Wednesday August 28 - Full Show - The Dana Show with Dana Loesch

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Unrealized gains.

Speaker 2 (00:01):
Taxing unrealized games just doesn't seem fair in any sense
of the word.

Speaker 3 (00:06):
But in a very different point, in the very best sense.

Speaker 2 (00:08):
If you are taxing unrealized gains, all you're doing is
pulling forward the taxes that would be paid later when
someone actually sells the stock.

Speaker 4 (00:15):
I think that this reaction to unrealized gains is a
little funny, given that I bet that the majority of
people watching right now are already paying a tax on
unrealized gains. It's called a property tax when the.

Speaker 1 (00:25):
Value of your use, when the value of your home
goes up.

Speaker 4 (00:30):
You pay higher tires, even if.

Speaker 2 (00:31):
Your value of your home never moves the way the
stock moves.

Speaker 5 (00:35):
The way something's always the go to answer.

Speaker 2 (00:38):
It's also property tax is a use tax. You're paying
for school for the schools, you're paying for emergency services.
Those are things that make absolute sense.

Speaker 4 (00:46):
And sure and all the all the revenue that comes
in from these unrealized gains taxes and the other taxes,
and the tax in the Harris Plan are going to
go to what creating what she calls more opportunity.

Speaker 3 (00:55):
It's to make sure that that's.

Speaker 4 (00:56):
Not in this country actually gets six thousand.

Speaker 1 (00:58):
Dollars the services.

Speaker 4 (01:00):
Well, look, you're you're arguing that this is some sort
of foreign concept that's completely unknown.

Speaker 5 (01:06):
It's probably unconstitutional, it's probably and it was never in
anyone's intent.

Speaker 2 (01:12):
It's not an income tax, and it's never gonna happen.

Speaker 3 (01:14):
This probably not.

Speaker 5 (01:18):
Well, I'm not gonna say my life was not in
Becky's lifetime.

Speaker 1 (01:22):
I like this guy on the right. I don't remember
who he is. I don't remember what isn't Yeah, what
is it? I don't know who the hell he is.
I don't watch the NBC. But the more that I
the more clips that I see this guy, the more
I like him because I feel like he just sat
down his pint and was like, look, you're stupid, and
he just goes into it from there. Golee, Welcome to

(01:44):
the program. Stana Lash here with you. We're at the
top of this first hour. And of course you know
now that I was talking a little bit about this
on Jesse Waters last night, and we're going to touch
on some of it today. Uh, the Kamala Kamala Harris, communism,
her economic plans, the wealth tax, all of this other stuff.
One of the reasons I think that they are not

(02:04):
on the website, and I was thinking about this is
because they I mean, when you put it up on
the website, you got to claim it. Right. When you
put it up on the website, that's your plan, right,
that's that becomes your that's your plan, that's your thing,
and you can't run away from it because it's on
your website and you own it now, and it's a

(02:28):
it's a big deal. So I think the reason why
they haven't actually put it on the website is because
she doesn't want to have to own it in case
it blows up in her face like this is so
they do these like trial balloon things where they float
out these these policies, because the stuff about the border,
and even even some of her other economic policy, not

(02:51):
necessarily the unrealized gains which she's talked about before, but
some of these new changes in positions that she has,
you know, away from what she's always held. They've been
put out there by toadies, by her staffers, et cetera.
And I think that they float these ideas and then

(03:12):
kind of see how the public reacts, and then they
gauge whether or not that's something that she's gonna hit
really hard, or if she needs to modify her position
on it, et cetera, et cetera. That's really how I
think that they've been doing this, and that's that's the purpose.
So welcome to the show. You can also find this
channel thirty forty seven Direct TV. The chats over at
Rumbull also on X two substack, chapter and verse. The

(03:34):
unrealized gains is gonna be This is going to be
something that destroys America. It will destroy our economy. And
I just turn our founders went to war for less
and if they start doing this, honestly, I just our
founders went to war for less. This is it's insane.

(03:55):
And the property tax I we did't CNBC. They were
pushing back against it because they know they're gonna get
hit with those stuff too. They know exactly they're gonna
get hit with all of this stuff too. It's a
property to look. I think property taxes are also stupid.
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to discuss how
you never own your own property. If you want to
pay a fee, charge a fee for your water and

(04:16):
your police and everything else, that's fine, do it. Do
it like you do the trash service. That's fine, you
know for and I don't think we should be publicly
funding schools. I think we should just tax parents less
so parents can choose where the hell they want to
send their kids, so they're not looped into sending them
wherever they have to live. So I'm even for a
change in that structure because it's all a racket. It's

(04:38):
all an absolute racket. So the comparison to property taxes
is even dumber because at least you get some sort
of return on your forced investment, right, even if you
didn't necessarily agree to it. You get some kind of
return on your forced investment. But by and large that's
not a sacred cow either. So I love the opportunity
to talk about how dumb it is, but it's not

(04:59):
even remo and any way comparable. You're talking about taxing
something that you haven't even made yet, money that you
don't even have, and that it's assumed value by the government, who,
by the way, as we talked about with Carol Roth
what was it last week, you don't Actually, they don't
pay you if you lose on it. So if it
de appreciates it, if it if it is devalued by you, know,
whatever factor, whatever reason, is the government going to write

(05:21):
me a check on it? What about that? Because see
that's a two way street. The problem is that the
government won't stop spending and sitting here telling everyone we're
gonna give you twenty five thousand dollars for a house.
That's gonna make it even worse. None of these people
can do math because these people on the left have
never had to make payroll, They have never started a business,

(05:42):
They've never really worked. Think about it. Look at all
of these people. They've never worked a day in the
private sector. Kamblay Harris has always been in public office always.
Joe Biden has never worked a day in the private
sector ever. Tim Walls was what an assistant coach for
a year and he is living off that for the
rest of his life as as an optic. These people

(06:05):
have no idea. Bernie Sanders, Bernie Sanders never literally, I'm
not exaggerating. He literally never worked in the private sector
a day in his life. Ever. These people are trash.
They have no idea what you go through, They have
no idea what what things cost, because they live in
an alternate reality. I mean they want to they they

(06:30):
want to text the value of your house basically when
you can't not basically before you he hain't even sold it. Oh,
would appreciate it. We're gonna text you on this. We're
gonna text on all the gains, all of the unrealized
I mean, that's the dumbest phrase ever. I don't know
if there's a dumber phrase from other you know, with
unrealized gains, maybe assault weapons. But hat, I don't know.

(06:54):
I mean, you know it's a hat for your butt.
I don't know.

Speaker 6 (06:56):
I mean homeowners also know this that they won't even
lower your home property tax is when your value of
your home might go down until you actually protest it.

Speaker 1 (07:05):
Oh, I fight. I will fight every little thing to
the instagree.

Speaker 6 (07:09):
Government is a vacuum of money.

Speaker 1 (07:11):
I will tell you this, local bureaucrats, If me or
my husband roll up, they know that they're in for
a bad time. I will literally fight you on every
damned thing. If you raise something on me, even a
half a cent, I'm in your face. I don't give
a rats ask. I will roll up. And my husband's
always like, you're on the radio, when you do TV,

(07:33):
you can do I'm like, I don't care. I'm an
American citizen. I don't have enough middle fingers for this tyranny.
And then I just blow in there. My and my
and my we always do this thing where my husband's like, okay,
we got to be a good cop, bad cop. Let
me be the bad cop. And I'm like okay, all right,
and then we roll in and I'm like, ah, and
I'm bad cop immediately, so he asks to He's like, God,
dang it, Dana, stop it. That's where we're at. Our

(07:56):
kid's gonna test to this. It's it's hysterical. But I
fight everything and I totally agree with you. You you
still have to pay it. You still have to pay it.
They were trying to do that with our property tax,
and I'm like, listen here, kittens, this ain't This ain't
how And they're like, well, we have comps, and I'm like, oh,
you have comps. Oh what would you like to see
old mine? And then then they die because it's they can't.

(08:18):
They don't live long enough to read everything I brought them.
So I mean you, I mean the government could increase
your I mean think about your savings account, anything that
you own without selling any of it. They can increase
the cost of it and then tax you on it. Now,
think about how that works for a moment. Please. The
government in charge essentially of all monetary policy, right, they

(08:41):
are in charge of determining the worth of things. You say, well, Dana,
it's the market, but they manipulate the market so they
can just arbitrarily jack something up and then go, oh, well,
you all as taxes on this. You're on realized games.
We have determined that you're the property that you own
is one more. So we're going to tax you on
this unrealized gain. You didn't sell it. Where your car

(09:04):
is an unrealized gain. It appreciated them by it. We're
gonna tax you on everything everything. This is the dumbest
thing I've ever seen. They want your money because they
can't stop spending it. They're spending it like a drunk
dude at a strip club. I don't know. I can't
talk about it without getting really upset, like like comically mad.

(09:25):
I just I can't. There's I'm turning into my mother's daughter.
This is so crazy. Like you talk to her about
social security, you can't, Actually you can't talk to her
about social security. She like turns into a demon and
like fire shoots out of her eaders and she just,
you know, her eyes turned red and she talks about
how it's her money, which it is. No one's contesting it,
but you just can't even bring it up. You mention it,

(09:47):
and you are an enemy. It doesn't matter. Everyone in
the vicinity is an enemy. It's a thing. And don't
text me either. She's she's retired now, so she listens.
She'll text me, Like she told me I was a
smart ass the other day when I mentioned her. She
texts me. I was on air and she says this,
It's like, mother, Uh, but I'm this is how I'm
becoming with this. It's insane how much everybody's paying in tax.

(10:11):
So much we've paid in tax, it's crazy, and now
they want more of it. This is going to utterly
destroy the economy. We're going to talk more about this
because I can't talk enough about it. Also, the some
people are saying, is is Kamala House. This Brat summer
finally over? Can we stop with that? But so Brat Summer?

(10:32):
And I'm gonna And now it's being used in the
context of political discourse, as I understand it. If you're
a bitch and you wear neon. That means you're brat?
Is that correct, Steve? Oh, Well, for the love, well,
that's what I read. It's all these annoying chicks and
they're all in neon colors, and they're like, this is
the Bratt wardrobe. And I'm like, okay, like brad Stahle wardrobe.

(10:54):
I don't know, but they're saying it's Kamala hers is brat.
Summer finally over uh the because newspapers are questioning her
on this, people are starting to question her now a
couple of other things. We got the Jack Smith indictment.
One of the reasons I don't get into the weeds
in this is because other people do. And I would rather,
i think, dangle my feet in a wood chipper than

(11:16):
to spend an inordinate amount of time on it, because
if I talk about it in a serious fashion, then
I feel like I'm giving it gravita. I feel like
I am treating it as though I think it's a
serious maneuver, and I think it's all a clown show
of epic proportions. I have zero faith in the quote
unquote system. I don't have any faith in government because
I'm an American and that's part of my DNA. In fact,

(11:38):
if you put you take, you know, draw some blood
on us, and you look at our blood under a microscope,
and you go all the way into our DNA, you
look at it and it is basically somebody with a
bandana rambow style tied around their forehead and they're holding
up a one finger salute to overreaching government. That's what it.
That's what the American DNA looks like. And when you

(11:59):
become an American citizen, your DNA's transfixed and it turns
into that that is a scientific reality. And so I
just don't I don't trust any of this. And so on. Oh,
thirty six page indictment by this guy who looks lonely,
that's just that's je. I mean, we'll talk a little
bit about it, but I mean, it's just all. It's all.

