Dan takes call on who won the Presidential Debate

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:06):
Ladies and gentlemen in this corner from the University of Colorado,
thirty years in the rain, fighting for truth, justice and
the American Way.

Speaker 2 (00:22):
Good Man, this is the American Way right on full display.

Speaker 3 (00:25):
I mean, we're just kind of hours away, right from
this race being decided.

Speaker 2 (00:29):
It's so close you feel like you could reach out
and touch it. And what do we have.

Speaker 3 (00:34):
We got the choice to write, We've got the choice
whether to keep our country, keep our country as we've
always known it, keep our country as it served the world,
or we have a choice to become something very unlike America.
And once that happens, who knows if there's a chance
to turn back eight five to five for zero five
eight two five five the number. But I know you

(00:55):
know all that, which is why you listen to shows
like this, whether you're on the right, which most people
the audience are, or whether you're on the left. We
appreciate having you here and so many folks who just
bounce back and forth right kind of right in the middle.
I put my wife in that camp, registered Democrat forever.

Speaker 2 (01:11):
Somebody.

Speaker 3 (01:11):
I think my daughter told me, excuse me, that she
recently became unaffiliated. I've got to ask her about that,
but she's always kind of bounced back and forth. Like
John McCain asked her to host a town hall for him,
and she did that even though she was a registered Democrat.
So you get all those folks too. And all I'm
saying right now is as we are in this absolutely

(01:34):
critical phase. So great to be taking this ride with you.
Eight five five four zero five eight two five five
and something big every day, right like today President Trump
comes out and says, okay, there isn't going to be
a third debate. Love to hear from you. Do you
think he's right or wrong to do that? Does it
make him look weak? Does it make him look strong,
make him look like a winner, make him look like

(01:55):
a loser? Is it going to have any impact on
the arc of the race? To get your take on that?
Have some fresh Thank you, Kelly, sound normally to be
Ryan pulling it, but he claims to have COVID Is
that right? So where do you go to get these
falsified tasks? You know, whatever you need to take? What's
he taking now? A four or five day vacation? But

(02:15):
our friend Ryan on the DL today, so kind of
like Ferris Bulett, right, just get everybody praying for Ryan
and then he can enjoy himself out of the game.
All right, here is the latest from President Trump today.
He's talking both about, you know, not doing a third
debate and then hitting a theme that I think is

(02:37):
absolutely perfect.

Speaker 4 (02:40):
But I am angry about Venezuelan gangs taking over.

Speaker 3 (02:43):
An Okay, my bad. I took that in reverse order.
Here's how it starts, and then he gets to that
messaging you just got a taste of, which I think
is man. I think this is right on target.

Speaker 4 (02:54):
There will be no third debate.

Speaker 5 (03:00):
Way.

Speaker 4 (03:00):
The voting has already begun. You got to go out
and vote. We gotta vote. We're gonna this is gonna
be the most important vote in the history of our country.

Speaker 2 (03:10):
It will be the most important.

Speaker 4 (03:12):
People said that I was angry.

Speaker 2 (03:14):
At the debate, angry, very angry.

Speaker 4 (03:18):
And yes, I am angry because he allowed twenty one
million illgal aliens invading our communities. Many of them are criminals,
many are criminals. I'm angry. They said, he's an angry person. No,
they're destroying our country. I don't like she's you know,
she's smiling, Oh, practice right, did you see it?

Speaker 5 (03:40):
She's like.

Speaker 4 (03:42):
We're talking about a border invasion the likes of which
no country has ever suffered. And she's like this, but
I am angry about Venezuelan gangs taking over Aurora, Colorado
and illegal Haitian So he came in, illegal Haitian migrants

(04:03):
taking over a beautiful place. It was so beautiful Springfield, Ohio.
I was there. I campaign there a while ago. Springfield,
it was so beautiful. Now it's just what a place.
Can you imagine? You have this small little community, all
of a sudden, you have twenty thousand illegals in your community.

Speaker 2 (04:24):
Nobody knows where they come from.

Speaker 4 (04:27):
I'm angry about young American girls being raped and sodomized
and murdered by savage, criminal aliens. I'm angry about rampant
inflation destroying our middle class, and the American people are
also very angry about that.

