I
think that's I am pretty sure that that's Michelle Grisham,
who is the New Mexico in New Mexico's anti gun governor.

(34:11):
This is so awkward. And the chick in the maroon suit,
Oh my gosh, like, why are you and the blue lady?
Why this is so? Is this bratt? I'm told this
is bratt. But Michelle Grisham the new Mexico governor, and
I think she's the lady in the middle there. She
had to settle a sexual harassment claim for one hundred

(34:32):
and fifty thousand dollars. Yeah. Yeah, he She was accused
by James Hallinan, a former campaign staffer, of dropping water
on his crotch and then grabbing his crotch in the
midst of a campaign meeting prior to the election. So
they paid him six figures to shut him up. Oh,

(34:53):
I'm sorry to settle legal legals out there. Yeah, so
that's it.

Speaker 4 (34:57):
This sounds like hush money.

Speaker 2 (34:59):
She was also credit sized for her handle into the pandemic,
and you know, obviously her gun control stuff. Big wretches
in it. Some other people Kathy Hokel, I don't know.
It's just so awkward. The lady in the maroon suit,
her fashion sense is killing my soul. And then the
lady in the blue looks like she just put a
suit jacket on in the middle of Pe and just
ducked out of like freshman girl's Pe to go and

(35:20):
pose for this picture. It's so bad. And I don't
know why they have Michelle Grisham in the middle like
she's the princess. It's a weird that's a weird flex right.
I was again watching this and they kept touching on
abortion everything else. I wish they would actually talk about
things that impact women because the abortion comment. They would
go up there and they would say things that just

(35:41):
the dumbest stuff. I'm gonna give you some examples coming
up next hour. But they kept acting like no one
is helping them with their reproduction or whatever, and all
because they're told it's already protected state by state. In
the case of raper, I hate saying that. Oh my gosh,
I'm so tired of saying this stuff Raper and set Thila,
it's all that's already, that's already a statute in every state.

(36:03):
The issue is up till the moment of birth, taxpayer funded,
which is what they tried to do through the Senate
with the Women's Protection Act, which is a weird title
for something that was just basically like, taxpayers fund our
abortion is birth control up into the moment of birth
because we need nine months to figure it out. I
don't know that that's they don't. They kept talking about
that like women are being denied because it's not free,

(36:24):
or women are being denied if they can't go and
get an abortion when they're nine months pregnant, or women
are being denied if they use it as a form
of birth control, which is what it's used for according
to Plane Parenthood Zone stats. I just wish that they
could talk about something other than what they they're like
sexual organs. It'd be great, you know. I thought we
as women, you know, kind of progressed past that. But

(36:45):
then I watched the DNC and I'm like, maybe maybe
some of us didn't. We got a lot more on
the way. I've got examples stick with a second hour next,
I agree with Annie Oakley, who said quote, I would
like to see every woman know how to handle guns
as naturally as they know how to handle babies. I
myself regularly concealed carry a nine millimeter. Now that's said,
not every woman is like me, has had the hours
of training that I've had, or it feels comfortable around

(37:07):
firearms due to years of use, or maybe they're by
a gun free zone. I like to change that what
I can, while encouraging self defense at the same time.
So this is where BURNA comes in. It's kind of
like a starter weapon. It's they make a non firearm firearm.
I like the idea of incredible force sending chemical irritants
towards a threat as an additional option for women, and

(37:27):
the Berna SD model shoots chemical irritant projectiles sixty eight
caliber rounds that can deter threats in their tracks up
to fifty feet away. I mean it is hard, easy
target acquisition, zero recoil. Burna is legal in all fifty states.
There's no background checks, no permits required, It's shipped directly
to your door. Gun free isn't applicable to Berna. It's

(37:50):
great for wherever guns are banned. Visit burna dot com
slash data for ten percent off. That's b y r
Ina dot com slash data.

Speaker 11 (37:59):
When Donald comes down to Texas, stands next to officers
in uniforms just like mine, He's not there to help us.
Don't think that, not for a second voice. He is
a self serving man. I mean, look, just like, just
like when he killed the border bill, he just made

(38:21):
our jobs harder.

Speaker 5 (38:22):
What now.

Speaker 11 (38:23):
Kamala, on the other hand, has been fighting border crime
for years.

Speaker 2 (38:28):
Gosh, I do not She's gone down to nextas this dude.
So this dude, if you didn't hear, he's this is
chef Javier Salazar. He uh holds Pride events and has
Dragon Entertainment and all that stuff. And he's got a
suspiciously high pitched voice. And uh yeah, he's a big
time democrat. He's you know very much. He also was

(38:50):
blasting Kamala Harris like literally just not even a year
ago audio actually one year ago eighteen audio sound about eighteen.
Listen to the same guy, same.

Speaker 12 (39:00):
Guy, Sheriff's a pleasure to see you, sir. Tell us
about what you are asking for? What are your needs?

Speaker 6 (39:10):
Well right now, thank you for having me.

Speaker 2 (39:12):
First off, right now.

Speaker 13 (39:12):
What I'm asking for is for the President or a
member of his administration that can make decisions to come
down and talk to not just me, but at least
twelve other Texas sheriffs from major counties in the state
of Texas that are dealing with this issue firsthand. So
I'd like to see somebody from Washington come down here,
get boots on the ground, get eyes on the issue

(39:33):
at hand, and then talk.

Speaker 11 (39:34):
To us a bipartisan.

Speaker 2 (39:36):
So he's complaining that nobody's helping him at the border.
That's so weird. So which is it? No, they dangled out, Hey, sheriffs, Salazar,
we need to use someone with a badge to come
up and speak about the border and bash Republicans. Can
you come to you? I'll do it or this is why.
By the way, I don't back the blue uniformly. It's situational.

(39:58):
No problem saying that either it is situational, because yeah,
I mean, get mad at me all you want to.
I don't care. I don't care. I feel like Ricky's
your vase at the Golden Globes. I was up late
watching the DNC trash. I don't even care. Today, Dane
lash with you welcome back to the program, top of
the second hour. It's exactly what I'm talking. I sat
on stage with the bad cop at Parkland. I know
they exist. I know there's good ones out there too,
but I don't have to pay that indulgence, you know,

(40:20):
every time I want to like criticize a clearly bad cop.
You know what I'm saying. So this guy was like begging,
begging for help at the border a year ago. Now
he's like, no, I love Kamala here is I love
her so much? Now it's a totally different tune because
someone offered him a speaking gig at the DNC. Interesting.
Interesting that maybe he can go and hold another drag event,

(40:43):
you know, maybe because that's this just oh sorry two
years ago. But still the same thing. Yeah, come down here,
get boots on the ground, get eyes on the issue
at hand. And then two years later, I mean, she's amazing.
She's literally down here fighting at the border like herself,
physically repelling ill egal entrance, trying to cross the Rio.

(41:04):
I can't, can't. So the other couple issues. I've been
watching the DNC and I I have to view. You
guys are my therapy today. I have to vent about
it because I watched it last night, moved a kid
into college and then came and watched the stuff. So

(41:25):
maybe hoping to get some sort of insight into what
policies they're promoting the even if let's just say, let's
just say, if you know Kamala Harris is elected, do
we even have an idea as to what her policies
are going to be? Because all I get out of
everything is that money's bad in Vagina. That's it. It's
all I get out of it, Right, Kane, that's going

(41:45):
to help you a lot pay your bills.

Speaker 5 (41:47):
Right.

Speaker 2 (41:48):
It seems to feel the stress coming off your shoulders
from that. I'm not joking. Audio sound by twenty This
is a DNC video. Well, I forget which one this
was because we have a literallyly eleventy million cuts of
this stuff. Poor Wand is like, I feel like we
gotta wash his brain.

Speaker 11 (42:06):
Now.

Speaker 2 (42:07):
I know it's an abortion, but was it like one
of the pre prepared or was it one of those
broads up there top? I can't even remember anymore. This
is this is what I'm talking about, twenty.

Speaker 5 (42:15):
BRITA little moment in history we've seen.

Speaker 9 (42:17):
Women stripped of their most fundamental right to autonomy over
their bodies.

