Trump’s MSG Rally Rocks NYC, The Left’s Meltdown, and Kamala’s 100-Day Plans

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is the Dana Show. My name is Craig Collins,
filling in, thrilled to be with you. Bunch of stuff
to talk about on a Monday. One of the bigger things, though,
of course, is the hate rally that everyone claims that
Donald Trump threw at Madison Square Garden. Okay, a couple
things actually. First, I'm really impressed that that many people
showed up in New York City, because I don't know when,

(00:21):
and it isn't recent. It's been a while that we've
known that Trump has this kind of pull in in
New York. But I know at some point in the
past people would have doubted that he could fill a
Madison Square garden, and not because of his popularity throughout
the country, because of his popularity in New York City,
where a whole bunch of jurors were found that could
convict him of all kinds of crazy stuff. But nonetheless,

(00:43):
as I say that things went pretty well, there was
one other report all over social media before I hit
play on this nuts AOC audio, but there was a
report that the concession stands stayed closed until Trump took
the stage, which is insane. Most people should understand that
that is a very strategic move. If it did happen,

(01:06):
I can't totally confirm that, but it seems that it did.
There's a bunch of people that were saying that and
showing closed concession stands. But nonetheless, as I say that,
the crazy thing about this is that, of course it
makes it look like people are leaving. And that's part
of the democratic narrative. Now, but let's go ahead and
pit play on MSNBC asking Alexandria Ocassio Cortes all about

(01:28):
the hate rally in New York City.

Speaker 2 (01:31):
So, Congressman, last night, right here in New York City,
your hometown, Donald Trump held a packed rally at Masasbuare
Garden and a number of speakers used downright racist and
offensive language, no more so than the so called comedian
who said that Puerto Rico was an island of garbage.
Can you just give us your reaction to what you

(01:51):
heard last night, just hours and hours of frankly hate
and what, frankly, how it could electrify this electorate.

Speaker 3 (01:58):
Well, there's a couple of things.

Speaker 1 (02:00):
Old on IOC I don't care. I'm going to jump
in for a sec. What I love about that question?
And you probably noticed it as I played it is
it ignores any version of anything that was said that
wasn't categorized as hate by MSNBC. They essentially said that
every moment, every second, it was spewing hatred. The attempt
to continue to try to demonstrate that Trump is Hitler

(02:24):
or Trump is whoever you want him to be on
the left is disgusting and it's gotten to a point
where it's almost desperate in how they're doing it. But
they claim that the Madison Square Garden, New York City
version of a rally was horrible and terrible, and everything
said was the worst thing you've ever heard out of
any human being in the history of our country. Right now,

(02:46):
go ahead, AOC, what do you.

Speaker 3 (02:47):
Think this was not? This was a hate rally. This
was not just a presidential rally. This was also not
just a campaign rally. I think it's very important for
people to understand that these are many January sixth rallies.
These are many Stop the Steel rallies. These are rallies
to climb an electorate into rejecting the results of an

(03:10):
election if it doesn't go the way that they.

Speaker 1 (03:11):
Want, because hurt everybody.

Speaker 3 (03:14):
Donald Trump and that entire cadre of people up on
that stage, Stephen Miller, etc. Do not respect the law
of these.

Speaker 1 (03:24):
They hate you, or they hate somebody, or something's going on.
I don't even know what it is. This is amazing.
I'll play for you moments of the rally as we
go through today, and I promise that it's not going
to be anything like what you're hearing. The description is
on the left. But this is the only way they
believe they can win. You know that, I know that
everyone seems to know that, even the Democrats know that

(03:47):
in how they approach these topics, they can win by
telling you what their platforms are, if they'll be good
for you or for us, or for anyone, because they won't.
And we know that you don't even have the ability
if you're Kamala Harris. As amazing as this is to
say out loud that Biden has done a bad job,
because she should be able to say that. Excuse me

(04:09):
if she's actually going to run on the turn the
page narrative. The let's go ahead and move on to
this other place. And by the way, Michelle Obama was
out there saying certain things. Got to stop talking right now.
Michelle Obama is out there doing her thing and saying
once again that we might miss our opportunity to not

(04:30):
turn the page. What if so many Americans are just
horrified with how bad things went for the last few years.
What if it has very little to do with Trump?
And I'm not saying that, although I do believe there
are voters that actually would fall under that category, that
they're voting against the policies of the last few years
as opposed to in favor of the current candidate. I

(04:52):
don't know how many people that would be, but I'm
saying they exist. And what's funny is Democrats obliterate the
notion that could even be a possibility that they couldn't
have possibly failed this bad because the way they behave
to not even tell you what they're going to do
is arrogant. It's it's as if, of course, we're going
to do a good job if you give us a chance.

(05:14):
How dare anybody say anything else? Oh and by the way,
I guess this last thing I can say on this,
the poll numbers. They're right now very much in benefit
of Donald Trump. MSNBC has reported on this, many other
organizations have that polls continue to creep closer and closer
to not even being a fifty to fifty. But a

(05:35):
Trump is beating Harris version of a demonstration in swing states,
in a bunch of places. And what's significant about that
is Trump always outdes his poll numbers. It doesn't matter
necessarily in my opinion what the polls say going in,
and certainly in Trump's opinion and a lot of other
people's opinion. And there's some audio we can play from

(05:57):
at some point, we'll play from his interview and down
on Joe Rogan's show. But there were so many moments
where Trump seems to demonstrate to a whole lot of
people that he's different than whatever the narrative or the
things they're saying about him are. And then the only
thing that the Democrats have is to continue to go
the other way. It's just it's amusing at this point.

(06:17):
It doesn't have to be something that amuses everyone, but
it amuses me at very least. All Right, you know what,
I'll play a little bit of Trump audio and then
we'll go ahead and move on from that, because I
do want to play at least this and I'm.

Speaker 4 (06:29):
Here by calling for the death penalty for any migrant
that kills an American citizen or a law inforce officer.

Speaker 1 (06:41):
Okay, now I want to stop that right there. There
was a time in our society, because this is probably
one of the only moments where people are going to say,
see how much hate this is, See how horrible and
terrible this is. There was a time in our society
where being pro cop was normal, and if someone hurt
a cop, if someone took a cop life, if a
bad guy did that, the world in which we live,

(07:03):
in the country in which we have, would rally together
and say how wrong and disgusting that is. It still
happens within certain communities, but it's no longer a thing
that exists within the totality of our country. So when
Trump starts his statement by saying that he would hurt
or fight for the death penalty for people who took

(07:25):
the lives of our police officers, that shouldn't be as
radical as it sounds. Because of the premise of the statement.
I don't know how to say this differently, so I'm
just gonna say it like this. He's not saying that
I want the death penalty against people who are here illegally,
or want the death penalty against people who are from
other countries that are in the country legally. Of course
he's not saying those things. The Left will pretend that

(07:48):
that's what he's saying, that he's so hateful that he
wants to kill people that don't look like him. But
what he's saying he wants to do is have people
punished to a different letter of the law if they
take the lives of cops. Now, I don't think that's
anywhere near his radical If you said it that way,
to be honest, it's kind of funny. I meant to

(08:08):
move on, and I guess I can't. When you hear
jd Vance say some of the same things that Trump says,
media digests it better. They still hate him, they still
say he's a terrible guy and all this other stuff.
But the funny thing about that vice presidential debate is
very often you heard people say that jd Vance did
a good job of disguising the bad person he is

(08:32):
in looking nice. And that's very different than what they
say about Trump. They say that Trump is very willingly
a jerk I guess, or whatever it is, it gets
set out there. But what I think is really fascinating
about that is if you articulate the idea differently, as
I just tried to do with Trump's statement about the
death penalty on people that hurt cops, then more people

(08:53):
wind up agreeing with it, or more people wind up
being incapable of being tricked by certain places in media
to think it's worse than it is. It's just the
way it's articulated. But honestly, that's the big pull of
the person. So Trump obviously won't change any of that
anytime soon. I just think it's interesting because you get
these little snippets played at a context or played in

(09:15):
whatever way that the mainstream media people want them to
be played, or the left leaning media people want them
to be played, and you think to yourself, man, I
don't think that's actually what he intended to say. If
you watched even two other seconds of it. I don't
want to play one last thing and then we'll take
our first break. This is Kamala Harris. She's talking about
Project twenty twenty five, which is, of course the other

(09:37):
very big scary thing that you're not even supposed to understand.
They don't tell you all of the pieces of Project
twenty twenty five. They just tell you little snippets that
are supposed to be the worst thing. But I do
like this a lot, so here, let's play this five.

Speaker 2 (09:51):
He says, that is not his campaign plan.

Speaker 5 (09:53):
As you know, I am a former prosecutor. His DNA
is all over it, all over it is running mate
roads forward to gross to the book of the author
of Project twenty twenty five. I believe Donald Trump's name
appears at least three hundred times in Project twenty twenty five.
And it is a blueprint, a detailed blueprint that is

(10:17):
about the danger and the detail, the detail Donald Trump
and his allies.

Speaker 1 (10:22):
The details are important, according to the Vice president. Yeah,
also really gross for her to reference how much DNA
was a part of what she used to do in
the past. I don't really want to know any more
about that. I've heard some of the stories, not all
of them about her work as a prosecutor, although her
work trying to get to that job. Nonetheless, what I
will say about this is it's just sort of amazing

(10:43):
for someone to reiterate multiple times in a very short answer, details, details,
pay attention to the details, and she gives you none
of her own. And not only that, but she's even
leaving very few details out there for you to understand.
When it comes to Project twenty twenty five, which is
not Trump's, it's the Heritage Foundations. They put one out
every single time, every single election, i should say, and

(11:06):
they don't get followed to the t. There's a lot
of times where some of the things in there wind
up being thought of as good ideas and other people
use them, and there's times where there's ideas that aren't
used at all. That's a long running thing, the Heritage Foundation.
I'll just say this for anyone who doesn't know, has
been putting out their version of a hoped agenda for

(11:27):
whoever the eventual Republican winner of an election is. They've
been doing this for a long time. This is not
a Trump thing. It existed long before Trump and it'll
exist long after Trump. All right, we'll take our first break.
We got a lot to get to. This is Creig
Collins filling in on the Danish show More coming up next.

Speaker 6 (11:45):
Life can take a toll on our bodies, there's no
way around it. And whether it's just sitting for hours
on end at your computer or if you're working a
physical job over time, your body pays the price. There is, however,
an effective way to turn back the clock on pain.
Relief Factor developed by doctors. Relief Factor helps support your
body's response to inflammation and the difference. Instead of just

(12:06):
masking pain, relief Factor helps eliminate it for good and
it's one hundred percent drug free. My husband Chris has
taken Relief Factor with incredible results. So if the pains
that come with living a full life are affecting you,
do as many others have done and turn back the
clock on pain with Relief Factor. Their three week quick
start is just nineteen ninety five. That's less than a
dollar a day, and when you feel good, it's amazing

(12:29):
how much more you get out of life. Visit Reliefactor
dot com or call one eight hundred four Relief. That's
one eight hundred the number four relief. Try it for
only nineteen ninety five and turn back the clock on
pain with Relief Factor relief Factor dot Com.

Speaker 7 (12:44):
The Supermarket doesn't Lie. Latest report show more people are
changing where they're buying their groceries, heading to box stores
like Walmart goes to show that food and energy prices
have yet to go down. Check out the Watchdog on
Wall Street podcast on Apple Spotify, wherevery you get your podcasts.

Speaker 4 (13:02):
Makes some common sense of the crazy headlines. With a
Dana Show podcast, you're on the go guide for getting
up to speed on today's most important stories. Subscribe on YouTube,
Apple or your favorite podcast platform.

