Thursday September 19 - Full Show - The Dana Show with Dana Loesch

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Well, listen, we interviewed both candidates, and we were seeking
commitments from both candidates, and we couldn't get solid commitments
on our core issues like the pro Act, like video
and national right to work, like staying out of labor
disputes and not trying to force any contracts on us,
like what happened to our brothers and sisters in the
real industry. And we didn't get solid commitments for either candidate,

(00:21):
which was a major factor in our decision as a
general executive board not to endorse.

Speaker 2 (00:29):
So a little bit of trouble there for Democrats because
they did not get you know, like the biggest union
to back them, despite saying that all the unions love them,
all the unions love them, and they all the unions
are going to back them, and.

Speaker 3 (00:47):
Et cetera, et cetera.

Speaker 2 (00:49):
That was big because that statement that and everybody's been
talking about it today. It's like the first time since
I was in high school.

Speaker 3 (00:59):
That think about that.

Speaker 2 (01:00):
That's a that's a big deal that they decided to
not back someone who a Democrat, really and you heard them,
you know, lay out the reasons as to why. Just
pretty amazing that this is, you know, it's kind of

(01:20):
amazing that this is uh blowing up in their faces
after they were trying to act like it was the
Republicans that were the the scourge of the working man.

Speaker 3 (01:30):
And how is that going.

Speaker 2 (01:33):
To affect the surveys as we go into the election now,
because you know, like we've been saying, uh, we're everything's
going to be decided in the margins and it's super close.
Welcome to the show, Dana lash with you. We're at
the top of this first hour on this Thursday. That's

(01:54):
pretty a big Now here's the here's the breakdown of this.
And this is what I was really fascinated by because
this this is kind of I think typically how it
is so this it's the Teamsters Union. I mean, it's huge.
And they posted they had their own presidential endorsement poll, right,

(02:17):
and they posted that online. And I'm looking at the
tweet that they had for this that said that they
posted this yesterday. It said that in their survey, they
pledged to conduct the most inclusive, democratic, and transparent presidential
endorsement process in the history of their one hundred and

(02:39):
twenty one year old organization.

Speaker 3 (02:40):
Blah blah blah.

Speaker 2 (02:42):
And they said that they have not yet endorsed anybody,
and then that's when they announced yesterday they weren't going
to endorse anyone.

Speaker 3 (02:47):
But what is amazing in this is when you look.

Speaker 2 (02:50):
At it, it was like three to one that the
members actually supported Trump over Harris, a Republican over Democrat
in this. And I think it's interesting because their president,
Sean O'Brien was the guy that we just played coming
into this first hour. He was the one that you
heard talking and he say, no, our members are the

(03:10):
union and their voices and opinions with the forefront of
everything that they do. So three to one the members
actually endorse the Republican over the Democrat, and on a
ton of these different issues, because they did phone they
did phone polls, everything they looked at issues overall, it
was forty four when they looked at when they were

(03:31):
looking when it was Biden, they were supporting Biden over Trump.
When they switched it out to Harris, it went overwhelmingly
to Trump. So when it was Biden, it was forty
four to thirty six Biden over Trump.

Speaker 3 (03:41):
When Harris got put in.

Speaker 2 (03:43):
It was it's sixty to thirty four, two to one,
rather sixty to thirty four that's pretty crazy. And only
six percent were undecided. That's kind of a big deal.
But when Sean O'Brien you heard him as we were,
i mean end of this hour, he's saying, oh, well,
you know, the are the voices and the opinions of

(04:04):
our members are at the forefront of everything that they do.
But yet you didn't endorse. I mean, not that they
have to. Their non endorsement is everything that tells you everything.
But they didn't endoorse because they the leadership, the leadership
they broke.

Speaker 3 (04:21):
They they they got wimpy over it. They did. They
turned into whimps.

Speaker 2 (04:27):
If they were really like balls out, they'd be they'd
be backing who they're members back. I don't think that
that's a mean thing to say, because it's wimpy what
they just did.

Speaker 3 (04:36):
I think. So, I mean, Kan, that's a pretty big dude.
High school.

Speaker 4 (04:40):
Yeah, And I really think because I don't, I know,
we have AOC on this because she's she was out
there just bashing him saying whenever he you know, they
needed stuff, he teamed democrats.

Speaker 3 (04:53):
I have somebody thirty four listen to this is what
Kan's talking about. Listening to this.

Speaker 5 (04:58):
I'm very disappointed and Sean O'Brien's leadership. I have found
it increasingly alarming all year when the teamsters are in trouble,
who do they call when we need to make sure
that teamster's pensions are bailed out, when we need to
make sure that that they're that they have a fair shake.
At the negotiating table with Rail, it was Seann O'Brien

(05:18):
calling Democrats for help.

Speaker 2 (05:20):
Hm, hm, well, you know it's it's the the slogan
is what have you done for me lately? Doesn't look
like Democrats have done a whole hell of a lot
for for the union folks lately. I mean, think about it,
really they haven't. She's disappointed in his leadership. Oh, I
guess Sean O'Brien's gonna go cry himself to sleep because.

Speaker 3 (05:41):
AOC is disappointed in his leadership. Hmmm. I'm just I'm
fascinated by this.

Speaker 2 (05:46):
So it looks like I mean, so it's I mean
this he was Sean O'Brien was the speaker at the
r n C when the when Democrats had pulled this up.

Speaker 3 (05:55):
This is axious. When Democrats had their.

Speaker 2 (06:00):
Convention, they didn't invite him to speak, or they requested
to speak, and they were snubbed. In fact, Kara Dennis,
their spokesperson for the Teamsters, told Axios, quote, we didn't
get a response to our request for him to speak.
Now they had rank and file teamster's retirees that were invited.

(06:24):
That kind of signals that I and I think that
was just kind of a gimmey to me. It seems
like they were trying to signal that it was personal.
They're snub to O'Brien. But you got to remember, look
at them, look at where the membership was, Look at
what the I just told you, what the uh what
their their whole uh it was, you know, like sixty

(06:46):
percent of thirty four in favor of.

Speaker 3 (06:50):
Trump over Harris.

Speaker 2 (06:52):
That's significant, That's that's incredibly significant. You're not snubbing at
that point the guy who is the head of the Teamsters.
You're snubbing the Teamsters because them not endorsing actually is
ignoring their membership. So they snubbed him, and the Democrats
did not have him at their convention, and then when

(07:14):
Axios reached out to Democrats to get them to respond,
Democrats didn't. They DNC didn't have any response to Axios
which was interesting as well. They said that because historically
they've done it. I mean, they have thirteen million members
in the Teamsters, so that's significant. He's not making his
union man. I hope Democrats realize this. He's not making

(07:35):
the rank and file angry. They're all not voting for her.
I mean, going by the survey, they're not voting for
So would it have changed that much had he endorsed Trump?
Do you think that's the big question.

Speaker 3 (07:49):
Do you think it would have.

Speaker 4 (07:50):
I think he would have effectively killed any cooperation that
he would have gotten from Democrats in any future negotiations
in regards to the union. And I think he was
protecting himself.

Speaker 3 (08:00):
That's true.

Speaker 2 (08:01):
I mean it's I simultaneously dislike union bosses and then
I also understand that it is not an easy place
for them right now. Dislike the well, I don't dislike
private sector. Public sector is what angers me, because I,
as a taxpayer, am denied a table. That deny a
seat at the table where everyone else gets to argue

(08:23):
with the money I work my ass off to earn,
and that you work your ass off to earn, and
we're all at the table, but we're told to get
up and leave it when it comes to public unions,
and that's on American I don't do that. I don't,
I'm not. I mean, you don't treat us like that.
You don't take our money. Tell us to shut up
and get out of the room, and then negotiate with
our money. Oh hell no, private sector, you guys do
what you want. Public sector. That's not I got a

(08:45):
problem because I'm not at the table and it's my money.
But this, I mean, he's not in an easy spot,
as Kine just said, because they you know, for negotiations,
you got to negotiate, and he I think hedging his
bets because it is now before get mad at him,
go Lee, I cannot even believe. Will you mark this down.

(09:06):
I'm sort of defending him right now. This is wild,
a whole new world. I can't exactly blame him for
hedging his bets when he's looking at his union membership
because look at the polls. Everything is really close. And
I've got some other stuff for you as well. The

(09:27):
enthusiasm for some reason, are they all like what are
they doing?

Speaker 3 (09:30):
Are they all like hitting the booger sugar that hunter has?

Speaker 6 (09:33):
Like?

Speaker 2 (09:33):
What is up with the Democratic enthusiasm now starting to increase.
I don't get it. Well, I saw a couple of surveys.
I think it's only because they're getting hyped up over nothing.
It's gonna fade. It's like a sugar rush, you know,
like they get him hyped up over something and then
it starts to fade as they go towards the election.
That's what I tend to think this is. But anyway

(09:53):
it is, I mean, it's close. Considering it's close, be
wary of anyone who tells you that one person and
is way ahead of the other.

Speaker 3 (10:01):
Be wary of any survey that tells you that.

Speaker 2 (10:05):
So he's kind of hedging his bets and he's trying
to figure out, Okay, what's the best thing for me
to do here? Because you know what of I I mean,
he's and as Kine points out, I mean O'Brien's speech
to the RNC was a little lefty, and I get
what the RNC was trying to do. Although I got
to tell you, I was more shocked by the stuff
that he said on the DNC stage than I was
over Amber. What's her face? The SlutWalk lady? I like

(10:28):
way more so than that, because I'm like, that's just
you know, whatever, this is actual policy.

Speaker 3 (10:33):
So I'm a little concerned here. It's Democrats. What are
they going to do?

Speaker 2 (10:40):
I mean, that's a great thing for Republican operatives to exploit.
You've got Democrats who are trying to put a wedge
between the leadership and the members, and they're trying to
disregard the members by reducing them all down to just
Sean O'Brien's voice.

Speaker 3 (10:59):
You know, this whole idea.

Speaker 2 (11:00):
Who is it Neil Simon that wrote Waiting for Lefty
that that sentiment is dead in the Democrat Party right now?

Speaker 3 (11:06):
Interesting? I mean, I'm just curious, So what is what
are Democrats going to do now?

Speaker 7 (11:10):
Is she?

Speaker 2 (11:11):
Are they going to blow it? Are they going to
blow it with unions? And then what does that mean
for blue collar vote? Because blue collars they don't want
to be paying No. Four or five dollars a gallon
for gas. They don't want to have dudes in their
daughter's locker rooms. They don't want to struggle to keep
the roof over their head. They don't like watching the

(11:33):
news and hearing stories about people who enter the country
at the southern border illegally being put up in five
star hotels, and then other people who are brought in
under the Temporary Protection Status program illegally sheltered in these
Midwestern towns, and then and then completely taking them over.

Speaker 3 (11:51):
They don't like that stuff. What do you? How are you?

Speaker 2 (11:54):
You're not going to be able to convince them to
accept those policies. And furthermore, here's the big thing that
this is a huge cultural thing that we're sort of missing.
And I remember thinking about this when I was watching
The Grand Tour. They were in the United States and
actually Clarkson and May and Hammond.

Speaker 3 (12:12):
I love that show.

Speaker 2 (12:12):
And they just had their last episode that Amazon came
out with earlier this week, and they were in Detroit
and they it was richer. It was James May who noted, oh,
that they put a garden here where this automobile factory
used to be and it was like part of what
was the Ford Factory and it had been taken down
and they had this community garden there. And Jeremy Clarkson

(12:34):
goes up and says, this is garbage. This is garbage,
this is stupid garden. He wanted to run over it
and do Wheeley's in it. He said, This is so
dumb because this used to be like the manufacturing center
of the world. And he said Detroit was the envy
of the world. And now look what it is. It's
like a hippies garden. And he's like, this is what's happening.
It is and it is it marked. It was a
great insight on the de industrialization of the United States

(12:57):
and the rust belt and what we are currently going
through and what blue collar is going through. And now
with the emergence of AI, you have an entire swath
of voters who are on very shaky ground and they're
nervous because they used to be supremely influential in elections
and now what is their influence. They still have influence

(13:20):
because they have numbers. It's a weird time and it
seems like only certain Republicans get this.

Speaker 3 (13:24):
Democrats haven't caught onto this yet.

Speaker 2 (13:27):
That sentiment, I feel is going to play huge going
into who's voting for whom in November.

Speaker 3 (13:32):
We've got a lot more.

Speaker 2 (13:33):
I like having options, diverse options when it comes to
defensive accouterments, and the burner gun is one of those things.
Because not everyone has the luxury of being able to
take their firearm with them everywhere. I got very good
friends of mine who live and work in the present DC,
and you know, they think like you you'd but I
mean believe it they do.

Speaker 3 (13:54):
But even if they.

Speaker 2 (13:55):
Have their license to carry in DC, which is hard
to get, and they have their firearm, which is hard
to get out there, then they can't carry in like
ninety percent of the places.

Speaker 3 (14:04):
So what are they going to do?

Speaker 2 (14:04):
You've seen the crime rate they my friends, I have
friends out there and friends in New York that went
and got.

