June 18, 2024 • 43 mins
The Democrats are doing whatever they can to win the 2024 election. This includes buying votes with the depletion of the strategic oil reserves, lying about Joe Biden's mental fitness and denying that they've opened the border on purpose. Jesse Kelly dives into all of this. Jesse also engages in very important legal conversations with Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach and former federal prosecutor Katie Cherkasky. Plus, a one-on-one with actor Nick Searcy.
Follow The Jesse Kelly Show on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheJesseKellyShow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
We're going to talk about how evil democrats are and
what they're doing. Now, we're going to talk to a
movie star, an attorney general, a lawyer. We are all
over the place tonight, and I'm right now.
Speaker 2 (00:23):
Why the border? Why illegal immigration?
Speaker 1 (00:28):
Look, look, let's just talk about some moves Joe Biden's
pulling recently. Joe Biden is shielding illegals now from being deported.
You know, he gave that speech where he pretended like
he was being tough on the border. Now there's been
no more border enforcement. In fact, since that speech. He's
bent over backwards to protect not only just regular illegals,
(00:49):
which are already criminals, I need to point out, but
convicted criminals, shielding them from deportation. They're taking crazy steps
now saying, hey, if you're an illegal and you skip
across the border and marry a US citizen, boom, you're
good to go.
Speaker 2 (01:02):
You can't be deported.
Speaker 1 (01:04):
They are bending over backwards to ensure everyone they've brought
here can stay here. And they're bending over backwards. They
are going all in now to bring in as many
as humanly possible. Now, why, well, I'll tell you something.
There's something that hits me a lot. You've probably picked
(01:25):
up on this if you watch the show, which obviously
you watch the show you're watching now, But there's something
that hits me a lot. How truly, truly evil and
deprave the people are who leave this country.
Speaker 2 (01:38):
They are evil? And you want to hear how evil
these people are. They have power.
Speaker 1 (01:43):
Okay, they have power, the presidency. It's a very very
powerful thing. They have power, and they want to hang
on to that power, and they want to destroy the
country and the process because they will burn an evil man.
What's that old quote, An evil man will burn down
his own cun to rule over the ashes. That's democrats
in this country and Republican leadership too. I need to
(02:04):
point that out. Republicans love amnesty too. But right now,
Joe Biden's looking at I don't want to say of
a loss in an election because it's way too early
to say that, but the poll numbers are bad.
Speaker 2 (02:17):
It looks bad. It looks like.
Speaker 1 (02:20):
There's a chance Joe Biden's going to be a four
year president. The American people are sick over it. And
part of the reason the American people are sick over
Joe Biden's presidency is illegal immigration. So wrap your mind
around that the people are mad about illegal immigration and
that's going to result in Joe Biden being removed from office,
losing his reelection. In response to that, the evil people
(02:43):
who run this country are bringing in as many as
they possibly can before they might lose the election. And
the ones that are here, they're essentially building a wall
around them to make sure they can't be deported. How
evil is that? How evil is that it is? And
(03:04):
this is something that I've accepted in something I understand, something.
Speaker 2 (03:07):
You and I have talked about before.
Speaker 1 (03:08):
But how do we deal with living in a country,
sharing a country? Remember, we all live here, sharing a
country with people who want to destroy it and are
willing to do anything to keep power and destroy it.
Speaker 2 (03:27):
How do we handle that?
Speaker 1 (03:30):
Look, it's not just like this as a right wing
talking point.
Speaker 2 (03:34):
Around the planet.
Speaker 1 (03:37):
People know these illegals know, Hey, with Joe Biden there,
we can do whatever we want to America. We've been
talking to migransom all over the world arriving here into
the San Diego sector.
Speaker 2 (03:49):
I talked to one man from Turkey. Here's what he
had to say. What do you think of President Biden? Biden?
Speaker 3 (03:58):
Why do you love Biden, Biden.
Speaker 4 (04:04):
We love Why do you love them?
Speaker 2 (04:09):
Maiden had us that man was from Turkey.
Speaker 1 (04:16):
We've had hordes of military age Chinese males. We've had
how many people on the terrorists watch list that we
know of being intentionally released into the country. By the
grace of God, they've managed to track down a couple
of them after the fact. But the people who run
this country are so evil they're hoovering up as much
(04:40):
of the Third World as humanly possible before they might
lose the presidency. And people get confused to why listen
Cloward Piven? I would highly recommend you go look up
Cloward Piven.
Speaker 2 (04:58):
This is a phrase you probably heard of before.
Speaker 1 (05:01):
They were a couple of communist professors and they were
trying to figure out how do we destroy America? That's
really honestly, they wrote it down, how do we destroy
this evil country that is America? And illegal immigration was
a central part of their plan. Their plan essentially is
no matter how big and powerful a country is, you
(05:24):
can overwhelm its systems and bring about its collapse. You
understand that your rent mortgage is sky high because of
illegal immigration, your healthcare costs are sky high in part
because of illegal immigration. The education system in this country
is rotting out from underneath us. We have high school
graduates who can't read or right now because in part
(05:46):
of illegal immigration. Illegals are destroying wages, destroying the job market.
You can't import millions of people from nations who have
no loyalty to yours and continue to have a country.
That's why Democrats do it. How evil is that? And
there's nothing they won't do. The strategic oil reserve, you
(06:07):
remember that that's there for emergency purposes, as in WW
three cooks offf The Biden administration is once again draining
the strategic oil reserve in an election year in order
to keep gas prices low. Gas prices low. The people
(06:31):
who lead the country are so inhumanly evil they will
put this country on dangerous ground without oil in order
to keep power for themselves. You do understand that big
beautiful navy, we have, the air force, we have, most
(06:53):
of that goes right on the scrap heap without oil.
You know what, a plane without oil is worth nothing.
In fact, a plane, a fighter jet without oil, it's
worth less than your car. It'd be more militarily beneficial
(07:14):
to strap a couple of machine guns on your car
and drive it at the enemy than have a plane
that can't fly. We can have a military that is
worth virtually nothing if we run out of oil. They
know this, and they're draining it anyway. And you know
what I do find funny, not funny, horrific. But this
(07:35):
whole Ukraine thing we know now, we know several reports
have been out that now a couple times over the
last year Vladimir Putin has come out and tried to negotiate.
Speaker 2 (07:47):
An end to this.
Speaker 1 (07:47):
And this is not a celebration of Putin. He invaded,
but Putin has come to the table and said, hey,
we can end this thing. Very clearly, Russia has seized
some of Ukraine, They're not going to be able to
get them out, and Putin has said, Okay, we got it.
Let's come to an agreement. Let's end this thing. And
yet it's funny. The powers that be who run this
country are adamant that Ukraine must go on without end,
(08:10):
but at the same time, when it comes to things
like Israel in their war with Hamas, those same people
become peace hawks.
Speaker 5 (08:21):
It's inconceivable that in the past few months the administration
has been withholding weapons and ammunitions to Israel. Israel America's
closest ally fighting for its life, fighting against Iran, and
are other common enemies. Secretary of Blincoln assured me that
the administration is working day and not to remove these bottlenecks.
(08:41):
I certainly hope that's the case.
Speaker 1 (08:45):
Well, why are they treating it differently? Why are they
treating one one way and the other one the other way. Well,
it's very clear that they have a vested monetary interest
in keeping Ukraine owing forever, and it's very clear they
have a political interest in this whole Israel Hamas thing
(09:06):
going away. It's dividing the Democrat Party, it's making Joe
Biden look bad.
Speaker 2 (09:10):
They're worried about.
Speaker 1 (09:11):
All these protests and counter protests that are probably going
to be coming at the convention this year. So it's all,
all of it is simply.
Speaker 2 (09:20):
For selfish reasons.
Speaker 1 (09:22):
None of the people doing anything making decisions for this
country are doing so on behalf of the country. They
do everything they do only on behalf of themselves, and
the lengths they go to the lie to your face
so they can keep power. Joe Biden can't function anymore.
(09:43):
Everyone can see it. It's not just how he talks,
it's how he walks, it's how he looks, so that
glossed out look in his eye, half dead all the time.
Everyone knows that there's about two marbles still rattling around
in Joe Biden's head. And these people have the g
all the stand in front of you and tell you
that these videos that we've all seen are cheap fakes.
Speaker 2 (10:10):
Secondly, there seems to be a sort of rash of.
Speaker 1 (10:12):
The videos that have been exited to make the president
appear especially frail or defentally confused.
Speaker 2 (10:19):
I'm wondering if the.
Speaker 4 (10:21):
White Houses especially worried about the fact that this this
appears to be a pattern everything more wrong.
Speaker 3 (10:26):
Yeah, and I think you all have called this the
cheap fakes video, and that's exactly what they are. They
are cheap fakes video. They are done in bad faith.
In some of your news organization have been very clear
have stressed that these right wing, the white wing critics
of the president have a credibility problem because of the
(10:46):
fact checkers have repeatedly caught them pushing misinformation, disinformation.
Speaker 1 (10:55):
Evil evil people run the country and evil people in
the media trying to work on behalf of the regime.
How evil is that? Did you see Nicole Wallace? This
freaking woman.
Speaker 6 (11:08):
There's a growing and insidious trend in right wing media, broadcast, print,
and social media. It is to take highly misleading and
selectively edited videos of President Biden directly from Republican National
Committee social media accounts and then use those videos to
spread messages virally to cast out on President Biden's fitness
(11:30):
for office.
Speaker 1 (11:33):
These people really are evil. They're not wrong, they're not misguided.
We are led by people enriching themselves and destroying our
country on purpose. And sometimes it's a lot to take in,
isn't it all? That may have made you uncomfortable? But
I am right. We have the Attorney General of Kansas.