Speaker 1 (13:16):
This is the Dana Show. You can find her everywhere
d lash or Dana Lash Radio, or two great places
to stay connected to her on X On Twitter, a
teenager singer, I think this was Loomis is the person's
name screwed up during her singing of the national anthem.

(13:37):
And this has gone very viral because I don't know.
I guess a lot of people get used to how
many things aren't live. This was live. She was singing
the national anthem for a event that probably a lot
of people weren't watching. But here, I'll play some of
this audio first and then we'll get into this toy.

Speaker 2 (14:06):
We're so goodly stream.

Speaker 8 (14:13):
Dad cannot go back, Please, you cannot blasting.

Speaker 1 (14:25):
I don't want to keep going. Yeah, she's struggling a lot.
She's being told that she's live. She's not exactly happy
to know that, or doesn't really even listen to that.
But it's bad, and I don't know. I think part
of It's actually kind of amusing to me for a
different reason than for many people. I think just hearing
the F bomb during the national anthem, if you're not offended,
is something that you might be like, Wow, this person

(14:47):
really didn't understand the mission when they signed up for
this job. But the thing that's amusing to me is
how real it is. I imagine a lot of singers doing
a lot of other things that are not this wind
up saying those words a few different times and being like, man,
I really screwed up. I'd really like to go back.
I'd like to get it different. And actually it also
kind of tells me that there's a lot of singers

(15:07):
out there who aren't anywhere near as talented as we
think they are, because it takes them a few tries
to get something right to begin with. I don't know
how many of us could do better singing if we
had seven or eight tries in a recording studio. But
I thought about that too, But I don't know. It
was just amusing to me out there that she was
very human in a not very good way at a
very inopportune time. And it's definitely going to be viral

(15:30):
for a while. I would think another thing out there
that people are debating. I think this is mostly on
Reddit and a couple other places online, and granted people
have talked about this for a while. Should there be
an age that you age out of trick or treating?
Is there a limit? Some places in New Jersey have

(15:50):
set the limit around twelve. Other towns in that area
I think thirteen and fourteen. Yeah. I think there should
absolutely be a limit to when you can and can't
go trigger treating and when you should. Now, I say
this with two caveats, and I'll throw them both out there.
I may have once in my life gone trigger treating
past an age I should have been trigger treating at

(16:11):
but I have an excuse. A very attractive girl that
I was going to school with in high school wanted
to do it as a joke, and I said, yes,
is the idiot guy? And I didn't take candy. I
just would show up at houses and then put my
head down and be like, you know what this is.
You know I've signed up to do this because this
girl wanted me to go with her. Beside that move,
which I wouldn't begrudge the man for doing, but I

(16:32):
do things probably not a good look. I don't want
to give candy to people who seem like miniature adults.
They're not cute in their costumes anymore. They're definitely people
that you can see a few years from now, maybe
owning a home and giving out candy themselves. That's the cutoff.
You can't keep going, you can't keep showing up and
asking for free things. It's just wrong. I don't know

(16:54):
if twelve or thirteen's the right age. I guess it
depends on how big a family is. It would be
a little bit of a crappy thing for me to tell,
like the oldest kid in a family that they can't go,
but everybody else is going. So I think there might
be exceptions to the rule. But especially if it's just
two or three older kids, you know, thirteen, fourteen, fifteen

(17:15):
years old and no young children around, you can refuse
them any sort of candy. I think that makes sense.
All right, Well, take a break a lot coming up
on the show. I don't know if that was a
hot take or not. Maybe it was not strong enough.
This Craig Gallons filling in on the Dana show.

Speaker 6 (17:29):
Tex Network USA. They have been helping taxpayers save over
a billion dollars in tax set and they filed over
ten thousand tax returns. They specialize in helping people like
you reduce their tax burdens and they can help so
that October fifteenth deadline has passed now several days and
if you go back taxes or have unfilled returns, there's

(17:50):
likely you're totally going to get intensified enforcement efforts from
the IRS. Is totally going to happen. You could see
wage garnishments, frozen bank accounts, property seizures. If you've not
done anything, schedule today complimentary consultation called one eight hundred
nine five eight one thousand, or visit tanusa dot com
slash data and if you feel overwhelmed by the thought
of filing your back taxes, this is where you can

(18:11):
rely on the expert team at Tax Network USA. They
have skilled professionals dedicated to getting you the best resolution
for your issues. Doesn't matter if you are ten thousand
or ten million, if it's a if it's just you,
or if it's a business. They have the experience and
tools to handle anything and they can get you a
tailored solution. Whether you're able to pay her on a
fixed income, they'll or solve your tax burdens effectively. Visit

(18:32):
tanusa dot com slash Danta or called one eight hundred
nine five eight one thousand for a freak consultation. Their
experts will walk you through a few simple questions to
see how much you can say act now before the
IRS takes more aggressive steps. Take control today tanusa dot
com slash Dana one eight hundred nine five eight one thousand.

Speaker 4 (18:47):
Keep your finger on the pulse with a data show
podcast delivering timely news with insightful analysis whenever you want,
straight to you on YouTube, Apple or wherever you get
your podcasts.

Speaker 1 (19:00):
filling in, thrilled to be with you. Bunch of stuff
to talk about out there in the world. Let's play this.
Mayor Eric Adams is a weird, somewhat new Trump fan.
All right, that might be going too far, but he
at least said a few things that no one else
in New York is willing to say about Trump and

(19:22):
about the rhetoric that surrounds him. Here we go.

Speaker 9 (19:27):
You know, I have been had those terms hurled at
me by some political leaders in the city. Used the
terms like Hitler and fascist. My answer is known, I
know what Hitler has done, and I know what a

(19:49):
fascist regime looks like. I think, as I've called over
and over again, that the level of conversation and I
think we could all dial down the.

Speaker 1 (20:01):
Temperature just attack.

Speaker 9 (20:03):
And I've heard people say that the former president should
not be able to have a rally in a medicine
Square garden. I strongly disagree. Of course, you know, this
is America, this is New York, and I think it's
important that we allow individuals to exercise their right.

Speaker 1 (20:22):
Yes, how crazy that that's not a tick that more
people have that Eric Adams, who's now actually been the
target of his own versions of politicians, don't like you anymore,
not saying that he didn't do the things he's accused
of doing. I think there's a whole lot of people
that when the Democrats decide, hey, we're going to go

(20:42):
after you, they already know what the sins are. Actually,
you know what, let's throw the tinfoil hat for a
second and just talk about this the way I do
with one of my uncles, an uncle that very much
believes a lot of these things. So he would say
to me that in your political career. And I'm sure
a lot of people believe this. They find some dirt,

(21:05):
whether that's dirt they create themselves or dirt that they've
always had, it doesn't matter. Once they find the dirt,
they hold onto it, and then when they decide to
use it, because you're not playing the game the way
you're supposed to play anymore, you're screwed. And that's what
a lot of people think is happening to Eric Adams.
They believe, and I don't think they're totally wrong in

(21:26):
saying this or thinking this, that Eric Adams said way
too many negative things. He said negative things about the
amount of immigrants in New York, a place that was
uniquely being hit harder than say, many other places in
the country, although a lot of the country has some version.
Now that's crazy, But as you say that stuff, and

(21:46):
as you get pulled those directions, you start to open
your eyes to all, right, well, you know, if I
no longer have to protect my speech, if I no
longer have to not say the thing out loud that
I do believe that many people believe because they've already
taken their shot at me. And with Trumpet's literal shots,
which is even crazier. But as you say that, you

(22:07):
start to see this version of Eric Adams more and more,
and maybe he believes he won't have any future in politics.
I don't know, but I thought it was really interesting
to say what should be a very simple thing that
a whole lot of people say and a whole lot
of people agree with. Of Course, you have a right
to your freedom to speech, of course you do. Of

(22:28):
Course you have the ability to go out and speak,
and go out and sell your message to whoever it
is you want to sell it to. And you shouldn't
be censored by the government, because that's horribly scary and
a thing that we never want to get to in
our society, and a thing that a whole bunch of
people on the left say would be terrible if it happened,
even though they're the ones that are more seeking it

(22:50):
all the time. All Right, let's move on. There are
other things out there in the world. I do love this.
Kamala Harris recently said about pulling and remember from the
moment she started her campaign, which for some reason was
just a few months ago, she was very happy with
the polls, saying how great they were, saying how things

(23:12):
were only you know, trending in the direction she'd wanted
to go. And then all of a sudden, the polls
turn on her and they're saying more and more that
Trump is doing better. And then all of a sudden,
you find a version of rhetoric that exists on the
right things that Trump has said all of a sudden
coming out of the mouth of Kamala Harris, and I

(23:32):
love it. She essentially said that she doesn't trust the polls,
which is awesome. And the reason it's awesome, I guess,
more so than just saying that part out loud, is
because these are the same people that all the time
tell you to sit down and shut up. If you
say that the pull numbers, you know, don't make sense

(23:52):
and you don't believe in them, it's obviously your fault
and not theirs. But here we'll play a little bit
of this audio because I do really enjoy this with
Harris saying the thing out loud that has not just
been said by democrats.

Speaker 10 (24:06):
I'm feeling very optimistic.

Speaker 1 (24:11):
Hold on, we got we got the wrong clip here.
Let's play this again. You give us a sense of
your internal polling at the campaign and how that is
making or influencing your decisions on what to do over
the next nine days.

Speaker 11 (24:21):
So, to be very frank with you, my internal polling
is my instinct. I let the campaign people deal with
the I don't.

Speaker 1 (24:29):
Worry about that stuff. My internal beliefs are the only
thing that matters to me, the only thing that convinces
me if I'm going to win or lose. I love it.
You know, it's obvious, and I'm saying the thing out
loud that I think a whole lot of people already know.
But I could do this again and again and again.
I could find you examples of the rhetoric on the

(24:49):
right being reused by the left when it benefits the left,
and so on and so on. By the way, uh,
I don't know if I actually threw this out there,
So I'm going to go ahead and do it now.
Trump did have a sellout crowd twenty thousand people, roaring fans,
I think, as they were described by the New York
Post at Madison Square Garden for historic rally nine days

(25:10):
before an election. Is Trump actually trying to win New
York the state? I doubt it. Could he win New
York the state? I also am not sure, but numbers
have been better for him there than anyone else in
recent memory on his side of the aisle. Why did
he do it? I think he did it because of

(25:31):
all the ways he'd be shot at. And I don't
mean that again literally, I mean all the things that
he knew would be said and that his campaign knew
would be said about how inappropriate it was for him
to be there in the first place. That stuff is
just crazy. You know it, and I know it. I
think more people need to accept that, you know, actually,

(25:54):
just to pivot for a second. In my career doing
what I do for a living, where you share or
your political opinion willingly every day wherever you are. I
have worked with people who were done dealing with me
or talking to me or interacting with me, and I
never spoke to them. They were people that were done

(26:16):
the minute they heard the radio show. And so what's
funny about that to me, and it's not used as
well in your everyday life as it is by these politicians,
is when you notice that, you can probably find a
way to demonstrate it to everyone else around you, like
this is unfair. How I'm being treated is unfair. They

(26:37):
really need to switch this, do this differently, And I
don't know, just in your day to day life, you
probably don't create those traps and out these crappy things
that happen because you're not planning it that way. But
when the Republican candidate for president can do this and
can have people say that he's a danger to society,

(26:59):
that he's not just a danger, but that he shouldn't
be allowed to speak in New York City, it throws
out there how crazy this stuff is gone. And I
don't know what else to say about it, other than
it's sort of surreal to play something on a radio
show and talk about it in this tone, in this way,

