All Episodes

September 5, 2024 45 mins

(Full Show) Hunter Biden shocked the world on the first day of his tax trial by entering an interesting plea into the system. Will he go to prison? Jesse Kelly thinks the fix is in from the system. This comes as the DOJ alleges a conservative media outlet was in bed with Russia. Jesse gives his thoughts on that as well with reaction from Vince Coglianese. Plus, Officer Brandon Tatum joins the show to break down the crisis of illegal alien crime in Arizona and around the world. 

I'm Right with Jesse Kelly | 9-5-24

Follow The Jesse Kelly Show on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheJesseKellyShow

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
Hunter Biden's guilty plea another left wing op illegal immigration crime.

Speaker 2 (00:08):
We have so much for you, I don't know how
we're going to fit it all in.

Speaker 1 (00:10):
When I'm right, Hunter Biden's guilty, I mean, we knew that,
but the news of the day today is Hunter Biden
is pleading guilty. I'm not going to get into all

(00:32):
the stupid legal terms, but here's what you need to
understand about the guilty plea. He's saying the charges are
overwhelming and I'm going to be convicted, but I'm not
admitting guilt. But all that's really water under the bridge.
He is going to get a sentence. He is going
to get a sentence. They're going to decide exactly how

(00:53):
long his prison term.

Speaker 2 (00:55):
Is going to be. And you probably remember how many.

Speaker 1 (01:00):
Times Joe Biden and his people went out and made
public statements. Joe Biden said this himself, but this is
Grenniversity Hires saying I'm not going to pardon him.

Speaker 3 (01:12):
You've said for the podium that President Biden would not
pardon his son.

Speaker 4 (01:15):
If Vice President Harris is elected, would he telper also
to not parnest.

Speaker 5 (01:20):
I mean that's a hypothetical that I look the President.

Speaker 3 (01:23):
I could speak for the President, and he said he
would not pardon his son. And I'm just going to
leave it there.

Speaker 1 (01:32):
Okay, let's first, let's get past all the kid game
stuff here. Joe Biden's going to pardon Hunter Biden. Almost undoubtedly,
this was a deal that has been in the works
since they were trying to.

Speaker 2 (01:49):
Shove Joe Biden out of the race.

Speaker 1 (01:52):
Remember how Joe Biden was digging in his heels and
they kept sending every Democrat under the sun to the
White House to threaten him, beg him to out of
the race.

Speaker 2 (02:01):
Pelosi, Schumer, Chris Koons. They just had him lined up
at the door trying to Joe please leave.

Speaker 1 (02:07):
Did you think political operator has experienced as Joe Biden
wasn't going to get some things on the back end
of that deal. Of course, he was going to get
some things. You know how this works. I know how
this works. All this stuff. We all woke up today
we saw the news, whoa Hunter Biden? But they've already

(02:27):
known all these things. All this was part of the plan.
So how does this work from here? Most likely this
is just a prediction. They have to go through the
sentencing stuff and then Dome will have to complete her
election because Democrats will understand that it'll look bad if
Joe pardons his dirtball son before the election, that might

(02:51):
cause a little dip in the polls, so they won't
do it before the election. And then you're gonna wake
up the Wednesday morning after election day and Joe Biden
of course going to pardon his son, commute his sentence.

Speaker 2 (03:03):
Whatever way you want to put it.

Speaker 1 (03:05):
Hunter, Biden is never going to see a single day
in federal lock up the way you or I would.
That's how all of this stuff works. And know, these
people don't worry about keeping their word. Well, he said
he wouldn't. Joe Biden has said that he's Polish. He
said that he fought off a gang of black dudes
at a pool with straight razors. Joe Biden has said

(03:27):
that he taught the Second Amendment in college. Joe Biden
has told huge, easily verifiable lies his entire career. And
now that he's on the shady side of dead, sunning
himself on the beach with his mouth hanging open, do
you think he's going to turn into some bold truth teller.

Speaker 2 (03:45):
Of course, he's going to let his son go. Of course,
this is all part of the deal.

Speaker 1 (03:49):
And remember this is the exact same dirty d o
jan who tried to get Hunter Biden off on charges
scott free. They had already put together the deal not
only to get him out of the charges, but to
give him pretty much immunity from any other future crimes
that they knew were coming. And the only reason that

(04:10):
deal didn't go through is there was a judge in
Delaware who was looking at it and saying, wait a minute,
what is no this is crazy, and the judge would
have stopped to it. They already tried to let him
off scot free. Lausa for the littles, laser for me,
for you. These people don't have laws. So let's talk

(04:31):
about that, DJ, shall we. Because there is something that
frustrates me to no end. I've seen it happen so
many times, and every time it happens.

Speaker 2 (04:45):
If you ever seen one of those.

Speaker 1 (04:46):
Cartoons or movies where the guy just bashing himself in
the head out of frustration, you've ever seen that scene before,
this is what happens to me every time I see this.
The Left will never, ever, ever, ever, under any circumstances,
participate in a right wing op.

Speaker 2 (05:06):
What's an op? Well, Walls, Tim Walls. It's a good example.

Speaker 1 (05:10):
Remember when he got in the race and it turned
out he's a stolen, stolen valor cowardly dirt ball.

Speaker 2 (05:17):
Let me ask you a question, really honest question.

Speaker 1 (05:19):
Did you see a single Democrat elected Democrat or left
wing dirty commie pundit on any channel radio anywhere? Did
you see a single left winger pile on? Tim Walls one?
Did you see one? All I'm asking for is one?
Did you see a single one? Of course you didn't, No,

(05:40):
you didn't. Well, yesterday, the big news of the day,
it happened last night was the DOJ slash FBI brought
down charges alleging, of course, Russian collusion, Russian payoff. And
there's a bunch of right wing pundits who are being
wrapped up in the whole thing, not necessarily accused of things.