Speaker 2 (42:22):
Okay, stop, full stop, full stop. Who is stripping women
of our full right to autonomy? What is that? That's
a phrase, right to autonomy. It's kind of redundant, isn't it?
Like you don't even need to say right to autonomy.
You would just say autonomy. You don't need to have
this like complete ridiculous word salad. But who's doing that?

(42:47):
Who's making you have sex and get pregnant? Who I
want to know who is making you have sex and
get pregnant? Because the only time that I have ever
seen the government strip any thing from anybody was Starring Lockdown.
That is the only time I have ever seen anyone
stripped of dignity, of autonomy, of other rights. They act like,

(43:17):
what is what do you mean what decision over your body?
Let's start there, because that means that sounds like rape.
So you're saying the government is raping people. That's at
the very basic just crux of it is what you're saying.
Where's that at where's that news story? I don't see it,
where's MSNBC. I would imagine that if the government is

(43:39):
getting women raped and getting them pregnant then that would
be a major news story. Kane, Right, So where is it?
Oh wait a minute, it's it's women who are choosing
to engage in an activity that can result in pregnancy,
and that's according to Planned Parenthood's own publicly available statistics.

(43:59):
Can we stop this stupid It's the same stuff over
and over again. All these chicks need to get a
new line. I it's amazing. This is what I'm talking about.
This is all it is. Anytime a woman comes up,
it's just this. They save the other issues for the men.
By the way, speaking of videos, Waltz's audio some by sixteen.

(44:21):
His introductory video once again once again incorrectly identified him
as a command sergeant major in the National Guard watch.

Speaker 14 (44:34):
After his seventeenth birthday and served twenty four years in
the National Guard, rising to command sergeant major.

Speaker 2 (44:41):
Oh boy, oh boy, oh boy. Yeah that's not right.
But you know, and then people are like, can you
believe that he uh is being criticized. He's being criticized.
No one's attacking his service. They're attacking for line about it.
This is the other thing that really bothers me that
I think is is not getting enough attention. He lies

(45:03):
about the goofiest things. So again last night they were
talking about abortion, and they were also misrepresenting the women
who which we're going to talk about coming up, the
women who had received abortions. But they keep saying that
he had he and his wife had IVF, that they
underwent IVF, even though his wife came out and said, no,
that wasn't what we did. We didn't go through IVF.
They went through a different process that was not at

(45:24):
all IVF. But the reason they keep touching on IVF
is because they're trying to make it, make it something
that they're trying to act like Republicans are against it.
Trump has literally come out and said he's not against it,
that it would not be anything that he would oppose
in his administration, regardless whether where you stand on it
as a Republican or as a conservative. That's I mean,

(45:46):
he's already said that. So why are they I don't
get why are they trying to claim that they're they're
trying to they're creating that's an actual straw man there,
I'm creating something to fight against. It's not a position
that the right holds are like this, who's this chick?
What's she? The ag I'm scrolling through a million dollar

(46:09):
audio or a million kinds of audio. She's, oh my gosh,
audio some bide eleven. So I tweeted this out. I said,
no one, absolutely, no one, and then Michigan ag Dana Nessel, listen,
by the way, I.

Speaker 14 (46:23):
Get a message for the Republicans and the justices of
the United States Supreme Court.

Speaker 5 (46:30):
You can private wedding band.

Speaker 2 (46:32):
From my cold, dead gay hand. So my first thought was,
no one cares. Literally, no one cares. My second thought
was gay hand. That's so cringe. That probably sounded better
in her head gay hand. I mean, I've heard of

(46:55):
Nick Kves's red right hand, but I've never heard of
the gay left hand. I've never heard of that.

Speaker 15 (47:00):
Dead gay hand.

Speaker 2 (47:01):
My dad gay, I love my dad Gay's son. I'll
take it off my dead gay hand. They are our
gay hands, different from regular hands. She got like an
extra finger on it or something. I don't know. I

(47:21):
don't know what's wrong with it, what makes it different.

Speaker 4 (47:26):
Every finger's a different color.

Speaker 2 (47:28):
You're just stop trying to be specialer than everyone else.
Stop it. No one cares. No one said anything. She
gets it there, and she says she does that. Oh
my gosh, that's embarrassing. That is embarrassing, Like no one
was talking about literally, nobody was talking about this. And
then she gets up there, you know, bright off my

(47:50):
dead gay hand. Okay, Heather's all right. It's like Kurt's sister,
Kurt's dad, Kurt's sister from Heather's It's a deep dive.
It's a deep cut, Lee, this is what we're talking about.
It's all like they keep trying to create things to
argue against. No one's taught no one that's the again
where I'm not arguing about IVF because the Trump team

(48:14):
already came out and said that's not anything that they're opposing,
So that's not going to be a part of the administration.
So why are they doing that? I don't get it.
Why are they mad? And then they get mad at
Republicans because Democrats fool Bard Roe v.

Speaker 5 (48:27):
Wade.

Speaker 2 (48:28):
That wasn't anything Republicans did, and Democrats are trying to
target Republicans so their own base doesn't get mad about
how over how poorly they handle that. If Democrats were
really concerned about what they call quote unquote women's reproductive rights,
why do they not do anything state by state for decades.
They focused everything federally. Even Ruth Bader Ginsburg before she passed,

(48:48):
was warning them all, you this is a horribly determined
case and it's going to be contradicted and it's going
to be undone. You need to do something about it,
state by state. I mean this what she was saying.
They never did anything, and then the inevitable took place
and they got out of Republicans because they didn't do anything. Again,

(49:09):
you're creating, You're making up stuff to argue about that
you did yourself or that no one is arguing. But
this is them. But do you want to hear what
the most uncomfortable point was so far? I missed this
because I was off air. But can I play audio
SoundBite nine? Please? Ashley Biden just showers her dad with praise.

Speaker 7 (49:32):
Joe Biden is the og girl dad.

Speaker 2 (49:37):
No one else had daughters beforehand.

Speaker 9 (49:40):
He told me I could be anything and I could
do anything.

Speaker 5 (49:45):
As a child, I would sit.

Speaker 9 (49:47):
On the leather chair in his office doing my homework
and he would sit next to me doing his work
drafting the Violence Against Women.

Speaker 2 (49:57):
Act, and then we had a shower. Look. She wrote
that in her diary that she claimed was hers and
took ownership of, and then the FBI took possession of
and then they tried to sue people over it. So
don't sit here and tell me that it's not real,
because she wrote that in her own hand in her
diary and she claimed that it was hers. So moving on.
That was weird, right, it was weird. My dad told
me I could do whatever drug I wanted. Remember, by

(50:19):
the way, the reason that that diary came into someone
else's possession is because she literally left it in a flophouse,
a drug flophouse, in the mattress. Yes, I actually know
whose house it is. I don't know the person, but
I know someone who does it. It's a she was
using it as a flophouse. It was like an ex
lover and left it in the mattress and apparently another
female found it. That's what happened. That's how that diary

(50:42):
came out. So weird, right, awkward, super awkward. Tonight's going
to be even more awkward. Oh my gosh, it's going
to be because Kamala Harris is going to be speaking
or wait a minute, do we have what did Clinton
call her? Hold up? We have that audio like some
eleventy million billion. It's my fault too. We have Oh gosh,

(51:04):
where's it? Where's Where's where's h's it? Oh yeah, yeah,
just real quick, it's like five seconds. You guys need
to hear this because where's the outrage? Go ahead, ask
for their help and then follow our leader. Caml Oh wait,
I heard that's wrong, he said, Camel. Uh. Yeah, it's
like a bunch of assists, right if you don't say

(51:25):
your name right, Cammel uh oh man I made of remarks. Okay,
let's move. Hillsdale is a great institution. It's like one
of the remaining I guess, educational institutions that that's out there.
And a lot of people, you know, it's like going
back to school. A lot of people are going back.
I think this week. You know, I'm my oldest that
goes back to school this week. And uh, it's really

(51:48):
awesome that they make so many resources available for you.
If you're not going back to school, you can still
take advantage of all the resources that Hillsdale has that
are for free to you, and you can do that
at Dana for Hillsdale dot com. So they have all
of these educational podcasts on their website. Right, they do
deep dives into history, they have their lectures, they have

(52:11):
you know, deep dives into some of the most fascinating
aspects of our Republic's founding, and you can access all
of that on the Hillsdale College Podcast Network at Dana
four f o R Hillsdale dot com. And they that's
this is one of the many ways that they're defending
liberty on the battlefield of education. You also get special

(52:32):
content from Hillsdale's President Larry arn Up there as well.
But I mean, they've got everything like the Classical Education podcast,
they have their history Radio Free Hillsdale, all of that,
and it's just a great way to stay up to
date and also know everything about the founding of our republic.
It's a small Christian, classical liberal arts college in southern
Michigan founded in eighteen forty four to do just this,

(52:54):
to preserve liberty through education. Choose your new favorite educational
podcast today on the Hillsdale College Podcast Network at Dana
four Hillsdale dot com. That's fo R Dana four Hillsdale
dot com.