(12:21):
You knew this was coming. This isn't a surprise. You
knew that they were gonna keep doing this. What they're
doing is he they're the same charges. It's just he's
now trying to do it in the context of the
new Scotis ruling on presidential immunity. So he just they
just adjusted it to fit that. So we'll touch on
that here coming up. Also later on we're gonna get
into some polling and Goshen. Oh, so this is a

(12:42):
fascinating I've been watching this. Jade Vance was in Michigan yesterday.
He was hitting out at Goshen. Goshen is the big
Chinese EV battery maker, and they're wanting to move into Michigan.
And of course big gretches up there like yeah, I
love me some CCP. And so now you've got Democrats
who they're in a really weird position like do we

(13:03):
want to bring the commies into Michigan, I mean, I mean, sorry,
more commedies into Michigan? Or do we want to try
to how do we want to do this? So we're
going to discuss some of this. We're going to get
into some of the immigration, the election culture, all kinds
of stuff. So you don't want to miss it. People
who helped bring you free radio over at Hillsdale. This
is Hillsdale exists to provide the type of education needed

(13:24):
to prevent a Kamala Herris. There is this is no
other way of putting it. It's a small Christian, classical
liberal arts college in southern Michigan. All about the pursuit
of truth and defense of liberty, and they were founded
to offer this education type of education needed to outfight
for and preserve this republic. Now you can visit Dana
four f R Hillsdale dot com and choose from all

(13:45):
of their educational podcasts. This is one of the things
that they offer for free to you. They have all
kinds of videos, lectures, all kinds of stuff. Their free
speech digest called in Primus. You don't have to be
on their campus in southern Michigan to take advantage of
all this. I mean, you can just go to Dana
four fo R Hillsdale dot com and really have an
opportunity to learn for free from Hillsdale. It's lots of

(14:10):
informative topics. I mean, they have their visiting lecturers, they
have authors, but these are all educational podcasts and you
can pick from it on the Hillsdale College Podcast Network,
accessible only at Dana four f R Hillsdale dot com.
So choose your new favorite educational podcast today on the
Hillsdale College Podcast Network at Dana four Hillsdale dot com.

Speaker 7 (14:31):
And now all of the news you would probably miss,
it's time for Dana's Quick five Okay.

Speaker 1 (14:37):
First up, we've got oh more kitchen spices being recalled
because leads in it. And I was looking at this
because I'm very particular about my spices, as y'all know,
So I was looking at it. They said there's six
other it's like ground cinnamon. That is the thing with cinnamon.
You gotta be real careful about the cinnamon you get.
I could do a whole show on it, but I'm
not going to. But they have this there's like the

(15:00):
serve It or Corp cinnamon that was mainly sold in
New York. Maybe don't use maybe ixnay that one. That
one they found some lead in it and it's a
Gutierras distributor. They've reported no illnesses. They're just like, hey,
what's up. So make sure you're checking your your spices.
Be real careful about the cinnamon you get. There's like
a certain kind that actually is. Yeah. Kane's like, I

(15:21):
feel so validated. I got like mister Kombuka over there
going there.

Speaker 6 (15:25):
Is, Yeah, Ceylon is better than Cassia.

Speaker 1 (15:27):
Just that's basically how yes that is? That is true.
A ransomware gang threatens to release data on us marshals.
I just think it's funny that there's a ransomware gang.
Like anybody could be a gang right now, right Like,
you can have a cartel that's a gang. You know,
you can have your basic you know, drug and guns
gang in Chicago. Now you got the ransomware gang. You know,
you're probably gonna have like your painty gang, your you know. It'say,

(15:48):
everybody's a gang. They're threatening to release top secret documents
from US marshals. They've said they've got all kinds of stuff.
I just think that's gonna make it a lot more
fun for US marshals. I don't know, I've watched too
much Justified. I feel like it's gonna make it a
lot more fun for them. Also, matching set of dinosaur
footprints was found on the opposite sides of the Atlantic Ocean.

(16:09):
Can you believe it? Dinosaur is so big just straddle
the Atlantic Ocean like that? So crazy? Wow. Matching set
of footprints discovered in Africa and South America. They revealed
that there was a giant dinosaur that once had its
foot on either side. No, they think that there was Pangaea.
That's what it goes back to. Pangaea. Also, deadly mosquito
virus puts Massachusetts towns on high alert. Why do we

(16:32):
have those, like out of all the things that they
look to eradicate, you know, like you know, family, wealth, freedom,
go after mosquitos. Right, just start there. I'll make fun
of Peloton in the next segment. We got more coming up.
Stick with us. I agree with Annie Oakley who said quote,
I would like to see every woman know how to
handle guns as naturally as they know how to handle babies. Now,

(16:52):
I myself regularly concealed carry and I'm millimeter. Now that's said.
Not every woman is like me, has had the hours
of training that I've had, or it feels comfortable on
firearms due to years of use, or maybe they're by
a gun free zone. I'd like to change that what
I can, while encouraging self defense at the same time.
So this is where BURNA comes in. It's kind of
like a starter weapon. It's they make a non firearm firearm.

(17:13):
I like the idea of incredible force sending chemical irritants
towards a threat as an additional option for women, and
the Berna SD model shoots chemical irritant projectiles sixty eight
caliber rounds that can deter threats in their tracks up
to fifty feet away. I mean it is hard easy
target acquisition. Zero recoil. Burna is legal in all fifty states.

(17:36):
There's no background checks, no permits required. It's shipped directly
to your door. Gun Free isn't applicable to Burna. It's
great for wherever guns are banned. Visit burna dot com
slash data for ten percent off. That's b y r
Ina dot com slash data.

Speaker 8 (17:51):
Woul kamalas proposed raisin corporate tax affect you the consumer.
Kamala is proposing raising corporate tax rates from twenty one
to twenty eight percent. Corporation are the ones selling stuff
and providing services. By raising taxes, they raise the prices
on things that they sell to you. Check out The
Watchdog on Wall Street podcast on Apple, Spotify, wherever you
get your podcast.

Speaker 9 (18:11):
The Danish Show podcast. You're Fast, funny and informative news
companion for those always on the move. Subscribe on YouTube, Apple,
or wherever you get your podcasts.

Speaker 1 (18:22):
Now.

Speaker 10 (18:23):
We stand very close, of course, to the new Goshen factory. Right,
that's right, and remember the tie breaking vote that she
casts to send inflation through the roof.

Speaker 6 (18:34):
Remember that vote.

Speaker 10 (18:35):
That vote also made Chinese companies like Goshen eligible for
millions of your tax payer.

Speaker 1 (18:42):
Dollars hashtag facts. That is true. So Goshen, this is
now going to be a big thing. And it's because
Michigan's Michigan's Uh, it's not as in play as much
as Pennsylvania is, or even maybe perhaps as much as
Georgia is, but it's still very important. It's that part
of that blue Welcome back to the program, Dana Lash
with you bottom of this first hour. So Goshen is

(19:05):
this big CCP company, it's they always say, well, it's
Chinese communist link. Look, I'm gonna say it once and
for all. You cannot be a business out of China
and not be a CCP member in good standing. Not
only do you have to be a member of the
CCP and good standing, but the CCP also puts members
of its own party on your company's board. That's to

(19:28):
ensure compliance. So you know, the beating cis when behavior improves.
So the CCP link, No, they're communist straight up. And
so this partnership with Goshen, you know, this is something
that's been really championed by big Gretch, the governor over there.
They had a and this was back in last year.

(19:51):
It's a two point four billion dollar project and it's
slated for Macosta County's big rapids. They say they're going
to create over twenty three hundre jobs and they want
to produce components that go into making the electric vehicle batteries. Right,
but understandably, there is a lot of concern about the

(20:16):
connections Goshin has to the CCP. There are legitimate NATSEC issues,
and they went underwent this voluntary review that was carried
out by the Department of Treasury, their Committee on Foreign
Investment in the United States. And you know, our government
has never aired and our government is run by entirely

(20:40):
pure people, right, we all know this, you know, especially
under this administration. So those people determine that that's uh,
it's fine. They don't need to undergo anything else. So
they approved all of this. There was a lot of
public outcry during the hearing though. People were very upset.
They didn't want this Chinese based company developing this massive

(21:00):
factory in Michigan, and a lot of people were like, why,
you know, you have American companies that are willing to
do this that want to undertake this project. Why are
you allowing a Chinese company to come in here and
do this? And they a lot of people in Michigan
felt that it was rushed, that the process to consider
them and move on to the next step was rushed,
and they, I mean, there were a lot of people.

(21:22):
It seems like more than not, more more people than not.
We're angry that this was being pushed through so rapidly.
And they think that, you know, this could also be
you know, here's CCP coming in and trying to trying
to get tentacles in. I mean, it's seven hundred acres
of land in Michigan that the CCP would own. It
would be a CCP business, the employees, and you could

(21:43):
say it creates twenty three hundred American jobs, but these
are people who are working for the CCP. So you're
making communist chills out of regular American people who just
simply want to have a job when you could have
an American company come in and do the exact same thing,
but for some reason, it's the CCP adjacent owned company
that's that's you know, getting apparently all of the consideration

(22:04):
and the company itself and this is something that that
all companies do in China. They have to so not
only do they have to be a CCP member in
good standing, and not only does a member of the
CCP place someone on their board, but they also have
to have like a commitment, be very public about their
commitment and their unwavering loyalty to the CCP. So, yeah,

(22:25):
there's there's a lot of concerns there. And the it
was the Midwesterner, uh, the Midwesterner dot News that had
this story where it says that Goshen's bylaws say that
it will set up a party organization and carry out
party activities in accordance with the constitution of the Communist
Party of China. That's a that's a little bit of

(22:48):
a problem. And they because you know, the company, which
is CCP, will guarantee and oversee the implementation of the
party's guidelines, principles, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. So
you have a huge company Michigan that's going to be
basically a satellite for the CCP h H And of
course Michigan Democrats are very excited about it. Big Gretch

(23:11):
is very excited about it. But there are some and
this is what Vance was hitting out at. By the way,
so this was a headline over the New York Times.
The reason I'm bringing all of this up is because
the media wants to use this as a wedge without
reporting on everything. So the headline over the New York
Times is quote to Lord, Michigan voters Trump campaign stokes
China fears. I don't know how you can stoke fears

(23:33):
about communists. I mean, it's a communism. And they noted JD.
Vance was in Michigan and they said he waded into
a fight over plans by Goshen to build this company.
They said that it's green Charter township. It's about sixty
miles north of Grand Rapids. They've been it's been this huge.
It's been a big battleground. And now they're acting like somehow,

(23:55):
like it's like Trump is creating Trump and Vance are
creating the drama. Uh yeah, it's so stupid. They said.
I was reading this piece and it says because Michigan.
They again, it is a state that is in play.
I don't think as much as Pennsylvania, but it is.

