August 12, 2024 • 34 mins
Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) shines on three separate Sunday morning news shows - joining Dana Bash on CNN, Jonathan Karl on ABC, and Margaret Brennan on CBS - clearly and concisely getting the message out for Donald Trump and the campaign, breaking through the white noise in his role as running mate on the ticket.
Dan also asks listeners for sharply focused nicknames Donald Trump should use to label Kamala Harris. Brevity is the soul of wit, less is more.
Dan also asks listeners for sharply focused nicknames Donald Trump should use to label Kamala Harris. Brevity is the soul of wit, less is more.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is Dan Capless and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform. It really seems
to be just starting now at five oh six. I
understand we had phase one, right, which is where Trump
(00:21):
defeated Biden, and I can understand why he'd be a
little down after that when all of a sudden Biden
gets deposed and Harris installed, and now he has to
start all over again. But Trump's a warrior. Sounds like
he's heard the bell and he's back up off the
mat and he is full speed ahead. So he'll be
on with Elon Musk tonight. Critically, he is now back
on Twitter, where he has to be right. I mean,
(00:42):
obviously the media isn't going to give him even remotely
affairshake or access to the American people other than for
a very brief time during the debate maybe a town
hall or two, so it's got to use everything he has.
So Twitter, he's back on. That's awesome Elon Musk Tonight.
But then this needs to be an almost day thing, right,
That's how he's won before is this work course, almost
(01:05):
daily reach out to the American people. And then we
hear his super PAC's going to spend one hundred million
over the next what nineteen or twenty days in the
Swing States, and we'll get into some interesting reporting coming
out on where that money's going to be spent and
how much where, which is fascinating. And so a headline
on CNN White House Now says Biden backs no tax
(01:26):
on tips after come after Harris pledge. Well, listen, Trump's
going to get the full benefit of this right on
multiple levels, not just the policy gain, but but just
on more evidence of the duplicitousness of Harris and Biden,
et cetera.
Speaker 2 (01:42):
There is evidence, and I believe I could be wrong
on this, but maybe Kelly can check me. The Washington
Post the passage of the Inflation Reduction Act in name
only the irno, as I call it, that Kamala Harris
was the tie breaking vote as the Vice president overseeing
the Senate, that there was pursuit of the irs of
(02:02):
service workers to tax their tips, right.
Speaker 1 (02:05):
Right, No, exactly, goodness exactly, but eight five five two
five five, Hey, a couple of quick notes. One is
we're told Ryan, I think we're trying to confirm it
now that the jury is back in the Tina Peters case.
If so, we will look forward to Evan Jimmy Sangenberger
on with the verdict if that comes down tonight, A
(02:25):
special guest at five point thirty six from Catholic Vote.
And this goes to you know, there's so much good
news today for the Trump campaign. Yeah, it's going to
be a dogfight, et cetera, but so much good news,
including the fact and it's not good for Trump or
the campaign as an apparatus, but in terms of winning
the election, I think this is going to send such
(02:47):
a powerful message to the American people, and the Biden
administration confirming it Iran wants Kamala Harris to win. Iran
is actively working against President Trump first and it's horrific
by trying to kill him, which the Biden administration is
now confirmed, but also Trump campaign saying it was Iran
who hacked into the Trump campaign. Obviously had been hacked,
(03:10):
but the Biden administration has confirmed that Iran is interfering
in this election on behalf of Harris and against Trump.
So I know it's not the cleanest message to get
to the undecideds out there, but there's enough time to
cause it to sync in and Trump, I hope, will
make a point of this in the debate, which is
(03:31):
that Iran wants Harris and there's no doubt about that,
and that needs to be front and center. The other
thing is, and you know, we'll have guessed at five
point thirty six to talk on this a bit. We
won't get into all the wonky number stuff today, just
a little bit of that. But but the Catholic vote,
and keep in mind, whoever wins the Catholic vote almost
(03:53):
always wins the presidency in modern times. And you have
the Catholic vote very prominent in many of these swing states,
certainly the Blue Wall swing states. And my own personal
belief is that for multiple reasons we can kick around
as we talk about a lot more, I think Harris
is going to get destroyed with the Catholic vote. I
(04:15):
think she's going to lose it much larger. And then
we've seen other Democrats lose the Catholic vote, and we've
seen Democrats win the Catholic vote when they've won the presidency.
So the Catholic vote I think is going to be
key in the outcome of this election, and it's going
to be good for Trump and not for Harris. Let's
go to Ourvada talk to Brian. You're on the Dan
Kaplis show. Welcome.
Speaker 3 (04:37):
Well once again, Dan, I was right. Didn't pick your Shapiro.
Speaker 4 (04:43):
Okay, that's a good thing, right, But because you know.
Speaker 3 (04:47):
Why, then everybody says, well, just take Shapiro. You don't
get Pennsylvania. And they already got Pennsylvania. They have the
weakest voting laws, it's the most corrupt state there is.
She already knows she has Pennsylvania. So Trump has to
go another way to win the presidency. And if you
(05:07):
ever look up homeless drug addicts, guess where the even
does a good row. It's Kensington Avenue in Pennsylvania. So
he's got his own problem.
Speaker 4 (05:18):
May ask you this, Brian, may ask you this.
Speaker 1 (05:20):
And first of all, I am so glad I was
wrong about her picking Shapiro, and you can bet right
now she wishes she had And don't be surprised there, yeah,
and don't be surprised. It would have made up for
all those other bets you lost to me. But don't
be surprised if.
Speaker 5 (05:34):
She dumps marijuana, if she she dumps Waltz and and
adds Shapiro, and I pray literally she does not because
Trump has to win Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1 (05:46):
And tell me this, Brian. If you're right and Pennsylvania
is already lost because because of stolen votes, as you allege,
well then why is Trump spending all that time and
money there? Why is he going back to a place where,
but for the grace of God, he would have hit
his head blown off.
Speaker 3 (06:06):
Well, you know what you are right on, Melan, But
it's got to be too big to rig. And it's
not about the people that are on the fence. Nobody's
on the fence right now. Nobody is paying attentions going well,
I don't know, that's not the way it works. But
how about all the people who aren't paying attention, princing
the young kids. If you get the young kids to
pay attention, we win, Dan. But that's not an easy
thing to do.
Speaker 4 (06:28):
Yeah, I listen, I think Trump's gonna do.
Speaker 3 (06:30):
They're gonna cheat in Pennsylvania, guarantee they did the last time. Guys,
we're all we're all stupid. Okay, somebody do with put
Tulshi Gabbared okay on the tariff watch list. You don't
think they're cheating an election? Well, all the things these people.
Speaker 4 (06:45):
Did, you keep driving.
Speaker 1 (06:48):
By my point, obviously, President Trump does not agree with you.
He thinks he can win Pennsylvania, which is why he's
spending so much time and money there. So listen, I
am glad that I was wrong about Ship. He thrilled.
And let's hope I stay wrong about Shapiro because they
still have time to dump walls and replace him. And
(07:08):
let's hope they don't eight five five or zero five
A two five five the number I always enjoy hearing
from Brian. And again we'll have a special guest from
Catholic vote dot org, which will be with us at
five point thirty six. And again, one of the many
reasons to believe that Trump is going to win is
the Catholic vote. But Ryan was say, I think everybody
gets this. All of these things now that line up
(07:31):
to favor President Trump, none of them matter unless we
get the good Trump, unless we get the A or
B Trump, And when we get that, nobody better, and
he's going to win bigley. But we've got to stop
with the crowd sized stuff. You know, we've got to
stop with the other silly season stuff and just focus
(07:53):
on And I know people are sick of the bullet points.
It's so obvious, right, he had the job, he has
all these accomplishments. She was in the administration and they
had all these failures. Just focus on the stuff that
matters to the people who are hurting.
Speaker 2 (08:08):
And because Kamala Harris is refusing to paint her own picture,
then he needs to come right out, Dan and maybe
starting to night, do you define her? You paint in
the details with her own words and her own policy
stances which are wacko tobacco left. Just point those out,
put a spotlight.