(06:01):
Some of them are, some of them aren't. Here was
Christopher Ray and Merrit Garland yesterday.

Speaker 6 (06:08):
The American people are entitled to know when a foreign
power is attempting to exploit our country's free exchange of
ideas in order to send around to its own propaganda.
And that is what we alleged cappen in.

Speaker 7 (06:20):
This case, whether it's China, Iran, Russia or any other
country attempts to meddle in our elections or destabilize our
free and open society represent attacks on our democracy. And
as long as foreign addressaries keep engaging in these hostile
influence campaigns, are going to keep running into the FBI.

Speaker 1 (06:45):
Yeah, just some brave truth tellers there, and so it's
not Christopher Ray and Merrit Garland doing what they do
that has me frustrated. For the last twenty four hours,
I have seen, I don't want to say half, maybe
that's unfair, a significant portion of right wing pundits, TV

(07:07):
radio people, online, people.

Speaker 2 (07:11):
For a laundry list of reasons jump in and.

Speaker 1 (07:14):
Say, yep, I always knew these people were dirty figures.

Speaker 2 (07:18):
That's a dirt ball works for Russia. I knew it.
Are you stupid or are you just jealous?

Speaker 1 (07:32):
Are you corrupt? I really want to know. This is
so obviously a left wing op. This is an op.
This is an operation done by the very very corrupt
people at the DOJ and FBI. This is an operation
that happens to drop right about the time early voting

(07:54):
begins for the presidency, and right about the time the
left is going to ramp up its Russian collusion narrative
against the right, the DOJ FBI happens to bring down
a major public indictment on pundance on the right. And
if you're on the right and you participate in this,

(08:14):
you are a boot licking, backstabbing loser, or you are
a moron. Can you not see what is happening in
front of your eyes? And look, I want to be clear,
I have no idea about the validity of these charges none,
But after what you have seen and what I have
seen over the past few years, the default position for

(08:37):
any patriotic American citizen is theoj's lying, FBI's lying.

Speaker 2 (08:43):
These people.

Speaker 1 (08:44):
Remember remember this, Remember Merrick Garland. He said this yesterday
in the same press conference.

Speaker 3 (08:49):
Tomorrow is the first hearing in the January sixth case
against the former president since the superseding indictment against him.
He's called these new charges is election interference and a
violation of the Justice warming policy against doing something too
close to the election.

Speaker 5 (09:07):
How do you respond to that?

Speaker 3 (09:09):
And how confident are you that your team has followed
instructions from the Supreme Court following that decision the summer.

Speaker 8 (09:16):
I stand by the actions of the Special Council. The
superseding indictment is an effort to respond to the direct
instructions of the Supreme Court as to how to effectuate
a new indictment in an ongoing case. The Special Council
is required by the regulations.

Speaker 2 (09:33):
To follow the policies of the.

Speaker 8 (09:34):
Justice Department, including the election sensitivities policies, and I'm quite
confident that he did so.

Speaker 1 (09:43):
In the same press conference, Merrick Garland defends illegal Jack
Smith in his illegal prosecution of their political opponent two
months before election day, and yet the pundits on our
side are so full of jealousy. Maybe it's a jealousy thing.

(10:06):
I wish I had that person's audience. I wish I
had that person paycheck. I don't know what it is,
but watching the right gleefully participate in left wing op
after left wing op, it's enough to make me bang
my head off the desk. I can't believe it. Is
it just I have this theory. Do you think that

(10:30):
people who get to do what we do for a living, TV, radio,
whatever it is, do you think a lot of the
people don't really believe. That's my suspect. That's my suspicion.
I think a lot of these people don't really believe
in freedom. They don't really believe the government's evil. They
don't really believe the institutions have been taken over. They
know that that's what you believe, so and what I believe.

(10:52):
So that's what they say to us, But they don't
really believe it. And so the second the DOJ comes
down with charges, whether they're valid or not, they're just
gonna say, I with the DOJ as long as it's
against somebody that happen or not. Like, that's what I suspect.
I suspect. We have a lot of pretenders on our side.
Something to watch man. I mean, Christopher Ray, the head
of the FBI. It's not as if he's hiding it.

(11:13):
He's still on camera bragging about or rounding up his
political opponents.

Speaker 9 (11:18):
Let me ask you about January sixth. Are you still
pursuing January sixth cases?

Speaker 10 (11:23):
We have sort of any number of January sixth cases underway.

Speaker 9 (11:27):
Former President Trump has referred to those who have been
imprison or facing trial as hostages. Do you see those
individuals who took part in the January sixth ryots as hostages.

Speaker 10 (11:39):
I see the defendants in the January sixth cases as
criminal defendants who are being charged with federal crimes and
are in front of independent courts as part of our
legal system.

Speaker 1 (11:53):
But hey, now that they came down with some charges
against somebody you don't like, maybe you want his little
radio gig. Of course, the DJ is some truth tellers.
We have got some backstab and boot lick and losers
on our side.

Speaker 2 (12:07):
I'm telling you what.

Speaker 1 (12:08):
Remember when Merret Garland tried to explain why he couldn't
seem to track down those people who were firebombing pro
life centers.

Speaker 8 (12:18):
I will say, you're quite right. There are many more
prosecutions with respect to the blocking of the of the
abortion centers, but that is generally because they are those
actions are taken with photography at the time during the daylight,
and seeing the person who did it is quite easy.