(11:57):
He's going to join us next There is something out there.
I'm not trying to get my hopes up, but there
are some Republican ags who are starting to step up
across the country. They're starting to develop teeth when it
comes to dealing with these evil organizations. That when it
comes to dealing with the evil left, and that is
a very good thing. We are going to need teeth,
(12:17):
and I love that some of these people have it
before we get to him, though, Let's get to your coffee.
Speaker 2 (12:23):
Where do you get your coffee from? Who brings you
your coffee?
Speaker 1 (12:27):
You see, as far as industries go, coffee might be
the worst of them when it comes to all this
left wing crap.
Speaker 2 (12:37):
I don't know what it is.
Speaker 1 (12:38):
Maybe there's something in the water, but these coffee companies,
they're all left Ekomi filth except for Blackout Coffee. Blackout
Coffee doesn't do that. They are exactly the opposite. They
have a million different flavors. If you're a flavored coffee person,
they deliver it to your front door, and they share
and promote our values.
Speaker 2 (12:58):
Put your money where your morals are.
Speaker 1 (13:02):
We have to be purposeful about putting our money where
our morals are.
Speaker 2 (13:05):
They'll deliver it to your front door.
Speaker 1 (13:08):
Go to Blackoutcoffee dot com slash jesse.
Speaker 2 (13:11):
That gets you twenty percent off your first order. So
make your first order a.
Speaker 1 (13:15):
Fatty Blackoutcoffee dot com slash jesse.
Speaker 2 (13:20):
We'll be back.
Speaker 1 (13:29):
Republican Attorney General's Attorneys General.
Speaker 2 (13:32):
I hate that. That's how you say that.
Speaker 1 (13:33):
Either way, they're starting to really really step up in
major ways now that we have some decent ones in
this country.
Speaker 2 (13:39):
Pfiser.
Speaker 1 (13:40):
Remember all those Pfizer ads used to see all over television.
There was a lot of crap in those ads, a
lot of well whys for lack of a better way
to put it, And Kansas's age is all over these
guys like white An Rice joining me now, Chris Kovak,
the Attorney General of the great State of Kansas. Okay,
mister Attorney General, what do you do in the piser
(14:01):
for all the thirty lies they told?
Speaker 7 (14:04):
Well, we have brought a civil lawsuit under our Kansas
Consumer Protection Act seeking monetary penalties and damages and junk
of relief for misleading, making deceptive and misleading statements in
advertising and promoting their COVID nineteen vaccine. And we filed
(14:24):
that base on Monday, and the ball is rolling out.
It's a sixty nine page complaint and we alleging great
detail of various instances in which Weser made statements that
were contrary to information they had at the time. You know,
just to give you two examples. One is with respect
(14:47):
to pregnancy. Weiser advertised It's the vaccine and promoted its
vaccine as being safe for people who are pregnant. But
as early as October of twenty twenty, they were assession
of information from their own study done on rats rats
of course that showed them skill birds and other complications
(15:09):
litter debts resulting from the vaccine. And then a few
months later in February twenty twenty one, they had information
they study with over four hundred pregnant women and in
that study the majority of women had some medical complication
relating to their pregnancy right after the COVID vaccine.
Speaker 8 (15:32):
So that's one example. And then the other one is
that myocardi of course is a heart condition.
Speaker 7 (15:38):
The CEO of Pfiser was asked if there's any connection
between the Pfizer vaccine and that is he said, no,
there are no safety signals signals the term of art
they used. But in fact, the Pfiser was aware of
multiple studies that had indicated in multiple data sets that
had indicated there was a connection between the vaccine and
(16:01):
my charnizis. So those are just a couple of examples.
It's pretty clear that they said things publicly that were
not consistent with what they knew product.
Speaker 1 (16:13):
Yeah, and I'm glad you're focusing on that part of
it as well, not that you need any help doing
your job. The fact that they knew, because there's a
lot of revision as history today, we didn't know, nobody knew.
We didn't know Pizer had this information and lied, didn't
they Well.
Speaker 7 (16:31):
They had this information, and they said things that were
misleading and did not you know, were clearly contradictory to
the information they had. And let's put this back, and
let's let's go back in time and remember, so some
people were taking the vaccine, forced to take a vaccine
because they were under duress, their employer was forcing them
(16:51):
issues in their job and taking a vaccine, and maybe
they were given a.
Speaker 8 (16:54):
Deadline to take your vaccine by such and such a date.
Speaker 7 (16:57):
Other individuals elected to take the vaccine voluntarily, but they
also felt some anxiety and they felt that maybe there
their health was at risk if they didn't do it.
And so people were making a decision quickly, and they
were making a decision in some instances under duress. And
when they make that decision, they had to choose which
(17:19):
vaccine to pay. And in making that choice, it is
essential that American consumers are presented with the truth and
with all medical evidence that is out there so that
they can make that choice on an informed basis, and
that's really what we're getting in here with our Consumer
Protection Act charges against Advisor. They acted in a way
(17:40):
that was deceptive when Americans in Kansas in particular, were
making that choice about whether to take the vaccine, and
so which vaccine to take.
Speaker 8 (17:49):
Everybody knows that whenever a pharmaceutical product.
Speaker 7 (17:52):
Is advertised on radio or TV, there is a long
list of disclaimers, and that's part of how our system works.
So you inform the consumer with the risk might be.
In this case, as we allege, Wiser not only didn't
inform of risks, they stated that the risks were not there,
when in fact they did that the risks were.
Speaker 2 (18:13):
Gosh, that's freaking evil.
Speaker 1 (18:15):
Your suit goes into the censorship of dissenting opinions too,
doesn't it.
Speaker 5 (18:21):
Yeah.
Speaker 7 (18:21):
Biser also took we allegendacy Advisor to success to stop
or suppress.
Speaker 8 (18:29):
Opinions contrary to.
Speaker 7 (18:30):
What they were saying copy on on social media platforms.
Speaker 1 (18:37):
Let's talk about some other things you're doing, which I love,
standing up standing in between a federal government that has
lost its mind in the people of your great state.
Tell me about the ATF in you.
Speaker 7 (18:50):
Yeah, so, Kansas has a monster lawsuit against the ATF.
Many people may not be aware, but the ATF recently
passed a regulation or promulgated to regulate that basically says
that when one individual sells a firearm to another individual
just out of their personal elections, not dealers dealing with dealers,
(19:12):
if you make any profit, even one dollar, you will
be deemed to be a dealer engaged in the business
of dealing firearms, and you therefore have to get an
NFL that o't firearms devicens and you have to run
a background Yet, well, that's not the way the law
has been in.
Speaker 8 (19:29):
Americans for decades.
Speaker 7 (19:31):
For more than a decade, centuries have been selling firearms
to one another, trading firearms, and that can also be
considered a sale of firearms traded for another end. One
is slightly more valuable than the other, than the potentially
one person.
Speaker 8 (19:44):
Has made a profit.
Speaker 7 (19:45):
So again, this is if this rule stayed in place,
it's going to effectively make it very difficult, if not
in some cases impossible, or friends, in some cases families
to versas firearms from one another. And the reason they're
doing this is pretty transparent. They're trying to do what
they could not accomplish cloth begun shoe loophole, which they
(20:10):
refer to it for productorial past, and so they're going
to try to do it for a regulation and we
are suing and we expect that we will prevail.
Speaker 1 (20:18):
Good, good, Okay, finally to wrap this whole thing up,
Biden's student loan handown.
Speaker 2 (20:23):
It's amazing.
Speaker 1 (20:24):
We live in a country where the president now just
gives speeches talking about how the Supreme Court tried to
stop me, but I didn't let them.
Speaker 2 (20:31):
I don't think that's how it works. Edw what are
you doing with all this?
Speaker 7 (20:36):
Yeah, so we have have wants to a lawsuit, which
is we're waiting a decision on a culminary junction right now.
We have filed with a group of other states a
suit saying that look, Iden lost in the Supreme Court
in twenty twenty three with his first round of student
handout sort of cancellations, and now he's brought another one
(20:57):
and he's it's basically the same thing over again, just
with excusing slightly different provision of statutes. By administration's assess
was saying, well, okay, we lost when.
Speaker 8 (21:05):
We cited this statue for provision. Howbout if we cite
this other one over.
Speaker 7 (21:08):
Here and attempt to cancel student loans in an extraordinary
way billions of dollars, and uh, you know, we intend
to prevail the court.
Speaker 8 (21:18):
Again.
Speaker 7 (21:18):
Only Congress has the authority to forgive or cancel loans.
And let's not forget that when alone is canceled or forgive.
Speaker 8 (21:26):
It, it's not like it just comes out of.
Speaker 7 (21:28):
Thin air and it just goes away. No, that the
debt is transferred from the student borrower to the taxpayer.
And so there's a there's a in addition to the
legal reasons why this is a big deal, and it's
there's just a policy reason why in the world wo
we do that? Why would we transfer debt from people
(21:50):
who've gotten expensive graduate degrees or whatever and take it
out big loans to people who didn't go to college,
or to people who paid their own way through comes,
or people who work their way through college.
Speaker 8 (22:01):
It makes no sense that it's unfair. And be hope
prevailing on that issues.
Speaker 2 (22:07):
Yeah, I hope you do too, mister Attorney General.
Speaker 1 (22:09):
Thank you so much. Please keep at the mine. I
love seeing that. That's awesome. We have some good ages
now I dig it, and we haven't had many in
the past. We have some good wins. Now, you know
what else is good? Loan Star Transfer is good. Do
you know that Lone Star Transfer. They're the company that
saves you from that time share You can't seem to
get off your back. That time share you want out of,
(22:32):
but you can't. You sign the contract. They told you
your trapped for life. You're paying the annual fees. You're
trying to cut costs, and you one out. Well, stop
calling the timeshare company and start calling Loan Star Transfer.
