All Episodes

July 3, 2025 • 29 mins

We talk about what we've been doing for the past few weeks. We also dig into the P. Diddy verdict, and how we beat a famous lawyer on predicting the outcome.

Support the show: https://redpilledamerica.com/support/

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:03):
This is Red Pilled America. Hey, it's Patrick Carrelci and.

Speaker 2 (00:09):
I'm Adriana Cortez and welcome to Red Pilled America's Bam boogie.

Speaker 1 (00:31):
We're back.

Speaker 2 (00:32):
We are back. It's been a while we are, but
we are back and we are doing it for the people.

Speaker 3 (00:41):
Ah, we missed you, guys. I hope you missed us.
It's been a couple of weeks. We've been dealing with
some things over here called an empty nest and getting
kind of used to that for the summer. It's kind
of a brief trial run.

Speaker 2 (00:56):
Six weeks is not brief.

Speaker 3 (00:59):
Six weeks without our daughter, and so we've been really
focused on some new projects that we will be announcing
hopefully soon, the kind of projects that every one of
our subscribers is going to be like.

Speaker 1 (01:12):
This is why I subscribed.

Speaker 3 (01:14):
I wanted to support Red Pilled America because they are
in the fight. They understand the power of storytelling, and
we want to support these guys. They align with our values.
And all you guys out there that have not yet subscribed,
this is the time. Go to Redpilled America dot com

(01:35):
click join the top of the menu, become a subscriber,
support people that have your values, that want to imbue
storytelling with your values. This is something that we feel
strong about, that we're passionate about, and when we announce
the projects that we are working on very soon, hopefully
you will understand what this show.

Speaker 1 (01:55):
Has all been about.

Speaker 3 (01:57):
So, yes, we've been taking a little bit of a break.
One we've been dealing with this kind of emptiness.

Speaker 2 (02:02):
Is I'm not well. I'm not well at all. I'm
just gonna say say it like it is not well.

Speaker 1 (02:08):
I have not been well. No, you haven't been well.

Speaker 3 (02:11):
Our daughter's off at a a summer program, and so
we have been kind of together trying to see what
life would be like without having a daughter in the house.
And I gotta say, we've been doing pretty good, you
know what.

Speaker 2 (02:25):
Because I'm great. I'm very very fun to be around.
Let's be honest, you're.

Speaker 1 (02:29):
Fun to be around. I take that to the next level.
Square it you so do. It's weird, it's weird, weird.

Speaker 2 (02:38):
How fun you want you guys?

Speaker 1 (02:39):
Is so fun?

Speaker 3 (02:40):
Couple last, So we've been doing that, and honestly, a
couple of weeks ago we were getting ready to do
another fan boogie and this Iran conflict broke out, and
I sitting back, and my knee jerk response towards any
kind of war action or any kind of bomb dropping

(03:01):
or anything is always kind of like, I don't want wars.
I want peace. I want I don't want people to
be hurt. I don't want people to die. I don't
want civilians to die. I don't want our troops getting
involved in any more actions.

Speaker 2 (03:13):
You don't want Americans to die for other countries, period, And.

Speaker 3 (03:16):
I just want innocent people to die. But that's my
knee jerk reaction. So I think at the time, I
put out a tweet on red Pilled America that said
something along the lines of please President Trump, don't get
us involved in another Middle East war. And then I
saw all these political pundits online on both sides of
this issue, just kind of going a little bit haywire.

(03:39):
You had on one side, let Trump, you know, bomb
everybody to oblivion in that area. And then you had
on the other side, Oh, we're entering World War three,
and and you know Trump's bringing us into World War three.
He should be impeached, which is what Dave Smith said.
And I saw this happening, and I'm like, I'm not
going to get caught up in it. I'm not gonna

(04:01):
get involved in this discussion, and I think Adriana agreed
with me on that. And it was the similar position
that we had during the Ukraine stuff. You didn't hear
us talk much about the Ukraine War. And here's why
we don't have all the information exactly. We don't have
the intelligence, We don't have on the ground knowledge. We

(04:23):
are against war because there are homeless people here on
the streets of Los Angeles and in other parts of
the area that we want that issue taken care of.
We want our borders secured, we want illegal immigration halted,
we want attention spent on the United States. So that

