Trump Takes South African Refugees, A Smooth Saudi Speech & Sen. Rand Paul Joins Us

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
So Potus right now is speaking at a forum. It's
a free market forum that's being held in read and
he arrived about well, I mean technically yesterday. It's the
Saudi US Investment Forum. He's speaking there along with I mean,
obviously you have the Mohammad Ben Salman, who's the NBS,

(00:21):
the head of Saudi Arabia, the Crown Prince, you have
I'm trying to think of the number of you have
a lot of big companies that are there, including the
Black Rock you got them there as well. But it
is a very interesting speech that Potus is giving, and
we're going to isolate one part of it that came
about maybe a minute or two minutes before what you

(00:45):
just heard. It's only delayed by a few minutes. And
I thought it was very smart because Potus is up
there and clearly you can tell that he has a
really good relationship with MBS. We'll call him MBS for short.
And he got up there and when he was speaking,
he immediately he went and very you know, segued into

(01:06):
the Abraham Accords and the importance of Saudi Arabia signing
on to the Abraham Accords, which they have indicated that
they are open to doing. And I thought that was
very interesting that he did that Nriod in front of
Mohammed Ben Salman and all of these other dignitaries and

(01:29):
leaders that are there, and it's very very it's very interesting.
He got a very warm welcome, which is I mean,
and we're going to talk about this. I can't even
discuss how different it is from what Joe Biden got.

(01:49):
So we're going to discuss all of that. Welcome to
the program. We're at the top of this first hour,
and we may dive back in just in and out
of this address Trump. It's a major speech that he's making,
and I think some of the most important soundbites we've
already we've already nabbed, including Kane found the one that
I mean had just happened. He snipped the one that

(02:11):
I was just referencing, because I thought that was incredibly
It was an incredibly important aspect because also, I mean,
you have to remember, for some reason, Biden as like
a continuation of Obama. Biden was so much more inclined
towards Iran, and you know, you have the Shia Sunni conflict,

(02:34):
was so much more inclined towards Iran to the point
where it was detrimental to our relationship with Saudi Arabia.
And I think you will remember when Biden went to
Saudi Arabia hat in hand, after he had insulted Mohammed
bin Salman and the other leaders in Saudi Arabia, and
after he insulted them and called him names essentially, and

(02:56):
then they told him to go pound sand over the
price of crude. Now look now look at the difference
in reception, and we're going to talk a little bit
about the changes that have undergone that Saudi Arabia has undergone.
It is a very different nation than what it was
ten years ago. And it sounds weird for a lot

(03:17):
of us, for some people to say that or to
even realize it, but there has been a major shift
in direction in that country. And we're going to discuss
that because it's all playing right now honestly in the
United States's favor. So again, welcome. This is the SoundBite
that I was referencing. EI think that this was one
of the biggest ones. Can we play that?

Speaker 2 (03:42):
Yeah, And with the historic Abraham Accords that were so
proud of, all the momentum was aimed at peace and
it aimed very successfully. It's been an amazing thing, the
Abraham Accords, and it's my favorite, hope, wish and even
my dream that Saudi Arabia place. I have such respect for,

(04:04):
especially over the last fairly short.

Speaker 1 (04:06):
Period of time, what you've been able to do.

Speaker 2 (04:08):
But we'll soon be joining the Abraham Accords. I think
it'll be a tremendous tribute to your country and it
will be something that's really going to be very important
for the future of the Middle East. I took a
risk in doing them, and they've been an absolute bonanza
for the countries that have joined. The Biden administration did

(04:29):
nothing for four years. We would have had it filled out.
But it will be a special day in the Middle
East with the whole world watching when Saudi Arabia joins us,
and you'll be greatly honoring me, and you'll be greatly
honoring all of those people that have fought so hard
for the Middle East. And I really think it's going
to be something special. But you'll do it in your

(04:49):
own time, and that's what I want, and that's what
you want, and that's the way it's going to be.

Speaker 1 (04:53):
That's key. You'll do it in your own time. So
he's noting, he's acknowledging, Okay, yes, and you are. You
have indicated that you're open to joining the Abraham Accords,
which have done a lot to stabilize the Middle East,
and in fact, on October seventh, you had a lot
of cooperation from those signatories against Hamas, against Iran in

(05:14):
response to that atrocity, and Saudi Arabia is again, it's
very different than what it was when we were all
I mean a couple of you know, a couple of
decades ago, Very very different. And he's saying, notice how
he ended that SoundBite, You're going to do it in
your own time, noting that they're that they're moving towards that,
and he says he's indicating, I'm not pressuring you, but

(05:36):
I want this done. And he's saying that Verry On
in front of all of them, saying yes, we want
you to join the Abraham Accords. And he's also saying
that this is a different direction than what it was
under the Obama Biden regime. The Biden regime was just
the third term of Barack Obama's tenure, and it's a
very different direction because the United States was favoring Saudi

(05:59):
Arabia geopolitical foe, which is Iran, whereas the United States
is going back to Saudi Arabia and Saudi Arabia is
I can't. I can't emphasize how much different it is,
whether it's women driving, or whether women having more representation
in the courts, which all contributes to stronger family units,
or whether opening up to more capitalistic opportunities as well

(06:22):
as getting away from some of the factions previously in
the family that have been very much inclined against the
United States. And that's what a lot of people don't
realize as well. It's very different, and it's their vision
twenty thirty project. And you could tell even back when
they had Mohammed Ben Nayef, who was the Crown Prince,

(06:44):
I mean you could they were signaling this. The Trump
administration noted that there was definitely a clear transition under way.
And then after he was out, Mohammed ben Salman, who
is the Crown Prince and the de facto a Prime minister,
he's the driving worse behind that vision twenty thirty and
they are modernizing. They are a lot of people are like, oh, well,

(07:06):
they're trying to you know, whitewash. For the lack of
a better way to put it, there's a lot of
missing nuance, and that there are different factions in their leadership,
just as there are different factions in the leadership of
the United States. And the leadership that wanted to modernize
and become more normalized relations with the United States is
the faction that won out. I have don't know how

(07:28):
else to put it. I mean, the the open the
opening to investment in the United States and these deals,
the fact that they're even leaning towards you know, the
Abraham Accords, which is you know, incredibly important their response
to in the face of October seventh, and just looking

(07:48):
at some of the other like for instance, you know,
they're getting involved in, yes, entertainment and in sports. But
also and this might sound like something silly and stupid,
but I think it's a it's a good measure of
where a nation is. They started having women's like fashion
shows for women, which is something unheard of there fifteen
twenty years ago. They had swimsuit fashion shows. And not

(08:11):
like the full one piece or the you know you're
gonna wear your wet suit burka into the sea, No,
like actual you know, fashion shows. I'm not saying that
they're they're leaning towards you know, crudeness or anything like
you know what you would say. I think, honestly it's
some Victoria's secrets walkways, but they're they're opening up the
idea to modernization and incorporating all of this. It's just

(08:34):
I think it's incredibly significant. Not every nation can be
the United States, but nations that open up to capitalist
opportunities and alliances with the United States that also are
in lockstep with our national interests in our national security.
That's a huge thing that should be acknowledged. I think
already this has been a major victory for the administration,
a big optic. I mean, I mean, think about this,

(08:56):
the non oil sector. I just have some data for
you sector in Saudi Arabia. I mean, that was what
a driving force was by twenty twenty two, that had
grown to account for almost sixty percent of their GDP,
and they began attracting millions upon millions upon millions of
international visitors. They doubled. Now it's by choice. It's women

(09:19):
who want to have something to do, especially as their
kids get older. Women's participation in the workforce nearly doubled
by choice, not because of third wave feminists like what
we've seen in the United States driving people to have
to subsist on two incomes just to support one family.
They lifted the driving ban. That was a huge thing.
Go back to Mia when she did her one video

(09:40):
where she was pretending that she was you know, they
were racing in the desert. That was in statement to
the previous factions ban on women being able to drive.
Women couldn't go to doctor's appointments, they couldn't go. That's
been lifted. Unemployment has fallen, and they culturally they have
wen They've been opening up to Western retailers, to American businesses. You,

(10:00):
I mean, it's it's It is very stunning. Women don't
have to enter through the back door anymore. You would
not have thought of this. You've seen it fifteen years ago,
and it is. These are just some smaller steps that
indicate an even bigger movement. I think that the United
States needs as many alliances as possible, especially when you

(10:23):
have China, Russia, and Iran, and this is proving they're
proving to be a potentially good one. That's all I'm saying.
And I think it's been very interesting and clearly, you know,
you've seen the reaction to Trump or I mean he
got you know, the escort in as they were as
they were descending into Riad, they had the fighter jets

(10:44):
that were accompanying them, and apparently they broke protocol and
NBS met him on the tarmac. Now, I'm also going
to tell you I'm not going to be wowed by
little stunts of theater. None of those things move me.
But my point in bringing these up to you is
the difference in reception from this administration to the previous one,
and how they're taking our country seriously again, because now

(11:08):
we're being serious about things, whether or not we're having
trouble getting it accomplished in Congress, but they're taking it seriously.
They're taking the leadership of the United States seriously. Again.
We have a lot more on this. Plus we got
to talk about how Democrats finally met refugees they don't like.
Oh yeah, we have a mean girl's moment on the way.
A lot to unpack in today's program as we move.

(11:30):
It's our friends at All Family Pharmacy. Love this company,
Love the website, Love how easy it is to get
the medications that I need, and whether it is things
that the government try to keep from you, like oh,
I don't know, I've Rebecca in our hydroxychlorical and whether
it's antibiotics or your every day maintenance medicines, you can
take control. You can get like a one year supply

(11:51):
of your essential medicines, like medicines for blood pressure or
cholesterol or diabetes. You can skip last minute pharmacy runs
and stay ahead of your health. When you order your
medications directly, you don't have to worry about waiting in
line or the refills. Convenience is absolutely everything, and it's simple.
It's fast, it's affordable, no insurance, no problem. They have

(12:11):
straightforward pricing, online ordering. They ship everything in two to
four days, or if you really need it fast, if
it's a serious issue, you can get overnight in a pinch.
Your health is always within reach, and I order from
the comfort of home, let them deliver right to your door.
The big thing, in addition to the easiness of ordering
is that it's all made in the USA. How many
people can say that you know that your medications are

(12:32):
manufactured right here in this country, high standards of quality
and safety. You don't have to worry about inputs from China.
Visit All Familypharmacy dot com slash data. That's how you
get ten percent off. Use Coddina ten. You get ten
percent off your order. Be prepared protect yourself and your
family today. Visit Allfamilypharmacy dot com slash data coupon code
data ten to save ten percent.

Speaker 3 (12:53):
And now all of the news you would probably miss.
It's time for data's quick five.

Speaker 1 (12:59):
Gosh, we got consumer price index we got to discuss
as well. It's a big pack show today. New health
issue for Joe Biden is apparently somebody found a nodule.
Doctor found a nodle on his prostate hot topic of conversation.
I mean, I'm surprised it's just a nodule. I just
think they said that so far the nature of it
has yet has not been determined yet. It's still like

(13:21):
very early on. But they said it's too soon to
say if it's benign or if it's like, you know,
inflammation or anything of that issue. Let's see. Also, the
can Film Festival has banned riskue outfits after years of trashy,
provocative red carpet displays. I want to go back to
the days of like Grace Kelly and Audrey Hepburn and

(13:43):
like where it was actual tailoring and class and beauty
instead of skanky like herpies looking type of stuff. I mean,
everybody looks like they have been road and hung up.
Can I be honest about it? They do? They look nasty.
A lot of it's not And a lot of these
ladies do not need to be wearing body con. You

(14:03):
can't do that, Okay. If I see fat rolls sticking
out the back of your dress, that means body cons
too tart, is too tight for you. Don't do it.
And if you're a celebrity and you have stylists, you
should not even be making that error. Madonna canceled her
movie about herself, so it's going straight to Netflix. I
don't really care who is that one Julia Chick from
the from Ozark playing her? Because if not, I don't care.

