Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
We're going to talk about being sandwiched, someone on top,
someone on bottom, and no Kamala Harris isn't featured on
the show Tonight. We're gonna talk about the open borders
culture wars, that and more coming up when I'm right,
(00:24):
Let's talk about the why. The why is always the
most interesting question, is it?
Speaker 2 (00:29):
Not?
Speaker 1 (00:29):
Not just analyzing what we see every day, this sound bite,
this headline, but what's the why behind it all? What's
the why? What's the why? Well, right now you're seeing
something going on across the United States of America, but
it's nothing new for you. Frankly, if you're someone on
the right, you've gotten.
Speaker 2 (00:48):
Used to this.
Speaker 1 (00:49):
A violent commy protests going on. They're going on all
over the place here.
Speaker 2 (00:53):
They are.
Speaker 1 (00:56):
Long live rebellions.
Speaker 2 (01:03):
You're of US? Whoa's yes? What do you think about
the USA? Since using about USA?
Speaker 3 (01:15):
I want to think about the usie your shirt?
Speaker 1 (01:23):
Sure?
Speaker 3 (01:23):
What do you think about the burning the American flag?
Speaker 1 (01:25):
I love it?
Speaker 2 (01:26):
Burn it down, burn it again and again and again.
Where do you think about Osalavon Laudie in nine to eleven?
He did what he did because you had to do it,
so it was justified.
Speaker 1 (01:34):
I said what I've said, OK, honestly, you're not. You're
probably not even upset.
Speaker 2 (01:44):
I'm not.
Speaker 1 (01:44):
Doesn't even get my blood pressure up. Why I'm used
to it. We saw the ANTIFA Black Lives Matter street
animals burning down the country during.
Speaker 2 (01:54):
George Floyd's protests.
Speaker 1 (01:56):
We've seen this after elections, before elections. Turn elections were
used to this. You remember after Roe versus Way got overturned,
that pregnancy centers were firebomb vandalized all over the country.
Speaker 2 (02:09):
We'll get to that in a moment. But why Well,
there are.
Speaker 1 (02:14):
Lots of reasons why the street animals do what they do,
no question about it. Those individuals, every person you've seen there,
there are reasons. Maybe it's mental illness. Maybe it's just
they had parents or educators, or parents and educators who
taught them that America sucked.
Speaker 2 (02:32):
Maybe they're on drugs. Many of those people are on drugs.
Speaker 1 (02:35):
Maybe they're just people who hate themselves who We could
go into all those details, but that's not the why
we're dealing with here.
Speaker 2 (02:43):
Why are street communist.
Speaker 1 (02:45):
Protests so common in the United States of America? With
the vandalism, the assaults, the murder, the everything else, everything
that comes with it. They're very common here. They're all
over the place. Well, that's interesting. I'm glad you asked
that question. Let's come back to that question, shall we.
Christopher Ray just sat down to do a sit down
interview and he was asked, you know, hey, all these protests,
(03:08):
are you guys looking into that stuff?
Speaker 2 (03:12):
Are you actively monitoring these protests?
Speaker 4 (03:14):
We don't monitor protests, but we do share intelligence about
specific threats of violence with campuses with state and local
law enforcement.
Speaker 2 (03:23):
But we don't monitor protest.
Speaker 1 (03:27):
Protests. What a monitor you mean you want us to
look into him? No, man, that's not what we do.
That's not what we do. Pause for a moment.
Speaker 2 (03:38):
Pause.
Speaker 1 (03:38):
I know what you're saying right now. You're rolling your eyes.
Maybe you're chucking stuff at the TV, saying, Jesse, that's
exactly what they do. Think about what they did on
January sixth.
Speaker 2 (03:47):
Okay, I got you.
Speaker 1 (03:47):
I got you to stay with me for a moment,
Stay with me for a moment. I saw that interview
and it reminded me. It reminded me of this little gym.
Remember I just brought up the fire bombing right after
Rovers's way got overturned.
Speaker 2 (04:00):
All these commed street.
Speaker 1 (04:01):
Animals across America started vandalizing and throwing molotov cocktails into
these pregnancy centers, these pro life centers that really they're
wonderful places. They just they're out there helping young women
have a baby free ultra sounds that they're just wonderful places.
And they were getting fire bombed all over the country,
and they just weren't arrests. Maybe one or two here
or there, but the FBI wasn't getting any of these people.
(04:24):
And Merrick Garland sat in front of Congress and he
was asked why, and this is what he said.
Speaker 5 (04:30):
I will say, you are quite right. There are many
more prosecutions with respect to the blocking of the of
the abortion centers, but that is generally because they are
those actions are taken with photography at the time during
the daylight, and seeing the person who did it is
(04:50):
quite easy. Those who are attacking the pregnancy resources centers,
which is a horrid thing to do, are doing this
at night in the dark. We have put full resources
on this.
Speaker 1 (05:07):
I'm trying not to laugh it. You probably are too.
It's that absurd, isn't it. It's every bit as absurd,
if not more absurd, than what Christopher Ray just said, oh,
the terrorists, the street terrorists. Man, that is really bad,
and we are upset.
Speaker 2 (05:20):
But gosh, guys, it's so dark.