Speaker 6 (53:06):
And now all of the news you would probably miss,
it's time for Dana's quickfive.

Speaker 2 (53:12):
This headline brings me so much. Joy I think my
heart started beating again because I've never so related to
a headline more in my entire life. You know your
girls a cynic, right, Okay, I wake up cinecle. So
this study, the headline is the average person knows if
their day has been ruined by eight thirty six am. Like,

(53:37):
that's right, you know it?

Speaker 4 (53:39):
Which time zone?

Speaker 2 (53:41):
Oh, that's a great question. I think just their time zone.
It says one bad morning can derail everything. They did
this survey and it shows that Americans know if they're
in for a bad day by eight thirty six am.
And they surveyed two thousand Americans and they find the
average person endorse four bad days a month, So that's
forty eight days or a month and a half of
bad days annually. And then over twenty six percent of

(54:04):
respond and said that when something goes away in the morning,
the day seems totally lost, like if they wake up
feeling sick, or if they didn't sleep well, if they
lost their keys, or if they wake up with a headache,
or or women, if they mess up their makeup or
their hair's back. I mean, they just know it. You
know it's not going to be their day. I thought
that was hysterical. Parents are baffled by high school principal
Robert Nunez giving a mascot lap dance as the oh boy,

(54:28):
this is over in the sun. Parents are this isn't Atwater, California,
Bohawk Colony High School in Central Valley. They held it
back to school pep rally and apparently parents are furious
because their principal gave and received a lap dance from
the school mascot and there were actual students there going,

(54:51):
am I a square that's getting old? Or is this weird?
Like students were They were actually like putting that out
on TikTok, and so the parents are very upset. Why
is this happening? Like apparently like the mascot was torking
on him and all this stuff that Like you're at
a high school, you know what I mean? If you
can't differentiate, you know, the club from the high school,
then maybe you shouldn't be an education. So coming up,

(55:13):
uh Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, does he know where
all those missing kids went that Harris was in charge
of his borders are We'll ask stick with us the
best coffee that's out there. Everything else is just absolute swill.
It's just garbage. I can't stand drinking other people's coffee
because their beans are bitter. It's just not good. Black
Rifle Coffee gets the best dam beans from all around
the world. They bring them to their facilities in Utah

(55:35):
and Tennessee where they roast them five days a week.
It's veteran owned, veteran run and they support veterans and
first responders as well. I got to tell you, Big
Coffee hates them, like the Starbucks and all the other
garbage coffee places out there. They can't stand Black Rifle
Coffee because they found a way to get into American
culture and mainstream, you know, support for military and two

(55:56):
A rights and first responders and all of that, and
they just can't it. And so one of the I've
seen they try to attack Black Rifle Coffee so that
you know, every time you buy Black Rifle Coffee, you're
help fighting back against that too. Save twenty percent with
Code Dana and you can join the Coffee Club, choose
your roast, frequency of shipment, have it sent to your
doorstep free shipping, so you never run out of coffee.

(56:16):
You never have to worry about it. They got groundhole
being k cups, ready to drink, apparels, kettles, grinders, mugs,
and more. See it all for yourself at Black Rifle
Coffee dot com. Order today and get twenty percent off
with code Dana. Twenty percent off with code Dana only
at Black Rifle Coffee dot Com.

Speaker 8 (56:31):
The Dana Is Show podcast. You're fast, funny and informative
news companion for those always on the move. Subscribe on YouTube, Apple,
or wherever you get your podcasts.

Speaker 12 (56:41):
Share It's a pleasure to see you, sir. Tell us
about what you are asking for. What are your needs?

Speaker 4 (56:50):
Well, right now, thank you for having me.

Speaker 13 (56:52):
First off, right now, what I'm asking for is for
the President or a member of his administration that can
make decisions to come down and talk to not just me,
but at least twelve other Texas sheriffs from major counties
in the state of Texas that are dealing with this
issue firsthand. So I'd like to see somebody from Washington
come down here and get boots on the ground.

Speaker 2 (57:12):
Business flashback audio from two years ago Bear County Sheriff
Javier Salazar, who was criticizing the administration for being miaight
Now interestingly, enough, same sheriff. I guess they lured him
to their side by promising him a speaking slot at
the DNC, and he goes out and says, oh, Trump
made our job harder. Republicans made it harder. They killed

(57:34):
that Bible heart is in border Bilt. You know what
was absent from any discussion last night at the DNC
really largely the border, including this insane headline. That is,
it's actually an extension of what the New York Times
reported on a year ago how the Biden Harris administration
lost track of over three hundred and twenty thousand kids

(57:57):
brought illegally over the border. Nobody knows where they're at.
This is while this is the exact kind of stuff
that Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has been hitting at
and pointing out, We've got two big issues to talk
with him about today, he joins us now via Skype. General,
always a pleasure to have you. I just I got
to get your reaction. First off, to the story, the

(58:18):
fact that this wasn't nobody. I mean, they say that
they claim to care about the lives of people crossing
the border illegally, but yet there is no concern for
the hundreds of thousands of kids brought illegally over the
border who have just gone missing. The New York Times
were put about this a year ago. Now New York
Post has it.

Speaker 7 (58:35):
Yeah, and they've known about this for the entire time.

Speaker 15 (58:37):
The administration has been dealing with.

Speaker 7 (58:38):
This the last four years, and I think they anticipated
it's just the cost of doing business. They wanted to
get people here for their purposes, which is voting, and
they were willing to sacrifice these children because there's no
way that they had the capacity.

Speaker 15 (58:51):
To keep track of these kids. And they knew it
when they started.

Speaker 2 (58:54):
Yeah, no, that's I mean, that's what they knew that.
And the number is increased. When the New York Times
was writing about it was like two hundred and ninety
something thousand. Now it's over three hundred and twenty thousand
kids that have gone missing, and they're just there. I mean,
the only assumption that can be made is either child
labor or trafficking. And the New York Times said that
they a year ago that they could see that there
were some hotspots that these kids were going to. But interestingly,

(59:17):
nobody in the Abiden Harris administration was concerned about any
of this. In fact, they wanted it. They wanted them
processed faster and released quicker.

Speaker 15 (59:25):
Yeah.

Speaker 7 (59:26):
This, remember, the purpose is not to protect these child up.
They cared about that. They would have done this whole
process slower. They would have made sure people weren't crossing
under dangerous conditions and traversing all these countries under dangerous conditions.
They would have made sure that cartels were not involved
in this. Cartels were one hundred percent involve in all
of it. So there was nothing safe about the way
they did it. All they cared about was speed and

(59:47):
numbers because their purposes were not protecting these people or
taking care of these people.

Speaker 15 (59:52):
This is about votes, that's it.

Speaker 2 (59:53):
And I've heard to that point, we're talking to Texas
Attorney General Con Paxton that there have been Democrat outfit
that have been stationed outside of like some of these
processing offices, et cetera, to register people who are not
in the country legally to register to them to vote.
What do you know about this?

Speaker 15 (01:00:10):
Yeah, So we just started our investigation.

Speaker 7 (01:00:12):
We actually went out and side sent out my investigative
team undercover start looking at that we're still involved, and
we went on to state property.

Speaker 15 (01:00:20):
We went on to state police property.

Speaker 7 (01:00:22):
Where they were issuing driver's licenses and where you typically
register people to vote at the DMV office.

Speaker 15 (01:00:29):
Typically you get your driver's license, you can register to
vote right there.

Speaker 7 (01:00:32):
And yet, despite the fact that this was on state
property and they were registering people to vote at state offices,
for some reason, there was a separate There were separate
nonprofit station that we discovered that were registering people. Now,
why would you have a separate location when supposedly you
could register at the DMV while.

