Charlie Kirk Memorial Recap, Tom Homan's Fake Bribery Scandal & Jazzy Crockett Does It Again

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Your wife is not your servant.

Speaker 2 (00:04):
Your wife is not your employee. Your wife is not
your slave, She is your helper. You are not rivals.
You are one flesh working together for the glory of God.

Speaker 3 (00:27):
That was just one of the longer cuts of the
memorial that was yesterday. As you can tell, I don't
really have a voice today. The show must go on,
the bosses demanded, So we uh, we're gonna play. I mean,
we've got some We've got a lot of stuff to
get into. But you'll have to forgive me because I'm
on four hours of sleep. I'm exhausted, and I don't
have a crew like I have. We have two people

(00:49):
in here, so we're we're it's a little bit jumbly today,
so we uh, it's been a lot.

Speaker 1 (00:54):
It's been a lot the past couple of days. So
that's where we are. So if.

Speaker 3 (01:01):
If my voice Peter's out, hopefully it'll last the show.

Speaker 1 (01:04):
But we'll see.

Speaker 3 (01:05):
So welcome to the program, Dana lash with you. We're
at the top of this first hour. Number of things
to get into, but first and foremost the memorial that
took place yesterday. It was in Arizona, and it was
very it was very pretty. It was packed.

Speaker 1 (01:22):
Excuse me, all of the.

Speaker 3 (01:25):
All of the stories that you heard about the lines
and everything else is all true.

Speaker 1 (01:33):
I mean, the lines were crazy.

Speaker 3 (01:37):
It was unlike anything I think I've ever seen before,
and it was so I mean, I've been to tea
party rallies all over the country. I've been to different
presidential events, debates, things of that nature, and I've never

(01:58):
been to anything where I've seen so many people like this.

Speaker 1 (02:00):
It's just.

Speaker 3 (02:02):
All for the same purpose and all very Christian driven.
I mean, obviously it was like a giant worship service.
It was just pretty amazing. And then of course to
hear Erica Kirk forgive her Killer, which we're going to
talk about more in depth. But it was just unlike
anything that I've ever seen before. And with that so

(02:24):
many young people, there were so many young people. It was.

Speaker 1 (02:31):
Pretty amazing. That's all. I mean. What else does I mean?

Speaker 3 (02:33):
My voice is about to drop, So I'm just We're
we're gonna pray that we can last through the show
because it may it may not happen.

Speaker 1 (02:42):
Well, we'll just have to, like chirp from the.

Speaker 3 (02:44):
Mic, just we'll do We'll do morse code, We'll do
that and finish the finish the broadcast. But I've I've
just never seen anything like it. When we first got there,
and because you can only you can pull through, and
we were able to pull through and park. When we
first got in there, it was people had been lined up.

(03:05):
I think three forty five is when some of the
first people began getting there at like three something like
three forty five am. It was just pretty unbelievable. And
then the lines already at five am. They said it
was the audience was the equivalent of like three Super Bowls,
and they had I didn't even know that there was
a hockey stadium that was across the way, and then

(03:26):
they put a bunch of people in the hockey state.

Speaker 1 (03:28):
It was crazy.

Speaker 3 (03:30):
That's how many people showed up. And I think that's
incredibly important because if they showed up to thinking it
was just going to be just a political rally, I mean,
it was literally the first because it was a long day, guys,
it was a very long day. Everybody started getting there
between eight nine o'clock in the morning, and then it
went to like four o'clock and then you know, everybody

(03:51):
was racing to airports and you had storms blowing through
that delayed everything.

Speaker 1 (03:55):
So it was a very long day.

Speaker 3 (03:56):
But the reason I bring up the crowd number and
the number of people that were showing up is because
it was like one of the largest worship services. I
think was the largest worship service I've ever seen. And
I don't know, like I said, if they were expecting
to have a political rally or whatever it was, but
it was. I know some people are trying to make
it out like that, but it wasn't. Just because Trump

(04:18):
spoke at it doesn't make it a political rally. You know,
it was the celebration of Charlie's life, and it was
things that Charlie liked, and you know, they had the
like the little firework things that went off on stage.
They did that because he loved that. And that's what
Andrew Colevett had said, who's the spokesperson for TPUSA. They
incorporated that because he and I actually remember him telling
me in ahead of I think it was the tp

(04:41):
you know, Turning Point Women's event, and he was saying, yeah,
we got these great you know, we're going to start,
We're going to get into Pyro and he was very
very excited about those and he and I remember talking
with him backstage at an event and I complimented him
on the fact that he didn't burn the stage down,
and he said, oh, it's so great, and he was like,
I wish I could put more. I mean, he loved it.
He just loved the He thought it looked like the

(05:04):
Fourth of July, like it was the most celebratory thing
that you could do. And so that's why they had
those on the stage for when his widow came out
and when Potus came out and the VP, et cetera,
because that was one of the things that he liked.
He he was like the fourth of July, it was
like a celebration, and it was a celebration of his life.
So I think there's you know, a couple of things
to address in terms of some of the responses to it.

(05:26):
But I just the people that went there. I don't
know if they were anticipating having, you know, like a
three hour worship service before the remembrances began. I don't
know if that if that's what they were thinking, but
that's what they got and it was, uh, it was
it was just pretty. It was just wild. It was
just wild, absolutely wild. The service we went out and

(05:50):
when we got there and everybody was so, you know,
just so nice. When we got there, they went in
and they were giving out free water and all this stuff.

Speaker 1 (06:00):
They thought of everything. But they had like.

Speaker 3 (06:03):
Some of the most amazing They had Kerry Jobi, who
was up there also. We walked in and I thought
they were playing a music track. Oh my gosh, she
literally is up there on stage. And then they had
a bunch of really well known Christian singers that I
don't know how they were able to get all these
people together in seven days.

Speaker 1 (06:21):
This was described as a.

Speaker 3 (06:22):
Tier one event, a level one event, meaning that of
level one events, the only things that are kind of
similar are, you know, if you've got the inauguration, if
you've got you know, some of the debates between presidential candidates,
things like that. I mean it, so the security was
awesome and off the charts and needed considering. But I

(06:42):
just couldn't believe that they got it together in seven days.
I mean, it makes me feel like the things that
I take forever to do and they're a little they're
infantesimal considering it. Just you know, I'm like, golly, of course,
they have a whole team of people that are so
good at it, and the on the inside getting inside,
and as every filled in and as everybody was singing,

(07:03):
there were people who, like I said, who who showed
up with the intent like it was going to be,
you know, like a political thing maybe, and then they
ended up finding themselves worshiping. And then there were a
number of people towards the end. At one point people
who had not yet been baptized. Ra asked, you know,
not in a judgmental way, but so that other believers

(07:23):
could pray with them.

Speaker 1 (07:24):
Things like that.

Speaker 3 (07:25):
It was pretty amazing and I just imagine, like, you know,
how many other people were saved at that event, just
you know, because that's that's what Charlie would have wanted,
what they would have had it designed as So it
was just fascinating. I've never seen anything like it in
my life. And I saw a lot of people, you know,
there a lot of the folks that were on TV

(07:46):
that you might you know, watch with podcasts things of
that nature, a lot of really good folks. And everybody
kind of had that because everybody knew him. Everybody had
the same response. It was just very you know, you
walk up to each other and you just give a
hug although I saw Glenn back, God love him. He's like,
he's such an emotional teddybear. He saw me and we hugged,
and he was just blubbering.

Speaker 1 (08:04):
God love him. He just blubbering. He just bawling.

Speaker 3 (08:08):
Is he's an emotional teddy bear. That man cries like
I've never seen a woman cry. Is like, as hard
as that man cries, he wins, he wins.

Speaker 1 (08:15):
Ladies sit down.

Speaker 3 (08:16):
But it was just wild, just oh, I've never seen
an event like it. And then at one point, here's
the other thing. We were like four rows behind Elon Musk.
Elon Musk is sitting there to worship service for two hours.
Let's just be real about it. Elon Musk was sitting
there while people were praying and singing worship songs for

(08:38):
two hours. Now, if you ever have an opportunity to
like witness to the world's richest man who literally can
help determine the outcome of elections, don't you think that
this was a good thing?

Speaker 1 (08:50):
Exactly? There were a lot of things that play here.

Speaker 3 (08:53):
And then at one point I saw a secret service
come down, and then they escorted him up to the
box where Potus had gotten in after he flew in
the event and they were hopefully making amends. That's at
least what they indicated on social media. So we have
a lot to touch on as we move. Everybody needs
to take Relief Factor. This is a great partner to
the show. Relief Factor can help you with your everyday

(09:14):
aches and pains, and they do it by targeting your
body's inflammatory response.

Speaker 1 (09:19):
We honestly, people need to get that under control because.

Speaker 3 (09:22):
Inflammation leads to so many other health consequences and that's
a big deal. And so what Relief Factor does is
they have a bunch of stuff that targets all of
that and they resveratrol. I can't pronounce some of this
stuff turmeric. We're going to try it, kerq In I
did it all I look, I'm not a scientist. All
I know is does this work?

Speaker 1 (09:43):
It does? Okay, yay, thanks thanks Relief Factor.

Speaker 3 (09:46):
Because if you're targeting inflammation, especially if you're doing it early,
don't think that because you're in your sweet summer child twenties,
that you're not gonna have to deal with, you know, inflammation,
and that you won't have the consequences of it later
on in life. Surprise you, will they don't tell you that.
They don't give you a book for old people like
when you're in your twenties, it just doesn't happen. So
it's important to take care of yourself and important to
watch your inflammatory responses. Relief Factor helps support the natural

(10:09):
response to that. It targets the inflammation that keeps you
from moving freely doing the things that you love and
again one hundred percent drug free. It's a research based formula.
It's all designed to support that healthy response, and it
maintains helps you to maintain healthy joints and muscles over time.

Speaker 1 (10:22):
Try their three week quick Start. It's only nineteen ninety five.
You don't have to wait.

Speaker 3 (10:25):
Visit relief Factor dot com or call eight hundred number
four Relief. Get your three week quick start today for
nineteen ninety five. It's relief Factor dot Com eight hundred
and four Relief.

Speaker 4 (10:34):
Are young people really going into debt to impress? Apparently
the ticket to attention for young people is going into
debt to impress others by things like clothes and shoes.
Two and five gen zers admit to going into debt
to impress. That'll get you into some trouble. Check out
the Watchdog on Wall Street podcast on Apple, Spotify, wherever
you get your podcasts.

Speaker 5 (10:55):
And now all of the news you would probably miss.
It's time for Data's quick.

Speaker 3 (11:01):
A bear has attacked a ninety year old woman in
what in the well? It did it in a grocery
store as well, which is kind of insane. A well
dollar General store. A ninety year old woman. A black
bear tore through this was a New Jersey and went
on a rampage. They had to euthanize it after I attacked,
and I thought, you never know when you hear bear

(11:21):
now and rainbowst I.

Speaker 1 (11:23):
Just never know anymore.

Speaker 3 (11:24):
But they some of it was caught on video. I
just she had scratches on her legs, like thankfully she
was a mauled.

Speaker 1 (11:31):
The bear looks crazy. I got to say, bear looks crazy.

Speaker 3 (11:34):
They said that they had a sixty five year old
that was recording everything that was happening. And apparently you
can hear another man say get the blank away from me.
Of course it's a new Jersey. I just love that
they he's going to cut at the bear and make
the bear go away. You know, it's like democrats. I
think you're going to cut and made people agree through
policies anyway, everybody's okay, thankfully, but or while she was

(11:58):
injured but nobody else, but they euthanized the bear. Okay,
So a disabled man, this is an insane story. This
is horrifying. Actually, a disabled man ended up self driving
robot delivery cart cut off, cut him off in traffic
and reversed into him.

Speaker 1 (12:15):
He was on a mobility scooter.

Speaker 3 (12:17):
So it was a food delivery robot and apparently there's
video that captured it. The man who has cerebral palsy
was on his way home from a procedure and a
Serve Robotics cart crashed into his mobility scooter that he
uses for long distances. It's like all over Instagram and
it literally cut. It didn't It was almost like it

(12:39):
was doing it.

Speaker 1 (12:39):
Like it was a jerk. It looked on purpose. I'm sorry.