Speaker 1 (05:25):
We're the Justice Department and the FBI, but we can't
see in the dark. If someone commits a crime in
the dark, our hands are tied. They'll get away with
it every time. It's laughably ridiculous, isn't it. So why
do they say that Merrick Garland is the top law
enforcement officer in America? Christopher Ray, you could argue as
(05:47):
director of the FBI is number two. Look, it's not
unreasonable to say, so that's the top two law enforcement
officers in America, giving ridiculous excuses why they just can't
seem to crack down on these dirty communists. So why, Well,
you know what's going on. You understand that, if you've
(06:07):
watched the show for any length of time, you understand
exactly what's going on. What's going on is good people
are sandwiched. That would be you, normal Americans, law abiding
American citizens are currently being attacked from the top and
from the bottom. And the communists work with each other,
(06:29):
the two different brands of communism, two different divisions. They're
not the same, but they work with each other. The
elite communists, scum at the top, the Joe Biden's, the
Christopher Rays, the Bill Gates of the world, the people
who really hold.
Speaker 2 (06:43):
Power, the judges, so on and so forth. Who are they?
Speaker 1 (06:47):
Well, they're communists, but not really true believers. They don't
care about any of the causes. They just understand. They're
a bunch of very violent, very stupid people. They can use.
They can use their anger to get for themselves more
in mind, in power.
Speaker 2 (07:00):
They don't believe in any of these causes, black lives better,
climate change or whatever. They don't believe in those things.
Speaker 1 (07:04):
But they do have an important role to play, a
critically important role to play. You see, the elite communists
they want more money and power for themselves. And what
they need to achieve more money and power for themselves
is sometimes they need things done, violent things even. Maybe
they need a Supreme Court justice assassinated. Remember when they
(07:28):
just tried to kill Brett Kavanaugh. Maybe you just need
this Republican event to get shut down. Whatever you may need,
you need it done, and Chuck Schumer can't.
Speaker 2 (07:37):
Go do it. So what do you do? Well, you
need your street communists COUM. The second division.
Speaker 1 (07:42):
You need to have to step in and be your
hands and feet, to be your enforcement arm.
Speaker 2 (07:46):
Now the street communists COUM. These are who? Who are
these people?
Speaker 1 (07:49):
These are the ones we talked about mentally ill most
of them, all of them very very stupid. It's stupid.
People get taken advantage of it. That's just part of life.
They are true believers, I'll give them that, even though
they generally don't understand why. They really think man is
warming the climate and stuff like that. So they are
true believers, and they're violent. They're very very in fact,
they believe in violence. And why back to the question
(08:12):
we asked in the beginning, why do they do what
they do? Why are they all over America? Why are
they shutting down highways? Why are they shutting down college campuses?
Why are they shutting down pro life centers? Because they
are protected by the elites.
Speaker 2 (08:30):
The elites have a job.
Speaker 1 (08:33):
Their job is to direct the street communists scum and
then to protect the street communists scum. Did you know
that the street communists scum problem in this country that
it could be cleaned up like that? Do you understand
that you could stop you know, shutting down a highway,
You could stop that immediately right now. It would and
(08:55):
in fact it would be easy, and you wouldn't have
to do anything illegal and nothing violent, no l any justice,
no running them over, nothing like that, simple law, quick law,
automatic five year prison sentence. No, do not pass go,
do not collect two hundred dollars anyone, stop blocking, anyone
blocking a highway.
Speaker 2 (09:11):
Done gone.
Speaker 1 (09:13):
You would never have the problem again, even as mentally
ill and sick as these people are. If that protection
was taken away from them, if it was removed from them,
you would never see these protests again. But these protests
are ramping up because good people are sandwiched the elite
communists scum on the top, the street communists.
Speaker 2 (09:33):
Scum at the bottom.
Speaker 1 (09:36):
And that is important to understand about the system we
have here. When Christopher Ray sits down and gives an
answer like that, when Merritt Garland sits down and she
gives an answer like that, you should understand they're not
speaking to you. They're speaking to the street communists. They're
letting them know, hey, guys, go get them. That is
(09:57):
why you see what you see. That may have made
you uncomfortable, but I am right.
Speaker 2 (10:02):
We have.
Speaker 1 (10:04):
Bad Republicans, lots of them. We're going to discuss them
and their weakness. In just the moment. Before we discuss
them and their weakness, let's discuss who stands with us.
There are all kinds of people who stand against us.
We talk about it all the time, but who stands
with us? Well, in the corporate world, that's very hard
to find now, I admit it is. It is one
of the reasons I love Blackout Coffee so much. Is
(10:27):
it's not just that they stand with us. They advertise
it while every other corporation is out there championing black guys,
batter and this and that. Here's Blackout Coffee, pro life, god,
guns and coffee. It's not like Blackout Coffee is just
kind of quietly with us. They're in your face about it.
We believe in things here and I believe in them.
(10:48):
And also they deliver me the best coffee ever. And
by the way, you can buy these mugs too, twenty
percent off your first order. Blackoutcoffee dot com slash jesse
is how you get that twenty percent off? May I
recommend him monk join me with that Blackout Coffee dot
com slash Jesse I'll be back. Sometimes I struggle with something.
