Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:10):
This is a Jesse Kelly show. You're messing truth the
Jesse Kelly Show. My name is James T. Harris. I
am a talk show host out of a Phoenix, Arizona.
Also can be heard in a Tucson, Arizona. Happy to
be sitting in for Jesse Kelly. And are you still
(00:31):
floating on cloud nine? I am? I am. I see
my conservative friends in the street, and we're not winking anymore.
We're not we're hiding. We're kind of bold. Great election,
Why isn't it?
Speaker 2 (00:44):
Yeah?
Speaker 1 (00:44):
But how about that transition? We love what is going on.
How can you not if you believe in America? How
can you not if you've been praying for this day,
praying that President Trump reelect President Trump, you know, wins
the election. Pray that the corruption should be exposed, that
(01:07):
the arms of the corrupt be broken. Yeah, we pray
for that, and we're watching it happen in real time.
The big news yesterday the the FBI, the lying FBI
actually did have assets in the crowd January sixth. Really, yes,
(01:36):
FBI informants stormed the Capitol on January sixth, But but
but they want you to believe that they didn't tell
these agents to do it. What yet a lot of
people were there. But but but they didn't let the
you know, the FBI know. They were just you know,
they weren't really doing overtime. They just wanted to go
(01:57):
on down there, move the on down to the Capitol,
make sure that everything was in order. That's what they
want you to believe. Now, when we look back, I mean,
it's it's incredible. As a matter of fact, we don't
need to look that far back. Let's just a look
at a conversation that outgoing FBI Director Christopher Ree had
(02:19):
just a little while ago.
Speaker 3 (02:21):
If you are asking whether the violence at the Capitol
on January sixth was part of some operation orchestrated by
FBI sources and or agents, the answer is emphatical saying no. No,
you saying not violence orchestrated by FBI sources.
Speaker 1 (02:38):
No. If you are saying that that violence was orchestrated
by the FB, I I'm here to tell you no,
that did not happen. Really well, that's amazing. As Fox
News is reporting about the new IG report stating that
(02:59):
a Christopher Ray you did have assets there, remember back
in the day, I think it was last year we
had Representative Massy. He was questioning Attorney General Merrick Garland.
Were their federal agents present and or agitating on January
(03:21):
were the sixth?
Speaker 4 (03:23):
Okay, without I was hoping today to give you an
opportunity to put to rest the concerns that people have
that there were federal agents or assets of the federal
government present on January fifth and January sixth.
Speaker 5 (03:36):
Can you tell us, without talking about particular incidents or
particular videos, how many.
Speaker 4 (03:41):
Agents or assets of the federal government were present on
January sixth, whether they agitated to go into the capitol,
and if any of them did so.
Speaker 1 (03:49):
I'm not going to violate this move of the rule
of law in a comment on investigation that's ongoing. No, No,
I'm not gonna I'm not going to you're the ongoing investigation.
I'm not going to make any comments on it whatsoever. Yeah.
And then at a later date they had Mary Garland
back in front of the committee.
Speaker 6 (04:09):
Video that was your answer to a question to me
two years ago when I said, how many agents or
assets of the government were present on January fifth and
January sixth and agitating in the crowd to go into
the Capitol and how many went into the Capitol.
Speaker 1 (04:23):
Can you answer that now? I don't know the answer
to that question, Oh.
Speaker 6 (04:27):
Last time, you don't know how many there were or
there were none.
Speaker 7 (04:32):
I don't know the answer to either of those questions.
If there were any. I don't know how many. You've
don't know whether there are any.
Speaker 6 (04:39):
I think you may have just perjured yourself that you
don't know that there were any. You want to say
that again, that you don't know that there.
Speaker 7 (04:45):
Were any personal knowledge of this matter. I think what
I said the last time.
Speaker 6 (04:50):
You've had two years to find out, you know, were
there any confidential human sources involved from the FBI or
any other agency in the erection of that prop those gallows.