Speaker 3 (12:42):
This looked on purpose, he screamed, as he was trying
to zigzag on the sidewalk to avoid the robot's jolting impact.

Speaker 1 (12:50):
But it literally like cut in front of.

Speaker 3 (12:52):
Him and then slammed on its brakes like I watched this, dude,
I'm sorry, this robot tried to kill him.

Speaker 1 (12:59):
This robot.

Speaker 3 (13:00):
Legit, try to kill this guy. Don't tell me that
they don't do that, because one of them committed suicide.
One of the robots did. Remember I was in Washington
where this little security robot was like, I'm done with
life and rolled itself into a fountain.

Speaker 1 (13:10):
I'm not that actually happened. Totally happened. Oh, I don't know.

Speaker 3 (13:15):
Americans have had they have so much card at Apparently
it could start a two thousand and eight like recession,
although I think we're already there. If I'm being honest,
what do you mean to start? The soaring cost of
cars and insurance, a lot of people are pushed to
the financial brink and now drivers apparently a one point
six trillion in car loans. It's a bigger burden than
federal student loan debt or credit cards. It's apt twenty

(13:36):
percent since twenty twenty. And the squeeze is showing up
in a lot of miscar payments, delinquencies, defaults, repossessions, things
like that. So it's pretty pretty wild. But we're already there,
let's see. And apparently oh DFW had to and that's
an old one. That's because it's not really in practice. Anymore,
but there have been. There was a cyber attack on

(13:58):
European airports. Heathrow operates like there's a cyber attack on
it anyway every given day. I mean, I've never been
to a crazier airport.

Speaker 1 (14:06):
In my life.

Speaker 3 (14:07):
But apparently they had a lot of problems all over
the weekend Canada, all over Europe as well. The Dublin
Airport was evacuated because of safety concerns the check in
and boarding. Of course, you know, if you imagine Irish
people not being able to go go in and get
on their planes might get fighty I'm joking.

Speaker 1 (14:23):
I can say that because I part Irish. All Right,
We've got a lot more on the way.

Speaker 3 (14:27):
We're going to dive into some of this stuff, not
just with the memorial, but Tomholman as well.

Speaker 1 (14:31):
Stick with us.

Speaker 3 (14:32):
If you've not gotten super beats, you need to. They
also have super Maerine. It's a powerful metabolism support and
it's all designed to keep your energy steady even after
you eat. So metabolism is where it's at. Healthy metabolism,
healthy blood sugar support. A lot of people could benefit
from that, no matter what decade of life you're in,
and berberine. They don't use any just any old berberine supplement.

(14:54):
They use a unique berberine that's been clinically studied to
deliver ten times higher absorption than standard burbering. One concentrated,
easy to swallow capsule is all it takes and the
berberine that they use as you know, top much, but
they also include olifruit extract and other things to help
support and minimize GI distress as well. You can find

(15:15):
both the Superbarine and the number one selling superb beatsrtoes
at Sam's Club. Stock up and save on Healthy Bloo
Pressure Support with five dollars off Superbeats Hartchoes and from
August twenty seventh to September twenty first at Sam's Club
and you can start to date it on the road
of better cardiovascular.

Speaker 6 (15:30):
Health makes some common sense of the crazy headlines. With
a data show podcast, you're on the go guide for
getting up to speed on today's most important stories. Subscribe
on YouTube, Apple or your favorite podcast platform.

Speaker 7 (15:44):
Many of these people, by the way, are paid a
lot of money to do this. They're agitators. They're paid agitators.
Remember that when you see they all have the same
beautifully printed sign. Every sign is identical comes out of
a top level print shop. That's not the that are
made in somebody's basement. Those are paid for by very

(16:04):
bad people. And hopefully we're going to be finding out
through the DOJ who those people are. At another college,
Antifa terra shattered windows, through rocks and tried to storm
the building where Charlie was speaking. It was a really

(16:25):
bad one. Often dozens of police officers were needed to
prevent left wing violence, and the violence comes largely from
the left. You don't hear that from too many people,
do you.

Speaker 3 (16:39):
Well, And he's not wrong, I mean that's exactly Some
people were mad and saying, oh well Trump was political.
He wasn't, and he was talking about that.

Speaker 1 (16:47):
Can I just be really frank about something here with.

Speaker 3 (16:52):
This this idea that you know, Charlie was a political person.

Speaker 1 (16:59):
You know, he he followed.

Speaker 3 (17:01):
He was obviously is very into politics. This was not
just a memorial, was also a celebration of his life,
and it was very helpful for his family and friends.
It's not about how other people would celebrate, It's about
how he his family and friends would celebrate. And I
don't think that Trump said anything in that that was
in any way inaccurate.

Speaker 8 (17:22):
Kane, no lives detected.

Speaker 1 (17:25):
I didn't detect any lives. I didn't.

Speaker 3 (17:28):
I didn't hear of anything that was incorrect in that.
Welcome back to the program, Daniel Lashley. I know I've
already gotten emails about it. Yes, I know my voice
soun's bad.

Speaker 1 (17:36):
Just get over it. I'm fine.

Speaker 3 (17:38):
I just I'm just doublely exhausted. H the I am, okay,
stop telling me what teas to drink.

Speaker 1 (17:43):
God love you.

Speaker 3 (17:45):
They're also sweet, they'll they all mean the best. But
I've just I keep noticing this. I'm trying to pull
this up because I had an example of it that
I found this morning, so I'm trying to There were
actually a lot of examples of this where people were like, well,
why did they say anything about those or why was this?
This is the way that again his family and his friends,
this is them honoring his life. It's not how you

(18:07):
would honor your life. It's not what I don't care
if it's what you would.

Speaker 1 (18:10):
God lead people. Just get over it.

Speaker 3 (18:12):
I am so tired of everybody trying to clout Chase
and everybody trying to have an opinion, and everybody trying
to be like, oh, this is what I would do.

Speaker 1 (18:18):
Nobody cares what you would do. Stop I get so aggravated.

Speaker 3 (18:23):
I thought it was a beautiful service, and it was
worshiped for you know, hours, and even between speakers. They
also played worship music, and they had worship songs between speakers,
even just saying, it's very different from what the left does, Kane,
what does the left.

Speaker 9 (18:38):
Do beside celebrate evil?

Speaker 3 (18:42):
Well, you know, if the left lost someone, how do
they typically respond to things like this, Oh.

Speaker 10 (18:48):
They go out and they become violent and riot and
burn buildings, and yeah, that caused more damage.

Speaker 1 (18:55):
I didn't see any rioting. I didn't see one. Are
we doing it? I didn't even see a burning building.

Speaker 9 (19:02):
We're doing it right?

Speaker 3 (19:03):
Just well, I mean, you know, because we were told
that that's like all mostly peaceful protests. So I was just,
you know, I was just curious as to how that works.
I mean, just a very interesting thing here. We there
was no burning of buildings, There was no lighting churches
on fire, there were no riots, there was none of that,

(19:28):
none of it. So it was just it was literally
prayer and peace and all of that. Nothing bad, nothing, nothing,
you know, nothing that we've seen on like CNN, nothing
that we've seen on MSNBC. I think that's kind of

(19:48):
a big difference of it a huge difference. I'll have
a post later today on substack. I was going to
try to do it last night, but we didn't have
Wi Fi on the plane and got in super late
because the storm that were all around Dallas and so
it was in in Phoenix, so it was delayed. Your
girls on like four hours of sleep, so we didn't
get the piece up last night. But well, I'll have

(20:11):
some I have some audio and video for you. I
wanted to I think do we have this video? It's
just one of the ones I sent you guys this morning.
This was I took this inside and this was like
before any of the speakers began, and it was a
moment when the audience was you know, they stopped the instrumentation,

(20:32):
and the audience, like everybody who was there participating began
to sing, what audio? Because we have a million audio soundbites,
what do we got? Because this is the one I
sent earlier, so it should be we only have photos.

Speaker 10 (20:45):
The videos that I don't see any of those in
the audio channel at all, So I don't know if
you have those in there.

Speaker 9 (20:51):
I totally put it up there.

Speaker 3 (20:53):
Okay, well I'll go back to this because we because
I had put it in there.

Speaker 1 (20:56):
I hate slack so bad again, bear with us all.

Speaker 3 (21:00):
So, but there it was a it was an amazing event,
like I said, And there were no protesters inside either.
I didn't see any protesters inside, did I didn't. There
was in a single protester that was inside. And it
was just it was just uh, which I actually was

(21:20):
surprised about. I'm not going to be able to send
it via slack, so it's just it is what it is.
But I'll put it up on substack on my YouTube.
I'll personally myself put it up there so that you
guys can see it.

Speaker 1 (21:33):
But it was it was pretty it was pretty cool.

Speaker 3 (21:35):
We played some of the audio from her remarks from
Erica's remarks, and this was interesting too. I wanted to
play this audio SoundBite six because there was a lot
of a lot of conspiracy theories about this stuff. I
don't like conspiracy theories. I also understand that absent you know,

(21:55):
any kind of clarification or detail, people fill in the
holes and they do this stuff themselves. I don't think
that that's a great idea to do. That said it
just I think she shared this with everyone because I'm
not going to dive into her head and exploit and
get into why she felt she needed she I mean
clearly did uh.

Speaker 1 (22:12):
She wanted to share that with people.

Speaker 3 (22:14):
But there were a lot of people that were saying, like,
he faked his death and all this kind of stuff.
And I'm just like the fact that a family and
these and his friends keep having to to stop in
the middle of an insane amount of grief and address
this stuff is insane. Like uh, Andrew Covett and others,
the fact that they keep having to address some of

(22:34):
that stuff was insane. This was interesting, and I wanted
to play this SoundBite for you because.

Speaker 1 (22:40):
I think it.

Speaker 3 (22:41):
I think it it helps some people try to process,
especially like the young, like the younger generation, people like
my kid's age, that just couldn't believe that this happened
on livestream. And I think that they were worried more
than anything that this person that they knew, because my
kids knew. Charlie didn't feel any kind of pain, And
I wanted up play audio somebody six for you.

Speaker 2 (23:00):
Charlie didn't suffer. Even the doctor told me it was
something so instant that even even if Charlie had been
shot in the operating room, it's itself nothing could have
been done. There was no fane, there was no fear,

(23:22):
no agony. One moment, Charlie was doing what he loved,
arguing and debating on campus.

Speaker 1 (23:31):
Fighting for the gospel.

Speaker 2 (23:34):
Truth in front of a big crowd, and then he blinked,
He blinked and saw his Savior in paradise.

Speaker 3 (23:56):
It was I mean, it's amazing that so basically what
she's saying, it was instantaneous, and that he felt no pain,
et cetera. And that's kind of what I think a
lot of people were thinking some of the video. Again,
I hope some of you never see that, because it's
things that you just things that you cannot unsee. I
thought Potus had a lot of really good He made

(24:21):
a lot of really good points. I thought all of
the speakers were really good, some of them. I you know,
I'm not going to question why people were there. I
don't know what's you know, the friends and family, they
were the ones who decided that this is what these are,
this this is the speaker roster that they wanted, et cetera.
And again, it's about a celebration of Charlie's life. It's
not about our lives or someone else celebrating the way

(24:43):
that they wanted to celebrate.

Speaker 1 (24:44):
It's not about any of that.

Speaker 3 (24:45):
So, but the speakers, I thought the pastor, his pastor
and another pastor who spoke, we were unbelievable. They were
absolutely unbelievable. And I thought they had just like the
right tone, the right messaging. I just I've never you know,
with like the Floyd stuff. You know, if you wanted

(25:06):
to compare, I wanted to go back to Erica Kirk,
which stunned everybody by the way. She didn't have to
do that at this event, but I think it was
so incredibly important, and I think that she had the
foresight to understand that this is kind of a watershed
moment in culture, not just politics. This is this extends
beyond politics. It's like a watershed moment culturally. And I

(25:28):
think it also determines, well, what is going to be
the way that people react going forward, because clearly, you know,
conservatives are targeted, there's threats to conservatives that exist. I
turned down some speaking things over the weekend at different
events that were outside because there was no guarantee of safety,
and a lot of people are kind of people who

(25:49):
are in this industry, people who want to be active
in politics, are watching this, and I think.

Speaker 1 (25:54):
It was very important what she did.