(11:18):
I'm just gonna be honest with you here. Sometimes I
struggle with bitterness and hatred. I'm gonna explain why. All right,
I showed up today. We get all kinds of emails
to the show, and I love your emails. But I
showed up today and I got this email, and I'm
just gonna read it for you, and I as I
was reading it, I could actually feel the vein in
(11:39):
my head start to pulse a little bit. Here it is, hey, Jesse,
I feel like a complete failure as a man, husband
and father. I just applied for EBT welfare. We just
can't make it with things costing what they do. We
just don't have any money to pay for anything, let
alone food. We've been eating ramen for a few months
(12:01):
and getting eggs from a few chickens in the backyard.
Speaker 2 (12:05):
Hopefully the garden will be better this year.
Speaker 1 (12:08):
I'm a farmer, and crop prices are at historic lows
with record input costs, and things aren't going to get
better anytime soon.
Speaker 2 (12:18):
I'm dying here, man, And as I read that, I think,
just honestly, I don't even have to go back to
ancient history.
Speaker 1 (12:30):
I think about just the past couple weeks. I think
about House of Representatives wave in Ukrainian flags on the
floor as they passed ninety some billion dollars in money
for Ukraine, Israel, Taiwans.
Speaker 2 (12:50):
Money here, money there.
Speaker 1 (12:52):
And I think about this farmer, welfare farmer now on welfare, humiliated.
Speaker 2 (12:56):
He shouldn't be, but humiliated. I think about it.
Speaker 1 (13:01):
I think about three hundred million dollars. Did you know
that's the amount of money the Biden administration is sending
to sanctuary cities.
Speaker 2 (13:11):
Sure money. They took three.
Speaker 1 (13:14):
Hundred million dollars from welfare farmer's wallet, and they're sending
it to sanctuary cities to pay for food, shelter, housing, education,
medical care for illegal immigrants.
Speaker 2 (13:30):
As a farmer sits there.
Speaker 1 (13:34):
Desperate, living, desperately, illegal immigrants in this country are being
showered with gifts. I think about money for Chinese solar
panels so Joe Biden's family can keep getting rich. And
I shouldn't actually even single out Joe Biden. It's Democrats,
it's Republicans. Just millions, billions, billions of dollars sent overseas
(14:01):
to China so they can build US solar panels.
Speaker 2 (14:04):
Well, the government just blood sucks your money and.
Speaker 1 (14:06):
Hands it out to them and hands it out to them,
money for them, money for them, money for them, money
for them. You never get a break, you never get
a tax break. You're sitting there watching your groceries go crazy,
and get what do we get from our government? Here
was Mitch McConnell, this is what we get.
Speaker 6 (14:24):
I think the demonization of Ukraine began by Tucker Carlson, who,
in my opinion, ended up where he should have been
all along, which was interviewing Vladimir Putin, and so he
had an enormous audience which convinced a lot of rank
(14:44):
and file Republicans. Maybe this was a mistake.
Speaker 1 (14:53):
Have you ever heard Mitch McConnell talk about Democrats with
the to stain He just talked about Tucker Carlson with, Oh,
of course you haven't.
Speaker 2 (15:07):
He doesn't care about you.
Speaker 1 (15:10):
These people, Republican and Democrats, they just don't care about
welfare farmer. They don't ever wake up and think about
you at all. You never cross their mind. You You're
just a You're just a something they can blood suck.
You're like a dairy cow to these people. They'll show
(15:30):
up in the morning and suck all the taxpayer money
out of you and then go back and hand it
out to their friends. And I'll tell you, I'm really
struggling with bitterness right now.
Speaker 2 (15:39):
I am.
Speaker 1 (15:40):
I really hate these people a lot. I do a
lot emails like that. Just bring it out of me.
I can't help it. There's that anyway. Whatever, At least
my feet are comfortable. How are your feet at the
end of the day. How are your feet? Most people's
feed hurt. They have these sore spots, or they're tired.
(16:01):
Do you ever just kind of have tired feet? Ever,
at the end of the day, just reach down and
just rub them. Why does that hurt so bad? It
hurts so bad because you don't have the right shoes.
Gravity to fire will change your life, It really, genuinely will.
Every single pair comes with custom orthotics made for you specifically.
(16:23):
Your feet hurt at the end of the day because
your shoes aren't made for you. Your shoes are made
for everyone who happens to have that particular shoe size. Well,
everyone's feed are different. How could you have the same
shoe for everyone? Of course your feet hurt. Of course
my feet hurt. Change your entire life, whether you're standing
(16:43):
all day, sitting all day, running around with the kids,
try some gravity to fire shoes is what you need
to do. Go to ged e fy dot com and
use the promo code Jessey dot com promo code Jesse
We'll be back.
Speaker 7 (17:12):
The Republicans were sent there and the number one issue
that our voters wanted them to address is the southern
border and the massive influx of foreigners by the millions
coming into this country. And we don't know who these
people are, and they basically just surrendered on the border.
They now have no leverage to do anything on the border.
Speaker 2 (17:33):
I'm not going to fund both sides of the war.
Speaker 4 (17:36):
I'm not going to spend one hundred billion dollars we
don't have unpaid for to then walk away from securing
the border of the United States.
Speaker 2 (17:42):
And that is what the Speaker did.
