June 18, 2026 • 48 mins
A wave of major national stories is breaking at once — from domestic unrest investigations to a foiled White House security threat and high-profile political scrutiny. Across multiple fronts, federal agencies are being pushed into constant action as pressure builds around law enforcement, security, and political accountability. Jesse Kelly breaks down why the Trump DOJ appears to be operating at full speed — and what it signals about the current moment in America.
PureTalk: Support America’s Warrior Partnership and cut your phone bill today by switching to Pure Talk at https://PureTalk.com/JESSETV
Choq: Visit https://choq.com/jessetv for a 17.76% discount on your CHOQ subscription for life
American Financing: Call American Financing today to find out how customers are saving an average of $800/mo. NMLS 182334_1 https://nmlsconsumeraccess.org APR for rates in the 5s start at 6.327% for well qualified borrowers. Call 866-891-2821 for details about credit, costs and terms. Visit https://AmericanFinancing.net/Jesse Average savings based on borrowers who save over $199.99
Follow The Jesse Kelly Show on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheJesseKellyShow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Listen
Watch
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is a PSA about awareness, awareness about the kind
of country we have become. Sadly, it's bad that Antifa
is obviously still around, but we're finally getting some action
when the Biden DOJ clearly protected.
Speaker 2 (00:16):
All these freaks, throwing the most vulnerable young girls in
society literally to the wolves.
Speaker 3 (00:23):
Trump does want revenge because you guys declared lawfair on him.
Speaker 1 (00:31):
All right, let's talk about something heavy before we dig
intoe everything else on the rest of the show.
Speaker 4 (00:36):
We have so much to get to. It's going to
be wonderful.
Speaker 1 (00:38):
I'm right tonight, but this is more of a PSA
for you, and I want to be clear about this
PSA I'm about to talk about. So we're about to
talk about left wing violence and left wing terrorism, things
like that.
Speaker 4 (00:52):
I am not I want to stress this loudly.
Speaker 1 (00:55):
I am not telling you to not live your life,
avoid going out, to not go to a political rally
or a UFC event or a football game or whatever.
You only have one life, Go out there and live it.
This is a PSA about awareness, awareness about the kind
(01:16):
of country we have become, sadly, and the awareness of
you and how you conduct yourself in public. So you've
probably already seen the headlines. I'm assuming it's just headlines
for the most part. But we just had that big
UFC two fifty event at the White House. You saw
the FBI arrested some people. Okay, Well, that's sadly so
(01:39):
common in America that oftentimes people don't read past the
headlines and dig into the details. A couple left wing comedies,
of course, got arrested. They're violent people. We all get
the game, darn I got all that. They're getting better
at terrorism, and terrorists always do. Remember that when you
(02:02):
could call it crime, criminals, terrorism, whatever it is. You
start out, you try some things, doesn't work, so you
try other things it doesn't work.
Speaker 4 (02:12):
What's human nature?
Speaker 1 (02:13):
When you try something that you want to do and
you fail at it, you make adjustments, You work harder,
you get more organized, and you figure out a way
to succeed. The supplies not just to good people, not
just to you trying to get that promotion at work.
This applies to communist terrorists in the United States of America.
I dug into some details about this plot, and I'll
(02:36):
tell you what it maybe sit up in my chair.
Speaker 4 (02:38):
It did.
Speaker 1 (02:40):
This was a very legitimate plot that could have, had
it been carried out, killed a lot of people. Twenty
three people allegedly as of right now, that's what we know.
Speaker 4 (02:52):
Twenty three people were involved.
Speaker 1 (02:53):
We're not talking about just some freak sitting in his
mom's basement.
Speaker 4 (02:57):
Twenty three people involved. The plan.
Speaker 1 (03:02):
Well, during that UFC event, they were going to send
out drones. We'll come back to that in a moment.
They were going to send out drones with explosives. They
were going to be dropping them in strategic areas with
the intention of what because as soon as I say
drones with explosives, what do you think, Well, they're going
to drop them on people. Not necessarily, they were going
(03:22):
to drop them in specific areas with the intention of
creating a mass panic, which probably would have happened, and
driving people towards a specific funnel where they were going
to start gunning people down with sniperfire. By the grace
of God, the plan failed. FBI, to their credit, discovered
(03:44):
it took it down all those things.
Speaker 4 (03:45):
By the grace of God, the plan failed.
Speaker 1 (03:47):
But does that sound like the kind of plan some
turbo freak commie sitting in his basement came up with
on a cocktail napkin after five bud heavies one night. No,
they took their time with this, And I'll be honest,
that's a good plan. If I was a left wing
commed dirt ball, that's a solid plan. They are getting better.
(04:13):
We already know their violent.
Speaker 4 (04:14):
That's who they are, that's how they operate.
Speaker 1 (04:16):
And of course we know that Democrats will continue to
encourage this behavior with their rhetoric, which is often falls.
These people were allegedly motivated by Epstein lies. Well, I'm
Democrats are going to do this stuff still.
Speaker 5 (04:29):
Donald Trump is in the Epstein files thousands and thousands
of times. In those files there's highly disturbing allegations of
Donald Trump raping children, of Donald Trump threatening to kill children.
Speaker 1 (04:46):
Those are lies. You're right, You're right, you know those
are lies. The scumbags sitting at home don't know their lies.
We have to be aware. This is about awareness. Be
aware when you're out and about. Put your phone in
your pocket and be aware. All right, all right, we
have a great show for you. We'll talk to you
about some of these dirt balls in the streets. Before
we get to these dirt balls in the streets, let
(05:09):
me talk to you about a wonderful company, Pure Talk.
We are coming up on our two hundred and fiftieth
birthday in this country. Now is as good a time
as any to be a patriot.
Speaker 4 (05:23):
To put your money where your morals are. The big mobile.
Speaker 1 (05:27):
Companies, they've been crapping all over this country for years,
Pride Month and all that other stuff for years and
years and years.
Speaker 4 (05:35):
Then you have pure Talk. Don't do that. Pure Talk
is out there.
Speaker 1 (05:41):
Hiring Americans, charging you less for your wireless plan and
hiring Americans. You know it's easy to switch. You know
you can keep your phone, you can keep your phone number.
Go to puretalk dot com, slash Jesse TV and make
the switch. Pure Talk slash JESSETV, the companies run by
(06:03):
a Vietnam veteran.
Speaker 4 (06:05):
Make the switch to Puretop. We'll be back today.
Speaker 6 (06:16):
A federal indictment was unsealed, charging fifteen defendants with conspiracy
to impede or injure federal officers and other charges related
to efforts of too Minneapolis based Antifa groups that violently
opposed the enforcement of federal law in our state.
Speaker 4 (06:36):
That's a good thing, a very good thing.
Speaker 1 (06:39):
The bad news is Antifa still around the good.
Speaker 4 (06:41):
News is some of these dirt balls are going to prison.
Speaker 1 (06:44):
Joining me now, the Great Josh Philip, host of the
Josh Philip Joe. All right, Josh, Okay, it's bad that
Antifa's obviously still around, but we're finally getting some action
when the Biden DOJ clearly protected all these freaks.
Speaker 7 (07:00):
Yeah, well, I think what we're seeing now is that
finally something is happening. Going back to Trump's first term
in office, we've been watching Antifa attacking people, carrying out
violence on the streets with the intent it seems, of
denying people their constitutional rights to freedom to gather in,
freedom to speak. And I think that's actually what Trump
is doing now. He's actually going after these groups on
(07:22):
terroristic threats, which is denial of rights. Not these fifteen individuals,
but like overall with Antifa, the denial of rights, arguing
that their actions to discourage people, scare people out of
you know, again, publicly expressing their opinions or their values
is actually denying people their constitutional rights. These fifteen individuals
(07:44):
latest chapter of several arrests we've seen of Antifa. They're
part of a group called Direct Action, and I think
we're getting more. I think what's really big here. We're
getting more details now that Antifa is not just an
idea like we've been told for so long, just some
kind of random grassroots group of people coming out to
protest or whatever else. It's a highly organized group training materials, logistics,
(08:09):
people behind the scenes, large skill funding networks. And what
we're seeing also is with these arrests, those networks of
training are actually getting taken down. That was the significance
of this latest one, Josh.
Speaker 1 (08:25):
Can we focus on the funding aspect of it? And
maybe that's a dumb thing to do because this gets
into a really dark area, which is dark on purpose, right,
they don't advertise all this.
Speaker 4 (08:34):
I just have such a difficult.
Speaker 1 (08:36):
Time wrapping my mind around anybody with any means sitting down,
pulling out the proverbial checkbook, not that anybody writes a
check anymore, and stroking a check to some purple haired
freak so he can go throw poop at federal officers for.
Speaker 4 (08:51):
Kicking out illegals.
Speaker 1 (08:52):
But clearly somebody the peoples are doing this, or is
it government? Therese are large checks that are being written
fund this many dirt balls.
Speaker 7 (09:02):
Well, you know, we're still getting answers on the funding.
That's still a bit opaque what it does seem, though
there are investigations into possible foreign funding. A lot of
focus right now is on this individual, Neville Roy Singham,
based out of Shanghai in China. He's a billionaire there
tight he is merried, of course, to the leader of
(09:23):
Code Pink, another one of these far left organizations. These
organizations are actually kind of organizing many of the mass
protests against across the United States, not just like Antifa,
but the entire far left machine, and some of the
organizations being looked at, Code Pink, Party of Liberation, and Socialism.
These are some of the biggest ones I would actually
(09:44):
add to the list, though there's a couple that I
believe the US government should be looking into. I would
actually argue that the Rainbow Coalition is one of the
largest organizations with possible foreign funds. I believe there are
foreign funds, but I'll say possible foreign funds. That is
massively organizing many of the anti government protests across the
(10:06):
United States, that are actually actively trying to undermine the
political system of the United States, that are promoting really
revolutionary communist movements across the United States and that I
believe we're actually breaking the law. Another one would be
Freedom Road Socialists, which is also heavily involved in some
of the migrant caravans and issues like that.
Speaker 1 (10:26):
Okay, let's focus on the fruit basket for a minute,
the gay tr and all these other people.
Speaker 4 (10:32):
What's the motivation.