(12:42):
Those who are attacking the pregnancy resources centers, which is
a hard thing to do, are doing this at night
in the dark. We have put full resources on this.

Speaker 2 (12:55):
Oh well, they're doing it in the dark.

Speaker 1 (12:58):
But hey, those same people, as of yesterday, September fourth,
they turned into brave, bold, truth tellers, law enforcement guys
just out there doing the right thing.

Speaker 2 (13:11):
Gosh, jeez all, that may have made.

Speaker 1 (13:13):
You uncomfortable, but I am right. You know what makes
me comfortable laughing laughing at dirty commies? Do you like
to laugh at dirty commies? Matt Walsh has a movie
coming out called Am I Racist? Where he goes undercover
as this DEI expert. He of course had to wear

(13:34):
some stupid man bun and his hair and it's great
and your entire family will enjoy it and go. It's
the family outing you've been looking for. Stop supporting dirtball Hollywood.
Support a company that's putting out entertainment that's good and
family friendly and education as well. It's revealing. Go enjoy

(13:55):
it and laugh until you cry. Go pre order tickets now,
it helps them. Ami Racist dot com is where you go.

Speaker 2 (14:04):
Do that. All right, we'll be back.

Speaker 11 (14:15):
There's no evidence that Hunter Biden has done anything wrong.

Speaker 1 (14:18):
There is no evidence of any wrongdoing between by Biden,
by Joe Biden, or by Hunter Biden.

Speaker 12 (14:24):
There's no evidence that Joe Biden actually did anything wrong
or did anything just way things in Hunter Biden's favor.

Speaker 13 (14:29):
He's denied that his son ever lobbied him for anything.

Speaker 12 (14:32):
There is nothing, There is nothing wrong that Vice President
Biden did.

Speaker 14 (14:36):
President Trump has falsely accused your son of doing something
wrong while serving on a company board in Ukraine. I
want to point out there's no evidence of wrongdoing by
either one of you.

Speaker 11 (14:46):
There is no evidence that anybody did anything illegal regarding
the Biden's and Ukraine and Joe Biden was carrying out
US policy.

Speaker 2 (14:56):
Man, no evidence. I don't know how they got that guilty.

Speaker 1 (15:01):
Please joining me now, Vince Colinase, he is the host
of the Vince Colonades show. Vince, where did all this
evidence come from? I was told repeatedly there was no evidence.

Speaker 12 (15:11):
Actually, I think a lot of it came from Hunter
Biden's laptop, which has been in the possession of the
United States federal government for now. We're geting approaching a
decade now. I think of the evidence that they've had. Yeah,
they've had this evidence all along. You know, everything from
ten percent for the big guy treating his dad as
the chairman.

Speaker 2 (15:27):
You know, a dad.

Speaker 12 (15:28):
Jumping on phone calls with all of his business partners,
greasing the tracks from millions of dollars from places like
Ukraine and China and the wife of the Moscow mayor.

Speaker 2 (15:37):
There's an endless trail.

Speaker 12 (15:39):
Of evidence that leads back to Joe Biden and using
his jobs in the federal government in corrupt ways to
enrich his family. But what we lack is curiosity. The
mainstream press has no interest whatsoever in the story. Continues
not to be to this very day, and that includes
while Joe Biden is not even in the running anymore
for the next president of the United States.

Speaker 1 (16:01):
Vince this looks to me, I just said it in
the open. This looks to me like an obvious thing.
They're gonna go ahead and get the conviction out of
the way so Joe Biden can get the pardon out
of the way as they wheel him out the back door.
But please correct me if I'm wrong. Am I missing something?

Speaker 12 (16:18):
I don't think you're missing anything. In fact, this makes
all the sense in the world for a bunch of reasons.
So today, and even in the way it's being described,
he's like, oh, he's pleading guilty. Not exactly, it's like
a weird technicality they're working on. It's something called an
Alfred pleague apparently, and essentially he's gonna say I'm innocent,
but the evidence sure makes me look guilty, so I'll
just go with them.

Speaker 15 (16:38):
That's the claim he's today. And here's what we know.

Speaker 12 (16:42):
One, it's gonna end up saving the Biden family a
ton of money that they would have to spend in
a courtroom, so they're not spending it now. And two,
we all know that Joe Biden is going to pardon
this guy. It's not like he's going to let his
son take the fall for this. So a pardon is coming.
And what that also means is remember that sweetheart plead
deal that was built to make Hunter Biden all of

(17:02):
his problems go away.

Speaker 15 (17:03):
Well, Joe's going to come through in the end.

Speaker 12 (17:05):
Unless Joe kicks it before the pardon comes through, Hunter
Biden's going to get out of here with a pardon.

Speaker 2 (17:11):
And so that's that's.

Speaker 12 (17:12):
You know, clearly, everybody with two brain cells to rub
together can see where this story's had it.

Speaker 2 (17:18):
Yeah, might want to put a rush on that.

Speaker 1 (17:20):
All right, let's talk about this Russian thing that dropped
down yesterday courtesy of the doj FBI. Honestly, the details
of the whole.

Speaker 2 (17:27):
Thing, I really don't care about.

Speaker 1 (17:29):
Vin's couple of Ruskies get charged, some money gets tossed around.
What blows me away is how quickly people on our
side will go from the DOJ's weaponized, they're evil, they're
lying about everything, and then the second some pundit who
has a job they want gets charged, they run and
side with the DOJ. I just I don't understand why
the right participates in left wing ops every time they

(17:52):
do one, every time the right will participate, well, yeah, I.