Speaker 15 (01:00:52):
You're getting a license.

Speaker 7 (01:00:53):
The answer seems pretty pretty common sense. Those are people
who couldn't get registered legally, and so my guess is
as they went at these nonprofits are out registering people
who didn't get they're registered in Texas at the DMB.

Speaker 2 (01:01:08):
So we are like people who are excuse me, not
here legally are registering to vote in Texas elections.

Speaker 15 (01:01:16):
That is my suspicion.

Speaker 7 (01:01:17):
Now, we've just started this investigation, so we're you know,
we're at the beginning stages. But this was these people
were allowed onto state property, state police control, property controlled
by our state right. They were allowed up and we
just assumed they were registering.

Speaker 15 (01:01:33):
I guess assume they were registering correct people.

Speaker 7 (01:01:37):
But that doesn't make any sense if you just think
a little bit deep, not even slightly, just a little bit.
Why do we need a separate location when that's the
job of the DMV is to register people that are
getting their drivers.

Speaker 2 (01:01:50):
Lize And why are they being allowed any kind of
third party entity outside of these DMV offices?

Speaker 7 (01:01:57):
Even well, it all got cut off, like I think
yesterday or today, State Police issued the bulletin saying all
of this is going to end at RE immediately. But
you know, part of it is that we got that out.
I wanted to get it out to stop it. I
also wanted to get it out to let people know
who are registering illegally that they can be prosecuted. So
you may want to try to do this, but you

(01:02:18):
could go to jail for this, and the people that
are organizing it. The punishment is actually longer if you're
actually coordinating a bunch of illegal votes. So we wanted
to make people aware of it, get it out there.
But we're still investigating what actually happened. It's shocking, but
I'm not surprised given that. I think the whole plan
from day one, remember Joe Biden day one is number

(01:02:40):
one party, no more deportations. Why would you announce that
on day one? Why does that become the most important
thing to tell the cartels on day one?

Speaker 15 (01:02:48):
You're not going to deport anybody.

Speaker 7 (01:02:50):
The idea, I think, was to send them this message
to the cartels, get people here, we'll take care of them.

Speaker 15 (01:02:55):
We'll put them where we want them.

Speaker 7 (01:02:56):
And now we're seeing the fruition of their goal, which
is to get people.

Speaker 8 (01:02:59):
Read to vote.

Speaker 2 (01:03:00):
Wow, do we have an idea as to how many
have been registered? I'm sure that's something you're going to
find out with this investigation.

Speaker 7 (01:03:06):
I don't think we'll ever know because we're just we're
having to dig this up. This has been a plan
that they put together before Biden got into office, I think,
and this, unfortunately, I think this is going all over
the country, especially in states like Florida and Georgia and Wisconsin,
the swing states.

Speaker 15 (01:03:21):
They moved these.

Speaker 7 (01:03:22):
Illegals in That's why they wanted them, and then they
transported them to where they wanted them. They took care
of them, made sure they could stay in contact with them,
and now they've got them registered to vote, a lot
of them, and they've done it using.

Speaker 15 (01:03:34):
Issuing SIBI security numbers.

Speaker 7 (01:03:35):
So then they go into these states and get their
driver's license, and only three states require proof of citizenship
get the ability to vote, So most states are.

Speaker 15 (01:03:45):
Not prepared for having to require some type of proof
of citizenship.

Speaker 7 (01:03:49):
So obviously the federal government is they're not just quat,
but they created this plan knowing that the states were
not prepared to stop in.

Speaker 15 (01:03:55):
So we're in a little we're playing beyond.

Speaker 7 (01:03:58):
Eight ball right now, and I'm trying to get the
message out so that other states we'll look at this
and try to at least educate these illegals about prosecution
if they're going to vote illegally.

Speaker 2 (01:04:07):
Yeah, and Kin makes a good point, so they can
follow up with them for their vote, but not a
court date too. When all of this is when they're
when they're coming in and being processed. Exactly unbelievable. You
would think that, you know, I just you know at
the audio that we played coming in Bear County Sheriff
five ourselves, are you think that this would be something
he would be interested in, except instead of being at
the DNC and bashing Republicans for trying to restore law
and order at the border.

Speaker 15 (01:04:29):
No, This is what they wanted. This was the plan
for the beginning.

Speaker 7 (01:04:32):
Maybe maybe he's an exception, but the reality is I
believe that they planned this before Biden came in, because
that's why.

Speaker 15 (01:04:38):
They were ready to go on day one.

Speaker 7 (01:04:39):
They wanted to maximize the number of people that the cartels,
because this is a partnership between the cartels and the
Biden administration, get these people here.

Speaker 15 (01:04:48):
They're They're not like hiding from borbtroll.

Speaker 7 (01:04:51):
It's it's a handoff, right, It's a handoff so that
the borbatroll can get them into the right places, to
the right states so that they are in a position
to vote.

Speaker 2 (01:04:59):
Wow, we're talking. Oh gosh, we're talking about Texas Attorney
General Ken Paxton. I want to switch gears here and
ask you about this suit that you filed on behalf
of Texans because the State Fair of Texas has banned firearms. Now,
I have to point out that it's by you know,
two of statistically higher crime areas, and that's where the
fair is held at. And I don't think that they

(01:05:19):
have enough security per person that's there at the fairgrounds
in order to keep everyone safe. So, as someone who
values the safety of myself, and my family. I was
very concerned that they've decided to ban everyone else from
being able to defend themselves. Heaven forbid.

Speaker 7 (01:05:33):
Look, first of all, we haven't bolt loss that. We
give them a fifteen day notice.

Speaker 15 (01:05:36):
Okay, they're they're close to the end of that.

Speaker 7 (01:05:38):
If they do not stop this policy, this rule that
they put in place by that fifteenth day, we will
soon because they are not allowed under state law to
ban and seal carry on government property. Even though this
is a private organization. They are renting, leasing this space
from a city government Dallas to hold their That's that's illegal.

Speaker 15 (01:06:02):
You cannot ban con sealed carry.

Speaker 7 (01:06:04):
Now, if you're a private organization, you have private property,
you're you're whether it's nonprofit.

Speaker 2 (01:06:09):
Or profit, a private property issue.

Speaker 15 (01:06:11):
That's your decision.

Speaker 7 (01:06:12):
But government under Texas law very clear that they cannot
stop in sealed carry.

Speaker 15 (01:06:17):
That's Texas law.

Speaker 2 (01:06:18):
That's why that they even tried doing this then, knowing
that that's the law, I get.

Speaker 15 (01:06:22):
Look, this is what they do. They ignore our laws
and they make us sick. This is the this is
the Obama model.

Speaker 7 (01:06:28):
This is what you created, and now we fight everything
because they have no respect for the Constitution or the.

Speaker 2 (01:06:33):
Law and it costs taxpayers.

Speaker 7 (01:06:35):
Yeah, and they know that we can't fight them on everything,
so they just change everything. They don't they don't respect
the constitutes, don't care about the constitutes, don't care about
the laws.

Speaker 15 (01:06:43):
They do what they want to do, and.

Speaker 7 (01:06:44):
Then they make us go fight them, and we will.

Speaker 15 (01:06:47):
You know what we can. We know we have resources
to do it. We'll fight them.

Speaker 2 (01:06:51):
Are they going to back down on this? You think, General,
I have.

Speaker 15 (01:06:54):
No idea, but it doesn't. I mean I would prefer
we don't. We don't have to go to litigation.

Speaker 7 (01:06:59):
But you know, yeah, so they want to go to court.
You know, we'll asoom and we'll find out whether Texas
all media matters.

Speaker 15 (01:07:06):
My guess is that it does.

Speaker 2 (01:07:07):
This is just just wild, just wild to me. We've
got one more question for you, talking Texas Attorney General Conpacson.
Who's juggling I think every issue that you can juggle intel,
you got immigration, you got Second Amendment. Now we've got
the GM data collection as well, because Texas is now
taking on GM. You've been talking about this taking data
from people and not telling consumers that they're taking data

(01:07:31):
from you. I mean, privacy is a luxury anymore in
today's age. Tell us what you're doing to fight this.