(04:45):
is always kind of paramount to us. But we also
don't understand and don't have the intelligence in front of
us to make judgments on any of these kinds of things,
and we're never going to understand the truth until five
to ten years from now. And so instead of like
all caught up in the craziness of this time, we

(05:08):
decided we were going to take a step back and
just kind of watch it unfold. And sure enough, the
kind of crazies on both sides of the discussion, they
look so foolish right now. They all act like they
are so certain that they are right, they somehow have
some inside information that they clearly don't have inside information

(05:29):
on because they sound today so foolish. I want to
play a clip for you guys. This was made June
twenty third, and it was you know, Candae coming back
from her eternity leave and she's with one of my
favorite people in the world, Ian Carroll, and they are
talking about America bombing of Iran, and this is how

(05:52):
they opened this show.

Speaker 4 (05:54):
Apparently, I'm back in time for World War three and
I hate to say that we told you so. By we,
I mean to me and Ian Carroll.

Speaker 5 (06:01):
Ian, you know, it's incredible and it's looking like we
may be going to war, which either I had a
crystal ball, you had a crystal ball, could see into
the future.

Speaker 4 (06:11):
Or this has been the most obvious and the most
planned war.

Speaker 6 (06:15):
And a lot of people saw it coming like that
was clearly the agenda.

Speaker 4 (06:20):
The MAGA movement is going to change, okay, and there's
no question about that.

Speaker 6 (06:24):
Yeah, Trump is on the edge right now. He's ready
to burn his entire legacy to the ground. Everything was
laid out for him. All he had to do was
close the border to poured a bunch of people and
not go to war. And so far it's failing on
all three counts and actually going to the wars we
didn't want. And like it's it's really sad.

Speaker 4 (06:39):
This is gonna be the one of the candas Candas's right, jar,
but I'm not.

Speaker 1 (06:42):
It's not even I'm right, just paying attention.

Speaker 3 (06:44):
So in hindsight now, in the rear view mirror, that
segment looks I don't know, I guess i'd be charitable,
you know, kind of misguided. But you know, they really
sound silly. There's no world war happening right now. Should
people speak out about conflict and be concerned about conflict? Yes,

(07:05):
of course they almost sounded giddy.

Speaker 2 (07:08):
Yeah, that I had a problem with that.

Speaker 3 (07:09):
They sound giddy and talking about war and talking about
being right about war. And I think that's one of
the big problems right now in media is that people,
instead of you know, wanting to de escalate or bring
solutions to the public, they instead want to be right
about their predictions. And you know, we've done shows that

(07:30):
we've ended up having to come forward and say, hey,
you know what we were wrong on this issue. But
this is where media is right now, these people claiming
to have some kind of foresight or knowledge and just
trying to pull people into their this crazy chaos of
the moment, and I don't want to be a part

(07:53):
of that media. And when I saw this war happening,
and when I saw this these bombs being dropped, or
at least I should say, the call for war or
the cry out against war, I didn't want to be
a part of that chaos and that crying because I
didn't have any additional information for you guys on this topic,

(08:14):
and I knew that we weren't going to And I
also wanted to place a little bit of trust in
the administration because I think Trump ran as an anti
war president. I feel in my heart that is who
he is, and I think that's kind of played out
as playing out right now. We are not in war
with Iran. I've known a lot of Iranian people throughout

(08:36):
my life. They're good people. Obviously, there's some bad players there,
and there's their administration doesn't like the United States, and
I don't, you know, don't like that, and I don't
want them to have a nuclear weapon. But I also
I don't want to get caught up in these kinds
of media hype moments because all it does is rile

(08:57):
everybody up, scare them, and doesn't provide solutions that they
can tangibly kind of use in their daily life. I mean,
this is kind of the level. Here's Ian Carroll. You
guys might remember we spoke about this a couple months back,
with the RFK story that was supposedly supposed to change

(09:18):
all of media back at the end of March, and
this was Ian Carroll leading into a weekend where once
the weekend was over, everything was going to change with
all this RFK information that was supposed to come out.
This is Ian Carroll.

Speaker 6 (09:33):
So the Bobby Kennedy blackmail story is currently breaking in
many directions all across the Internet, and American politics is
not going to be the same after this weekend. That's
not hyperbole. This is not just a hook. And I
don't really know where to start, but this is the
kind of story that I've gotten enough calls from enough

(09:53):
people tonight, and enough people there's enough going on that
I feel like we need to make a video right
now to keep some people safe and to get as
much as we all know out on the internet right
right now, so that everyone can be safe.