Speaker 12 (17:56):
Mean, how many times do you have to hear the
boy cry wolf before you're like, I don't think there's what.

Speaker 15 (18:00):
I think this is a lot. Yeah, this has happened
over and over and over again by now.

Speaker 12 (18:03):
If you're not wise to it, I think it says
something about your judgment, or it certainly says something about
maybe your cowardice. I don't know right now, it's obvious
to me, as it sounds like it's obvious to you,
that we shouldn't in any way reflexibly believe the Justice
Department here, given that their behavior is in the run
up to each election, in the closing days of those elections,

(18:26):
they always conjure up a Russian threat and then later
tell us that well, it wasn't quite as bad as
we thought it was, or the evidence seems to suggest
that there were no American interests even involved. And it's
just always garbage. And what it is is election interference.
What it's meant to do, it's meant to do I
think two things. One once again suggests that Donald Trump
or his allies are in bed with the Russians to

(18:49):
get Trump elected, which is bogus. And two, it's meant
to silence speech in the United States on issues that
Americans genuinely have real opinions about. Maybe we shouldn't be
spending so much money in Ukraine, Maybe we shouldn't be
sending all of our weapons stockpiles to Ukraine. Maybe having
so many hundreds of thousands of millions of people killed

(19:10):
in Ukraine in the end won't actually redound to either
their benefit or our benefit. That's a reasonable discussion to
have in the United States. And what I'm seeing the
Justice Department do in the last twenty four hours is
try and take that off the table and say if
you say that, well you're just a putin stooge.

Speaker 2 (19:26):
Vince the debate next week September tenth. I just have
a hard time seeing how.

Speaker 1 (19:32):
This goes poorly for Trump? Dome can't speak about anything.
She just doesn't know anything about anything, and now she
won't have Trump interrupting her, which she was obviously banking on.

Speaker 2 (19:42):
So how does this go wrong for Trump? What am
I not seeing?

Speaker 15 (19:46):
I don't think it goes wrong for Trump.

Speaker 12 (19:48):
First of all, it's just brilliant that the Trump campaign,
they first argued They're like, hey, can we get three
debates with Kamala? And Kamala's campaign response, No, no, no,
you only get one debate with Kamala. Those are the
rules you set up with Biden. All right, We're gonna
stick to the rules we set up with Biden then,
and that includes muting the microphone. So so the Trump
campaign turns around and said, let's do that again. And
I don't blame him because look how well it went

(20:09):
the first time. Like, if you're going to try and
duplicate a victory, you may as well look back at
the strategy that worked in the past.

Speaker 15 (20:15):
And here's Kamala's problem.

Speaker 12 (20:17):
Biden's brain doesn't function, which is why he ran into
the problems he did with trying to complete sentences before
that microphone got muted. Kamala's brain doesn't function, not because
of age, but she's just dumb and she's not good
at communicating. And as a result, there's a high probability
that she's going to be halfway through some sort of
poetic development in her head and it's not gonna make

(20:38):
it past the f and that microphone will go off
and Trump will be able to react and look at
her and.

Speaker 15 (20:44):
Go, what was that? That was crazy? This is gonna
work great?

Speaker 12 (20:47):
And I think, you know, I hate to set expectations
so low for Kamala, but I'm expecting a disaster out
of her.

Speaker 1 (20:54):
Too, Vince, I'll talk to you soonbuddy, come back soon.

Speaker 2 (20:58):
All right, He's right, she can't talk.

Speaker 1 (21:03):
You know what she needs Pure talk. Actually, I don't
know how pure talk would help Kamala talk. In fact,
Kamal is the one who shouldn't switch to pure talk
because her voice would come through so clearly on the phone.
The other side would know that this woman's an idiot.

Speaker 2 (21:21):
You though, you.

Speaker 1 (21:21):
Should switch to pure talk for sure. You shouldn't fund Verizon.
You shouldn't fund AT and T. You shouldn't fund t Mobile.
These companies hate your guts. They use the money you
pay them to work against your values. And not only
is pure Talk on the same vibe G network.

Speaker 2 (21:37):
You'll save a ton of money.

Speaker 1 (21:39):
Go switch to pure talk, It's cake, Puretalk dot com.

Speaker 2 (21:43):
Slash jessetv. It's like ten minutes switch, we'll be back.

Speaker 16 (21:53):
We have to reimagine safety in public safety in America.
You know, the status quo has been to determine and
create policy around the idea that more police equals more safety,
and that's just wrong. We need to demilitarize police departments.

Speaker 1 (22:11):
So there's a.

Speaker 16 (22:12):
Lot in this conversation, but at its core, one of
the issues that I think we should all agree on
is that it is old thinking. It is outdated and
is actually wrong and backward to think that more police
officers will create more safety.

Speaker 2 (22:31):
Yeah, that's old thinking.

Speaker 1 (22:33):
I wonder what Brandon has to say about this, joining
me now, host of the Officer Tatum Show, which is
huge out there. My friend Brandon Tatum, Hey, Brandon, why
are you so old in your thinking?

Speaker 2 (22:45):
Well, I'll tell you what.

Speaker 17 (22:46):
I'd rather be old in my thinking and correct and
then be new in my thinking and dumb. I don't
understand how any rational person thinks that less police officers
make things more safe. You know, in the totality of
you know, what we're speaking of is that when you
are in law enforcement, law enforcement agencies are available to
proactively police, we see crime go down in a tremendous way.

(23:08):
I remember when they should do stopping frisks. People didn't
like it. They felt they were targeting black people, but
the crime was down and guns were off the streets.
And when people have never served in law enforcement, they
don't talk to any law enforcement officers. They don't really
talk to citizens in the community. They say outlandish things
like Kamala Harris.