(27:19):
and to wonder to yourself, how can they even be
saying this on one side of the aisle and not
realizing what they're saying. And they probably know exactly what
they're saying. They're not struggling in reality. They just don't care.
If you can tell how ridiculous the position has gotten.
All right, let's play this audio. This is Joe Biden
crapping all over Elon Musk because darn it, they have

(27:42):
to do that now too. I guess here we go.
Tone am I registered a million dollars. Do you mean
that's ego condract Do you think that's the lection that
they care. I think it's totally inappropriate. I think it's
totally inappropriate. We hate this guy, we think he's the
worst guy ever. We need him to stop all the

(28:03):
things he's doing at asap. Look, I'll be honest, the
Elon Musk move is probably not the most well thought
out move. Paying people, although you're not actually paying them
to vote for a specific candidate, So I don't know
that it's actually wrong or illegal or any of those
things that they're going to say it is. But obviously,
as someone who's showed up at campaign rallies and said
stuff pro Trump, it certainly appears as though he's got

(28:27):
a one sided hope and what you do or what
you choose to do based on getting some sweet sweet
cache form Elon Musk. But it's actually not, in my opinion,
as far as what the Democrats are saying about it,
something that we shouldn't do more of in some other capacity,
because getting paid to care about the election, unfortunately, is
a very nice incentive for people who wouldn't care otherwise,

(28:50):
And honestly, it's a very smart thing to do for
young voters to get them to try to be evolved. Hey,
you might win a million dollars from the world's richest man,
who's not going to miss a million bucks. But I
just the way that if Democrats were gaining this and actually,
you know what, we'll play this in a little bit
because this is probably where we're going for this topic.
On the show today, Joe Rogan did an amazing job

(29:12):
of articulating how crazy it was to watch the Democrats
love Donald Trump just a few years ago, to go
on the view and have them screaming about how wonderful
of a guy he is and how they were all
hugging him and everyone was his best friend. And then
a few years later things go crazy and everything gets
way way worse because Donald Trump is no longer on

(29:34):
team them. So it was fascinating to see, fascinating to
kind of, you know, hear a conversation with Trump and
someone about that topic and to go further into how
ridiculous it is. But the same holds true in this
way when you point to these other people, when you
point to the elon Musks of the world, loved at
one point by Democrats, hated now if he was spending

(29:56):
millions of dollars paying people to sign up for super
packs or other things that benefited them. They'd say he
was a national treasure. All right, let's take a break.
A lot coming up. Craig Collins filling in on the
data show.

Speaker 6 (30:09):
Ready wise actually will be prepared for you, so you
really don't have to. You just let ready wis handle it.
And when you consider the you know, I mean, we
sew some hurricanes. We I mean, you always just want
to be prepared. You never want to be in a
situation where you're you and your family are trying to
figure out what you're going to eat that night and
you have no idea because you have no food, because
the stores are bare and everybody's crazy. So visit readywise

(30:30):
dot com, use promo Coddana twenty aet checkout. You're gonna
get twenty percent off for your entire purchase. They have
seventy two hour food kits. Buy one, get one on
those right now, one hundred dollars in value for fifty bucks.
They have all the calories you need, all the protein
you need, your all your daily carb allotments, the whole
nine yards comfort in a crisis and beyond, and it's
not only perfect for emergencies. Were my grandfather alive, I

(30:52):
am positive that he would be eating ready Wise while
he's out deer hunting, because that man would just take
tea and spam. And I'm like, how are you surviving
on that? You would love?

Speaker 7 (31:00):
Right?

Speaker 6 (31:01):
You would have love ready Wise twenty five year shelf life.
So visit readywis dot com. He's promo code data twenty
at checkout for twenty percent off your entire purchase. That's
Readywise dot com promo code data twenty for twenty percent off.

Speaker 1 (31:14):
This is the Data Show. My name is Craig Collins,
filling in. Thrilled to be with you. Bunch of stuff,
as I always say, to talk about and honestly, one
of the biggest conversations outside of the fact that Donald
Trump went on the Joe Rogan Show and had a
really interesting conversation. I will be honest. We're having a
couple of technical difficulties on my end here as I'm
broadcasting this show remotely, so I'm probably not gonna be

(31:37):
able to get to some of those clips right now.
We'll get to them a little bit later on in
the show, hopefully, But the Joe Rogan. Conversation went three hours,
and what I thought was most fascinating about it, and
this is just before you do the Madison Square Garden thing,
where you show up, you sell out twenty thousand seats
in an arena, and you're, you know, speaking to the

(31:58):
masses the way that Donald Trump often does for hours
on end, and people seem to enjoy it. That's what
the Rogan podcast was. It was a three hour conversation
between a prominent podcaster and a person who's got relevance
you didn't expect him to have I think just a
few years ago, or maybe longer than that. I think

(32:20):
he's had relevance now for quite some time. And Trump,
and one of my favorite moments was when Trump said,
can you picture Harris doing this sort of interview? Can
you picture having this kind of sit down for three hours.
She'd be in the corner, she'd be rolling over, she'd
be crying, all of that stuff. And he's right in
all honesty. One of the biggest reasons that the Brett

(32:40):
Bear interview was something that I think the left could
push and say, hey, look at this, Brett interrupted Kamala
all the time is because of how little time she
gave him. She was supposed to give him thirty minutes.
She gave the guy like twenty. And during that twenty minutes,
you're trying to get a bunch of topics, and she's
doing everything she can to prevent you from even having

(33:02):
those conversations. So when you talk about that, when you
think about that, when you realize how silly some of
those things are. And then you watch Trump sit down
for hours, you know, with Rogan or do the podcast
the way he does it, and then follow that up
with the Madison Square Garden show, you see another tremendous

(33:22):
difference between him and between those who are saying that
they're trying to be, you know, people that compete against him.
I don't know. He's so profoundly different of a politician
even then, like the Robert F. Kennedy juniors of the world,
that not many people could have pulled off the Madison
Square Garden conversation at all the way that he did it,

(33:45):
and with the success that he had in that environment,
in that moment, in that room. And of course again
I will say I guess, and it's important to say
it that there's no need for him to campaign there
because he's probably unlikely to win New York, but it
was a statement. It was a demonstration of power, a
demonstration of capability. And maybe, I guess I'll say this too,

(34:07):
and I don't mean to rant on a Monday. Can't
help myself a little bit, I guess, especially when technical
difficulties make it harder for me to play anything other
than myself talking to you. But I wonder if a
part of it, too, is not necessarily a shot across
the bow for Democrats, but truthfully a show for you,
or for your relative, or for the person that says

(34:30):
Trump actually isn't popular, or the person that says he's
so popular that he's unlikely to lose an election fairly.
Maybe it's a show for everyone in that environment that
he can go into a hostile place, a place where
he was convicted of crimes, crimes that many people believe
are ridiculous to have tried him with in the first place,

(34:50):
because they make no sense compared to what the initial
accusations were, and he can prove that he does have
a tremendous amount of of appeal of fandom. I'll say
it another way too, because I kind of enjoy this,
and I wonder if you've had this experience with you know,
family members of yours just a few days before the

(35:11):
election admitting that Trump is actually funny, no matter how
much they think he's a horrible, terrible person and someone
who's a danger to our society as a whole, which
is often something they say. The other thing that I
think is interesting is the amount of people who begrudgingly
admit that Donald Trump is actually humorous, that he makes
good jokes, and that he, you know, makes people laugh.

(35:33):
Because you would think to yourself, out of all the
things that make it hard to say, you know, win
or lose an election, that one of the more significant
ones is just trying to be as funny as you
can be as you are in any other walk of life,
any other place that you wind up in, you know.
And I wonder if I think maybe we're getting some
of our technology things to work now. So I think

(35:55):
we're just a couple of minutes away from a short
break and then we'll be back early. I'm going to
I'm going to keep going right now because it's too
early to break. But I do know, I think that
some of the technology we have is finally fixing itself.
Which means we'll be back to normal in a little bit.
So this is a cathartic ranty moment, I guess, for
whatever reason you want to consider it.

Speaker 5 (36:16):
That.

Speaker 1 (36:16):
But one last thing, and this was another thing I
was thinking about with Jade Vance being as eloquent as
he is and as friendly as he is and media
telling you how you know, he's horrible and terrible I
know a lot of times. And I was thinking this
more for the younger voters, if there's anyone younger listening
out there by chance, and I imagine Dana has a
whole bunch of younger listeners actually, So I'm just going

(36:39):
to assume you're out there, and maybe you don't like Republicans,
maybe you don't like the rhetoric of the right, maybe
you don't like the use of terms like legacy media
or any of that stuff. But the truth is, when
you actually pay attention to these things, when you drive
into the reality of the things people are talking about,
they exist. The real media bias is something that you

(37:02):
might not notice on a certain side of the political
aisle until it's too late, or until you've paid attention
long enough to be like, oh okay, now I see
it now I understand what you're talking about, because, in
all honesty, and I don't know how to say this
any other way than the way I'm going to say it,
Kamala Harris is a horrible candidate for president and you

(37:23):
know it, and I know it, and the Democratic Party
knew it and didn't throw her the reins two years
ago on purpose because they were worried that it was
going to be horrible and it was going to be
exactly what it is now, that she was not going
to be capable of having a long form discussion with anyone.
And that is a core aspect of being the president
of the United States. Not only do you need to

(37:44):
motivate and inspire people, you need to be capable of
having conversations about tough topics with the media, something Trump relishes.
He enjoys going back and forth with the people who
most dislike him. Case in point is holding a rally
in Madison Square Garden to begin with, all right, you
know what we're going to do. I know this is
much sooner than we normally do it, but we are

(38:04):
figuring out some technical things. So we're going to take
a quick break and we'll be back in the regular
amount of time. In just a few minutes, we'll be
backed with all of the normal setup that we typically
have here on the Dana Show. My name is Craig
Collins filling in.

Speaker 9 (38:21):
Hi.

Speaker 12 (38:21):
I'm Lillian, an English major at Hillsdale College. Here's Hillsdale President,
doctor Larry Arne with a Constitution Minute.

Speaker 10 (38:29):
America's founders believed in a separation of church and state,
in that the country was not to have an official
religion or an official sect, but that did not mean
that government was to be hostile to religion or even
indifferent to religion, as many today argue. In fact, America's
founding document, the Decrice of Independence, includes both a reference
to God as the author of the laws of nature

(38:52):
and a confident assertion that human beings are endowed by
their creator with certain inalienable rights. Far from being hostile
or indifferent to religion, America's founders understood the theology of
the Declaration to be an essential part of the education
of citizens.

Speaker 12 (39:07):
To learn more and get a free pocket constitution, visit
constitutionminute dot com.

Speaker 1 (39:13):
This Constitution Minute was furnished by Hillsdale College.

Speaker 4 (39:18):
The Danish show podcast You're Fast, Funny and informative news
companion for those always on the move. Subscribe on YouTube,
Apple or wherever you get your podcasts.