Speaker 8 (17:44):
This is the third betrayal by Mike Johnson. He delivered
a two part omnibus, funded the Department of Justice, ninety
one federal indictments against President Trump, funded the FBI that
raided mar A Lago, gave him a brand new FBI building,
funded Joe Biden's open policies, that are killing Americans every
single day. Then he reauthorized SIZA that spied on American citizens,
(18:07):
spied on President Trump's campaign, and he voted against the
warrant requirement, the same warrant requirement that he was four
six months ago. And then he did this here on
the House floor, foreign war package that does nothing for America.
It's unbelievable.
Speaker 2 (18:26):
That sounds bad, doesn't it? Talking to Steve about it?
Speaker 1 (18:29):
Joining me now, Steve Cortes, you need to subscribe to
his substack called Patria.
Speaker 2 (18:34):
I think i'd said that right. You can correct me
if I'm wrong with Steve.
Speaker 1 (18:37):
Anyway, you have a peace on it talking about surrender Republicans, please, Steve,
the floor is yours.
Speaker 4 (18:43):
Yes, well, I'm glad you started there with Ron DeSantis,
who I think is by far the best governor in America.
Talking about Speaker Mike Johnson, who is unfortunately taking the
dubious title I think of the worst Republican speaker ever.
And that's not an easy mark to achieve because previously
we had a child molester as a Republican speaker. But
(19:05):
Mike Johnson right now is on his way to being
even worse than Dennis Hasterard, and I say that in part,
by the way, because he broke what was previously known
as the hast rule, which means you do not bring
to the Florida legislation which your own party a majority
of your own party does not support. But Mike Johnson
did exactly that. He passed funding for Ukraine which a
majority of his own caucus of Republicans opposed. That means
(19:29):
that he is, if anything, a decent speaker for the Democrats.
I won't say he's a good speaker for them because
it doesn't rise to the level of Pelosi when it
comes to being a gangster and getting things done for
the Democrats.
Speaker 2 (19:39):
But he's at least getting things done for the Democrats.
Speaker 4 (19:42):
The reality is Johnson is unfortunately exhibit a right now
of why so many people are frustrated in America, so
many Salt of the Earth America First citizens, because sometimes
even when it seems like we win, we lose because
our leaders are feckless. Leaders like Mike Johnson in Washington,
DC see do not know how to exercise power, and
(20:03):
they don't have the backbone when it comes down to
when the rubber meets the road. They don't have the
backbone to stand on principle principles that he was a
nun seating by the way, as recently as weeks ago,
So this isn't like he evolved on policy. This was
a capitulation and it was a Republican surrender.
Speaker 2 (20:23):
Why Steve, why is this in all the time? Thing?
Speaker 1 (20:27):
Honestly, I told everyone on my show two weeks ago,
I told him, fia is it's going to pass. The
Foreign a Bill is going to pass. Everything's going to
go through. And it's not like I was no stradamus.
I'm sure you were saying the same things. We all
just knew.
Speaker 2 (20:39):
We all knew it's built in. The GOP leadership.
Speaker 1 (20:43):
Is going to sell out the GOP base. Why does
the GOP leadership hate the GOP base?
Speaker 4 (20:49):
You know, I think there's a couple of reasons, and
I'll give you sort of my less cynical but still
cynical explanation, and that is that in this case, specifically,
when it comes to things like Faiza into things like
the foreign Wars build, they are they are fooled.
Speaker 2 (21:02):
They're hoodwinked by the intelligence community.
Speaker 4 (21:04):
And by the way, Mike Johnson told us this, he said, literally,
you know, I got my briefing from them, my secretive breeding.
Speaker 2 (21:09):
I can't tell you what I learned, but believe me,
it's terrible.
Speaker 4 (21:12):
And because of that, I'm going to send almost one
hundred billion dollars that we don't have that we're going
to borrow overseas. So I think they are manipulated in
a sort of straightforward way by the intelligence community. But
I also give you my much more cynical read. And
I can't say this with any proof, but I think
that all signs point this.
Speaker 2 (21:30):
Way, is that these people are also.
Speaker 4 (21:32):
Compromised, that there are there is information about them that
perhaps the intelligence community knows, and it is able to
basically put people like Mike Johnson over a barrel and
say do this or else. Now, again, I don't know that,
but all the signs certainly point that way.
Speaker 2 (21:46):
When you have somebody like Mike Johnson.
Speaker 4 (21:47):
Who seems to be a decent enough guy, certainly in
his personal life, seems like he's a good Christian man,
good father, husband, all of that, and yet for him
to betray his word in this quick a manner, I mean,
in this short or or to completely capitulate and acquiesce
to the Democrats and effectively become the speaker for the Democrats.
It tells you there's something here that's not necessarily obvious,
(22:11):
that is going on behind the scenes. Because you're right,
and this is why it's so befuddling. It's so frustrating
to millions of Americans out there.
Speaker 1 (22:17):
Now.
Speaker 2 (22:18):
Listen, I would.
Speaker 4 (22:19):
Say, what do we do because we can't just complain,
we can't just curse the darkness.
Speaker 2 (22:22):
So what do we do about this?
Speaker 4 (22:23):
Well, it's going to be difficult to keep the House,
in part because of Mike Johnson, by the way, who
to boot. Not only does he not only does he
betray us on principle, he's also a terrible fundraiser. So
it's going to be hard to keep the house. But
if we do keep the House, it better be with
Republican candidates who pledge that they are going to put
a real speaker in there, somebody who believes in America
first principles, somebody who's not going to prioritize the border
(22:45):
of eastern Ukraine over the border of the southern United States.
