Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is Dan Kaplis, and welcome to today's online podcast
edition of The Dan Kaplis Show. Please be sure to
give us a five star rating if you'd be so kind,
and to subscribe, download, and listen to the show every
single day on your favorite podcast platform. MAT used to
be in the warm up act. I used to be
in the main event, right, but we are the warmackt
(00:20):
warm up act four tonight and I've been dying to
get back on air since certain news broke last night.
So glad it is finally four h six in the
Rocky Mountain West. Glad you are here, hey, some of
the tidbits of news. This is fascinating to me. Kamala
Harris is already at the debate venue, right, already there
(00:43):
three hours in advance. Trump he's just rolling in, right,
He's I think his playing hasn't even landed yet in Philadelphia.
So you can see these two different styles. And there's
no right or wrong here. It's whatever works for you, right,
and Trump's done this a bunch and what works for him.
What's fascinating is I think on the campaign trail, very
(01:04):
very often, unless he's on the opposite coast, he'll fly
home sleep in his own bed and then fly back
out to wherever he's going the next day. So he's
got his routine, and that's great. Whatever works for him, Harris,
I mean, I can relate to her approach, which is
kind of the you know, typical regimented debate prep and
then getting to the venue early. I'm telling you, every
(01:26):
case I try, I am the first one at that
courthouse door when they open the door in the morning,
And to me, that's just I get a lot of
comfort from that. I want to get there early, I
want to get set up, I want to get in
the zone. So I understand her approach there. Now, she's
got much bigger problems, right because when we roll into court,
we're right, and we've got we got the fags, we
(01:49):
got the truth on our side. She's rolling in and
she's trying to pull a con. She's trying to pull
off the big lie. You know that she doesn't really
believe the things she believed or the things she currently believes.
I mean, it's just one big lie. So she's got
a much much tougher job there. Eight y five for
zero five eight two five to five The number text
(02:09):
DN five seven seven three nine and the reason I've
been so anxious to get back on air with you
is is what happened last night on CNN. And what
happened last night when CNN unleashed this story about the
twenty nineteen questionnaire that Kamala Harris filled out in that race,
(02:30):
which lays out all of her true beliefs right, and
we know they're her true beliefs for lots of different
reasons that we can review together. But obviously the big
news is that CNN decided to run that story and why.
And I am as convinced as my own name, I'm
convinced of anything I've ever known in my life that
(02:51):
I know the answer to that question. But I wanted
to play this sound for you first, and it truly
is remarkable. Now. We dabbled in this last week, Remember
when CNN ran that story about Kamala Harris the fifty
different times she had condemned the border wall and mocked
it and ridiculed it, and now she's adopting it and
(03:11):
claiming it's her own idea. And so we talked about, Okay,
why do you think they're doing that? But this thing yesterday,
this took it to a whole different level.
Speaker 2 (03:22):
Here's a taste a K file investigation has uncovered meanti
I'm a twenty nineteen questionnaire and in this questionnaire, Harris
laid out some much more liberal stances, among them on immigration.
So in twenty nineteen, and what K file found, she
said she would cut funding to ICE, writing, quote, our
immigrant detention system is out of control, and I believe
(03:43):
we must end the unfair incarceration of thousands of individuals, families,
and children. I was one of the first senators after
President Trump was elected to advocate for a decrease in
funding to ICE. Well, now, of course she's touting the
Biden administration's executive order to crack down on the border.
Speaker 1 (04:00):
And now, I hey, CNN's just getting warmed up.
Speaker 3 (04:02):
This questionnaire is really an interesting snapshot in time of
that twenty nineteen Democratic primary. Kamala Harris was trying to
get to the left of Bernie Sanders, she was trying
to get to the left of Elizabeth Warren. And you
really see that in a lot of these answers. And
I want to walk our viewers through a little bit
of what she said. Let's just take immigration and look
at what she said here. She said on immigration, she
(04:23):
made this open ended pledge to end immigrant attention. She
said she supported taxpayer funded gender transition surgeries for detained migrants.