Speaker 1 (39:31):
Technology stinks sometimes, but we got it all figured out.
Thrilled to be with you. So many things to talk
about throughout the show today. Let's do this one other
quick topic and then we'll get to some sillier things.
Democrats do really only have two discussion points this election.
One is, of course, what I've been talking about for
most of the show so far, how horrible and terrible

(39:51):
Trump is. The other one is abortion, and not only
the fact that they say that this is a woman's
body rights issue, but also that they inflate any reality
as far as the dangers that occur when abortion is
slightly more limited than they would like it to be
anywhere in the country, or maybe extremely more limited in

(40:13):
certain places than what Democrats would want, which is abortion
right up until basically a baby pops out, and even then,
if you look at certain places, there are horrific stories
about how babies who survive failed abortions are allowed to
die in hospitals because the doctors do nothing to save
their lives. That's a real conversation that actually exists. It's

(40:33):
not something that's being made up by a certain side,
but I thought this was interesting. A obgyn. Her name
is Ingrid Scope. She's all over social media now. She
went viral a couple days ago for a nine piece
thread on x on Twitter about how she's been doing
this procedure for years and she lives in Texas and

(40:54):
she wants to shed light on all of the harmful
lies coming from the pro abortion liwe. I can read
some of the tweets to you because they're excellent. I'm
a board certified obgyn. Is how she starts practicing in Texas.
I've been practicing for thirty years. I've delivered over five
thousand babies. Allow me to shed some light on these
lies and how important they are. After Texas enacted its

(41:17):
pro life law, the quality medical care I provide did
not change, nor has the law prevented me from caring
for my patients. This is true even in cases of
pregnancy emergencies. Since the Dobbs decision, I have cared for
many women suffering from certain ailments in their pregnancies. I've
performed surgeries to treat in complete miscarriages and failed drug

(41:40):
induced abortions, etc. Etc. She goes on, I have intervened
when a pregnancy complication threatened mother's life, even when I
anticipated that sadly the unborn child would not survive. This
is all stuff she's done and she continues to do
in Texas to the letter of the law. Under every
pro life law, including in Texas, our doctors can intervene

(42:04):
to save women's lives in pregnancy. Physicians, excuse me, can
intervene to save women's lives and pregnancy emergencies, and so
on and so on every pro life law. She is
explicit in how she describes and demonstrates to you, to me,
to anyone paying attention as someone working in the field,
that there's a whole lot of crap out there, a

(42:24):
whole lot of lies, and a whole lot of extreme
rhetoric that try to cause you to vote based on
just one thing your heart and saying to yourself, you
know what, darn it. The only way I can vote
to be a good person is if I vote for
this side and reject this side of the political aisle.
But it's obviously not true according to her and many
other people. So I just thought it was interesting when

(42:44):
viral she even references I think at one point in
her Twitter thread that she has voted Democratic before, which
feels like, for some reason it has to be the
final straw for someone to not reject their opinion. The
opinion disagrees with the masses on the left, But nonetheless,
I just thought it was fantastic how it was portrayed

(43:07):
put out there in the world, and how little coverage
it's probably going to get a lot of places. All right,
now it's time. Let's try to rapid fire. Let's do
a quick.

Speaker 13 (43:14):
Five, and now all of the news you would probably miss.
It's time for Dana's quick five.

Speaker 1 (43:21):
That's right, we're cruising along. We're doing great. Does masculinity
shorten your life span? A study suggests manly men or
at higher risk of heart problems. This feels somewhat as
if it was intentionally put out there into the world,
although studyfinds dot org is not necessarily a place that
I think has a political sway or agenda. It depends

(43:42):
on what you define as toxic masculinity, which is just
a crap term that's used so often in the world.
But researchers from the University of Chicago say there was
a pattern that begins in adolescence and continues through adulthood,
which potentially puts certain men at greater risk of heart issues.
These are men who are more prone to certain types

(44:03):
of I love how this is described male behavior like
risk taking and whatnot or adrenaline junkies. High blood pressure
and diabetes are also issues they see more with men.
But you know what's so funny about this. The thing
that's missing, and I think a byproduct of the toxic
masculinity conversation, is people are in like good shape, people
who work out, people who behave like the kind of

(44:26):
individuals that would fight to protect you or fight to
protect this country. The alpha men. They're not in this list.
They're not part of the toxic masculinity group that's suffering
with health issues because oh yeah, by being that health
conscious you actually are doing quite well for a lot
of your life. They're more talking about the people who
have certain mental versions of approaching life that might not

(44:48):
actually match their physical ability. People like me, I guess,
who jump off of peers in high school and college
into freezing cold water that you shouldn't do. Guys like
friends of mine who jumped off of roofs of houses
into pools just the stupid things that you do. But
that's not a totality or not a full description of
I think toxic masculinity. So it's kind of amusing that

(45:10):
in order to get to this point in this study
they left out a lot of the people who probably
are not struggling with any of this. More of quick
five stuff. Google is developing AI that can take over
your computer information is reporting on this finance Yahoo. I
think ran the story to essentially the Google AI would
realize that your computer needs to not be run by

(45:32):
you anymore and then just do their own thing. It's
called Project Jarvis, which is a reference to Marvel stuff
and Jarvis who eventually in one of those Marvel movies
became his own sentient being. And that would be just crazy,
and it seems to be the path we're barreling toward.
For whatever reason. Wealthier Americans are paying millions to age

(45:53):
in luxury campuses. Is another viral story. This was from
the Wall Street Journal. This is not something I would
blame anyone for spending money on personally, but if you
have the cash and you don't want to grow old
in your house that you've been in a long time,
no matter what darn it, nostalgia feelings you have about it,
but you'd much rather age somewhere fancy with professionals around

(46:16):
you that can help you. While more and more Americans
are choosing to go this road, this might be I
know this is supposed to be a quick five and
a lighter set of topics, but it might also be
a reflection of the difference in family today and in
years in the past. Maybe more people are less connected
to their family, and for that reason they don't feel
they could be taken care of by being at home

(46:37):
with loved ones. I don't know if that's true, but
it feels like it could be a byproduct of choosing
to spend a ton of money to live somewhere that's awesome,
which I again would probably do myself, as opposed to
living somewhere that has say you know less of the
cool things that you would have living in some of
these fancy complexes. And then one other thing I thought

(46:58):
this was interesting A viral store worry about a super
rat that was spotted on a Spirit Airlines flight inside
a light fixture. The super rat may have actually been
a raccoon and not a rat at all, but it
was giant, and it was very happy to be living
inside a Spirit flight. I don't know if there's any
sort of extra charge to remove the rat from your

(47:18):
seat or the area near you, the light fixture near you.
In Spirit, I feel like they would charge for that,
maybe the whole plane would get together completely into it.
But I just love how viral this story went and
how crazy this thing looks. It's either a very small
raccoon or a very giant rat. Neither scenario is very
good to have with you on an airline. To have
with you on a flight, I feel like Samuel L.

(47:40):
Jackson might start in the next version of this next movie.
But nonetheless, what I really love about it is the
fact that as they're looking at this, it was Spirit.
Because most people would not have been surprised if you
had to guess the airline and I told you the
story without the airline. I think people's first guest, unfortunately
would have been Spirit Airlines, because well, okay, I don't

(48:00):
have to explain that any further help. They're not a sponsor.
Quick break a lot more. Craig Collins filling in on
the Danish show.

Speaker 6 (48:07):
Our Friend's Over at Keltech. The p fifteen if you
haven't gotten a Keltech, if you haven't gotten the P fifteen,
you really need to. It is the lightest, thinnest, literally
the lightest thinnest double stack nine millimeter on the market.
Nothing is lighter or thinner than this thing. And it
is nine Like I said, double stack magazine. You don't
lose the stopping power, and you don't lose any power

(48:29):
at all, and it's super ultra concealable. It's from the
inventors of the micro compact pistol category and the versions.
It comes in a metal version, in a polymer version.
The metal version has the walnut walnut wood panels and
you have the gator grip texture on the polymer two
magazine standard fifteen round minimal pinky extension. The other's a
flesh fit double stack mag that holds twelve for ultra concealability,

(48:52):
tritating them in fiber optic front sight fully adjustable, fiber
optic two dot rear striker fire smooth trigger lifetime warranty. Again,
it is from the inventors of this category and quality
made right here in the US of a innovation performance
in Celtech. Learn Moore at Keltech weapons dot Com. It's
k E Ltec Weapons dot com. It's the P fifteen.
Tell them that Dana sent you.

Speaker 4 (49:12):
Subscribe to The Dana Show podcast because who says you
can't make fun of people while staying informed on your
own personal time. Subscribe on YouTube, Apple or wherever you
get your podcast.

Speaker 1 (49:23):
filling in. Thrilled to be with you. A bunch of
stuff as always to talk about, although actually I just
found out producer Steven was at a heck of a
football game yesterday, a game that actually beat the crap
out of the Chicago Bears. Here, I'll play the audio
real quick. I do want to do this first before
we get to anything else.

Speaker 4 (49:43):
Comes down to one last play, and it's going to
be getting longer by the second.

Speaker 6 (49:50):
You're all the way back at the thirty yard line.

Speaker 4 (49:52):
Now you can step into it. Here comes the hail Mary.

Speaker 14 (49:56):
But the game on the line and the balls time,
it's a miracle.

Speaker 1 (50:03):
It's insane.

Speaker 9 (50:04):
Oh my goodness, this town is going crazy.

Speaker 1 (50:11):
Yes, and you were there going crazy, Steven? Is that right?

Speaker 6 (50:14):
I was.

Speaker 14 (50:14):
I was with the Bears fan, so he wasn't excited
to see it happen, but it was okay, great bear,
it was a great moment.

Speaker 1 (50:22):
Well, what happened for you? Like after did your phone
get blown up with people asking you how you could
be at the game? Were you one of the people
that holds up your cell phone and you're taping it
or are you actually doing the good thing and watching
it like a human being in an event that doesn't
need a record of it yourself.

Speaker 14 (50:37):
I watched it happen, and then about thirty seconds later
I pulled my phone out to get there because they
were they were still hollering and cheering for a while,
so oh yeah, I got like thirty seconds of it
at the app and then I was as soon as
I got self service walking to the train, and my
phone blew up and our fantasy group chat was just
going nuts because we it's a lot of Commanders fans
around here.

Speaker 1 (50:55):
So sure, So not only does fantasy football probably get
impacted by that, a lot of other things getting back
up by that. You know, I've only been to one,
you know, Marquee Sports moment in my life. I've seen
a lot of games, but not ones that are terribly significant.
I was in the student section and people might not
know about this for the Bush push when Notre Dame

(51:17):
lost to USC, when USC was ranked number one, with
the very last play of a football game, because Reggie
Bush shoved Matt Lioner into an end zone and I
was on the field as some students were. I was
not a Notre Dame student. I was a Holy Cross student.
You were allowed to have tickets and go to the
game like cheering, thinking we won, and then one more
play gets run. They make all the students get into

(51:37):
the tunnel and you watch horrifically the other side of
the end zone as the team loses, and then you
walk out very sad. That was a national story and
I was there. There's something cool about being at those.
You now get to be at one that's a national
story too. Is there anything you take away from it
yourself that experience.

Speaker 4 (51:55):
I don't know.

Speaker 14 (51:55):
This team hasn't been good in this town for a while,
like a long time, and it's nice to see like
there's some cold and people are actually excited. It's cool
to see.

Speaker 1 (52:03):
Yes, yeah, they probably won't have a lot of hail
Mary wins, to be honest, and the Bears, who are
known for their defense, probably don't feel so good today
after the way that you lose that game. I was
amazed at how open he was at the end of
that play though, you know, in all honesty, like to
have that one player for the Commanders just standing in
the end zone behind the ruckus where the ball is

(52:24):
falling to be able to catch that pass like that,
like that almost never happens where it's just one dude
by himself being like, I don't know, if the ball
bounces a certain way, maybe I'll get it.

Speaker 14 (52:35):
Yeah, dude, I mean the guy that tipped it into
the Noah Brown's hands was like chirping the fans on
the sidelines before he didn't even know the ball was snapped, right.