So thankfully we do at least have an opportunity to
try to rectify this as citizens into November.
Speaker 1 (22:56):
Steve can I ask you something and you can just
give it to me between the eyes.
Speaker 2 (23:01):
It's fine.
Speaker 1 (23:01):
I know we're on camera, but you say we might
not be able to keep the House.
Speaker 2 (23:06):
Yeah, why should I care? And to allow me to.
Speaker 1 (23:08):
Explain, why should I care? So the GOP gives me
endless foreign money. The GOP just got done trying for
a massive amnesty buill that guaranteed amnesty for everybody. The
GOP doesn't even bother fighting culture wars anymore. Hey, we
love abortion now, we don't want to lose elections up
gay marriage for everyone. So the GOP spends more money,
(23:30):
frankly as much will more than Democrats do. They do
every single time. I'm going down the list of issue
after issue after issue after issue. And I understand that
Joe Biden's bad and the Democrats are evil, and I
get all that, But why should I sit and lose
one minute of sleep that the GOP might lose the
House of Representatives in November?
Speaker 2 (23:49):
And I really want you to tell me, Steve, give
it to me. Yeah, why should I give it? A crap?
Speaker 4 (23:53):
I hear what you're saying, and generally I would agree
with you with this major coveyat and this I think
is a compelling reason that I hope will motivate the
audience out there why we do need a Republican House.
Because if his Keem Jeffries is the Speaker of the
House and Donald Trump is the President of the United States,
and I believe both those things are probably going to
happen given current trajectories. If that happens, they are going
(24:14):
to impeach Donald Trump in a nanosecond, particularly if Donald
Trump is convicted in New York, which I think he
will be in this circus kangaroo court sham trial that's
going on in New York City. If he is convicted,
they will have at least a pretense of a reason
a patent that they can use to engage immediately in
(24:34):
impeachment proceedings. And I don't want Donald Trump to take
office for his second term, which I think can be really,
really effective and I think in many ways better than his.
Speaker 2 (24:42):
First term was.
Speaker 4 (24:43):
But if he is immediately thrown into impeachment, which I
think he would be if the Democrats control the House,
then it will be incredibly difficult for him to get
things done. It would be almost like the Russia hoaes
was during the first administration. So that would be my
most compelling argument. I agreed with you. I can't come
up with many other ones. That's a really important reason
why we should keep the House. And absolutely they'll elect
(25:04):
a new speaker if we do keep the House. Not
beckless Mike Johnson.
Speaker 2 (25:09):
Okay, all right, well it's something.
Speaker 1 (25:11):
Look I asked, all right, let's talk about our border.
You have a great piece up in American Greatness about
our border, and man, it's really bad.
Speaker 2 (25:20):
Yeah, it's terrible.
Speaker 4 (25:23):
As a matter of fact, I was there last week
of filming a documentary which should be out soon.
Speaker 2 (25:27):
But the migrant pain.
Speaker 4 (25:29):
What I also want to point out is it's not just,
of course, at America's front door in Arizona.
Speaker 2 (25:34):
It is all over this country.
Speaker 4 (25:35):
So I wrote this piece for American Greatness talking about
migrant pain all the way up in Wisconsin, two thousand
miles away from the US southern border, and I highlight
a town called Whitewater, Wisconsin. It's a very pleasant little place.
I've been there. It's basically a college town. It's a
satellite campus of University of Wisconsin. Fifteen thousand people. They
have won thousand migrants in a town of fifteen thousand
(25:55):
and one thousand migrants who've arrived since Biden became president,
illegal migrants from Venezuela and Nicaragua, and the town is
absolutely overwhelmed. The police department is, the schools are. This
is again two thousand miles away from the United States
southern border. And when we poll Wisconsin nights, by the way,
what we find is that they are as up in
(26:17):
arms about the border as folks in Arizona are. That
is the reality, because they are living with the consequences.
And for example Lake and Riley, which needs to be
a better known story, but because it's so horrific, that's
at least somewhat widely known, at least on the political right.
Speaker 2 (26:31):
That story a lot of folks probably don't know about.
Speaker 4 (26:33):
A man named Steve Nasholm in Wisconsin, near Rice Lake
in northern Wisconsin.
Speaker 2 (26:38):
He was killed, father of three, husband.
Speaker 4 (26:40):
Young man, his whole life still ahead of him, wonderful family,
young man who was killed by a drunk driver who
had been previously came into this country illegally under Joe
Biden's open borders, had been previously arrested for DUI in
the state of Wisconsin. Instead of being deported, was allowed
to continue to roam the streets of Wisconsin and ultimately
(27:01):
killed this bothery. These cases, unfortunately, are not isolated. I
mean I've just named two of them, but unfortunately I
could go on and on.
Speaker 2 (27:08):
So the consequences of economics.
Speaker 4 (27:09):
Street safety, national security, they are nationwide from an open border.
And my point is voters in places like Wisconsin, which
could be a determinative state, I mean it could very
well decide whose president come fall, they are very very angry.
Speaker 2 (27:24):
Even the ones who are somewhat sympathetic A.
Speaker 4 (27:25):
Biden on other issues, they're very very angry about the border.
Speaker 2 (27:28):
This is a fulcrum issue.
