March 19, 2025 • 46 mins
President Trump just made big news with the JFK files. Jesse Kelly gives his instant reaction and looks ahead at what's to come. This comes as the Democrat Party has moved far away from the Party of JFK, to the point where Chuck Schumer is now being called out. Jesse discusses this as well. Jesse also dives into President Trump's call with Vladimir Putin and breaks it down with Col. John Mills. Plus, big talk around elections and judges with Governor Scott Walker and William A. Jacobson.
I'm Right with Jesse Kelly on The First TV | 3-18-25
Pure Talk: Get an additional 50% off your first month at https://PureTalk.com/JESSETV
Beam: Visit https://ShopBeam.com/JESSEKELLY and use code JESSEKELLY at checkout for 40% off
Follow The Jesse Kelly Show on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheJesseKellyShow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
The JFK Files. I'll be Daddy Jesse and tell you
my thoughts on that. We're gonna talk about what's going
on within the Democrat Party, what's going on around the world.
Trump talked to Putin or were about to have peace,
all that more coming up on. I'm right, okay, before
(00:26):
we get to the Democrat Party, let's go ahead and
get the flashy headline out of the way. And as
you can probably already tell by the tone of my voice,
I'm gonna have to be Daddy Jesse here. Look, it's
not that I love being Daddy Jesse. All right. The
country needs fathers. The country needs dads. They need dads
(00:47):
like the one I had, where you're having a good time,
you're being an idiot, and dad has to step in,
turn on the lights, turn down the music, and say, okay, okay,
straighten up. Let's do the real world here. I know
the JFK Files got released. I got it, and everyone's
still sifting through it. Eighty thousand pages. Nobody's gone through
(01:07):
all that yet. And in case you're wondering, yes, I'm
gonna go through it. I'm gonna meander my way through it.
But don't expect some ground breaking thing that you didn't
know or assume before. For this one very very simple reason.
What does it take to kill the president of the
United States of America? It takes a lot, takes a
(01:29):
lot of organization, commitment, honestly resources, not even necessarily money.
You even put everything into place, whether it's a loan
gunman Lee Harvey Oswald, Cia or the mob or the
who knows, the Russians. I don't know, I do know,
but do you honestly think that they've found a way
whoever it was, to kill the president of the United
(01:52):
States of America and then they just kind of left
the evidence sitting around for sixty years.
Speaker 2 (01:59):
Come on, it's not gonna be anything.
Speaker 3 (02:03):
I know.
Speaker 1 (02:04):
I know in the interest of ratings and headlines and
everybody wants to bop JFK fouls, I'm supposed to come
here and act like this is like some groundbreaking thing.
Come on, we all know what it's gonna be. Let's
move on and talk about the real world. Shaw we
by the way, I should say, in all fairness, I
do applaud Trump for releasing it because there is such
(02:27):
now between the American people and their government. Understandably that
the only way you can repair that is opening the books.
And so, while this is not some groundbreaking thing, books
being open is a good thing. I'm glad you can
read it. I'm glad I can read it. It's all good,
but it's not gonna be anything. Now, let's discuss what's
taking place right now inside the Democrat Party. And to
(02:47):
do this, I'm gonna kind of walk my way into
where Chuck Schumer is today and Hakeem Jeffreys and Nancy Pelosi.
But we're gonna rewind just a little bituse I think
it'll help help understand what they're going through. And this
is great news. I'm in joining this. This is better
news than the JFK files. So first, let's discuss Barack Obama,
because a lot of this comes back to Barack Obama.
(03:08):
There have been Democrats and Republicans since basically forever in
this country.
Speaker 2 (03:12):
There's nothing new.
Speaker 1 (03:13):
You had your Clintons and Reagans, and the Fords and Carters,
and you had all you had all these types. But
Barack Obama came along and he really really changed so much,
and he changed so much for this reason, he is
very very sharp. I don't send me your emails I
hate him, That's not what I said. Okay, I hate
(03:33):
him too, But he's very sharp, very charismatic, and what
he did was he knew how to put on a
very moderate, reasonable, very charming face, soaring speeches. He knew
how to cloak what was actually inside of Barack Obama,
and that is born in bred hatred of America. We've
(03:55):
had plenty of bad presidents, Republicans and Democrats, right, I
can't stand FDR. But FDR didn't hate America. I can't
stand Jimmy Carter. He was an awful president that's almost
universally acknowledged, terrible, dreadful. Did Jimmy Carter hate America? I
don't think I'd go that far. Barack Obama did. That's
how he was raised. Frank Marshall Davis. He hated America,
(04:17):
but again, he knew how.
Speaker 2 (04:18):
To masket like most communists do.
Speaker 1 (04:20):
So he got into office using all that charisma against
into office. But when he got into office, he did
something totally different. He started putting into place throughout the
government the most radical anti Americans he could find, and
not just in normal places where where a president would
(04:43):
you know a secretary of State or ambassador to this.
Barack Obama, he cleaned out the FBI. You're gone, You're gone,
You're gone, You're gone. Who's he putting into place? He's
putting into place committed MAOIs who will go after his
political opponents. And he did this branch after branch, piece
after piece of the federal government. Eight years. We had
(05:04):
an anti American remaking this country and more importantly, for
the purposes of where we're at today, remaking the Democrat Party.
Speaker 2 (05:12):
You see, he.
Speaker 1 (05:13):
Got into office pretending to be some moderate, very reasonably
like cool, Hey, look at my NCAA bracket. But the
people he brought in, they didn't feel they need to
mask any of that. He brought into and mainstreamed people
like Newland, Lisa Monico, Susan Rice, real born and bred
(05:34):
American haters who would implement that vision and change the
Democrat Party. And the Democrat parties slowly but surely changed
under Barack Obama, and they began courting the most evil,
depraved anti Americans in the country. This is all taking
place under Barack Obama's presidency. Now towards the end of that.
(05:55):
The American people, I'm not talking about you. You always
knew what was going on. But the normies, norms, the
people who kind of have pay attention, they didn't realize
what Barack Obama was even at the end of his
eight years, but they knew something seems off, something seems wrong.
They elected Donald Trump. Then Donald Trump and all of
us frankly discovered what Obama had been doing. We didn't
(06:17):
truly discover it until Donald Trump got elected. When Donald
Trump was completely destroyed his first presidency, completely destroyed from
within the government by all the communists Obama put into place.
He put into place a system of radicalism, full loan
cultural Marxism, destroyed Trump's presidency. They impeached him a couple
of times. But during this entire time, the party's going
(06:38):
further left, further left, for further left, more rabid, more rapid, rabid,
to a level we'd never really seen before. Are you
still shocked? Sometimes you turn on the television, there are
tesla's burning in a parking lot. You're thinking, what in
the world Barack Obama helped author all of this stuff?
So Donald Trump gets impedes, gets his president, the presidency
destroyed for four years, then Democrats steal an election. Don't
(07:01):
argue with me about that. Look at the number of
voters in the last it's the ultimate anomaly. All of
a sudden, we just dug up millions of new voters.
They stole an election. They installed Joe Biden. Now this
is when all the stuff, all the problems of the
modern Democrat Party got turned into hyperdrive. The modern Democrat
Party would actually have been better off without Joe Biden,
(07:21):
because Joe Biden got elected. Only Joe Biden is a
walking cadaver with dementia. He can't think, he's not strong,
he doesn't know anything. He walked around drooling on himself,
and he put those very same maoists all around him,
and he was never strong enough to keep them in check.
So they just did things like, hey, let's open up
(07:43):
the border, and.
Speaker 2 (07:44):
There's Joe on the corner.
Speaker 1 (07:45):
Huh the border, And then I just kept taking that further. Well,
wait a minute, let's not just open up the border.
Let's bring in as many people as we can.
Speaker 2 (07:54):
And there's Joe drooling on himself.
Speaker 1 (07:56):
Okay, let's fly him into the country. Hey, somebody create
so they could come in by an app And they
brought in as many rapists and murders in the country
and there's Joe drooling on himself, never able to keep
the worst instincts of the Democrats in check. And along
this way, Nancy Pelosi was there too, getting older. You see,
(08:17):
remember Donald Trump's presidency the first time, Remember when he
got impeached. Do you know it was Nancy Pelosi who
fought off that impeachment for a couple of years because
she knew it would.
Speaker 2 (08:27):
Make her party look bad.
Speaker 1 (08:28):
It's not that I love Nancy Pelosi, but she was
old enough, savvy enough to know, guys, this is gonna
make us look bad. It's gonna go too far. Finally
she broke, and the animals came storming through. As Nancy
Pelosi got older and weaker, Joe Biden old and weak,
the savages that were brought into the Democrat Party. All
(08:48):
this began in under Barack Obama. The savages came in
and slowly but surely started taking over the Democrat Party.
And I told you about this years ago, that this
was happening, that the Pelosi types, that Joe Biden in types,
really what was getting them was father time. None of
us are getting younger. Look at me, none of us
are getting younger. They got older, they got weaker as
(09:08):
we all will. And soon you couldn't hold back the
aocs anymore. You couldn't hold back the Rashida to leaves,
the Jasmine Crocketts. So what happened recently, what's going on? Well,
Chuck Schumer, Chuck Schumer had an option. He's the most
powerful Democrat really in the househoord Senate, but in the
Senate the most powerful Democrat. And they had that Continuing
(09:29):
Resolution coming through, and Chuck Schumer was presented with two options,
and of course he's not going to like either of them.
That's part of being in the minority. We've been in
the minority many times before. His options were, I can
get a few Democrat votes and get this CR passed,
or I can stop it and shut down the government,
which Democrats would have to own. And his options are
(09:51):
awful because Americans liked what was in the CR. Because
things that were in the CR were things like border security,
things like that. The Americans wanted that stuff in the CR.
Speaker 2 (10:04):
They wanted it in there.
Speaker 1 (10:05):
And I realized there's another bill coming, but Americans wanted
the CR. Chuck Schumer looked at his party and said, hey,
the smart thing politically is to pass the cr If
we don't, we look terrible.
Speaker 2 (10:22):
So we passed it.
Speaker 1 (10:24):
The Democrat Party, now run by the animals, is in
full blown revolt. Chuck Schumer had to cancel his book tour,
not because of you or me. He had to cancel
the book tour because the street animals across the country,
the Democrat base, they're so angry with him that we're
going to protest and scream at him and things. Today
he's out there trying to do this apology tour.
Speaker 4 (10:48):
Democrats are talking about they're going to medicaid centers, They're
going to people who would be desprived.