(14:25):
Cargo thieves are attacking the US supply chain at alarming rates.
Total reported losses of topped this is wild half a
billion dollars according to industry insiders. They think it might
be lower per CNBC than the true total, but I'm
not sure. Stick with us. We've got a lot in
store democrats finally met refugees. They don't like shocking right.

(14:46):
Home title Uck is one such company. Now, your home
is your most valuable asset. So when's the last time
that you checked on your home's title? You know, the
legal proof that you own your own house. The issue
is that in today's AI and CyberWorld, scammers will steal
your home titles, and your equity is the target. They
can forge your signature on a document, they can use

(15:08):
a fake notary stamp, pay a small fee with your county,
and before you know it, your homes, your your home's
title has been totally transferred out of your name. You
need to get a free title history report and fourteen
day trial of the million dollar Triple Lock protection and
you can do that at home title lock dot com
using promo code data. You're not even going to know
if somebody forges something, You're not going to know what happened.

(15:29):
I mean, it's transferred without you ever being aware. And
then when you find out, that's when that's you find out,
usually through foreclosure notices or collection calls, and then you
have to hire a lawyer and it is a very
expensive legal battle just to get back what is yours.
Always always protect your assets, particularly your biggest one. Use

(15:49):
promo code data at home title dock dot com and
make sure your title is still in your name. You'll
get a free title history report, plus a free fourteen
day trial of their million dollar Triple Lock Protection twenty
four to seven month monitoring of your title, urgent alerts
to any changes in a fraud should happen, They'll spend
up to a million dollars to fix it. Visit home
title loc dot com today and use promo codeina.

Speaker 4 (16:09):
Keep your finger on the pulse with a Dana Show
podcast delivering timely news with insightful analysis whenever you want,
straight to you on YouTube, Apple or wherever you get
your podcasts.

Speaker 1 (16:23):
Quote is there in Riodd as they play the Star
Spangled banner welcoming him to the nation ahead of the
Saudi Arabian US Investment Forum. Y you had a very
warm welcome and broke protocol even by greeting him on

(16:49):
the tarmac, which he did not do previously at all.
With Joe Biden, they would always send a subordinate. People
were trying to downplay it this morning. I saw all
the excuses this morning that, oh my gosh, No, it wasn't.
He know he did he did greet No, he didn't,
he didn't. They sent a subordinate to greet Biden at
the airport, and then when he would arrive at the palace,

(17:09):
that's when Nbas would come out and greet him. And
I think that that's important. I also think it's Saudi
Arabia knowing that we have a pension in the United
States for you know, that kind of political theater. And
they really wanted to drive home the point how much
they don't like Biden. That's why they I mean, let's
be real, that's why they're doing it. They did not
like Biden. Biden was bad for business, Biden was bad
for international relations. Biden leaned towards their geopolitical enemy Eron.

(17:35):
So they're really driving at home, like I don't think
you could have more of a middle finger in the
air than the welcome that Trump got to Democrats than
what Saudi Arabia gave to Potus as he arrived in
riadd Welcome back to the program, Dana lash with you.
We're at the bottom of this first hour. That's one
of the things that I love about these things. I
will watch videos over and over again of their first interactions,

(17:56):
how they're sitting where they're sitting. Because body language, you
can be the best actor, you can be the best statesman.
Everybody's got to tell. Everybody has a tell. See sidebar
like one of my I would have loved it one
day been a spy. I think it would have been
very fun to do that. It'd have been very fun.

(18:16):
Like you watch everybody and you like a mirror with there.
There's a lot of psychology in it. But and I
will say I think Trump went in strong. I know
there's a lot of criticism of some of the stuff
that he's been doing lately, but I think that him
going in the way that he did. And then he
dropped very nicely, I thought, in a very nice way.
We played that SoundBite, you know, in really kind of
nudging them towards making it official instead of just indicating

(18:40):
that they wanted to be on Team Abraham accords. And
he says, you know, you'll do it your own way,
and that's fine, that's how we would have you do it.
I mean that's I thought that was a power move
and that was very smart. That his very first address,
not even a third of the way through, and he
brought it up that needs to continually be brought up,
So that's good. You know, Iran is probably they're probably
so mad right now, they're watching and all of this.
They're so mad because what are they left to They're

(19:03):
left to use their nasty, little stinky factions. They're little
great value factions, right your little hesbla ragtag team of
welfare terrorists. You know, your Hamas, your little ragtag team
of welfare terrorists. They're not even smart enough to properly
set up a rocket, so they blow up their own
damn schools. They don't they're not even they're not even

(19:24):
smart enough to administer a strip of land that Israel
had no problem administring. And then Hamas gets a hold
of it, and what do they do. They run it
into third world status, like instantly, dig in tunnels, steal
and copper because they're animals. Because Hamas are animals. I've
seen dogs and packs that can govern better than what
they can. It's true, So great speech. We're gonna come

(19:49):
back to it. We finally met some refugees that Democrats
don't like. Have you heard about what's going on in
South Africa? We've only touched on it here and there.
But they got a problem in South Africa, a big problem.
The overcorrection is genocidal. They're killing white farmers in South

(20:10):
Africa because they're white. And so al Trump did has said, hey,
if you are fleeing racial violence, because it's not I've
met people from South Africa at different confabs before and
it is a very real thing. What ends up happening
is the government will step in. They've changed a lot
of policies in recent years, and land that you know,

(20:32):
these people know how to farm and know how to
irrigate and know how to manage, et cetera, is forcibly
taken from them, and then it's given to different families
of color. And then those families have no idea about
land management. They have no idea about agriculture, they have
no idea about livestock, they have no idea about anything
as it pertains to farming or ranching. And then you

(20:54):
don't have any yield. The everything goes sideways, and then
now you're having a problem with you producing your food supply.
There's a lot of genocidal there's a lot of violence
over there right now against particularly white South African farmers,
and I think a lot of people in media are
afraid to talk about it because a lot of people,
including on the right, have been conditioned that if you

(21:15):
bring this up at all, then somehow you're a white supremacist,
which is so stupid. It's an emotional trick designed to
keep people quiet about the issues so that the atrocities
can continue. And I don't know if you've seen some
of this stuff from some of these leaders that they
have over there, but it's pretty rough and they so

(21:36):
Trump decided he was going to allow people who are
fleeing this genocidal violence to be able to come as
actual refugees to the United States. And that's really how
ultimately that whole program is supposed to work. Now, I
want to play for you too sound bites. First, I'm

(21:59):
going to play this is CNN, of course at CNN,
and they're they're trying to say that that no, this, uh,
this is all a lie and that Trump is lying.
Listen to this.

Speaker 5 (22:11):
The South African president says the people arriving in the
US today do not fit the definition of refugees and
that what Trump has been told about their persecution is false.

Speaker 1 (22:23):
Huh, well, that's not true at all. I mean we've
been able to see a lot of this stuff. Uh,
it's it's I mean it's I mean, they're they're doing
what you would call property uh, expropriation, expropriation there. It's
a very terrifying development what has been happening over then,
this has been going on for quite some time. They're

(22:45):
following the Zimbabwe model. Their president this was back in
January beginning of this year, signed the Expropriation Bill, so
the government can confiscate farms without compensation if they can
make the case that it's best for public interest and
the law doesn't specifically only isn't only for farms, it

(23:06):
actually can mean anything any property really at all, which
is wild that this is even happening because there's so
many there's an over abundance of natural resources on that
continent and in South Africa, but we have, I mean,
you have an ungodly amount of government corruption, violence, tribalism,

(23:28):
and it is now a failed state. I don't know
how you can say it. I mean it's I mean,
they like talk about their power grid. I mean, there's
a lot we could discuss here, but they've had like,
for instance, in South Africa, they've been having like power.
They've been having power interruptions since last year, and they
have literally an actual racist government. This is a piece.

(23:52):
This is from a couple of years ago. They have
their Minister of Water and Sanitation. They this is from
South African media back in twenty twenty three. In May,
they revised their guidelines and they basically decided that they

(24:12):
were going to, how do I put it, administer water.
I mean there's water and sanitation services literally like based
on your race, like seriously, race and gender, and if
you're particularly the wrong skin color, they tell you that,

(24:35):
Like for instance, application for mining this is from page
ninety two. Applications for mining related industries. One hundred percent
black owned are exempt to comply with these regulations, et cetera.
So they were squeezing people based on race. And this
is just one of the things that these farmers have
had to deal with. They have race quotas. They've been

(24:56):
banning entire people based on you know, race, from high
from certain just entire sectors, certain sectors. They've also implemented
race quotas that are involved that are every aspect of
life down to water, sanitation, you know, trash, all of that.

(25:18):
All of that is determined literally on the base of
skin color. They introduced race quotas. Their Minister of Water,
Senzo Mitchunu, may have twenty twenty three, introduced race quotas
for the allocation of water use licenses and they said
that AN, A and C, that's their governing party. They

(25:40):
said that under their new water race quotas, applicants that
use more than this certain particular amount or withdraw more
than a set minimum amount from streams must meet strict
racial quotas in order to access water. And it's not
depending on livestock or agriculture or whatever. Streets literally about

(26:01):
race and how many people that work with you on
your land, what race are they? And they said farmers
or companies that have not allocated between twenty five to
seventy five percent of its shares to black citizens will
be denied access all access to water. And that's insane,
that is absolutely devastating. I mean, they've had there's been

(26:21):
constant violence. There are some of the stories that have
come out of South Africa, if you are unfamiliar, are
so gruesome and so barbaric. It is. It's insane. Children
are murdered in front of their parents, women are raped
in front of their spouses before they are brutally killed.
I mean, they have electrical blackouts that are a regular,
everyday thing. There have been stories about their power grid.

(26:45):
I mean, good grief. Even electricity is made. It out
based on race eighty murders every twenty four hours. This
is actually from their official government crime statistics. Eighty murders
every twenty four hours, one hundred and twenty women raped
every twenty four hours, two hundred and forty five children
murdered monthly, eleven women murdered every twenty four hours. Murder
rates are absolutely through the roof and the north. The

(27:07):
African National Congress, they don't want to do anything. They
just go to these conferences and act like they're doing all,
you know, God's work in South Africa, and they're not.
Their economy is a sewer. Their trade balance is just
I mean, I don't think it can get any lower.
Oh my gosh. They can't even, like I said, keep
the lights on their retail industry. They don't have any anymore.

(27:30):
They have no consumer spending power, I mean, how's It
is one of the most unsustainable things I've ever seen,
and the blame goes down to they try to make
all the blame exactly down on racial divide. I mean,
it's it is one of the craziest things ever. They

(27:51):
would have their race quotas. The first race quotas that
they implemented, this was back in June of twenty twenty three,
were designed to demand entire groups from employment. And when
I say groups, I mean white South Africans. The A
and C government also they established those race quotas that
determine the waters. We talked about. It is one of
the craziest CNN says it doesn't exist. Would you like

(28:14):
to hear their leader seeing about murdering white people, white farmers,
the kill de Boer, because that's what all that means.
There's been you know, there's a history there, there's a
history of violence there, but they've decided to lean into it.
I think I threw that in slack this morning, but
it is it's one of the craziest things ever they've
I mean, just like in the past year they were
singing a song at official government events, killed the white farmer.

(28:37):
That's like an actual thing that was. That's so now
you can see why. And by the way, Kane, how
many refugees literally came in just the other day, like
not even sixty. Okay, so and I'm going to talk
more about this. When they came into the United States,
they were all waving American flags and they were like,

(29:00):
they were so happy to come to the United States.
Compared to I mean, the hell You'll have people third
generation Mexican and the United States acting like.

Speaker 6 (29:09):
The border stepped on me.