Speaker 1 (10:34):
There to tear down the United States of America promote communism.
I understand they have a whole different host of values
over in that part, but what's the connection.
Speaker 7 (10:46):
Yeah, so what they're using as a maoist strategy and
this is where people get lost in the weeds with
identity politics.
Speaker 4 (10:53):
Right.
Speaker 7 (10:54):
Basically, long story short, Communism under Karl Marx was basically,
you know, the bourgeois against the proletaria. It was class warfare.
They discovered over time that the narrative of class conflict
did not really work in the United States. We have
a very fluid class system. You can be born into
a rich family do stupid things and become poor. You
(11:17):
could be born into a poor family do very smart
things to become rich. We have a fluid class system
in the United States. Class warfare didn't work here. So
what they decided was, well, you know what that doesn't work,
So why don't we try to use identity? America is
kind of a big basket of a bunch of you know,
we're a free country. Betweens, people can have some crazy ideas. Okay,
(11:38):
we have a lot of different groups, a lot of
different beliefs, different religions, different races, different different political opinions.
Of course, different identities, even which has become more of
a thing. And the idea was to basically use that.
So they created critical theory. This was under the Frankfurt
School right, formerly the School of Marxist Studies, the Frankfurt
(11:59):
School out of Columbia. They created critical theory as a
way to effectively use rather than class conflict, using identity conflict.
So it became instead of the bourgeoisie against the proletariat,
men against women, black against white. Later on it became
straight against gay and gay against trans and you know,
(12:20):
I don't even know, like tree people and fairy folk
whatever they heck going to go by now, or dog
people whatever they've they've done everything now right, basically dividing
people into smaller and smaller camps. Now, the marks or
the Maoist strategy was basically around uniting minorities to create
a majority. So Mao Zedong's strategy in China was to
(12:40):
unite these smaller ethnic groups in revolution against you know,
basically the larger incumbent ethnic groups. He used identity politics
and the same way you see the left doing it now.
And so the theory is, and this is one of
the big agendas, as I mentioned the Rainbow Coalition. In fact,
that's why they call it the Rainbow Coalition, is to
actually create meta narratives for these different identity groups and
(13:05):
then unite them saying that, well, you know, the way
to solve your problems is to empower us, to get
rid of the haters and the racists and the bigots
and everything else, and so people buy into it. Then
they have the paid agitators who kind of you know,
suppress the opposition. Then they have the media, oftentimes working,
I mean there's even Antifa member news outlets working to
(13:26):
go after their political enemies and going after their ideological enemies.
Then you have massive foreign billionaires, guys like never we're
seeing them funding the networks. And then you have government
officials redirecting even taxpayer funds to NGOs non governmental organizations,
many of which also are involved in carrying out these
kinds of operations, and when you get to the ground operations,
(13:48):
whether it be Black Lives Matter or you know, the
ANTIFA protests or the anti ice protests or whatever it is,
many times what you have is tiered organizations that will
start up front movements based on whatever the ideological draws
of the time. Sometimes it's going to be black against white.
Sometimes it's going to be, you know, Israel against Gaza.
Sometimes it's going to be you know, as we're seeing
(14:09):
now the anti Ice protests, for example. They will change
the narrative depending on what's most in front of people ideologically,
and then use that kind of alter that trajectory to
have it serve their own interest.
Speaker 1 (14:24):
Josh, we touched on it a little bit earlier, and
I can only ask what you think because we don't
have all the documents and things like that. We may
never but so much of this seems to me from
a thirty thousand foot view of just another way for
countries like China to declare war on the United States
of Americans. Then the setting bombs and submarines and missiles
and things like that, all you have to do doesn't
(14:45):
cost that much In the long run, few billion dollars here,
a few billion dollars there. You got some training freaks
tearing up the streets. America divided against each other. In
China Games, there was.
Speaker 7 (14:57):
Actually a publicly announced strategy within China from one of
Chijing King's main advisors. It was specifically on this. It
was a guy named jin Can Wrong or Chinkan Wrong right. Basically,
he set down a plan to start four different wars
to distract the United States prior to the CECIP. He's
planned to invade Taiwan. Again, this was public twenty six
(15:19):
well got leaked, but twenty sixteen plan of the Chinese
Communist Party, and so this was the theory. Jin Can
Wrong came out and said, well, look, the US military
is designed to fight two wars simultaneously, Eastern Front, Western Front.
He said, therefore, if we're going to defeat the United States,
we have to get them involved in at least three wars.
At least. He came up with a strategy to start
(15:42):
four wars. And then the fifth was, of course, China
invading Taiwan. They wanted a war with Russia. That was
before the Russian invasion of Ukraine. They wanted a war
in the Middle East. That was before the Gaza, you know,
Israel Iran conflict came about. They wanted a war in
Latin America. The original plan was they wanted Lula in
(16:02):
Brazil to start a war. He got pushed up by Bolsonaro.
He's now back in power. We almost had a war
in Latin America because Maduro working with Lula where they
were about to invade Guyana, just to the east of
Venezuela because they claim historical rights to the oil there.
We almost had a war had Trump not gone in
you know, call it what you will, I don't know,
kidnapped Maduro that stopped that war from taking place. The
(16:26):
Fourth War was chaos on American streets. They wanted to
actually finance movements of protest, ideological struggle, class struggle within
the United States. And I think that's what we're seeing
with these identity groups getting money, as we now know
from China. And remember going back even during Black Lives Matter,
right when that was a big thing. If you remember,
(16:46):
the donation page for Black Lives Matter used to redirect
the Chinese Progressive Association. The Chinese Progressive Association was a
front group of the Little Red Guard of the Chinese
Communist Party. And I know that was fact checked by
like New York Times, but they actually falsified it because
they claimed that, like the Eastern branch right on the
East Coast was different from the West coast. But it's
(17:07):
like trying to claim that, like, okay, Walmart in New
York is different from Walmart in San Francisco. It's the
same organization as different franchises. So there was a lot
of fake reporting to cover up that major finding. This
also ties into the Soviet strategy, which the CCP basically
picked up the slack of after the fall of the
Soviet Union, which was on ideological warfare or demoralization, the
(17:31):
idea of effectively demoralizing people, causing chaos in American streets,
destabilizing the country, and then using the destabilization to make
people demand totalitarian response, in other words, to demand what
they call state capitalism, which means socialism right the state
controls the systems of the free market, or to demand
(17:52):
a type of strong arm tactic to destroy their enemies
to restore order. And I think now you see that
with this idea that hey, there's no none of these
problems in China you know, why don't we do that
or none of these problems in North Korea, why don't
we do that? I think we're at that stage now
of ideological subversion, where people are actually wanting the stability
(18:13):
of totalitarianism. And this was the publicly stated Chinese strategy.
I'll add one more thing to it. There was another
book in China, one of the main advisors of Shiji
Ping again, there was a book called America against America,
and the idea was effectively that they could manipulate the
internal differences among Americans among ourselves, to study loopholes within
(18:38):
our laws, to study constitutional law, and to manipulate the
open system of the United States, to weaponize our own
legal systems and our own cultural systems as a way
to destroy US. So I believe these mass protests Chinese
run intelligence operations ideological subversion, even drug war, which was
publicly listed as part of their unrestricted war against the
(19:00):
United States, as is culture war. I believe they were
doing this intentionally to manipulate the open system of the
United States to use it as a weapon against US.
Speaker 1 (19:11):
Josh as always outstanding, Thank you, coming back soon.
Speaker 4 (19:15):
All right, we have to go.
Speaker 1 (19:18):
Across the pond and talk about something unbelievably ugly. Now
it's not joy. Behar Next, before we get to that,
we're drinking estrogen. I don't have a bottle of water
sitting here beside me. If I did, I'd hold it
up for effect. You are drinking synthetic estrogen. We have
(19:39):
lost Wrap your mind around this and what this means
for a country. We have lost fifty percent of our
testosterone in the last fifty years. We have to fight
back against that. You have to be proactive. You can't
just be aware. What are you doing? Are you tired along?
Feeling lethargic?
Speaker 4 (19:57):
Along?
Speaker 1 (19:58):
Mine little foggy than it used to beat. Your tea
levels are low. Natural herbal supplements from choc will change
your life. Clinically tested you start taking a male Vitality Stack.
I've been taking one for four years. Twenty percent increase
in your tea levels in ninety days. Go to Chuck
dot com slash Jesse TV.
Speaker 4 (20:19):
We'll be back all right.
Speaker 1 (20:27):
So I think it's very rare that we do disclaimers
on this show. You know, we always try to keep
it kid friendly as much as humanly possible. But I'm
going to lay a little disclaimer out here. I almost
didn't even talk about this. I didn't talk about it
because it's so horrible. I've spent the last I think
day and a half reading about this rape gang inquiry
(20:53):
from the UK and it is some of the most horrible,
heartbreaking stuff. It'll make you want to go on a
vigilantes free and it's young girls. It is the some
of the worst stuff I've ever read in my entire life,
and I've read some really really dark things in my life.
So I soon to consider just not even talking about it.
(21:14):
But I don't think that's right. We can't hide from
the reality, and I don't think that's fair to all
the victims, all those wonderful young British girls who have
had their lives destroyed. So we thought there'd be nobody
better than talk to, talking to the Great Carl Benjamin
at lotus Eaters.
Speaker 4 (21:29):
Dot com about this.
Speaker 1 (21:31):
Okay, Carl, the rape gang inquiry report. I give you
the four just because I don't want to talk anymore
about it.
Speaker 4 (21:41):
What is it? What we find it? Again? It is?
Speaker 2 (21:53):
Excuse me, it's quite difficult. So about this, right, I
have to just preface this with I'm a married father
with full children daughters. So I spent the last day
and a half reading the rape gang report and it's
just harrowing, to be honest, It's just it's the product
of decades of institutional failure in the United Kingdom that
(22:17):
is built fundamentally upon the mass immigration of the twentieth
and twenty first centuries and the oppressive culture of political correctness.