Speaker 5 (10:54):
And Senator Bill faith in the Democrats, well, let me
say this, and it gives me no pleasure to say this,
because we are friends. But I think you caved. I
think you and nine other Democrats cave. I don't think
you showed the fight that this party needs right now.
Speaker 4 (11:07):
So a lot of people responded to the anguish. I
appreciate it.
Speaker 1 (11:11):
I am fure.
Speaker 4 (11:12):
I wake up three in the morning sometimes so worried
about the future of the country under these oligaruchs or
what you know as the oligarchs.
Speaker 1 (11:22):
I guess yes, And.
Speaker 4 (11:25):
But you know what, Their attitude is I made my
money all by myself. How dare your government take my
money from me? I don't want to pay taxes? Or
I built my company with my bare hands. How dare
your government tell me how I should treat my customers,
the land and order water that I owned, or my employees.
They hate government. Government's a barrier to people, a barrier
(11:49):
to stop them from doing things.
Speaker 2 (11:51):
They want to destroy it.
Speaker 4 (11:52):
We are not letting them do it, and we're united.
Speaker 1 (11:57):
Those last little bits. What did you see there? Does
Chuck Schumer really wake up at three am upset about
Elon Musk? No, he doesn't care about any of that stuff.
Does Chuck Schumer really think it's smart to tell you
that you're not supposed to keep your business and keep
your money. No, that that that little tidbit. You're going
to see that on campaign ads in the midterms. That
was a disastrous thing to put on television.
Speaker 2 (12:18):
So what's he doing? Why would he say it?
Speaker 1 (12:21):
He's trying to keep the animals at bay. He's trying
as best he can to placate the savages in his party.
Look a Keem Jeffries is the minority leader in the
House of representatives.
Speaker 2 (12:33):
He and Schumer should.
Speaker 1 (12:34):
Be like this a keem. He knows there's trouble.
Speaker 3 (12:41):
Is it time for new leadership in the Senate?
Speaker 6 (12:43):
Next question?
Speaker 3 (12:47):
First, can you clarify it?
Speaker 1 (12:51):
That's an easy answer unless you're a king Jeffries, and
you're also trying to keep the animals in check, and
the animals don't want to be kept in check. As
you see again, clear back to Barack Obama. This is
what the Democrat Party became, the squad. They can't get
their face off the news.
Speaker 7 (13:10):
Chuck Schumer, I guess the Democratic leader, your senator said
at this meeting that he is going to vote for cloture.
He is going to vote to allow there to be
a simple majority vote. You think that's wrong.
Speaker 8 (13:22):
I believe that's a tremendous mistake. To me, it is
almost unthinkable why Senate Democrats would vote to hand the
few pieces of leverage that we have away for free
when we've been sent here to protect social security, protect Medicaid,
and protect Medicare.
Speaker 7 (13:40):
You're close with Congresswoman Alexandria A. Cassio Quortez of New York.
Some of your fellow House Democrats say, and not just
progressives by the way. We've heard that moderates have said
this too, that they're ready to support her to challenge
Chuck Schumer in a Democratic primary.
Speaker 6 (13:56):
Would you get behind.
Speaker 9 (13:57):
That that's four years from now. If you were asking
me at least in two years, then I would have
an absolute answer. But I can tell you that there
are a lot of people that are watching his leadership.
Speaker 10 (14:10):
In this moment.
Speaker 8 (14:11):
This is the moment.
Speaker 9 (14:12):
We don't even know what elections will look like in
four years, if we will have elections, and so I
definitely think that younger, fresher leadership may be something that
many of us, not just depending on what part of
the spectrum you're on, but many Americans may be looking for.
Especially in the state of New York.
Speaker 2 (14:35):
They're in complete disarray.
Speaker 1 (14:37):
As the old guard fades away, the young savages are
taking over. Kind of frightening, but kind of hilarious to watch.
All that may have made you uncomfortable, but I am
right now this may make you uncomfortable too. The election
of Donald Trump didn't save America. It bought us some time.
(14:58):
It bought us time to win critical local and state
elections that will actually save America. There's one happening in Wisconsin.
Are you paying attention? Are you involved?
Speaker 2 (15:09):
Doctor? Former Governor Scott Walker about it?
Speaker 1 (15:11):
In just a moment before we talk to him, Let
me talk to you about your cell phone service. Pure
talk is what you should have. Put your money where
your morals are. We need to do this with everything,
myself included. When we go out and purchase things, we
need to make sure our money follows our morals. These
gigantic cell phone companies, the AT and Ts, the T Mobiles,
(15:34):
the Verizons, they hate us. They've made that crystal clear.
They take our money and throw it at the most
putrid cause it's our money we pay for all that.
Your Talk's never done that to you. Their ceo walk
the jungles of Vietnam for this country. They hire American
citizens and they'll save you money. Why wouldn't you switch
(15:54):
puretalk dot com slash JESSETV.
Speaker 2 (15:58):
We'll be back.
Speaker 1 (16:07):
A reminder that I just got done telling you the
election of Donald Trump did not save America.
Speaker 2 (16:14):
It bought us some time.
Speaker 1 (16:16):
We have a thousand more battles to fight, legal and
local in order to save this country. We cannot win
presidential elections and then sit back on our hands and
say who Thank goodness, save us Trump. That's not how
it works. We have a lot of work to do,
including work in the critical swing state of Wisconsin. Did
you know there's a big bat election there, an important one.
(16:36):
Joining me now, former Governor Scott Walker, president of the
Young America's Foundation, joins us to talk about that. Governor,
what's happening in your state.
Speaker 11 (16:46):
It's a battle royal forty seven forty seven the latest
poll by the state wide Chamber of Commercial Reliable poll.
And you know this shouldn't even be close. Brad Shimmel,
the conservative former attorney general, is running against radically liberal,
ultra left winger out of Dane County named Susan Crawford
who's letting child sex offenders out and other awful things.
(17:08):
But George Sorows, Rex Hoffman, Jad Pritzker, they're all putting
millions in this state and that's why it's incredibly close
and incredibly important for us to win.
Speaker 1 (17:19):
Who is I think I already know the answer to
this question based on what you just said. But who's
winning the money race? Are we even competing there? Or
is this another one of those things where we're getting
out spent by the maoists.
Speaker 3 (17:31):
Well being outspent, but it's actually surprisingly relatively close.
Speaker 11 (17:34):
I think that's because early on I and a whole
bunch of other folks from Wisconsin reached out to people
across the country.
Speaker 3 (17:41):
And mentioned what was at state. This isn't just about
the things I did.
Speaker 11 (17:44):
Hear of the reforms that we did, and we took
on the big ever union bosses years ago, or school
choice or even photo id to vote requirements that will
be gone as Susan.
Speaker 3 (17:53):
Crawford's on the High Court. This has a national application.
Speaker 11 (17:57):
Really, twofold one was an obvious one we've been talking
about for the last month, and that is if Crawford
gets in her campaign invites even said this for a
fundraiser she was on.
Speaker 3 (18:06):
They said their goal is to get rid of two
seats currently.
Speaker 11 (18:10):
Held by Republicans in the House of Representatives from Wisconsin
as a new court where wedraw the boundaries for those
congressional districts. So right there, you could stop the president's
agenda just by stopping what the majority in the US House.
Speaker 3 (18:24):
And we saw how close it was over the last
few weeks.
Speaker 11 (18:26):
But secondly, even more timely, we saw what happened this
weekend when President Trump and his team did what they
said they were going to do and get the worst
of the worst of the worst criminals in the world,
send them back to their countries of origin.
Speaker 3 (18:39):
And what do we got a judge who's trying to
block that.
Speaker 11 (18:42):
If Susan Crawford's on the bench with three other activists,
radical liberal, brazen political activists, they're going to stop the
flow of horrendous criminals like that out of the state
of Wisconsin. And that's another blow to the president's agenda.
Speaker 1 (18:58):
Governor, obviously, this is the state you know, well, it's
a state you did so well, and can you help
me understand Wisconsin?
Speaker 2 (19:05):
It's a state I love.
Speaker 1 (19:07):
How can this woman even possibly compete money or no money?
Every Wisconsinate I've ever met in my life, it's like
the most down to earth, wonderful human being. And even
the non political people, they're just decent people. That It's
not San Francisco. I don't understand it.
Speaker 11 (19:23):
It's very much a slice of Americana here except for
pockets in Milwaukee and good junks of the city of Madison.
Madison is so liberal they still have Bernie Sanders signs
up from twenty twenty.
Speaker 3 (19:35):
Six, so this is an area who thinks Hillary Clinton
was too moderate, and this shows you just out of touch.
Speaker 11 (19:40):
So you get those two big urban areas who are
radically overwhelmingly not just Democrat, but liberal socialist radicals out there,
and then the rest of us have to usset that.
Speaker 3 (19:50):
And so that's really what the margins are about. You
throw in the money the mix.
Speaker 11 (19:53):
In the last twenty five years, Wisconsin has been the
closest battleground state in America now, thank god, and we
help Donald Trump win.
Speaker 3 (20:01):
It last year, or a little bit more than we
typically went.
Speaker 11 (20:04):
But what we need now more than ever, all those
people voted for Trump advance in the fall have to
show up this spring. Traditionally there's a huge drop off
for people who vote in the November election versus those
who vote in the April spring election. If we carry
just a fraction of those people we won with last ball,
we'll win this election.
Speaker 3 (20:22):
But we've got to wake those folks up.
Speaker 11 (20:24):
And it's why I hope President Trump will come here
to Wisconsin between now and April first and actually campaign
for Brad Shimmel, because I think Donald Trump can win this.
Speaker 1 (20:32):
Racecourse, Governor, before I let you go, people were watching
all over the country, not just Wisconsin. Is there anything
people around the country can do to help or do
we all just have to sit back and pray and
cross our fingers.
Speaker 11 (20:47):
Well Shimmel for Justice dot conmics Brad Schimmel side. He's
a former Attorney general career prosecutor. Versus Susan Crawford, who
you know, Brad puts people away for a long time.
Speaker 3 (20:57):
She listened out too early. It couldn't a contrast. But
I think what people could do is what they did
for me a number of years ago when we had
that recall election and all the protesters from around the
country counter it.
Speaker 11 (21:08):
Not just send money, make phone calls, reach out to
anyone you know Wisconsin, anyone who's got connections to Wisconsin,
volunteer to help out with the campaign or with the
party making calls.
Speaker 3 (21:19):
As it was for me in that Recoe election.
Speaker 11 (21:20):
People on all fifty states connected to help us win
the recall, which was the first of it's kind in America.
We won with more votes than we did the first
time around. I think if we have that kind of
pouring out, not just financially, but if people making calls,
reaching out to people, text the emailing.