Speaker 3 (05:03):
I'm not aware of anything like that, Spector General Horwitz.
Speaker 5 (05:06):
Over the past three years, I've questioned FBI Director Ray
and Attorney General Merrick Garland about the federal assets, such
as confidential human sources, that were present on January sixth
at the Capitol, and they have continuously stonewalled me. We've
got no answers whatsoever about this from them. You have
(05:28):
evidence of the number of confidential human sources that we're
operating on the Capitol grounds on January sixth.
Speaker 1 (05:36):
Our report will include the information in that regard, Yes
it will, and it did. So it turns out to
we learn that, yes, the FBI did have assets in
that crowd. Now, we're not surprised by this. Listeners to
(05:57):
Jesse Kelly Shell. They're not surprised by this at all.
But the AG report did come out, and I believe
that they were, you know, cutting them a little slack.
But no, okay, you know what, I believe there were
a lot of agents there. But we'll go with their report.
We'll go with with their reporting because still what it
(06:17):
does is it proves that the Attorney General, the FBI director,
they were all lying.
Speaker 2 (06:26):
Part.
Speaker 8 (06:26):
Reveals that there were a total of twenty six confidential
human sources in the crowd that day. David Sponte his
life in the Justice Department.
Speaker 5 (06:35):
He has got the news for us.
Speaker 2 (06:36):
David Chandra. Three of those were authorized and tasked by
the FBI to be there on January sixth, twenty twenty one.
Were coming up on four years since that day of
the Capitol riot. This IG report specifically focuses on the
FBI's handling of confidential human sources, or as we know him,
FBI informants. For years, the outgoing FBI Director Chris Ray
(06:57):
has been pressed on reports of under cover agents. According
to this new report, there were no undercover FBI agents. However,
there were three confidential human sources tasked by the bureau
to be in the crowd on January sixth to specifically
watch what the report states is concerns over domestic terrorism.
Speaker 1 (07:16):
But they're concerned about domestic terrorism, so they have at
least three agents, and that was their job. They were
tasked to see are there any domestic terrorists in the crowd?
Could there be three? He wants us to believe that
there were only three. Okay, we'll go with that. But
what about all those other folks that were also in
(07:38):
the crowd. I mean, we're being told that there were
a number of these FBI assets.
Speaker 3 (07:47):
If you are asking whether the violence at the Capitol
on January sixth was part of some operation orchestrated by
FBI sources and or agents, the answer is emphatically saying no.
Speaker 5 (07:58):
No.
Speaker 3 (07:59):
He saying no lence orchestrated by FBI sources.
Speaker 1 (08:04):
Nope, he said nope. You're saying no, they were not violent. Well,
we do know that things got violent that day, don't
we What we don't know is was the FBI involved
with that it any way.
Speaker 2 (08:18):
Out of those three Sandra and John, one entered the capital,
two others entered a restricted area. The report says the
FBI did not encourage or authorize any sources to go
into the building or a restricted area. In addition to
the three confidential human sources, the FBI told there were
twenty three that were there on their own. Now three
(08:39):
the FBI in the past on other cases, but not
specifically on the January sixth rally. Some of them entered
a restricted area as well. And what stands out in
this report John and Sandra, none of the confidential human
sources that enter the US capital or a restricted area
were prosecuted by the DCUs attorneys. Remember, this is an
office that is still arresting nearly four years later and
(09:02):
prosecuting people with this case.
Speaker 1 (09:05):
Oh, this is bad, This is really bad. Could this
be part of the reason why Christopher Ray announced that
he was going to resign his position yesterday? He said
that his last day will be the day that Donald
Trump has worn in Could this be part of the reason. Oh,
my goodness, twenty six twenty three asses were there, but
(09:26):
they weren't asked to go. They went on down because
they're just good old boys. Right, We're supposed to believe
that Hey was one of those assets that worked their
way into the Capitol. Was that Ray Apps, you know,
the guy who was like telling everybody to go win,
we gotta go in and take the capitol. We need
more people. Was that Ray Ray? I mean, because the
(09:47):
people who were there protesting, they looked at him and said, fed, fed.