They will set you free. Loan Star Transfer. This is
the family business. They have an A plus rating from
(22:53):
the Better Business.
Speaker 2 (22:54):
Bureau for a reason.
Speaker 1 (22:56):
They are ninety nine percent successful and not making that
ninety nine percent successful getting people out of their time
share free.
Speaker 2 (23:04):
You ready to be free?
Speaker 1 (23:05):
Call eight four four three one zero two six four
to six.
Speaker 2 (23:11):
We'll be better.
Speaker 1 (23:20):
There's all these smart legal things that happen, and I
don't have any idea what's going on because I'm stupid
and uneducated. I've been told that the Supreme Court has
some big, fatty opinions coming down. What exactly is coming
this Thursday or Friday? I don't freaking know, but I
bet Katie does. Joining me now, Katie Turkowski, she is
a former federal prosecutor and she wrote a book on
(23:41):
woke Warriors, How these dirty comedies are taken over everything.
Speaker 2 (23:45):
I highly highly recommend it. Okay, Katie? What does this mean?
We have opinions coming down? What's happening. It's a big day.
Speaker 9 (23:53):
It's going to be a big day at the Supreme
Court because this is the last day before the election
that the Court is scheduled to release opinion. And there's
two big cases relating to President Trump that everybody's waiting on,
and one of those is the immunity case, and that
is the big question about whether a president has immunity
and to what extent they have immunity for acts that
(24:15):
they commit while they're in office. And it's actually very
complicated legal question. But that opinion will impact the rest
of President Trump's pending criminal cases. But not only that,
I think it could also impact even the New York
conviction that came down, So there's an of course, of course,
(24:35):
beyond President Trump, it will impact the entire country forever.
So it's a significant moment that we're all anticipating.
Speaker 2 (24:43):
With that opinion.
Speaker 9 (24:44):
And then there's another opinion related to one of the
criminal statutes that was used against many of the January
sixth individuals and that people were convicted under that the
Supreme Court is looking at to determine whether it is
actually a proper t charge that should have been brought
against those people or whether their conduct didn't even fall.
Speaker 2 (25:05):
Within that charge.
Speaker 9 (25:06):
And so that's also important because that same charge is
something that President Trump is charged with in the January
sixth case. So it is absolutely a big day, especially
for President Trump, but really for the country generally speaking.
Speaker 1 (25:20):
Yeah, no doubt about it. Okay, I'm not asking I'm
not going to hold you to this. I'm not asking
you to be an oracle here, but do we have
some idea of which way they might go? Just from
the lay person's view, I have a hard time believing
the Supreme Court is going to give some blanket immunity ruling.
But at the same time, a lot of these prosecutions
are ridiculous.
Speaker 2 (25:40):
What say you?
Speaker 9 (25:41):
Well, actually, I've been writing about this for a long time,
and last summer I wrote an article for The Hill
saying that the president should have full immunity unless they
were actually impeached and convicted by the Senate, And there's
a whole long explanation legally as to why I think
that's the correct outcome here. But I agree with you
that that that the court probably won't go so far
(26:02):
as to say that anything a president does while in
office is immune from criminal prosecution. But based upon the
Justice's questions during the oral arguments, it seemed pretty clear
that they were open to some degree of immunity. And
the question is exactly how they define that. And I
think what they're going to find as they were going
(26:22):
through this process of making a decision is that when
you start talking about the president, which is obviously one
person that is an entire branch of government unto themselves,
how do you start to parse apart when they're on
the job or off the job, and how do you
hold them accountable for things when supposedly they can't be
prosecuted while they're in office. So you wait around. They
(26:44):
are the head of the DOJ, they are the head
of law enforcement in this country, and you start getting
into a lot of hypotheticals about what if the president
did this, and some people disagree with that or it
turned out to be a negligent decision. Could that lead
to a prosecution, And essentially what happens is that you'll
see that. But really anything could potentially be twisted into
a criminal allegation, especially by an opposing political party when
(27:06):
somebody leaves office. So I know that wasn't a direct prediction,
but I think that the Court will have to go
pretty far to say that a president is probably immune
in many circumstances from prosecution for acts that they undertake
while in office, and whether there are some exceptions to that.
I think that's the big question here.
Speaker 1 (27:26):
Let's talk more specifically about the New York trial really
quickly before we switch gears to the President's dirtball son.
Speaker 2 (27:33):
Assuming the Supreme Court does.
Speaker 1 (27:34):
Not give Donald Trump blanket immunity for these ridiculous charges
in New York, we're not expecting Donald Trump to go
to state prison in New York, right.
Speaker 9 (27:46):
Well, of course, as everyone's been discussing, now that President
Trump's been convicted, he does theoretically face jail time, and
the decision about that is left solely up to the
trial judge, Judge Morton, who of course has been very
unfair and many people have noted has been very unconstitutional in.
Speaker 2 (28:03):
A lot of his rulings.
Speaker 9 (28:04):
So the idea of whether he could sentence Trump to
jail is the real possibility, But whether he actually serves
that time as another question. Because even if he gets
sentenced to jail, which is possible although it shouldn't happen,
the appeal of that case, just the normal appeal would
normally essentially pause the execution of the sentence while the
appeals are pending. So what that means is that the
(28:25):
appeals take a long time. Sometimes it takes even years
to complete appeals on these type criminal cases, and that
the appellate court can essentially pause the jail sentence while
the appeals are still being decided. Even aside from the
immunity issue, but I think personally that if the court
says that there is some sort of immunity for acts
(28:46):
committed while in office, that would impact the New York case,
because at the end of the day, even though the
New York Case talked a lot about these affairs with
Stormy Daniels back in the day and all these things
that happened many many years ago, the charm defenses the
actual payments and the bookkeeping that were at the heart
of the charge defenses. All of that occurred after President
(29:07):
Trump was in office, and so at the very least,
I think that that could result in the case being
sent back down for a factual analysis about whether or
not it falls on one side of the immunity line.
So I think the immunity case could absolutely pause the
sentencing there as well. But even without that, even if
the court says that somehow that New York case is
(29:29):
not applicable, the regular appellate process will pause any sort
of jail sentence for the foreseeable future.
Speaker 2 (29:37):
More than likely, Katie, talk to.
Speaker 1 (29:41):
Me about what you found inside of the United States military.
This is something that's near and dear to my heart.
To everyone who watches this show.
Speaker 2 (29:48):
We talk a lot about the rot.
Speaker 1 (29:50):
That's taking place within it. Most people from the outside
can't see it. You wrote a book on it. What
did you find?
Speaker 2 (29:57):
Yeah, I did so.
Speaker 9 (29:58):
I was in the Air Force JAG many moons ago,
but even since I left the service back in two
thousand and thirteen or so, I've been working with military
members daily. I run a military law practice where I
represent military members who are facing criminal or derogatory actions.
Speaker 2 (30:13):
And so because I'm.
Speaker 9 (30:14):
So deeply embedded in the legal system, in the military's
legal system. I have seen directly how these liberal and
wolf policies have been infiltrated on the Department of Defense.
And we could go down the line and talk about
everything from the DEI policies, the way that they handle
allegations of sexual assault, the way that they handle even
(30:35):
just the COVID pandemic situation that came down, the clamp
down on free speech, all of the LGBTQ situation that
they've kind of ushered into the Department of Defense, all
of these things. I mean, the book is obviously inclusive
of all these topics, but when you're not really intimately
familiar with the military, you might not understand how political
(30:57):
it really is. And because of the leadership at the
way House and at the Pentagon, which are you know,
all political appointees, the Department of Defense is just completely woke.
It's completely, in my opinion, probably wasting so much of
its time on all these policies and investigations that they
there's no way to tell that they're actually operationally ready
for any sort of conflict. It's just practical when you're
(31:20):
spending that much time on these matters. There's no way
that you're putting the time into training that should be required.
Speaker 1 (31:26):
God the book Woke Warriors, go pick it up. Katie Tchurukawski,
thank you so much for coming on.
Speaker 2 (31:33):
Talking to us for a little bit today. All Right, there's.
Speaker 1 (31:38):
Something we have not forgotten about and we will not
forget about. January sixth, the event the communists have used
to lock up over a thousand of their political opponents.
My friend Nick sirously did a movie on the whole thing.
He's got a whole lot to say. There are innocent
people already rotting in prison because of these dirty communists.
(32:00):
We're gonna talk to Nick, And just the moment before
we talk to Nick, let me talk to you about
your cell phone. We all have them. And here's the
thing about your cell phone. You pay the bill automatically,
don't you? Everyone does you put in your credit card
online and they just there is a payment every single month.
Do you make an automatic payment to Commis every month?
Speaker 8 (32:22):
You know?
Speaker 1 (32:22):
The Verizon is a terrible company right at and T
T Mobile? These are soulless, evil, leftist monster companies. Are
you paying them? I'm not paying them. I have paid
them I've had all three of those before. T Mobile
was the one we switched from. We switch to pure Talk.
I pay half of what I used to pay. Pure
(32:42):
Talk CEO is a veteran thought for this country, loves
this country, shares our values. So you can keep your phone,
keep your numbers, saved money, and pay a company that
actually agrees with you. Puretalk dot Com slash jessetv is.
Speaker 2 (32:58):
Where you go do it, So go do it. We'll
be back. It's not protesting, it's insurrection.
Speaker 4 (33:13):
When I said how many agents or assets of the
government were present on January fifth and January sixth and
agitating in the crowd to go into the capitol, and
how many went into the capitol, can you answer that now?