Speaker 3 (21:36):
Whatever you can do. Let people in Wisconsin know how
important this race is.
Speaker 1 (21:40):
Governor appreciate you very much, sir, come back soon. All right,
How are you sleeping? It can be hard. Sleep can
be hard to come by anymore. It's not hard to
find something to get stressed out about.
Speaker 2 (22:00):
What do we do?
Speaker 1 (22:00):
We reach for the worst things because there's all kinds
of things that'll help you sleep. I acknowledge that all
kinds of things. Doctor will write your prescription for something.
You can even pick something up at the gas station
put you right to sleep. But they all have the
same thing in common. When you wake up, you feel horrible.
You don't feel rested, feel tired, and grog gets awful.
That's why you need dreampowder from Beam because it's natural stuff.
(22:21):
It's a cup of hot chocolate, have wonderful flavors, but
that's not the best part. It has natural things in
it like melatonin, and you just kind of drift off
to sleep, and.
Speaker 2 (22:31):
Then when you wake up you feel.
Speaker 1 (22:33):
Wonderful because you didn't take some garbage pill shotbeam dot
com slash Jesse Kelly gets you up to forty percent off.
Speaker 2 (22:42):
Go try a bag of it. Tell me what you
think we'll be back.
Speaker 6 (22:54):
Not just the student. We're gonna do more.
Speaker 12 (22:56):
In fact, every day now we're approving visa ravocations, and
if that visa led to a green card, the green
card process as well.
Speaker 6 (23:02):
And here's why. It's very simple. When you apply to
enter the United.
Speaker 12 (23:06):
States and you get a visa, you are a guest
and you're coming as a student, you're coming as a
tourist or what have you, and in it you have
to make certain assertations. And if you tell us when
you apply for a visa, I'm coming to the US
to participate in pro Hamas events, that runs counter to
the foreign policy interest in the United States of America.
Speaker 6 (23:22):
It's that simple. So you lied, you came.
Speaker 12 (23:24):
If you had told us that you were going to
do that, we never would have given you the visa.
Speaker 6 (23:28):
Now you're here, Now you do it. You lied to us.
You're out. He's going to leave, and so are others,
and we're going to keep doing it.
Speaker 1 (23:35):
There are so many things that become controversial that I
don't understand why. I don't understand how any of this
stuff is controversial. Maybe the great Bill Jacobson will explain
it to me. Joining me now, Founder of Legal Insurrection
and professor at Cornell Law Bill Jacobson. Okay, Professor Machmood
Khalil was a scumbag, came here as a guest, cause trouble.
(23:59):
Now he's gone. What's the controversy, what a time.
Speaker 10 (24:01):
Is You didn't miss anything. What you're missing is that
we have, you know, an organizational structure in this country
which is meant to protect people like him against the force.
Speaker 3 (24:16):
Of our laws.
Speaker 10 (24:16):
So you know, he came here and seemingly from the
moment he landed here a couple of years ago, he's
been nothing but depriving Americans of their rights. Remember, this
is a guy who led an organization at Columbia University
which took over buildings, trashed buildings, you know, basically took
janitor's hostage, that's all over the New York Post yesterday,
(24:40):
interfered with student's ability to go to class. So this
is a guy who did not respect Americans' rights. And
when he's called out on it and held to the
terms of his visa and green card, which do not
allow for this sort of conduct, he all of a
sudden becomes a hero. So it's a fake outrage. It's
the sort of outrage we've become used to, but we
(25:02):
should not bow down to it, can you.
Speaker 1 (25:06):
I'm glad you brought up the point, because we might
as well just wade into this ugly territory the judges.
Everyone's outraged right now. We wake up to a new
outrage every day, myself included, where the Trump administration tries
to implement really anything to port some Hamas guy send
a bunch of MS thirteen guys to El Salvador. It
really doesn't matter what he does. Some judge will step
(25:27):
in and stop it. And people are pulling their hair out.
Look at me, Bill, I was at a full head
of hair tomorrow yesterday. Now look at me. People are
angry about the whole thing. How do we stop this
without tearing the country apart? Because either we have to
ignore these people or something.
Speaker 10 (25:44):
Well, the Supreme Court needs to do its job. Twice
the government has gone to the Supreme Court and said,
put a halt to what these district court judges are doing.
In one of the cases, a district court judge or
did the two billion dollars be paid within thirty six hours?
And he didn't even know what the contracts were? The
judge we're talking about in the news today ordered planes
(26:08):
carrying the MS thirteen and other terrorist groups out of
the country to be turned around mid flight. Judge couldn't
have even known if the planes had enough fuel to
do that, but ordered it. We've had one am in
the morning orders by judges. And what needs to happen
is the Supreme Court needs to take control of the
judiciary and Justice Roberts is out there today complaining about
(26:32):
all the criticism, but he needs to do his job.
Speaker 1 (26:36):
Okay, I hate to play some childish game of what ifs,
but I can't help but think about the future. What
if they don't where do we go from that? Look,
they just had a chance. I realized that was a
temporary thing and they're gonna have a chance to make
a more permanent ruling. I get that, But what if
they let us down they have before?
Speaker 2 (26:55):
Are we stuck?
Speaker 10 (26:59):
Well, you know, the Democrats like to scream all the
time about constitutional crisis. There really is no constitutional crisis
other than the Democrats lost the election and they're utilizing
and manipulating with some judges, you know, connivance the judiciary
to try to take over the executive branch. Yeah, this
(27:20):
is a problem. You know, we have separation of powers
for a reason, we have an appellate process for a reason.
And the appellate process is not working. The district court judges,
and this is why there's a lack of good faith,
have been using a technique called temporary restraining orders. Temporary
restraining orders, for the most part, are not appealable, and
(27:40):
so what they've been doing, they've been creating these two
to four week windows where you can't even go to
an appellate judge. And the government tried to go to
the DC circuit and the d C circuits said, well,
you can't appeal this tro and the Supreme Court basically
did the same thing. So, yeah, we're approaching a crisis level.
We don't want want to talk about it, and we're
(28:01):
not going to suggest it. But we don't want to
talk about what if the Trump administration just says I'm
not following your order. We want to avoid getting there.
And Chief Justice Roberts, rather than lecturing people who are
talking about impeaching judges, needs to lecture the district court
judges to not go out of their lane. I mean,
(28:23):
we have had some crazy, crazy rulings which were then
you know insulated by calling them tros temporary restraining orders. So, yeah,
we don't like to talk about it, but let's hope
we don't get there, because then you really do have
a crisis.
Speaker 1 (28:38):
Yeah, it seems like it's all bad decisions to choose from. Right,
Let's move on and talk about some other things, mainly
things to do with the court, like birthright citizenship. Obviously,
it's just beyond absurd that we live in a country
where you can step across the border and have a baby.
Speaker 2 (28:55):
And it's an American citizen.
Speaker 1 (28:56):
It's just such a blatant violation of the law. But
what are we expecting the Supreme Court to do about this?
Speaker 10 (29:02):
Well, if I had to wager, and I'm not a
betting person because they always lose, I would wager that
the Supreme Court is not going to touch it. That
they will simply say that this is the way it's
been for one hundred years and we're not going to
change the current practice. They would be wrong. They would
be wrong to do that, and I don't know if
(29:24):
they will have the fortitude to stand up to the
public pressure. But there are very good arguments that historically
the provisions in the Fourteenth Amendment granting citizenship, which were
meant to apply to newly freed slaves, were never intended
(29:45):
to apply to people who are here illegally. And that's
the key thing. There have been a couple of Supreme
Court rulings, but always as to people who were here legally,
permanent resident aliens here. It has never been a situation
where you can fly here on a birthright tourism, where
you fly in from Asia or wherever you're flying in from.
(30:08):
They put you up in a hotel in Los Angeles,
you have your baby, you fly back to China or wherever,
and your kid's now an American citizen. It's completely absurd.
It's not what was intended, and there's very good historical
arguments that that is beyond what was meant by the
fourteenth Amendment. I just don't know if this Court, having
come under the pressure over abortion and reversing Roe v. Wade,
(30:32):
is willing to go there. I mean, let's not forget
the Democrats whip people into such a frenzy that some
lunatic with a gun showed up on the doorstep of
Justice Kavanaugh over the abortion decision. So I don't know
if they will have the strength to do it, but
I believe it would be the right decision.
Speaker 1 (30:51):
All right. Finally, the pardon pen. Obviously, Trump made a
bunch of waves yesterday put out a social media post
that Joe Biden pardons or not and void because he
was a cadaver and it was all auto pen and
I had to play Daddy Jesse on the air and
let everybody know it's not how it works. As much
as I want those pardons to go away, they're not
(31:11):
going to go away. Doesn't really matter what we want.
That's reality. But Bill, feel free to slap me around
with your version of it.
Speaker 10 (31:20):
Well, this is a thing which in the popular conception
I think makes perfect sense that if he didn't actually
sign it, how is it a real pardon. The Constitution
doesn't require that a pardon even be signed. Can read
the provision, and the Constitution on pardons grants the president
the power of I think it's called reprieve. And pardon
does not say you've got to sign it, doesn't say
(31:41):
you have to sign it yourself, doesn't say you have
to use a ballpoint pen, which of course didn't exist
at that time, doesn't say any of that. But I
think there is a very serious issue which is going
to have to be brought forward in the right way,
which is, if Joe Biden did not sign it, did
he specifically authorize the autopen to be used, if the
(32:02):
autopen was used, did he even know about the pardons
or the clemencies, And if he did not know about it,
and if he did not direct the pen the autopen
to be used, I think you've got a real issue there.
The only way it comes up is if the Trump
administration and federal prosecutors moved to prosecute somebody who got
(32:23):
a pardon, and they would then say, hey, you can't
do that. Here's the pardon, here's the piece of paper.
The government would have to then come in with proof
that it was not validly issued, just like any other document.
If somebody signs your name to something and you didn't
authorize them to do that, you're not bound by it.
I don't know if the government has that proof, but
(32:43):
if the only thing they've got is that the autopen
was used and if Joe Biden authorized it, there's probably
nothing there.
Speaker 1 (32:53):
And obviously you're the legal expert, I'm the furthest thing
from it. How do we prove that he didn't authorize
it because it would seem to me the key witness
in his whole case is somebody that has already been
decided is not even mentally fit to stand trial, and
that was a year ago. This we're gonna go ask
Joe Biden if he remembers it, doesn't remember what he
(33:13):
had for breakfast?