Combine that with the classist society in which we live,
and what you have is a recipee for the authorities
(22:38):
throwing the most vulnerable young girls in society literally to
the wolves, to gangs of Pakistani men, so they can
they can treat them like sex slaves. And there was
for many of them no help coming, no where they
could go, no one they could turn to, because they
(23:01):
were repeatedly betrayed by the authorities, by the police, by
the social services, by the children's home children, you know,
the people running the children's homes, by politicians, by the media,
all attempting to cover it up because the overwhelming preponderance
of the perpetrators were Pakistani men. And what was happening
(23:24):
is that young girls from broken homes who had difficult
styleing life, So people who had the worst possible start,
they could imagine, would be groomed into spending all of
their time with these men. So they had become hooked
on alcohol and drugs and cigarettes, and they would take them.
(23:46):
I think they call it what was a boyfriend boyfriend
grooming or something like that. One of them would often
pretend to be the boyfriend and then they would start
just prostituting them out. And once it became clear that
they had access to a particular girl, they become highly abusive,
rape her repeatedly and do everything in their power to
demean her, to make her feel that she was worthless,
(24:07):
And then they would traffic her around Britain to various
other Pakistani communities and pimp her out to other men.
So as it stands, at the moment, there are hundreds
and hundreds of the ringleaders of these gangs in jail,
but there are also going to be tens of thousands
of men in this country of Pakistani heritage who have
(24:27):
raped a child and are just walking around free.
Speaker 4 (24:29):
At the moment. God have mercy.
Speaker 1 (24:32):
Okay, a couple things can you give me? Not that
one isn't too many. Can you give me some idea
of how many British girls were talking about here.
Speaker 2 (24:45):
Well, we don't really know, because the authorities have done
everything in their power to hide this until it became
apparent that it just couldn't be hidden. And this has
been happening in Britain since at least the nineteenth fifties,
just on a much smaller scale than it was happening
in modern times with the advent of immigration from this
(25:07):
particular community.
Speaker 4 (25:08):
It began.
Speaker 2 (25:10):
In the late nineties and early two thousands the Labor
government decided to increase the amount of immigration and this
started to increase as a problem because political correctness became
more prevalent in our society, and that's what led to
the rise of the British National Party and people like
Tommy Robinson blowing the whistle and raising the alarm and saying, listen,
(25:35):
something terrible is being done to vulnerable English girls by
this particular community and the authorities. Of course, I mean,
you'll know what Tommy Robinson's reputation in Britain is like.
You'll know what the British National Party's reputation in Britain
is like, whether they deserve these or not for other
things that they've done. They were right to raise the
alarm on this. They were correct about this, and it
(25:57):
took until twenty fourteen when we had the elect Jay
Inquiry that found yes, this was mostly men of Pakistani heritage,
and this has been going on and it is very widespread.
At the time it was something like sixteen different cities,
but now this Rape Gang Inquiry has found that it's
probably in one hundred and fifty counties across England.
Speaker 4 (26:20):
This is.
Speaker 2 (26:22):
Really, really widespread. And the important thing about this Rape
Gang Inquiry is that this is the only inquiry that
we've had that has not been bounded by concerns of
political correctness, as in, the people doing it don't care
about political correctness at all. What they care about is
the harm that's been done to English girls. And so
that's why this one is such brutal reading. I mean,
(26:44):
the other ones were bad as well, obviously, but this
one has a much more severe and penetrative discourse in
it because they are just giving you the full testimonies
of the victims as the things that happened to them.
And I don't really want to describe a lot of
(27:05):
what happened, but the worst parts were well all of it, really,
but the institutional failures are the things that are genuinely
the most shocking. I mean, if you know, if you
put a wolf in the henhouse and it eats all
the hens, Okay, fair enough, you knew it was a wolf.
But when the farmer comes and brings the hens to
the wolves, which is what happened in this case, the
(27:30):
children's homes would work in cooperation with these gangs and
would bring them girls that they chose in some cases.
In other cases, the police would find these girls in
a property drunk, naked, high, drugged and arrest the girls
for being prostitutes, or sometimes just return the girls if
they escaped from the men to the men. In one
(27:52):
particular case, the police said, here she is have fun.
And so I mean, it's just impossible to describe the
scale of the betrayal. And this, of course, because of
the complicity with the authorities, means we don't know how
many girls.
Speaker 4 (28:11):
We just don't know.
Speaker 2 (28:13):
In twenty I think it was twenty nineteen, Rotherham MP
Sarah Champion estimated it could have been up to a million.
I pray to god it's not that many. This report
estimates probably around quarter of a million, So two hundred
and fifty thousand girls. It's worth noting that that's way
worse than most war atrocities. When the Japanese took Nanking,
(28:37):
I think it among eighty thousand people raped, which is awful, obviously,
But this is an a trustee against the British people
that has hitherto never been imagined or even like, no
one has ever been in a position to do this
to us. And this has been done with the permission
of our own governments, with our own authorities, with the
local councils, with the police, with those people who would
(28:59):
change to actually keep the children safe.
Speaker 1 (29:03):
Carl As, I was reading like you were for the
last day and a half, these stories that I really
wish I could unread. If I had to do it
over again, I wouldn't have read them, not to be
honest with you, I was thinking to myself, this is
the kind of thing that sparks a revolution. I mean,
that's how bad that kind of stuff is. This is
the kind of thing that can lead to political change.
Maybe not doing peaceful political change, not cheering that on,
(29:25):
but this is the kind of thing that can lead
to that, no question about it. But I'm a long
way across the Atlantic ocean. What is the mood like,
how is this landing in the UK?
Speaker 2 (29:38):
Well, the media is doing their dan does knots talk
about it? As you can imagine, the political parties, the
Conservative and Labor parties are both complicit in this state
of affairs. It was often done in labor run councils,
labor on areas, so the police were heavily synthetic to
labor and the Conservatives had fourteen years in government and
(30:00):
did nothing about it. So they are also complicit in
consenting to allow this to the sleeping dog, letting it lie.
So it's hard to tell. I mean, if the only
reaction we have to go by social media, well, millions
of people are outraged by it, but I think there's
a sense of disconnect in it because there's, as I
(30:24):
mentioned at the beginning, there's definitely a classist element in this,
and these girls come from something underclass in British society.
They are looked down upon as being morally people who
kind of deserve what's happening to them by the people
in the children's homes, by the police, and dare I say,
(30:46):
by some people in wider society more broadly, and so
while obviously no one is in favor of the abuse
these girls suffered. It's surprisingly difficult to muster all that
much sympathy. People feel sympathetic in the abstract, but they're
not personally outraged in the way that I think actually
(31:08):
a sensible and well adjusted person would be. There's a
strange amount of apathy regarding this subject, and I do
think it's something to do with the distance between the normal,
average person and the girls from the underclass who are
being abused by the immigrants. It's a very difficult thing
people want to talk about, and I don't think it's
(31:32):
going to cause riots. I don't think it's going to
cause trouble.
Speaker 1 (31:35):
So it sounds like and I don't want to put
words in your mouth, let me, let me try to
summarize that. It sounds like because these were, yeah, the
poor British girls, you know, the dregs of society, that
there's not going to be enough widespread hot anger for
this to prompt real change.
Speaker 2 (31:55):
I think a lot of people live in denial about
this because the failures are so widespread and the evil
so systemic that I think they have trouble believing that
this is real. I think they have trouble believing that
this is the country that they live in and that
these are the reports from the girls who were abused.
(32:15):
And the implications are also staggering, shall we say, because
the implication is essentially an entire immigrant community, almost all
of them in this country are essentially complicit, which is
what the events would show. And that's a hard thing
(32:40):
to deal with. That's a hard thing to try and
get your mind around, even if they are any indirectly
complicit and they knew and they did nothing, or they
directly took part. I think for a lot of people,
it's very uncomfortable to try and deal with the magnitude
and the horror of the crimes. And so I think
for a lot of people, pretending that they don't believe,
(33:03):
not even necessarily pretending, but downplaying it, ignoring it, assuming
the best for some reason in this circumstance, is a
kind of self defense measure, because otherwise, well, I mean,
it says a lot about the civilization, doesn't it, if
it's prepared sacrifice the least privileged people in a society
(33:24):
for multiculturalism, for the stability of community relations. I mean,
where do you go from there?
Speaker 1 (33:34):
That is so unimaginably, said Carl. Prayers for you guys
over there, and thank you, thank.
Speaker 4 (33:39):
You for your time.
Speaker 1 (33:39):
I appreciate my Please, all right, let's focus on something happy.
Because Gavin Newsom going to prison.
Speaker 4 (33:47):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (33:49):
It looks like he's in some trouble. Adam Carolla is
out there. We'll talk to him about that. And just
a moment before we talk to Adam Carolla, let me
talk to you about the h I interest debt you're
drowning in. Are you carrying twenty thirty percent high interest that.
Speaker 4 (34:08):
You don't have to? You know that, right? You don't
have to live like that? Do you have a mortgage?
Speaker 1 (34:14):
American Financing is going to do something for you, because
right now you feel like you're trapped in the woods,
like you're never going to get out.
Speaker 4 (34:21):
They'll carve you a path out.
Speaker 1 (34:24):
They will carve you a path so you can finally,
one day be free of it.
Speaker 4 (34:29):
Go look them up. This is what they do.
Speaker 1 (34:33):
Take people who think they're drowning and pull them out
of the water.
Speaker 4 (34:37):
Go to American.
Speaker 1 (34:38):
Financing dot net slash jesse and find out what they
can do for you. American Financing dot net slash jesse
we'll be back.
Speaker 8 (34:56):
In recent days, federal agents have knocked on the doors
of family, friends and former employees, not because they found
a crime, because they're simply trying to find one. They're
demanding records.
Speaker 4 (35:07):
They're abusing the.
Speaker 8 (35:08):
Grand jury process, digging through years and years of random documents.
Donald Trump isn't just coming after me because of my
mean tweets. He's coming after me because I'm considering running
for president. One by one, anyone who has challenged Donald
Trump has ended up on his hit list, and today
I proudly joined that list. After calling for my arrest
(35:32):
last year, Donald Trump directed his Department of Justice to
investigate me, and just in the last week, I've learned
that his campaign has reached my own home to get me.
He's coming after my wife Jen Donald Trump hicked the
wrong target. We have nothing to hide.