This is amazing, This is amazing. Confidential human sources in
the crowd. The Democrats, the Deep States January sixth narrative
(10:10):
is coming completely apart. Four years almost four years has
taken us the STONEWALLD and STONEWALLD, and now now we're
starting to learn more of the truth, or maybe I
should say most of America, because the reality is, if
(10:32):
you are a listener to the Jesse Kelly Show or
my show, The Conservative Circus, you've known from the very
beginning that this was the trap that conservatives America first
lovers stepped into. Now let's reconsider all of these people
that want to preemptive pardon. There may be something to this.
(10:54):
James T. Harris sitting in for The Jesse Kelly Show.
Truth at It Dude, Jesse Kelly. James T. Harris sitting
in for the Jesse Kelly Show. I am a talk
show host out of Phoenix, Arizona, five fifty KYI. It's
where you can find me also Tucson, Arizona, my adoptive
(11:16):
hometown seven ninety KNST. You can follow me on x
AT James T. Harris. We are talking about January sixth.
From the very beginning, we knew. I mean once, once
I saw what was happening at the Capitol, I was like, oh, no,
this is this is not going to work out well
for Trump. Not that it was Trump's fault. Never for
(11:37):
a moment did I ever believe that. I just believed
that the that the Democrats were devious enough to use
this against Trump. At the time, I didn't know that
they orchestrated it. But now we're finding that out. Of course,
we have Nancy Pelosi on tape, you know, talking about
where where's the National Guard? When you know we had
President Trump he offered up about ten of them. She said, no,
(12:04):
We've got all of the Democrats talking about how they
were running for their lives out of the Capitol some
of them weren't even there. And then we get the
January sixth Commission. Oh, oh my goodness. We tried to
get peach the president over it. We tried to have
the commission, you know, to find out and dig up
more dirt, really just to keep it alive, to keep
(12:26):
it in the front foremost of the public's mind. But
slowly things started dripping out. People started asking questions. Tucker
Crauson got a hand on videotape, and once the Republicans
won the House back to midterms, all of a sudden
we started seeing different narratives. We found out the buffalo
guy who was from Arizona, he wasn't crazy, He wasn't
(12:49):
in there trying to foment violence. He got into the
chambers and prayed. The police let him in, gave him
a little tour. We found out the police officer was
not killed that day, but Ashley Babbitt was. And now
we found out as a garden days ago, there were
three others that were killed. One woman was beat by
the police. None of these videos found their way to
(13:09):
the January sixth Commission. We got news that there was
white supremacists there there at the Capitol and then all
of a sudden, we found a pipe Bombit strange because
we have the person planning it on video, but we
never found out who it was. The FBI couldn't identify them.
(13:38):
This is this is agregious. That's that's not strong enough word.
This is this is treason. This is this is our
government setting up American people in order to destroy a
sitting president. This is anarchy, government sponsored And we were, well,
(14:02):
we're no assets, there are no FBI asset. Well, we
don't know. I don't know how many. Why don't you
go find out? He comes back talking about Attorney General. Oh,
I know, Fox News continuing the report of us going
on what we're finding out.
Speaker 2 (14:23):
Confidential Human sources tasked by the FBI are not undercover agents.
These are people that belonged to groups like, for instance,
the Proud Boys, the Oathkeepers, and then became paid FBI
informants at certain points in time, still being members of
their groups. And of course John and Sandra others are
not putter of any group and just decided to show
up to the Capitol for whatever reason and still work
(14:44):
with the FBI on the side and provide information, work with.
