August 28, 2024 • 34 mins
Kamala Harris campaign surrogate Michael Tyler is evasive with CNN's John Berman on whether the Vice-President will agree to the original terms of the upcoming ABC debate on September 10th, as set by her predecessor Joe Biden. Would it be better for Donald Trump if the microphones were on or off when she's speaking?
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is Dan Caplis and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform. Each and every
day there's something new, and we look forward to bringing
that to you, in part because most days it's going
(00:21):
to be something positive.
Speaker 2 (00:22):
If like me, you want to see.
Speaker 1 (00:23):
Donald Trump elected and America saved, and once again today
we have plenty of good news.
Speaker 2 (00:29):
It's not all good news.
Speaker 1 (00:31):
Every day that it'd probably even get kind of boring,
but a lot of good news in the polling and beyond,
and we want to dive into that.
Speaker 2 (00:38):
Lots going on locally as well.
Speaker 1 (00:39):
Daniel Chinsky joined us at four thirty six to talk
about I saw on Fox News today talking about what's going.
Speaker 2 (00:46):
On out in Aurora, and Danielle was telling us today.
Speaker 1 (00:49):
She says that gangs are taking over apartment complexes and
then they're serving as the landlords to tenants, etc. Which
seems consistent with what Mayor Hoffman had told us on
Are a couple three weeks ago, which was that there
were entire blocks in Aurora that Aurora had to take back.
So look forward to the merit joining us next week.
(01:10):
But I know during the break, guys, I saw some
video on KDVR or tweeted out by KDVR that showed
at least one looked like an AR or a similar
type of weapon, you know, being carried by a gang
roaming through one of the apartment complexes, opening doors, etc.
So it's a national story now big local story, and
(01:32):
we look forward to having a Mayor Kaufman on soon
also out of DIA in studio for a full hour,
we hope next week DA trains running at limited capacity
after mechanical issue, and I won't dwell on it today,
but I'd love to know the real story someday, because
nobody can be that stupid right to design DIA the
way it was originally designed.
Speaker 2 (01:52):
Nobody can be that stupid.
Speaker 1 (01:54):
So who influenced whom in order to get certain things done?
And let me start with the most, you've got to
have a way to walk between these concourses. But beyond that,
who in the world would design an airport where when
you pick up your luggage after a long trip, you
cannot walk out the door on that same floor.
Speaker 3 (02:15):
Nope, you have to.
Speaker 1 (02:16):
Get on an elevator or risk death on an escalator
in order to get to.
Speaker 2 (02:22):
The floor where you can then leave. Uh huh. Nobody
could be that stupid.
Speaker 4 (02:27):
So anyway, I've got one other complaint about DIA. Why
in the original design they moved Stapleton right, They had
to Denver was going to grow, and they anticipated that,
and that was smart.
Speaker 3 (02:38):
However, you set it out way to the east.
Speaker 4 (02:41):
Why Dan, are there only two lanes in either direction
on pain of Boulevard?
Speaker 2 (02:47):
Yeah? Right, yeah?
Speaker 1 (02:48):
And why name it after a living guy? And listen,
we are politics different. I like Payin you just fine
had him on a bunch, and I think our kids
played on the same baseball team. But you don't name
a highway like that after a living person.
Speaker 4 (03:00):
But there's no reason, Dan, and I'm not an engineer,
but to have three lanes in either direction the whole
way from when you go off of Ice seventy dude
to get out there and back. No, you gotta two
lanes and now it's jamming aacked.
Speaker 1 (03:14):
You don't have to tell me how much there is
that stinks about that DIA deal. I mean, I'm the
guy I'll tell you true story. I'm the guy who
was threatened in a way very few people in the
media have ever been threatened. When I was breaking the
story on Channel four, I was their legal analyst at
the time, and credit to Channel four for having the
(03:35):
guts to run with it.
Speaker 2 (03:36):
But I had it well documented.
Speaker 1 (03:38):
You know, I was breaking the story that wait a second,
you know the city may have been misleading bond buyers
about when that.
Speaker 2 (03:46):
Airport was going to open.
Speaker 1 (03:48):
So I broke that story and had everything we reported
was backed up. And then get this, right, I get
this call. I get this call. Came about a month
away from my wedding at the time this story breaks,
and I get this call and uh, hey, Dan, you
know want you to come down, Want you to come
down to the city Attorney's office. Okay, yeah, what time
(04:09):
you want me there? Six o'clock, six o'clock at night, So, huh,
I'm fine. I go down to the City Attorney's office.
It turned into a very let's say, a very very
long intense conversation in which I was not doing much talking.
And I was informed during this conversation that if I
(04:32):
don't back off my story, if I don't back off
my story. Not only am I going to get sued,
my law firm's going to get sued. And I said
my law firm and they said, yeah, you sent this
public records request on your law firm letterhead.
Speaker 2 (04:46):
So so it's.
Speaker 1 (04:49):
Remarkable, as I remember it went to like ten at night,
and and then I don't remember the verbatim.
Speaker 2 (04:55):
It was so many years ago. But but.
Speaker 1 (04:58):
I was left with the very distinct impression that very
very bad things and I'm just I'm not talking about
anything criminal, but very very bad things were going to
happen to me in terms of lawsuits, et cetera if
I did not back off, and you know, everlasting credit,
everlasting credit to Channel four and to KOA Radio Lee Larson,
(05:22):
and they did not back off, threat of lawsuit, lawyers hired,
everything else. They did not back off. They stuck with
the story. And when the SEC, I was called into
the SEC offices in this region in Denver, and I
can't remember if it was the top guy. I think
it may have been, but one of the top people
in the SEC said, hey, man, we've been following your stories.
(05:44):
We want your files. And I said, hey, they are
all yours. Station gave permission, turned over my files and
they began to pursue it. So all I'm saying is
there were a lot, a lot of questions surrounding that
whole DIA thing when it started. And to his credit, listen,
I want to give credit to Meyorweb because Mayor Web,
(06:07):
I think we went to lunch one day or he
initiated something and and he just said, hey, Dan, I'm
I heard your story about what happened at the City
Attorney's office at night, and I just want to tell
you that I don't know all the details, but but
I apologize. He said, I never I never would have
wanted anything like that to happen. So, you know, kudos
(06:29):
to Mayor Web for stepping up and making that point.
But but yeah, I was just so impressed Channel four,
their management, KOA, their management, all these threats coming down
on them. They stuck behind the story and they should
have eight five five for zero five eight two five
five the number. Glad you're here, Hey, Polling, there is
no doubt now on equivocally no DNC bounce for Kamala Harrison.
(06:54):
Think about how significant that is with all of the
bubble rep all of the protection everything she had going
for her from the media, no bounce from the DNC.
What does that tell you, mister fung? And that leads
us to some interesting sound here where Eugene Robinson from
the hard Left on MSNBC says, listen, yeah, Harris campaign
(07:18):
is trying to change the rules of the debate because
they can, because Trump needs it more than they do.
Speaker 5 (07:25):
The Harris campaign is trying to change the rules, right,
I mean three weeks two, three weeks ago, they were saying, no,
we're gonna stick with the rules that were agreed with,
you know, for the for the Biden debate, when it's
going to be September tenth, it's going to be ABC,
the same rules. And now they're saying, well, but we
want to change this rule. They're doing that because they can,
because at this point it looks to me as if
(07:48):
Donald Trump believes he needs this debate more than Kamala
Harris does.
Speaker 2 (07:53):
Do you think that's true?
Speaker 1 (07:54):
Right now, let me ask you, listen, the debate's going
to happen, right, I mean, Trump's whole brand had his strength.
Speaker 2 (08:00):
She's obviously weak.
Speaker 1 (08:02):
Trump is not going to take a hit on his
brand by not showing up. He's going to show up
no matter what, and he should. But if there was
at this point, if there was a way to get
out of the debate without looking weak, would you advise
Trump to do that? Because right now the trend line
(08:23):
is not good for Kamala Harris. I think Kamala Harris
needs this debate right now more than Donald Trump. And
I think proof of that is the Harris camp, after
saying there would just be one debate agreed to now,
the Harris camp then said they wanted a debate October. So, yeah,
who do you think needs the debate more right now?
