August 21, 2025 • 44 mins
The Democrat Party just got caught cooking the books on some serious data. Will it lead to accountability? This comes as multiple Democrats face potential indictments. Jesse Kelly is joined by Senator Eric Schmitt to discuss this and more. You'll also hear from Alex Swoyer on some big Supreme Court cases on the way. Plus, John Phillips discusses whether or not Gavin Newsom's 2028 schemes will work.
I'm Right with Jesse Kelly on The First TV | 8-20-25
Beam: Visit https://shopbeam.com/JESSEKELLY and use code JESSEKELLY to get our exclusive discount of up to 40% off.
Choq: Visit https://choq.com/jessetv for a 17.76% discount on your CHOQ subscription for life
Pure Talk: Go to https://www.puretalk.com/JESSETV to make the switch
Follow The Jesse Kelly Show on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheJesseKellyShow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
Democrats cook the books on everything. We're going to talk about,
why is it pertains to crime and other things. Here
we have Senator Eric Schmidt joining us. Is Adam Schiff
actually going to go to jail? More Supreme Court news,
all that coming up on I'm rite. Okay, let's have
(00:26):
a discussion about crime, violent crime in blue cities, why
it's so rampant, what's going on? And let's have a
discussion that may get uncomfortable about police agencies, large police
agencies in the United States of America. First, let's get
a couple basics out of the way. First, basics you
(00:46):
already know you watch this show all the time. We
don't have to rehash the entire thing, but just for
the purposes here, democrats are not democrats. They're communists. Now.
They are fighting a revolution. They are not political, they
are religion. Are fighting a revolution against everything. And part
of fighting a communist revolution is the use of violence,
(01:08):
not just them. You just want violence everywhere in society
to increase these stabilizes things, makes society more rightful. Revolution. Thus,
open up the prisons. Open up the prisons. Now. One
of the main ways that communists do this in this
country is through this cashless bail thing. Here was Trump
(01:29):
talking about it.
Speaker 2 (01:30):
This dire public safety crisis stem is directly from the
abject failures of the city's local leadership. The radical left
city Council adopted no cash bail. By the way, every
place in the country you have no cash bail is
a disaster. That's what started the problem in New York.
And they don't change it. They don't want to change it.
(01:52):
That's what started it in Chicago. I mean, bad politicians
started it. Bad leadership started it. But that was the
one thing that's central. No cash mail. Somebody murders somebody,
and they're out on no cash mail before the day
is out.
Speaker 1 (02:09):
No cash bail. So let's talk about this. And this
is something that it can make people squirm in their chairs,
right because we're about to separate society, separate human beings.
We don't like doing that, especially as Americans. Everyone's equal, right,
But let's be honest. The reason traffic was bad on
your way to work or school this morning is not
(02:30):
because all the drivers on the road are stupid or selfish.
Ten percent stupid selfish. It only takes a small percentage
to ruin traffic. Why do you have to sign eight
thousand disclaimers when you go to the doctor's office. Is
it one hundred percent of the patients who are morons?
Too happy? All those things? Now ten percent? Why does
(02:55):
your kid not learn as much in school as you
think they should? Is it because the whole class this
is a bunch of hooligans and dummies. No, it's ten percent.
Whenever you are at any place in your life, you
will discover it's a small percentage of society, the bottom
of the barrel, who ruin it for everybody. And it
works the exact same way with crime. You don't believe me,
(03:18):
I suggest you go get to know some cops. I
am friends with many of them. A cop who is
well established in an area, well established in any area,
they will tell you when they hear of a crime.
A cop established in an area will hear that somebody
somebody stuck up a convenience store. That cop will usually
(03:39):
be able to give you a short list of the
people and or groups responsible for that crime. Why they
know who the bad guys are? I mean, we act
as if criminal justice is complicated, and don't get me wrong,
some parts of it are complicated. What do we do
after we catch them by how do we stop them
from being that? I get that, but overall, criminal justice
is not that comp If you want to stop crime,
(04:01):
find the criminals, it's a small percent. Find the criminals,
arrest them, and keep them in prison. Period. Once they're
locked in cages, people don't get hurt anymore. Society gets
better and safer. If you let them out of those cages,
they'll go on and they'll hurt more people. Why would
democrats fall in love with something like cashless bail because
it allows animals to commit crimes, walk into jail, sign
their name on a piece of paper, and turn around
(04:22):
and walk right back out. The point of bail, after all,
in part is to keep you inside so you're not
outside hurting people. Naturally, Democrats hate that because why be
concern not Democrats? Because they're communists. They want people hurt.
Now here's the problem. If you're a communist, that's not
going to be a popular And don't delude yourself into
(04:45):
thinking these democrats they don't know what's going to happen
when you turn the serial rapists loose from jail. They
know what's going to happen. They want it to happen.
But that doesn't look good, right, no matter what society
you're in, that's very hard done for office. On the Hey,
I'm pro crime, that's a tough platform to sell. So
(05:07):
they lie like this.
Speaker 3 (05:10):
Well, first let's just look at the actual numbers. In Washington,
DC and all across the country. Crime was going up
during Donald Trump's first term, and when Joe Biden became
a president, crime started to come down. In fact, it's
been coming down precipitously in Washington and in cities all
across the country. So it's just not true the allegation
that they are making.
Speaker 1 (05:31):
Crime's been going down. Crime's been going down. I mean
they've been taking this stance for a while now. Remember
when Dome got crushed on stage when she was debating
Donald Trump. And of course, because the GOP is suicidal,
we allowed a communist and they named David Muhir to
moderate the debate, and he jumped in and said, this.
Speaker 4 (05:51):
Crime here is up and through the roof. Despite their
fraudulent statements that they made crime in this country's through
the roof. And we have a new form of crime.
It's called migrant crime, and it's happening at levels that
nobody thought possible pident Trump.
Speaker 5 (06:04):
As you know, the FBI says, overall, violent crime is
actually coming down in this country.
Speaker 4 (06:08):
But excuse me, the FBI defraud. They were defrauding statements.
They didn't include the worst cities, They didn't include the
cities with the worst crime. It was a fraud, just
like their number of eight hundred and eighteen thousand jobs
that they said they created turned out to be a fraud.
Speaker 1 (06:26):
Credit to Donald Trump for giving it right back to
that dirty communist. But you saw what he tried to
do there. Oh well, the FBI said violent crime's going
down anyway, let's move on. We'll talk to her right there.
We'll see. The communists are in a bit of a pickle.
When you're turning the jails loose, when you're turning the
animals loose onto society, people don't like it, so you
(06:49):
have to lie about it. But when you lie about it,
you see. This is where institutions are so critical for
a society. Institutions keep liars in check. It's one of
the main things institutions do. If you're a communist who's
caused violent crime to go up, you have to worry
about the FBI and these major police agencies, you know,
(07:13):
NYPD places like that. If you're lying about crime, you
know these institutions will step up and say, now, ah,
that's a lie. These guys are all committing crimes, crimes
going up. It's a lie. It's a lie. It's a lie.
So what to do? What to do? If the institution
is there to stop your lies from moving forward? Conquer
(07:35):
the institution. You don't stop lying. You certainly don't stop
turning the criminals loose onto society. If the FBI is
in your way, you conquer the FBI. Barack Obama did that.
He spent eight years filling up the FBI with committed communists,
promoting them through the ranks. They have since promoted others
through the ranks. Now the federal police force is completely
(07:58):
communist and against you. They are the enemy. What to
what to do? If the NYPD is going to be
honest about crime, well, communists run the city. Communists choose
the police commissioner. Communists will get to choose the leadership
of the NYPD. Doesn't matter how wonderful and brave the
(08:18):
guys on the ground are trying to stop the crime.
Simply take over the leadership and lie about the crime statistics,
the communists will constantly run into walls because he's selling
something demonic, destructive, and evil. He will then have to
find a way over or through that wall, and the
most efficient way to do that is conquer the institution
(08:42):
that stands in your way and rest assured. Right now,
communists are very afraid of what Donald Trump is doing
in DC for a couple different reasons. One, what if
what if he solves the crime? What if Donald Trump
actually fixes crime in DC? All these crime stats are
(09:03):
going down? How would that make all the other d
c all the DC, all the other cities, how would
it make them look? And let's be honest with you.
Let's be honest here. If Donald Trump starts putting violent
criminals in jail, who's going to vote for Democrats. That's
why they're on MSNBC talking like this.
Speaker 6 (09:23):
Lives can only take him so far. He's hoping that
with this presence of these troops he likes, you know,
the protests this weekend we're peaceful, and the New King's
protests were peaceful. He's hoping for a George Floyd twenty
twenty like situation in DC where he can then use
that to manufacture another emergency so we can expand power.
Because what we're seeing is that he governs by emergency,
(09:44):
not by popular mandate.
Speaker 1 (09:45):
Right, and he gets to define the emergency exactly.
Speaker 6 (09:47):
He just declares, you know, I here by declare emergency,
and that gets to do whatever he wants, right. But
in reality, there is no there is no crime emergency
that can't be handled by local law enforcement.
Speaker 1 (09:59):
What sucking I really wor about fashion them Donald Trump
taking over everything by emergency. Though, that guy understands that
if you start taking violent criminals, you lock them in cages,
and you keep them locked in cages, the streets will
be safe, and the American people will slowly maybe begin
to wake up and realize voting for Democrats is the
only reason America's cities are filthy and full of crime.
(10:21):
And if you stop doing that, crime disappears. All that
may have made you uncomfortable, but I am right. We
have a wonderful show for you here. We're going to
talk to the great Senator, and there aren't many of
those from the state of Missouri, Senator Eric Schmidt. Before
we get to the Senator, let me get to you
and how you sleep at night, and how you wake
(10:43):
in the morning. How do you feel when those eyes
of yours flutter open in the morning? Do you feel rested?
Or was it yet another restless, crappy night's sleep, stressed
about yesterday, stressed about tomorrow. Stop living like that every night.