I don't know the answer to that question.
Speaker 2 (33:26):
You don't know how many there were or there were none.
Speaker 10 (33:28):
I don't know the answer to either of those questions.
Speaker 4 (33:30):
I think you may have just perjured yourself that you
don't know that there were any.
Speaker 6 (33:41):
Most Pops and the f start to leave.
Speaker 3 (33:44):
He's got four people in front of him and four
people behind him, and they literally get him the hell
out of there.
Speaker 5 (33:48):
Based on your investigation so far, do you have any
evidence that the Capital of Tech.
Speaker 10 (33:53):
Was organized by quote fake Trump protesters.
Speaker 2 (33:56):
We have not seen evidence so that. Yeah, I was
in the front.
Speaker 10 (34:01):
I also orchestrated.
Speaker 1 (34:03):
In pretty interesting, pretty ominous. Actually, I gotta stop watching
Nick's movies. Every time I do, I just realize what
kind of a.
Speaker 2 (34:15):
Banana republic we live in. Joining me now, my friend.
Speaker 1 (34:19):
Actor, producer, author. I hate these guys who do everything good.
Speaker 2 (34:25):
Nick.
Speaker 1 (34:25):
Seriously, he's the author of the new book, by the way,
justify this, which we will get to in.
Speaker 2 (34:30):
A little while.
Speaker 1 (34:30):
Nick, do you think you're better than me because you
have all these talents?
Speaker 10 (34:34):
No, I'm kind of the same. I mean, we're both
literally authors. Now, I've literally written about Oh.
Speaker 2 (34:40):
Oh, why did you? Why do you have to torment me?
Speaker 11 (34:43):
Nick?
Speaker 2 (34:43):
I'm not even I'm not gonna let you bake me.
I'm not gonna let you better. All right, honestly, let's
talk about the war. What's that. We're literary giants, both of.
Speaker 1 (34:53):
Us, well, obviously, yes, the world famous authors of course.
Speaker 2 (34:57):
Okay, war on truth.
Speaker 1 (35:00):
You keep making these documentaries exposing these people, and every single.
Speaker 2 (35:05):
Time I watched one, I'm just floored. Nick. Do you
think the FEDS did January sixth. Did they plan and
coordinate it? There's no question. Yeah, not in my mind.
Speaker 10 (35:16):
I mean, after all the people we talked to, all
the people that have given eyewitness testimony of what they
saw that day, there is no question. And to me,
the biggest factor in proving that is that what was
going on inside the House and Senate that day was
exactly what the people who went to Washington, like me, wanted.
Speaker 2 (35:35):
To have happened.
Speaker 10 (35:36):
The only people that wanted that procedure stopped were the Democrats,
who wanted to stop them from sending the election back
to the States to be certified. So they had to
stage this insurrection nonsense in order to stop the House
and Senate from doing its constitutional duty.
Speaker 1 (35:55):
A lot of people forget that, and people don't seem
to understand how many lives have already been ruined, destroyed
over this.
Speaker 2 (36:03):
Whole thing that. I mean.
Speaker 1 (36:05):
I realized, the big band gets all the publicity, convicted
in New York and whatnot, but all those normal people
matter too, and they've been riding in jail because of
all this, haven't they.
Speaker 10 (36:15):
Yes, And that's really the biggest part of the war
on truth. The trailer doesn't really show you what I
think is the most important part of the film, which
is telling these people's stories. These people have had their
lives completely ruined by the lives of people like Liz
Cheney and the January sixth Committee, because they have to
advance this narrative. They have to keep this going that
(36:37):
this was the most dangerous insurrection that ever happened in
the country after the Civil War. And these people are
just normal, decent people that you would trust with your
pets or your children while you were out of town,
and they're being treated like their you know, domestic terrorists
and really just having their lives destroyed. And so that's
(37:00):
that's the bulk of the film is trying to show
you who these people are that they are talking that
they are calling domestic terrorists.
Speaker 1 (37:09):
They've gone a long ways to try to paint the
right as domestic terrorists, and of course they've justified every
time someone on the right gets hurt. What'd you find
out about Ashley Babbitt.
Speaker 10 (37:23):
Well, in the film, we talked to Taylor Hansen, who
was an eyewitness to what happened to Ashley Babbitt. And
what you see in our movie that you really haven't
seen anywhere else. Very especially not on the mainstream media,
is that Ashley Babbitt was in that hallway trying to
stop the people who were breaking the windows, who were
trying to break the door down, and the people that
(37:43):
she stopped were actually Antifa people like Zachary Alum. And
so when she was pulling people back saying stop, she
was talking to the police officers in there saying you
need more backup. And then she was shocked. She jumped
in the window and was killed without a word of warning, nothing.
(38:03):
And Taylor Hanson was ranked there and tells the story.
And the other part of that is that Taylor Hanson
repeatedly told the January sixth Committee that he was an eyewitness,
that he had video that he was there, and they
never they never questioned it. There's not one word about
Ashley Babbitt and the January sixth Committee's report, not one
(38:23):
word about Roseanne Boylin of the January sixth Committee's report.
Speaker 2 (38:27):
They're covering it up.
Speaker 1 (38:30):
How funny that is that Nancy Pelosi video was making
the rounds last week before anyone forgets about it.
Speaker 11 (38:37):
Here it was we have responsibility, Terry. We did not
have any accountability for what was going on there.
Speaker 1 (38:46):
And we should have.
Speaker 11 (38:48):
This is ridiculous. You're going to ask me in the
middle of the thing, when they've already breached the innaugural stuff,
that us should we call the Capitol police, I mean
the National Guard? Why weren't the National Guard there to
begin with? They thought that they had sufficient Well, there's
(39:10):
not a question of how they they don't know. They
clearly didn't know, and I take responsibility for not having
them just prepare for more.
Speaker 10 (39:22):
Nick, what do you make of all that she's such
a terrible actress? To me, that whole thing was staged
to make it look like she just found out that
the National Guard was not called. She knew that they
weren't called because she stopped them from being called. That
whole thing is just that's her trying to get away
with her culpability in the whole day, and she's she's
(39:44):
a really bad actress. But of course she's convincing the
Democrats because they they're used to really bad acting.
Speaker 1 (39:53):
Nick, do you think I could have been a movie star.
I've always felt that I would be a huge movie star,
be a.
Speaker 2 (40:00):
Really tall one. Yes, you would be really huge.
Speaker 10 (40:03):
I think I think, Look, you could look at it
this way, if I could do it, you could probably
do it.
Speaker 2 (40:10):
You know you just hey, nigga.
Speaker 1 (40:15):
Trump's to get a debate Biden next week. He's going
to be asked about January sixth. He's going to be
asked about the January sixth political prisoners.
Speaker 2 (40:24):
What should he say? What should he do?
Speaker 10 (40:28):
He should say straight out that he's going to pardon them,
and he should say straight out that these people were
set up and that they should not continue to get
away with the lie that they have perpetrated about January sixth,
because that's what it is. They have built this narrative.
They have lied about these people. Trump said a long
(40:48):
time ago, he said, it's not just me thereafter, I'm
just in the way. They're really after all of you.
And what they're doing to the January sixth people is
meant not only to punish them for going to Washington
on January sixth. It's meant to intimidate the rest of America.
It's meant to say to everyone, don't ever protest anything
we ever do again, or this is what's going to
(41:11):
happen to you. They're trying to show everybody that they're
in charge and they shouldn't be challenged, and Trump has
to counteract that.
Speaker 2 (41:19):
Right, Nick, tell us about this book, justify this?
Speaker 10 (41:24):
Well, it's like I said before, Jesse, it's literally a
book about my life. I know how you like that word,
but it's really it's not necessarily a political book.
Speaker 2 (41:37):
You know.
Speaker 10 (41:37):
It's really a book about how, you know, a guy
like me from North Carolina who didn't know any actors
and you know, came up and was able to make
a living as an actor. And it also has chapters
in there about my professional wrestling career and my stand
up comedy career, a lot.
Speaker 2 (41:55):
Of things that people don't know about.
Speaker 1 (42:00):
That's just the least surprising thing in the world that
you were in professional wrestling. That is just anyway, the
book is justify this, Nick.
Speaker 2 (42:08):
Well, I mistakes sooner, my brother.
Speaker 1 (42:10):
All right, it's time to lighten the mood. Well, it's
annoying as we go into light in the mood, it's annoying.
I find it annoying that everybody has a month or
a day now right today it's midget month, it's green
(42:30):
people months.
Speaker 2 (42:31):
This month, it's that month, it's.
Speaker 1 (42:33):
Left handed people month, like anyone needs to celebrate those freaks.
Speaker 2 (42:37):
But today is a day.
Speaker 1 (42:39):
It's a day that we all should celebrate, you, me, everybody.
Speaker 2 (42:45):
It's National Jesse Day.
Speaker 1 (42:46):
Did you know that this is a day where we
celebrate people named Jesse? Did you know that Jesse means
God's gift? Pretty appropriate if you ask me. In Hebrew
it means king. Honestly, Just how accurate is all this?
I am a I'm not a wealth of knowledge on
(43:08):
all the Jesse's out there. I mainly just focus on me.
How many Jessees do you know? Wrote a national best
selling book called The Anti Communist Manifesto, which can be
purchased at Jesse kellybook dot com. I believe there's only one,
and I think that's me. How many Jesses do you know?
Have the greatest burger recipe in history? A burger recipe
(43:29):
that is so good. I'm not making this up. It's
actually in the book. I just covered that up so
you couldn't read it in time. You have to buy
the book to get it. My burger recipe is in
the book.