She also said she.
Speaker 2 (04:33):
Taxpair funded gender transition surgeries for detainment change Mike actually
said she supported.
Speaker 3 (04:37):
She wrote both wrote and answered in the affirmative when
she was asked this, and she said she also supported
it for federal prisoners.
Speaker 1 (04:46):
So if there was any doubt about what CNN was
trying to do here and there's more and we'll get
it to you than what Aaron Burnett did at the end,
there just puts any doubt to rest, right, because listen,
she knew what was in this package. She knew what
he was going to say before he said it. I mean,
you know it's true. I know it's true. I've done
a ton of this TV stuff, some national, out of
it local, and they absolutely knew what was going to
(05:09):
be said before they said it. So why did she
decide then to pile on and to mock to make
sure everybody noticed it?
Speaker 3 (05:16):
Right?
Speaker 1 (05:16):
Why wait a second, hey, listener, if you're busy cooking something,
listen to this. She wants to use your taxpayer dollars
to pay for people in jail, to cut off their
body parts and change their sex. I mean, CNN, and
you can be sure this wasn't Aaron Burnett going rogue.
(05:37):
CNN wanted to make sure you caught that part. So
they were trying to do as much damage as possible.
And the fact that they led with immigration, well, listen,
everybody knows right now that is probably the number one issue,
even bigger than the economy, is the open borders. And
obviously the open borders undermind's the economy, etc. So why
(05:58):
why did they do this? Well, this brings me back
to something I was saying a week or two ago,
and that is and I think it's made one hundred
percent certain through that CNN report. The powers on the
left I'm not saying there one hundred percent unified, but
most of the powers on the left, and you can
(06:20):
be sure the Obamas they want Kamala Harris to lose.
They must have Kamala Harris lose. They are desperate to
have Kamala Harris lose. And the reason for that is
if she wins, it devastates the Democratic Party. And if
you're the Obamas, right, if you're the Obamas or any
(06:41):
of these big money people, in the Democratic Party has
been your tool. Literally you can do with it what
you want to accomplish your own purposes. You need that tool.
You need that tool intact, you need that tool functioning.
You need that tool able to pull off the lie
so you can win elections. And they know that Kamala
(07:01):
Harris is so terrible that she is going to do
enormous damage to their tool, to the Democratic Party over
the next four years. They need her to lose. That's
what this story is all about. You think the timings
a coincidence, coming the day before the debate. I'll play
some sound for in a few minutes. It'll prove part
(07:23):
of the reason CNN did that was to put pressure
on ABC, to put pressure on ABC to bring this
stuff up tonight because they need her to lose. And
think about it in a snapshot, and I'll put meat
on the bones as we take calls and texts. But
if you're Obama right now and you're looking at this scenario,
what you know is this she is so bad. She
(07:46):
is so lacking in what it takes to be president,
from intellectual capacity, to skills, etc. Judgment, all of that
that she is going to have by far, the most
terrible presidency we've known in our lifetime. This nation is
going to suffer in incalculable ways. Enemies are going to
(08:08):
be devouring her, the nation that the world's going to
be on fire, America may well be drawn into another war,
the economy is going to suffer greatly at every single front.
She is going to fail, and the nation's going to
take it out on the Democratic Party. So the Democrats
are then because of her failed presidency, they're going to
(08:31):
get wiped out in the midterms. They're going to get
wiped out in the Senate, which is setting up favorably.
Speaker 4 (08:36):
To begin with.
Speaker 1 (08:36):
They're going to get wiped out in the House in
the midterms, and then they're going to get wiped out
in twenty eight. So all of this quote good young
talent they have with all these terrible ideas, But the
Whitmers and the Newsoms and the Shapiros and all that talent,
they're on the bench for eight years because she's going
(08:58):
to be the sitting president. If she wins, she's going
to be their nominee. They can't depose a sitting president nominee,
though didn't they do that recently? Yeah, but they're not
going to be able to do it to her because
of their identity politics. So all this talent and quotes
is going to be on the bench for eight years,
and the GOP is assured of victory in four years.