Speaker 1 (14:49):
The FBI on the side and provide information. Well, here's
another big story. On the same day that Christopher Ray
resigned his posts at the FB as their director, we
found out that the Proud Boys are disbanding. Yeah, the
Proud Boys, you know, you know that the white supremacy
(15:09):
group that's walking around wearing khaki pants and matching shirts
like they were like like ger animals. Okay, everybody, do
you have you have your khakis? Yes? Do you have
your penny loafers? Yes? Do you have your blue shirts? Yes?
How many of you? Do you have your red, white
and blue mask yes, sir, yes, sir? And your flags? Yes?
They're disbanding. Article says they're going back to their regular routine,
(15:34):
which is code for they're going back to their office
in the FBI, probably to pack up their stuff.
Speaker 9 (15:44):
Right.
Speaker 1 (15:45):
You gotta be kidding me. This is all astro turfed
and it was designed to stop Trump and it did temporarily,
kept fighting, kept fighting, and now we're finding god that
(16:09):
it was all a lie. This is crazy. We are
talking about a coup, a color revolution. This is what
the CIA has done to other countries around the world,
you know, like Ukraine, I mean all around the world. Venezuela. Well,
CIA has its fingers and everything trying to control nations, peoples,
(16:33):
and now they tried to do that to us a
color revolution. It was successful, actually, because I do believe
that Donald Trump won the election in twenty twenty. I
do believe that Biden was installed. I believe that. But
they were not able to pull it off. I don't
(16:53):
say that with pride. I say that would caution and
prayerfully because I'm still praying for the president because they
tried to kill them three times. Oh officially it's two.
But you know what, a lot of folks don't know
that what happened in Tucson. You know that little gas
attack when he was on stage and half of the
stage ended up getting violently ill and some of them
went blind for a moment. Yeah, yeah, I think that
was an attempt as well. So, now that this whole
(17:19):
narrative is falling apart, what about those Democrats and those
Republicans in name only those establishment Republicans. Now, what are
they going to do? Well, we'll talk about that coming
up next. My name is James T. Harris, sitting in
(17:41):
for the Jesse Kelly Show. The Jesse Kelly Show it's
still real to me, dammit. With ternstacks. You are listening
to the Jesse Kelly Show. My name is James T. Harris,
iamy talk show hosts out of Phoenix, Arizona. Also could
be heard in Tucson, Arizona. You can also follow me
(18:01):
and my friends at James T. Harris on X. Well.
We have the Democrats law fair has fallen apart, we
have a crossfire hurricane being exposed. We have the j
sixth Commission. You know, President Trump, he was he was
not happy about this. He was saying that Liz Cheney,
(18:24):
Benny Thompson, these people should be in jail, and you
know what, they were talking all tough at first, but
now that the ig rebard is coming out, and now
that we're seeing just absolutely how this was a setup,
a lot of these Democrats and some Republicans they're still
(18:45):
they're still trying to hang tough Liz Cheney. These preemptive
pardons a term that we had never heard before before Biden.
After Biden pardoned his son Hunter, and he's still getting
a whole lot of, you know, backlash over that. After
(19:06):
saying that he would not do it, he went ahead
and did it, anyway, and only the hardcore Democrats are
trying to make excuses for it. You know, this is
the love of a father for his son. He's already
lost one vial. How can you expect that the but
his second son away at child. I do it. I
(19:28):
do it acting as if this was just a gun
charge and tax evasion, ignoring Hunter Biden's laptop in which
he has all types of job. It's crazy, possible pedophelia.
(19:48):
You know, I didn't even feel comfortable talking about this
stuff on Jesse Kelly's show. I've seen the laptop, ladies
and gentlemen. I saw it. When I had to take
great caution. I went to a Chinese site, but I
saw it.
Speaker 6 (20:03):
I did.