Speaker 1 (29:10):
Shut the hell up, you entitled. Oh yeah, these people
were happy to be here.

Speaker 7 (29:16):
The Left would rather thousands of unvetted come in at once,
but dare vet fifty or less?

Speaker 1 (29:24):
Yeah? And to your point, they were vetted. These people
were vetted, and they are legitimately fleeing for their lives.
I mean, it's crazy. This is like for let's play
three real quick and then we're gonna and then we'll
play four coming up. This is the first group. I
mean like tens of them, that was it. Tens of them,
that was it. They're so excited to come to the
United Democrats eat them because they're white. Listen to this

(29:46):
audio seventy three. First group, they were so looking, they
got American flags, and they came in the right way.
There they actually are legitimately fleeing murder because the people
over there taking their land, they don't care if they
got kids. Those kids will be raped and killed. It
doesn't matter the age. The horror stories. There are missionaries

(30:13):
over there that have been trying to collie. They are
even having a hard time the stories that have been
coming out from, whether it's missionaries, whether it's you know,
the farmers themselves, whether it's staggering. And so Democrats are
seething mad about this. They're livid they finally met refugees

(30:34):
they don't like. They want to throw a blanket over
the statue of liberty. Gold Coat is making it easy
to take that first step toward protecting your savings. Just
fill out a quick form, no commitment, just free information,
and then they'll ship you your free twenty twenty five
gold and silver kits straight to your door, no shipping fees,
no strings, just a free infoKit to help you understand

(30:55):
how gold and silver can fit into your financial plan.
I'm a big believer in doing your research, and this
kit is a great place to start. So I'm really
excited to be partnering with gold Code because not only
do they support my show, which I truly appreciate, but
They've made the whole process of buying precious metals super straightforward.
Because if you're a fan of the show, gold Co

(31:16):
is also going to tell you how to qualify for
unlimited free bonus silver on eligible orders. If you qualify,
you can even get a free half out silver Ronald
reagancoin totally free. Don't wait. Take that first step towards
protecting and diversifying your savings with gold Co. Visit Dana
likes gold dot com to learn more. That's Dana Likes
gold dot com.

Speaker 4 (31:37):
Get the loaddown on the latest news with a side
of laughs whenever you want. Subscribe to the Dana Show
podcast on YouTube, Apple or wherever you get your podcast.

Speaker 7 (31:47):
Like SAMs through the Ale Glans. So are the days
of the United States?

Speaker 8 (31:53):
No, Like I said, going forward, I've realized now that
I see some of this coming back at me.

Speaker 6 (32:02):
That I should probably tone it down.

Speaker 8 (32:04):
So I've I've backed off a lot of media. It's
a pope brother, and I don't see myself really getting
too much involved in that, at least and especially until
I've had a chance to actually talk with my brother
and see.

Speaker 1 (32:24):
What his I mean, if you're the pope's brother, do
you get, like, what, he's an invite to the Vatican,
and do you get to go see like the rare
rooms and all that kind of stuff. I'm just curious.
I'd be totally taking advantage of that. They like, sub bro,
I want to go look at those tapestries without a
bunch of sweaty people standing shoulder to shoulder with me.
Can you make that happen? You know, I'd be asking
for stuff like that, Like, you know, can I just

(32:45):
like chill out in Assistine Chapel before it reopens to
the public or opens to the public for the day.
I'd be asking for those type of favors, you know,
little things. But he apparently was real saucy on social
media and the media was going what they don't quite
understand that siblings don't share the same brain. It's a
scientific achievement that our legacy press hasn't fully realized yet.

(33:07):
And I just think it's funny. I also think you're
the Pope's brother. Can't he just be like, I think
I'm good, right, Like I don't need your judgment. I
think I'm good. I don't know, That's what I wouldn't because, like,
you know, how we got to get out of a jail
free card with FCC. I would think, you know, if
your brother's the Pope, you know, yeah, you could just
like you. You know, I don't care if you're Catholic

(33:29):
or not. I totally would be using that if I was. Yeah,
if I was the sibling of the pope. Totally right.
I know. I'm just saying, welcome back to the program,
Dana lash with you. We have coming up in our
second hour. We're gonna have Senator Rampaul Is gonna be
joining us a little bit later. We're also going to
talk about how a bunch of blockheaded Republicans are trying

(33:51):
to screw you over in your Second Amendment rights with
some bills that you may not be aware of. We're
going to discuss all of that and more. Stick with
the second hour on the way. I've seen the amazing
changes relief Factor has made for so many people, and
I've seen it firsthand through my husband Chris's pain relief
from using relief Factor. Right now, it's easy to give
their product a try because relief Factor makes it pain free.

(34:12):
With their three week quick start for just nineteen ninety five,
get rid of pain and start living better. Relief Factor
is a one hundred percent drug free daily supplement that
helps your body fight pain. Naturally developed by doctors, it
works by supporting your body's response to inflammation. It doesn't
just mask pain for a short time. It helps reduce
or even eliminate it. It's safe to take daily, and

(34:32):
in fact, the longer you take Relief Factor, the more effective.
Whether its neck, back, joint or muscle pain, Relief Factor
can help. Over one million people have turned to Relief Factor.
Give Relief Factor a try with their pain free trial.
You can get a three week quick start for only
nineteen ninety five, less than a dollar a day. Call
one eight hundred four Relief. That's one eight hundred, the

(34:52):
number four relief. Get rid of pain and start living better.
Give Relief Factor a try. Call one eight hundred for
relief or visit Relief Fact.

Speaker 2 (35:02):
Here's far too many American presidents have been afflicted with
the notion that it's our job to look into the
souls of foreign leaders and use US policy to dispense
justice for this sins they loved, using our very powerful military,
and now it's really the most powerful it's ever been.

(35:22):
We just are getting a budget approof one trillion dollars,
highest budget we've ever had in history for military, one
trillion dollars.

Speaker 1 (35:31):
That's a good line and getting greatest welcome back to
the program. It's the Saudi US Investment Forum. Potus just
wrapped up a little bit ago his speech. Can we
play just some of that video, although we may have
to strip the sound out later for digital because they
played YMCA even though it's fair use the fascists that
are on the sewerd that's called YouTube, they object. It

(35:57):
was funny because he had MBS, you know, the Crown
Prince and de facto Prime Minister Mohammad bin Salman who's
up on stage with him, and they're playing YMCA, and
I have to I was thinking about this. I'm like,
there have to be people, you know in the audience,
like you know Middle Eastern businessmen and other Saudis that
are in the audience, like why why are they playing
the YMCA song? Like they have to be wondering. It's

(36:20):
cracks me up. It always cracks me up when you
have these cultural touch points that don't exactly hit in
other countries. But I thought it was hysterical. They were
on stage together after Trump finished his speech and they
started the Limca song. We can hear it a little
bit of that, and THENBS is like Tess, and then

(36:40):
he's like, okay, I'm done. But it was great. They
get along very well. So welcome back, Dana, lash with you.
On top of the second hour, just a couple of
other things. Situations like this are where Trump shines. Now
people will say, oh, but Trump's such a jackass. Oh my,
when you are dealing with a male dominated event and

(37:05):
you are in a very patriarchal society, he can blow
in and he can run the room. He's very good
at that. And I like seeing that kind of stuff.
I like seeing that. I thought that America was very
well represented this afternoon. I don't care what. I don't
care if you're mad about Trump with this or that
or that.

Speaker 9 (37:23):
Io.

Speaker 1 (37:23):
I don't like the Katari jet either. I thought, nope,
this was good. And I still go back to that
SoundBite that he had where we played it already, but
where he said, you know, talked about the Abraham Accords
and said, you know, I look forward to you joining this,
you know, in your own time. But he reemphasized right
there in front of everybody in that room, that that
was an expectation of the United States and that was
a power move and I appreciated that. And I also

(37:45):
like the welcome that he received because it was a
giant middle finger to the previous administration that was trying
to chuck Saudi Arabia to the side and elevate you know,
the geopolitical fote Iran which you know, finance is the
killing of Americans, American soldier, you know all of this stuff.
One other quick point as it relates to Saudi Arabia,

(38:05):
because a lot of people are like, oh, you know
the last time, you know, they go back, They go back,
and I get it, they go back to nine to eleven.
There are also different factions in different world governments, as
there are in the United States, and people really need
people to be able to understand this nuance, especially as
we navigate this brave new world. Right, So I thought

(38:25):
this was a good trip for the President of the
United States. Meantime, In the meantime, Democrats they well, it
was like that mean girls scene, Kine, I can't play it,
you can. The refugees, like fifty something of them that
came in from South Africa, and Democrats, I think thought
ooh African refugees, and then they saw they were white.

Speaker 6 (38:48):
So you're from Africa, why are you white?

Speaker 1 (38:50):
Yeah? It was like Karen for mean girls, if you're
from Africa, why are you white? Because now they're very upset,
including can I oh hang on? I got I thinks. Okay,
here it is including do you hear about this church?
This episcopal church? They shut down their ministries. They're quote
unquote migration ministries because Trump took some white South African

(39:16):
UH refugees in and they have who is this? They're
episcopal bishop? Oh okay, I'm gonna I'm gonna tread into
some very probably not commonly held opinions here. I don't
want a woman as my church leader. The fastest way

(39:36):
you're gonna run me out of that pew is if
you put a broad up on stage. Who So, I
take Paul's words very very seriously. I don't want to
hear from a woman. I don't I don't want to
hear from a young preacher either. You better be old
and have lived in order for me to be able
to take you seriously, or have something seriously happen in
your life that you're calling is evident to all before you.

(39:56):
So I have a major problem with this woman calling
her self a bishop. Your girl is old school. I
am more old school than anybody else that you're gonna
come across on air. I don't want to see a
female bishop. I don't believe in it, just like I
don't believe that Palestine is a real thing or real ethnicity,
just like I don't believe in the term assault weapon,
just like I don't think that men can you know,

(40:18):
put some tape between their noother regions and stuff, or
braun called themselves women. I don't believe in female bishops,
female preachers, female pastors. I don't believe in any of
that stuff because it's anti biblical. If you have a
problem with it, your problem is with God, not with me,
and you can take it up with Him and he
can evaluate whether or not he thinks that's a logical
stance for you to have. So uh, this this one woman,

(40:42):
she was very upset. The reason I bring her up,
Mary and Edgar is how do you say her last name?
B you dde buddy, beauty who knows she's the episcopal bishop?
And she had this big illegal immigration stance, and you
know she likes all the letters and all, you know,
doesn't matter if you come in legally or not. And

(41:04):
she's given some remember the speech that she gave where
she was trying to slam the administration and everybody who
voted for him, who were supportive of deporting people who
were here illegally, and she was saying, oh, God teaches
us that we're to be merciful to the stranger, because
you know, mercy and the facilitation of criminality are the

(41:24):
exact same thing. Apparently, so she is upset because now
these refugees from South Africa are being allowed into the
United States and what happened to mercy for the stranger?
By the way, so the Episcopalians, they ended in nearly

(41:50):
four decades old relationship. This comes from sorry, this is
religion news, because they're very upset over the white africaners.
They said, in light of our starch, our church's steadfast
commitment to racial justice, and this is where that Bishop
Buddy is from. In light of our church is steadfast
commitment to racial justice and reconciliation and our historic ties
to the Anglican Church of Southern Africa, we're not able

(42:12):
to take this step. That's what they're presiding. Bishop said
in the letter, and they are upset by this. They
said that it is and it's the Chanroe, presiding Bishop
of the Episcopal Church. They said that they are expected
to resettle white Africaners from South Africa, whom the US

(42:34):
government classified as refugees. They don't believe that they're refugees
and they are against it. So they said that they're
going to stop their episcopal migration ministries because they are
expected to take in white Africaners, people who are actual
victims of literal genocidal persecution, and they are helping to

(42:58):
whitewash the A and C primes apparently, But what happened
to the mercy for the immigrant? Caine, Oh, the mercy
for the refuge what.