(09:19):
And the GOP has a ton of young talent that
that's going to be competing to beat her in four years.
And here's the key, here's the cherry on top. The
Democratic Party is going to sacrifice all of that. It's
going to lose all of that, undergo all of that
harm if she wins in exchange for what not a
(09:40):
zilch nothing that matters to them, because you know what
matters to them. All that matters to them is the
US Supreme Court. And if she wins, they aren't going
to get any new justices during her four years. Maybe
they convince sodomority to step aside, but I doubt it.
But even if they can convince her to step aside,
(10:02):
they don't pick up a Conservative seat. So the Democrats
undergo this massive damage for the next eight years, her
four and then the damage beyond that in their view,
because the GOP wins, and what do they get in return?
They don't even get a Supreme Court seat. So yeah,
they want her to lose. That's why that CNN piece
(10:24):
ran back in a flash here on the Dan Caplass Show.
Speaker 4 (10:29):
And now back to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 3 (10:32):
You at the pledge to be slacked immigration detention by
fifty percent, close all family and private facilities, and decrease
funding for ICE and then the end and ICE detainers
with local law enforcement.
Speaker 2 (10:45):
I mean, these are things that you know, it would
be hard to think that you would come up with
taxpayer funding gender transitions for detained migrants. And yet this,
as you say, written and verbally.
Speaker 1 (10:56):
This is Aaron Burnett on CNN who then circles back
to it. So if there was ever any doubts CNN
ran this piece because they want her to lose, there
is none now. And I would love to hear anybody's
alternative explanation for that. If you just joined us, thank you.
I made the case in the last break for why
Barack Obama and the powers on the left want Harris
(11:16):
to lose this election, and I don't think there's any
doubt about it, and it's why both Obamas did not
want her as the nominee, and they came out and
they were public about that very early. They said they
wanted an open a process because they know that unless
Trump literally hands it to her, she is going to lose.
Speaker 4 (11:36):
And is that.
Speaker 1 (11:37):
Because oh, they know she's going to lose the debate tonight. No,
she's already been declared the winner. She'll be declared the
winner tomorrow. Has nothing to do with that. They know
a couple of things. A they know what's out there
on her right that we don't even know about yet.
I'm going to play something for you in a second
that guarantees her defeat. Guarantees her defeat, and you haven't
heard it yet, hasn't even been on your radar. It
(11:58):
guarantees her defeat unless Trump literally hands it to her.
And let me play it for you right now. So
nobody's speculating before we even get to this. The Obama's new,
the Obama's new, and Joe Biden new, because remember, Joe
Biden wants her to lose. Joe Biden wants the people
(12:19):
who humiliated him and deposed him and stripped him of
the nomination and his dignity, he wants them to fail.
That's why he forced Kamala Harris on him. But here
is what a loan will defeat her. And I know
there are five six different things we've played for you
before that alone would defeat her if played on a loop,
and swing states, this will make the margin very large,
(12:42):
because across America, this is so radical, this is so
far left, it is so insane that it'll cut through
all the noise and be an automatic disqualifier.
Speaker 3 (12:54):
The question from the ACLU was, since drug use is
better addressed as a public health issue through treatment in
another programming, will you support the decriminalization at the federal
level of all drug possession for personal use? And Harris
answers yes, Now what would that mean? Will it mean
the federal fentanyl, all all drug possession. That's the mess marijuana,
(13:14):
which she she lied to in her answer to this question,
But it also would mean yea cokain and things like that.