Trump or Harris. The other thing I want to get
(08:44):
to and there isn't time for it now, is the
Harris camp remains adamant that they want the mics on
full time in that debate. Now, in the end, they're
not going to get that unless Trump agrees to it,
because ABC is saying they're going to stick with the
original rules. ABC is saying that after Trump has brought
(09:06):
the public pressure. But in the end, do you think
it would be better for Trump to have the mics on?
And why do you think the Harris campaign is so
determined that Trump's mic remain on while she's talking eight
five five or zero five eight two five five. And
(09:26):
I know what the obvious answer to that is, but
what do you think is really going on there?
Speaker 2 (09:29):
You're on the Dan Capla Show.
Speaker 3 (09:32):
And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 6 (09:35):
The Governor and I and we were all doing a
tour of the library here and I'm talking about the
significance of the passage of time, right, the significance of
the passage of time.
Speaker 7 (09:48):
So when you think about it.
Speaker 6 (09:49):
There is great significance to the passage of time in
terms of what we need to do to lay these wires,
what we need to do to create these jobs. And
there is such great signif efficants to the passage of
time when we think about a day in the life
of our.
Speaker 2 (10:05):
Children five point twenty one.
Speaker 1 (10:07):
And the reason some of these oldies but goodies are
popping up is is obviously there's much more thought being
given now to whether there's something really wrong with Kamala Harris.
When it gets to the point where the cabal the
campaign has to admit that she cannot go out into
a friendly interview on her own, she has to have
(10:30):
tim Walls of all people go with her. They know
those optics are terrible. They know it makes it look
very weak. So it's an admission there's something wrong there.
Speaker 6 (10:40):
Do you think you just fell out of a coconut tree?
You exist in the context of all in which you
live and what came before you.
Speaker 1 (10:52):
Yeah, so, well, probably never know what it is, because
I don't think she's going to win the presidency. If
she wins, we probably find out after that in a
very very painful way. But we'll probably never know what
it is. But there's obviously something wrong and it's obviously disqualifying.
Let's go to the phone lines and fuy go how
about Dan and Centennial. You're on the Dan Kapla show.
Speaker 8 (11:14):
Welcome, Hey Dan, how's you going living the dream?
Speaker 2 (11:18):
My friend?
Speaker 8 (11:19):
Hey, So, I've been living in Denver pretty much my
whole life, and I worked for the airline for fifteen years,
and in ninety ninety one I was working for Continental.
I started at A one and ninety one. I've worked
for Continental and was a sign to the DA Continental
construction team to be on site out there.
Speaker 2 (11:39):
Huh.
Speaker 8 (11:40):
And you had to run the baggage tests and do
all that stuff with that failed program. But there even that,
they put the regular folks have to drop a level
of Yes, they wanted all the sets. They wanted all
the shuttle buses and ground service and taxi cabs and
all that other stuff to be right outside bag you
calim to case they had to stand there waiting in
(12:02):
the weather.
Speaker 2 (12:04):
R Well, thank you for clearing that up.
Speaker 7 (12:06):
Dan.
Speaker 1 (12:07):
It's it is the stupidest thing I've ever heard right
at di A and I talked about it earlier, and
Dan just gave us a.
Speaker 2 (12:13):
Story behind it.
Speaker 1 (12:15):
You pick up your luggage, as you know, you can't
just pick up your luggage and roll out and get
into a car. You have to go to a different floor.
I don't I didn't think there was a person on
the face of the air stupid enough to design a
building that way. But Dan and I must have just
missed because I worked for Continental Airlines in baggage. But
that was out at the old Stapleton Back to the
(12:37):
phone lines. How about Brian and Arvada, Colorado. You're on
the Dan Kapla show.
Speaker 2 (12:42):
Welcome and you know I think.
Speaker 8 (12:49):
Anything.
Speaker 2 (12:54):
Brian, obviously my.
Speaker 1 (12:56):
Friend, you're you're a little choppy right now. We're going
to try to get you back in a second. Let's
go to beautiful Peblo. Talk to Patrick here on the
dan Kaplas.
Speaker 7 (13:03):
Sh'll welcome, Hey, Dan, Hey, Well, Kelly kind of corrected
me here. I was going to call in and say
that eighty two percent of Kamala's staff is clit. That's
got to say something. I'd like to know what some
of those people quit over, you know why they left.
But she said it's ninety two percent. And I'll tell
(13:24):
you what, There's got to be something wrong if you've
got that much of a problem with people that you've hired. Yeah,
And I don't trust these polls because I believe there's
a lot of foreign influence right now. And like when
ABC gives Kamala's, say, a one point lead, well that
(13:44):
tells me she must really be down because that's a
that's a friendly source there.
Speaker 2 (13:49):
Now, that is a great point. Patrick.
Speaker 1 (13:50):
Can you look historically and you know when this time
in the past, right, I think probably in sixteen Clinton
probably at a six to seven point lead in the
nation race, Biden probably five six, stuff like that. So clearly,
now consensus of the polls is as much as most
of the polls are trying to lie to help Paris.
Consensus of the polls, is no bounce out of the
(14:12):
DNC in and of itself. I think that's huge news.
Then we can point to individual other polls that again
I read as encouraging because of the trend line. Right,
because of the trend line. Even if Ryan you tell me,
because you're a pole geek like me, if the election
was held today, right based on the polls, we're looking
(14:32):
at who wins Donald Trump.
Speaker 2 (14:35):
I think that's true.
Speaker 4 (14:35):
I think he wins again. And it's sound like a
broken record. I'm going to call it the ac C strategy.
We're coming into college football season here, and if I
were part of the Trump team, I'm not. But if
I were and I were being advised the acc strategy
Atlantic Coast Conference would be Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Georgia. He
wins those three states, he wins the election.
Speaker 3 (14:54):
That's it.
Speaker 4 (14:55):
Nevada, Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin would not matter. If Trump wins
the three states I just stated, and obviously holds Ohio, Iowa, Texas, Florida,
he wins Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Georgia.
Speaker 3 (15:07):
He's in the White House.
Speaker 1 (15:08):
Well, And in addition to just the numbers in the polls,
you have to look at. You have to look at
the overarching factors, the powerful currents in the race, and
the most powerful of all of those is the well
founded belief that America is not going to elect a
San Francisco radical. And remember, I mean, but Biden only
(15:31):
pulled it off by a handful of votes. First, that
the media rigged the election by not reporting the hunter
Joe Biden corruption story with the laptop. If that story
had been fairly reported, Biden loses. But beyond that, you know,
he also only won because he pulled off the con
that he was some kind of moderate. America is simply
not going to elect a San Francisco radical. I don't
(15:52):
care if it's male, female, this color, that color, whatever,
ain't gonna happen.
Speaker 4 (15:57):
Here's my other point that it has to happen. It's
going to happen a little bit in this interview, you
would figure, even with Dana Bash being a friendly the
debate her on the campaign trail, she's got to come
out and flesh out a policy position on all these
things that she allegedly flip flopped on, and that doesn't
break well for her either way.
Speaker 3 (16:13):
Dan.
Speaker 4 (16:14):
If she flip flops on them, then she's abandoned the
Left in their base, and they're going to be wondering, well,
what are you doing. I thought you were in favor
of the Green New Deal in Medicare for all. If
she and then to the other point of that, people
aren't going to believe her if she just flips on
every one of these issues.
Speaker 1 (16:28):
But let me point out, respectfully, a possible fatal flaw
in your analysis. Not your analysis. I'm not suggesting you
have to take your analysis, but the left at this point, Ryan,
Kamala Harris could come out in her speech on September ten,
where she'll be protected by ABC. She could come out
(16:50):
and take every single position Donald Trump takes.
Speaker 2 (16:53):
Build the wall, build it now.
Speaker 1 (16:55):
I want to build it ten feet higher than Trump,
says Kamala Harris. And the left still going to vote
for her because they're going to know she's lying. They're
still going to vote for and right, I mean that
they're just going to bet that she's lying.