Speaker 3 (10:05):
Okay, so you know there's a big he was a
big story that RFK was being blackmailed and all the
information was going to come out nothing the whole world
was going to change at the end of the weekend.
And of course none of that happened.

Speaker 2 (10:17):
None of that happened.

Speaker 1 (10:18):
It's all like been completely like swept under the rug.

Speaker 3 (10:21):
I mean, listen to that. And if you listen to
this segment, you can go ahead and see on his
Twitter account you could find this just search RFK Junior
blackmail on Ian Carroll's Twitter feed, his x feed. This
is kind of where media is at right now, and
this is not something that we want to be a
part of. We did a story on this coin flip

(10:42):
about CNN and about this kind of twenty four hour
news cycle and how it really has helped destroy America
because people need things to talk about, they need war,
they need these kinds of events that could constantly drive
them to create content and to drive viewers and to
feed the algorithm. And our job here is to entertain you,

(11:06):
guys and inform you through storytelling. And I just I
don't want to play a part of that.

Speaker 6 (11:13):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (11:13):
I mean, I think what these people have figured out,
many many people, both on the right and the left,
is that fear captures audience, and they are just so
good at that ramping up the fear, and unfortunately people
buy into this. But I have to say, I and
Carrol I just think he's the worst.

Speaker 3 (11:32):
Yeah, he's the worst, and that he is everything is
everything that that that we talk about, the fake news
about about the mainstream media, legacy media. He is perhaps
worse than them. Yeah, I think that he is because
he's less informed. He knows, you could see by doing
these kinds of stories and talking about with such certainty,

(11:55):
like when he talked about Andrew bright Part being assassinated
and oh, go look it up, Go look it up yourself.
Don't trust me, go look at yourself. It appears to
me that he is spreading conspiracy theories to build a
following because he knows the power of conspiracy theory.

Speaker 2 (12:11):
Yeah. And you know, that's a tactic, and it's a
tactic that works to take the position that you know,
you know, and be very strong in that position. People
will will believe you and they will buy into that.
I feel like I really come from a position of
I know nothing, and most I think intelligent people do.

Speaker 3 (12:30):
So we're going to get into a couple other stories
right now, but we just kind of wanted to start
off with that discussion. I want to talk a little
bit about the P Diddy verdict and how we talked
about it a couple months ago, when the kind of
story came out and where it landed, and we'll get
to that right after the break.

Speaker 1 (12:53):
You're listening to Red Pilled America's Fambogie.

Speaker 3 (12:56):
If you want to join the Fanbam, we need you,
We need you guys, go to Redpilled America dot com,
click join in the top menu and support storytelling that
aligns with your values. We're talking about kind of outrage
media right now and how they the media complex and
basically the algorithm feeds on outrage and you see it.

(13:20):
It's on the legacy media side and now it's on
all the alt media side as well too. This P
Diddy story, I think is kind of a good indication
of this. So we've been talking about P Diddy for.

Speaker 1 (13:33):
A while a long time, and we know.

Speaker 3 (13:36):
A couple of years back, I think it is we
kind of talked about how we worked with this guy
that worked with him and was telling us, you know,
back in two thousand and four, I think it was
that P. Didy was gay and that there was kind
of just some you know, things going on over there
that wasn't getting out to the public. But people in

(13:59):
the music business knew this, and like I said, we
were hearing this back into the tho and four and
so when all this stuff about the freak offs started
coming out and the.

Speaker 1 (14:10):
Oil, I was shocked about the baby oil.

Speaker 2 (14:13):
I didn't know that one required so much baby oil.
That was a little weird.

Speaker 3 (14:19):
We actually talked about that. I want to play clip
about that for you guys for a minute. But you know,
when that story kind of broke, you know, we were like, oh, okay,
you know, let's take our time and kind of see
where this P.

Speaker 1 (14:30):
Diddy thing goes.

Speaker 3 (14:31):
And you know, we watched a documentary on him, and
I was unimpressed with the information that was in the documentary.

Speaker 1 (14:41):
It was kind of like the Fall of P Diddy.
It might have been on HBO.