Speaker 1 (35:52):
Well, I guess I'm naturally a suspicious person. I suspect
that's not the whole truth about what's actually happening. I
bet Adam Adam Carolla can enlighten us joining me now,
the great Adam Carolla in Washington. Since I was a kid, Adam,
I don't suspected Gavin Newsom is lying maybe I'm a prophet.
Speaker 3 (36:15):
Well, it doesn't make sense to go after people if
there's nothing there. It's a big democratic lie where they
go they're gonna go after this guy, and they're gonna
go after that guy. Yeah, they won after Trump. They
won after Trump multiple times and multiple jurisdictions and they
didn't have a case. And now Trump's the president. So
(36:36):
you can go after anybody you want. But if they
didn't do anything, good luck. So it's also funny because
they could. They say it's revenge. You know, this is
Trump revenge for his political enemies. But if you think
about revenge in any Western you've ever seen, it was
like they killed his wife, they killed his family, they
(36:58):
burnt his farm, and now he wants revenge. Yeah, Trump
does want revenge because you guys declared lawfair on him
basically the last decade of his life.
Speaker 4 (37:12):
Adam.
Speaker 1 (37:13):
Okay, this investigation actually was started not by the federal
DOJ under Donald Trump. It was started in California when
Joe Biden was still president. We can get to the
nitty gritty of it in a minute, but again, call
me suspicious. That tells me that Gavin Newsom has enemies
inside the Democrat machine in California because I'm used to
(37:34):
the way it works, and these things kind of tend
to go away when Democrats get in trouble when democrats states,
am I crazy.
Speaker 9 (37:42):
No.
Speaker 3 (37:42):
I think we've established in the last few years, especially
that Democrats will turn on Democrats. I mean Bernie Sanders,
Hillary Clinton, that whole debacle from a few years ago,
and then of course the whole Kamala you know Biden.
So Democrats want to be in power, and that's the
(38:05):
raise on debt. There's no other thing they want to
do other than be in power. And if that means
throwing other Democrats under the bus, like Swallwell or Bernie Sanders,
then they will throw other Democrats under the bus so
they can remain in power. So this probably comes from
a Democrat.
Speaker 1 (38:23):
Okay, I'll set aside who I think that probably is.
I suspect it's Tome, but we'll get to that another time.
Speaker 4 (38:30):
What is it they're saying he did? Is it his wife?
Is it taxes? What is it?
Speaker 3 (38:36):
Well, it's a lot of like Pritzker's family bottom a
house and then they I don't know, got a second
mortgage or something on the house and then just sort.
Speaker 4 (38:46):
Of cashed it out.
Speaker 3 (38:48):
His wife makes documentaries that nobody wants to see and
then gets a whole bunch of money for them. I
make documentaries people want to see and don't get any
money for them, makes ones about the trans community and
about the patriarchy, and then pushes it onto kids in
schools and unions. It's the same old story. The question
(39:11):
is is is it it's morally illegal? Is it technically illegal?
You know, she gets grants, she gets fun she gets
unions who back her husband to buy her docs, and
there's a bunch of tax related stuff. She's a world
class dingbat. By the way, if you hear her talk,
she makes she makes come Kamala Harris sound like Thomas Soul.
(39:37):
That's I swear to you. She makes she makes Kamala
Harris sound scholarly. She is so stupid.
Speaker 1 (39:48):
That's actually funny about that up because we're going to
get the dome here in a moment.
Speaker 4 (39:51):
But does any of this stick?
Speaker 1 (39:53):
Because I'll be honest with you, maybe he did really
bad things, and maybe it was morally incorrect, and maybe
they were felonies. I get that, but politically it doesn't
sound like something that brings down a Democrat. To bring
down a Democrat in a state like California, you've almost
got to find gold bars under his bed, like Bob
Menendez in New Jersey. It doesn't sound like it rises
(40:13):
to that, as much as that may want it to.
Speaker 3 (40:17):
Gold bars aren't going to do it in California, but panties,
panties under the bed will do it. So it's got
to be me too. We don't care about any form
of corruption involving money. We care about any me too
related stuff, or maybe you made fun of someone who
(40:37):
is transitioning or something like that, But all the money
related stuff and the gold bars, we would not penalize
you for that. If Eric Swallwell had swindled millions of
dollars in cash, he'd be in the thick of the
gubernatorial race right now.
Speaker 1 (40:55):
And that brings me to Dome. She's obviously considering running.
Speaker 4 (40:59):
She's out.
Speaker 1 (40:59):
They are continuing the words salad tour.
Speaker 9 (41:02):
Here she was, as the governor says, where we should
be unstoppable and knowing that there is so much that
has already been done and can be done. It's really
good difference in a way that builds industries and creates
efficiencies and creates leadership around helping the people see well,
(41:28):
it can be unburned by the ways.
Speaker 1 (41:33):
She never says anything about anything.
Speaker 3 (41:37):
I agree, but we are in a new society filled
with dumb women who this appeals to, and then a
handful of dudes who cross their legs real deep, who
also buy into this same bs. It's a word salad group.
It's a group that's never done anything with their hands.
(41:57):
They never built anything, they've never gain apped spark plugs,
they've never bump started a car. They've never done anything.
It's all been talk. It's all been virtual, it's all
been on a screen. It's all been ideas. And to
those people these idiots appeal to.
Speaker 1 (42:16):
I just want to point out that I'm six foot
eight and I multiple times bump started my nineteen eighty
three Honda Accord to get it going, and that is
not as easy as it sounds for a six' eight
body to jump in and bump start a nineteen.
Speaker 4 (42:30):
Eighty Three Honda.
Speaker 1 (42:31):
Accord hatchback at, THEM i wish you could have seen
me back.
Speaker 4 (42:34):
Then you'd have been so proud of.
Speaker 3 (42:35):
ME i Think i've pushed cars further Than i've driven.
Them if you really just laid it end to. END
i would be at least approaching a tie in the
next several years IF i don't have to push another. Card,
YES i bump started. Everything by the Way i've bump
started and jump. Started i've done. Them i've done them.
(42:55):
Both get the cables, out push it down the, hill
the whole nine. Yard but we're living in a time
when nobody's gone out and put anything, together built, anything
got any grease underneath their, fingernails and they can't think.
Straight and to, them the endless talk is, effective and
(43:16):
their studies for women to talk. Satiates so if you
talk enough about a problem with a, woman it feels
to them is if you'd address the.
Speaker 1 (43:27):
Problem you, KNOW i run into that with my wife
all the. Time it's just have to sit and talk about.
Speaker 4 (43:35):
It it saysn't matter if you're not talking about. Anything
that's that's all she. Wants you know.
Speaker 3 (43:39):
What the number one ANSWER i would get from my
wife if the cable was out or something back in the,
Day i'd, go what's going on with the? Cable she?
GO i called the guy AND i, go what? Happened
he didn't pick? Up, okay we don't have. Cable in her,
mind it felt like we had it because she did.
It she felt. Satiated What i'm, Saying i'm IN. La
(44:00):
this whole place is run by dumb. Chicks we just
talk about things over and over and. Over we're reimagining.
Policing no one's. Illegal everyone wants a seat at the.
Table everyone needs world class healthcare and. Education, Okay i'm going.
Home we're done. NOW i called the cable.
Speaker 1 (44:16):
Guy and of course when all these dumb communists talk about,
reimagining they love that. Word, Right i'm gonna reimagine the.
Economy i'm gonna reimagining. Police that's just commy speak for.
Destroy that's what they. Mean destroy doesn't sound as, good
so you have to reimagine.
Speaker 4 (44:30):
It so it appeals to the. Hippies.
Speaker 3 (44:32):
Right but the words satiate in the sense That i'm
not making this. Up this is clinical women and the
way their brain works feels like they've done something because
we've talked about. It and if you get enough women in,
government they're gonna talk about enough stuff and it's not
(44:53):
gonna get. Done but when you listen To Kamala, harris
she just does the word salad and then dumb. Pyce
people feel satiated when they hear.
Speaker 4 (45:02):
It what happened To Spencer?
Speaker 3 (45:04):
PRATT i think he tried to enter a system where
he wasn't, welcome and that system sort of took care of.
Speaker 8 (45:16):
Him you, know.
Speaker 3 (45:18):
He was he was basically a gay guy walking into
a biker bar and everyone looked at, him or a
biker walking into a gay. Bar it'll work either. Direction
and all eyes were on him and they, said we
don't want your kind around, here and they got rid of.
Him and that's what the system does In Los, angeles.
Speaker 4 (45:42):
Freaking.
Speaker 1 (45:42):
California, adam my, BROTHER i appreciates you man as.
Speaker 4 (45:45):
Always All, right.
Speaker 1 (45:51):
It's time for light in the, mood AND i am
going to very reluctantly bring up something that relates to
The World.
Speaker 4 (45:59):
Cup. Bang all, right it's time to light in the.
Speaker 1 (46:13):
Mood The World cup is going, on and that's neither
here nor. There but what has been totally entertaining is
the fact That europeans are over here In america and
they're loving.
Speaker 4 (46:24):
It it's just, incredible absolutely.
Speaker 10 (46:27):
Incredible there really is like no. OTHER i honestly think
unless you've unless you live In, america unless you or
unless you visit, here you can't really comprehend how nice
these areas.
Speaker 4 (46:44):
Are everybody's so, Friendly southern. Hospitality the air smells nice.
Speaker 11 (46:49):
When you're in THE. Uk, okay if you're next to the,
beach it. Smells the beach doesn't smell her, right everything for.
Speaker 12 (46:55):
YOU i kinder As, yeah but you won't drink a
thousand Cabs i've got and it's three you bid.
Speaker 4 (47:08):
Free you beat it.
Speaker 11 (47:11):
DOWN i just love it here like and they give
to fuck human, trafficking which is. Awesome we Have bible
verses on the bottom of their cut never see but,
yeah look at that. Burger it's so.
Speaker 10 (47:25):
Good and then we've got the.
Speaker 12 (47:26):
SUNSET i Love.
Speaker 11 (47:28):
AMERICA i can never. LEAVE i cannot live with.
Speaker 13 (47:32):
Others i've been back home in THE, UK i haven't
felt like, myself which sounds so. CRAZY i now live
for that, adventure that crazy, lifestyle that meeting new, people
seeing new people every, day AND i just long for.