Speaker 1 (08:25):
On them, right, and stay focused on the stuff that
matters to people in their real lives, which he has
done so well so many times over the years. But
listen now, the way this thing is lined up and
with just I ballots drop in less than a month
in some places. You know, it's just so important of
the A plus game now. But Ryan raises a good question,
(08:49):
and when we come back, I'd love your take on this.
President Trump bought. Part of his success has been he
has been masterful at branding political opponents. You know, little
Marco lion ted this and this and that and that.
Speaker 4 (09:04):
He has not.
Speaker 1 (09:05):
Yet nailed the branding of Kamala Harris. He's he's kind
of been all over the map on it. So when
we come back, I'd love to hear from you. You
can text d A N five seven seven three nine
or call eight five five for zero five eight two
five five the number when we come back. What should
the final branding? And I say that in the fair
political sense, what should the final branding of Kamala Harris be?
(09:28):
How should he label her in a way that will
stick and ring true? Because these labels are only valuable
if they're true, and only appropriate if they're true. And
we'll cut through the noise. What should that label be?
You're on the Dan Caplas Show.
Speaker 6 (09:45):
And now back to the Dan Kaplass Show podcast.
Speaker 7 (09:48):
I've never criticized what Tim Waltz did when he was
in the military. I criticized his retirement decision and most importantly, Dana,
I criticized his li lying about his own record. Okay,
this is a guy who is captured on video saying
I carried a gun in war. He never went to war.
Speaker 1 (10:08):
Boy ged Vance on fire over the weekend. We're talking
about it late last week. Grid. He's really come into
his own since the mistake by the Lake that the
choice of Walls as VP, and let's hope they do
not reverse that. Eight five for zero five two five
five text d an five seven seven three nine. We
are told that it's going to be a verdict in
(10:29):
the Tina Peters case. Jimmy sang and Berger will join
us after that verdict comes in. I don't think the
jury has been out long. Jimmy will clarify that for us.
And then now Logan Church at five thirty six from
Catholic vote, Logan Church will join us. One of my
big reasons for optimism is normally ever wins the Catholic
vote wins the presidency, and I think Harris is going
(10:51):
to get relatively crushed in the Catholic vote for lots
of good reasons, and so that among many other reasons,
all of which assumes that you know, oh, we have
Logan Church with us right now, beautiful Logan Church from
the Catholic vote. Welcome to the Dan Kapli Show.
Speaker 8 (11:09):
Hello, thanks for having me on.
Speaker 1 (11:11):
Well, thank you Logan and appreciate all that the Catholic
vote does, and I contribute to it as well. I
want that out there for folks. I like what they're doing,
and so tell us a Catholic vote has been very
strong about the fact that this Harris Walls ticket is
(11:31):
very bad for Catholic So elaborate on that if you would.
Speaker 9 (11:35):
Yeah, absolutely well.
Speaker 8 (11:36):
I think that the first thing that if what I
want everyone to take away from this is everything that
Joe Biden was bad about, Kamala is worse. And so
I think that's the first thing we need.
Speaker 10 (11:48):
To get out there.
Speaker 8 (11:49):
You know, Joe Biden was obviously the embodiment of everything
that we don't want in a Catholic politician, and Kamala
was the driving force behind a lot of that. And
if you look back in Kamala's history in office, you
see that she targeted people for being Knights of Columbus.
So she claimed that like they she claimed that the
(12:10):
Nights of Columbus was an extremist group, which is like,
all right, any Catholic out there knows the nicest people,
the nicest we know are in the Nice of Columbus exactly,
so for them to call these these wonderful men extreme
as is just absolutely absurd. But past that, her policies
on the border and on life, I mean, don't even
get be started on life. They are basically the antithesis
(12:35):
of what we need to be concerned about as Catholic voters.
Speaker 1 (12:40):
So yeah, yeah, Logan, I want to go I want
to go back to your point about Knights of Columbus
because I think that's such a vital point for everybody
and not just Catholics to consider. When you're talking about
the Knights of Columbus, you're talking about people who are
very devoted to the faith and then put it in
action in ways that takes a ton of their time
and of their effort, and often a ton of their money.
(13:02):
So when you say they're being an extremists, that's like
calling christ An extremists, because they're just doing the best
we as humans can to be christ Like. So to
take a federal court nominee, to take a federal court
nominee and question that nominee over membership and the Knights
of Columbus like it's over membership in the Communist Party
(13:23):
or something that that should be an automatic, I don't
care where and I know many many Catholics. I have
great admiration for who end up voting Democratic and for
reasons I don't fully understand, but for Democrats and Republicans
of life, for every Catholic, and I would hope many
beyond the fact that she would question a nominee over
(13:43):
membership and the Knights of Columbus should be an automatic disqualifier.
Speaker 9 (13:48):
Absolutely well.
Speaker 8 (13:49):
And you have to keep in mind that is exclusively
essentially what she questioned him over.
Speaker 9 (13:54):
That was her big, big bone to pick.
Speaker 8 (13:57):
And so, like you said, like, these people are people
who are trying to live out Christ's teaching in our
communities and a big part of what they do or
build up our communities, and so this isn't just Catholic things.
You know, there are people who are invested in making communities.
Speaker 3 (14:14):
A better place.
Speaker 1 (14:15):
Well, it's like Catholic charities, right, which so many of
the people they serve aren't Catholic. You're just you're you're
doing Christ's work on earth, which means you're serving everybody
regardless of faith. But for Kamala Harris to attack him
on that, But what bigger disqualifier could there be? And
I understand powerful argument. The bigger disqualifier is she avidly
(14:35):
and actively supports the mass killing of humans before birth.
But my goodness, so many reasons to believe that the
Catholic vote will will be what it should in this race,
which will mean a big loss for her.
Speaker 8 (14:52):
Right, absolutely well. I think Catholics just want the opportunity
to practice their faith freely without the government and getting
in the way. And so you have a lot of
Catholic organizations and individuals who essentially, I mean, they don't
want to be political, but at the end of the day,
when somebody is stepping in between them and their faith,
(15:12):
which is exactly what this ticket does, that's when they
start to get loud. And so I think you're absolutely right.
I think that points to a very positive outcome for
Catholics in this election.
Speaker 1 (15:23):
Logan Church our guest from Catholic Vote. How can folks
learn more about Catholic Vote.
Speaker 8 (15:29):
You can find us online at Catholic vote dot org.
We're involved in all the Tier one states that everyone
else is involved in, and a few more so odds
are we're involved in your state. So if you're interested
in getting to know what we're doing or maybe coming
on board with the team, check us out at Catholic
Vote dot org. Or on any social media.
Speaker 1 (15:48):
And Logan, what do you say to the folks who say,
wait a second, And we actually had a US senator
here years ago who said it, wait a second, Catholics,
wait a second, Archbishop, you should just keep this behind
church doors. What do you say to those folks?
Speaker 8 (16:01):
I say that we're called to live our faith in
the public square. That's what we're called to as Catholics.
And guess what politics is the public square?
Speaker 9 (16:09):
So get out there have your.
Speaker 8 (16:11):
Voice heard, because if you don't, you know you've seen
what's on the line. You see, with that risk, our
faith is quite literally on the chomping block and we
have to stand up.
Speaker 1 (16:20):
Thank you Logan, hope you join us off and appreciate
the time.
Speaker 8 (16:24):
Thanks so much.
Speaker 4 (16:24):
Have a good one you too.
Speaker 1 (16:25):
That's Logan Church, Catholic vote dot org and you know
the think about it. Polis came out the day after
he won the governor's race the first time and said, hey, hey, folks,
you've got to keep your faith out of the public square.
Why because it doesn't matter if you're Catholic, Christian, Jewish,
whatever faith you happen to have. The left knows and
you don't get any further left than Kamala Harris. The
left knows that if they don't separate people from their faith,
(16:49):
the left loses. It's that simple. Remember that Ryan, when
Barack Obama got caught on tape saying that in his
first run, Julian Denver, you're on the Dan Kaplis Show. Welcome, Hey, Julie,
talk to you.