(24:16):
And New York Times notes this. They said Michigan is
a pivotal swing state. I don't know if I go
that far in the November election. It's not guaranteed by
Democrats though, and remember Trump did win it before It's
and New York Times Santa Pole showed this month showed
Harris was she was ahead of Trump by four points.
This same poll was a margin of era of three

(24:38):
point five. So if she's ahead by four percentage points,
and if you factor in a three point five margin
of error, that's like what she's like half a point ahead.
So they're tied virtually at this they're tied. And what
Vance noted was accurate. I mean her vote. She was
the deciding vote, the deciding vote that enabled the Inflation

(25:04):
Reduction Act to pass the Senate. The New York Times
noted this too, They said she was the deciding vote.
It was Harris, Miss Harris in twenty twenty two enabled
passage of the Inflation Reduction Act. And this is all
of these the subsidies that that bill created for the
new green energy. That was what was luring companies like

(25:27):
Goshen to come to the United States. And he's there's
not a thing that he said that was incorrect. It
would be this this CCPA company would be getting taxpayer
dollars in order to get going on this. I mean,
that's I mean, that's it's kind of crazy to think

(25:49):
about it, but that's true. There's a lot of been
a lot of reporting on it. I mean, you're getting
taxpayer dollars that are being funneled to a CCP company.
The Michigan Senate they granted legislative approval to provide one
hundred and seventy five million dollars in state funds for
this factory. That's one hundred and seventy five million dollars
taxpayer dollars to go towards Goshen. One hundred and seventy

(26:12):
five million taxpayer dollars. Even though people on you know,
have very legitimate concerns about the CCP alignment here and
when they had a hearing for it, that's when a
lot of people were really very very vocally slamming it.
Now keep in mind too, and there have been a

(26:33):
lot of people that have talked about this, including some
congressmen who are from Michigan who have noted that. And
this is also I'm going to pull this up. This
is a Wall Street Journal piece that I have from
my bookmarks. Chinese gate crashers at US based spark espionage concerns.
I mean, there have been about one hundred incidents involving

(26:54):
Chinese nationals trying to access American military and other installations.
Now it is completely completely acceptable to question this and
then questioned Goshen's parent company and question the goals that
they have in coming to Michigan and why they're getting
hundreds of millions of dollars in taxpayer money to get started.

(27:17):
I think it's perfectly acceptable to do this. I mean
you again, they Goshen, they sent their employees and this
is from UH this is pulled this up. They sent
their employees. This is Daily Caller, So Goshen they had
their employees go on these field trips. They were wearing

(27:39):
Red Army outfits and pledging their lives to the CCP.
This is a real I mean this was back in
August of last year. They were at the US based
Goshen company. So these are people in the US dressing
as Red Army soldiers during company field trips. There's photos
and video of it, and it's even posted on Goshen's website.

(28:03):
Gosh and High Type Power Energy. They ran multiple company
field trips. They took they went to different uh, some
of them went to Communist revolutionary memorials in China, and
they were wearing red army uniforms, swearing to fight for
communism at the end of their lives, et cetera, et cetera,
et cetera. Why is Goshen because go I mean, this
is there. It's so they're this subsidiaries, a California based

(28:26):
company is still owned by the CCP, wholly owned and
controlled by the way by the CCP, and they are
looking I mean, there's a lot of questions about this.

Speaker 9 (28:38):
Now.

Speaker 1 (28:38):
I'm bringing all of this up again because the media
wants to make it look like Trump is trying to
run off jobs in Michigan. Can you believe this Trump
is trying to That's what the New York Times. I mean,
I'm reading this piece, and that's what it looks like.
I mean, it's making it look like Trump is Trump
and Vance are trying to cost tax Here's jobs. They're

(29:03):
using this as a line of attack in Michigan against Trump.
Advance Harris wants to literally allow the CCP to come
in and build this factory. This is like a crappy
Belton Road initiative and in exchange for what twenty three
hundred jobs, you have American companies that could do this,
but they're not getting the consideration. They're not getting the

(29:24):
consideration at all. And by the way, it hasn't been
well received in Michigan that company. Treasury Department, per New
York Times, estimates that only two percent of the clean
energy investments made in the United States during this previous
administration have been made by Chinese companies. Huh, it's all

(29:45):
American companies that have made the rest that have done
the rest of it, all of them and some allies.

Speaker 8 (29:51):
Hm.

Speaker 1 (29:52):
Interesting, keep this in mind because this is going to
be something that's going to I think boil over a
little bit. Harris is walking back the ev mandate. She's
holding a bit of an edge in Michigan, and other
Republicans like Mike Rodgers was in Michigan and he was
condemning this, the creation of this plant. But the way
that they're going to try to put it is this

(30:14):
is this is Trump Advance attacking jobs in Michigan. This
is them trying to trying to prevent jobs. This is
them hitting out. They're going to try to make it
and omit all of the CCP stuff that I have
just spent the last you know, almost this whole subpment,
because I think this is an important topic explaining to
you they're omitting all of this. So keep this in mind,
and keep in mind too, the messaging for it, because

(30:36):
if Michigan, Michigan is in play and is that, how
do you message that that's going to be? I mean
people like look, people like the promises of stuff, and
when people need they're in a crunch period Less consideration
is going to be given to where the help comes from.
Only the help is coming. That's something you got to
keep in mind. We got more on the way as

(30:57):
we rolled towards days of these United States dates and
coming up. Jim Jordan's going to be joining us later
on in the program. We're going to get into some
of the tech stuff that they uncovered, particularly that Zuckerberg
admission on being pressured by Biden and Harris to suppress speech.
We're going to get into that. And now that school's
back in session, get ready for more DEI battles. We

(31:17):
have some stories on that front as well. Do you
owe back taxes on unfiled returns that fake pandemic relief
is now over and along with hiring tens of thousands
of new agents and field officers, the Glorious IRS is
kicked off twenty twenty four by sending over five million
pay up letters to those people who have unfiled tax
returns or balances owed. Don't waive your rights and speak

(31:38):
with them on your own because they're not your friends.
Tax Network usay is a trusted tax relief firm and
they've saved over one billion dollars in back taxes for
their clients, and they can help you secure the best
deal possible, whether you owe ten thousand or ten million.
They can help you whether it's business or personal taxes,
even if you have the means to pay or you're
on a fixed income. They can help finally resolve your

(31:58):
tax burdens. Once and call them at one eight hundred
nine to five eight one thousand for a private, free consultation,
or visit TNUSA dot com slash data. Don't let the
IRS control your life. Empower yourself with Tax Network USA
support and take charge of your financial future. Visit TNUSA
dot com slash data today.

Speaker 9 (32:20):
Get the loaddown on the latest news with a side
of laughs whenever you want subscribe to the Data Show
podcast on YouTube, Apple or wherever you get your podcast.

Speaker 6 (32:31):
Like SAMs through the Alley Glass. So are the days
of the United States.

Speaker 11 (32:37):
A just released housing index reveals just how rough the
market is, especially for first time home buyers. It showed
home prices for the nation's top twenty metro areas rose
five point four percent from June of last year to
June of this year, a record jump for that month,
and renters, not just home buyers, are feeling a serious squeeze,
especially in New York. Moodies found New Yorkers dedicated a

(33:00):
whopping fifty eight percent of their income toward rent, compared
to twenty seven percent nationwide.

Speaker 1 (33:06):
I mean, you have these headlines which we're going to
talk about coming up from people saying, I just you know,
it's younger generations. They they're questioning whether or not, you know,
they can ever achieve the American dream, whether or not
they can ever afford the American dream. And it's really sad.
It's super sad when you think about it. But that's

(33:28):
I mean, story after story, I just keep I keep
seeing this, and then you look at what this economy
has done, and look how expensive everything is housing prices.
I mean, it's gonna what the hell do you think
given everybody twenty five thousand dollars for a house is
going to do to housing prices. If it's let's do
the math. If it's jumping up. You had a five
point four percent record jump. It's a rough market already.

(33:50):
Factor in twenty five thousand dollars for people buying a house,
especially if people who enter the country illegally, and you're
you're giving away to pay dollars and you you want
a tax unrealized gains. That's going to affect everybody. By
the way, that's not just for rich people. That's for you,
that's for middle class, all of us. It's for like,

(34:11):
you know, people who are at every either end of
the spectrum on the economic scale. Everybody is going to
get hit by it because it's not just stock and
you know stock market and investments and things like that.
It's everything. Everything you own, your property, if you everything,

(34:33):
If you have something that you could make money off
of but you haven't made money off of it yet,
that's it's an unrealized gain you're up for. That's up
for grabs. But you know, if you take a loss
the government's not going to give you any money for it.
What is that going to do to all of this?
What is that going to do to housing, the housing market?
What's it going to do to investment? You know, we

(34:54):
need in this country. We desperately need several things. We
need more refineries, and we need to be able to
make chips and be able to produce a lot of
this stuff, whether it's antibiotics ourselves, whether it's manufacturing these chips,
whatever it is. And when you kill investment, where do
you think the capital is going to come to create

(35:14):
and establish these manufacturing bases in the United States. It
doesn't just come out of the ether, right, Rich people
don't just like pull it out of their backsides. You know,
it is this business. How do you think that that's
going to happen? This is going to destroy absolutely everything.
There is no way in hell that a low tier

(35:37):
last place candidate from twenty twenty that Democrat voters would
have rejected had she actually been on the ballot, primary
and caucuses across the country is now the nominee and
they're going to fast track her into making all of
these decisions that are going to ruin your lives. They
will ruin your lives. You're going to see suicide rates
go up. People are going to be broken, desperate. That's

(35:57):
what's on the ballot In November. We got a lot
more on the way stick with us Second Hour next
as we move our partners that help bring you free radio.
The folks at Keltech the P fifteen. If you don't
have it, you should have it. There's two versions. There's
the metal version and the polymer version. It is the lightest,
thinnest double stack nine millimeter on the market. It's ideal
for doesn't matter if you're season pro, if you're a newbie.

(36:19):
It's sleek, compact, fifteen round capacity, lightweight and powerful. It
comes to two mags by the way standard fifteen rounds
minimal pinky extension. You also have a flush fit double
stack mag that holds twelve rounds. Treatment fiber optic front site,
fully adjustable fiber optic, fiber optic two dot rear as
well lifetime more decompact from the inventors of the microcompact
pistol category. Just innovation performance with the P fifteen and

(36:45):
super concealable. You have to check it out. Quality made
right here in the US of A Innovation, Performance and Caltech.
Learn more at celtech weapons dot com. That's k e
Ltec Weapons dot com. It's the P fifteen tell them
Dana send you. Welcome to the show. Everyone. It is I,
your lovable curmudgeon Dana Lash and don't forget. You can
watch us on x Rumbles where the chat is channel

(37:06):
thirty forty seven Direct TV. Also at substract, chapter and verse.
If you turn away a migrant, it is a grave sin,
saith the Pope. That is new, it is new, it's
all over everywhere it was, he said, working to turn
away migrants, working to turn migrants away from peace and

(37:29):
security in a new country is a grave sin. He said, okay, hmm,
that's the sin. So countries with laws have sins. I mean,
give to Caesar what is Caesar's and give to God
what is God's. But that might be a sin. I
mean it's only in the Bible and all. Yes, he says,

(37:51):
if you were if you are rejecting migrants and you're
blocking their roots, it is a grave sin. Uh. And
this was part of his address, his weekly address on Wednesday,
and he I think he was in the Vatican when
he said this. So is are we sending them all
to the Vatican. Now, is that what it is? I mean,
let's just put it to the test, right, Yeah, he

(38:16):
said quote working to turn migrants away from the prospect
of peace and security in a new country is a
grave sin. It needs to be said clearly. There are
those who systematically work by all means to drive away migrants,
and this, when done knowingly and deliberately, is a grave sin.
He was in Saint Peter Square. But you got to
go through a lot of security to get into by
the way. I mean, you have to go through a

(38:36):
ton of security to get into the Vatican and to
go see all the beautiful artwork that's in there. You know,
they lopped off all the statues male copulatory organs because
it was considered so they got a room full of
like statue Dong somewhere. I would imagine I'm just saying
what I'm talking about, art Kine. I just don't know

(39:03):
why the expectation of following law when entering a sovereign
nation is a sin. This is what I'm talking about.
This is what is angering me to the nth degree.
And I keep seeing it popping up in churches, and
this pope is no exception. This is wrong by the way.
I mean, follow the law. If you're not following the law,

(39:26):
is that not a sin? Is that not also a sin?
If you're not following the law. If you are breaking
into someone's home, is that not a sin? If you're
breaking into another country? Is that not a sin? The
way that these people present it? And I feel like
some and especially there are a lot of church leaders
out there. And I haven't turned away from my faith