Speaker 7 (43:10):
Happened what she was saying, if you want to hear
that back in January, when she.

Speaker 1 (43:14):
Oh, please do, please do.

Speaker 10 (43:16):
And the people, the people who pick our crops and
clean our office buildings, who labor in poultry farms and
meatpacking plants, who wash the dishes after we eat in restaurants,
and work the night shifts in hospitals. They they may
not be citizens or have the proper documentation, but the

(43:38):
vast majority of immigrants are not criminals. They pay taxes.

Speaker 1 (43:43):
Oh, except if you're a white South Africa that's different.
And unless you're that the Episcopal Church, you're a joke.
You're an absolute joke. You're the reason why people hate
organized religion. And it proves that even the devil can
quote Scripture. Get behind me, Satan.

Speaker 7 (43:59):
If you have the threat of being a white and
be potentially voting conservative, the left will not want Yet.

Speaker 1 (44:06):
Of course this is a problem. You know, do you
want to know why people have been leaving the church
in droves because of ungodly, heathenistic attempted ministries like the
one I'm talking about right here. We're going to put
up some old white crone and then she's going to
sit here and try to lecture everyone and try to
play a game of guilt over everyone. Oh, you have

(44:27):
to accept every form of criminality that the Democrats endorse. Basically,
she's trying to shroud her partisan political zelotry in religion.
That's what they're doing right now. Oh wait a minute.
Now we have refugees that are white. What and now
it's a big issue for them, proving that it was

(44:48):
never about the refugee. You know, they're no better than
the Pharisees who roll around in ash and then parade
around in public. Oh well, look at me, I'm so penitent.
Look at me. Oh I've taken a vot. Oh make
sure you glorify me and my theatrical performative actions and
not God, whom it's supposed to actually honor. I mean,

(45:09):
they literally go against everything that the Gospels talk about.
But okay, all right, so this is this is this
is one of the bigger reasons why a lot of people,
by the way, have such a problem with organized religion.
Now you're supposed to I don't. I don't mean for
this to be a religious sermon, because again I don't.

(45:30):
I do not. I do not rise to the mantle
of shepherd, and nor do I claim it, nor do
I seek it. But my observation is that people see
the double standard. And yet you are also simultaneously called
to fellowship. You're supposed to be part of a body.
I mean, my gosh, just read Paul's writings. I mean,
the Gospels are quite clear, but it's very difficult when

(45:55):
you have performative charlatans like what we're seeing here coming
out of the Episcopal Church, with these missives. Oh no,
we can't take part in this ministry anymore because now
it's white South African ers. What makes them less than?
Why is it that they are not allowed? But you
guys will fall all over and wash the feet of

(46:16):
a woman beating human trafficking Ms. Thirteen, Gangbanger, Oh, because
they play on skin color. If ever, you wanted an
actual example of racism, which is an immoral position, because
that's never really something that's used divisively. In fact, you're

(46:36):
extorted to move against that throughout the Bible. But if
you want a real example of racism, then look at
what these so called shepherds are doing. Oh no, we
can't help them because of their skin color. Meanwhile, we're
going to exalt you because of your skin color, things
over which you cannot control. It's the modern day clan.

(46:58):
Pretty amazing, is it not. And they have the audacity
to call themselves bishops and shepherds and drape themselves with
vestments and pretend to offer the bread and the wine
and pretend that they're reading from Scripture when really they're
just spitting poison. Maybe the part of the Bible that
they missed was what happens to shepherds who mislead their flock,

(47:21):
and how they are yoked with a stone so heavy
and thrown into the deepest part of the sea. Now
I know I shouldn't practice more engage in the shaden
freuda of such an action, but I dare say that
I don't even know if that would convey the lesson
that they need to learn. Such as they're evil, we
have a lot more coming up. Your body is a powerhouse.
It heals, it builds, it keeps you moving. But as

(47:43):
you age, those natural processes slow down, and that's where
Ancient Nutrition's collagen comes in. It's like backup power for
your body. It helps you stay strong, radiant, and ready
for anything. Ancient Nutrition blends ancient wisdom with modern science
to create high quality supplements, and their multi coollagen Advanced
Lean features ten types of collagen from real food based sources.

(48:04):
It's powered by clinically studied ingredients that support fat loss,
healthy weight management, and lean muscle building. You'll love it
because it can reduce your joint discomfort, boost your skin,
your hair and nails, and plus you'll love how it
tastes and how easily it fits into your daily routine.
Collagen is real and it works. And Ancient Nutrition's multi
coollagen Advanced Lean has you covered look and feel your best.

(48:25):
Starting today, right now, Ancient Nutrition is offering you twenty
five percent off your first order. Just visit Ancient nutrition
dot com slash data promo Coddana. That's Ancient Nutrition dot
com slash data Coddana for twenty five percent off your
first order.

Speaker 3 (48:40):
And now all of the news you would probably miss,
It's time for Dana's Quick five.

Speaker 1 (48:46):
All right, So we got uh man bites dog. I
mean that's literally a headline. Police say naked man bit
a dog and fought officers at a Kansas gas station
in custody because he resisted arrest. He attacked police officers
and his own dog during a violent struggle at a
Lawrence gas station on Wednesday. They responded to the disturbance

(49:10):
at the Casey's General Store. How are you going to
do the dog like that? He had brought a dog
inside with him when they When the officers arrived, he
was totally you know, in his birthday suit. They tased
him twice. He continued to arrest or resist. He bit
his dog's ear and neck and refused to release his grip.
I would have beat him to death with my baton.
I would have Yeah, I would have made it last.
I would have made it go quick with a firearm.
I would have beat him to within an inch of

(49:31):
his life with my baton, and then I would have
tasted him to the point where he couldn't he couldn't
stop drooling. That's me. The dog suffered minor injuries, and
clearly I value the dog's life more than this guy's
and was transported to Laurence Humane Society for Evaluation and Care.
Please someone adopt that sweep up. Oh, let's see here,
moving on, we got oh, well the no, no, no, I

(49:53):
want to do the let's do oh. Half of Tesla
owners say their cars have been damaged intentionally. Steven, it's
our friend, Steven Yates. His car was keyed. He drives
a Tesla, and he came out and said, well, I
guess I get to join the keyed club. And his
Tesla had been keyed. This is in US, and they
say half of half like it's like a point. Away

(50:13):
of Tesla owners say that their cars have been damaged
on purpose. So, because I'm a very confrontational person when
when situation requires Caine. I feel like I want to
get a Tesla and just sit in it, and then
if somebody tries to keep my car, Katie bar the door,
it's going to be like Darth Vader when he's like

(50:33):
getting on that spaceship going after Leah, and it'll be.

Speaker 7 (50:36):
Like that could be a fun way to kill time.

Speaker 1 (50:38):
Killing time. Yes, that is correct. Kane, a Nebraska man,
is facing two felonies because he attacked, oh speaking of Vader,
his neighbor and a seven year old with a lightsaber.
Like it's not a real one, right, it's because that's impossible.
They said it was a higher quality device, was throw
and a half feet made of metal and thick plastic.
That's actually I mean, don't do it, but I mean that's,

(50:59):
you know, a little bit better than a baseball at
I guess stick with us because we've got some rhinoism afoot.
With two A Gold co is making it easy to
take that first step toward protecting your savings. Just fill
out a quick form, no commitment, just free information, and
then they'll ship you your free twenty twenty five gold
and silver kits straight to your door, No shipping fees,

(51:21):
excited to be partnering with gold Co because not only
they've made the whole process of buying precious metals super straightforward.

(51:43):
Reagan Cooin totally free. Don't wait. Take that first step
towards protecting and i versifying your savings with gold Co.
Visit Dana likes goold dot com to learn more. That's

(52:05):
Dana Likes Goold dot com.

Speaker 4 (52:08):
Makes some common sense of the crazy headlines with a
data show podcast. You're on the go guide for getting
up to speed on today's most important stories. Subscribe on YouTube,
Apple or your favorite podcast platform.

Speaker 1 (52:20):
And welcome back to the program. Dana lash with you.
We're at the bottom of this second hour and we've
covered a lot today. We need to look at some
domestic stuff, including a sneaky little trick that some of
these moderates I suppose in Congress are trying to pull
over on you. Specifically, this is about the National Firearms

(52:42):
Act and of course suppressors. Now, for those of you
who maybe you're not that far into two A, or
you don't own a suppression, you think it doesn't affect you,
it does, because this is just another example of and
I hate to say it, you've got a lot of
soft Republicans that are out there thinking we can just
do the bare minimum, call it a VIC, and then
go ahead and ask for donations, because we're going to

(53:02):
pretend that we've done something for your for your constitutionally
affirmed rights, and that's not the way it works. So
right now, and I mentioned this yesterday, the House Ways
and Means Committee, they have a draft, their reconciliation draft,
and in it they're trying to act like this is
a big second Amendment when they're going to reduce the extortion,
I mean, the tax that you would have to pay

(53:23):
on your suppressor from two hundred to just five dollars,
but yet it's still going to remain classified as in
an fai a it meaning you have to go and
beg the government please, may I have suppress a suppressed shooting?
May I please? And still get all that permission, and
they know what you have, et cetera, et cetera. And
there are actually some Republicans that are going along with us,
and they're going to try to act like it's a

(53:43):
huge victory. And I've been hearing a lot of chatter
behind the scenes on this, so obviously this cannot stand,
especially when you know we we we should have more,
we should have more, we should have friendlier two way
legislation coming out of the House than this. Joining us
right now is Knox Williams. He's the president and executive
director of the American Suppressor Association, and we welcome him back. Noox,

(54:07):
good to see you. So I just feel like this
is this is such a lazy way to like a
lazy toss to voters, like, oh, well, we're going to
reduce from two hundred to five dollars. But the big
issue is that it's still going to be classified under
n FA, which that's not a win at all. But
I mean, I've literally been hearing from some people in

(54:27):
DC that they think that this is like a great victory.

Speaker 9 (54:31):
Yeah, and Dana, thanks for having me on again. It's
truly a pleasure to chat with you. And I agree.

Speaker 11 (54:36):
I think that it's just the members who are pushing
this in the.

Speaker 9 (54:39):
House don't understand where the gun community lands. Where they're
coming from. You know, it's ninety one years that we've
been taxed for our right to purchase suppressors, and at
the end of the day, if we have an opportunity
to do away with that tax entirely and get these
things out of the NFA, the gun community wants our
members of Congress to take that action, period of hard stop.

Speaker 1 (54:59):
What is their argue for keeping it under a National
Firearms Act? I don't understand their reluctance to move it
off of.

Speaker 9 (55:07):
That, you know, honestly, that's a great question, and when
I can't fully answer for them, I can't comprehend it.
And the draft that they put out it has the
reduction of the two hundred dollars transfer tax down to zero.

Speaker 11 (55:18):
So it seems to me to be a bit.

Speaker 9 (55:19):
Of a moot point, right like, if we're going to
zero out the tax, why not just take the extra
step to actually remove these things from the National Firearms Act.
And the critical importance of that is because again, this
is a ninety one year old tax scheme that was
set up in nineteen thirty four. There is a federal
registry called the NFRTR that exists solely as a record

(55:40):
of taxes paid.

Speaker 11 (55:41):
And people don't want to have to deal with that.

Speaker 9 (55:43):
You know, you shouldn't have to submit fingerprint cards, you
shouldn't have to submit passport photos, you shouldn't have to
ask permission from the ATF to be able to purchase
these items. And yet here we are, and that's where
it would stand if they even.

Speaker 11 (55:55):
Zero this tax out.

Speaker 9 (55:56):
So I think that a lot of these members think
that they are generating a win, but it just isn't
the win that.