Speaker 4 (27:30):
And to me, along with the economy, these are the
two most compelling value propositions or Donald Trump for winning
over persuadable voters.
Speaker 2 (27:40):
Who are they angry at?
Speaker 1 (27:41):
Steve and I asked this question because people on the right,
everyone watching this show, everyone who watches your wonderful stuff
that you do, reach your stuff, They're going to make
the linear argument, the logical argument. I'm upset about ilegal immigration. Okay,
who's at fault for that? Who's in charge right now?
Democrats are at fault? Then I will therefore go to
the polls and I will punish the people who opened
(28:02):
up the border, but the general public does not think
that way. Oftentimes, it's one thing.
Speaker 2 (28:06):
To be bad about the border, that's another.
Speaker 1 (28:08):
Thing to place blame where it belongs. Who are they
mad at?
Speaker 4 (28:11):
No, it's a great question, and because the corporate media
has done a good job of burying these terrible stories
about the consequences of a legal migration, we have work
to do. But once people are informed, they do blame
Joe Biden. Let me back it up again with the
polling that we just did so in Wisconsin, again critical
swing state I think will likely decide the presidency either
(28:32):
wis consin or Michigan. But in the state of Wisconsin,
among likely voters, only half of them really know. For example,
about the Lake and Riley story. Fifty percent said that
they know nothing or very little about the Lake and
Riley story. Now of that other half, that tells us
they do know either a great deal or a good
bit about the Lake and Riley story. When we ask
do you blame Joe Biden for her death, for her
(28:53):
tragic murder, seventy percent of them say yes.
Speaker 2 (28:56):
So if they are informed about the full consequences.
Speaker 4 (28:59):
They do absolutely blamed Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, who's
allegedly the borders are that tag By the way, I
think we need to put on her into this campaign
because that also, by the way, Number one, it's true,
so it's important for people to know that. But also
the more we can bring up Kamala Harris's name, I
think the better, because we also need to reinforce in voters'
minds as terrible and dreadful and as much of a
(29:20):
failure as Joe Biden has been. If you are voting
for Joe Biden, remember you are voting for Kamala Harris.
Because the chance of Joe Biden lasting five years from
now in the presidency, I think even his supporters would concede,
is next to zero. So I think that's also an
added benefit of bringing her up in relation to this
border failure. But look, we have work to do. Corporate
(29:41):
media is not doing its job. We don't have an
honest president this country anymore. So those of us who
are activists need to do all we can, use every
platform we can to make sure all Americans should know
about Lake and Riley. Every single American should know what
happened to her? Totally preventable crime. Illegal migrant who crossed
illegally in this country was arrested two more times for
serious crimes before he decided in broad dayly to kill
(30:04):
a precious twenty two year old, beautiful American college student
of the University of Georgia campus. That story needs to
be known, and if it is, I think that the
reasonable patriotic people of America will place blame where it
belongs on Joe Biden and we can win this election.
Speaker 1 (30:20):
Yeah, well, fingers crossed, Steve, Thank you brother, As always,
I appreciate.
Speaker 2 (30:23):
It, you bet, thank you, Jesse.
Speaker 1 (30:25):
All Right, culture, America's culture, it's under attack. We are
fighting legal battles and these are important battles, and we're
going to discuss those legal battles as we speak. But
it is important to understand we have a system in
place where criminals are protected. You just heard Steve. Criminals
(30:46):
are protected in this country, nurture provided for. So when
it comes to protecting yourself from criminals, it's up to you.
It's up to you. Go ahead, call the cops. They're
busy down at the local shelter trying to provide papoosas
for all the new arrivals. You you're on your own
with that dangerous man in a dark parking lot. Can
(31:07):
you stop him from hurting you? That's what Burna is
all about. B y Rna. These are non lethal pistol launchers.
What do they shoot them? Pepper balls? They hurt just
when they hit you wap, But then it's this pepper
powder that is just debilitating, or tear gas balls, or
they have a mixture of the two. This is legal
(31:29):
in all fifty states, no background check needed, no permit needed.
Speaker 2 (31:34):
I carry lethal and non lethal.
Speaker 1 (31:36):
But no matter what, whether you carry like I do,
or whether maybe you hate guns, get a Burna pistol launcher.
We'll save your life, all right, burna dot com slash
Jesse saves.
Speaker 2 (31:48):
You ten percent. We'll be back well.
Speaker 1 (31:59):
In the ongoing assault of every part of our culture,
the Biden administration actually dug its dirty fingers into Title
nine rules recently.
Speaker 2 (32:08):
Now, Title nine is one.
Speaker 1 (32:09):
Of those things confuses a lot of people. They don't
understand even what it was, what's it turned into.
Speaker 2 (32:14):
I don't want to be the one to explain it
to you.
Speaker 1 (32:16):
I'm stupid, But Kimberly herman is not and she joins
us now. She is the executive director of the Southeastern
Legal Foundation. Okay, Kim, act like I just got here
from Mars Title nine before we get into what Biden did?
Speaker 2 (32:30):
What was it? What is it? Absolutely?
Speaker 3 (32:34):
So, back in nineteen seventy two, Congress stepped in and
passed what we all referred to as Title nine. It
was part of amendments to our Civil Rights Act. And
all Title nine does is it says that the government,
so our schools right, who receive government money, our K
through twelve schools, are public colleges, that they cannot discriminate
on the basis of sex. This afforded women the ability
(32:57):
to participate in educational programs that they.