(39:50):
at all, and I'm not going to stop going to church,
but I'm we're in the process of determining whether or
not we're staying at our church or we're leaving. We
didn't go last Sunday. We didn't attend to because I
didn't really appreciate, you know, a church leader telling people
that they wanted a safe and fair border and I
don't even know what that means. What is what do

(40:12):
you mean a fair border? Why don't you just say
something smart like let's have uh, you know, lawful, orderly crossings.
Let's just do that. And you know, when I look
at what this pope is is saying, it's not unlike
what you know, my pastor was saying. A couple of
weeks ago, and my pastor didn't go so far as
to say it was a sin, but he walked right

(40:34):
up to the line. He was right there toes to
the line. If you turn away, people were coming at
the border, it's a sin. Well, I've been to the border.
I've been to the border several times. I've been down
there to the processing centers, I've toured them. I have
been down there at the bank of the Rio looking
at the shell casings from when cartels were firing fifty

(40:55):
cows at our border agents. I went and I saw
the photos of children who had been dumped on the
banks of the Rio and rescued by border patrol because
the loopholes, the Flores Agreement Amendment, all of that exploited
by the cartels to fast track people who are able
to get a part of that rented kit operation. I've

(41:17):
seen all of this stuff, all of the horrors that
this creates, all of the rumors that you've heard about
the border are true. It's horrifying. And the innocent people
who live in these border communities that are predominantly Hispanic,
they're preyed upon. So I've just noticed that these religious leaders,

(41:38):
all the people who say this. They're all white religious leaders,
and I kind of question what they did in their youth.
I called up one very well known, very well known
I don't want to put them on blast, although I
think I have written about it. I did write about
it my book Grace Canceled. But I called up one

(42:01):
very well known religious leader who had, during lockdown, conducted
a Sunday service in their parking lot when they couldn't
go indoors, and they bent that they had did the
whole bend knything. And I called him and I said,
I just I'm curious as to your angle here, and
he was he was clearly taken aback, and he was like, well,

(42:23):
I don't understand what you mean. And he was very nice,
and I feel in some respects like he felt like
he was doing it out of the goodness of his
heart in a way. And he was saying, well, you know,
when I grew up in East Texas, I saw a
lot of very different things. And he's old enough to
be my father. And I said, look, I go, you
need to understand something. When my generation was growing up,
and very specifically me, I didn't have this racial animosity

(42:48):
that you all talk about. I didn't see it. It
was not a part of our lives. And it wasn't
because we didn't see it or didn't know what it was.
We were everybody was friends. Everybody was We were all friends,
black and white and Asian. Everybody went to everybody's houses.

(43:09):
Until the Marxist realized that maybe, just maybe they would
have a better advantage using things like culture and different
sexual orientations as the wedge more so than socioeconomic statuses.
And that's what they grab that's what they pivoted to.

(43:32):
And then all of a sudden there was all of
this animosity where there had not been animosity before. There
was hard there were hard feelings and uh lines drawn,
and it had not been like that when we grew up.
And I was telling this very famous pastor, I said,
why are you trying to yoke younger generations to your

(43:53):
moral failings? Your generations or your specifically moral failings. If
you've done something in your life, why should I or
anyone else have to be yoked to it. I go
as a shepherd. You're building resentment in the hearts of
your flock. Do you not see this? And you're creating
a hurdle to worship.

Speaker 3 (44:16):
It?

Speaker 1 (44:16):
Really made me angry, and as a mother, it enraged
me to have my kids sit there during Sunday service
and be told that if they didn't want to free
for all at the border, then they were somehow sinful.
Intimating that they were sinful. Isn't that? Aren't you bearing

(44:38):
false witness upon their characters? Preachers? If you don't want
to turn people away from organized religion, then stop doing
the devil's work. I just it's sad and it's infuriating.
I know our churches are under attack, and I know
that pastors are foul people. I know this, but you

(45:03):
work against the devil, not with him when you're talking
about these things from the pulpit, And if you don't
know it enough, then don't bring it up at the pulpit.
I've literally sat there in church service before and I
heard my pastor talk about how more black people are
shot by cops every year than white people. I'm like,

(45:23):
that's actually a lie. I can tell where you go
and you get your information for your sermons without even
you telling me. I know where you go. I wrote
an email and I had receipts from the DJ, from
the FBI, local law enforcement from around the country. You
can even divide it up in regions. It's just absolutely
factually incorrect, which, by the way, was my only beef

(45:46):
with everybody taking a knee with the NFL. I don't
mind peaceful protest. My problem was they were doing it
based on a lie. That was all my only objection.
And when I heard my pastor and I know it's
a lie because I've looked at the number they're available
on this thing called the Internet that the Good Lord
gave us to use as a tool. I mean, enough

(46:07):
people use the Internet to go and lecture about what
they think the facts are, but not enough of them
actually use it to go and look at what the
facts are. I sent all this stuff in an email
and that's when I got like one little response back
like oh well, thank Giah, blah blah blah. So I
was like, Okay, I'm gonna have grace, and I'm having

(46:29):
grace by not name checking. And I have said things privately,
and we have made overtures and we've had we have
reached out and done all of this stuff, and I'm
just it's you know, and to see the Pope say this.
I'm not a fan of the Pope because I think
he's a socialist, and I think socialism is antithetical to
Christianity because socialism denies you free will. Why do government?

(46:52):
Why do tyrants think that they're holier than God? God
gives you free will. Socialists don't to see someone say, oh, well,
you know, if you're turning away people at the border,
that's a grave sin. To expect security and lawful entry.
It's a grave sin. Okay, Well, then stop turning people
away from the Vatican. If they don't have proper id

(47:15):
stop turning people away from the Vatican. If they don't
want to have their bags checked, Stop turning people away
from the Vatican. If their shoulders aren't covered or their
knees aren't covered. How about that. Stop turning away people
at the Vatican. That's a sin. I mean, we can
do this all day. Someone else's political issue. They think

(47:36):
if someone has a political issue and they think they
mistake that of somebody else's sin if they don't agree
with them. That's where we're going at going to I
want you to realize that they're trying to emotionally blackmail
Christians by thinking that if you disagree with them, you
are committing a grave sin. If you are not in
lockstep with Marxist ideology, then you are creating a great sin.

(48:01):
If you do not believe in lawlessness and disorder, then
you are creating a great sin. There have been a
lot of people all throughout the centuries who wear the robes,
and they carry the cross, and they sell the books
on the good Book, and they stand up at the
pulpit and they say a lot of great things in

(48:22):
the name of the Lord. But I'm gonna tell you
what even the devil can cite scripture, Ye workers of inequity,
I never knew thee So I'm getting real tired of
the stuff, getting really tired of it. And it's not
one denomination or another, it's all of them. It is

(48:45):
poor representation. Shepherds, do your jobs. You have a higher
penalty according to the New Testament. Don't mislead, don't misrepresent.
I get it why some people in church are so
terrified to talk about politics. You shouldn't be if you

(49:10):
are doing your best to speak fact and truth. I've
always said, show me the fact, and if I am.
If I am incorrect, I will modify my position. I'm
not a zealot for lies, but I'm telling you it is,

(49:36):
this is what's tearing down the church, stuff like this.
And here's the thing, there are people who are not
even political who don't want to see pastors talk about
this stuff because it gets to say I want to
safe and fair border. What does it even mean? How
about I want lawfulness and order because that does provide

(49:59):
safety and it creates safety for everybody involved, and that
is what is truly fair. There's nothing wrong in saying that,
I'm so not even done with this issue. But that's
that's what was said in Saint Peter Square today and
probably in some of your churches this Sunday. And again

(50:21):
it's not one denomination or another. I know our church
is under attack, but the shepherds have to they have
to be able to hear. We got a lot more
on the ways we roll into headlines, and as we
do so, our partners that will bring you free radio
the people over at ready wise, because when sweet meteor
of death hits this planet, if for some strange mathematical twist,

(50:41):
it doesn't obliterate it, and we are still stuck on
half of a crumpled rock. You're gonna need to have
your survival meals ready, or I don't know. Maybe you
have like rolling brownouts or blackouts or whatever. Maybe it's
you know, it's a natural disaster if it's not a
political one. Having emergency food from ready wise gives you
peace of mind. You're gonna be to feed your family
no matter the situation. It's free and fast shipping on

(51:04):
most orders. Your provisions are going to reach you promptly.
They have two offers for you. One is the seventy
two hour Food Kit one hundred dollars value for fifty
bucks two boxes twelve pouches of premium survival food. You
got all your three hots and drinks and snacks. It's
over eleven thousand calories in each kit. Additionally, you can
also use promo code data twenty at checkout. You're gonna

(51:25):
get twenty percent off any regularly priced item. All the
food is made with high quality US ingredients, so you
know exactly what you're getting at any given time. It's
all freeze dried, dehydrated, easy to prepare, just add water,
twenty five year shelf life. You know the chain of
command for your food from start to finish. Visit readywise
dot com and use promo code data twenty at checkout

(51:45):
for twenty percent off any regularly priced item. Readywise dot
Com promo code data twenty twenty percent off order yours
today and.

Speaker 7 (51:54):
Now all of the news you would probably miss, it's
time for Data's quick five.

Speaker 1 (51:59):
So the entire town was put under nighttime lockdown as
a disabling horse virus that kills one in three has
run rampant. This is one of the craziest stories that
I've written, I've ever read. It's like it's actually half
a dozen communities that have been designated as higher critical
risk for this illness. There was a guy who tested
positive for it earlier this month, and it's an Eastern

(52:23):
equine encephalitis. It is rare, but a potentially deadly virus
that was first identified in horses, and so it's called
EEE or triple E. It can be spread to people
by mosquitoes. Again, what do we have them? It can
be spread to people by mosquitos. The CDC says about
thirty percent of those who are infected it. It is

(52:45):
a fatality that they said. Ten counties in Massachusetts were
placed on a high alert. And there was a guy
who was eighties. It sounds like, you know, if you're
older or if you again. You got immunity issues. But
it's a Massachusetts that's where they were looking at it
at this point. Ooh, New York City is spraying pesticides
to help prevent the spread of mosquitos and potential diseases.
I'm totally fine with pesticides, Kane love.

Speaker 6 (53:07):
Psoncidey stopped throwing mosquitos on top of us.

Speaker 1 (53:10):
That's what they need to step to the I mean,
why do we have them all of the things that
science looks at like, I don't need to study why.
I don't need to study lesbian obesities or what happens
if you give squirrels crack. I don't need that. What
I need is why do we have mosquitoes? Kill them all?
They don't. Can anybody prove to me why they are required? No,
you can't. So New York City's increasing pesticides increase sausage

(53:33):
demand could be a worrying signal in the economy. Kine
thinks that they're pushing this sausage story because they can
grind anything into it and say that it's meat and
convincing us that there's a demand for it. And that's
Kane's tinfoil hat moment. Stick with us. I agree with
Annie Oakley who said quote, I would like to see
every woman know how to handle guns as naturally as
they know how to handle babies. Now, I myself regularly

(53:54):
concealed carry and I'm millimeter. Now that's said. Not every
woman is like me, has had the hours of training
that I've had, or it feels come around firearms due
to years of use, or maybe they're by a gun
free zone. I'd like to change that what I can,
while encouraging self defense at the same time. So this
is where BURNA comes in. It's kind of like a
starter weapon. It's they make a non firearm firearm. I
like the idea of incredible force sending chemical irritants towards

(54:17):
a threat as an additional option for women, and the
Berna SD model shoots chemical irritant projectiles sixty eight caliber
rounds that can deter threats in their tracks up to
fifty feet away. I mean it is hard, easy target acquisition,
zero recoil. Burna is legal in all fifty states. There's
no background checks, no permits required, It's shipped directly to

(54:40):
your door. Gun free isn't applicable to Berna. It's great
for wherever guns are banned, visit burna dot com slash
data for ten percent off. That's by r Ina dot
Com slash Data.