Speaker 2 (23:24):
There's no way whatsoever.

Speaker 17 (23:25):
That the math will math up to equate that less
police officers will somehow make people more safe and get criminals.

Speaker 2 (23:32):
Off the streets. Brandon.

Speaker 1 (23:35):
These people are trying the best they can now to
try to back off that defund the police thing a little,
but it's very obvious that's how the left thinks.

Speaker 2 (23:44):
Now that's the Democrat position.

Speaker 1 (23:45):
They may not be politically popular in September, right before
an election, but that's how all these people think.

Speaker 2 (23:52):
One thousand percent. Jesse.

Speaker 17 (23:53):
Look, listen when someone says that we need less police,
and also they talk about demilitarizing police. I'm not I'm
almost keep it clean because I'm a good Christian man.
This woman has no idea what she's talking about. If
you had asked Kamala Harris, Kamala Harris, have you say
a name? And any of these other progressives, what do
they mean by demilitarizing police? Do you not want police

(24:14):
to have weapons? Do you not want them to have
body armor? Like what militarization in policing that is available
to law enforcement that you don't want them to have
when an active shooter occurs. Do you not want them
to have the adequate amount of equipment when they're doing
a search warm on a dangerous criminal or potentially a terrorist,
because we know that they're right here in the United
States of America. Venezuelan's are already taking over parts of Colorado.

(24:36):
Do you not want them to be equipped if a
terrorist attack happened here in the States, the military don't
respond to that. It's going to have to be local
municipalities that respond to these threats.

Speaker 2 (24:46):
Do you not want them to have a routines? Do
you not want them to have the advantage?

Speaker 17 (24:49):
These people are so disingenuous because they are behind walls
and gates and guarded communities, and they're protected by Capitol
police and also other tear law enforcement officers. Vice President Harris,
she's protected by the Secret Service. That means she has security, arms,
trained security twenty four hours a day to make sure

(25:10):
that she's safe. She's not gonna get robbed in San Francisco.
She's not gonna get robbed in the South Side of
Chicago or in a dry by shooting. These people do
not understand what the everyday American is experiencing and what's
necessary to protect and serve.

Speaker 2 (25:26):
Brendon.

Speaker 1 (25:27):
Do you think they don't understand? Do you think they
really just genuinely enjoyed burning this place down from behind
their gates. I waver back and forth between they're completely
naive and they're just malicious little demons who enjoy watching
poor people suffer.

Speaker 17 (25:43):
I think it's a combination of two things. I think
some people may be genuine in their approach and they're
just completely wrong.

Speaker 2 (25:48):
They have out of touch with reality.

Speaker 17 (25:50):
Look, if you've never been to an inner city community,
you never lived in an inner city community, it's hard
for you to really diagnose what's really going on there.
And so some of These politicians are so out of
because they've been politician their whole life. They don't live
a regular life, so they are just going off soundbites
on what they think the people want to hear. Then
you have those who are actually malicious. They hate America,

(26:12):
they hate the idea of God, and they want to
dismantle every single thing that we're made of. And in
doing so, they want a ruling class in a peasant class.
They want to be the people that consume all the money.
They want to have all the wealth, have all the
access to security and safety, and they want the peasants
to be dependent on them forever. They don't want us

(26:32):
to have guns, they don't want us have autonomy. They
want us to be under their thumb, like you see
in communists China and other places like that. That's what
they want as an end result in America, and that's
what they're pushing for, you know, slowly but surely.

Speaker 2 (26:46):
Yeah, no doubt this video.

Speaker 1 (26:49):
I'm sure you remember the video of the illegal kicking
the cop when he's down in Times Square. God protect
the NYPD. Well, now Brandon, we're finding out they're really
going to drop that hammer on this guy. He might
get a year in jail and may be deported.

Speaker 2 (27:04):
Listen, I don't know why would you even be a
big city cop anymore. I'd be out of there.

Speaker 17 (27:08):
I'd be on a plane to Florida tomorrow. That's why
I'm not a cop anymore. And I would never go
back to law enforcement because, well, I'll say I'll never
go back to law enforcement in particular cities that don't
care about their police officers. There are many cities around
the country and many municipalities and counties that actually care
about their police officers. And I'd say go there. Travel
there a lateral to those agencies because they respect and

(27:29):
they care about you. NYPD, you can forget about it.

Speaker 2 (27:31):
Man.

Speaker 17 (27:32):
If you're not in law enforcement because God has called
you to do that, you shouldn't be in law enforcement
because you're not gonna get paid enough to deal with
all this mess. Listen, if you come over here and
you are a legal alien, that should be an aggravated
charge on top of the things that you do here.
Just say that you're a prohibitive possession of meaning you're
a convicted feeling. If you get caught with a gun
in your possession, that's an aggravated charge. If you are

(27:54):
a sex offender and you do a crime related to
sex offense, you're gonna get an aggravated charge because you're
already a registered sex offender. Why can't we have aggravated
charges for illegal aliens been in this country? If you
come to America and you're here illegally, you shouldn't be here.
You already broke federal law. You come and kick a
cop in the head, that you should get maximum penalty.

(28:16):
I would argue that you should spend a lot of
time in prison, or they should deport you immediately. But
and I will say this, the deportation is not as
effective as in prison in these people simply because they
can just come back over here and re offend.

Speaker 1 (28:32):
Which they all do. All right, you covered this on
your YouTube channel, but a lot of people haven't seen
this yet.

Speaker 2 (28:37):
Take take a look at this. He said that he's
already illegal. He already said that he.