Speaker 1 (13:21):
Yeah, give me a break. This election's over unless the
Trump campaign is idiotic, and they're not. You think these
swing state voters are going to elect somebody who wants
to legalize crack, who wants to legalize meth, who wants
to legalize fentanyl. That's wacky, wacky stuff. And she already
(13:45):
wasn't gonna win because America is not going to elect
uh San Francisco radical, but legalizing meth, legalizing fentanyl. And
do you think people are gonna believe for a second
when she says, oh no, my attitude one that has changed?
Well when and why? I think people are going to
believe that for a second. No, And even if for
some reason they had any doubt, they're not going to
(14:06):
take the chance. So I'm not saying that Trump can't
lose this race. I'm saying she can't win. The only
way she ends up as president is if Trump hands
it to her. But the important point today is that's
why CNN ran this story. Obama and the powers on
(14:28):
the left want her to lose because if she wins,
she's going to be so terrible and her presidency is
going to be so terrible. The Dems get wiped out
in the midterms, they get wiped out in twenty eight
and all of their big so called talent is on
the bench for eight years. Yeah, all right, let's go
to the phone lines. Let's go to text. Boy, what
a night it's going to be. I'm sure you have
(14:49):
your ideas of what you want to see from Trump tonight.
I have mine and I think that some of mine
may surprise you, Dan. Do you think Harris says some
thing on one of the guys or gales, oh Hunter,
Jill Obama. That's why she was eventually picked as the
chosen one. Good question. No, she was picked by Biden
because he wants her to lose. He wants the Democrats
(15:09):
to lose. He wants the people who humiliated him and
deposed him to fail. He wants to be sitting there
on election night and crowing about the fact that, see,
I was the only one who can beat Trump. That's
why Biden forced Harris on them. Does anybody think for
a second that there was anybody else in the Democrat
hierarchy who wanted Harris not a chance. Obama's came right
(15:34):
out and said it. They wanted an open process. No,
Biden forced Harris on them, and they're stuck with her.
Speaker 4 (15:40):
Real quick, did you remember Gavin Newsome sitting down with
the hosts of Pod Save America, one of the biggest
left of center podcasts that's out there, and he very
coyly and sarcastically say, hey, had an you know, very
thorough process, and you know she's the rightful cannonary.
Speaker 1 (15:57):
Minutes is what he said, right, thirty minute Yeah, yeah,
totally mocked it. And he doesn't say that if you
think if he thinks she's going to be the next president, correct,
because he knows what's out there on her. And he
did it again today when he came out and he
talked about how she should do more interviews. But no,
(16:18):
they know what's out there. Explain to me. Can somebody
look me in the eye and tell me how Trump
loses this race when Kamala Harris is now on record
is wanting to legalize fentanyl and legalize crack and CNN's
pushing the story. Now, Ryan, how much pressure does that
put on ABC now to do something tonight with what
(16:38):
CNN reported. I think it puts ABC in a position
where they have to they.
Speaker 4 (16:43):
Have to And Dan, I want to ask you why CNN,
why Aaron Burnett specifically on her program and why now
this moment?
Speaker 1 (16:52):
I think, Well, they did it now. I think because
of the timing of the debate, right, and I think
they wanted it out there before the debate so it
would do more harm to Hey Harris, so ABC would
have to be tougher honor Trump could use it. Trump
would have to use it right because now it's in
the public domain. So I think that's the reason for
the timing. Ryan. I think, and this can only be
a guess, but my guess is that any doubt, any
(17:19):
doubt about whether she was going to lose this race,
was put to rest when she showed up at CNN
to do that spongebath. Because think about it, CNN knows
what happened there. They haven't released the transcript, they haven't
released the raw video. She was there for over an hour,
and they could only cobble together sixteen minutes of video
for that alleged interview, and sixteen minutes where Harris wasn't
(17:41):
very good most of the time. So I think CNN
probably looked at what happened that day and said, no,
she has got to lose. She's going to destroy us
if she's in office for four years. Hey, when we
come back, let's dive into what you want to see
Trump do tonight. And I'd love to hear from you.