Speaker 3 (14:09):
The model they got was the Burna SD.

Speaker 2 (14:11):
Burna makes several different kinds and now you're probably like, okay,
well what is it. Well, it's better than a stunt gun,
as stunt gun's only got like a couple of shots.
The Burna SD can stop threats from up to fifty
feet away with chemical irritant projectiles. So it's a deterrent
that can serve to help you in any kind of
in a defensive situation. And you don't have a background

(14:34):
check to go through. It's illegal in all fifty states.
There's no permit. I mean they can ship it right
to your door, so it's super accessible. It doesn't care
about your gun for his own science. It really doesn't.
And this is why I say it's good to have
multiple options for self defense, particularly when you're limited in
the usage of some of those. To learn more about
the Burner gun, visit burna dot com slash Dana for
ten percent off your purchase. That's b y r NA

(14:56):
Burna dot com slash Dana. Check out the different models
accessories more bernad dot com slash in it for ten
percent off.

Speaker 7 (15:02):
Have you ever noticed it's only called a recession after
we're already in it or past it. Economists are always
in search of a recession, like letter nimoy.

Speaker 3 (15:11):
If they find one, it's already too late.

Speaker 7 (15:13):
Always be prepared by putting money away and investing accordingly.
Check out the Watchdog on Wall Street podcast on Apple, Spotify,
wherever you get your podcasts.

Speaker 8 (15:22):
And now all of the news you would probably miss,
it's time for Dana's Quick five.

Speaker 3 (15:28):
So apparently when you stare at okay.

Speaker 2 (15:31):
This is a study that says if you look into
your dog's eye, something really cool happens. Apparently it's called
inter brain coupling, and it's a bond between humans and
their canine companions. And it was published in the journal
Advanced Science. They used a cutting edge technique called dual
EEG to measure the activity of both humans and dogs

(15:52):
as they gained as they engage in bonding behaviors like
petting and looking at each other.

Speaker 3 (15:56):
Looking at each other as a bonding thing.

Speaker 2 (15:58):
It's hysterical, but they said that there when they would
look at each other, that the dog brains and the
people brains actually fell into sync, a coordinated pattern of activity,
and it had a leader follower dynamic like the humans
the pack leader in the It's very intert I totally
believe this.

Speaker 3 (16:15):
I completely totally believe this.

Speaker 9 (16:18):
Uh.

Speaker 2 (16:18):
Michelle Obama plugs the healthy new drink at Costco. I
don't want to say the name of it because I
feel like I'm advertising it.

Speaker 3 (16:24):
It's supposed to be calorie.

Speaker 2 (16:25):
Free, which means it's going to taste horrible. It's pleasy fizz.
That's what it's called. Pleasy fizz, limonade, big MIC's hard lemonade. Yeah,
I mean that would have been better. I would have
Pleasy fizz sounds like A it does, it does, and

(16:45):
you know I'm right it is. It sounds like a
I can't say that out loud, but so you know
I'm right.

Speaker 3 (16:54):
Let's see. Oh it's in today's episode.

Speaker 2 (16:57):
If it's not the vax guys deep links between alcohol
and cancer described in a new report alcohol and.

Speaker 3 (17:03):
Cancer, I don't believe it.

Speaker 2 (17:04):
It's the American adults under fifty, the colon cancer, colon cancer.

Speaker 3 (17:10):
Yeah, we would have seen it way before, way way before.
We've got a lot more on the way. Stick with us.

Speaker 2 (17:16):
The P fifteen. This is a great company, and this
is a great firearm. If you are unfamiliar with the
P fifteen, you need not be. It is the smallest,
thinnest double stack nine millimeter that you can get on
the market. And with the P fifteen it comes in
two versions. It's the metal version and the polymer version.

(17:37):
And the metal versions I mean, I like both of them,
and I think they're both great for different things too.
The metal version has that gorgeous walnut would frame with
the texture grip. It's really it's just a mix. It
anath looking gun. It comes to two magazines. Both of
them do standard fifteen round with minimal pinky extension. You
have a flush fit double stack mag that holds twelve
rounds as well. Tritium and fiber optic front site and

(17:58):
you got a fully adjustable fiber two rear and lifetime warranty,
Striker fire reliability, great smooth trigger pool. It is just ideal,
and it's from the inventors of the microcompact pistol category,
so it's great concealed carry guns. The lightest lightest nine
millimeter I have. You don't lose any stopping power at all,
and you get ultimate concealability. It's innovation performance in Caltech.
Learn more at celtech weapons dot com, k e Ltec

(18:20):
weapons dot com. It's the P fifteen. Tell them Dana
sent you.

Speaker 10 (18:25):
Not Able to catch you the full Dana Show. Follow
Dana's Absurd Truth podcast and get news and laughs delivered
in short, easy to digest episodes. Ideal for your busy
lifestyle on Apple or wherever you get your podcast.

Speaker 11 (18:38):
Neat to take that on. We need to lower the
cost of housing. We don't have enough housing in our country.
The supply is too low and it's too expensive, both
for renters and for folks who want to buy a home.
So we will get bill together millions of new homes
and give first time home buyers twenty five thousand dollars
in down payment assistance.

Speaker 2 (19:02):
I like how they promised to build all of these
houses when they couldn't even build the EV stations. Remember
they were really trying that, they were really trying to
do that, and it didn't it didn't happen. How many
did they say they were going to build, like a
million or something like that, five hundred thousand, it's like seven, yeah,
something something just ridiculous.

Speaker 3 (19:25):
So yeah, it's she hasn't really done a whole hell
of a lot. I mean, I would think that.

Speaker 2 (19:31):
Houses, you know, that's a lot more, a lot more
goes into building those than you know, just the EV
charging stations, right, Kine. I mean I'm not like a
you know, I'm not a construction worker or a contractor,
but just feel like that's probably a lot different.

Speaker 4 (19:46):
Oh yeah, it's a lot different. Plus the logic here
is she should really be working on bringing prices down,
not taking our money, to close the gap between the
overinflated prices and where everyone is in their income today.
She's she's losing it.

Speaker 2 (20:02):
I mean, it's it's just why we're gonna talk to
Carol Roth about all of this coming up, especially after
the FED cut.

Speaker 3 (20:09):
You know, fifty basis points yesterday. I mean this is
it's Yeah, well if that it's it's not.

Speaker 2 (20:18):
It's like a cheap band aid, the ones that don't
stick so good. Yeah, that's exactly what it is. Oh,
welcome back, Dana Lash. At the bottom of this first hour, Hey,
she had a new accent. Kane Audio sound by four
Kamala had a new accent that she debuted while speaking
to the Congressional Hispanic Caucus. Uh, listen to how fluent
she sounds.

Speaker 12 (20:41):
I love you, good god?

Speaker 3 (20:46):
Why why why do people do that?

Speaker 4 (20:50):
I've heard the explanation. It's called code switching.

Speaker 3 (20:55):
And code switching.

Speaker 4 (20:56):
Yeah, and apparently, whenever you're in front of a crowd
a certain ethnicity, you tend to take on the vernacular
and the speaking techniques of what the majority of the
crowd speaks like. So it's called code switch. They're excusing this.

Speaker 3 (21:14):
Is the way to empathize or.

Speaker 4 (21:16):
Yeah, they're trying to say it's for empathy, but in reality,
this is all a bunch of bs and she's only
doing it to pander. But they're given it an excuse.

Speaker 3 (21:24):
Yeah, it sounds like it. That's who boy. Yeah, I
love you dude.

Speaker 4 (21:31):
That's imagine if Trump changes excellent.

Speaker 3 (21:34):
For he had a taco salad, right, and they they
got mad at him.

Speaker 2 (21:38):
You guys, this is like probably one of my favorite
most outrages of the left.

Speaker 3 (21:43):
He ate legit. Remember this, you guys remember this. What
was this, Sanko to Mayo.

Speaker 2 (21:47):
Yeah, it was and he legit ate a taco salad
that he got from his restaurant.

Speaker 3 (21:52):
He was in his restaurant, he was sitting at his desk.

Speaker 2 (21:54):
This is before he was elected in twenty sixteen, had
a taco salad and he had it at his desk
and he's like, oh happy, Sinko to Mayas like, I
love Hispanic culture. And everyone everyone said, you're pandering because
he's in a taco salad, you know, so the favorite
food of the Irish.

Speaker 4 (22:11):
The right cannot celebrate culture because then the left just
calls it racism. But the left can totally do what
Kamala does and what Hillary does and what they all
do it.

Speaker 2 (22:19):
Saying that you like Hispanic food is not appropriation. That's
celebration of a culture. Pretending that you have a Spanish
accent a la Hillary Baldwin or whatever her name is,
and pretending that you're Spanish, that's appropriation and doing what
Kamala did.

Speaker 3 (22:35):
That's that sounds like appropriation.

Speaker 4 (22:37):
Hot sauce in my purse, right, Hillary?

Speaker 3 (22:39):
Yeah, exactly. It's pandering and it's so cringe, like you don't,
you don't.

Speaker 2 (22:47):
How do they go in front of a big group
of people and not be embarrassed that they're doing this? Like, oh,
these people know that I'm I mean, they look at
her and they are like, Okay, you're not Hispanic? Why
are you? Why did you just cop a Hispanic accent
with us? They look at Hillary Clinton, You're not black?
Why are you all of a sudden trying to cop
like the you know, the Southern Baptist preacher speaking technique

(23:07):
with maybe a little.

Speaker 3 (23:09):
Bit of Jesse Jackson flair. What what's up? Why are
you doing that? You know what I mean?

Speaker 2 (23:13):
Like they don't the normal people like us would be
would we would be? We would embarrass ourselves to death.

Speaker 4 (23:21):
And more than one occasion they'll go as far as
playing despasita while they're sitting at the lectin.

Speaker 2 (23:27):
It's unbelievab' Well, he tried to play it off his
phone and then he couldn't figure it out, and an
aid had to go up and then he had to
be like, yeah, I have Desposito on my phone, And
I mean, it's one thing to get the accent correctly
when you're saying a word like Joe Biden doesn't, it's
another thing to do like Kamala Harris went full on

(23:48):
Hillary Baldwin or how do you say your name?

Speaker 3 (23:51):
She changed her name.

Speaker 2 (23:52):
She's like this white chick from Boston, and then she's like, no,
I am espanic.

Speaker 3 (23:55):
How you say cucumbar? She did our cooking show.

Speaker 2 (23:59):
How you say it's like butt? You're from Boston, you
know how to say cucumber?

Speaker 3 (24:04):
Grief? Can I talk real quick about this?

Speaker 9 (24:06):
Is?

Speaker 2 (24:06):
I just got to switch it up because we've got
we're politics heavy today, but I gotta hit on a
couple other things too, because we gotta get into the
Iran stuff.

Speaker 3 (24:13):
We gotta get in these real stuff.

Speaker 2 (24:14):
I think I have this like way down on the rundown.
So I'm really sorry one, but I wanted to bring
it up now since we're talking about culture stuff. You
guys remember the ginger, the angry ginger, the royal or whatever,
the British royal ginger, the balding, British angry royal Ginger,
I gotta. I mean, I could keep going, but anyway,
he lives in his olive garden mcmahonson in Montecito and

(24:39):
his suitcase game show girlfriend or wife, sorry, yach girl,
former yaka or whatever they've decided.

Speaker 3 (24:47):
They dropped this huge video.

Speaker 2 (24:49):
I only watch them because I am fascinated by how
they believe in the own hype that they try to
make for themselves. I've never seen anything like in my life,
except for maybe some influencers in politics. I've never seen
anything like this in my life. They really think that
they are the be all end all, and they do
all this stuff, and they trash their family, and they

(25:11):
trash our free speech. He's the guy who came over
here and complained about our First Amendment, all of this stuff.
So now they came out with this big video where
they said that it's very important that they said, together,
let's make sure every eligible voter is informed and empowered
to participate in shaping America's future.

Speaker 3 (25:29):
This is so stupid.

Speaker 2 (25:31):
It's like they gave a basic be explainer on like
how do you vote, and they did this video and
they released it and it's supposed to like they're intimating
obviously that they're voting for Kamala Harris, but they're trying
to They made a big statement they want to stay
neutral in the race. Who cares what you people want
to do? This is the United States. Quit trying to

(25:52):
establish your little quasi court here and you're olive Garden
McMansion of Montecito that I think you bought from a
Russian oligarch. I'm pretty sure like a Russia a drug
deal in Russian oligarch. Stop just stop it. And they
have this foundation, this Archwell Foundation. Does anyone know what
this thing actually does? I think all they do is
grift off it. Their expense reports that they have to

(26:12):
file because of their tax structure apparently shows that they
spend more on salaries than they do any actual do gooding.
I just can't stand. And they both want to play
a part in politics. This dude is British. He should
probably be deported because he's a Nazi cosplaying druggie.

Speaker 3 (26:27):
Why is he?

Speaker 2 (26:27):
Why is he here? How did it even get here?
They want a taxpayer funded protection and all this stuff.

Speaker 3 (26:33):
Why are they even here? I just can't stand these two.
Do you don't follow them? Kne to you?