Speaker 3 (25:57):
I don't know that I could do that that eleven
days after that's that is a strong faith that that's
where she was able to punch down into the grief
and into the dark and find forgiveness for the person
who put her in this state and busted her family.
I mean, it just it was an amazing thing. She

(26:17):
didn't have to do it, but I think she felt
the weight of the moment also. And she's a Christian.
She's more conservative than Charlie ever was true, and that's
just her. So it was amazing to see that, especially
contrast with contrasted with everything else that we've seen with

(26:38):
regards to how the left does things. And I bring
that up because I'm not sitting here going, oh, look
at the left is so bad. I wish that they
would react that way. That's my point in telling that
to you. I wish that they would react that way.
Doubt that they ever will, but you know, still we wish.

Speaker 1 (26:55):
I'll have more of it.

Speaker 3 (26:55):
There's other things that I want to get into as well,
because we have some domestic issues. Can we just talk
about the Let me just set the table, because we're
going to get into this Tom Hooman thing. And you
guys know, I tend to like Tom Holman. He actually
kind of reminds me of one of my grandfathers. He
was accused by MSNBC in this This is how they
put it in an undercover operation. The MSNBC is saying

(27:19):
the FBI recorded Tomhoman, who is the White House borders
are accepting fifty thousand dollars in cash after indicating that
he could help the agents, who were posing as business
executives win government contracts and a second administration, according to
multiple people familiar with the probe and internal documents reviewed
by NBC, now, there's a number of things to kind
of keep in mind here. Immediately, I don't want to

(27:41):
trust it. Number one. Number two, even Andrew McCarthy, My
friend Andrew McCarthy is like, this is weird. What none
of this makes sense? And third, Tomhoman is not an idiot.
Let me tell you how I would take a bribe. Okay,
if I'm going to take a bribe. It's not going
to be in like mark dollar bills, especially when you
can do like crypto and bitcoin.

Speaker 1 (28:02):
I'm just I'm not.

Speaker 3 (28:02):
I haven't done this, but I'm just telling you if
I would, this is what I would do. You've got
like crypto, You've got bitcoin. I mean, gosh, if you
insist on cash, can't you just be like, oh well,
leave it in the hotel room. Just get a hotel room,
leave it there. I will get this hotel room and
then be shocked when I discover a bag of cash
onder the bed.

Speaker 1 (28:19):
You know, there's all a million.

Speaker 3 (28:21):
The fact that this that they're saying that Tom Mahoman
himself was like, yes, I would like to accept this
cash with my hands.

Speaker 1 (28:27):
I just don't believe it.

Speaker 3 (28:28):
Also, to me and you all, it's a lot of money,
but not in the grand scheme of things. Fifty thousand
dollars is not enough for a guy who's going who
knows he's going to be in the administration, to wreck
his entire career for Sorry, but there's a lot of
things that are against this that I don't buy.

Speaker 11 (28:45):
Now.

Speaker 1 (28:45):
You guys know I always carry I.

Speaker 3 (28:46):
Have zero problem throwing lead. Doown range and defense of
myself and or loved ones. And I also am completely
aware of the municipal and private property restrictions that affect
your abil to carry where you would like, when you
would like, at certain or any time. And that's where
I think it's good to diversify your weapons array, especially

(29:07):
if you're a college kid who's old enough to go
and serve their country overseas and carry fol auto but
apparently you're not trusted enough to even carry to protect
yourself here at home under the age of twenty one.
So this is where the burnagun comes in. Barnegun shoots
chemical irritant projectiles that can deter threats from up to
fifty feet away. The SD is their most popular model.
The smaller cl new the newest one I think is

(29:28):
going to overtake the SD in terms of popularity, easy
target acquisition, no recoil unlike regular stunt guns, and only
have a couple of shots. This one I had said yesterday,
I had seven. Sorry, it was a fifteen round capacity
per cartridge, so you have fifteen rounds compared like your
regular stunt guns, which is like one maybe two. It
also super lightweight, there's no recoil, And here's the thing.

(29:50):
There's no background check, there are no fees, there's no
none of that. There's no they don't care about gun
free zone signs at all whatsoever. The legal in every state.
You can get it sent right to your front door.
It's burna dot com slash Dana BYRNA. You have different calibers,
you carry blades. It's always good to have a diversified
weapons array. Check out the new bernaclstance for compact launcher.

(30:12):
Berna dot Com slash.

Speaker 6 (30:13):
Dana get the loaddown on the latest news with a
side of laughs whenever you want. Subscribe to the Data
Show podcast on YouTube, Apple or wherever you get your podcast,
like SAMs through.

Speaker 8 (30:28):
The hour Glass.

Speaker 9 (30:29):
So are the days of the United States.

Speaker 12 (30:33):
Hey, I just canceled my Disney Plus and Hulu subscriptions
and they asked me why I hit other and I wrote,
because I believe in the First Amendment. Reinstate. Jimmy Kimmel,
Now my whole family is really gonna miss at ad Elementary.
We are really gonna miss only murders in the building,
but you know what, we would miss the First Amendment

(30:55):
a whole lot more. Don't go to the theme parks,
don't go on the cruises, cancel your subscriptions.

Speaker 3 (31:01):
Now mind your own business. Broad don't made me sit
here and defend Disney. I hate everything. Don't make me
defend Disney. But it's not a First Amendment issue. That's
one where I do disagree with people, and it's not
I have some people like, Oh, I thought you were
a free speech warrior. I thought you actually understood the
concept of private business. Are you a Marxist? Because only

(31:22):
Marxist don't understand the concept of private business. And if
we're starting this discussion from the point of private businesses
don't have the right to control their employment, then you
then we I already can't talk to you about this
because you have you've adopted a Marxist stance on it.
This was the These companies chose to do this because
they got so many calls and so much feedback. This

(31:45):
had nothing to do with the administration, This had nothing
to do with the FCC, And there were people out
there saying, well, Brendan Carr should a Brendan Carr whatever.
I don't give a rats ask how Brendan Carr said it,
because Brendan Carr didn't do the stuff Brendan Carr was
being accused of. You can have a separate conversation as
to whether or not you think it's appropriate for him

(32:05):
to quote the Matthew McConaughey line from that movie Rain
of Fire. We can make it easier, we can make
it real easy. That's not the same thing as Joe Biden, actually,
even Barack Obama, Joe Biden actually pressuring tech companies to
censor conservatives. It's not the same thing as Barack Obama
going after the Associated Press for writing unflattering pieces about

(32:26):
his second term. It's not the same thing as people
getting suspended or actually it's not even the same thing
as the Biden administration sending the FBI to raid people's
homes and arrest journalists because his drug addicted loud lay
about daughter who is literally my age and she acts
like she's eighteen, was lost her diary in a flophouse,

(32:50):
and so they decided to go after the journalists that
uncovered it. So it's not even remotely the same. The
issue is these entities not want to hear this feedback
from their listeners, from their viewers. They took action themselves.
It's not a First Amendment issue. That is an employment issue.
That is an issue between the employer and the employee.

(33:12):
And as for car, again, it's a separate issue how
he set it to what really happened. I mean, do
you I feel like the goalposter moving. So the debate was, wow,
it's like so bad. This is such a First Amendment violation.
The FCC did this, and then when shown mounds of
evidence that the FCC actually didn't. And again, I had
Brendan Carr on the show and I asked him twice

(33:33):
if he actually himself or the administration put pressure on
Next Star or Sinclair or Disney or ABC, and the
answer was no, So absent any evidence of coercion, I'm
not going to go, oh gosh, that's that's the first
because it's not. If people dislike how he said it,
that's a completely separate issue from what happened. I will

(33:54):
say that I don't think it's helpful for the administration
to try to spike a football that wasn't there's to
spike in the first place, because that gives the left fuel.
And I think that's a pretty fair assessment. But the
accusations that this was a government thing, it's dumb. We're
not Marxist. We believe in private property. We got more
on the way second hour coming up. So apparently we
have to stop falling for the whole higher thread count

(34:16):
thing because it doesn't necessarily mean better sheets. That's fake news. Apparently,
it's like believing that you use like ten percent of
your brain. So the secret isn't thread count, it's thread quality.
And this is where Bowlin Branch has one a lot
of folks over at years. Truly, they use the best
organic cotton end of I mean, these are sheets that
feel incredible, like the moment you take them out of

(34:38):
the box. So the first night that you put them on,
you can tell right away that they're softer, they're cooler,
and they have a great weight. It's like kind of
having a five star hotel room in your own house.
And I'll tell you something else. The sheets get better
every time that you've washed them. I've washed mine countless
times and they just keep getting softer. You can't do
that with cheap sheets because they totally fall apart. Bowl

(34:58):
and Branch. They get more like so you'll sleep better
and you're kind of kind of feel like a spoiled brat.

Speaker 1 (35:04):
But it's okay.

Speaker 3 (35:05):
I'm not going to go back to the old sheets.
Once you try them, you're not going to either. So
if you're ready to upgrade your sleep and you should
visit bowlanbranch dot com slash Danas Show because there you'll
get fifteen percent off your first set plus free shipping.
So that's bowlanbranch dot com slash Danish Show for fifteen
percent off. Exclusions apply.

Speaker 11 (35:28):
He did not hate his opponents.

Speaker 8 (35:29):
He wanted.

Speaker 11 (35:32):
The best for them.

Speaker 7 (35:33):
That's where I disagreed with Charlie.

Speaker 11 (35:35):
I hate my opponent and I don't want the best
for them. I'm sorry. I am sorry Erica. But now
Erica can talk to me and the whole group and
maybe they can convince me that that's not right. But
I can't stand my opponent. Charlie's angry.

Speaker 1 (35:55):
Look at that. He's angry at me.

Speaker 11 (35:56):
That he wasn't interested in demonized anyone. He was interested
in persuading everyone to the ideas and principles he believed
were good, right and true.

Speaker 3 (36:08):
This was actually a funny moment, and I think it
was illustrative in a number of different ways. Welcome back
to the program, Dana lash with you. Yes, I'm drinking
horrible tea right now. No, it's throatcoat. My husband was
a he does. He used to sing opera, so he can,
like he did, he can. He makes me drink this
horrible liquorice thing to help with the voice. Y'all, I know,
I see you all.

Speaker 1 (36:29):
God love you. I've got your little emails in your
little comments. I thank you. I'm not sick. It was
one of my favorite.

Speaker 3 (36:34):
I thought that was one of my favorite moments from
Trump's remarks, and it was hysterical because FaceID, how many
of y'all think this? I mean really until everyone was
like completely humbled by Erica's remarks, like I forget, I
mean everyone, I think that really reset the tone.

Speaker 1 (36:48):
Not kidding you, I think it did again. Welcome back
to the program.

Speaker 3 (36:52):
We are doing our nationally syndicated radio show that you
can watch Channel three forty seven direct TV. We have
the chat at Rumble and and just apologies in advance
if I sound a little bit. I'm just exhausted your
girls four hours asleep and flew home in a storm
so I could get here and be with you today.
So it's I think I'm actually still I was thrown
all over the plane almost not that might be a

(37:13):
slight exaggeration. I liked what the President said there because
he was not guys, guys, guys, I need some people
to just chill. Take a beat, please, Dear God, I
need some people to just exhale. And I've heard from
a few of you where you said all that was
completely inappropriate.

Speaker 1 (37:33):
What he said. He wasn't saying that literally. He's making
a joke. He's making a joke. It was funny.

Speaker 3 (37:40):
He's not sitting here expressing that as some sort of
Christian doctrine, so you know, let's just chill. It was
a funny remark, and I think it could. I think
he actually was. He's basically saying, here's my here's my flaw,
here's my weakness. And it's funny because everybody really kind
of felt the same way until she said what she said.

(38:05):
And I know for a fact that that not as
socks off. He was not, and that was that was
well known. He did not know she was going to
say that, and that really reset the tone for a
lot of stuff. Steve and I and Kane, we were
all talking on break I didn't because last night I
came in I didn't have Wi Fi on the plane

(38:25):
and it was just a madhouse leaving, and so I
didn't see a lot of what people were saying about
because they had a lot of people stream the event.
I think how many people did they say stream the event?

Speaker 9 (38:37):
Cane, do you remember, like total is like one hundred million?
Like it was?