Speaker 1 (52:44):
Yeah, it's crazy, all right, Well, thank you man, after
you told me that you were there, and I know
that was a big story and a lot of people
were paying attention to it. And actually, if I'm going
to take a slight break from serious topics, yes, where
just a few days away from the election, and everyone
is talking about, or at least should be talking about
pull numbers. Everything is demonstrating that the election is at

(53:04):
the forefront of our minds, but it really is only
a very simple topic. Who do you think is better
suited to run the country for the next four years
Kamala Harris, someone who couldn't even run a presidential campaign
to gain a nomination, or someone who's been in that
role before after everything has gone so poorly. I can
oversimplify that because I kind of want to talk about

(53:26):
one other sports thing. The Dwayne Wade statue has been viral.
It's made the rounds all over the internet. Dwayne Wade
was standing there in front of the statue the other
day talking about how he couldn't believe, you know, that
he had a statue. He actually seemed like genuinely moved
by it. And I think at one point Dwayne Wade said, like,
who is that guy? But sadly that was actually the

(53:48):
question for a lot of people watching, and I saw that.
I think some people on some of the broadcast sports
stations claimed that it looks better in person than any
of the photos make it look. But it looks horrendous.
It's not if you google it right now and check
it out. The face of the Dwayne Wade statue, which
is an iconic moment in his own basketball career, unfortunately

(54:10):
also against Chicago Sports team. So apparently today a lot
of the Marquee sports stories involve teams from Chicago losing
and stuff, but that is what it is. But what
I think is so interesting about it he just looks
like an old guy. Part of it looks like it's
supposed to be much more beard than the sort of

(54:30):
stubbly look that Dwayne Wade has. And then the face,
the eyes, the nose, everything, the way that he crumples
his face, and I guess it's supposed to look as
though he's in that moment where he's saying, not in
this house or I think this is our house. I
can't remember exactly what the phrase is. But as Dwayne
Wade is pointing to the ground and saying like, you know,

(54:51):
we just won this game, they made him look old,
not someone who's in moments of joy. Like everything about
his face doesn't look like someone who's squinting or are
squishing his face because he's happy. It looks like father
time has wreaked havoc on him. He looked younger saying
thank you for his statue. Then he looks behind him, like,

(55:12):
you know, looking at the statue, and I wonder how
much of a gut page that is, and Dwayne Wade
won't say it, but if any of us are ever
to have a statue, which very few of us ever
will get in our lifetimes, we want it to be
the epitome of when we looked our best. I would think,
I think you'd want to look at it and me
like that was me as a young man, you know,
I would bring my wife to the statue essentially point

(55:33):
at it and say, look, honey, that's the man you
married back when he was in his prime. And that's
not what Dwayne Wade got. Dwayne Wade got a very
different experience version of that, and for some reason, I
found that both amusing and sad. I feel bad for
the man. He doesn't seem to feel bad for himself.
The Internet absolutely agrees it looks nothing like him. All right,
let's move on to actual news. For anyone that didn't

(55:55):
want to talk about the the you know, sports news
out there in the world that I found so interesting,
I thought this was kind of important. Tucker Carlson ripped
the party of single, mostly useless people in America and
it went very viral. The discussion for this went very viral.
Carlson landed on something that has been talked about before.

(56:18):
And I'll preface what I'm about to say about this topic.
I am a man married in my late thirties early forties. Well,
i'll be forty in a couple of years that doesn't
have any kids, and not through any choice of our own.
Just I guess this is awkward to do for a second,
but I'll move on God's choice. We tried didn't work
out for us. There are people in that boat. So

(56:39):
when the Republican politicians or JD. Vance or Tucker Carlson
or whoever talk about the lack of parents on a
certain side of the political aisle and how much of
an impact that might have on their decision making as politicians,
especially in the world of say what happens in schools.
I don't think they're wrong. I don't get mad about it.

(57:00):
I don't, you know, go up in arms and scream
and yell. How dare they say this thing? Because a
part of that is true, and it's something that many
people will preach to you throughout your life that in
order to make good decisions, you at least need someone
around you that can give you a valuable version of
experience to play off of. If you have no idea

(57:20):
what the experience of something is. It's much harder for
you to decide what the right moves are for you,
or for your family, or for anyone, or for in
this case, you know, a community, or the entirety of
the country. So it's interesting. But here's part of what
Carlson said. He said, the people he's about to defeat
have no idea and they're panicked. They have no idea

(57:43):
why people like Donald Trump. And their first theory was, well,
Donald Trump is evil. He's you know, so half the
country must be evil just like him. And that's one
reason that they've spent four years trying to destroy the country,
because they're mad at his voters for liking him and
liking his policies. And also, as he says Tucker when
he goes into this, the useless, mostly single people out

(58:07):
there in the world. And so there's one other thing
I'll say in response to this, it's not intent to
be offensive. And I will say it because it's true.
And if you get offended, I guess that's on you
and not on me. But you do, in parts of
your life wind up gaining a much better understanding of
some of the most important things we talk about you

(58:27):
own your first home, and then all of a sudden,
your brain clicks and you go, Okay, now I understand
these issues or why these things are complaints because they're
actually happening to me. Not even just the ability to
envision the issues, but actually the ability to articulate how
they negatively impact you or anyone else. And it's silly
to say it, but it's true, and it's true of anything.

(58:47):
If you ask somebody to run the South Side of
Chicago who has no idea what the south Side of
Chicago is or would be, or no version of experience
of it, they're going to struggle, at least for a while.
I'm not saying that they can't inevitably succeed, because they can.
You can gain information by working with smart people who
understand things that you don't understand. But I just think

(59:08):
it's fascinating that that basic premise, a premise, by the way,
that the left loves in almost every other discussion. If
you talk about the left and their desire to say,
have DEI take over your workplace, it's because they believe
that the only way to have diverse ideas is to
have diverse people throwing ideas out there, which I don't

(59:29):
necessarily agree with, but I do think is an interesting premise.
They love this idea that if you're not experienced in
some way, you probably have a limited understanding of what
it should be that you want to do. And yet
when it comes to the whole parent's discussion, or it
comes to the whole family discussion, or a single versus
anything else discussion, all of a sudden, that mindset craters

(59:50):
and falls apart. And it is fascinating to watch. All Right,
one last thing that I want to just throw out here,
and I do think it's interesting Kamala Harris has been
pushing Joe Biden as far away from her as humanly possible,
as she's only a few days away from the inevitable
decisions in this election. I do think it'll be very
important to see exactly what happens, what plays out there,

(01:00:14):
because Joe Biden is no fan of the fact that
he's been regulated to the closet once again. But the
Harris campaign is reportedly keeping this distance, and one of
the people with that group called Axios, he's a reminder
of the last four years, not the new way forward.
And yet Harris says she would change nothing about the
policies and decision making of the past, which is fascinating.

(01:00:36):
But as we get closer to the election, I wonder
if there will be another Joe Biden moment where he
will continue to try to demonstrate, Hey, I'm still the
president and one out of every thirty days my brain functions,
and I want to be treated like the president. Especially
if Harris continues to trend the way she does. Will
we in the last few days of this election hear
more from Joe Biden than we've heard from him in

(01:00:58):
the last few years because of his own ego, making
him feel as though he was replaced unfairly again, which
he was, and he might have been the better candidate
all along to run against Trump. He wouldn't have beat Trump.
But as Harris fails, it makes it seem as though
this plan was flawed to begin with. I don't know,
but I do find it interesting, and I think Axio's
reporting on both Joe Biden President Biden's version of being

(01:01:23):
mad at how little he's being used and Harris's desire
to keep him as far away as humanly possible has
to collide because well, she's still his vice president. All right,
well take a quick break. A lot coming up. This
is Craig Collins filling in on the data show.

Speaker 6 (01:01:36):
Patriot Mobile the only Christian conservative cell phone service in existence.
Patriot Mobile wants to save you money while not using
your hard earned dollars to work against you at the
ballot box. So you're getting the best service in your
area without funding the Left, and you're also supporting US
based jobs, even one hundred percent US based customer service team.

(01:01:58):
They make it easy to switch their now offer and
also Patriot Mobile one one phone, one carrier, and you
also get multiple networks so you can seamlessly use dual
SIM capabilities. You can manage both personal and business lines
and a single device, which is nice and travel friendly coverage.
I have never had one issue traveling with my Patriot

(01:02:18):
Mobile service, and I've traveled extensively in the past like
decade plus using it. So visit Patriot Mobile dot com,
slash data or call nine seven two Patriot because right
now you can get a free month of service when
you use offer code data. You can also get free
activation too. Don't be fooled by the pretenders. Go with
the real thing. Patriot Mobile dot com slash data at
nine seven two Patriot for your free month of service today.

Speaker 13 (01:02:43):
It's his life mission to make bad decisions.

Speaker 1 (01:02:49):
It's time for Florida Man. That's right, this is Craig
Collins filling in on the Dana Show. Time for Florida Man.
I'm actually now technically a Florida man. We have just
relocated to Florida, so I will be living in this
place where I'm going to see a lot of this
awesome stuff. I assume two quick ones. First, a Florida
man threatened storm water maintenance workers with a machete for

(01:03:11):
blocking the road. This is from w FLA in Florida.
Not a good move usually to go full machete and
to yell at people for certain things. It's probably not
going to work out for you. I don't know where
you have the machete too, how you store it, what
decisions you make to make sure it's by your side
throughout the totality of your day, just in case you

(01:03:32):
need to threaten somebody. No one was hurt, luckily, and
the guy is in trouble for well a lot of things.
I don't think that also makes people work faster. We've
had several versions of that story. Recently out of Florida
where people are noticing, say, and granted, there's been so
many difficult things with all the hurricanes recently and all
the digging out and then having to get hit again. Luckily,

(01:03:56):
even though Milton was bad, none of it feels anywhere
near as bad as does to people I talk to
in the area. So truthfully, it's still not good, but
it's nowhere near as bad as it's been in the past.
So there's some weird silver lining in that. But maybe
it's just people being so angry. I'm now defending Florida man.
I got here and immediately my mentality is to try

(01:04:16):
to defend them. I guess I should leave it b
But maybe that mentality the frustration is overboard and the
guy also has a machete. The other story, a man
faces over five hundred charges for allegedly dealing stolen items.
He violated He violated pawnbroker laws. He does not have
any TV show, any pawnbroking thing out there in order

(01:04:37):
to do this with. But CBS News reported on this
one that's not going to go. Well, that's a lot
of charges. You're going to struggle just a bit in
court to go through all of them. I wonder how
you even go through that. Do you read them all
off one at a time, and then when he's eventually
either convicted or found innocent, do you again go through
them one at a time? Does the jury get asked
for five hundred different questions? I'm not sure. I don't

(01:05:00):
I really want to know. I imagine he's just gonna
plead guilty, because why not. This makes no sense. You
gotta have some licenses and stuff in order to open
a pawnbroking shop. You can't just tell people to drop
stuff off at your house or a place that you're
renting and then sell it to other people. That's not
how it works, even if Facebook Marketplace makes you think that.
Oh by the way, real quick side note caveat selling

(01:05:23):
things on FAKEOK. Facebook marketplace is horrific. It's the worst
experience in the world. As someone who recently moved and
did some of that with some of our stuff that
we were getting rid of. So many people click the
button is this available, and then never talk to you again.
I don't know what version of the world that would
be like if we had to deal with this in

(01:05:44):
real life, but I think anyone who does something stupid
on the Internet should be subject to that exact behavior
in their real life to see if they like it.
Because what I'd love to do is find every one
of the people that asked me if the things I
was selling was still available, and for a day hound
them with is this still available? Is this still available?
And then not answer any other questions and not talk

(01:06:06):
to them at all. It is the most annoying. I
don't know who else has done it recently. Facebook get
rid of that feature. Do not allow people to click
a button asking if something is available. Just assume that
anyone selling stuff on your website has it available, and
if it's not available, they'll go ahead and take it
down off of your website. Just do that for me, please.
And if they don't do that, then when someone else

(01:06:27):
asks a different question other than is this available, guess what,
they still wind up with the same answer, I'm sorry,
it's not available. That's fine, we can live in that world.
It's so annoying. I couldn't get over how terrible it was.
There were moments where I just wanted to leave stuff
just on the side of the street, because it'd be
better than having a stranger pay me some amount of
money for it because of how annoying it was. But

(01:06:49):
that's real, and I don't know how that works in
Florida compared to other places like Illinois that I was
living in, but I assume this is a thing that
happens all over the place. I was tempted to do
one more story in the Flora Man segment that is
not a Florida Man story, but I'll hold it. I'll
save it for you till later. But there was a
hot pocket attack. This happened in Boston, not in Florida.