Speaker 9 (54:52):
Keep your finger on the pulse with a Data show
podcast delivering timely news with insightful analysis whenever you want,
straight to you on YouTube, Apple or wherever you get
your podcasts.

Speaker 12 (55:06):
Support our young ladies and not allow any boys in
their locker rooms or on their sports team.

Speaker 3 (55:13):
Okay, we have a motion on the floor, as Chad
Rusty Green has stated, we.

Speaker 13 (55:16):
Have a second, and do you might just to clarify again,
find out Miss Pearce.

Speaker 12 (55:22):
Wanted to make sure the motion that we support our
young ladies and not allow boys. That's that's the young
men that have a.

Speaker 5 (55:32):
That have DNA.

Speaker 12 (55:33):
That is boy DNA not being allowed in the locker
rooms or on the sports team competing against Gennoyd.

Speaker 3 (55:39):
S's the motion, and do we have a second for
the motion for the nose second, we'll go ahead and off.

Speaker 6 (55:48):
We'll go ahead.

Speaker 3 (55:49):
That die, aren't We're moving on to our last speaker.

Speaker 1 (55:52):
So that's McKinney is d that's McKinney's school in Texas
where they had the school board, they introduced emotion that
was not seconded to keep boys from going into girls
sports and keep them from going into girls' locker rooms.
Welcome back to the program, Dana Lash here with you.
That's I'm telling you you need to take your kids

(56:15):
out of McKinney is d if they are in it,
because that's I mean, to have something like that happen
and the silence. I mean, as you hear seconded, nobody,
nobody even wanted to second it. Why is that such
a big issue? And when you consider too some of

(56:36):
these boys in high school they might be eighteen where
they'll have a fourteen year old girl there. I mean,
let's talk about some of the statutory implication implications of that.
I mean this, there's no interest in protecting our kids.
There's none. I'm looking for pulling this up. This is this.
UH school sent a letter to the parents in response

(57:02):
of the school board meeting right vscra Fields. They write,
McKinney ID parents and guardians. They said they were talking
about this this school board meeting which was just two
days ago. They said, Trustee Chad Green proposed emotion to
support our young ladies and not allow boys who have
boyding and a not be allowed in locker rooms or

(57:23):
on the sports teams competing against young ladies. They said
it didn't receive a second because you know the guidelines
and you know McKinney id female students are already protected
to take for their action would have violated the law.
Passing a frivolous and meaningless emotion was unnecessary because protections
are already in place. Not really, And first off, the

(57:46):
concern that they that they put up is not necessarily true.
That's what they've all been saying as a way to
side stuff the issue silence parents, et cetera. And there's
the block that's on when they talk about the protections
that the Title nine stuff. The block on those changes

(58:09):
that Biden made is a temporary one. So when they
cite protections, it is a temporary protection. This is still ongoing.
So it's not meaningless to say that schools can and
need to have their own protections in place. Because what

(58:31):
happens if you know Biden's what happens if this is
allowed to go through? You know, I mean, what is
it if it's if it's allowed to go through. If
what Biden had pushed for in remember he wanted to
go after any kind of federal funding for any kind
of educational institution that did not allow for boys to

(58:55):
go on girls teams and be in the locker rooms
and all that stuff. And Texas was litigating this et cetera.
By the way, these are multiple schools that are allowing this.
I mean, it's not just it's not just you know this,
this school is not the only one. There are several
that are like this. And they said that you know
the law as it is, you know, they can't you

(59:16):
can't force the school to adopt such a thing. But
the schools can choose to do so unless because unless
the parents oppose it. The federal government under this administration
has been trying to coerce schools into doing this by
hank dangling as the carrot federal funding. So when they

(59:36):
the title that Biden instituted for this, that was temporarily blocked.
And again that's a temporary block. This can still happen.
This isn't a done deal. And so the letter that
the school sent out is not entirely honest as you
would imagine, right, And that's in McKinney. Can you know

(59:58):
where McKinney is exists. McKinney, it's time to pull your
kids out of this. It is it's time. I'm just
it's time to pull your kids out of the stuff,
out of these schools. If they're doing this, it's it's
it is that our tax dollars forcibly go to the

(01:00:21):
stuff that facilitate predatory behavior against women and girls is
just wild. There are a couple of parents that told
me that they just moved out of that area, and
they can say that, you know, they've noticed like a
lot of people who have fled California and they are
bringing a lot of that momentum with them there. But man,

(01:00:41):
and that's it's like that, what is it the McKinney
prosper Frisco area? Hmmm, And I don't think it was.
Someone asked if it was grand standing to get a
viral video. I really don't think it was. Again, it's
a temporary block, i e. It is a temporary protection.
So unless schools do something individually to protect students, if

(01:01:05):
that is allowed to stand, then there isn't going to
be any protections for these students. Now that kids are
going back to school, all of this stuff now is
coming back up to light. It's all like the protests
and everything else, and because it's an election cycle. I
don't think it's a fun time to be a student
on campus. Do you can. I really don't think it is. Well, yeah,

(01:01:29):
I mean it's just not it's not fun. It's not
fun to be a kid like this on campus. I
don't think I feel bad for a lot of students,
like for instance, this Colorado school district. This is in
This is from Daily Caller. They now everybody's going back
to school. They're not going to allow students to opt
out of alphabet lessons LGBTQ plus regardless of parents wishes.

(01:01:52):
A Colorado school district is implementing the Alphabet Toolkit and
it's forcing students to attend lessons on related topics even
if the parents disapprove. It was created by the Denver
School District, updated in July. It prohibits students from opting
out of these lessons and curriculum doesn't matter. If you
have different beliefs, you're going to be forced into it.
And it's about sex. It's lessons on sex. It's about

(01:02:14):
how same sex people have it. That's what they're talking about.
They're forcing your kids to sit through pornography. And I
don't get it. Why are they so obsessed with us?
This isn't educational, not educational at all. They're like, oh,
we'll make sure it's age appropriate. Really, you're the people

(01:02:34):
who put gender queer in elementary school libraries. People don't
believe me when I say this. They honestly, like actual
like moderate Republicans, didn't even believe it. It started in
Texas when a parent first discovered that book. That's crazy.
A twelve year old's or thirteen year old's library and

(01:02:57):
elementary can access it, and it literally was a graphic
novel that it showed. Well, I can't even say on
air what it showed because I would probably get in troublecane, right,
I can't. We can't even show the images because if
I showed these images on Facebook. Actually, when we've tried,
they do monetize my videos and they issue a strike
against my account. I can't even show it on Facebook,

(01:03:18):
but they can show your underage kids in school and
they consider that to be educational. And it is nothing
more than gratuitous graphic sex. That's all it is. There's
no literary value to it, there's nothing. I mean, honestly,
I think that probably Playboy had better articles. You know
what I'm saying. I mean, it's there's no value to
it at all whatsoever. It's it's this is just you're

(01:03:42):
forcing this in kids' faces so that they're just shell
shocked by it and you can't That's that's, that's all
it is. They're forcing they're forcing them to acclimate to it,
regardless of whether or not parents agree. And the Denver
School District doesn't require the parntal consent either with any

(01:04:02):
of this stuff. They're like, Oh, it's our commitment to
equity and inclusion. What about Look, I don't even want
I don't want any kind of sexual material like that
taught to underage kids in the classroom. Because they're not
telling it's not a biological they're not approaching it from
a biological standpoint like this is where children, how children

(01:04:24):
are created, or this is how which that at least
serves a purpose. They're like, this is how this stuff happens,
this is how you know men's bodies work and how
women's bodies work. No, they disregard science, and it's all
about fetish It is nothing more than an educational or not.
It's fetish education. That's all it is. It is I
And I just I kind of wonder if the people
and if the people pushing this on kids, are you

(01:04:46):
getting off on this? No, that's not too forward to ask.
When you're talking about introducing books that show pegging in
the classroom, don't google that. People did not believe how
bad the photos were or how bad the illustrations were.
And that's not that's just one book. There are others.

(01:05:11):
And then there's you know, like the written word that
get really graphic with stuff, and that again that has
nothing to do with education. Why is this? Why is
this like the hill that these people want to fight on.
I mean, I've got suspicions, but good night. But now
that everybody's going back to school, this is all up again.

(01:05:32):
You Pin is hosting gender equity orientation for a freshmen
Can you say freshmen? Can you say freshmen? Anymore? Fresh
persons from campus Reform. This piece is orientation focusing on

(01:05:52):
providing a safe space for first year students of marginalized
genders you mean, make believe and their allies to share
their experiences and continue to grow. So it's gender equity.
It's a freshman pre orientation program. I don't see how
this is about. This isn't about creating safe spaces. This

(01:06:15):
is again about shoving it in your face. It's bringing
fetish out. That's all. It is historically marginalized genders. Here's
the thing with all of this, the language and the
approach to this. No one cared until you tried to
penalize people for pronoun usage. No one cared until you

(01:06:37):
started demanding that their underage children be exposed to you,
lecturing them about how you'd like to get off. Nobody
cared until you made it an issue. It wasn't about
living your life. It was about making them be participants
in it. That's when it became an issue. Started marginalizing

(01:07:01):
themselves by acting like a marginalized subset of society that
is obsessed with talking to kids about their fetishes. That's
when it became an issue. Trying to get people fired
because they wanted to say things like women are real,
Stop acting like we're not real. Trying to get people
fired for that is when it became an issue. It

(01:07:22):
wasn't an issue until then. So people who subscribe to
this wanted to pick a fight with everyone else, and
then when everyone else started objecting, then they wanted to
act like they were marginalized. It doesn't go both ways.
You're the bullies, you're the jackasses. It's you, it's not us.

(01:07:44):
Patriot Mobile is the only Christian conservative cell phone service.
And if you don't care about that because you're broke
like most Americans, they're going to save you more money
than what you're saving now. You're going to pay less
with Patriot Mobile than with your big commie cell phone service.
And that's just because they charge less. I mean they
don't have to charge to pay all of the donations
to all of the Marxist stuff that they have. Patriot Mobile,

(01:08:06):
like I said, they've got great plans, great coverage on
all three major networks, so you're getting the best service
in your area and you're not funding the left. And
when you switch, you're helping to support US based jobs.
All of their whole team is one hundred percent US based.
They make it so easy to switch. You can keep
your phone, keep your number, upgrade, the choice is yours,
and you can also get a free month of service

(01:08:26):
right now using offer code data, which also gets you
free activation. So why on God's green Earth would you
work with a Marxist cell phone company that actually works
against you donates to the stuff that you vote against,
protects and advocates for the stuff that you fight against.
Why would you not switch to Patriot Mobile. My gosh,
they love Jesus, they love America, they love guns, and

(01:08:47):
they want to save you money for crying out loud.
Just call them all ready, for the love of God.
Patriotmobile dot Com Slash Data nine seventy two, Patriot use
code data free activation, free month of service.

Speaker 6 (01:08:58):
It's his laugh mission to make bad decisions. It's time
for Florida man.