Speaker 4 (17:08):
So how many people in the middle of the road
politically are going to buy her bs that she's flipped
on all these positions. I don't think that's why she's
going to lose the race, right, I don't think it's
a sale she can make.
Speaker 2 (17:18):
Yeah, no, I and listen.
Speaker 1 (17:21):
This is where we get into those other subjective I
think powerful currents in the race, and that is that
the swing states are the swing states for a reason,
that the swing state voters who go back and forth
and decide these elections are like that for a reason.
And they know they know about her from the three
and a half years she's been VP, but they also
(17:43):
know that she didn't get a single vote, that she
wasn't elected. She doesn't have the gravitas, she doesn't have
the weight, she doesn't have the credibility that comes from
winning a primary. They know that Joe Biden was deposed,
They know this whole set of circumstances, all of that
ways against her, and in race as close as this
(18:04):
one may well be, I think all of those currents
are really going to matter, and they're going to break
in Trump's favor. Eight five five for zero five eight
two five to five. Come back to our lines, come
back to great Texters. But what do you want to hear?
Dana Bash, not ask, but pursue with Kamala Harris.
Speaker 2 (18:19):
Tomorrow, You're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 3 (18:28):
You're listening to the Dan Kaplass Show podcast.
Speaker 2 (18:31):
Have you not agreed to muted microphones?
Speaker 9 (18:34):
Yill.
Speaker 10 (18:34):
I think we've made pretty clear our pooks, how along
with Donald Trump himself, is for unmuted microphones. I think
the question that you got to ask is to Donald
Trump and his and his team. Are they in agreement
between themselves on how we should approach this debate because
we are in agreement with Donald Trump that he should
be live and unmuted microphone.
Speaker 2 (18:50):
Yeah, fascinating.
Speaker 1 (18:51):
You know again, it comes back to it appears to
be the emo of the Harris campaign. That's somehow, you know,
being angry and being mean and being jerks is some
kind of substitute for real strength because you get that
attitude from them. You get that attitude from these various
(19:13):
spokespersons in almost every single interview. But Berman on CNN
did a great job of pinning down the hair spokesperson
and at times appeared openly frustrated with the hair spokesperson.
Just said, Hey, I just want to know. ABC has
said these are the rules. The mics are muted. Do
you agree to the rules and listen In the end,
the mics are going to be muted and it's absolutely
(19:36):
critical for Donald Trump that they be muted, not for
the reason everybody's talking about. Because everybody says, oh, yeah,
it's to Trump's benefit that the MIC's off when he's
not talking, because then he won't interrupt as much and
look bad and turn off photers. I understand that's the
popular perception, and you know, maybe there's truth in that,
but but that's not the reason the Harris camp is
(19:58):
so furiously dedicated to getting those mics on. Here's their problem. Okay, Obviously,
obviously Kamala Harris has some kind of challenge, some kind
of issue, some kind of processing issue that makes it
very difficult for her to think on her feet. We've
seen that a million times, right, That's why they hide her.
(20:19):
That's why she needs Tim Walls with her for a
friendly tomorrow with CNN. So she's got this issue wherever
it comes from, and we may never know the origin
she's got this problem. But when the mics are muted,
when Trump's mike is off, what he's able to do
is what he did to Biden, and this gets very
(20:40):
little attention.
Speaker 7 (20:41):
Ryan.
Speaker 2 (20:42):
He gets to chirp at her.
Speaker 1 (20:46):
And distract her, and the audience doesn't know he's doing
it because his mic'saw.
Speaker 2 (20:51):
It right, and that really threw Biden off.
Speaker 1 (20:54):
Now, you could take somebody super sharp like okay, Barack
Obama was a s'more on smart guy who did moronic
things that really hurt the country. But a very very
smart guy, even a super smart, sharp on his feet
normally guy like Obama would have a hard time with, say,
if John McCain had been chirping at him and the
audience couldn't hear McCain chirping at him.
Speaker 2 (21:17):
So it's a tremendous.
Speaker 1 (21:18):
Advantage for Trump to be able to throw her off
like that without the audience being able to hear him
doing it. That's why it's so critical that the current
rules stay in effect, and his might be off when
it's not his turn to speak. That's what the Harris
campaign is so concerned about. Brian and Arvada. You're on
(21:39):
the Dan Kapla show. Welcome, Hey Brian. Hmm, okay, Brian
is a soft spoken type. We've had a little trouble
with that phone line. Let me get to some of
these texts, and there are a great great text eight
five for zero five, A two five five text Dan
five seven seven three nine. Dan lawyers are known to
(22:01):
have pretty good I cus Ta kamaa get up pass
in grading her academics. Somehow, Bob and nerveda great question, Bob, No,
I listen. I'm the guy who's constantly saying on air,
she is not a dummy, she is not a stupid person.
There are all different types of smart, and there are
lots of smart people who have processing issues. I mean,
(22:23):
they may be intellectually smart, but they can't process quickly,
they can't think on their feet, they can't defend a position.
Then you get smart people who have other overlays. You
can get some really smart people who then don't process
as well. They aren't cognitively as intact because they have
other kind of impairments. So I believe that she's an
(22:43):
intelligent person who has processing issues and has some kind
of challenge. So I don't think she's any dummy. I
just think she's incapable of being president because of these issues.
Speaker 3 (22:55):
She failed the California bar the first time.
Speaker 1 (22:58):
Ryan, I know so many great lawyers who find the
bar from I was very blessed to pass. And I'm told,
don't we just sound like Trump? And I'm told was
at the very top of my class, not number one
or two, and they don't keep a formal rank.
Speaker 2 (23:10):
But I knew somebody who knew.
Speaker 1 (23:12):
Okaypective, but just let me, can I emphasize one thing,
Kelly again, not to be redundant. There are so many
truly great lawyers who failed the bar the first time, because, guys,
the bar exam is not about your ability to practice law,
It's about your ability to take a test.
Speaker 2 (23:33):
Yes, Kelly, thank you. Okay.
Speaker 9 (23:36):
From a woman's perspective, she's not very intelligent.
Speaker 1 (23:41):
You're not into kind of the fine points of processing
issues or any of that.
Speaker 2 (23:47):
Okay, you know.
Speaker 9 (23:48):
I would say if it was one or two occasions
where it was a processing error, like sometimes Trump will
speak and he'll bloviate and do all of those things
that we all kind of go.
Speaker 6 (24:05):
Really do you have to go there?
Speaker 2 (24:07):
But for her it's a recurring condition, thank you.
Speaker 1 (24:14):
I do think, Kelly, there is an obvious functional problem.
Speaker 4 (24:19):
I think you said this before, Dan, and I absolutely
think a spot on. She has some kind of social
anxiety disorder when she's doing these weird things with laughing
at her own jokes, but nobody else is laughing. The
coconut tree thing like, very bizarre behavior and social settings.
Speaker 3 (24:34):
I think that's part of it.
Speaker 2 (24:35):
And I have not drawn any conclusions because I can't.
Speaker 1 (24:38):
No, Listen, I spend my life, you know how, I
spend my days with subpoena power. I spend my days
examining witnesses under oath, obtaining documents through subpoenas, drilling down
to get to the truth. Ryan, And this I can
tell you. I can't possibly know the origin of her
functional impairment without subpoena power access to her medical records
(24:58):
that stuff.
Speaker 2 (24:58):
But all I know is there is one. There is
a functional.
Speaker 1 (25:02):
Impairment, and it's the type which prevents her from being
an effective president. And that's separate apart from policy. I mean,
she shouldn't be president just based on policy. But this,
but listen, is one of those, Ryan, is one of
those potential explanations for this obvious functional impairment. Is it
possible that she has a major anxiety disorder which she
(25:26):
then either clinically and or self medicais for it. That's
one of a lot of different possibilities. Sure, but we
can't possibly know who was the Rogan skit. You should
pull that with a guy. Well, he did America's Wine, Mom.
And I'm not drawing any conclusions. I'm not saying it's
this or it's that. I'm just saying it's obviously something,
and that's why they're hiding her.
Speaker 3 (25:48):
They have to, and that's very true.