(01:07:09):
I feel like this is appropriate to happen in places
all throughout where I now am, So maybe we'll see
it in the near future. Maybe it's not news because
it happens every day, But essentially a guy was attacked
with the hot pocket and it was reported on beautifully
by Boston News. So we'll get to that later today,
not here. Craig Gallin's filling in on the Danish show.

Speaker 6 (01:07:29):
Bern a Gun. I've got a lot of friends that
have gotten Berna guns, and they all live in areas
like one of my friends, the first one to get it.
Where's a friend of mine who lives in Washington, d C.
And works in the media and it's you know, it's
a nobody wants to be without protection or in ability
to protect themselves in DC because you know high the crime.
I'm sure you've seen it. And so with Berna's SD,

(01:07:52):
the Burna SD, that's their most popular model. If you
compare what this does and it shoots chemical irritant projectiles
that can deter threats from fifty feet away when you
compare it to like regular stun guns or you know,
they got like one or two shots, right, but with
the Burner SD you have five rounds. And now they have
different models and they have all kinds of different accessories

(01:08:13):
and projectiles. But the thing is is that the places
where you can't carry this is where Burna comes in.
If you don't want to be left as statistic because
of a magical gun free zone area or a gun
free zone sign. And this is legal in all fifty states.
There's no waiting period, there's no background checks. That ships
right to your porch and you are not left defenseless,

(01:08:37):
and that is the whole point to diversify your toolkit.
You can learn more about the Burner gun by visiting
bernat dot com, slash data and get ten percent off
your purchase. It's by r inna dot com slash data
for ten percent off.

Speaker 1 (01:08:53):
This is the Data show. My name is Craig Collins
filling in. You can find data all over d Lash
Dana Lash Radio two of the best places to stay
connected to everything. She's doing, everything going on in her world.
Just excellent human and great broadcaster. I'm not her. I'm
Craig Collins filling in. I'm thrilled to be here doing
the best I can. I do love this. I'll just

(01:09:14):
say this quickly. The Joe Rogan Donald Trump interview, which
lasted like three hours, took on a bunch of different topics.
A Rogan at one point demonstrated his belief on global
warming and environment issues and how different it was from
Donald Trump's position on that or a lot of politicians.
Discussion of those things also at other points pushed back

(01:09:34):
to an extent not the way media described it. Media
described Rogan as completely dismissing Trump on anything election fraud
in some of their recaps of that interview, and that
didn't exactly happen. Rogan absolutely agreed that election fraud does exist.
For anyone to say that zero percent happens in an election,
is being moronic that it probably happens to some extent

(01:09:57):
has actually impact the outcome of an election. I don't
know that Rogan would say that per se, but darn it.
The conversation itself lasted a long time, covered a lot
of topics, three hours long. Someone actually went out there
and said that Rogan gave Trump the questions in advance.
How do you give someone that much stuff in all,
Like if you're giving Kamala Harris question in advance. I

(01:10:19):
get that she spends twenty minutes to an hour at
most with anyone that she specifically curates out of a
pile and picks to talk to. Even Fox knew she
only gave them twenty minutes because they didn't probably give
her questions in advance, but she wouldn't do a three
hour sit down even with the knowledge of what they
were going to talk about. Trump doesn't care even if
he got questions, which he didn't. Rogan rejected this idea completely.

(01:10:42):
I doubt he'd even pay attention to them. I think
Trump is the kind of guy that would go in
with whatever plan he had, regardless of what they were
going to ask, because he wants to go whatever roads
he wants to go. Anyway, they talked about that too.
By the way, Trump called his speech giving stuf of
bringing in a bunch of topics and kind of bouncing

(01:11:03):
back and forth between them as weaving. He said he
weaves in certain things, or he weaves out certain topics.
I thought that was pretty interesting too. But nonetheless, Rogan
was asked this question and did reject on social media,
saying no, he did not give questions to Trump in
advance and people saying he did. Are people just trying
to further their own narrative or broken things in their brain?

(01:11:24):
And also taking a shot at one guy who went
viral for it, said that guy probably also he is
sitting down, which I found amusing. I did like that
joke from Rogan. All right, let's move on to this.
John Carl, ABC News surprised how well Trump did in
Madison Square Garden.

Speaker 15 (01:11:39):
I was there for about six hours yesterday. First thing
I've got to say, Madison Square Garden was packed. People
waited hours to get in. They sat through hour after
hour of this rally. They were fervent in their devotion
to all things Trump. Trump has created a movement. There
is no doubt. I cannot think of another Republican faire

(01:12:00):
year of my lifetime who could have come into a
democratic city like New York and put together anything like.

Speaker 1 (01:12:05):
That, anything at all like what Trump did. Absolutely, I
think a lot of us agree with him that the
ability to do that, and honestly, just to demonstrate that
he could, because it doesn't really feel like he's actually
trying to fight to win New York. I don't think
people would make that argument, but to have a sellout crowd.
They sang God bless America at one point, which is

(01:12:26):
as somebody who was born in New Jersey, somebody who
certainly remembers specific times that we all remember in our country,
in our world, and how much America came together after
nine to eleven support for New York and support for
America as a whole was incredible. And honestly, I'm also
a Yankee fan that hasn't been going so well the

(01:12:48):
last couple of days. Although Game three is tonight and
hopefully things I go better this evening for the Yankees,
but I vividly remember after nine to eleven watching on TV,
wasn't able to go to the game myself, and seeing
the way in which America kind of surrounded themselves, even
in the Yankees, even in you know, a world series
and things going on at that time, and the support

(01:13:10):
for the city itself and the firefighters and police officers,
first responders, because we pictured that community being like any
other community in our country, anyone else in the world,
dealing with what they were dealing with and struggling the
way they did. And so God bless America is saying
at Yankee Games now because of that, because of nine
to eleven, and so it's just sort of surreal to

(01:13:32):
see the people of New York, at least the people
who shut up in Madison Square Garden creating that same
environment of you know, patriotism that exists only in certain
moments for a lot of our society, very much to
the detriment I would say of our society as a whole.
All Right, Another thing I want to play because even
though you could take that version of a conversation or

(01:13:55):
that version of a path on describing what Madison Square
Garden with Trump at the forefront of it was, you
can also say this stuff, if you're AOC.

Speaker 3 (01:14:04):
Was not this was a hate rally. This was not
just a presidential rally. This was also not just a
campaign rally. I think it's very important for people to
understand that these are many January sixth rallies. These are
many Stop the Steel rallies. These are rallies to prime
an electorate into rejecting the results of an election if

(01:14:25):
it doesn't go the way that they want. Because Donald
Trump and that entire cadre of people up on that stage,
Stephen Miller, et cetera, do not respect the law of
the United States of America.

Speaker 1 (01:14:40):
Don't respect it. They don't respect us. She is so
mad that this successfully happened so close to her turf
in New York City. She's so upset about that, you
can tell in the way and what she talks about it.
And Democrats are calling it a hate rally. Democrats are
saying that Trump, you know, went to extremes in order
to discuss his positions on things. Now, I'll tell you one,

(01:15:02):
just honest, for anyone that's never been to New York
City or lived in New York City or understand it
at all. The collection of people there as massive as
you can probably guess, and people's opinions are all over
the place. But you watch something like a Saturday Night Live,
for example, and especially early on, they're making jokes about
Joe Biden and the crowd goes silent. There's a lot

(01:15:23):
of New York that winds up showing itself in a
certain way in these moments, and then you have a
Trump rally with that amount of people responding to the
things he's saying. Yes, he did say that if a
migrant I think was the word he chose, killed a cop,
that he would push for the death penalty as a
punishment for someone who took the life of a police officer. Now, granted,
that's the moment that's getting played all over media by

(01:15:46):
the left to try to claim that this was a
hate rally and that was the entirety of the discussion,
which it was not. But more importantly, and this is
the only way I can say this, and I can
play the audio again, but I'm not even going to
play it. That's what he said. There was a time
in our society, again around nine to eleven, where support
for cops and firefighters was so through the roof, and

(01:16:08):
honestly for years and years, for decades before that, that
if a cop was hurt in the line of duty,
it was the kind of thing that a community rallied around,
and the community wanted the person to be held responsible.
They wanted the punishment to fit the crime, whatever narrative
that takes for you in your own life. And so
it's sort of surreal to think that the things that

(01:16:29):
Trump is saying are shaped the way they're shaped by
media because they intentionally misrepresent the core of the idea,
and they sort of love to dabble in what is
a change society for some people. I don't know if
the death penalty is the right decision or not. A
me Catholic part of me says certain things in my

(01:16:50):
brain as far as my religion goes, no matter what
the crime was. The pope infamous or famously forgave someone
a former pope for shooting him, Pope John Paul. So
there's something about that. But nonetheless, regardless of if that's
the line for you or not, or however you go
through that part of the discussion, a significant punishment, a

(01:17:11):
tremendously negative punishment for someone who kills a cop in
our country that's not here legally shouldn't be as controversial
of a statement as it is. But it's because they
want to paint that as well, now they hate anyone
from another country. That's not true. If you are completely
fine with legal immigration, you're completely fine with this, that,
and all these other things that exist in our world,

(01:17:33):
and you only have a problem with someone who's a
criminal who hurts a cop as like the reason to
get the punishment to be what it is. Why would
that It's sort of a here, I know I'm not
getting my point out. Well, let me try one more time,
because I want to make sure this is crystal clear.
It'd be like being in the middle of an argument
and someone just deciding that anything you're saying, any of

(01:17:55):
the topic of discussion, is irrelevant, and like kicking you
in the face. Ah, I love that version of a thing,
and then only wanting to talk about how mad you
are that you got kicked in the face, not not
even taking blame themselves, Like, yeah, I kicked you in
the face, but so what, look at how mad you are,
look at how mean of a person you are, just
because somebody kicked you in the face that one time.
That's what this is. That's what this discussion is is

(01:18:18):
is the point matters but needs to be forgotten, so
the emotion has to take control, and the emotion has
to then be blamed on things that have nothing to
do with what you're talking about in the first place.
I hope that made more sense. I hope we got
there all right. I want to play one other piece
of audio. I do like this too. I do think
this is pretty interesting. This is a former cop. This
is an individual who also was the acting director of

(01:18:39):
ICE during the Trump administration, Thomas Homan, who very simply,
in a sixty minutes answer, says, why deportation of people
who aren't there legally in the country isn't as bad
as media tells you it is, even if it's expensive.
I love kind of the matter of fact, the way
this goes.