Speaker 2 (26:37):
I only follow because they see stuff that comes up
on daily mail.

Speaker 4 (26:40):
Yeah, and when I'm prepping for the show and I
have a.

Speaker 2 (26:43):
Couple of British friends, one of whom really rapidly dislikes them,
and I get text updates about it.

Speaker 4 (26:50):
But it's like that tour of I Want My Privacy
tour where they're out there just protesting.

Speaker 2 (26:55):
Yeah, like, why do you have to sit here and
tell people how important it is to vote? And they
said that the suitcase chick was all it's Dutch as suitcase.

Speaker 3 (27:04):
It's the most important election of our lifetime.

Speaker 2 (27:07):
Shut up like the most vapid, unintellectual things that you
could possibly say. These two cobble them together and act
like it's like this earth shattering video. Stop it and
learn how to iron your damn clothes and him your
things properly. My gosh, unless you're a Juggalo wearing Juneco jeans,
your stuff doesn't always need to be dragging the ground
like a car wash. God help us, I said, wash,

(27:28):
I meant it all right. I'm moving on now. I
had to get that out of my system. Thank you
guys for humoring me. I just I have a thing
with that, all right. So a couple of other things.
Did you guys hear this flashback video from Kamala Harris on.

Speaker 3 (27:46):
Cane? Did I? Immediately He's like, oh.

Speaker 2 (27:49):
Lord, lort Kamala Harris, this win was this It was
some years ago, but it shows that she has never
changed her position where it concerns gun confiscation. So she
has this video where she talks about the basically how

(28:10):
she's they want to go door to door and basically
take everybody's guns.

Speaker 3 (28:14):
That's what they had said.

Speaker 2 (28:16):
I was looking at the it was supposed to be
it's a flashback she had said. Quote, just because you
legally possess a gun in the sanctity of your home
doesn't mean that we're not going to walk into that
home and check to see if you're being responsible. I'm sorry,
what listen to this?

Speaker 13 (28:32):
Responsible behaviors among everybody in the community. And just because
you legally possess a gun in the sanctity of your
blocked home doesn't mean that we're not going to walk
into that home and check to see if you're being
responsible and safe. And the way you come back.

Speaker 3 (28:47):
To your finger, like, hell, what do you mean now
she's speaking.

Speaker 2 (28:51):
This was when Gavin Newsom was still mayor, so she
was the ag of California when this happened, So it
was a little bit ago because then she was so
this is when she was Attorney General of California. So
it's not that long ago, but it's a little bit ago. Uh,
and Gavin Newsom is still seeing Francisco mayor. She's saying that, well,
you know, we can still walk into your house and

(29:11):
check to see if you're being responsible.

Speaker 3 (29:15):
What what what would.

Speaker 2 (29:17):
People who don't even know anything about firearms? What would
they even know to check? I'm curious and you and
what army like you sit here and you you demonize
gun ownership. How do you think you're going to gain
entry to all of these private homes with guns? Because
that's kind of defeats the purpose, or rather does in
that underscore your agenda. And it depends on which way

(29:39):
you look at it. She's always been an extremist on
this stuff. This is why when she sits here, her
and Tim fudd up there, when they get out there
and say, oh, we don't want your guns, we're gun owners,
NERF doesn't count. NERF doesn't count, Cynthia, it does not count.
No one believes you now Tim Fudd. I think he
does own like a couple firearms, and he really brags

(30:01):
about it, Like he's the guy who maybe goes hunting
like once every few years, and then he brags about
it all the time.

Speaker 3 (30:07):
Whatever.

Speaker 2 (30:08):
Uh I, No one believes. No one believes that she
has changed her position on this. You do not go
in the span of six seven years, eight years. You
do not go from advocating forced entry into people's homes
to confiscate their firearms or to inspect them to No.

Speaker 3 (30:28):
We totally support the second of my mind. Yeah, like
I have guns?

Speaker 2 (30:32):
No, what what is what is the walk the path
to the one eighty on that?

Speaker 3 (30:38):
Right?

Speaker 2 (30:39):
Like if you I'm all four people changing their minds
on issues, but the people who've genuinely changed their mind
on an issue, they have the story arc to go
with it.

Speaker 3 (30:50):
Right.

Speaker 2 (30:50):
Oh, well this happened, and when this happened, it altered
my thinking. And then I started thinking this and I went,
I mean that's she doesn't have that. And as noted,
Kane says that she's never said that she's a gunner.
He's never heard her say that until the past several months.

Speaker 4 (31:05):
I mean maybe she's mentioned it for a political reason
in the past, because you know AG and the DA
and all that, but I have never heard it until recently.
So I'm again the campaign does nothing but lie. They
know they don't have a lot of time before the election,
so this is what they're doing, just.

Speaker 3 (31:23):
Saying we have a more on the way as well.

Speaker 2 (31:28):
We're going to get into we got immigration to get into,
We've got the well, you know the VP debates coming up.
We're going to Hillary says the reason she lost is
because you all are sexist, and she would say racist
if she could get away with it. Well, they did
actually wait a minute, what am I talking about? They
actually did say that. I think I did a TV
hit like in the week after the week the days
following the election, where people were actually arguing that it

(31:50):
was because they didn't vote for the old white woman.

Speaker 3 (31:52):
Okay, we're going to get.

Speaker 2 (31:53):
Into all of that as well. I got some culture
issues for you and Gop.

Speaker 3 (31:58):
We got China.

Speaker 2 (32:00):
We also have the latest with Israel Hamas hasbl I
think about this, while we get ready to roll towards
days of these United States, what if the pager phone
little exploding hack thing. Is there a concern that could
fall into the wrong hands or bad hands rather like
I'm fine with Israel doing it. I mean, go and
get them terrorists, get them, blow them up.

Speaker 3 (32:21):
I don't care. I mean, you know how many service
members is they are in around killed? How many?

Speaker 2 (32:25):
How many Americans do they kill? Nineteen eighty three? You know,
im I blow them all up? But what if that
tech kit, what if that does get into like oh,
I don't know, like Isa's hands or something. I'm just
asking a question. I mean, it's not wrong to ask questions.
So we're gonna discuss this. Our partners over at Black
Rifle Coffee make the best coffee in America. They really do.
Black Rifle Coffee Company they have right now a Mission

(32:50):
fuel Kit Variety Sampler. This thing is awesome. You can
get four ounce bags of my favorites AK forty seven
Espress so beyond black, Silence or smooth with just black.
Every flavor is amazing, and the fuel Kit comes in
a really cool blue box. So it's a great gift
for people. Or if you just want to sample some
of these other roasts without committing to like the big

(33:12):
giant full bag, you can. It's available exclusively right now
on ground texture.

Speaker 14 (33:16):
But you know.

Speaker 2 (33:16):
You can get the whole being k cups ready to
drink and ground in addition to that of all of
these roasts at Black Riflecoffee dot Com, where you can
also sign up for the Coffee Club.

Speaker 3 (33:26):
This is what I do because I drink. We drink
coffee in our house. We're coffee drinkers. You choose your
roast or roasts, there's.

Speaker 2 (33:32):
More than one, how often you want it shipped, how
often you want to have it, and they will send
it to your front porch with free shipping. That's amazing
and it's God bless America. That's just the best coffee.
They roast them five days a week Tennessee in Utah,
and they get award winning coffee beans and they bring
it back and everything that they do pays homage to
American culture and military history. Experience outstanding flavor and aroma

(33:56):
at Black Rifle Coffee dot Com. Order the Complete Mission
Fuel Kit Variety Sampler today. Get twenty percent off using Coddana.
Codana gets you twenty percent off only at Black Rifle
Coffee dot Com.

Speaker 10 (34:07):
Get the loaddown on the latest news with the side
of laughs whenever you want. Subscribe to The Dana Show
podcast on YouTube, Apple or wherever you get your podcast,
like SAMs through the ali Glass.

Speaker 4 (34:20):
So are the days of the United States.

Speaker 12 (34:24):
I don't think I'm a believer, but I've interviewed pilots
that look I like Tom Cruise, but better than Tom Cruise,
the blonde, the blonde crew cuts, the hale and this, yes, sir.
And they were in the Oval office, three or four pilots.
These are not people that make up stories. They said,

(34:45):
all I know, sir is there was a round object
that was going four times faster than my F twenty two,
which is a very fast plan. And it wasn't you know,
it shouldn't have been it was round, sir. They have
seen I mean four or five guys, I've in you,
solid people, great pilots for the US Air Force, et cetera.

(35:06):
They've seen things that they cannot explain.

Speaker 2 (35:08):
So this is like what Mike Pompeo said when he
was on the show. When he was CIA director. We
had him on the show and the first question was, Sarah,
can you tell us about the aliens. I just like
threw all like professional courtesy out the window, and I'm like, no, Sara,
we got to ask about the aliens.

Speaker 3 (35:22):
I'm sorry, and he laughed.

Speaker 2 (35:23):
I was like, oh, well, people said they saw stuff
in anyway, next topic, I'm.

Speaker 7 (35:27):
Like, what.

Speaker 2 (35:29):
That's I mean, that's the way to tell me that
there are aliens if you know you can't tell me
that there are aliens, that's the way. That's what someone
who knows that there are aliens but can't tell me
about the aliens, that's what they would say, right. I
don't think we're reading too much into that game. I
feel like that's an accurate assessment.

Speaker 4 (35:46):
Unless there is such a deep state that they have
all this technology that four times faster than an F
twenty two.

Speaker 3 (35:52):
But if it's the deep state from the future.

Speaker 4 (35:55):
See, now you're speaking my language.

Speaker 3 (35:58):
I were you guys ready for that.

Speaker 4 (36:00):
Whole roll a tin foil back here?

Speaker 3 (36:02):
I mean what if? Though?

Speaker 2 (36:05):
Just saying what what if? Now, I'm like, oh, no, weird.
I don't want them to have that, Like may I
need to reevaluate mate? See, I only want my tax
dollars to go to wards. I don't know, like blown up.
Terry's just saying, like we got to talk about that
because Hesbula, the chief hassan Israla says this.

Speaker 3 (36:22):
Patre attack is a declaration of wool.

Speaker 2 (36:25):
What I like it is that Israel has regained the whole.
What the hell are they going to do next? Specula speculation?
Now hesbla hamas Iran. They're all worried, like wait, wait, wait,
what else are they gonna blow up?

Speaker 3 (36:39):
What's next? That's a fun game. What else are they
going to blow up?

Speaker 2 (36:42):
I like that game? Stick with us, We've got more
to come. Second hour next. In an era where daily
election headlines and political turmoil can create a sense of unrest,
having a peaceful retreat is more important than ever. Cozy
Earth's exceptional products can be instrumental in helping you establish
a sanctuary within your own home. Their sheets at is
a standout favorite of mine. You get unmatched comfort and

(37:03):
a nice soothing touch. You can create your own sanctuary
with Cozy Earth's best selling bamboo sheet set, made from
one hundred percent premium viscos from bamboo. The softness of
their sheets and the quality of their materials will truly
elevate your space and turn your bedroom into a cozyhaven.
And if you're seeking to transform your living environment into
a serene escape, Cozy Earth also offers the perfect solution

(37:26):
to create that tranquil home that you've been longing for
with a tenure guarantee. These sheets are a long lasting
investment in quality. So get the ultimate in comfort and
up to forty percent off at cozyearth dot com slash
data and use codana. Don't forget to tell them that
I sent you in the post purchase survey and you
can get free socks. That's cozyearth dot com slash data

(37:47):
and use Codana to get up to forty percent off.

Speaker 9 (37:51):
And in this situation, I cannot take signs. I get
the violence a bomb a bomb, no matter where it
goes off. I think that there's also a question of
the numbers of people who are killed. And it certainly
is a longsided situation there that the Palestinians really don't

(38:12):
stand much of a chance on school if they're trying
to compete with machine.

Speaker 3 (38:19):
Oh my gosh, shut up. You know what.

Speaker 2 (38:21):
They shouldn't have attacked a country and murdered innocent women
and children, babies.

Speaker 3 (38:27):
What this was?

Speaker 2 (38:28):
First off, welcome back to the program Dana Lash with you,
top of the second hour, Channel three forty seven Direct You.
The chats at Rumble were also on X so that's
Joan Biez, don't.

Speaker 3 (38:41):
Get mad at me.

Speaker 2 (38:42):
For the older members of my audience, I could not
tell you a single song this chick is saying. All
I know is that she is not one of the
good hippies. She's like the commie dirty feet and burke
and stock hippie.

Speaker 3 (38:55):
Isn't that correct? Kane? Do are you familiar with her?

Speaker 2 (38:58):
Like who said around at MSNB, he sees mourning Joe
and is like, you know what we need? We need
one of those dirty marks as tip beasts to come over,
the one who sounds like she plays the guitar with
her dirty birkenstock feet. Let's have her on the show.
Let's get check's notes. Joan Biez's take on this. Really,
who else can you get from? Like the Days of

(39:20):
Your good Night? I didn't know what song she's done.
Why the hell is her thoughts on what's happening with
Israel defending itself relevant right now? Well, the Palestinians can't
go against a machine. Israel has every right to defend itself.
The elected government of the people who live in Gaza

(39:40):
Hamas attack them their country that they love still Hamas,
they love this representation, they were gonna vote for it again.
They attacked Israel and Hamas still enjoys an over sixty
three percent approval rating in Gaza, so their government Gazan's government.