Speaker 2 (32:59):
Were previously excluded from.
Speaker 3 (33:01):
So we typically will hear Title nine in the context
of sports because as Title nine was implemented and ensured
that women were able to have sports teams, that they
had the same number and equal opportunities when it came
to athletics, educational programs, classrooms, you name it, right, clubs, organizations,
anything that deals with education. The problem now is that
(33:24):
we have the Biden administration that came in and on
Friday they released a new definition of sex. So for
decades and decades, hundreds of years, right, we've had sex
defined as a man or a woman. Now sex includes
sexual stereotypes, gender identity. Basically, anything that you want to
(33:46):
consider sex can now be considered sex. And it eviscerates
the idea that we have men and women in society
that need to be protected through equality and through a
civil rights act. It guts everything and protection that Title
nine has ever afforded to women. And again it literally
ends the distinction between genders and sexes in this country.
Speaker 1 (34:09):
Well that doesn't sound good, okay, So it's another massive
trendy handout program. I did see the Louisiana Education director
told schools to ignore it. And I find this to
be fascinating, Kim, because this very clearly is the way
it's going to go in the future. But I guess,
to put it bluntly, can he do that? Can they
do that? Can states just say no? What happens if
(34:32):
they just say no?
Speaker 3 (34:34):
We were very glad when we saw Louisiana come out
and say that they were telling their schools to not
follow this new Title nine rule. It's not effective until August,
and so what you're going to see. Is you're going
to see a race to the courts now, right, this rule,
once it's formally published in the Federal Register, is going
to be challenged in courtrooms all across the country because.
Speaker 2 (34:56):
Of a few reasons.
Speaker 3 (34:58):
The Department of Education frankly does not have the power
to unilaterally change the definition of sex for all Americans.
That's something that Congress wants, that has the power to do. Right,
if Congress wanted to do it, then they could have
done it to begin with, or they could go back
and they could do it now. This is a federal statute.
The Department of Education is a federal agency, and they
(35:19):
just do not have the power to make these major
changes to statutes that have been passed by Congress. Title
nine also will infringe free speech rights of parents, students, teachers,
professors all across the country because if you don't want
to use an incorrect pronoun now, you can arguably be
(35:40):
brought up on Title nine charges, face suspension, face expulsion,
or even worse. Right, so, you could be a senior
in college, you paid two hundred thousand dollars to get
this education. You refuse to call a girl a he
or a boy a she. And all of a sudden,
you're facing expulsion from your college and changing the entire
(36:00):
trajectory of your future. That's what we're facing in this country.
And so we need more state attorney generals, we need governors,
we need parents, we need teachers all to stand up
and fight against this rule.
Speaker 2 (36:12):
Oh, we sure do.
Speaker 1 (36:13):
All right, let's switch gears here to something else. Something
you guys are involved in your suing the Department of
Education over segregation in Chicago.
Speaker 2 (36:22):
What's going on?
Speaker 3 (36:24):
Yeah, so District sixty five up in Evanston, Illinois, which
is kind of the hotbed of liberalism, right, they have
they've been at this for a long before we were
talking about anti racism and equity in this country. They
have had mandatory segregation in training, teacher trainings, in classroom settings.
(36:44):
And we represent a very brave teacher who in twenty
nineteen filed a complaint with the Department of Education. They
investigated this complaint and they ultimately found that yes, segregation
was happening, and yes, as we all know, it violates
it's the Civil Rights Act. And they went ahead and
issued a letter of finding to that effect, saying that
(37:05):
the school district had to stop. But then Biden comes in,
he becomes our president, and two days later the Department
of Education with drew that letter of finding and so
we filed a lawsuit in federal court. It is still pending,
but we're also trying to get information from the Department
of Education on why all of a sudden it did
this about phase What now makes segregation in their minds
(37:27):
legal when it has been on constitutional and illegal in
this country for decades, as it should have been. And
so they're stonewalling us. They won't give us any information
about why they withdrew that formal finding, and we were
finally forced to actually turn to the courts just to
get these documents. It's the same problem parents are having
a complete lack of transparency by our Department of Education
(37:48):
and all of our k through twelve school districts throughout
this country. I don't know why we have to fight
so hard to get government records, but we have to
keep going to court.
Speaker 1 (37:56):
Yeah, I have a pretty good idea why you have
to fight so hard? Because he's thirty commune, the scumbags
want to keep them hidden. What do parents? What can
parents do? You're Kney deep involved in this stuff. You
know all the issues, all these fights, and I love
what you guys do there. But if you're me, right,
if you're my wife, and this craziness is going on
at my kids' school, what can I do?
Speaker 2 (38:14):
I feel powerless. Yeah.
Speaker 3 (38:16):
One of the things that we've been trying to do
to help parents is we conduct parent trainings, We have
parent guide books. Educate yourself on the issues and on
the law. The law can be very confusing, but it
can also be a very powerful weapon. And I'm right
there in the trenches with all of the parents that
we help. I have a first and a fourth grader myself,
and so I see these issues firsthand, and I feel
(38:39):
just as passionate about them as the parents that come
to us. And so they can find the guidebook at
Slfliberty dot org where they can always reach out. Right,
if you know the terminology, if you know your parental rights,
then when you go into that school board meeting, when
you go into that meeting with the principal, when you
go meet the teacher about the curriculum, you at least
(39:00):
just have some additional tools and your toolkit to fight
to save America schools and protect your children, which we
all know is the most important thing as a parent.