Speaker 1 (01:09:07):
All right. So first up, Just like Caine says, old
people aren't innocent. That's what he says. An elderly Florida
man pulled a knife on a manager at Swink, New
Jersey Eatery Swink, seventy five year old man from Florida
was arrested Thursday night after allegedly pulling a knife on
another restaurant patron and assaulting the manager at The Red

(01:09:28):
Horse in Rumson. According to authorities, the resident of Palm
Beat Shores, David Gully, faces multiple charges including aggravated assault,
possession of a weapon for an unlawful purpose, terroristic threats,
disorderly conduct, simple assault. That's according to the Rumpsul police lieutenant.
It was the Red Horse restaurant and there's a celebrity

(01:09:50):
chef that owns it, I guess, and the general manager
had asked, is there a knife? There's like video of it,
but there's a lot of fun words in there that
that wand can't hear because he's innocent, and so they
I mean they literally watched the guys pullice shut up
the gully guy like punching the restaurant manager with a
knife in his hand. He was taken into custody without

(01:10:13):
further incident. They're still investigating. Do you know why? You know,
it's really simple. He had a knife and he hit someone.
There you go, case close. Wow, we've solved it. A
man turns himself in after he it's an oldie, but
a goodie. I missed this. A man turns himself in
after murdering his imaginary friend. Jeff Gaylord from Florida turned

(01:10:38):
himself into police and demanded they give him the death
penalty after he admitted to I'm not making this up.
After he admitted to murdering his imaginary friend mister Happy,
he told officers he had stabbed mister Happy to death
with a knife, cut up mister Happy's body with a hatchet,
and buried him in the backyard. Jacksonville officers took a
drunk gay Lord into custody and got a search warn
for his house. Gay Lord said that he had killed

(01:11:00):
mister Happy because he was messy, and then he told
officers Alsifer's his room was a mess all the time,
with his toys and his talls. And then he left
his empty vodka bottles all over the kitchen, and he
never picked up his empty cocaine baggies. And it was
mister Happy who left the toilet set down when he peed.
He messed up my apartment to the point where I

(01:11:20):
just couldn't get it clean. You know what. It kind
of sounds like it sounds like he was gonna get
busted for drugs anyway and decided to make up a story.
I'm beginning to think that it wasn't mister Happy's cocaine
and empty vodka bottles, but in fact, mister Gaylord's cocaine
baggies and empty vodka bottles. Oh, they also found a
machine gun at his house. No, I think that one

(01:11:43):
was his. He's like, yeah, that's probably mine, because you know,
I'm oh boy, that's probably one of my favorite ones.
This woman looks crazy. She in a vest. Oh she
is okay, so oh no, It's never anybody that you
would want to see. Fifty six year old Grace Sharp

(01:12:05):
got arrested for walking around outside neked during her neighbor's
birthday party. According to an arrests report. The incident happened
Sunday long Thaler Avenue in Pensacola, as her neighbor was
having a birthday party. According to the report, the report
stated that the neighbor told deputies around seven pm as Sharp,
pictured on the simulcast, walked up naked to the chain

(01:12:25):
link fence that separates the properties, and she was reportedly
waving around plastic doll legs and then she rubbed the
plastic doll legs on her private lady area, and then
the neighbor made the kids go inside. According to the report,
when the neighbor told Sharp that she was naked, Sharp said,
I know it's hot outside quote end quote. She eventually
went back inside her home when deputies were cow old

(01:12:47):
Sharp remains and this can be a county jail on
twenty five hundred dollars bond. Any questions about that one.
I do have one.

Speaker 6 (01:12:55):
She knows who Nelly is.

Speaker 1 (01:12:57):
The plastic doll legs like Barbie sized? What is that like?
Where does one? I mean what size? I gotta know.
Stay tuned. We got Jim Jordan coming up next hour.

Speaker 13 (01:13:10):
I'm just trying to understand where we are right now,
because yesterday the Trump campaign very clearly put out a
statement said they agreed to the same rules as took
place in the June debate between President Biden and Donald Trump,
where they were muted microphones. Have you not agreed to
muted microphones?

Speaker 9 (01:13:26):
I think we've made pretty clear our preference, along with
Donald Trump himself, is for unmuted microphones.

Speaker 3 (01:13:30):
I think the question that you'd have to ask is
to Donald Trump and his and his team.

Speaker 10 (01:13:34):
Are they in agreement between themselves on how we should
approach this debate?

Speaker 1 (01:13:40):
It was one of her surrogates, Kamala Harris' surrogates, Welcome
to the program. Top of the third hour, we got
Congressman Jim Jordan's going to be done at the bottom
of this hour. Daniell last year with you, make sure
you find us on rumbles where the chat is happening.
We also have Substack. We've got all kinds of good
stuff happening, chapter and verse over at Substack X channel

(01:14:04):
thirty forty seven Direct TV. We've got them. We're growing
folks over on Rumble, got a lot of stuff happening.
I want you to keep the so the debate stuff
in mind. I was thinking how I was gonna start
this segment, So let me preface it with this. So
Kamala Harris, They've they've She's finally, you know, they got

(01:14:24):
the debate coming up there. They've been going back and
forth over muted Mike's She also yesterday agreed to do
a sit down interview with Dana bash Over at CNN.
She's finally gonna do it. I'm gonna sit down interview.
She's gonna have the interviewing journalist. She's also it's gonna
be pre taped, and she's gonna have Mike Walls there,

(01:14:47):
Tim Walls, sorry, all the same person. Tim Wall's there.
You know what, It reminded me of one of the
funniest movies I've ever seen. It's a little cinemat masterpiece
called Step Brothers. And in Step Brothers you have thirty
nine year old Brennan Huff and forty nine year old

(01:15:09):
Dale Doback So Brennan and Dale, their parents, they are
the grown men who have never actually aged beyond being teenagers.
Their parents get together and they have a blended family
and it's it's hysterical. And they are told at one point,
you guys got to go out in good jobs because

(01:15:31):
they don't work. They're like in their thirties in the show.
They don't work, and they go out and get a job,
or they well, they try to. They go in and
they do job interviews and they decide, Okay, we're going
for a job. Let's wear tucks. It's gonna make it
real fans, They're gonna wear tuxes. They show up together
for their job interview, Brennan and Dale sitting there interviewing

(01:15:52):
for a job, and it reminds me of Kamala Harrison,
Tim Walls. They're pulling a step brothers. Brennan and Dale
move by sitting down and having that's what it is.
It's kind of like a job interview in a way
together on CNN. That's what they're doing. How is that
going to work out? Is he going to offer her
delritos when they're sitting there, so she can't do a

(01:16:17):
live interview, it has to be she's doing a pre
taped interview with one of the more inoffensive anchors on CNN,
and Tim Wallas is going to be sitting there with her.
Does that sound like a candidate that's confident? They also

(01:16:40):
said Tim Wallas is going to be doing any interviews
by himself, So take from that what you will, But
does that sound like a candidate that is confident? Does
it sound like a party that is confident in their candidate? No,
it sound sounds absolutely goofy Okay, she's gonna sit down

(01:17:03):
with Tim Wall She can't do it by herself. That's
I mean, doesn't that not sound exactly like what they're
talking about? Kine? Oh yeah, I mean it that. It
exactly sounds like that. I am. I first heard this
and I thought, wait, what, she can't do it by herself.

Speaker 6 (01:17:27):
I loved Carol Ross's response to this, where it's like
it's like when you go on an interview and you
bring your parents along with you, yeah, and you're like, Okay,
I'm not sure I'm gonna hire this one, and you
know what, we shouldn't hire her either.

Speaker 1 (01:17:42):
It's exactly like that. It is entirely exactly like that.
I mean, it's it's I don't know. I so we're
gonna see how well that. I mean, it's I think
it already happened, but it's tomorrow. It's gonna air tomorrow,
or I think it happens today. I think they precate
it to but it's gonna air tomorrow, and I guess

(01:18:04):
we'll see how well it goes. But it's just gonna
I don't know, it's it's it's I don't think you're
gonna get any like clear answers. I think where she struggles,
I think he is going to probably step in, and
it's also going to take some of the heat off
her because they're going to sit there and then you,
because Tim Walls is there, obviously, you're going to have

(01:18:25):
to ask him. And I think Dana bash will. I mean,
she's a lefty for sure, but I also think that
she is somebody who I don't think she I don't
I don't know if she's like in the Harris camp
or not, but she is a lefty and I don't
think that she has any loyalty to Tim Walls. I

(01:18:45):
don't think he's been in this at this level long
enough for any of these reporters to have that although
Democrats are really good about like faking manufacturing loyalty because
you know they want to win and power, you know,
at all costs doesn't matter.

Speaker 3 (01:18:56):
So the.

Speaker 1 (01:19:00):
Tension that he would take from her is going to
come by way of Dana Bash saying, well, what about you?
You misrepresented your service or you know you made the
snitch line that you're you're telling everyone to quoteunquote mind
their own damn business or this or that. That's that's his.
I mean, both of them have insane baggage, but his
is also so bad. It's kookie, right, and he's a

(01:19:24):
kooky character. I don't like kookie characters like this. You
know what kind of cookie characters I like? I like
Coo audio somebite one please, This is what I'm talking about.
I like cookie characters like this.

Speaker 14 (01:19:35):
Go ahead, and you a ballot harvesting, but you also
have people getting ballots. I mean, in California, you have
people getting seven ballots. If Jesus came down and was
the vote counter, I would win California. Okay, if we
had an honest vote counter, I would win California.

Speaker 1 (01:19:55):
He may not be wrong. I mean, I know that
there's a lot of Democrats. There are all of the Republicans.
From what I understand from my friends who live in California,
all of this is funny. All of my friends who
live in California, they're all Republican and they all live
like literally within blocks of each other. Do you know that, King,
Like all the friends that we know, all the people
we know, they all live in this like in the

(01:20:15):
same town, all right by each other. It is hysterical.
They're all like that. They're all concentrated right in like
Orange County or a Simi Valley, that's it, or some
of the some of the independent ones are in I
don't know where Bigfoot and weed is. Where's that at?

Speaker 6 (01:20:38):
Northwest?

Speaker 1 (01:20:39):
No, in California, it's up by the bigfoots and the weeds,
the weed growers in the bigfoots big feet bigfoot? How
does that work California. No, I'm only concerned about the
pluralization of multiple versions of a Bigfoot, Like if it's
more than one bigfoot, is it bigfoots big feats or
is it a singular plural bigfoot? We got to solve
this anyway. But there's I'm up there that are is

(01:21:02):
it BIG's foot and then they're up there with the
weed farms or wait a minute, sidebar and I'm gonna
come back to this. I'm gonna get back on point
real quick. Are there really no bigfoot? There's not a
bigfoot population up there, and it's just the people that
are high and they think they see bigfoot. Also that
could be that that either way, they are kind of
more independents up there. So long story short, I don't

(01:21:24):
know if that is actually true, although I do think
that Jesus, if he came down, he would probably do
more than count votes, just saying I'm here to count
votes for the Lord, which I'm not like pretending to
be Jesus, but I'm just saying, like, which among you
has cast your lot for God? That's what he'd be doing.

(01:21:45):
But I do think it's kind of interesting. Can we
touch on this really quickly? Audio sound bite three. I
have a post up about this. We talked about this
yesterday over at Substack. This is RFK Junior. Listen to this.

Speaker 15 (01:21:56):
I'm going to work to get them lactin and you
know I'm working with the campaign. We're working on policy
issues together. I will I've been asked to go onto
the transition team and you know, to help pick the
people who will be running the government. And I'm looking

(01:22:19):
forward to that.