Speaker 11 (56:02):
They think it is, at least not in the eyes
of the two A community.

Speaker 1 (56:05):
Yeah, I completely agree with you, and it just doesn't
I mean, because still that's the big issue. The big
issue isn't, you know, the transfer tax. The big issue
is you know, the fact that it's still listed on
this I mean, and we've talked before in OX when
you were on I mean, when you go to you know,
any other country, if you're in Europe, if you're in
South America, if you're wherever, and if you're not shooting suppressed,
you know, you're kind of looked at like, oh, that's

(56:26):
so trashy, like it's just you know, bad form, like
you're a bad guest. And but yet here they act
like it just it's I don't know what they think
it contributes to. It's this the difference is startling to me.

Speaker 9 (56:40):
Yeah, I mean, I think that they're looking for the
easiest path, right, and I understand that in the context
of this reconciliation process, this is a very small component
of the one big, beautiful bill that.

Speaker 11 (56:49):
The President is trying to get to his desk.

Speaker 9 (56:51):
Certainly sympathetic to that, but gun owners shouldn't be the
one taking it on the chin for the advancement of
this package. And I also just really question whether or
not they're doing the math right. You know, Look, if
you're going to bake this down to you know, what's
in the best interest of the least conservative member of a.

Speaker 11 (57:08):
Committee, I don't think that's a way to run this.
I think that you've got to look at holistically what
impact this is going to have.

Speaker 9 (57:14):
And I just don't see, you know, the hardliners on
our side being willing to take this as a measure
to get them to vote for other components of the
reconciliation package that leadership is going to need them to
vote for.

Speaker 1 (57:27):
Yeah, we're talking for those listening around the country and
not watching the simulcast. We're talking with Knox Williams, who's
the president and executive director of the American Suppressor Association.
And I've tried, NOx, I've tried thinking, Okay, well, what
are the arguments that the left could make or that
you know, antisecond Amendment advocates could make against these lawmakers
removing your suppressors from being classified as n FA items.

(57:48):
And I just don't think that there's like a good
enough SoundBite that they couldn't overcome unless they're that horrific
at messaging.

Speaker 11 (57:55):
Yeah.

Speaker 9 (57:55):
Absolutely, And that's the weird part, right, Like, it's not
a win for the two A community, but you're still
going to take all the flak from the anti gunners, Right,
It's kind of a lose lose situation.

Speaker 11 (58:04):
And I really.

Speaker 9 (58:05):
Genuinely think they don't see it that way, but it's
really it shows the disconnect between those members and the
second memic community.

Speaker 1 (58:12):
Yeah, I completely agree with you on this. Is this likely?
Is this? Do you think that there's going to be
pushback against some of these more moderate members of the
Committee and or in the House to maybe like reconsider
and remove this. I know, because you know you've you know,
obviously the Hearing Protection Act is something that we know
very much support and you've been doing a great job

(58:34):
advocating for that. But and the reason I asked the
question that way is because I feel like if we
miss our opportunity here with us, I don't know when
that's going to come back around again.

Speaker 11 (58:43):
Yeah, I agree completely. Look, I've been working at this
since twenty eleven.

Speaker 9 (58:47):
We wrote the Hearing Protection Actor, helped write it in
twenty fifteen, so it's been a decade of advocating to
remove suppressures from the National Firms Act. This is only
the second time in that entire ten year now where
we have a legitimate shot at getting the done. These
opportunities don't come around very often, and you know, look,
I think that we've.

Speaker 11 (59:06):
Got to be able to seize on the moment.

Speaker 9 (59:07):
I think that is really at the core of why
the Second Amendment community is so frustrated, because when these
opportunities do arise. If we get soft on the issue,
it's kind of like, why are we even participating? And
I think that's a message that the gun world is
sending loud and clear to houseways and means and to Congress.

Speaker 11 (59:25):
I mean, I think that we all need to stand
united in that front.

Speaker 1 (59:27):
And when I look at some of the soundbites that
these people are not soundbites, but rather quotes that they've given,
whether it's you know, they're walking from walking back to
the you know, the heart building or wherever, and you know,
they give little quotes to reporters outside. I honestly don't
even think any of them have ever shot suppressed before
with the way that they talk about it. And I
feel like, if you're going to sit here and legislative
about firearms, maybe you should, you know, kind of halfway

(59:49):
know what you're talking about. And we joke about football,
like I know nothing about football. I live in like
a football crazy house and I'm the only person that
does not know about football. It's like me joining you know,
the NFL and being able to make regulations pertaining to
the field. You know, you would never have me do that.
It's like, why would you have these lawmakers do this
about a constitutionally firm right.

Speaker 11 (01:00:07):
Yeah, I mean, you're absolutely right.

Speaker 9 (01:00:09):
And that's something that we that we love to do
is take lawmakers out to the shooting range and expose
them to what suppress guntracts actually can and more importantly,
cannot do because there is a massive disconnect there.

Speaker 1 (01:00:19):
Yeah. Theyfic like a bunch of gang bangers are running
around the streets and it's just all like silent, like
pew pew like, and it's not like that at all.
Last quick question for you, and I don't know. I
don't want to. I don't want you to to jeopardize
any negotiations or positions that you have with these or
wherever you're at with these other lawmakers and persuading them
to see the light of liberty. But is there anybody
that's just been that's just proven immovable that you know,

(01:00:42):
maybe could deserve a little bit of heat.

Speaker 11 (01:00:45):
Yeah, I mean there certainly are.

Speaker 9 (01:00:47):
I don't want to blow up negotiations at this point,
but what I can say is visit Hearing Protection Act
dot com. It's a landing page that we have where
you can put in your information and send an email
to your elected official that certainly helps call the House
Ways and Means Committee as well, those guys need to
know and understand, Hey, we want to see section two

(01:01:07):
of the Hearing Protection Act, which removes suppressors from the
NFA included in the reconciliation process. The more heat we
can dial up, again, do it in a positive way.
Don't come out attacking these folks, but just say, hey, look,
I'm a constituent and I care.

Speaker 11 (01:01:21):
Yeah, do it polite, but do it firm.

Speaker 1 (01:01:23):
I would think that this would be a huge talking
point too for the administration, and it might, you know,
be like a good made good for a lot of
the stuff that people saw with bump stocks until the
courts got involved. You know. I think that would go
a long way and kind of like normalizing those relationships
with that community that got fractured during all of that.
So hopefully, I mean, fingers crossed, but I agree with you.
People need to be blown up the phones rhetorically. Speaking

(01:01:46):
to the House Ways and Means Committee members as well.
Knox Williams, we'd love to have you back. Please keep
us updated as to all of this, and we're going
to watch as well, but we'll probably be reaching back
out to you here shortly with as this thing progresses.
Good to see you.

Speaker 11 (01:01:59):
That sounds great, Dana, thank you so much, you so much.

Speaker 1 (01:02:02):
That's Knox Williams. He's the president executive director of the
American Suppressor Association. Then Hearing Protection Actor is just smart legislation,
and I'm just I'm floored that there are all lawmakers
and I'm trying to remember the name of them. I
save this piece, uh, because I'm doing an overall piece
on this for substec over a chapter and verse. But
someone's like, oh, we can't just have people out there
the way that they said it was something like unaccountable,

(01:02:24):
like shootings unaccountable. It's like they're not. It's not silent.
It just reduces the decibel level. They did studies on it.
The decibel level is like the same as the level
coming from giant monitors at like a rock concert. If
you've ever been to a concert and you've been anywhere
near the giant monitors, you know your ears ring afterwards.

(01:02:46):
So it doesn't you know, Hollywood is fiction and it
made it very fictional the way that suppressors worked, and
it's just it's weird. I had a friend who has
gone bird hunting all over the world, and he loves
to joke that the first time that he ever was
invited to go overseas to go bird hunting, he was

(01:03:08):
not shooting suppressed. And when they were doing a whole
bunch of stuff and people thought it was like bad manners,
it's just thought of as like very ghost like, very
bad manners, like, oh, you're you don't shoot suppresed, because
over there that's the norm. And because people aren't idiotic,
they realize that it still makes a quite a loud sound.
But a lot of the anti gun advocates, particularly those

(01:03:30):
that come from high crime areas, like you hear this
a lot from Chicago. Authorities in Chicago or elected officials there.
They would say, oh, you know, shooting suppressed. You know,
you can't have like they would have a bunch of
shootings that they couldn't hear and they wouldn't be able
to stop their It's the dumbest thing I've ever heard
of my life. And so for these lawmakers to say, oh,
we're just going to either reduce the tax transfer or
the transfer tax, or we're going to do away with it,

(01:03:54):
that's that's a yuric victory. I mean, barely even that.
I mean, you're you're it's still an NFAI. I mean,
you still have to beg the government for permission. It's
they still have a receipt of exactly what you have
when you got it, et cetera. I mean, that's a
de facto registrate, and I think by allowing it to
remain on that list, you're essentially making it easier for
the establishment of any such registering in the future. So

(01:04:16):
these lawmakers need to get on the same page with
liberty minded Americans. We have a lot more on the way.
We got Senator Rampaul is going to be joining us later.
And of course you know the problem with the refugees
coming in from South Africa. We have this, and we
also have the latest Democrat fallout. Apparently everybody's coming out
with books books galore, like Apparently Biden didn't recognize George

(01:04:39):
Clooney per Axios at a June twenty twenty four fundraiser,
and they knew each other for like fifteen plus years,
and apparently that's why George Clooney wrote the editorial that
he did.

Speaker 8 (01:04:48):
I know.

Speaker 1 (01:04:49):
So we got a lot of stuff to discuss as well.
With super Beach you guys are familiar with the Hart
choose super mariene. A lot of people are talking about
healthy metabolism and supporting healthy blood sugar and this is
where superburine comes in. It's plant based, doctor formulated. It
has a unique form of berberine, an Italian fruit extract
that gives it an additional antioxidant, additional level of antioxidant

(01:05:12):
cardiovascular support, and the berberine is unique. It's been clinically
studied to deliver nearly ten times higher absorption than standard berbering.
It's highly concentrated, so you get all these benefits in
just one easy to swallow capsule a day in a
grape seed extract that's included in the superberine that provides
for greater tolerability. If you're concerned about any potential GI distress,

(01:05:37):
visit Sam's Club and restock your heart health support with
super beets arrechoes and expand your routine with new superbarine
for healthy metabolism and blood sugar support. Start today and
get on the better the road to better cardiovascular health support.

Speaker 7 (01:05:52):
It's his life mission to make bad decisions.

Speaker 1 (01:06:00):
A Florida man, so a Florida man. He got done,
got himself in trouble here. He broke in Sascambia County.
He broke in to his ex girlfriend's home through a
doggy door. This is why we'll not have doggy doors.
Twenty six year old. How do you say his name?
Caylin Cae? You have too many vowels in your name, sir. Anyway,

(01:06:20):
some dude he broke into the home. Deputies were called
for the report of a burglary, and then he climbed
into his ex's bed and they struggled. She hid him
in the nose with her elbow and then he left
the same way he had come in, through the large
dog door. He's been charged with burglary or assault with
as salt or battery. And I told Canaan break, I said,

(01:06:40):
I said, why I don't have a dog door. But
if I did, maybe I would want like some AI
facial recognition and I would have like two robotic arms
that would automatically descend maybe with like I don't know
MP five's or something. And you know, full fully pointed
at the dog door. So if it's not my dog, yes,
both of them like a snare. Since you know, I'm

(01:07:02):
not going to beg the government for NFA stuff. So yeah,
i'd be like that, I'd have enough to do or
it would just be like that.

Speaker 7 (01:07:07):
So if you're fitting through a doggy door, you're a
small dude.

Speaker 1 (01:07:10):
They said it was a large dog door. I don't
know what that means, what the measurements on that are.
You know, I'm not like Bob the Builder, but you know.
But yeah, that's why I haven't wanted because criminals aren't
necessarily came the healthiest of the smartest people.