Speaker 2 (14:44):
There was nothing that was given that I thought, Oh, okay,
that's a gotcha, that's that's oh he really did something,
Like yes, he did bad things, but it seemed like
a lot of the women and the people they were
talking to, they were uh, you know, willing participants.

Speaker 1 (14:59):
Willing participants they wanted.

Speaker 2 (15:01):
It seems to be the case a lot with the
these stories.

Speaker 3 (15:04):
They agreed, so it seemed like they wanted to be
close to power and money. And so you have a
bunch of these women talking in this And yes, he
was involved in some kind of thuggish things, and you know,
that was kind of the culture of hip hop and
everybody knew about that. But this whole kind of blackmail
scheme that was going on, this kind of you know,

(15:26):
crazy rico sex trafficking thing, I just wasn't seeing it.
It seemed like somebody that was living a degenerate lifestyle
that was getting involved in these kinds of sex party
freak offs and you know, was hiring prostitutes. It sounded
like his girlfriend Cassie at the time, was at least
into it on a couple occasions, because she expressed show

(15:48):
in text messages.

Speaker 2 (15:49):
I mean, the things these girls are willing to do
for a burken and some lip filler.

Speaker 1 (15:54):
It was shocking.

Speaker 3 (15:58):
What So I want to play a few clips on
this on how we spoke about this a few weeks back,
after watching that HBO documentary about Diddy, about Diddy and
his downfall, I was not impressed. I thought that it
didn't give up any new information. It was kind of like,
this guy's a thug, he's has a thug history, and

(16:20):
then there's they put forward these women that had these
claims against him, but the claims were, to me, didn't
have any credibility. One of the women that they kind
of used for the longest time, they kind of introduced
early in the show and they don't show her until
later on in the series. She didn't deliver. She seemed
like she was a gold digger. She wanted to be

(16:40):
associated with him because of his money and power. So
I was unimpressed at the end of that documentary, and
so far, I'm kind of unimpressed with this case from
what I've been seeing so far. Okay, so you know,
we were really not seeing this kind of broad case

(17:02):
that was being sold to the public of him having
this rico style sex trafficking ring. And we aren't lawyers, okay.
We are just people that understand narrative and kind of
are willing to search for the truth regardless of what

(17:24):
the outcome might be p did. He is not a
kind of a sympathetic character in the public space. I
don't think people sympathize with him, at least the general
kind of normal public doesn't. So, you know, saying something
like that when you clearly see him beat up his

(17:44):
ex girlfriend and he should you know, serve time for
that and he should be severely punished for that.

Speaker 1 (17:49):
Obviously, that's very clear, and we've made that clear.

Speaker 3 (17:52):
But this whole rico thing, we started looking at him
like this does this doesn't make sense. It just looks
like they're having parties and they're hiring prostitutes. And this
isn't how it's being sold to the public. Now others
out there we're having a different take. This is Megan
Kelly and how she talked about it is she's a
lawyer speaking about this case at the time that the

(18:16):
kind of charges were brought up in the court case
was just getting started.

Speaker 7 (18:22):
It's complicated. I think they've got him on the transportation
to engage in prostitution count. That's the third count. It's
only got a year's penalty, but he's got multiple potential
offenses on it. But it's the least serious of the
charges brought against him. They've had so much testimony that
he did he did pay prostitutes. They've proven beyond a
doubt that he was engaging in, you know, hiring and

(18:42):
transporting prostitutes. But you've got sex trafficking by fraud or coercion.
Is this is the middle count? And originally I thought
that the sex trafficking involved the prostitute and the coercion
involved Cassie, But I've since come to understand and from

(19:03):
sources close to the case, that's not it that it's
Cassie who's been sex trafficked. In the theory of the
prosecutors that it's that they are arguing he by coercion
or fraud, et cetera. But I think they're going with
coercion forced her to engage in these freak offs, not

(19:25):
every single time, right, but many, many times, and even
during certain times unlike the back end. Maybe she was
there voluntarily in the front end, but then you know,
but overall, I think they're going to argue that right
after the beginning of the relationship, things switched to a
place where she did not want to be doing this,
and she was only there because she was afraid of him,

(19:45):
or he was threatening her, or she knew she was
going to be publicly humiliated by the tapes getting released,
or he was going to beat her again. And so
they're arguing he was forcing her to sex traffic herself
in these freak offs. That's the theory. And they're doing
a pretty good job, you know, they're doing an excell
in job, to be honest.