Start getting something in your body that'll have you relaxed
(11:03):
in sleeping without drugs. No more pills, no more drugs.
Dream powder from Beam is a cup of delicious hot chocolate.
They have several flavors. I'm personally a cinnamon chocolate guy,
but you do you. I have a cup of hot
chocolate before bed only it's special. Hot chocolate has all
these things in it that just relax me and put
(11:25):
me to sleep. Wake up every morning, ready to take
on the day. Shotbeam dot com, slash Jesse Kelly, we'll
be back. Well, there's more good news out there. At
(11:46):
least I think there's good news out there, bad and good.
Tulsa gabber Dn I came out and said, Hey, more
than forty more security clearances are being revoked for these
I don't even know if we can call them intelligence
people intelligence professionals for quote, abused public trust by politicizing
and manipulating that sounds bad. Who's going to jail for that?
(12:09):
Joining me now one of the great senators, very few
good senators. We have Senator Eric Schmidt from the great
state of Missouri and author of the book The Last
Line of Defense. My goodness, do we all need to
learn about that beating the left in court? Okay, Senator,
you have an op ed now talking about prosecutions for
this Russia Gate hoax stuff. Obviously, I've said over and
(12:31):
over again I believe this is critical for the United
States of America if we can't if you can't go
to jail for cooking the books and using the CIA
to attack your Republican opponent, then you can't go to
jail if you're in government. Right.
Speaker 5 (12:42):
No, I think that we've gotten, you know now these
disclosures from Tulca Gabbard, and you've got the breadcrumb trail
now to indictments. That's how I feel about it. And
also and we can walk through that. But I also
think if you want to understand why they were still
helbent on making sure President Trump never gotten back in office,
it because they knew that Hillary Clinton worked with the
(13:04):
Soros organization to come up with the distraction from her
email problems. They knew that the Steele dossier was fake.
They knew President Are at the time Barack Obama authorized
spying on a political candidate. They knew they doctored the
books on the Intelligence Committee report even though they knew
it was a BS story, and then they continue to
use that to try to sideline his first administration. They
(13:26):
continue to use it. By the way, we talk about
it in the book, when we took the deposition of
Elvis Chan, they used that as a predicate for you know,
the Hunter Biden laptop, keeping that quiet because they claimed
it was a Russian hack and League operation, even though
they knew it was true. So the punchline is, I
think that you know, the Statute of limitations may have
expired on some of this stuff, but it doesn't expire
(13:47):
on a conspiracy. And I think that's where the indictments
ought to go. There should be indictments this conspiracy. So
if you're Clapper, Comy or Brennan, I'd make sure you're
lawyered up, because that's where this thing's going.
Speaker 1 (13:59):
Okay, you say that's where this thing's going, and I
know you are a man of your word. It's one
thing for me to get on television and scream, someone
has to go to jail, right, every American feels that way.
It's quite another to actually prosecute and convict and put
them there. How do we go about doing that?
Speaker 5 (14:16):
Well, I think again, when you're dealing with the conspiracy,
when you like the fuse at Mile Marker ie, you're
responsible for the things that happen, even if you're not
directly involved in Mile Marker ten. And I think that's
again the most likely scenario of where we would see
indictments here as a conspiracy potentially to defraud the United States,
(14:37):
because if you think about what they were doing, this
makes Watergate look like Child's player, at least what people
wanted everyone to believe about Watergate. This was about sidelining
somebody from ever being elected in the first place, and
then when he was elected and something they knew was false,
they tried to get rid of him there and try
to diminish his presidency. And again we saw the law
(15:00):
fair that followed after that once they demonized President Trump,
and he delivered the greatest political comeback in American history.
So the conspiracy, I think is the is the is
the angle here, And I hope we see something from that.
I think the time has come.
Speaker 1 (15:15):
You mentioned Elvis Chan and I'm glad you did. He's
somebody people who watch the show are very familiar with him.
I understand we have statute of limitation things and things
like that, but we have a former FBI special agent
on camera bragging about campaigning for Democrats as an FBI
special agent. That's essentially what he did. How can we
(15:35):
go on without people inside the walls of the FBI
seeing the seeing the inside of the walls of a prison,
that being at the FBI cannot be a license to
commit crimes. And clearly the people at the FBI think
did is well.
Speaker 5 (15:47):
And one of the things and the reason why I
wrote the book Last Line of Defense, How to Beat
the Left and Court. You can go to Amazon and
get it right now, released yesterday, is to walk people
through what was it like to take his deposition?
Speaker 1 (15:58):
What do we find out?
Speaker 5 (15:58):
What was it like to take Anthony Fauci's deposition? Because
we brought the Missouri versus Biden lawsuit, which exposed the
censorship enterprise before Elon Muskin even bought Twitter and Twitter files,
and the congressional investigations and what we found, Jesse was
this leviathan of government agencies that were turned against the
American people. If you had the wrong opinion about masks,
or the wrong opinion about vaccines, or you had an
(16:21):
opinion about the election in twenty twenty, the government was
working directly with social media companies through secret special portals
to silence millions of voices. That's the truth. And I
think what we're seeing now is so these kind of
things are exposed. What the book is about is you
got to stand up and fight back. We fought back
on the vaccine mandate. We took to the Spreme Court.
We won. We fought back on the student loan debt
forgiveness case, we took that to the Supreme Court.
Speaker 4 (16:42):
We won.
Speaker 5 (16:43):
We followed Missouri versus Biden, and we were successful ultimately
getting the truth out. We sued fifty plus school districts
of Missouri for the mass mandates and we won. We
took on ESG and now that's in retreat. We took
on DEI and CRT and we won. So if you
got the courage to stand up and fight back, and
you talk about this a lot, we could do anything.
The people are with us. The laws on our side,
(17:03):
common senses on common senses on our side. So this book,
Last Line Defense, is a playbook for not just the
stuff that we did, but the fights that are ahead.
And I think it's important to tell that story.
Speaker 1 (17:16):
Senator you mentioned the NGO connection, the cartel we have
going with a government essentially it knows it can't censor,
but you just give out grants work with a private company,
and you find now that has to be against the law.
But that's a whole different nut to crack. Can that
be cracked? Because obviously our freedom of speech can work
(17:38):
against us when it comes to things like that. But
we can't have democrats colluding with private corporations to crush
the rights of American citizens every time they take office.
That's right.
Speaker 5 (17:47):
And you know these names like the Institute for Peace
and the National Endowment for Democracy and all these ridiculous things.
We need to totally get rid of these things. They
need to be defunded. One of the things I'm most
it is I handled the recisions package in the Senate
and we clawed back eight billion dollars for all the
ridiculous stuff like you know, the DEI in Burma and
(18:10):
Sesame Street in Iraq and guatemal and sex changes. It
was money. I mean, it's eight billion dollars, but it
was also we demonstrated the political will to do something
about it. We've not done recisions like that in thirty years.
It's the first really kind of its kind. So my
hope is there's more of those things. But we got
to root this stuff out because this NGO nexus with
the government, they like, it's fueled violations of free speech,
(18:31):
it's fueled censorship, it's fueled mass migration into this country.
They give it to these entities, then they go around
and send everybody through the back door, and then the
government claims they don't know anything about it. This is
a true quote unquote threat to democracy. It's not President Trump.
The reason why he was the threat to democracy to
them is he wanted to disrupt this stuff, and I
think that's our mission. I believe that firmly. And again,
(18:53):
the reason why I wrote the book Last Line of
Defense was to see the landscape as I saw it
when I was ag at that time at all, from
the highest levels of government to the local superintendent. And
the lesson is if you stand up and you fight back,
we can win. We can be successful. And what people
want more than anything, Justine, what they want is authentic leadership.
They want to know that there's people that are going
(19:14):
to fight for them, not permanent Washington or the Washington consensus,
but the people in so called flyover country, in states
like Missouri. They're tired of this stuff and they want fighters.
Speaker 1 (19:25):
Yeah, speaking of Missouri, you left the ag post of
Missouri and now you're United States Senator Andrew Bailey, who
I like very much. He's apparently leaving and he's going
to be co director of the FBI. Is there anybody
left to bag of Missouri? Well?
Speaker 5 (19:40):
Yeah, we listen to show me sting. We punch above
our weight class. I feel like and so Andrew's going
to do. He'll do a great job at the FBI,
and hope we can help clean up that place too.
Speaker 1 (19:51):
What do we do about the judges? Every day we
wake up, I know you do the same thing. We
wake up and there's a new judge that did something crazy.
We're screaming at our phones. But there's still judges. You know,
you're not voting for them. How do we get these
people out? Because we can't survive like this If there's
a network of judges who are working against the country
at all times.
Speaker 5 (20:09):
Well, let me give a little bit of at least
an optimistic view of this. So what happens typically when
people get upset is they'll see that district court ruling.
But as these cases President Trump and again last line
of defense Whiver wrote the book, is you got to
have the courage to fight back. My solictener general, speaking
of Missouri, who was my solictener General, John Sowers, the
solstener General of the United States of America. Now, so
(20:31):
John knows how to fight and win. And by and
large they are winning. They got the Supreme Court to say,
you can't do these universal injunctions anymore. It's a total
abuse of authority that one judge in New Mexico can
decide foreign policy for the president of the United States
of America. So those are gone. President Trump by and
large is winning on these deportation cases as they make
their way through, and even on the personnel and programming,
they've said, yeah, you can fire these USAID employees. And
(20:54):
so I think along the way, look, there's some radical
judges that Biden got in, but at buy in law
arch As they're making their way through the courts. President
Trump is successful in his defense of his policies. That's
good news, even though some of these individual decisions certainly
are frustrating.
Speaker 1 (21:11):
The book is last line of defense. Senator, I appreciate
you very much. All right, we have some Supreme Court happenings,
so we had to bring Alex Sawyer back here to
teach us what exactly those things are. Now would be
a very good time to get your testosterone up. By
the way, I'm talking about naturally, we have estrogen in
(21:33):
our waters, synthetic estrogens. We shower in them, we drink
them through in the plastics. What are you doing about it?