Speaker 3 (04:44):
And see, I think this general messaging is right on
target that yeah, he's angry, but it's righteous anger, it's
justified anger. If you can't get angry at injustice, then
you are a waste of breath, You're waste of space,
and you sure as hell shouldn't be president of the
United States if you cannot get angry at this kind

(05:06):
of injustice. So I think that's generally great messaging, and
it's a great contrast because on the other hand, you
have her even the other night, and she really blew
it right because, and I understand, compared to the in
the basement expectations for her, for good reason, she exceeded
those by a mile, because she was thoroughly protected by ABC.

Speaker 2 (05:27):
But but she blew it.

Speaker 3 (05:30):
Because she had this one opportunity, which is why she
started begging for that second debate right away. She had
this one opportunity to look the American people in the
eye and convince them she's not a phony, convince them
she's not a liar, Convince them that she has actually
changed these wacko positions of hers and for good reason,

(05:50):
and explain why. And she wouldn't even try to do it.
And that's how she blew it. So that's why she's
begging for a second debate. She missed her opportunity, and
she couldn't have delivered on that anyway, because the truth is,
she has not changed those positions. It's a lie to
say she's changed those positions. So that's why she's begging

(06:13):
for a second debate. Now, I know we have great
callers and textures who disagree with Man that they think
Trump looks weak for not being willing to agree to
what would be a third debate. Actually, I think it's
exactly the opposite. But I want to hear from those
who disagree, and we'll start with eerie Mike. But here's
the point. If Trump agrees to this third debate, then
she just portrays that is see, he's admitting he lost,

(06:36):
He's admitting he lost, he needs a rematch because he lost,
And then she would use the specter of the upcoming
third debate to distract from the truth about her. Trump
would be an idiot to agree to a third debate
because then you take up all the oxygen in the room.
You want every bit of focus you can get right
now on who she really is.

Speaker 2 (06:58):
And you've been blessed with all of this.

Speaker 3 (07:00):
It's on video, all of this stuff on video of
her saying incredibly far left stupid things that are going
to bury her. So why in the world would Trump
want to agree to a third debate and distract from
stuff like this.

Speaker 2 (07:15):
And it's a specific phase of life.

Speaker 6 (07:16):
Remember, age is more than a chronological fact. What else
do we know about this population eighteenth through twenty four?

Speaker 2 (07:23):
They are stupid.

Speaker 6 (07:27):
That is why we put them in dormitories, and they
have a resident assistant.

Speaker 2 (07:34):
They make really bad decisions.

Speaker 3 (07:36):
And you got twenty more of these right everything. We
got the tape right here, and we played it first.
I don't think anybody else is airing it out there
of her saying, yeah, she wants taxpayer dollars for sex
change operations for illegals in prison. No, don't distract from
any of that. So I think he's doing exactly the
right thing in this messaging that Yeah, okay, she's so
happy over there, because you know what, She's happy we

(07:59):
have open borders. She's happy that our elections soon are
going to be decided by people who who aren't Americans, right, because.

Speaker 2 (08:09):
That's all Democrat plan.

Speaker 3 (08:10):
Get all these people here and eventually have them be
able to vote. She's happy about And you go down
through this laundry list, and then Trump says, I'm not
happy about this. I'm angry about this. I want to
change it. Which of those do you think is the
winning message?

Speaker 2 (08:24):
Let's go to Eerie. Mike, you're on the Dan Kapla Show. Welcome.

Speaker 5 (08:29):
Hey, Mike, I agree with you that I think it
would be foolish of Trump to debate again, but for
a different reason than you think. I think I liken
it too. I was playing golf of the colleague the
other day and we were playing match play and we're
just playing nine holes and I had him shut out
by seven, so you haven't ten bucks. And then I

(08:50):
gave an opportunity to get his money back on the night,
fulle because I was playing really well and I knew
it would again beat him again, and I did. And
I think that's exactly what she's like. She's thinking, is
that beat them like a drum?

Speaker 2 (09:01):
Yeah?

Speaker 5 (09:01):
And why not do it again? Why not do it again?

Speaker 2 (09:04):
Mike?

Speaker 3 (09:04):
Have you ever heard of a fighter. Have you ever
heard of a fighter who has just won a fight
saying he wants a rematch like a big prize fight.
Have you ever heard of that or seen it?