It and In america it is so. Amazing, Seriously, americans
(47:54):
what have you done to?
Speaker 4 (47:56):
ME i need to come, back come back, anytime, brother
see them up
Speaker 11 (48:04):
Mm hmmmmmmm
This is a PSA about awareness, awareness about the kind
of country we have become. Sadly, it's bad that Antifa
is obviously still around, but we're finally getting some action
when the Biden DOJ clearly protected.
Speaker 2 (00:16):
All these freaks, throwing the most vulnerable young girls in
society literally to the wolves.
Speaker 3 (00:23):
Trump does want revenge because you guys declared lawfair on him.
Speaker 1 (00:31):
All right, let's talk about something heavy before we dig
intoe everything else on the rest of the show.
Speaker 4 (00:36):
We have so much to get to. It's going to
be wonderful.
Speaker 1 (00:38):
I'm right tonight, but this is more of a PSA
for you, and I want to be clear about this
PSA I'm about to talk about. So we're about to
talk about left wing violence and left wing terrorism, things
like that.
Speaker 4 (00:52):
I am not I want to stress this loudly.
Speaker 1 (00:55):
I am not telling you to not live your life,
avoid going out, to not go to a political rally
or a UFC event or a football game or whatever.
You only have one life, Go out there and live it.
This is a PSA about awareness, awareness about the kind
(01:16):
of country we have become, sadly, and the awareness of
you and how you conduct yourself in public. So you've
probably already seen the headlines. I'm assuming it's just headlines
for the most part. But we just had that big
UFC two fifty event at the White House. You saw
the FBI arrested some people. Okay, Well, that's sadly so
(01:39):
common in America that oftentimes people don't read past the
headlines and dig into the details. A couple left wing comedies,
of course, got arrested. They're violent people. We all get
the game, darn I got all that. They're getting better
at terrorism, and terrorists always do. Remember that when you
(02:02):
could call it crime, criminals, terrorism, whatever it is. You
start out, you try some things, doesn't work, so you
try other things it doesn't work.
Speaker 4 (02:12):
What's human nature?
Speaker 1 (02:13):
When you try something that you want to do and
you fail at it, you make adjustments, You work harder,
you get more organized, and you figure out a way
to succeed. The supplies not just to good people, not
just to you trying to get that promotion at work.
This applies to communist terrorists in the United States of America.
I dug into some details about this plot, and I'll
(02:36):
tell you what it maybe sit up in my chair.
Speaker 4 (02:38):
It did.
Speaker 1 (02:40):
This was a very legitimate plot that could have, had
it been carried out, killed a lot of people. Twenty
three people allegedly as of right now, that's what we know.
Speaker 4 (02:52):
Twenty three people were involved.
Speaker 1 (02:53):
We're not talking about just some freak sitting in his
mom's basement.
Speaker 4 (02:57):
Twenty three people involved. The plan.
Speaker 1 (03:02):
Well, during that UFC event, they were going to send
out drones. We'll come back to that in a moment.
They were going to send out drones with explosives. They
were going to be dropping them in strategic areas with
the intention of what because as soon as I say
drones with explosives, what do you think, Well, they're going
to drop them on people. Not necessarily, they were going
(03:22):
to drop them in specific areas with the intention of
creating a mass panic, which probably would have happened, and
driving people towards a specific funnel where they were going
to start gunning people down with sniperfire. By the grace
of God, the plan failed. FBI, to their credit, discovered
(03:44):
it took it down all those things.
Speaker 4 (03:45):
By the grace of God, the plan failed.
Speaker 1 (03:47):
But does that sound like the kind of plan some
turbo freak commie sitting in his basement came up with
on a cocktail napkin after five bud heavies one night. No,
they took their time with this, And I'll be honest,
that's a good plan. If I was a left wing
commed dirt ball, that's a solid plan. They are getting better.
(04:13):
We already know their violent.
Speaker 4 (04:14):
That's who they are, that's how they operate.
Speaker 1 (04:16):
And of course we know that Democrats will continue to
encourage this behavior with their rhetoric, which is often falls.
These people were allegedly motivated by Epstein lies. Well, I'm
Democrats are going to do this stuff still.
Speaker 5 (04:29):
Donald Trump is in the Epstein files thousands and thousands
of times. In those files there's highly disturbing allegations of
Donald Trump raping children, of Donald Trump threatening to kill children.
Speaker 1 (04:46):
Those are lies. You're right, You're right, you know those
are lies. The scumbags sitting at home don't know their lies.
We have to be aware. This is about awareness. Be
aware when you're out and about. Put your phone in
your pocket and be aware. All right, all right, we
have a great show for you. We'll talk to you
about some of these dirt balls in the streets. Before
we get to these dirt balls in the streets, let
(05:09):
me talk to you about a wonderful company, Pure Talk.
We are coming up on our two hundred and fiftieth
birthday in this country. Now is as good a time
as any to be a patriot.
Speaker 4 (05:23):
To put your money where your morals are. The big mobile.
Speaker 1 (05:27):
Companies, they've been crapping all over this country for years,
Pride Month and all that other stuff for years and
years and years.
Speaker 4 (05:35):
Then you have pure Talk. Don't do that. Pure Talk
is out there.
Speaker 1 (05:41):
Hiring Americans, charging you less for your wireless plan and
hiring Americans. You know it's easy to switch. You know
you can keep your phone, you can keep your phone number.
Go to puretalk dot com, slash Jesse TV and make
the switch. Pure Talk slash JESSETV, the companies run by
(06:03):
a Vietnam veteran.
Speaker 4 (06:05):
Make the switch to Puretop. We'll be back today.
Speaker 6 (06:16):
A federal indictment was unsealed, charging fifteen defendants with conspiracy
to impede or injure federal officers and other charges related
to efforts of too Minneapolis based Antifa groups that violently
opposed the enforcement of federal law in our state.
Speaker 4 (06:36):
That's a good thing, a very good thing.
Speaker 1 (06:39):
The bad news is Antifa still around the good.
Speaker 4 (06:41):
News is some of these dirt balls are going to prison.
Speaker 1 (06:44):
Joining me now, the Great Josh Philip, host of the
Josh Philip Joe. All right, Josh, Okay, it's bad that
Antifa's obviously still around, but we're finally getting some action
when the Biden DOJ clearly protected all these freaks.
Speaker 7 (07:00):
Yeah, well, I think what we're seeing now is that
finally something is happening. Going back to Trump's first term
in office, we've been watching Antifa attacking people, carrying out
violence on the streets with the intent it seems, of
denying people their constitutional rights to freedom to gather in,
freedom to speak. And I think that's actually what Trump
is doing now. He's actually going after these groups on
(07:22):
terroristic threats, which is denial of rights. Not these fifteen individuals,
but like overall with Antifa, the denial of rights, arguing
that their actions to discourage people, scare people out of
you know, again, publicly expressing their opinions or their values
is actually denying people their constitutional rights. These fifteen individuals
(07:44):
latest chapter of several arrests we've seen of Antifa. They're
part of a group called Direct Action, and I think
we're getting more. I think what's really big here. We're
getting more details now that Antifa is not just an
idea like we've been told for so long, just some
kind of random grassroots group of people coming out to
protest or whatever else. It's a highly organized group training materials, logistics,
(08:09):
people behind the scenes, large skill funding networks. And what
we're seeing also is with these arrests, those networks of
training are actually getting taken down. That was the significance
of this latest one, Josh.
Speaker 1 (08:25):
Can we focus on the funding aspect of it? And
maybe that's a dumb thing to do because this gets
into a really dark area, which is dark on purpose, right,
they don't advertise all this.
Speaker 4 (08:34):
I just have such a difficult.
Speaker 1 (08:36):
Time wrapping my mind around anybody with any means sitting down,
pulling out the proverbial checkbook, not that anybody writes a
check anymore, and stroking a check to some purple haired
freak so he can go throw poop at federal officers for.
Speaker 4 (08:51):
Kicking out illegals.
Speaker 1 (08:52):
But clearly somebody the peoples are doing this, or is
it government? Therese are large checks that are being written
fund this many dirt balls.
Speaker 7 (09:02):
Well, you know, we're still getting answers on the funding.
That's still a bit opaque what it does seem, though
there are investigations into possible foreign funding. A lot of
focus right now is on this individual, Neville Roy Singham,
based out of Shanghai in China. He's a billionaire there
tight he is merried, of course, to the leader of
(09:23):
Code Pink, another one of these far left organizations. These
organizations are actually kind of organizing many of the mass
protests against across the United States, not just like Antifa,
but the entire far left machine, and some of the
organizations being looked at, Code Pink, Party of Liberation, and Socialism.
These are some of the biggest ones I would actually
(09:44):
add to the list, though there's a couple that I
believe the US government should be looking into. I would
actually argue that the Rainbow Coalition is one of the
largest organizations with possible foreign funds. I believe there are
foreign funds, but I'll say possible foreign funds. That is
massively organizing many of the anti government protests across the
(10:06):
United States, that are actually actively trying to undermine the
political system of the United States, that are promoting really
revolutionary communist movements across the United States and that I
believe we're actually breaking the law. Another one would be
Freedom Road Socialists, which is also heavily involved in some
of the migrant caravans and issues like that.
Speaker 1 (10:26):
Okay, let's focus on the fruit basket for a minute,
the gay tr and all these other people.
Speaker 4 (10:32):
What's the motivation.
Speaker 1 (10:34):
There to tear down the United States of America promote communism.
I understand they have a whole different host of values
over in that part, but what's the connection.
Speaker 7 (10:46):
Yeah, so what they're using as a maoist strategy and
this is where people get lost in the weeds with
identity politics.
Speaker 4 (10:53):
Right.
Speaker 7 (10:54):
Basically, long story short, Communism under Karl Marx was basically,
you know, the bourgeois against the proletaria. It was class warfare.
They discovered over time that the narrative of class conflict
did not really work in the United States. We have
a very fluid class system. You can be born into
a rich family do stupid things and become poor. You
(11:17):
could be born into a poor family do very smart
things to become rich. We have a fluid class system
in the United States. Class warfare didn't work here. So
what they decided was, well, you know what that doesn't work,
So why don't we try to use identity? America is
kind of a big basket of a bunch of you know,
we're a free country. Betweens, people can have some crazy ideas. Okay,
(11:38):
we have a lot of different groups, a lot of
different beliefs, different religions, different races, different different political opinions.