Speaker 4 (25:50):
There was also talk that even some of her closest
advisors were telling her, you've got to do a tough interview,
and she was adamant that that was not what she
was going to do.
Speaker 3 (26:01):
And there's just so much evidence.
Speaker 4 (26:03):
Dan, It's out there, it's on video, it's the recordings
that I do, all these deep thoughts that I have
with her of her saying these very strange, bizarre things
talking to kids about outer space. I mean, give you
hundreds of examples, but to the gut felled rule, you
can't give me one example where she said something very
profound that stands out.
Speaker 2 (26:22):
Oh, let's be fair, what about this one?
Speaker 11 (26:24):
And as a woman, there's a balance to be struck
between being tough.
Speaker 2 (26:32):
And being a bitch, or what about this one?
Speaker 11 (26:37):
So you're now no longer are you necessarily keeping those
private files in some file cabinet that's locked in the
basement of the house, it's on your laptop and it's
then therefore up here in this cloud.
Speaker 12 (26:53):
What about you know, we have to say woke, like
everybody needs to be woke, and you can talk about
if you're the WOKEUSS or woker, just stay more woke
than less woke.
Speaker 6 (27:08):
Do you think you just fell out of a coconut tree.
Speaker 2 (27:13):
Ryan, You're not being fair to her.
Speaker 7 (27:15):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (27:16):
Yeah, okay, yeah, but anyway, so my bottom line is
Dana Bash tomorrow is going to ask Kamala Harris lots
of tough questions and that will be meaningless. That'll be
a favor to Harris because what Dana Bash isn't going
to do is follow up. She isn't going to pursue
Harris until she gets an answer. So that's why that
(27:38):
interview between that and the editing that's going to occur later.
Here's a question for you if if Waltz makes the
fatal mistake of stepping in to bail her out, Man's
plain would see an even show it or is that
just going to be edited out cutting room FLOORA yeah,
eight five five four zero five eight two five five
the number come back to our fiery text.
Speaker 2 (27:59):
You're on Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 3 (28:02):
And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 13 (28:05):
It's been nearly forty days since Kamala Harris became the
installed nominee of the Democrat Party, and she's finally sitting
down for an interview, but not by herself. She is
sitting down with her running mate, Tim Walls. And I
think it's quite sad that the woman trying to be
the first female president of the United States needs her
male running mate by her side in her first sit
(28:28):
down interview.
Speaker 1 (28:29):
Yeah, that's that's a Trump spokesman. But it's an undeniable truth.
And I think that's a big key to these close
races is what are the undeniable truths that are important
enough that many of these swing voters are going to
be aware of them? And this is one of those
that she's not able to go to this friendly interview
(28:50):
on her own. She has to bring her running mate,
who happens to be male. That's so bad for her
without anybody having to make the argument, right. I mean
that the really winning points are the points that voters
realize on their own, and you just have to present
the information and then they draw that own conclusion. Because
(29:10):
it's so obvious and true. So Harris knows this, The
cabal knows this. So why are they doing it anyway? Well,
because they have to, because she has some kind of impairment,
functional impairment, which makes it necessary for her to do this.
(29:30):
I think that's the undeniable reality. I can't know what
that functional impairment is. I don't think anybody from the
outside can know. People can guess, but all we can
know is it's a disqualifier. It's so bad that she
can't be present, and if she can't go to a
friendly interview and sit down on her own, she cannot
be president. I think Ryan, it'll never show up in
(29:52):
any particular poll. It won't be polled as an individual issue,
it won't be in the exit polls. But I wouldn't
be at all surprised if come election day this is
one of those five to ten points slash truce that
is having the greatest impact across the swing states on
election day, and it ties into the larger issue of weakness.
Speaker 2 (30:16):
But it's a big deal. Dan.
Speaker 1 (30:18):
Can you imagine President Kamala at a high level dinner
in France or Italy and suddenly plunking a cube of
ice into her white wine. That from Andy, I could
picture that I can't take it end as well for
our country. But yeah, Dan, why have you thought Ryan?
Speaker 2 (30:34):
Is it all fair?
Speaker 1 (30:35):
Yes, his agenda and rarely presents the other side. Ryan,
you have officially arrived, not that there was any doubt
when people are taking shots at you on somebody else's
show to know what's my agenda?
Speaker 3 (30:45):
Yeah?
Speaker 1 (30:45):
Yeah, doing what is your agenda other than your next date?
Speaker 2 (30:50):
Or yeah, what is your ronda?
Speaker 1 (30:52):
Yeah it's Oh, by the way, I got to work
this in before the end of the show. If there's
two contributions I hope to have made to society, one
is warning people all the time when the light turns green,
look both ways because so many people are running red lights.
But the other is predicting the outcome of CEU games
and see.
Speaker 2 (31:13):
You opener tomorrow night.
Speaker 1 (31:14):
A very good North Dakota State team. Many experts picking
North Dakota State. I think CEU will not only win,
but will win by a lot, bigly, bigly. Yes, I
think this is a very good see team. I just
start with the fact that you have the best quarterback
in the country. That's a pretty good starting point. Dan
(31:36):
If Kamala has all these issues you Ryan and Kelly
are implying, aren't her accomplishments pretty good? In spite of those? Texter,
thank you? Please call the show. I'd want to ask
you what accomplishments. I'd really I would love to know
what accomplishments. I understand that. Yeah, she became San Francisco DA.
(31:59):
I understand, became an elected United States senator. I understand
she was selected to be vice president and became vice
president when Joe Biden won. But what are her accomplishments
within all of that? And remember, she was picked by
Biden because of her weakness, not because of any accomplishments,
(32:21):
just like Obama picked Biden because of his weakness. Obama
wanted somebody as VP who nobody out there would want
as president, and that's what Biden did. He picked Kamala Harris,
who got knocked out two months before the Iowa primaries
because she was so bad she made him look good,
just like Biden was so bad, he made Obama look good.
(32:44):
So she didn't get to be VP because of accomplishments.
And obviously she didn't get a single vote here to
become nominee. So I'd like to have that conversation, because
I garan friggin tee this. There are millions and millions
and millions of far more accomplished people than Kamala Harris.
(33:06):
You've never heard of and I'll never hear of. My father, Okay,
infinitely more accomplished than Kamala Harris. He wasn't elected to this,
he wasn't elected to that. You know, he wasn't a
household name outside of our household. Everybody knew him, respected
him a little bit different than Kamala Harris, but he
was far more accomplished. My mother, who could have been
(33:27):
anything and gave it all up for the toughest job
in the world raising we five bancheese? Is that proper
grammar Ryne? My mother was a million times more accomplished
than Kamala Harris. So what accomplishments are we talking about here?
Speaker 2 (33:44):
Dan?
Speaker 1 (33:44):
As Jessa Otel said, she's thick as a brick. I
think she's an intelligent person who has functional, some kind
of functional impairment that disqualifies her from the job. Ah,
we have so many other great texts. I'd say I'm
going to try to get to some of these.
Speaker 2 (33:59):
Tomorrow.
Speaker 1 (34:00):
John Caldera will have the show tomorrow. I'll be back Friday.
But you know John, if you're new to the area,
John is iconic, and he's funny, and he's a historian.
He's seen so much happen in Colorado over the year,
so he'll have his own fun, unique take on all
of this. And of course Ryan, you're gonna be here
with him, right and Kelly as well.
Speaker 3 (34:19):
We always have a good time.
Speaker 4 (34:20):
Usually we're talking about star treking Gilligan's Island and stuff
like that.
Speaker 3 (34:24):
But it'll be fun.
Speaker 1 (34:25):
Yeah, And we're just gonna have one of the great
family outings ever right, just our whole family. We're heading
up to Boulder. We're gonna have a little picnic on
far and Field. Awesome, wander over to the stadium. These
kids they were raised in folsom Field. They were going
there since they were babies. So it's just going to
be a real fun family outing. Hey, have a great,
(34:46):
safe night. Please be back on our show tomorrow.