Speaker 1 (38:42):
It was that it was a lot. I saw that figure,
but I was like.

Speaker 9 (38:46):
Yeah, that's the figure I've been seeing.

Speaker 1 (38:47):
Wow, that's pretty impressive.

Speaker 3 (38:49):
So some of the people Steve was saying were upset because, like,
for instance, the sparklers, Can we is that the best
way to say?

Speaker 1 (39:00):
What are they? They're fireworks, right, They're giant floor sparklers
pyrotechnics for stage. Is that technically how you would say it?

Speaker 8 (39:07):
Yeah?

Speaker 1 (39:07):
Not my layman's Oh it's giant.

Speaker 9 (39:09):
Flor sparkler stage pyrotechnics.

Speaker 3 (39:11):
Yeah, okay, I was saying, like floor, okay, floor sparks
that but your sounds way much more knowledgeable and professional.

Speaker 9 (39:17):
Yours isn't inaccurate though, Okay.

Speaker 3 (39:20):
So she walked out to the podium and they had piate,
can we show this this is four?

Speaker 1 (39:27):
Yeah? I think this is four.

Speaker 3 (39:28):
This is when she had walked out a lot of
people apparently were reacting to the pyros.

Speaker 1 (39:48):
It's a powerful owner.

Speaker 3 (39:51):
Some people were talking about the pyrotechnics. Can we just
let me address this? I hope that nobody in the
organization has to, because they're very busy right now and
they're grieving and they, you know, a lot of things
are happening for them. Charlie loved the pyro case in point.
I remember when they first started incorporating at TPUSA events
because I've known Charlie for a long time and done

(40:12):
a lot of his events. You know, he is a good,
good guy.

Speaker 1 (40:16):
And I remember at one point, I can't remember where
it was or what event.

Speaker 3 (40:20):
It was, but I was backstage. Because they line you
up backstage and everybody gets it. You know, you're you're
free to pretty much do whatever you're gonna do, and
everybody knows what their lanes are. I mean, it's just
it's pretty remarkable how conservatives just know and just can
congeal and work together. But I watched somebody go out
on stage and I saw the floor sparklers came. What

(40:45):
do you call him again? The no stay in the
microphone and make it sound smart, and I act like
it was.

Speaker 9 (40:49):
Me stage pyrotechnics.

Speaker 3 (40:51):
Okay, So they went off and I'm like, because you
see they're right there on the stage right and I
and I it.

Speaker 1 (40:58):
Made me jump a little bit.

Speaker 3 (40:59):
And Harley was backstage standing next to me, and he
laughed because he saw that I jumped because they were
they all of a sudden, there they were, and I
look back at him. He was like, don't worry, You're
not going to get set on fire, is what he
told me. And I'm like, those sparks.

Speaker 1 (41:13):
Go pretty high, my dude.

Speaker 3 (41:15):
Those I'm like, and they you know, sometimes they come down.
And he's like, no, it's all like it's tested, you know.
He's like, we have total pros that are doing everything.
And he's like, I love it so much. He's like,
it's like the fourth of July.

Speaker 1 (41:27):
He loved it.

Speaker 3 (41:28):
So that's why and Andrew Colvett, who's the spokesperson for
the organization, said that's why they had those there because
he loved them. He wanted He just liked celebrating and
this was about his celebration of life.

Speaker 1 (41:43):
He would have wanted it there. That's what it was about.

Speaker 3 (41:46):
And I think it highlights that a lot of people
aren't familiar with how TPOSA does stuff. They're not familiar
with how they do their events. They're not familiar with
how they do a lot of their outreach and some
of the stuff that they do.

Speaker 1 (41:56):
This was like par for the course.

Speaker 3 (41:58):
So anybody who's ever been to a TPUSA, that's literally
what that That's like a Charlie Hallmark. That's because he
loved that stuff. That's a Charlie Charlie Hallmark. But I
he was like he like bent over laughing because I
literally jumped, and he was like he just thought it
was hysterical, and he's like, don't worry, you're not going

(42:18):
to get set on fire.

Speaker 10 (42:19):
If you ever stand next to those there's some real
heat that.

Speaker 3 (42:22):
Comes to and they're so bright. They're so bright like
when they're going you So when I'm when I would
be up on stage and I would go out whenever
they would do their event. If sometimes they have the
stage where you walk out like on a catwalk and
there's a podium, and sometimes like the women's event last time,
they didn't have that, and when those things go off, it's.

Speaker 1 (42:44):
So bright you can't see anything else. You are like blinded.

Speaker 3 (42:48):
It's yeah, but I jumped, and he thought it was hysterical,
and he was like, don't worry, You're not going to
get set on fire.

Speaker 1 (42:54):
And I'm like, Charlie, I'm like.

Speaker 3 (42:55):
You know, those sparks come down too write He's like, no,
it's all you know. He very confident and they always
they always had flawless events. So I was like, I try,
if you say it's good, I trust it. You say
it's good, I'm not gonna have my head caught on fire.
That's why they had him and a lot of people
I think we're trying to I saw somebody who wasn't
at the event say I don't want to get into denominations.

Speaker 1 (43:19):
I'm not going to be pushed into that.

Speaker 3 (43:21):
But it's someone who clearly is not like a non
denominational or something of that manner. And they were like, oh, well,
this looked like a circus, not a revival. I'm like, well,
you weren't even there, and and you know that seems
like pretty mean spirited of somebody to say when they
have Christian in their bio, you weren't there. And that's
exactly not what it was like. And it was also
about a celebration of his life. It was the celebration

(43:43):
of his life.

Speaker 1 (43:43):
That's it.

Speaker 3 (43:45):
I think that, you know, not everybody grieves the same,
And I just think it's silly if people were going
to focus on things like pyrotechnics as opposed to the
fact that you had several hundred thousand people I don't
know how many, you know, hundreds of thousands millions online
that were watching, but you had thousands of people in
that stadium and then in the hockey arena next door

(44:06):
who were literally all worshiping together. It was like a
Sunday service. And so instead of talking about that, they're
going to sit here and focus on pyrotechnics.

Speaker 1 (44:15):
Are you kidding me? Right now?

Speaker 3 (44:17):
Like I get that there's this There is fame to
be found in being a contrarian. If you're the person
who's always picking everyone else apart, that's like an appropriation
of power, right It's a substitute for power or some
sort of seniority in an issue in which you have
no other means to achieve it. It's pathetic and I'm

(44:37):
tired of seeing it. I just really am. I don't
really have anything else to add on it. I didn't
think it, and kin, I mean your thoughts because you
were watching some of those.

Speaker 10 (44:48):
Yeah, there's a lot of it that was really moving.
I mean, you know what the context is and all
of that, but it was great to see the moments
of levity, the stuff that Trump abroad and other people
to the stage just sort of you know, it didn't
allow you to sort.

Speaker 9 (45:02):
Of be swallowed up by the sorrow of it all.
And I thought that was really happy.

Speaker 3 (45:06):
What do people what were they expecting? I think that
in light of all of the all of the different
ways this could have gone, I think that people should
be happy that hundreds of thousands got together and worshiped
and prayed. But see, here's what the left is going
to do, and I need the right to not feed
into this. What the left is going to do is

(45:27):
they're going to try to focus on everything that they
can pick apart. They're going to ignore the fact that
it was praise and worship for three hours. They're going
to ignore the praise and worship between the speakers. They're
going to ignore the the demands and statements of the
speakers for peace and for revival, and they're going to

(45:50):
instead focus on Owill Trump was there, Oh, will Vance
was there? Or this happened or whatever. And it was
a political rally. If you want to see a political rally,
I'll direct you to Paul Wellstone's visitation and back in
the early aughts, if you want a comparison, go and
look what happened there. I mean, getting out there and
actually going after Republicans in an uncharitable way and being very,

(46:11):
very polarizing. That's one thing that wasn't happening here. In fact,
the most polarizing thing that you if you wanted to
make the argument for it was Trump joking about I
don't love my enemies. I mean that was like that
was I mean, I was there, I heard all of it.
That was the most you know, if you wanted to
try to argue that there was something polarizing, that was
the most polarizing thing that was there.

Speaker 1 (46:30):
And it Uh.

Speaker 3 (46:35):
The media is going to focus on those things because
they need something to invalidate the lack of violence.

Speaker 1 (46:41):
They didn't get the right, They didn't get.

Speaker 3 (46:43):
Riots like what they get after you know, one of
their drug dealers dies. They didn't get that. Oh no,
that was accurate, and I'm it was accurate. I didn't
say anything it was false.

Speaker 1 (46:51):
What do you want me to do? Dress it up.

Speaker 3 (46:53):
They the right doesn't. This did not happen. It was peaceful.
People were nice to each other. They were like, weirdly
nice to each other. I get weird when people are
really nice. So I'm like in the stadium the whole time.

Speaker 1 (47:07):
I go because everybody was so nice.

Speaker 3 (47:11):
But the left, that's another bomb to their narrative. On
the right, you have to realize they're trying to figure
out how to counter program what everybody just saw. You
had people all in this country and all around the
world watch one of the most peaceful, faith based things
that you could see, and everybody was I mean, you

(47:33):
had the world's richest me and sitting there through a
praise and worship service for hours. We were four ers
behind them for hours. Clearly that had to plant some seeds,
don't you think. There were a lot of other high
profile people there.

Speaker 13 (47:49):
And.

Speaker 1 (47:51):
It was a great it was a great way to witness.

Speaker 3 (47:55):
The left sees that and they're like, oh my gosh,
this is completely counter to everything that we tell everybody
that the right is. They it didn't look like Nazis,
they didn't look like fascists.

Speaker 1 (48:06):
They look like people who just were honoring someone.

Speaker 3 (48:08):
And then then they turned the period up until the
speeches into a Sunday service so that, hey, we're all here,
we're going.

Speaker 1 (48:16):
To praise in worship.

Speaker 3 (48:19):
The left has to figure out a way to counterprogram that.
So all they can do is try to pick apart
and try to find the most what they think is
the most political moments of it. And then they're going
to try to work with you to convince you that, oh, well,
why did they have the sparklers there, Why do they
have the floor the floor pyrotechnics, Why did they have that?

(48:40):
And they're going to play on maybe you not knowing
how TPUSA operates, or maybe you not knowing that Charlie
loved those things and that's literally and they said it.
That's why they had it, And they're going to try
to pick and divide that way. Do not feed into that.
You don't need to tell You don't need anyone to
redescribe to you what you saw with your own eyes.
Do not allow someone to influence the narrative that you

(49:01):
the truth that you saw with their BS narrative.

Speaker 1 (49:03):
Do not do that.

Speaker 3 (49:04):
As we move our partners who help bring you the program, Caltech,
the PR fifty seven, it's a five to seven rotary
barrel pistol forty percent lighter than the next five to seven.
The top loading design replaces traditional max with stripper clips.
You get a slimmer carry profile of twenty plus one
capacity as well super lightweight because of the rotary barrel
design and because of the way it loads. It also

(49:24):
super affordable with an MSRP of only three ninety nine.
Made in America, family owned based in Florida. It is
the PR fifty seven chambered in five seven. If you
ever wanted a nice concealable five seven, here it is.
It's from Keltech K E L T e C Weapons
dot Com. Tell them Dana sent you.

Speaker 5 (49:43):
And now all of the news you would probably miss.
It's time for Dana's Quick five.

Speaker 1 (49:49):
This is crazy.

Speaker 3 (49:49):
So the New York Post reported it's another story of
a Brooklyn PDEGO worker. Oh wait, how does Jill Jill
Biden say it? Boda good, thank you, who claimed self
defense a fatal scuffle with what is being described as
a neighborhood nuisance who threatened to kill him. It was
one of the Brooklyn workers he got into this fatal
tussle with this guy. Both of the men that were involved,

(50:11):
said they were defending themselves from this guy who repeatedly
threatened to kill them. Royal Deli and grill worker Kevin
Mellow told Daily News that Jerry Hill loudly barged into
the business and threatened workers, and then when they asked
him to quit screaming, then he's because the customers were
obviously freaking out. He said, I'm going to kill you.
Any one of you come outside and fight, I'm gonna

(50:32):
kill you. So the workers, I mean, Jerry Hill ended
up losing his life as a result of it. He
started throwing stuff at them everything, and then he attacked them.
He said, I just I grabbed him and he fell
on top of me and we were fighting, and he
said he realized that he had been bleeding. But they

(50:52):
were defending themselves, and apparently I think what he ended
up it's kind of hard to follow the article, but
it sounds like he ended up getting accent stab because
they were just throwing each other all over tables and everything.
But the guy was a problem, and apparently, you know,
whenever he was to detain prior guess.