Speaker 2 (39:09):
Yeah, it is all.
Speaker 1 (39:10):
Right, we're switching gears on you again, Kim. Tell me
about what you guys are doing with these Texas farmers
who are being dumped on.
Speaker 3 (39:17):
Oh my goodness, the administration just keeps it coming, right.
It's this whole of government equity approach that we see
in schools that we're talking about. We see it in
every agency. And the USDA is not a stranger to
this either. What they've done is they took twenty five
billion dollars that Congress has appropriated for disaster relief. So,
in other words, you have a drought, you have a flood,
(39:39):
anything that affects our farmers throughout this country and our
food production source, and the USDA is posted dole that
money out based on need. Well, they decided that white
male farmers don't need that money as much as other farmers,
and they've built out exclusions and so if you're a
white f arm you're just simply not getting the same
(40:02):
amount of money that other farmers are getting. And we've
got ahead and filed a lawsuit. This is not the
first time we've had to see the USDA for this.
It is blatantly unconstitutional, and so we expect the court
to rule quickly and swiftly in this case and enjoin
the USDA from excluding people from its programs based simply
on race and sex as long as the USDA continues
(40:26):
to define sex as a man or a woman. Right,
We'll see what happens as they take on the Department
of Heads definitions too.
Speaker 2 (40:32):
Probably.
Speaker 1 (40:34):
Yeah, that racism is almost starting to sound systemic. That
was the word that you'll love to use. Systemic. Okay,
let's one more thing. The National Archives. They've been in
the news a lot lately because it looks like they coordinated,
collaborated with the Biden administration. But for many Americans, the
National Archives, it sounds like something from a Nicholas Cage movie.
Speaker 2 (40:56):
What is the National Archives? What's going on with them? So?
Speaker 3 (41:01):
The National Archives is one of our federal agencies and
departments that simply houses all of our federal records. And
so when President Joe Biden was vice president and he
left office, he has to give over his papers to
the National Archives, and four years later, we as Americans
can request to see those records. Joe Biden use pseudonym emails, right,
(41:24):
so he made up these email addresses, and he used
them to conduct government business. That much we know because
we've already obtained a number of those emails. But the
American public needs to see what else is in those
What other government information was he passing through these unsecured
Gmail email addresses. We've been asking the National Archives for
(41:44):
these documents for years. We again had to finally file
a lawsuit to try to get them, and as we
get them, we'll release them to the public. We know
that there's congressional committees trying to get them. Also, these
are highly important documents because we know that, again, government
business was being done through unsecure servers. What information had
(42:05):
to be hidden that you had to use pseudonym emails for?
Why not just do it above the board? Right, That's
something that all of us want to know.
Speaker 1 (42:13):
Okay, I got to ask a dumb question before I
let you go here, Kim. But how can they just
say no, it's our information, it's public record. So when
Kim knocks on the door of the National Archives and
says I'd like to see this, they can just say no,
and you.
Speaker 2 (42:30):
Have to sue them. What they say, we're busy.
Speaker 3 (42:34):
So the response that we keep getting from every single
federal agency is we don't have enough money. We all
know that the federal government has plenty of money. It
has all of our money, right, just got a whole
bunch more after April fifteenth. And so they say we're
too busy, we don't have enough time, and we don't
have enough resources. And so then we have to go
to court and negotiate and negotiate and negotiate to get
(42:57):
records that Congress has very clearly said we all have
a right to see. And honestly, they should just be
putting these out there on the website anyway. If they're
public records, just give us access to them and we'll
leave you guys alone.
Speaker 1 (43:10):
That's wild how often the public records aren't quite as public. Kim,
Thank you so much, Please keep going. Appreciate you guys.
That's enough for that, not for the serious stuff. Have
you ever fought an animal? Have you ever wanted to
fight an animal? We have a light in the mood next,
(43:32):
all right, it is time to lighten the mood.
Speaker 2 (43:35):
And I will tell you this.
Speaker 1 (43:36):
I can't speak for women, but as a dude.
Speaker 2 (43:40):
We think about fighting animals. We do. Look, I'm not
alone in this. Every dude watching me right now, is
nodding his head.
Speaker 1 (43:48):
Maybe your wife is rolling her eyes, but you have
you've thought about it. What animal could you take in
a fight? Could you take a lion? It's happened Bene
fought lions in one Maybe I could fight a lion.
I've been on record for years saying a cheetah. I
could take a cheetah. They're like one hundred and thirty pounds.
I could take out a cheatah.
Speaker 2 (44:08):
I could.
Speaker 1 (44:09):
No one believes me, but I could. This MMA guy,
Mike Dragic, he fought an alligator.
Speaker 5 (44:40):
I gave a play.
Speaker 1 (44:46):
That's amazing. I mean it wasn't a very big one.
I think I could. No, I couldn't ever, and then look,
this is not exactly his first time. This is like
what he does. That was amazing. I want to know
(45:26):
if I could do it. Probably not. Maybe I'll try.
I'll see the one