Speaker 1 (20:04):
You can't unsee it. So when I hear these liberals
talking about this is this forest son? And you know what, Hunter,
you could do your father a favor by staying clean
and beying perductive. No no, no, no no no. That
parton was a crime against humanity. Literally. But now that
(20:27):
he's done this, you know, you have you have some
Democrats that were doing the bidding of the party, that
were doing bidding of the deep state. They want their
pardon too, And you know what, you know what. One
of those guys is Representative Benny Thompson. And I want
to tell you, Benny Thompson, you could just look at
him and you can tell that he's a squealer. He's
(20:50):
a squealer. If you start to put the you know,
the clamp downald him real tight, he is going to
we like a stuck peg. He was talking to Jim
Acosta or over there at CNN, and Jim was getting
right down to it. I mean, Benny, Benny, do you
(21:12):
want one of those Biden preemptive pardons?
Speaker 8 (21:16):
Congressman Trump is saying you should go to jail. Are
you worried about him or the FBI coming after you?
Speaker 10 (21:22):
Well, you know, we are members of Congress. We operated
based on our direction from Congress. They are specific laws
that give security to member of Congress.
Speaker 1 (21:34):
In other words, we did exactly as we were told.
Nancy Pelosi put me over the Jay sixth Commission and
told me what to do, and I did it. So
anything that negative comes from this is really not my
fault because I did what I was told.
Speaker 10 (21:52):
And I hope the President would take that into consideration.
But to be honest with you, Jim, we've not done
anything wrong. Yeah, what we did was in fact what
the law prescribed. No, what evolution we were given, and
we're comfortable with our report. There's nothing that we omitted
in the report or anything like that. So being in
(22:15):
disagreement with a person is not a reason to lock
them up. Oh, this is out the house, where we
debate issues, where we debate laws. Sometimes you're right, sometimes
you're wrong. That doesn't mean you're illegal, And it doesn't
mean that because you're wrong in the eyes of someone
you should go to jail. Oh who we are as American?
Speaker 1 (22:38):
Benny Thompson, Do you hear yourself talking? Sir? Do you
hear yourself talking? What about all of the people who
were in jail? JA six people in jail for twenty
thirty years of being in the wrong place the wrong time.
What are you talking about? You disagree with me? Paul Manaford,
General Flynn? How many people did you disagree with? Did
(23:00):
you guys throw in jail? Lawfair?
Speaker 11 (23:01):
What?
Speaker 1 (23:02):
Steve Bennon, what you are rated the President's house? I
know this wasn't J six related, but you all started
part of the same cabal created his house went through
the first Lady's underwear drawer went sifted through her draws.
You're grabbing fbi ans. I'm sorry, what were you saying? Bnny?
(23:28):
Disagreeing is not a reason to throw someone in jail.
You followed the law, you did you know what you
were supposed to do. Okay, okay, then you should be okay, right,
You didn't do anything wrong. You were just following the law.
If that's the case, Benny, why do you want a
preemptive pardon?
Speaker 8 (23:49):
And connresson? Apparently the White House is discussing preemptive pardons
for people who may be targeted by Trump when he
gets back in office. Do you want the president to
offer kind of pardon to you as strangers? That just
asked that question.
Speaker 12 (24:03):
I'm just wondering what you think.
Speaker 10 (24:05):
Well, you know, the president is his paragraph.
Speaker 1 (24:07):
Huh.
Speaker 10 (24:08):
If he offers it to me or other members of
the committee, I think it, I would accept it.
Speaker 1 (24:17):
My prerogative. You get a pardon, you get a pardon,
You get a pardon. This is absurd. Oh, Benny, he's
gonna squeal. Oh, Ben, you will probably be the first
one because he's a squealer. You can look at him,
you can tell you just tighten up on him. He'll
tell it all. He will tell you about all of
(24:39):
the videotapes that the Jasix Commission destroyed. He'll tell it all.
He'll tell you how Ray Epps was an asset. He'll
tell you. He might even tell you who planned it.