What are you doing about the fact that you're drinking
a free following testosterone. That's what you're doing when you
drink water. You have to keep drinking water. A male
vitality stack from chalk twenty percent increase in your T
(21:54):
levels in ninety days, I've had seventy some year old
men email me and tell me their doctors are looking
at their blood works. Say, what in the world are
you doing? You look like a twenty year old You
want that? You want to feel like that? I do
Chuck dot com slash JESSETV. Get you a fat seventeen
(22:17):
point seven six percent discount on subscriptions. Go get one.
We'll be bad all right. We had Alex Sawyer on
last week. She was awesome. She wrote that book Lawless
Law Fair, as you already know, and she gave us
(22:39):
the skinny on all kinds of legal things going on.
That was the good news. The bad news is there's
so much freaking going on that we didn't get to
like half of the cases that are really important. We
covered the same sex marriage stuff and all the other
stuff last week. So let's go back to Alex again.
Apparently we're just going to hire her permanently and talk
about these things through the book Lawless Law Fair. Alex
(23:01):
Sawyer joins me. Okay, the court, what are they doing now?
What's coming? Normal people like me don't understand this stuff.
Speaker 7 (23:10):
Yeah.
Speaker 8 (23:10):
So right now, the justices are on their summer resist,
which basically means the end of June to the first
week of October they're out. We get about four updates
from them in terms of order lists, cases that they're
going to either hear or get rid of. Normally, it's
not too noosy until what's called the Long Conference, and
(23:31):
so the long Conference is usually the week before they return.
They generally meet in private on Thursdays, and so we
get a lengthy list the first Monday in October any
new cases that they might be adding to this term's docket.
There's a couple that I'm watching that I can just
flag for you. One actually has to do with two
(23:51):
Christian schools in Florida who wanted to say a prayer
over the loud speaker, but we're not allowed. And so
there's two thousand from the year two thousand, the Supreme
Court had said a school prayer, you know, on the
loud speaker would violate the Establishment clause. So you have
these schools asking the Justices to revisit that precedent and
rule that they are able to speak.
Speaker 7 (24:13):
Freely at the First Amendment. They're both Christian schools. Why
would they not be able to say a prayer?
Speaker 8 (24:17):
Of course, you and I touched last week on the
same sex marriage petition whether or not the Justices will
go ahead and take up an opportunity to overturn same
sex marriage legal when they legalized it in twenty fifteen.
That case is pending. And then of course there's going
to be one that I think is going to maybe
be the biggest case of the term in terms of
precedent that could be overturned. The likelihood that it would
(24:40):
be taken now same sex marriage would be huge if
they did that, but most court watchers don't think they're
going to take up that case.
Speaker 7 (24:47):
But this one has to do with Trump's.
Speaker 8 (24:48):
Ability to fire agency heads, these independent agency heads. He's
already had to come to the Supreme Court a few
times trying to remove some abiden appointees to like the
National Labor's Relation Board, the Consumer Products Safety Board, all
of this. So there's like a nineteen thirty five case
where the Supreme Court basically limited the president's power to
fire these type of people at will, saying that there
(25:11):
has to be some sort of independence from these agencies
that Congress created. Now, our Supreme Court, the current Supreme
Court has gone ahead and sided with Trump over the
last few months in his ability to do these firings.
So there's been a lot of court watchers that say, hey,
when this kind of case comes up before the merits
and there's actually oral arguments on it, it's very likely
that this Supreme Court will reverse that nineteen thirty five president.
Speaker 1 (25:36):
Oh gosh, okay, I'm sorry, I have to pause for
a second. They're off from June to October. What do
they do?
Speaker 3 (25:43):
Yeah?
Speaker 8 (25:43):
So it sounds like a really good job, doesn't it.
I would love to have a fief fund. Yes, it's
almost more than our lawmakers who love to be home.
Speaker 7 (25:51):
All the time.
Speaker 1 (25:54):
Yeah, okay, all right, voting rights, ballot counting, are these
things coming?
Speaker 7 (26:00):
Yes?
Speaker 8 (26:00):
So you bring up some very interesting case. So there's
already one case that's scheduled. There's a dispute out of Louisiana.
This one was actually argued last term, and the justices
put off issue in the ruling and have scheduled again
for oral arguments.
Speaker 7 (26:14):
That usually doesn't happen. I don't think I can.
Speaker 8 (26:16):
I won't remember that happening since I've covered the court
in twenty seventeen. So essentially, what this case is is
challengers have said that race was used when drawing the
congressional map in Louisiana to make sure that there's two
majority black districts. It took it from five majority like
Republican control districts and one Democrat to now four Republican
(26:38):
and two Democrat. So you have groups protesting the use
of race when considering drawing these lines. It's kind of
what I would say, like a reverse case. You usually
see minorities bringing the Voting Rights dispute saying hey, we
don't have adequate representation. This is kind of the opposite, saying, hey,
it violates the fourteenth Amendment to use race for drawing
(26:59):
these district lines and that it was inappropriately done so
by the state.
Speaker 7 (27:02):
So, you know, there could be.
Speaker 8 (27:05):
I'm expecting a ruling in this one definitely by when
the court wraps up its term in June.
Speaker 7 (27:10):
But this would be very huge.
Speaker 8 (27:12):
It could potentially take a big gut to Section two
of the Voting Rights Act, which was used, you know,
for to try to correct decades of political oppression way
back when. So if they change what you could use
race for when drawing these congressional district lines, obviously that's huge.
It would not just impact Louisiana, it would impact states
across the nation. There's also a ballot counting dispute. Now,
(27:34):
this one is kind of you're gonna have to kind
of stay with me on this. Illinois has a law
where they're allowed to count mail in ballots fourteen days
after election day.
Speaker 7 (27:44):
So federal candidates hune I know, fourteen days, right, not enough.
Speaker 8 (27:49):
I guess people you know don't get their their mail
out in time. So that was challenged by federal candidates
who say, no, like this is costing us, the federal
these election monitors were having to pay for we're suffering
from that. There is one election day, and so we're
challenging the state law. They lost in lower court, not
on the law, but on the fact that the lower
(28:11):
court said, well, you haven't had sufficient legal injury basically
what's called standing to bring this lawsuit that you didn't
really have to pay these monitors that much. It's too
early to sue before the twenty twenty four election, and
that's how they got rid of the case. So now
it's at the Supreme Court on that issue. Do federal
candidates really have the right to challenge these state laws?
(28:33):
And if they don't, who would, right, So that's kind
of what the justices will decide with this one case.
There is a separate petition out of Mississippi dealing with
mail in ballots. That state allows ballots to be counted
up to five days past election day. The RNC has
challenged that the Fifth Circuit head ruled that there is
only one election day, basically striking down the Mississippi law,
(28:54):
but let it stand on appeal. So now it's at
the Supreme Court with Mississippi trying to defend it's grace period.
Speaker 7 (29:01):
Law for receiving these male in ballots.
Speaker 8 (29:02):
Now, if the Supreme Court were to take this, this
could change not just what Mississippi does, but states across
the board. If the Supreme Court says, yes, we'll take
this up and no, a state cannot count ballots you know,
five fourteen days past election day there is one federal
election day. Then, of course that would make many states
that have these grace periods have to change their law.
Speaker 1 (29:25):
Alex, let's get away from the Supreme Court for a moment.
In Virginia, are schools funding abortions for children?
Speaker 8 (29:32):
That is the big news out of northern Virginia. So
it looks like in twenty twenty one Centerville High School
there was a social worker, a school social worker who
must have a facilitated to at least two abortions for
two minor female students. Okay, so took them to the clinic.
There's some reporting that the girls were coerced into doing it.
(29:57):
Maybe they weren't, you know, for this they were told
they needed and there was a teacher who I believe
that was confided in by these girls who flagged this
I believe several times to principles into school officials.
Speaker 7 (30:10):
Yet it went unresolved.
Speaker 8 (30:11):
So what you have now is Governor Glenn Youngkin who
has ordered a criminal investigation into this into the school
district about whether these funds, you know, local, state, federal
tax dollars at the school were used to facilitate student abortions.
Speaker 7 (30:27):
Right now, we have no update.
Speaker 8 (30:28):
There's actually questions about exactly which abortion facility they were
taken to. There's a lot of reporting on the ground happening,
So it does seem like where there's smoke, there's fire.
And we know these Northern Virginia schools have had quite
issues with parental rights and respecting those. You can remember
the whole bathroom incident with using letting transgender student into
(30:50):
the female bathroom, the female student was raped, and the
one father who was.
Speaker 7 (30:54):
Actually kicked out of the school board meeting over that.
Speaker 8 (30:58):
I think that everybody a bell, everyone remembers that dispute.
So yes, these Northern Virginia schools definitely need to have
some sort of investigation, and it looks like that's ongoing
with this one Center Bill High School.
Speaker 1 (31:11):
Northern Virginia. Sounds like, hell, Alex, thank you, I appreciate it.
Just thinking back to that tranny bathroom story in the
rape of that young girl, It's just the worst freaking
thing in the world. And then of course the dad
gets arrested. These freaking communists men. All right, let's talk
to John Phillips. Is that am shift in serious legal
jeopardy because of all this mortgage fraud stuff. Wouldn't that
(31:33):
be hilarious if that turd went down for mortgage fraud.
Before we get to that, let me get to your phone,
your mobile company, you know, Corporate America. That's one you know,
we talked about institutions at the beginning of the show.
Corporate America is one of the institutions the Communists conquered.
That was an institution he was never going to let
just sit there. All that money, all that power and influence.
(31:56):
He conquered it. And that's why you've seen Verizon at
and T and T Mobile consistently, consistently take part in
the culture wars against you. I remember all the LGBTQ propaganda,
the George Floyd stuff paid for by you. My company
doesn't do that. I was talking to somebody this weekend.