Speaker 5 (09:16):
I know you got the email talking points from Trump.
That's great, danwer.

Speaker 7 (09:20):
It.

Speaker 3 (09:20):
Just wave a white flag, Mike, Just wave a white
flag and say, Okay, Dan, you have a winning argument.

Speaker 2 (09:25):
I have nothing.

Speaker 5 (09:26):
And I'm telling you a true story that happened just
the other day. I wanted another Rema Donald Trump.

Speaker 3 (09:34):
Donald Trump should Donald Trump at this point should take
all the focus off of her awful record and who
she truly is by agreeing to a third debate, which
will then suck up all the attention.

Speaker 2 (09:47):
And I understand why you would want.

Speaker 3 (09:49):
That, because you want Trump to lose, right, I mean,
it's it's something my mom told me when I was
very young. Never take advice from people who want you
to fail. And do you want Trump to fail?

Speaker 2 (10:01):
Right?

Speaker 5 (10:02):
Of course I want Yeah, of course I think he's
a danger.

Speaker 6 (10:06):
No.

Speaker 5 (10:06):
I think his whole strategy when he does a debate
is to say something so ridiculous like he did with
this evening of the Dogs and the Cats, that everybody
gets distracted and says, wait a minute. He couldn't even
answer a single policy question when I asked him.

Speaker 2 (10:22):
About uh, he answered a lot of policy questions. Mike
called on.

Speaker 3 (10:25):
I don't want you to go anywhere, but we have
to hit this hard break. In fact, if you look
at the internals of the post debate polling, yeah, you
have most people saying, Okay, she had a better debate,
But when you then get down to the issues that
matter to people, he actually gained on the economy, still
has an enormous lead over on immigration, et cetera. Some
the issues that matter most, including Warren Peace. You know,

(10:47):
I think he was a clear winner, but appreciate those
who disagree. So we'll come back to eerie mic. You're
on the Dan Kapla show, CBS News talking about Michigan.

Speaker 6 (10:58):
So I talked to twenty voters. Thought one of them
was undecided? Wow, not one And headlines come and go.
But let me tell you this support for former President
Trump is real and resilient. I encountered that everywhere I went,
and that's something the Harris campaign knows recognized as the
fact in Michigan.

Speaker 2 (11:16):
Yeah, that's in Michigan.

Speaker 3 (11:18):
And a new poll out in Michigan today had Trump
upped one in any one poll. Right, you have to
take with whatever. But this is part of an overall trend.
So on many many, many fronts looking very good.

Speaker 2 (11:30):
Right now.

Speaker 3 (11:31):
Now you will see, I mean CNN this big blaring headline,
first post debate poll Harris plus five.

Speaker 2 (11:38):
Holy cow.

Speaker 3 (11:39):
Well, I did a little research and I found out
what pole they're talking about. It's the Morning Console poll
where she has held a steady plus four lead, even
at the same time that the New York Times poll has.

Speaker 2 (11:52):
Trump up one.

Speaker 3 (11:53):
So yeah, that proves my point in Trump's favor that
even after the very best night Harris can have, because
of the corruption of ABC, the rigging of that event
by ABC, the best night she could possibly have, she
gains maybe a point, and many indicators she didn't even
gain that.

Speaker 2 (12:13):
So hey, let's go back to Mike.

Speaker 3 (12:15):
From Eerie kind enough to disagree with me. So Mike,
keep it going, my friend, we're having fun.

Speaker 5 (12:22):
No, I was just continuing my point that I wish
I had a mute button every time some discussion wasn't
doing exactly my way, Candy one, but oh you can
do that, just hang up. Yeah, I know. So my
point is is that when you're when you're on a roll,
you want to stay on a roll. You want to win,
you want to and when someone get somebody down, you
put your foot on their neck and you okay, And

(12:45):
that's what she's gonna do.

Speaker 2 (12:45):
Okay.

Speaker 8 (12:46):
So if we can move, he knows he's going to
get his asking if.

Speaker 3 (12:49):
We can maybe visit planet of Earth for a second.
So you're telling me in a presidential race that if
Kamala Harris said, is there.