Speaker 13 (28:43):
Went his backup loved for software or a sanctuary city.

Speaker 2 (28:46):
Even if he is legally here, we cannot call it.
But you still come to report that, right, No, we don't.

Speaker 13 (28:51):
He's a sanctuary city.

Speaker 2 (28:52):
You're not.

Speaker 17 (28:54):
So you're gonna let a person who went to prison,
he committed crime in America, who's illegally right now, and
you're gonna let him go free right now the elevator.

Speaker 2 (29:00):
That's exactly what I'm saying.

Speaker 5 (29:01):
Because we're a century city.

Speaker 12 (29:03):
I've arrested a double homicide suspect in the city before
and let him walk out the door.

Speaker 13 (29:07):
Because we're a sanctuary city, We're not going to call
high school to come pick up and the port of me.

Speaker 2 (29:12):
Brendan, what did I just? What? What is he say?

Speaker 17 (29:16):
I think that the department needs to investigate him as
an officer immediately.

Speaker 2 (29:20):
If you you can't. There's a lot of things going
on here.

Speaker 17 (29:23):
First and foremost, this is an example of a rookie
cop who's the one that's not speaking, and then a
lazy cop who's the one that is speaking. I watched
this entire video, and one thing that struck me in
this video is that this particular officer was so encouraged
or or are adamant about this sanctuary status type stuff
that he didn't even do an investigation.

Speaker 2 (29:45):
If someone is illegally.

Speaker 17 (29:47):
In this country, even if you're a sanctuary city a
sanctuary state, you still have to investigate a crime.

Speaker 2 (29:53):
Now. The crime that's allay us.

Speaker 17 (29:55):
Here is a federal crime across international lines, so a
municip cop can't arrest, but they have to do an
investigation to pass it over to the FBI. The cop
didn't even run his name just because he's illegal in
his country.

Speaker 2 (30:10):
He didn't even run his name.

Speaker 17 (30:11):
Listen, this cop didn't even know if the gentleman that's
reporting this is even telling the truth about his illegal status.
That guy could have been a citizen and just you know,
promoting that he's illegal, so people think that he can't
be caught up. This guy may have a record, he
may be wanted for murder. The cop didn't even run
his name in the system. According to what I saw
on the video, this is a complete failure in law

(30:33):
enforcement of failure in policy.

Speaker 2 (30:36):
If a man is illegally in this country.

Speaker 17 (30:38):
We should be able to detain this person, do an
investigation as to his status because he may be wanted
internationally for murder and all kinds of other things.

Speaker 2 (30:49):
You can't just let these people go.

Speaker 17 (30:51):
In Arizona, we had SB ten seventy and people were
out crying in the streets and protesting. We had the
ability to slightly profile, which means that we get in
the traffic stop or something that we talk to a
person and they can't speak English, they don't have citizenship,
they cannot produce an ID. They tell us them from Mexico,
somewhere else and not the United States of America.

Speaker 2 (31:12):
We have a right to run their name through border patrol.

Speaker 17 (31:17):
And there's been plenty times, Jesse, that I've run someone's
name and come to find out they're warned they need
to be taken into custody.

Speaker 2 (31:25):
They're wanted for all kinds of crimes all over the world.

Speaker 17 (31:28):
And so this is an example of how these sanctuary
states are just robbing the dignity of the American citizens
to be safe and holding people accountable.

Speaker 2 (31:40):
Brandon, I have to ask you before I let you go.

Speaker 1 (31:43):
Your YouTube channel has a three point two million subscribers.

Speaker 2 (31:46):
That's freaking enorvous. How'd you do that?

Speaker 1 (31:48):
People want to grow their YouTube channel, what do they do?
What's the officer tatum with?

Speaker 2 (31:53):
The biggest thing is authenticity and consistency.

Speaker 17 (31:56):
I literally upload maybe two or three, sometimes five videos
a day, and I just keep them coming. Man, I'm
on this all day long, twenty four hours a day.
I'm passionate about what I do, and I'm authentic.

Speaker 2 (32:07):
I just keep it real.

Speaker 17 (32:08):
One thing that I'll tell people that want to build
their social media platform is don't chase the followers. Be
yourself and people that are like minded will follow you that.

Speaker 2 (32:15):
This is how it works.

Speaker 1 (32:17):
Amen, Brandon, my brother, thank you so much. I appreciate it. Look,
thanks for having me on. All right, we still have
a lot. It's a huge show for you tonight. Now,
after you watch such an amazing show like this one,
I know it could be hard to get to sleep.
You're just so excited about what you just saw. And

(32:38):
that's where Beam comes in. Specifically, that's where dream powder
from Beam comes in.

Speaker 2 (32:45):
You see dream powder.

Speaker 1 (32:47):
It's hot chocolate that puts you to sleep, but more importantly,
it's all natural stuff. So yeah, you go sleep, but
when you wake up, you wake up and feel like
you had seven eight hours of natural sleep, not that groggy, miserable,
heavy feeling you get with everything else.

Speaker 2 (33:06):
You want the best night's sleep of your life, of your.

Speaker 1 (33:09):
Life, go to Shopbeam dot com slash Jesse Kelly. That
gets you forty percent off Shopbeam dot com slash Jesse Kelly.

Speaker 2 (33:20):
We'll be back. One thing that drives me.

Speaker 1 (33:31):
Insane is Republicans being weak when it matters most. You
can always count on Republicans to step up to the
plate and do the right thing at the precise moment
it's too late to do any good.

Speaker 2 (33:42):
Do you remember when Saint George Floyd died. Every Republican out.