Speaker 10 (33:15):
Well, that's true, So he can't be a witness as
to his remembering. But there were people around him. What
time of day was it used, who was there when
it was used? What were the communications? Where are the emails?
Where are the text messages? Did he have communications when
he was on the beach wherever he was, or on
some island wherever he was? Was he communicating with the
office on the day in which it was used? So
(33:37):
you can build a circumstantial case, But you're right, Joe
Biden can't be effectively a witness for himself. Federal prosecutors
already have ruled not quite that he's not mentally capable
to stand trial, but that he was so damaged that
no jury would ever convict him of anything. So I
think that it's a problem, And if the Trump administration
(33:58):
is going to go that route, they really better do
their research before they go that route. But if they've
got the goods, then these could be invalid pardons.
Speaker 1 (34:09):
My fingers are crossed. I have more hope than I
did yesterday. Professor, Thank you so much. I appreciate you
lighten the mood. Next, well, good news is we continue
to snatch very, very bad people out of Mexico bring
(34:30):
them back to the United States of America for justice.
Cash Patel appears to be moving forward. Obviously, there's a
lot more work to do within the walls of the FBI,
but we'll take W's where we can get W's bad
guys being pulled off the street instead of January sixth, Grandma's,
I guess is a good start. Joining me now, retired
(34:51):
Colonel Army Colonel John Mills, author of the book The
War Against the Deep State. Okay, Colonel Cash battel know
he's got a mountain to climb and this is only
the beginning.
Speaker 2 (35:03):
How's he doing so far?
Speaker 3 (35:05):
Well?
Speaker 13 (35:06):
I think going really well.
Speaker 1 (35:10):
Jesse.
Speaker 13 (35:10):
It's this thing with Mexico. You read between the lines.
Speaker 3 (35:15):
What is going on?
Speaker 13 (35:17):
This is demonstrating cooperation from Mexico. Well, why weren't they
cooperating with the Biden Committee. Well, because obviously the Biden
Committee was incompetent in negotiation and couldn't have cared less
about protecting Americans. But a president Shinbaum of Mexico, she's
not really the president of Mexico. She's the president of
(35:39):
Mexico City, and she knows she has a huge, ungoverned
space issue. She bought off and corrupt. I'll just pass
on that question. But this shows demon This is demonstrating
cooperation with the FBI.
Speaker 1 (35:56):
This is a good thing, you know, so far, it's great, right,
don't take this as any kind of a complaint. But
removing cartel leaders, getting them back to America where they
can't escape and live like kings in prison, it's a
good thing. But it's also not eradicating the cartels, as
the trub administration has said repeatedly is their intention. So
(36:19):
this is clearly step one. What does step two look like?
Speaker 13 (36:24):
Well, it's a great question. I just had a special
operator on my podcast and we were going over through this,
and I got a lot of long planning experience these things.
There's a number of deliberate steps that need to be
taken place, and we want to apply increasing pressure. But
Right now as we speak, a huge event is undergoing
(36:47):
ongoing in Mexico, and that's that Seventh Group, Special Forces
Group is conducting training of Mexican Marines and naval elements.
This is this is I know it's hard to trust
anybody in Mexico, but these these folks are pretty good
and as good as you can get as far as
(37:08):
the trust level. Why are they training them, Well, they're
training them to take on the cartels, but just be honest.
This is also what's called advance force operations, essentially laying
the human terrain and network in preparation for possible strikes
down the road. We've already heard CIA is flying predator drones.
(37:30):
We have banned intelligence aircraft flying. So it's all about
mapping the battle space. So when we're ready to pull
the trigger, if that's necessary, we can pull the trigger.
And when next time they're having an appropriate meeting, we
just might be waiting for them.
Speaker 1 (37:50):
Colonel Trump spoke today to Vladimir Putin. I was not
on the phone call. I'm reasonably sure you were not
on the phone call. But I'm thrilled there was a
phone call. I can't believe we get got to the
point where this is somehow controversial. The American president, when
trying to broke your a peace deal, should be speaking
to both sides, should he not? Oh?
Speaker 13 (38:10):
Absolutely, And this is on this top of Ukraine. I've
always tried to be America first. I am not taking
sides or cheerleading for either side in any way, shape
or form. And that's I think the downfall some people
have been cheerleading. You've got to talk to both sides.
And what I think is really the wrong approach is
Democrats will say, yeah, they want peace, but Putin is
(38:31):
the enemy. Okay, this is peace. These are peace discussions,
one oh one. You can't have conduct peace negotiations when
you're saying one side is evil and one side is right.
That's not how peace nego. Successful peace negotiats are conducted, Okay.
Plenty of blame and fault to go around with everyone here.
(38:52):
So if we're interested in peace, you've got to talk
to both sides. Now, I will make an observation. I
think Zelenski, who had a beachhead inside of Russia with
the curse Salient, I think he we call it stepping
on your poncho. I think he really cost a lot
(39:12):
of lives and he cost his own significant bargaining point
by choosing to have a dust up. And I really
people saying no, I mean he was the one. He
was the one who I think handled inappropriately the engagement
with President Trump and Vice President Vance. It was huge
lost opportunity for Ukraine, and he really handled it poorly.
Speaker 1 (39:36):
That cost.
Speaker 13 (39:37):
The salient is down to less than a third of
what it was. There's now Ukrainian forces surrounded and I'm
not hearing a whole lot more about this, but now
there's a big report twenty Ukrainian or excuse me, NATO
officers are in some inside one of the encircled areas.
Why are there NATO officers?
Speaker 1 (39:57):
What's going on?
Speaker 13 (39:59):
Why were there NATO officers there?
Speaker 1 (40:03):
Colonel I'm glad you brought up this point because it's
something I brought up on my show a couple times.
Speaker 2 (40:09):
One I don't understand.
Speaker 1 (40:10):
Granted, I was just a dumb corporal, Okay, so that's
certainly not a colonel or anything like that. I don't
understand the thinking behind a counter offensive at all. When
you don't have the numbers and you don't have a
guaranteed way you're going to be able to logistically supply
and maintain the route into your counter offensive. Me, I
don't understand the thinking of that period one and two.
Speaker 2 (40:33):
Doesn't this give.
Speaker 1 (40:34):
Putin all the cards because he has a bunch of
Ukrainian troops surrounded. If I'm Vladimir Putin, You've really got
to sweeten the potter. I'm going to annihilate this army
I've been fighting for three years.
Speaker 13 (40:47):
Well, Zelensky made a bad decision. You know, he found
a weak point in the in the Soviet or excuse me,
the Russian front. He took advantage of it, Putin through
and now Putin that that area was weak, area was weak,
and Zelensky was able to exploit at for a period.
But that's where the North Korean troops were brought in
(41:08):
and it's been worn down and again because of that
horrible we're going to look back in history, that horrible
decision by Zelenski. What did President Trump do? Said, okay,
you want to dust up with me, Fine, we're temporarily
cutting off intelligence, we're temporarily cutting off logistics flow. That
cost him the salient and shame on Zelensky for horrible
(41:30):
decision making.
Speaker 1 (41:34):
Good friend of mine, Sean Parnell is at the Pentagon
and it warms my heart. He gave a little presser yesterday.
Here's what he said.
Speaker 5 (41:42):
Will the Department of Defense commit to firing or otherwise
disciplining any remaining leadership that were directly involved in the
Afghanistan withdrawal.
Speaker 14 (41:50):
So we're in the process of figuring out what that
investigation will look like. And so to your question of
will those will people be held accountable? I think we
have an obligation both to the American people and to
the American warfighters who fought an Afghanistan to hold the
leadership accountable in some way. Now we don't know what
that looks like right now, but to hold the leadership
(42:12):
that was in charge of the afghan withdraw accountable. Because look,
if you have a private that loses a sensitive item,
that loses night vision, god, because it loses a weapon,
you can bet that that private is going to be
held accountable. The same and equal standards must apply to
senior military leaders.
Speaker 1 (42:28):
So is obviously correct about that. But it's not a
system that we've had really since Vietnam where the Flag
officer corps are treated as if these they are all
these untouchable gods, and it really is chafing on the
people who were in.
Speaker 13 (42:46):
Yeah no, and you mentioned you were a lovely corporal.
Never never call yourself a lovely corporal please, very important
position in the military. The Sean is right on, and
I think this is where the we've got to We've
got to get back into the mode excuse me, but
of firing generals and admirals. This is it's called plucking.
(43:09):
There's historical precedence for this. It's been done. And you know,
it really kind of started during the Vietnam days when uh,
Westmorland uh just kept on asking for more and more
and more and more, and it just became a quakemire
of nothingness. We never fired Westmorland. So we've got to
(43:33):
get back into this business of holding general generals and admirals.
Speaker 3 (43:38):
And anybody in the military.
Speaker 13 (43:39):
You're not anointed by God, you're appointed.
Speaker 3 (43:44):
You could be removed.
Speaker 13 (43:45):
And you know the end of the night Vision Goggle
episode that he mentioned, Oh my goodness, do you how
many times we fired we fired people for situations like that.
And now we've got a whold generals and and this
goes into the uh, the pardons situation, and the I
think it's all these pardons are essentially let's start with
(44:07):
General Millie. I don't think those pardons are legally valid.
So I think we have an opening, and I think
we have probably our first general who should be called
back on active duty to face responsibility, no.
Speaker 1 (44:20):
Doubt, Colonel, Thank you, sir, I'm back soon. Please all right,
lighten the mood next. All right, it is time to
lighten the mood. And I just can't help it. I
(44:41):
enjoyed greatly watching Donald Trump beat the living crapit of
the American media. Who are you?
Speaker 3 (44:47):
Who are you? That's the same, the same one. I
don't want to I don't want to talk to NBC anymore.
Speaker 1 (44:53):
I think you're so discredited.
Speaker 9 (44:56):
Is there any evidence of a link to terrorism or
is it just his point of view?
Speaker 6 (45:02):
Yeah?
Speaker 12 (45:03):
They take over I mean, do you not? I mean
you should watch the news. These guys take over entire buildings.
Speaker 6 (45:07):
We can shut down. I'm asking about this.
Speaker 10 (45:11):
Do you say to those who claim you're using a
home and you're little to circumvent you?
Speaker 1 (45:15):
President?
Speaker 3 (45:16):
No law.
Speaker 6 (45:18):
Not as old as constitution. We still pay attention to that, don't.
Speaker 5 (45:20):
We The record talking about the issuing preemptive pardons, to
these people.
Speaker 14 (45:26):
But was he aware of the of his signature being
used on every single parton that's a question you should
ask the by.
Speaker 2 (45:31):
The way, any evidence on that that.