Speaker 3 (39:56):
Because Palestine's a fake thing. It doesn't exist.

Speaker 2 (39:59):
We like, we don't pretend that the phrase the assault
weapon is real, or we pretend that guys who tuck
and put on lipstick or chicks. We also don't pretend
that made up places like Palestine exists or that's a
real ethnicity, entity or country. It's not supported by two
thousand years of antiquity.

Speaker 3 (40:12):
So stop.

Speaker 2 (40:14):
If you want to use Hadrian's spiteful word to describe
people that he thought of his enemies and rename their
land after a long ago defeated enemy that was actually
based in crete, the Philistines, then you can go right ahead.
But we like to actually play in science and history here.
That said, who thought like, let's have her on? What
does she why? They have again every right to defend

(40:35):
themselves against being attacked, So where was the concern?

Speaker 3 (40:38):
Then?

Speaker 2 (40:38):
It's always, oh, well, now we've got to be feel
sorry for the people that are getting their butts kicked
because they decided to try to carry Well, they carried
out an act of genocide against Israel.

Speaker 3 (40:48):
It was an active war. Good grief, John Bias, what
name me a song?

Speaker 2 (40:53):
She's done, Kane, She's been out there since the sixties.

Speaker 3 (40:58):
I don't know anything she's done.

Speaker 4 (40:59):
I know that she did a lot of covers. Yeah
she did that much.

Speaker 2 (41:03):
I know she did some covers. So she's basically a
cover artist. No better than a cover artist. That's like
playing at a hula Hans Steve Steve goes, who cares
what jaw.

Speaker 3 (41:12):
Roll thinks about nine to eleven? Yeah? Right, it's like
getting jo jow rule job, what do you think about?
What do you think about all this? You and Joan?
Let's get Joan Bias jaw Rule?

Speaker 2 (41:20):
Who else can we get to fill out our trifecta
of of of talking heads on MSNBC? Like, who is
that just a warning Joe thing? Isn't he he's like
one of the bad boomers?

Speaker 3 (41:33):
Right?

Speaker 2 (41:34):
Yeah, there are some good boomers because they helped raise
gen X. But we're talking and I don't want to
get hate meal from me people. We're specifically talking about
the Jarney Marks as hippies, So who sits around is
like let's bring.

Speaker 3 (41:46):
This old relic up. Let's go dust her off from
the Museum of dgaf.

Speaker 15 (41:53):
X.

Speaker 3 (41:54):
Shut up, No, they don't. I think they shut up.
They're like sixty and seventy years old. He like seventy
morning Joe. Yeah, he's like older than dirt, isn't he.
I'll up, I don't know he's sixty one. Oh see,
I was no.

Speaker 2 (42:09):
Offense, guys, but he's old and and he's mean. The
fact that he's mean and not cool makes it worse. Right,
He's like, I'm going to tie the sweater around my shoulders,
kind of d bag. That's that guy, and they got
every time I talk about him because they used to
obsessively watch everything I said, and they would freak out
on their show every morning if I ever spoke about them.

Speaker 3 (42:30):
So, you know, just sign this with a kiss.

Speaker 4 (42:33):
So anyway, well, it looks like if gen X is nineteen.

Speaker 3 (42:36):
Sixty, shut up.

Speaker 2 (42:37):
I'm not even hearing this. No, you know what, let
me tell you something, sir gatekeeper. You act like that
you're the gatekeeper for gen X and you're trying to
shove me out so you can get this boomer in.

Speaker 3 (42:49):
I'm just oh, hail j I l no, we'll fight
right now in this segment. We'll throw down.

Speaker 4 (42:55):
I'm just looking at what the internet is saying about
the dates.

Speaker 3 (42:57):
Oh now, now, tinfoil, you're gonna look at the internet.

Speaker 4 (43:00):
I'm just saying, this is what.

Speaker 3 (43:02):
I'm not even dealing with you right now. You're grounded.
I'm just not even dealing with you. They can think it,
but it doesn't me.

Speaker 2 (43:10):
I mean, it's real anymore than the guy who's like
it's ma'am is a woman.

Speaker 3 (43:14):
Right, how do you do, fellow kids?

Speaker 2 (43:20):
So this story about the exploding everything, it gets better
because they had the second wave yesterday. So first it
was the pagers, you know, from the liver to the knee.
As the meme says, this is so great, from the
liver to the knee. So apparently there was yet another

(43:40):
wave where they had walkie talkies exploding. And now the
people on husbal are freaking out. They're like, what else
is gonna blow up? Oh my gosh, they have no idea.
So the walkie talkie's exploded, all kinds of stuff they've
been so it's been so zeroed in it's it's kind

(44:01):
of wild. The New York Times reported that the first series,
the pagers were secretly packed with explosives. Now you might
be going, well, how did this happen? Remember we talked
yesterday about Israel had to have probably intercepted something, you know,
or maybe they had. And I was speculating, because the
story hadn't even come out yet. I was speculating, well,

(44:21):
maybe the an't they got in there and you know,
had a shell company and they were a vendor or
something and they packed this stuff with explosives. Because one
of the reports was that and I included this in
your prep if you get the newsletter for its substack.
One of the reports had said that that hospital I
got a new vendor, Like at the last minute. How
dumb is that that they got a new vendor and

(44:42):
that they were made in Taiwan. Oh boy, it gets
so it gets even better and better. So apparently check
this out. There was a Hungarian company that produced explodable
pagers for Lebanon that generated a revenue of like over
almost a million dollars with one employee, and it was
a company that was registered in Hungary in twenty twenty two.

(45:04):
The company back Consulting KFT. It's at the center of
a controversy. Well, if you had Israel went literally created
a company, They built a fake company to manufacture these
pagers themselves. If you had that on your BINGO card,
well you get to fill that space, because that's exactly
what they did. I am so here for this, I

(45:26):
am so unbelievably here for this. So that's what they did.
They created this fake company specifically for this purpose.

Speaker 3 (45:34):
It is.

Speaker 2 (45:36):
Quite wild, and so they said it's BAC Consulting. It
was a Hungary based company that was under contract to
produce the devices on behalf of a Taiwanese company, gold Apollo,
but it was all in Israeli front. Apparently, they said
at least two other shell companies were created to mask
the real identities of the people creating the pagers Israel.

(45:58):
Israeli intelligence off this, I think was in New York Times.
BAC did take on ordinary clients and it produced a
range of ordinary pagers, but the only client that mattered
was HESBLA, and its pagers produced separately contained batteries laced
with the explosive pet and according to three intelligence officers,
they began shipping to Lebanon in the summer of twenty
two in small numbers, and then the production ramped up

(46:21):
after they Nozraela denounced cell phones and some of the
head of Hesbela's spheares were that spread by reports from
allies that Israel had acquired new means to hack into
phones and activating microphones and cameras to spy on the owners,
and so three intelligence officials that Israel invested millions into
developing the tech. Words spread among Hesbela that no cell

(46:44):
phone communication even encrypted messaging apps were safe anymore. So
they all got pagers and walkie talkies and got blowed up,
just saying now, I think that that's done.

Speaker 3 (46:58):
A couple of things.

Speaker 2 (47:00):
First off, there was the appearance of reputational harm in
terms of how hardcore Israel could go.

Speaker 3 (47:09):
In the wake of October seventh, and.

Speaker 2 (47:14):
The idea of Israel setting these pagers up and doing
this reclaims that, and how they.

Speaker 3 (47:25):
Rig them up, and and and.

Speaker 2 (47:27):
Yes, maybe has below messed up because they should not
have gotten like an unvetted new vendor. But the problem
is that Israel I think was hurt on the appearance
of defense and their ability to go on offense after
October seventh, And that has a value when you consider deterrence, right,
you're not going to attack an opponent that is hardcore

(47:50):
and we'll just murk you off this rock. There's not
a there's there's less of a deterrent if they take
that kind of hit. And so that is what I
think Israel has reclaimed with us because now Hesbel has
been knocked back and they have no idea where the
next wave is going to come from. They have no
idea what's going to happen next. They're just freaking out.

(48:12):
And they also they keep saying, well, we're going to
escalate where this is a where the Israel's inching towards war.
But Hesbel has been doing this to Israel. Israel's just
finally had enough and they're defending themselves. So hesbela doesn't
want to take it one further because they have no
idea where this is going to come from.

Speaker 3 (48:27):
They have no idea.

Speaker 2 (48:28):
I mean, I think that Israel reclaimed the credibility for
deterrence after October seventh because they looked wounded after that
and now they've now I mean this is they've apparently
they can even track the data. I was reading this
one piece on all the pages. If they modified like
the code used and all this stuff, and they don't
even know like what other things that they've modified, or

(48:50):
what other companies they may or may not have to
produce stuff. Nobody knows. It's actually kind of smart. So
here's the big question. What happens if think about how
many phones we all have. I'm not saying that this
would I'm not at all even remotely saying that Israel
will do this. I'm saying that bad actors would copy this.
Is that a concern? Should it be a concern?

Speaker 3 (49:14):
You really got it?

Speaker 2 (49:14):
This is why chain of command for these or chain
of custody for this stuff is incredibly important. Like the
production of our phones, right, you got a new whole
bunch of new iPhones coming out there every couple of years.

Speaker 3 (49:29):
Y'all got new phone, Samsung iPhone, all kinds of stuff.

Speaker 2 (49:31):
Y'all got the smart watches, you all got all kinds
of stuff with lithium batteries in it. Although these apparently
were modified to include some explosives. Still you got to think,
could that be what if you got you have all
these terror What if you have terror cells in the
US and they just want to blow stuff up and
they could I'm just asking a question. That's that's why

(49:53):
the chain of custody for product like that is incredibly important.
Supply chains are incredibly important. Interesting new thing to think about. Goodness. Also,
let's see we were talking about what the Fed did.
We got to get into this thing I want to
coming up because we got Carol Roth on to talk
about the fifty basis points and the Federal Reserve and

(50:13):
all of that we've got to debunk. And I mentioned
this in the newsletter that I sent out this morning
that has all the radio prep on it. This horrible
woman or horrible story from Democrats about a woman who
she passed away after she had taken abortion pills, and
Democrats are trying to say, well, she passed away because

(50:33):
she couldn't get an abortion.

Speaker 3 (50:34):
That's not what happened.

Speaker 2 (50:35):
And we're going to set that record straight coming up
because they're trying to make this a big deal in
these battleground states. So we have a lot to hit
as we move. Brought to you by our friends over
at Patriot Mobile, the only Christian conservative cell phone service
in the country, and Patriot Mobile not only once to
make sure that you can afford your phone service in
this commal economy.

Speaker 3 (50:56):
I had to say that slow. But that also, you're.

Speaker 2 (50:59):
Not going to be taking They're not gonna be taking
your hard earned money and using it on the things
that you vote against. Every time you're at the ballot box,
You're gonna save because they have plans tailored for everybody.
Dinks families of you know what to dink is the
dual income no kids. I just like saying it, dinks
families of all sizes, businesses of all sizes.

Speaker 3 (51:18):
Everybody come and gets your plan. At Patriot Mobile.

Speaker 2 (51:20):
You get free activation using code data, and right now
you get a free month of service as well. Look,
you want to put some momentum behind the stuff that
you're voting to protect this November, Patriot Mobile can help.
It's one of the reasons why I'm proud to partner
with them. Best service in your area. You're saving money
and not funding the left. Visit Patriotmobile dot com, slash
data or call nine seven two Patriot get that free
month of service using offer code data. Don't be fooled

(51:42):
by the others pretending to share your values or have
the same coverage. Switch today nine to seven to two
Patriot Patriotmobile dot com slash data.

Speaker 8 (51:51):
And now all of the news you would probably miss
it's time for Data's quick five.

Speaker 3 (51:57):
So I feel like this is how plagues start.

Speaker 2 (52:00):
So these apparently these researchers, archaeologists, they found a three
thousand year old sword that had the pharaoh's mark on
it in Egypt. Three thousand years ago, a team of archaeologists,
they were digging up an ancient fort and they spotted
a bronze blade in Nile Delta and they claimed it,

(52:21):
and they said it had the intricacies of.

Speaker 16 (52:24):
The ornamental cartouche, the personal emblem used by the pharaohs
still visible. It had not lost its reflective shine. And
they said that they're gonna put it in the museum.
But good night. I just feel like and that how
the mummy comes back. And all that stuff like they found,
like they pulled up.

Speaker 3 (52:40):
I'm just saying it's very pretty.

Speaker 2 (52:42):
But this is where I'd be totally craved out as
an archaeologist, because I read all that stuff about the
guy who the family that owns the house where Downton
Abbey's filmed, that's the family that did like the king
tut stuff, and they said it was the pharaoh's curse
and all this that played. It's fascinating. You should read
about it. And everyone's like, thanks Dana Radio. Our history
is now terrifying. We're so happy. Let's see this Supreme Court.