Speaker 2 (43:40):
I'm just kidding. You can find it for free online anywhere.
But this is a day.
Speaker 1 (43:45):
It's about me, So celebrate me tonight with friends and family.
Speaker 2 (43:51):
I'll see them
We're going to talk about how evil democrats are and
what they're doing. Now, we're going to talk to a
movie star, an attorney general, a lawyer. We are all
over the place tonight, and I'm right now.
Speaker 2 (00:23):
Why the border? Why illegal immigration?
Speaker 1 (00:28):
Look, look, let's just talk about some moves Joe Biden's
pulling recently. Joe Biden is shielding illegals now from being deported.
You know, he gave that speech where he pretended like
he was being tough on the border. Now there's been
no more border enforcement. In fact, since that speech. He's
bent over backwards to protect not only just regular illegals,
(00:49):
which are already criminals, I need to point out, but
convicted criminals, shielding them from deportation. They're taking crazy steps
now saying, hey, if you're an illegal and you skip
across the border and marry a US citizen, boom, you're
good to go.
Speaker 2 (01:02):
You can't be deported.
Speaker 1 (01:04):
They are bending over backwards to ensure everyone they've brought
here can stay here. And they're bending over backwards. They
are going all in now to bring in as many
as humanly possible. Now, why, well, I'll tell you something.
There's something that hits me a lot. You've probably picked
(01:25):
up on this if you watch the show, which obviously
you watch the show you're watching now, But there's something
that hits me a lot. How truly, truly evil and
deprave the people are who leave this country.
Speaker 2 (01:38):
They are evil? And you want to hear how evil
these people are. They have power.
Speaker 1 (01:43):
Okay, they have power, the presidency. It's a very very
powerful thing. They have power, and they want to hang
on to that power, and they want to destroy the
country and the process because they will burn an evil man.
What's that old quote, An evil man will burn down
his own cun to rule over the ashes. That's democrats
in this country and Republican leadership too. I need to
(02:04):
point that out. Republicans love amnesty too. But right now,
Joe Biden's looking at I don't want to say of
a loss in an election because it's way too early
to say that, but the poll numbers are bad.
Speaker 2 (02:17):
It looks bad. It looks like.
Speaker 1 (02:20):
There's a chance Joe Biden's going to be a four
year president. The American people are sick over it. And
part of the reason the American people are sick over
Joe Biden's presidency is illegal immigration. So wrap your mind
around that the people are mad about illegal immigration and
that's going to result in Joe Biden being removed from office,
losing his reelection. In response to that, the evil people
(02:43):
who run this country are bringing in as many as
they possibly can before they might lose the election. And
the ones that are here, they're essentially building a wall
around them to make sure they can't be deported. How
evil is that? How evil is that it is? And
(03:04):
this is something that I've accepted in something I understand, something.
Speaker 2 (03:07):
You and I have talked about before.
Speaker 1 (03:08):
But how do we deal with living in a country,
sharing a country? Remember, we all live here, sharing a
country with people who want to destroy it and are
willing to do anything to keep power and destroy it.
Speaker 2 (03:27):
How do we handle that?
Speaker 1 (03:30):
Look, it's not just like this as a right wing
talking point.
Speaker 2 (03:34):
Around the planet.
Speaker 1 (03:37):
People know these illegals know, Hey, with Joe Biden there,
we can do whatever we want to America. We've been
talking to migransom all over the world arriving here into
the San Diego sector.
Speaker 2 (03:49):
I talked to one man from Turkey. Here's what he
had to say. What do you think of President Biden? Biden?
Speaker 3 (03:58):
Why do you love Biden, Biden.
Speaker 4 (04:04):
We love Why do you love them?
Speaker 2 (04:09):
Maiden had us that man was from Turkey.
Speaker 1 (04:16):
We've had hordes of military age Chinese males. We've had
how many people on the terrorists watch list that we
know of being intentionally released into the country. By the
grace of God, they've managed to track down a couple
of them after the fact. But the people who run
this country are so evil they're hoovering up as much
(04:40):
of the Third World as humanly possible before they might
lose the presidency. And people get confused to why listen
Cloward Piven? I would highly recommend you go look up
Cloward Piven.
Speaker 2 (04:58):
This is a phrase you probably heard of before.
Speaker 1 (05:01):
They were a couple of communist professors and they were
trying to figure out how do we destroy America? That's
really honestly, they wrote it down, how do we destroy
this evil country that is America? And illegal immigration was
a central part of their plan. Their plan essentially is
no matter how big and powerful a country is, you
(05:24):
can overwhelm its systems and bring about its collapse. You
understand that your rent mortgage is sky high because of
illegal immigration, your healthcare costs are sky high in part
because of illegal immigration. The education system in this country
is rotting out from underneath us. We have high school
graduates who can't read or right now because in part
(05:46):
of illegal immigration. Illegals are destroying wages, destroying the job market.
You can't import millions of people from nations who have
no loyalty to yours and continue to have a country.
That's why Democrats do it. How evil is that? And
there's nothing they won't do. The strategic oil reserve, you
(06:07):
remember that that's there for emergency purposes, as in WW
three cooks offf The Biden administration is once again draining
the strategic oil reserve in an election year in order
to keep gas prices low. Gas prices low. The people
(06:31):
who lead the country are so inhumanly evil they will
put this country on dangerous ground without oil in order
to keep power for themselves. You do understand that big
beautiful navy, we have, the air force, we have, most
(06:53):
of that goes right on the scrap heap without oil.
You know what, a plane without oil is worth nothing.
In fact, a plane, a fighter jet without oil, it's
worth less than your car. It'd be more militarily beneficial
(07:14):
to strap a couple of machine guns on your car
and drive it at the enemy than have a plane
that can't fly. We can have a military that is
worth virtually nothing if we run out of oil. They
know this, and they're draining it anyway. And you know
what I do find funny, not funny, horrific. But this
(07:35):
whole Ukraine thing we know now, we know several reports
have been out that now a couple times over the
last year Vladimir Putin has come out and tried to negotiate.
Speaker 2 (07:47):
An end to this.
Speaker 1 (07:47):
And this is not a celebration of Putin. He invaded,
but Putin has come to the table and said, hey,
we can end this thing. Very clearly, Russia has seized
some of Ukraine, They're not going to be able to
get them out, and Putin has said, Okay, we got it.
Let's come to an agreement. Let's end this thing. And
yet it's funny. The powers that be who run this
country are adamant that Ukraine must go on without end,
(08:10):
but at the same time, when it comes to things
like Israel in their war with Hamas, those same people
become peace hawks.
Speaker 5 (08:21):
It's inconceivable that in the past few months the administration
has been withholding weapons and ammunitions to Israel. Israel America's
closest ally fighting for its life, fighting against Iran, and
are other common enemies. Secretary of Blincoln assured me that
the administration is working day and not to remove these bottlenecks.
(08:41):
I certainly hope that's the case.
Speaker 1 (08:45):
Well, why are they treating it differently? Why are they
treating one one way and the other one the other way. Well,
it's very clear that they have a vested monetary interest
in keeping Ukraine owing forever, and it's very clear they
have a political interest in this whole Israel Hamas thing
(09:06):
going away. It's dividing the Democrat Party, it's making Joe
Biden look bad.
Speaker 2 (09:10):
They're worried about.
Speaker 1 (09:11):
All these protests and counter protests that are probably going
to be coming at the convention this year. So it's all,
all of it is simply.
Speaker 2 (09:20):
For selfish reasons.
Speaker 1 (09:22):
None of the people doing anything making decisions for this
country are doing so on behalf of the country. They
do everything they do only on behalf of themselves, and
the lengths they go to the lie to your face
so they can keep power. Joe Biden can't function anymore.
(09:43):
Everyone can see it. It's not just how he talks,
it's how he walks, it's how he looks, so that
glossed out look in his eye, half dead all the time.
Everyone knows that there's about two marbles still rattling around
in Joe Biden's head. And these people have the g
all the stand in front of you and tell you
that these videos that we've all seen are cheap fakes.
Speaker 2 (10:10):
Secondly, there seems to be a sort of rash of.
Speaker 1 (10:12):
The videos that have been exited to make the president
appear especially frail or defentally confused.
Speaker 2 (10:19):
I'm wondering if the.
Speaker 4 (10:21):
White Houses especially worried about the fact that this this
appears to be a pattern everything more wrong.
Speaker 3 (10:26):
Yeah, and I think you all have called this the
cheap fakes video, and that's exactly what they are. They
are cheap fakes video. They are done in bad faith.
In some of your news organization have been very clear
have stressed that these right wing, the white wing critics
of the president have a credibility problem because of the
(10:46):
fact checkers have repeatedly caught them pushing misinformation, disinformation.
Speaker 1 (10:55):
Evil evil people run the country and evil people in
the media trying to work on behalf of the regime.
How evil is that? Did you see Nicole Wallace? This
freaking woman.
Speaker 6 (11:08):
There's a growing and insidious trend in right wing media, broadcast, print,
and social media. It is to take highly misleading and
selectively edited videos of President Biden directly from Republican National
Committee social media accounts and then use those videos to
spread messages virally to cast out on President Biden's fitness
(11:30):
for office.
Speaker 1 (11:33):
These people really are evil. They're not wrong, they're not misguided.
We are led by people enriching themselves and destroying our
country on purpose. And sometimes it's a lot to take in,
isn't it all? That may have made you uncomfortable? But
I am right. We have the Attorney General of Kansas.
(11:57):
He's going to join us next There is something out there.