Speaker 10 (45:34):
You're a reporter, you should find out.
Speaker 8 (45:35):
He was exactly mister president.
Speaker 1 (45:37):
He obviously you're.
Speaker 5 (45:41):
You're concerned about the situation, and Godli, what are the
hopes now to get the hound around?
Speaker 1 (45:48):
He just became a big story that happened, right, did
you see that
Speaker 2 (45:57):
A suitable
The JFK Files. I'll be Daddy Jesse and tell you
my thoughts on that. We're gonna talk about what's going
on within the Democrat Party, what's going on around the world.
Trump talked to Putin or were about to have peace,
all that more coming up on. I'm right, okay, before
(00:26):
we get to the Democrat Party, let's go ahead and
get the flashy headline out of the way. And as
you can probably already tell by the tone of my voice,
I'm gonna have to be Daddy Jesse here. Look, it's
not that I love being Daddy Jesse. All right. The
country needs fathers. The country needs dads. They need dads
(00:47):
like the one I had, where you're having a good time,
you're being an idiot, and dad has to step in,
turn on the lights, turn down the music, and say, okay, okay,
straighten up. Let's do the real world here. I know
the JFK Files got released. I got it, and everyone's
still sifting through it. Eighty thousand pages. Nobody's gone through
(01:07):
all that yet. And in case you're wondering, yes, I'm
gonna go through it. I'm gonna meander my way through it.
But don't expect some ground breaking thing that you didn't
know or assume before. For this one very very simple reason.
What does it take to kill the president of the
United States of America? It takes a lot, takes a
(01:29):
lot of organization, commitment, honestly resources, not even necessarily money.
You even put everything into place, whether it's a loan
gunman Lee Harvey Oswald, Cia or the mob or the
who knows, the Russians. I don't know, I do know,
but do you honestly think that they've found a way
whoever it was, to kill the president of the United
(01:52):
States of America and then they just kind of left
the evidence sitting around for sixty years.
Speaker 2 (01:59):
Come on, it's not gonna be anything.
Speaker 3 (02:03):
I know.
Speaker 1 (02:04):
I know in the interest of ratings and headlines and
everybody wants to bop JFK fouls, I'm supposed to come
here and act like this is like some groundbreaking thing.
Come on, we all know what it's gonna be. Let's
move on and talk about the real world. Shaw we
by the way, I should say, in all fairness, I
do applaud Trump for releasing it because there is such
(02:27):
now between the American people and their government. Understandably that
the only way you can repair that is opening the books.
And so, while this is not some groundbreaking thing, books
being open is a good thing. I'm glad you can
read it. I'm glad I can read it. It's all good,
but it's not gonna be anything. Now, let's discuss what's
taking place right now inside the Democrat Party. And to
(02:47):
do this, I'm gonna kind of walk my way into
where Chuck Schumer is today and Hakeem Jeffreys and Nancy Pelosi.
But we're gonna rewind just a little bituse I think
it'll help help understand what they're going through. And this
is great news. I'm in joining this. This is better
news than the JFK files. So first, let's discuss Barack Obama,
because a lot of this comes back to Barack Obama.
(03:08):
There have been Democrats and Republicans since basically forever in
this country.
Speaker 2 (03:12):
There's nothing new.
Speaker 1 (03:13):
You had your Clintons and Reagans, and the Fords and Carters,
and you had all you had all these types. But
Barack Obama came along and he really really changed so much,
and he changed so much for this reason, he is
very very sharp. I don't send me your emails I
hate him, That's not what I said. Okay, I hate
(03:33):
him too, But he's very sharp, very charismatic, and what
he did was he knew how to put on a
very moderate, reasonable, very charming face, soaring speeches. He knew
how to cloak what was actually inside of Barack Obama,
and that is born in bred hatred of America. We've
(03:55):
had plenty of bad presidents, Republicans and Democrats, right, I
can't stand FDR. But FDR didn't hate America. I can't
stand Jimmy Carter. He was an awful president that's almost
universally acknowledged, terrible, dreadful. Did Jimmy Carter hate America? I
don't think I'd go that far. Barack Obama did. That's
how he was raised. Frank Marshall Davis. He hated America,
(04:17):
but again, he knew how.
Speaker 2 (04:18):
To masket like most communists do.
Speaker 1 (04:20):
So he got into office using all that charisma against
into office. But when he got into office, he did
something totally different. He started putting into place throughout the
government the most radical anti Americans he could find, and
not just in normal places where where a president would
(04:43):
you know a secretary of State or ambassador to this.
Barack Obama, he cleaned out the FBI. You're gone, You're gone,
You're gone, You're gone. Who's he putting into place? He's
putting into place committed MAOIs who will go after his
political opponents. And he did this branch after branch, piece
after piece of the federal government. Eight years. We had
(05:04):
an anti American remaking this country and more importantly, for
the purposes of where we're at today, remaking the Democrat Party.
Speaker 2 (05:12):
You see, he.
Speaker 1 (05:13):
Got into office pretending to be some moderate, very reasonably
like cool, Hey, look at my NCAA bracket. But the
people he brought in, they didn't feel they need to
mask any of that. He brought into and mainstreamed people
like Newland, Lisa Monico, Susan Rice, real born and bred
(05:34):
American haters who would implement that vision and change the
Democrat Party. And the Democrat parties slowly but surely changed
under Barack Obama, and they began courting the most evil,
depraved anti Americans in the country. This is all taking
place under Barack Obama's presidency. Now towards the end of that.
(05:55):
The American people, I'm not talking about you. You always
knew what was going on. But the normies, norms, the
people who kind of have pay attention, they didn't realize
what Barack Obama was even at the end of his
eight years, but they knew something seems off, something seems wrong.
They elected Donald Trump. Then Donald Trump and all of
us frankly discovered what Obama had been doing. We didn't
(06:17):
truly discover it until Donald Trump got elected. When Donald
Trump was completely destroyed his first presidency, completely destroyed from
within the government by all the communists Obama put into place.
He put into place a system of radicalism, full loan
cultural Marxism, destroyed Trump's presidency. They impeached him a couple
of times. But during this entire time, the party's going
(06:38):
further left, further left, for further left, more rabid, more rapid, rabid,
to a level we'd never really seen before. Are you
still shocked? Sometimes you turn on the television, there are
tesla's burning in a parking lot. You're thinking, what in
the world Barack Obama helped author all of this stuff?
So Donald Trump gets impedes, gets his president, the presidency
destroyed for four years, then Democrats steal an election. Don't
(07:01):
argue with me about that. Look at the number of
voters in the last it's the ultimate anomaly. All of
a sudden, we just dug up millions of new voters.
They stole an election. They installed Joe Biden. Now this
is when all the stuff, all the problems of the
modern Democrat Party got turned into hyperdrive. The modern Democrat
Party would actually have been better off without Joe Biden,
(07:21):
because Joe Biden got elected. Only Joe Biden is a
walking cadaver with dementia. He can't think, he's not strong,
he doesn't know anything. He walked around drooling on himself,
and he put those very same maoists all around him,
and he was never strong enough to keep them in check.
So they just did things like, hey, let's open up
(07:43):
the border, and.
Speaker 2 (07:44):
There's Joe on the corner.
Speaker 1 (07:45):
Huh the border, And then I just kept taking that further. Well,
wait a minute, let's not just open up the border.
Let's bring in as many people as we can.
Speaker 2 (07:54):
And there's Joe drooling on himself.
Speaker 1 (07:56):
Okay, let's fly him into the country. Hey, somebody create
so they could come in by an app And they
brought in as many rapists and murders in the country
and there's Joe drooling on himself, never able to keep
the worst instincts of the Democrats in check. And along
this way, Nancy Pelosi was there too, getting older. You see,
(08:17):
remember Donald Trump's presidency the first time, Remember when he
got impeached. Do you know it was Nancy Pelosi who
fought off that impeachment for a couple of years because
she knew it would.
Speaker 2 (08:27):
Make her party look bad.
Speaker 1 (08:28):
It's not that I love Nancy Pelosi, but she was
old enough, savvy enough to know, guys, this is gonna
make us look bad. It's gonna go too far. Finally
she broke, and the animals came storming through. As Nancy
Pelosi got older and weaker, Joe Biden old and weak,
the savages that were brought into the Democrat Party. All
(08:48):
this began in under Barack Obama. The savages came in
and slowly but surely started taking over the Democrat Party.
And I told you about this years ago, that this
was happening, that the Pelosi types, that Joe Biden in types,
really what was getting them was father time. None of
us are getting younger. Look at me, none of us
are getting younger. They got older, they got weaker as
(09:08):
we all will. And soon you couldn't hold back the
aocs anymore. You couldn't hold back the Rashida to leaves,
the Jasmine Crocketts. So what happened recently, what's going on? Well,
Chuck Schumer, Chuck Schumer had an option. He's the most
powerful Democrat really in the househoord Senate, but in the
Senate the most powerful Democrat. And they had that Continuing
(09:29):
Resolution coming through, and Chuck Schumer was presented with two options,
and of course he's not going to like either of them.
That's part of being in the minority. We've been in
the minority many times before. His options were, I can
get a few Democrat votes and get this CR passed,
or I can stop it and shut down the government,
which Democrats would have to own. And his options are
(09:51):
awful because Americans liked what was in the CR. Because
things that were in the CR were things like border security,
things like that. The Americans wanted that stuff in the CR.
Speaker 2 (10:04):
They wanted it in there.
Speaker 1 (10:05):
And I realized there's another bill coming, but Americans wanted
the CR. Chuck Schumer looked at his party and said, hey,
the smart thing politically is to pass the cr If
we don't, we look terrible.
Speaker 2 (10:22):
So we passed it.
Speaker 1 (10:24):
The Democrat Party, now run by the animals, is in
full blown revolt. Chuck Schumer had to cancel his book tour,
not because of you or me. He had to cancel
the book tour because the street animals across the country,
the Democrat base, they're so angry with him that we're
going to protest and scream at him and things. Today
he's out there trying to do this apology tour.
Speaker 4 (10:48):
Democrats are talking about they're going to medicaid centers, They're
going to people who would be desprived.
Speaker 5 (10:54):
And Senator Bill faith in the Democrats, well, let me
say this, and it gives me no pleasure to say this,
because we are friends. But I think you caved. I
think you and nine other Democrats cave. I don't think
you showed the fight that this party needs right now.
Speaker 4 (11:07):
So a lot of people responded to the anguish. I
appreciate it.
Speaker 1 (11:11):
I am fure.
Speaker 4 (11:12):
I wake up three in the morning sometimes so worried
about the future of the country under these oligaruchs or
what you know as the oligarchs.