(53:06):
We're going to talk about this coming up. And Alaska
man was charged with the threatening to assassinate six Supreme
Court justices, which ones all the conservative ones. It was
only the conservative justices and he's been accused of seventy
six year old guy has sent over four hundred and
sixty five messages to them through the online portal. According
to court violings, He's threatened to kill them, kill them,

(53:28):
torture them, hang them, ahead them, execute them, masassinity, all
kinds of stuff, and encouraged other people to join him
in committing acts of violence. So, and it's all he
didn't like their decisions, That's what he said. He disliked
their decisions. And they're all the conservative ones. We're going
to come back to that. Starlink says, the government is
increasingly interfering with astronomy. That dang private sector. How dare

(53:51):
they do that? That's ultimately what I think it comes
down to. Don't you think it's a way for them
to try to dean a private entity. I think so
easy Jet flight may him a back of vapes. I
thought this said vipers at first, and I was like, ooh,
snakes on a plane. Now it's boring. A bag of
apes exploded on a London bound flight and an evacuating
passenger injured themselves on the evacuation slide. I mean, it's

(54:12):
a slide. How you go down it. I didn't even
know how that happens, but you know it did. And
passports now can be renewed online in the United States.
According to the State Department US passports can now be
renewed online adult ones. They're rolling out of system bypassing
the traditional method that requires printing out a form and
mailing a check.

Speaker 3 (54:31):
Coming up. Our friend Carol Roth joins us on.

Speaker 2 (54:34):
What the federal government did yesterday that basis points interest rates.
What does it mean stick with us to our partners
of ready Wise. Speaking of chain of custody for stuff,
you know where your food is coming from when it
where it concerns ready Wise, And I always think it's
really important for things like survival food, right, I mean,
heaven forbid something goes sideways, whether it's a natural disaster

(54:54):
or otherwise. Maybe have a power outage, whatever it is,
having an emergency food that your family can rely on
is incredibly important, and it gives you confidence and you
get security knowing you've got essentials on hand to keep
your family fed and you don't have to worry about
where your meals come from. You don't have to fight
at the stores where the shelves are stripped or any
of that stuff. With writing Wise, they have all kinds

(55:16):
of deals right now, and they have premium survival food
made with one hundred percent US ingredients and it's packed
in a US plant and shipped out from a US plant,
so you know the chain of custody for all your stuff.
Freeze dried, dehydrated, easy to prepare, just had water with
a twenty five year shelf life. They have a buy one,
get one seventy seventy two hour food kit that includes
two boxes twelve pouches of premium survival food over eleven

(55:39):
thousand total calories in each kit, and they also have
fast and free shipping and promo code data twenty at
chekock gets you twenty percent off of any regularly priced item,
So visit readywise dot com in use promo code data
twenty at checkout for twenty percent off any regularly priced
item that's readywiss dot com promo code Data twenty.

Speaker 10 (56:00):
And up your timely news consumption with a Dana Show
podcast where every update comes with a little dash of
not so serious on YouTube, Apple, or wherever you get
your podcasts.

Speaker 15 (56:11):
We're committed to maintaining our economy's strength by supporting maximum
employment and returning inflation to our two percent goal. Today,
the Federal Open Market Committee decided to reduce the degree
of policy restraint by lowering our policy interest rate by
a half percentage point.

Speaker 2 (56:29):
So we were this is Jerome Powell Turre of the FED.
We were talking about this yesterday when it came out
that there was only one on the one on the
board that voted for the twenty five point two five cut,
a more modest cut, and everyone else wanted the half
point And Canaan made the observation that this isn't going

(56:50):
to do anything because you're with what the federal government's
propos Biden Harris Biden is proposing and what the FED
is doing here. This is it's not gonna do anything.
We're gonna stay in the same exact spot that we've
been in this whole time.

Speaker 3 (57:05):
We're gonna dive into this. Welcome back, Dana Lash with
you joining me now.

Speaker 2 (57:09):
She is one of the funnest, coolest people in all
of economics, investment, everything. It's Carol Roth, who has got
the best hair ever, and she's gen x cool.

Speaker 3 (57:18):
She's like she's an og. She's very cool Carol Roth.

Speaker 2 (57:21):
She describes herself as a recovering investment banker. But you
can make sure you get our newsletter over at Carrolroth
dot com slash news because that's where you can go
and get almost as educated as she is on all
this stuff. She breaks it down for you regularly, and
her latest book, You Will Own Nothing, Your War with
a New Financial World Order and How to Fight Back,
should win the scariest book of the decade.

Speaker 3 (57:41):
Carol joins us now via Skype.

Speaker 2 (57:42):
It is terrifying, and I learned a lot of things
that I didn't even know before, and I wish I
didn't know now. But Carol, I wanted to get your
reaction to this because everyone says that this is just
a giant, big gift to Kamala Harris and Democrats right
before the election.

Speaker 3 (57:59):
Is it?

Speaker 17 (58:00):
Do you believe that, well, Dana Jerome Powell is unburdened
by what helped now and that is a rate hike cycle.
We are now in a rate cutting environment. And I
think there are a few things and a few different
ways you can look at it.

Speaker 14 (58:15):
Certainly, the optics.

Speaker 17 (58:17):
Of it right before an election are not what you'd
want to be looking at.

Speaker 14 (58:22):
If you know, if you have.

Speaker 17 (58:23):
All different potential meetings to cut at, waiting till the
one right before the election and then doing a fifty
basis point cut isn't necessarily the greatest optics because then
you have Kamala Harris and all of the people who
are spreading propaganda for her saying, on one hand, oh, well, look,
you know inflation is clearly under control, because otherwise the FED.

Speaker 14 (58:44):
Wouldn't have felt comfortable in cutting fifty bases points. So
there is that optic. There is the other optic.

Speaker 17 (58:51):
Which is, wow, he's saying the economy is so great,
but he's cutting fifty basis points. Maybe it's not as good,
and maybe he is concerned about what she has been
touting in terms of the labor market and the strength
of the economy. So really the narrative could work either way,
And I'm sure if you are on Commonal side, you're

(59:11):
going to interpret it one way.

Speaker 14 (59:13):
If you are on Trump side.

Speaker 17 (59:15):
You are probably going to interpret it the other way.
And my guess is that they have seen some of
the data, probably more than we have seen, and are
worried about what's coming down the pike in terms of
the economy, particularly in terms of the white collar jobs.
We have seen more and more layoffs for the people
who have been propping up the economy, the asset holders,

(59:38):
the people who are wealthy who have the.

Speaker 14 (59:39):
High paying jobs.

Speaker 17 (59:40):
Even a company like Amazon now is mandating five days
back in the office.

Speaker 14 (59:46):
Companies didn't have that kind of leverage before.

Speaker 17 (59:49):
Buried in that release they said we're looking to maybe
get rid of some managers. So I think that all
plays more into the narrative that they are concerned about
being behind the curve and that the economy and particularly
the job's situation could get it away with them. So, yes,
it does seem political, but it could cut either way.

Speaker 2 (01:00:10):
Yeah, it's it's such a shell game, it really is,
because you know, as the job's numbers being revised and
then I think it was what like a million that
were just sort of thick made up from nothing, and
when normally when you would see a ray cut like this,
you would think, oh, everything must be doing going really
well for them to do this. You know, jobs I
guess are being created. You know, there's a lot of

(01:00:31):
people out there that you know, this is our job.
We follow this stuff and so we can we know
the truth of it because this is what we do
day in and day out. But people who are like
you know, working you know, anywhere from eight to twelve
hours a day to makens meet, they can't follow all
of the ins and outs and the slide of hand
that they see Washington do. So they see stuff like
this and then they might think, well, maybe this is
a good sign. Maybe the economy isn't doing as bad.

(01:00:53):
And that's what you would think, except that's not really
what this is signaling. And they're saying too that more
cuts could be coming this year, which makes it even
more confusing. I mean, is that something that we can
bank on?

Speaker 3 (01:01:04):
That's see. That's where I'm like, wait, well then why
just go big or go home? What are you doing?

Speaker 17 (01:01:09):
So all of this is very contextual when you think
about cutting fifty basis points. You know from doing absolutely nothing.
The historically when that has happened is usually when there has.

Speaker 14 (01:01:20):
Been some sort of a crisis.

Speaker 15 (01:01:22):
Right.

Speaker 14 (01:01:22):
We saw this, you know, during COVID.

Speaker 17 (01:01:24):
We saw this during the Great Recession financial crisis, So
it's not actually typically a great signal. That being said,
they have raised very very far, very fast, and I've
been somebody who said that I think that they went
too high. I think that they were behind the curve
in terms of cutting. So I do think it makes
sense for them to cut. The question is, like you said,

(01:01:46):
when do they stop, Because the expectation is that we'll
probably see another two twenty five basis point cuts in
November and December, so that we'll bring it to a
percentage point this year and then maybe another one percent
next year. The challenge is there's something called the neutral rate,
and this is sort of theoretical. This is the line
in the sand between where FED policy goes from being

(01:02:09):
restrictive to accommodative. And they want FED policy theoretically to
have no impact the market, to just do what it's
supposed to be doing, and that is this theoretical neutral rate.
So right now I think we are above that rate,
which is why cutting the rates doesn't become massively inflationary
or anything like that. The challenge is they don't know

(01:02:29):
what that's going to be, and so they keep cutting away,
and at some point they may cut too far, and
that's when you see the tickup of inflation and you
see it becoming more accommodative and creating all of the
backlash and the other direction. So I don't think we're
there yet. I think that this is warranted, although potentially.

Speaker 14 (01:02:49):
Could be a signal that.

Speaker 17 (01:02:51):
We should be paying attention to, But it really is
all about what's coming down the line.

Speaker 14 (01:02:56):
And by the way, Dana, all of.

Speaker 17 (01:02:57):
Us focused on the Fed, which when I start in
investment banking, we never did this. This is a newer
thing that's come out kind of post Great Recession financial crisis,
that we hang on the Feds every word. It really
obfuscates the important issue, which is the massive debt load
that we have and the massive deficits that the governments
are running, the debt to GDP, the deficits to GDP. Yes,

(01:03:22):
the rate cut will hopefully help in terms of financing
that and make it cheaper to finance, which helps a
little bit, but it doesn't solve the bigger issue, and
that is what is underpinning all of this discussion.

Speaker 2 (01:03:34):
That's exactly what I was going to ask you, like
what this means for because we keep hearing about the
housing market and you know, mortgages, and we've got you know,
the promise from Kamala hair it's got a shrinking housing
market and we've got to give everybody twenty five thousand
dollars you know, to buy houses. And then you have
the stories about the automobile loans and how people are defaulting,
and you have repossessions that are that are going through
the roof, and you know it's you and four oh

(01:03:56):
one k and people losing on their savings.

Speaker 3 (01:04:00):
For all of those.

Speaker 2 (01:04:01):
Folks, which is the majority of Americans I think that
are in this crunch, how is this This isn't really
going to improve things for them?

Speaker 17 (01:04:08):
Well, if they have floating rate debt, as interest rates
come down, they will probably see that like interest rate
coming down in their debt. But the reality is it
doesn't change the fact that they are out of runway,
that they have very little savings, that they have historic
levels of debt, and so yes, maybe it gives them
a little breathing room. It's one of the reasons why

(01:04:29):
I don't think this particular FED cut is going to
be inflation area. I don't think that consumers en mass
have this massive ability to take on more debt because
the rates are now lower and they think that it's
a quote unquote bargain, which.

Speaker 14 (01:04:42):
It's still not. But we do.

Speaker 17 (01:04:44):
You have this consumer that is very much constrained and
has been really propped up by government spending and by
the people who are more well off.

Speaker 14 (01:04:54):
And that goes back to the point I made.

Speaker 17 (01:04:56):
Before, is that if we see the cracks around the
white collar jobs that have really been propping up this
idea that there's growth in the economy, then all bets
are off because we know that middle to lower end
consumers struggling and is going to continue to struggle because
prices for them, cost of living remain out of touch.

Speaker 2 (01:05:15):
Talking with our good friend Carol Roth, I wanted to
play for you. This is audio sun by thirty two.
It's one of your favorite people, Janet Yellen, who is
talking about the extension of the Trump tax cuts, which
we're told are very expensive to have tax cuts, and
I know how you feel about that. You almost see
smoke coming out of Carol's ears right now, I want
to play this for you, and I wanted to get

(01:05:37):
your reaction to this. This is Janet Yellen talking about
tax cuts.

Speaker 18 (01:05:41):
So if the entire tax cut is just extended and
nothing is allowed to expire, I believe the Congressional Budget
Office is estimated that over ten years, that would be
almost a five trillion dollar blowed to the overall budget deficit.

(01:06:03):
And honestly, I really believe that something the United States
can't afford.

Speaker 2 (01:06:10):
In all of the discussion that I hear from Yellen,
even Powell, all of the soundbites that we collect and
that we play, not a single one of these people,
Carol talk about the government spending and government spending what
it doesn't have and how that factors into this. So
they're talking about how we can't continue these tax cuts,

(01:06:31):
but what about the level of spending.