The pipe bomb. Oh man, I hope that Biden is
a real punk. I hope he's like none. I'm I'm
(25:02):
gonna commute the sentences of every retro break in the country,
but not one Democrat beside my son. We'll get anything
white because you all punk me. You think I'm gonna
forget about that. You think I'm gonna forget about the
Palace coup. You think I'm gonna forget that. You put
(25:22):
that half wit Kamala Harris above me. Oh democrat, Hell,
have no fury like a dementia pat who can somewhat
think a little bit scarn. And that's what we're dealing
with here in the Democrats. Oh my goodness, How they're scrambling,
(25:47):
how they're coming up with the just most most ridiculous excuses,
how they're trying to give themselves cover. No, no, I
hope you have your popcorn, because this is about to
get crazy. You've got democrats here who are contradicting themselves
(26:14):
left and right. And you know what I would say,
they don't care who sees it. I mean they probably
would or probably did at one time care. But no,
this is all hands on deck situation here. I mean
we're talking about we're not talking about lawfare, We're not
talking about revenge. If these politicians broke the law and
(26:39):
trying to cut off the head of what they considered
the snake and they missed, it's not retribution, it's justice.
And if Benny Thompson and Liz Cheney and what's his name,
Kissing Girt and all of these other if they were
(26:59):
involved in this illegality, then they deserve to get got.
And I have some examples of this hypocrisy that I
speak of. I'll have it for you coming up next.
James T. Harris sitting in for the Jesse Kelly Show. True,
(27:25):
it's the Jesse Kelly Show. You are listening to the
Jesse Kelly Show. My name is James T. Harris. I
am a talk show host out of Phoenix, Arizona and Tucson, Arizona.
You can hear me on five fifty KFYI and seven
ninety K and st You can also follow me on
Twitter or should say on x at James T. Harris.
We're just talking about the fallout, the fallout from not
(27:49):
only January sixth being exposed. Really, it's the fallout from
Donald J. Trump winning the election. The Rats are trying
to jump off the show. Some of them stayed on
too long. But people are looking to Joe Biden now
for that preemptive pardon. They just made that up. We
(28:10):
don't even know what's legal, but they're going with it
because that's all they have. And it's funny to sit
back and watch all of the hypocrisy, the hypocrisy from
the left. Senator A Koons he got into a conversation
(28:32):
about pardons and preemptive pardons, and boy he was He
was kind of like, hey, you know, it's okay, it's okay.
Most Americans approve how Trump is handling the whole transition
and everything, but when it comes to Trump being in power,
I mean, this could be a little bit dicey. Here
(28:52):
he is on CNN, he.
Speaker 13 (28:54):
Is going to pardon January sixth rioters. We don't know
which ones are. How many in the first hour after
he is inaugurated? How do you feel about that.
Speaker 14 (29:05):
I think that is a terrible idea. These are people
who have been duly tried and convicted in a court
of law.
Speaker 13 (29:11):
How do you feel about President Barria is doing preemptive partons?
Speaker 14 (29:17):
John, I respect the quote you just read from one
of the folks on Cash Betel's enemies list. I'll just
remind you that to be investigated by the FBI, prosecuted
by a US attorney can cost a defendant hundreds of thousands.
Speaker 1 (29:32):
Of dollars millions of dollars really, and can be profoundly
disruptive to their lives.
Speaker 14 (29:36):
I spoke to Senator shiff this week on the floor,
and he has made similar statements that he and I
think Liz Cheney, former Congresswoman Liz Cheney, has also made
this statement that they don't want to be pardoned because
they've done nothing wrong. And I admire their determination to
trust our legal system and to stand up to the
bluster and the threats of Cash Battel and President Electroump.
(30:00):
But I think part of why there is some consideration
being given to proactive pardons is the cost and the disruption,
and frankly, the disrespect for the work that underlies a
threat to try those who served on a committee of
the House of Representative.