Speaker 9 (17:01):
I've never called you before. I just started listening to you.
Speaker 1 (17:04):
Thank you.
Speaker 3 (17:06):
But you wanted to.
Speaker 9 (17:08):
Know how to find Kamala.
Speaker 3 (17:11):
Basically, how Trump should do what he wants you to do.
Speaker 10 (17:14):
I think he needs to start calling her.
Speaker 3 (17:16):
OBAMAA all all.
Speaker 1 (17:21):
Truly that thank you for that creativity, Julie. And I'm
so glad you started listening to that show. Wow, see
it and we've got to hit a heart break now.
But that's good. But yet, that's that's the best I've
heard OBAMAA Yeah, it's fun, accurate. President Trump, part of
his great success has been branding his political opponents, and
it's short and punchy. He got away with low energy,
(17:44):
jeb But I think it's got to be like one
word or a quick two words at most. How should
he do that? How should he brand Kamala Harris? It
has to be true. It has to be accurate, It
has to be fair, it has to be catchy, it
has to stick, it has to cut through the noise.
What should that be? Should it be Obamala? When we
come back, and I'm grateful to Julie for that creativity,
(18:06):
I'll actually make the case against OBAMAA not that I
have anything better, but to you.
Speaker 6 (18:14):
You're listening to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 11 (18:17):
Games thirteen gang member here illegally robbed a pregnant woman
and then released, then executed a San Francisco family.
Speaker 1 (18:26):
Another illegal arrested, released, then killed this young boy with
a sword.
Speaker 11 (18:32):
Illegal immigrant convicted, released, then finally fractured a woman's skulls who.
Speaker 1 (18:38):
Released every one of them. Liberal da Kamala Harris. The
victim's blood is on her hands. I'm Donald J.
Speaker 4 (18:45):
Trump and I approved this message.
Speaker 1 (18:47):
Yeah, new spot going up now. Trump pack spending what
is it? Ryan a little over? I think it's one
hundred million over the next nineteen days in six swing states.
So it is on it is onlines, on fires. We
talk about, Okay, Trump is a master brander, right lion
Ted Lil Marco, etcetera, etcetera. But he has not yet
(19:07):
zeroed in. He's not really hit the nail on the
head yet. When it comes to Kamala Harris, so what
would you suggest to President Trump that is branding of
her be It has to be honest, it has to
be on point, it has to resonate, it has to
cut through the noise. We had a wonderful new listener
call in the next segment and say, hey, obamaa he
should refer to her as Obama and I really appreciate
(19:29):
the intelligence and creativity as we go back to the
phone lines. I would argue against that though, because there
are so many people in the middle who still think
fondly of Obama and listen, Obama was horrible for this country.
But Obama is a very skilled guy. He's a very
smart guy. He's a very talented guy. Kamala Harris, who's
(19:52):
just as awful on policy, doesn't have his ability level.
She's so much less than Obama in so many different ways.
I'm not sure i'd want to elevator with that. David
and Boulder, you're on the Dan Kapla Show. Welcome.
Speaker 12 (20:08):
Oh yeah, Kamala Harris is no.
Speaker 1 (20:16):
David. We're losing that connection and we love when David
calls from Boulder. Uh, David, try to find a better spot.
Speaker 2 (20:22):
We'll come right back to you said that Kamala Harris
is no Barack Obama, which I would agree with him
on actually pretty strong.
Speaker 1 (20:29):
Well, yeah, Obama horrible but very skilled and very intelligent.
It's you know, Obama is so much better than Harris
in a skill level in so many different ways, while
both are just obviously horrible on ideology. But I want
to elaborate on that in a second. Jimmy Singenberger kind
enough to join us from the Tina Peterstrow we'd heard
the jury is back. Jimmy, Welcome back to the Dan
(20:52):
Capla Show.
Speaker 10 (20:53):
Hey Dan, thanks for having me. We do have a
verdict that is very curious because it took them only
a few hours to deliberate after closing arguments. Yet we
have a split verdict of a guilty on seven of
ten counts, then seven.
Speaker 4 (21:14):
Of ten okay, and which convicted and which you quitted.
Speaker 10 (21:20):
So the particular ones that are very curious in regards
to not guilty quitted are three of I think four
related to identity thefts. So remember a big part of
this whole saga of Tina Peters is that she had
obtained a badge for a guy named gerald Wood that
(21:42):
was actually used by a former nineteen nineties pro surfer
named Conan Hayes. And the defense was arguing on these
four counts related to identity theft and criminal impersonation, that
Jerry gerald Wood was in the know, he knew he
was going to have his badge used, and it looks
(22:03):
like the jury was convinced that there was at least
reasonable doubt in this regard. So the only count on
that score that Tina Peters was found guilty on was
conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation. But she was found guilty
on multiple accounts felony accounts of attempt to influence a
(22:24):
public servant as well as I think these are misdemeanors
a first degree official misconduct, violation of duty, and failure
to comply with requirements of the Secretary of State.
Speaker 1 (22:36):
But I thank you, sir, the verdicts Jimmy Segenberger reporting,
Thank you Jimmy. And now I just want to clarify
any of the convictions.
Speaker 10 (22:44):
Felony convictions, Yes, her multiple felony convictions. If my count
is right, one to three four felony convictions. If I
am counting this right, and I believe that is accurate.
Speaker 4 (23:00):
Any sentencing date set.
Speaker 10 (23:04):
It looks like it will be out in October. I
didn't catch the specific date, but that they will have
sentencing in October. They were doing back and forth, as
you know how that works, Jimmy.
Speaker 1 (23:17):
Funny question, but not so funny if you're the defendant
in the courtroom. Which verdicts were read first? The guilty
verdicts are the acquittals.
Speaker 10 (23:26):
They did it in order, so not guilty was actually
mixed in along with guilt.
Speaker 4 (23:33):
They just did it.
Speaker 10 (23:34):
It counts one through ten.
Speaker 1 (23:35):
Do you remember whether count one was guilty or not guilty?
The only reason I ask is it it can be
very hard on a defendant if the first verdict read
is not guilty, and then guilty verdicts follow.
Speaker 10 (23:51):
The first two counts were guilty.
Speaker 1 (23:53):
Okay, Okay, Well, Jimmy, great reporting. My friend really appreciated
throughout the trial, and I'm sure we'll have you back
as we get into retrospect and approach the sentencing.
Speaker 5 (24:04):
Yeah.
Speaker 10 (24:05):
I would just say that it has been fascinating how
this progressed the trial and so many of the interconnected
webs involved in it have been I would say, both
wild and bonkers. And it is quite a result in
terms of the jury viewing enough from one piece there
was a thread on an encrypted signal messaging app a
(24:28):
thread there that apparently provided enough reasonable doubt to give
the jury a sense that maybe Jerry would knew. Now
whether he did or not, this is not, of course,
a trial about him, but that seems to be the
basis for reasonable doubt. Just so folks know, it was
an interesting twist.
Speaker 3 (24:45):
In this trial.
Speaker 1 (24:46):
And Jimmy, I know that the jury was quick, but
how long were they out?
Speaker 3 (24:51):
Oh gosh, it was three or four hours?
Speaker 1 (24:53):
Okay, okay, appreciate it. Well, thank you again, Jimmy, really
appreciate the great recording and look forward to the next one.
Thank you, so thank you. That is Jimmy Sangenberger. You
can follow him. Does a lot for the Colorado Gazette
as Denver Gazette, Colorado Springs Gazette as well. Kim and Broomfield.
You're on the dan Kapla. She'll welcome.
Speaker 9 (25:12):
Yeah, Hi, I know you're seeking a tour name for
one farm, right right? Okay, So I heard this is
not original to me. I heard this on Charlie Charlie Kirk,
but Tommy Kamalah.
Speaker 4 (25:28):
Okay, and this if you just joined us, thank you.
Speaker 1 (25:31):
But Trump has struggled a little bit to brand Kamala
Harris as effectively as he's branded other opponents. So COMMI Kamala.
And now let me ask you, Kim. Obviously for it
to work, it needs to be true. And and so
do you think that's true. Do you think she's a commie?