Speaker 7 (01:07:37):
Yeah, so we think this is a deceptive trade practice
to take people's information about how they're driving, and they're
recording everything, whether you're wearing your seat belt, how far
you're driving, how fast you're driving, whether you're taking hard
right turns, you're hitting the breaks too hard, and that
information is for sale to whoever they want to sell
it to. And of course they're selling it to insurance companies,

(01:07:58):
which then affects whether you're covered or how much you
have to pay.

Speaker 15 (01:08:01):
And the consumer is.

Speaker 7 (01:08:02):
Not aware, is not giving They don't give consent, they're
not the disclosure is not clear. And so we think
that's a violation of Texas law and we're going to
try to stop it, and we're gonna hold them account
for it. And we believe there are other car manufacturers
doing this.

Speaker 2 (01:08:16):
Got Lee, you can't trust anything anymore. Oh my word,
this is well. Now, see now I feel like I'm
good to be paranoid. There's a reason why I am
normally Attorney General Ken Paxon the Republic of Texas. Good
to see you, so thank you for fighting on behalf
of Texans. We appreciate it. We have a great day
you too. We have more to come, folks. As we
wrap up this second hour, we got to roll into
some Florida man as well. And as we do so,

(01:08:39):
it's his laugh mission to make bad decisions.

Speaker 4 (01:08:46):
It's time for Florida man.

Speaker 2 (01:08:48):
All right, So lost on my stf all right, here
we go. Boy oh boy, So there's a million. I
want to start with the why No, I don't want
to do that one. I don't want to do this
screwdriver one. Oh oh, cain, good luck with that one. Okay,

(01:09:10):
how do I do this? Because it's an let's skip
this one. There is no way that I can share
with you a story about a guy is a Florida
man who uh, I don't know how to put it,
imbibed a screwdriver through a place that's not his mouth.

Speaker 4 (01:09:30):
I would say he loves tools.

Speaker 2 (01:09:34):
Yeah, let's not do that one. There's no way I
can talk about that one. But I can't talk about
a Florida man who was arrested for alleged upskirt photos
of women at a Florida grocery store. Oh my gosh,
this guy, forty five year old man was arrested by
detectives on suspicion of taking upskirt photos of multiple multiple
women at a Florida grocery store. It occurred in June

(01:09:55):
of this year. Deputies were called after reports of this
very suspicious individual. He was like sticking his phone trying
to get pictures under their skirts, and he would place
his cell phone in a shopping cart and then like
get it close to I guess, like on the bottom
part of the shopping cart. He's being held on sixty
thousand dollars bond. I got to tell you, I if

(01:10:16):
I would catch somebody doing that, I think I'd beat
them to death in the store. I mean, so there
must be some restraint on behalf of the ladies who
saw it and did not do that. So just saying
that's now this guy, boy, oh boy, he's the guy
who kind of looks like post Malone, but not like
like at post Malone were a total bad guy and

(01:10:36):
totally well. This guy, he looks like he's crawled out
from under a rock. Dylan Fogel. So, Dylan Fogel got
really upset because he was kicked out of a strip
club due to inappropriate behavior. And I'm trying to figure
out how you get kicked out of strip club for
inappropriate behavior? Like what are you doing? Like raving pete,
Like what are you doing? So this happened about four
to twenty in the morning. It took place just a

(01:10:59):
few days ago. They were responding to the parking lot
of the Emperor's Gentleman Club, so taking it up not
just a gentleman club, at the Emperor's Gentleman Club where
a truck had crashed, according to Tampa Police. Now eyewitnessed
this said that twenty five year old Dylan Fogel had
been kicked out of the club but got mad and
then drove the truck into people standing at the entrance

(01:11:20):
because he was mad after having been kicked out of
the club. And they said he did it. He killed
our friend. They were all pointing to him. When all
law enforcement arrived. They said there were no breakmark, skid
marks at the scene, no evasive maneuvers at all. He definitely,
according to court records, wanted to hurt someone. He wanted
to drive them over. Oh my gosh. So yeah, that's

(01:11:43):
I mean, he just doubled down on the insanity. That guy.
So this one, let's see my favorite story, I think
of all time as the pizzeria guy we had that.
I put that on I put that out on Twitter
because no one believed that story. This guy Local ten,
a Florida man bleeding from the head, was rested at
a Miami airport after, along with his companion, he refused

(01:12:03):
to get off the plane Miami Date. They got arrested
Miami International Airport. They boarded an American Airlines flight. They
were going to Vegas, and then they noticed that twenty
seven year old Eugenio Garnier was a Vegas was bleeding
from his head. The woman was Florida woman, this isn't
He's going to Vegas, bleeding from his forehead and had
a bandage around the wound. So they were asked Miami Date,

(01:12:24):
said Hernandez Garnia. He was asked to clean up the
blood replace his bandages, but he said he didn't have
any clean ones. They asked him to deboard. They were
concerned about his medical contamination and the fact, you know,
body fluid contamination, and they said if they couldn't fly,
no one else could either. He and his companion so
they would not leave. So they ended apparently up on

(01:12:45):
TikTok and the woman was saying that he had just
had surgery, and they were told please, you know, you're
gonna have to get out or you're gonna have to
be escorted out. So they had to be escorted out,
They were handcuffed, they were placed under arrest, and every
other passenger was forced to deboard as well. So the
flight was delayed. And they didn't actually say why he
was bleeding. They didn't say that, but she was saying.

(01:13:06):
The woman with him was saying that he had surgery.
So that whole flight was delayed. I'm sure they were
just elated third hour next.

Speaker 14 (01:13:13):
When you hear that, do you potentially think that this
new numbers could be a liability for this campaign? Now,
when I hear that, first of all, I don't believe
it because I've never heard Donald Trump say anything truthful.

Speaker 2 (01:13:24):
It is though, from the Bureau of Labor, I don't
I'm not familiar with. Yeah, so this is the Commerce
secretary who has no idea what is happening with jobs
or these jobs. The job numbers where you had Biden
Harris saying they created all these jobs and then like what,

(01:13:46):
almost a million of them just don't even exist. They
just evaporated into the ether, it's not real. Welcome back
to the program, Dana lash with you. Top of this
third hour, that's Gina Rmando who says she doesn't believe
the government data, from her own government that she works
for as Commerce secretary, that these jobs don't exist. And
that's that's a crazy aspect of this, because this is

(01:14:09):
something I mean, how do you how do you over
First off, how would you overcount? Right, let's just say, like,
how would you how would you make this mistake? Eight
hundred and eighteen thousand jobs have vanished from the jobs report.
Cane's eyes are so big. They sit in a really

(01:14:30):
dark corner of the studio because they got the control
stuff over there, and I can see his eyes from
where I am.

Speaker 4 (01:14:34):
And a good fifteen percent of.

Speaker 2 (01:14:35):
Those anime character over there.

Speaker 4 (01:14:38):
Were manufacturing jobs, like one hundred and fifteen thousand plus
that they had to revise downward in manufacturing. So this
narrative the entire time they were in office that they
were bringing jobs back in the whole nine the only
jobs that actually came back were the ones from COVID,
and then the ones that were created were government jobs,
jobs that take from the tech space and not contribute

(01:14:59):
to it exactly.

Speaker 2 (01:15:00):
The biggest number was government jobs. The biggest number. Peer
of Labor Statistics said that job's growth data for twelve
for the twelve months to March. We kind of fed
it's thirty percent under what they had said. Yeah, thirty
percent under. So they had to do quite a bit

(01:15:21):
of our downward revision there. They I hang on, let
me pull up my notes. One surrogate. One surrogate was saying, ye,
just means the market is a little cool. Okay, guys,
I'm going to pick up this four and a half
foot wide monitor and throw it and like fi, Oh
my heavens. It's because they lied. They wanted to hide

(01:15:44):
the extent of the the damage done by their economic policies.
That's the true thing. They didn't want to have that
co incide like this real actual, like real reality coincide
with the DNC where they're out there talking about what
they're going to do for people, and then they have
to go, oh, by the way, we we cost all
these jobs a million, almost a million, fewer jobs than

(01:16:07):
they actually said. So they lied. They patted it. The
jobs that they these are jobs that never actually existed.
In fact, as Cana and I were just talking. The
only ones that they actually, you know, were able to
say existed were government the government jobs, and that was
the huge There was the significant Uh when we when

(01:16:28):
we the jobs numbers came out last and we looked
at this, that was the significant portion of the new
of the jobs that were created. So yeah, they this
is there's I don't expect them to be asked about this,
So I don't expect to have any kind of clarity
from the people who actually wrote the policy and passed
the policy that led to this conclusion. But you know,
they they said that, I mean it, Bloomberg's News is

(01:16:51):
trying to say that's still a healthy rate of hiring.
That's not what I'm seeing. That's not at all what
we're seeing. It's I mean, this is this downward revision
is exactly what everybody has been feeling with their checkbook.
That's what we've been seeing for four years. It also
means they've been lying for four years about those because

(01:17:14):
this is a.