Speaker 3 (20:04):
So you know, she's was basically taking a pretty you know,
the position that the prosecution is doing well. This rico case,
this sex trafficking case is looking strong. This guy should,
you know, go to jail for a very long time.
And she's a lawyer, Megan Kelly is a lawyer. We

(20:27):
were kind of taking a little bit of a different position.
We were like, you know, this information is not matching
with the news articles that are out there. We're not
seeing leaks of any blackmail tapes. We're not seeing leaks
of video from the from their freak offs. We're not
seeing a lot of this activity that they're saying that
he's doing. We're not seeing that. What we're seeing is

(20:49):
is a girlfriend Cassie that it appears to be, at
least in several instances into these freak offs and that
we don't think that it's going to you know, convince
a jury basically on this, and that knowing the hip
hop world and knowing the hip hop community, the people
that get involved with people like P Diddy know what

(21:09):
they're entering into. They know the people that they're getting
associated with, and they just want to be close to
money and power.

Speaker 2 (21:16):
Yeah, and you know, she had an opioid addiction, and
when you are addicted to drugs, you make poor decisions
for yourself. You know, he wasn't holding her against her will.
She wasn't his prisoner, she wasn't locked in a dungeon.
I understand that there was, you know, a difference in power,
and that can be problematic. However, it just seemed to

(21:38):
me that she put herself in a bad position.

Speaker 1 (21:43):
Yes, and she could have left.

Speaker 2 (21:45):
She didn't have children with this man, they were not married.
But she was getting a lot of perks. And it's
something that you know, people don't want to talk about
the perks and the fact that you know a lot
of these women that then later cry abuse. They love
the perks when the perks are coming in, Yes, and
they're willing to suffer what they're probably thinking that this

(22:06):
is uncomfortable in this moment, but this is going to pass,
and then I'm going to go back to my gorgeous penthouse.
I'm going to put on my croc Berken, I'm going
to get some plastic surgery, well whatever it is, you know,
and they're willing to put up with that.

Speaker 3 (22:21):
The thing that I didn't like about Megan Kelly's position
on this was that she was taking complete agency away
from Cassie, that she could not make decisions for herself,
that she was, you know, kind of stuck in this relationship.
And when you take that position, Yes, do I think
P Diddy is a scumbag? Yes, I don't like the man.

(22:43):
I think that he When I saw that videotape of
him beating up his Cassie, I thought he was That
was definitely not the first time he's ever done something
like this. He's obviously has a past history of abuse.
You don't do what you did to somebody in a
hotel like the way that he did and that be
the first time that you do it. He's clearly a scumbag,
but Cassie was involved with him for a very long time,

(23:07):
and for Megan Kelly to take the position that she's
just kind of this innocent, sweet girl. What that does
is it creates an out for anybody that makes those
poor decisions.

Speaker 1 (23:18):
Okay.

Speaker 3 (23:19):
The arguments that we were having about this back in
the day was is that if my daughter said that
she was going to go out with P Diddy, I
would do everything within my power to not allow that
to happen. She had parents, good parents. It sounds like
I've looked into that she made the decision to get
involved with them. She's not blameless here, Okay, there is.

Speaker 2 (23:37):
Some accountability on her part which people are completely choosing
to ignore.

Speaker 3 (23:42):
So now the verdict comes out and all of the
heavy charges, all of the big charges against him, did
not stick. Pddy Comb's verdict is split. According to Variety,
he has been found guilty of two counts of transportation
to engage in prostitution, but has dodged the three most

(24:03):
serious charges, including sex trafficking and racketeering. So this is
kind of you know, you're hearing to this kind of
two lay people over here talk about this when this
trial first started, saying that yeah, I'm we're not seeing this.
We're unimpressed with what we're hearing about. From this case.
And then you have someone like Megan Kelly who kind

(24:24):
of feeds on this algorithm and feeds on this outrage media,
and she has a lawyer background. She's seeing the evidence,
reading the evidence, and she says, yeah, they'd make it
a pretty good argument for this sex trafficking without saying,
you know what, the jury is possibly going to see
that this person, Cassie participated in this activity. And if