Speaker 2 (12:59):
Something in the background there are you shoveling something? My friend?

Speaker 3 (13:03):
Oh, maybe just chipping on cement whatever. But anyway, so
you're telling us, well, one understand your premise that Kamala
Harris comes out of this debate believing she had done
what she needed to do to win the presidency, and
then she's going to say, oh, but that's not good enough.

Speaker 2 (13:20):
I want to put my boot on his throat.

Speaker 3 (13:22):
So even though I want and I'm going to win
the presidency, I want another debate.

Speaker 2 (13:27):
That's your theory.

Speaker 3 (13:32):
Okay, tell me this, then tell me this. Then did
she do enough in that debate to win the presidency?

Speaker 5 (13:40):
Well, certainly we won't know until between you.

Speaker 2 (13:45):
You're not claiming she did well.

Speaker 3 (13:47):
Just basic logic and truth tells you that if she
thought she was arking toward victory, she would not.

Speaker 2 (13:54):
Want to change that.

Speaker 3 (13:54):
Right, So the last thing she'd want to do would
be have another debate or something big could happen. If
she thinks she's on an arc to win, the last
thing she'd want is another debate. Well, okay, then explain
explain why, Explain why.

Speaker 5 (14:09):
My point is is that when you're playing well and
your opponent is playing poorly, which is what I perceived
happened Tuesday night. Do you want to keep that going?

Speaker 3 (14:17):
You want to know why are the polls, Why are
the polls not supporting your premise?

Speaker 5 (14:24):
It's Thursday, Dan, Okay.

Speaker 3 (14:26):
Let's let's talk about the CNN. Let's talk about the
CNN poll that came out right afterwards. And this was scientific.
They had the same group before him that they had
polled and measured, and they had everybody on dials. And
the CNN poll came out right afterwards, and you had
sixty percent say she won and forty percent say he won.
But she did not gain in the race, and he

(14:48):
extended his lead on the key issue of the economy,
and he kept his big lead on the key issue
of immigration.

Speaker 2 (14:55):
So how do you read into that that somehow she won?

Speaker 3 (14:59):
I mean, if if winning means winning the presidency and
the debate didn't gain anything for her, how's that a win?

Speaker 5 (15:07):
Dan? You said, I don't know how many times on
this program I listen to you on a casion, how
many times did you say, I don't believe this poll,
but I do believe.

Speaker 3 (15:15):
Okay, Well, okay, so you're telling us Mike, you're telling
us you do not believe the CNN poll. Okay, fine,
you don't believe the CNN poll they did that night.
Can you point to any post debate poll at this
point that suggests she changed the arc of the race
in her favor?

Speaker 5 (15:34):
Dan, she won the debate?

Speaker 2 (15:37):
Okay, all right, you know here's the difference.

Speaker 5 (15:39):
Mike.

Speaker 3 (15:40):
You don't have David Muir to help you here, so
I'll give you another chance. Are you going to answer
this very fair question directly? Have you seen any any
poll that suggests she changed the arc of this race
in her favor?

Speaker 9 (15:54):
No?

Speaker 5 (15:54):
Okay, all right, that's right.

Speaker 3 (15:58):
You'd rather call this show uninformed, and I understand that
can be if you're a Harris fan, you are unburdened
by what has been including Pole's I love that question.

Speaker 5 (16:07):
You asked the question. It was it smart that he
not debate. I answered your questions and I gave you
a serious to watch.

Speaker 3 (16:15):
Yeah, and we're grateful for that, Mike, But you couldn't
back it up.

Speaker 2 (16:18):
That's that's the point, my friend. Thank you. Our lines
are jammed, and listen. I love that I love that
it'll call and disagree.

Speaker 3 (16:26):
I love that he has a theory, but the bottom
line is, and I think it's undeniable. If she thought
she did enough that night to win, the last thing
she'd want is another debate.

Speaker 2 (16:37):
Well, why take the risk?

Speaker 3 (16:38):
She knows she can't have a better night than the
other night because she can't be more protected than that.
And if those ABC moderators had not been corrupt, if
they had not rigged it, if they had not election interfeered,
she would have crumbled. She would have crumbled on that
very first question. If David Muhr had just come back
and said, wait a second, men, a vice president, respectfully,
you didn't answer my question, do you think Americans are.