Speaker 9 (25:52):
Oh well, I think she's. Everybody's calling it Marxism, but
you know it's pretty much interchangeable, so oh yeah, totally
the left. I mean, all you have to do is
look at things like social inequality and things like that
online and you can find Marxism.
Speaker 3 (26:13):
It's just the fine times.
Speaker 1 (26:15):
My goodness. Kim, and we were talking about it a
bit earlier when the one poll came out that showed
Kamala Harris pulling about even with Trump on the economy,
and my point was, if that polls accurate, Yeah, there's
a certain significant number of people in America and I
saw one poll as high as twenty percent who want socialism,
and Kamala Harris and Tim Walls have I think in
(26:37):
some very direct ways, tried to signal to those people
that if you want socialism, vote for us, such as
you know Kamala Harris talking about guaranteeing equality of outcome,
not a quality of opportunity, but a quality of outcome,
and then talking last week about the collective, et cetera.
So I think they're trying to signal those folks who
want socialism while still being able to deny I did
(27:00):
the broader voting public that they're they're going to bring
us to socialism. But well, thank you, Kim, sure appreciate that.
So Kim's vote. Ryan, are we keeping track of these?
We have a Bama La and then Kim has COMMI Kamala.
Speaker 2 (27:15):
There's a couple on the text Kamala no nada. That's
a pretty funny one in Shamla copycat Kamala.
Speaker 6 (27:22):
I got a couple of those.
Speaker 1 (27:23):
Yeah, boy, copyat Kamala.
Speaker 6 (27:25):
Just copy.
Speaker 1 (27:27):
But which is true? Right, it'll ring true. She obviously
texts on tips, but there could be a downside to
that as well. Right, doesn't draw enough of a contrast.
But it's not easy. There's so much awfulness with her. Yeah,
so well, hey, what we'll do we'll take a quick
break here and then we'll come back and take more
callers and texters on. Okay, Trump really needs to, you know,
(27:50):
brand Kamala more accurately, and how should he do that.
We'll preview Trump back tonight on X with Elon Musk,
and we'll get to a couple of spots back up
on the air. On the air in the Swing States,
now bankrolled by one hundred million from a super pack
they're going to spend in the next nineteen days in
the Swing States. We'll have a couple of those spots
for you. You're on the Dan Caplis Show.
Speaker 6 (28:14):
And now back to the Dan Taplas Show podcast.
Speaker 1 (28:17):
Hey, we're having some fun right now because we're helping
President Trump brand Kamala Harris. And you know how brilliantly
he's branded political opponents in the past, but he hasn't
quite landed on one yet for Kamala Harris. So we'll
get to text and Kelly will help us reset those
phone calls as well. Let's go back to a David
(28:38):
in Boulder. You're on the Dan Caplis Show. Welcome, David.
Speaker 12 (28:41):
I'm sorry I lost a few months A ugly dead spot.
Speaker 3 (28:44):
Ray Cante on Belmont Road.
Speaker 12 (28:46):
But nonetheless, yeah, I heard the reticence in your voice
from that call. I was actually surprised that Ryan seemed
like he liked it. But you and I both know
that's realistically, the most popular former living president of the United
States is obviously Obama. So yeah, you do not bring
Kamala Harris up by equating with Obama if you want
(29:06):
to win. That'd be the worst thing they could conceivably.
Speaker 1 (29:08):
Do, and I'd have to examine your premise. But yes,
because right Obama, for all of his awful policies and
the damage he did to the country, was a five
tool player, very very skilled.
Speaker 12 (29:22):
Make it more popular than, hands down the most popular
living former president.
Speaker 1 (29:28):
David appreciate the go oh sorry, didn't mean to cut
you off, my friend, But yeah, love the caller's creativity
with OBAMAA but I think it elevates her. Let's go
to Kevin in Este's Park. You're on the Dan Kaplis show.
Speaker 3 (29:39):
Welcome, Thank you.
Speaker 1 (29:42):
I think it should be chameleon and spell it with
a K, so it'd be like ka M and that'll
fit her to a t. Do you think it's sharp enough?
Do you think it's edgy enough. Do you think it
pops enough?
Speaker 3 (29:58):
Well, I was just trying to go for one.
Speaker 1 (30:00):
Well no, no, no, no, no, I appreciate it. Yeah, I
appreciate Advance used it. Oh jd Vance used it. Well,
that's that's true. Yeah, that's true. We'll pull that sound
back up. Yeah, yeah, no, thank you, my friend.
Speaker 9 (30:11):
I think it could could hit and especially you know,
especially getting.
Speaker 10 (30:15):
That word out the letter K out there, and you
know maybe that would Yeah.
Speaker 1 (30:20):
No, it's it's good alliteration. Appreciate that, and thank you
so much for that. Appreciate that. Here's jd On that.
Speaker 7 (30:26):
Pretends to be one thing in front of one audience,
she pretends to be something different in front of another audience. Look,
dann it. She's not running a political campaign. She's running
a movie. She only speaks to voters behind a teleprompter.
Everything is scripted. She doesn't have her policy positions out there.
She hasn't answered why she wanted to banfracking, but now
she doesn't.
Speaker 1 (30:44):
She want one of the challenges. I guess if you
want kamala kamalan or is that some people say chameleon, right,
I mean people pronounce that word differently, but maybe it
works it's it's just interesting that President Trump Amaster Brander
hasn't quite nailed that one yet. By the way, He'll
(31:05):
be on tonight with Elon Musk on X and I
think that starts at six very very importantly. He is
back on X now, right, And I've been saying that
for a long time. Is he has to be because
he can reach at least ten times more people on X.
And he's got to be able to bypass the media here.
He would not have been able to win before in
(31:25):
sixteen without X. Is that way to reach the people
directly and not be reliant on the media. Other headlines
of the day if you just joined us, thank you,
is that they are going on air now. The plan
had been to a hold off and not put up
these expensive spots in the swing states until after the
Democrat Convention, and obviously the campaign and its supporters, super
(31:47):
Pac included, feel that at this point she's just gaining
too much momentum and they've got to tamp that down
and reach people now. So super Pac, which is going
to be spending one hundred million over the next nineteen
days or so in six swing states to just remind
people who the real Kamala Harris is and boy, Ryan,
and I sure hope this is one of the spots.
Speaker 13 (32:09):
And it's a specific phase of life. Remember, age is
more than a chronological fact. What else do we know
about this population eighteenth through twenty four? They are stupid,
that is why we put them in dormitories and they
have a resident assistant. They make really bad decisions.
Speaker 1 (32:31):
Boy, I'll tell you that has to be.
Speaker 4 (32:33):
That has to be on a loop lots in places.
Speaker 2 (32:35):
Well one but bizarre thing, Dan is she's on a
loop with that exact quote like that. It's weird how
she word for word hoppies and paste exactly that in
like three five different settings.
Speaker 1 (32:45):
Yeah, you know why because she never in a million
years managed that she'd be a credible pre candidate for
president again, right, I mean, think about it. Think what's
happened over the last month. She went from a VP
who many credible reports Biden won to try to find
a way to replace. But then there wasn't a Supreme
Court opening for with thirty eight percent approval a laughing stock,
(33:08):
you know, to now being installed and glorified and fully protected.
It's bizarre, Thank goodness, Ryan, we have so many reasons
to be thankful, right, thank goodness that the hand of
the Democrats was forced before the convention, because if this
installation had happened, say right after the convention, say Biden
had gone through the convention, they were the team, and
(33:31):
then then you have the debate and then he's replaced
that then there's so much less time to cut through
all of this and remind the American people, show the
American people who haven't been paying attention who she really is.
So we're so fortunate it happened as early as it did.
Lord knows. We're fortunate it's her and not one of
the stronger Democrats. They could have put up like a
(33:53):
Shapiro Whitmer or Whitmer Shapiro ticket. We're so fortunate it
wasn't that. And then thank you Lord chooses Waltz instead
of Shapiro. And that's a gift that keeps on giving,
and it's made JD. Vance so sharp and on target now,
So lots of reasons to be optimistic. Thank you around
your great work. Kelly U Human sunshine as well. Join
us tomorrow please on the Dan Kapla Show.