Speaker 1 (51:08):
What, he's always allowed to walk out.

Speaker 3 (51:10):
So this is what happens when you have politicians that
won't allow law enforcement to do their job.

Speaker 1 (51:15):
It's unfortunate.

Speaker 3 (51:17):
Also, let's see, Oh, I'm going to come back to
the sky Meadow country Club. We're going to talk about
that as well. The media has been trying to cover
up the fact that the guy was screaming free Palestine
before he decided to kill a guest at the.

Speaker 1 (51:29):
Sky Metal Country Club. We're going to talk about that
coming up.

Speaker 3 (51:32):
Two year old lives alone for days on junk food
after the mother passed away in China, and nobody apparently
was able to check on the baby, and oh my goodness,
but apparently they weren't able to confirm why the mother passed,
But the toddlers survived on junk food, including snacks and
jellies and other things that he could find in their house.

Speaker 1 (51:49):
That's so sad.

Speaker 3 (51:50):
We have a lot more on the way because we've
got the Tom Homan and then Medium All Practice stick
with us partners of what All Family Pharmacy. All Family
Pharmacy is the place to go if you're tired of
doctors telling you no, if you're trying to get you know,
off off patent medications or stuff that insurance won't cover.

Speaker 1 (52:07):
But that works.

Speaker 3 (52:07):
There's a lot of people frustrated with a stupid, broken
system that was just blown all the bits back on
three administrations ago. Really, all Family Pharmacy is an independent
pharmacy patient first, and they connect you with licensed to
US doctors who approved medications online, fast and legal. No gatekeeping,
no insurance middleman, no red tape. It's all affordable. All
the inputs, all the medications that they use. This is

(52:30):
these are US made, US manufactured medications, so you don't
have to worry about inputs from China or anything like that.
They've got everything everyday medications, antibiotics. I have gotten overnight
delivery of stuff so I could treat strap ahead of Thanksgiving.

Speaker 1 (52:42):
It work like a charm.

Speaker 3 (52:43):
I've used them tons of times for things like prescription
anti nausea when I went on my MRC trip. I've
gotten ivermectin. I've gotten hydroxychlorq one. I've gotten an ad plus,
you name it, They've they've got it. They got Latisse
for your eyelashes ladies, which I totally bought.

Speaker 1 (52:57):
What else I mean? They got everything Kane.

Speaker 3 (52:59):
They've got what like emergency kits, stuff I can't pronounce.
They've got it all and you can get it in
two to four days or online in a pinch, order
online in minutes, doctor reviews, it approves your scripts, and
it's sent right to your door. Take your medical freedom
back and visit all Familypharmacy dot com slash data and
use code Dana ten today. That's all Familypharmacy dot com
slash Dana Code Dana ten.

Speaker 6 (53:20):
Keep your finger on the pulse with a Dana Show
podcast delivering timely news with insightful analysis whenever you want,
straight to you on YouTube, Apple or wherever you get
your podcasts.

Speaker 3 (53:32):
Welcome back to the program, Dana Lash with you or
at the bottom of the second hour. The story of
Tom Holman. We were talking a little bit about this earlier.
I immediately was just like, M don't know if I
believe this. Why in the stories he was accused of
being involved in some kind of in a sting. They

(53:53):
got him accepting fifty thousand dollars in cash to get
some govern contracts and basically to produce some government contracts.
That's kind of that's what the accusation is. And it
sounds stupid. Here's why it sounds stupid. You're Tomhoman. You
are you know you're going to have a significant role

(54:17):
in the president's administration. Correct, you know you're going to
have a sizable role in the next admin. Why would
you accept a bribe? And yes, this is a lot
of money to us, but not to DC and people
who play in that pit. You're going to take fifty

(54:40):
thousand dollars in cash and wreck your whole professional life
and your chances coming up in the next admin. For
fifty thousand dollars in cash that you can't even live
for a year off of. Seriously, I mean you could,
but I'm sure he's got you know what I mean.
That's not a lot to wreck your whole life, your

(55:00):
whole body of work, and your whole reputation, and to
sell out that's number one. Number two, you're Tom Homan.
You're not stupid enough to accept cash just in your
hands from people. That's not how this is done. How
the hell do people think this is done? My gosh,
come on, sometimes the media is very, very stupid. If
you're gonna all I'm saying is if I'm gonna take

(55:21):
a bribe, I'm gonna do bitcoin.

Speaker 1 (55:22):
I'm doing crypto.

Speaker 3 (55:24):
At the very least, I'm gonna have somebody, Oh, well, look,
I just got this hotel room to stay the night,
and there's this cash under the bed that I had
no idea was pre arranged to be left here.

Speaker 1 (55:34):
That's what I'm doing, you know what I'm saying. I'm
not gonna be like, yeah, I would like to take
the fifty thousand dollars in my hands now, thank you.

Speaker 3 (55:41):
You know, I know this is so stupid. Yes, here's
your receipt. Put bribe in the memo.

Speaker 1 (55:51):
Nobody, that's not how this is done.

Speaker 3 (55:54):
And it's Tom Homan again. I think that everybody's got
a currency and that's not one of his.

Speaker 1 (56:02):
Now.

Speaker 3 (56:03):
The White House just addressed it through their spokesperson, if
we can get this ready, They just addressed it.

Speaker 1 (56:08):
And pretty much said the same thing, although more in
a more curt fashion. Listen, sure, thanks, Kleen.

Speaker 8 (56:16):
So two of the women investigation.

Speaker 14 (56:19):
I mean, can you just speak too to the President
and the Justice Department to close the case. And does
Holda have to return the fifty thousand dollars. Well, mister
Homan never took the fifty thousand dollars that you're referring to,
So you should get your facts straight. Number one. Number two,
this was another example of the weaponization of the Biden
Department of Justice against one of President Trump's strongest and

(56:40):
most vocal supporters. In the midst of a presidential campaign,
you had FBI agents going undercover to try and and
trap one of the President's top allies and supporters, someone
who they knew very well would be taking a government
position months later. Mister Homan did absolutely nothing wrong, and
even the president Department of Justice, even cash Pttel's FBI

(57:03):
looked into this, just to make sure. They had a
number of different prosecutors and FBI agents who looked into this.
They found zero evidence of illegal activity or criminal wrongdoing
in the White House. And the President stand by Tom
Holman one hundred percent because he did absolutely nothing wrong
and he is a brave public servant who has done
a phenomenal job in helping the President shut down the border.

Speaker 3 (57:25):
Well, there you go, So it's a bunk. So can
we stop with this dumb story he didn't do it.
I mean, you're you're relying on people who have lied
to you repeatedly, and they're like, no, no, no, this time
we're true.

Speaker 1 (57:37):
This time is true. Swearzees. It just doesn't make sense.

Speaker 3 (57:45):
I was reading my friend Nady McCarthy, and he was
talking about his incredulity with regards to this, you know,
like meeting covertly recorded on video, fifty thousand in cash,
you know, all of this stuff. That's what they're But
they've you know, they the report they said was the
Justice Department apparently assessed it and was like, there's no

(58:06):
there there, what are you guys talking about? It originated
under the previous admin. Okay, so the Biden administration started it.
Now he does have the caveat that it actually began.
Where is this me pull this up? Because he had
a great piece. It actually began. They were FBI was

(58:27):
a it started in Texas. A suspect the FBI was
investigating in Texas was overheard claiming that Homan was soliciting payments,
et cetera, et cetera. And Andy was saying that, well,
what's reported sounds bad. But you know, it can't just
be the FBI. It's you know, it started in Texas. Well,
it can't just be that. It absolutely can't. They're still

(58:49):
running that up in Texas, you see what I'm saying.
So that doesn't that that doesn't doesn't make any sense.
And the Trump administry, as I said, assessed and was
like there's no there there he was like in the
private sector. Again, you have to remember this originated. The
investigation originated under the Biden administration, and it began when

(59:15):
Tom Holman and came. Remind everybody, when did Tom Hooman
actually take his position in the administration. It wasn't during
the Biden administration.

Speaker 10 (59:23):
Wasn't until after Trump was inaugurated.

Speaker 3 (59:26):
Can I ask you a question, what is the point
of bribing someone? Just play this out for a second, all.

Speaker 10 (59:35):
Right, to gain special favor because they have a position
that could be advantageous to what you want.

Speaker 3 (59:40):
Okay, but that last part, they have a position that
could be advantageous to what you want. At that point
in time when this investigation under the Biden administration began,
did Tom Homan.

Speaker 1 (59:51):
Have that position?

Speaker 9 (59:52):
Sure did not.

Speaker 1 (59:53):
He didn't. So why the hell would you be bribing
someone who was in no position to deliver.

Speaker 9 (01:00:01):
It's almost like it was a setup.

Speaker 3 (01:00:03):
Wait, no way, you mean to tell me that the
same FBI that had some wayward agents that literally were
able to get a wiretap on a private citizen over
his politics because they went around the proper operating procedure
with a FISA court that that same entity that worked

(01:00:24):
in collusion with all of them, that we can't trust
them on this wha.

Speaker 1 (01:00:33):
Much shock, So surprised. I can't believe it, guys.

Speaker 3 (01:00:39):
So I just think, if I'm going to bribe somebody,
I'm going to make sure that they are worthy of
being bribed.

Speaker 1 (01:00:47):
If you can't, if you're not even in the position
to do anything for me, why am I going to
bribe you?

Speaker 3 (01:00:51):
You know what, This is stupid, but it is the
Biden administration, King, And think about it.

Speaker 10 (01:00:56):
It's all that they couldn't run on any sort of
accomplishments that Biden had a the four years. So their
only thing and by the way, the only thing for
the longest time that I can remember.

Speaker 9 (01:01:05):
Is just media smears. That's literally all it is.

Speaker 3 (01:01:08):
Yeah, So I don't know. Congress may determine that they
would look into it or not. I don't know, but
I would imagine that when it is I mean, a
Homan did get an admin job where they did not,
he did not have to go through the Senate confirmation
process instead of just an outright nominating nominating him for

(01:01:29):
a cabinet post. I don't the only and that just
might be timing. I don't know, it's it also might
be a way for him to just you know, try
to people out the different positions in different departments with
people that had his back. I mean, it could be
a number of things. But the left is saying, well,
you know, he didn't have that centate confirmation process, so
that's evidence of what of not having a center confirmation process? Yeah,

(01:01:53):
you're correct, he was appointed to this admin job. Is
it confirmation that he was involved in a bright By scheme?

Speaker 1 (01:02:01):
No, it wasn't.

Speaker 3 (01:02:03):
That's I really wish that they would look at the
crimes that exists instead of making up things that don't exist.
So that and I and I accept the I accept
the administration's remarks on this. I mean that makes sense.
We have a couple of other things as well, actually

(01:02:24):
a lot to get into still and I want to
switch them and pulled this up. And again bear with
us because we flew in in in a storm and
got in really late last night and so we're a
little today. But the where is because I saw this
can it had to do who was was it the

(01:02:45):
Kavanaugh killer or well want to be killer that came
out as trans. Yeah, so is anybody surprised at this?
So this story, I think this came out when over
the weekend. Yes, so Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, his

(01:03:06):
would be assassin idees as trans. This is according to
court documents. Twenty the twenty nine year old he pled
guilty to attempting to kill Kavanaugh. Now remember that attempt
came after Chuck Schumer was on the steps of the
Supreme Court building and screaming, you know you're going to
feel the wrath, blah blah blah, all this stuff. So

(01:03:27):
the defense attorneys revealed that the twenty nine year old
his name is Nicholas. Now they got to call him Sophie.
The public defenders assigned to his case indicated in a
court filing that they're going to refer to their client
with female pronouns out of respect. You gotta respect the
training want to be killer. So this they have this

(01:03:51):
in the legal filing. They want to change his name
from Nicholas to Sophie. What okay, just let's just news
flash here. You are are going to court because you
brought you were on your way armed and ready to
try to kill a Supreme Court justice. And then you
admitted that you did it. They're giving you your trial

(01:04:12):
due process, but you admitted that you did it. You
don't get to pick pronouns. You don't get to do
any of this other stuff. That's free people's stuff. Okay,
you're not free. That's free people's stuff. Free people can
pretend that their genitals aren't what they are. Free people
get to make the determination that they want to change
their name or do whatever, if they want to fly

(01:04:33):
their freak flag or not. Free people get to do that.
Not people like this dude who was admitted that he
was trying to go and kill a Supreme Court justice
and got caught trying.