Speaker 11 (01:07:23):
That's true.

Speaker 1 (01:07:24):
Yeah, I know. So let's see here. Okay, this blew
my mind. I don't do I've my I had a
family member that took me to disney World or Disneyland
one time. Never been a I think I was at
disney World once for a work thing. But this Florida man,
he says, this is the average cost when he took

(01:07:46):
his family. Florida man says that it was fourteen hundred
dollars for one day at Walt Disney World. I'm sorry, what,
So let's break this down. Yeah, he said that it
was like fourteen hundred dollars. Parking was thirty dollars. Tickets
for his family to get into Hollywood studios and it's
like a family for nine hundred and seventy four dollars
five tickets and parking immediately that's one thousand dollars. And

(01:08:08):
they even got the Florida resident discount and they have
one child under ten. Everything else quick service meals in
Disney Springs, any kind of snack or drink, water and
ice cream was thirty dollars. He had a pretzel and
a beer that was twenty dollars. They said it was
over forty four dollars for quick service pizza and a drink.

(01:08:28):
They said that Star Wars coke was like seven dollars.
I mean, just insane. And one of their restaurants for
their dinner was like almost three hundred dollars ending at
just like just under fourteen hundred. And they said that
they didn't even stay at one of the resort hotels.
I love nothing that much to pay that kind of money, right,

(01:08:48):
no way payment. I mean, I don't know. And now
remember how Disney was like, oh Florida, don't say gay. Well,
they're building a resort in Abu Dhabi where you definitely
can't say gay. Are they going to have like a
ride featuring you know, we're gonna throw the gates to
death because they're gay. I mean, I'm just curious other
So fourteen hundred dollars. I my jaw hit the floor.

(01:09:09):
There is no way I would pay that. I could
be a petrillionaire and I will not pay that. That
is insane. I go to take a stand somewhere. That's crazy.
So a m where to start with this one. While
we're almost out of time, I'll have to tell you
about the Walmart worst robbery technique ever tomorrow. In the meantime,
third hour is on the way and we're gonna have

(01:09:31):
Senator Rampaul Joanna stick with us. With All Family Pharmacy,
convenience is everything and they make it so simple. It's
fast shipping, no hassle, no gatekeepers. You can order from
the comfort of home and let All Family Pharmacy deliver
right to your door. So take control. With up to
a one year supply of essential medicines like blood pressure, cholesterol,
diabetes treatments. No insurance not an issue. All Family Pharmacy

(01:09:52):
has you covered. No more monthly refills, no more lines,
no more surprise pharmacy trips, and everything is made right
here in the US of A. So you can rest
easy knowing that your medications meet high standards for quality
and safety. Nothing's outsourced, just reliable American made medicines. And
they provide ivermectin, hydroxychloroquin antibiotics, and so much more, the

(01:10:13):
very medications you know that the system try to keep
from you. And you can even get your everyday maintenance
meds too. They make it simple, fast shipping, no hassles,
no gatekeepers. Visit Allfamilypharmacy dot com slash data now and
use code Dana ten for ten percent off. Be prepared,
stand control because they're not looking out for you. All
Familypharmacy dot Com slash data Code data ten.

Speaker 12 (01:10:34):
The partheid system ended and they reform their constitution under
the great leader of Nelson Mandela, and that allowed for
a racial reconciliation, one that this country has yet to do.

Speaker 6 (01:10:46):
But South Africa did it.

Speaker 10 (01:10:48):
Wow.

Speaker 1 (01:10:48):
I don't even know who this chick is that's saying this,
some CNN panelist who clearly does not understand the history
of South Africa. I mean, wow, if you don't like it,
then you can leave. And they did. That's the problem
that the Left has is that they did Welcome back
to the program, Dana lash with you or at the

(01:11:10):
top of this third hour. I mean, look at Zimbabwe.
They were I mean, they were neighbors, and they took
away farms, and the indigenous people there could not maintain
the farms. They could not handle the agriculture, the land management,
the livestock, none of it, and their agricultural output entirely
totally collapsed. And then they ended up having to fight

(01:11:34):
deal with famine, and then they were trying to lure
people back to manage these farms unsuccessfully. The problem is
that in South Africa they're literally hunting down I've met
I've met South African farmers. In fact, one of the
last war trips I was on, I went, I met there,
happened to be included some a couple that was from

(01:11:56):
South Africa and they still have family there, so they
were like not doing any press, but they actually I
had to go and seek refugee status in a different nation.
And the stories and the photos are amazing, amazingly horrible.
It's just it's you think wow, because it was last year,
and you think wow, it's like twenty twenty four and
I was twenty five. It's crazy that that this stuff

(01:12:18):
happens and that you know, people do this to themselves.
But you know she thinks that there's needs to be
a racial reconciliation. Like what does she think? What does
that mean to her? A racial reconciliation, Because this is
what we're talking about audio some by four. This was
like a year ago, not even a year ago. And
you have the Julius Milama, he's the head of the
e f F political party over there, the Economic Freedom

(01:12:39):
Fighters screaming about killing the white farmer audio some by four.

Speaker 13 (01:12:43):
Listen, Kiti comes.

Speaker 6 (01:12:56):
The pool the devil.

Speaker 1 (01:13:11):
Yeah, that is it's it's literally derived from ah, a
word that means boer. It's in Dutch and Africans, so
it means that's it bower means farmer. So they're saying
kill the farmer, kill the white farmer. He is he
is literally the head of a major South African political party,
and he's calling for wholesale genocide.

Speaker 14 (01:13:33):
UH.

Speaker 1 (01:13:34):
And that's what they call settlers in South Africa, even
if they're their second third generations, they're called Boers and
it's the chance to kill the boers and they are
they're farmers now the whole you know, one of the
things that this UH talking head on CNN doesn't understand
is that when they had the whole when when Nelson
Mandela was negotiating power transfer, part of the reason why

(01:13:58):
you had certain factions hand over power to other factions
was under the promise that they were going to be
their lives, their property, and their rights were going to
be protected. And that didn't happen. And they were trying
to do what they were what was considered as unjust colonialism.
Now with more unjust colonialism. It's I mean, it's crazy,

(01:14:22):
and I mean everything that people say that Mandela's negotiations
were trying to prevent, well, it's happening, so it didn't
prevent anything. And then you have the New York Times
a year ago they were livid. So when this happened,
what was this a year ago that this happened. I
think it may have been a year ago, a year
ago or eighteen months ago. The New York Times had

(01:14:44):
a story. It was about eighteen months ago. The New
York Times had a story when that SoundBite first came out,
where they were livid that people were reacting to Julius
Malema's call for genocide. Literally that's what it was, and
they were trying to excuse it. I'm reading from this
piece that was in August of twenty three, so almost

(01:15:07):
two years and they noted the rally from Julius Malema
and they said that the video clip that shot across
the internet was seized by Americans on the far right
who said it was a call to violence. Unless you're
a geopolitical moron with no knowledge of what's happening and

(01:15:28):
thus no authority or really room to speak on what's happening.
I mean, you can observe history. That's what that phrase means.
It's a genocidal phrase, just like when you say from
the river to the sea, when you're talking about Gosins
Jordanians who want to make up an ethnicity and call
themselves Palestinians, which doesn't exist. That's also a call for genocide.

(01:15:50):
When you say kill the bower, that literally translates to
your killing the farmer. And they're going after these white
farmers in South Africa. Anyone who are argues otherwise isn't
smart enough or knowledgeable enough about the issue to discuss it.
And it is embarrassing, especially if you're a racial grifter
like this woman was on CNN, who's trying to parlay

(01:16:13):
her ethnicity into as a substitute for merit or education,
and she's downplaying You literally just heard and watched the
video downplaying that and act acting like that didn't happen,
Acting like that had of a major political party in
South Africa wasn't in an arena leading thousands of people
to scream kill the white farmer. That's the problem with

(01:16:34):
so many people in legacy press. You would be shocked
how stupid some of them are. I mean, some of
the dumbest people I've ever had conversations with have been
some of these individuals in green rooms, not kidding. So
I one of the reasons why you know, for instance,
Elon Musk came to the United States is he wasn't
going to be drafted into a military that was weaponized

(01:16:55):
to actually maintain apartheid. And that's one of the that's
that's one of the reasons that handed up leaving. And
it is as deeply racist to scream, you know, to
kill the boer like Malema was in that arena. So
for in the New York Times was trying to say
that it was, oh, it's a mostly peaceful call to genocide.

(01:17:16):
That's what they were trying to argue The New York
Times literally was running cover for calls for genocide. You know,
they probably would have done the same thing under Hitler.
There's a proper appeal to Godwin's law if you ever
want one. So you know, I don't know. And the
eff if you're unfamiliar with them. They are a very
far left, violent Marxist political entity. That's a cult. I

(01:17:39):
didn't even want to say it's a political entity. I
think at some point you're so far left that it's
just a cult. And they excuse violence as political activism. Okay,
who else does that? This sounds really familiar. Excusing violence
as legitimate political activists. Oh it's the naz that are

(01:18:00):
chasing Jewish students on college campuses around the United States. Hm. Well,
I mean all throughout history, that's what these far left
people do. I mean, so people who say that this
genocide isn't happening. It is people who say that, you know,
they're not calling for it, they're aligned to you. And

(01:18:22):
so going back, this is why Trump said, okay, if
you're fleeing racial violence, this is why we and other nations,
not just the United States, have you know, refugee programs,
assilhe programs. Can you had mentioned the Temporary Protected status
the TPS program that was implemented like here and then

(01:18:45):
to where we can validate the threat level and it
is they're trying to argue that there's like no, yeah,
play this because this is the history writing that they're
trying to to implement to justify this as stunning, Go
ahead and play this. This is an MSNBC the descendants.

Speaker 15 (01:19:06):
Of the people who created the most diabolical system of
white supremacy in human history, apartheid. They're not directly responsible
for it, but it was a system that actually moved
black people.

Speaker 11 (01:19:19):
Off of the arable land, so they.

Speaker 15 (01:19:22):
Inherited the land that the black people had to give up.

Speaker 11 (01:19:25):
It was called forced removal.

Speaker 15 (01:19:27):
It was something called a Bantustan policy where they moved
black people out of the cities and farmlands into these
remote areas with non arable land. I mean, it was
just one of the most worst processes ever. But what
has happened in this strange, bizarre world we're living in
is that the Afrikaners have become the darling of these
right wing white supremacist movements around the world that it's

(01:19:51):
like the lost cause for them, it's like the old
Confederacy they're held up.