This is Dan Capless and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform. It really seems
to be just starting now at five oh six. I
understand we had phase one, right, which is where Trump
(00:21):
defeated Biden, and I can understand why he'd be a
little down after that when all of a sudden Biden
gets deposed and Harris installed, and now he has to
start all over again. But Trump's a warrior. Sounds like
he's heard the bell and he's back up off the
mat and he is full speed ahead. So he'll be
on with Elon Musk tonight. Critically, he is now back
on Twitter, where he has to be right. I mean,
(00:42):
obviously the media isn't going to give him even remotely
affairshake or access to the American people other than for
a very brief time during the debate maybe a town
hall or two, so it's got to use everything he has.
So Twitter, he's back on. That's awesome Elon Musk Tonight.
But then this needs to be an almost day thing, right,
That's how he's won before is this work course, almost
(01:05):
daily reach out to the American people. And then we
hear his super PAC's going to spend one hundred million
over the next what nineteen or twenty days in the
Swing States, and we'll get into some interesting reporting coming
out on where that money's going to be spent and
how much where, which is fascinating. And so a headline
on CNN White House Now says Biden backs no tax
(01:26):
on tips after come after Harris pledge. Well, listen, Trump's
going to get the full benefit of this right on
multiple levels, not just the policy gain, but but just
on more evidence of the duplicitousness of Harris and Biden,
et cetera.
Speaker 2 (01:42):
There is evidence, and I believe I could be wrong
on this, but maybe Kelly can check me. The Washington
Post the passage of the Inflation Reduction Act in name
only the irno, as I call it, that Kamala Harris
was the tie breaking vote as the Vice president overseeing
the Senate, that there was pursuit of the irs of
(02:02):
service workers to tax their tips, right.
Speaker 1 (02:05):
Right, No, exactly, goodness exactly, but eight five five two
five five, Hey, a couple of quick notes. One is
we're told Ryan, I think we're trying to confirm it
now that the jury is back in the Tina Peters case.
If so, we will look forward to Evan Jimmy Sangenberger
on with the verdict if that comes down tonight, A
(02:25):
special guest at five point thirty six from Catholic Vote.
And this goes to you know, there's so much good
news today for the Trump campaign. Yeah, it's going to
be a dogfight, et cetera, but so much good news,
including the fact and it's not good for Trump or
the campaign as an apparatus, but in terms of winning
the election, I think this is going to send such
(02:47):
a powerful message to the American people, and the Biden
administration confirming it Iran wants Kamala Harris to win. Iran
is actively working against President Trump first and it's horrific
by trying to kill him, which the Biden administration is
now confirmed, but also Trump campaign saying it was Iran
who hacked into the Trump campaign. Obviously had been hacked,
(03:10):
but the Biden administration has confirmed that Iran is interfering
in this election on behalf of Harris and against Trump.
So I know it's not the cleanest message to get
to the undecideds out there, but there's enough time to
cause it to sync in and Trump, I hope, will
make a point of this in the debate, which is
(03:31):
that Iran wants Harris and there's no doubt about that,
and that needs to be front and center. The other
thing is, and you know, we'll have guessed at five
point thirty six to talk on this a bit. We
won't get into all the wonky number stuff today, just
a little bit of that. But but the Catholic vote,
and keep in mind, whoever wins the Catholic vote almost
(03:53):
always wins the presidency in modern times. And you have
the Catholic vote very prominent in many of these swing states,
certainly the Blue Wall swing states. And my own personal
belief is that for multiple reasons we can kick around
as we talk about a lot more, I think Harris
is going to get destroyed with the Catholic vote. I
(04:15):
think she's going to lose it much larger. And then
we've seen other Democrats lose the Catholic vote, and we've
seen Democrats win the Catholic vote when they've won the presidency.
So the Catholic vote I think is going to be
key in the outcome of this election, and it's going
to be good for Trump and not for Harris. Let's
go to Ourvada talk to Brian. You're on the Dan
Kaplis show. Welcome.
Speaker 3 (04:37):
Well once again, Dan, I was right. Didn't pick your Shapiro.
Speaker 4 (04:43):
Okay, that's a good thing, right, But because you know.
Speaker 3 (04:47):
Why, then everybody says, well, just take Shapiro. You don't
get Pennsylvania. And they already got Pennsylvania. They have the
weakest voting laws, it's the most corrupt state there is.
She already knows she has Pennsylvania. So Trump has to
go another way to win the presidency. And if you
(05:07):
ever look up homeless drug addicts, guess where the even
does a good row. It's Kensington Avenue in Pennsylvania. So
he's got his own problem.
Speaker 4 (05:18):
May ask you this, Brian, may ask you this.
Speaker 1 (05:20):
And first of all, I am so glad I was
wrong about her picking Shapiro, and you can bet right
now she wishes she had And don't be surprised there, yeah,
and don't be surprised. It would have made up for
all those other bets you lost to me. But don't
be surprised if.
Speaker 5 (05:34):
She dumps marijuana, if she she dumps Waltz and and
adds Shapiro, and I pray literally she does not because
Trump has to win Pennsylvania.
Speaker 1 (05:46):
And tell me this, Brian. If you're right and Pennsylvania
is already lost because because of stolen votes, as you allege,
well then why is Trump spending all that time and
money there? Why is he going back to a place where,
but for the grace of God, he would have hit
his head blown off.
Speaker 3 (06:06):
Well, you know what you are right on, Melan, But
it's got to be too big to rig. And it's
not about the people that are on the fence. Nobody's
on the fence right now. Nobody is paying attentions going well,
I don't know, that's not the way it works. But
how about all the people who aren't paying attention, princing
the young kids. If you get the young kids to
pay attention, we win, Dan. But that's not an easy
thing to do.
Speaker 4 (06:28):
Yeah, I listen, I think Trump's gonna do.
Speaker 3 (06:30):
They're gonna cheat in Pennsylvania, guarantee they did the last time. Guys,
we're all we're all stupid. Okay, somebody do with put
Tulshi Gabbared okay on the tariff watch list. You don't
think they're cheating an election? Well, all the things these people.
Speaker 4 (06:45):
Did, you keep driving.
Speaker 1 (06:48):
By my point, obviously, President Trump does not agree with you.
He thinks he can win Pennsylvania, which is why he's
spending so much time and money there. So listen, I
am glad that I was wrong about Ship. He thrilled.
And let's hope I stay wrong about Shapiro because they
still have time to dump walls and replace him. And
(07:08):
let's hope they don't eight five five or zero five
A two five five the number I always enjoy hearing
from Brian. And again we'll have a special guest from
Catholic vote dot org, which will be with us at
five point thirty six. And again, one of the many
reasons to believe that Trump is going to win is
the Catholic vote. But Ryan was say, I think everybody
gets this. All of these things now that line up
(07:31):
to favor President Trump, none of them matter unless we
get the good Trump, unless we get the A or
B Trump, And when we get that, nobody better, and
he's going to win bigley. But we've got to stop
with the crowd sized stuff. You know, we've got to
stop with the other silly season stuff and just focus
(07:53):
on And I know people are sick of the bullet points.
It's so obvious, right, he had the job, he has
all these accomplishments. She was in the administration and they
had all these failures. Just focus on the stuff that
matters to the people who are hurting.
Speaker 2 (08:08):
And because Kamala Harris is refusing to paint her own picture,
then he needs to come right out, Dan and maybe
starting to night, do you define her? You paint in
the details with her own words and her own policy
stances which are wacko tobacco left. Just point those out,
put a spotlight.
Speaker 1 (08:25):
On them, right, and stay focused on the stuff that
matters to people in their real lives, which he has
done so well so many times over the years. But
listen now, the way this thing is lined up and
with just I ballots drop in less than a month
in some places. You know, it's just so important of
the A plus game now. But Ryan raises a good question,
(08:49):
and when we come back, I'd love your take on this.