Speaker 1 (01:04:43):
To do it.

Speaker 3 (01:04:44):
You don't get to do free people stuff. Why are
we indulging this? You know, sidebar part of me wants
to become a judge just so I can just sit
there and be like, get the out of my courtroom,
just so I can just throw people out right and left.
Has to be so satisfying. So they said that they
want to be respectful. Now, remember he wasn't just caught

(01:05:07):
armed out. He was literally outside of Kavanaugh's house in Maryland.
I think a lot of people are would be shocked
to realize how close he got. But he also had
a tack light, but he had zip ties, he had
burglary tools, apparently, had like a crowbar and a whole
bunch of other stuff. So he had like a little
knapsack of no good and he was there to do

(01:05:27):
some harm.

Speaker 1 (01:05:30):
He was there to do.

Speaker 3 (01:05:31):
Harm so that he doesn't get to say, I want
to pick my pronouns now I want to do it.
He doesn't get to do any of that stuff. We're
not doing this. We're not doing this at all, not
at all.

Speaker 1 (01:05:44):
It's silly.

Speaker 3 (01:05:45):
It's scilly into danger. All right, We've got more on
the way. We've got Florida man coming up. Let me
give you a couple of other things. So Howard Stern,
is that like the new big thing that all these
progressive boomers are they going to try to like stunt on,
I'm canceling my Disney.

Speaker 9 (01:06:00):
Yeah, it's like the black square for.

Speaker 1 (01:06:04):
This is not like does this affect you, Okain.

Speaker 9 (01:06:12):
Not at all. First of all, I don't even have
Disney either, so there's nothing for me to can't.

Speaker 3 (01:06:16):
I get rid of it after Corno, but they get
rid of it after Corona because it's all about free
speech and stuff.

Speaker 9 (01:06:22):
Yeah, no, they're not consistent.

Speaker 1 (01:06:23):
Wait, these big free speech warriors.

Speaker 3 (01:06:24):
They didn't get rid of Disney after Disney fied Gina
Corano because she didn't do a damn thing.

Speaker 9 (01:06:29):
What the Left's not consistent?

Speaker 8 (01:06:30):
What?

Speaker 1 (01:06:31):
That's why it's so stupid.

Speaker 3 (01:06:33):
Also, why does Howard Stern increasingly look like my dear
departed aunt? Like ever, every time I see a new
photo of him, I'm like, is that my my dearly
departed aunt? I don't know, Like he does look like
you know, he.

Speaker 1 (01:06:47):
Looks like an old lady.

Speaker 3 (01:06:49):
Do you think it's because he's taken estrogen? Well yeah,
I mean that we could see that coming a mile away.
But I'm just like, he looks like an old, cantankerous lady, right,
like somebody who has who likes chained smokes cigarettes and stuff.

Speaker 1 (01:07:03):
Like one of those ladies. That's what he looks like.

Speaker 3 (01:07:05):
Anyway, we got to get moving, as we do so
our partners that help bring you the program. It's our
friends over at Patriot Mobile. This is such a great look.

Speaker 1 (01:07:12):
I saw them.

Speaker 3 (01:07:15):
When we went out because they went We went with
them to the TPUSA event. We got invited to go
to the by the organization to go to the memorial,
and we found out that Patriot Mobile, our friends Glenn
and his wife that own and operate Patriot Mobile, were
going to so we all decided to go out there together.
And I'm telling you, I think other people were having

(01:07:37):
problems with their service. I didn't because there were a
lot of people on that band with inside.

Speaker 1 (01:07:41):
I get it.

Speaker 3 (01:07:42):
This is just the only Christian conservative cell phone provider
in the country. They partner, they were early partners with TPUSA.
They were early supporters of Charlie's vision and big, big supporters,
and they loved what he did, and they were very
close to the organization. And they just provide the best access,

(01:08:02):
the best service at the best price. But what's more
is that they're not taking your hard earned dollars that
you're paying for when it comes to paying for your
service and spending it on things like DEI and CRT
and gun control and all of this stuff. They like
I said, they've been working to support TPUSA, and they
work with supporting legislation, like, for instance, in Texas the

(01:08:24):
Centate Bill two forty, backing legislation that protects women and
girls in private spaces. They've helped empower parents who needed
help taking over their school boards to protect their children's education.
They've been there through every major fight, second Amendment, first Amendment,
you name it. And you're not paying more for all
of this either, which is what's also super stunning.

Speaker 1 (01:08:43):
I have a Cadillac Play.

Speaker 3 (01:08:44):
My whole family's on it, and I actually pay less
than what I did with my previous provider, and I've
been I switched over ten years ago. I switched to
Patriot Mobile. I've been all over the world with this
service and never had an issue. And it takes just
minutes to get switched and set up. If my mom
can do it by yourself at home, you can do
it too. And that's the thing. At home, there's no
store visits. They have one US based customer service team.

(01:09:05):
Look at you switched over and set up. You can
keep your phone, keep your number, get all new, and
if you use promo Coddina, you get a free month
of service on top of it. So visit Patriotmobile dot com,
slash Dana or call nine seventy two Patriot and make
sure to use promo Codina for that free month of service.

Speaker 10 (01:09:22):
It's his life mission to make bad decisions.

Speaker 9 (01:09:29):
It's time for Florida man.

Speaker 1 (01:09:32):
So a uh, I'm not saying this.

Speaker 3 (01:09:37):
A teaching assistant charged after allegedly using a fecal spray
at a high school. They're claiming damages to the AC system.
So it's like, uh, yeah, they he had this spray.

Speaker 1 (01:09:52):
He was a teaching assistant who was arrested. He used this.

Speaker 3 (01:09:57):
Who spray to create a foul odor to South Carolina
High School. Thirty two year old teaching assistant allegedly sprayed
to imitate fecal matter while at school multiple times. He
acquired it online. People apparently had to seek medical attention
and had respiratory issues, and then they had to spend
fifty five thousand dollars to inspect it it's AC and

(01:10:18):
look at damages. So he's charged with disturbing schools and
malicious property. Okay, here's the big thing. Why why did
he do it? I need to know this because I
I've seen like videos on Instagram where they spray them
into this like inflatable costumes and then you know, everybody laughs.

Speaker 1 (01:10:40):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:10:40):
So they said that they're still investigating the situation, but
it's been two days, so you can't come on. Why
they said it like really disrupted none of the articles
I'm seeing there, just I guess was he doing it
to be a jerk.

Speaker 1 (01:10:52):
I don't know.

Speaker 9 (01:10:53):
When I was a kid, we used to play with
that stuff.

Speaker 3 (01:10:56):
It's just did you send anyone to the hospital, No,
nobody was one. A Florida man shot a bear that
was a lot of bear stories hiding in his shower.
It was an actual bear animal. A Central Florida man
came to face to face with a home intruder, but
it was.

Speaker 1 (01:11:10):
A bear in his shower. It was hiding in his shower.

Speaker 3 (01:11:14):
And he literally said that he thought there was an
intruder in his bathroom. He was panicking, He his bart, his
dogs were barking. The bear ran into the bathroom and
I got into the shower and was literally hiding there,
and he thought it took him a second to figure
out what was happening, but he shot the bear, and
unfortunately the bear did not make it. Florida Fish and Wildlife,

(01:11:34):
they said, be vigilant, don't leave food out, et cetera,
et cetera. But I mean the bear was in his shower,
went into his house and hit his shower. This is
not like a case of campaign stick with this, we
got our third hour on the way.

Speaker 15 (01:11:46):
Fine Jarring is that there's so many people willing to
excuse the most reprehensible things that he said, that they
agree with, that that they're willing to have monuments for him,
that they want to create a day to honor him,
and that they want to produce resolutions in the House
of Congress honoring his life and legacy. It is one

(01:12:10):
thing to care about his life, because obviously so many
people loved him, including his children and life. But I
am not going to sit here and be judged for
not wanting to honor any legacy this man has left behind.
That should be in the dust pin of history and

(01:12:30):
we should hopefully move on.

Speaker 3 (01:12:32):
As should your citizenship here in the United States. It
should also be in the dustbin of history. That's elean Omar,
who whenever she has the opportunity to be a decent
human and not a yelping dog, she chooses the dog.
It's fascinating. It's some insulted dogs. I'm sorry dogs. Welcome
back to the program. Pan a lash top of this
third hour. Do you know it's when you think about

(01:12:54):
like her, just demonic views. She's a nasty person. She's
just a nasty piece of work. She never has anything
nice to say about anybody. I mean, you know, the
fact that she had a marri or brother to even
cheat to get citizenship or to even get in the
United States is insane. And the fact that she used
her campaign money to help facilitate the divorce and all

(01:13:15):
of this other stuff, Oh she did. That's why she
had to pay fine for all of that. I don't
know if people are actually familiar with that. There are
receipts there. That's why this is said so often because
it's true. It's not a joke, it's actually true.

Speaker 2 (01:13:27):
And the.

Speaker 3 (01:13:30):
I think the sentiment that she states and what I
have heard. You know, a lot of these college campuses
the TPUSA went to, she just seems like she was
just very She never liked the group, and she Charlie
never said anything controversial, except if you consider scripture controversial.

(01:13:50):
He was again the nice one. But I was thinking
about all of this in context with the pressure that
foreign money plays into all of these colleges and universities
across the country. Did you know that the biggest funder
two American universities is Cutter billions and billions and billions

(01:14:16):
and billions of dollars they have given. And it's interesting
because if you look at where all the money in
which I'm looking at now, if you look at where
all they give their money, it's very interesting that that's
we're all like, for instance, you know the protests where
they are going after all the Jewish students, It's kind
of interesting that those were the universities where they got

(01:14:36):
the most money from Cutter. I'm just saying it just
could be kan I'm sure a total coincidence. It's and
there are a lot of things that have been written
about this, and it's not just Cutter, China is as well,
but Cutter is the biggest donor of two American universities.
And so allow that to kind of sit in your
head for a little bit when you are wondering, why

(01:14:59):
is it that all of this stuff, like with the
anti Semitic protest, where they actually were targeting people for
being Jewish. They weren't like, well, we disagree with the
Israeli government. They can't even tell you how it structured.
They just were mad because of to Jews.

Speaker 1 (01:15:12):
That's it.

Speaker 3 (01:15:13):
But think about how that really got kicked off and
why it seems like it was expedited to this point.
And then look at all the money that these these
companies or these countries have been pouring in China and Cutter,
they've poorn. Just over the past few years, it's been
like twenty nine billion, twenty nine billion dollars. Foreign donors

(01:15:35):
have given as much to American universities just like in
the last handful of years as they did in the
last Like in the last four years, they've given as
much as they did in the last four decades. So
take four decades and condense it down into four years.

(01:15:57):
There is an absolute I mean an explosion of foreign
money on campus. Is Cutter is the largest source, and
all of these donations to these campuses, all of this
started to get reported like a nine in the eighties,
they have given over six billion, China's two point three billion.

(01:16:23):
The Saudi's are like way below. But I mean, Cutter
is the largest source of all of this foreign money
to these campuses. Now the second largest source of foreign
funding is China. So I told you that Cutter six
point three billion in counting, China is five point six

(01:16:43):
billion in counting. And just like you saw it with Cutter,
the donations from China have exploded over the past several years.
And again the universe cities where you saw all of
the upheaval where you could even have TPUSA go on campus,

(01:17:04):
hardly the Harvard's, the Colombia's, Oh guess who those are
the ones that get the most money from China and cutter.
In fact, every single one of these universities where you
that you have seen in the headlines where the students
are like rioting or they're they're protesting to the extent
where it's not safe for conservative speakers to even leave

(01:17:24):
the campus and they have to hide in janitorial closets.
Those are all the campuses that have received tons Those
are all the universities that have tons of Qatari and
Chinese money.