Speaker 1 (01:19:55):
You're talking about, I mean, when did the English move
And let's go back like what the seven teenth century?
I mean, you're talking about several hundred years ago that
this happened. So are you discussing descendants? What do you
mean descendants? Like descendants are the ones that are responsible
for everything right now, I'm trying to So he's justifying genocide,
that's what. So on MSNBC, they're selling commercial airtime on

(01:20:20):
justifying genocide. This is amazing. When these people show you
who they are, believe them. I mean when he said
descendants after that, I couldn't take anything seriously. I'm like,
I'm sorry, what because it's like over three hundred years
ago at this point. And again you're ignoring the negotiations
that took place after Mandela and then how that was

(01:20:40):
for the protection of land, property, et cetera. And then
that was thrown out the window a lot of these people.
And look, I don't proclaim to be an expert. I
know enough because I pay attention to world events right
as any smart aware person would. But you have these
individuals who have been raised in the tupperware fresh environment
of stagnant academia, and they only believe what their Marxist

(01:21:02):
instructors tell them. And so their Marxist instructors tell them
this is the way of it, and they actually go
and then they spit this sewage onto airwaves like this
Goofball did on MSNBC. I mean, good heavens, this guy.
I don't even know who he is. I'm not I
don't know. I just it just shocks me. And by

(01:21:23):
the way, the South African president had already reiterated that
talking about these specific farmers, they don't deserve any kind
of protection, refugee or otherwise because they don't conform to
the standards that he demands for such refugee protection. And

(01:21:44):
he said that before he in fact, there was a
report where he had said he talked to Trump and
told him that he had been Trump had been provided
with false information. This guy's a liar. I mean, they're thugs.
The people who run South Africa are thugs, bottom line.
And I mean it's just the left will always excuse
genocide if it if it if it's advantageous to them,

(01:22:07):
not unlike what they did in the thirties. So al
Sharpton was slamming of all people, the refugee status that
Potus was granting to white africaners. And in the wake
of that expropriation law, because they can just seize not
again not just farms, but any fixed property. They can
seize any property. And Al Sharpton and by the way,

(01:22:27):
that act was signed in last year, Al Sharpton says
that he that it was mass deportation of the worst
of the worst. He was saying that he said, your taking.
I mean, he was basically questioning whether or not they

(01:22:48):
could be refugees, is what he was doing. They applied
for asylum. People are missing that they stayed in their
country and applied for asylum. Remember how we were to
that Gan gang bangers coming in from Mexico. They had
to come to the United States and then apply for asylum. Okay,
So these refugees that came from South Africa, they did

(01:23:08):
it the correct way. They applied for asylum and then
they came in fifty something of them. They were allowed
in a huge sizeable number of them children. I just
don't think that I'm going to take Al Sharpton seriously
on anything. Because al Sharpton insided a riot that caused
a fire and burned a man to death because Al

(01:23:30):
Sharpton was mad that the business owner was Jewish and
that he wasn't just going to allow He didn't even
own the property someone else. It was a church that
owned the property and this guy was subleasing and he
had to raise the raids and it was just like
a big deal and he was targeted because he was
Jewish and Al Sharpton is an anti Semitic bigot. Not
only that, but sidebar I was in one of the

(01:23:50):
times I was on Real Time with Bill Maher who
lied about me and never corrected it. Al Sharpton came
in with a whole ter I've never seen any I mean,
he looked like he was James Brown rolled in with
this major entourage man. They were hoovering up everything in
craft service. I was with a couple of friends and
we were backstage. I hadn't gone on yet. That was

(01:24:12):
very just very interesting. There you go. Your body is
a powerhouse. It heals, it builds, it keeps you moving.
But as you age, those natural processes slow down, and
that's where ancient nutritions collagen comes in. It's like backup
power for your body. It helps you stay strong, radiant,
and ready for anything. Ancient Nutrition blends ancient wisdom with
modern science to create high quality supplements, and their multicollagen

(01:24:34):
Advanced Lian features ten types of collagen from real food
based sources. It's powered by clinically studied ingredients that support
fat loss, healthy weight management, and lean muscle building. You'll
love it because it can reduce your joint discomfort, boost
your skin, your hair and nails, and plus you'll love
how it tastes and how easily it fits into your
daily routine. Collagen is real and it works, and Ancient

(01:24:55):
Nutrition's multi Coollagen Advanced Lean has you covered, look and
feel your best. Starting today, Right now, Ancient Nutrition is
offering you twenty five percent off your first order. Just
visit Ancient Nutrition dot com slash data promo Coddana. That's
Ancient Nutrition dot com slash data Coddana for twenty five
percent off your first order.

Speaker 3 (01:25:15):
And now all of the news you would probably miss.
It's time for Dana's quickfive.

Speaker 1 (01:25:20):
So Texas is facing a major housing market correction as
prices drop across the state. This latest per Newsweek, they
said that listening's just at one, twenty one hundred and
twenty three thousand in April of this year. Fifty three
percent higher than normal is what was being reported. They
said that they the state experienced a significant immigration boom

(01:25:46):
or migration boom during the pandemic with other presidents from
other states coming in with the promise of affordability. Then
they met the property taxes. Then they met the Republicans
and the state legislature in Austin that don't want to
give anyone relief from property taxes at all whatsoever. But
they do want to consider limiting your Second Amendment rights
depending on some of these bills that they're trying to
push out of committee. A military vehicle went over the
wall onto I ninety on the roadway below. This is

(01:26:09):
kind of crazy. This is in Bellevue, Washington. Two people
were injured when a military vehicle looks like a henbee
flew over the wall in Interstate ninety. It's unclear what
caused it to drift, but they had the lane shut
down for quite some time. Fifty six percent of pet
owners would cut their own life short to extend their pets.
I love my pets. I'm not doing that. I love

(01:26:30):
my dogs. You guys know I'm a big dog person.
No not doing it. No, No, I'm not going to
not going to do it at all. Let's see. And
the Southern accent they're saying is starting to go away.
I don't think that that's going to happen. They said
they've been studying it for the past twenty years, and
they the Atlantic accent went away and away. Senator Rampaul
joins us next Bernagun. I always tell people to carry.
I always carry, and I have no problem using lethal

(01:26:52):
force to protect myself or my loved ones. And there
are instances though, where you can't. I mean, you're you're
denied your constitutional right of self defense, either because of
municipal restrictions or private property restrictions. Well, there's a way
that you can still protect yourself and you diversify your
weapons array. You do this already with knives and different calibers,

(01:27:15):
So why not incorporate the burner gun as part of it.
Now for this purpose, they have rifles and all kinds
of stuff, but I would suggest the Burna SD or
the Burna SL, the BURNA or sorry CL, the burn
of CL compact launcher. It's like basically similar to a
forty three eight block forty three x right, it's about
the length of your phone. Then you have red Dot.

(01:27:36):
There's quick on whole stream made in the USA. You
have fifteen rounds per cartridge. Now you know, the Burner
gun shoots chemical irritant projectiles that can disable threats from
up to fifty feet away. It's effective and it gives
you some protection when the state or whatever is trying
to disarm you. I have friends who live in New
York and DC that carry this, and that's the thing.

(01:27:56):
Burnagun doesn't care about gun for his own signs. There's
no waiting period, there's no tax stamp, there's none of
that stuff. They can ship it right to your door,
and that's important when you're talking about making sure that
you're protected, especially in high crime areas where you need
protection the most. So check it out. The BURNACL their
newest one, the compact launcher, the most compact one that
they have, one of the smallest. It's for maximum concealability

(01:28:20):
and stopping power, and it uses you know, compressed AIRCO
two and again it shoots those chemical irritant projectiles. You
need to check it out at burna dot com, slash
Data b y r Ina dot com slash Data It's
ready when.

Speaker 4 (01:28:34):
You are keep your finger on the pulse with a
Data Show podcast delivering timely news with insightful analysis whenever
you want, straight to you on YouTube, Apple or wherever
you get your podcasts.

Speaker 1 (01:28:47):
Welcome back to the program. You can listen coast to
coast on one of our hundreds of affiliates around the country.
You can also watch the stream digital Everywhere Channel three
forty seven Direct TV. So we've had a busy news day,
and we also have to get to the big beautiful bill.
What is happening in Congress right now? What is happening
in the House, what's happening in the Senate? Are our

(01:29:08):
taxes going to be increased because government won't stop spending?
That's the million dollar question on this and other issues.
Joining us right now one of our favorite people in
the Senate, Senator Ran Paul, who's one of the only
lawmakers remaining who can do math. He joins us now
via video. Senator, always a pleasure to have you, and
I always appreciate your fiscal sanity. Where do we stand

(01:29:29):
with this? By the way, because I keep hearing discussions
that the administration was floating tax hikes or that we
were going to maybe cut less. But I do know
that the debt ceiling is something being discussed which you
are staunchly against raising.

Speaker 14 (01:29:43):
So the big beautiful bill is comprised of tax cuts,
the same tax cuts we passed in twenty seventeen. I've
been supportive of those tax cuts, making them permanent, and
then there's a few additions to it. They are adding
into it no tax on tips, a deduction for or overtime,
and some deductions for seniors. There's a few wrinkles, but

(01:30:04):
it's largely keeping the tax cuts. I'm in favor of that.
There are some spending cuts. We don't know exactly what
they're going to be yet coming out of the House,
I predict they will be wimpy. I predict that they
will be insufficient and that the deficit will continue to burgeon.
The reason I predict this is that the third aspect
of the bill is they're going to increase the debt ceiling.

(01:30:25):
Now the House is voted to increase it by four trillion.
The Senate, previously, against my wishes, voted to increase it
by five trillion. I think, no matter what kind of
supposed spending cuts you're coming up with. If you're going
to actually raise the debt ceiling four or five trillion dollars,
that's not a fiscally responsible position, and I can't support it.

(01:30:45):
So I've told them I can't vote for the bill
if it expands the debt by trillions of dollars. But
I could if they were to separate the issues. Whether
or not that will come to fruition, we'll see. If
they get a quick agreement and they're done in a month,
probably at all stays together. If the negotiations break down
it takes longer than a month or two to pass this,

(01:31:06):
then I think there's a possibility the debt ceiling gets
stripped out and done more urgently, and then the bill
would go forward, but without the debt ceiling on it.
I frankly think that we just we can't keep expanding
the deficit each year by more than two trillion dollars.
That's just not fiscally conservative. And many of our supporters

(01:31:26):
who have seen Elon Musk and the work of Doze
and are enthusiastic as to the cuts, are like, where
are the cuts if the deficits still two trillion dollars?
And that is a question that everybody's going to be asking,
and the answer is that Congress doesn't have the sufficient
wherewithal to actually cut spending.

Speaker 1 (01:31:46):
And that's what's so incredibly disappointing in this I know
that some of the recommended cuts from DOZE are caught
up in litigation, and I know that you know that's
something that lawmakers have to wait on, But you know
the recommended cuts that are not that seems like an
easy fix that Congress could come together, codify that, get
it done, and then talk about reducing spending more, and
then if they want to have the discussion about the
dead ceiling, they can have it. Well.

Speaker 14 (01:32:08):
The only DOGE cuts that are really caught in litigation
are whether or not the administration can do it without
congressional authority. So if they're sent back to us and
we were to give them authority, there would be no
legal case for virtually all of the cuts. The people
are suing because they maintain the president can't do this
without congressional authority. Some of that is an open debate,

(01:32:28):
but with regard to where we move, if we move forward,
they can send some of the spending cuts that DOZE
is found back through a process called recision, and recision
is a special legislative vehicle. It's a simple majority required,
it's a privileged vote. And we have enough Republicans in
both House the room, in both the House and the Senate.

(01:32:50):
The rumors are they have a nine billion dollar one. Now,
while I'm for that, nine billions is a pittance, it's
a rounding error. If the deficit next year is going
to two point two trillion, that means if you cut
nine billion, it's two point one nine to one billion trillion.
So it really is not much of a cut. So
I think we need to do more. But the fact

(01:33:11):
that they're hung up and don't think they can get
the vote for nine billion is pathetic. That means that
we don't have enough Republicans who will cut sex change
surgeries in Guatemala, trans comic book in Peru, trans opera
in Colombia, you name it, all the crazy stuff that
Dosh has found. We don't have a majority of Republicans

(01:33:34):
who will vote for that. That to me is such
a disappointment that I'm going to keep agitating and saying
send us a nine billion because I want to know
who the Republicans are that can't vote to cut nine billion,
because if you can't vote to cut nine billion, you
might as well switch parties, quit or let us elect
a real Republican who will cut spending well.

Speaker 1 (01:33:53):
And that's kind of the thing we've been hearing that, oh, well,
we couldn't do it earlier. This after the first of
the year, we have to wait. And now we're told, well,
this may drag out till September, and it seems like
this can keeps getting kicked further and further down the road,
and then before we know what we're going to be
in midterms that we're going to be told not we
can't wait because we've got midterms coming up, so we're
going to have to wait after that. That's what they
told us last midterms. Do Senator.