I'm not trying to get my hopes up, but there
are some Republican ags who are starting to step up
across the country. They're starting to develop teeth when it
comes to dealing with these evil organizations. That when it
comes to dealing with the evil left, and that is
a very good thing. We are going to need teeth,
(12:17):
and I love that some of these people have it
before we get to him, though, Let's get to your coffee.
Speaker 2 (12:23):
Where do you get your coffee from? Who brings you
your coffee?
Speaker 1 (12:27):
You see, as far as industries go, coffee might be
the worst of them when it comes to all this
left wing crap.
Speaker 2 (12:37):
I don't know what it is.
Speaker 1 (12:38):
Maybe there's something in the water, but these coffee companies,
they're all left Ekomi filth except for Blackout Coffee. Blackout
Coffee doesn't do that. They are exactly the opposite. They
have a million different flavors. If you're a flavored coffee person,
they deliver it to your front door, and they share
and promote our values.
Speaker 2 (12:58):
Put your money where your morals are.
Speaker 1 (13:02):
We have to be purposeful about putting our money where
our morals are.
Speaker 2 (13:05):
They'll deliver it to your front door.
Speaker 1 (13:08):
Go to Blackoutcoffee dot com slash jesse.
Speaker 2 (13:11):
That gets you twenty percent off your first order. So
make your first order a.
Speaker 1 (13:15):
Fatty Blackoutcoffee dot com slash jesse.
Speaker 2 (13:20):
We'll be back.
Speaker 1 (13:29):
Republican Attorney General's Attorneys General.
Speaker 2 (13:32):
I hate that. That's how you say that.
Speaker 1 (13:33):
Either way, they're starting to really really step up in
major ways now that we have some decent ones in
this country.
Speaker 2 (13:39):
Pfiser.
Speaker 1 (13:40):
Remember all those Pfizer ads used to see all over television.
There was a lot of crap in those ads, a
lot of well whys for lack of a better way
to put it, And Kansas's age is all over these
guys like white An Rice joining me now, Chris Kovak,
the Attorney General of the great State of Kansas. Okay,
mister Attorney General, what do you do in the piser
(14:01):
for all the thirty lies they told?
Speaker 7 (14:04):
Well, we have brought a civil lawsuit under our Kansas
Consumer Protection Act seeking monetary penalties and damages and junk
of relief for misleading, making deceptive and misleading statements in
advertising and promoting their COVID nineteen vaccine. And we filed
(14:24):
that base on Monday, and the ball is rolling out.
It's a sixty nine page complaint and we alleging great
detail of various instances in which Weser made statements that
were contrary to information they had at the time. You know,
just to give you two examples. One is with respect
(14:47):
to pregnancy. Weiser advertised It's the vaccine and promoted its
vaccine as being safe for people who are pregnant. But
as early as October of twenty twenty, they were assession
of information from their own study done on rats rats
of course that showed them skill birds and other complications
(15:09):
litter debts resulting from the vaccine. And then a few
months later in February twenty twenty one, they had information
they study with over four hundred pregnant women and in
that study the majority of women had some medical complication
relating to their pregnancy right after the COVID vaccine.
Speaker 8 (15:32):
So that's one example. And then the other one is
that myocardi of course is a heart condition.
Speaker 7 (15:38):
The CEO of Pfiser was asked if there's any connection
between the Pfizer vaccine and that is he said, no,
there are no safety signals signals the term of art
they used. But in fact, the Pfiser was aware of
multiple studies that had indicated in multiple data sets that
had indicated there was a connection between the vaccine and
(16:01):
my charnizis. So those are just a couple of examples.
It's pretty clear that they said things publicly that were
not consistent with what they knew product.
Speaker 1 (16:13):
Yeah, and I'm glad you're focusing on that part of
it as well, not that you need any help doing
your job. The fact that they knew, because there's a
lot of revision as history today, we didn't know, nobody knew.
We didn't know Pizer had this information and lied, didn't
they Well.
Speaker 7 (16:31):
They had this information, and they said things that were
misleading and did not you know, were clearly contradictory to
the information they had. And let's put this back, and
let's let's go back in time and remember, so some
people were taking the vaccine, forced to take a vaccine
because they were under duress, their employer was forcing them
(16:51):
issues in their job and taking a vaccine, and maybe
they were given a.
Speaker 8 (16:54):
Deadline to take your vaccine by such and such a date.
Speaker 7 (16:57):
Other individuals elected to take the vaccine voluntarily, but they
also felt some anxiety and they felt that maybe there
their health was at risk if they didn't do it.
And so people were making a decision quickly, and they
were making a decision in some instances under duress. And
when they make that decision, they had to choose which
(17:19):
vaccine to pay. And in making that choice, it is
essential that American consumers are presented with the truth and
with all medical evidence that is out there so that
they can make that choice on an informed basis, and
that's really what we're getting in here with our Consumer
Protection Act charges against Advisor. They acted in a way
(17:40):
that was deceptive when Americans in Kansas in particular, were
making that choice about whether to take the vaccine, and
so which vaccine to take.
Speaker 8 (17:49):
Everybody knows that whenever a pharmaceutical product.
Speaker 7 (17:52):
Is advertised on radio or TV, there is a long
list of disclaimers, and that's part of how our system works.
So you inform the consumer with the risk might be.
In this case, as we allege, Wiser not only didn't
inform of risks, they stated that the risks were not there,
when in fact they did that the risks were.
Speaker 2 (18:13):
Gosh, that's freaking evil.
Speaker 1 (18:15):
Your suit goes into the censorship of dissenting opinions too,
doesn't it.
Speaker 5 (18:21):
Yeah.
Speaker 7 (18:21):
Biser also took we allegendacy Advisor to success to stop
or suppress.
Speaker 8 (18:29):
Opinions contrary to.
Speaker 7 (18:30):
What they were saying copy on on social media platforms.
Speaker 1 (18:37):
Let's talk about some other things you're doing, which I love,
standing up standing in between a federal government that has
lost its mind in the people of your great state.
Tell me about the ATF in you.
Speaker 7 (18:50):
Yeah, so, Kansas has a monster lawsuit against the ATF.
Many people may not be aware, but the ATF recently
passed a regulation or promulgated to regulate that basically says
that when one individual sells a firearm to another individual
just out of their personal elections, not dealers dealing with dealers,
(19:12):
if you make any profit, even one dollar, you will
be deemed to be a dealer engaged in the business
of dealing firearms, and you therefore have to get an
NFL that o't firearms devicens and you have to run
a background Yet, well, that's not the way the law
has been in.
Speaker 8 (19:29):
Americans for decades.
Speaker 7 (19:31):
For more than a decade, centuries have been selling firearms
to one another, trading firearms, and that can also be
considered a sale of firearms traded for another end. One
is slightly more valuable than the other, than the potentially
one person.
Speaker 8 (19:44):
Has made a profit.
Speaker 7 (19:45):
So again, this is if this rule stayed in place,
it's going to effectively make it very difficult, if not
in some cases impossible, or friends, in some cases families
to versas firearms from one another. And the reason they're
doing this is pretty transparent. They're trying to do what
they could not accomplish cloth begun shoe loophole, which they
(20:10):
refer to it for productorial past, and so they're going
to try to do it for a regulation and we
are suing and we expect that we will prevail.
Speaker 1 (20:18):
Good, good, Okay, finally to wrap this whole thing up,
Biden's student loan handown.
Speaker 2 (20:23):
It's amazing.
Speaker 1 (20:24):
We live in a country where the president now just
gives speeches talking about how the Supreme Court tried to
stop me, but I didn't let them.
Speaker 2 (20:31):
I don't think that's how it works. Edw what are
you doing with all this?
Speaker 7 (20:36):
Yeah, so we have have wants to a lawsuit, which
is we're waiting a decision on a culminary junction right now.
We have filed with a group of other states a
suit saying that look, Iden lost in the Supreme Court
in twenty twenty three with his first round of student
handout sort of cancellations, and now he's brought another one
(20:57):
and he's it's basically the same thing over again, just
with excusing slightly different provision of statutes. By administration's assess
was saying, well, okay, we lost when.
Speaker 8 (21:05):
We cited this statue for provision. Howbout if we cite
this other one over.
Speaker 7 (21:08):
Here and attempt to cancel student loans in an extraordinary
way billions of dollars, and uh, you know, we intend
to prevail the court.
Speaker 8 (21:18):
Again.
Speaker 7 (21:18):
Only Congress has the authority to forgive or cancel loans.
And let's not forget that when alone is canceled or forgive.
Speaker 8 (21:26):
It, it's not like it just comes out of.
Speaker 7 (21:28):
Thin air and it just goes away. No, that the
debt is transferred from the student borrower to the taxpayer.
And so there's a there's a in addition to the
legal reasons why this is a big deal, and it's
there's just a policy reason why in the world wo
we do that? Why would we transfer debt from people
(21:50):
who've gotten expensive graduate degrees or whatever and take it
out big loans to people who didn't go to college,
or to people who paid their own way through comes,
or people who work their way through college.
Speaker 8 (22:01):
It makes no sense that it's unfair. And be hope
prevailing on that issues.
Speaker 2 (22:07):
Yeah, I hope you do too, mister Attorney General.
Speaker 1 (22:09):
Thank you so much. Please keep at the mine. I
love seeing that. That's awesome. We have some good ages
now I dig it, and we haven't had many in
the past. We have some good wins. Now, you know
what else is good? Loan Star Transfer is good. Do
you know that Lone Star Transfer. They're the company that
saves you from that time share You can't seem to
get off your back. That time share you want out of,
(22:32):
but you can't. You sign the contract. They told you
your trapped for life. You're paying the annual fees. You're
trying to cut costs, and you one out. Well, stop
calling the timeshare company and start calling Loan Star Transfer.