Speaker 1 (11:22):
I guess yes, And.
Speaker 4 (11:25):
But you know what, Their attitude is I made my
money all by myself. How dare your government take my
money from me? I don't want to pay taxes? Or
I built my company with my bare hands. How dare
your government tell me how I should treat my customers,
the land and order water that I owned, or my employees.
They hate government. Government's a barrier to people, a barrier
(11:49):
to stop them from doing things.
Speaker 2 (11:51):
They want to destroy it.
Speaker 4 (11:52):
We are not letting them do it, and we're united.
Speaker 1 (11:57):
Those last little bits. What did you see there? Does
Chuck Schumer really wake up at three am upset about
Elon Musk? No, he doesn't care about any of that stuff.
Does Chuck Schumer really think it's smart to tell you
that you're not supposed to keep your business and keep
your money. No, that that that little tidbit. You're going
to see that on campaign ads in the midterms. That
was a disastrous thing to put on television.
Speaker 2 (12:18):
So what's he doing? Why would he say it?
Speaker 1 (12:21):
He's trying to keep the animals at bay. He's trying
as best he can to placate the savages in his party.
Look a Keem Jeffries is the minority leader in the
House of representatives.
Speaker 2 (12:33):
He and Schumer should.
Speaker 1 (12:34):
Be like this a keem. He knows there's trouble.
Speaker 3 (12:41):
Is it time for new leadership in the Senate?
Speaker 6 (12:43):
Next question?
Speaker 3 (12:47):
First, can you clarify it?
Speaker 1 (12:51):
That's an easy answer unless you're a king Jeffries, and
you're also trying to keep the animals in check, and
the animals don't want to be kept in check. As
you see again, clear back to Barack Obama. This is
what the Democrat Party became, the squad. They can't get
their face off the news.
Speaker 7 (13:10):
Chuck Schumer, I guess the Democratic leader, your senator said
at this meeting that he is going to vote for cloture.
He is going to vote to allow there to be
a simple majority vote. You think that's wrong.
Speaker 8 (13:22):
I believe that's a tremendous mistake. To me, it is
almost unthinkable why Senate Democrats would vote to hand the
few pieces of leverage that we have away for free
when we've been sent here to protect social security, protect Medicaid,
and protect Medicare.
Speaker 7 (13:40):
You're close with Congresswoman Alexandria A. Cassio Quortez of New York.
Some of your fellow House Democrats say, and not just
progressives by the way. We've heard that moderates have said
this too, that they're ready to support her to challenge
Chuck Schumer in a Democratic primary.
Speaker 6 (13:56):
Would you get behind.
Speaker 9 (13:57):
That that's four years from now. If you were asking
me at least in two years, then I would have
an absolute answer. But I can tell you that there
are a lot of people that are watching his leadership.
Speaker 10 (14:10):
In this moment.
Speaker 8 (14:11):
This is the moment.
Speaker 9 (14:12):
We don't even know what elections will look like in
four years, if we will have elections, and so I
definitely think that younger, fresher leadership may be something that
many of us, not just depending on what part of
the spectrum you're on, but many Americans may be looking for.
Especially in the state of New York.
Speaker 2 (14:35):
They're in complete disarray.
Speaker 1 (14:37):
As the old guard fades away, the young savages are
taking over. Kind of frightening, but kind of hilarious to watch.
All that may have made you uncomfortable, but I am
right now this may make you uncomfortable too. The election
of Donald Trump didn't save America. It bought us some time.
(14:58):
It bought us time to win critical local and state
elections that will actually save America. There's one happening in Wisconsin.
Are you paying attention? Are you involved?
Speaker 2 (15:09):
Doctor? Former Governor Scott Walker about it?
Speaker 1 (15:11):
In just a moment before we talk to him, Let
me talk to you about your cell phone service. Pure
talk is what you should have. Put your money where
your morals are. We need to do this with everything,
myself included. When we go out and purchase things, we
need to make sure our money follows our morals. These
gigantic cell phone companies, the AT and Ts, the T Mobiles,
(15:34):
the Verizons, they hate us. They've made that crystal clear.
They take our money and throw it at the most
putrid cause it's our money we pay for all that.
Your Talk's never done that to you. Their ceo walk
the jungles of Vietnam for this country. They hire American
citizens and they'll save you money. Why wouldn't you switch
(15:54):
puretalk dot com slash JESSETV.
Speaker 2 (15:58):
We'll be back.
Speaker 1 (16:07):
A reminder that I just got done telling you the
election of Donald Trump did not save America.
Speaker 2 (16:14):
It bought us some time.
Speaker 1 (16:16):
We have a thousand more battles to fight, legal and
local in order to save this country. We cannot win
presidential elections and then sit back on our hands and
say who Thank goodness, save us Trump. That's not how
it works. We have a lot of work to do,
including work in the critical swing state of Wisconsin. Did
you know there's a big bat election there, an important one.
(16:36):
Joining me now, former Governor Scott Walker, president of the
Young America's Foundation, joins us to talk about that. Governor,
what's happening in your state.
Speaker 11 (16:46):
It's a battle royal forty seven forty seven the latest
poll by the state wide Chamber of Commercial Reliable poll.
And you know this shouldn't even be close. Brad Shimmel,
the conservative former attorney general, is running against radically liberal,
ultra left winger out of Dane County named Susan Crawford
who's letting child sex offenders out and other awful things.
(17:08):
But George Sorows, Rex Hoffman, Jad Pritzker, they're all putting
millions in this state and that's why it's incredibly close
and incredibly important for us to win.
Speaker 1 (17:19):
Who is I think I already know the answer to
this question based on what you just said. But who's
winning the money race? Are we even competing there? Or
is this another one of those things where we're getting
out spent by the maoists.
Speaker 3 (17:31):
Well being outspent, but it's actually surprisingly relatively close.
Speaker 11 (17:34):
I think that's because early on I and a whole
bunch of other folks from Wisconsin reached out to people
across the country.
Speaker 3 (17:41):
And mentioned what was at state. This isn't just about
the things I did.
Speaker 11 (17:44):
Hear of the reforms that we did, and we took
on the big ever union bosses years ago, or school
choice or even photo id to vote requirements that will
be gone as Susan.
Speaker 3 (17:53):
Crawford's on the High Court. This has a national application.
Speaker 11 (17:57):
Really, twofold one was an obvious one we've been talking
about for the last month, and that is if Crawford
gets in her campaign invites even said this for a
fundraiser she was on.
Speaker 3 (18:06):
They said their goal is to get rid of two
seats currently.
Speaker 11 (18:10):
Held by Republicans in the House of Representatives from Wisconsin
as a new court where wedraw the boundaries for those
congressional districts. So right there, you could stop the president's
agenda just by stopping what the majority in the US House.
Speaker 3 (18:24):
And we saw how close it was over the last
few weeks.
Speaker 11 (18:26):
But secondly, even more timely, we saw what happened this
weekend when President Trump and his team did what they
said they were going to do and get the worst
of the worst of the worst criminals in the world,
send them back to their countries of origin.
Speaker 3 (18:39):
And what do we got a judge who's trying to
block that.
Speaker 11 (18:42):
If Susan Crawford's on the bench with three other activists,
radical liberal, brazen political activists, they're going to stop the
flow of horrendous criminals like that out of the state
of Wisconsin. And that's another blow to the president's agenda.
Speaker 1 (18:58):
Governor, obviously, this is the state you know, well, it's
a state you did so well, and can you help
me understand Wisconsin?
Speaker 2 (19:05):
It's a state I love.
Speaker 1 (19:07):
How can this woman even possibly compete money or no money?
Every Wisconsinate I've ever met in my life, it's like
the most down to earth, wonderful human being. And even
the non political people, they're just decent people. That It's
not San Francisco. I don't understand it.
Speaker 11 (19:23):
It's very much a slice of Americana here except for
pockets in Milwaukee and good junks of the city of Madison.
Madison is so liberal they still have Bernie Sanders signs
up from twenty twenty.
Speaker 3 (19:35):
Six, so this is an area who thinks Hillary Clinton
was too moderate, and this shows you just out of touch.
Speaker 11 (19:40):
So you get those two big urban areas who are
radically overwhelmingly not just Democrat, but liberal socialist radicals out there,
and then the rest of us have to usset that.
Speaker 3 (19:50):
And so that's really what the margins are about. You
throw in the money the mix.
Speaker 11 (19:53):
In the last twenty five years, Wisconsin has been the
closest battleground state in America now, thank god, and we
help Donald Trump win.
Speaker 3 (20:01):
It last year, or a little bit more than we
typically went.
Speaker 11 (20:04):
But what we need now more than ever, all those
people voted for Trump advance in the fall have to
show up this spring. Traditionally there's a huge drop off
for people who vote in the November election versus those
who vote in the April spring election. If we carry
just a fraction of those people we won with last ball,
we'll win this election.
Speaker 3 (20:22):
But we've got to wake those folks up.
Speaker 11 (20:24):
And it's why I hope President Trump will come here
to Wisconsin between now and April first and actually campaign
for Brad Shimmel, because I think Donald Trump can win this.
Speaker 1 (20:32):
Racecourse, Governor, before I let you go, people were watching
all over the country, not just Wisconsin. Is there anything
people around the country can do to help or do
we all just have to sit back and pray and
cross our fingers.
Speaker 11 (20:47):
Well Shimmel for Justice dot conmics Brad Schimmel side. He's
a former Attorney general career prosecutor. Versus Susan Crawford, who
you know, Brad puts people away for a long time.
Speaker 3 (20:57):
She listened out too early. It couldn't a contrast. But
I think what people could do is what they did
for me a number of years ago when we had
that recall election and all the protesters from around the
country counter it.
Speaker 11 (21:08):
Not just send money, make phone calls, reach out to
anyone you know Wisconsin, anyone who's got connections to Wisconsin,
volunteer to help out with the campaign or with the
party making calls.
Speaker 3 (21:19):
As it was for me in that Recoe election.
Speaker 11 (21:20):
People on all fifty states connected to help us win
the recall, which was the first of it's kind in America.
We won with more votes than we did the first
time around. I think if we have that kind of
pouring out, not just financially, but if people making calls,
reaching out to people, text the emailing.
Speaker 3 (21:36):
Whatever you can do. Let people in Wisconsin know how
important this race is.
Speaker 1 (21:40):
Governor appreciate you very much, sir, come back soon. All right,
How are you sleeping? It can be hard. Sleep can
be hard to come by anymore. It's not hard to
find something to get stressed out about.
Speaker 2 (22:00):
What do we do?