(32:19):
He's a living Medal of Honor recipient. He was hanging
out with the Pure Talk boys. That's who Pure Talk
cares about. You, America, American heroes, veterans switched to the
cell phone company that hires Americans and loves America. Go
to Puretalk dot com, slash Jesse TV. We'll be back.
(32:48):
Sometimes I notice things. Most of the time, I'm too
stupid to notice things. But sometimes I do notice things,
and I can't help but notice online. If you're at
all on social media, I'm not saying you have to be.
Gavin Newsom is spending money already. He is very clearly
spending money doing some kind of bizarre and not funny
online propaganda campaign. But that's not important. What they're actually
(33:11):
doing is not important. They're spending money in twenty twenty five, boy,
Gavin Newsom is all in for president. Joining me. Now,
somebody quite familiar with that lizard person, John Phillips of
the Great John Phillips Show. John, I know you've noticed
that I've noticed that they're spending money. None of this
is organic. They're spending money already three years ahead of time.
Speaker 5 (33:33):
Sure well, he wants to be president and he knows
that this is his opportunity to get out in front
of all of his other competitors in the Democratic primary.
Speaker 1 (33:43):
And Gavin Newsom is.
Speaker 5 (33:45):
Of the belief that we are in a post cancel
culture world where there are no guardrails. You can say
whatever it is that you want to say. There will
be no consequences. The benefit of signaling the Democratic voters
that you are the fighter and you are willing to
do anything to win outweighs any potential drawbacks of saying
(34:07):
reckless things. Over the last few days on social media,
he was suggesting that the assassination attempt of Donald Trump
was fake. There were pictures of him holding up a
bottle of ketchup with the Secret Service around him and
catch up on his ear. He's been attacking fire victims
who have been complaining that the response from the state
was not adequate. He's attacked members of the legislature in
(34:31):
very personal sexual terms. And what's happened. He's shot up
in the polls in the Democratic primary, and he has
spiked his engagement on social media. The number of people
now following him, liking his tweets, retweeting what he's saying
is now through the roof, and he now sees himself
(34:52):
as the leader of the pack in the Democratic primary. Now,
with all of that being said, this is not without
potential pitfalls because he has turned over the keys to
his social media accounts to very young, very left wing
people who have been told to rattle the cage and
say whatever to generate engagement. Well, we know people like
(35:16):
this in our own lives. We see them on social
media themselves. They're reckless. It's only a matter of time
before Gavin Newsom tweets something like, well, you know, the
Jews were really responsible for the holocogue or something along
those lines, and then it's all over. So it's fun
for him now. But guess what, there's a reason why
(35:38):
you don't turn over your social media accounts to teenagers
craving attention.
Speaker 1 (35:45):
Yeah you know what, mister producer, go ahead and record
that little segment because you know it's coming. You know
it's coming. These savages have nothing holding them back. Okay,
So let's talk about the effectiveness of it, because as
you mentioned he's trying to win a primary right now,
right to got to win that to get to the general.
His numbers, at least now it's early, have shot up.
So did that prove him right.
Speaker 5 (36:08):
In the short term? Yes, But let me refer back
to a conversation I just had last week with Fox
eleven's Alex Michaelson, who was interviewing Gavin Newsom at one
of these press conferences, and Gavin was standing there taking questions,
and he asked Gavin a question about something that he
had tweeted earlier that day, and Gavin Newsom had no
(36:31):
clue what he was talking about, and so Alex had
to go back and find the tweet and read the
tweet and then have Newsom respond to it. But it
was clear that Newsom had never seen that tweet before.
So not only are the teenagers responsible for putting the
tweets out, they're not even informing him of what they're
(36:51):
tweeting when they're tweeting it. At some point, this is
going off the rails and the car is going into
the ocean. I will make that prediction right now on
your show.
Speaker 1 (37:03):
Okay, So on a macro level, let's do the best
we can to get out of our bubbles here and
zoom out. I understand I'm too biased to probably answer
this question, but I like Donald Trump. I certainly don't
worship him, but I like him. I have an affinity
for him. I like a lot of his policies. He
makes me laugh, and I just despise everything about Gavin Newsom.
(37:23):
In my opinion, what Donald Trump says works because it's authentic.
He'll say and do some horrible, horrific, stupid stuff, but
it gets away with it because it's authentically him. As
you just laid out, it's not authentically Gavin. So is
it doomed to failure because of that?
Speaker 5 (37:44):
I think so, because keep in mind Trump was a
known quantity even before he got into politics. We knew
him from The Apprentice, we knew him from Howard Stern,
we knew him from WrestleMania, we knew him from Home alone.
And the guy was the same throughout his entire public
persona or in his dire public time in the public eye.
(38:06):
Gavin Newsom not long ago was trying to brand himself
as the Democrat who could talk to Republicans. He had
a podcast where he had Charlie kirk On and Michael
Savage and Stephen Bannon and others, and that was how
he was trying to present himself. And then it didn't
work out, and then he recalibrated and decided that he
(38:27):
was going to take this gentry class winemaker from San
Francisco and turn him into the ghost of Paul Lynde,
where every single tweet is something you'd hear at Drag
Queen Bingo, and suddenly we're supposed to buy that as authentic.
Just imagine for one second, because Gavin Newsom is a
guy who is known for making these big, grandiose proclamations
(38:49):
and having zero follow through. You know, he was the
guy that when Arizona decriminalized or when Arizona made abortion illegal,
he was going to allow abortion providers to come to
California to perform abortions. He made a big deal out
of that. You know how many abortions actually happened from
Arizona providers. Zero? He just moved on and pretended like
(39:10):
it didn't happen. He was the guy who came out
after George Floyd and said California is going to have
reparations and we're going to be the first state that
really just puts the flag in the ground on that subject.
You know how many.
Speaker 1 (39:23):
Reparations we've paid.
Speaker 5 (39:26):
And so the problem for Gavin Newsom on the Democratic
primary stage is going to be that he is inauthentic
and a flake, and this lobotomy, this personality lobotomy that
he's gone through right now, is only going to feed
into that because when he's standing there and AOC is
at the podium next to him, she's going to say,
(39:49):
I want transgender and athletes on every basketball court in America.
How about you, Gavin. I want to I want to
make sure that every illegal alien has whatever resources they
need from the taxpayers. And I certainly want to abolish ice.
How about you, Gavin? And they try to pin him
down on all of these things, when Gavin Newsom has
(40:11):
been all over the board his entire career and certainly
hasn't followed through with any of his big proclamations in California.
What he's doing now benefits him in the short term,
but he is opening himself up in the Democratic primary
in all kinds of ways for someone from the left
to really expose him.
Speaker 1 (40:33):
Does his record in California, which is awful, You know,
as you well know. But every California friend I have
says the same thing. California, he sucked at this, he
sucked at that. But does that matter? I know it
matters to politicos like us, but primary voters, general election
voters do they look at your record as governor and say, wow,
you can't be president.
Speaker 3 (40:54):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (40:54):
I'm skeptical on that that that matters to the people.
Speaker 5 (40:57):
Yeah, I don't think that's relevant because Democrats regard his
failures in California as a distraction to the big issue,
which is hating Donald Trump. So they're willing to forgive
him for all of that and then look at how
the news media will cover him. He says that the
bullet train is a success. The bullet train, for example,
(41:19):
was supposed to be completed years ago, and no one
has been able to ride the bullet train because the
bullet train doesn't exist. It's gone way over on cost,
it's never actually going to be completed. But he says
it's a success, and the fact checkers will back him up.
And when those of us say, hey, this is a
train that doesn't actually exist, we will be called conspiracy theorists,
(41:41):
or we will be called people who are part of
the doom loop, or whatever the case may be. When
he says the insurance market is fine in California, but
none of us can buy it, or they're kicking us
off our policies, the fact checkers will back him up
and say that he's right. Fact checkers will say there's
no crime in California, that we just have to buy
shampoo through bulletproof glass because I don't know, it looks
(42:05):
better that way. He will make all of these ridiculous claims,
and all of the big newspapers will validate his absurd proclamations,
so I don't think that part will bother him at all.
Speaker 1 (42:19):
Okay, is Adam Schiff going to prison? I saw that
he started a legal defense fund, which is quite a
thing for a city United States senator. Is he sweating?
Speaker 5 (42:30):
That's where he belongs? He claimed that his residence was
in Maryland when he applied for a loan to get
a better rate. You can't legally be the resident of
another state and represent the state of California in the
United States Congress. That is illegal. You have to be
a resident of the state, So one of those things
is not true either. He can resign from Congress because
(42:51):
he's not a resident, or he committed bank fraud people
in California. Politicians in California have gone to jail over
residency issues. There was a state senator by the name
of Rod Wright who got nailed for that. There was
an La City councilman by the name of Richard Alarcon
who got nailed for that. There's no difference at all
(43:12):
between what those two did and what Adam Schiff is doing,
which is lying about your residence to benefit one way
or the other. If they apply the law equally, then
Adam Schiff should go to jail.
Speaker 1 (43:27):
Wow, what a day that would be. John, Thank you buddy.
All Right, it's time to lighten the mood. And I
have to be honest with you. I'm at a very
dangerous age in my life. That dangerous age is I'm
(43:48):
forty four, so I don't feel old yet. But if
we're being honest, I'm not as young as I used
to be, not as injury system as I used to be.
Remember when you were a kid and you could jump
off of fifty story building and not break anything. Obviously
I'm exaggerating, but you remember what that was like. And
so I'm at that age where i'll do things like this, Bro,
(44:13):
this's your bike, your how do you get on it?
Speaker 2 (44:18):
Yeah?
Speaker 1 (44:18):
Yeah, there's a peg on the bottom. Are you sure.
Speaker 4 (44:38):
He's alive.