President Trump bought. Part of his success has been he
has been masterful at branding political opponents. You know, little
Marco lion ted this and this and that and that.
Speaker 4 (09:04):
He has not.
Speaker 1 (09:05):
Yet nailed the branding of Kamala Harris. He's he's kind
of been all over the map on it. So when
we come back, I'd love to hear from you. You
can text d A N five seven seven three nine
or call eight five five for zero five eight two
five five the number when we come back. What should
the final branding? And I say that in the fair
political sense, what should the final branding of Kamala Harris be?
(09:28):
How should he label her in a way that will
stick and ring true? Because these labels are only valuable
if they're true, and only appropriate if they're true. And
we'll cut through the noise. What should that label be?
You're on the Dan Caplas Show.
Speaker 6 (09:45):
And now back to the Dan Kaplass Show podcast.
Speaker 7 (09:48):
I've never criticized what Tim Waltz did when he was
in the military. I criticized his retirement decision and most importantly, Dana,
I criticized his li lying about his own record. Okay,
this is a guy who is captured on video saying
I carried a gun in war. He never went to war.
Speaker 1 (10:08):
Boy ged Vance on fire over the weekend. We're talking
about it late last week. Grid. He's really come into
his own since the mistake by the Lake that the
choice of Walls as VP, and let's hope they do
not reverse that. Eight five for zero five two five
five text d an five seven seven three nine. We
are told that it's going to be a verdict in
(10:29):
the Tina Peters case. Jimmy sang and Berger will join
us after that verdict comes in. I don't think the
jury has been out long. Jimmy will clarify that for us.
And then now Logan Church at five thirty six from
Catholic vote, Logan Church will join us. One of my
big reasons for optimism is normally ever wins the Catholic
vote wins the presidency, and I think Harris is going
(10:51):
to get relatively crushed in the Catholic vote for lots
of good reasons, and so that among many other reasons,
all of which assumes that you know, oh, we have
Logan Church with us right now, beautiful Logan Church from
the Catholic vote. Welcome to the Dan Kapli Show.
Speaker 8 (11:09):
Hello, thanks for having me on.
Speaker 1 (11:11):
Well, thank you Logan and appreciate all that the Catholic
vote does, and I contribute to it as well. I
want that out there for folks. I like what they're doing,
and so tell us a Catholic vote has been very
strong about the fact that this Harris Walls ticket is
(11:31):
very bad for Catholic So elaborate on that if you would.
Speaker 9 (11:35):
Yeah, absolutely well.
Speaker 8 (11:36):
I think that the first thing that if what I
want everyone to take away from this is everything that
Joe Biden was bad about, Kamala is worse. And so
I think that's the first thing we need.
Speaker 10 (11:48):
To get out there.
Speaker 8 (11:49):
You know, Joe Biden was obviously the embodiment of everything
that we don't want in a Catholic politician, and Kamala
was the driving force behind a lot of that. And
if you look back in Kamala's history in office, you
see that she targeted people for being Knights of Columbus.
So she claimed that like they she claimed that the
(12:10):
Nights of Columbus was an extremist group, which is like,
all right, any Catholic out there knows the nicest people,
the nicest we know are in the Nice of Columbus exactly,
so for them to call these these wonderful men extreme
as is just absolutely absurd. But past that, her policies
on the border and on life, I mean, don't even
get be started on life. They are basically the antithesis
(12:35):
of what we need to be concerned about as Catholic voters.
Speaker 1 (12:40):
So yeah, yeah, Logan, I want to go I want
to go back to your point about Knights of Columbus
because I think that's such a vital point for everybody
and not just Catholics to consider. When you're talking about
the Knights of Columbus, you're talking about people who are
very devoted to the faith and then put it in
action in ways that takes a ton of their time
and of their effort, and often a ton of their money.
(13:02):
So when you say they're being an extremists, that's like
calling christ An extremists, because they're just doing the best
we as humans can to be christ Like. So to
take a federal court nominee, to take a federal court
nominee and question that nominee over membership and the Knights
of Columbus like it's over membership in the Communist Party
(13:23):
or something that that should be an automatic, I don't
care where and I know many many Catholics. I have
great admiration for who end up voting Democratic and for
reasons I don't fully understand, but for Democrats and Republicans
of life, for every Catholic, and I would hope many
beyond the fact that she would question a nominee over
(13:43):
membership and the Knights of Columbus should be an automatic disqualifier.
Speaker 9 (13:48):
Absolutely well.
Speaker 8 (13:49):
And you have to keep in mind that is exclusively
essentially what she questioned him over.
Speaker 9 (13:54):
That was her big, big bone to pick.
Speaker 8 (13:57):
And so, like you said, like, these people are people
who are trying to live out Christ's teaching in our
communities and a big part of what they do or
build up our communities, and so this isn't just Catholic things.
You know, there are people who are invested in making communities.
Speaker 3 (14:14):
A better place.
Speaker 1 (14:15):
Well, it's like Catholic charities, right, which so many of
the people they serve aren't Catholic. You're just you're you're
doing Christ's work on earth, which means you're serving everybody
regardless of faith. But for Kamala Harris to attack him
on that, But what bigger disqualifier could there be? And
I understand powerful argument. The bigger disqualifier is she avidly
(14:35):
and actively supports the mass killing of humans before birth.
But my goodness, so many reasons to believe that the
Catholic vote will will be what it should in this race,
which will mean a big loss for her.
Speaker 8 (14:52):
Right, absolutely well. I think Catholics just want the opportunity
to practice their faith freely without the government and getting
in the way. And so you have a lot of
Catholic organizations and individuals who essentially, I mean, they don't
want to be political, but at the end of the day,
when somebody is stepping in between them and their faith,
(15:12):
which is exactly what this ticket does, that's when they
start to get loud. And so I think you're absolutely right.
I think that points to a very positive outcome for
Catholics in this election.
Speaker 1 (15:23):
Logan Church our guest from Catholic Vote. How can folks
learn more about Catholic Vote.
Speaker 8 (15:29):
You can find us online at Catholic vote dot org.
We're involved in all the Tier one states that everyone
else is involved in, and a few more so odds
are we're involved in your state. So if you're interested
in getting to know what we're doing or maybe coming
on board with the team, check us out at Catholic
Vote dot org. Or on any social media.
Speaker 1 (15:48):
And Logan, what do you say to the folks who say,
wait a second, And we actually had a US senator
here years ago who said it, wait a second, Catholics,
wait a second, Archbishop, you should just keep this behind
church doors. What do you say to those folks?
Speaker 8 (16:01):
I say that we're called to live our faith in
the public square. That's what we're called to as Catholics.
And guess what politics is the public square?
Speaker 9 (16:09):
So get out there have your.
Speaker 8 (16:11):
Voice heard, because if you don't, you know you've seen
what's on the line. You see, with that risk, our
faith is quite literally on the chomping block and we
have to stand up.
Speaker 1 (16:20):
Thank you Logan, hope you join us off and appreciate
the time.
Speaker 8 (16:24):
Thanks so much.
Speaker 4 (16:24):
Have a good one you too.
Speaker 1 (16:25):
That's Logan Church, Catholic vote dot org and you know
the think about it. Polis came out the day after
he won the governor's race the first time and said, hey, hey, folks,
you've got to keep your faith out of the public square.
Why because it doesn't matter if you're Catholic, Christian, Jewish,
whatever faith you happen to have. The left knows and
you don't get any further left than Kamala Harris. The
left knows that if they don't separate people from their faith,
(16:49):
the left loses. It's that simple. Remember that Ryan, when
Barack Obama got caught on tape saying that in his
first run, Julian Denver, you're on the Dan Kaplis Show. Welcome, Hey, Julie,
talk to you.
Speaker 9 (17:01):
I've never called you before. I just started listening to you.
Speaker 1 (17:04):
Thank you.
Speaker 3 (17:06):
But you wanted to.
Speaker 9 (17:08):
Know how to find Kamala.
Speaker 3 (17:11):
Basically, how Trump should do what he wants you to do.
Speaker 10 (17:14):
I think he needs to start calling her.