Speaker 1 (33:46):
There now in the Year of Our Lord twenty twenty
four talks tough on crime, But do you remember right
afterwards when the system was running another up against you?
Remember Republicans like Lindsey Graham grabbing their ankles for all
of it.

Speaker 13 (33:59):
You had a year under President Obama, the Justice and
Policing Act, None of it was taken up virtually, So
let's knock that off their shopping list. For lack of
a better term of what to do. Compared to Thames,
there's a lot overlap, but there's some real differences. And
how do you hammer out those real differences. You talk

(34:20):
to each other. I am more hopeful than I was
before the hearing that there's going to be a genuine
effort to bring reform to a problem that's been going
on well before President Obama, and if we don't do
something about it, it's going to go on well past
President Trump, Thank you for your leadership, Tim.

Speaker 2 (34:43):
When it mattered.

Speaker 1 (34:44):
Most Republicans couldn't pour gas on that fire fast enough.
Joining me now a better Lindsey Graham. She doesn't lay
down for these people.

Speaker 2 (34:53):
Lindsey Graham.

Speaker 1 (34:54):
She's an author of the book Targeted One Mom's fight
for life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. Lindsay, First of all,
I'm sorry it must be so freaking frustrating to share
a name with that goober.

Speaker 4 (35:08):
You know what, it is a little bit, But last
night I got the honor of meeting Tucker Carlson, and
when I told him my name was Lindsay Graham, he
remembered it the rest of the night.

Speaker 1 (35:18):
So those songs, I played that clip because that actually
ties back to your story.

Speaker 2 (35:29):
All that George Floyd Madness, tell me your story. What's
going on?

Speaker 5 (35:33):
Listen?

Speaker 4 (35:34):
Gosh, it was four years ago I opened up my
salon in Oregon against lockdowns. A lot of people remember,
the government tried to shut me down, throw me in jail,
find me.

Speaker 5 (35:43):
They did ultimately find me.

Speaker 4 (35:45):
But what really annoyed we the people was that the
government threatened to take my three children when I opened
up against lockdowns and at the time, I had a
six week old, two year old and a five year old.
That is me opening up my doors against COVID lockdowns
in twenty twenty, letting my.

Speaker 5 (36:06):
First customer in in six weeks.

Speaker 4 (36:08):
And you know that decision alone, it created this idea
that I was this conservative activist, this icon right and
I was not political before twenty twenty at all. And
so when I opened I opened that and I'm smiling
and I'm happy, and I'm thinking to myself, everyone in

(36:28):
America is going to understand that I have to work,
that I'm not getting a paycheck. I don't want a
paycheck from the government. I want to work for my paycheck.
And when that happens, I got the full force of
the leftist, woke mob attacking me on a minute by
minute basis. And I opened my phone and I opened
my emails, and I went, holy smokes, what in the world.

(36:52):
I did not realize this would be political, and that
was my great awakening. I went, these people want to
kill me. They want my children to die of COVID.
On the left and on the right, they're calling me
a hero, which I didn't really expect either. I just
think that this is my right to work, and the
George Floyd riot started, and because I had become this
conservative icon accidentally, Antifa had posted online, when you start

(37:18):
burning down businesses, start with Glamours salon and kick Linda Graham's.

Speaker 5 (37:22):
But I used a more power word, and I.

Speaker 4 (37:26):
Went, hold on a second, I want to do hair
for a living. And then some guy died in another
state that I don't even know of, a criminal and
you're going to burn down my salon after I just
bought the government. And so I did a called arms
and four hundred people showed up outside my salon in Oregon, Patriots,
biker gangs, veterans, three percenters, And of course I became

(37:50):
quote a white supremacist and a white nationalist because I didn't.

Speaker 5 (37:54):
Want my business burned down.

Speaker 4 (37:56):
And so that is ultimately how I got canceled in Oregon,
come lately, lost all my businesses, moved to Arizona. But yeah,
that's that's kind of the elevator pitch, if you will,
that's how George Floyd, you know, ruined my life.

Speaker 1 (38:11):
Tell me about moving to Arizona, because this is something
I encourage people to do regularly on this show, my
radio show. If you're in a blue state as beautiful
as Oregon is. Gosh, I love Oregon. You can't exist
behind enemy lines anymore, or you just you don't have
any protection at any layer, any level.

Speaker 2 (38:29):
Right.

Speaker 17 (38:30):
Yeah.

Speaker 4 (38:30):
So when I moved to Arizona, it was the greatest,
the greatest blessing of my life.

Speaker 5 (38:36):
I mean, I wish that I would.

Speaker 4 (38:38):
Have been strong enough to endure what was going on
in organ but like I said, I wasn't political. So
this cancel culture, which is very violent, by the way,
very violent. It had me hiding in my home with
my shades drawn, like I didn't know if they were
going to come to my house and attack my children.
When I moved to Arizona, it seemed like I was fleeing,

(39:01):
but really it was like, you know what, my kids
are safe.

Speaker 5 (39:04):
I'm safe.

Speaker 4 (39:06):
I feel like I can speak out now without worrying that,
you know, a brick is going to get thrown through
my sill on window, or that someone's going to come
to my house at night. I felt safe, and so
it actually emboldened me to speak up more. And so
for anyone that's in a blue state and you can
stay and you can fight, please do But if you

(39:27):
feel like you can't because your life is going to
be threatened, or your business, or you know it's uncomfortable
and it's unsafe. Run for your life, find find a
good place for you to plant your family safely, and
then go full board because the leftist they need it,
They need us.