Speaker 1 (44:48):
I'll see them all
Democrats cook the books on everything. We're going to talk about,
why is it pertains to crime and other things. Here
we have Senator Eric Schmidt joining us. Is Adam Schiff
actually going to go to jail? More Supreme Court news,
all that coming up on I'm rite. Okay, let's have
(00:26):
a discussion about crime, violent crime in blue cities, why
it's so rampant, what's going on? And let's have a
discussion that may get uncomfortable about police agencies, large police
agencies in the United States of America. First, let's get
a couple basics out of the way. First, basics you
(00:46):
already know you watch this show all the time. We
don't have to rehash the entire thing, but just for
the purposes here, democrats are not democrats. They're communists. Now.
They are fighting a revolution. They are not political, they
are religion. Are fighting a revolution against everything. And part
of fighting a communist revolution is the use of violence,
(01:08):
not just them. You just want violence everywhere in society
to increase these stabilizes things, makes society more rightful. Revolution. Thus,
open up the prisons. Open up the prisons. Now. One
of the main ways that communists do this in this
country is through this cashless bail thing. Here was Trump
(01:29):
talking about it.
Speaker 2 (01:30):
This dire public safety crisis stem is directly from the
abject failures of the city's local leadership. The radical left
city Council adopted no cash bail. By the way, every
place in the country you have no cash bail is
a disaster. That's what started the problem in New York.
And they don't change it. They don't want to change it.
(01:52):
That's what started it in Chicago. I mean, bad politicians
started it. Bad leadership started it. But that was the
one thing that's central. No cash mail. Somebody murders somebody,
and they're out on no cash mail before the day
is out.
Speaker 1 (02:09):
No cash bail. So let's talk about this. And this
is something that it can make people squirm in their chairs,
right because we're about to separate society, separate human beings.
We don't like doing that, especially as Americans. Everyone's equal, right,
But let's be honest. The reason traffic was bad on
your way to work or school this morning is not
(02:30):
because all the drivers on the road are stupid or selfish.
Ten percent stupid selfish. It only takes a small percentage
to ruin traffic. Why do you have to sign eight
thousand disclaimers when you go to the doctor's office. Is
it one hundred percent of the patients who are morons?
Too happy? All those things? Now ten percent? Why does
(02:55):
your kid not learn as much in school as you
think they should? Is it because the whole class this
is a bunch of hooligans and dummies. No, it's ten percent.
Whenever you are at any place in your life, you
will discover it's a small percentage of society, the bottom
of the barrel, who ruin it for everybody. And it
works the exact same way with crime. You don't believe me,
(03:18):
I suggest you go get to know some cops. I
am friends with many of them. A cop who is
well established in an area, well established in any area,
they will tell you when they hear of a crime.
A cop established in an area will hear that somebody
somebody stuck up a convenience store. That cop will usually
(03:39):
be able to give you a short list of the
people and or groups responsible for that crime. Why they
know who the bad guys are? I mean, we act
as if criminal justice is complicated, and don't get me wrong,
some parts of it are complicated. What do we do
after we catch them by how do we stop them
from being that? I get that, but overall, criminal justice
is not that comp If you want to stop crime,
(04:01):
find the criminals, it's a small percent. Find the criminals,
arrest them, and keep them in prison. Period. Once they're
locked in cages, people don't get hurt anymore. Society gets
better and safer. If you let them out of those cages,
they'll go on and they'll hurt more people. Why would
democrats fall in love with something like cashless bail because
it allows animals to commit crimes, walk into jail, sign
their name on a piece of paper, and turn around
(04:22):
and walk right back out. The point of bail, after all,
in part is to keep you inside so you're not
outside hurting people. Naturally, Democrats hate that because why be
concern not Democrats? Because they're communists. They want people hurt.
Now here's the problem. If you're a communist, that's not
going to be a popular And don't delude yourself into
(04:45):
thinking these democrats they don't know what's going to happen
when you turn the serial rapists loose from jail. They
know what's going to happen. They want it to happen.
But that doesn't look good, right, no matter what society
you're in, that's very hard done for office. On the Hey,
I'm pro crime, that's a tough platform to sell. So
(05:07):
they lie like this.
Speaker 3 (05:10):
Well, first let's just look at the actual numbers. In Washington,
DC and all across the country. Crime was going up
during Donald Trump's first term, and when Joe Biden became
a president, crime started to come down. In fact, it's
been coming down precipitously in Washington and in cities all
across the country. So it's just not true the allegation
that they are making.
Speaker 1 (05:31):
Crime's been going down. Crime's been going down. I mean
they've been taking this stance for a while now. Remember
when Dome got crushed on stage when she was debating
Donald Trump. And of course, because the GOP is suicidal,
we allowed a communist and they named David Muhir to
moderate the debate, and he jumped in and said, this.
Speaker 4 (05:51):
Crime here is up and through the roof. Despite their
fraudulent statements that they made crime in this country's through
the roof. And we have a new form of crime.
It's called migrant crime, and it's happening at levels that
nobody thought possible pident Trump.
Speaker 5 (06:04):
As you know, the FBI says, overall, violent crime is
actually coming down in this country.
Speaker 4 (06:08):
But excuse me, the FBI defraud. They were defrauding statements.
They didn't include the worst cities, They didn't include the
cities with the worst crime. It was a fraud, just
like their number of eight hundred and eighteen thousand jobs
that they said they created turned out to be a fraud.
Speaker 1 (06:26):
Credit to Donald Trump for giving it right back to
that dirty communist. But you saw what he tried to
do there. Oh well, the FBI said violent crime's going
down anyway, let's move on. We'll talk to her right there.
We'll see. The communists are in a bit of a pickle.
When you're turning the jails loose, when you're turning the
animals loose onto society, people don't like it, so you
(06:49):
have to lie about it. But when you lie about it,
you see. This is where institutions are so critical for
a society. Institutions keep liars in check. It's one of
the main things institutions do. If you're a communist who's
caused violent crime to go up, you have to worry
about the FBI and these major police agencies, you know,
(07:13):
NYPD places like that. If you're lying about crime, you
know these institutions will step up and say, now, ah,
that's a lie. These guys are all committing crimes, crimes
going up. It's a lie. It's a lie. It's a lie.
So what to do? What to do? If the institution
is there to stop your lies from moving forward? Conquer
(07:35):
the institution. You don't stop lying. You certainly don't stop
turning the criminals loose onto society. If the FBI is
in your way, you conquer the FBI. Barack Obama did that.
He spent eight years filling up the FBI with committed communists,
promoting them through the ranks. They have since promoted others
through the ranks. Now the federal police force is completely
(07:58):
communist and against you. They are the enemy. What to
what to do? If the NYPD is going to be
honest about crime, well, communists run the city. Communists choose
the police commissioner. Communists will get to choose the leadership
of the NYPD. Doesn't matter how wonderful and brave the
(08:18):
guys on the ground are trying to stop the crime.
Simply take over the leadership and lie about the crime statistics,
the communists will constantly run into walls because he's selling
something demonic, destructive, and evil. He will then have to
find a way over or through that wall, and the
most efficient way to do that is conquer the institution
(08:42):
that stands in your way and rest assured. Right now,
communists are very afraid of what Donald Trump is doing
in DC for a couple different reasons. One, what if
what if he solves the crime? What if Donald Trump
actually fixes crime in DC? All these crime stats are
(09:03):
going down? How would that make all the other d
c all the DC, all the other cities, how would
it make them look? And let's be honest with you.
Let's be honest here. If Donald Trump starts putting violent
criminals in jail, who's going to vote for Democrats. That's
why they're on MSNBC talking like this.
Speaker 6 (09:23):
Lives can only take him so far. He's hoping that
with this presence of these troops he likes, you know,
the protests this weekend we're peaceful, and the New King's
protests were peaceful. He's hoping for a George Floyd twenty
twenty like situation in DC where he can then use
that to manufacture another emergency so we can expand power.
Because what we're seeing is that he governs by emergency,
(09:44):
not by popular mandate.
Speaker 1 (09:45):
Right, and he gets to define the emergency exactly.
Speaker 6 (09:47):
He just declares, you know, I here by declare emergency,
and that gets to do whatever he wants, right. But
in reality, there is no there is no crime emergency
that can't be handled by local law enforcement.
Speaker 1 (09:59):
What sucking I really wor about fashion them Donald Trump
taking over everything by emergency. Though, that guy understands that
if you start taking violent criminals, you lock them in cages,
and you keep them locked in cages, the streets will
be safe, and the American people will slowly maybe begin
to wake up and realize voting for Democrats is the
only reason America's cities are filthy and full of crime.
(10:21):
And if you stop doing that, crime disappears. All that
may have made you uncomfortable, but I am right. We
have a wonderful show for you here. We're going to
talk to the great Senator, and there aren't many of
those from the state of Missouri, Senator Eric Schmidt. Before
we get to the Senator, let me get to you
and how you sleep at night, and how you wake
(10:43):
in the morning. How do you feel when those eyes
of yours flutter open in the morning? Do you feel rested?
Or was it yet another restless, crappy night's sleep, stressed
about yesterday, stressed about tomorrow. Stop living like that every night.
Start getting something in your body that'll have you relaxed
(11:03):
in sleeping without drugs. No more pills, no more drugs.
Dream powder from Beam is a cup of delicious hot chocolate.
They have several flavors. I'm personally a cinnamon chocolate guy,
but you do you. I have a cup of hot
chocolate before bed only it's special. Hot chocolate has all
these things in it that just relax me and put
(11:25):
me to sleep. Wake up every morning, ready to take
on the day. Shotbeam dot com, slash Jesse Kelly, we'll
be back. Well, there's more good news out there. At
(11:46):
least I think there's good news out there, bad and good.
Tulsa gabber Dn I came out and said, Hey, more
than forty more security clearances are being revoked for these
I don't even know if we can call them intelligence
people intelligence professionals for quote, abused public trust by politicizing
and manipulating that sounds bad. Who's going to jail for that?