Speaker 1 (01:17:34):
Oh, it's a fact. The receipts are out.

Speaker 3 (01:17:39):
Carnegie, Mellon, Cornell, Stanford, Columbia, Harvard, lots of them. Why
because it's soft power. It's a it's a it's to
build soft power. This they're expanding their influence. If you
don't think it's an SEC issue, I'll remind you every

(01:18:00):
single revolution started in academia. You could even argue French
Revolution start in academia, the Color Revolution, in China started
in academia, Russia, academia, Germany.

Speaker 1 (01:18:16):
In the thirties.

Speaker 3 (01:18:17):
Academia started on college campuses every single time, because you
have minds that are easily influenced, and there is a
huge effort to continue that trend here in the United States.

(01:18:38):
That's why you've been seeing an increase in all of
this stuff on college campuses, because there are absolutely outside
sources that are funding it. They like the division, they
like the hostility spreading on college campuses, and just like
in every other nation where this has happened, it goes
from there. So now it becomes a national secure issue.

(01:19:03):
I had someone say, well, it really isn't Tell that
to China because their communist revolutions started in their campuses
and took over their entire country, and outlook, tell that
to nineteen thirties Germany. Tell it to Russia with the Bolsheviks.

Speaker 1 (01:19:21):
I mean, dare I go on? It's without exception. So
these this influence.

Speaker 3 (01:19:33):
Is I mean, and the qataris they they're all ramping
up their donations. We're going to talk a little bit
about this to Steve and Yates as well. But it's
interesting to note the Free Press had a peace. Where
Harvard didn't comply with seven Section one hundred and seventeen
of the Higher Education Act. They were trying to not
disclose all of this foreign financial funding that seems sketch

(01:19:56):
to the point where it wasn't just like an an
over It wasn't just like a you know, someone just
forgot accidentally. It wasn't just mirror oversight. It was purposeful
and that this is one of the things that the
administration is doing. They are looking at these connections between
foreign money and the increasing violence and et cetera that's

(01:20:23):
happening on college campuses. It's not just the sore of stuff.
It's these foreign companies, these foreign countries that would like
to sew division.

Speaker 1 (01:20:32):
It's very sun Zoo.

Speaker 3 (01:20:33):
If you can sew division within your opponent, you don't
even need to do anything, because your opponent will divide
and have and fight itself.

Speaker 1 (01:20:42):
That's exactly the design.

Speaker 3 (01:20:43):
It's a soft power move, and that's why it's a
national security issue.

Speaker 1 (01:20:48):
I don't even know why.

Speaker 3 (01:20:50):
I mean, and this is just me just speculating, but
why are these universities allowed to accept money from foreign governments?
Why it's not like Harvard needs it. Their endowment is
like is billions of dollars. Why are they accepting or
allowed to accept money from foreign governments. I'm not even

(01:21:14):
talking about, Oh, here's a charitable group in United Arab Emirates,
We're going to donate. No, no, no, it's like literally
the Katari government. Why are universities allowed to accept money
from foreign governments? And you know that they come with
strings attached? This is a giant question. And then Berkeley,

(01:21:37):
for instance, remember Berkeley where you had all of those
riots and protests and all this stuff breakout, cain, if
you had to guess how much money they had that
they got recently with a partnership with the communist Chinese government,
literally from China's China's government, how much would you make guess?

Speaker 9 (01:21:58):
I would say one hundred million or more.

Speaker 3 (01:22:00):
Double it, seriously, double it, and then go up a
little bit. Yeah lord, yeah, yeah. Here's the funny thing.
Berkeley refused to report it the Daily Beast. Actually, I
can't even believe I'm citing the Daily Beast, which is
what the world's come to. They had their headline. This
was from May of twenty three. Berkeley's two hundred and

(01:22:24):
twenty million dollar mistake exposed in a massive deal with China,
so they were trying to get ahead of it and
frame it as a mistake. But the people that were
investigating the failure to disclose, they didn't really think it
was a mistake because they found other purposeful, questionably purposeful
omissions interesting. Yes, so there's a lot of questions to

(01:22:48):
be asked here, and all of this comes together. I
was thinking about all of this over this weekend, especially
now that people are talking about approaching campus debates and
campus events differently in light of security that I think

(01:23:09):
that right there is the front line. Those college campuses
are the front line. And I'm just you know, I'm curious.
I'd be curious to look at money going into that
Utah Utah Valley College. Go and look and see all
of these universities where the students have gotten more and
more agitated and progressive, and it completely corresponds with the

(01:23:36):
massive amount of donations that they get from foreign governments.
I'm just saying, there is enough there to not only
beg the question, but pose a legitimate one, not even
assuming the premise is true. Now you can actually question
whether or not it is. It's not even begging the
question anymore. It's a legit question. This administration is going

(01:23:57):
to have to get around this one other quick thing.
We're talking about some of the medium malpractice, if we
have time to do this. I was shocked at the
way I had posted this. I think I had tweeted
about it online, but I was looking at this situation
with the media. So first up, you had this nbcpiece,

(01:24:20):
and this had to do with this.

Speaker 1 (01:24:22):
Gosh our. If I can get our WiFi to work,
it'd be great.

Speaker 3 (01:24:25):
This had to do. We're just waiting for it to load. Sorry,
just do it a live radio show. We're gonna wait
for the WiFi to load. This was uh had to
do with this sky Meadow country club shooting. Witnesses were
saying that the killer was screaming free Palestine before he
fired upon country club event attendees.

Speaker 1 (01:24:45):
And the witnesses were.

Speaker 3 (01:24:48):
Telling the local news, and there's a video of it
that the guy was saying free Palestine. He was saying,
he was screaming it. That sounded like a pretty targeted attack.
I think correct. I mean, that's what it sounds like.
Here's what NBC did, NBC at whole piece. Let me
pull this up a whole entire piece where they they

(01:25:09):
refused to admit or refuse to report on the fact
that the killer had screamed Free Palestine, or that witnesses
were telling local media that the killer was screaming it.
In their piece, NBC didn't touch on it at all.
They reported it like, oh, some guy did something, cover.

Speaker 5 (01:25:30):
Up and now all of the news you would probably miss.
It's time for Dana's Quick five.

Speaker 3 (01:25:38):
So American woman admits to using our employer's money to
play business's slot machines. It's the average worker, today's work
force on board already by this story.

Speaker 1 (01:25:47):
Let's see.

Speaker 3 (01:25:49):
Oh, here's this, let's do this. This is an Iowa town.
So in Iowa, the Jessa Police Department issued a statement
regards harassment from toilet papering people's houses in that now
the police department says teping has banned. Anyone caught doing
it will face legal charges, et cetera, and that they

(01:26:11):
said that it's effective immediately. There's zero I just think
it's perfectly a good waste of toilet paper. It is
kind of a pain to clean up. I've never had,
you know, I've only I've never actually done it to
anyone or had it done. I did help spork someone's art, though.

Speaker 10 (01:26:27):
I never realized how well off we were back in
the day. We're just throwing toilet paper and as everywhere.

Speaker 1 (01:26:31):
Right.

Speaker 3 (01:26:32):
Did we joke about this during COVID? Oh my gosh,
I just don't let your kids do that. It's a
waste of resources and it's annoying. Okay, I just don't.
A traveler was caught with human remains at the Tampa airport.
When they asked him what he was going to do
with it, he said.

Speaker 1 (01:26:45):
It's for rituals.

Speaker 3 (01:26:51):
I mean US Customs and Border Protection at Tampa. It
was a skull and what's gross is it was all
wrapped in foil. Ooh can it's so gross?

Speaker 1 (01:27:04):
Bit It was all wrapped in foil.

Speaker 3 (01:27:08):
And he told officers that the items were for rituals
and due to it being gross and nasty, they I mean, yes,
health risks and all that, but just totally grody. They
seize them and destroy them. Wow, who thinks they're going
to walk.

Speaker 1 (01:27:22):
Through tsa, Oh, here's my skulls and bones and going
what is the matter with you? Our friend Stevin Yates
joins us next.

Speaker 6 (01:27:30):
Brighten up your timely news consumption with a Dana Show
podcast where every update comes with a little dash of
not so serious on YouTube, Apple or wherever you get
your podcasts.

Speaker 16 (01:27:42):
Today, I can confirm that at the eightieth Session of
the United Nations General Assembly in September, Australia will recognize
the Stite of Palestine. Australia will recognize the rod up
the Palestinian people to a stite of their own predit
caided on the commitments Australia has received from the Palestinian authority.

(01:28:05):
We will work with the international community to make this
right a reality.

Speaker 3 (01:28:11):
So the entity that is expected to give the assurances
is an entity that is so scared of being taken
over by Hamas that they suspended elections in twenty twenty
one because after Hamas won back in what was it
O seven those elections, they took over Gaza Strip, their
popularity surged even more so in West Bank and they
were expected to take both territories, and their popularity is

(01:28:34):
still through the route. They suspended the elections in twenty one,
and then they turned around and blamed Israel by saying, well,
we can't just be a share that people there are
going to be able to come out and vote which
was a lie. It was a scapegoat to hide the
fact that they completely lost control. So when I hear
these foreign leaders say, well, you know, the Palestinian authority
is going to give us these assurances, they can't even
assure themselves. Joining us on this in a host of

(01:28:57):
other issues, are very good friends. Stephen Yates, you know
him on X. Yates Comm's senior research fellow at the
Heritage Foundation.

Speaker 1 (01:29:04):
He joins us via video. Good to see you, my friend.

Speaker 3 (01:29:06):
I mean, I don't think anything's changed since twenty twenty one,
has it? I mean, if anything, by estimation, Hamas's popularity
seems to have grown.

Speaker 8 (01:29:16):
Oh, Dana, this is a painful story. I mean, the
one thing that should have changed since that time is
that we pass the sobriety checkpoint somewhere along the way.
And this delusional, destructive, lefty weirdo comment about we're going
to recognize these people, this buffoon masquerading as a prime

(01:29:36):
minister of a formally respectful country, can't even say where
are the territorial boundaries of this mysterio, mysterious state? You
are recognizing? What is this demographic population statistics? What is
their currency? Is there? What is the military that's going
to be securing the sovereignty that you are recognizing in

(01:29:59):
this And of course, since this is of course a
deeply strategic, principled point of view and you're concerned about
an oppressed Muslim community, you must be recognizing the independent
state of East Turkestan, where there is a recognized genocide
by China against wigers there. And of course, because this
is a deeply principled, strategic and realistic approach to foreign policy,

(01:30:22):
you're recognizing the independence of the state of Taiwan against
further threat from China, which is all much closer to Australia,
which your people have much more material economic ties with.
And so this is discussing on a number of levels.
And worst of all, it doesn't fee a single gossm.
It doesn't increase the chances of peace at all. This

(01:30:45):
is virtue signaling with no virtue.

Speaker 3 (01:30:47):
You have the UK, well, you have England and I
you have Canada that are coming out saying that we're
kir Starmer said, oh, yes, we're going to affirm the right.

Speaker 1 (01:30:54):
What is this?

Speaker 3 (01:30:55):
I don't understand what this affirmation of this state based
on a made up name of an old dead Roman emperor.
What that has to what does it get them, what
does it accomplish?

Speaker 8 (01:31:07):
Well, I mean the Brits really got to thank you
very much in the form of, since you're going to
recognize us, how about you pay reparations for the decades
that you were our ruler? And so that is, as
my dad might have said, a fine, how do you
do in exchange for this political sop in their direction,
what it really is is trying to pretend is if

(01:31:28):
they're smarter and more virtuous than President Trump and trying
to negotiate and hold peace. But what they're really doing
is undermining any incentive for hostages to be released in
a ceasefire, to be honored. And what they're doing is
empowering the low grade terrorism that occasionally rears its nasty,
evil head that comes out of that region.

Speaker 3 (01:31:50):
It seems to me that the fanaticism seen early on
in the ought with the ascension to power by Hamas,
and it's the spread of its influence in that reach,
that that's going to be the de facto ruling ideology.
Because from everything that I've seen, and maybe I'm wrong here,
but I don't see any other faction getting close to

(01:32:12):
having Hamasa's influence, and so we're we're I mean, the
way I look at it is these countries are legitimizing
a terrorist organization that basically controls the PA.