I've got a very specific approach in mind, but I
(18:04):
do think it's going to surprise you on the issue
of how aggressive Trump should because everybody's talking about restrained
poise et cetera, which is all true, but how aggressive
he should be. I'll give you my thoughts here on
the Dan Caplis Show.
Speaker 4 (18:22):
You're listening to the Dankaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 3 (18:25):
The question from the ACLU was, since drug use is
better addressed as a public health issue through treatment and
other programming, will you support the decriminalization at the federal
level of all drug possession for personal use? And Harris
answers yes, Now what would that mean? Will it mean
the federal all all drug possession that's not just marijuana,
(18:45):
which she alluded to in her answer to this question,
But it also would mean yeah, level cokaine and things
like that.
Speaker 1 (18:53):
Yeah, yeah, sure, ticket to success in the Swing States,
legalize crack. No, here's a little hand for the less.
They don't get this because they just don't value human life.
That they don't see the inherent dignity and value. It's
all about the collective. Parents, including Democrat parents, love their
children much more than they love their political party. And
(19:14):
a candidate who wants to legalize crack and fentanyl and math. No,
that candidate is not going to win, so she can
out win. Trump could lose if he hands it to her.
And I certainly don't expect that. Hey, let's go to
the VIP line. Welcome Christy Burton Brown back to the
Dan Kaplis Show. Fresh off a big win on property
tax reform, now pursuing one of the true work of
(19:37):
Angels issues out there, which is true school choice. You
want to talk about liberating all these poor kids and
giving all kids a fair opportunity, level playing field. The
Democrats worst night, maare right, Christy, because the Democratic Party
literally relies on a certain number of people not earning
much money. Because once people start earning sixty grand more
(20:00):
and a majority start voting Republicans, so they got to
keep people down. And once you have true school choice
and all these kids, and all these kids of color,
they have an equal opportunity or a roughly equal opportunity
in education, guess what they're going to break out of
that cycle. They're going to prosper and the left is dead.
Speaker 5 (20:19):
Right.
Speaker 6 (20:19):
Well, Dan, I think you hit on a couple of
spential points there, as always. But first of all, that
parents care more about their kids succeeding than they do
their political party. That's one reason this amendment it's going
to be a mint eighty on the ballot is so
popular across the political spectrum, no matter what party you
belong to. Across Colorado, most voters think that parents should
(20:39):
get a choice in kids' education. That one size doesn't
fit all in that charter school, of private schools, homeschool,
traditional neighborhood public school should be open to all kids.
And you're so right about the economic and racial diversity
that opens up in charter schools, in particular in Colorado
that the Left sometimes doesn't like at all, but they
actually serve more economically and racially diverse populations than traditional
(21:04):
public schools.
Speaker 1 (21:05):
Yeah, which is another overtly racist and effect policy of
the Democratic Party to a post school choice.
Speaker 6 (21:11):
Right.
Speaker 1 (21:11):
I mean, you saw the movie Waiting for Superman. You
saw those lines of people of color literally for blocks
to try to get in and qualify for that charter
school program in DC, and Michael Bennett and the Democrats
just moved to crush all of that.
Speaker 6 (21:27):
Yeah. No, and we're seeing that in Colorado. That's one
reason that at Advanced Colorado we're bringing this measure because
the legislature is beginning to attack charter schools try and
shut them down. In Colorado. There are anti charter school
districts across the state. That to your point, Dan, doesn't
matter that hundreds of parents, literally hundreds, are on waiting
lists and say we want to send our kids to
(21:49):
this charter school and the district just says, Nope, don't
want to let it in. That shouldn't be happening in Colorado,
a state where people claim to support choice often right.
Speaker 1 (22:00):
Jared Paulus in the Left, you have the choice to
dismember the child seconds before it's born, but the parents
shouldn't have the choice where to send the kid to
school if they decide to let it live, So they
can have the choice to dismember, have it dismembered seconds
before birth, but not where to send the baby to school.