(12:09):
Joining me now one of the great senators, very few
good senators. We have Senator Eric Schmidt from the great
state of Missouri and author of the book The Last
Line of Defense. My goodness, do we all need to
learn about that beating the left in court? Okay, Senator,
you have an op ed now talking about prosecutions for
this Russia Gate hoax stuff. Obviously, I've said over and
(12:31):
over again I believe this is critical for the United
States of America if we can't if you can't go
to jail for cooking the books and using the CIA
to attack your Republican opponent, then you can't go to
jail if you're in government. Right.
Speaker 5 (12:42):
No, I think that we've gotten, you know now these
disclosures from Tulca Gabbard, and you've got the breadcrumb trail
now to indictments. That's how I feel about it. And
also and we can walk through that. But I also
think if you want to understand why they were still
helbent on making sure President Trump never gotten back in office,
it because they knew that Hillary Clinton worked with the
(13:04):
Soros organization to come up with the distraction from her
email problems. They knew that the Steele dossier was fake.
They knew President Are at the time Barack Obama authorized
spying on a political candidate. They knew they doctored the
books on the Intelligence Committee report even though they knew
it was a BS story, and then they continue to
use that to try to sideline his first administration. They
(13:26):
continue to use it. By the way, we talk about
it in the book, when we took the deposition of
Elvis Chan, they used that as a predicate for you know,
the Hunter Biden laptop, keeping that quiet because they claimed
it was a Russian hack and League operation, even though
they knew it was true. So the punchline is, I
think that you know, the Statute of limitations may have
expired on some of this stuff, but it doesn't expire
(13:47):
on a conspiracy. And I think that's where the indictments
ought to go. There should be indictments this conspiracy. So
if you're Clapper, Comy or Brennan, I'd make sure you're
lawyered up, because that's where this thing's going.
Speaker 1 (13:59):
Okay, you say that's where this thing's going, and I
know you are a man of your word. It's one
thing for me to get on television and scream, someone
has to go to jail, right, every American feels that way.
It's quite another to actually prosecute and convict and put
them there. How do we go about doing that?
Speaker 5 (14:16):
Well, I think again, when you're dealing with the conspiracy,
when you like the fuse at Mile Marker ie, you're
responsible for the things that happen, even if you're not
directly involved in Mile Marker ten. And I think that's
again the most likely scenario of where we would see
indictments here as a conspiracy potentially to defraud the United States,
(14:37):
because if you think about what they were doing, this
makes Watergate look like Child's player, at least what people
wanted everyone to believe about Watergate. This was about sidelining
somebody from ever being elected in the first place, and
then when he was elected and something they knew was false,
they tried to get rid of him there and try
to diminish his presidency. And again we saw the law
(15:00):
fair that followed after that once they demonized President Trump,
and he delivered the greatest political comeback in American history.
So the conspiracy, I think is the is the is
the angle here, And I hope we see something from that.
I think the time has come.
Speaker 1 (15:15):
You mentioned Elvis Chan and I'm glad you did. He's
somebody people who watch the show are very familiar with him.
I understand we have statute of limitation things and things
like that, but we have a former FBI special agent
on camera bragging about campaigning for Democrats as an FBI
special agent. That's essentially what he did. How can we
(15:35):
go on without people inside the walls of the FBI
seeing the seeing the inside of the walls of a prison,
that being at the FBI cannot be a license to
commit crimes. And clearly the people at the FBI think
did is well.
Speaker 5 (15:47):
And one of the things and the reason why I
wrote the book Last Line of Defense, How to Beat
the Left and Court. You can go to Amazon and
get it right now, released yesterday, is to walk people
through what was it like to take his deposition?
Speaker 1 (15:58):
What do we find out?
Speaker 5 (15:58):
What was it like to take Anthony Fauci's deposition? Because
we brought the Missouri versus Biden lawsuit, which exposed the
censorship enterprise before Elon Muskin even bought Twitter and Twitter files,
and the congressional investigations and what we found, Jesse was
this leviathan of government agencies that were turned against the
American people. If you had the wrong opinion about masks,
or the wrong opinion about vaccines, or you had an
(16:21):
opinion about the election in twenty twenty, the government was
working directly with social media companies through secret special portals
to silence millions of voices. That's the truth. And I
think what we're seeing now is so these kind of
things are exposed. What the book is about is you
got to stand up and fight back. We fought back
on the vaccine mandate. We took to the Spreme Court.
We won. We fought back on the student loan debt
forgiveness case, we took that to the Supreme Court.
Speaker 4 (16:42):
We won.
Speaker 5 (16:43):
We followed Missouri versus Biden, and we were successful ultimately
getting the truth out. We sued fifty plus school districts
of Missouri for the mass mandates and we won. We
took on ESG and now that's in retreat. We took
on DEI and CRT and we won. So if you
got the courage to stand up and fight back, and
you talk about this a lot, we could do anything.
The people are with us. The laws on our side,
(17:03):
common senses on common senses on our side. So this book,
Last Line Defense, is a playbook for not just the
stuff that we did, but the fights that are ahead.
And I think it's important to tell that story.
Speaker 1 (17:16):
Senator you mentioned the NGO connection, the cartel we have
going with a government essentially it knows it can't censor,
but you just give out grants work with a private company,
and you find now that has to be against the law.
But that's a whole different nut to crack. Can that
be cracked? Because obviously our freedom of speech can work
(17:38):
against us when it comes to things like that. But
we can't have democrats colluding with private corporations to crush
the rights of American citizens every time they take office.
That's right.
Speaker 5 (17:47):
And you know these names like the Institute for Peace
and the National Endowment for Democracy and all these ridiculous things.
We need to totally get rid of these things. They
need to be defunded. One of the things I'm most
it is I handled the recisions package in the Senate
and we clawed back eight billion dollars for all the
ridiculous stuff like you know, the DEI in Burma and
(18:10):
Sesame Street in Iraq and guatemal and sex changes. It
was money. I mean, it's eight billion dollars, but it
was also we demonstrated the political will to do something
about it. We've not done recisions like that in thirty years.
It's the first really kind of its kind. So my
hope is there's more of those things. But we got
to root this stuff out because this NGO nexus with
the government, they like, it's fueled violations of free speech,
(18:31):
it's fueled censorship, it's fueled mass migration into this country.
They give it to these entities, then they go around
and send everybody through the back door, and then the
government claims they don't know anything about it. This is
a true quote unquote threat to democracy. It's not President Trump.
The reason why he was the threat to democracy to
them is he wanted to disrupt this stuff, and I
think that's our mission. I believe that firmly. And again,
(18:53):
the reason why I wrote the book Last Line of
Defense was to see the landscape as I saw it
when I was ag at that time at all, from
the highest levels of government to the local superintendent. And
the lesson is if you stand up and you fight back,
we can win. We can be successful. And what people
want more than anything, Justine, what they want is authentic leadership.
They want to know that there's people that are going
(19:14):
to fight for them, not permanent Washington or the Washington consensus,
but the people in so called flyover country, in states
like Missouri. They're tired of this stuff and they want fighters.
Speaker 1 (19:25):
Yeah, speaking of Missouri, you left the ag post of
Missouri and now you're United States Senator Andrew Bailey, who
I like very much. He's apparently leaving and he's going
to be co director of the FBI. Is there anybody
left to bag of Missouri? Well?
Speaker 5 (19:40):
Yeah, we listen to show me sting. We punch above
our weight class. I feel like and so Andrew's going
to do. He'll do a great job at the FBI,
and hope we can help clean up that place too.
Speaker 1 (19:51):
What do we do about the judges? Every day we
wake up, I know you do the same thing. We
wake up and there's a new judge that did something crazy.
We're screaming at our phones. But there's still judges. You know,
you're not voting for them. How do we get these
people out? Because we can't survive like this If there's
a network of judges who are working against the country
at all times.
Speaker 5 (20:09):
Well, let me give a little bit of at least
an optimistic view of this. So what happens typically when
people get upset is they'll see that district court ruling.
But as these cases President Trump and again last line
of defense Whiver wrote the book, is you got to
have the courage to fight back. My solictener general, speaking
of Missouri, who was my solictener General, John Sowers, the
solstener General of the United States of America. Now, so
(20:31):
John knows how to fight and win. And by and
large they are winning. They got the Supreme Court to say,
you can't do these universal injunctions anymore. It's a total
abuse of authority that one judge in New Mexico can
decide foreign policy for the president of the United States
of America. So those are gone. President Trump by and
large is winning on these deportation cases as they make
their way through, and even on the personnel and programming,
they've said, yeah, you can fire these USAID employees. And
(20:54):
so I think along the way, look, there's some radical
judges that Biden got in, but at buy in law
arch As they're making their way through the courts. President
Trump is successful in his defense of his policies. That's
good news, even though some of these individual decisions certainly
are frustrating.
Speaker 1 (21:11):
The book is last line of defense. Senator, I appreciate
you very much. All right, we have some Supreme Court happenings,
so we had to bring Alex Sawyer back here to
teach us what exactly those things are. Now would be
a very good time to get your testosterone up. By
the way, I'm talking about naturally, we have estrogen in
(21:33):
our waters, synthetic estrogens. We shower in them, we drink
them through in the plastics. What are you doing about it?
What are you doing about the fact that you're drinking
a free following testosterone. That's what you're doing when you
drink water. You have to keep drinking water. A male
vitality stack from chalk twenty percent increase in your T
(21:54):
levels in ninety days, I've had seventy some year old
men email me and tell me their doctors are looking
at their blood works. Say, what in the world are
you doing? You look like a twenty year old You
want that? You want to feel like that? I do
Chuck dot com slash JESSETV. Get you a fat seventeen
(22:17):
point seven six percent discount on subscriptions. Go get one.
We'll be bad all right. We had Alex Sawyer on
last week. She was awesome. She wrote that book Lawless
Law Fair, as you already know, and she gave us
(22:39):
the skinny on all kinds of legal things going on.