Speaker 2 (34:48):
On The Dan Captain Show,
This is Dan Caplis and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dan Caplis Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform. Each and every
day there's something new, and we look forward to bringing
that to you, in part because most days it's going
(00:21):
to be something positive.
Speaker 2 (00:22):
If like me, you want to see.
Speaker 1 (00:23):
Donald Trump elected and America saved, and once again today
we have plenty of good news.
Speaker 2 (00:29):
It's not all good news.
Speaker 1 (00:31):
Every day that it'd probably even get kind of boring,
but a lot of good news in the polling and beyond,
and we want to dive into that.
Speaker 2 (00:38):
Lots going on locally as well.
Speaker 1 (00:39):
Daniel Chinsky joined us at four thirty six to talk
about I saw on Fox News today talking about what's going.
Speaker 2 (00:46):
On out in Aurora, and Danielle was telling us today.
Speaker 1 (00:49):
She says that gangs are taking over apartment complexes and
then they're serving as the landlords to tenants, etc. Which
seems consistent with what Mayor Hoffman had told us on
Are a couple three weeks ago, which was that there
were entire blocks in Aurora that Aurora had to take back.
So look forward to the merit joining us next week.
(01:10):
But I know during the break, guys, I saw some
video on KDVR or tweeted out by KDVR that showed
at least one looked like an AR or a similar
type of weapon, you know, being carried by a gang
roaming through one of the apartment complexes, opening doors, etc.
So it's a national story now big local story, and
(01:32):
we look forward to having a Mayor Kaufman on soon
also out of DIA in studio for a full hour,
we hope next week DA trains running at limited capacity
after mechanical issue, and I won't dwell on it today,
but I'd love to know the real story someday, because
nobody can be that stupid right to design DIA the
way it was originally designed.
Speaker 2 (01:52):
Nobody can be that stupid.
Speaker 1 (01:54):
So who influenced whom in order to get certain things done?
And let me start with the most, you've got to
have a way to walk between these concourses. But beyond that,
who in the world would design an airport where when
you pick up your luggage after a long trip, you
cannot walk out the door on that same floor.
Speaker 3 (02:15):
Nope, you have to.
Speaker 1 (02:16):
Get on an elevator or risk death on an escalator
in order to get to.
Speaker 2 (02:22):
The floor where you can then leave. Uh huh. Nobody
could be that stupid.
Speaker 4 (02:27):
So anyway, I've got one other complaint about DIA. Why
in the original design they moved Stapleton right, They had
to Denver was going to grow, and they anticipated that,
and that was smart.
Speaker 3 (02:38):
However, you set it out way to the east.
Speaker 4 (02:41):
Why Dan, are there only two lanes in either direction
on pain of Boulevard?
Speaker 2 (02:47):
Yeah? Right, yeah?
Speaker 1 (02:48):
And why name it after a living guy? And listen,
we are politics different. I like Payin you just fine
had him on a bunch, and I think our kids
played on the same baseball team. But you don't name
a highway like that after a living person.
Speaker 4 (03:00):
But there's no reason, Dan, and I'm not an engineer,
but to have three lanes in either direction the whole
way from when you go off of Ice seventy dude
to get out there and back. No, you gotta two
lanes and now it's jamming aacked.
Speaker 1 (03:14):
You don't have to tell me how much there is
that stinks about that DIA deal. I mean, I'm the
guy I'll tell you true story. I'm the guy who
was threatened in a way very few people in the
media have ever been threatened. When I was breaking the
story on Channel four, I was their legal analyst at
the time, and credit to Channel four for having the
(03:35):
guts to run with it.
Speaker 2 (03:36):
But I had it well documented.
Speaker 1 (03:38):
You know, I was breaking the story that wait a second,
you know the city may have been misleading bond buyers
about when that.
Speaker 2 (03:46):
Airport was going to open.
Speaker 1 (03:48):
So I broke that story and had everything we reported
was backed up. And then get this, right, I get
this call. I get this call. Came about a month
away from my wedding at the time this story breaks,
and I get this call and uh, hey, Dan, you
know want you to come down, Want you to come
down to the city Attorney's office. Okay, yeah, what time
(04:09):
you want me there? Six o'clock, six o'clock at night, So, huh,
I'm fine. I go down to the City Attorney's office.
It turned into a very let's say, a very very
long intense conversation in which I was not doing much talking.
And I was informed during this conversation that if I
(04:32):
don't back off my story, if I don't back off
my story. Not only am I going to get sued,
my law firm's going to get sued. And I said
my law firm and they said, yeah, you sent this
public records request on your law firm letterhead.
Speaker 2 (04:46):
So so it's.
Speaker 1 (04:49):
Remarkable, as I remember it went to like ten at night,
and and then I don't remember the verbatim.
Speaker 2 (04:55):
It was so many years ago. But but.
Speaker 1 (04:58):
I was left with the very distinct impression that very
very bad things and I'm just I'm not talking about
anything criminal, but very very bad things were going to
happen to me in terms of lawsuits, et cetera if
I did not back off, and you know, everlasting credit,
everlasting credit to Channel four and to KOA Radio Lee Larson,
(05:22):
and they did not back off, threat of lawsuit, lawyers hired,
everything else. They did not back off. They stuck with
the story. And when the SEC, I was called into
the SEC offices in this region in Denver, and I
can't remember if it was the top guy. I think
it may have been, but one of the top people
in the SEC said, hey, man, we've been following your stories.
(05:44):
We want your files. And I said, hey, they are
all yours. Station gave permission, turned over my files and
they began to pursue it. So all I'm saying is
there were a lot, a lot of questions surrounding that
whole DIA thing when it started. And to his credit, listen,
I want to give credit to Meyorweb because Mayor Web,
(06:07):
I think we went to lunch one day or he
initiated something and and he just said, hey, Dan, I'm
I heard your story about what happened at the City
Attorney's office at night, and I just want to tell
you that I don't know all the details, but but
I apologize. He said, I never I never would have
wanted anything like that to happen. So, you know, kudos
(06:29):
to Mayor Web for stepping up and making that point.
But but yeah, I was just so impressed Channel four,
their management, KOA, their management, all these threats coming down
on them. They stuck behind the story and they should
have eight five five for zero five eight two five
five the number. Glad you're here, Hey, Polling, there is
no doubt now on equivocally no DNC bounce for Kamala Harrison.
(06:54):
Think about how significant that is with all of the
bubble rep all of the protection everything she had going
for her from the media, no bounce from the DNC.
What does that tell you, mister fung? And that leads
us to some interesting sound here where Eugene Robinson from
the hard Left on MSNBC says, listen, yeah, Harris campaign
(07:18):
is trying to change the rules of the debate because
they can, because Trump needs it more than they do.
Speaker 5 (07:25):
The Harris campaign is trying to change the rules, right,
I mean three weeks two, three weeks ago, they were saying, no,
we're gonna stick with the rules that were agreed with,
you know, for the for the Biden debate, when it's
going to be September tenth, it's going to be ABC,
the same rules. And now they're saying, well, but we
want to change this rule. They're doing that because they can,
because at this point it looks to me as if
(07:48):
Donald Trump believes he needs this debate more than Kamala
Harris does.
Speaker 2 (07:53):
Do you think that's true?
Speaker 1 (07:54):
Right now, let me ask you, listen, the debate's going
to happen, right, I mean, Trump's whole brand had his strength.
Speaker 2 (08:00):
She's obviously weak.
Speaker 1 (08:02):
Trump is not going to take a hit on his
brand by not showing up. He's going to show up
no matter what, and he should. But if there was
at this point, if there was a way to get
out of the debate without looking weak, would you advise
Trump to do that? Because right now the trend line
(08:23):
is not good for Kamala Harris. I think Kamala Harris
needs this debate right now more than Donald Trump. And
I think proof of that is the Harris camp, after
saying there would just be one debate agreed to now,
the Harris camp then said they wanted a debate October. So, yeah,
who do you think needs the debate more right now?
Trump or Harris. The other thing I want to get
(08:44):
to and there isn't time for it now, is the
Harris camp remains adamant that they want the mics on
full time in that debate. Now, in the end, they're
not going to get that unless Trump agrees to it,
because ABC is saying they're going to stick with the
original rules. ABC is saying that after Trump has brought
(09:06):
the public pressure. But in the end, do you think
it would be better for Trump to have the mics on?