Speaker 1 (30:17):
You know that is just absolutely absurd. It costs could
cost thousands, it costs millions of dollars.
Speaker 11 (30:23):
Oh, how the J six protesters, how their lives have
been disrupted, How they have been bankrupted, bankrupted, How some
of them were so distracted they committed suicide.
Speaker 1 (30:38):
Sir, sir, I have to restrain myself. I almost said
something crazy. Oh yeah, you know, to give a blanket
party to the J six, that's wrong, that's a miscare
of a justice. But to give preempted pardon for the
people who cause them to be in jail, well, you know,
this is something we have to take under consideration. I mean,
(30:59):
because of the damage that it could calls to one's lives.
These democrats Hip Pocker, say, be thy name Adam Shift?
You know his I guess his mind, is his his
values Shift Shift. I guess his proper name based on
whatever he is going through at the time. I mean,
(31:22):
over the years, he's changed his position. It is kind
of amazing. It's a you know what it is, Donald Trump?
Adam Adam Tadam. I didn't ask for you yet. Patience, sir,
Patience Adam Shift. You know he can dish it out,
but when the tables are turned, he has a hard
time taking it. You're about to hear a little compilation
(31:44):
from twenty eighteen, twenty nineteen, and twenty twenty four. Okay, Adam,
go ahead.
Speaker 12 (31:51):
On the day Donald Trump believes office, the Justice.
Speaker 1 (31:53):
Department may indict him very strongly.
Speaker 12 (31:56):
In favor of indicting the president when he is out
of office, I think the incoming president should be threatening
his political opponents for jail time. That's not the kind
of talker should hear from the president in a democracy.
Speaker 1 (32:14):
Do these people hear themselves? They can't twenty eighteen, we're
gonna indicet them. Twenty nineteen, when he's on our office,
we're gonna diet him. Twenty twenty four after their guy loses.
I don't think that this is the kind of talk
that should be coming from the leader of the world
to go after and persecute your political enemies. Adam Schiff,
(32:37):
I'm telling you it's absolutely crazy what we're watching. We
even have Bill Clinton weighing in, Why does Hillary want
to pardon? Why would Hillary possibly want to pardon?
Speaker 15 (32:51):
Do you think it would be wise of President Biden
to preemptively pardon any potential targets. What about your wife,
Hillary Clinton? She apparently is on cash Betel's list.
Speaker 1 (33:04):
Fuck?
Speaker 11 (33:05):
Yeah, what, Well.
Speaker 1 (33:07):
They got a problem with her because.
Speaker 9 (33:10):
First she didn't do anything wrong she did. Second, she
followed the rules exactly, No, she didn't. Third, Trump's State Department.
Trump's State department found they remember how the emails was
such a big issue in twenty sixteen, Trump's State Department
found that Hillary said and received exactly zero classified.
Speaker 1 (33:36):
Uh huh uh zero exactly? Why is Bill Clinton on
the view? Why? Better question? Why aren't the girls you
know on the view? Did that? Was that sexist? Why
were the gals on the view? Well? Why did they
even have Bill Clinton on? Don't they know this man's background?
This man is a predator. This man he allegedly raped
(34:00):
Whiting of Broderick. He exposed himself to Uh, who's the
woman who was If you drag a dollar the trailer park,
you never know what you're gonna get. Paula Jones. Paula Jones.
He felt up Kathleen Willie, you know, upon learning that
her husband had had died. This guy, this guy, you know,
(34:25):
Jeffrey Epstein, has him in a dress, you know, a
blue dress, Monica's blue dress on a chair that's a painting.
And yet they're gonna talk to him and he's gonna
tell them that Hillary did nothing wrong. I'm telling you,
the Democrats are being exposed. They're running for the hills.
They want that pre empty pardon. Meanwhile, you have some
(34:48):
Democrats that have seen the light. We'll talk about that next.
James C. Harris sitting it for the Jesse Kelly Show.