That was the good news. The bad news is there's
so much freaking going on that we didn't get to
like half of the cases that are really important. We
covered the same sex marriage stuff and all the other
stuff last week. So let's go back to Alex again.
Apparently we're just going to hire her permanently and talk
about these things through the book Lawless Law Fair. Alex
(23:01):
Sawyer joins me. Okay, the court, what are they doing now?
What's coming? Normal people like me don't understand this stuff.
Speaker 7 (23:10):
Yeah.
Speaker 8 (23:10):
So right now, the justices are on their summer resist,
which basically means the end of June to the first
week of October they're out. We get about four updates
from them in terms of order lists, cases that they're
going to either hear or get rid of. Normally, it's
not too noosy until what's called the Long Conference, and
(23:31):
so the long Conference is usually the week before they return.
They generally meet in private on Thursdays, and so we
get a lengthy list the first Monday in October any
new cases that they might be adding to this term's docket.
There's a couple that I'm watching that I can just
flag for you. One actually has to do with two
(23:51):
Christian schools in Florida who wanted to say a prayer
over the loud speaker, but we're not allowed. And so
there's two thousand from the year two thousand, the Supreme
Court had said a school prayer, you know, on the
loud speaker would violate the Establishment clause. So you have
these schools asking the Justices to revisit that precedent and
rule that they are able to speak.
Speaker 7 (24:13):
Freely at the First Amendment. They're both Christian schools. Why
would they not be able to say a prayer?
Speaker 8 (24:17):
Of course, you and I touched last week on the
same sex marriage petition whether or not the Justices will
go ahead and take up an opportunity to overturn same
sex marriage legal when they legalized it in twenty fifteen.
That case is pending. And then of course there's going
to be one that I think is going to maybe
be the biggest case of the term in terms of
precedent that could be overturned. The likelihood that it would
(24:40):
be taken now same sex marriage would be huge if
they did that, but most court watchers don't think they're
going to take up that case.
Speaker 7 (24:47):
But this one has to do with Trump's.
Speaker 8 (24:48):
Ability to fire agency heads, these independent agency heads. He's
already had to come to the Supreme Court a few
times trying to remove some abiden appointees to like the
National Labor's Relation Board, the Consumer Products Safety Board, all
of this. So there's like a nineteen thirty five case
where the Supreme Court basically limited the president's power to
fire these type of people at will, saying that there
(25:11):
has to be some sort of independence from these agencies
that Congress created. Now, our Supreme Court, the current Supreme
Court has gone ahead and sided with Trump over the
last few months in his ability to do these firings.
So there's been a lot of court watchers that say, hey,
when this kind of case comes up before the merits
and there's actually oral arguments on it, it's very likely
that this Supreme Court will reverse that nineteen thirty five president.
Speaker 1 (25:36):
Oh gosh, okay, I'm sorry, I have to pause for
a second. They're off from June to October. What do
they do?
Speaker 3 (25:43):
Yeah?
Speaker 8 (25:43):
So it sounds like a really good job, doesn't it.
I would love to have a fief fund. Yes, it's
almost more than our lawmakers who love to be home.
Speaker 7 (25:51):
All the time.
Speaker 1 (25:54):
Yeah, okay, all right, voting rights, ballot counting, are these
things coming?
Speaker 7 (26:00):
Yes?
Speaker 8 (26:00):
So you bring up some very interesting case. So there's
already one case that's scheduled. There's a dispute out of Louisiana.
This one was actually argued last term, and the justices
put off issue in the ruling and have scheduled again
for oral arguments.
Speaker 7 (26:14):
That usually doesn't happen. I don't think I can.
Speaker 8 (26:16):
I won't remember that happening since I've covered the court
in twenty seventeen. So essentially, what this case is is
challengers have said that race was used when drawing the
congressional map in Louisiana to make sure that there's two
majority black districts. It took it from five majority like
Republican control districts and one Democrat to now four Republican
(26:38):
and two Democrat. So you have groups protesting the use
of race when considering drawing these lines. It's kind of
what I would say, like a reverse case. You usually
see minorities bringing the Voting Rights dispute saying hey, we
don't have adequate representation. This is kind of the opposite, saying, hey,
it violates the fourteenth Amendment to use race for drawing
(26:59):
these district lines and that it was inappropriately done so
by the state.
Speaker 7 (27:02):
So, you know, there could be.
Speaker 8 (27:05):
I'm expecting a ruling in this one definitely by when
the court wraps up its term in June.
Speaker 7 (27:10):
But this would be very huge.
Speaker 8 (27:12):
It could potentially take a big gut to Section two
of the Voting Rights Act, which was used, you know,
for to try to correct decades of political oppression way
back when. So if they change what you could use
race for when drawing these congressional district lines, obviously that's huge.
It would not just impact Louisiana, it would impact states
across the nation. There's also a ballot counting dispute. Now,
(27:34):
this one is kind of you're gonna have to kind
of stay with me on this. Illinois has a law
where they're allowed to count mail in ballots fourteen days
after election day.
Speaker 7 (27:44):
So federal candidates hune I know, fourteen days, right, not enough.
Speaker 8 (27:49):
I guess people you know don't get their their mail
out in time. So that was challenged by federal candidates
who say, no, like this is costing us, the federal
these election monitors were having to pay for we're suffering
from that. There is one election day, and so we're
challenging the state law. They lost in lower court, not
on the law, but on the fact that the lower
(28:11):
court said, well, you haven't had sufficient legal injury basically
what's called standing to bring this lawsuit that you didn't
really have to pay these monitors that much. It's too
early to sue before the twenty twenty four election, and
that's how they got rid of the case. So now
it's at the Supreme Court on that issue. Do federal
candidates really have the right to challenge these state laws?
(28:33):
And if they don't, who would, right, So that's kind
of what the justices will decide with this one case.
There is a separate petition out of Mississippi dealing with
mail in ballots. That state allows ballots to be counted
up to five days past election day. The RNC has
challenged that the Fifth Circuit head ruled that there is
only one election day, basically striking down the Mississippi law,
(28:54):
but let it stand on appeal. So now it's at
the Supreme Court with Mississippi trying to defend it's grace period.
Speaker 7 (29:01):
Law for receiving these male in ballots.
Speaker 8 (29:02):
Now, if the Supreme Court were to take this, this
could change not just what Mississippi does, but states across
the board. If the Supreme Court says, yes, we'll take
this up and no, a state cannot count ballots you know,
five fourteen days past election day there is one federal
election day. Then, of course that would make many states
that have these grace periods have to change their law.
Speaker 1 (29:25):
Alex, let's get away from the Supreme Court for a moment.
In Virginia, are schools funding abortions for children?
Speaker 8 (29:32):
That is the big news out of northern Virginia. So
it looks like in twenty twenty one Centerville High School
there was a social worker, a school social worker who
must have a facilitated to at least two abortions for
two minor female students. Okay, so took them to the clinic.
There's some reporting that the girls were coerced into doing it.
(29:57):
Maybe they weren't, you know, for this they were told
they needed and there was a teacher who I believe
that was confided in by these girls who flagged this
I believe several times to principles into school officials.
Speaker 7 (30:10):
Yet it went unresolved.
Speaker 8 (30:11):
So what you have now is Governor Glenn Youngkin who
has ordered a criminal investigation into this into the school
district about whether these funds, you know, local, state, federal
tax dollars at the school were used to facilitate student abortions.
Speaker 7 (30:27):
Right now, we have no update.
Speaker 8 (30:28):
There's actually questions about exactly which abortion facility they were
taken to. There's a lot of reporting on the ground happening,
So it does seem like where there's smoke, there's fire.
And we know these Northern Virginia schools have had quite
issues with parental rights and respecting those. You can remember
the whole bathroom incident with using letting transgender student into
(30:50):
the female bathroom, the female student was raped, and the
one father who was.
Speaker 7 (30:54):
Actually kicked out of the school board meeting over that.
Speaker 8 (30:58):
I think that everybody a bell, everyone remembers that dispute.
So yes, these Northern Virginia schools definitely need to have
some sort of investigation, and it looks like that's ongoing
with this one Center Bill High School.
Speaker 1 (31:11):
Northern Virginia. Sounds like, hell, Alex, thank you, I appreciate it.
Just thinking back to that tranny bathroom story in the
rape of that young girl, It's just the worst freaking
thing in the world. And then of course the dad
gets arrested. These freaking communists men. All right, let's talk
to John Phillips. Is that am shift in serious legal
jeopardy because of all this mortgage fraud stuff. Wouldn't that
(31:33):
be hilarious if that turd went down for mortgage fraud.
Before we get to that, let me get to your phone,
your mobile company, you know, Corporate America. That's one you know,
we talked about institutions at the beginning of the show.
Corporate America is one of the institutions the Communists conquered.
That was an institution he was never going to let
just sit there. All that money, all that power and influence.
(31:56):
He conquered it. And that's why you've seen Verizon at
and T and T Mobile consistently, consistently take part in
the culture wars against you. I remember all the LGBTQ propaganda,
the George Floyd stuff paid for by you. My company
doesn't do that. I was talking to somebody this weekend.
(32:19):
He's a living Medal of Honor recipient. He was hanging
out with the Pure Talk boys. That's who Pure Talk
cares about. You, America, American heroes, veterans switched to the
cell phone company that hires Americans and loves America. Go
to Puretalk dot com, slash Jesse TV. We'll be back.
(32:48):
Sometimes I notice things. Most of the time, I'm too
stupid to notice things. But sometimes I do notice things,
and I can't help but notice online. If you're at
all on social media, I'm not saying you have to be.
Gavin Newsom is spending money already. He is very clearly
spending money doing some kind of bizarre and not funny
online propaganda campaign. But that's not important. What they're actually
(33:11):
doing is not important. They're spending money in twenty twenty five, boy,
Gavin Newsom is all in for president. Joining me. Now,
somebody quite familiar with that lizard person, John Phillips of
the Great John Phillips Show. John, I know you've noticed
that I've noticed that they're spending money. None of this
is organic. They're spending money already three years ahead of time.