Speaker 3 (17:16):
OBAMAA all all.
Speaker 1 (17:21):
Truly that thank you for that creativity, Julie. And I'm
so glad you started listening to that show. Wow, see
it and we've got to hit a heart break now.
But that's good. But yet, that's that's the best I've
heard OBAMAA Yeah, it's fun, accurate. President Trump, part of
his great success has been branding his political opponents, and
it's short and punchy. He got away with low energy,
(17:44):
jeb But I think it's got to be like one
word or a quick two words at most. How should
he do that? How should he brand Kamala Harris? It
has to be true. It has to be accurate, It
has to be fair, it has to be catchy, it
has to stick, it has to cut through the noise.
What should that be? Should it be Obamala? When we
come back, and I'm grateful to Julie for that creativity,
(18:06):
I'll actually make the case against OBAMAA not that I
have anything better, but to you.
Speaker 6 (18:14):
You're listening to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 11 (18:17):
Games thirteen gang member here illegally robbed a pregnant woman
and then released, then executed a San Francisco family.
Speaker 1 (18:26):
Another illegal arrested, released, then killed this young boy with
a sword.
Speaker 11 (18:32):
Illegal immigrant convicted, released, then finally fractured a woman's skulls who.
Speaker 1 (18:38):
Released every one of them. Liberal da Kamala Harris. The
victim's blood is on her hands. I'm Donald J.
Speaker 4 (18:45):
Trump and I approved this message.
Speaker 1 (18:47):
Yeah, new spot going up now. Trump pack spending what
is it? Ryan a little over? I think it's one
hundred million over the next nineteen days in six swing states.
So it is on it is onlines, on fires. We
talk about, Okay, Trump is a master brander, right lion
Ted Lil Marco, etcetera, etcetera. But he has not yet
(19:07):
zeroed in. He's not really hit the nail on the
head yet. When it comes to Kamala Harris, so what
would you suggest to President Trump that is branding of
her be It has to be honest, it has to
be on point, it has to resonate, it has to
cut through the noise. We had a wonderful new listener
call in the next segment and say, hey, obamaa he
should refer to her as Obama and I really appreciate
(19:29):
the intelligence and creativity as we go back to the
phone lines. I would argue against that though, because there
are so many people in the middle who still think
fondly of Obama and listen, Obama was horrible for this country.
But Obama is a very skilled guy. He's a very
smart guy. He's a very talented guy. Kamala Harris, who's
(19:52):
just as awful on policy, doesn't have his ability level.
She's so much less than Obama in so many different ways.
I'm not sure i'd want to elevator with that. David
and Boulder, you're on the Dan Kapla Show. Welcome.
Speaker 12 (20:08):
Oh yeah, Kamala Harris is no.
Speaker 1 (20:16):
David. We're losing that connection and we love when David
calls from Boulder. Uh, David, try to find a better spot.
Speaker 2 (20:22):
We'll come right back to you said that Kamala Harris
is no Barack Obama, which I would agree with him
on actually pretty strong.
Speaker 1 (20:29):
Well, yeah, Obama horrible but very skilled and very intelligent.
It's you know, Obama is so much better than Harris
in a skill level in so many different ways, while
both are just obviously horrible on ideology. But I want
to elaborate on that in a second. Jimmy Singenberger kind
enough to join us from the Tina Peterstrow we'd heard
the jury is back. Jimmy, Welcome back to the Dan
(20:52):
Capla Show.
Speaker 10 (20:53):
Hey Dan, thanks for having me. We do have a
verdict that is very curious because it took them only
a few hours to deliberate after closing arguments. Yet we
have a split verdict of a guilty on seven of
ten counts, then seven.
Speaker 4 (21:14):
Of ten okay, and which convicted and which you quitted.
Speaker 10 (21:20):
So the particular ones that are very curious in regards
to not guilty quitted are three of I think four
related to identity thefts. So remember a big part of
this whole saga of Tina Peters is that she had
obtained a badge for a guy named gerald Wood that
(21:42):
was actually used by a former nineteen nineties pro surfer
named Conan Hayes. And the defense was arguing on these
four counts related to identity theft and criminal impersonation, that
Jerry gerald Wood was in the know, he knew he
was going to have his badge used, and it looks
(22:03):
like the jury was convinced that there was at least
reasonable doubt in this regard. So the only count on
that score that Tina Peters was found guilty on was
conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation. But she was found guilty
on multiple accounts felony accounts of attempt to influence a
(22:24):
public servant as well as I think these are misdemeanors
a first degree official misconduct, violation of duty, and failure
to comply with requirements of the Secretary of State.
Speaker 1 (22:36):
But I thank you, sir, the verdicts Jimmy Segenberger reporting,
Thank you Jimmy. And now I just want to clarify
any of the convictions.
Speaker 10 (22:44):
Felony convictions, Yes, her multiple felony convictions. If my count
is right, one to three four felony convictions. If I
am counting this right, and I believe that is accurate.
Speaker 4 (23:00):
Any sentencing date set.
Speaker 10 (23:04):
It looks like it will be out in October. I
didn't catch the specific date, but that they will have
sentencing in October. They were doing back and forth, as
you know how that works, Jimmy.
Speaker 1 (23:17):
Funny question, but not so funny if you're the defendant
in the courtroom. Which verdicts were read first? The guilty
verdicts are the acquittals.
Speaker 10 (23:26):
They did it in order, so not guilty was actually
mixed in along with guilt.
Speaker 4 (23:33):
They just did it.
Speaker 10 (23:34):
It counts one through ten.
Speaker 1 (23:35):
Do you remember whether count one was guilty or not guilty?
The only reason I ask is it it can be
very hard on a defendant if the first verdict read
is not guilty, and then guilty verdicts follow.
Speaker 10 (23:51):
The first two counts were guilty.
Speaker 1 (23:53):
Okay, Okay, Well, Jimmy, great reporting. My friend really appreciated
throughout the trial, and I'm sure we'll have you back
as we get into retrospect and approach the sentencing.
Speaker 5 (24:04):
Yeah.
Speaker 10 (24:05):
I would just say that it has been fascinating how
this progressed the trial and so many of the interconnected
webs involved in it have been I would say, both
wild and bonkers. And it is quite a result in
terms of the jury viewing enough from one piece there
was a thread on an encrypted signal messaging app a
(24:28):
thread there that apparently provided enough reasonable doubt to give
the jury a sense that maybe Jerry would knew. Now
whether he did or not, this is not, of course,
a trial about him, but that seems to be the
basis for reasonable doubt. Just so folks know, it was
an interesting twist.
Speaker 3 (24:45):
In this trial.
Speaker 1 (24:46):
And Jimmy, I know that the jury was quick, but
how long were they out?
Speaker 3 (24:51):
Oh gosh, it was three or four hours?
Speaker 1 (24:53):
Okay, okay, appreciate it. Well, thank you again, Jimmy, really
appreciate the great recording and look forward to the next one.
Thank you, so thank you. That is Jimmy Sangenberger. You
can follow him. Does a lot for the Colorado Gazette
as Denver Gazette, Colorado Springs Gazette as well. Kim and Broomfield.
You're on the dan Kapla. She'll welcome.
Speaker 9 (25:12):
Yeah, Hi, I know you're seeking a tour name for
one farm, right right? Okay, So I heard this is
not original to me. I heard this on Charlie Charlie Kirk,
but Tommy Kamalah.
Speaker 4 (25:28):
Okay, and this if you just joined us, thank you.
Speaker 1 (25:31):
But Trump has struggled a little bit to brand Kamala
Harris as effectively as he's branded other opponents. So COMMI Kamala.
And now let me ask you, Kim. Obviously for it
to work, it needs to be true. And and so
do you think that's true. Do you think she's a commie?
Speaker 9 (25:52):
Oh well, I think she's. Everybody's calling it Marxism, but
you know it's pretty much interchangeable, so oh yeah, totally
the left. I mean, all you have to do is
look at things like social inequality and things like that
online and you can find Marxism.
Speaker 3 (26:13):
It's just the fine times.