Speaker 8 (01:18:58):
We have seen one estimate that said it would cost
eighty eight billion dollars to deport a million people a year.

Speaker 10 (01:19:07):
I don't know if it's accurate or not.

Speaker 8 (01:19:09):
Is that what American taxpayers should expect?

Speaker 9 (01:19:12):
What price do you put on a national security?

Speaker 15 (01:19:13):
Is that worth it?

Speaker 6 (01:19:15):
Is there a way to carry out mass deportation without
separating families?

Speaker 4 (01:19:20):
Of course?

Speaker 14 (01:19:21):
Is families can be deported together.

Speaker 1 (01:19:26):
Look, I'm not not laughing because the concept itself is
something that amuses me. I'm laughing because of how simplistically
he answers the question could we fix this problem that
the Democrats talk about all the time as one of
the biggest issues. Yeah, you can fix it. You can
do it this way. That's one way to fix it.
That's the no nonsense approach people used to have to

(01:19:47):
some of these discussions that people just simply don't have
anymore now. Now, granted, I understand the emotional poll or
the emotional side of the discussion, but that's not his
area to concern himself with. That's the problem is that
more and more people want everyone to have a heart,
when some people, to do their jobs, need to not
have a heart. You need to not think about it

(01:20:07):
from an emotional standpoint. Is this legal? Is this illegal?
Is this good? Is this bad? Those are black and
white questions. Those are questions that don't need to have
debate and nuance behind them. And especially for people like
him put in charge as police officers or government officials
designed to do certain things to protect us, that should
be the position he has, and then someone else, maybe

(01:20:29):
above him, has some sort of more nuanced position, and
yet it is also being represented today as horrible and
terrible Okay, We'll take another break. A lot coming up.
Craig Collins filling in on the Dana Show.

Speaker 6 (01:20:41):
Our partners at Black Rifle Coffee. The best coffee that
is out there, the best roast. They get the best
coffee beans. This is great coffee, veteran owned, veteran run,
veteran roasted. They get the best coffee beans from around
the world and they bring them back to their facilities
in Tennessee and Utah and they roast them. You can
have right now now at Black Rifle Coffee dot com.

(01:21:02):
You need to check out their Freedom Roast. It's the
It's what our founding fathers would drink. If they were
drinking Black Rifle coffee. They're drinking any coffee'd be a
Black Rifle coffee. If they were drinking Black Rifle coffee,
it'd be Freedom Roast. It's a smooth, medium roast. You
got notes of milk and chocolate and vanilla, and it's
complimented by a hint of cinnamon in a buttery finish.
And every sip is a throat punch to Marxism. It's

(01:21:25):
a tribute to liberty and those who fought for our nation.
And you can save twenty percent using code Dana and
subscribe to the Coffee Club at Black Rifle Coffee and
get free shipping and automated orders right to your doorstep.
And you get the convenience of always having your favorite
coffee on hand without the need for last minute trips
that's stressful when you wake up and there's no coffee.
You can also find apparel, kettles, grinders, mugs, and more.

(01:21:46):
Get your freedom on with the Freedom Roast from Black
Rifle Coffee dot Com and taste all of the other
topshelf rost they offer, like the Black Roast dot just
black and silence are smooth and whatever you decide, you
get twenty percent off your order with Codina. That's twenty
percent and off Codana Black Riflecoffee dot Com.

Speaker 4 (01:22:03):
Not Able to catch the full Dana show, Follow Dana's
Absurd Truth podcast and get news and laughs delivered in short,
easy to digest episodes ideal for your busy lifestyle on
Apple or wherever you get your podcast.

Speaker 1 (01:22:16):
That's right, or follow Dana at d Lash or Dana
Lash Radio on x on Twitter. Great ways to stay
connected to her. My name is Craig Collins filling in.
Let's do a quick five.

Speaker 13 (01:22:27):
And now all of the news you would probably miss
it's time for Dana's quickfive.

Speaker 1 (01:22:33):
So apparently KFC is hoping that you love the sound
of Kentucky fried chicken as much as they do when
it's being cooked, because they're saying, and I guess they
made this sound in connection with Hatch, which is a
company that tries to help people sleep via playing white
noise for them. They say it sounds exactly like rainfall.

(01:22:53):
You tell me. Here's the bit where they set up
actually recording the sound for their sleep app with the
guy who was in charge of Hatch. That's gonna be
one of the voices on this audio.

Speaker 14 (01:23:04):
You heard the internet rumor that the sound of falling
rain is actually the sound of fried chicken.

Speaker 12 (01:23:09):
Yes, should we get to the bottom of that rumor?

Speaker 2 (01:23:12):
Yeah, I've got everything set up ready to go.

Speaker 8 (01:23:13):
Okay, let's make chicken, all right, Okay, it sounds yeah,
it sounds a little like right.

Speaker 1 (01:23:24):
I'll be honest, She's right about that. It does. I
don't think i'd want to fall asleep to the sound
of fried chicken at all for any reason whatsoever. But
I do find that pretty interesting. And Hatch, the company
that plays white noise to help you fall asleep. I
might actually be able to help you with their chicken sounds.
And KFC is just thrilled by it, probably every once
in a while after your sleep. But also whisper buy

(01:23:45):
more KFC. Another thing out there that I saw that
I thought was interesting just quickly. This isn't necessarily politics,
although it is politics. About twenty five percent of our
expected amount of people that will vote in this election
have already voted. Forty three million people have either sent
in a mail in or showed up for an in
person early voting to cast their vote. Nationally, if one

(01:24:08):
hundred and seventy million people vote in this election, forty
three million is more than twenty five percent. Is this real?
Is one question I guess I would ask, and we'll
all be asking as we go here, And is this
something we'll see more of for years to come? Are
people sick of the elections? They just want to cast
their ballot and be done with it and move on.
I don't know. I think that's an interesting question to

(01:24:30):
ask in an interesting discussion to have for sure. Also
out there, as far as quick five topics, police in
Boston are looking for a suspect of a hot pocket assault.
That's what they're calling it. A guy went into a store,
grabbed a hot pocket, argued with the clerk over whether
or not he had to pay for said hot pocket,
and when he decided, he did the frozen hot pocket

(01:24:51):
at the guy that was trying to charge him for it.
Just mean all around Boston terrible. As a New York fan,
I think I can say that and feel confident about it,
although I'm sure they'll tell me a lot of things
about how poor the Yankees are doing. By the way,
that's another of my quick five topics. Game three is tonight,
the first game in New York City for a World
Series in fifteen years. We pray, if you're a Yankee fan,

(01:25:12):
that it wakes up Aaron Judge and any of the
rest of the Yankees that need to play better. I
guess mostly the pitchers because gian Carlo and Wan Soto
have been amazing, Labor's doing well. It's really just Aaron
Judge and the pitching staff that needs to remember, oh, yeah,
we don't get to play anymore if we keep losing.
Right now, but that game is tonight, I go Yankees,
and well once again, Boston hot pocket, not surprise at all,

(01:25:35):
quick break, A little more coming up. Craig Collins filling
in on The Dana Show.

Speaker 4 (01:25:41):
Makes some common sense of the crazy headlines. With a
Dana Show podcast, you're on the go guide for getting
up to speed on today's most important stories. Subscribe on YouTube,
Apple or your favorite podcast platform.

Speaker 1 (01:25:53):
filling in. Thrilled to be with you. You know what's interesting
to me? I have some audio I'll play in a
second of Kamala Harris and what she says she'll do
her first one hundred days in office. It's interesting she
wants to fix a lot of the problems that essentially
her own administration created, which is nice. I guess if
you're going to say that, hey, you need me to

(01:26:14):
fix this stuff that I broke. But before I get
to that, there are two stories out there that fascinate me.
One is about Jeff Bezos and the others about Elon Musk.
So the Amazon founder is getting backlash because of course
is the editor at large and well or is someone
who owns the Washington Post. He is getting shots fired

(01:26:34):
by calumnists editor at large other in his organization in
that organization for condemning the paper's decision to not endorse
Kamala Harris, saying that it would have no specific candidate,
that it's throwing its weight behind whatever weight that is
in today's world. And Bezos himself is now dealing with backlash.
Others within the Washington Post are dealing with the same

(01:26:56):
calls of how dare you, sir? And what's fast about
this to me is, of course, Jeff Bezos one of
the richest people in our society. Then you look at
Elon Musk. He has been more of a vocal candidate
for Trump and is getting attacked for a decision to
encourage people to sign up to vote in the election,
not to vote for a specific candidate, but to vote

(01:27:16):
in general. And one of the things he would do
in response to that is give a lucky set of
people a bunch of money which he can afford. He
wouldn't even notice it. It's like him giving you his
version of twenty bucks a million dollars or whatever it is.
And he's facing a lot of backlash and complaints about
that too. But here's the thing that I find interesting
about those topics. There's never been an easier way to

(01:27:39):
describe how much the ridiculous, elite whatever you want to
call it money, the dirty money of Washington impacts the
outcome of our elections than these two stories and how
regular news media is approaching them. And no, I don't
think that Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk are single handedly

(01:27:59):
capable of, you know, changing the outcome of our election.
Although maybe if they wanted to spend a bunch more
of their money on it, maybe they could. But nonetheless,
it's yelling to you out loud the thing that so
many of us know that the money itself in Washington
is what drives so many of these decisions. I mean
fear about the Heritage Foundation and Project twenty twenty five.

(01:28:21):
And Harris, I think again talking about how it's got
Trump's DNA all over it, which I have that clip
that just sounds gross as a phrase. That's not the
kind of thing I want to hear from Kamala Harris.
And it's not true Trump has denied it. But again,
it's all of these you know, Washington insiders or elite
or all this money that makes a lot of people
believe that there's so much that goes on behind the

(01:28:43):
scenes in the dark that we never know about that
influences so much of even how media discusses things, and
media rejects that. News media gets offended by the idea,
how dare you, sir, say that we would make decisions
based on the amount of money we're making from certain
organizations or loss or the pharmaceutical industry per se as
one example, How dare you say that? But then they

(01:29:06):
cover so much of why Bezos and Musk are doing
things they don't like, one not behaving in a way
that has a specific candidate of choice, and the other
one in certainly behaving with a candidate of choice, but
more than that, just trying to encourage people to vote.
Both are bad. We hate them equally, but we also
reject the notion, if we're mainstream media, legacy media, whatever

(01:29:27):
you want to call it, that these deep pocketed people
have so much of an impact on what actually happens
within our political process. All right, let's play play this audio.
Excuse me, I just choked on something. I think someone
just tried to out me or off me a second ago.
This is Harris talking about her first hundred days in office,
and I love the things she wants to fight as

(01:29:48):
far as the problem she'd face, because they're all created
by her in this administration.

Speaker 2 (01:29:52):
Your first one hundred days look like, what would be
your top legislative priority.

Speaker 16 (01:29:57):
Well, it's going to be lowering costs in a package
of legislation that is about law and cost again on
the issue of housing, small businesses, child tax credit, basically
putting more money in the hands of American working people,
but also cutting middle class taxes. A priority in equal
form is going to be what we need to do
to deal with reproductive health care.

Speaker 1 (01:30:20):
I love how much he struggled by the way I just,
in my opinion, struggled in between those first two answers.
The first answer was all about how she needs the
lower costs costs that her administration, the one she's a
part of, has caused, mostly because of their energy policies,
but certainly a lot of other policies that have caused
things to skyrocket and how expensive they are. But then
after that, she's like, and what else, what are the

(01:30:41):
other talking points?