Of course, different identities, even which has become more of
a thing. And the idea was to basically use that.
So they created critical theory. This was under the Frankfurt
School right, formerly the School of Marxist Studies, the Frankfurt
(11:59):
School out of Columbia. They created critical theory as a
way to effectively use rather than class conflict, using identity conflict.
So it became instead of the bourgeoisie against the proletariat,
men against women, black against white. Later on it became
straight against gay and gay against trans and you know,
(12:20):
I don't even know, like tree people and fairy folk
whatever they heck going to go by now, or dog
people whatever they've they've done everything now right, basically dividing
people into smaller and smaller camps. Now, the marks or
the Maoist strategy was basically around uniting minorities to create
a majority. So Mao Zedong's strategy in China was to
(12:40):
unite these smaller ethnic groups in revolution against you know,
basically the larger incumbent ethnic groups. He used identity politics
and the same way you see the left doing it now.
And so the theory is, and this is one of
the big agendas, as I mentioned the Rainbow Coalition. In fact,
that's why they call it the Rainbow Coalition, is to
actually create meta narratives for these different identity groups and
(13:05):
then unite them saying that, well, you know, the way
to solve your problems is to empower us, to get
rid of the haters and the racists and the bigots
and everything else, and so people buy into it. Then
they have the paid agitators who kind of you know,
suppress the opposition. Then they have the media, oftentimes working,
I mean there's even Antifa member news outlets working to
(13:26):
go after their political enemies and going after their ideological enemies.
Then you have massive foreign billionaires, guys like never we're
seeing them funding the networks. And then you have government
officials redirecting even taxpayer funds to NGOs non governmental organizations,
many of which also are involved in carrying out these
kinds of operations, and when you get to the ground operations,
(13:48):
whether it be Black Lives Matter or you know, the
ANTIFA protests or the anti ice protests or whatever it is,
many times what you have is tiered organizations that will
start up front movements based on whatever the ideological draws
of the time. Sometimes it's going to be black against white.
Sometimes it's going to be, you know, Israel against Gaza.
Sometimes it's going to be you know, as we're seeing
(14:09):
now the anti Ice protests, for example. They will change
the narrative depending on what's most in front of people ideologically,
and then use that kind of alter that trajectory to
have it serve their own interest.
Speaker 1 (14:24):
Josh, we touched on it a little bit earlier, and
I can only ask what you think because we don't
have all the documents and things like that. We may
never but so much of this seems to me from
a thirty thousand foot view of just another way for
countries like China to declare war on the United States
of Americans. Then the setting bombs and submarines and missiles
and things like that, all you have to do doesn't
(14:45):
cost that much In the long run, few billion dollars here,
a few billion dollars there. You got some training freaks
tearing up the streets. America divided against each other. In
China Games, there was.
Speaker 7 (14:57):
Actually a publicly announced strategy within China from one of
Chijing King's main advisors. It was specifically on this. It
was a guy named jin Can Wrong or Chinkan Wrong right. Basically,
he set down a plan to start four different wars
to distract the United States prior to the CECIP. He's
planned to invade Taiwan. Again, this was public twenty six
(15:19):
well got leaked, but twenty sixteen plan of the Chinese
Communist Party, and so this was the theory. Jin Can
Wrong came out and said, well, look, the US military
is designed to fight two wars simultaneously, Eastern Front, Western Front.
He said, therefore, if we're going to defeat the United States,
we have to get them involved in at least three wars.
At least. He came up with a strategy to start
(15:42):
four wars. And then the fifth was, of course, China
invading Taiwan. They wanted a war with Russia. That was
before the Russian invasion of Ukraine. They wanted a war
in the Middle East. That was before the Gaza, you know,
Israel Iran conflict came about. They wanted a war in
Latin America. The original plan was they wanted Lula in
(16:02):
Brazil to start a war. He got pushed up by Bolsonaro.
He's now back in power. We almost had a war
in Latin America because Maduro working with Lula where they
were about to invade Guyana, just to the east of
Venezuela because they claim historical rights to the oil there.
We almost had a war had Trump not gone in
you know, call it what you will, I don't know,
kidnapped Maduro that stopped that war from taking place. The
(16:26):
Fourth War was chaos on American streets. They wanted to
actually finance movements of protest, ideological struggle, class struggle within
the United States. And I think that's what we're seeing
with these identity groups getting money, as we now know
from China. And remember going back even during Black Lives Matter,
right when that was a big thing. If you remember,
(16:46):
the donation page for Black Lives Matter used to redirect
the Chinese Progressive Association. The Chinese Progressive Association was a
front group of the Little Red Guard of the Chinese
Communist Party. And I know that was fact checked by
like New York Times, but they actually falsified it because
they claimed that, like the Eastern branch right on the
East Coast was different from the West coast. But it's
(17:07):
like trying to claim that, like, okay, Walmart in New
York is different from Walmart in San Francisco. It's the
same organization as different franchises. So there was a lot
of fake reporting to cover up that major finding. This
also ties into the Soviet strategy, which the CCP basically
picked up the slack of after the fall of the
Soviet Union, which was on ideological warfare or demoralization, the
(17:31):
idea of effectively demoralizing people, causing chaos in American streets,
destabilizing the country, and then using the destabilization to make
people demand totalitarian response, in other words, to demand what
they call state capitalism, which means socialism right the state
controls the systems of the free market, or to demand
(17:52):
a type of strong arm tactic to destroy their enemies
to restore order. And I think now you see that
with this idea that hey, there's no none of these
problems in China you know, why don't we do that
or none of these problems in North Korea, why don't
we do that? I think we're at that stage now
of ideological subversion, where people are actually wanting the stability
(18:13):
of totalitarianism. And this was the publicly stated Chinese strategy.
I'll add one more thing to it. There was another
book in China, one of the main advisors of Shiji
Ping again, there was a book called America against America,
and the idea was effectively that they could manipulate the
internal differences among Americans among ourselves, to study loopholes within
(18:38):
our laws, to study constitutional law, and to manipulate the
open system of the United States, to weaponize our own
legal systems and our own cultural systems as a way
to destroy US. So I believe these mass protests Chinese
run intelligence operations ideological subversion, even drug war, which was
publicly listed as part of their unrestricted war against the
(19:00):
United States, as is culture war. I believe they were
doing this intentionally to manipulate the open system of the
United States to use it as a weapon against US.
Speaker 1 (19:11):
Josh as always outstanding, Thank you, coming back soon.
Speaker 4 (19:15):
All right, we have to go.
Speaker 1 (19:18):
Across the pond and talk about something unbelievably ugly. Now
it's not joy. Behar Next, before we get to that,
we're drinking estrogen. I don't have a bottle of water
sitting here beside me. If I did, I'd hold it
up for effect. You are drinking synthetic estrogen. We have
(19:39):
lost Wrap your mind around this and what this means
for a country. We have lost fifty percent of our
testosterone in the last fifty years. We have to fight
back against that. You have to be proactive. You can't
just be aware. What are you doing? Are you tired along?
Feeling lethargic?
Speaker 4 (19:57):
Along?
Speaker 1 (19:58):
Mine little foggy than it used to beat. Your tea
levels are low. Natural herbal supplements from choc will change
your life. Clinically tested you start taking a male Vitality Stack.
I've been taking one for four years. Twenty percent increase
in your tea levels in ninety days. Go to Chuck
dot com slash Jesse TV.
Speaker 4 (20:19):
We'll be back all right.
Speaker 1 (20:27):
So I think it's very rare that we do disclaimers
on this show. You know, we always try to keep
it kid friendly as much as humanly possible. But I'm
going to lay a little disclaimer out here. I almost
didn't even talk about this. I didn't talk about it
because it's so horrible. I've spent the last I think
day and a half reading about this rape gang inquiry
(20:53):
from the UK and it is some of the most horrible,
heartbreaking stuff. It'll make you want to go on a
vigilantes free and it's young girls. It is the some
of the worst stuff I've ever read in my entire life,
and I've read some really really dark things in my life.
So I soon to consider just not even talking about it.
(21:14):
But I don't think that's right. We can't hide from
the reality, and I don't think that's fair to all
the victims, all those wonderful young British girls who have
had their lives destroyed. So we thought there'd be nobody
better than talk to, talking to the Great Carl Benjamin
at lotus Eaters.
Speaker 4 (21:29):
Dot com about this.
Speaker 1 (21:31):
Okay, Carl, the rape gang inquiry report. I give you
the four just because I don't want to talk anymore
about it.
Speaker 4 (21:41):
What is it? What we find it? Again? It is?
Speaker 2 (21:53):
Excuse me, it's quite difficult. So about this, right, I
have to just preface this with I'm a married father
with full children daughters. So I spent the last day
and a half reading the rape gang report and it's
just harrowing, to be honest, It's just it's the product
of decades of institutional failure in the United Kingdom that
(22:17):
is built fundamentally upon the mass immigration of the twentieth
and twenty first centuries and the oppressive culture of political correctness.
Combine that with the classist society in which we live,
and what you have is a recipee for the authorities
(22:38):
throwing the most vulnerable young girls in society literally to
the wolves, to gangs of Pakistani men, so they can
they can treat them like sex slaves. And there was
for many of them no help coming, no where they
could go, no one they could turn to, because they
(23:01):
were repeatedly betrayed by the authorities, by the police, by
the social services, by the children's home children, you know,
the people running the children's homes, by politicians, by the media,
all attempting to cover it up because the overwhelming preponderance
of the perpetrators were Pakistani men. And what was happening
(23:24):
is that young girls from broken homes who had difficult
styleing life, So people who had the worst possible start,
they could imagine, would be groomed into spending all of
their time with these men. So they had become hooked
on alcohol and drugs and cigarettes, and they would take them.