Speaker 1 (26:15):
My goodness. Kim, and we were talking about it a
bit earlier when the one poll came out that showed
Kamala Harris pulling about even with Trump on the economy,
and my point was, if that polls accurate, Yeah, there's
a certain significant number of people in America and I
saw one poll as high as twenty percent who want socialism,
and Kamala Harris and Tim Walls have I think in
(26:37):
some very direct ways, tried to signal to those people
that if you want socialism, vote for us, such as
you know Kamala Harris talking about guaranteeing equality of outcome,
not a quality of opportunity, but a quality of outcome,
and then talking last week about the collective, et cetera.
So I think they're trying to signal those folks who
want socialism while still being able to deny I did
(27:00):
the broader voting public that they're they're going to bring
us to socialism. But well, thank you, Kim, sure appreciate that.
So Kim's vote. Ryan, are we keeping track of these?
We have a Bama La and then Kim has COMMI Kamala.
Speaker 2 (27:15):
There's a couple on the text Kamala no nada. That's
a pretty funny one in Shamla copycat Kamala.
Speaker 6 (27:22):
I got a couple of those.
Speaker 1 (27:23):
Yeah, boy, copyat Kamala.
Speaker 6 (27:25):
Just copy.
Speaker 1 (27:27):
But which is true? Right, it'll ring true. She obviously
texts on tips, but there could be a downside to
that as well. Right, doesn't draw enough of a contrast.
But it's not easy. There's so much awfulness with her. Yeah,
so well, hey, what we'll do we'll take a quick
break here and then we'll come back and take more
callers and texters on. Okay, Trump really needs to, you know,
(27:50):
brand Kamala more accurately, and how should he do that.
We'll preview Trump back tonight on X with Elon Musk,
and we'll get to a couple of spots back up
on the air. On the air in the Swing States,
now bankrolled by one hundred million from a super pack
they're going to spend in the next nineteen days in
the Swing States. We'll have a couple of those spots
for you. You're on the Dan Caplis Show.
Speaker 6 (28:14):
And now back to the Dan Taplas Show podcast.
Speaker 1 (28:17):
Hey, we're having some fun right now because we're helping
President Trump brand Kamala Harris. And you know how brilliantly
he's branded political opponents in the past, but he hasn't
quite landed on one yet for Kamala Harris. So we'll
get to text and Kelly will help us reset those
phone calls as well. Let's go back to a David
(28:38):
in Boulder. You're on the Dan Caplis Show. Welcome, David.
Speaker 12 (28:41):
I'm sorry I lost a few months A ugly dead spot.
Speaker 3 (28:44):
Ray Cante on Belmont Road.
Speaker 12 (28:46):
But nonetheless, yeah, I heard the reticence in your voice
from that call. I was actually surprised that Ryan seemed
like he liked it. But you and I both know
that's realistically, the most popular former living president of the United
States is obviously Obama. So yeah, you do not bring
Kamala Harris up by equating with Obama if you want
(29:06):
to win. That'd be the worst thing they could conceivably.
Speaker 1 (29:08):
Do, and I'd have to examine your premise. But yes,
because right Obama, for all of his awful policies and
the damage he did to the country, was a five
tool player, very very skilled.
Speaker 12 (29:22):
Make it more popular than, hands down the most popular
living former president.
Speaker 1 (29:28):
David appreciate the go oh sorry, didn't mean to cut
you off, my friend, But yeah, love the caller's creativity
with OBAMAA but I think it elevates her. Let's go
to Kevin in Este's Park. You're on the Dan Kaplis show.
Speaker 3 (29:39):
Welcome, Thank you.
Speaker 1 (29:42):
I think it should be chameleon and spell it with
a K, so it'd be like ka M and that'll
fit her to a t. Do you think it's sharp enough?
Do you think it's edgy enough. Do you think it
pops enough?
Speaker 3 (29:58):
Well, I was just trying to go for one.
Speaker 1 (30:00):
Well no, no, no, no, no, I appreciate it. Yeah, I
appreciate Advance used it. Oh jd Vance used it. Well,
that's that's true. Yeah, that's true. We'll pull that sound
back up. Yeah, yeah, no, thank you, my friend.
Speaker 9 (30:11):
I think it could could hit and especially you know,
especially getting.
Speaker 10 (30:15):
That word out the letter K out there, and you
know maybe that would Yeah.
Speaker 1 (30:20):
No, it's it's good alliteration. Appreciate that, and thank you
so much for that. Appreciate that. Here's jd On that.
Speaker 7 (30:26):
Pretends to be one thing in front of one audience,
she pretends to be something different in front of another audience. Look,
dann it. She's not running a political campaign. She's running
a movie. She only speaks to voters behind a teleprompter.
Everything is scripted. She doesn't have her policy positions out there.
She hasn't answered why she wanted to banfracking, but now
she doesn't.
Speaker 1 (30:44):
She want one of the challenges. I guess if you
want kamala kamalan or is that some people say chameleon, right,
I mean people pronounce that word differently, but maybe it
works it's it's just interesting that President Trump Amaster Brander
hasn't quite nailed that one yet. By the way, He'll
(31:05):
be on tonight with Elon Musk on X and I
think that starts at six very very importantly. He is
back on X now, right, And I've been saying that
for a long time. Is he has to be because
he can reach at least ten times more people on X.
And he's got to be able to bypass the media here.
He would not have been able to win before in
(31:25):
sixteen without X. Is that way to reach the people
directly and not be reliant on the media. Other headlines
of the day if you just joined us, thank you,
is that they are going on air now. The plan
had been to a hold off and not put up
these expensive spots in the swing states until after the
Democrat Convention, and obviously the campaign and its supporters, super
(31:47):
Pac included, feel that at this point she's just gaining
too much momentum and they've got to tamp that down
and reach people now. So super Pac, which is going
to be spending one hundred million over the next nineteen
days or so in six swing states to just remind
people who the real Kamala Harris is and boy, Ryan,
and I sure hope this is one of the spots.
Speaker 13 (32:09):
And it's a specific phase of life. Remember, age is
more than a chronological fact. What else do we know
about this population eighteenth through twenty four? They are stupid,
that is why we put them in dormitories and they
have a resident assistant. They make really bad decisions.
Speaker 1 (32:31):
Boy, I'll tell you that has to be.
Speaker 4 (32:33):
That has to be on a loop lots in places.
Speaker 2 (32:35):
Well one but bizarre thing, Dan is she's on a
loop with that exact quote like that. It's weird how
she word for word hoppies and paste exactly that in
like three five different settings.
Speaker 1 (32:45):
Yeah, you know why because she never in a million
years managed that she'd be a credible pre candidate for
president again, right, I mean, think about it. Think what's
happened over the last month. She went from a VP
who many credible reports Biden won to try to find
a way to replace. But then there wasn't a Supreme
Court opening for with thirty eight percent approval a laughing stock,
(33:08):
you know, to now being installed and glorified and fully protected.
It's bizarre, Thank goodness, Ryan, we have so many reasons
to be thankful, right, thank goodness that the hand of
the Democrats was forced before the convention, because if this
installation had happened, say right after the convention, say Biden
had gone through the convention, they were the team, and
(33:31):
then then you have the debate and then he's replaced
that then there's so much less time to cut through
all of this and remind the American people, show the
American people who haven't been paying attention who she really is.
So we're so fortunate it happened as early as it did.
Lord knows. We're fortunate it's her and not one of
the stronger Democrats. They could have put up like a
(33:53):
Shapiro Whitmer or Whitmer Shapiro ticket. We're so fortunate it
wasn't that. And then thank you Lord chooses Waltz instead
of Shapiro. And that's a gift that keeps on giving,
and it's made JD. Vance so sharp and on target now,
So lots of reasons to be optimistic. Thank you around
your great work. Kelly U Human sunshine as well. Join
us tomorrow please on the Dan Kapla Show.
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Special Summer Offer: Exclusively on Apple Podcasts, try our Dateline Premium subscription completely free for one month! With Dateline Premium, you get every episode ad-free plus exclusive bonus content.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.