Speaker 15 (01:30:42):
Oh?

Speaker 1 (01:30:42):
Yeah, abortion, we got to talk about that.

Speaker 16 (01:30:43):
One rein state the freedoms and the rights that all
people should have and women should have over their own body.
And then dealing with immigration and in particular border security
and bringing back or problem that bipartisan bill that Donald
Trump killed so we can get more research.

Speaker 1 (01:30:59):
Yeah, that bipartisan bill, according to Byron Donald's and a
whole lot of other politicians, doesn't actually address all the
issues that are caused by the broken immigration or illegal
immigration system we have in play right now. So I
love that that one's reference too, because it's not going
to be passed by Republicans. They don't support a lot
of the things that were stuffed into that bill that

(01:31:20):
had nothing to do with it. Now. Granted, part of
it was supporting Ukraine with blank check after blank check,
which needed to be talked about on its own. That's
just one of several issues making everyone who's currently already
in this country legally here as opposed to dealing with
illegal immigration. But I don't know, maybe making some people
leave is one of many other issues, many other discussion

(01:31:41):
points that matter so much there. But what's interesting again
for Harris, as pull numbers are starting to say she's
not doing that great, things are going worse and worse
for her and for Democrats, then they would want things
to be going. But as those discussions happen. She's focused
on two or three issues that they caused and one
issue that she thinks is a home run an election. Now, granted,

(01:32:02):
I will say this, and I do think it's really
interesting how viral this went. A Texas board certified obgyn
went viral I think on Friday, although really these tweets
were more consumed all over the weekend, obliterating the notion
that Texas is putting people in mothers in danger because

(01:32:22):
of its abortion policies. And I can just read some
of the specifics on what she put out, she does
seem like an interesting person that maybe should jump on
some radio shows and other things and talk about this.
Ingrid Scope is her name in MD. She says that
she's been practicing for thirty years. She's delivered over five
thousand babies, and she wants to shed light on the
harmful lies that are coming up with this election and

(01:32:45):
for pro abortion lobbies, including in those lies are moments
that put parents or mother's lives in jeopardy at risk.
She says that she has absolutely acted in moments when
sadly they would lose a child, a child would not survive,
but it had to be done because of the mother's life.
Here's what she tweeted exactly. I have intervened when a

(01:33:07):
pregnancy complication threatened a mother's life, even when I anticipated
that sadly the unborn child would not survive, the action
required to protect his mother, to protect her mother. This
is something she did within the letter of the law,
under every pro This is her still speaking via her
social media pages. Under every pro life law, including in Texas,

(01:33:27):
physicians can intervene to save women's lives in pregnancy emergencies.
This is not something that's panned. In fact, according to
recent Texas Health and Human Service Commission reports, physicians reported
one hundred and sixteen abortions for medical emergencies and physical
health issues between July twenty twenty two and May of
twenty twenty four. Not talked about, not discussed, not even

(01:33:49):
remotely honestly articulated by much of the media that wants
you to believe in their one sided version of rhetoric.
But I just thought it's fascinating that these individuals, they say,
I'm an expert, I live here, I work in this field,
I deal with this every day, and mainstream media is like,
stop saying stuff. We need you to shut up because
it's not who you are, it's what you say that

(01:34:12):
matters to us. And if you say the wrong thing,
we don't want to deal with it. We don't want
to let you talk. We want it to just go
the way of you know, in one ear and out
the other as much as humanly possible. But those are it.
Those are the three issues that Kamala Harris will sit
on and run on and try to convince you matter
more so than anything else. And honestly, for two of

(01:34:32):
the three issues, she's even vague on details of what
she would do to fix the problems that she herself created.
One last thing, just to throw it out there. I
know it's getting talked about a lot. Pull numbers are
demonstrating Trump pulling further and further ahead, a granted only
by like a percentage of point or two, but certainly
in some of the battleground states, Trump is doing better

(01:34:54):
and better on the heels of his giant rally in
Madison Square Garden in New York City. You have to
say to yourself that if Trump is someone who two
elections in a row heavily outperformed his pulling numbers, he
did much better than people expected him to do. People
claim that individuals who answer pulls lie and then show

(01:35:15):
up and vote for the candidate that they didn't say
they would vote for, as opposed to I don't know.
Pulls just heavily getting the wrong people to answer these questions,
and people who don't care to answer the polls, maybe
not returning the phone call. But if we're sitting here
right now, eight days before the election, and that's the
world we're in, Harris is getting obliterated and that shouldn't

(01:35:36):
be a shocking statement. That should be the kind of
expectation many have, and it seems they have because one
of my favorite things was Harris herself recently saying that
his poll numbers are starting to trend in the negative.
You can't trust them. She doesn't want to trust them,
she doesn't want to believe in them. She wants to
trust her own gut instincts on this, which feels so
eerily similar to any time anyone else says that PULL

(01:35:59):
numbers are this number that number, I can't be trusted,
and well dart it. Politicians go after and a media
goes after someone for saying those things. Here, I'll just
play the audio for you, because I do think it's
fascinating how much of hypocrites people can be when all
of a sudden, Harris is saying something that you've heard
from them many times before, bouncing your decisions on what
to do over the next nine days.

Speaker 11 (01:36:20):
So, to be very frank with you, my internal pulling
is my instinct. I let the campaign people deal with the.

Speaker 1 (01:36:27):
I just think about what I think is going to happen,
and I don't worry about what any of the numbers
are saying or anyone's telling me it's going to occur
that might be horrible for me, are terrible for our
party in general. I just ignore that stuff. Who cares
about that stuff? Let's let that stuff go. I love
that approach, and honestly, a lot of people would say
that's fine, Madam Vice President. Do whatever you want. Just
don't vilify the other guy when he says those exact

(01:36:49):
same things too, and says that he doesn't believe in
polls or he thinks that some of them are unfair
to him, which they often have actually been. All Right,
I will take a break. We'll get out of here
with lighter stuff. Is darn it? How can you keep
going with all the serious stuff? All the time. We're
just a few days away from the election. You're probably
dealing with every person in your life talking about it now,
even people that only sort of cared about it. So

(01:37:12):
we'll close the show without any of that being the
topic of discussion, and just a bit. This is Craig
Collins filling in on The Dana Show.

Speaker 4 (01:37:19):
On the go and need a quick news fix with
a fun twist. Follow Dana's Absurd Truth podcast for bite size,
informative episodes perfect for your busy schedule on Apple or
wherever you get your podcast.

Speaker 1 (01:37:31):
That's right, this is the Dana Show. My name is
Craig Collins, filling in. Thrilled to be with you for
just a little bit more here, and let's not talk
about anything serious, shall we at the end? I love this.
Gen Z says it has the most annoying coworkers, I
meaning other gen Z professionals, not saying that other generations
are annoying to them. One of the reasons why gen
Z says that they feel their fellow workers of that

(01:37:54):
age group are people who don't want to be around
is they don't know how to fit in, which I
thought was interesting, saying the problem is everybody's trying too
hard to fit in, and it makes you annoying in
a workplace. Just do work, Just show up, get a
job done. Maybe you don't like everybody you work with,
maybe you love them. Maybe you want to be best
friends and hang out all the time. Both are fine.

(01:38:15):
Everything that is important in the workplace is not necessarily
important in your social life. I love how that's the issue.
But because of that, apparently many young professionals are saying
their coworkers annoy them in how much they want to
try to fit in with them. I guess I don't know.
I don't know exactly what that is, but I love
that story being out there in the world. This one
is hilarious to me. Not because of the crime. The

(01:38:38):
crime is bad. Don't do this. It's because of the
reaction to it on the internet. But a guy was
pulled over in Connecticut for driving one hundred and eighteen
miles on the highway bad. Don't do that. He was
on I eighty four in Willington. A trooper pulled him
over and said, hey, that's a little bit too fast.
He had a New York City license plate or a
New York license plate, which might be saying, but here's

(01:39:00):
the part the internet loved. He was driving a Hyundai Elantra.
I don't even know what year the car is, but
it was a blue one day Ladra. Most people were like,
I didn't know the car would go that fast. I
didn't know you could pull one hundred and eighteen out
of that vehicle. And I love that reaction to it.
Maybe the trooper was even somewhat surprised to be pulling
over that car and not a nicer vehicle. No offense

(01:39:21):
to the Hyundai, but that was shocking, and I am
again thinking that maybe they need to turn this into
some sort of commercial themselves, to be like, you won't
believe the mistakes you could make behind the wheel of
Ondai Lantra as far as speed is concerned, but don't
make these mistakes. They'd be bad. Luckily, no one was hurt.
Another story I saw that I thought was interesting Elon

(01:39:42):
Musk in the news, not just for his political decisions
and things like that, but also because of how cavalierly
he kind of discussed that aliens could be real. Honestly.
One of the discussion points that seemed to be a
big deal between Trump and Joe Rogan was the potential
existence of aliens, So that was a big conversation piece,
and Trump saying that, yeah, there's a lot of likelihood

(01:40:03):
that it's true. But Elon went a step further, saying,
they're probably walking around among us right now. I don't
know if that's because we don't notice who they are
or how they behave or anything else, or if we're
just so focused on ourselves. Maybe we're all looking at
our cell phones so much that an alien could legitimately
walk by us looking like an alien, and a lot
of people wouldn't look up. I don't know, but Elon

(01:40:24):
said it. They could be wandering the earth right now
in some form, and you know, it's not as big
of a story as it should be, and that feels true.
I have had people tell me that the distraction of
aliens is something that politicians want to use to hide
whatever the real things are that we're supposed to care about.
I'll never accept that, because aliens, to me, will always

(01:40:45):
be a fascinating concept. I'll always have the ability to
multitask and hear about the existence of them and other stuff.
I'll never have to do just one or the other.
It's not an either or with me. Tell me all
the stuff you know about aliens. That'll be fine, and
then tell me anything else you'd want to tell me
on top of it, and I'll be able to pay
attention to each equally or well, maybe not equally, but enough.

(01:41:06):
And one last one, just a quick story that I
saw that I wanted to throw out there. There's a
heartwarming moment that's gone viral for a family that gave
their beloved grandfather an explosive send off by sending his
ashes up into the night sky via fireworks. Sometimes when
this stuff goes viral, people think of it as dark, like, well,
someone passed away, and now we're all talking about it

(01:41:28):
with this positive thing around it. Out of all the
one I don't agree with that, I just think that's
a reaction some people have. Out of all the things
that have gone viral, like silly obituaries, whatever else, this
is the one I'm most envious of. Firing your ashes
off in a ridiculous firework display sounds incredible. That sounds
like the kind of thing that absolutely I'm going to

(01:41:51):
add now to any sort of discussion on what I
want to have happen when I leave this earth, because
I want it to be as crazy and explosive as
this event was. And they said that their grandfather was
a guy with a big personality. He was a guy
who walked into a room and you noticed him. There
so no better way to send him off than to
blow a bunch of stuff up in the sky with

(01:42:11):
his ashes in them. That is awesome to me and
hilarious as a move. And I wonder if someone in
the family was like, really, we're buying this many fireworks
for this, and someone else pushed them and said, there
can't be too many. We could do twenty thousand more
and it'll still be fine. We want it to be epic.
All right, that's it. That's the show for today. Craig
Collins filling in. Go Yankees, Dana back tomorrow.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Trump’s MSG Rally Rocks NYC, The Left’s Meltdown, and Kamala’s 100-Day Plans

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

All Episodes

Trump’s MSG Rally Rocks NYC, The Left’s Meltdown, and Kamala’s 100-Day Plans

Stuff You Should Know