Speaker 14 (01:06:34):
I mean, you cannot loan these people enough.

Speaker 17 (01:06:38):
The discourse is so dishonest, and it's one.

Speaker 14 (01:06:41):
Thing if you're ignorant.

Speaker 17 (01:06:42):
It's an entirely different thing if you know better, and
Janet Yellen should know better. So shame on you, Janet Yellen,
once again for saying another ridiculous thing.

Speaker 14 (01:06:50):
First of all Dana.

Speaker 17 (01:06:51):
There's a reason why the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
have not been overturned during the Biden Harris administration, and
that is because the government can tinues to collect more
and more money. They are on track to collect five
trillion dollars this year, which is more than the GDP,
the entire output of every country in the entire world

(01:07:13):
other than the United States and China. So they are collecting,
in terms of taxes from US, more than the output
of Germany or Japan, and it's still not enough for them.
When you lower a tax rate, it doesn't mean you
collect less taxes. They know that very well. So the
idea that you keeping more of your money use it

(01:07:34):
productively give even more back to the government somehow as
creating a.

Speaker 14 (01:07:38):
Deficit is ridiculous.

Speaker 17 (01:07:40):
The fact of the matter is that government spending is
out of control and that they are running deficits at
this point which are double the historic average, and that
is usually done in a time of stress, not in
a time of quote unquote growth.

Speaker 14 (01:07:54):
They have been doing that to prop.

Speaker 17 (01:07:56):
Up the appearance of growth in the economy, and we
are paying the price for that, very very literally, each
in one of every one of us so we need
to continue growth and we need to shrink spending, and
it is the only way we are going to save
the fiscal situation in this country. Otherwise it will go
off that cliff eventually, and it will have implications not

(01:08:17):
just for every one of us in this country, but globally.

Speaker 14 (01:08:20):
It will be a very ugly thing.

Speaker 17 (01:08:22):
And the idea to say that letting people keep more
of their money while they are continuing to collect more
dollars is going to create an issue. You know, they
all deserve to be well. I shouldn't say what they
deserve to because I'll get in trouble. But you can
our favorite thing from a card too.

Speaker 3 (01:08:39):
I can imagine. I can imagine.

Speaker 2 (01:08:40):
Well, said our very good and very smart friend, Carol Roth.
She's the smartest, loveliest person in finance and business in
the economy. She needs to actually be directing economic policy. Really,
I'm just saying for the Republicans that are that are watching.

Speaker 3 (01:08:54):
Always thought you.

Speaker 14 (01:08:55):
I thought you liked to be data.

Speaker 3 (01:08:56):
Oh wait, I wouldn't want to do that to you.

Speaker 2 (01:08:59):
Oh no, we're so glad that we're so glad that
you're on our side.

Speaker 3 (01:09:02):
Really get her book.

Speaker 2 (01:09:03):
You will own nothing It's terrifying and one of the
most educational reads. And make sure you send up for
her newsletterle Carolroth dot com slash news Carol always a pleasure.
Thank you, my friend.

Speaker 14 (01:09:12):
Thanks my friend.

Speaker 4 (01:09:13):
Of course, it's his laugh mission to make bad decisions.
It's time for Florida Man.

Speaker 2 (01:09:24):
A Florida man removed twenty Burmese pythons from the Everglades,
winning a contest. This is actually a big deal down there.
Would it happen because somebody ended up having a pet
at some point they let it go and then the
population just went crazy. This guy, Ronald Kaiger, won ten
thousand dollars in the Florida Python Challenge after the annual
ten day hunt because they are an invasive species that

(01:09:46):
can destabilize the entire ecosystem, and so they had they
have this this challenge that they do every year, and
this guy ended up he tipped the scales this year.
He reached first place by one python. It's a ten
to They have eight hundred people from thirty three states
and they compete for twenty five thousand dollars in prize
money and they have novice, professional, military, different categories and

(01:10:10):
they had in total one hundred and ninety five Burmese
pythons removed from the wild. And that's I mean, that's wild.
They said that the female can lay like fifty to
one hundred eggs at a time. They have to humanly
kill them and then they have to turn their carcasses
into three check in stations. So because they are invasive,
I mean, they will just wreck a whole area.

Speaker 3 (01:10:30):
So wow, this guy, this dad, I mean, would you
do anything different?

Speaker 2 (01:10:35):
Imagine you find it a peeping tom looking into your
daughter's bedroom window. That's what happened to this Fligger County
father of Florida. Dad took matters into his own hands
when he found a peeping tom peering into his daughter's
bedroom window.

Speaker 3 (01:10:53):
The guy camped out.

Speaker 2 (01:10:55):
This guy, the dad, September thirteenth. He had a Louisville
Slugger and a beer, and he camped out in his
backyard waiting for the suspect, who he said had been
terrorizing their neighborhood. He was a peeping tom that's been
going to multiple houses. And he said the daughter saw him.
And then the dad said that he saw the guy
at his daughter's window looking in. He goes, I said

(01:11:16):
a couple of choice words, and when he turned toward me,
I swung the bat. He said he was a pretty
big dude, so I was going for his head and
when I did, he started to run. They have security
footage showing the dad chasing him down, yelling out to
the neighbors to call the cops, and the guy. You
can hear the dad yelling where are you. There's a
lot of explotives, but he goes, where are you going?

(01:11:36):
A boy, come here, I've got something for you. They
find the suspect was caught creeping around multiple neighbors homes,
spying on women and the like on. One guy said
that his wife saw the silhouette of a guy in
her backyard and the porn range just staring at her
and it scared her half to death. And all these
people have been seeing this.

Speaker 3 (01:11:56):
So the they they're they're getting him. This is wild.
They got it. His name is Damian Smith. Golly, what
a devilish name.

Speaker 2 (01:12:04):
He's charged with aggravated stalking voyeurs and prowling eighty six
thousand dollars bond. He had made a bomb threat at
a Flager High school in twenty thirteen, so the sheriff
Rix Daily, Flager County praised the dad for his hands
on approach. He goes, I want to kind of put
a cape on and go find another bad guy. That's
what the dad said. That's awesome. But the guy apparently
he admitted to deputies that he gets a thrill from

(01:12:25):
watching people women, particularly in their homes. This guy sounds
like a serial killer. This David Smith guy. He's twenty
nine years old. He sounds like a serial killer, does
he not? Goh Lee, I swear I've seen this movie.

Speaker 3 (01:12:37):
It's crazy.

Speaker 2 (01:12:39):
Uh and we're almost well, we're out of time. I've
got a couple other ones. I'll share those with you tomorrow.

Speaker 3 (01:12:43):
Coming up. We got a lot of stuff to soak
it into.

Speaker 2 (01:12:45):
The guy who targeted the Supreme Court justice is only
the conservative ones.

Speaker 3 (01:12:49):
We got that coming up as well. Stick with us
third hour on the way, you.

Speaker 19 (01:12:53):
Know, and you know, sometimes i'm mass, well, where is
the policy? We'll go to the website. That's where the
policy is. You know, I had more policy than anybody had.

Speaker 3 (01:13:02):
It was I gave speeches about it. It was on
our website.

Speaker 19 (01:13:06):
I wrote a book with Jim Kaine about it. We
have lots of policy at the end of the day,
that's not what caused people to vote for me or
against me.

Speaker 2 (01:13:16):
No, she kept saying that it was sexism. That's what
did it. Good Heavens, Welcome back to the program. Top
of this third hour, Dana lash with You, and this
going into this the policy, what policy? She didn't really
have a whole hell of a lot, and and all

(01:13:37):
she did was complain about everybody else that was I
don't really consider that something that you can take to
the bank. Top of this third hour, Dana Lash with You.
You can find us a channel thirty forty seven Direct
TV on x The chat is at rumble and we
are also on substack chapter in verse policy one of
the policies.

Speaker 3 (01:13:56):
The only thing that they can focus on on the
left is what is it? Abortion? And taxing the everybody?

Speaker 2 (01:14:03):
Taxing everybody and the earned path to citizenship whatever that
phrase means. I don't know if you've seen this, if
you get this the newsletter, if you're one of the
subscribers that gets the newsletter. This was one of the
things that are that is being discussed, this headline and

(01:14:23):
these accusations.

Speaker 3 (01:14:25):
It's being discussed.

Speaker 2 (01:14:25):
There was this story of this woman, her name is
Amber Thurman, and her story is being weaponized by Democrats
as a way to argue, particularly in Georgia, because they've
been arguing about the six week a ban on abortion
for birth control in Georgia, and Democrats have been trying

(01:14:46):
to make this like a key thing. They think that
this is going to be a wedge that gets those
independents and maybe some of the moderates back. The headline
is Democrats blame abortion bands for Georgia woman's death. And
this is a story Lorraine's kind of written about this
before because this is very similar to some other stories
that they've tried to weaponize. So, this woman, she discovered

(01:15:07):
that she was expecting twins and she sought abortion as
a form of birth control. She was passed the six
week mark, the limitation in her state of Georgia, so
she drove to North Carolina. She took an abortion pill
in North Carolina, and then she took another in Georgia.

Speaker 3 (01:15:28):
And women commonly wind up in.

Speaker 2 (01:15:32):
The hospital because of this because of the complications that
these pills cause. As Thurman discovered, she began vomiting blood
and then she developed sepsis. You know why she developed
sepsis and she waited, and I don't know why she
waited for days before going to the hospital. So by

(01:15:55):
the time she got to the hospital, the hospital due
to medical negligence, and which was they waited to perform
a DNC, which was needed because there was a medical
emergency caused by taking the abortion pills. Now the left,
including Elizabeth Warren, who's repeated this a nauseum, is claiming

(01:16:17):
that she could not that Thurmann could not obtain a
DNC upon admitting herself to the hospital because state law
outlawed them, which was a lie if you get the newsletter.
I actually linked the specific statute in Georgia law that
explicitly allows for those for dncs as a treatment following
a miscarriage. It's not to be used to take a life,

(01:16:40):
but it's completely commented for use for treatment for miscarriage.
That's I can't even believe that someone would actually make
that statement with a straight face, because that's not true
in any state, and it's especially not true in Georgia.
So the reason that this woman ended up losing her

(01:17:00):
life was because she took these pills and then she
waited to go to the hospital, and then there's negligence
on for whatever reason on the part of the staff,
because the law is that the laws, you know, it
explicitly states that they can't do that, and they're trying
to say that, oh, you know, we couldn't because it

(01:17:20):
was at that point she had already miscarried. That's why
she was developing sepsis. This wasn't using a DNC to
perform an abortion, it was to treat following a miscarriage.
So these doctors are any doctor that's saying otherwise, and
they are always these super far left pro abortionists, and
they're all for abortions as birth controlled. They're the ones

(01:17:43):
who are they And the politicians pushing this narrative want
you to They want to convince stupid people who don't
know human biology nor these processes or how the human
body works. They think that those people will believe this
stuff if they claim it, I mean really more and more.
And one of the things that Loraina had noted in

(01:18:04):
some of the pieces that she had written about this
is that they will gamble with women's lives to score
political points.

Speaker 3 (01:18:12):
Like with this.

Speaker 2 (01:18:13):
I mean, there's a reason why these pills come with
a lot of caution attached because the complications can be severe.
And she began developing these symptoms like almost immediately, according
to the court documents, and so she waited for days
before going in this had she didn't die because she
was denied an abortion. She died because she took an

(01:18:34):
abortion pills. She legally acquired abortion pills. None of this.
She didn't do anything illegally. She legally went and got
abortion pills, and she began her body began rejecting her twins.
Then she developed sepsis, she's vomiting blood. She waited for
days before she went to the hospital. So none of

(01:18:54):
this was because she was denied an abortion. It sounded
like she was reckless and irresponsible in terms of taking
abortion pills and then not getting medical care immediately and
then for whatever part in medical negligence apparently played. But
to falsely to try to weaponize this, because there's three
lives involved, not just one, to try to say that, oh, well,
this is because abortion. That's not even that's the dumbest

(01:19:16):
and most maliciously incorrect thing.

Speaker 3 (01:19:20):
That's a lie.

Speaker 2 (01:19:21):
It is a malicious, hateful lie, and it ignores that
three lives were lost so that people could make a
point on abortion.

Speaker 3 (01:19:26):
It's sad.

Speaker 2 (01:19:27):
But the left, I mean, it's like they know no bounds. Honestly,
if you want to if you want to say, well,
if you want to go after the hospital for negligence
or uh whatever for that reason, then that's a completely
legitimate thing to make because at that point she was
having a miscarriage. She had had a miscarriage, her body
was poisoning itself, she was in sepsis. She didn't go
into sepsis for no good reason. There's a reason she

(01:19:48):
went into sepsis. So that's and the law explicitly allows
and again I'll pull it up even it's the uh,
it's the title SI sixteen and it gets into sub
section sixteen to eleven and this was actually codified in
twenty three, where they I mean, there's nothing that, there's

(01:20:09):
no gray areas here, and it gets into exactly what
is allowed and the DNC as a treatment fall into
miscarriage is completely protected, which is exactly what was happening here.
So don't let them lie to you about this stuff
to weaponize it.