Speaker 2 (17:00):
Better off now than they were four years ago?

Speaker 3 (17:03):
She would have gone off into some kind of word
salad and the whole night would have gone south. For Carlos,
you're on the Dan Kaplis Show. Welcome, We'll come back
to our friend, Carlos. We'd only have about thirty seconds
from anywhere. Here's the deal. Lines are jammed. Everybody on
the line. I'm going to get you on air, hopefully
everybody in the next segment. Texts are exploding, as they

(17:26):
should be. Hey, come on, this is one of the
most important wildest times in American history. If you just
joined us, thank you, But the news of the day
you may have gathered. President Trump says, no third debate,
and we'll play that sound for you as well.

Speaker 2 (17:39):
Good move, bad move, weak, strong. I think it's brilliant.

Speaker 3 (17:43):
Some others, and including others who want them to win, disagree.
Eight five five four zero five eight two five five
the number you cond text d An five seven seven
three nine. So we'll come back and we will dive
all into that, and many text along these lines, Dan,
Would there be any advantage for Trump having a second
debate on Fox News of moderators being Jesse and Sean?

(18:06):
I still don't think so. In first Harris would never
agree to that, right, but I still don't think so,
because she failed to do what she needed to do.
The arc of the races toured to Trump victory, and
now all the attention is going to be on her record.
Why would you want to distract from all this great Ammo,
all this great video you have to put out there

(18:27):
in the Swing states right now? Don't distract from that
show the people who she really is, in her own words,
that's what she fears.

Speaker 2 (18:34):
Don't take her off the hook. You're on the Dane
Kapla show. Islam Terrorism and the greatest victims of terror
also have the very string.

Speaker 3 (18:55):
Illegal alien boy Kamala Harris saying we must ree that
term radical Islamic terrorism.

Speaker 2 (19:04):
Wow.

Speaker 3 (19:05):
And another This is probably the biggest reason among many
good ones that that Trump wisely is not going to
distract from from the truth of Kamala Harris with a
third debate is they've got so much AMMO that proves
who she really is, and he just he needs to
get it out there. The reason she wants this debate is, Ay,

(19:26):
she knows she didn't do what she had to do
the other night, and b it would distract from what
is to come now. It's hey, it's an open playing field,
right and Trump can use it now to use all
of this video everything to show these swing state voters
who she really is. Let's go back to the phone lines.
Let's start up in up beautiful for Collins. What a
night it is going to be up there on Saturday night.

(19:48):
Shannon Scott, who's in for Ryan today, and I were
talking about it. We're both going to be up there.
Shannon works the buff games for Kowa. I'm going to
be up there just as a fan. It is going
to be an amazing evening. David, you're on the Dan
Kaplas show.

Speaker 10 (20:01):
Welcome, Hey, Dan, love you, bro. But you are just
so off base on who won the debate, because listen,
I love frum policies. I admire his strength. I get
frustrated by his lack of temperament, but by any metric,
she won, And I'll tell you, I'll explain it from

(20:23):
a different perspective. Do you believe they came out of
it at a draw first? I don't attempt that, but
even if I did. The point is that Trump had
virtually every issue on his side, with the exception of abortion.
He didn't prosecute those those at all. Instead, he would

(20:47):
make these generalized rambling ramps. When she brings up when
they talk about illegal immigration, he could have turned to
her and said, you're the one who said you wanted
to deep from the legal border crossing. You don't want
to detain people coming here illegally, you want to defund ice.

(21:07):
That would have been hard, hard facts an abortion. When
she's hitting him on abortion, he should have turned to
her and said, would you accept legislation outline third term abortions,
since you claim they don't happen. Yet, he would have
put some meat on the bone. He would have buried her.
But instead he missed at every turn.

Speaker 2 (21:31):
He sure missed a lot. And if he had hit
maybe half of those.

Speaker 3 (21:38):
Low hanging curveballs, right, if you had hit even half
of those, then he would bidanize her and the Democrats
would be talking about whether they could replace her today.
I agree with all of that, But the metric I
used to judge the debate and who won and who
lost is who is tracking to win the presidency after
the debate. So to me, a win in that debait

(22:00):
isn't oh stylistically, did she exceed expectations and appear to
perform better than him that night? If that's the metric,
then sure she did. But if the metric of winning
the debate is who comes out tracking to win the presidency,
then I believe he clearly won.