Speaker 14 (01:34:14):
It's also part of the argument for why they want
to increase the debt ceiling four to five trillion dollars,
as they're saying, oh, we want to get beyond the
next election so the voters won't hear us having to
talk about it or vote about it. I have the
opposite approach. I offered an amendment when this bill came
up a week or two ago in the Senate to
give them three months of debt ceiling increase. You know

(01:34:36):
how much that is in three months, You've got to
give them five hundred billion dollars. Even that hurt me,
But I could only convince two other colleagues if the
vote was three to ninety seven, not to increase it
by three months. The reason I would do it three
months at a time is if you're promising me, and
these are the powers that be, the leadership are all
promising me we're going to cut spending, We're going to

(01:34:58):
bring in those dose cuts. I'll believe it when I
see it. So here's three months worth of borrowing. Show
me what you got over the next three months. And
I predicted three months we'd see nothing and Doe response
and no cuts, and then I would never give them
another don Instead, we're doing the opposite, and conservatives, many
who have traditionally been conservatives, are going along with this

(01:35:19):
four trillion dollar increase. I think it's it's shameful, and
it removes the moral ground from any conservatives who want
to say I oppose the spending, I oppose the debt.
Once they get on board voting for this debt ceiling,
I don't know. I think our moral ground as lost
as deficit crusaders.

Speaker 1 (01:35:37):
I think that you hit the nail on the head.
This reminds me very much of like eight nine, the
early Tea Party days, when that was kind of the
same argument that we were hearing from the Republican establishment
that we have to you know, this is too big
to fail. We got to go along to get along.
And now it's like, you know, to be quite frank
about it, and now you have some of that bush
league republicanism that's re emerging in the party, and it's

(01:35:57):
called itself populism. It doesn't make any sense talking to
Senator Ran Paul about the budget, the big beautiful bill
you had. Also, I know that you were talking about
the Federal Reserve Senator operating at a loss, and you
were talking about the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau must go.
I was surprised that you were getting pushed back on this.

Speaker 14 (01:36:16):
Yeah, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was a baby of
the left, a baby of Elizabeth Warren and the far left.
They got it passed and they wanted to make it
permanent so nobody could ever cut it, even if Republicans
ever got in charge. So they said Congress won't fund it,
it will be funded by profit from the Federal Reserve. Well,
I think that's not in constitutional. You can't create an

(01:36:37):
agency that's perpetually funded with no more voting. That went
to the Supreme Court, though, and we lost. The Supreme
Court ruled that they can fund it that way. The
Supreme Court did rule that Trump could fire the person
in charge of it. The legislation said even a president
could not fire the head. Trump won that in the
first term. But the interesting thing now is for the
last three years, the Federal Reserve, even the way they've

(01:37:00):
always measured it, doesn't make a profit. They print their
own money and they can't make a profit, so they're
running a negative balance right now. So really the CFP
should get no money. So I've written a letter to
the President and to the OMP saying why don't you
just no longer funded or request any money? That they've
gotten to where they're not requesting money and they're reforming it.

(01:37:21):
But I would just shut to the doors the same
way they did. Usaid, I would close the doors of
CFPB and say there's no more money because the Fed's
not running a profit, and I think they could get
rid of the agency completely. This is one where the
law is actually on their side, and I think they
would win in court that by orders of the Congress

(01:37:41):
it is not to be funded unless there's a profit
to come from the FED.

Speaker 1 (01:37:44):
And that makes all the sense in the world. Talking
with Senator Ran Paul, the trade deals we keep hearing.
I know that a couple of have been coming in.
We've got the UK Trade Deal, there's been the reduction
in tariffs with China. I had always questioned the sequencing
of this. Are we doing tariffs ahead of tax cuts?
But here we are, We're in this position. Are you more?

(01:38:05):
Are you optimistic now? You know, seeing some of the
stuff with China and seeing maybe the UK trade deal.
I know that that's kind of been up for debates
to whose consumers, British or Americans that benefits more? But
are are we going to because there's like seventy of
them that need to be made in order, you know,
to get us off to a into good footing. Are
you confident? Do you think that these are going at

(01:38:27):
a good pace?

Speaker 14 (01:38:29):
You know, I think the fundamental argument of whether trade
is good or bad needs to occur again because people
have lost this knowledge trade is nothing more than extension
of capitalism. Trade is if you go to your local Walmart,
or you go to a local restaurant, that is trade.
And if your local Walmart buys their goods from overseas,
that's also trade between individuals. But no trade occurs that

(01:38:52):
is not mutually beneficial. You will not give your money
to McDonald's unless you want that burger more than you
want your money. You will not give your money to
Walmt unless you want whatever you're purchasing more than you
want your money. All trade is mutually beneficial, and we
have all gotten richer. But it is an integral part
of capitalism. Trade is there isn't something unique about oh

(01:39:13):
Trade came you know, it's not in my county any longer.
If I still trade with people and the rest of
my state, I trade with people in Ohio just because
there are borders and national borders doesn't somehow change trade.
Trade is beneficial and what has happened is the division
of labor has spread worldwide and we're all the richer
for it. So that being said, if we erect trade barriers,

(01:39:35):
it will affect prosperity. Right now that if they can
get reciprocal arrangements that lower trade barriers. That's good. Every
time something has happened that is lessening the expectation of
high tariffs, the market responds. When he announced Liberation Day,
the market went down six point six trillion dollars in
two days. It's largely come back each time the number

(01:39:59):
for the deficit has been lowered. So the lower the tariff,
the less traconian, the more the marketplace is willing to
tolerate it. But the marketplace is millions of people. It's
not just me saying tariffs are bad. This is millions
of people around the world, all trading saying tariffs aren't
good for the economy. Trade barriers aren't good for the economy,

(01:40:19):
and aren't good for the consumer. So I think that
debate's worth having. I've been part of that debate because
I want our country to continue to thrive, and I
think if we erect barriers, taxation barriers, it's not a
good thing. I'm also an old fashioned conservative. I think
you lower taxes to help business. You don't raise taxes. Somehow,
conservatives say, oh, well, raising taxes for imports is a

(01:40:41):
good idea, but we want to lower all other taxes. No,
why don't we If we want to compete with China.
Let's say China makes four antibotics that aren't made anywhere else,
and we're stuck with their supply chain. Why don't we
eliminate the corporate income tax for those particular antibotics and
see if somebody will make them. Let's say ten years
of no corporate income tax for a company that will
begin to make these things again, I think you would

(01:41:03):
get people into that space. But it also needs to
be a long term goal. It can't be a tariff
that's up and down and all over the place over weeks.
People are going to build a factory or begin manufacturing
something want some certainty. So since none of these tariffs
are laws, they're all directed by the President at his discretion.
I'm not sure there's enough certainty for someone to start

(01:41:25):
a whole factory. Now. If it were a law or
a ten year reduction in the corporate income tax for
certain industries, I think people might actually build an industry
and have a more significant investment.

Speaker 1 (01:41:36):
Or to use your example, just to even repeal Obamacare
and get rid of those excise taxes that made it,
you know, so financially punitive for R and D and
all of that whether it's for medical devices or you know, pharmaceuticals, antibiotics,
things like that, we wouldn't have to rely on China.
One last quick thing for you, Senator this because you mentioned,
you know, the tariffs and the executive order. My concern

(01:41:57):
is that conservatives are they have a sugar high right
now from the quick, immediate satisfaction of executive orders, and
then when it's too late and they're not able to
affect that change change legislatively, we're going to get hit.
Maybe in twenty twenty eight. However this swings out is
that I mean, obviously that's a concern that you have
because you're fighting so hard to make this permanent and

(01:42:19):
heavier than what it is.

Speaker 14 (01:42:21):
Yeah, with regard to the tariffs, are being done by
emergency orders, so we're living under an emergency that President
Trump is as announced. I worry about if AOC wins
in twenty eight and we have an AOC climate emergency
and she says no more gasoline powered cars immediately. So
you really don't want a government run by one person

(01:42:41):
because you may like the current president, but you may
not like the next president. It's always for those of
us who believe in small constitutional government been an argument
that no president should have too much power centralized, no
federal government should have too much power centralized.

Speaker 1 (01:42:58):
True, true, very true.

Speaker 14 (01:43:00):
The power needs to be dispersed between the presidency and
the Congress, but also between the federal government and the
state governments and the local governments. So I continue to
make these arguments that we don't want emergency orders, whether
it's a Republican or a Democrat president.

Speaker 1 (01:43:15):
I have to tell you, Senator, I think you may
be only one of two lawmakers in DC who have
been consistent to TEA Party ideals back in two thousand
and eight, in two thousand and nine, even when the
winds are against you, you have been incredibly consistent, and
we appreciate that. Appreciate your your time today. Thanks so much,
Senator Rampaul. Good to see you. Gold Co is making
it easy to take that first step toward protecting your savings.

(01:43:36):
Just fill out a quick form, no commitment, just free information,
and then they'll ship you your free twenty twenty five
gold and silver kits straight to your door, no shipping fees,

(01:43:57):
excited to be partnering with gold Code because not only
they've made the whole process of buying precious metals super straightforward.

(01:44:17):
reagancoin totally free. Don't wait. Take that first step towards
protecting and diversifying your savings with gold Co. Visit Dana
likes gold dot com to learn more. That's Dana likes
gold dot com.

Speaker 4 (01:44:32):
On the go and need a quick news fix with
a fun twist, follow Dana's Absurd Truth podcast for bite
size and formative episodes perfect for your busy schedule on
Apple or wherever you get your podcast.

Speaker 1 (01:44:45):
So I read that the DNC voted to nullify that
Vice Twigs victory to win vice chair. That David Hogg
Twig kid, he's a grown adult, but I don't know.
He's built like a woman. But yeah, he told me.
He said once on CNN that I owned Congress, and

(01:45:07):
then when I criticized CNN and said that they allow
slander and all this stuff on their network, and then
they had me on the next day to say, no,
we don't. I'm like you literally just had someone on
that said that I, you know, kill kids and that
I own Congress, Like, what are you talking about? Anyway,
they it's not final, but they voted to kick him
out a vice chair because of their gender roles. Oh oh,

(01:45:31):
live by Dee, I died by DEI Matt, all right,
today's stupidity came.

Speaker 7 (01:45:36):
All right, now I got something this made I need
a little discernment. I think on this one.

Speaker 1 (01:45:41):
I love these scenarios.

Speaker 7 (01:45:43):
So Hakeem Jefferies, Well, let's just play this and you
tell me whether or not he's threatening law enforcement.

Speaker 11 (01:45:49):
Here. Listen to this.

Speaker 9 (01:45:50):
Your statement the other day after there was this incident
in Newark, you said.

Speaker 11 (01:45:53):
They better not touch our members.

Speaker 14 (01:45:55):
Correct what happens if they were to go and arrest
these members or if they would try to sanction.

Speaker 11 (01:46:00):
Them doing the house for don't find out? What would
you do the honey don't find out recourse?

Speaker 15 (01:46:04):
I mean, don't find out, doesn't that's a red line.

Speaker 11 (01:46:09):
What's the what's the red line? Though, I mean, I
know we have this a red line.

Speaker 7 (01:46:12):
It's very clear, is it clear? Because you weren't clear
at all.

Speaker 1 (01:46:15):
He's trying to act tough but also not answer the question.
That's the opposite of tough. So I'm going to be
tough by on my vagary here, which is an oxymoron,
but okay, yeah, I know. I may be on waters
World tonight. If you are subscribing like the Facebook page,
you'll see it there. Also find us a sub sect

(01:46:36):
chapter and verse. Back with you tomorrow. Have a great night.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Trump Takes South African Refugees, A Smooth Saudi Speech & Sen. Rand Paul Joins Us

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Dateline NBC

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

All Episodes

Trump Takes South African Refugees, A Smooth Saudi Speech & Sen. Rand Paul Joins Us

Stuff You Should Know