Speaker 4 (01:17:14):
Tactic that actually has proven well for them, because what
ends up happening is they lie. The lie travels around
the world twice before the truth gets its pants on,
and then the millions of eyes that saw the lie,
only a portion like thousands of people see the retraction.
And this is how they've been doing it for years
and years and years, and something I just put in

(01:17:36):
slacks shows how they did it again.

Speaker 2 (01:17:39):
How does how do they how does if you want
to if you want to assume that they didn't lie
and this is innocent, how does someone make a mistake
like this? How do you mess up this bad intentional?

Speaker 10 (01:17:52):
I know?

Speaker 2 (01:17:52):
I mean, that's the thing. It's like, there's no way
you can screw up this badly unless it's on purpose.
There's no way. It's weird because it's almost like, you know,
people were trying to warn you about this. Your government
is lying to you and telling me that the economy
is super strong, everything's great, but we're seeing like, what
over sixty thousand fewer jobs every single month and media

(01:18:14):
plays alone. Yeah, they've been they've been lying about how
many jobs were added to the economy for four years
now and then yeah, so now do you trust them
about Oh, inflation's not bad? Do you trust them about that?
Good night? So they lie to us. It's a lie.
Everything's been a lie from the get go. You know this,

(01:18:39):
And it also is a lie. Let me share with
you this media story. This is crazy. This is we
talk about media malpractice. By the way, we're gonna have
Carol roth on tomorrow about all that we talk about
media malpractice. And this is one of the worst I
think I've ever I've seen in recent times. So PBS,
you guys know, let me explain to you for really

(01:18:59):
quickly before I get into the story. PBS Public Broadcasting
Station is owned by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting or
is under. Not owned, it's under it's regulated. It's managed
by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which receives annually half
a billion dollars in taxpayer money. And in fact, you
might remember back several years ago when Trump wanted to

(01:19:23):
cut money to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting CPB. I
always say it out loud so people don't get it
confused with customs and border patrol. So he wanted to
cut the funding like to zero for the Corporation for
Public Broadcasting. And the left lost their mind and they
said it was an attack on free speech. And uh,

(01:19:44):
even though it's a government funded thing, it's it's propaganda.
Now Here's why I give you that structure, because again
remember they get half a half a billion. It was
something like four hundred and fifty five million dollars that
they got. That was the last appropriation I think there
was from twenty twenty two. So Judy Woodrooff, who is

(01:20:05):
with PBS, which gets its money from the Corporation for
Public Broadcasting, which gets its money from entirely the government,
they always say, oh, no, generous donors, No, no, a
fraction of them give more than what they pay in taxes.
So Judy Woodrooff was speaking on to a live audience

(01:20:29):
and this was in Chicago. This was in Chicago on
the PBS Roundtable, and they were they had an audience
and they were talking about the ceased fire, any kind
of potential negotiation for a ceasefire between Hamas and Israel,
and Woodrooff was saying that she knew that there wasn't

(01:20:51):
going to be one because this is what she said.
She said, quote, the reporting is that former President Trump
is on the phone with the Prime Minister of israeling
him not to cut a deal right now because it's
believed that it would help the Harris campaign. End quote.
That's what she said verbatim, And then she adds, who
knows whether that will come out or not, but I

(01:21:12):
have to think that the Harris campaign would like for
President Biden to do what presidents do, which is to
work on that one. So and she's she used to
be on News Hour and then she just was slammed
for it. So she presents this as an actual headline.
I read you the quote. I read you the quote.

(01:21:32):
She says. You know, the reporting is that he's telling
Nan Yahoo to not cut this deal because he would
benefit the Harris campaign. So then she gets a lot
of flack for this right because people were like, where
are you getting this from? What do you mean? What reports?
So she tries to come back on it, and she
writes on X she says, quote, I want to clarify

(01:21:53):
my remarks on the PBS News special Monday Night about
the ongoing ceasefire talks in the Middle East. She says,
as I like, this is some sort of excuse for her. Now,
remember how I told you how she said the statement
based on reporting. She goes, as, I said, this is
not based on my original reporting. I was talking about
she said, the reports and axios embroiders about Trump having

(01:22:15):
spoken to the Israeli Prime minister, and in the live
TV moment, I repeated the story, you know, et cetera,
et cetera, and she's like, you know, I made a
mistaken for that, I apologize. So she just approached. She
just repeats, like not conjecture. And by the way, people

(01:22:36):
have been looking for like the reports that she's talking about.
So she repeats this, and this story went wild like everyone, Oh,
Trump is trying to tank the ceasefire discussion. He doesn't
want the ceasefire discussion. He's trying to because of the
Harris campaign, and they were trying to really make him
look bad. And this is what And then she has

(01:22:57):
to come out and say, well, this is based on
my original, not that this was. Oh my gosh, do
you not have a responsibility because she calls herself, as
she calls herself a journalist, right, does she not have
a responsibility to I don't know, maybe just be somewhat

(01:23:21):
honest and accurate when you're repeating news. Oh my gosh,
I mean, she makes it up entirely what she did,
because people are like, where are these stories that are
saying this? She's making it up entirely, And she says,
I'm just reporting this from and I'm looking actually at
I'm looking at her tweet. I'm just reporting this, you know,

(01:23:41):
from x AS and Reuters and that, except it's not there.
Both sides, everybody was denying it. They're like, wait a
minute's here's the problem. The original and this is what
I have. The original reporting that they had on it.
They were reporting on the ceasefire, didn't have anything about

(01:24:04):
Trump calling them. They actually wrote a second piece about this,
saying Netna whose office denies a call with Trump about
the guy's a hostage ceasefire deal. They had a whole
story denying that that ever happened. They never claimed that
it happened. They just said that this was like floating
around and he denied it and it never happened. Literally,
no one, not Axios and I didn't even find anything

(01:24:26):
with Reuters, like Axios had a piece where they were
dispelling this worders. Did he even have one? No one, literally
nobody had that. Nobody was running that as a story.
There was no outlet at all whatsoever that was reporting
that as a fact. Nobody was saying Donald Trump is
calling Benjamin NETANYAHUO and telling him not to accept the ceasefire.

(01:24:47):
Not a single one not a single one. She literally
made it up. She pulled it out of her ass
and ran with it. She made it up entirely, and
she is still on air. Her salary is paid for
by us. She is a Judy Woodrooff is a glorified

(01:25:10):
welfare recipient on the taxpayer teat as part of PBS,
which is under Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which receives half
a billion taxpair dollars every year. Their appropriations make that happen.
And that's the level of reporting that is on PBS.
She made it up, She made it up out of

(01:25:30):
the ether and ran with it. And then she tries
to blame two other outlets, one of which didn't even
write about it at all, and the other one only
wrote about how, oh there's a rumor going around. This
never happened and she just made it up. Why are
they getting public funding? Why is a government agency running

(01:25:53):
with false or dare I say misinformation? Is this not
the same government that wanted to create a disinformations? Are
is this not disinformation? I mean, this is like Dan
rather level of violations in terms of journalistic ethics. Judy Woodruff,

(01:26:15):
that's insane. She and she's like oh, I'm sorry, I'd
read it there. She doubled down, and that was her response.
So she lied about a story on stage. Then she
lied on Twitter defending herself about it. You do not
loathe the press enough.

Speaker 6 (01:26:34):
And now all of the news you would probably miss
It's time for Dana's Quick five.