Speaker 5 (39:43):
To fight back. They are little minions behind a keyboard.
And when I got to Arizona and realized you guys.

Speaker 4 (39:49):
Are coming for me, I got louder and bolder, and
I totally fell into being able to speak truth, unapologetically
and without fear.

Speaker 2 (40:00):
Yes, you do. In fact, we have a little video
of you.

Speaker 1 (40:03):
You see, Lindsay didn't move to Arizona and sit on
her hands. Lindsey did what I've talked to you about.
She moved to Arizona and she got freaking involved. Here's
Lindsay dressed as a cat.

Speaker 4 (40:16):
Hello, my name is Lindsey Graham, and I am a cat.

Speaker 5 (40:19):
Meow meow. I'm not a woman dressed as a cat.
I am a cat.

Speaker 4 (40:23):
By show of hands, I'm curious how many of you
believe and confess that I'm a cat? Great, I am
by show of hands, I'm curious how many of you
believe that your child or a child from this school
would believe that I'm actually a cat.

Speaker 5 (40:36):
No one, You are right.

Speaker 4 (40:38):
Why because you are not stupid and these children are
not stupid. Children come to school to learn facts and
truths about reality, including unchanging biological truths about science and nature,
not to learn that they can change biological realities and
become anything they want in the name of diversity.

Speaker 1 (40:58):
Lindsay, how's it been being an activist going from being
a mom salon owner to now you are knee deep
involved in politics there. Has it been rewarding or has
it been awful?

Speaker 5 (41:11):
Oh my gosh, it's been so rewarding.

Speaker 4 (41:14):
I can't say enough about and this is my entire
testimony now, I can't say enough about the difference between
working for a living and just trying to make money
and going about my day ignorantly, intentionally, ignorantly about politics,
mining my own business.

Speaker 5 (41:32):
You know, I might might have made a lot of money.

Speaker 2 (41:34):
I might have been a.

Speaker 4 (41:35):
Boss babe in Oregon, and you know that certainly affected
me when I lost all of it and I kind
of went through an identity crisis in Arizona. But when
I wrote targeted, like you showed earlier, God used that
time to let me tell my story. Not really so
that I could be a best selling book author or
anything like that, but really to talk to me about
I've created you in this time, in this place for

(41:58):
a purpose, and it is not to go to the.

Speaker 5 (42:00):
Salon every day and make a bunch of money.

Speaker 4 (42:02):
It's to use the voice that I gave you, the
testimony that I gave you, the story that I gave you,
to glorify me and.

Speaker 5 (42:11):
To make a difference in this world.

Speaker 4 (42:13):
I was not making a difference in organ I'm not
saying all hairstylists aren't making a difference. I had a
testimony that I wasn't sharing, So I wasn't making a difference.
But when I moved to Arizona and I felt called
to speak up, and I'd already lost everything, Right, that's
half the people's concern in America. So if I speak up,
I'm gonna lose my job. I'm gonna get canceled. I

(42:33):
already got canceled.

Speaker 5 (42:34):
So when I moved to.

Speaker 4 (42:35):
Arizona, I was like, well, now I can say whatever
I want.

Speaker 5 (42:37):
What are you gonna do? I don't have a job,
I don't have a salon. I don't have anything you
can cancel.

Speaker 4 (42:42):
It's been the greatest blessing in my life that I
experience now true freedom, freedom of speech, freedom to say
what I want without fear, freedom to know that my
life has a bigger purpose than just going day to
day making money. And when I truly woke up to

(43:04):
the problems more like spiritually and societally society, I don't
know if it's the word in America, it was like
I couldn't possibly go back to just working and ignoring
these things, especially with three kids. That cat video, My
kids don't go to that school. They don't go to
public school. That dude dressing as a woman has no

(43:25):
effect on my family. But I felt like I have
a voice. I got balls to go dress up as
a cat and go there, not literally some conservative I
don't actually have balls.

Speaker 5 (43:36):
I can do this, and I can fight for other
people's kids.

Speaker 4 (43:39):
If you're not going to go and speak up against
this man and protect your children, then I will. And
it's my pleasure trust me to dress up like a
cat and tell a grown man you know you should
not be using the little girl's restrooms at the school
fairs like you are vile, You are disgusting. And to
know that that video made a difference, that speech made

(44:01):
a difference, is so much more empowering and fulfilling than
any other job that I can do.

Speaker 2 (44:09):
Well, You've done well. You keep going.

Speaker 1 (44:10):
Her book is targeted. Go pick it up, Lindsey. Appreciate you.
You can come join me anytime. Appreciate it. All right,
we have light in the mood. Next, all right, it's
time to lighten the mood. So I want to do

(44:31):
two things really quickly. First, we have a special coming
out actually on Barack Obama. Doesn't sound very timely, does it.
It's very timely because he's the engineer behind so much
of this. If you want to watch it two hours
earlier than everyone else, you have to go subscribe to
my YouTube channel YouTube dot.

Speaker 2 (44:49):
Com slash Jesse Kelly DC.

Speaker 1 (44:52):
Go sign up, enjoy that early. Also, it's National Cheese
Pizza Day. Now I don't eat cheese pizza because I'm
freaking American, but I do love pizza, and I just
want to say that I was just in Florida and
they had a pizza delivery boat delivering.

Speaker 2 (45:11):
Pizzas out on the water. I love this country. I'll
see it them all
Advertise With Us

Host

Jesse Kelly

Jesse Kelly

Popular Podcasts

Crime Junkie

Crime Junkie

Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.

24/7 News: The Latest

24/7 News: The Latest

The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.

Stuff You Should Know

Stuff You Should Know

If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.