They will set you free. Loan Star Transfer. This is
the family business. They have an A plus rating from
(22:53):
the Better Business.
Speaker 2 (22:54):
Bureau for a reason.
Speaker 1 (22:56):
They are ninety nine percent successful and not making that
ninety nine percent successful getting people out of their time
share free.
Speaker 2 (23:04):
You ready to be free?
Speaker 1 (23:05):
Call eight four four three one zero two six four
to six.
Speaker 2 (23:11):
We'll be better.
Speaker 1 (23:20):
There's all these smart legal things that happen, and I
don't have any idea what's going on because I'm stupid
and uneducated. I've been told that the Supreme Court has
some big, fatty opinions coming down. What exactly is coming
this Thursday or Friday? I don't freaking know, but I
bet Katie does. Joining me now, Katie Turkowski, she is
a former federal prosecutor and she wrote a book on
(23:41):
woke Warriors, How these dirty comedies are taken over everything.
Speaker 2 (23:45):
I highly highly recommend it. Okay, Katie? What does this mean?
We have opinions coming down? What's happening. It's a big day.
Speaker 9 (23:53):
It's going to be a big day at the Supreme
Court because this is the last day before the election
that the Court is scheduled to release opinion. And there's
two big cases relating to President Trump that everybody's waiting on,
and one of those is the immunity case, and that
is the big question about whether a president has immunity
and to what extent they have immunity for acts that
(24:15):
they commit while they're in office. And it's actually very
complicated legal question. But that opinion will impact the rest
of President Trump's pending criminal cases. But not only that,
I think it could also impact even the New York
conviction that came down, So there's an of course, of course,
(24:35):
beyond President Trump, it will impact the entire country forever.
So it's a significant moment that we're all anticipating.
Speaker 2 (24:43):
With that opinion.
Speaker 9 (24:44):
And then there's another opinion related to one of the
criminal statutes that was used against many of the January
sixth individuals and that people were convicted under that the
Supreme Court is looking at to determine whether it is
actually a proper t charge that should have been brought
against those people or whether their conduct didn't even fall.
Speaker 2 (25:05):
Within that charge.
Speaker 9 (25:06):
And so that's also important because that same charge is
something that President Trump is charged with in the January
sixth case. So it is absolutely a big day, especially
for President Trump, but really for the country generally speaking.
Speaker 1 (25:20):
Yeah, no doubt about it. Okay, I'm not asking I'm
not going to hold you to this. I'm not asking
you to be an oracle here, but do we have
some idea of which way they might go? Just from
the lay person's view, I have a hard time believing
the Supreme Court is going to give some blanket immunity ruling.
But at the same time, a lot of these prosecutions
are ridiculous.
Speaker 2 (25:40):
What say you?
Speaker 9 (25:41):
Well, actually, I've been writing about this for a long time,
and last summer I wrote an article for The Hill
saying that the president should have full immunity unless they
were actually impeached and convicted by the Senate, And there's
a whole long explanation legally as to why I think
that's the correct outcome here. But I agree with you
that that that the court probably won't go so far
(26:02):
as to say that anything a president does while in
office is immune from criminal prosecution. But based upon the
Justice's questions during the oral arguments, it seemed pretty clear
that they were open to some degree of immunity. And
the question is exactly how they define that. And I
think what they're going to find as they were going
(26:22):
through this process of making a decision is that when
you start talking about the president, which is obviously one
person that is an entire branch of government unto themselves,
how do you start to parse apart when they're on
the job or off the job, and how do you
hold them accountable for things when supposedly they can't be
prosecuted while they're in office. So you wait around. They
(26:44):
are the head of the DOJ, they are the head
of law enforcement in this country, and you start getting
into a lot of hypotheticals about what if the president
did this, and some people disagree with that or it
turned out to be a negligent decision. Could that lead
to a prosecution, And essentially what happens is that you'll
see that. But really anything could potentially be twisted into
a criminal allegation, especially by an opposing political party when
(27:06):
somebody leaves office. So I know that wasn't a direct prediction,
but I think that the Court will have to go
pretty far to say that a president is probably immune
in many circumstances from prosecution for acts that they undertake
while in office, and whether there are some exceptions to that.
I think that's the big question here.
Speaker 1 (27:26):
Let's talk more specifically about the New York trial really
quickly before we switch gears to the President's dirtball son.
Speaker 2 (27:33):
Assuming the Supreme Court does.
Speaker 1 (27:34):
Not give Donald Trump blanket immunity for these ridiculous charges
in New York, we're not expecting Donald Trump to go
to state prison in New York, right.
Speaker 9 (27:46):
Well, of course, as everyone's been discussing, now that President
Trump's been convicted, he does theoretically face jail time, and
the decision about that is left solely up to the
trial judge, Judge Morton, who of course has been very
unfair and many people have noted has been very unconstitutional in.
Speaker 2 (28:03):
A lot of his rulings.
Speaker 9 (28:04):
So the idea of whether he could sentence Trump to
jail is the real possibility, But whether he actually serves
that time as another question. Because even if he gets
sentenced to jail, which is possible although it shouldn't happen,
the appeal of that case, just the normal appeal would
normally essentially pause the execution of the sentence while the
appeals are pending. So what that means is that the
(28:25):
appeals take a long time. Sometimes it takes even years
to complete appeals on these type criminal cases, and that
the appellate court can essentially pause the jail sentence while
the appeals are still being decided. Even aside from the
immunity issue, but I think personally that if the court
says that there is some sort of immunity for acts
(28:46):
committed while in office, that would impact the New York case,
because at the end of the day, even though the
New York Case talked a lot about these affairs with
Stormy Daniels back in the day and all these things
that happened many many years ago, the charm defenses the
actual payments and the bookkeeping that were at the heart
of the charge defenses. All of that occurred after President
(29:07):
Trump was in office, and so at the very least,
I think that that could result in the case being
sent back down for a factual analysis about whether or
not it falls on one side of the immunity line.
So I think the immunity case could absolutely pause the
sentencing there as well. But even without that, even if
the court says that somehow that New York case is
(29:29):
not applicable, the regular appellate process will pause any sort
of jail sentence for the foreseeable future.
Speaker 2 (29:37):
More than likely, Katie, talk to.
Speaker 1 (29:41):
Me about what you found inside of the United States military.
This is something that's near and dear to my heart.
To everyone who watches this show.
Speaker 2 (29:48):
We talk a lot about the rot.
Speaker 1 (29:50):
That's taking place within it. Most people from the outside
can't see it. You wrote a book on it. What
did you find?
Speaker 2 (29:57):
Yeah, I did so.
Speaker 9 (29:58):
I was in the Air Force JAG many moons ago,
but even since I left the service back in two
thousand and thirteen or so, I've been working with military
members daily. I run a military law practice where I
represent military members who are facing criminal or derogatory actions.
Speaker 2 (30:13):
And so because I'm.
Speaker 9 (30:14):
So deeply embedded in the legal system, in the military's
legal system. I have seen directly how these liberal and
wolf policies have been infiltrated on the Department of Defense.
And we could go down the line and talk about
everything from the DEI policies, the way that they handle
allegations of sexual assault, the way that they handle even
(30:35):
just the COVID pandemic situation that came down, the clamp
down on free speech, all of the LGBTQ situation that
they've kind of ushered into the Department of Defense, all
of these things. I mean, the book is obviously inclusive
of all these topics, but when you're not really intimately
familiar with the military, you might not understand how political
(30:57):
it really is. And because of the leadership at the
way House and at the Pentagon, which are you know,
all political appointees, the Department of Defense is just completely woke.
It's completely, in my opinion, probably wasting so much of
its time on all these policies and investigations that they
there's no way to tell that they're actually operationally ready
for any sort of conflict. It's just practical when you're
(31:20):
spending that much time on these matters. There's no way
that you're putting the time into training that should be required.
Speaker 1 (31:26):
God the book Woke Warriors, go pick it up. Katie Tchurukawski,
thank you so much for coming on.
Speaker 2 (31:33):
Talking to us for a little bit today. All Right, there's.
Speaker 1 (31:38):
Something we have not forgotten about and we will not
forget about. January sixth, the event the communists have used
to lock up over a thousand of their political opponents.
My friend Nick sirously did a movie on the whole thing.
He's got a whole lot to say. There are innocent
people already rotting in prison because of these dirty communists.
(32:00):
We're gonna talk to Nick, And just the moment before
we talk to Nick, let me talk to you about
your cell phone. We all have them. And here's the
thing about your cell phone. You pay the bill automatically,
don't you? Everyone does you put in your credit card
online and they just there is a payment every single month.
Do you make an automatic payment to Commis every month?
Speaker 8 (32:22):
You know?
Speaker 1 (32:22):
The Verizon is a terrible company right at and T
T Mobile? These are soulless, evil, leftist monster companies. Are
you paying them? I'm not paying them. I have paid
them I've had all three of those before. T Mobile
was the one we switched from. We switch to pure Talk.
I pay half of what I used to pay. Pure
(32:42):
Talk CEO is a veteran thought for this country, loves
this country, shares our values. So you can keep your phone,
keep your numbers, saved money, and pay a company that
actually agrees with you. Puretalk dot Com slash jessetv is.
Speaker 2 (32:58):
Where you go do it, So go do it. We'll
be back. It's not protesting, it's insurrection.
Speaker 4 (33:13):
When I said how many agents or assets of the
government were present on January fifth and January sixth and
agitating in the crowd to go into the capitol, and
how many went into the capitol, can you answer that now?
I don't know the answer to that question.
Speaker 2 (33:26):
You don't know how many there were or there were none.
Speaker 10 (33:28):
I don't know the answer to either of those questions.