Speaker 3 (01:20:20):
It's so lame.

Speaker 2 (01:20:22):
This is you know, the the left needs to think
of their language because it's getting it's going to get
people killed and here. Within the same week that we
had the news of a second attempt on the former
president's life, now we have the news of with the
Supreme Court. This is insane as well. This guy from
Alaska has been charged with threatening to kill six Supreme

(01:20:43):
Court justices. He was arrested yesterday for allegedly threatening to
kill six members of them. This seventy six year old
He sent over four hundred and sixty five messages to
the Supreme Court through an online portal, and they, I mean,
it was pretty bad stuff. He threaten to kill them,
torture them, kidnap them, hang them, but had them execute them,
all kinds of stuff. It was encouraging other people to

(01:21:05):
join in. He faces nine counts of making threats against
a federal judge, thirteen counts of making threats in interstate commerce,
and he pled not guilty. And the reason that he
did it, he says, is because he was disagreeing with
their decisions. And interestingly, it was literally all the conservative justices. Hm,

(01:21:26):
conservative justices imagine that. Huh, that's kind of wild?

Speaker 3 (01:21:32):
Is it not.

Speaker 2 (01:21:34):
All that they just happened to be one political ideology?

Speaker 4 (01:21:38):
Yeah, but the right is a threat to democracy. They're
a danger, Okay.

Speaker 2 (01:21:44):
He was saying that he wanted to hang one justice
from an oak tree and that yea yeah, and said
that he would.

Speaker 3 (01:21:55):
Gladly provide the rope.

Speaker 2 (01:21:57):
And he was referring to the former president as a
quote convicted criminal. And he was also using racial slurs
towards one justice. I wonder who that justice was, and
saying that he was protecting the convicted criminal. I wonder

(01:22:17):
what justice that was? Conservative. Yeah, So of course this
guy is like this is just left.

Speaker 3 (01:22:24):
He through and through.

Speaker 2 (01:22:25):
He had over eighty donations going back to twenty sixteen
through Act Blue, according to an investigation in Red State
has a link to that. So just saying at some point,
there is no both sides of this. It's all coming
from one side, and it's all directed to one side.

(01:22:48):
This is how it's been I mean from I don't
know if it's ever. I've never seen both sides when
people try to both sides that. I've never seen it
coming from the right. I have not seen it coming
from the right. King, correct me if I'm wrong. I've
not seen it. Whether it was Occupy Wall Street, going
back to the Weatherman in the sixties, Occupy Wall Street BLM,
this stuff, trans Tifa, Antifa, all of it. I've never

(01:23:09):
seen it. It's all been the violence that everything has
been from one side.

Speaker 4 (01:23:12):
I've seen when the media immediately comes out after these
events and say that it's somebody from the right, that's
somebody that supports Trump or somebody that whatever. But then
later when the actual truth comes out to see this
is the thing. The lie travels around the world twice
before the truth gets its pants on, and that's how
they always get away with them.

Speaker 2 (01:23:31):
I mean, the Nashville killer and that school trans Tifa
from the left. I mean when you look at the
past killers, they're from the left. When you look at
the first guy who in Butler County, Pennsylvania, who shot
Trump in the head, that guy lefty. According to the
online activity, et cetera. This guy lefty. The Alaskan guy

(01:23:54):
with the Supreme Court justice is lefty. The guy who
was going to kill Breck havanall the Alasco after Chuck
Schumer was out in front of the Supreme Court Saint
Brett Cavanaugh and yelling and talking about how the justices
were going to pay that.

Speaker 3 (01:24:06):
Guy was a lefty. I mean, at what point are
we is the left going to go.

Speaker 2 (01:24:10):
Maybe we should, I don't know, stop inspiring our nut
jobs to go and try to murder people on the right.

Speaker 3 (01:24:18):
How often is this?

Speaker 2 (01:24:20):
I mean, good heavens and then they they act as
though they project and say that this is oh, well,
you know Trump's remarks here, Trump's remarks there. I'm just
so tired of it. I am so tired of it.
That's all we've been hearing in California Newsome is basically, well,
he's banning parody. We mentioned this a little bit yesterday.
He signed this ban against political deep fakes. The issue

(01:24:43):
is that it was this bill pertaining to AI, and
he was pretending that he was signing it for the
protection of Hollywood actors and voiceover artists and things like that,
which I do think for that industry. There you could say,
will negotiate in your contract, and that's true, but you
have to realize a lot of these people, they'll sign

(01:25:04):
four to six year contracts in the entertainment industry, and
in that timeframe, you know, you have all of these uh,
all of the software et cetera with AI that that
develops and is released and is put into use before
they're able to renegotiate their contract. So in those instances,
I do understand having to the requirement to have the

(01:25:26):
state legislature act on something. I do understand that because
it's new tech, and if your contract isn't up for negotiation,
you're it's not something that you can foresee because nobody
knows when the timeline of what software is going to
be released, et cetera.

Speaker 3 (01:25:41):
He was he's trying.

Speaker 2 (01:25:42):
To use that as like a Mott Bailey like, oh, well,
this is good, like this is this is really what
I'm doing. But really he's like, we've got to ban
deep fakes and we've got a band. But he's not
talking about defakes. He's talking about parity. He was using
as an example when he was tweeting a parody videos
of that clearly are fake of Kamal here as being
goofy or whatever, and then it's being shared politically and

(01:26:03):
he gets mad at it and acts like he's got
to go in and save the day, et cetera, et cetera.
But you can't just I mean, AI, the power of
it is an issue, but using that as a front
to do what you really want to do, which is
to ban one of the most stinging forms and most
effective forms of dissent, which is parody and ridicule. That's

(01:26:26):
not the way to do it, not the way to
do it. We got more in store, We've got headlines
coming up. And then while we're dealing with all of
our open borders and everything here in the United States,
some of these European nations are actually doing a one eighty.
So what does that mean for the EU? And is
that I mean, are we going to have some of
that here?

Speaker 3 (01:26:46):
Like, what's what's up?

Speaker 2 (01:26:47):
We're going to talk with the guy Matt Moers with
the Eous Form about that.

Speaker 8 (01:26:51):
And now all of the news you would probably miss.
It's time for Dana's Quick five.

Speaker 2 (01:26:57):
So there's panic over new Do you chat GPT that
reasons as experts are warning of terror AI raids that
can steal cash from huge numbers of victims. So AI
that thinks, I'm telling you this is and they're taking
up jobs. AI is taking people's jobs.

Speaker 3 (01:27:17):
It's a scary thing. Uh this, let's see. I don't
follow this mister beast guy. Do you follow him? I've
heard some pretty bad.

Speaker 4 (01:27:26):
Watch his videos. Actually all the time.

Speaker 3 (01:27:28):
I've heard some really bad stuff though.

Speaker 4 (01:27:30):
Yeah, I have two like really bad stuff, and some
of that's already pretty much all played out, but I
think this is all residual stuff here.

Speaker 2 (01:27:36):
Yeah, he's facing a class action lawsuit over a lleged
mistreatment of contestants on his reality television show. And because
he's had a guy who wasn't one of his guys,
like a like considered.

Speaker 3 (01:27:48):
A groomer or something like that, he was trans yeah, but.

Speaker 20 (01:27:51):
Also there behavior.

Speaker 3 (01:27:54):
Behavior.

Speaker 2 (01:27:55):
Yeah, so a class action lawsuit was apparently filed against him.
Concept quench, your website is garbage, by the way. You
need to stop all your crappy pop up ads because
you're not even a good enough website to arrest people's
browsers with these type of pop up ads. And the
class action lawsuit filed against Amazon and YouTube mister b
s leedging severe mistreatment. Let's see la la la la.

(01:28:17):
I mean, I just I just think that with all
the guy's baggage, why would anybody want to have anything
to do with them at this point?

Speaker 3 (01:28:25):
Why? I mean you just why, I don't know why.
It's just this dumb.

Speaker 2 (01:28:29):
Also, let's see here everything's frozen because the consequence website
is so bad it froze everything, horrible website, just garbage.

Speaker 9 (01:28:37):
This.

Speaker 2 (01:28:37):
Uh San Francisco cops are using a stunt to capture
lawbreakers an inflatable chicken costume. In San Francisco, I think
you probably it'd be too dangerous to do it. And
in Ohio, Springfield, Ohio, I think, but yeah, they're using
it to navigate crosswalks.

Speaker 10 (01:28:53):
Stick with Us the Danish your podcast You're fast, funny
and informative news companion for those always on the move.
Subscribe on YouTube, Apple or wherever you get your podcasts.

Speaker 3 (01:29:08):
So JD.

Speaker 2 (01:29:09):
Vans is apparently going to be speaking about immigration in
uh Well, I think he was talking about he's going
to go to Wisconsin, and then there's discussion of whether
or not he would go to Springfield, Ohio to talk
about it. And it's not just here in the United
States that we're having to worry about issues, whether it's
at the southern border, whether it's that Temporary Protected Status
program through which you know they you have the Biden

(01:29:31):
Harris Harris Biden administration bringing in people without documentation, without
any kind of vetting and dropping them in these Midwestern towns.
This is an issue, and we've talked about this that
we're we've been seeing play out in the EU and
EU nations and I've been stunned at some of what
I've seen. So I just saw this headline was three
days ago. Starmer, who is the new Prime minister over

(01:29:53):
in Britain, is looking to Italy on how to stop
migrant boats or boats of illegal immigrants. Germany, we had
this story, we talked about this last week. Notified the
European Union that they're going to bring in controls on
all land borders and this apparently infuriated the European Union
and they were worried about their free movement principle. What

(01:30:15):
is happening and there are more nations to come, and
so for this, for some insight on this, I wanted
to bring in our friend Matt Maers. He is a
founding board member of the EU US Forum and he
worked with the Trump administration as well. He joins US
now via Skype. Matt, it's good to see you. Thank
you so much for joining us. What is happening here?
I mean, Kirs Starmer, he's very very far left, very

(01:30:38):
very open borders. I mean from everything that he said
that I've read, like his transcripts of his remarks and
things like that. Now they're looking to Italy very i
mean for Europe, very conservative Italy for how to deal
with this what's happening.

Speaker 6 (01:30:52):
Well, it just goes to show you that these folks
have been so asleep or have been so wrong for
so long they had to do something, and they're living
the impact.

Speaker 20 (01:31:02):
Of it every single day right now. I mean, you had.

Speaker 6 (01:31:04):
Had folks in the European Union and in the UK
for a generation now saying we have to have open borders,
we have to have everyone welcome. It's the same type
of language that you heard from the left here in
the United States. And yet what they weren't thinking about
was the fact that if you do that, if you
implement those policies, not only are you going to have
economic repercussions, but you're gonna have safety issues.

Speaker 20 (01:31:25):
And we see that. I mean, you brought up Germany.

Speaker 6 (01:31:27):
Right now, forty percent or so crimes committed in Germany,
violent crimes are being committed by someone who's not Germany,
someone who migrat there legally or illegally, with one or
the other. And so what you are seeing right now
is the real life repercussions of that. And so even
the left wing is recognizing that they have a problem
on their hands. And even if they don't believe that

(01:31:49):
they need to change the policy, they recognize they have
a political problem on their hands. And that's what I
think the biggest issue is. I mean, we did a
poll in junior, so just before the EU elections, and
we showed that over seventy percent of residents voters and
a lot of the key countries that we were pulling
wanted stronger immigration controls seventy percent.

Speaker 20 (01:32:08):
And you can't get anyone to agree on that something
like that that much in the United States, and.

Speaker 6 (01:32:12):
Yet in Europe it's been so bad and so problematic
that they actually come around to it. And so there's
one lesson from those EU elections, or it's one lesson
that even is coming from the UK elections because the
quote unquote conservatives in the UK were not really doing
much on this issue, is that you know, they needed
to actually take new actions. And that's where you're seeing
Starmer take the position he is, and as the reason

(01:32:34):
you're beginning to see even some folks in the European
Union wake up and recognize.

Speaker 20 (01:32:37):
They have to change into right.

Speaker 3 (01:32:39):
And for Starmer, with the UK.

Speaker 2 (01:32:40):
I mean, this was the guy who was against Brexit,
and one of the reasons why they wanted to leave
the EUS. They wanted to have one of the many
reasons they wanted to have greater control over their borders.

Speaker 3 (01:32:49):
Germany part of the EU.

Speaker 2 (01:32:50):
They tell the country's interior minister informs the European Union
that they would like to bring in more restrictive controls.
And the way that I understand that matt is part
of the EU and I know the that they're part
of the agreement with these I think out of the
twenty seven member nations, there was only two like Ireland,
I think in Cyprus that that don't go along with
I think the Shang agreement. But they're informing the European
Union that they we have an emergency. We're invoking the

(01:33:13):
emergency clause here and the headline and I have this
is a different headline. These are all British and German publications.

Speaker 3 (01:33:21):
It was described as fury, Europe's fury, as Germany titans
its borders. Now the addendum to this is that all
of the neighboring countries, who are also all EU nations,
are saying we're not going to take no, we're not
going to take these people in if Germany rejects them.
How so, what does this do to the agreement that
they had, the Free Movement Agreement, the Shangan Agreement. What

(01:33:43):
does this due to.