And why do you think the Harris campaign is so
determined that Trump's mic remain on while she's talking eight
five five or zero five eight two five five. And
(09:26):
I know what the obvious answer to that is, but
what do you think is really going on there?
Speaker 2 (09:29):
You're on the Dan Capla Show.
Speaker 3 (09:32):
And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 6 (09:35):
The Governor and I and we were all doing a
tour of the library here and I'm talking about the
significance of the passage of time, right, the significance of
the passage of time.
Speaker 7 (09:48):
So when you think about it.
Speaker 6 (09:49):
There is great significance to the passage of time in
terms of what we need to do to lay these wires,
what we need to do to create these jobs. And
there is such great signif efficants to the passage of
time when we think about a day in the life
of our.
Speaker 2 (10:05):
Children five point twenty one.
Speaker 1 (10:07):
And the reason some of these oldies but goodies are
popping up is is obviously there's much more thought being
given now to whether there's something really wrong with Kamala Harris.
When it gets to the point where the cabal the
campaign has to admit that she cannot go out into
a friendly interview on her own, she has to have
(10:30):
tim Walls of all people go with her. They know
those optics are terrible. They know it makes it look
very weak. So it's an admission there's something wrong there.
Speaker 6 (10:40):
Do you think you just fell out of a coconut tree?
You exist in the context of all in which you
live and what came before you.
Speaker 1 (10:52):
Yeah, so, well, probably never know what it is, because
I don't think she's going to win the presidency. If
she wins, we probably find out after that in a
very very painful way. But we'll probably never know what
it is. But there's obviously something wrong and it's obviously disqualifying.
Let's go to the phone lines and fuy go how
about Dan and Centennial. You're on the Dan Kapla show.
Speaker 8 (11:14):
Welcome, Hey Dan, how's you going living the dream?
Speaker 2 (11:18):
My friend?
Speaker 8 (11:19):
Hey, So, I've been living in Denver pretty much my
whole life, and I worked for the airline for fifteen years,
and in ninety ninety one I was working for Continental.
I started at A one and ninety one. I've worked
for Continental and was a sign to the DA Continental
construction team to be on site out there.
Speaker 2 (11:39):
Huh.
Speaker 8 (11:40):
And you had to run the baggage tests and do
all that stuff with that failed program. But there even that,
they put the regular folks have to drop a level
of Yes, they wanted all the sets. They wanted all
the shuttle buses and ground service and taxi cabs and
all that other stuff to be right outside bag you
calim to case they had to stand there waiting in
(12:02):
the weather.
Speaker 2 (12:04):
R Well, thank you for clearing that up.
Speaker 7 (12:06):
Dan.
Speaker 1 (12:07):
It's it is the stupidest thing I've ever heard right
at di A and I talked about it earlier, and
Dan just gave us a.
Speaker 2 (12:13):
Story behind it.
Speaker 1 (12:15):
You pick up your luggage, as you know, you can't
just pick up your luggage and roll out and get
into a car. You have to go to a different floor.
I don't I didn't think there was a person on
the face of the air stupid enough to design a
building that way. But Dan and I must have just
missed because I worked for Continental Airlines in baggage. But
that was out at the old Stapleton Back to the
(12:37):
phone lines. How about Brian and Arvada, Colorado. You're on
the Dan Kapla show.
Speaker 2 (12:42):
Welcome and you know I think.
Speaker 8 (12:49):
Anything.
Speaker 2 (12:54):
Brian, obviously my.
Speaker 1 (12:56):
Friend, you're you're a little choppy right now. We're going
to try to get you back in a second. Let's
go to beautiful Peblo. Talk to Patrick here on the
dan Kaplas.
Speaker 7 (13:03):
Sh'll welcome, Hey, Dan, Hey, Well, Kelly kind of corrected
me here. I was going to call in and say
that eighty two percent of Kamala's staff is clit. That's
got to say something. I'd like to know what some
of those people quit over, you know why they left.
But she said it's ninety two percent. And I'll tell
(13:24):
you what, There's got to be something wrong if you've
got that much of a problem with people that you've hired. Yeah,
And I don't trust these polls because I believe there's
a lot of foreign influence right now. And like when
ABC gives Kamala's, say, a one point lead, well that
(13:44):
tells me she must really be down because that's a
that's a friendly source there.
Speaker 2 (13:49):
Now, that is a great point. Patrick.
Speaker 1 (13:50):
Can you look historically and you know when this time
in the past, right, I think probably in sixteen Clinton
probably at a six to seven point lead in the
nation race, Biden probably five six, stuff like that. So clearly,
now consensus of the polls is as much as most
of the polls are trying to lie to help Paris.
Consensus of the polls, is no bounce out of the
(14:12):
DNC in and of itself. I think that's huge news.
Then we can point to individual other polls that again
I read as encouraging because of the trend line. Right,
because of the trend line. Even if Ryan you tell me,
because you're a pole geek like me, if the election
was held today, right based on the polls, we're looking
(14:32):
at who wins Donald Trump.
Speaker 2 (14:35):
I think that's true.
Speaker 4 (14:35):
I think he wins again. And it's sound like a
broken record. I'm going to call it the ac C strategy.
We're coming into college football season here, and if I
were part of the Trump team, I'm not. But if
I were and I were being advised the acc strategy
Atlantic Coast Conference would be Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Georgia. He
wins those three states, he wins the election.
Speaker 3 (14:54):
That's it.
Speaker 4 (14:55):
Nevada, Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin would not matter. If Trump wins
the three states I just stated, and obviously holds Ohio, Iowa, Texas, Florida,
he wins Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Georgia.
Speaker 3 (15:07):
He's in the White House.
Speaker 1 (15:08):
Well, And in addition to just the numbers in the polls,
you have to look at. You have to look at
the overarching factors, the powerful currents in the race, and
the most powerful of all of those is the well
founded belief that America is not going to elect a
San Francisco radical. And remember, I mean, but Biden only
(15:31):
pulled it off by a handful of votes. First, that
the media rigged the election by not reporting the hunter
Joe Biden corruption story with the laptop. If that story
had been fairly reported, Biden loses. But beyond that, you know,
he also only won because he pulled off the con
that he was some kind of moderate. America is simply
not going to elect a San Francisco radical. I don't
(15:52):
care if it's male, female, this color, that color, whatever,
ain't gonna happen.
Speaker 4 (15:57):
Here's my other point that it has to happen. It's
going to happen a little bit in this interview, you
would figure, even with Dana Bash being a friendly the
debate her on the campaign trail, she's got to come
out and flesh out a policy position on all these
things that she allegedly flip flopped on, and that doesn't
break well for her either way.
Speaker 3 (16:13):
Dan.
Speaker 4 (16:14):
If she flip flops on them, then she's abandoned the
Left in their base, and they're going to be wondering, well,
what are you doing. I thought you were in favor
of the Green New Deal in Medicare for all. If
she and then to the other point of that, people
aren't going to believe her if she just flips on
every one of these issues.
Speaker 1 (16:28):
But let me point out, respectfully, a possible fatal flaw
in your analysis. Not your analysis. I'm not suggesting you
have to take your analysis, but the left at this point, Ryan,
Kamala Harris could come out in her speech on September ten,
where she'll be protected by ABC. She could come out
(16:50):
and take every single position Donald Trump takes.
Speaker 2 (16:53):
Build the wall, build it now.
Speaker 1 (16:55):
I want to build it ten feet higher than Trump,
says Kamala Harris. And the left still going to vote
for her because they're going to know she's lying. They're
still going to vote for and right, I mean that
they're just going to bet that she's lying.
Speaker 4 (17:08):
So how many people in the middle of the road
politically are going to buy her bs that she's flipped
on all these positions. I don't think that's why she's
going to lose the race, right, I don't think it's
a sale she can make.
Speaker 2 (17:18):
Yeah, no, I and listen.