(24:47):
you know about this community at all, you know that
people know what they're getting involved in here, and then
later try to claim victim. And I do think that
she's obviously been a victim, you know, throughout her association
with p Diddy. But these hard charges, these rico charges,
these sex trafficking charges. We've been saying time and time

(25:09):
again it's an overused thing. People overuse this allegation because
it captures the minds of some people in the media
and in the public. But when the evidence comes out,
he's going to walk on those things. Now, he's apparently
asked to be released until he's sentenced in October, but

(25:31):
the judge has denied him that release. People are kind
of thinking of saying, well, this is kind of a
little bit crazy. He should be released. He's not involved
in the sex trafficking in the Rico stuff. He should
be released because of that. So once the verdict came out,
you know, looking back at Megan Kelly's kind of discussions
about this PDDY case, she was kind of certain that

(25:52):
he was going to get you know, there was going
to be a guilty verdict on some of these very
serious charges. She kind of put all the blame on
him and not anything on the people that were kind
of around him. But the verdict comes out and here
she is outraged over the verdict.

Speaker 7 (26:10):
Oh, it's all just so chummy inside the courtroom for
this disgusting pervert, female abuser who I can't believe is
about Jiromar Streets. Again, I'm sorry, I'm disgusted by this verdict.
This is fucking ridiculous. I just find it absolutely outrageous
the amount of crime that this guy just got away with.
It's this is just like the proof was there, the beatings,

(26:32):
the threats that if they didn't go back into those
rooms and get off with these male escorts, that they
were going to get beaten. The testimony from that Daniel Phillip,
who was the male escort who heard Calm's abusing Cassie
behind the door, and she was screaming, I'm sorry, I'm sorry,
as he heard him slapping her. Get back out there.
She came back out, she was shaking. She got back

(26:52):
into the escort's lap, physically shaking.

Speaker 1 (26:54):
She was so scared to.

Speaker 7 (26:55):
The point where that guy couldn't perform sexually because this
was so horrifying to him. What in the actual went on.

Speaker 3 (27:03):
And there, So you know, she's really outraged by the verdict.

Speaker 1 (27:09):
It's kind of a strange one. Really.

Speaker 3 (27:12):
She is really a pro woman, kind of a me
too person. She has been when she went over to NBC.
That was kind of when she was at Fox News
and she ended up leaving Fox News. She kind of
has this worldview, but it kind of morphs when it
involves other people like heg Seth. We'll not stuff with
heg Seth was coming out. But it's just this kind

(27:33):
of this outraged media algorithm that constantly needs to be fed,
and she fed into that algorithm for months and months
and was benefiting from it. And then when the verdict
comes out. Now she has this entire history of covering
this story. The way that she's been covering it to

(27:56):
feed the algorithm. And now she has to respond to that,
and this is really the only response that she can give.

Speaker 2 (28:02):
Oh great, great, she put herself in a corner. You know,
she couldn't be like, well, yeah, we kind of saw
that coming. She obviously is not going to take that.

Speaker 3 (28:09):
Position because it doesn't feed the algorithm. I mean, we
don't typically benefit from telling the truth on some of
these kinds of things. The truth does not pay all
of the time, or it doesn't pay as well as outrage.

Speaker 2 (28:21):
It's just not always as popular, you know, it's not
as exciting.

Speaker 3 (28:25):
I guess the point that I'm trying to say here
is is that don't get caught up in this outraged media.
Don't get sucked into it, because it tears you down.
It brings you down, it makes you feel like the
world is hopeless and that's not the place to be.

Speaker 1 (28:45):
And kind of just.

Speaker 3 (28:47):
Look for other media sources and look for other people
that aren't constantly doing that and constantly trying to rile
you up. Look for people that are bringing you solutions.
We're gonna go on to part two right now. We're
gonna talk a little bit about the changing America and
the what's going on with Elon and Trump. There's been
some new news with that kind of feeds into this,

(29:08):
and also this very interesting free speech question on whether
bands that kind of are vitriolic from foreign countries coming
into the United States, should they be allowed into the
United States to kind of rile up our public. It's
this kind of interesting free speech question that's been coming up,

(29:28):
and we're going to get into that in part two.

Speaker 1 (29:30):
Join us there,
Advertise With Us

Hosts And Creators

Adryana Cortez

Adryana Cortez

Patrick Courrielche

Patrick Courrielche

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.