(23:46):
I think they call it what was a boyfriend boyfriend
grooming or something like that. One of them would often
pretend to be the boyfriend and then they would start
just prostituting them out. And once it became clear that
they had access to a particular girl, they become highly abusive,
rape her repeatedly and do everything in their power to
demean her, to make her feel that she was worthless,
(24:07):
And then they would traffic her around Britain to various
other Pakistani communities and pimp her out to other men.
So as it stands, at the moment, there are hundreds
and hundreds of the ringleaders of these gangs in jail,
but there are also going to be tens of thousands
of men in this country of Pakistani heritage who have
(24:27):
raped a child and are just walking around free.
Speaker 4 (24:29):
At the moment. God have mercy.
Speaker 1 (24:32):
Okay, a couple things can you give me? Not that
one isn't too many. Can you give me some idea
of how many British girls were talking about here.
Speaker 2 (24:45):
Well, we don't really know, because the authorities have done
everything in their power to hide this until it became
apparent that it just couldn't be hidden. And this has
been happening in Britain since at least the nineteenth fifties,
just on a much smaller scale than it was happening
in modern times with the advent of immigration from this
(25:07):
particular community.
Speaker 4 (25:08):
It began.
Speaker 2 (25:10):
In the late nineties and early two thousands the Labor
government decided to increase the amount of immigration and this
started to increase as a problem because political correctness became
more prevalent in our society, and that's what led to
the rise of the British National Party and people like
Tommy Robinson blowing the whistle and raising the alarm and saying, listen,
(25:35):
something terrible is being done to vulnerable English girls by
this particular community and the authorities. Of course, I mean,
you'll know what Tommy Robinson's reputation in Britain is like.
You'll know what the British National Party's reputation in Britain
is like, whether they deserve these or not for other
things that they've done. They were right to raise the
alarm on this. They were correct about this, and it
(25:57):
took until twenty fourteen when we had the elect Jay
Inquiry that found yes, this was mostly men of Pakistani heritage,
and this has been going on and it is very widespread.
At the time it was something like sixteen different cities,
but now this Rape Gang Inquiry has found that it's
probably in one hundred and fifty counties across England.
Speaker 4 (26:20):
This is.
Speaker 2 (26:22):
Really, really widespread. And the important thing about this Rape
Gang Inquiry is that this is the only inquiry that
we've had that has not been bounded by concerns of
political correctness, as in, the people doing it don't care
about political correctness at all. What they care about is
the harm that's been done to English girls. And so
that's why this one is such brutal reading. I mean,
(26:44):
the other ones were bad as well, obviously, but this
one has a much more severe and penetrative discourse in
it because they are just giving you the full testimonies
of the victims as the things that happened to them.
And I don't really want to describe a lot of
(27:05):
what happened, but the worst parts were well all of it, really,
but the institutional failures are the things that are genuinely
the most shocking. I mean, if you know, if you
put a wolf in the henhouse and it eats all
the hens, Okay, fair enough, you knew it was a wolf.
But when the farmer comes and brings the hens to
the wolves, which is what happened in this case, the
(27:30):
children's homes would work in cooperation with these gangs and
would bring them girls that they chose in some cases.
In other cases, the police would find these girls in
a property drunk, naked, high, drugged and arrest the girls
for being prostitutes, or sometimes just return the girls if
they escaped from the men to the men. In one
(27:52):
particular case, the police said, here she is have fun.
And so I mean, it's just impossible to describe the
scale of the betrayal. And this, of course, because of
the complicity with the authorities, means we don't know how
many girls.
Speaker 4 (28:11):
We just don't know.
Speaker 2 (28:13):
In twenty I think it was twenty nineteen, Rotherham MP
Sarah Champion estimated it could have been up to a million.
I pray to god it's not that many. This report
estimates probably around quarter of a million, So two hundred
and fifty thousand girls. It's worth noting that that's way
worse than most war atrocities. When the Japanese took Nanking,
(28:37):
I think it among eighty thousand people raped, which is awful, obviously,
But this is an a trustee against the British people
that has hitherto never been imagined or even like, no
one has ever been in a position to do this
to us. And this has been done with the permission
of our own governments, with our own authorities, with the
local councils, with the police, with those people who would
(28:59):
change to actually keep the children safe.
Speaker 1 (29:03):
Carl As, I was reading like you were for the
last day and a half, these stories that I really
wish I could unread. If I had to do it
over again, I wouldn't have read them, not to be
honest with you, I was thinking to myself, this is
the kind of thing that sparks a revolution. I mean,
that's how bad that kind of stuff is. This is
the kind of thing that can lead to political change.
Maybe not doing peaceful political change, not cheering that on,
(29:25):
but this is the kind of thing that can lead
to that, no question about it. But I'm a long
way across the Atlantic ocean. What is the mood like,
how is this landing in the UK?
Speaker 2 (29:38):
Well, the media is doing their dan does knots talk
about it? As you can imagine, the political parties, the
Conservative and Labor parties are both complicit in this state
of affairs. It was often done in labor run councils,
labor on areas, so the police were heavily synthetic to
labor and the Conservatives had fourteen years in government and
(30:00):
did nothing about it. So they are also complicit in
consenting to allow this to the sleeping dog, letting it lie.
So it's hard to tell. I mean, if the only
reaction we have to go by social media, well, millions
of people are outraged by it, but I think there's
a sense of disconnect in it because there's, as I
(30:24):
mentioned at the beginning, there's definitely a classist element in this,
and these girls come from something underclass in British society.
They are looked down upon as being morally people who
kind of deserve what's happening to them by the people
in the children's homes, by the police, and dare I say,
(30:46):
by some people in wider society more broadly, and so
while obviously no one is in favor of the abuse
these girls suffered. It's surprisingly difficult to muster all that
much sympathy. People feel sympathetic in the abstract, but they're
not personally outraged in the way that I think actually
(31:08):
a sensible and well adjusted person would be. There's a
strange amount of apathy regarding this subject, and I do
think it's something to do with the distance between the normal,
average person and the girls from the underclass who are
being abused by the immigrants. It's a very difficult thing
people want to talk about, and I don't think it's
(31:32):
going to cause riots. I don't think it's going to
cause trouble.
Speaker 1 (31:35):
So it sounds like and I don't want to put
words in your mouth, let me, let me try to
summarize that. It sounds like because these were, yeah, the
poor British girls, you know, the dregs of society, that
there's not going to be enough widespread hot anger for
this to prompt real change.
Speaker 2 (31:55):
I think a lot of people live in denial about
this because the failures are so widespread and the evil
so systemic that I think they have trouble believing that
this is real. I think they have trouble believing that
this is the country that they live in and that
these are the reports from the girls who were abused.
(32:15):
And the implications are also staggering, shall we say, because
the implication is essentially an entire immigrant community, almost all
of them in this country are essentially complicit, which is
what the events would show. And that's a hard thing
(32:40):
to deal with. That's a hard thing to try and
get your mind around, even if they are any indirectly
complicit and they knew and they did nothing, or they
directly took part. I think for a lot of people,
it's very uncomfortable to try and deal with the magnitude
and the horror of the crimes. And so I think
for a lot of people, pretending that they don't believe,
(33:03):
not even necessarily pretending, but downplaying it, ignoring it, assuming
the best for some reason in this circumstance, is a
kind of self defense measure, because otherwise, well, I mean,
it says a lot about the civilization, doesn't it, if
it's prepared sacrifice the least privileged people in a society
(33:24):
for multiculturalism, for the stability of community relations. I mean,
where do you go from there?
Speaker 1 (33:34):
That is so unimaginably, said Carl. Prayers for you guys
over there, and thank you, thank.
Speaker 4 (33:39):
You for your time.
Speaker 1 (33:39):
I appreciate my Please, all right, let's focus on something happy.
Because Gavin Newsom going to prison.
Speaker 4 (33:47):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (33:49):
It looks like he's in some trouble. Adam Carolla is
out there. We'll talk to him about that. And just
a moment before we talk to Adam Carolla, let me
talk to you about the h I interest debt you're
drowning in. Are you carrying twenty thirty percent high interest that.
Speaker 4 (34:08):
You don't have to? You know that, right? You don't
have to live like that? Do you have a mortgage?
Speaker 1 (34:14):
American Financing is going to do something for you, because
right now you feel like you're trapped in the woods,
like you're never going to get out.
Speaker 4 (34:21):
They'll carve you a path out.
Speaker 1 (34:24):
They will carve you a path so you can finally,
one day be free of it.
Speaker 4 (34:29):
Go look them up. This is what they do.
Speaker 1 (34:33):
Take people who think they're drowning and pull them out
of the water.
Speaker 4 (34:37):
Go to American.
Speaker 1 (34:38):
Financing dot net slash jesse and find out what they
can do for you. American Financing dot net slash jesse
we'll be back.
Speaker 8 (34:56):
In recent days, federal agents have knocked on the doors
of family, friends and former employees, not because they found
a crime, because they're simply trying to find one. They're
demanding records.
Speaker 4 (35:07):
They're abusing the.
Speaker 8 (35:08):
Grand jury process, digging through years and years of random documents.
Donald Trump isn't just coming after me because of my
mean tweets. He's coming after me because I'm considering running
for president. One by one, anyone who has challenged Donald
Trump has ended up on his hit list, and today
I proudly joined that list. After calling for my arrest
(35:32):
last year, Donald Trump directed his Department of Justice to
investigate me, and just in the last week, I've learned
that his campaign has reached my own home to get me.
He's coming after my wife Jen Donald Trump hicked the
wrong target. We have nothing to hide.
Speaker 1 (35:52):
Well, I guess I'm naturally a suspicious person. I suspect
that's not the whole truth about what's actually happening. I
bet Adam Adam Carolla can enlighten us joining me now,
the great Adam Carolla in Washington. Since I was a kid, Adam,
I don't suspected Gavin Newsom is lying maybe I'm a prophet.
Speaker 3 (36:15):
Well, it doesn't make sense to go after people if
there's nothing there. It's a big democratic lie where they
go they're gonna go after this guy, and they're gonna
go after that guy. Yeah, they won after Trump. They
won after Trump multiple times and multiple jurisdictions and they
didn't have a case. And now Trump's the president. So
(36:36):
you can go after anybody you want. But if they
didn't do anything, good luck. So it's also funny because
they could. They say it's revenge. You know, this is
Trump revenge for his political enemies. But if you think
about revenge in any Western you've ever seen, it was
like they killed his wife, they killed his family, they
(36:58):
burnt his farm, and now he wants revenge. Yeah, Trump
does want revenge because you guys declared lawfair on him
basically the last decade of his life.