Speaker 1 (17:21):
This is where we get into those other subjective I
think powerful currents in the race, and that is that
the swing states are the swing states for a reason,
that the swing state voters who go back and forth
and decide these elections are like that for a reason.
And they know they know about her from the three
and a half years she's been VP, but they also
(17:43):
know that she didn't get a single vote, that she
wasn't elected. She doesn't have the gravitas, she doesn't have
the weight, she doesn't have the credibility that comes from
winning a primary. They know that Joe Biden was deposed,
They know this whole set of circumstances, all of that
ways against her, and in race as close as this
(18:04):
one may well be, I think all of those currents
are really going to matter, and they're going to break
in Trump's favor. Eight five five for zero five eight
two five to five. Come back to our lines, come
back to great Texters. But what do you want to hear?
Dana Bash, not ask, but pursue with Kamala Harris.
Speaker 2 (18:19):
Tomorrow, You're on the Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 3 (18:28):
You're listening to the Dan Kaplass Show podcast.
Speaker 2 (18:31):
Have you not agreed to muted microphones?
Speaker 9 (18:34):
Yill.
Speaker 10 (18:34):
I think we've made pretty clear our pooks, how along
with Donald Trump himself, is for unmuted microphones. I think
the question that you got to ask is to Donald
Trump and his and his team. Are they in agreement
between themselves on how we should approach this debate because
we are in agreement with Donald Trump that he should
be live and unmuted microphone.
Speaker 2 (18:50):
Yeah, fascinating.
Speaker 1 (18:51):
You know again, it comes back to it appears to
be the emo of the Harris campaign. That's somehow, you know,
being angry and being mean and being jerks is some
kind of substitute for real strength because you get that
attitude from them. You get that attitude from these various
(19:13):
spokespersons in almost every single interview. But Berman on CNN
did a great job of pinning down the hair spokesperson
and at times appeared openly frustrated with the hair spokesperson.
Just said, Hey, I just want to know. ABC has
said these are the rules. The mics are muted. Do
you agree to the rules and listen In the end,
the mics are going to be muted and it's absolutely
(19:36):
critical for Donald Trump that they be muted, not for
the reason everybody's talking about. Because everybody says, oh, yeah,
it's to Trump's benefit that the MIC's off when he's
not talking, because then he won't interrupt as much and
look bad and turn off photers. I understand that's the
popular perception, and you know, maybe there's truth in that,
but but that's not the reason the Harris camp is
(19:58):
so furiously dedicated to getting those mics on. Here's their problem. Okay, Obviously,
obviously Kamala Harris has some kind of challenge, some kind
of issue, some kind of processing issue that makes it
very difficult for her to think on her feet. We've
seen that a million times, right, That's why they hide her.
(20:19):
That's why she needs Tim Walls with her for a
friendly tomorrow with CNN. So she's got this issue wherever
it comes from, and we may never know the origin
she's got this problem. But when the mics are muted,
when Trump's mike is off, what he's able to do
is what he did to Biden, and this gets very
(20:40):
little attention.
Speaker 7 (20:41):
Ryan.
Speaker 2 (20:42):
He gets to chirp at her.
Speaker 1 (20:46):
And distract her, and the audience doesn't know he's doing
it because his mic'saw.
Speaker 2 (20:51):
It right, and that really threw Biden off.
Speaker 1 (20:54):
Now, you could take somebody super sharp like okay, Barack
Obama was a s'more on smart guy who did moronic
things that really hurt the country. But a very very
smart guy, even a super smart, sharp on his feet
normally guy like Obama would have a hard time with, say,
if John McCain had been chirping at him and the
audience couldn't hear McCain chirping at him.
Speaker 2 (21:17):
So it's a tremendous.
Speaker 1 (21:18):
Advantage for Trump to be able to throw her off
like that without the audience being able to hear him
doing it. That's why it's so critical that the current
rules stay in effect, and his might be off when
it's not his turn to speak. That's what the Harris
campaign is so concerned about. Brian and Arvada. You're on
(21:39):
the Dan Kapla show. Welcome, Hey Brian. Hmm, okay, Brian
is a soft spoken type. We've had a little trouble
with that phone line. Let me get to some of
these texts, and there are a great great text eight
five for zero five, A two five five text Dan
five seven seven three nine. Dan lawyers are known to
(22:01):
have pretty good I cus Ta kamaa get up pass
in grading her academics. Somehow, Bob and nerveda great question, Bob, No,
I listen. I'm the guy who's constantly saying on air,
she is not a dummy, she is not a stupid person.
There are all different types of smart, and there are
lots of smart people who have processing issues. I mean,
(22:23):
they may be intellectually smart, but they can't process quickly,
they can't think on their feet, they can't defend a position.
Then you get smart people who have other overlays. You
can get some really smart people who then don't process
as well. They aren't cognitively as intact because they have
other kind of impairments. So I believe that she's an
(22:43):
intelligent person who has processing issues and has some kind
of challenge. So I don't think she's any dummy. I
just think she's incapable of being president because of these issues.
Speaker 3 (22:55):
She failed the California bar the first time.
Speaker 1 (22:58):
Ryan, I know so many great lawyers who find the
bar from I was very blessed to pass. And I'm told,
don't we just sound like Trump? And I'm told was
at the very top of my class, not number one
or two, and they don't keep a formal rank.
Speaker 2 (23:10):
But I knew somebody who knew.
Speaker 1 (23:12):
Okaypective, but just let me, can I emphasize one thing,
Kelly again, not to be redundant. There are so many
truly great lawyers who failed the bar the first time, because, guys,
the bar exam is not about your ability to practice law,
It's about your ability to take a test.
Speaker 2 (23:33):
Yes, Kelly, thank you. Okay.
Speaker 9 (23:36):
From a woman's perspective, she's not very intelligent.
Speaker 1 (23:41):
You're not into kind of the fine points of processing
issues or any of that.
Speaker 2 (23:47):
Okay, you know.
Speaker 9 (23:48):
I would say if it was one or two occasions
where it was a processing error, like sometimes Trump will
speak and he'll bloviate and do all of those things
that we all kind of go.
Speaker 6 (24:05):
Really do you have to go there?
Speaker 2 (24:07):
But for her it's a recurring condition, thank you.
Speaker 1 (24:14):
I do think, Kelly, there is an obvious functional problem.
Speaker 4 (24:19):
I think you said this before, Dan, and I absolutely
think a spot on. She has some kind of social
anxiety disorder when she's doing these weird things with laughing
at her own jokes, but nobody else is laughing. The
coconut tree thing like, very bizarre behavior and social settings.
Speaker 3 (24:34):
I think that's part of it.
Speaker 2 (24:35):
And I have not drawn any conclusions because I can't.
Speaker 1 (24:38):
No, Listen, I spend my life, you know how, I
spend my days with subpoena power. I spend my days
examining witnesses under oath, obtaining documents through subpoenas, drilling down
to get to the truth. Ryan, And this I can
tell you. I can't possibly know the origin of her
functional impairment without subpoena power access to her medical records
(24:58):
that stuff.
Speaker 2 (24:58):
But all I know is there is one. There is
a functional.
Speaker 1 (25:02):
Impairment, and it's the type which prevents her from being
an effective president. And that's separate apart from policy. I mean,
she shouldn't be president just based on policy. But this,
but listen, is one of those, Ryan, is one of
those potential explanations for this obvious functional impairment. Is it
possible that she has a major anxiety disorder which she
(25:26):
then either clinically and or self medicais for it. That's
one of a lot of different possibilities. Sure, but we
can't possibly know who was the Rogan skit. You should
pull that with a guy. Well, he did America's Wine, Mom.
And I'm not drawing any conclusions. I'm not saying it's
this or it's that. I'm just saying it's obviously something,
and that's why they're hiding her.
Speaker 3 (25:48):
They have to, and that's very true.
Speaker 4 (25:50):
There was also talk that even some of her closest
advisors were telling her, you've got to do a tough interview,
and she was adamant that that was not what she
was going to do.
Speaker 3 (26:01):
And there's just so much evidence.