Speaker 1 (01:22:20):
So this is the question that I asked in the
piece that I made mentioned this yesterday, and then I
wrote a piece about this yesterday too over at substack.
If you're one of the subscribers, how you know there's
this Republican habit of rushing to coordinate. You know, the
newest celebrity who was like maybe on the left, as
you know, Reagan, Jesus, you know, here's your crown. So

(01:22:44):
he's been right on the COVID vaccines, right, he's been
right on the COVID vaccines, but he's been wrong on
guns and you know, due process and climate change and
all this other stuff. And I've written about that extensively,
which I've linked over on my substack if you want
to go and read it. I don't want to get
into it right now. But my point is that he
likes Trump and he endorsed Trump's campaign, and that's all
well and good because there's this coalition, but that doesn't

(01:23:06):
make him more amenable on climate change, and it doesn't
make him more likely to support you owning, however, many
guns that you want to own. Right, it just means
that he of Harris and Trump, between the two, he
likes Trump and on that we agree, right. I he
can compartment compartmentalize this, but some people on the right cannot.

(01:23:28):
And I get it. People are very excited about this,
to the point where they were already this is what
I was telling canabout yesterday. They were already drawing up
like Kennedy's potential appointments or how he was going to
work with the campaign. So he and Tulca Gabbard are
already now on the transition team and they're picking people

(01:23:49):
who are going to determine policy. And I'm thinking, okay,
determine what policy? So do you? I mean, he's a
pretty strong believer in the climate change off and he
is a pretty strong supporter of like the Green New
Deal stuff. Are we talking like that kind of.

Speaker 6 (01:24:07):
I just heard he was going to be part of
helping decide who's in charge.

Speaker 1 (01:24:11):
Yeah, well, and he's going to bring his ideological I.

Speaker 6 (01:24:15):
Mean he may, but I mean he's he's only one
of the spokes in the wheel that are in that
decision making. And that's the way I look at it.

Speaker 1 (01:24:23):
But he's in the decision making process, a guy who
wants to jail people who deny that climate change is real,
and the other spokes.

Speaker 6 (01:24:31):
In the wheel will probably not agree with that. Probably,
I'm assuming they won't.

Speaker 1 (01:24:37):
You are very optimistic about our government, So.

Speaker 6 (01:24:40):
You're going to attribute RFK Junior's stance with the other
spokes in the wheel that are actually now.

Speaker 1 (01:24:48):
I'm attributing his stance to the decisions that he makes. Yeah,
And I'm attributing his perspective to how he is going
to influence the potential next president to hire. Yeah, that's
what I'm attributing.

Speaker 6 (01:25:00):
I don't think his influence would be at a level
where everyone else's influence wouldn't matter.

Speaker 1 (01:25:05):
I don't know about that.

Speaker 6 (01:25:07):
I'm pretty sure about that.

Speaker 1 (01:25:08):
You are. See. I guess I'm more American than you
because I don't trust my government.

Speaker 6 (01:25:13):
I am half Mexican, but I am one America.

Speaker 1 (01:25:16):
You're white adjacent, sir, white adjacent.

Speaker 6 (01:25:22):
No, I'm proud.

Speaker 1 (01:25:25):
No, you're sorry. You're LATINX. Isn't that how it is?
Stay that right?

Speaker 6 (01:25:32):
Oh, that's direct.

Speaker 1 (01:25:33):
So you make my mom mad by talking about social Security.
You can make Cane mad by referring to him as LATINX,
which actually sounds can I just be real like a
cool band name, like you're a one man band. Anyway,
My whole point is that I coal is just don't
have to agree on everything, and I think partnerships like
that are necessary to overcoming Marxism like we see it.

(01:25:54):
But that doesn't mean that they different parties exchange members
to help each other determine their party's policy. You know,
building coalitions doesn't mean that you hand the car keys
to people who don't share your views on liberty. There
was a listener who's who I thought made a great point.
You know, it's you know, you want an open tent,
but not open borders, and that's I think that is

(01:26:15):
because anything else is not coalition building. That's policied. So
you should read the piece that I have. I got
a lot of links up there over at chapter and verse.
In the meantime, we got Jim Jordan coming up.

Speaker 7 (01:26:26):
And now all of the news you would probably miss
it's time for Dana's Quick five.

Speaker 1 (01:26:32):
So according to Sky News, an Austrian surgeon got in
trouble because he allowed his teenage daughter to drill a
hole in a patient's skull. The victim first read about
the case in the media and only was told by
police months later that it was him that the teenage
girl was said to have helped operate on. This guy
was was in a forestry accident and he was flown

(01:26:55):
by air ambulance to this hospital in southwestern Austria. Had
serious head injuries. He needed emergencies surgery, but the doctor
let the thirteen year old daughter take part. This is
not to bring your daughter to work kind of a activity.
And it took that long. Somebody went like blew the
whistle on it. And the victim learned about the case
in the media and he just, I mean, can you
imagine that's a shocking thing. That is I can't good night.

(01:27:17):
A woman faces charges after climbing into a zoo tiger's enclosure.
Why do people keep doing this? Why?

Speaker 14 (01:27:24):
So?

Speaker 1 (01:27:25):
This woman climbed into this tiger enclosure in New Jersey
and she is trespassing for allegedly entering a fenced off area,
taunting and trying to entice one of the zoo's two
Bengal tigers, and a second wire fence separated her from
the tiger. The tiger tried to bite her and apparently
she did the same thing at a bear exhibit. I

(01:27:47):
think she needs to be barred from ever going to
the zoo because do not sit here and euthanize these
animals being after they were taunted and enticed by this loon.
But good night. They said it was against city ordnance,
et cetera, et cetera. Yeah, they just need to like
deny her entry to any place where there's animals. She
seems like a nut. Oh boy, no, I don't want

(01:28:08):
to listen. A bald eagle is believed that was thought
to be injured in Missouri instead was just too fat
to fly, according to wildlife officials. He apparently eight roadkill
and apparently ate up a raccoon and X ray showed
the raccoon pause in. It's gross. You don't want to
see it. I had to see it. But they they're
making them lose weight and so that he can fly again.

(01:28:29):
It's the funniest thing I've ever read. Congressman Jim Jordan.

Speaker 9 (01:28:32):
Next, brighten up your timely news consumption with a Dana
Show podcast where every update comes with a little dash
of not so serious. On YouTube, Apple or wherever you
get your podcasts.

Speaker 16 (01:28:45):
Yeah, it is a really good question, and in many
ways this plays directly into this narrative that Republican lawmakers
have been spreading that big tech companies censor the viewpoints
of conservatives. There's not a ton of evidence of that,
but a lot of what you know Zuckerberg is saying,
and this letter sort of does play into that narrative.
And you already see Republican lawmakers celebrating this, saying that

(01:29:07):
it's proof that the Biden Harris administration tried to censor
conservative voices and pressure big tech company.

Speaker 1 (01:29:12):
Knows better about the inner workings of meta and Facebook suppression.
The Randoh analyst at CNN, or Mark Zuckerberg, who sent
a letter to our next guest, Congressman Jim Jordan from
Ohio's beautiful fourth District. Congressman, it is so good to
see you. You got this letter from the man in question.
He admitted that all of the stuff that has been

(01:29:33):
said was accurate, and what I thought was interesting. It
seemed to indicate that because everyone always blamed the moderators
the fact checkers at Facebook, it really which they are culpable,
but the pressure from the Biden Harris administration was more
intense and that drove this suppression. What do you make
how do you react to that SoundBite?

Speaker 5 (01:29:54):
No, no, no, no, Well that's exactly what happened, and it's
mister Zuckerberg and missed the letter four Keith. One is
he said the Biden Harris administration pressured him to sensor
largely conservatives, and there re centship all over in all
our investigations, but largely conservatives.

Speaker 3 (01:30:10):
He's to come to that they actually did sensor.

Speaker 5 (01:30:12):
Third, they throttled back to the Hunter Byden laptop story, which
was critical, I think to the twenty twenty presidential race,
not that information not getting out like it should have
gotten now. And then fourth, he says he's not going
to spend any huckerbucks.

Speaker 3 (01:30:24):
He's not going to try to.

Speaker 5 (01:30:25):
Influence and send money to these boards of elections around
the country and key precincts, key areas, key cities. He's
no longer going to do that. So I thought those
were four key facts, and I think his motivation was
the fact that we have been doing a year and
a half long investigation game. We've deposed twelve different employees
at Facebook, from line level people all the way up

(01:30:45):
to Sir Nick Clegg, the number three guy, former Deputy
Prime Minister in Great Britain, number three guy at Meta.
So we've done that, we weren't going to stop. And
I think he said, let's just lay out the facts
and get that out there. So he sent us that
letter in a court so it kind of confirmed what
we all suspected and saw was going on.

Speaker 1 (01:31:05):
Do you believe him when he said that he wanted
to be more neutral or at least not have a
role like that in the next selection.

Speaker 5 (01:31:12):
I do kind of feel like, at least I think
Silicon Valley, a number of people are saying, wait a minute,
where the left is going and attacking the first to them,
its specifically free speech rights. I think many of them
are saying like, let's let's not go there. Let's not
And maybe his maybe his motivation is simply he didn't
want to hassle. But you got Elon Musk, who's been tremendous,

(01:31:33):
God blessed him.

Speaker 3 (01:31:34):
He came forward, his purchase of Twitter and.

Speaker 5 (01:31:37):
His full fledge that, you know, a full court defense
of the of the First Amendment, I think has just
been so so helpful. You've got others in Silicon Valleys
staying the same thing. So I think there's somewhat of
a shift happening because we see how radical the left
is and what they want to do to our you know,
to our fundamental liberty.

Speaker 1 (01:31:53):
Yeah, I've noticed too, And I'm going to come back
to this because i know everyone's talking about, you know,
what are the ramifications of this, what are the penalties?
But you mentioned, you know, free speech is under Attechia
the Telegram founder who was arrested, and not because you know,
anybody can use You can't offer secure protections like that
to people with that kind of platform without offering them
to everyone. And it just makes me wonder, well, anybody

(01:32:15):
can use any medium to scam anyone. I don't know
why he would be held more responsible than a telecom
company or anybody else that offers any kind of you know,
service like that, but it is. He wouldn't been the knee,
He wouldn't suppress speech in other nations, interestingly enough, NATO
nations cracking down on this stuff. I mean, it does
kind of make you wonder, are they starting to see

(01:32:38):
how bad this is getting and that their businesses may
not be their own to run anymore? I mean, that's
one of the reasons. Facebook never, to their credit, never
been to need to China, and China had to have
its own CCP friendly Facebook version.

Speaker 5 (01:32:52):
Well, I think I think people are waking up to
how how big this threat is. There's a reason why
RFK Junior and door President Trump last week. He said
in his announcement the same thing he said I when
we had him in as a as a witness in
one of our hearings, he said, when you look at history,
he said, the good guys aren't the ones who are
advocating censorship. They're not the ones for censorship. And he

(01:33:14):
said the same thing when he endorsed President Trump last week.
So remember RFK Junior was censored the third day of
the Biden Harris administration. There's an email from the Executive
Officer of the President, Clark Humphrey sends an email to
Twitter and it says this is January twenty third, twenty
twenty one. It says take down this tweet asap. And

(01:33:35):
the tweet had three sentences in it. Hank Aaron got
the vaccine. Hank Karen passed away after taking the vaccine.
He did so as a way to He got the
vaccine as a way to encourage black Americans to get vaccine.
Three sentences, all of them true. But the Biden administration
was trying to take down that tweet because they didn't
like what it conveyed about the vaccine and vaccine hesitancy.

Speaker 3 (01:33:56):
And all this stuff. So this is how garry again.
And you add to what they were doing, they were.

Speaker 5 (01:34:02):
Going after their political opponent, for goodness, stake that is
not supposed to happen in a country with the First Amendment.
That's not supposed to happen in America. So I do
think more and more people are saying, wait a minute,
we got to stop this.

Speaker 3 (01:34:15):
And as I said before, God bless Elon Musk.

Speaker 5 (01:34:17):
And his purchase Twitter and what he's doing to defend
the First Amendment.