Speaker 4 (37:12):
Adam.
Speaker 1 (37:13):
Okay, this investigation actually was started not by the federal
DOJ under Donald Trump. It was started in California when
Joe Biden was still president. We can get to the
nitty gritty of it in a minute, but again, call
me suspicious. That tells me that Gavin Newsom has enemies
inside the Democrat machine in California because I'm used to
(37:34):
the way it works, and these things kind of tend
to go away when Democrats get in trouble when democrats states,
am I crazy.
Speaker 9 (37:42):
No.
Speaker 3 (37:42):
I think we've established in the last few years, especially
that Democrats will turn on Democrats. I mean Bernie Sanders,
Hillary Clinton, that whole debacle from a few years ago,
and then of course the whole Kamala you know Biden.
So Democrats want to be in power, and that's the
(38:05):
raise on debt. There's no other thing they want to
do other than be in power. And if that means
throwing other Democrats under the bus, like Swallwell or Bernie Sanders,
then they will throw other Democrats under the bus so
they can remain in power. So this probably comes from
a Democrat.
Speaker 1 (38:23):
Okay, I'll set aside who I think that probably is.
I suspect it's Tome, but we'll get to that another time.
Speaker 4 (38:30):
What is it they're saying he did? Is it his wife?
Is it taxes? What is it?
Speaker 3 (38:36):
Well, it's a lot of like Pritzker's family bottom a
house and then they I don't know, got a second
mortgage or something on the house and then just sort.
Speaker 4 (38:46):
Of cashed it out.
Speaker 3 (38:48):
His wife makes documentaries that nobody wants to see and
then gets a whole bunch of money for them. I
make documentaries people want to see and don't get any
money for them, makes ones about the trans community and
about the patriarchy, and then pushes it onto kids in
schools and unions. It's the same old story. The question
(39:11):
is is is it it's morally illegal? Is it technically illegal?
You know, she gets grants, she gets fun she gets
unions who back her husband to buy her docs, and
there's a bunch of tax related stuff. She's a world
class dingbat. By the way, if you hear her talk,
she makes she makes come Kamala Harris sound like Thomas Soul.
(39:37):
That's I swear to you. She makes she makes Kamala
Harris sound scholarly. She is so stupid.
Speaker 1 (39:48):
That's actually funny about that up because we're going to
get the dome here in a moment.
Speaker 4 (39:51):
But does any of this stick?
Speaker 1 (39:53):
Because I'll be honest with you, maybe he did really
bad things, and maybe it was morally incorrect, and maybe
they were felonies. I get that, but politically it doesn't
sound like something that brings down a Democrat. To bring
down a Democrat in a state like California, you've almost
got to find gold bars under his bed, like Bob
Menendez in New Jersey. It doesn't sound like it rises
(40:13):
to that, as much as that may want it to.
Speaker 3 (40:17):
Gold bars aren't going to do it in California, but panties,
panties under the bed will do it. So it's got
to be me too. We don't care about any form
of corruption involving money. We care about any me too
related stuff, or maybe you made fun of someone who
(40:37):
is transitioning or something like that, But all the money
related stuff and the gold bars, we would not penalize
you for that. If Eric Swallwell had swindled millions of
dollars in cash, he'd be in the thick of the
gubernatorial race right now.
Speaker 1 (40:55):
And that brings me to Dome. She's obviously considering running.
Speaker 4 (40:59):
She's out.
Speaker 1 (40:59):
They are continuing the words salad tour.
Speaker 9 (41:02):
Here she was, as the governor says, where we should
be unstoppable and knowing that there is so much that
has already been done and can be done. It's really
good difference in a way that builds industries and creates
efficiencies and creates leadership around helping the people see well,
(41:28):
it can be unburned by the ways.
Speaker 1 (41:33):
She never says anything about anything.
Speaker 3 (41:37):
I agree, but we are in a new society filled
with dumb women who this appeals to, and then a
handful of dudes who cross their legs real deep, who
also buy into this same bs. It's a word salad group.
It's a group that's never done anything with their hands.
(41:57):
They never built anything, they've never gain apped spark plugs,
they've never bump started a car. They've never done anything.
It's all been talk. It's all been virtual, it's all
been on a screen. It's all been ideas. And to
those people these idiots appeal to.
Speaker 1 (42:16):
I just want to point out that I'm six foot
eight and I multiple times bump started my nineteen eighty
three Honda Accord to get it going, and that is
not as easy as it sounds for a six' eight
body to jump in and bump start a nineteen.
Speaker 4 (42:30):
Eighty Three Honda.
Speaker 1 (42:31):
Accord hatchback at, THEM i wish you could have seen
me back.
Speaker 4 (42:34):
Then you'd have been so proud of.
Speaker 3 (42:35):
ME i Think i've pushed cars further Than i've driven.
Them if you really just laid it end to. END
i would be at least approaching a tie in the
next several years IF i don't have to push another. Card,
YES i bump started. Everything by the Way i've bump
started and jump. Started i've done. Them i've done them.
(42:55):
Both get the cables, out push it down the, hill
the whole nine. Yard but we're living in a time
when nobody's gone out and put anything, together built, anything
got any grease underneath their, fingernails and they can't think.
Straight and to, them the endless talk is, effective and
(43:16):
their studies for women to talk. Satiates so if you
talk enough about a problem with a, woman it feels
to them is if you'd address the.
Speaker 1 (43:27):
Problem you, KNOW i run into that with my wife
all the. Time it's just have to sit and talk about.
Speaker 4 (43:35):
It it saysn't matter if you're not talking about. Anything
that's that's all she. Wants you know.
Speaker 3 (43:39):
What the number one ANSWER i would get from my
wife if the cable was out or something back in the,
Day i'd, go what's going on with the? Cable she?
GO i called the guy AND i, go what? Happened
he didn't pick? Up, okay we don't have. Cable in her,
mind it felt like we had it because she did.
It she felt. Satiated What i'm, Saying i'm IN. La
(44:00):
this whole place is run by dumb. Chicks we just
talk about things over and over and. Over we're reimagining.
Policing no one's. Illegal everyone wants a seat at the.
Table everyone needs world class healthcare and. Education, Okay i'm going.
Home we're done. NOW i called the cable.
Speaker 1 (44:16):
Guy and of course when all these dumb communists talk about,
reimagining they love that. Word, Right i'm gonna reimagine the.
Economy i'm gonna reimagining. Police that's just commy speak for.
Destroy that's what they. Mean destroy doesn't sound as, good
so you have to reimagine.
Speaker 4 (44:30):
It so it appeals to the. Hippies.
Speaker 3 (44:32):
Right but the words satiate in the sense That i'm
not making this. Up this is clinical women and the
way their brain works feels like they've done something because
we've talked about. It and if you get enough women in,
government they're gonna talk about enough stuff and it's not
(44:53):
gonna get. Done but when you listen To Kamala, harris
she just does the word salad and then dumb. Pyce
people feel satiated when they hear.
Speaker 4 (45:02):
It what happened To Spencer?
Speaker 3 (45:04):
PRATT i think he tried to enter a system where
he wasn't, welcome and that system sort of took care of.
Speaker 8 (45:16):
Him you, know.
Speaker 3 (45:18):
He was he was basically a gay guy walking into
a biker bar and everyone looked at, him or a
biker walking into a gay. Bar it'll work either. Direction
and all eyes were on him and they, said we
don't want your kind around, here and they got rid of.
Him and that's what the system does In Los, angeles.
Speaker 4 (45:42):
Freaking.
Speaker 1 (45:42):
California, adam my, BROTHER i appreciates you man as.
Speaker 4 (45:45):
Always All, right.
Speaker 1 (45:51):
It's time for light in the, mood AND i am
going to very reluctantly bring up something that relates to
The World.
Speaker 4 (45:59):
Cup. Bang all, right it's time to light in the.
Speaker 1 (46:13):
Mood The World cup is going, on and that's neither
here nor. There but what has been totally entertaining is
the fact That europeans are over here In america and
they're loving.
Speaker 4 (46:24):
It it's just, incredible absolutely.
Speaker 10 (46:27):
Incredible there really is like no. OTHER i honestly think
unless you've unless you live In, america unless you or
unless you visit, here you can't really comprehend how nice
these areas.
Speaker 4 (46:44):
Are everybody's so, Friendly southern. Hospitality the air smells nice.
Speaker 11 (46:49):
When you're in THE. Uk, okay if you're next to the,
beach it. Smells the beach doesn't smell her, right everything for.
Speaker 12 (46:55):
YOU i kinder As, yeah but you won't drink a
thousand Cabs i've got and it's three you bid.
Speaker 4 (47:08):
Free you beat it.
Speaker 11 (47:11):
DOWN i just love it here like and they give
to fuck human, trafficking which is. Awesome we Have bible
verses on the bottom of their cut never see but,
yeah look at that. Burger it's so.
Speaker 10 (47:25):
Good and then we've got the.
Speaker 12 (47:26):
SUNSET i Love.
Speaker 11 (47:28):
AMERICA i can never. LEAVE i cannot live with.
Speaker 13 (47:32):
Others i've been back home in THE, UK i haven't
felt like, myself which sounds so. CRAZY i now live
for that, adventure that crazy, lifestyle that meeting new, people
seeing new people every, day AND i just long for.
It and In america it is so. Amazing, Seriously, americans
(47:54):
what have you done to?
Speaker 4 (47:56):
ME i need to come, back come back, anytime, brother
see them up
Speaker 11 (48:04):
Mm hmmmmmmm
Host
Jesse Kelly
Popular Podcasts
Dolly Parton's America
In this intensely divided moment, one of the few things everyone still seems to agree on is Dolly Parton—but why? That simple question leads to a deeply personal, historical, and musical rethinking of one of America’s great icons. Join us for a 9-episode journey into the Dollyverse. Hosted by Jad Abumrad. Produced and reported by Shima Oliaee. Dolly Parton’s America is a production from OSM Audio and WNYC Studios.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com