Speaker 2 (01:26:40):
If you don't do the Eric cowboll can you really
say the you're a fan of bluish recult, just don't know.
Semi truck crash splattered nine ninety four with salad dressing
Detroit Free Press. It was an unsavory incident. It happened
in Saint Clair Shore's Michigan Department of Transportation showed the
whole Oh that is an absolute message everywhere. That's how

(01:27:00):
you get ants. That's how you get ants. What kind
of salad dressing was it? It doesn't say, just says
salad dressing. Maybe it was like a selection of various dressings.

Speaker 5 (01:27:12):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:27:12):
By the way, the Florida man that had that I
missed a very important element. The Florida man that had
the head surgery right in the plane that had to
be that was thrown off the plane. He had hair plugs.
That's why his scop was still bleeding and they thought
it was a bred idea to get with groady bandages
under the Okay, there you go. That's sick. I can't
talk about anymore. Another Guinness World What why do people

(01:27:33):
do this? Someone says, this chick has the biggest has
the fattest tongue, and that's like apparently a world record.
You're proud of that. That's the thing that we're doing
with the gunness world records. Okay, Yeah, two thousand pounds
of frozen fish missing after a flight diversion. I'm sure
that's totally accidental. That's what everyone's asking. How does a
plane from Alaska get diverted? What happened? They said that

(01:27:56):
passengers made it to their final destination, but their fish
never did. These people went on a yearly trip to
go and get fish, and they were returning from the
flight Alaska to Seattle and it was diverted, and they
said that they don't know what happened to the frozen fish.
They're waiting for it. Still. That has to be very
expensive mistake from that Airlines. You know that. We have

(01:28:18):
a lot more on the way, including a very interesting
point about the women that Democrats were using in their
abortion stories yesterday, there's something you need to know. Stick
with us.

Speaker 8 (01:28:27):
Subscribe to The Dana Show podcast because who says you
can't make fun of people while staying informed on your
own personal time. Subscribe on YouTube, Apple, or wherever you
get your podcast.

Speaker 2 (01:28:38):
I'm a vet trendy.

Speaker 1 (01:28:40):
I'm a hunter, and I was a better shot than
most Republicans in Congress, and I got the trophies to
prove it.

Speaker 2 (01:28:49):
But I'm also a dad.

Speaker 1 (01:28:52):
I believe in the Second Amendment, but I also believe
our first responsibility is to keep our kids safe.

Speaker 5 (01:29:04):
That's what this is all about.

Speaker 2 (01:29:07):
Yesterday, Governor Fudd, He's look, I'm gonna tell you, I
said when he first came out, because you knew he
was gonna mention this. He's like, I'm a veteran and
I'm an hunter. I'm a hunter, and neither walls nor
the guns that he wants to ban ever served in combat.
So stop, don't sit here and try to wow us

(01:29:29):
with I know guns, apparently not enough to know the
difference between like a semi automatic and a full auto.
Apparently not enough to know that servicemen don't carry AR fifteen's,
they carry him sixteens in him fours. Apparently he knows guns,
but not enough to do that, not that much. That's

(01:29:50):
like some fud level FLEXI. That's a fud flex that's
what that was. Welcome back to the program, Dana. Last
year with you bottom of this third hour, they only
only touched on two way stuff. But again, they don't
carry AR fifteens in combat, just like Tim Walston going
to combat. Uh, you know, that's that's it. That's not what.

(01:30:14):
Why do they keep pushing that? But you know what,
even if I don't care, our country was founded using
weapons of war. People celebrate Independence Day a holiday, an observance,
secure buy free people using the same the same guns
that our government had weapons of war. I hate that phrase.
Even anything is a weapon of war. And Democrats can

(01:30:35):
never figure out where they stand on this. They're like, oh,
well you can use your AR fifteens against us, but
we have jets and all this other stuff like wow, okay,
So either it is a big, big enough deal to
ban or it's not for you. Which is it? Pick
a lane here, pick a lane. Speaking of kids, there's
a weird thing and Lorraine over she moderates the chat.

(01:30:57):
That's over a rumble and then is also a contributor
over it in verse. So she noticed this and she
has a piece on one of the women mentioned. Now
here's what's weird. So one Democrats were mentioning over and
over again abortion, abortion, abortion, and they made a big
deal to try to highlight a number of women who

(01:31:19):
the way they represented it, had to get abortions and
Republicans almost killed them. And they said the reason these
women were in this situation is because of the abortion law.
Because Roe v. Wade was overturned and went back to
the states, which I might add again still just a
reminder life of the mother rape and says those are

(01:31:40):
all still protected exceptions in every state. And so the
first Woman Lorraine noted all of these cases, these weren't
cases because of abortion law. It was cases of medical malpractice.
The first woman, the Texas Tribune has a story about this.
She had what's referred to as like an incompetent cervix.

(01:32:02):
She went to labor at eighteen weeks and the doctors
had refused to induce. And this went to court, and
this is what the Texas Supreme Court said. They rejected
the challenge because they said that these the exceptions in

(01:32:23):
the law were broad enough the doctor she had a
cervix issue. It was the doctors who refused to induce
her a medical malpractice was the issue, not the abortion law.
The second woman, Caitlin Joshua Laree, noted that she was

(01:32:44):
told her doctor would not accept a pregnant patient after
week twelve, which is weird because all prenatal care is
incredibly important. Are not regardless, but okay. She had started
bleeding at week eleven, and she said that two different
ers had refused to give her pain medications and they

(01:33:04):
sent her home with orders to talk to her obgynn
in the morning, which apparently, I mean, none of this
is true because when you have to bring tissue in,
you have to. Whenever a woman goes through a miscarriage,
if it's at home, if it's not in a medical facility,
you're told to bring things in because they need to
make sure that you pass everything that needs to be passed,
not to get to into it. When you're treating a miscarriage.

(01:33:31):
That is a miscarriage. Your body's rejection of the baby
natural because something is wrong, something's happening, there's an issue there.
It's not the same thing as an abortion, and again
people were asking in this case in Louisiana, whether or
not this was medical malpractice. Again Hadley Duval. This is

(01:33:54):
the one who was raped by her stepfather when she
was twelve years old, and she was told that she
had options. She eventually had a miscarriage. According to the
Associated Press, she did not get an abortion. She ended
up having a miscarriage, but she was told that she
had and she did have options because this falls under
one of those protected classes. She's twelve, it's rape, it's

(01:34:14):
inset all of that. So these are being really misrepresented.
And Lorena has a piece back over and I'm going
to send this out in your preppymail for the morning,
unless that actually what I'm probably going to do is
a write up this evening for the DNC, and I'll
have that separate in this rite of again, if you're
a subscriber, Kate Cox's situation is the same thing. Back
in December of last year, Loraine had a piece talking

(01:34:35):
about how it was an activist doctor and an abortion
rights group that we're seizing on this woman's story as
a way to present it as an abortion issue for Democrats.
Kate Cox had two kids. She announced apparently at the
convention also that she's pregnant with her third there were
they discovered a genetic anomaly and ultrasounds showing multiple very

(01:34:56):
very serious deformities that were going to affect the child's life.
I mean, whether or not the child was even going
to be viable. The third pregnancy became very nightmaric for her. Obviously,
she had cramping, she had a lot of indicators of
preterm labor, and they were wondering whether or not she
was leaking amniotic fluid. She went to the er. She

(01:35:20):
was saying it was amniotic fluid, but apparently it wasn't
identified as such, and apparently it was trisomy eighteen was
what was identified as being the issue.

Speaker 16 (01:35:30):
And the.