Speaker 10 (22:15):
And here's what I disagree.

Speaker 2 (22:18):
Okay, okay, what do you see? What do you see?

Speaker 3 (22:22):
What do you see in the polling now that suggests
that she has changed the arc?

Speaker 10 (22:27):
Right now, the current polling suggests that the race remains
evenly tied, at least at least on a national basis.

Speaker 3 (22:34):
Okay, So do you agree that she didn't move the needle? Right,
you agree she did not move the needle.

Speaker 10 (22:40):
Okay, This could have been Trump's opportunity, sure to totally
bury her.

Speaker 5 (22:45):
And he hid.

Speaker 9 (22:46):
Right, Okay, that's a win.

Speaker 3 (22:49):
Well no, and listen, yes, compared to being annihilated in
her own party now wanting her out of the race,
Sure it is. But but I think you need to
be more balanced and at the same time, you need
to acknowledge there was no major gaff from Trump that
was going to allow her to open it up, that
was going to allow her to change the arc. And

(23:10):
I know you disagree with my premise that he's arcing
toward victory before the debate, but I think he clearly
was at least Nate Silver from the left believed he
was with a sixty percent chance to win to her
forty percent.

Speaker 2 (23:22):
But so that.

Speaker 3 (23:24):
There was no major gaff. There was no major gaff,
and it's normally big gaffs that that changed the arc
of the race. There was none of that. He did
hit some subjects I thought very effectively. He kept coming
back to immigration. I think he did very well on war,
versus peace. I think he did some things very effectively

(23:44):
temperament wise, you know, he kept it relatively under control
given you know, the very unfair environment he was in
that night. So I don't think you're giving him enough
credit for.

Speaker 5 (23:54):
What he did, right, I disagree them.

Speaker 10 (23:57):
Can I sell you something real quick going off subject
that something I think you're going to want to hear.
I'm the guy that called in I don't know last
November that my friend and her daughter had been abducted
by Hamas on October seventh and asked you, asked your
your listeners to pray for her, telling you there was

(24:20):
a miracle because she and her daughter to the Fernanda
daughter Natalie, were the first two hospitals really, so interestingly,
she came out here to visit, not to Occo, and
she opened up to us a bit. She's still got
a lot of PTSD. Yeah, but she told us that
after they were abducted across the border, they were taken

(24:41):
to the HAMAS command center in a large hospital and
as they were paraded, they and the other hostages were
prayed inside the nurses and other staff gathered around and
were trilling in celebrations. So I just wanted to that
out there, the Hamas propagandas that they own. They're not
in hospitals, schools, most they are.

Speaker 2 (25:02):
Well, thank you, David.

Speaker 10 (25:04):
The Palestinians are poor victims. They don't support us. That's
not the reality.

Speaker 3 (25:09):
Well, thank god she's free, thank god. Yeah, thank you, Hey, David,
appreciate the call.

Speaker 2 (25:14):
Thank you.

Speaker 3 (25:15):
Eight five five for zero five eight two five five
the number. Let's go to Charlie in Arvada. You're on
the Dane Caplis Show.

Speaker 9 (25:22):
Well, okay, I'm good with that.

Speaker 2 (25:29):
Charlie. How you doing? My friend?

Speaker 3 (25:32):
Looks like Charlie may be otherwise occupied at the moment,
which will let me get to some of these mountains
of text here.

Speaker 2 (25:39):
Dan, I think it was a mistake.

Speaker 3 (25:41):
I believe you should have said, fine, Fox News or
Newsmax or any other conservative outlet. It looks like he's
turning tail and running well. But but please understand, I
understand the desire to want to see another debate where
where you know he comes in better prepared and and
the moderators have to be have to to be at

(26:01):
least somewhat more appropriate than they were the other night,
because we all want to see him be able to
take those shots that he didn't take the other night.

Speaker 2 (26:09):
I get that.

Speaker 3 (26:10):
But if the idea is to win the presidency, that
then understand if he agrees to another debate, he looks
weaker than he looks by saying no to a third debate,
because when you say no to a third debate, you
can say, hey, the only reason she wants another one
is she lost, right, and that resonates with people's common sense.