Speaker 1 (01:34:22):
Talking with Congressman Jim Jordan, a lot of people are wondering, well,
what what are the penalties going to be? Because we
had Missouri v. Bidner, it was uh Murphy v. Missouri.
The Supreme Court's not gonna They're not going to weigh
in and enforce any kind of penalties for the sort
of federal uh pressure on these tech companies. So what
do we do?

Speaker 5 (01:34:40):
Well, remember that case, while it wasn't the outcome you
and I wanted, and like we got in the lower
court which said clearly that the government was pressuring big
tech and they were censoring conservative That.

Speaker 3 (01:34:50):
Case got remated back. They're going to look at the facts.

Speaker 5 (01:34:52):
I think I think I still think we got a
good chance with that case later on, but obviously it
wasn't the decision we wanted from this Supreme Court.

Speaker 3 (01:35:01):
We just keep we just keep doing what we're doing.

Speaker 5 (01:35:03):
We may remember the Disinformation Governance Sport that they tried
to form. They got rid of that arm, this organization
that was pressuring all kinds of companies not to advertise,
probably probably doing it to you. They doing it, did
it to Fox Right, Bar, Daily Wire, other places not
advertised there. They discontinued operations as a result of the

(01:35:23):
work we were doing in the suit brought by Elon
musk Uh, the head of three Excuse Me Group and
the largest advertising agency was fired after our hearings. So
these universities who were setting up this these disinformation UH operations.

Speaker 3 (01:35:39):
They're they're not there. Many of them are saying we're
not going to do that any longer.

Speaker 5 (01:35:43):
So we feel like we're making real progress in stopping
this assault, this attack on the First Amendment, we just
got to keep it off.

Speaker 1 (01:35:50):
And it makes me think too, you know, if this
is all coming out, and I think Zuckerberg for the
most part, has been more transparent than most on it,
I don't know what to make of that. I don't
care he's motivated by his own self and his own
advantage or not. At least you know, we're getting this information,
but it kind of makes me wonder, you know, how
many other companies is this affecting? And then this is
kind of what we're seeing play out in the financial

(01:36:11):
sector as well. This is so widespread, this is just
one aspect of it. What does that mean though for November?

Speaker 5 (01:36:19):
Well, well there's another reason we felt like this information
was good to get out now, because what are they
what are they planning for the October surprises exactly go around?

Speaker 3 (01:36:30):
Because we know this.

Speaker 5 (01:36:31):
We know that the Hunter Biden laptop story was October
fourteenth New York Post and as mister Zuckerberg admits in
his letter, they've throndled that story back.

Speaker 1 (01:36:41):
That was one of the accounts that got suspended.

Speaker 3 (01:36:43):
Yes, yes they had that.

Speaker 5 (01:36:45):
You know that this whole going after the disinformation, does
it and all these different things. They had these names
and people. It was, it was, it was ridiculous.

Speaker 3 (01:36:53):
So look what do they got planned? This year?

Speaker 5 (01:36:56):
We felt it's important to get this information out there
and and and it's why we focused so many much
on these investigations. Now. Remember we've released the Twitter files,
came out with Elon Musk, but when we've also done
studies and looked at Facebook, we released the Facebook files,
the Amazon files, YouTube files, all these big tech.

Speaker 3 (01:37:16):
Companies, we're doing the same thing.

Speaker 5 (01:37:18):
They were all censoring, all throttling back conservative viewpoint. So
we continue to highlight that, and again we feel like
we're making real progress in stopping this attack on free speed.

Speaker 1 (01:37:30):
One of the things I will say talking with Congressman
Jim Jordan that I appreciate the Republican approach is that
you're not using the heavy hand of government to do it.
I mean, it's actually appealing to these companies' own financial
best interests because you know, they're watching, you know, Pavel
Darov be arrested in France. They're seeing the stuff that's
coming at Elon Musk, They're watching the pressure that's on Zuckerberg,
and they're thinking, Okay, maybe maybe we don't want to

(01:37:50):
be in this business of you know, trying to mediate
with politics here. Maybe we should stay out of it.
And it's not, you know, anything that you have to
threaten with big government. I mean they're just reading the
writing on the law.

Speaker 3 (01:38:01):
Yep, yeap, never like like like r F K.

Speaker 5 (01:38:04):
Junr said, the good guys in history aren't the ones who's.

Speaker 3 (01:38:06):
Censored exactly, and that we need to keep that in mind.

Speaker 5 (01:38:11):
A robust First Amendment, a full First Amendment.

Speaker 3 (01:38:15):
And I tell this all. I said this the other
day to speed.

Speaker 5 (01:38:18):
Every right we enjoy as Americans under the First Amendment
was attacked by government.

Speaker 1 (01:38:22):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (01:38:22):
I mean, think about during COVID they told Americans you
could go to church on Sunday in America. I mean,
it's crazy, you're right to. I gave a speech to
the New Mexico Republican Party DATA in Amarillo, Texas two
and a half years ago because they had to go
to Texas to get the freedom to a symbol because
they're crazy. Democrat governor would let them do it in
their own state where they pay tax.

Speaker 3 (01:38:40):
And of course, your your right to petition your government.

Speaker 5 (01:38:44):
You could even go to your capital and yell at
your member of Congress. You had to do it back
home because Nancy Pelosi wouldn't let you in the Capitol,
your house, the people's house, so on and on it goes.
But the most important right is the one speak. Your
right to speak, because if you can't speak, you can't
practice your faith, share your faith, you don't have a
free press, can petition your government. That's the one the
Left's coming after, and that's why we had to work

(01:39:04):
so hard.

Speaker 1 (01:39:05):
Okay, this election should be a reckoning more than an election,
but the reckoning of twenty four. Last question for your congressman.
I know that you got the summer recess right now
you're back in action in September. What's the first thing,
the most important thing that you're looking to tackle.

Speaker 5 (01:39:20):
Well, the funding of the government takes place. So I
think we should attest to Stave Act, which says non
citizens aren't allowed to vote in our life.

Speaker 1 (01:39:26):
Johnson supports that. Can we get that to the Senate?

Speaker 5 (01:39:31):
I don't know, but we need a push for that
to be on this spending bill to build that that
funds the government.

Speaker 3 (01:39:37):
So I think that's key.

Speaker 5 (01:39:38):
And then we're going to continue to highlight this border situation.
And this censorship situation in our committee when we get
back in September.

Speaker 1 (01:39:44):
And for the people we talked about this yesterday, but
for the people who missed it, the Save Act, that's
about making sure that people are you know, legal citizens
that are voting, and it's protecting the integrity of the vote. Actually,
this will be the last question. I know that media
is already trying to fear monger about a potential shutdown
for October first if the Save Act's attached to it
and this falls apart. I don't think Republicans really have
ever been worried about it. I don't think a shutdown
it has hurt you. I mean, we had this shell lacking,

(01:40:06):
as Obama put it in twenty ten after government shutdown,
and that worked really well for Republicans. I think that
people would stay with you, and I think that they
would understand that should that be the case with us, Yeah.

Speaker 5 (01:40:17):
I mean, no one wants a shutdown, but we do
want only citizens to voting.

Speaker 1 (01:40:20):
Are exactly that's pretty important.

Speaker 5 (01:40:21):
One like you, like Chuck Schumer, you think it's more
important to not guarantee only citizens are voting. You think
that's that's why you want to shut down the government.
So if Tux Humer wants to do that, that's up
to him. Yeah, I'm for funding the government and I'm
even willing to fund it at the ridiculous level it's
currently funded at for goodness sake, to make sure we

(01:40:43):
get the bill on there. The bill attached to that
funding bill which says you got to be a citizen
to vote in the United States.

Speaker 1 (01:40:49):
Elect Congressman Jim Jordan, one of our favorite heavy hitters
in Congress. We appreciate it, sir, Thank you for your
time for your fund safe travels.

Speaker 5 (01:40:56):
You bet, thanks probably good work, Thanks you, thank you.

Speaker 9 (01:41:00):
Not Able to catch the full Dana Show, follow Dana's
Absurd Truth podcast and get news and laughs delivered in short,
easy to digest episodes, ideal for your busy lifestyle on
Apple or wherever you get your podcast.

Speaker 1 (01:41:14):
Welcome back to the program, Dana Lash here with you
the conclusion of this third hour, and this we were talking.
We're actually talking about Murphy v. Missouri, the Missouri v.
Biden case as it relates to that whole suppression of
free speech by the federal government and litigating over speech

(01:41:36):
is so incredibly hard. But I'm like, still, you have
overwhelming evidence, and you know that there were people who
were probably harmed, either reputationally or monetarily by what the
federal government was doing in classifying as falsely as the
laptop story the October surprise say no, no, no. They
wanted to ward it off and they used the full
force of government to do it by saying that it

(01:41:56):
was Russian disinformation and having all of these actual tele
officials sign their names. They knew it was, They knew
they were lying, and in fact, one of them went
on record to say so, they knew they were lying,
and they still sign their name to all of this.
I am of the mindset that heads have to roll,
maybe literally, and I don't mean maybe, in order for

(01:42:19):
there to be a deterrent established that will, at least
with the use of fear, prevent a tyrant from ever
considering doing this to a free people. Again. I'm just saying,
and I realized that we give you know, we have
our rule of law, but for something like this, you know,

(01:42:44):
couldn't we look for a little bit of a higher churn,
like you're betraying the American people, your tyrants. I can't
only imagine how this would have gone down in the
days of the King Street patriots up there in the
pubs in Boston. How would this have gone down? You know,

(01:43:05):
I mean there was little to which they reacted which
caused them to as symbol in the well, it was
still a lot at the time in the Boston Square.
So I'm you know, I'm just saying they went after
cannons out in Lexington and Concord, and they were they
faced off against the militia. I'm just saying, you know it,

(01:43:25):
it is such a betrayal of the people. And the
Left always likes to make the appeal to the civility
of society. Well, we can't have deterrence like this, we're
a civil society. Well that's incredibly ironic, because a civil
society doesn't use the full force of government to go

(01:43:46):
and shut down descent. That's the antithesis of a civil society.
So you don't get to make the determination as to
the penalty of being uncivil to a free people by
the overbearing use of an expanded government and weaponizing and
against innocent free people. You get to make that determination
after committing the ironic offense that you've committed. This is

(01:44:06):
kind of how I look at it. But they have
you noticed, they will do that. They appeal to that
civility of society, the people who don't practice them. All right,
today's stupidity came.

Speaker 6 (01:44:16):
All right, it's Kamala Harris's economic advisor, barant Rama Merty.
Now he's trying to convince you here that unrealized or yeah,
unrealized profits should be taxed. Unrealized gains, and your stocks
and your portfolios, they need that money. Listen to cut nine.

Speaker 2 (01:44:34):
Sorry one, oh, unrealized gains. Taxing unrealized games just doesn't
seem fair in any sense of the words.

Speaker 3 (01:44:41):
In a very different point, in the very best sense.

Speaker 2 (01:44:44):
If you are taxing unrealized gains, all you're doing is
pulling forward the taxes that would be paid later when
someone actually sells the stock.

Speaker 4 (01:44:51):
I think that this reaction to unrealized gains is a
little funny, given that I bet that the majority.

Speaker 6 (01:44:55):
Of act he finds this idea funny, and the pushback
to it funny is.

Speaker 1 (01:45:00):
To understand economics. This is others to it. He doesn't
understand any of those folks that does it for us today.
Find us over at Substack, Chapter and Verse, Facebook, YouTube,
Like and subscribe back with yourmorrow,

All Episodes

Wednesday August 28 - Full Show

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Cardiac Cowboys

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Wednesday August 28 - Full Show