Speaker 6 (22:18):
I mean, it doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
If you are a party that's going to claim you're
for all choices, school choice should be an easy one.
And honestly, Dan, as you know, I mean, you and
I are extremely pro life and we'd love to fix
that issue. I hope we fully do one day. But
I think when we look at education across the political spectrum,
(22:38):
people want choice, they want educational options. It consistently pulls
extremely high. You know, this. One reason Ron DeSantis one
in Florida, It's one reason Bill Owens one in Colorado
so many years ago, is because they said, hey, we're
going to make sure we allow more and better schools
in every area so that all kids can succeed.
Speaker 1 (23:00):
Yeah. No, that's right. But but again, the Democratic Party
knows it's the deaths of them if all of these
children of color and others succeed, right, I mean, it
is the death of them. They depend on dependency. The
Democratic Party depends on dependency on government.
Speaker 6 (23:16):
Right. Well, and you've seen that Democrat Party actually in
Colorado just put out their list of recommendations on pallet measures,
and they're recommending a no vote on the right to
school choice. Yeah, which is been bipartisan for decades. I mean.
And Jared Polis himself actually has at least said that
he supports school choice in Colorado. Michael Buddett has claimed
(23:37):
to support school choice, though he didn't exactly do it
in DC.
Speaker 1 (23:41):
Well, Polis can prove it here with eighty, right, it
could prove it by supporting eighty.
Speaker 6 (23:50):
We love that, you know, it's a basic and this
is the thing that I think voters need to know
about him. In the eighty It's basic, it's simple, it's
common sense. A lot of school choice measures across the
nation have had programs to them. This one doesn't. It's
a simple statement of rights. School choice is a right
here in Colorado, putting that in the constitution, and Dan,
this matters to a lot of your listeners. It also
(24:11):
says the parents have the right to direct the education
of their child, not the government, but parents right.
Speaker 1 (24:16):
And Christy Burton Brown, our guest with Advanced Colorado. Obviously,
the only success Jared Poulis cares about is his own,
and he is willing to sacrifice an awful lot of
kids killed before birth, an awful lot of kids deprived
of equal opportunity and education if it advances Jared Poulis.
And what a small and sad way to live.
Speaker 6 (24:39):
I mean, you know, I would love to see him
come out strong for school choice. I don't think that's
a huge, huge leaf from what he claims to believe.
Same with a lot of elected officials across Colorado. And
we are seeing a growing list of people across the
political spectrum endorse this amendment and say, yeah, school choice
is a hallmark of Colorado. It's not necessarily a partisan
(25:01):
thing in those often conservatives who spearhead the fights when
it comes down to voting for it and putting it
into law. I think we can all work together to
get this one.
Speaker 1 (25:10):
Done well right, and eventually this is going to succeed.
And I think you in advanced Colorado are so wise
to be pushing it because when we talk about changing
voting habits, right, I mean, how do you reach the
folks who whether they're folks like you know, our family
growing up in Chicago, whether there are folks who happen
(25:30):
to be of color who have these habitual kind of
vote for Democrat patterns. You know, it's through issues like
this where you point out, hey, wait a second, these
Democrats have been keeping your kids down for decades, and
here's how we can liberate them and give them a
fair chance. That's the sort of thing that I think
is going to break the cycle, the economic cycle, and
(25:52):
break voting habits.
Speaker 6 (25:54):
And I agree with you, Dan, it has to be
a focus on issues in a state like Colorado, where
you know, people like to fi different parties with different
brands that aren't necessarily accurate, but when they see, huh,
who is it, who's actually fighting for choice and education,
for keeping violent criminals in jail, for solving property taxes,
for funding law enforcement, all these things that most voters
agree with. Oh, it is conservative to our fighting for it.
(26:19):
I think that issue focus can reach across party lines
and draw people in.