(26:30):
It's like I try cases. I've had the privilege of
trying cases for forty years up to do another forty
and I know that for a truth to prevail, it
has to mesh with the jurors common sense, and that
meshes with common sense. Yeah, the reason she wants another
debate is she knows she lost. If she thought that

(26:51):
she had won and done what she needed, why would
she want to take that chance. So if he was
to agree to this third debate, Texter, at that point,
Democrats don't say, oh, yeah, thank you, Trump did the
right thing. They say, look how weak Trump is. He
knows he lost.

Speaker 2 (27:05):
That's why he's begging for another debate.

Speaker 3 (27:07):
So no, No, let the focus be on her now,
because the more the focus is on the truth about
her unprotected by moderators with your opportunity now, think about it,
Think about what she's staring at. This debate came so early,
and I understand mal ballots have gone out here and there, etc.
But election day itself still a long way away. Debate

(27:30):
came out so early, that's going to be forgotten. All
the focus now is going to be on her true
record and the statement she's made. She knows that's deadly
for her. She would love nothing more than to set
another debate to try to distract from that. And on
top of that, my friend, and then we'll come back
to our phone lines in great text. On top of that,
and I'm not saying it's going to be monumental, but

(27:52):
you have the vice presidential debate coming up, and you
know jd. Vance is going to clean that goofball's clock right,
And it won't have the same kind of impact a
presidential would, but without a third debate hanging out there,
it's going to get more attention than it otherwise would.
And that's going to be a tremendous opportunity to expose

(28:15):
how far left Harrison Walls are. So don't forget that
VP debate you're on the Dan Kapla show President Trump
in Arizona today.

Speaker 2 (28:24):
There will be no third debate.

Speaker 1 (28:28):
Too late.

Speaker 4 (28:29):
Anyway, the voting has already begun. You've got to go
out and vote.

Speaker 2 (28:33):
We got to vote.

Speaker 4 (28:33):
We're this is going to be the most important vote
in the history of our country.

Speaker 2 (28:40):
It will be the most important.

Speaker 4 (28:42):
People said that I was angry at the debate.

Speaker 2 (28:45):
Angry.

Speaker 4 (28:46):
I was angry, And yes, I am angry because he
allowed twenty one million illegal aliens invading our communities. Many
of them are criminals, many are criminals. I'm angry. They said,
he's an angry person. Now they're destroying our country. I
don't like she's smiling. Well, practice right, did you see it?

Speaker 5 (29:09):
She's like it?

Speaker 3 (29:10):
And then he went on with that team and Shannon
Scott the icon and today Ryan's sick. Shannon had edited
out a bunch of applause just so we could get
to that sounds sooner. Thank you for that, Shannon. So
I think this is tremendous messaging. You know, it's righteous anger.
If you can't get angry over all of these bad
things that are happening because of them, because of Biden

(29:32):
and Harris, well then there's something wrong with you, because
righteous anger. If you don't get angry at injustice, there
is something wrong with you, and we need that righteous anger. Obviously,
it has to be controlled upright within the bounds of
the law. But if you can't get angry at some
of this stuff they're doing, then you don't care. Tracy

(29:52):
and Colorado Springs lines are jams. You're on the Dan
Kapla show.

Speaker 2 (29:55):
Welcome.

Speaker 11 (29:57):
Oh, hello, thank you for taking my call. I wanted
to make a I was thinking about my parents are
extremely liberal.

Speaker 8 (30:06):
My mom is a.

Speaker 11 (30:07):
Very old school women's right aft to this type person.

Speaker 7 (30:11):
And what I.

Speaker 11 (30:12):
Feel, I'm just feeling this is very unfortunate. But I
believe that I'm just hoping this is not to be true.
But I believe many of the what call themselves maybe
moderate or that are just been democratic, you know, a
Democrat for many years. They're very, very focused on this
abortion issue and they're like blinded of anything else. And

(30:34):
like my mom literally said, I'm just it's so historic
and I'm just so proud to cast my vote for
the first woman, you know, so she's all about that.
And then I think many people are this whole, you know,
they're not looking at this whole. This pro choice movement
I think is very prominent even with moderate Democrats, and

(30:57):
I and how she was very much on the her
soapbox about being abortion pro abortion and da da da
da Dad. Unfortunately, I think this is going to make
a big impact, and I'm really hoping that doesn't fly
the skills over to them and how it could erase
all the terrible things that have happened over the last
three and a half years. That people are very focused

(31:19):
and they're probing those emotions, like they're very emotionally driven
about that one subject, and it's like blinding them from
anything else that's happening.