Speaker 1 (22:00):
We reach for the worst things because there's all kinds
of things that'll help you sleep. I acknowledge that all
kinds of things. Doctor will write your prescription for something.
You can even pick something up at the gas station
put you right to sleep. But they all have the
same thing in common. When you wake up, you feel horrible.
You don't feel rested, feel tired, and grog gets awful.
That's why you need dreampowder from Beam because it's natural stuff.
(22:21):
It's a cup of hot chocolate, have wonderful flavors, but
that's not the best part. It has natural things in
it like melatonin, and you just kind of drift off
to sleep, and.
Speaker 2 (22:31):
Then when you wake up you feel.
Speaker 1 (22:33):
Wonderful because you didn't take some garbage pill shotbeam dot
com slash Jesse Kelly gets you up to forty percent off.
Speaker 2 (22:42):
Go try a bag of it. Tell me what you
think we'll be back.
Speaker 6 (22:54):
Not just the student. We're gonna do more.
Speaker 12 (22:56):
In fact, every day now we're approving visa ravocations, and
if that visa led to a green card, the green
card process as well.
Speaker 6 (23:02):
And here's why. It's very simple. When you apply to
enter the United.
Speaker 12 (23:06):
States and you get a visa, you are a guest
and you're coming as a student, you're coming as a
tourist or what have you, and in it you have
to make certain assertations. And if you tell us when
you apply for a visa, I'm coming to the US
to participate in pro Hamas events, that runs counter to
the foreign policy interest in the United States of America.
Speaker 6 (23:22):
It's that simple. So you lied, you came.
Speaker 12 (23:24):
If you had told us that you were going to
do that, we never would have given you the visa.
Speaker 6 (23:28):
Now you're here, Now you do it. You lied to us.
You're out. He's going to leave, and so are others,
and we're going to keep doing it.
Speaker 1 (23:35):
There are so many things that become controversial that I
don't understand why. I don't understand how any of this
stuff is controversial. Maybe the great Bill Jacobson will explain
it to me. Joining me now, Founder of Legal Insurrection
and professor at Cornell Law Bill Jacobson. Okay, Professor Machmood
Khalil was a scumbag, came here as a guest, cause trouble.
(23:59):
Now he's gone. What's the controversy, what a time.
Speaker 10 (24:01):
Is You didn't miss anything. What you're missing is that
we have, you know, an organizational structure in this country
which is meant to protect people like him against the force.
Speaker 3 (24:16):
Of our laws.
Speaker 10 (24:16):
So you know, he came here and seemingly from the
moment he landed here a couple of years ago, he's
been nothing but depriving Americans of their rights. Remember, this
is a guy who led an organization at Columbia University
which took over buildings, trashed buildings, you know, basically took
janitor's hostage, that's all over the New York Post yesterday,
(24:40):
interfered with student's ability to go to class. So this
is a guy who did not respect Americans' rights. And
when he's called out on it and held to the
terms of his visa and green card, which do not
allow for this sort of conduct, he all of a
sudden becomes a hero. So it's a fake outrage. It's
the sort of outrage we've become used to, but we
(25:02):
should not bow down to it, can you.
Speaker 1 (25:06):
I'm glad you brought up the point, because we might
as well just wade into this ugly territory the judges.
Everyone's outraged right now. We wake up to a new
outrage every day, myself included, where the Trump administration tries
to implement really anything to port some Hamas guy send
a bunch of MS thirteen guys to El Salvador. It
really doesn't matter what he does. Some judge will step
(25:27):
in and stop it. And people are pulling their hair out.
Look at me, Bill, I was at a full head
of hair tomorrow yesterday. Now look at me. People are
angry about the whole thing. How do we stop this
without tearing the country apart? Because either we have to
ignore these people or something.
Speaker 10 (25:44):
Well, the Supreme Court needs to do its job. Twice
the government has gone to the Supreme Court and said,
put a halt to what these district court judges are doing.
In one of the cases, a district court judge or
did the two billion dollars be paid within thirty six hours?
And he didn't even know what the contracts were? The
judge we're talking about in the news today ordered planes
(26:08):
carrying the MS thirteen and other terrorist groups out of
the country to be turned around mid flight. Judge couldn't
have even known if the planes had enough fuel to
do that, but ordered it. We've had one am in
the morning orders by judges. And what needs to happen
is the Supreme Court needs to take control of the
judiciary and Justice Roberts is out there today complaining about
(26:32):
all the criticism, but he needs to do his job.
Speaker 1 (26:36):
Okay, I hate to play some childish game of what ifs,
but I can't help but think about the future. What
if they don't where do we go from that? Look,
they just had a chance. I realized that was a
temporary thing and they're gonna have a chance to make
a more permanent ruling. I get that, But what if
they let us down they have before?
Speaker 2 (26:55):
Are we stuck?
Speaker 10 (26:59):
Well, you know, the Democrats like to scream all the
time about constitutional crisis. There really is no constitutional crisis
other than the Democrats lost the election and they're utilizing
and manipulating with some judges, you know, connivance the judiciary
to try to take over the executive branch. Yeah, this
(27:20):
is a problem. You know, we have separation of powers
for a reason, we have an appellate process for a reason.
And the appellate process is not working. The district court judges,
and this is why there's a lack of good faith,
have been using a technique called temporary restraining orders. Temporary
restraining orders, for the most part, are not appealable, and
(27:40):
so what they've been doing, they've been creating these two
to four week windows where you can't even go to
an appellate judge. And the government tried to go to
the DC circuit and the d C circuits said, well,
you can't appeal this tro and the Supreme Court basically
did the same thing. So, yeah, we're approaching a crisis level.
We don't want want to talk about it, and we're
(28:01):
not going to suggest it. But we don't want to
talk about what if the Trump administration just says I'm
not following your order. We want to avoid getting there.
And Chief Justice Roberts, rather than lecturing people who are
talking about impeaching judges, needs to lecture the district court
judges to not go out of their lane. I mean,
(28:23):
we have had some crazy, crazy rulings which were then
you know insulated by calling them tros temporary restraining orders. So, yeah,
we don't like to talk about it, but let's hope
we don't get there, because then you really do have
a crisis.
Speaker 1 (28:38):
Yeah, it seems like it's all bad decisions to choose from. Right,
Let's move on and talk about some other things, mainly
things to do with the court, like birthright citizenship. Obviously,
it's just beyond absurd that we live in a country
where you can step across the border and have a baby.
Speaker 2 (28:55):
And it's an American citizen.
Speaker 1 (28:56):
It's just such a blatant violation of the law. But
what are we expecting the Supreme Court to do about this?
Speaker 10 (29:02):
Well, if I had to wager, and I'm not a
betting person because they always lose, I would wager that
the Supreme Court is not going to touch it. That
they will simply say that this is the way it's
been for one hundred years and we're not going to
change the current practice. They would be wrong. They would
be wrong to do that, and I don't know if
(29:24):
they will have the fortitude to stand up to the
public pressure. But there are very good arguments that historically
the provisions in the Fourteenth Amendment granting citizenship, which were
meant to apply to newly freed slaves, were never intended
(29:45):
to apply to people who are here illegally. And that's
the key thing. There have been a couple of Supreme
Court rulings, but always as to people who were here legally,
permanent resident aliens here. It has never been a situation
where you can fly here on a birthright tourism, where
you fly in from Asia or wherever you're flying in from.
(30:08):
They put you up in a hotel in Los Angeles,
you have your baby, you fly back to China or wherever,
and your kid's now an American citizen. It's completely absurd.
It's not what was intended, and there's very good historical
arguments that that is beyond what was meant by the
fourteenth Amendment. I just don't know if this Court, having
come under the pressure over abortion and reversing Roe v. Wade,
(30:32):
is willing to go there. I mean, let's not forget
the Democrats whip people into such a frenzy that some
lunatic with a gun showed up on the doorstep of
Justice Kavanaugh over the abortion decision. So I don't know
if they will have the strength to do it, but
I believe it would be the right decision.
Speaker 1 (30:51):
All right. Finally, the pardon pen. Obviously, Trump made a
bunch of waves yesterday put out a social media post
that Joe Biden pardons or not and void because he
was a cadaver and it was all auto pen and
I had to play Daddy Jesse on the air and
let everybody know it's not how it works. As much
as I want those pardons to go away, they're not
(31:11):
going to go away. Doesn't really matter what we want.
That's reality. But Bill, feel free to slap me around
with your version of it.
Speaker 10 (31:20):
Well, this is a thing which in the popular conception
I think makes perfect sense that if he didn't actually
sign it, how is it a real pardon. The Constitution
doesn't require that a pardon even be signed. Can read
the provision, and the Constitution on pardons grants the president
the power of I think it's called reprieve. And pardon
does not say you've got to sign it, doesn't say
(31:41):
you have to sign it yourself, doesn't say you have
to use a ballpoint pen, which of course didn't exist
at that time, doesn't say any of that. But I
think there is a very serious issue which is going
to have to be brought forward in the right way,
which is, if Joe Biden did not sign it, did
he specifically authorize the autopen to be used, if the
(32:02):
autopen was used, did he even know about the pardons
or the clemencies, And if he did not know about it,
and if he did not direct the pen the autopen
to be used, I think you've got a real issue there.
The only way it comes up is if the Trump
administration and federal prosecutors moved to prosecute somebody who got
(32:23):
a pardon, and they would then say, hey, you can't
do that. Here's the pardon, here's the piece of paper.
The government would have to then come in with proof
that it was not validly issued, just like any other document.
If somebody signs your name to something and you didn't
authorize them to do that, you're not bound by it.
I don't know if the government has that proof, but
(32:43):
if the only thing they've got is that the autopen
was used and if Joe Biden authorized it, there's probably
nothing there.
Speaker 1 (32:53):
And obviously you're the legal expert, I'm the furthest thing
from it. How do we prove that he didn't authorize
it because it would seem to me the key witness
in his whole case is somebody that has already been
decided is not even mentally fit to stand trial, and
that was a year ago. This we're gonna go ask
Joe Biden if he remembers it, doesn't remember what he
(33:13):
had for breakfast?
Speaker 10 (33:15):
Well, that's true, So he can't be a witness as
to his remembering. But there were people around him. What
time of day was it used, who was there when
it was used? What were the communications? Where are the emails?
Where are the text messages? Did he have communications when
he was on the beach wherever he was, or on
some island wherever he was? Was he communicating with the
office on the day in which it was used? So
(33:37):
you can build a circumstantial case, But you're right, Joe
Biden can't be effectively a witness for himself. Federal prosecutors
already have ruled not quite that he's not mentally capable
to stand trial, but that he was so damaged that
no jury would ever convict him of anything. So I
think that it's a problem, And if the Trump administration
(33:58):
is going to go that route, they really better do
their research before they go that route. But if they've
got the goods, then these could be invalid pardons.