Speaker 1 (26:23):
Yeah. And in the end, Christy, I think there are
a few things out there that can dramatically change America
for the better quickly than true school choice. And you
know it wouldn't happen in two weeks, but put it
could certainly happen in a decade or too. Dramatic change.
And so I'm really glad you're on this And where
(26:43):
could people go to learn more and to support it?
Speaker 6 (26:47):
Thank you, Dan Advance Colorado dot org to give you
plenty of information about our ballot measures and how you
can join us.
Speaker 1 (26:53):
Wonderful. Well, hey, look forward to the next visit. And
I know you're not going to watch this so called
debate tonight.
Speaker 6 (26:59):
Right, I'm going to hide one of the people that
just have to.
Speaker 1 (27:04):
Okay, so fifteen seconds, what's your prediction. What's this going
to look like? Who's going to win?
Speaker 6 (27:11):
I think Trump will do it. I think he's going
to use self control like he mostly did in the
debate against Biden, and he will show that Kamala Harris
does not have a plan that stands out from the
last three years of Biden.
Speaker 1 (27:23):
Christy, appreciate the time. Talk soon, Thanks Dan, Thank you,
take care. And this is hilarious. Kamala Harris has been
at the venue for the so called debate since before
this show started. Here's Trump planes rolling up right, and
I love his style. Right, plane's rolling up right now.
He's just going about his normal day. He's gonna get
(27:46):
off the plane. They'll roll over there, get there with
a few minutes to sparin. Hey, I like that style,
and I trust he will be ready when we come back.
We'll go to phone and text. But I want to
tell you what I think he needs to do, what
I think he will do tonight and why why No
matter what happens tonight, No matter what happens tonight, Donald
(28:08):
Trump cannot lose the election tonight, but Kamala Harris can
so no matter what happens tonight, Donald Trump can win
it tonight. He can put it away tonight, but he
cannot lose it tonight. You're on the Dan Caplas Show.
Speaker 4 (28:24):
And now back to the Dan Kaplis Show podcast.
Speaker 1 (28:27):
This is on Take the Same today.
Speaker 5 (28:30):
But I do want to ask you about the CNN report.
It shows Harris voice support for cutting funding for ICE
and for using taxpayer money to fund transgender surgery for
detained migrants in twenty nineteen. Does the Vice President still
support those positions and do you expect her to address
them tonight?
Speaker 1 (28:47):
Wait a second before I get to the answer from
the Harris spokesperson. What the question needs to be is
is that Stiller position? If not, when did it change
and why? So questions and you'll hear them tonight from ABC.
Is this still your position? Are meaningless? You got to
(29:09):
pin her down on when did that change and why?
But listen to the answer.
Speaker 4 (29:17):
Listen.
Speaker 7 (29:17):
I think you know, these old questionnaires are a complete
distraction from the task at hand right now, I think
the Vice and frankly, what the American people are actually
asking about, right but the American people are concerned about,
and what they're asking about is who's going to solve
for border security?
Speaker 1 (29:32):
Now? They're asking who the blank is?
Speaker 3 (29:34):
She?
Speaker 1 (29:36):
He poses it a questionnaire from twenty nineteen, is if
it answered itself? No, these are her stated positions, but
here's what really matters and the reason I played that
sound for you. ABC chose to ask about it today,
and we open this show by playing the CNN sound
from yesterday where they buried Harris with these indefensible positions
(29:58):
that are meant to under mind her campaign. That's why
CNN ran the story because Obama and others on the
left need her to lose. She knows she's going to
be a terrible president who will do tremendous harm to
the Democratic Party. That's why CNN ran the story. But
then ABC felt the pressure to go ahead and ask
that question today of the Harris campaign. Does that mean
(30:21):
you'll get a question like that in the debate tonight?
We'll find out. I think it probably does. Let's go
to Stephen's Point Wisconsin. Then I'll come back and explain
why I tease before the break that Trump can win
it tonight, he can put it away tonight, but he
cannot lose it tonight. Now i'll explain why Cynthia from
Stephen's Point Wisconsin, you're on the Dan Kaplis, she'll welcome.