Speaker 4 (26:03):
Dan, It's out there, it's on video, it's the recordings
that I do, all these deep thoughts that I have
with her of her saying these very strange, bizarre things
talking to kids about outer space. I mean, give you
hundreds of examples, but to the gut felled rule, you
can't give me one example where she said something very
profound that stands out.
Speaker 2 (26:22):
Oh, let's be fair, what about this one?
Speaker 11 (26:24):
And as a woman, there's a balance to be struck
between being tough.
Speaker 2 (26:32):
And being a bitch, or what about this one?
Speaker 11 (26:37):
So you're now no longer are you necessarily keeping those
private files in some file cabinet that's locked in the
basement of the house, it's on your laptop and it's
then therefore up here in this cloud.
Speaker 12 (26:53):
What about you know, we have to say woke, like
everybody needs to be woke, and you can talk about
if you're the WOKEUSS or woker, just stay more woke
than less woke.
Speaker 6 (27:08):
Do you think you just fell out of a coconut tree.
Speaker 2 (27:13):
Ryan, You're not being fair to her.
Speaker 7 (27:15):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (27:16):
Yeah, okay, yeah, but anyway, so my bottom line is
Dana Bash tomorrow is going to ask Kamala Harris lots
of tough questions and that will be meaningless. That'll be
a favor to Harris because what Dana Bash isn't going
to do is follow up. She isn't going to pursue
Harris until she gets an answer. So that's why that
(27:38):
interview between that and the editing that's going to occur later.
Here's a question for you if if Waltz makes the
fatal mistake of stepping in to bail her out, Man's
plain would see an even show it or is that
just going to be edited out cutting room FLOORA yeah,
eight five five four zero five eight two five five
the number come back to our fiery text.
Speaker 2 (27:59):
You're on Dan Kapla Show.
Speaker 3 (28:02):
And now back to the Dan Kaplas Show podcast.
Speaker 13 (28:05):
It's been nearly forty days since Kamala Harris became the
installed nominee of the Democrat Party, and she's finally sitting
down for an interview, but not by herself. She is
sitting down with her running mate, Tim Walls. And I
think it's quite sad that the woman trying to be
the first female president of the United States needs her
male running mate by her side in her first sit
(28:28):
down interview.
Speaker 1 (28:29):
Yeah, that's that's a Trump spokesman. But it's an undeniable truth.
And I think that's a big key to these close
races is what are the undeniable truths that are important
enough that many of these swing voters are going to
be aware of them? And this is one of those
that she's not able to go to this friendly interview
(28:50):
on her own. She has to bring her running mate,
who happens to be male. That's so bad for her
without anybody having to make the argument, right. I mean
that the really winning points are the points that voters
realize on their own, and you just have to present
the information and then they draw that own conclusion. Because
(29:10):
it's so obvious and true. So Harris knows this, The
cabal knows this. So why are they doing it anyway? Well,
because they have to, because she has some kind of impairment,
functional impairment, which makes it necessary for her to do this.
(29:30):
I think that's the undeniable reality. I can't know what
that functional impairment is. I don't think anybody from the
outside can know. People can guess, but all we can
know is it's a disqualifier. It's so bad that she
can't be present, and if she can't go to a
friendly interview and sit down on her own, she cannot
be president. I think Ryan, it'll never show up in
(29:52):
any particular poll. It won't be polled as an individual issue,
it won't be in the exit polls. But I wouldn't
be at all surprised if come election day this is
one of those five to ten points slash truce that
is having the greatest impact across the swing states on
election day, and it ties into the larger issue of weakness.
Speaker 2 (30:16):
But it's a big deal. Dan.
Speaker 1 (30:18):
Can you imagine President Kamala at a high level dinner
in France or Italy and suddenly plunking a cube of
ice into her white wine. That from Andy, I could
picture that I can't take it end as well for
our country. But yeah, Dan, why have you thought Ryan?
Speaker 2 (30:34):
Is it all fair?
Speaker 1 (30:35):
Yes, his agenda and rarely presents the other side. Ryan,
you have officially arrived, not that there was any doubt
when people are taking shots at you on somebody else's
show to know what's my agenda?
Speaker 3 (30:45):
Yeah?
Speaker 1 (30:45):
Yeah, doing what is your agenda other than your next date?
Speaker 2 (30:50):
Or yeah, what is your ronda?
Speaker 1 (30:52):
Yeah it's Oh, by the way, I got to work
this in before the end of the show. If there's
two contributions I hope to have made to society, one
is warning people all the time when the light turns green,
look both ways because so many people are running red lights.
But the other is predicting the outcome of CEU games
and see.
Speaker 2 (31:13):
You opener tomorrow night.
Speaker 1 (31:14):
A very good North Dakota State team. Many experts picking
North Dakota State. I think CEU will not only win,
but will win by a lot, bigly, bigly. Yes, I
think this is a very good see team. I just
start with the fact that you have the best quarterback
in the country. That's a pretty good starting point. Dan
(31:36):
If Kamala has all these issues you Ryan and Kelly
are implying, aren't her accomplishments pretty good? In spite of those? Texter,
thank you? Please call the show. I'd want to ask
you what accomplishments. I'd really I would love to know
what accomplishments. I understand that. Yeah, she became San Francisco DA.
(31:59):
I understand, became an elected United States senator. I understand
she was selected to be vice president and became vice
president when Joe Biden won. But what are her accomplishments
within all of that? And remember, she was picked by
Biden because of her weakness, not because of any accomplishments,
(32:21):
just like Obama picked Biden because of his weakness. Obama
wanted somebody as VP who nobody out there would want
as president, and that's what Biden did. He picked Kamala Harris,
who got knocked out two months before the Iowa primaries
because she was so bad she made him look good,
just like Biden was so bad, he made Obama look good.
(32:44):
So she didn't get to be VP because of accomplishments.
And obviously she didn't get a single vote here to
become nominee. So I'd like to have that conversation, because
I garan friggin tee this. There are millions and millions
and millions of far more accomplished people than Kamala Harris.
(33:06):
You've never heard of and I'll never hear of. My father, Okay,
infinitely more accomplished than Kamala Harris. He wasn't elected to this,
he wasn't elected to that. You know, he wasn't a
household name outside of our household. Everybody knew him, respected
him a little bit different than Kamala Harris, but he
was far more accomplished. My mother, who could have been
(33:27):
anything and gave it all up for the toughest job
in the world raising we five bancheese? Is that proper
grammar Ryne? My mother was a million times more accomplished
than Kamala Harris. So what accomplishments are we talking about here?
Speaker 2 (33:44):
Dan?
Speaker 1 (33:44):
As Jessa Otel said, she's thick as a brick. I
think she's an intelligent person who has functional, some kind
of functional impairment that disqualifies her from the job. Ah,
we have so many other great texts. I'd say I'm
going to try to get to some of these.
Speaker 2 (33:59):
Tomorrow.
Speaker 1 (34:00):
John Caldera will have the show tomorrow. I'll be back Friday.
But you know John, if you're new to the area,
John is iconic, and he's funny, and he's a historian.
He's seen so much happen in Colorado over the year,
so he'll have his own fun, unique take on all
of this. And of course Ryan, you're gonna be here
with him, right and Kelly as well.
Speaker 3 (34:19):
We always have a good time.
Speaker 4 (34:20):
Usually we're talking about star treking Gilligan's Island and stuff
like that.
Speaker 3 (34:24):
But it'll be fun.
Speaker 1 (34:25):
Yeah, And we're just gonna have one of the great
family outings ever right, just our whole family. We're heading
up to Boulder. We're gonna have a little picnic on
far and Field. Awesome, wander over to the stadium. These
kids they were raised in folsom Field. They were going
there since they were babies. So it's just going to
be a real fun family outing. Hey, have a great,
(34:46):
safe night. Please be back on our show tomorrow.
Speaker 2 (34:48):
On The Dan Captain Show,
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal
Gregg Rosenthal and a rotating crew of elite NFL Media co-hosts, including Patrick Claybon, Colleen Wolfe, Steve Wyche, Nick Shook and Jourdan Rodrigue of The Athletic get you caught up daily on all the NFL news and analysis you need to be smarter and funnier than your friends.