Speaker 2 (01:33:44):
The eusability their influence and strength if one country after
another is going to start saying no, we're invoking this
emergency clause.

Speaker 5 (01:33:52):
Yeah, I know.

Speaker 6 (01:33:53):
It's the biggest political problem for Brussels that they've probably
seen since they since prested. As you now have these
countries that are saying we can't take it anymore. I
mean Germany for example, you just talked on I just
mentioned the statistic that forty percent of crime is migrat
is committed by migrantes. You know, they're living the challenges
of this. And here's what's so frustrating in so many countries.

(01:34:15):
You know, it's a lot like the United States, a
lot of folks are coming in from Eastern and Eastern Europe.
They're coming to Southern Europe. It's why you've seen Italy
respond the way they have. That's why you've seen Hungary
respond the way they have, like Poland's responded the way
they have. Germany now responding, and it's because they're saying
we are on the front lines of this. I mean,
it's a lot like I can go back a few

(01:34:35):
years ago what happened in Texas and Florida when you
had Governor Abbott and you had Governor Desantas saying, this
is not just a Texas in Florida challenge anymore. This
is a national problem. We cannot come up with the housing,
the education costs, the healthcare costs, handle the you know,
the community safety, the law enforcement necessary to have policing

(01:34:56):
if we have this massive influx and handle it ourselves.
Germany is doing the exact same thing, crying out for
help right now. And what you've seen is because of
the results of the EU elections, you saw conservative parties
gained seats, you saw a collapse of support for the
Green parties and a lot of the left wing parties
in June. And so these are political leaders finally responding saying,

(01:35:17):
our people are crying out for help.

Speaker 20 (01:35:19):
We've gotten out cry to Brussels.

Speaker 6 (01:35:21):
The problem is Brussels is ignoring them. They kind of
continue to turn up their nose and say, you know what,
we'll just overpower your decision making. We're going to actually
determine what makes the most sense for all of us.
And not only that, but you saw Brussels after the
EU elections refuse to hold themselves accountable. So despite this
ascended conservative number of members going to the EU Parliament,

(01:35:45):
you actually had the same exact government coalition that you
did before. They didn't learn a single damn lesson. They
kept doing the exact same thing. And it's voters are
left saying, you know, what.

Speaker 20 (01:35:55):
Option do we have right now?

Speaker 6 (01:35:56):
And that's why you see some of the outcrying places
like Germany and certainly Hungary.

Speaker 2 (01:36:00):
Yeah, speaking of which, we're talking with Matt Mauers, who's
a founding board member of the EU US Forum, who's
been watching this growth, this explosion of conservatism and all
of these, you know, nations that are considered our allies.
And I always consider, you know, national security health to
also be measured by the health of your allies.

Speaker 3 (01:36:16):
You mentioned Hungary.

Speaker 2 (01:36:17):
So Hungary was going to send buses of illegal immigrants
to Belgian Belgium's capital, the Belgian capital now, and I
was looking at this guy's name, the Belgian Prime minister,
and you know, I know what I know about, you know,
the the the political affiliation of a number of European politicians.
This guy, though, I immediately remembered why I knew him.

(01:36:40):
He was the mayor when there was the Conservative conference
in Belgium. He was the mayor in Brussels who was
threatening to shut down free speech and to shut down
a conservative conference because it was conservative and they sent,
I mean police out correct me if I'm wrong on that.
So now he says, no, if you send ifhungry sends

(01:37:00):
buses of illegal immigrants, and we're going to turn them
right back around. We're going to block them. But I
thought this guy was like the open borders. If you
don't agree with me, I'm going to shut everything down.

Speaker 3 (01:37:09):
Guy, what happened?

Speaker 20 (01:37:10):
That's exactly right, the exact same guy. I think the
last one was on your show probably even was.

Speaker 6 (01:37:14):
We're talking about that exact moment when you had this
the Mara Brussels fullyp close go and start trying to
shut down any sort of free speech because he said,
well it could be dangerous rhetoric. You know, he was
gonna be the police speech. Fortunately, I think by the
time we even talked, the National Supreme Court stepped in
said wait a second, like we're they're.

Speaker 20 (01:37:34):
Actually one of the few.

Speaker 3 (01:37:35):
Here's the day after. Yeah, yeah, that's right.

Speaker 6 (01:37:37):
And they're one of the few countries that actually has
protection of free speech. Many European countries really don't that.
They're actually one of the few that does. And the
court said you can't do that, and so they let
the conference move on. But yes, same exact dopey mare.
And now the guys out there saying that if Hungary,
you know, Hungary is seeing a surge of quotus people

(01:37:58):
claiming asylum, folks are trying across order legally, whole hosts,
different folks, and they're saying the exact same thing that
Texas supported did, which is just because we're on the border.

Speaker 20 (01:38:06):
If we're going to claim.

Speaker 6 (01:38:07):
This is a continental EU problem, it's got to be
a total contental EU solution. So we can't absorb every
person who wants to just come across the border.

Speaker 20 (01:38:16):
You have to want you wanted to have this open
arm policy.

Speaker 6 (01:38:19):
You want to say everyone is accepted, doesn't matter you
know who you are, what your background is, or you
know what affiliation you may have with some sort of
crime network or the rest of it. You want to
do at vetting and fine, we will send them to Brussels.
And you've got this mayor now saying he won't have it.
It's just the same exact hypocrisy we saw when you
had a bunch of these you know, liberals in Martha's

(01:38:40):
vineyards saying, well, wait a second, we were we were
we had that position when it affected you know, the
borders on the border communities, when it was you know,
a someone dying in a on a ranch in Texas
every single day. But when it's an hour, you know,
ten million dollar vineyard, it's going to be a bit
of a you know, we have a bigger issue with it,
same exact type of elitism that we're seeing right now

(01:39:02):
out of the Mara Brussels.

Speaker 20 (01:39:03):
And you know, voters are just scay fed up with this.

Speaker 6 (01:39:07):
I mean they're fed up in Europe with it, they're
fed up in the United States with it, and they
recognize that we need to have stronger border controls to
ensure the security that we should all expect in our nations.

Speaker 3 (01:39:18):
Yeah, and we're talking with Matt Maers with this too.

Speaker 2 (01:39:23):
This to me, I look at it like as another
crack in this like very impractical, super ridiculously kittens and
sunshine idealistic goal that the EU had with the free
movement and let's just have unchecked, unfettered access for everybody
all throughout all of these nations. Well, now they're seeing
the consequence of that. What is their hesitancy at maybe

(01:39:44):
restoring some of these you know, border protections without having
to invoke emergency clauses. I mean, these sovereign nations have
the right to do that. Are they just trying to
be as influential as the United States and blocking everybody together.
I'm just trying to figure out, you know, the machination.

Speaker 20 (01:39:58):
Of this, well a part of its liisa.

Speaker 6 (01:39:59):
I'm so that that Mayor merrit Close actually went out
and said, well, Hungary is a small nation. We will
be able to squash them with the power of Brussels.
I mean, like he literally says the quiet part out
laughed right like that that one is supposed to be,
you know, something that they snicker about and close some
the doors and smoke filled rooms. They're now saying it

(01:40:20):
out in the open. And and that's the problem right now.
So you've got certain countries that are saying we are
on the front lines, we're on the border.

Speaker 20 (01:40:28):
We're trying to actually handle these issues.

Speaker 6 (01:40:30):
We need your help because all the agreements you just
spoke about, and you're seeing ignorance coming from Brussels and
both Brussels, obviously the merrit Brussels, but also the leadership
of the EU Parliament in Brussels, who continue to ignore
this issue, who despite the elections in June, aren't willing
to show any sort of connectivity to the people by
changing the political leadership, and they continue to ignore this issue,

(01:40:53):
or they put out a few vaguely worded talking points
that don't actually make any significant policy changes. I mean
that's I actually had a meeting with someone from one
of our allied countries who worked in the foreign ministry,
and it was right before the EU elections, and I
said to him, what's going to change when Conservatives went
on immigration? And I said, and he acknowledged that they'd

(01:41:15):
gone it wrong.

Speaker 20 (01:41:16):
There's credit. This guy actually said, we got it wrong.

Speaker 6 (01:41:18):
We thought we had to tell everyone they could be
open and welcome and the rest of it. It was
a good thing to do. We didn't recognize the problems
of it. So I said, what are you going to do?
He says, we don't know, Like it was honest they
had not even thought about what they were going to
change on it.

Speaker 20 (01:41:32):
Now.

Speaker 6 (01:41:32):
Others do believe there will at some point be enforcement
of borders, but it's going because of the way the
EU is constant of the European Commission and everything else.
It's going to come down to those individual leaders of
individual countries to truly make that type of change. You're
not seeing it out of the European Union Parliament right now.

Speaker 3 (01:41:47):
Last question for you, will they have to leave the
EU to make that happen?

Speaker 6 (01:41:51):
You know, I don't think they have to, so as
long as that the countries are affected and make sure,
you know, the leadership in Germany and Poland and Hungary
and Italy get together and actually force the European Union
to make the changes.

Speaker 20 (01:42:05):
A lot of change can.

Speaker 6 (01:42:06):
Happen on a policy level of the European Union when
the individual leadership of those countries who make up the
leadership in the EU can actually get together and make
policy change. You can go through the EU Parliament. That's important,
but it's a cumbersome process. It's a large body. It
doesn't always want to do anything to change. As we
saw in June, the individual leaders of the countries who

(01:42:27):
are going to be responsive to the individual citizens of
their countries can get together and make a change if
they're willing to stand.

Speaker 14 (01:42:32):
Up and do it.

Speaker 2 (01:42:33):
This is fascinating to watch because it seems as though
they're going the way that the United States needs to
go in terms of securing the border, and we have
a party here that doesn't. The government in charge it
doesn't want to do that doesn't whether it's the northern border,
the southern border, or all the other ports of entry.
Through these programs, Matt mowers with the eu US Forum.
You can find them also on x and keep and

(01:42:55):
stay up to date as always.

Speaker 3 (01:42:57):
Good to see you. Thanks so much for question. I
appreciate of course.

Speaker 10 (01:43:00):
Subscribe to the Dana Show podcast because who says you
can't make fun of people while staying informed on your
own personal time. Subscribe on YouTube, Apple or wherever you
get your podcast.

Speaker 3 (01:43:11):
What's your most important issue.

Speaker 4 (01:43:13):
Is the economy?

Speaker 8 (01:43:14):
Getting interestraates down, getting it what we can afford to
live in America right now?

Speaker 4 (01:43:19):
It's it's too expensive.

Speaker 18 (01:43:21):
Okay, now let me maybe ask for like a slightly
imp that question.

Speaker 3 (01:43:25):
Oh but you know, if he could afford a boat,
you're not.

Speaker 18 (01:43:29):
Hurt it, so bad, right, because a boat costs a
lot of money and it's a lot.

Speaker 3 (01:43:32):
Of upkeep listen.

Speaker 4 (01:43:34):
Nobody gave me.

Speaker 3 (01:43:36):
Wow. Then we had to draw.

Speaker 2 (01:43:38):
I mean, if I were if I was going to
zoomer talk this, how would I do it?

Speaker 3 (01:43:43):
Batty boss with a beer and no shirt?

Speaker 2 (01:43:45):
Batty boss with a beer and no shirt like that
guy right, he's uh. I mean that's it doesn't get
any more boss than that. He's out there with a
red solo cup a beer. He's bruskie and he's got
his boat and she's like like, well, you know you
got a boat. I mean they act like it's a yacht.
He's got a nice boat. It's not like a yeah,

(01:44:06):
come on.

Speaker 4 (01:44:07):
Try to demonize the flotilla that's in support of Trump.
And this is the best media effort.

Speaker 2 (01:44:13):
This is why I would actually want. I don't live
by the sea, and I'm a little scared of the
gator thing, but I kind of want to be able
to do I love the idea of doing a boat parade.
I have I've only done canoes and like little John boats.
Pretty sure I could drive this like a boat like this,
and by that I mean I probably couldn't. And you

(01:44:34):
should be terrified, but I'd like to try so. I'm
just saying because that would be fun. Right, all right,
I'm eating up Kene's time. Today's stupidity.

Speaker 4 (01:44:41):
All right, well this is more of a lie than stupid.
But let's hear it.

Speaker 20 (01:44:46):
By the way, I've never once spoken to the chairman FED.

Speaker 4 (01:44:51):
Okay, he's making a point that the FED should be independent.
But it's like no, but here's him talking to Paul
so clearly lying.

Speaker 3 (01:45:02):
He doesn't never talked to Pamela before.

Speaker 2 (01:45:04):
Apparently he was told that that guy was Yeah, yeah, golly,
he was told that that guy was his new vice president.
I bet who knows? Folks that does it for us today?
Find us over at substrack, chapter and verse. Have a
great night. Back with you, Frye tomorrow

All Episodes

Thursday September 19 - Full Show

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Thursday September 19 - Full Show