Speaker 8 (01:32:24):
I think that's what they're doing. But I think it's
even worse than that. I think they're empowering terrorist mobs
in their own countries. And what this is is less
foreign policy as it is defeatist and I think destructive
politics in their own countries. And so this has less
to do with facts on the ground, which I think
we can easily dismiss. Is this doesn't feed anyone, This

(01:32:47):
doesn't make peace. What this is is trying to beg
for peace from a merciless, violent mob in their own
country that their own policies have enabled.

Speaker 1 (01:32:57):
That's a great point.

Speaker 3 (01:32:58):
Talking with our friend Steven you so you can on
x at yates Coms, I have a couple of things
I wanted to ask you about, especially getting into some
of this TikTok and the Trump g meeting.

Speaker 1 (01:33:07):
But I wanted to ask you really quickly.

Speaker 3 (01:33:09):
We were talking a little bit ago about the biggest
donors to American universities and cutter in China one and two,
which is so weird because Cutter is such a tiny
little country, but they've donated over six billion dollars. Like
in the past forty years, it's been all condensed into
four years of spending what would normally take them forty
years to do.

Speaker 1 (01:33:27):
China has also increased.

Speaker 3 (01:33:28):
Obviously, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that
all of the universities were all of the riots, and
all of the well riots, it's not even a peaceful protest.
All of the bad stuff have been all of the campuses,
all of the universities that receive all of this money.
And we were talking about Berkeley who got in major
trouble for not disclosing that they got all of this
money from the CCP and they were trying to hide it,
and the Daily Beast actually broke that story.

Speaker 1 (01:33:50):
Why is that allowed?

Speaker 3 (01:33:53):
I'm all about freedom and all of that, but at
the same time, I really don't We don't need communists
China or Cutter donate billions of dollars to universities because
those are strings on that.

Speaker 8 (01:34:04):
Yeah, well, first, I just can't let past that.

Speaker 17 (01:34:07):
All of the ideologues and demagogues of the left really
can't sit idly by those private jets won't fly themselves,
and those laboratories won't run themselves, And.

Speaker 8 (01:34:18):
So they allow one of the richest fossil fuel benefiting
countries to fund them and one of the most successful
fossil fuel burning countries to donate to them to allow
their lives to continue. So on top of it all,
there is a mountain of wreaking hypocrisy on all of this.

(01:34:40):
But I do think it's time to step back and say,
why are universities so expensive and what exactly are they
producing that is of value to society, our country and
to the poor customers that go through. And I really
think that all this money pouring in, yeah, people, if
you have the money, they'll find a way to spend it,

(01:35:02):
and boy have they, but they're not producing better outcomes
at best. What these other countries are getting is maybe
some hard science is going back to their country, but
it's not as if we are producing genius citizens going
through these processes, and we are definitely generating huge pass
through debts for those graduates. So I think it's high

(01:35:23):
time to start thinking about the American pupil first and
the American net value dividend in this first before going
down the road of foreign contributions.

Speaker 1 (01:35:34):
Oh exactly.

Speaker 8 (01:35:34):
Oh.

Speaker 3 (01:35:34):
I hope that that comes to I hope that that
comes to realization. The US is going to complete the
TikTok deal in the coming days and control the algorithm.

Speaker 1 (01:35:42):
Is this enough for you? Do you think?

Speaker 3 (01:35:44):
I mean, because I consider you the good gauge as
to whether or not anything involving China is decent and acceptable?

Speaker 1 (01:35:51):
What say you on us?

Speaker 8 (01:35:53):
Well, I guess some would say I'm an extremist. I
can't believe that with all the wealth and expertise and
tools that we have in this country, that someone in America,
with our own technology and wealth, hasn't created an equally
evil and intoxicating, an addictive app that could lure people
at least away from the COMMI fueled one, and I

(01:36:15):
just can't I can't get past that first speed bump
in the conversation. I do have a lot of grace.
I would give the administration the sense that where things
were before was dangerous and unacceptable, And if this deal
plays out as advertised, I think it's net progress. But
I will still have some concerns or questions. I mean,

(01:36:36):
how can an egghead like me know whether the algorithm
is completely hived off. How will we really know whether
the foreign influence doesn't just shift indirect instead of direct
and obvious. And so I think there's still a lot
to answer in all of this. I would I really
hope that, just like we had a national conversation about

(01:36:58):
the centrality of faith being part of American revival, I
hope that breaking addiction to handheld devices is another way
we try to save the souls, the minds, and the
productivity of our next generation. And all of these things
are part of that. But the least we should agree
on is icing out any strategic adversary from ownership or control.

(01:37:22):
Hopefully this is a step in the right direction, but
I have no way to really know until it's done.

Speaker 3 (01:37:27):
Yeah, that's it, and I think that's I completely agree.
I agree with everything you said. I just I mean,
I don't have anything else sad to it. I think
it's just all. I'm like, I'm not going to wait,
I'm not going to make a determination about this, about
this issue until I talked to Stephen Yates. Our last
thing South Korea. Apparently this is going to be the
This is interesting. Why are they going to be the

(01:37:47):
venue for the Trump g sit down.

Speaker 15 (01:37:52):
Well.

Speaker 8 (01:37:52):
The grand strategicy behind that is that the members of
the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation rotate the hosting except for
one one member is never allowed to host, and I
bet you can get it right away, and it happens
to be the economy in air quotes known as Taiwan. Yeah, yeah,
they're not allowed to host, but everyone else is supposed

(01:38:14):
to take turns. And I don't think every single member
has taken a turn, but maybe I could be wrong
on that. But this is just luck of the draw
that it came around to Korea's time to host, and
it always comes in the late October sometime in November timeframe.
Usually there are leader meetings that will take place in
ministerial meetings where foreign ministers will get together, and then

(01:38:36):
there should be economic talk since it's after all an
economic gathering. It started in nineteen ninety three in Seattle,
and it's just kind of had an inertia of its own.
It's sort of like the U in General Assembly in
a way, where the meeting itself is one thing, but
it's the side meetings and bilaterals that are the opportunity

(01:38:57):
to do things. And so in a way, I always
thought this made sense as a time of opportunity. I
take it as a signal from the administration that the
deal making is not ripe enough to justify a standalone
visit to China, which actually gives me some solace because
I have grave doubts about the follow through by any

(01:39:19):
big deal by China. I'd like to see them maybe
stop sending fentonl precursors into the United States before we
make some kind of a deal. But that's just me.

Speaker 1 (01:39:29):
No, I agree with that. I agree with that. Also,
I agree with everything you're saying. You're just the perfect guess.

Speaker 3 (01:39:34):
Our good friend, he's never wrong, our good friend. Stevin
Yates at yates COM's on x We're going to be
watching that meeting with great interest, and I can't wait
to talk with you after.

Speaker 1 (01:39:43):
Good to see you, my friend. Have a great week.
God bless you.

Speaker 8 (01:39:46):
Thank you, Dana. Take care.

Speaker 6 (01:39:48):
On the go and need a quick news fix with
a fun twist. Follow Dana's Absurd Truth podcast for bite
size and formative episodes perfect for your busy schedule on
Apple or wherever you get your podcast.

Speaker 13 (01:40:00):
The rhetoric that Charlie Kirk continuously put out there was
rhetoric that specifically targeted people of color, and so it
is unfortunate that even our Allie's could not see how
harmful his rhetoric was specifically to us. And I can
tell you that a month prior to him passing away,
he had actually gotten out on his podcast. I wasn't

(01:40:22):
aware of this at the time, but he got out
there and he was talking negatively about me directly. So
if there was any way that I was going to
honor somebody who decided that they were just going to
negatively talk about me and proclaim that I was somehow
involved in the great white replacement, yeah, I'm not honoring
that kind of.

Speaker 3 (01:40:41):
Sty First of all, none of that's true. Secondly, you know,
do as Jesus said in the Gospels.

Speaker 1 (01:40:48):
Only like people who like you.

Speaker 3 (01:40:52):
Tots what it says, man, Yeah, tots what it says.
I mean in Jasmine Crockett's Bible anyway, only like be
nice and stuff to people who are like nice and
stuff to you. That's you know, that's what it says,
Matthew eleven and a half.

Speaker 1 (01:41:11):
It's in there.

Speaker 3 (01:41:12):
I'm first off, he didn't pass away. Yeah, he didn't
pass away. He was assassinated. Number one, she did this
on Sunday, which is why we're talking yesterday, guys. That's
why we're talking about it right now. That's first number two.
He didn't he criticized her lack of doing anything, and

(01:41:33):
he only ever criticized her policies and her inability to
actually sponsor legislation. So notice how she's like, well, he
was just talking negatively about me. Okay, well I do too,
But that doesn't mean that someone should be executed for it,
and it doesn't mean that you can't be He disagreed
with you, she doesn't. She's not smart enough to disagree
with him, just on simple premise. She has to take

(01:41:57):
it and get dirty and lie about him. He never
said anything like that. In fact, there's tons of video
out there contrary to that. But she's not a good
faith dealer, which is why she's read. One of the
reasons why I'm so ecstatic that she's redistricted out because
I think she brings the IQ quote. I think she

(01:42:18):
brings the whole intelligence quotion of the Democrat Party down
a couple points. And while I don't like them, I
don't want them to be so stupid that you cannot
persuade some of them to come and vote properly.

Speaker 1 (01:42:28):
So that being said, just ridiculous. Can we do a
flashback real quick?

Speaker 3 (01:42:32):
This is for all the people screaming about free speech
as it pertains to the FCC, which I've addressed him
in a million times as to why I disagree with
their premises on that. Where were these people for this
little audio SoundBite with what Zuckerberg told Joe Rogan.

Speaker 18 (01:42:46):
Listen, these people from the Biden administration would call up
our team and like scream at them and curse, and
it's like, these documents there, it's all kind of out there.

Speaker 8 (01:42:58):
Do you record any of those phone calls? I don't know.

Speaker 18 (01:43:00):
I don't think. I don't think we were, but but
I think listen, I mean there are emails that the
emails are published, it's all it's all kind of out there,
and and they're like and basically, it just got to
this point where we were like, no, we're not gonna
We're not gonna take down things that are true. That's ridiculous.
They want us to take down this meme of Leonardo
DiCaprio looking at a TV talking about how ten years

(01:43:23):
from now or something, you know you're going to see
an ad that says, okay, if you took a COVID vaccine,
your eligible, you know, like for for this kind of payment.
Except it was sort of like class action lawsuit type meme.
You have to take that down.

Speaker 3 (01:43:39):
That's to me where Leonardo DiCaprio was in the chair
with a drink, pointing at the television and it was
one of the final scenes in uh uh oh Hollywood,
the the movie did with Brad Pitt.

Speaker 1 (01:43:49):
Oh my gosh, I'm dying right now.

Speaker 9 (01:43:52):
Hold up, hold up, But it is the class action
lawsuit ad.

Speaker 3 (01:43:55):
Yeah, it was like it was an ad for once
upon a Time in Hollywood. So it was the last
one of the last things. And once upon a time
in Hollywood. He sees something on TV and he leans
up in the recliner and he's pointing at it. So
it was that meme. That's what Zuckerberg was talking about.
The ADMIN actually was trying to bully them into deleting
things so their free speech warriors came.

Speaker 1 (01:44:15):
Today's stupidity was so sorry I ran long.

Speaker 9 (01:44:16):
It was Jasmine Crockett, But eh, why be redundant.

Speaker 3 (01:44:19):
I'll give you more time, Yeah, I'll give you more
more time. I won't rob you tomorrow. Folks that does
it for us today. Find us at Substax, sign up, YouTube, Facebook,
like and subscribe.

Speaker 1 (01:44:28):
Back with you tomorrow. Two hundred thousand subscribers

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Stuff You Should Know

The Joe Rogan Experience

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}Charlie Kirk Memorial Recap, Tom Homan's Fake Bribery Scandal & Jazzy Crockett Does It Again

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Stuff You Should Know

The Joe Rogan Experience

All Episodes

Charlie Kirk Memorial Recap, Tom Homan's Fake Bribery Scandal & Jazzy Crockett Does It Again

On Purpose with Jay Shetty