Speaker 4 (33:30):
I think you may have just perjured yourself that you
don't know that there were any.
Speaker 6 (33:41):
Most Pops and the f start to leave.
Speaker 3 (33:44):
He's got four people in front of him and four
people behind him, and they literally get him the hell
out of there.
Speaker 5 (33:48):
Based on your investigation so far, do you have any
evidence that the Capital of Tech.
Speaker 10 (33:53):
Was organized by quote fake Trump protesters.
Speaker 2 (33:56):
We have not seen evidence so that. Yeah, I was
in the front.
Speaker 10 (34:01):
I also orchestrated.
Speaker 1 (34:03):
In pretty interesting, pretty ominous. Actually, I gotta stop watching
Nick's movies. Every time I do, I just realize what
kind of a.
Speaker 2 (34:15):
Banana republic we live in. Joining me now, my friend.
Speaker 1 (34:19):
Actor, producer, author. I hate these guys who do everything good.
Speaker 2 (34:25):
Nick.
Speaker 1 (34:25):
Seriously, he's the author of the new book, by the way,
justify this, which we will get to in.
Speaker 2 (34:30):
A little while.
Speaker 1 (34:30):
Nick, do you think you're better than me because you
have all these talents?
Speaker 10 (34:34):
No, I'm kind of the same. I mean, we're both
literally authors. Now, I've literally written about Oh.
Speaker 2 (34:40):
Oh, why did you? Why do you have to torment me?
Speaker 11 (34:43):
Nick?
Speaker 2 (34:43):
I'm not even I'm not gonna let you bake me.
I'm not gonna let you better. All right, honestly, let's
talk about the war. What's that. We're literary giants, both of.
Speaker 1 (34:53):
Us, well, obviously, yes, the world famous authors of course.
Speaker 2 (34:57):
Okay, war on truth.
Speaker 1 (35:00):
You keep making these documentaries exposing these people, and every single.
Speaker 2 (35:05):
Time I watched one, I'm just floored. Nick. Do you
think the FEDS did January sixth. Did they plan and
coordinate it? There's no question. Yeah, not in my mind.
Speaker 10 (35:16):
I mean, after all the people we talked to, all
the people that have given eyewitness testimony of what they
saw that day, there is no question. And to me,
the biggest factor in proving that is that what was
going on inside the House and Senate that day was
exactly what the people who went to Washington, like me, wanted.
Speaker 2 (35:35):
To have happened.
Speaker 10 (35:36):
The only people that wanted that procedure stopped were the Democrats,
who wanted to stop them from sending the election back
to the States to be certified. So they had to
stage this insurrection nonsense in order to stop the House
and Senate from doing its constitutional duty.
Speaker 1 (35:55):
A lot of people forget that, and people don't seem
to understand how many lives have already been ruined, destroyed
over this.
Speaker 2 (36:03):
Whole thing that. I mean.
Speaker 1 (36:05):
I realized, the big band gets all the publicity, convicted
in New York and whatnot, but all those normal people
matter too, and they've been riding in jail because of
all this, haven't they.
Speaker 10 (36:15):
Yes, And that's really the biggest part of the war
on truth. The trailer doesn't really show you what I
think is the most important part of the film, which
is telling these people's stories. These people have had their
lives completely ruined by the lives of people like Liz
Cheney and the January sixth Committee, because they have to
advance this narrative. They have to keep this going that
(36:37):
this was the most dangerous insurrection that ever happened in
the country after the Civil War. And these people are
just normal, decent people that you would trust with your
pets or your children while you were out of town,
and they're being treated like their you know, domestic terrorists
and really just having their lives destroyed. And so that's
(37:00):
that's the bulk of the film is trying to show
you who these people are that they are talking that
they are calling domestic terrorists.
Speaker 1 (37:09):
They've gone a long ways to try to paint the
right as domestic terrorists, and of course they've justified every
time someone on the right gets hurt. What'd you find
out about Ashley Babbitt.
Speaker 10 (37:23):
Well, in the film, we talked to Taylor Hansen, who
was an eyewitness to what happened to Ashley Babbitt. And
what you see in our movie that you really haven't
seen anywhere else. Very especially not on the mainstream media,
is that Ashley Babbitt was in that hallway trying to
stop the people who were breaking the windows, who were
trying to break the door down, and the people that
(37:43):
she stopped were actually Antifa people like Zachary Alum. And
so when she was pulling people back saying stop, she
was talking to the police officers in there saying you
need more backup. And then she was shocked. She jumped
in the window and was killed without a word of warning, nothing.
(38:03):
And Taylor Hanson was ranked there and tells the story.
And the other part of that is that Taylor Hanson
repeatedly told the January sixth Committee that he was an eyewitness,
that he had video that he was there, and they
never they never questioned it. There's not one word about
Ashley Babbitt and the January sixth Committee's report, not one
(38:23):
word about Roseanne Boylin of the January sixth Committee's report.
Speaker 2 (38:27):
They're covering it up.
Speaker 1 (38:30):
How funny that is that Nancy Pelosi video was making
the rounds last week before anyone forgets about it.
Speaker 11 (38:37):
Here it was we have responsibility, Terry. We did not
have any accountability for what was going on there.
Speaker 1 (38:46):
And we should have.
Speaker 11 (38:48):
This is ridiculous. You're going to ask me in the
middle of the thing, when they've already breached the innaugural stuff,
that us should we call the Capitol police, I mean
the National Guard? Why weren't the National Guard there to
begin with? They thought that they had sufficient Well, there's
(39:10):
not a question of how they they don't know. They
clearly didn't know, and I take responsibility for not having
them just prepare for more.
Speaker 10 (39:22):
Nick, what do you make of all that she's such
a terrible actress? To me, that whole thing was staged
to make it look like she just found out that
the National Guard was not called. She knew that they
weren't called because she stopped them from being called. That
whole thing is just that's her trying to get away
with her culpability in the whole day, and she's she's
(39:44):
a really bad actress. But of course she's convincing the
Democrats because they they're used to really bad acting.
Speaker 1 (39:53):
Nick, do you think I could have been a movie star.
I've always felt that I would be a huge movie star,
be a.
Speaker 2 (40:00):
Really tall one. Yes, you would be really huge.
Speaker 10 (40:03):
I think I think, Look, you could look at it
this way, if I could do it, you could probably
do it.
Speaker 2 (40:10):
You know you just hey, nigga.
Speaker 1 (40:15):
Trump's to get a debate Biden next week. He's going
to be asked about January sixth. He's going to be
asked about the January sixth political prisoners.
Speaker 2 (40:24):
What should he say? What should he do?
Speaker 10 (40:28):
He should say straight out that he's going to pardon them,
and he should say straight out that these people were
set up and that they should not continue to get
away with the lie that they have perpetrated about January sixth,
because that's what it is. They have built this narrative.
They have lied about these people. Trump said a long
(40:48):
time ago, he said, it's not just me thereafter, I'm
just in the way. They're really after all of you.
And what they're doing to the January sixth people is
meant not only to punish them for going to Washington
on January sixth. It's meant to intimidate the rest of America.
It's meant to say to everyone, don't ever protest anything
we ever do again, or this is what's going to
(41:11):
happen to you. They're trying to show everybody that they're
in charge and they shouldn't be challenged, and Trump has
to counteract that.
Speaker 2 (41:19):
Right, Nick, tell us about this book, justify this?
Speaker 10 (41:24):
Well, it's like I said before, Jesse, it's literally a
book about my life. I know how you like that word,
but it's really it's not necessarily a political book.
Speaker 2 (41:37):
You know.
Speaker 10 (41:37):
It's really a book about how, you know, a guy
like me from North Carolina who didn't know any actors
and you know, came up and was able to make
a living as an actor. And it also has chapters
in there about my professional wrestling career and my stand
up comedy career, a lot.
Speaker 2 (41:55):
Of things that people don't know about.
Speaker 1 (42:00):
That's just the least surprising thing in the world that
you were in professional wrestling. That is just anyway, the
book is justify this, Nick.
Speaker 2 (42:08):
Well, I mistakes sooner, my brother.
Speaker 1 (42:10):
All right, it's time to lighten the mood. Well, it's
annoying as we go into light in the mood, it's annoying.
I find it annoying that everybody has a month or
a day now right today it's midget month, it's green
(42:30):
people months.
Speaker 2 (42:31):
This month, it's that month, it's.
Speaker 1 (42:33):
Left handed people month, like anyone needs to celebrate those freaks.
Speaker 2 (42:37):
But today is a day.
Speaker 1 (42:39):
It's a day that we all should celebrate, you, me, everybody.
Speaker 2 (42:45):
It's National Jesse Day.
Speaker 1 (42:46):
Did you know that this is a day where we
celebrate people named Jesse? Did you know that Jesse means
God's gift? Pretty appropriate if you ask me. In Hebrew
it means king. Honestly, Just how accurate is all this?
I am a I'm not a wealth of knowledge on
(43:08):
all the Jesse's out there. I mainly just focus on me.
How many Jessees do you know? Wrote a national best
selling book called The Anti Communist Manifesto, which can be
purchased at Jesse kellybook dot com. I believe there's only one,
and I think that's me. How many Jesses do you know?
Have the greatest burger recipe in history? A burger recipe
(43:29):
that is so good. I'm not making this up. It's
actually in the book. I just covered that up so
you couldn't read it in time. You have to buy
the book to get it. My burger recipe is in
the book.
Speaker 2 (43:40):
I'm just kidding. You can find it for free online anywhere.
But this is a day.
Speaker 1 (43:45):
It's about me, So celebrate me tonight with friends and family.
Speaker 2 (43:51):
I'll see them
Host
Jesse Kelly
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.