Speaker 8 (30:43):
Oh, thank you so much. Dan. Just wanted to let
you know that I was at the Trump Rowley on
Saturday with my grandchildren. Oh wow, and yes they're in.
They're all of voting age, which is wonderful. And they
that's Trump a hundred great plus plus my husband was
one of fifteen children and all of his nieces and
(31:09):
nephews and there's hundreds of them. Band they're all Trump supporters.
Speaker 1 (31:13):
That's awesome.
Speaker 8 (31:14):
Hispanic we go Hispanic Trump supporters and it's wonderful.
Speaker 1 (31:18):
Nice.
Speaker 8 (31:19):
But at the rally dance there were I had to
be over eight thousand people. It was amazing, and we
were right in front and President Trump was acknowledging all
of us. It was just wonderful.
Speaker 1 (31:32):
Oh that is awesome. And so, Cynthia, how do you
persuade a neighbor who say undecided? The people already voting
for Harris, there's no chance to persuade them. But folks
who are undecided, how do you do that?
Speaker 6 (31:46):
Well?
Speaker 8 (31:47):
I think I believe, first of all, I go back
to the Trump record when he was in office from
sixteen to twenty and show them exactly what he has
done for the Middle American people, which which are who
we are? And I would I would probably key in
(32:08):
on those certain economy points, the border.
Speaker 1 (32:13):
And the border. Well, Cynthia, we know, we know this, right,
we know. If you help Trump win Wisconsin, the race
is over, right, I mean, yeah, yeah, it's well, good
luck up there, thanks to the call.
Speaker 8 (32:28):
Yes, you're welcome, Thank you appreciate it.
Speaker 4 (32:30):
What a neat lady on Wisconsin.
Speaker 1 (32:32):
Yeah, boy, you win Wisconsin. Now, obviously, if you win Wisconsin,
it probably means you win Pennsylvania and or Michigan, just
the whole carryover. But yeah, you win Wisconsin. Backbreaker. Here's why,
in my humble opinion, Trump can absolutely put the race
away tonight, but he cannot lose it tonight. And the
reason he can put it away tonight is Kamala Harris. Right,
(32:55):
Americans know at this point, you can see it's showing
up in the polls that come. Alla Harris doesn't have
the basic skills necessary to be present. And Americans also
know that it's she's not a legitimate nominee. She didn't
win any votes. There was a coup and the guy
who won all the votes was deposed and she was installed.
Americans know that that combination before you even get to
(33:17):
her fire radical San Francisco stuff. Yeah, so Americans right
now have these grave doubts about her. All that a
lot of people are waiting on is for Trump to
give them permission to vote for him by being hinged
instead of unhinged. They know their life was better during
the Trump years. They just want to see that he's
(33:38):
hinged so he can put it away tonight. He can
win tonight. The reason he cannot lose tonight is because
she is so awful. And that's not a peturity if
I mean, we have new evidence today, right, she favors
in her heart and it was her formal position before.
She favors legalization a crack. Right. She's so awful ideologically
(34:03):
on so many different fronts. She's so dishonest now as
she tries to deny what she really stands for. That's
a terrible combination for her and the Democrats. So even
if Trump had a horrible night tonight, and he won't,
even if he had a horrible night tonight, he can
still win this thing because she is so bad, and
because he did have a very successful peace and prosperity
(34:26):
first presidency. And so yeah, it's similar to and believe me,
I think he's gonna have a good night. But it's
similar to why and how he was able to win
an election occurring just weeks after the excess Hollywood tapes
came out, because Hillary Clinton was so bad and Kamala
(34:47):
Harris is much worse than Hillary Clinton. So Trump has
a chance to put it away tonight when we come back.
How we think he can do that here on the
Dan Capla Show.