Speaker 1 (34:09):
My fingers are crossed. I have more hope than I
did yesterday. Professor, Thank you so much. I appreciate you
lighten the mood. Next, well, good news is we continue
to snatch very, very bad people out of Mexico bring
(34:30):
them back to the United States of America for justice.
Cash Patel appears to be moving forward. Obviously, there's a
lot more work to do within the walls of the FBI,
but we'll take W's where we can get W's bad
guys being pulled off the street instead of January sixth, Grandma's,
I guess is a good start. Joining me now, retired
(34:51):
Colonel Army Colonel John Mills, author of the book The
War Against the Deep State. Okay, Colonel Cash battel know
he's got a mountain to climb and this is only
the beginning.
Speaker 2 (35:03):
How's he doing so far?
Speaker 3 (35:05):
Well?
Speaker 13 (35:06):
I think going really well.
Speaker 1 (35:10):
Jesse.
Speaker 13 (35:10):
It's this thing with Mexico. You read between the lines.
Speaker 3 (35:15):
What is going on?
Speaker 13 (35:17):
This is demonstrating cooperation from Mexico. Well, why weren't they
cooperating with the Biden Committee. Well, because obviously the Biden
Committee was incompetent in negotiation and couldn't have cared less
about protecting Americans. But a president Shinbaum of Mexico, she's
not really the president of Mexico. She's the president of
(35:39):
Mexico City, and she knows she has a huge, ungoverned
space issue. She bought off and corrupt. I'll just pass
on that question. But this shows demon This is demonstrating
cooperation with the FBI.
Speaker 1 (35:56):
This is a good thing, you know, so far, it's great, right,
don't take this as any kind of a complaint. But
removing cartel leaders, getting them back to America where they
can't escape and live like kings in prison, it's a
good thing. But it's also not eradicating the cartels, as
the trub administration has said repeatedly is their intention. So
(36:19):
this is clearly step one. What does step two look like?
Speaker 13 (36:24):
Well, it's a great question. I just had a special
operator on my podcast and we were going over through this,
and I got a lot of long planning experience these things.
There's a number of deliberate steps that need to be
taken place, and we want to apply increasing pressure. But
Right now as we speak, a huge event is undergoing
(36:47):
ongoing in Mexico, and that's that Seventh Group, Special Forces
Group is conducting training of Mexican Marines and naval elements.
This is this is I know it's hard to trust
anybody in Mexico, but these these folks are pretty good
and as good as you can get as far as
(37:08):
the trust level. Why are they training them, Well, they're
training them to take on the cartels, but just be honest.
This is also what's called advance force operations, essentially laying
the human terrain and network in preparation for possible strikes
down the road. We've already heard CIA is flying predator drones.
(37:30):
We have banned intelligence aircraft flying. So it's all about
mapping the battle space. So when we're ready to pull
the trigger, if that's necessary, we can pull the trigger.
And when next time they're having an appropriate meeting, we
just might be waiting for them.
Speaker 1 (37:50):
Colonel Trump spoke today to Vladimir Putin. I was not
on the phone call. I'm reasonably sure you were not
on the phone call. But I'm thrilled there was a
phone call. I can't believe we get got to the
point where this is somehow controversial. The American president, when
trying to broke your a peace deal, should be speaking
to both sides, should he not? Oh?
Speaker 13 (38:10):
Absolutely, And this is on this top of Ukraine. I've
always tried to be America first. I am not taking
sides or cheerleading for either side in any way, shape
or form. And that's I think the downfall some people
have been cheerleading. You've got to talk to both sides.
And what I think is really the wrong approach is
Democrats will say, yeah, they want peace, but Putin is
(38:31):
the enemy. Okay, this is peace. These are peace discussions,
one oh one. You can't have conduct peace negotiations when
you're saying one side is evil and one side is right.
That's not how peace nego. Successful peace negotiats are conducted, Okay.
Plenty of blame and fault to go around with everyone here.
(38:52):
So if we're interested in peace, you've got to talk
to both sides. Now, I will make an observation. I
think Zelenski, who had a beachhead inside of Russia with
the curse Salient, I think he we call it stepping
on your poncho. I think he really cost a lot
(39:12):
of lives and he cost his own significant bargaining point
by choosing to have a dust up. And I really
people saying no, I mean he was the one. He
was the one who I think handled inappropriately the engagement
with President Trump and Vice President Vance. It was huge
lost opportunity for Ukraine, and he really handled it poorly.
Speaker 1 (39:36):
That cost.
Speaker 13 (39:37):
The salient is down to less than a third of
what it was. There's now Ukrainian forces surrounded and I'm
not hearing a whole lot more about this, but now
there's a big report twenty Ukrainian or excuse me, NATO
officers are in some inside one of the encircled areas.
Why are there NATO officers?
Speaker 1 (39:57):
What's going on?
Speaker 13 (39:59):
Why were there NATO officers there?
Speaker 1 (40:03):
Colonel I'm glad you brought up this point because it's
something I brought up on my show a couple times.
Speaker 2 (40:09):
One I don't understand.
Speaker 1 (40:10):
Granted, I was just a dumb corporal, Okay, so that's
certainly not a colonel or anything like that. I don't
understand the thinking behind a counter offensive at all. When
you don't have the numbers and you don't have a
guaranteed way you're going to be able to logistically supply
and maintain the route into your counter offensive. Me, I
don't understand the thinking of that period one and two.
Speaker 2 (40:33):
Doesn't this give.
Speaker 1 (40:34):
Putin all the cards because he has a bunch of
Ukrainian troops surrounded. If I'm Vladimir Putin, You've really got
to sweeten the potter. I'm going to annihilate this army
I've been fighting for three years.
Speaker 13 (40:47):
Well, Zelensky made a bad decision. You know, he found
a weak point in the in the Soviet or excuse me,
the Russian front. He took advantage of it, Putin through
and now Putin that that area was weak, area was weak,
and Zelensky was able to exploit at for a period.
But that's where the North Korean troops were brought in
(41:08):
and it's been worn down and again because of that
horrible we're going to look back in history, that horrible
decision by Zelenski. What did President Trump do? Said, okay,
you want to dust up with me, Fine, we're temporarily
cutting off intelligence, we're temporarily cutting off logistics flow. That
cost him the salient and shame on Zelensky for horrible
(41:30):
decision making.
Speaker 1 (41:34):
Good friend of mine, Sean Parnell is at the Pentagon
and it warms my heart. He gave a little presser yesterday.
Here's what he said.
Speaker 5 (41:42):
Will the Department of Defense commit to firing or otherwise
disciplining any remaining leadership that were directly involved in the
Afghanistan withdrawal.
Speaker 14 (41:50):
So we're in the process of figuring out what that
investigation will look like. And so to your question of
will those will people be held accountable? I think we
have an obligation both to the American people and to
the American warfighters who fought an Afghanistan to hold the
leadership accountable in some way. Now we don't know what
that looks like right now, but to hold the leadership
(42:12):
that was in charge of the afghan withdraw accountable. Because look,
if you have a private that loses a sensitive item,
that loses night vision, god, because it loses a weapon,
you can bet that that private is going to be
held accountable. The same and equal standards must apply to
senior military leaders.
Speaker 1 (42:28):
So is obviously correct about that. But it's not a
system that we've had really since Vietnam where the Flag
officer corps are treated as if these they are all
these untouchable gods, and it really is chafing on the
people who were in.
Speaker 13 (42:46):
Yeah no, and you mentioned you were a lovely corporal.
Never never call yourself a lovely corporal please, very important
position in the military. The Sean is right on, and
I think this is where the we've got to We've
got to get back into the mode excuse me, but
of firing generals and admirals. This is it's called plucking.
(43:09):
There's historical precedence for this. It's been done. And you know,
it really kind of started during the Vietnam days when uh,
Westmorland uh just kept on asking for more and more
and more and more, and it just became a quakemire
of nothingness. We never fired Westmorland. So we've got to
(43:33):
get back into this business of holding general generals and admirals.
Speaker 3 (43:38):
And anybody in the military.
Speaker 13 (43:39):
You're not anointed by God, you're appointed.
Speaker 3 (43:44):
You could be removed.
Speaker 13 (43:45):
And you know the end of the night Vision Goggle
episode that he mentioned, Oh my goodness, do you how
many times we fired we fired people for situations like that.
And now we've got a whold generals and and this
goes into the uh, the pardons situation, and the I
think it's all these pardons are essentially let's start with
(44:07):
General Millie. I don't think those pardons are legally valid.
So I think we have an opening, and I think
we have probably our first general who should be called
back on active duty to face responsibility, no.
Speaker 1 (44:20):
Doubt, Colonel, Thank you, sir, I'm back soon. Please all right,
lighten the mood next. All right, it is time to
lighten the mood. And I just can't help it. I
(44:41):
enjoyed greatly watching Donald Trump beat the living crapit of
the American media. Who are you?
Speaker 3 (44:47):
Who are you? That's the same, the same one. I
don't want to I don't want to talk to NBC anymore.
Speaker 1 (44:53):
I think you're so discredited.
Speaker 9 (44:56):
Is there any evidence of a link to terrorism or
is it just his point of view?
Speaker 6 (45:02):
Yeah?
Speaker 12 (45:03):
They take over I mean, do you not? I mean
you should watch the news. These guys take over entire buildings.
Speaker 6 (45:07):
We can shut down. I'm asking about this.
Speaker 10 (45:11):
Do you say to those who claim you're using a
home and you're little to circumvent you?
Speaker 1 (45:15):
President?
Speaker 3 (45:16):
No law.
Speaker 6 (45:18):
Not as old as constitution. We still pay attention to that, don't.
Speaker 5 (45:20):
We The record talking about the issuing preemptive pardons, to
these people.
Speaker 14 (45:26):
But was he aware of the of his signature being
used on every single parton that's a question you should
ask the by.
Speaker 2 (45:31):
The way, any evidence on that that.
Speaker 10 (45:34):
You're a reporter, you should find out.
Speaker 8 (45:35):
He was exactly mister president.
Speaker 1 (45:37):
He obviously you're.
Speaker 5 (45:41):
You're concerned about the situation, and Godli, what are the
hopes now to get the hound around?
Speaker 1 (45:48):
He just became a big story that happened, right, did
you see that
Speaker 2 (45:57):
A suitable
Host
Jesse Kelly
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.