Speaker 3 (31:27):
Thank you for that, Tracy, And you're right to be
concerned about that. And in the end it could lead
to a Harris victory. I don't believe it will, and
I think the polls are reflecting that that you have
so much intensity of support for President Trump for lots
of reasons, including among folks who don't normally vote. I
think it's sixteen all over again, and you're going to
see a massive turnout, a massive turnout swamp these other concerns.

(31:50):
But you are right to be You are right to
be concerned about that. Dave, you're on the Dan Kapla show.

Speaker 2 (31:55):
Welcome.

Speaker 7 (31:58):
Yeah, Dan, thanks for taking my First of all, I
am a Trump supporter, and the next thing is, I
do think he should debate. And the main reason is
I do believe the polls he's ahead. But I don't
know why he wouldn't want to increase his lead even more,

(32:20):
particularly when it would be you know, supporters from Fox,
because he's always said that, you know, he doesn't speak
with anybody fair from the media, and I agree with this,
but this would really give him an opportunity to expose her, right, Yeah,
I mean because they will ask good follow up questions,

(32:42):
and of course that's with what's been lacking through this
whole process.

Speaker 3 (32:46):
Yeah, Dave, appreciate the call. Thank you, my friend. I
know many Trump supporters agree with you on that. I
personally feel otherwise for the reasons I mentioned. But Jim
in Denver, you're on the Dan Kaplash Welcome.

Speaker 9 (32:58):
Perfect logic and disagree with anything.

Speaker 3 (33:02):
Oh I wish i'd hear that from my wife.

Speaker 9 (33:07):
I did disagree with President Trump. That was not a
smile and her face is like the Manedan Dez brothers
being gripped their their sentence because they killed her parents
a stupid, mindless smirk.

Speaker 3 (33:20):
I don't agree with that, my friend, But but I
don't think I think that she alienated as many people
as she got excited about.

Speaker 9 (33:30):
Her I agree there too, Yeah, yeah, and maybe more,
maybe more, But isn't the bottom line, Jim.

Speaker 3 (33:38):
She didn't get it done what she had to get
done that night was convinced these swing voters that her
change in beliefs was true, her change in position was sincere,
and why she had changed her position.

Speaker 2 (33:53):
She never even touched that.

Speaker 9 (33:57):
Yeah, and I also made discreet. You think her personal
behavior and actions and manners, and I think she'd hurt herself.

Speaker 3 (34:06):
I think it depends on who you're talking about, Jim.
Appreciate the call, thank you. I think she hurt herself
with some people, helped herself with others. But I think
you got to come back to the big engines, the
big drivers, right, and the big things she needed to
do was to explain your change in positions, because come on,
vast majority of people are going to not believe that,
are going to think she's just claiming to have changed

(34:27):
your position. So she needed to persuade on that and
convince she didn't do it. She also did nothing to
suggest she would be different than Biden, and people are
obviously ready to move on from what they've experienced under Biden.
Charlie and Arvada. You're on the Dan Kapla Show.

Speaker 8 (34:41):
Welcome, Hey, Dan, Thank you.

Speaker 5 (34:43):
Hey.

Speaker 8 (34:44):
I think that Dan, that Trump could have said, yeah,
I'll go to the next I'll do another debate, but
it's going to be on my terms, and that means
my moderators, my network, and she would have knocked out
of it and they would called her bluff and she
would have failed.

Speaker 2 (35:00):
Thank you for that, Charlie.

Speaker 3 (35:00):
My concern with that, which a lot of smart people
agree with you and have suggested, is even that conversation
distracts now from the focus on Harris. The more focus
on her, what she said in the past, who she
really is the better great joption and great to work
with you.

Speaker 2 (35:15):
Thank you, Kelly. Please join us tomorrow