Speaker 2 (01:35:34):
Look at the case. When you look at the case,
apparently her doctors were making this situation entirely worse because
doctors can't identify if there is a leak, whether or
not it is amniotic fluid. It's not, you know, a mystery,
and it doesn't seem like her water had broken. But apparently, ever,

(01:35:55):
and looking at the case, without getting into the weeds
of this specific case, it looked like she had a
activist doctor. And it also looked like this woman this case,
Cox searched out and looked for an activist doctor because
because she had been told that her life was not
at risk, that she would be able to deliver health
you know, she'd find so she did not qualify for

(01:36:15):
the exemption under the current law. So she went looking
for an activist doctor and that's how this case ended
up going coming to be and she ended up leaving.
Apparently the report was to get an abortion in another state.
So the problem is that there wasn't any objective evidence

(01:36:36):
that this was the route to go. There was even
questions as to the validity of the information that they
were using to cite to justify for it. I mean,
there's a lot of stuff that a lot of questions
from it. But the bottom line what I'm saying here
is that democrats have been using and making these cases
and they act like rape exception the life of the

(01:36:57):
mother are a universal thing when they are the rare
exception that count that amounts to less than one percent
of all cases for which there were already protected exemptions.
So they were using issues of medical malpractice and then
one protected exemption, lying about the one exemption, and then
representing the other issues of two definitely medical malpractice one

(01:37:18):
technically could be and trying to use those as a
way to sort of pad their argument and so that
they could demand this abortion on Demando's birth control up
to the moment of birth. And it's just misrepresentation, that's
what That's what these stories are. These stories are not

(01:37:39):
I mean this is and Lorraine's got a big piece
that lists all of these things coming up, including some
of the other women that have been mentioned. But these cases,
the commonality, the common denominator, is that these are medical
malpractice cases and the doctors are not tending or advocating
for these women and their patients. So restricted abortion law

(01:38:05):
has nothing to do with these cases. But they're presenting
them as such so that they can try to argue
for it. And they expect the media to not ask
questions they expect and if anybody asks too many questions,
what they'll say is, oh, no, this is a private issue. Well,
how is it a private issue when you're making it
a part of you your party platform? How is it
a private issue? You the party that wanted to know

(01:38:27):
whether or not someone had an injection and they had
to get an ID card, You the party that is
demanding to get involved in parents who are dealing with
children that want to minor children that want to have
experimental surgery on their sexual organs. Like, how are you
sitting here saying that this is now that you can't
have it both ways. You're going to hear a lot

(01:38:47):
about this tonight because Kamala Harris is going to be speaking,
and this is going to be a major issue that
she hits because it's all she has. She can't talk
about the border. Heaven forbid, Trump's at the border today,
apparently he just got there. She can't talk talk about
the border, she can't talk about the economy. She doesn't
resonate with middle class voters. I don't know what there

(01:39:10):
is left for her to try to find some way
to reach people other than like, do these abortions scaremongering stories.
That's the only thing I can see. So it's a
this is gonna be a huge this is gonna be
a huge focus. I would imagine you're gonna hear these
women's names. I would imagine that you're gonna hear about

(01:39:30):
the Kate Cox lady again. And there's gonna be a
piece up at Substeck for you about this. I got
a couple of other things to get into some audio
as well, because we haven't we don't have the audio already.

Speaker 5 (01:39:42):
Uh.

Speaker 2 (01:39:43):
First up, this is Dana Bash last night. Listen to this.
This is a weird SoundBite. This is audio SoundBite thirty nine,
and Bash's remarking on the tone of messaging that Democrats
are using to reach a particular subset.

Speaker 14 (01:39:58):
Listen, but they are doing so in trying to put
forward male figures, Tim Walls being one of them, Doug
m Hoff last night, who can speak to men out
there who might not be the sort of testosterone Leyden

(01:40:19):
you know, gun coating kind of guy who wants to
listen to Paul Cogan and the kind of players that
came out of the RNC or might want to listen
to that. But also, in addition, understand that it's okay
in twenty twenty four to be a man comfortable in
his own skin who supports a woman. And that's something

(01:40:42):
that they really are trying to work on with male voters.

Speaker 2 (01:40:46):
So it sounds like they're trying to reach low T dudes,
low T beta dudes. That's what I heard from her.
What a weird remark, you know, if a Republican had
said that people Democrats would be upset right.

Speaker 8 (01:41:02):
Writing up your timely news consumption with a Dana Show
podcast where every update comes with a little dash of
not so serious on YouTube, Apple or wherever you get
your podcasts.

Speaker 16 (01:41:13):
Yeah, you know. The Vice President was returning to Chicago
after having campaigned in Milwaukee earlier in the day, and
she was on Air Force two when her husband, Doug M. Hoff,
the Second Gentleman, began speaking at the convention. So the
plane actually circles for an extra fifteen minutes, we're told
in this guy, so she could finish watching his speech.

Speaker 2 (01:41:32):
Of course, I mean Green knew what who cares about that?
She's gonna watch her husband for fifteen minutes give a speech.
So let's burn some fuel so she can do that. Yeah,
she can do that because she's specialer than you. Don't
forget it either. Welcome back to the program, Dana Lash
here with you. She's speaking tonight. Ooh boy, I'm telling you,

(01:41:55):
uh I can it's I don't know. They said that
there's like rumors that someone bigger than Oprah is going
to be speaking at this thing tonight at the DNC.
I don't know. I'm just happy that I only got
one more night to watch and I'm done. One more
night to follow and I'm done. I don't expect to
hear any kind of specificity with her anything with anything,

(01:42:16):
none of it. I mean, you know what I imagine
what she's going to try to do is talk. I
would imagine that she's going to probably bring up the
price gouging, sorry, gauging. She said that twice. Whatever, that's crazy. Uh,
and any taxing on realized gains that was something that
they had also put out, which is one of the
craziest things I've ever heard. Carol Roth is probably going

(01:42:37):
to lose her mind to her ow on the show Kane.
Kane's like, immediately, Fidgets, did you break dance over there?
What was that you did?

Speaker 4 (01:42:44):
Like our hurcy Joe, you say, hate the fact that literally,
if I walked into a bank and took money that
wasn't mine, that would be considered theft stealing. I'd go
to jail. But the government can go right in there
on gaines you haven't even realized and charge you for it.

Speaker 2 (01:43:01):
That's literally what if they lose value too?

Speaker 4 (01:43:04):
Right, is the government going to pay you then?

Speaker 2 (01:43:06):
Exactly like what if they lose value? Do you get
do you get money from the government, and where does
that money come from? This just doesn't this just doesn't
even make sense. It's just an unword. It's unworkable. It's
just asset and capital seizure, that's all it is.

Speaker 4 (01:43:23):
And I worry about the dollar. The way the government,
our government's been treating our money. I think the dollar
on the global stage is also collapsib.

Speaker 2 (01:43:30):
Well, the petro dollars already gone.

Speaker 4 (01:43:31):
So I have true, genuine, strong worries about the dollar.

Speaker 2 (01:43:37):
Mm hmm. So that's imagine that's going to be very
That'll be something that you're gonna hear that you're I
would imagine that you will hear when nobody's I think
there's only they'll give out her speech, maybe a couple
of hours before she gives it, but it'll be on bargoed,
it'll be for the press, uh. And I would imagine
it'll be abortion. She'll probably hit some of that. It's

(01:43:57):
going to be mostly like how bad Trump is. Even
she's been vice president for you know, the past four
years and then before that senator, so she's been in
office the entire time. I'm sure she's going to try
to act like she's the big prosecutor. This is one
thing that they've been playing up and we'll talk more
about this tomorrow, is that she's the prosecutor going into
the going against the felon. Let's look at her prosecutorial

(01:44:20):
record though as ag and let's look at the injustice
that she perpetuated. That's one of the things we're going
to be doing tomorrow, and then we'll highlight the final day. Highlight,
low light the final day of the DNC today in's
stupidity game.

Speaker 4 (01:44:34):
All right, believe it or not. It's a Democrat and
her name's Amy Klobachar. She's a Senator from Minnesota. And
she thought she was being clever. I think in this
moment where you know, she's so anti Maga for whatever reason,
making America great again. Really it ticks off Democrats for
whatever reason. But she's got a new suggestion. Is what
it should be called cut thirty five one.

Speaker 17 (01:44:58):
So psyched to see all of you, I decided, instead
of the Maga movement, we're gonna start the Mama movement,
that is make America Michigan and Minnesota again.

Speaker 2 (01:45:11):
What thanks, that's stupid, but I will say this. He
is in many respects, Tim Walls kind of like I mean,
Newsome's pretty far left. Walls has been able to go
further left because he's been in Minnesota and sort of
shielded for media attention. And don't underestimate that we'll have

(01:45:36):
a recap of all of that tomorrow. Folks. Make sure
you find us on Facebook, YouTube, like and subscribe, find
us on subseec, chapter and verse. I'll be back with
you behind the mike tomorrow

All Episodes

Thursday August 22 - Full Show

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Dateline NBC

Stuff You Should Know

My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Thursday August 22 - Full Show