Speaker 5 (33:33):
Sure well, he wants to be president and he knows
that this is his opportunity to get out in front
of all of his other competitors in the Democratic primary.
Speaker 1 (33:43):
And Gavin Newsom is.
Speaker 5 (33:45):
Of the belief that we are in a post cancel
culture world where there are no guardrails. You can say
whatever it is that you want to say. There will
be no consequences. The benefit of signaling the Democratic voters
that you are the fighter and you are willing to
do anything to win outweighs any potential drawbacks of saying
(34:07):
reckless things. Over the last few days on social media,
he was suggesting that the assassination attempt of Donald Trump
was fake. There were pictures of him holding up a
bottle of ketchup with the Secret Service around him and
catch up on his ear. He's been attacking fire victims
who have been complaining that the response from the state
was not adequate. He's attacked members of the legislature in
(34:31):
very personal sexual terms. And what's happened. He's shot up
in the polls in the Democratic primary, and he has
spiked his engagement on social media. The number of people
now following him, liking his tweets, retweeting what he's saying
is now through the roof, and he now sees himself
(34:52):
as the leader of the pack in the Democratic primary. Now,
with all of that being said, this is not without
potential pitfalls because he has turned over the keys to
his social media accounts to very young, very left wing
people who have been told to rattle the cage and
say whatever to generate engagement. Well, we know people like
(35:16):
this in our own lives. We see them on social
media themselves. They're reckless. It's only a matter of time
before Gavin Newsom tweets something like, well, you know, the
Jews were really responsible for the holocogue or something along
those lines, and then it's all over. So it's fun
for him now. But guess what, there's a reason why
(35:38):
you don't turn over your social media accounts to teenagers
craving attention.
Speaker 1 (35:45):
Yeah you know what, mister producer, go ahead and record
that little segment because you know it's coming. You know
it's coming. These savages have nothing holding them back. Okay,
So let's talk about the effectiveness of it, because as
you mentioned he's trying to win a primary right now,
right to got to win that to get to the general.
His numbers, at least now it's early, have shot up.
So did that prove him right.
Speaker 5 (36:08):
In the short term? Yes, But let me refer back
to a conversation I just had last week with Fox
eleven's Alex Michaelson, who was interviewing Gavin Newsom at one
of these press conferences, and Gavin was standing there taking questions,
and he asked Gavin a question about something that he
had tweeted earlier that day, and Gavin Newsom had no
(36:31):
clue what he was talking about, and so Alex had
to go back and find the tweet and read the
tweet and then have Newsom respond to it. But it
was clear that Newsom had never seen that tweet before.
So not only are the teenagers responsible for putting the
tweets out, they're not even informing him of what they're
(36:51):
tweeting when they're tweeting it. At some point, this is
going off the rails and the car is going into
the ocean. I will make that prediction right now on
your show.
Speaker 1 (37:03):
Okay, So on a macro level, let's do the best
we can to get out of our bubbles here and
zoom out. I understand I'm too biased to probably answer
this question, but I like Donald Trump. I certainly don't
worship him, but I like him. I have an affinity
for him. I like a lot of his policies. He
makes me laugh, and I just despise everything about Gavin Newsom.
(37:23):
In my opinion, what Donald Trump says works because it's authentic.
He'll say and do some horrible, horrific, stupid stuff, but
it gets away with it because it's authentically him. As
you just laid out, it's not authentically Gavin. So is
it doomed to failure because of that?
Speaker 5 (37:44):
I think so, because keep in mind Trump was a
known quantity even before he got into politics. We knew
him from The Apprentice, we knew him from Howard Stern,
we knew him from WrestleMania, we knew him from Home alone.
And the guy was the same throughout his entire public
persona or in his dire public time in the public eye.
(38:06):
Gavin Newsom not long ago was trying to brand himself
as the Democrat who could talk to Republicans. He had
a podcast where he had Charlie kirk On and Michael
Savage and Stephen Bannon and others, and that was how
he was trying to present himself. And then it didn't
work out, and then he recalibrated and decided that he
(38:27):
was going to take this gentry class winemaker from San
Francisco and turn him into the ghost of Paul Lynde,
where every single tweet is something you'd hear at Drag
Queen Bingo, and suddenly we're supposed to buy that as authentic.
Just imagine for one second, because Gavin Newsom is a
guy who is known for making these big, grandiose proclamations
(38:49):
and having zero follow through. You know, he was the
guy that when Arizona decriminalized or when Arizona made abortion illegal,
he was going to allow abortion providers to come to
California to perform abortions. He made a big deal out
of that. You know how many abortions actually happened from
Arizona providers. Zero? He just moved on and pretended like
(39:10):
it didn't happen. He was the guy who came out
after George Floyd and said California is going to have
reparations and we're going to be the first state that
really just puts the flag in the ground on that subject.
You know how many.
Speaker 1 (39:23):
Reparations we've paid.
Speaker 5 (39:26):
And so the problem for Gavin Newsom on the Democratic
primary stage is going to be that he is inauthentic
and a flake, and this lobotomy, this personality lobotomy that
he's gone through right now, is only going to feed
into that because when he's standing there and AOC is
at the podium next to him, she's going to say,
(39:49):
I want transgender and athletes on every basketball court in America.
How about you, Gavin. I want to I want to
make sure that every illegal alien has whatever resources they
need from the taxpayers. And I certainly want to abolish ice.
How about you, Gavin? And they try to pin him
down on all of these things, when Gavin Newsom has
(40:11):
been all over the board his entire career and certainly
hasn't followed through with any of his big proclamations in California.
What he's doing now benefits him in the short term,
but he is opening himself up in the Democratic primary
in all kinds of ways for someone from the left
to really expose him.
Speaker 1 (40:33):
Does his record in California, which is awful, You know,
as you well know. But every California friend I have
says the same thing. California, he sucked at this, he
sucked at that. But does that matter? I know it
matters to politicos like us, but primary voters, general election
voters do they look at your record as governor and say, wow,
you can't be president.
Speaker 3 (40:54):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (40:54):
I'm skeptical on that that that matters to the people.
Speaker 5 (40:57):
Yeah, I don't think that's relevant because Democrats regard his
failures in California as a distraction to the big issue,
which is hating Donald Trump. So they're willing to forgive
him for all of that and then look at how
the news media will cover him. He says that the
bullet train is a success. The bullet train, for example,
(41:19):
was supposed to be completed years ago, and no one
has been able to ride the bullet train because the
bullet train doesn't exist. It's gone way over on cost,
it's never actually going to be completed. But he says
it's a success, and the fact checkers will back him up.
And when those of us say, hey, this is a
train that doesn't actually exist, we will be called conspiracy theorists,
(41:41):
or we will be called people who are part of
the doom loop, or whatever the case may be. When
he says the insurance market is fine in California, but
none of us can buy it, or they're kicking us
off our policies, the fact checkers will back him up
and say that he's right. Fact checkers will say there's
no crime in California, that we just have to buy
shampoo through bulletproof glass because I don't know, it looks
(42:05):
better that way. He will make all of these ridiculous claims,
and all of the big newspapers will validate his absurd proclamations,
so I don't think that part will bother him at all.
Speaker 1 (42:19):
Okay, is Adam Schiff going to prison? I saw that
he started a legal defense fund, which is quite a
thing for a city United States senator. Is he sweating?
Speaker 5 (42:30):
That's where he belongs? He claimed that his residence was
in Maryland when he applied for a loan to get
a better rate. You can't legally be the resident of
another state and represent the state of California in the
United States Congress. That is illegal. You have to be
a resident of the state, So one of those things
is not true either. He can resign from Congress because
(42:51):
he's not a resident, or he committed bank fraud people
in California. Politicians in California have gone to jail over
residency issues. There was a state senator by the name
of Rod Wright who got nailed for that. There was
an La City councilman by the name of Richard Alarcon
who got nailed for that. There's no difference at all
(43:12):
between what those two did and what Adam Schiff is doing,
which is lying about your residence to benefit one way
or the other. If they apply the law equally, then
Adam Schiff should go to jail.
Speaker 1 (43:27):
Wow, what a day that would be. John, Thank you buddy.
All Right, it's time to lighten the mood. And I
have to be honest with you. I'm at a very
dangerous age in my life. That dangerous age is I'm
(43:48):
forty four, so I don't feel old yet. But if
we're being honest, I'm not as young as I used
to be, not as injury system as I used to be.
Remember when you were a kid and you could jump
off of fifty story building and not break anything. Obviously
I'm exaggerating, but you remember what that was like. And
so I'm at that age where i'll do things like this, Bro,
(44:13):
this's your bike, your how do you get on it?
Speaker 2 (44:18):
Yeah?
Speaker 1 (44:18):
Yeah, there's a peg on the bottom. Are you sure.
Speaker 4 (44:38):
He's alive.
Speaker 1 (44:48):
I'll see them all
Host
Jesse Kelly
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
My Favorite Murder with Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark
My Favorite Murder is a true crime comedy podcast hosted by Karen Kilgariff and Georgia Hardstark. Each week, Karen and Georgia share compelling true crimes and hometown stories from friends and listeners. Since MFM launched in January of 2016, Karen and Georgia have shared their lifelong interest in true crime and have covered stories of infamous serial killers like the Night Stalker, mysterious cold cases, captivating cults, incredible survivor stories and important events from history like the Tulsa race massacre of 1921. My Favorite Murder is part of the Exactly Right podcast network that provides a platform for bold, creative voices to bring to life provocative, entertaining and relatable stories for audiences everywhere. The Exactly Right roster of podcasts covers a variety of topics including historic true crime, comedic interviews and news, science, pop culture and more. Podcasts on the network include Buried Bones with Kate Winkler Dawson and Paul Holes, That's Messed Up: An SVU Podcast, This Podcast Will Kill You, Bananas and more.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.